Department of Employment, Training and Rehabilitation ...nvdetr.org/Rehab pages/survey_reports/Survey_Transition_Student... · Department of Employment, Training and Rehabilitation,

Department of Employment,

Training and Rehabilitation,

Rehabilitation Division

Transition Student Satisfaction

Survey

Report Date: August 1, 2014

Federal FY 2013 (Service Dates: Oct 2012 – Sept 2013)

Nevada Department of Employment, Training and Rehabilitation

Federal Fiscal Year 2013 Transition Student Satisfaction Survey

1

Michael J. Doane, M.A.

Graduate Research Assistant, CRDA

Jordan D. Clark, M.A.

Graduate Research Assistant, CRDA

Veronica Blas Dahir, Ph.D.1

Manager, Research Services, CRDA

Principal Investigator

Fan Zhang

Biostatistician

Wei Yang, M.D., Ph.D.2

Professor and Director, CHSI and Co-Principal Investigator

1Please direct any correspondence about this report to Dr. Veronica Dahir at [email protected] or 775-784-6718.

2Please direct any questions about the data analysis to Dr. Wei Yang at [email protected] or 775-682-1094.

Photo credit: http://www.onlineuniversities.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/10datamining1.jpg



2

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Christopher Sanchez and Christopher Swinger, Survey

Lab Managers, for the management of the data collection and all of the survey

lab interviewers and other supervisors at the Center for Research Design and

Analysis for their hard work in the data collection process.

We would also like to thank the Nevada Department of Employment, Training,

and Rehabilitation, Rehabilitation Division. Specifically, we are grateful for

Melissa Starr’s assistance throughout each stage of the project, for Heather

Johnson’s help in providing the sampling frame database, and for Beth Talcott’s

administrative assistance on the project.

Additionally, we would also like to recognize David Shirley, IT Technician II,

and Vamsi Alluri for programming the survey instruments, updating the website

for the project, and aiding with the data management. Finally, we would like to

acknowledge the role of the following co-authors: Fan Zhang and Dr. Wei Yang

for their roles in the programming of all of the data tables in the Appendix and

data analysis.



3

Table of Contents Executive Summary .............................................................................................................................. 4

Introduction ........................................................................................................................................... 5

Methodology ................................................................................................................................. 5

Results................................................................................................................................................... 8

Transition Student Characteristics ................................................................................................ 8

Satisfaction with Overall Services of Vocational Rehabilitation Division ................................. 10

Experiences and Satisfaction with the High School Program..................................................... 11

Experiences and Satisfaction with Other Educational Programs ................................................ 12

GED Program ..................................................................................................................... 12

Technical or Trade School Program ................................................................................... 12

On-the-Job Training Program ............................................................................................. 13

Two-Year College Degree Program ................................................................................... 13

Four-Year College Degree Program ................................................................................... 13

Job Corps Program.............................................................................................................. 13

General Employment History and Satisfaction ................................................................................... 14

General Experiences and Satisfaction with Job Placement, Job Coaching, and Other Support ......... 18

Job Placement ....................................................................................................................... 18

Job Coaching ........................................................................................................................ 19

Other support from vocational rehabilitation employees other than your counselor .......................... 20

Third Party Contractor or Vendor Services……………………………………….............................21

Referrals and Recommendations of Transition Student Services ....................................................... 23

Source of Information about Services ................................................................................................ 24

Format of Information ........................................................................................................................ 24

Natural Support ................................................................................................................................... 25

Service Locations ................................................................................................................................ 26

Appendix A: Post-Weighting Methodology ....................................................................................... 27

Appendix B: Transition Student Satisfaction Survey ......................................................................... 29

Appendix C: Cover Letter Invitations ................................................................................................ 53

Appendix D: Website Information about Study ................................................................................. 55

Appendix E: Listing of Nevada Areas Called for General Student Survey ........................................ 60

Appendix F: Data Tables .................................................................................................................... 62

Appendix G: Open Ended Response Themes ................................................................................... 141



4

Executive Summary

A mixed-mode telephone and web-based survey was conducted quarterly from January 2013

through December 2013 to assess the satisfaction of services received by transition student

clients of the State of Nevada Department of Employment, Training and Rehabilitation,

Rehabilitation Division (see Appendix B). These student clients received services from the

Division between October 1, 2012 and September 30, 2013 (Federal Fiscal Year 2013), and this

report includes all data collected from student clients who received services during the 2013

Federal Fiscal year even though data were collected quarterly. A total of 109 surveys were

completed out of 272 student clients in the population for a raw response rate of 40%. A

cooperation rate of 63% was obtained from those student clients actually reached. Post-

stratification weighting was used to match the responses obtained from the sample to the

population of transition student clients (see Appendix A).

Most of the transition student clients (73%) were satisfied, either ‘very’ or ‘somewhat’, with the

overall services of the Vocational Rehabilitation Division. Further, approximately 61% of the

student clients were ‘very’ or ‘somewhat’ satisfied with the timeliness of the services.

Approximately 58% of transition students reported being employed at the time of their interview.

The majority of respondents (90%) in the sample utilized the high school program, and almost

65% of these respondents were ‘somewhat’ or ‘very satisfied’ with the program. Students

utilized other programs beyond the high school program to varying degrees. Of those students

offered the opportunity for the program, 69% participated in the On-the-Job Training program,

25% in Technical or Trade School, 35% in the Two-Year College Degree program, 20% in the

Four-Year College Degree program, and 26% the Job Corps program. With respect to schooling,

43% of students who completed high school received an adjusted diploma and 49% received a

standard diploma.

A large number of transition student clients (78%) were satisfied, either somewhat or very, with

the support they received from Vocational Rehabilitation staff while in the Job Corps program.

Thirty-six out of 41 students were satisfied with the On-the-Job Training program.

Approximately 52% of the students received job placement services and 51% of students

received job-coaching services. Overall satisfaction was 68% for job placement services and

75% for job coaching services. Transition student clients reported receiving various assistive

technology devices from the Division and 55% of students rated these devices as ‘good’ or

‘excellent’. Overall, transition students were generally satisfied with the services that they

received, and 79% of them would recommend those services to others.



5

Introduction

A mixed-mode telephone and web-based survey was conducted by the Center for Research

Design and Analysis (herein referred to as the “Center” or “CRDA”) to assess transition student

satisfaction with the vocational rehabilitation services provided by the State of Nevada

Department of Employment, Training and Rehabilitation, Rehabilitation Division (herein

referred to as “the Division”). Data collection began in January 2013 and ended in December

2013. Changes to the methodology for this report included the use of smaller quarterly samples

instead of a large single sample.

The survey utilized an instrument that was used in the previous year for the same assessment

objectives; a copy of the telephone version of the survey instrument is presented in Appendix B.

The web-based version of the survey contained identical items; however, the introductory section

was modified to fit this methodology. Appendix C contains examples of the introductory letter

that was mailed to transition students and Appendix D contains website information about the

survey; the informational website included a description about the study, information about the

Division and CRDA, and answers to frequently asked questions. Appendix E contains a list of all

geographical areas called within Nevada for this study. All Figures are located within the text of

the report, and all Tables referenced within the report are located in Appendix F. Additionally,

the most common responses to the last two open-ended survey items are found in Appendix G.

Post-stratification weighting was used to make the responses from the sample better reflect the

entire population of transition students. During analyses, weights were applied so that the

responses from each group were represented in the overall results, in proportion to their real size

in the population. This strategy corrects for inaccurate conclusions that can be drawn if the

survey over-represented some groups, while under-representing others. Detailed information

regarding the weighting methodology is provided in Appendix A. All tables listed in the report

indicate confidence intervals (C.I.), the unweighted sample response frequency (“N”), and the

weighted prevalence rates in percentages (%).1 Throughout the text of this report, all results

mentioned refer to the weighted analyses, unless otherwise stated.

Methodology

The sampling frame for the survey was drawn from a list of all transition student clients who

were deemed eligible to receive services between October 1, 2012 and September 30, 2013. The

population list was provided to CRDA in quarters. Thus, students who received services from

October 1, 2012-December 31, 2012 were part of first quarter, students who received services

1For all tables:

C.I. = Confidence Interval. The points (range) between which the true population parameter (population estimate) will

fall 95% of the time, if statistical assumptions regarding sampling are met.

“N”= sample response frequency (unweighted).

“%”= weighted prevalence rates.



6

from January 1, 2013-March 31, 2013 were second quarter, students who received services from

April 1, 2013-June 30, 2013 were third quarter, and finally, students who received services from

July 1, 2013-September 30, 2013 were part of the fourth quarter distribution. The sampling

frame was provided by the Division in this manner to ensure that potential participants were

contacted with the most up to date information possible. Thus, recruitment of first quarter

participants was able to commence in January 2013 rather than October, 2013, which would have

been the case if the entire sampling frame had been provided at once in September, 2013.

The sample for the survey was drawn from a compiled list of 316 transition students who were

deemed eligible to receive services between October 1, 2012 and September 30, 2013. This

compiled list was provided by the Division in four segments, and was comprised of students who

went through the Application and Eligibility processes. Once they had been determined eligible,

a Plan was developed for services. Only those students deemed eligible for services were

included in the sampling frame provided by the Division. From this complied list, 44 students

were removed because they did not keep in contact with DETR, did not have contact

information, were deceased, or no longer lived in Nevada. This process resulted in a final

population of 272 transition students. For this survey, the entire population was sampled. Table 1

below illustrates how the student population and final number of completed interviews were

represented by stratum.

Table 1: Transition Student Population and Completed Surveys by Stratum

STRATUM STUDENT

POPULATION

COMPLETED

SURVEYS

Southern Nevada 197 (72.4%) 74 (67.9%)

Northern Nevada 41 (15.1%) 19 (17.4%)

Rural Nevada 34 (12.5%) 16 (14.7%)

Total 272 (100%) 109 (100%)

The 272 individuals in the transition student population were sent a cover letter that introduced

the survey, detailed the incentive for participation (i.e., chance to win one of six prepaid $50

Visa gift cards), and provided directions on how to participate by either telephone or web (see

Appendix C). Two to three weeks later, transition students were contacted by Center

interviewers via telephone to participate in the survey. A total of 32 letters were returned to the

CRDA.

The calling protocol for the study was set at 8 call attempts. In addition, it was determined by the

Division and CRDA that CRDA’s 1-800 telephone number for the respondents to call back on

was left on answering machines on the 3rd, 6th, and 8th call attempts. Additionally, the website

address for the survey was left on answering machines on the 6th call attempt. CRDA also called



7

back all “soft” refusals.2 Thus, the calling protocol was 8 call attempts with no contact, two

“soft” refusals, or one “hard” refusal, regardless of the number of call attempts made.

A total of 103 interviews were completed on the telephone and 6 interviews were completed on

the web, for a raw response rate of 40% (109 out of 272). Of the 272 transition students

interviewers attempted to contact, 98 were not successfully contacted or were unable to

participate. For instance, there were 44 numbers provided by the Division that were no longer

correct or were disconnected. The accuracy of a further 51 numbers could not be determined

because no one in the residence ever answered the telephone over the course of the 8 call

protocol. Unfortunately, three people could not complete the interview due to severe

impairments.

A total of 174 eligible transition students, of the 272 student clients called, were successfully

contacted by telephone and eligible for participation. Of these, 103 completed the interview over

the phone, 6 competed the survey on the web, 6 refused to participate, and 59 never started the

interview and never refused. Excluding the respondents that were never reached or were

ineligible, a cooperation rate of 63% (109 out of 174 successfully contacted) was achieved.

2A “soft” refusal is considered one in which the informant (the person that answered the phone) or the respondent

(the Vocational Rehabilitation client), seemed interested in participating but the interviewer just called at an

inconvenient time (e.g., “We’re in the middle of dinner,” “I was just running out the door.”). A “hard” refusal is a

call where the informant or the respondent is rude to the interviewer, uses profanity, or says something like, “Take

me off your list!” or “Don’t ever call back!”



8

Results

All results are illustrated in tables in Appendix F of this report. It is suggested that the reader

consult the tables for further detail or clarification. As stated above, throughout this report all

results mentioned in text refer to the weighted analyses unless otherwise stated.

Transition Student Characteristics

A final sample of 109 transition students responded to the survey. Table 2 on the next page

provides detailed unweighted and weighted sample information by gender, age, race, stratum,

type of impairment, and educational program.

A majority of the transition student clients are located in the Southern stratum of the state (73%),

with smaller numbers located in the Northern stratum (15%) and Rural stratum (12%; see Table

2). There are more men than women (58% vs. 43% respectively) who received the Division’s

Transition Student services. The majority of transition student clients were 19 years of age or

older (86%). Under half of clients identified as White (40%). The largest majority of

impairments of the transition student clients are cognitive (64%), followed by ‘other mental

impairments’ (16%; see Table 2).

The majority of transition students had enrolled in a high school program (90%) and on-the-job

training program (69%). To a lesser degree, students had participated in Job Corps program

(26%), two-year college programs (35%), technical and trade school programs (25%), and four-

year college programs (20%). A small percentage of students participated in GED programs

(2%).



9

Table 2: Gender, Age, Stratum, Impairment Type & Educational Program of Student Population

Response

Frequency (N)

Weighted Response

Frequency (N)

Weighted Response

Rate (%) C.I. (95%)

Total 109 272 100.00% (100.0-100.0)

Gender Female

Male

44 a

65

116 b

156

42.5 c

57.5

(32.39-52.67) d

(47.33-67.61)

Age <=18

Age 19 or older

8

101

37

235

13.7

86.3

(04.29-23.10)

(76.90-95.71)

Race White

Non-White

49 109 39.9 (30.21-49.66)

60 163 60.1 (50.34-69.79)

Stratum

Southern

Northern

Rural

74

19

16

198

41

33

72.9

15.2

11.9

(64.36-81.41)

(08.50-21.83)

(05.86-18.04)

Disability Type

Cognitive Impairments 70 173 63.8 (53.86-73.81)

Deafness, Communication Visual 1 3 0.9 (00.00-02.73)

Mobility Orthopedic/Neurological Impairments 6 15 5.4 (01.02-09.71)

Other Mental Impairments 15 42 15.6 (07.27-23.85)

Other Physical Impairments 3 7 2.6 (00.00-05.61)

Other Visual Impairments 3 6 2.2 (00.00-04.72)

Psychosocial Impairments 5 12 4.6 (00.50-08.62)

Other Hearing Impairments 2 4 1.5 (00.00-03.76)

Blindness 2 5 1.8 (00.00-04.49)

Hearing Loss, Communication Visual 1 3 0.9 (00.00-02.73)

Hearing Loss, Communication Auditory 1 2 0.7 (00.00-02.23)

High School Yes 98 243 89.5 (83.39-95-65)

No 8 21 7.8 (02.37-13.25)

GED Program Yes 2 4 1.6 (00.00-03.89)

No 105 263 96.6 93.17-100.00)

Technical or Trade School Yes 6 13 21.7 (03.61-39.79)

No 17 46 75.7 (56.93-94.45)

2-Year College Degree Yes 9 29 28.7 (09.55-47.83)

No 17 71 71.3 (52.17-90.45)


No 15 40 77.7 (57.86-97.62)

On-the-Job Training Yes 41 102 67.8 (53.67-81.92)

No 18 48 32.2 (18-08-46.33)

Job Corps Yes 9 18 20.7 (06.88-34.46)

No 25 64 71.8 (53.90-89.73)

a. Response frequency is the number of participants in the sample for each category. For example, 44 of all participants in the obtained sample were females.

b. Weighted response frequency is the approximate number of individuals in the population that is represented by the sample after accounting for differential

sampling. For example, the 44 females in the sample is equivalent to 116 females in the entire transition student population. c. Weighted response rate is the approximate proportion of individuals in the population that is represented by the sample after accounting for differential

sampling. For example, the 44 females in the sample represent 42.5% of the transition student population.

d. Confidence Interval (C.I.) means that 95% of the time, the “true point estimate” will fall between the lower and upper bounds of the 95% Confidence Interval. For example, the true percentages of females in the population (based on 44 females from the sample) will fall between 32.39% and 52.67%.



10

Satisfaction with Overall Services of Vocational

Rehabilitation Division

Transition students

were asked two items

regarding their

satisfaction with

services received and

with the timeliness of

services received. The

majority of transition

students (73%)

reported being

‘somewhat’ or ‘very

satisfied’ overall with

the services they

received from the

Vocational

Rehabilitation

Division, while only

10% reported being

‘somewhat’ or ‘very

dissatisfied’ (see Figure 1 and Table Q1). Further, approximately 17% of students reported being

‘neither satisfied nor dissatisfied’ with the services they received.

Regarding timeliness of services, the majority of transition students again reported being

‘somewhat’ or ‘very satisfied’ (61%). Only 16% of transition students reported being

‘somewhat’ or ‘very dissatisfied’ with the timeliness of services and 21% of students reported

being ‘neither satisfied nor dissatisfied’ (see Figure 2 and Table Q2).

10.2%

72.6%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

Very/Somewhat Dissatisfied Very/Somewhat Satisfied

Figure 1: Satisfaction with the Services Received

from the Vocational Rehabilitation Division

15.5%

61.4%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%


Figure 2: Satisfaction with the Timeliness of the Services

Received from the Vocational Rehabilitation Division



11

Experiences and Satisfaction with the High School Program

Of the transition students that have been enrolled in the high school program (n = 98), 8% are

currently attending the program, 87% have completed the program, and 5% left without

completing the program (see Figure 3 and Tables Q3a and Q4a).

Student clients who indicated that they completed high school reported doing so via three

methods: (1) an adjusted diploma (i.e., diploma given to special education students who cannot

qualify for a standard diploma), (2) a standard, advance, or honors diploma, or (3) a certificate of

attendance (i.e., diploma given to those students who have met all the satisfactory requirements

for graduation from high school or completion of an adult education program except that they

have not passed one or more of the proficiency examinations). The majority of students received

either a standard diploma (49%) or an adjusted diploma (43%), while a smaller number of

students received a certificate of attendance (7%; see Figure 4 and Table Q4b).

86.7%

7.5% 5.2%

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

Completed Program Currently Attending Left Without Completing

Figure 3: Progress in High School Program

43.2%48.7%

6.6%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

Adjusted Diploma Standard Diploma Certificate of Attendance

Figure 4: Method by which Completed High School Program



12

Clients’ overall satisfaction with the

help the Vocational Rehabilitation

Staff gave them with job or career

planning while in high school was

generally positive; almost two-thirds

(65%) of students reported being

‘somewhat’ or ‘very satisfied’ with

the help, and only 18% of students

reported being ‘somewhat’ or ‘very

dissatisfied’ with the help (see Figure

5 and Table Q5a).

Experiences and

Satisfaction with Other

Educational Programs

Students were asked about their enrollment and satisfaction in a total of six different educational

programs: (1) GED Program, (2) Technical or Trade School Program, (3) On-the-Job Training,

(4) Two-Year College Degree Program, (5) Four-Year College Degree Program, and (6) Job

Corps Program. Each of the educational programs had sample sizes too small to allow summary

analyses by weighted percentages. In addition, the use of weighted statistics to make

comparisons between groups, such as gender, age, and region, is not appropriate as these

descriptions will not be accurate. Below is an overall summary of experience and satisfaction

with these programs by non-weighted frequencies (N). Tables Q3b-Q6ce in Appendix F are

available for further detailed information. Due to the small sample sizes, both weighted

percentages and summary analyses regarding between-group comparisons are excluded from this

text.

GED Program

Two students reported having enrolled in a GED program, and both students left without

completing their GED Program (see Tables Q3b and Q4c). Regarding their level of satisfaction

with the help that Vocational Rehabilitation Staff gave to them for job or career planning while

in the GED program, both students were satisfied, either ‘somewhat’ or ‘very’ (see Table Q5b).

Technical or Trade School Program

Twenty-four students (16 males and 8 females) reported being offered the opportunity to

participate in a technical or trade school program (see Figure 6 on page 14 and Table Q6Aa). Of

the students who were offered the opportunity, six reported participating in a technical or trade

school (see Figure 6 on page 14 and Table Q6Ba). Students participating in a technical or trade

18.0%

64.8%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

Very/Somewhat

Dissatisfied

Very/Somewhat Satisfied

Figure 5: Satisfaction with Help

Vocational Rehabilitation Staff Provided

Regarding Job or Career Planning while

in High School Program



13

school program comprised of five males and one female (see Table Q6Ba). Of the six students

who participated in the technical or trade school program, all students were satisfied, either

‘somewhat’ or ‘very,’ with the help they received from the Vocational Rehabilitation staff for the

program (see Table Q6Ca).

On-the-Job Training Program

Fifty-nine students (39 males and 20 females) reported being offered the opportunity to

participate in an on-the-job training program (see Figure 6 on next page and Table Q6Ab). Of the

students who were offered the opportunity, 41 reported participating in on-the-job training

program (see Figure 6 on next page and Table Q6Ab). Students participating in on-the-job

training program were comprised of 27 males and 14 females (see Table Q6Bb). Thirty-six

students were ‘somewhat’ or ‘very satisfied’ with the help Vocational Rehabilitation Staff gave

to them with the on-the-job training program (see Table Q6Cb). Only two students were ‘very

dissatisfied,’ and three were ‘neither satisfied nor dissatisfied’ with the help they received from

the Vocational Rehabilitation Staff for the program (see Table Q6Cb).

Two-Year College Degree Program

Twenty-six students (13 males and 13 females) reported being offered the opportunity to

participate in a two-year college degree program (see Figure 6 on next page and Table Q6Ac).

Of the students who were offered the opportunity, nine students reported participating in a two-

year degree program (see Figure 6 on next page and Table Q6Bc). Students participating in a

two-year college degree program were comprised of four males and five females (see Table

Q6Bc). Six of these students were ‘very’ or ‘somewhat satisfied’ with the help they received

from the Vocational Rehabilitation Staff with the two-year college degree program, while three

students were ‘neither satisfied nor dissatisfied’ with the help they received for the program (see

Table Q6Cc).

Four-Year College Degree Program

Twenty students (11 males and 9 females) reported being offered an opportunity to participate in

a four-year college degree program (see Figure 6 on next page and Table Q6Ad). Of the students

offered the opportunity, four reported participating in a four-year college degree program (see

Figure 6 on next page and Table Q6Bd). Students participating in four-year college degree

program comprised of two males and two females (see Table Q6Bd). All students reported being

satisfied, either ‘somewhat’ or ‘very,’ with the help they received from the Vocational

Rehabilitation Staff with the four-year college degree program (see Table Q6Cd).

Job Corps Program Thirty-five students (22 males and 13 females) reported being offered an opportunity to

participate in a Job Corps program (see Figure 6 on next page and Table Q6Ae). Of the students

offered the opportunity, nine reported participating in a Job Corps Program (see Figure 6 on next

page and Table Q6Be). Students participating in Job Corps Program comprised of seven males



14

and two females (see Table Q6Be). Seven of these students—the majority—were ‘somewhat’ or

‘very satisfied’ with the help they received from the Vocational Rehabilitation staff with the Job

Corps Program, while only two were ‘neither satisfied nor dissatisfied’ with the help they

received for the program (see Table Q6Ce).

Of all of the programs offered to students, the On-the Job-Training Program had the highest

percentage of participation at 69% (41 of 59 offered the opportunity to participate; see Figure 6).

The Two-Year College Degree Program had a 35% participation rate (9 of 26), the Job Corps

Program had a 26% participation rate (9 of 35), and the Technical or Trade School Program had

a 25% participation rate (6 of 24).

General Employment History and Satisfaction

Current Employment

Sixty-three student clients reported being

currently employed (57%), while the other

45 clients (42%) indicated that they were

unemployed (see Figure 7 and Table Q8).

Of the currently employed students, 47% (n

= 27) indicated that they had received their

current job as a result of the services they

received from the Vocational Rehabilitation

Program (see Figure 8 on next page and

Table Q9).

n = 9

n = 4

n = 9

n = 41

n = 6

n = 35

n = 20

n = 26

n = 59

n = 24

Job Corps Program

Four-Year College Degree

Two-Year College Degree

Prograrm

On-the-Job Training

Technical or Trade School

Program

Figure 6: Number of Students Offered and Participated in

Educational Programs

# of Students Participated in Program # of Students Offered Program

45 (42%)

63 (58%)

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

# Unemployed # Employed

Figure 7: Number of Student

Clients by Employment Status



15

Of the 50% (n = 33) of respondents who did not get their current job as a result of Vocational

Rehabilitation services, 21% (n = 8; see Table Q9) reported getting any job as a result of the

services they received from the Vocational Rehabilitation Program (see Table Q10). Of the

respondents who reported getting a previous job as the result of the services they received from

the Vocational Rehabilitation Program, four (47%) reported that they held that job when their

case was closed (see Table Q11). Of these four students, one student is not currently employed in

the same job (see Table Q12) but is still in the same career field since his or her case was closed

(see Table Q13). This student’s current position does provide him or her with equal or better pay

or benefits (see Table Q14).

Students were asked what kind of job they were currently employed in at the time of the

interview. The majority of students indicated being employed in service occupations (30%), sales

and related occupations (22%), and production, construction, operating, maintenance, and

material handling occupations (18%; see Figure 9 and Table Q15). Another 23% of students

indicated being in another kind of job not listed. Of those students with a current job, 72%

agreed that they were employed in an integrated setting (see Table Q15k)

49.7% 46.6%

0%

20%

40%

60%

No Yes

Figure 8: Services from the Vocational Rehabilitation Program

Helped Student Client get Current Job

2.2%

3.1%

17.9%

22.2%

23.4%

29.5%

0 10 20 30 40

Professional

Clerical

Production

Sales

Other

Service

Figure 9: Type of Current Occupation



16

Generally, most students (82%) were ‘somewhat’ or ‘very satisfied’ with their current job, while

9% reported being dissatisfied, either ‘somewhat’ or ‘very’ (see Figure 10 and Table Q16).

Of the students who were currently

employed, 23% reported having their

current position for less than one month,

62% reported having their current position

for 1-2 months, and 12% reported having

their current position for more than 2

months (see Table Q17).

Of the students who were employed, the

largest percentage (33%) reported

working less than 16 hours per week

(Figure 11 and Table Q18). Twenty-six

percent of students reported working 40

hours or more per week, 18% reported

working between 32 and 39 hours per

week, and 14% reported working between

17 and 31 hours per week. Further, approximately 73% of students reported that they earned

between $7.56 and $12 per hour, followed by 11% of students who earned less than $7.55 per

hour and 8% who earned more than $12 per hour (see Figure 12 and Table Q19).

9.0%

81.5%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

Very/Somewhat DissatisfiedVery/Somewhat Satisfied

Figure 10: Current Job

Satisfaction

11.1%

72.4%

8.1%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80%

Less than $7.55

$7.56 to $12

More than $12

Figure 12: Hourly Wage

33.2%

13.6%

17.5%

25.5%

0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35%

Less than 16 Hours

17 to 31 Hours

32 to 39 Hours

40 Hours or More

Figure 11: Hours Worked Per Week

Employed respondents were asked about the benefits that they currently received from their

employers. The most commonly received benefits included the receipt of clothes/uniform

allowance (52%), followed by health insurance (52%), paid vacation (42%), retirement plan

(39%), paid holidays (38%), meals (30%), paid sick leave (28%), daycare (9%), and ‘other’

(8%; see Figure 13 and Tables Q20a-Q20i).



17

Unemployment

Those students who were currently unemployed during the time of the interview were asked to

indicate the main reason why. Overall, the four reasons for unemployment that were highest

among the students included that they could not find any job (21%), they were attending school

(17%), had family commitments (13%), were fired (10%), could not find the kind of job they

wanted (10%), could not find jobs that they were qualified for (8%), were disabled (6%), or they

lacked transportation (6%). An additional 10% indicated that the main reason for being

unemployed was to keep their current healthcare, that the employer could not accommodate their

disabilities, or for “other” reasons not listed (see Figure 14 and Table Q21).

8.4%

9.0%

27.8%

30.2%

37.8%

38.8%

41.6%

51.7%

51.8%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70%

Other

Daycare

Paid Sick Leave

Meals

Paid Holidays

Retirement Plan

Paid Vacation

Health Insurance

Clothes/Uniform Allowance

Figure 13: Employment Benefits

2.8%

3.7%

4.0%

5.7%

6.2%

7.6%

9.6%

10.1%

12.5%

16.9%

20.8%

0% 10% 20% 30%

Did Not Want to Lose Health Insurance

Other Reason

Employer Could Not Accommodate Disability

Lack of Transportation

Disability

Could Not Find Job Qualified For

Could Not Find Job Desired

Fired or Laid Off

Could Not Work - Family Commitments

Attending School

Could Not Find Any Job

Figure 14: Main Reason for Current Unemployment



18

General Experiences and Satisfaction with Job Placement,

Job Coaching, and Other Support Services

Job Placement

Students were asked to

indicate their experiences

with the services provided

by the Vocational

Rehabilitation Program.

Over half of the students

(52%) received job

placement services from

the Vocational

Rehabilitation Program

(see Figure 15 and Table

Q23a).

The overall satisfaction

with job placement

services was high, with

68% being ‘somewhat’ or

‘very satisfied’ with the statement (see Figure 16 and Table Q24). Twenty percent reported being

‘neither satisfied nor dissatisfied’ with job placement services, and 13% being ‘somewhat’ or

‘very dissatisfied’ (see Figure 16 and Table Q24).

12.8%

67.6%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%


Figure 16: Job Placement Satisfaction

47.9%

52.1%

45%

46%

47%

48%

49%

50%

51%

52%

53%

No Yes

Figure 15: Received Job Placement



19

Job Coaching

Approximately 51% of students received job coaching services from the Vocational

Rehabilitation Program (see Figure 17 and Table Q23b).

The overall satisfaction of job coaching was high, with 75% of students reporting being

‘somewhat’ or ‘very satisfied’ (see Figure 18 / and Table Q25). Approximately 4% reported

dissatisfied, either ‘somewhat’ or ‘very’, and the remaining 21% of students reported being

‘neither satisfied nor dissatisfied’ with job coaching services (see Figure 18 and Table Q25).

3.9%

75.2%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%


Figure 18: Job Coaching Satisfaction

48.4%

51.0%

47%

48%

49%

50%

51%

52%

No Yes

Figure 17: Received Job Coaching



20

Other support from Vocational Rehabilitation employees other than your Counselor

Approximately 66% of students reported that they have received other support from Vocational

Rehabilitation employees other than their primary counselor (see Figure 19 and Table Q23c).

Of those 71 students who received support from employees other than their counselor, 72% of

students were ‘somewhat’ or ‘very satisfied’ with these services (see Figure 20 and Table Q26).

Nearly 22% reported being ‘neither satisfied nor dissatisfied’ with the support they received

from other Vocational Rehabilitation employees, while the remaining 6% reported being

‘somewhat’ or ‘very dissatisfied’ with the support they received (see Figure 21 and Table Q26).

33.8%

66.2%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

No Yes

Figure 19: Received Support from Employees Other

than Counselor

5.9%

72.4%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%


Figure 20: Satisfaction with Support from

Other Employees



21

Third Party Contractor or Vendor Services

Respondents were asked whether they had received third party contractor or vendor services and,

if so, their level of satisfaction with such services. Nearly 16% of students reported that they

have received support from third party contractor or vendor services through the Vocational

Rehabilitation Program (see Figure 21 and Table Q23d); however, most (81%) said ‘no’.

The majority of students were either ‘somewhat’ or ‘very satisfied’ with the services from third

party contractors or vendors (72%; see Figure 22 and Table Q26n). The other students were

‘neither satisfied nor dissatisfied’ (18%) or ‘somewhat dissatisfied’ (10%) with the services (see

Table Q26n).

10.1%

71.6%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

Somewhat Dissatisfied Very/Somewhat Satisfied

Figure 22: Satisfaction with Support from Third Party

Contractor or Vendor Services

80.9%

15.9%

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

No Yes

Figure 21: Received Support from Third Party

Contractor or Vendor Services



22

Assistive Technology Devices

The Vocational Rehabilitation Program provides student clients with assistive technology

services, such as providing or purchasing devices to help with vision, hearing, communication,

getting around, and changes to students’ home or workplaces. Of the students who responded to

these questions, 18% received devices that helped them with their vision, such as glasses or

screen readers, and 2% reported receiving devices that helped them to get around, such as

transportation, canes, wheelchairs, or orthotics/prosthetics. Approximately 2% of students

reported receiving devices that made their home or workplace more accessible, such as

specialized office equipment or book/copy holders. Additionally, 10% of students reported

receiving hearing devices, such as hearing aids or alert signal systems, 5% of students reported

receiving devices to help them communicate, such as hand-held digital recorders or AAC box,

and another 3% indicated the receipt of other types of assistive technology devices (see Figure

23 and Tables Q27a-Q27f).

Most of these respondents rated these devices as ‘good’ or ‘excellent’ (54%; see Figure 24 and

Table Q28).

3.3%

5.4%

10.0%

1.9%

1.6%

17.6%

0% 2% 4% 6% 8% 10% 12% 14% 16% 18% 20%

Other

Communication

Hearing

Making Home/Workplace Accessible

Getting Around

Vision

Figure 23: Types of Assistive Technology Devices

14.9%

29.8%

21.3%

34.0%

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

Poor Fair Good Excellent

Figure 24: Rating the Quality of Assistive Technology Devices



23

Referrals and Recommendations of Transition Student

Services

Students were asked to indicate who referred them to the Vocational Rehabilitation Services as

well as their likelihood to recommend the services to other people who may need the services.

Approximately 34% of students were referred by a school counselor, 30% were referred by a

friend, 21% referred by a teacher, and another 15% referred by a parent (see Figure 25 and Table

Q29a).

Based on their experiences with the transition services, approximately 79% of student clients

reported being ‘somewhat’ or ‘very likely’ to refer other students to the services in the future

(see Figure 26 and Table Q30). Nearly 7% of the students reported being ‘neither likely nor

unlikely’ to refer other students in the future, and 14% reported being ‘somewhat’ or ‘very

unlikely’ to refer other students in the future (see Figure 26 and Table Q30).

13.5%

79.0%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

Very/Somewhat Unlikely Very/Somewhat Likely

Figure 26: Likelihood of Recommending Transition

Services

29.8%

14.9%

21.3%

34.0%

0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40%

Friend

Parent

Teacher

School Counselor

Figure 25: Referral Source



24

Source of Information about Services

Respondents were asked to indicate how they first found out about the services offered by the

Vocational Rehabilitation Program (see Figure 28 and Table Q34). Among the choices, the most

frequently cited source of information was through “Other Community Resources” (85%). These

other sources included Job Connect, medical doctors, teachers, and school counselors. Clients

also indicated that they found out about services through relatives (6%), friends (4%), or they did

not know (4%). Very few respondents found out about services over the television or internet.

Format of Information

Respondents were asked whether

they had received information

about services offered by the

Vocational Rehabilitation

Program in the format that they

preferred (see Table Q35).

Although 66% of respondents

reported that they did receive

information in their preferred

format, 30% of respondents did

not. Among those who did not

receive information in their

preferred format (n=33), the most

commonly requested formats

were electronic (37%) and

“Other” (e.g., in a booklet, in

bolded font; 23%; see Figure 30 on the next page and Table Q35a).

0.7%

0.8%

3.7%

6.0%

84.6%

4.3%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90%

Television

Internet

Friend

Relative

Other Community Resource

Don't Know / Refused

Figure 28: Source of Information about Services

30.4%

65.5%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

No Yes

Figure 29: Agreement that Information

was Given in the Preferred Format



25

Natural Support

Respondents indicated the extent to which they received “natural support” during the services

provided by the Vocational Rehabilitation Program (See Table Q36). Examples of natural

support include help from friends and family. Approximately equal percentages of respondents

indicated that they either often received natural support (36%) or sometimes received natural

support (32%). About 30% of respondents never or seldom received natural support (see Figure

31 and Table Q36).

11.4%

4.3%

36.9%

2.1%

22.8%

22.5%

0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40%

Large Font

Braille

Electronically

Alternative Language

Other

Don't Know / Refused

Figure 30: Preferred Format for Service Information

21.1%

9.9%

32.2%

35.9%

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

Never Seldom Sometimes Often

Figure 31: Frequency of Receipt of Natural Support



26

Service Locations

See Figure 27 and Table Q33 for a listing of all service location with their respective number of

survey respondents. The largest percentage of students (32%) reported that they received

services in Las Vegas at the “West Bay” facility. Just under 12% of students reported that they

had received services from Las Vegas at the “Maryland Parkway” facility, and 11% of students

received services from the corporate office in Reno. Other service locations had substantially

smaller percentages of student respondents, including Las Vegas at the North Town facility (9%)

and “Other” (9%).

0.8%

1.3%

1.8%

1.8%

2.6%

2.7%

4.6%

5.0%

6.4%

8.6%

9.4%%

11.4%

11.9%

31.9%

0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35%

Ely

Reno (Old Town Mall)

Elko

Sparks

Carson City

Winnemucca

Fallon

Henderson

Don't Know/Refused

North Las Vegas (North Town)

Other

Reno (Corporate Office)

Las Vegas (Maryland Parkway)

Las Vegas (West Bay)

Figure 27: Service Locations



27

Appendix A:

Post-Weighting Methodology



28

Post-Weighting Methodology

Surveys are conducted to obtain a representative sample of the population. However, due to the

nature of any sampling process, over-sampling some categories and under-sampling others is

more likely to occur. In other words, the way a certain characteristic (such as region, sex, age

etc.) of the sample is distributed may differ from the way it is distributed in the population,

which introduces bias into any estimate you may obtain from the sample data. To correct for

these biases mathematically and to restore the population’s region, sex and age distribution in the

sample, post-stratification weighting must be conducted. The post-stratification adjustment

forces the sampling weights within each post stratum (region, sex and age in the Division

sample) to the known Division population distribution. Post-stratification improves the precision

of the sample estimators and serves as a correction for non-response and under-coverage error,

which consequently induce a relative reduction in bias.

Un-weighted rates from the survey are not influenced by the stratum, sex, age, and race

distributions in the population. By using un-weighted rates, it is assumed implicitly, that every

single person in the survey represents one and only one person in the whole population (which is

not the case!). For example, if people of the age 18-24 were underrepresented in the survey, after

adjusting for stratum, sex and age, these people of the age 18-24 years old will be granted a

higher weight in order to overcome such under representation in the survey to account for

differing distributions of stratum, sex and age within the entire population. So, to compensate for

over-representation and/or under-representation in the sample, weighted rates must be used.

The formula for the weights is: where is the sample proportion, and is the

same proportion. The formula was used on the cell proportion from tables indicating the size of

particular subpopulations based on known demographic characteristics (e.g., males aged 18 – 24

living in Southern Nevada). After post-stratification, the weighting assured that the

representation of certain subpopulations corresponded to figures from the population as shown in

Tables 2 and 3.



29

Appendix B:

Transition Student

Satisfaction Survey



30

Transition Student Satisfaction Survey

Dial Screen

1st Phone Number: [primary phone]

2nd Phone Number: [secondary phone]

Client Name: [respondent]

Client's Gender: [Male/Female]

Client's City: [city]

Client's Primary Disability: [primary disability]

What happened when you dialed the number?

1 - Someone Answered (skip to Introduction 1)

2 - Busy

3 - No Response

4 - Answering Machine (skip to Answering Machine)

5 - Blocked Call

6 - Disconnected Number

7 -TTY or other Disability-Related Line Impairment

8 - Phone/Line Impairment

9 - Computer/Fax Machine

Introduction 1

Hello, my name is [name] from the University of Nevada. I am calling on behalf of the Nevada

Department of Employment, Training, and Rehabilitation for [respondent]. Each year we call

clients who worked with vocational rehabilitation counselors to receive help with training,

finding a job, or going from school to work or post-educational activities. This information is

confidential and [his/her] name will not be given to anyone. [His/Her] responses will be

combined with information from other clients and given to the Nevada Rehabilitation Division

so they can see how well the Division is doing and to determine how to improve the way they

help people find the best job for them. The questions are brief, and should only take about 10

minutes to complete. For [respondent]s’ participation, [he/she] will also be entered into a

drawing for a chance to receive 1 of 6 prepaid $50.00 VISA gift cards that can be used at any

location that accepts VISA.

If person says they did not receive services, PROBE: We show that you received services

from the Rehabilitation Division between 10/1/12-9/30/13 (READ: October 1st, 2012 and

September 30th, 2013). Did your counselor write up ANY type of plan for services? For

example, did they write up a plan for you to go to work, to go to training, for you to receive bus

passes or any type of transportation, for a uniform, for school, for assistive technology, or maybe

something else?

Read if respondent still doesn’t understand above question: By receiving services, we mean

you went to the Vocational Rehabilitation program, were determined to be eligible for services,



31

and received one or more of the following: an individual employment plan, counseling,

evaluation, advice, or a product.

If person says they have never heard of DETR or Rehabilitation Division, PROBE: The

Rehabilitation Division provides services for people with disabilities to help enable them to work

and live independently. The Rehabilitation Division's vision is that of a barrier-free future where

every individual in Nevada has equal vocational, employment, and independent living

opportunities.

May I speak to [respondent]?

1 - R is available (informant answered phone, transfer to R) (skip to Introduction 1)

2 - R is speaking (respondent answered phone) (skip to Introduction 4)

3 - R has hearing impairment (skip to Hearing Impairment)

4 - Call back set by Informant

5 - Caregiver or Parent/Guardian will complete survey for respondent (skip to Introduction 3)

6 - Severe impairment/OR R unable to complete survey by phone OR WEB

7 - Wrong number (IWER: Verify phone number) (skip to Verify Phone)

8 - Language Barrier

9 - Refused

10 - Eligible respondent away for duration

Introduction 2

Hello, my name is [name], and I'm calling from the University of Nevada on behalf of the

Nevada Department of Employment, Training, and Rehabilitation. Each year we call clients who

worked with vocational rehabilitation counselors to receive help with training, finding a job, or

going from school to work or post-educational activities. We would like to know how you feel

about the services provided to you by your counselor. This information is confidential and your

name will not be given to anyone. Your responses will be combined with information from other

clients and given to the Nevada Rehabilitation Division so they can see how well the Division is

doing and to determine how to improve the way they help people find the best job for them. The

questions are brief, and should only take about 10 minutes to complete. For [respondent]s’

participation, [he/she] will also be entered into a drawing for a chance to receive 1 of 6 prepaid

$50.00 VISA gift cards that can be used at any location that accepts VISA. Would you be willing

to participate in this interview now?

Interviewer: If respondent says, "I have the information on the web, and I was just going to do it

online." Say, "Well if you have time now, it's actually easier to do the survey over the phone

because I can help you through it. May we do the interview now?"

If respondent says that they already did it on the web, thank them, and code out as 4.







32


something else?









opportunities.

If person says "no" code 7 otherwise continue.

1 - Yes (skip to Impairment Check)

2 - Set call back

4 - No, I already completed it on the web

7 - Ineligible/Did not receive services from DETR

8 - Severe impairment/OR R unable to complete survey by phone or WEB

9 - Refused

Introduction 3

Each year we call clients who worked with vocational rehabilitation counselors to receive help

with training, finding a job, or going from school to work or post-educational activities. Over

the course of this interview, please respond as if you were the client receiving services from the

Department of Employment, Training, and Rehabilitation.

We would like to know about how you feel about the services provided to you by your

counselor. This information is confidential and your name will not be given to anyone. Your

responses will be combined with information from other clients and given to the Nevada

Rehabilitation Division so they can see how well the Division is doing and to determine how to

improve the way they help people find the best job for them.

Again, please respond to the questions as if you were the client receiving services from our

vocational rehabilitation counselors.








33





something else?









opportunities.


1 - Continue (skip to Impairment Check)

2 - Set call back



9 - Refused

Introduction 4

Okay, as I mentioned, I'm calling from the University of Nevada on behalf of the Nevada

Department of Employment, Training, and Rehabilitation. They would like to know about how

you feel about the services provided to you by your counselor. The questions are brief, and

should only take about 10 minutes to complete. For [respondent]s’ participation, [he/she] will

also be entered into a drawing for a chance to receive 1 of 6 prepaid $50.00 VISA gift cards that

can be used at any location that accepts VISA. Would you be willing to participate in this

interview now?












34

something else?









opportunities.


1 - Yes (skip to Impairment Check)

2 - Set call back




9 - Refused

Hearing Impairment

Interviewer: Read if informant is saying that respondent has a hearing impairment.

[He/She] can fill out the survey online at www.crda.unr.edu/student and enter case ID #[case id].

1 - Continue to memo

Web Information

Okay, you can fill out the brief survey online at www.crda.unr.edu/student and enter case ID #

[case id].

1 - Impairment, gave web address

2 - Not impaired, gave web address (Will call back if it's not completed online in one week)


Verify Phone

Let me verify your phone number, is this [primary phone] or [secondary phone]?

1 - Yes

2 - No (skip to Dial Screen)

Answering Machine



35

Hello, my name is [name] from the University of Nevada. I'm calling on behalf of the Nevada

Department of Employment, Training, and Rehabilitation, to gather information about its

services, particularly [respondent]'s experiences with the vocational rehabilitation counselor.

This information is confidential and [his/her] name will not be given to anyone. Please call us

back to complete this brief 10 minute survey at 1-800-929-9079 (for local 784-6412), Monday

through Friday 10am to 9pm, Saturday 10am to 4pm or Sunday 10am to 6pm, and refer to client

#[case id]. Or, you can fill out the brief survey online at www.crda.unr.edu/student, and

reference client ID #[case id]. Thank you for your time, and we look forward to hearing from

you.

1 - Message Left

2 - No Message Left

Impairment Check

Before we begin, do you have any impairment or condition that makes it difficult for you to

complete this interview over the telephone?

1 - Yes (skip to Offer Web Information)

2 - No (continue with interview) (skip to Inf1)

3 - No impairment but don't want to do it over the phone (skip to Web Information)

Interviewer: Before choosing option 1 or 3, say "Well it's actually easier to do the survey over

the phone because I can help you through it. May we do the interview now?" If respondent still

says they would like to do it over the web, choose 3, if they want to continue the interview

choose 2, not 1.

Offer Web Information

If you would prefer, you can complete this interview online. Would you like me to give you the

website address and a user ID so that you can complete the interview this way?

1 - Yes (skip to Web Information)

2 - No, Continue over the phone (skip to Inf1)


9 - No, Refused survey

Section 1: Satisfaction with Vocational Rehabilitation Program

The first set of questions asks about your satisfaction level with the Vocational Rehabilitation

Division. For each of the following questions, please rate your level of satisfaction on a scale of

one to five where ONE is very dissatisfied, TWO is somewhat dissatisfied, THREE is neither

dissatisfied nor satisfied, FOUR is somewhat satisfied, and FIVE is very satisfied. The first

question is...

Q1: Overall, how dissatisfied or satisfied are you with the services you received from the



36

Vocational Rehabilitation Division?

1 - Very dissatisfied

2 - Somewhat dissatisfied

3 - Neither dissatisfied nor satisfied

4 - Somewhat satisfied or

5 - Very satisfied

DO NOT READ 8 - Don't Know

9 - Refused

Q2: Overall, how dissatisfied or satisfied were you with the timeliness of the services you

received from the Vocational Rehabilitation Division?

RE-READ ONLY IF NECESSARY 1 - Very dissatisfied




5 - Very satisfied

DO NOT READ 8 - Don't Know

9 - Refused

Section 2: Educational Programs

Q3a: Have you ever enrolled in High School?

READ

1 - Yes

2 - No

DO NOT READ 8. Don’t Know

9. Refused

Q3b: Have you ever enrolled in a GED program?

READ

1 - Yes

2 - No

DO NOT READ 8. Don’t Know



37

9. Refused

Q4a (ask only if Q3a = 1): Which of the following best describes your progress in your High

School program? Do not include GED programs.

READ

1 - Currently attending

2 - Completed the program

3 - Left without completing the program

DO NOT READ

7 - Other

8 - Don't Know

9 - Refused

Q4b (ask only if Q3a = 1 and Q4a = 2): How did you complete High School? Again, do not

include GED programs.

INTERVIEWER NOTE: An adjusted diploma is given to special education students who do

not qualify for a standard diploma. "Aged out" means the student turned 22 and became too old

to attend High School. "Certificate of attendance" means certificate that evidences the

satisfaction of all the requirements for graduation from High School or completion of a program

of adult education except that a pupil has not passed one or more of the High School

proficiency examinations.

READ 1 - Standard, Advanced, or Honors diploma

2 - Adjusted diploma

3 - Aged out

4 - Certificate of attendance

DO NOT READ

8 - Don't Know

9 - Refused

Q4c (ask only if Q3b = 1): Which of the following best describes your progress in your GED

program?

READ

1 - Currently attending

2 - Completed the program

3 - Left without completing the program

DO NOT READ

7 – Other

8 - Don't Know



38

9 - Refused

Section 3: Satisfaction with Educational Programs

Inf2 (read only if either 3a or 3b = 1, yes)

Now, the next set of questions asks about your satisfaction level with the help you received with

the educational programs you indicated you have been previously enrolled in. For each of the

following questions, please rate your level of satisfaction on a scale of one to five where ONE is

very dissatisfied, TWO is somewhat dissatisfied, THREE is neither dissatisfied nor satisfied,

FOUR is somewhat satisfied, and FIVE is very satisfied. The first question is...

Q5a (ask only if Q3a = 1): How dissatisfied or satisfied were you with the help Vocational

Rehabilitation Staff gave you with job or career planning while in your High School program?

Again, do not include GED programs.

RE-READ ON IF NECESSARY




4 - Somewhat satisfied

5 - Very satisfied

DO NOT READ

8 - Don't Know

9 - Refused

Q5b (ask only if Q3b = 1): How dissatisfied or satisfied were you with the help Vocational

Rehabilitation Staff gave you with job or career planning while in your GED program? Would

you say you were ONE very dissatisfied, TWO somewhat dissatisfied, THREE neither

dissatisfied nor satisfied, FOUR somewhat satisfied, or FIVE very satisfied?

RE-READ ON IF NECESSARY





5 - Very satisfied

DO NOT READ

8 - Don't Know

9 - Refused



39

Section 4: Educational Programs

For the next set of questions, I'm going to read you a list of educational programs.

Q6a: Please indicate with a simple "yes" or "no" whether you were EVER OFFERED an

opportunity by the Vocational Rehabilitation Staff to participate in any of the following

programs?

a. Technical or trade school, such as electrician, construction, dog grooming, or cosmetology.

b. On-the-job training

c. Two-year college degree

d. Four-year college degree

e. Job Corps (PRONOUNCE “core”)

1 -Yes

2 - No

8 - Don’t Know

9 - Refused

Q6b: Did you participate in ___(name of program)___?

a. Technical or trade school, such as electrician, construction, dog grooming, or cosmetology.

b. On-the-job training

c. Two-year college degree

d. Four-year college degree

e. Job Corps (PRONOUNCE “core”)

1 -Yes

2 - No

8 - Don’t Know

9 - Refused

Q6ca (ask only if Q6ba = 1): How satisfied or dissatisfied were you with the help Vocational

Rehabilitation Staff gave you with the technical or trade school program?

RE-READ ONLY IF NECESSARY





5 - Very satisfied

DO NOT READ

8 - Don't Know



40

9 - Refused

Q6cb (ask only if Q6bb = 1): How satisfied or dissatisfied were you with the help Vocational

Rehabilitation Staff gave you with the on-the-job training program?






5 - Very satisfied

DO NOT READ

8 - Don't Know

9 - Refused

Q6cc (ask only if Q6bc = 1): How satisfied or dissatisfied were you with the help Vocational

Rehabilitation Staff gave you with the two-year college degree program?






5 - Very satisfied

DO NOT READ

8 - Don't Know

9 - Refused

Q6cd (ask only if Q6bd = 1): How satisfied or dissatisfied were you with the help Vocational

Rehabilitation Staff gave you with the four-year college degree program?






5 - Very satisfied

DO NOT READ

8 - Don't Know

9 - Refused



41

Q6ce (ask only if Q6be = 1): How satisfied or dissatisfied were you with the help Vocational

Rehabilitation Staff gave you with the Job Corps program? Interviewer note: Pronounced

"CORE"






5 - Very satisfied

DO NOT READ

8 - Don't Know

9 - Refused

Section 5: Employment History

The next set of questions asks about your employment history.

Q7 (ask only if Q3a = 1 and Q4a = 2 or 3): How many jobs have you had since you left High

School? Specify number 0-87.

88 - Don't Know

99 - Refused

Q8: Are you currently employed?

1 - Yes

2 - No (skip to Q21)

DO NOT READ 8 - Don't Know (skip to Q23)

9 - Refused (skip to Q23)

Q9: Did you get your current job as a result of the services you received from the Vocational

Rehabilitation Program?

1 - Yes (skip to Q15)






42

Q10: Did you get ANY job as a result of the services you received from the Vocational



2 – No (skip to Q15)



Q11: When your case was closed, were you in a job that the Vocational Rehabilitation Program

helped place you in?

1 – Yes (skip to Q12)


DO NOT READ

8 - Don't Know (skip to Q15)


Q12: Are you currently employed in that same job?



DO NOT READ



Q13: Are you currently employed in the same career field as the job you were in when your case

was closed?

1 – Yes (skip to Q14)


DO NOT READ





43

Q14: Compared to the job you had when your case was closed, does your current job provide

you with either equal or better pay OR equal or better benefits?

IF THEY ANSWER “EQUAL or BETTER PAY OR EQUAL OR BETTER BENEFITS,”

PROBE: We are looking for a “yes” or “no” answer.



DO NOT READ



Q15: In what kind of job are you employed? I am going to read you a list of occupations. Please

allow me to read the entire list before answering. ONE is Agricultural, Forestry, Fishing and

Related, TWO is Clerical and Administrative Support, THREE is Managerial and

Administrative, FOUR is Production, Construction, Operating, Maintenance and Material

Handling, FIVE is Professional, Paraprofessional and Technical, SIX is Sales and Related

Occupations, for example cashiers and stock takers, SEVEN is Service Occupations, for example

food service and attendants, and EIGHT is Other.

INTERVIEWER NOTE: See study materials for list of sales and service occupations.

1 - Agricultural, Forestry, Fishing and Related

2 - Clerical and Administrative Support

3 - Managerial and Administrative

4 - Production, Construction, Operating, Maintenance and Material Handling

5 - Professional, Paraprofessional and Technical

6 - Sales and Related Occupations, for example cashiers and stock takers

7 - Service Occupations, for example food service and attendants

8 - Other (specify)

DO NOT READ

88 - Don't Know

99 - Refused

SPECIFY: [__________________________________________________](50 characters)

Q16: How dissatisfied or satisfied are you with your current job? Would you say you are ONE

very dissatisfied, TWO somewhat dissatisfied, THREE neither dissatisfied nor satisfied, FOUR

somewhat satisfied, or FIVE very satisfied?

Re-read only if necessary





44



5 - Very satisfied

DO NOT READ

8 - Don't Know

9 - Refused

Q17: How long have you had your current job? Specify 0 - 87

Interviewer: First enter the duration and then the units

Duration

Units

1 - days

2 - weeks

3 - months

4 - years

DO NOT READ

88 - Don't Know

99 - Refused

Q18: How many hours do you normally work each week? Specify 0 - 160 hours

DO NOT READ

888 - Don't know

999 - Refused

Q19: How much money are you normally paid per hour? Specify 0.00 - 87.99. NOTE: If they

make more than $87.99 enter $87.99 and make a note here.

Dollars

Cents

DO NOT READ

88 - Don't know

99 - Refused

Q20: Which, if any, of the following benefits do you receive as part of your current

employment? Please respond with a simple "yes" or "no."

a. Paid federal or state holidays

b. Paid vacations

c. Health insurance



45

d. Paid sick leave

e. Retirement plan

f. Meals

g. Daycare

h. Clothes/Uniform allowance

i. Other (specify)

1 – Yes

2 – No

DO NOT READ

8 - Don't Know

9 - Refused

INTERVIEWER NOTE: FOR OTHER, ASK "Are there any other benefits that you receive

from your current job that I didn't mention?"


INTERVIEWER NOTE: FOR OTHER, ASK "Are there any other benefits that you receive

from your current job that I didn't mention?"


Q21: What is the MAIN REASON you are not currently employed? Please allow me to read the

entire list before answering and choose ONLY ONE response.

READ

1 - Attending school

2 - Volunteering

3 - Employer could not accommodate my disability

4 - Fired or laid off from previous job

5 - Could not find any job

6 - Could not find the kind of job I wanted

7 - Could not find a job I was qualified for

8 - Lack of transportation

9 - Could not work because of family commitments

10 - Could not work because of other commitments

11 - Did not want to lose health insurance from another source

12 - Changed my mind about the value of working

DO NOT READ

77 - Other (specify)

78 – Disability

79 - Other medical reason (not disability-related)

88 - Don't Know



46

99 - Refused

INTERVIEWER NOTE: Read 78 and 79 ONLY if respondent mentions their disability as a

reason for not working; but be sure to read BOTH 78 and 79, PROBE: "So would the MAIN

reason you are not currently employed be because of your disability or some other medical

reason not disability related?"

THIS SPACE IS ONLY FOR CODE 77, “OTHER” SPECIFY:


Q22 (ask only if Q20c = 2): Do you receive health insurance coverage from ANY source?

1 - Yes

2 - No

DO NOT READ

8 - Don't Know

9 - Refused

Section 6: Vocational Rehabilitation Services

The next set of questions asks about the State of Nevada's Vocational Rehabilitation services.

Q23: Have you EVER received any of the following services from the Vocational Rehabilitation

program? Please respond with a simple "yes" or "no."

a. Job placement

b. Job coaching

c. Other support from vocational rehabilitation employees other than your counselor

1 – Yes

2 – No

DO NOT READ

8 – Don’t Know

9 - Refused

Interviewer note: Read only if they are not sure what you are referring to in item C above, "For

example, clerical staff or a technician." See below also.

DEFINITIONS FOR INTERVIEWER (Read only if requested) "Job Placement" means being

placed, in an integrated work environment with disabled and non-disabled employees for at least



47

minimum wage. Job placement services include things like being referred to a job developer,

being referred to another agency, or receiving services like help preparing a resume or

developing interviewing skills.

A "Job Coach" is someone who works with you to provide support such as verbal reinforcement,

reminders, or additional training. The Job coach might work through difficulties that arise at your

place of employment either initially or after the participant has been employed for a period of

time.

Services from other vocational rehabilitation employees other than your counselor include things

like scheduling appointments, help with transportation needs, and assistance filling out

applications.

Q24 (ask only if Q23a = 1): How dissatisfied or satisfied were you with the job placement

services you received from the Vocational Rehabilitation program? Job placement services

include services such as interest and skill testing. Would you say you were ONE very

dissatisfied, TWO somewhat dissatisfied, THREE neither dissatisfied nor satisfied, FOUR

somewhat satisfied, or FIVE very satisfied?





5 - Very satisfied

8 - Don't Know

9 - Refused

Q25 (ask only if Q23b = 1): How dissatisfied or satisfied were you with the job coaching

services you received from the Vocational Rehabilitation program? Would you say you were

ONE very dissatisfied, TWO somewhat dissatisfied, THREE neither dissatisfied nor satisfied,

FOUR somewhat satisfied, or FIVE very satisfied?





5 - Very satisfied

DO NOT READ

8 - Don't Know

9 – Refused

Q26 (ask only if Q23c = 1): How dissatisfied or satisfied were you with the other vocational

rehabilitation services you received from employees other than your counselor in the Vocational

Rehabilitation program? Would you say you were ONE very dissatisfied, TWO somewhat



48

dissatisfied, THREE neither dissatisfied nor satisfied, FOUR somewhat satisfied, or FIVE very

satisfied?

Re-read only if necessary





5 - Very satisfied

DO NOT READ

8 - Don't Know

9 - Refused

Q27: Assistive technology services include things like providing or purchasing devices to help

with vision, hearing, communication, or changes to your home or workplace. I'm going to read

you a list of various TYPES of assistive technology devices you may have received. Please

indicate with a simple "yes" or "no" whether or not you have received the following DEVICES:

a. Devices to help with your hearing, for example, hearing aids, alert signal systems,

telephone amplifiers or decoders.

b. Devices to help with your vision, for example, glasses, specialized magnifiers, screen

readers, talking equipment, or Braille equipment.

c. Devices to help with getting around, for example, transportation, canes or wheelchairs,

orthotics or prosthetics.

d. Devices to help make your home or workplace more accessible, for example, specialized

office equipment, foot stools, or book or copy holders.

e. Devices to help with your communication, for example, hand-held digital recorders or an

AAC box or iPhone.

f. Devices to help with something else that was not already mentioned above

1 – Yes

2 – No

DO NOT READ

8 – Don’t Know

9 – Refused

INTERVIEWER NOTE: FOR OTHER, ASK "And what was the assistive technology

DEVICE you received?"


PROBE: IF PERSON SAYS THEY RECEIVED COMPUTER SOFTWARE OR

HARDWARE, PLEASE ASK: “For which of the following categories did you receive the



49

computer software or hardware: hearing, vision, getting around, changes to your home or

workplace, communication, or something else?” IF IT FALLS UNDER ONE OF THE ABOVE

CATEGORIES: a) hearing; b) vision; c) getting around d) home or workplace e) communication,

DO NOT CODE AS “OTHER”

Q28: Overall, how would you rate the quality of those assistive technology DEVICES you

received? Would you say they were poor, fair, good, or excellent?


1 – Poor

2 – Fair

3 - Good or

4 – Excellent

DO NOT READ

8 - Don't Know

9 - Refused

IF PERSON SAYS SOMETHING ABOUT THE SERVICE OR THE PROVIDER, BUT

NOT THE DEVICE, PROBE: “For this question, we are asking you to rate the device itself,

not the person who provided the device to you or explained how to use the device.”

Q29: Who first told you about the transition student services available to you from the Nevada

Department of Employment Training and Rehabilitation?

READ

1 – Parent

2 – Friend

3 - Teacher

4 - School counselor

5 - Found out about them by myself, or

6 - Someone else (specify)

DO NOT READ

8 - Don't Know

9 - Refused


Section 5: Needed Improvements and Positive Aspects

Q30: Based on your experiences with the transition services you have received, how unlikely or

likely is it that you would recommend these services to other students who might need them?

Would you say ONE very unlikely, TWO somewhat unlikely, THREE neither unlikely nor

likely, FOUR somewhat likely or FIVE very likely:



50

1 - very unlikely

2 - somewhat unlikely

3 - neither unlikely nor likely

4 - somewhat likely

5 - very likely

DO NOT READ

8 - Don't Know

9 - Refused

Q31: Based on your experiences with the student transition program, are there any specific

CHANGES that you think could be made in order to IMPROVE the program?

1 - To answer (specify)

2 - No comments

Q32: Based on your experiences with the student transition program, are there any specific

POSITIVE aspects that should be continued or expanded in the future?

1 - To answer (specify)

2 - No comments

Q33: Which Vocational Rehabilitation location did you receive all OR a majority of your

services from?

NOTE: You may only select one, if you received services from multiple locations, please select

the location you received the majority of your services from.

1 - Carson City (1370 South Curry Street)

2 - Carson City (1933 North Carson Street)

3 - Elko (172 6th Street)

4 - Ely (1500 Ave F #1)

5 - Fallon (121 Industrial Way)

6 - Henderson (119 Water Street)

7 - Las Vegas (3016 West Charleston Boulevard - Suite 200; “West Bay”)

8 - Las Vegas (6161 West Charleston Boulevard; “Mental Health Campus”)

9 - Las Vegas (3405 South Maryland Parkway)

10 - North Las Vegas (2827 Las Vegas Boulevard North; “North Town”)

11 - Reno (1325 Corporate Boulevard; “Corporate Office”)

12 - Reno (4001 South Virginia Street; “Old Town Mall”)

13 - Sparks (1675 East Prater Way)

14 - Winnemucca (475 West Haskell, #2)

15 - Other [please enter here]

Q34: How did you first find out about the Vocational Rehabilitation Program services available



51

to you from the Nevada Department of Employment Training and Rehabilitation?

READ ONLY IF NECESSARY:

01 - Television

02 - Radio

03 - Internet

04 - Newspaper

05 - Brochure

06 - Billboard

07 - Friend

08- Relative or

09- Other community resource (For example, school counselor, Job Connect, disability resource

center) (specify)

DO NOT READ

88 - Don't Know

99 - Refused


Q35: Was Vocational Rehabilitation Program information given to you in your preferred format,

such as large font, Braille, or electronically?

1 - Yes

2 - No (skip to Q35a)

8 - Don't Know

9 - Refused

IF NO TO Q35: Q35a

What format would you have preferred?

Read

1 – Large font

2 – Braille

3 – Electronically

4 – Alternative Language (specify)

5 – Other (specify)

DO NOT READ

8 - Don't Know

9 - Refused



52

IF 4 to Q35a: Can you please specify what other language you would have preferred? [__________________________________________________](50 characters)

IF 5 to Q35a: Can you please specify what other format you would have preferred?

[__________________________________________________](50 characters)

Q36

How frequently did you receive any natural support (for example, help from a friend, relative,

neighbor, co-worker, etc.) while you were in the Vocational Rehabilitation Program?

Read

1 – Never

2 – Seldom

3 – Sometimes

4 – Often

DO NOT READ

8 - Don't Know

9 - Refused

Closing Statement

Those are all the questions I have. I'd like to thank you on behalf of the Department of

Employment, Training, and Rehabilitation for answering these questions. Thanks again.

Goodbye.

IWER: READ ONLY IF RESPONDENT HAS FURTHER QUESTIONS.

If you have any questions about this survey, you may call my supervisor toll-free at 1-800-929-

9079 or 1-775-784-6421.

1 - To continue



53

Appendix C:

Cover Letter Invitations



54



55

Appendix D:

Website Information about

Study



56



57



58



59



60

Appendix E:

Listing of Nevada Areas

Called for General Student

Survey



61

Listing of Nevada Areas Called for General Student Survey

Southern Nevada

Caliente

Henderson

Las Vegas

Mesquite

North Las Vegas

Northern Nevada

Carson City

Gardberville

Reno

Sparks

Sun Valley

Zephyr Cove

Rural Nevada

Alamo

Battle Mountain

Elko

Ely

Fallon

Lovelock

Owyhee

Ryndon

Stage Coach

Spring Creek

West Wendover

Winnemucca

Yerington



62

Appendix F:

Data Tables



63

Table 1: Transition Student Population and Completed Interviews

STRATUM STUDENT

POPULATION

COMPLETED

SURVEYS

Southern Nevada 197 (72.4%) 74 (67.9%)

Northern Nevada 41 (15.1%) 19 (17.4%)

Rural Nevada 34 (12.5%) 16 (14.7%)

Total 272 (100%) 109 (100%)



64

Table 2: Gender, Age, Stratum, Impairment Type & Educational Program of Student Population

Response

Frequency (N)

Weighted Response

Frequency (N)

Weighted Response

Rate (%) C.I. (95%)

Total 109 272 100.00% (100.0-100.0)

Gender Female

Male

44 a

65

116 b

156

42.5 c

57.5

(32.39-52.67) d

(47.33-67.61)

Age <=18

Age 19 or older

8

101

37

235

13.7

86.3

(04.29-23.10)

(76.90-95.71)

Race White

Non-White

49 109 39.9 (30.21-49.66)

60 163 60.1 (50.34-69.79)

Stratum

Southern

Northern

Rural

74

19

16

198

41

33

72.9

15.2

11.9

(64.36-81.41)

(08.50-21.83)

(05.86-18.04)

Disability Type

Cognitive Impairments 70 173 63.8 (53.86-73.81)

Deafness, Communication Visual 1 3 0.9 (00.00-02.73)

Mobility Orthopedic/Neurological Impairments 6 15 5.4 (01.02-09.71)

Other Mental Impairments 15 42 15.6 (07.27-23.85)

Other Physical Impairments 3 7 2.6 (00.00-05.61)

Other Visual Impairments 3 6 2.2 (00.00-04.72)

Psychosocial Impairments 5 12 4.6 (00.50-08.62)

Other Hearing Impairments 2 4 1.5 (00.00-03.76)

Blindness 2 5 1.8 (00.00-04.49)

Hearing Loss, Communication Visual 1 3 0.9 (00.00-02.73)

Hearing Loss, Communication Auditory 1 2 0.7 (00.00-02.23)

High School Yes 98 243 89.5 (83.39-95-65)

No 8 21 7.8 (02.37-13.25)

GED Program Yes 2 4 1.6 (00.00-03.89)

No 105 263 96.6 93.17-100.00)

Technical or Trade School Yes 6 13 21.7 (03.61-39.79)

No 17 46 75.7 (56.93-94.45)


No 17 71 71.3 (52.17-90.45)


No 15 40 77.7 (57.86-97.62)

On-the-Job Training Yes 41 102 67.8 (53.67-81.92)

No 18 48 32.2 (18-08-46.33)

Job Corps Yes 9 18 20.7 (06.88-34.46)

No 25 64 71.8 (53.90-89.73)

a. Response frequency is the number of participants in the sample for each category. For example, 44 of all participants in the obtained sample were females.

b. Weighted response frequency is the approximate number of individuals in the population that is represented by the sample after accounting for differential sampling. For example, the 44 females in the sample is equivalent to 116 females in the entire transition student population.

c. Weighted response rate is the approximate proportion of individuals in the population that is represented by the sample after accounting for differential

sampling. For example, the 44 females in the sample represent 42.5% of the transition student population. d. Confidence Interval (C.I.) means that 95% of the time, the “true point estimate” will fall between the lower and upper bounds of the 95% Confidence Interval.

For example, the true percentages of females in the population (based on 44 females from the sample) will fall between 32.39% and 52.67%.



65

Table 3: Stratum, Gender, and Age Distribution for Transition Student Population, Weighted

Sample, and Unweighted Sample

Population (1) Weighted Sample (2) Un-Weighted Sample (3)

Stratum Gender Age Frequency N Percent % Weighted

Frequency N

Weighted

Percent %

Response

Frequency

N

Response

Percent %

Southern Female <=18 14 5.15% 14 5.15% 2 1.83%

Southern Female Age 19 or older 51 18.75% 51 18.75% 26 23.85%

Southern Male <=18 15 5.51% 15 5.51% 6 5.50%

Southern Male Age 19 or older 117 43.01% 117 43.01% 40 36.70%

Southern Subtotal (4) 197 72.43% 197 72.43% 74 67.89

Northern Female <=18 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Northern Female Age 19 or older 16 5.88% 16 5.88% 7 6.42%

Northern Male <=18 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Northern Male Age 19 or older 25 9.19% 25 9.19% 12 11.01%

Northern Subtotal (4) 41 15.07% 41 15.07% 19 17.43

Rural Female <=18 1 0.37% 1 0.37% 0 0.00%

Rural Female Age 19 or older 17 6.25% 17 6.25% 9 8.26%

Rural Male <=18 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Rural Male Age 19 or older 16 5.88% 16 5.88% 7 6.42%

Rural Subtotal (4) 34 12.50% 34 12.50% 16 14.68

Total (5) 272 100.0% 272 100.0% 109 100.0%

1. Transition student population distribution of the State of Nevada Vocational Rehabilitation services.

2. Transition student distribution of the State of Nevada Vocational Rehabilitation services’ sample after weighting for strata, sex, & age.

3. Transition student distribution of the State of Nevada Vocational Rehabilitation services’ sample without post stratification weighting.

4. Frequency, and percentage of each stratum, in the transition student population and sample (weighted and un-weighted).

5. Total subjects in the population and sample (weighted and un-weighted).



66

Q1. Overall, how satisfied or dissatisfied were you with the services you received from the

Vocational Rehabilitation Division?

Very Dissatisfied Somewhat Dissatisfied Neither Satisfied Nor

Dissatisfied Somewhat Satisfied Very Satisfied Total

N % C.I.(95%) N % C.I.(95%) N % C.I.(95%) N % C.I.(95%) N % C.I.(95%) N % C.I.(95%)

Overall Total Total 7 6.4% (1.7-11.1) 5 3.8% (0.4-7.2) 20 17.3% (9.9-24.7) 30 29.7% (19.9-39.4) 47 42.9% (32.6-53.1) 109 100.0% (_-_)

Gender

Female 3 6.5% (0.0-13.8) 3 5.1% (0.0-11.0) 7 15.7% (4.4-26.9) 15 35.6% (20.7-50.6) 16 37.1% (22.1-52.1) 44 42.5% (32.4-52.7)

Male 4 6.3% (0.2-12.4) 2 2.8% (0.0-6.8) 13 18.5% (8.7-28.4) 15 25.2% (12.4-38.1) 31 47.1% (33.3-60.9) 65 57.5% (47.3-67.6)

Total 7 6.4% (1.7-11.1) 5 3.8% (0.4-7.2) 20 17.3% (9.9-24.7) 30 29.7% (19.9-39.4) 47 42.9% (32.6-53.1) 109 100.0% (_-_)

Age

<=18 1 6.4% (0.0-19.3) 0 . (.-.) 1 6.4% (0.0-19.3) 2 35.9% (0.0-74.4) 4 51.3% (12.9-89.7) 8 13.7% (4.3-23.1)

Age 19 or older 6 6.4% (1.3-11.4) 5 4.4% (0.5-8.3) 19 19.0% (10.9-27.2) 28 28.7% (19.3-38.1) 43 41.5% (31.4-51.6) 101 86.3% (76.9-95.7)

Total 7 6.4% (1.7-11.1) 5 3.8% (0.4-7.2) 20 17.3% (9.9-24.7) 30 29.7% (19.9-39.4) 47 42.9% (32.6-53.1) 109 100.0% (_-_)

Race

White 6 12.9% (3.1-22.8) 4 7.9% (0.2-15.5) 10 19.9% (8.5-31.4) 11 22.5% (10.5-34.5) 18 36.7% (22.8-50.7) 49 39.9% (30.2-49.7)

Non White 1 2.0% (0.0-5.9) 1 1.1% (0.0-3.2) 10 15.6% (5.9-25.2) 19 34.4% (20.6-48.3) 29 47.0% (32.7-61.2) 60 60.1% (50.3-69.8)

Total 7 6.4% (1.7-11.1) 5 3.8% (0.4-7.2) 20 17.3% (9.9-24.7) 30 29.7% (19.9-39.4) 47 42.9% (32.6-53.1) 109 100.0% (_-_)

Region

South NV 6 7.7% (1.6-13.8) 2 2.0% (0.0-4.8) 14 17.1% (8.4-25.9) 21 31.8% (19.7-43.9) 31 41.4% (29.0-53.8) 74 72.9% (64.4-81.4)

North NV 1 4.9% (0.0-14.5) 2 11.3% (0.0-26.3) 1 6.4% (0.0-18.6) 7 34.9% (13.0-56.9) 8 42.5% (19.4-65.5) 19 15.2% (8.5-21.8)

Rural NV 0 . (.-.) 1 5.3% (0.0-15.6) 5 32.4% (7.1-57.7) 2 10.1% (0.0-23.8) 8 52.2% (25.6-78.9) 16 12.0% (5.9-18.0)

Total 7 6.4% (1.7-11.1) 5 3.8% (0.4-7.2) 20 17.3% (9.9-24.7) 30 29.7% (19.9-39.4) 47 42.9% (32.6-53.1) 109 100.0% (_-_)

Participated in on-the-job training

Yes 3 7.8% (0.0-16.6) 1 1.7% (0.0-5.1) 4 9.7% (0.1-19.4) 9 22.2% (7.0-37.4) 24 58.6% (41.5-75.7) 41 67.8% (53.7-81.9)

No 1 4.2% (0.0-12.6) 1 3.5% (0.0-10.7) 6 28.6% (6.1-51.2) 3 25.0% (0.0-51.6) 7 38.6% (11.8-65.5) 18 32.2% (18.1-46.3)

Total 4 6.6% (0.0-13.2) 2 2.3% (0.0-5.6) 10 15.8% (6.0-25.7) 12 23.1% (9.7-36.5) 31 52.2% (37.5-66.8) 59 100.0% (_-_)

Participated in Job Corps

Yes 0 . (.-.) 1 9.4% (0.0-28.1) 1 9.4% (0.0-28.1) 2 25.3% (0.0-56.9) 5 55.9% (21.2-90.7) 9 22.4% (7.7-37.0)

No 1 3.9% (0.0-11.8) 2 5.9% (0.0-14.4) 4 11.7% (0.0-23.7) 5 16.1% (1.6-30.6) 13 62.4% (41.6-83.3) 25 77.6% (63.0-92.3)

Total 1 3.0% (0.0-9.2) 3 6.6% (0.0-14.5) 5 11.2% (0.9-21.4) 7 18.2% (4.7-31.7) 18 61.0% (42.8-79.2) 34 100.0% (_-_)

Currently Employed

Yes 3 5.1% (0.0-11.0) 2 2.5% (0.0-6.1) 10 15.4% (5.9-24.8) 18 28.2% (16.3-40.1) 30 48.8% (35.2-62.3) 63 57.3% (47.0-67.6)

No 4 8.2% (0.3-16.1) 3 5.5% (0.0-11.9) 9 18.1% (6.6-29.6) 12 32.3% (16.0-48.6) 17 35.9% (20.8-50.9) 45 42.7% (32.4-53.0)

Total 7 6.4% (1.7-11.2) 5 3.8% (0.4-7.2) 19 16.5% (9.2-23.9) 30 29.9% (20.1-39.8) 47 43.3% (33.0-53.6) 108 100.0% (_-_)



67

Q2. Overall, how satisfied or dissatisfied were you with the

timeliness of the services you received from the Vocational Rehabilitation

Division?


Dissatisfied Somewhat Satisfied Very Satisfied Don't Know/Refused Total

N % C.I.(95%) N % C.I.(95%) N % C.I.(95%) N % C.I.(95%) N % C.I.(95%) N % C.I.(95%) N % C.I.(95%)

Overall Total Total 9 8.1% (2.8-13.5) 7 7.4% (1.3-13.6) 21 21.1% (12.4-29.9) 27 22.8% (14.3-31.3) 43 38.6% (28.7-48.6) 2 1.9% (0.0-4.5) 109 100.0% (_-_)

Gender

Female 4 9.3% (0.3-18.2) 3 6.2% (0.0-13.3) 12 27.1% (13.4-40.8) 10 20.7% (8.5-32.9) 15 36.8% (21.7-51.9) 0 . (.-.) 44 42.5% (32.4-52.7)

Male 5 7.3% (0.9-13.7) 4 8.4% (0.0-17.6) 9 16.8% (5.5-28.0) 17 24.3% (12.7-35.9) 28 40.0% (26.7-53.2) 2 3.3% (0.0-7.8) 65 57.5% (47.3-67.6)

Total 9 8.1% (2.8-13.5) 7 7.4% (1.3-13.6) 21 21.1% (12.4-29.9) 27 22.8% (14.3-31.3) 43 38.6% (28.7-48.6) 2 1.9% (0.0-4.5) 109 100.0% (_-_)

Age

<=18 1 6.4% (0.0-19.3) 2 24.4% (0.0-57.4) 1 18.0% (0.0-49.7) 1 18.0% (0.0-49.7) 3 33.3% (0.0-68.5) 0 . (.-.) 8 13.7% (4.3-23.1)

Age 19 or older 8 8.4% (2.6-14.2) 5 4.8% (0.5-9.1) 20 21.6% (12.9-30.4) 26 23.5% (15.1-32.0) 40 39.4% (29.4-49.5) 2 2.2% (0.0-5.2) 101 86.3% (76.9-95.7)

Total 9 8.1% (2.8-13.5) 7 7.4% (1.3-13.6) 21 21.1% (12.4-29.9) 27 22.8% (14.3-31.3) 43 38.6% (28.7-48.6) 2 1.9% (0.0-4.5) 109 100.0% (_-_)

Race

White 6 12.9% (3.1-22.8) 5 9.5% (1.3-17.7) 9 17.1% (6.5-27.6) 9 18.2% (7.1-29.3) 18 37.6% (23.5-51.6) 2 4.7% (0.0-11.2) 49 39.9% (30.2-49.7)

Non White 3 4.9% (0.0-10.7) 2 6.1% (0.0-14.7) 12 23.8% (11.2-36.5) 18 25.8% (13.8-37.9) 25 39.3% (25.6-53.0) 0 . (.-.) 60 60.1% (50.3-69.8)

Total 9 8.1% (2.8-13.5) 7 7.4% (1.3-13.6) 21 21.1% (12.4-29.9) 27 22.8% (14.3-31.3) 43 38.6% (28.7-48.6) 2 1.9% (0.0-4.5) 109 100.0% (_-_)

Region

South NV 7 9.3% (2.5-16.2) 5 8.6% (0.5-16.6) 13 19.3% (9.0-29.5) 18 22.8% (12.3-33.2) 30 38.8% (26.7-50.9) 1 1.3% (0.0-3.7) 74 72.9% (64.4-81.4)

North NV 2 8.8% (0.0-20.8) 0 . (.-.) 3 16.2% (0.0-33.4) 6 28.3% (8.0-48.5) 7 40.3% (17.2-63.5) 1 6.4% (0.0-18.6) 19 15.2% (8.5-21.8)

Rural NV 0 . (.-.) 2 10.1% (0.0-23.8) 5 38.9% (11.6-66.2) 3 15.9% (0.0-33.2) 6 35.2% (10.2-60.2) 0 . (.-.) 16 12.0% (5.9-18.0)

Total 9 8.1% (2.8-13.5) 7 7.4% (1.3-13.6) 21 21.1% (12.4-29.9) 27 22.8% (14.3-31.3) 43 38.6% (28.7-48.6) 2 1.9% (0.0-4.5) 109 100.0% (_-_)


Yes 4 9.3% (0.0-18.6) 0 . (.-.) 5 12.2% (1.4-22.9) 11 27.3% (11.4-43.1) 21 51.3% (34.0-68.5) . . . 41 67.8% (53.7-81.9)

No 1 4.2% (0.0-12.6) 3 23.8% (0.0-50.0) 5 33.3% (6.2-60.5) 4 14.6% (0.0-29.4) 5 24.0% (3.2-44.8) . . . 18 32.2% (18.1-46.3)

Total 5 7.7% (0.7-14.6) 3 7.7% (0.0-17.2) 10 19.0% (6.9-31.1) 15 23.2% (11.1-35.3) 26 42.5% (28.2-56.8) . . . 59 100.0% (_-_)


Yes 0 . (.-.) . . . 2 20.4% (0.0-47.5) 4 43.4% (8.8-78.1) 3 36.2% (1.8-70.6) . . . 9 22.4% (7.7-37.0)

No 1 3.9% (0.0-11.8) . . . 9 39.3% (16.0-62.6) 6 20.0% (3.6-36.5) 9 36.8% (13.9-59.6) . . . 25 77.6% (63.0-92.3)

Total 1 3.0% (0.0-9.2) . . . 11 35.1% (15.6-54.5) 10 25.3% (9.7-40.8) 12 36.6% (17.3-56.0) . . . 34 100.0% (_-_)

Currently Employed

Yes 3 5.1% (0.0-11.0) 5 7.2% (0.8-13.6) 14 24.5% (12.2-36.9) 13 17.4% (8.1-26.8) 28 45.8% (32.2-59.3) 0 . (.-.) 63 57.3% (47.0-67.6)

No 6 12.4% (2.6-22.1) 2 8.0% (0.0-19.6) 7 17.1% (5.1-29.1) 14 30.5% (15.4-45.5) 15 29.9% (15.9-43.8) 1 2.3% (0.0-6.8) 45 42.7% (32.4-53.0)

Total 9 8.2% (2.8-13.6) 7 7.5% (1.3-13.7) 21 21.3% (12.5-30.1) 27 23.0% (14.4-31.5) 43 39.0% (28.9-49.0) 1 1.0% (0.0-2.9) 108 100.0% (_-_)



68

Q3. Overall, how dissatisfied or satisfied are you with the amount of choice you have between providers of

vocational rehabilitation services?





Gender

Female 4 8.8% (0.1-17.6) 4 9.4% (0.3-18.5) 8 19.1% (6.7-31.4) 13 28.7% (14.8-42.6) 15 34.0% (19.3-48.6) 0 . (.-.) 44 42.5% (32.4-52.7)

Male 5 7.8% (1.1-14.6) 5 9.6% (0.2-19.1) 11 13.5% (5.5-21.5) 16 29.6% (16.1-43.1) 27 38.4% (25.3-51.5) 1 1.0% (0.0-3.0) 65 57.5% (47.3-67.6)

Total 9 8.3% (2.9-13.6) 9 9.5% (2.9-16.2) 19 15.9% (8.8-22.9) 29 29.2% (19.5-39.0) 42 36.5% (26.7-46.3) 1 0.6% (0.0-1.7) 109 100.0% (_-_)

Age

<=18 2 12.8% (0.0-31.2) 1 18.0% (0.0-49.7) 0 . (.-.) 2 35.9% (0.0-74.4) 3 33.3% (0.0-68.5) 0 . (.-.) 8 13.7% (4.3-23.1)

Age 19 or older

7 7.5% (2.0-13.1) 8 8.2% (2.5-13.9) 19 18.4% (10.5-26.3) 27 28.2% (18.8-37.6) 39 37.0% (27.2-46.9) 1 0.7% (0.0-2.0) 101 86.3% (76.9-95.7)

Total 9 8.3% (2.9-13.6) 9 9.5% (2.9-16.2) 19 15.9% (8.8-22.9) 29 29.2% (19.5-39.0) 42 36.5% (26.7-46.3) 1 0.6% (0.0-1.7) 109 100.0% (_-_)

Race

White 7 14.7% (4.4-25.0) 5 10.2% (1.5-18.9) 5 10.3% (1.5-19.1) 12 24.8% (12.3-37.3) 19 38.6% (24.6-52.7) 1 1.4% (0.0-4.3) 49 39.9% (30.2-49.7)

Non White 2 4.0% (0.0-9.4) 4 9.1% (0.0-18.6) 14 19.6% (9.4-29.8) 17 32.2% (18.4-46.0) 23 35.1% (21.8-48.4) 0 . (.-.) 60 60.1% (50.3-69.8)

Total 9 8.3% (2.9-13.6) 9 9.5% (2.9-16.2) 19 15.9% (8.8-22.9) 29 29.2% (19.5-39.0) 42 36.5% (26.7-46.3) 1 0.6% (0.0-1.7) 109 100.0% (_-_)

Region

South NV 7 9.4% (2.6-16.3) 7 11.0% (2.4-19.6) 13 15.9% (7.4-24.4) 20 29.4% (17.5-41.3) 27 34.3% (22.6-46.0) 0 . (.-.) 74 72.9% (64.4-81.4)

North NV 1 4.9% (0.0-14.5) 1 6.4% (0.0-18.6) 5 24.4% (5.0-43.9) 5 24.7% (5.1-44.3) 7 39.6% (16.5-62.6) 0 . (.-.) 19 15.2% (8.5-21.8)

Rural NV 1 5.3% (0.0-15.6) 1 4.8% (0.0-14.2) 1 4.8% (0.0-14.2) 4 34.1% (6.7-61.5) 8 46.3% (19.9-72.7) 1 4.8% (0.0-14.2) 16 12.0% (5.9-18.0)

Total 9 8.3% (2.9-13.6) 9 9.5% (2.9-16.2) 19 15.9% (8.8-22.9) 29 29.2% (19.5-39.0) 42 36.5% (26.7-46.3) 1 0.6% (0.0-1.7) 109 100.0% (_-_)


Yes 2 5.6% (0.0-13.5) 3 10.4% (0.0-23.7) 7 15.6% (4.0-27.2) 13 33.3% (16.6-49.9) 16 35.1% (19.4-50.8) . . . 41 67.8% (53.7-81.9)

No 2 9.1% (0.0-21.9) 1 5.1% (0.0-15.3) 3 10.7% (0.0-23.3) 6 37.5% (10.2-64.8) 6 37.5% (10.4-64.7) . . . 18 32.2% (18.1-46.3)

Total 4 6.7% (0.0-13.5) 4 8.7% (0.0-18.4) 10 14.0% (5.1-23.0) 19 34.6% (20.3-49.0) 22 35.9% (22.1-49.7) . . . 59 100.0% (_-_)


Yes 0 . (.-.) 0 . (.-.) 3 28.2% (0.0-58.0) 4 44.1% (9.3-78.8) 2 27.8% (0.0-61.1) . . . 9 22.4% (7.7-37.0)

No 1 3.9% (0.0-11.8) 1 2.4% (0.0-7.4) 3 11.2% (0.0-24.5) 9 48.5% (24.9-72.1) 11 34.0% (13.9-54.0) . . . 25 77.6% (63.0-92.3)

Total 1 3.0% (0.0-9.2) 1 1.9% (0.0-5.8) 6 15.0% (2.6-27.5) 13 47.5% (27.5-67.5) 13 32.6% (15.4-49.7) . . . 34 100.0% (_-_)

Currently Employed

Yes 4 6.4% (0.1-12.7) 4 5.0% (0.0-9.9) 8 12.8% (3.9-21.6) 17 33.3% (19.5-47.0) 29 41.6% (28.6-54.6) 1 1.0% (0.0-3.0) 63 57.3% (47.0-67.6)

No 5 11.0% (1.5-20.4) 5 15.9% (2.2-29.6) 11 20.4% (8.7-32.0) 11 22.3% (9.6-35.0) 13 30.5% (15.2-45.7) 0 . (.-.) 45 42.7% (32.4-53.0)

Total 9 8.3% (2.9-13.7) 9 9.6% (2.9-16.4) 19 16.0% (8.9-23.1) 28 28.6% (18.8-38.4) 42 36.9% (27.0-46.7) 1 0.6% (0.0-1.7) 108 100.0% (_-_)



69

Q3a. Have you ever enrolled in High School program?

Yes No Don't Know/Refused Total

N % C.I.(95%) N % C.I.(95%) N % C.I.(95%) N % C.I.(95%)

Overall Total Total 98 89.5% (83.4-95.7) 8 7.8% (2.4-13.2) 3 2.7% (0.0-5.7) 109 100.0% (_-_)

Gender

Female 37 82.8% (70.8-94.7) 5 13.1% (2.2-24.0) 2 4.1% (0.0-10.0) 44 42.5% (32.4-52.7)

Male 61 94.5% (89.1-100.0) 3 3.9% (0.0-8.4) 1 1.6% (0.0-4.7) 65 57.5% (47.3-67.6)

Total 98 89.5% (83.4-95.7) 8 7.8% (2.4-13.2) 3 2.7% (0.0-5.7) 109 100.0% (_-_)

Age

<=18 7 92.3% (77.0-100.0) 0 . (.-.) 1 7.7% (0.0-23.0) 8 13.7% (4.3-23.1)

Age 19 or older 91 89.1% (82.4-95.7) 8 9.0% (2.8-15.3) 2 1.9% (0.0-4.5) 101 86.3% (76.9-95.7)

Total 98 89.5% (83.4-95.7) 8 7.8% (2.4-13.2) 3 2.7% (0.0-5.7) 109 100.0% (_-_)

Race

White 46 93.3% (85.8-100.0) 2 4.4% (0.0-10.6) 1 2.3% (0.0-6.8) 49 39.9% (30.2-49.7)

Non White 52 87.0% (78.1-95.9) 6 10.0% (2.0-18.1) 2 2.9% (0.0-7.1) 60 60.1% (50.3-69.8)

Total 98 89.5% (83.4-95.7) 8 7.8% (2.4-13.2) 3 2.7% (0.0-5.7) 109 100.0% (_-_)

Region

South NV 65 87.9% (80.1-95.7) 7 9.4% (2.4-16.4) 2 2.7% (0.0-6.5) 74 72.9% (64.4-81.4)

North NV 17 89.0% (74.2-100.0) 1 6.4% (0.0-18.6) 1 4.6% (0.0-13.7) 19 15.2% (8.5-21.8)

Rural NV 16 100.0% (100.0-100.0) 0 . (.-.) 0 . (.-.) 16 12.0% (5.9-18.0)

Total 98 89.5% (83.4-95.7) 8 7.8% (2.4-13.2) 3 2.7% (0.0-5.7) 109 100.0% (_-_)


Yes 37 89.1% (78.5-99.8) 3 8.0% (0.0-17.4) 1 2.8% (0.0-8.4) 41 67.8% (53.7-81.9)

No 17 96.1% (88.1-100.0) 0 . (.-.) 1 3.9% (0.0-11.9) 18 32.2% (18.1-46.3)

Total 54 91.4% (83.6-99.1) 3 5.5% (0.0-11.9) 2 3.2% (0.0-7.7) 59 100.0% (_-_)


Yes 8 89.6% (69.2-100.0) . . . 1 10.4% (0.0-30.8) 9 22.4% (7.7-37.0)

No 25 100.0% (100.0-100.0) . . . 0 . (.-.) 25 77.6% (63.0-92.3)

Total 33 97.7% (92.9-100.0) . . . 1 2.3% (0.0-7.1) 34 100.0% (_-_)

Currently Employed

Yes 56 87.2% (78.1-96.4) 6 10.9% (2.4-19.5) 1 1.9% (0.0-5.5) 63 57.3% (47.0-67.6)

No 42 94.6% (88.3-100.0) 2 3.8% (0.0-9.2) 1 1.7% (0.0-5.0) 45 42.7% (32.4-53.0)

Total 98 90.3% (84.4-96.3) 8 7.9% (2.4-13.4) 2 1.8% (0.0-4.3) 108 100.0% (_-_)



70

Q3b. Have you ever enrolled in a GED program?


N % C.I.(95%) N % C.I.(95%) N % C.I.(95%) N % C.I.(95%)


Gender

Female 0 . (.-.) 43 97.2% (91.7-100.0) 1 2.8% (0.0-8.3) 44 42.5% (32.4-52.7)

Male 2 2.8% (0.0-6.8) 62 96.2% (91.8-100.0) 1 1.0% (0.0-3.0) 65 57.5% (47.3-67.6)

Total 2 1.6% (0.0-3.9) 105 96.6% (93.2-100.0) 2 1.8% (0.0-4.4) 109 100.0% (_-_)

Age

<=18 0 . (.-.) 8 100.0% (100.0-100.0) 0 . (.-.) 8 13.7% (4.3-23.1)

Age 19 or older 2 1.9% (0.0-4.5) 97 96.1% (92.1-100.0) 2 2.1% (0.0-5.1) 101 86.3% (76.9-95.7)

Total 2 1.6% (0.0-3.9) 105 96.6% (93.2-100.0) 2 1.8% (0.0-4.4) 109 100.0% (_-_)

Race

White 1 2.4% (0.0-7.2) 48 97.6% (92.8-100.0) 0 . (.-.) 49 39.9% (30.2-49.7)

Non White 1 1.1% (0.0-3.2) 57 96.0% (91.2-100.0) 2 3.0% (0.0-7.3) 60 60.1% (50.3-69.8)

Total 2 1.6% (0.0-3.9) 105 96.6% (93.2-100.0) 2 1.8% (0.0-4.4) 109 100.0% (_-_)

Region

South NV 1 0.9% (0.0-2.6) 72 97.5% (93.8-100.0) 1 1.6% (0.0-4.9) 74 72.9% (64.4-81.4)

North NV 1 6.4% (0.0-18.6) 17 89.8% (75.7-100.0) 1 3.9% (0.0-11.5) 19 15.2% (8.5-21.8)

Rural NV 0 . (.-.) 16 100.0% (100.0-100.0) 0 . (.-.) 16 12.0% (5.9-18.0)

Total 2 1.6% (0.0-3.9) 105 96.6% (93.2-100.0) 2 1.8% (0.0-4.4) 109 100.0% (_-_)


Yes . . . 40 98.4% (95.3-100.0) 1 1.6% (0.0-4.7) 41 67.8% (53.7-81.9)

No . . . 18 100.0% (100.0-100.0) 0 . (.-.) 18 32.2% (18.1-46.3)

Total . . . 58 98.9% (96.8-100.0) 1 1.1% (0.0-3.2) 59 100.0% (_-_)


Yes . . . 9 100.0% (100.0-100.0) . . . 9 22.4% (7.7-37.0)

No . . . 25 100.0% (100.0-100.0) . . . 25 77.6% (63.0-92.3)

Total . . . 34 100.0% (100.0-100.0) . . . 34 100.0% (_-_)

Currently Employed

Yes 1 1.1% (0.0-3.3) 60 95.8% (90.7-100.0) 2 3.1% (0.0-7.7) 63 57.3% (47.0-67.6)

No 1 2.3% (0.0-6.8) 44 97.7% (93.2-100.0) 0 . (.-.) 45 42.7% (32.4-53.0)

Total 2 1.6% (0.0-3.9) 104 96.6% (93.1-100.0) 2 1.8% (0.0-4.4) 108 100.0% (_-_)



71

Q4a. Which of the following best describes your progress in your High School program?

Currently attending Completed program Left without completing

program Don't Know/Refused Total

N % C.I.(95%) N % C.I.(95%) N % C.I.(95%) N % C.I.(95%) N % C.I.(95%)

Overall Total Total 8 7.5% (2.3-12.6) 84 86.7% (79.9-93.5) 5 5.2% (0.7-9.7) 1 0.7% (0.0-2.1) 98 100.0% (_-_)

Gender

Female 0 . (.-.) 37 100.0% (100.0-100.0) 0 . (.-.) 0 . (.-.) 37 39.3% (28.7-49.9)

Male 8 12.3% (3.9-20.7) 47 78.0% (67.2-88.9) 5 8.5% (1.2-15.8) 1 1.2% (0.0-3.5) 61 60.7% (50.1-71.3)

Total 8 7.5% (2.3-12.6) 84 86.7% (79.9-93.5) 5 5.2% (0.7-9.7) 1 0.7% (0.0-2.1) 98 100.0% (_-_)

Age

<=18 2 13.9% (0.0-34.0) 5 86.1% (66.0-100.0) 0 . (.-.) 0 . (.-.) 7 14.1% (3.9-24.4)

Age 19 or older 6 6.4% (1.3-11.5) 79 86.8% (79.6-94.0) 5 6.0% (0.8-11.2) 1 0.8% (0.0-2.5) 91 85.9% (75.6-96.1)

Total 8 7.5% (2.3-12.6) 84 86.7% (79.9-93.5) 5 5.2% (0.7-9.7) 1 0.7% (0.0-2.1) 98 100.0% (_-_)

Race

White 6 14.5% (3.7-25.4) 35 73.1% (59.5-86.7) 5 12.4% (2.1-22.7) 0 . (.-.) 46 41.6% (31.2-52.1)

Non White 2 2.4% (0.0-5.9) 49 96.4% (92.2-100.0) 0 . (.-.) 1 1.2% (0.0-3.6) 52 58.4% (47.9-68.8)

Total 8 7.5% (2.3-12.6) 84 86.7% (79.9-93.5) 5 5.2% (0.7-9.7) 1 0.7% (0.0-2.1) 98 100.0% (_-_)

Region

South NV 8 10.4% (3.2-17.6) 52 82.9% (73.9-91.9) 4 5.7% (0.1-11.3) 1 1.0% (0.0-3.0) 65 71.6% (62.4-80.8)

North NV 0 . (.-.) 16 92.8% (79.2-100.0) 1 7.2% (0.0-20.8) 0 . (.-.) 17 15.1% (8.0-22.1)

Rural NV 0 . (.-.) 16 100.0% (100.0-100.0) 0 . (.-.) 0 . (.-.) 16 13.4% (6.6-20.1)

Total 8 7.5% (2.3-12.6) 84 86.7% (79.9-93.5) 5 5.2% (0.7-9.7) 1 0.7% (0.0-2.1) 98 100.0% (_-_)


Yes 2 5.5% (0.0-13.1) 33 89.1% (78.5-99.6) 2 5.5% (0.0-13.1) . . . 37 66.1% (51.0-81.2)

No 4 17.9% (0.0-35.7) 13 82.1% (64.3-100.0) 0 . (.-.) . . . 17 33.9% (18.8-49.0)

Total 6 9.7% (1.8-17.5) 46 86.7% (77.5-95.9) 2 3.6% (0.0-8.7) . . . 54 100.0% (_-_)


Yes 1 10.5% (0.0-31.3) 6 74.5% (41.8-100.0) 1 15.0% (0.0-43.4) 0 . (.-.) 8 20.5% (6.1-34.9)

No 0 . (.-.) 24 97.3% (91.7-100.0) 0 . (.-.) 1 2.7% (0.0-8.3) 25 79.5% (65.1-93.9)

Total 1 2.1% (0.0-6.6) 30 92.6% (83.8-100.0) 1 3.1% (0.0-9.4) 1 2.1% (0.0-6.6) 33 100.0% (_-_)

Currently Employed

Yes 4 6.7% (0.1-13.4) 50 89.6% (81.4-97.8) 2 3.7% (0.0-8.8) 0 . (.-.) 56 55.3% (44.4-66.3)

No 4 8.3% (0.2-16.5) 34 83.1% (71.8-94.4) 3 7.0% (0.0-14.8) 1 1.6% (0.0-4.8) 42 44.7% (33.7-55.6)

Total 8 7.5% (2.3-12.6) 84 86.7% (79.9-93.5) 5 5.2% (0.7-9.7) 1 0.7% (0.0-2.1) 98 100.0% (_-_)



72

Q4b. How did you complete High School?

Standard, Advance, or Honors diploma

Adjusted diploma Certificate of attendance Don't Know/Refused Total



Gender

Female 14 40.2% (23.4-57.0) 20 52.3% (35.3-69.3) 2 4.1% (0.0-9.8) 1 3.4% (0.0-10.0) 37 45.4% (33.5-57.2)

Male 25 55.8% (39.1-72.4) 19 35.6% (20.0-51.1) 3 8.7% (0.0-20.2) 0 . (.-.) 47 54.6% (42.8-66.5)

Total 39 48.7% (36.7-60.7) 39 43.2% (31.4-54.9) 5 6.6% (0.0-13.5) 1 1.5% (0.0-4.6) 84 100.0% (_-_)

Age

<=18 2 45.2% (0.0-91.4) 2 32.3% (0.0-74.0) 1 22.6% (0.0-62.0) 0 . (.-.) 5 14.0% (2.5-25.5)

Age 19 or older 37 49.3% (37.5-61.0) 37 45.0% (33.3-56.6) 4 4.0% (0.0-8.0) 1 1.8% (0.0-5.3) 79 86.0% (74.5-97.5)

Total 39 48.7% (36.7-60.7) 39 43.2% (31.4-54.9) 5 6.6% (0.0-13.5) 1 1.5% (0.0-4.6) 84 100.0% (_-_)

Race

White 20 57.1% (40.0-74.1) 13 37.7% (21.0-54.3) 2 5.3% (0.0-12.6) 0 . (.-.) 35 35.1% (24.4-45.8)

Non White 19 44.2% (28.2-60.2) 26 46.2% (30.4-61.9) 3 7.3% (0.0-17.2) 1 2.4% (0.0-7.0) 49 64.9% (54.2-75.6)

Total 39 48.7% (36.7-60.7) 39 43.2% (31.4-54.9) 5 6.6% (0.0-13.5) 1 1.5% (0.0-4.6) 84 100.0% (_-_)

Region

South NV 22 45.2% (29.9-60.5) 26 45.2% (30.1-60.3) 3 7.3% (0.0-16.9) 1 2.2% (0.0-6.7) 52 68.4% (58.1-78.8)

North NV 6 39.7% (14.6-64.9) 9 55.6% (30.2-81.0) 1 4.7% (0.0-13.9) 0 . (.-.) 16 16.1% (8.3-23.9)

Rural NV 11 73.5% (52.0-95.1) 4 21.2% (1.5-40.8) 1 5.3% (0.0-15.7) 0 . (.-.) 16 15.4% (7.6-23.2)

Total 39 48.7% (36.7-60.7) 39 43.2% (31.4-54.9) 5 6.6% (0.0-13.5) 1 1.5% (0.0-4.6) 84 100.0% (_-_)


Yes 12 44.2% (23.9-64.4) 19 49.8% (30.1-69.6) 1 2.0% (0.0-6.0) 1 4.0% (0.0-12.0) 33 67.9% (51.3-84.6)

No 6 38.1% (8.2-67.9) 4 34.2% (2.1-66.3) 3 27.7% (0.0-59.2) 0 . (.-.) 13 32.1% (15.4-48.7)

Total 18 42.2% (25.2-59.3) 23 44.8% (28.1-61.5) 4 10.2% (0.0-22.1) 1 2.7% (0.0-8.2) 46 100.0% (_-_)


Yes 3 43.2% (1.1-85.3) 3 56.8% (14.7-98.9) 0 . (.-.) . . . 6 16.5% (2.8-30.2)

No 11 46.9% (22.9-70.9) 10 36.1% (14.4-57.8) 3 17.0% (0.0-38.3) . . . 24 83.5% (69.8-97.2)

Total 14 46.3% (25.0-67.6) 13 39.5% (19.5-59.5) 3 14.2% (0.0-32.4) . . . 30 100.0% (_-_)

Currently Employed

Yes 24 50.8% (35.3-66.3) 23 41.0% (26.2-55.7) 3 8.3% (0.0-19.3) 0 . (.-.) 50 57.2% (45.2-69.1)

No 15 46.0% (27.1-64.8) 16 46.1% (27.4-64.9) 2 4.3% (0.0-10.5) 1 3.6% (0.0-10.6) 34 42.8% (30.9-54.8)

Total 39 48.7% (36.7-60.7) 39 43.2% (31.4-54.9) 5 6.6% (0.0-13.5) 1 1.5% (0.0-4.6) 84 100.0% (_-_)



73

Q4c. Which of the following best describes your progress in your

GED program?

Left without completing program

Total

N % C.I.(95%) N % C.I.(95%)

Gender Male 2 100.0% (100.0-100.0) 2 100.0% (_-_)

Age Age 19 or older 2 100.0% (100.0-100.0) 2 100.0% (_-_)

Race

White 1 100.0% (100.0-100.0) 1 60.3% (0.0-100.0)

Non White 1 100.0% (100.0-100.0) 1 39.7% (0.0-100.0)

Total 2 100.0% (100.0-100.0) 2 100.0% (_-_)

Region

South NV 1 100.0% (100.0-100.0) 1 39.7% (0.0-100.0)

North NV 1 100.0% (100.0-100.0) 1 60.3% (0.0-100.0)

Total 2 100.0% (100.0-100.0) 2 100.0% (_-_)

Currently Employed

Yes 1 100.0% (100.0-100.0) 1 39.7% (0.0-100.0)

No 1 100.0% (100.0-100.0) 1 60.3% (0.0-100.0)

Total 2 100.0% (100.0-100.0) 2 100.0% (_-_)



74

Q5a. How dissatisfied or satisfied were you with the help Vocational

Rehabilitation staff gave you with job or career planning while in your High School

program?





Gender

Female 2 5.5% (0.0-13.2) 6 16.0% (3.6-28.4) 3 7.3% (0.0-15.7) 10 28.1% (12.7-43.5) 13 35.6% (19.3-51.8) 3 7.5% (0.0-16.1) 37 39.3% (28.7-49.9)

Male 6 9.6% (2.0-17.2) 4 6.1% (0.0-12.5) 9 17.0% (5.6-28.4) 18 26.7% (14.3-39.0) 23 39.0% (24.8-53.2) 1 1.7% (0.0-5.0) 61 60.7% (50.1-71.3)

Total 8 8.0% (2.5-13.5) 10 10.0% (3.7-16.3) 12 13.2% (5.4-20.9) 28 27.2% (17.6-36.9) 36 37.6% (26.9-48.4) 4 4.0% (0.0-7.9) 98 100.0% (_-_)

Age

<=18 1 6.9% (0.0-21.0) 0 . (.-.) 2 26.4% (0.0-62.0) 1 19.4% (0.0-53.7) 3 47.2% (6.3-88.1) 0 . (.-.) 7 14.1% (3.9-24.4)

Age 19 or older 7 8.2% (2.2-14.2) 10 11.6% (4.4-18.9) 10 11.0% (4.3-17.7) 27 28.5% (18.8-38.2) 33 36.1% (25.7-46.5) 4 4.6% (0.0-9.2) 91 85.9% (75.6-96.1)

Total 8 8.0% (2.5-13.5) 10 10.0% (3.7-16.3) 12 13.2% (5.4-20.9) 28 27.2% (17.6-36.9) 36 37.6% (26.9-48.4) 4 4.0% (0.0-7.9) 98 100.0% (_-_)

Race

White 6 14.3% (3.5-25.1) 3 5.6% (0.0-11.9) 9 20.1% (8.0-32.2) 11 23.0% (10.6-35.4) 14 30.7% (16.9-44.5) 3 6.3% (0.0-13.4) 46 41.6% (31.2-52.1)

Non White 2 3.5% (0.0-8.6) 7 13.2% (3.4-23.0) 3 8.2% (0.0-18.3) 17 30.2% (16.3-44.2) 22 42.6% (27.3-58.0) 1 2.3% (0.0-6.8) 52 58.4% (47.9-68.8)

Total 8 8.0% (2.5-13.5) 10 10.0% (3.7-16.3) 12 13.2% (5.4-20.9) 28 27.2% (17.6-36.9) 36 37.6% (26.9-48.4) 4 4.0% (0.0-7.9) 98 100.0% (_-_)

Region

South NV 6 8.5% (1.7-15.3) 7 9.8% (2.4-17.2) 7 12.3% (2.7-21.9) 17 26.2% (14.3-38.1) 25 38.6% (25.4-51.9) 3 4.5% (0.0-9.7) 65 71.6% (62.4-80.8)

North NV 2 12.7% (0.0-29.5) 0 . (.-.) 3 19.8% (0.0-40.2) 7 38.4% (14.7-62.1) 5 29.1% (6.8-51.4) 0 . (.-.) 17 15.1% (8.0-22.1)

Rural NV 0 . (.-.) 3 22.3% (0.0-46.2) 2 10.1% (0.0-23.9) 4 20.1% (1.2-39.0) 6 42.2% (15.2-69.1) 1 5.3% (0.0-15.7) 16 13.4% (6.6-20.1)

Total 8 8.0% (2.5-13.5) 10 10.0% (3.7-16.3) 12 13.2% (5.4-20.9) 28 27.2% (17.6-36.9) 36 37.6% (26.9-48.4) 4 4.0% (0.0-7.9) 98 100.0% (_-_)


Yes 1 1.9% (0.0-5.7) 2 4.3% (0.0-10.4) 3 7.4% (0.0-15.8) 10 29.3% (11.8-46.8) 19 52.0% (33.6-70.3) 2 5.1% (0.0-12.4) 37 66.1% (51.0-81.2)

No 2 9.7% (0.0-23.4) 1 8.2% (0.0-24.1) 3 23.2% (0.0-49.9) 7 32.4% (8.6-56.2) 4 26.5% (0.0-53.3) 0 . (.-.) 17 33.9% (18.8-49.0)

Total 3 4.5% (0.0-9.8) 3 5.6% (0.0-12.4) 6 12.7% (1.5-24.0) 17 30.4% (16.3-44.4) 23 43.4% (28.0-58.7) 2 3.4% (0.0-8.2) 54 100.0% (_-_)


Yes 1 10.5% (0.0-31.3) 0 . (.-.) 3 41.4% (4.2-78.7) 4 48.1% (10.9-85.3) 0 . (.-.) 0 . (.-.) 8 20.5% (6.1-34.9)

No 0 . (.-.) 1 2.7% (0.0-8.2) 3 8.3% (0.0-18.2) 8 29.9% (9.8-50.0) 12 55.3% (32.6-77.9) 1 3.9% (0.0-11.8) 25 79.5% (65.1-93.9)

Total 1 2.1% (0.0-6.6) 1 2.1% (0.0-6.5) 6 15.1% (2.6-27.5) 12 33.6% (15.6-51.7) 12 43.9% (23.3-64.6) 1 3.1% (0.0-9.4) 33 100.0% (_-_)

Currently Employed

Yes 1 2.4% (0.0-7.1) 6 10.7% (2.0-19.5) 6 9.8% (2.0-17.7) 18 28.0% (15.8-40.2) 24 46.6% (32.0-61.2) 1 2.4% (0.0-7.1) 56 55.3% (44.4-66.3)

No 7 14.9% (4.2-25.6) 4 9.1% (0.0-18.3) 6 17.3% (3.2-31.4) 10 26.3% (10.8-41.8) 12 26.5% (12.4-40.6) 3 5.9% (0.0-12.6) 42 44.7% (33.7-55.6)

Total 8 8.0% (2.5-13.5) 10 10.0% (3.7-16.3) 12 13.2% (5.4-20.9) 28 27.2% (17.6-36.9) 36 37.6% (26.9-48.4) 4 4.0% (0.0-7.9) 98 100.0% (_-_)



75

Q5b. How dissatisfied or satisfied were you with the help Vocational Rehabilitation staff gave you with

job or career planning while in your GED program?'

Somewhat Satisfied Very Satisfied Total

N % C.I.(95%) N % C.I.(95%) N % C.I.(95%)

Gender Male 1 60.3% (0.0-100.0) 1 39.7% (0.0-100.0) 2 100.0% (_-_)

Age Age 19 or older 1 60.3% (0.0-100.0) 1 39.7% (0.0-100.0) 2 100.0% (_-_)

Race

White 1 100.0% (100.0-100.0) 0 . (.-.) 1 60.3% (0.0-100.0)

Non White 0 . (.-.) 1 100.0% (100.0-100.0) 1 39.7% (0.0-100.0)

Total 1 60.3% (0.0-100.0) 1 39.7% (0.0-100.0) 2 100.0% (_-_)

Region

South NV 0 . (.-.) 1 100.0% (100.0-100.0) 1 39.7% (0.0-100.0)

North NV 1 100.0% (100.0-100.0) 0 . (.-.) 1 60.3% (0.0-100.0)

Total 1 60.3% (0.0-100.0) 1 39.7% (0.0-100.0) 2 100.0% (_-_)

Currently Employed

Yes 0 . (.-.) 1 100.0% (100.0-100.0) 1 39.7% (0.0-100.0)

No 1 100.0% (100.0-100.0) 0 . (.-.) 1 60.3% (0.0-100.0)

Total 1 60.3% (0.0-100.0) 1 39.7% (0.0-100.0) 2 100.0% (_-_)



76

Q6Aa. Ever offered an opportunity to participate in: Technical or trade school


N % C.I.(95%) N % C.I.(95%) N % C.I.(95%) N % C.I.(95%)


Gender

Female 8 16.8% (5.6-28.1) 36 83.2% (71.9-94.4) 0 . (.-.) 44 42.5% (32.4-52.7)

Male 16 26.5% (13.6-39.5) 47 70.9% (57.8-84.0) 2 2.6% (0.0-6.3) 65 57.5% (47.3-67.6)

Total 24 22.4% (13.4-31.4) 83 76.1% (67.0-85.2) 2 1.5% (0.0-3.6) 109 100.0% (_-_)

Age

<=18 3 42.3% (3.9-80.7) 5 57.7% (19.3-96.1) 0 . (.-.) 8 13.7% (4.3-23.1)

Age 19 or older 21 19.3% (11.4-27.1) 78 79.0% (70.9-87.1) 2 1.7% (0.0-4.2) 101 86.3% (76.9-95.7)

Total 24 22.4% (13.4-31.4) 83 76.1% (67.0-85.2) 2 1.5% (0.0-3.6) 109 100.0% (_-_)

Race

White 13 25.4% (13.0-37.8) 34 70.9% (57.9-83.9) 2 3.7% (0.0-9.0) 49 39.9% (30.2-49.7)

Non White 11 20.4% (8.0-32.9) 49 79.6% (67.1-92.0) 0 . (.-.) 60 60.1% (50.3-69.8)

Total 24 22.4% (13.4-31.4) 83 76.1% (67.0-85.2) 2 1.5% (0.0-3.6) 109 100.0% (_-_)

Region

South NV 14 21.4% (10.3-32.5) 59 77.3% (66.1-88.5) 1 1.3% (0.0-3.7) 74 72.9% (64.4-81.4)

North NV 5 25.1% (5.1-45.0) 14 74.9% (55.0-94.9) 0 . (.-.) 19 15.2% (8.5-21.8)

Rural NV 5 24.9% (4.3-45.5) 10 70.3% (48.2-92.4) 1 4.8% (0.0-14.2) 16 12.0% (5.9-18.0)

Total 24 22.4% (13.4-31.4) 83 76.1% (67.0-85.2) 2 1.5% (0.0-3.6) 109 100.0% (_-_)


Yes 13 26.6% (12.7-40.6) 27 70.9% (56.5-85.4) 1 2.4% (0.0-7.3) 41 67.8% (53.7-81.9)

No 7 47.7% (20.0-75.4) 11 52.3% (24.6-80.0) 0 . (.-.) 18 32.2% (18.1-46.3)

Total 20 33.4% (19.4-47.5) 38 64.9% (50.8-79.1) 1 1.7% (0.0-5.0) 59 100.0% (_-_)


Yes 4 46.6% (11.5-81.7) 5 53.4% (18.3-88.5) . . . 9 22.4% (7.7-37.0)

No 10 37.6% (14.9-60.2) 15 62.4% (39.8-85.1) . . . 25 77.6% (63.0-92.3)

Total 14 39.6% (20.2-58.9) 20 60.4% (41.1-79.8) . . . 34 100.0% (_-_)

Currently Employed

Yes 16 25.7% (13.6-37.8) 45 71.7% (59.3-84.1) 2 2.6% (0.0-6.4) 63 57.3% (47.0-67.6)

No 8 18.5% (5.0-31.9) 37 81.5% (68.1-95.0) 0 . (.-.) 45 42.7% (32.4-53.0)

Total 24 22.6% (13.6-31.7) 82 75.9% (66.7-85.0) 2 1.5% (0.0-3.7) 108 100.0% (_-_)



77

Q6Ab. Ever offered an opportunity to participate in: On-the-job training


N % C.I.(95%) N % C.I.(95%) N % C.I.(95%) N % C.I.(95%)


Gender

Female 20 44.0% (28.7-59.4) 23 53.2% (37.7-68.6) 1 2.8% (0.0-8.3) 44 42.5% (32.4-52.7)

Male 39 63.7% (51.0-76.3) 24 33.8% (21.4-46.1) 2 2.6% (0.0-6.3) 65 57.5% (47.3-67.6)

Total 59 55.3% (45.2-65.5) 47 42.0% (32.0-52.0) 3 2.7% (0.0-5.8) 109 100.0% (_-_)

Age

<=18 7 93.6% (80.7-100.0) 1 6.4% (0.0-19.3) 0 . (.-.) 8 13.7% (4.3-23.1)

Age 19 or older 52 49.2% (39.0-59.5) 46 47.7% (37.4-57.9) 3 3.1% (0.0-6.7) 101 86.3% (76.9-95.7)

Total 59 55.3% (45.2-65.5) 47 42.0% (32.0-52.0) 3 2.7% (0.0-5.8) 109 100.0% (_-_)

Race

White 24 49.4% (35.0-63.9) 23 46.8% (32.4-61.2) 2 3.7% (0.0-9.0) 49 39.9% (30.2-49.7)

Non White 35 59.2% (45.5-72.9) 24 38.8% (25.3-52.3) 1 2.0% (0.0-5.9) 60 60.1% (50.3-69.8)

Total 59 55.3% (45.2-65.5) 47 42.0% (32.0-52.0) 3 2.7% (0.0-5.8) 109 100.0% (_-_)

Region

South NV 43 59.6% (47.5-71.6) 29 37.5% (25.7-49.3) 2 2.9% (0.0-6.9) 74 72.9% (64.4-81.4)

North NV 9 44.9% (21.8-67.9) 10 55.1% (32.1-78.2) 0 . (.-.) 19 15.2% (8.5-21.8)

Rural NV 7 42.5% (16.2-68.8) 8 52.8% (26.2-79.3) 1 4.8% (0.0-14.2) 16 12.0% (5.9-18.0)

Total 59 55.3% (45.2-65.5) 47 42.0% (32.0-52.0) 3 2.7% (0.0-5.8) 109 100.0% (_-_)


Yes 41 100.0% (100.0-100.0) . . . . . . 41 67.8% (53.7-81.9)

No 18 100.0% (100.0-100.0) . . . . . . 18 32.2% (18.1-46.3)

Total 59 100.0% (100.0-100.0) . . . . . . 59 100.0% (_-_)


Yes 7 74.7% (43.1-100.0) 2 25.3% (0.0-56.9) . . . 9 22.4% (7.7-37.0)

No 18 74.5% (55.6-93.5) 7 25.5% (6.5-44.4) . . . 25 77.6% (63.0-92.3)

Total 25 74.6% (58.3-90.9) 9 25.4% (9.1-41.7) . . . 34 100.0% (_-_)

Currently Employed

Yes 34 56.2% (43.0-69.5) 27 40.7% (27.6-53.7) 2 3.1% (0.0-7.7) 63 57.3% (47.0-67.6)

No 25 55.3% (39.4-71.1) 20 44.7% (28.9-60.6) 0 . (.-.) 45 42.7% (32.4-53.0)

Total 59 55.8% (45.6-66.0) 47 42.4% (32.3-52.5) 2 1.8% (0.0-4.4) 108 100.0% (_-_)



78

Q6Ac. Ever offered an opportunity to participate in: Two-year college degree


N % C.I.(95%) N % C.I.(95%) N % C.I.(95%) N % C.I.(95%)


Gender

Female 13 28.7% (14.8-42.5) 30 69.7% (55.6-83.8) 1 1.7% (0.0-4.9) 44 42.5% (32.4-52.7)

Male 13 27.7% (13.7-41.8) 50 69.7% (55.6-83.8) 2 2.6% (0.0-6.3) 65 57.5% (47.3-67.6)

Total 26 28.1% (18.1-38.1) 80 69.7% (59.6-79.8) 3 2.2% (0.0-4.7) 109 100.0% (_-_)

Age

<=18 3 53.9% (16.2-91.5) 5 46.1% (8.5-83.8) 0 . (.-.) 8 13.7% (4.3-23.1)

Age 19 or older 23 24.0% (15.1-33.0) 75 73.4% (64.3-82.6) 3 2.5% (0.0-5.5) 101 86.3% (76.9-95.7)

Total 26 28.1% (18.1-38.1) 80 69.7% (59.6-79.8) 3 2.2% (0.0-4.7) 109 100.0% (_-_)

Race

White 13 25.8% (13.3-38.3) 34 70.5% (57.5-83.5) 2 3.7% (0.0-9.0) 49 39.9% (30.2-49.7)

Non White 13 29.7% (15.4-44.0) 46 69.2% (54.8-83.5) 1 1.2% (0.0-3.5) 60 60.1% (50.3-69.8)

Total 26 28.1% (18.1-38.1) 80 69.7% (59.6-79.8) 3 2.2% (0.0-4.7) 109 100.0% (_-_)

Region

South NV 14 24.8% (12.6-36.9) 59 74.0% (61.8-86.2) 1 1.3% (0.0-3.7) 74 72.9% (64.4-81.4)

North NV 6 32.8% (10.8-54.8) 12 62.5% (40.0-85.1) 1 4.6% (0.0-13.7) 19 15.2% (8.5-21.8)

Rural NV 6 42.7% (15.8-69.6) 9 52.5% (25.7-79.3) 1 4.8% (0.0-14.2) 16 12.0% (5.9-18.0)

Total 26 28.1% (18.1-38.1) 80 69.7% (59.6-79.8) 3 2.2% (0.0-4.7) 109 100.0% (_-_)


Yes 10 27.0% (10.8-43.1) 31 73.0% (56.9-89.2) 0 . (.-.) 41 67.8% (53.7-81.9)

No 6 50.9% (23.7-78.0) 11 45.2% (19.0-71.4) 1 3.9% (0.0-11.9) 18 32.2% (18.1-46.3)

Total 16 34.7% (19.7-49.7) 42 64.0% (49.1-79.0) 1 1.3% (0.0-3.8) 59 100.0% (_-_)


Yes 2 25.3% (0.0-56.9) 6 64.3% (30.4-98.3) 1 10.4% (0.0-30.8) 9 22.4% (7.7-37.0)

No 8 39.9% (15.6-64.2) 17 60.1% (35.8-84.4) 0 . (.-.) 25 77.6% (63.0-92.3)

Total 10 36.6% (16.1-57.2) 23 61.0% (40.6-81.5) 1 2.3% (0.0-7.1) 34 100.0% (_-_)

Currently Employed

Yes 18 34.9% (21.2-48.7) 44 64.1% (50.3-77.8) 1 1.0% (0.0-3.0) 63 57.3% (47.0-67.6)

No 8 19.6% (5.7-33.4) 36 78.8% (64.7-92.8) 1 1.7% (0.0-5.0) 45 42.7% (32.4-53.0)

Total 26 28.4% (18.3-38.5) 80 70.3% (60.2-80.4) 2 1.3% (0.0-3.1) 108 100.0% (_-_)



79

Q6Ad. Ever offered an opportunity to participate in: Four-year college degree


N % C.I.(95%) N % C.I.(95%) N % C.I.(95%) N % C.I.(95%)


Gender

Female 9 19.3% (7.3-31.3) 33 76.2% (63.2-89.2) 2 4.5% (0.0-10.8) 44 42.5% (32.4-52.7)

Male 11 18.3% (7.2-29.4) 53 80.7% (69.5-91.9) 1 1.0% (0.0-3.0) 65 57.5% (47.3-67.6)

Total 20 18.7% (10.6-26.9) 86 78.8% (70.3-87.3) 3 2.5% (0.0-5.4) 109 100.0% (_-_)

Age

<=18 1 18.0% (0.0-49.7) 7 82.0% (50.3-100.0) 0 . (.-.) 8 13.7% (4.3-23.1)

Age 19 or older 19 18.9% (10.8-26.9) 79 78.3% (69.8-86.7) 3 2.9% (0.0-6.3) 101 86.3% (76.9-95.7)

Total 20 18.7% (10.6-26.9) 86 78.8% (70.3-87.3) 3 2.5% (0.0-5.4) 109 100.0% (_-_)

Race

White 12 24.1% (11.8-36.3) 36 74.5% (62.1-87.0) 1 1.4% (0.0-4.3) 49 39.9% (30.2-49.7)

Non White 8 15.2% (4.4-26.0) 50 81.6% (70.2-93.1) 2 3.2% (0.0-7.7) 60 60.1% (50.3-69.8)

Total 20 18.7% (10.6-26.9) 86 78.8% (70.3-87.3) 3 2.5% (0.0-5.4) 109 100.0% (_-_)

Region

South NV 13 18.6% (8.6-28.7) 60 79.7% (69.4-90.1) 1 1.6% (0.0-4.9) 74 72.9% (64.4-81.4)

North NV 3 17.7% (0.0-36.0) 15 77.7% (58.0-97.4) 1 4.6% (0.0-13.7) 19 15.2% (8.5-21.8)

Rural NV 4 20.6% (1.4-39.9) 11 74.6% (53.7-95.5) 1 4.8% (0.0-14.2) 16 12.0% (5.9-18.0)

Total 20 18.7% (10.6-26.9) 86 78.8% (70.3-87.3) 3 2.5% (0.0-5.4) 109 100.0% (_-_)


Yes 8 20.8% (5.8-35.8) 32 76.0% (60.4-91.7) 1 3.2% (0.0-9.5) 41 67.8% (53.7-81.9)

No 3 16.3% (0.0-34.5) 14 79.7% (60.2-99.3) 1 3.9% (0.0-11.9) 18 32.2% (18.1-46.3)

Total 11 19.3% (7.5-31.2) 46 77.2% (64.8-89.6) 2 3.4% (0.0-8.4) 59 100.0% (_-_)


Yes 2 25.3% (0.0-56.9) 6 64.3% (30.4-98.3) 1 10.4% (0.0-30.8) 9 22.4% (7.7-37.0)

No 9 34.9% (12.4-57.4) 16 65.1% (42.6-87.6) 0 . (.-.) 25 77.6% (63.0-92.3)

Total 11 32.7% (13.8-51.6) 22 65.0% (45.9-84.0) 1 2.3% (0.0-7.1) 34 100.0% (_-_)

Currently Employed

Yes 13 22.9% (10.9-34.9) 48 74.0% (61.6-86.4) 2 3.1% (0.0-7.7) 63 57.3% (47.0-67.6)

No 6 11.4% (2.2-20.5) 38 87.0% (77.3-96.6) 1 1.7% (0.0-5.0) 45 42.7% (32.4-53.0)

Total 19 18.0% (9.9-26.1) 86 79.5% (71.1-88.0) 3 2.5% (0.0-5.5) 108 100.0% (_-_)



80

Q6Ae. Ever offered an opportunity to participate in: Job Corps


N % C.I.(95%) N % C.I.(95%) N % C.I.(95%) N % C.I.(95%)


Gender

Female 13 25.0% (12.3-37.6) 31 75.0% (62.4-87.7) 0 . (.-.) 44 42.5% (32.4-52.7)

Male 22 38.5% (24.5-52.6) 39 56.2% (42.2-70.2) 4 5.3% (0.0-10.6) 65 57.5% (47.3-67.6)

Total 35 32.8% (22.8-42.8) 70 64.2% (54.1-74.3) 4 3.0% (0.0-6.1) 109 100.0% (_-_)

Age

<=18 3 53.9% (16.2-91.5) 5 46.1% (8.5-83.8) 0 . (.-.) 8 13.7% (4.3-23.1)

Age 19 or older 32 29.4% (20.3-38.6) 65 67.1% (57.6-76.5) 4 3.5% (0.0-7.0) 101 86.3% (76.9-95.7)

Total 35 32.8% (22.8-42.8) 70 64.2% (54.1-74.3) 4 3.0% (0.0-6.1) 109 100.0% (_-_)

Race

White 17 33.2% (19.8-46.7) 29 60.8% (46.8-74.8) 3 6.0% (0.0-12.8) 49 39.9% (30.2-49.7)

Non White 18 32.4% (18.4-46.5) 41 66.5% (52.5-80.6) 1 1.1% (0.0-3.2) 60 60.1% (50.3-69.8)

Total 35 32.8% (22.8-42.8) 70 64.2% (54.1-74.3) 4 3.0% (0.0-6.1) 109 100.0% (_-_)

Region

South NV 22 31.3% (19.1-43.6) 49 65.3% (52.9-77.6) 3 3.4% (0.0-7.3) 74 72.9% (64.4-81.4)

North NV 6 31.9% (10.2-53.5) 13 68.1% (46.5-89.8) 0 . (.-.) 19 15.2% (8.5-21.8)

Rural NV 7 42.5% (16.2-68.8) 8 52.8% (26.2-79.3) 1 4.8% (0.0-14.2) 16 12.0% (5.9-18.0)

Total 35 32.8% (22.8-42.8) 70 64.2% (54.1-74.3) 4 3.0% (0.0-6.1) 109 100.0% (_-_)


Yes 17 41.4% (24.3-58.4) 22 54.5% (37.3-71.7) 2 4.1% (0.0-10.0) 41 67.8% (53.7-81.9)

No 9 53.5% (26.7-80.3) 9 46.5% (19.7-73.3) 0 . (.-.) 18 32.2% (18.1-46.3)

Total 26 45.3% (30.6-60.0) 31 51.9% (37.2-66.6) 2 2.8% (0.0-6.8) 59 100.0% (_-_)


Yes 9 100.0% (100.0-100.0) . . . . . . 9 22.4% (7.7-37.0)

No 25 100.0% (100.0-100.0) . . . . . . 25 77.6% (63.0-92.3)

Total 34 100.0% (100.0-100.0) . . . . . . 34 100.0% (_-_)

Currently Employed

Yes 19 30.1% (17.1-43.1) 42 67.3% (54.1-80.4) 2 2.6% (0.0-6.4) 63 57.3% (47.0-67.6)

No 16 37.0% (21.2-52.8) 28 61.5% (45.7-77.3) 1 1.5% (0.0-4.5) 45 42.7% (32.4-53.0)

Total 35 33.1% (23.0-43.1) 70 64.8% (54.7-74.9) 3 2.1% (0.0-4.6) 108 100.0% (_-_)



81

Q6Ba. Did you participate in: Technical or trade school


N % C.I.(95%) N % C.I.(95%) N % C.I.(95%) N % C.I.(95%)


Gender

Female 1 16.7% (0.0-48.1) 7 83.3% (51.9-100.0) 0 . (.-.) 8 31.9% (10.4-53.5)

Male 5 24.1% (1.6-46.6) 10 72.1% (48.2-96.0) 1 3.8% (0.0-12.0) 16 68.1% (46.5-89.6)

Total 6 21.7% (3.6-39.8) 17 75.7% (56.9-94.4) 1 2.6% (0.0-8.1) 24 100.0% (_-_)

Age

<=18 0 . (.-.) 3 100.0% (100.0-100.0) 0 . (.-.) 3 25.9% (0.0-52.5)

Age 19 or older 6 29.3% (7.3-51.2) 14 67.2% (44.8-89.6) 1 3.5% (0.0-10.9) 21 74.1% (47.5-100.0)

Total 6 21.7% (3.6-39.8) 17 75.7% (56.9-94.4) 1 2.6% (0.0-8.1) 24 100.0% (_-_)

Race

White 3 24.2% (0.0-50.2) 10 75.8% (49.8-100.0) 0 . (.-.) 13 45.2% (21.6-68.9)

Non White 3 19.7% (0.0-44.2) 7 75.6% (48.9-100.0) 1 4.8% (0.0-15.0) 11 54.8% (31.1-78.4)

Total 6 21.7% (3.6-39.8) 17 75.7% (56.9-94.4) 1 2.6% (0.0-8.1) 24 100.0% (_-_)

Region

South NV 3 17.5% (0.0-38.5) 11 82.5% (61.5-100.0) 0 . (.-.) 14 69.7% (50.0-89.5)

North NV 2 40.8% (0.0-88.6) 2 43.8% (0.0-92.3) 1 15.4% (0.0-46.3) 5 17.0% (1.2-32.7)

Rural NV 1 19.2% (0.0-55.8) 4 80.8% (44.2-100.0) 0 . (.-.) 5 13.3% (0.7-25.9)

Total 6 21.7% (3.6-39.8) 17 75.7% (56.9-94.4) 1 2.6% (0.0-8.1) 24 100.0% (_-_)


Yes 4 27.1% (1.0-53.2) 8 67.0% (39.4-94.7) 1 5.9% (0.0-18.2) 13 54.0% (25.5-82.5)

No 0 . (.-.) 7 100.0% (100.0-100.0) 0 . (.-.) 7 46.0% (17.5-74.5)

Total 4 14.6% (0.0-30.4) 15 82.2% (65.1-99.3) 1 3.2% (0.0-10.0) 20 100.0% (_-_)


Yes 0 . (.-.) 4 100.0% (100.0-100.0) . . . 4 26.3% (0.0-53.7)

No 2 17.5% (0.0-44.5) 8 82.5% (55.5-100.0) . . . 10 73.7% (46.3-100.0)

Total 2 12.9% (0.0-32.9) 12 87.1% (67.1-100.0) . . . 14 100.0% (_-_)

Currently Employed

Yes 4 21.1% (0.0-42.5) 11 74.8% (52.1-97.5) 1 4.0% (0.0-12.5) 16 65.1% (41.2-89.0)

No 2 22.7% (0.0-55.8) 6 77.3% (44.2-100.0) 0 . (.-.) 8 34.9% (11.0-58.8)

Total 6 21.7% (3.6-39.8) 17 75.7% (56.9-94.4) 1 2.6% (0.0-8.1) 24 100.0% (_-_)



82

Q6Bb. Did you participate in: On-the-job training

Yes No Total

N % C.I.(95%) N % C.I.(95%) N % C.I.(95%)

Overall Total Total 41 67.8% (53.7-81.9) 18 32.2% (18.1-46.3) 59 100.0% (_-_)

Gender

Female 14 74.9% (55.8-93.9) 6 25.1% (6.1-44.2) 20 33.9% (20.5-47.2)

Male 27 64.2% (45.6-82.8) 12 35.8% (17.2-54.4) 39 66.1% (52.8-79.5)

Total 41 67.8% (53.7-81.9) 18 32.2% (18.1-46.3) 59 100.0% (_-_)

Age

<=18 4 54.8% (13.8-95.8) 3 45.2% (4.2-86.2) 7 23.2% (7.7-38.7)

Age 19 or older 37 71.7% (58.7-84.7) 15 28.3% (15.3-41.3) 52 76.8% (61.3-92.3)

Total 41 67.8% (53.7-81.9) 18 32.2% (18.1-46.3) 59 100.0% (_-_)

Race

White 15 64.3% (44.4-84.1) 9 35.7% (15.9-55.6) 24 35.7% (22.5-48.8)

Non White 26 69.8% (50.7-88.9) 9 30.2% (11.1-49.3) 35 64.3% (51.2-77.5)

Total 41 67.8% (53.7-81.9) 18 32.2% (18.1-46.3) 59 100.0% (_-_)

Region

South NV 32 72.0% (55.7-88.3) 11 28.0% (11.7-44.3) 43 78.5% (67.9-89.1)

North NV 6 64.5% (31.3-97.7) 3 35.5% (2.3-68.7) 9 12.3% (4.1-20.5)

Rural NV 3 36.2% (0.0-73.1) 4 63.8% (26.9-100.0) 7 9.2% (1.9-16.5)

Total 41 67.8% (53.7-81.9) 18 32.2% (18.1-46.3) 59 100.0% (_-_)


Yes 41 100.0% (100.0-100.0) 0 . (.-.) 41 67.8% (53.7-81.9)

No 0 . (.-.) 18 100.0% (100.0-100.0) 18 32.2% (18.1-46.3)

Total 41 67.8% (53.7-81.9) 18 32.2% (18.1-46.3) 59 100.0% (_-_)


Yes 3 49.7% (9.1-90.3) 4 50.3% (9.7-90.9) 7 22.4% (5.1-39.6)

No 14 74.2% (47.0-100.0) 4 25.8% (0.0-53.0) 18 77.6% (60.4-94.9)

Total 17 68.7% (45.9-91.5) 8 31.3% (8.5-54.1) 25 100.0% (_-_)

Currently Employed

Yes 26 73.7% (55.7-91.7) 8 26.3% (8.3-44.3) 34 57.7% (43.2-72.2)

No 15 59.8% (37.3-82.2) 10 40.2% (17.8-62.7) 25 42.3% (27.8-56.8)

Total 41 67.8% (53.7-81.9) 18 32.2% (18.1-46.3) 59 100.0% (_-_)



83

Q6Bc. Did you participate in: Two-year college degree

Yes No Total

N % C.I.(95%) N % C.I.(95%) N % C.I.(95%)


Gender

Female 5 36.9% (8.0-65.7) 8 63.1% (34.3-92.0) 13 43.3% (21.2-65.5)

Male 4 22.5% (0.0-46.5) 9 77.5% (53.5-100.0) 13 56.7% (34.5-78.8)

Total 9 28.7% (9.6-47.8) 17 71.3% (52.2-90.4) 26 100.0% (_-_)

Age

<=18 0 . (.-.) 3 100.0% (100.0-100.0) 3 26.2% (1.2-51.3)

Age 19 or older 9 38.9% (16.7-61.1) 14 61.1% (38.9-83.3) 23 73.8% (48.7-98.8)

Total 9 28.7% (9.6-47.8) 17 71.3% (52.2-90.4) 26 100.0% (_-_)

Race

White 5 35.0% (7.3-62.7) 8 65.0% (37.3-92.7) 13 36.6% (16.3-56.9)

Non White 4 25.0% (0.0-50.1) 9 75.0% (49.9-100.0) 13 63.4% (43.1-83.7)

Total 9 28.7% (9.6-47.8) 17 71.3% (52.2-90.4) 26 100.0% (_-_)

Region

South NV 3 14.6% (0.0-32.5) 11 85.4% (67.5-100.0) 14 64.2% (43.6-84.7)

North NV 1 19.4% (0.0-55.5) 5 80.6% (44.5-100.0) 6 17.7% (2.9-32.5)

Rural NV 5 87.6% (62.3-100.0) 1 12.4% (0.0-37.7) 6 18.1% (2.4-33.9)

Total 9 28.7% (9.6-47.8) 17 71.3% (52.2-90.4) 26 100.0% (_-_)


Yes 2 18.0% (0.0-45.5) 8 82.0% (54.5-100.0) 10 52.8% (21.2-84.3)

No 1 15.5% (0.0-47.7) 5 84.5% (52.3-100.0) 6 47.2% (15.7-78.8)

Total 3 16.8% (0.0-37.9) 13 83.2% (62.1-100.0) 16 100.0% (_-_)


Yes 0 . (.-.) 2 100.0% (100.0-100.0) 2 15.4% (0.0-41.2)

No 1 6.1% (0.0-21.0) 7 93.9% (79.0-100.0) 8 84.6% (58.8-100.0)

Total 1 5.1% (0.0-17.6) 9 94.9% (82.4-100.0) 10 100.0% (_-_)

Currently Employed

Yes 7 31.3% (7.8-54.8) 11 68.7% (45.2-92.2) 18 70.5% (49.5-91.6)

No 2 22.5% (0.0-54.8) 6 77.5% (45.2-100.0) 8 29.5% (8.4-50.5)

Total 9 28.7% (9.6-47.8) 17 71.3% (52.2-90.4) 26 100.0% (_-_)



84

Q6Bd. Did you participate in: Four-year college degree


N % C.I.(95%) N % C.I.(95%) N % C.I.(95%) N % C.I.(95%)


Gender

Female 2 16.8% (0.0-41.1) 7 83.2% (58.9-100.0) 0 . (.-.) 9 43.8% (18.2-69.5)

Male 2 17.9% (0.0-43.2) 8 73.5% (43.7-100.0) 1 8.7% (0.0-26.8) 11 56.2% (30.5-81.8)

Total 4 17.4% (0.0-35.2) 15 77.7% (57.9-97.6) 1 4.9% (0.0-15.1) 20 100.0% (_-_)

Age

<=18 0 . (.-.) 1 100.0% (100.0-100.0) 0 . (.-.) 1 13.1% (0.0-38.3)

Age 19 or older 4 20.0% (0.3-39.7) 14 74.4% (52.7-96.1) 1 5.6% (0.0-17.3) 19 86.9% (61.7-100.0)

Total 4 17.4% (0.0-35.2) 15 77.7% (57.9-97.6) 1 4.9% (0.0-15.1) 20 100.0% (_-_)

Race

White 4 33.9% (4.0-63.8) 7 56.6% (25.2-87.9) 1 9.5% (0.0-28.8) 12 51.3% (24.9-77.6)

Non White 0 . (.-.) 8 100.0% (100.0-100.0) 0 . (.-.) 8 48.7% (22.4-75.1)

Total 4 17.4% (0.0-35.2) 15 77.7% (57.9-97.6) 1 4.9% (0.0-15.1) 20 100.0% (_-_)

Region

South NV 1 6.7% (0.0-20.8) 11 86.6% (67.0-100.0) 1 6.7% (0.0-20.8) 13 72.5% (51.5-93.5)

North NV 2 63.9% (3.1-100.0) 1 36.1% (0.0-96.9) 0 . (.-.) 3 14.3% (0.0-31.1)

Rural NV 1 25.6% (0.0-72.9) 3 74.4% (27.1-100.0) 0 . (.-.) 4 13.2% (0.0-27.1)

Total 4 17.4% (0.0-35.2) 15 77.7% (57.9-97.6) 1 4.9% (0.0-15.1) 20 100.0% (_-_)


Yes 0 . (.-.) 8 100.0% (100.0-100.0) . . . 8 72.8% (39.7-100.0)

No 1 31.4% (0.0-93.4) 2 68.6% (6.6-100.0) . . . 3 27.2% (0.0-60.3)

Total 1 8.5% (0.0-27.9) 10 91.5% (72.1-100.0) . . . 11 100.0% (_-_)


Yes 1 43.6% (0.0-100.0) 1 56.4% (0.0-100.0) . . . 2 17.3% (0.0-44.4)

No 0 . (.-.) 9 100.0% (100.0-100.0) . . . 9 82.7% (55.6-100.0)

Total 1 7.5% (0.0-24.9) 10 92.5% (75.1-100.0) . . . 11 100.0% (_-_)

Currently Employed

Yes 3 18.0% (0.0-39.8) 10 82.0% (60.2-100.0) . . . 13 73.0% (50.8-95.2)

No 1 19.0% (0.0-55.6) 5 81.0% (44.4-100.0) . . . 6 27.0% (4.8-49.2)

Total 4 18.3% (0.0-37.0) 15 81.7% (63.0-100.0) . . . 19 100.0% (_-_)



85

Q6Be. Did you participate in: Job Corps Yes No Don't Know/Refused Total

N % C.I.(95%) N % C.I.(95%) N % C.I.(95%) N % C.I.(95%)


Gender

Female 2 13.7% (0.0-32.5) 11 86.3% (67.5-100.0) 0 . (.-.) 13 32.4% (15.2-49.6)

Male 7 24.0% (5.5-42.6) 14 64.9% (40.5-89.2) 1 11.1% (0.0-32.1) 22 67.6% (50.4-84.8)

Total 9 20.7% (6.9-34.5) 25 71.8% (53.9-89.7) 1 7.5% (0.0-22.1) 35 100.0% (_-_)

Age

<=18 0 . (.-.) 2 66.7% (10.5-100.0) 1 33.3% (0.0-89.5) 3 22.5% (0.7-44.3)

Age 19 or older 9 26.7% (10.4-42.9) 23 73.3% (57.1-89.6) 0 . (.-.) 32 77.5% (55.7-99.3)

Total 9 20.7% (6.9-34.5) 25 71.8% (53.9-89.7) 1 7.5% (0.0-22.1) 35 100.0% (_-_)

Race

White 5 31.4% (7.4-55.4) 12 68.6% (44.6-92.6) 0 . (.-.) 17 40.5% (22.1-58.9)

Non White 4 13.4% (0.0-27.5) 13 74.0% (48.8-99.2) 1 12.6% (0.0-36.2) 18 59.5% (41.1-77.9)

Total 9 20.7% (6.9-34.5) 25 71.8% (53.9-89.7) 1 7.5% (0.0-22.1) 35 100.0% (_-_)

Region

South NV 4 12.3% (0.0-25.2) 17 76.9% (54.7-99.1) 1 10.8% (0.0-31.2) 22 69.8% (53.3-86.3)

North NV 4 70.0% (32.4-100.0) 2 30.0% (0.0-67.6) 0 . (.-.) 6 14.7% (2.7-26.8)

Rural NV 1 11.2% (0.0-33.7) 6 88.8% (66.3-100.0) 0 . (.-.) 7 15.5% (3.1-27.9)

Total 9 20.7% (6.9-34.5) 25 71.8% (53.9-89.7) 1 7.5% (0.0-22.1) 35 100.0% (_-_)


Yes 3 16.2% (0.0-35.0) 14 83.8% (65.0-100.0) 0 . (.-.) 17 61.9% (37.8-86.1)

No 4 26.7% (0.0-56.6) 4 47.5% (4.6-90.4) 1 25.8% (0.0-69.5) 9 38.1% (13.9-62.2)

Total 7 20.2% (4.3-36.1) 18 70.0% (48.0-91.9) 1 9.8% (0.0-28.9) 26 100.0% (_-_)


Yes 9 100.0% (100.0-100.0) 0 . (.-.) . . . 9 22.4% (7.7-37.0)

No 0 . (.-.) 25 100.0% (100.0-100.0) . . . 25 77.6% (63.0-92.3)

Total 9 22.4% (7.7-37.0) 25 77.6% (63.0-92.3) . . . 34 100.0% (_-_)

Currently Employed

Yes 6 26.1% (4.9-47.3) 13 73.9% (52.7-95.1) 0 . (.-.) 19 52.2% (32.4-72.0)

No 3 14.7% (0.0-31.9) 12 69.6% (40.7-98.4) 1 15.7% (0.0-44.0) 16 47.8% (28.0-67.6)

Total 9 20.7% (6.9-34.5) 25 71.8% (53.9-89.7) 1 7.5% (0.0-22.1) 35 100.0% (_-_)



86

Q6Ca. How dissatisfied or satisfied were you with the help Vocational Rehabilitation staff

gave you with the technical or trade school program?


N % C.I.(95%) N % C.I.(95%) N % C.I.(95%)


Gender

Female 0 . (.-.) 1 100.0% (100.0-100.0) 1 24.5% (0.0-81.8)

Male 1 15.9% (0.0-58.4) 4 84.1% (41.6-100.0) 5 75.5% (18.2-100.0)

Total 1 12.0% (0.0-44.9) 5 88.0% (55.1-100.0) 6 100.0% (_-_)

Age Age 19 or older 1 12.0% (0.0-44.9) 5 88.0% (55.1-100.0) 6 100.0% (_-_)

Race

White 0 . (.-.) 3 100.0% (100.0-100.0) 3 50.4% (0.0-100.0)

Non White 1 24.3% (0.0-88.6) 2 75.7% (11.4-100.0) 3 49.6% (0.0-100.0)

Total 1 12.0% (0.0-44.9) 5 88.0% (55.1-100.0) 6 100.0% (_-_)

Region

South NV 0 . (.-.) 3 100.0% (100.0-100.0) 3 56.4% (0.0-100.0)

North NV 1 37.7% (0.0-100.0) 1 62.3% (0.0-100.0) 2 31.9% (0.0-86.7)

Rural NV 0 . (.-.) 1 100.0% (100.0-100.0) 1 11.7% (0.0-43.9)

Total 1 12.0% (0.0-44.9) 5 88.0% (55.1-100.0) 6 100.0% (_-_)

Participated in on-the-job training Yes 1 21.6% (0.0-94.0) 3 78.4% (6.0-100.0) 4 100.0% (_-_)

Participated in Job Corps No . . . 2 100.0% (100.0-100.0) 2 100.0% (_-_)

Currently Employed

Yes 0 . (.-.) 4 100.0% (100.0-100.0) 4 63.5% (4.3-100.0)

No 1 33.0% (0.0-100.0) 1 67.0% (0.0-100.0) 2 36.5% (0.0-95.7)

Total 1 12.0% (0.0-44.9) 5 88.0% (55.1-100.0) 6 100.0% (_-_)



87

Q6Cb. How dissatisfied or satisfied were you with the help Vocational Rehabilitation staff gave you with on-the-job training program?

Very Dissatisfied Neither Satisfied Nor




Gender

Female 2 14.2% (0.0-33.7) 0 . (.-.) 4 26.5% (2.1-50.9) 8 59.3% (31.9-86.6) 14 37.4% (20.6-54.2)

Male 0 . (.-.) 3 11.7% (0.0-24.8) 4 19.8% (0.0-40.6) 20 68.5% (46.5-90.6) 27 62.6% (45.8-79.4)

Total 2 5.3% (0.0-13.0) 3 7.3% (0.0-15.7) 8 22.3% (6.5-38.1) 28 65.1% (48.0-82.2) 41 100.0% (_-_)

Age

<=18 0 . (.-.) 0 . (.-.) 1 35.0% (0.0-90.0) 3 65.0% (10.0-100.0) 4 18.7% (1.1-36.3)

Age 19 or older 2 6.6% (0.0-15.8) 3 9.0% (0.0-19.1) 7 19.4% (5.4-33.3) 25 65.1% (48.3-81.9) 37 81.3% (63.7-98.9)

Total 2 5.3% (0.0-13.0) 3 7.3% (0.0-15.7) 8 22.3% (6.5-38.1) 28 65.1% (48.0-82.2) 41 100.0% (_-_)

Race

White 1 6.4% (0.0-19.0) 3 21.6% (0.0-44.0) 2 12.2% (0.0-29.1) 9 59.9% (33.7-86.0) 15 33.8% (18.1-49.5)

Non White 1 4.8% (0.0-14.4) 0 . (.-.) 6 27.5% (5.9-49.1) 19 67.7% (45.5-90.0) 26 66.2% (50.5-81.9)

Total 2 5.3% (0.0-13.0) 3 7.3% (0.0-15.7) 8 22.3% (6.5-38.1) 28 65.1% (48.0-82.2) 41 100.0% (_-_)

Region

South NV 2 6.4% (0.0-15.5) 3 8.8% (0.0-18.8) 6 22.5% (4.4-40.6) 21 62.4% (42.8-81.9) 32 83.4% (72.3-94.5)

North NV 0 . (.-.) 0 . (.-.) 1 16.0% (0.0-46.3) 5 84.0% (53.7-100.0) 6 11.7% (2.0-21.4)

Rural NV 0 . (.-.) 0 . (.-.) 1 34.4% (0.0-91.1) 2 65.6% (8.9-100.0) 3 4.9% (0.0-10.7)

Total 2 5.3% (0.0-13.0) 3 7.3% (0.0-15.7) 8 22.3% (6.5-38.1) 28 65.1% (48.0-82.2) 41 100.0% (_-_)

Participated in on-the-job training Yes 2 5.3% (0.0-13.0) 3 7.3% (0.0-15.7) 8 22.3% (6.5-38.1) 28 65.1% (48.0-82.2) 41 100.0% (_-_)


Yes . . . 0 . (.-.) 1 25.3% (0.0-75.8) 2 74.7% (24.2-100.0) 3 16.2% (0.0-35.7)

No . . . 2 14.0% (0.0-34.6) 4 38.3% (4.0-72.7) 8 47.6% (15.4-79.8) 14 83.8% (64.3-100.0)

Total . . . 2 11.8% (0.0-29.1) 5 36.2% (5.7-66.7) 10 52.0% (22.5-81.6) 17 100.0% (_-_)

Currently Employed

Yes 2 8.5% (0.0-20.5) 0 . (.-.) 5 25.1% (3.5-46.6) 19 66.4% (44.2-88.6) 26 62.7% (45.6-79.9)

No 0 . (.-.) 3 19.6% (0.0-41.0) 3 17.6% (0.0-38.0) 9 62.8% (35.6-90.0) 15 37.3% (20.1-54.4)

Total 2 5.3% (0.0-13.0) 3 7.3% (0.0-15.7) 8 22.3% (6.5-38.1) 28 65.1% (48.0-82.2) 41 100.0% (_-_)



88

Q6Cc. How dissatisfied or satisfied were you with the help Vocational Rehabilitation staff

gave you with the two-year college degree program?

Neither Satisfied Nor Dissatisfied


N % C.I.(95%) N % C.I.(95%) N % C.I.(95%) N % C.I.(95%)


Gender

Female 0 . (.-.) 1 26.5% (0.0-80.3) 4 73.5% (19.7-100.0) 5 55.7% (12.9-98.4)

Male 3 82.2% (40.4-100.0) 0 . (.-.) 1 17.8% (0.0-59.6) 4 44.3% (1.6-87.1)

Total 3 36.5% (0.0-78.7) 1 14.8% (0.0-47.6) 5 48.8% (6.0-91.5) 9 100.0% (_-_)

Age Age 19 or older 3 36.5% (0.0-78.7) 1 14.8% (0.0-47.6) 5 48.8% (6.0-91.5) 9 100.0% (_-_)

Race

White 2 42.6% (0.0-98.4) 0 . (.-.) 3 57.4% (1.6-100.0) 5 44.7% (3.0-86.4)

Non White 1 31.5% (0.0-93.0) 1 26.7% (0.0-82.6) 2 41.8% (0.0-100.0) 4 55.3% (13.6-97.0)

Total 3 36.5% (0.0-78.7) 1 14.8% (0.0-47.6) 5 48.8% (6.0-91.5) 9 100.0% (_-_)

Region

South NV 0 . (.-.) 1 45.2% (0.0-100.0) 2 54.8% (0.0-100.0) 3 32.6% (0.0-72.3)

North NV 1 100.0% (100.0-100.0) 0 . (.-.) 0 . (.-.) 1 12.0% (0.0-39.5)

Rural NV 2 44.2% (0.0-100.0) 0 . (.-.) 3 55.8% (0.0-100.0) 5 55.4% (12.9-97.9)

Total 3 36.5% (0.0-78.7) 1 14.8% (0.0-47.6) 5 48.8% (6.0-91.5) 9 100.0% (_-_)


Yes 0 . (.-.) 1 65.2% (0.0-100.0) 1 34.8% (0.0-100.0) 2 56.5% (0.0-100.0)

No 1 100.0% (100.0-100.0) 0 . (.-.) 0 . (.-.) 1 43.5% (0.0-100.0)

Total 1 43.5% (0.0-100.0) 1 36.9% (0.0-100.0) 1 19.7% (0.0-100.0) 3 100.0% (_-_)

Participated in Job Corps No 1 100.0% (.-.) . . . . . . 1 100.0% (_-_)

Currently Employed

Yes 3 47.4% (0.0-96.3) 1 19.2% (0.0-60.5) 3 33.4% (0.0-75.9) 7 76.9% (40.3-100.0)

No 0 . (.-.) 0 . (.-.) 2 100.0% (100.0-100.0) 2 23.1% (0.0-59.7)

Total 3 36.5% (0.0-78.7) 1 14.8% (0.0-47.6) 5 48.8% (6.0-91.5) 9 100.0% (_-_)



89

Q6Cd. How dissatisfied or satisfied were you with the help Vocational Rehabilitation staff

gave you with the four-year college degree program?

Very Satisfied Total

N % C.I.(95%) N % C.I.(95%)

Overall Total Total 4 100.0% (100.0-100.0) 4 100.0% (_-_)

Gender

Female 2 100.0% (100.0-100.0) 2 42.3% (0.0-100.0)

Male 2 100.0% (100.0-100.0) 2 57.7% (0.0-100.0)

Total 4 100.0% (100.0-100.0) 4 100.0% (_-_)

Age Age 19 or older 4 100.0% (100.0-100.0) 4 100.0% (_-_)

Race White 4 100.0% (100.0-100.0) 4 100.0% (_-_)

Region

South NV 1 100.0% (100.0-100.0) 1 28.0% (0.0-100.0)

North NV 2 100.0% (100.0-100.0) 2 52.6% (0.0-100.0)

Rural NV 1 100.0% (100.0-100.0) 1 19.4% (0.0-85.9)

Total 4 100.0% (100.0-100.0) 4 100.0% (_-_)

Participated in on-the-job training No 1 100.0% (.-.) 1 100.0% (_-_)

Participated in Job Corps Yes 1 100.0% (.-.) 1 100.0% (_-_)

Currently Employed

Yes 3 100.0% (100.0-100.0) 3 72.0% (0.0-100.0)

No 1 100.0% (100.0-100.0) 1 28.0% (0.0-100.0)

Total 4 100.0% (100.0-100.0) 4 100.0% (_-_)



90

Q6Ce. How dissatisfied or satisfied were you with the help Vocational Rehabilitation staff

gave you with the Job Corps program?

Neither Satisfied Nor Dissatisfied


N % C.I.(95%) N % C.I.(95%) N % C.I.(95%) N % C.I.(95%)


Gender

Female 1 48.5% (0.0-100.0) 1 51.5% (0.0-100.0) 0 . (.-.) 2 21.4% (0.0-54.6)

Male 1 10.7% (0.0-36.1) 3 42.0% (0.0-88.6) 3 47.2% (0.0-94.7) 7 78.6% (45.4-100.0)

Total 2 18.8% (0.0-49.0) 4 44.1% (2.9-85.2) 3 37.1% (0.0-78.1) 9 100.0% (_-_)

Age Age 19 or older 2 18.8% (0.0-49.0) 4 44.1% (2.9-85.2) 3 37.1% (0.0-78.1) 9 100.0% (_-_)

Race

White 1 13.7% (0.0-46.1) 2 41.1% (0.0-96.0) 2 45.1% (0.0-100.0) 5 61.5% (22.3-100.0)

Non White 1 26.9% (0.0-82.5) 2 48.7% (0.0-100.0) 1 24.4% (0.0-76.4) 4 38.5% (0.0-77.7)

Total 2 18.8% (0.0-49.0) 4 44.1% (2.9-85.2) 3 37.1% (0.0-78.1) 9 100.0% (_-_)

Region

South NV 0 . (.-.) 2 45.1% (0.0-100.0) 2 54.9% (0.0-100.0) 4 41.6% (1.1-82.2)

North NV 1 20.8% (0.0-67.3) 2 50.6% (0.0-100.0) 1 28.6% (0.0-86.4) 4 49.9% (8.4-91.5)

Rural NV 1 100.0% (100.0-100.0) 0 . (.-.) 0 . (.-.) 1 8.4% (0.0-28.5)

Total 2 18.8% (0.0-49.0) 4 44.1% (2.9-85.2) 3 37.1% (0.0-78.1) 9 100.0% (_-_)


Yes 0 . (.-.) 1 25.3% (0.0-86.4) 2 74.7% (13.6-100.0) 3 49.7% (0.0-100.0)

No 2 50.0% (0.0-100.0) 1 25.0% (0.0-82.2) 1 25.0% (0.0-82.2) 4 50.3% (0.0-100.0)

Total 2 25.2% (0.0-67.2) 2 25.1% (0.0-67.0) 3 49.7% (0.0-100.0) 7 100.0% (_-_)

Participated in Job Corps Yes 2 18.8% (0.0-49.0) 4 44.1% (2.9-85.2) 3 37.1% (0.0-78.1) 9 100.0% (_-_)

Currently Employed

Yes 1 12.8% (0.0-42.7) 2 30.9% (0.0-76.7) 3 56.3% (6.6-100.0) 6 66.0% (26.5-100.0)

No 1 30.5% (0.0-94.4) 2 69.5% (5.6-100.0) 0 . (.-.) 3 34.0% (0.0-73.5)

Total 2 18.8% (0.0-49.0) 4 44.1% (2.9-85.2) 3 37.1% (0.0-78.1) 9 100.0% (_-_)



91

Q8. Are you currently employed? Yes No Don't Know/Refused Total

N % C.I.(95%) N % C.I.(95%) N % C.I.(95%) N % C.I.(95%)


Gender

Female 25 57.9% (42.7-73.1) 19 42.1% (26.9-57.3) 0 . (.-.) 44 42.5% (32.4-52.7)

Male 38 56.0% (42.2-69.8) 26 42.5% (28.7-56.2) 1 1.6% (0.0-4.7) 65 57.5% (47.3-67.6)

Total 63 56.8% (46.5-67.0) 45 42.3% (32.1-52.5) 1 0.9% (0.0-2.7) 109 100.0% (_-_)

Age

<=18 5 57.7% (19.3-96.1) 3 42.3% (3.9-80.7) 0 . (.-.) 8 13.7% (4.3-23.1)

Age 19 or older 58 56.6% (46.4-66.8) 42 42.3% (32.1-52.5) 1 1.1% (0.0-3.2) 101 86.3% (76.9-95.7)

Total 63 56.8% (46.5-67.0) 45 42.3% (32.1-52.5) 1 0.9% (0.0-2.7) 109 100.0% (_-_)

Race

White 28 55.4% (41.1-69.8) 20 42.3% (28.0-56.6) 1 2.3% (0.0-6.8) 49 39.9% (30.2-49.7)

Non White 35 57.7% (43.5-71.8) 25 42.3% (28.2-56.5) 0 . (.-.) 60 60.1% (50.3-69.8)

Total 63 56.8% (46.5-67.0) 45 42.3% (32.1-52.5) 1 0.9% (0.0-2.7) 109 100.0% (_-_)

Region

South NV 43 58.0% (45.6-70.4) 30 40.7% (28.3-53.1) 1 1.3% (0.0-3.7) 74 72.9% (64.4-81.4)

North NV 9 46.6% (23.4-69.8) 10 53.4% (30.2-76.6) 0 . (.-.) 19 15.2% (8.5-21.8)

Rural NV 11 62.1% (35.2-89.0) 5 37.9% (11.0-64.8) 0 . (.-.) 16 12.0% (5.9-18.0)

Total 63 56.8% (46.5-67.0) 45 42.3% (32.1-52.5) 1 0.9% (0.0-2.7) 109 100.0% (_-_)


Yes 26 62.7% (45.8-79.6) 15 37.3% (20.4-54.2) . . . 41 67.8% (53.7-81.9)

No 8 47.2% (19.8-74.6) 10 52.8% (25.4-80.2) . . . 18 32.2% (18.1-46.3)

Total 34 57.7% (43.2-72.2) 25 42.3% (27.8-56.8) . . . 59 100.0% (_-_)


Yes 6 66.0% (32.6-99.3) 3 34.0% (0.7-67.4) . . . 9 22.4% (7.7-37.0)

No 13 53.7% (30.7-76.7) 12 46.3% (23.3-69.3) . . . 25 77.6% (63.0-92.3)

Total 19 56.4% (37.2-75.7) 15 43.6% (24.3-62.8) . . . 34 100.0% (_-_)

Currently Employed

Yes 63 100.0% (100.0-100.0) 0 . (.-.) . . . 63 57.3% (47.0-67.6)

No 0 . (.-.) 45 100.0% (100.0-100.0) . . . 45 42.7% (32.4-53.0)

Total 63 57.3% (47.0-67.6) 45 42.7% (32.4-53.0) . . . 108 100.0% (_-_)



92

Q9. Did you get your current job as a result of the services you received from the Vocational



N % C.I.(95%) N % C.I.(95%) N % C.I.(95%) N % C.I.(95%)


Gender

Female 9 35.9% (16.0-55.8) 16 64.1% (44.2-84.0) 0 . (.-.) 25 43.4% (29.8-56.9)

Male 18 54.7% (36.9-72.5) 17 38.7% (21.7-55.6) 3 6.6% (0.0-14.3) 38 56.6% (43.1-70.2)

Total 27 46.6% (32.8-60.4) 33 49.7% (36.0-63.4) 3 3.7% (0.0-8.1) 63 100.0% (_-_)

Age

<=18 5 100.0% (100.0-100.0) 0 . (.-.) 0 . (.-.) 5 13.9% (1.6-26.2)

Age 19 or older 22 37.9% (24.6-51.2) 33 57.7% (44.2-71.3) 3 4.3% (0.0-9.4) 58 86.1% (73.8-98.4)

Total 27 46.6% (32.8-60.4) 33 49.7% (36.0-63.4) 3 3.7% (0.0-8.1) 63 100.0% (_-_)

Race

White 12 46.2% (26.8-65.6) 14 47.1% (27.8-66.4) 2 6.7% (0.0-16.2) 28 39.0% (26.2-51.8)

Non White 15 46.8% (27.9-65.7) 19 51.4% (32.6-70.2) 1 1.8% (0.0-5.5) 35 61.0% (48.2-73.8)

Total 27 46.6% (32.8-60.4) 33 49.7% (36.0-63.4) 3 3.7% (0.0-8.1) 63 100.0% (_-_)

Region

South NV 17 44.6% (27.8-61.4) 24 51.7% (35.1-68.4) 2 3.7% (0.0-8.9) 43 74.5% (63.6-85.4)

North NV 7 81.2% (56.2-100.0) 2 18.8% (0.0-43.8) 0 . (.-.) 9 12.5% (4.3-20.6)

Rural NV 3 24.7% (0.0-50.7) 7 67.6% (39.1-96.0) 1 7.7% (0.0-22.8) 11 13.1% (5.0-21.1)

Total 27 46.6% (32.8-60.4) 33 49.7% (36.0-63.4) 3 3.7% (0.0-8.1) 63 100.0% (_-_)


Yes 14 58.9% (37.9-79.8) 12 41.1% (20.2-62.1) . . . 26 73.7% (55.3-92.1)

No 4 54.8% (13.7-95.8) 4 45.2% (4.2-86.3) . . . 8 26.3% (7.9-44.7)

Total 18 57.8% (39.0-76.6) 16 42.2% (23.4-61.0) . . . 34 100.0% (_-_)


Yes 3 56.3% (12.5-100.0) 3 43.7% (0.0-87.5) 0 . (.-.) 6 26.1% (3.9-48.3)

No 5 54.5% (20.2-88.8) 7 41.0% (8.2-73.7) 1 4.5% (0.0-14.4) 13 73.9% (51.7-96.1)

Total 8 55.0% (27.2-82.7) 10 41.7% (14.8-68.6) 1 3.3% (0.0-10.6) 19 100.0% (_-_)



93

Q10. Did you get ANY job as a result of the services you received from the Vocational



N % C.I.(95%) N % C.I.(95%) N % C.I.(95%) N % C.I.(95%)


Gender

Female 4 20.3% (0.3-40.3) 12 79.7% (59.7-99.7) 0 . (.-.) 16 55.9% (37.5-74.3)

Male 4 22.7% (1.5-43.9) 12 72.2% (49.6-94.8) 1 5.1% (0.0-15.5) 17 44.1% (25.7-62.5)

Total 8 21.3% (6.7-35.9) 24 76.4% (61.3-91.5) 1 2.3% (0.0-6.9) 33 100.0% (_-_)

Age Age 19 or older 8 21.3% (6.7-35.9) 24 76.4% (61.3-91.5) 1 2.3% (0.0-6.9) 33 100.0% (_-_)

Race

White 4 28.0% (3.0-53.1) 10 72.0% (46.9-97.0) 0 . (.-.) 14 36.9% (19.5-54.4)

Non White 4 17.4% (0.0-34.9) 14 79.0% (60.4-97.6) 1 3.6% (0.0-10.9) 19 63.1% (45.6-80.5)

Total 8 21.3% (6.7-35.9) 24 76.4% (61.3-91.5) 1 2.3% (0.0-6.9) 33 100.0% (_-_)

Region

South NV 5 18.3% (2.2-34.5) 18 78.8% (61.9-95.6) 1 2.9% (0.0-8.9) 24 77.5% (62.7-92.4)

North NV 1 56.0% (0.0-100.0) 1 44.0% (0.0-100.0) 0 . (.-.) 2 4.7% (0.0-11.6)

Rural NV 2 25.2% (0.0-58.7) 5 74.8% (41.3-100.0) 0 . (.-.) 7 17.8% (4.0-31.5)

Total 8 21.3% (6.7-35.9) 24 76.4% (61.3-91.5) 1 2.3% (0.0-6.9) 33 100.0% (_-_)


Yes 2 13.1% (0.0-32.7) 9 80.3% (56.9-100.0) 1 6.6% (0.0-20.7) 12 71.8% (44.5-99.1)

No 0 . (.-.) 4 100.0% (100.0-100.0) 0 . (.-.) 4 28.2% (0.9-55.5)

Total 2 9.4% (0.0-23.7) 13 85.9% (68.6-100.0) 1 4.7% (0.0-15.0) 16 100.0% (_-_)


Yes 1 38.2% (0.0-100.0) 2 61.8% (0.0-100.0) . . . 3 27.4% (0.0-60.4)

No 3 36.8% (0.0-79.4) 4 63.2% (20.6-100.0) . . . 7 72.6% (39.6-100.0)

Total 4 37.2% (1.0-73.5) 6 62.8% (26.5-99.0) . . . 10 100.0% (_-_)



94

Q11. When your case was closed, were you in a job that the Vocational Rehabilitation

Program helped place you in?

Yes No Total

N % C.I.(95%) N % C.I.(95%) N % C.I.(95%)


Gender

Female 2 56.9% (0.0-100.0) 2 43.1% (0.0-100.0) 4 48.1% (6.0-90.2)

Male 2 36.8% (0.0-89.0) 3 63.2% (11.0-100.0) 5 51.9% (9.8-94.0)

Total 4 46.5% (4.4-88.6) 5 53.5% (11.4-95.6) 9 100.0% (_-_)

Age Age 19 or older 4 46.5% (4.4-88.6) 5 53.5% (11.4-95.6) 9 100.0% (_-_)

Race

White 1 21.6% (0.0-69.6) 3 78.4% (30.4-100.0) 4 43.9% (2.4-85.4)

Non White 3 66.0% (14.8-100.0) 2 34.0% (0.0-85.2) 5 56.1% (14.6-97.6)

Total 4 46.5% (4.4-88.6) 5 53.5% (11.4-95.6) 9 100.0% (_-_)

Region

South NV 3 53.0% (1.6-100.0) 3 47.0% (0.0-98.4) 6 69.8% (32.8-100.0)

North NV 0 . (.-.) 1 100.0% (100.0-100.0) 1 11.2% (0.0-37.1)

Rural NV 1 50.0% (0.0-100.0) 1 50.0% (0.0-100.0) 2 19.0% (0.0-49.4)

Total 4 46.5% (4.4-88.6) 5 53.5% (11.4-95.6) 9 100.0% (_-_)

Participated in on-the-job training Yes 1 50.0% (0.0-100.0) 1 50.0% (0.0-100.0) 2 100.0% (_-_)


Yes 0 . (.-.) 1 100.0% (100.0-100.0) 1 28.1% (0.0-100.0)

No 2 66.7% (0.0-100.0) 1 33.3% (0.0-100.0) 3 71.9% (0.0-100.0)

Total 2 47.9% (0.0-100.0) 2 52.1% (0.0-100.0) 4 100.0% (_-_)



95

Q12. Are you currently employed in that same job?

No Don't Know/Refused Total

N % C.I.(95%) N % C.I.(95%) N % C.I.(95%)


Gender

Female 1 34.7% (0.0-100.0) 1 65.3% (0.0-100.0) 2 58.9% (0.0-100.0)

Male 0 . (.-.) 2 100.0% (100.0-100.0) 2 41.1% (0.0-100.0)

Total 1 20.4% (0.0-90.3) 3 79.6% (9.7-100.0) 4 100.0% (_-_)

Age Age 19 or older 1 20.4% (0.0-90.3) 3 79.6% (9.7-100.0) 4 100.0% (_-_)

Race

White 1 100.0% (100.0-100.0) 0 . (.-.) 1 20.4% (0.0-90.3)

Non White 0 . (.-.) 3 100.0% (100.0-100.0) 3 79.6% (9.7-100.0)

Total 1 20.4% (0.0-90.3) 3 79.6% (9.7-100.0) 4 100.0% (_-_)

Region

South NV 0 . (.-.) 3 100.0% (100.0-100.0) 3 79.6% (9.7-100.0)

Rural NV 1 100.0% (100.0-100.0) 0 . (.-.) 1 20.4% (0.0-90.3)

Total 1 20.4% (0.0-90.3) 3 79.6% (9.7-100.0) 4 100.0% (_-_)

Participated in on-the-job training Yes . . . 1 100.0% (.-.) 1 100.0% (_-_)




96

Q13. Are you currently employed in the same career field as the job you were in when your

case was closed?

Yes Don't Know/Refused Total

N % C.I.(95%) N % C.I.(95%) N % C.I.(95%)

Gender Female 1 100.0% (.-.) . . . 1 100.0% (_-_)

Age Age 19 or older 1 100.0% (.-.) . . . 1 100.0% (_-_)

Race White 1 100.0% (.-.) . . . 1 100.0% (_-_)

Region Rural NV 1 100.0% (.-.) . . . 1 100.0% (_-_)





97

Q14. Compared to the job you had when your case was closed, does your current job provide

you with either equal or better pay OR equal or better benefits?

Yes Don't Know/Refused Total

N % C.I.(95%) N % C.I.(95%) N % C.I.(95%)

Gender Female 1 100.0% (.-.) . . . 1 100.0% (_-_)

Age Age 19 or older 1 100.0% (.-.) . . . 1 100.0% (_-_)

Race White 1 100.0% (.-.) . . . 1 100.0% (_-_)

Region Rural NV 1 100.0% (.-.) . . . 1 100.0% (_-_)





98

Q15. In what kind of job are you employed?

Clerical and admin support

Production, construction, operating, maintenance, and material handling

Professional, paraprofessional, and

technical

Sales and related occupations

N % C.I.(95%) N % C.I.(95%) N % C.I.(95%) N % C.I.(95%)

Overall Total Total 2 3.1% (0.0-7.7) 12 17.9% (7.9-28.0) 2 2.2% (0.0-5.4) 16 22.2% (11.7-32.7)

Gender

Female 1 4.8% (0.0-14.3) 2 9.1% (0.0-21.5) 1 2.6% (0.0-7.7) 4 16.0% (0.9-31.1)

Male 1 1.8% (0.0-5.3) 10 24.7% (9.9-39.5) 1 2.0% (0.0-5.9) 12 26.9% (12.3-41.6)

Total 2 3.1% (0.0-7.7) 12 17.9% (7.9-28.0) 2 2.2% (0.0-5.4) 16 22.2% (11.7-32.7)

Age

<=18 0 . (.-.) 1 13.3% (0.0-39.9) 0 . (.-.) 0 . (.-.)

Age 19 or older 2 3.6% (0.0-8.9) 11 18.7% (7.9-29.4) 2 2.6% (0.0-6.3) 16 25.8% (14.1-37.5)

Total 2 3.1% (0.0-7.7) 12 17.9% (7.9-28.0) 2 2.2% (0.0-5.4) 16 22.2% (11.7-32.7)

Race

White 1 2.6% (0.0-7.7) 5 18.0% (3.0-33.1) 1 2.9% (0.0-8.6) 8 28.9% (11.3-46.5)

Non White 1 3.4% (0.0-10.2) 7 17.9% (4.5-31.2) 1 1.8% (0.0-5.5) 8 17.9% (5.3-30.5)

Total 2 3.1% (0.0-7.7) 12 17.9% (7.9-28.0) 2 2.2% (0.0-5.4) 16 22.2% (11.7-32.7)

Region

South NV 1 2.8% (0.0-8.4) 7 13.5% (3.4-23.6) 1 1.5% (0.0-4.5) 12 23.0% (10.3-35.7)

North NV 0 . (.-.) 2 27.3% (0.0-59.6) 0 . (.-.) 2 24.2% (0.0-54.2)

Rural NV 1 7.7% (0.0-22.8) 3 34.3% (1.2-67.4) 1 8.5% (0.0-25.1) 2 15.4% (0.0-36.1)

Total 2 3.1% (0.0-7.7) 12 17.9% (7.9-28.0) 2 2.2% (0.0-5.4) 16 22.2% (11.7-32.7)


Yes . . . 5 16.4% (1.7-31.1) 1 2.7% (0.0-8.3) 5 17.3% (2.1-32.4)

No . . . 2 23.5% (0.0-57.1) 0 . (.-.) 1 7.6% (0.0-23.3)

Total . . . 7 18.3% (4.3-32.3) 1 2.0% (0.0-6.1) 6 14.7% (2.6-26.8)


Yes . . . 2 34.4% (0.0-77.7) 0 . (.-.) 3 51.4% (6.5-96.3)

No . . . 0 . (.-.) 1 5.0% (0.0-15.9) 4 21.0% (0.0-44.0)

Total . . . 2 9.0% (0.0-22.8) 1 3.7% (0.0-11.7) 7 28.9% (6.1-51.8)



99

Q15. In what kind of job are you employed? Service occupations Other Don't Know/Refused Total

N % C.I.(95%) N % C.I.(95%) N % C.I.(95%) N % C.I.(95%)


Gender

Female 7 30.0% (10.7-49.3) 10 37.5% (17.6-57.3) 0 . (.-.) 25 43.4% (29.8-56.9)

Male 8 29.2% (10.0-48.3) 5 12.6% (1.6-23.7) 1 2.8% (0.0-8.5) 38 56.6% (43.1-70.2)

Total 15 29.5% (15.8-43.2) 15 23.4% (12.2-34.6) 1 1.6% (0.0-4.8) 63 100.0% (_-_)

Age

<=18 3 73.3% (36.3-100.0) 1 13.3% (0.0-39.9) 0 . (.-.) 5 13.9% (1.6-26.2)

Age 19 or older 12 22.5% (10.6-34.3) 14 25.0% (13.0-37.0) 1 1.9% (0.0-5.6) 58 86.1% (73.8-98.4)

Total 15 29.5% (15.8-43.2) 15 23.4% (12.2-34.6) 1 1.6% (0.0-4.8) 63 100.0% (_-_)

Race

White 5 18.7% (3.4-34.0) 7 24.8% (8.1-41.5) 1 4.1% (0.0-12.2) 28 39.0% (26.2-51.8)

Non White 10 36.5% (17.2-55.7) 8 22.5% (7.6-37.4) 0 . (.-.) 35 61.0% (48.2-73.8)

Total 15 29.5% (15.8-43.2) 15 23.4% (12.2-34.6) 1 1.6% (0.0-4.8) 63 100.0% (_-_)

Region

South NV 11 34.0% (17.0-51.0) 10 23.0% (9.6-36.4) 1 2.2% (0.0-6.5) 43 74.5% (63.6-85.4)

North NV 3 24.8% (0.0-51.5) 2 23.6% (0.0-53.2) 0 . (.-.) 9 12.5% (4.3-20.6)

Rural NV 1 8.5% (0.0-25.1) 3 25.6% (0.0-52.1) 0 . (.-.) 11 13.1% (5.0-21.1)

Total 15 29.5% (15.8-43.2) 15 23.4% (12.2-34.6) 1 1.6% (0.0-4.8) 63 100.0% (_-_)


Yes 8 36.7% (14.3-59.2) 7 26.9% (8.0-45.7) . . . 26 73.7% (55.3-92.1)

No 2 39.7% (0.0-84.0) 3 29.3% (0.0-63.4) . . . 8 26.3% (7.9-44.7)

Total 10 37.5% (17.2-57.8) 10 27.5% (11.0-44.0) . . . 34 100.0% (_-_)


Yes 0 . (.-.) 1 14.2% (0.0-43.2) . . . 6 26.1% (3.9-48.3)

No 4 53.4% (18.8-88.0) 4 20.6% (0.0-43.2) . . . 13 73.9% (51.7-96.1)

Total 4 39.4% (8.0-70.8) 5 18.9% (0.8-37.1) . . . 19 100.0% (_-_)



100

Q15k. Do you feel that the job you are currently employed in is an integrated setting?

Yes No Don't know Total

N % C.I.(95%) N % C.I.(95%) N % C.I.(95%) N % C.I.(95%)


Gender

Female 18 70.8% (51.9-89.8) 3 12.9% (0.0-27.2) 4 16.2% (1.0-31.5) 25 43.4% (29.8-56.9)

Male 29 73.0% (55.8-90.3) 7 16.3% (4.3-28.3) 2 10.7% (0.0-25.8) 38 56.6% (43.1-70.2)

Total 47 72.1% (59.3-84.8) 10 14.9% (5.7-24.0) 6 13.1% (2.3-23.8) 63 100.0% (_-_)

Age

<=18 3 57.8% (8.4-100.0) 1 11.1% (0.0-33.7) 1 31.1% (0.0-80.5) 5 13.9% (1.6-26.2)

Age 19 or older 44 74.4% (62.2-86.6) 9 15.5% (5.6-25.4) 5 10.1% (1.4-18.9) 58 86.1% (73.8-98.4)

Total 47 72.1% (59.3-84.8) 10 14.9% (5.7-24.0) 6 13.1% (2.3-23.8) 63 100.0% (_-_)

Race

White 21 72.3% (54.5-90.0) 4 16.1% (1.3-30.8) 3 11.6% (0.0-24.4) 28 39.0% (26.2-51.8)

Non White 26 71.9% (54.4-89.5) 6 14.1% (2.5-25.7) 3 14.0% (0.0-29.6) 35 61.0% (48.2-73.8)

Total 47 72.1% (59.3-84.8) 10 14.9% (5.7-24.0) 6 13.1% (2.3-23.8) 63 100.0% (_-_)

Region

South NV 30 68.5% (52.7-84.2) 8 16.3% (5.1-27.5) 5 15.3% (1.6-28.9) 43 74.5% (63.6-85.4)

North NV 6 64.4% (31.0-97.8) 2 21.9% (0.0-50.4) 1 13.7% (0.0-38.9) 9 12.5% (4.3-20.6)

Rural NV 11 100.0% (100.0-100.0) 0 . (.-.) 0 . (.-.) 11 13.1% (5.0-21.1)

Total 47 72.1% (59.3-84.8) 10 14.9% (5.7-24.0) 6 13.1% (2.3-23.8) 63 100.0% (_-_)


Yes 23 91.2% (80.8-100.0) 2 5.4% (0.0-13.2) 1 3.4% (0.0-10.4) 26 73.7% (55.3-92.1)

No 5 46.1% (5.3-87.0) 1 10.4% (0.0-31.5) 2 43.4% (0.0-87.3) 8 26.3% (7.9-44.7)

Total 28 79.3% (61.9-96.7) 3 6.7% (0.0-14.7) 3 14.0% (0.0-30.5) 34 100.0% (_-_)


Yes 6 100.0% (100.0-100.0) 0 . (.-.) 0 . (.-.) 6 26.1% (3.9-48.3)

No 11 74.2% (38.3-100.0) 1 6.4% (0.0-20.0) 1 19.5% (0.0-55.2) 13 73.9% (51.7-96.1)

Total 17 80.9% (52.9-100.0) 1 4.7% (0.0-14.8) 1 14.4% (0.0-41.9) 19 100.0% (_-_)



101

Q16. How dissatisfied or satisfied are you with your current job?





Gender

Female 2 9.7% (0.0-22.7) 1 4.8% (0.0-14.3) 4 13.0% (0.1-25.9) 5 18.5% (3.0-34.0) 13 54.0% (33.4-74.6) 0 . (.-.) 25 43.4% (29.8-56.9)

Male 0 . (.-.) 2 4.7% (0.0-11.4) 2 3.8% (0.0-9.2) 10 24.4% (9.7-39.1) 23 64.1% (47.4-80.8) 1 3.0% (0.0-9.0) 38 56.6% (43.1-70.2)

Total 2 4.2% (0.0-10.0) 3 4.8% (0.0-10.4) 6 7.8% (1.3-14.3) 15 21.8% (11.1-32.5) 36 59.7% (46.5-72.9) 1 1.7% (0.0-5.1) 63 100.0% (_-_)

Age

<=18 0 . (.-.) 1 11.1% (0.0-33.7) 0 . (.-.) 1 13.3% (0.0-39.9) 3 75.6% (40.8-100.0) 0 . (.-.) 5 13.9% (1.6-26.2)

Age 19 or older 2 4.9% (0.0-11.6) 2 3.7% (0.0-9.2) 6 9.1% (1.6-16.5) 14 23.2% (11.7-34.7) 33 57.1% (43.5-70.8) 1 2.0% (0.0-5.9) 58 86.1% (73.8-98.4)

Total 2 4.2% (0.0-10.0) 3 4.8% (0.0-10.4) 6 7.8% (1.3-14.3) 15 21.8% (11.1-32.5) 36 59.7% (46.5-72.9) 1 1.7% (0.0-5.1) 63 100.0% (_-_)

Race

White 0 . (.-.) 1 4.0% (0.0-11.8) 3 9.1% (0.0-19.3) 6 22.2% (6.0-38.5) 17 60.4% (41.4-79.3) 1 4.4% (0.0-12.9) 28 39.0% (26.2-51.8)

Non White 2 6.9% (0.0-16.3) 2 5.3% (0.0-13.0) 3 7.0% (0.0-15.3) 9 21.6% (7.5-35.7) 19 59.3% (41.4-77.2) 0 . (.-.) 35 61.0% (48.2-73.8)

Total 2 4.2% (0.0-10.0) 3 4.8% (0.0-10.4) 6 7.8% (1.3-14.3) 15 21.8% (11.1-32.5) 36 59.7% (46.5-72.9) 1 1.7% (0.0-5.1) 63 100.0% (_-_)

Region

South NV 2 5.6% (0.0-13.4) 3 6.4% (0.0-13.9) 2 4.3% (0.0-10.6) 11 21.6% (9.2-34.0) 25 62.0% (46.5-77.6) 0 . (.-.) 43 74.5% (63.6-85.4)

North NV 0 . (.-.) 0 . (.-.) 2 18.8% (0.0-43.8) 2 18.2% (0.0-42.5) 4 49.3% (14.9-83.7) 1 13.7% (0.0-38.9) 9 12.5% (4.3-20.6)

Rural NV 0 . (.-.) 0 . (.-.) 2 17.0% (0.0-39.6) 2 26.6% (0.0-59.6) 7 56.3% (23.5-89.2) 0 . (.-.) 11 13.1% (5.0-21.1)

Total 2 4.2% (0.0-10.0) 3 4.8% (0.0-10.4) 6 7.8% (1.3-14.3) 15 21.8% (11.1-32.5) 36 59.7% (46.5-72.9) 1 1.7% (0.0-5.1) 63 100.0% (_-_)


Yes 1 5.1% (0.0-15.2) 0 . (.-.) 1 2.7% (0.0-8.2) 9 29.7% (11.0-48.5) 15 62.5% (42.1-83.0) . . . 26 73.7% (55.3-92.1)

No 0 . (.-.) 1 10.4% (0.0-31.5) 2 15.1% (0.0-37.4) 2 23.5% (0.0-57.1) 3 51.0% (9.2-92.8) . . . 8 26.3% (7.9-44.7)

Total 1 3.7% (0.0-11.3) 1 2.7% (0.0-8.4) 3 6.0% (0.0-13.0) 11 28.1% (11.6-44.5) 18 59.5% (41.0-78.0) . . . 34 100.0% (_-_)


Yes . . . . . . 2 30.9% (0.0-71.3) 1 12.8% (0.0-39.2) 3 56.3% (12.5-100.0) . . . 6 26.1% (3.9-48.3)

No . . . . . . 2 10.0% (0.0-25.5) 5 27.0% (0.7-53.4) 6 62.9% (32.2-93.7) . . . 13 73.9% (51.7-96.1)

Total . . . . . . 4 15.5% (0.0-32.0) 6 23.3% (3.0-43.6) 9 61.2% (35.4-87.0) . . . 19 100.0% (_-_)



102

Q17. How long have you had your current job? <1 month 1-2 months > 2 months Don't know/Refused Total



Gender

Female 6 25.9% (7.4-44.4) 14 55.6% (34.9-76.2) 4 15.3% (0.6-30.0) 1 3.3% (0.0-9.8) 25 43.4% (29.8-56.9)

Male 9 20.2% (7.2-33.2) 23 66.4% (50.4-82.4) 4 9.6% (0.0-19.2) 2 3.8% (0.0-9.1) 38 56.6% (43.1-70.2)

Total 15 22.7% (11.7-33.6) 37 61.7% (48.7-74.6) 8 12.1% (3.6-20.5) 3 3.5% (0.0-7.7) 63 100.0% (_-_)

Age

<=18 0 . (.-.) 5 100.0% (100.0-100.0) 0 . (.-.) 0 . (.-.) 5 13.9% (1.6-26.2)

Age 19 or older 15 26.4% (14.2-38.5) 32 55.5% (41.8-69.1) 8 14.0% (4.4-23.6) 3 4.1% (0.0-8.9) 58 86.1% (73.8-98.4)

Total 15 22.7% (11.7-33.6) 37 61.7% (48.7-74.6) 8 12.1% (3.6-20.5) 3 3.5% (0.0-7.7) 63 100.0% (_-_)

Race

White 5 19.7% (3.9-35.4) 17 59.4% (40.3-78.5) 4 14.7% (0.9-28.6) 2 6.2% (0.0-15.0) 28 39.0% (26.2-51.8)

Non White 10 24.6% (9.7-39.6) 20 63.1% (45.9-80.4) 4 10.4% (0.0-21.0) 1 1.8% (0.0-5.5) 35 61.0% (48.2-73.8)

Total 15 22.7% (11.7-33.6) 37 61.7% (48.7-74.6) 8 12.1% (3.6-20.5) 3 3.5% (0.0-7.7) 63 100.0% (_-_)

Region

South NV 14 29.1% (14.9-43.3) 23 58.2% (42.3-74.1) 4 9.3% (0.1-18.5) 2 3.4% (0.0-8.3) 43 74.5% (63.6-85.4)

North NV 1 8.3% (0.0-24.6) 5 59.2% (25.9-92.5) 3 32.5% (0.6-64.4) 0 . (.-.) 9 12.5% (4.3-20.6)

Rural NV 0 . (.-.) 9 83.8% (62.1-100.0) 1 8.5% (0.0-25.1) 1 7.7% (0.0-22.8) 11 13.1% (5.0-21.1)

Total 15 22.7% (11.7-33.6) 37 61.7% (48.7-74.6) 8 12.1% (3.6-20.5) 3 3.5% (0.0-7.7) 63 100.0% (_-_)


Yes 4 12.5% (0.0-25.1) 19 77.0% (60.1-94.0) 2 7.8% (0.0-19.2) 1 2.7% (0.0-8.3) 26 73.7% (55.3-92.1)

No 2 21.7% (0.0-52.7) 6 78.3% (47.3-100.0) 0 . (.-.) 0 . (.-.) 8 26.3% (7.9-44.7)

Total 6 14.9% (2.6-27.3) 25 77.4% (62.5-92.3) 2 5.7% (0.0-14.2) 1 2.0% (0.0-6.1) 34 100.0% (_-_)


Yes 1 14.2% (0.0-43.2) 4 69.1% (28.7-100.0) 1 16.7% (0.0-49.7) 0 . (.-.) 6 26.1% (3.9-48.3)

No 2 10.1% (0.0-25.6) 8 73.5% (47.6-99.4) 1 5.0% (0.0-15.9) 2 11.4% (0.0-28.9) 13 73.9% (51.7-96.1)

Total 3 11.2% (0.0-25.0) 12 72.4% (50.3-94.4) 2 8.1% (0.0-20.3) 2 8.4% (0.0-21.2) 19 100.0% (_-_)



103

Q18. How many hours do you normally work each week?

1 - 16 or fewer hours/week 17-31 hours/week 32-39 hours/week 40 or more hours/week Don't know/Refused Total



Gender

Female 10 44.0% (23.3-64.7) 6 18.8% (4.0-33.7) 1 2.9% (0.0-8.6) 4 17.1% (1.1-33.1) 4 17.2% (1.3-33.1) 25 43.4% (29.8-56.9)

Male 11 24.9% (10.7-39.2) 4 9.6% (0.1-19.2) 7 28.8% (9.4-48.2) 14 32.0% (16.1-48.0) 2 4.6% (0.0-11.3) 38 56.6% (43.1-70.2)

Total 21 33.2% (20.6-45.8) 10 13.6% (5.2-22.1) 8 17.5% (5.0-30.1) 18 25.5% (14.2-36.9) 6 10.1% (2.0-18.2) 63 100.0% (_-_)

Age

<=18 2 24.4% (0.0-59.2) 0 . (.-.) 2 62.2% (18.9-100.0) 0 . (.-.) 1 13.3% (0.0-39.9) 5 13.9% (1.6-26.2)

Age 19 or older 19 34.6% (21.3-47.9) 10 15.8% (6.2-25.4) 6 10.3% (2.2-18.5) 18 29.7% (17.2-42.2) 5 9.6% (1.1-18.0) 58 86.1% (73.8-98.4)

Total 21 33.2% (20.6-45.8) 10 13.6% (5.2-22.1) 8 17.5% (5.0-30.1) 18 25.5% (14.2-36.9) 6 10.1% (2.0-18.2) 63 100.0% (_-_)

Race

White 6 23.1% (6.4-39.7) 7 23.8% (7.6-40.0) 4 16.7% (1.5-32.0) 8 26.0% (9.4-42.7) 3 10.3% (0.0-22.0) 28 39.0% (26.2-51.8)

Non White 15 39.7% (21.9-57.5) 3 7.1% (0.0-15.6) 4 18.1% (0.0-36.1) 10 25.2% (10.0-40.5) 3 9.9% (0.0-20.9) 35 61.0% (48.2-73.8)

Total 21 33.2% (20.6-45.8) 10 13.6% (5.2-22.1) 8 17.5% (5.0-30.1) 18 25.5% (14.2-36.9) 6 10.1% (2.0-18.2) 63 100.0% (_-_)

Region

South NV 17 38.0% (22.3-53.7) 6 12.0% (2.3-21.8) 6 19.6% (3.8-35.4) 9 18.1% (6.3-29.9) 5 12.2% (1.7-22.7) 43 74.5% (63.6-85.4)

North NV 3 30.2% (0.0-61.1) 1 10.6% (0.0-30.8) 2 23.6% (0.0-53.2) 3 35.6% (2.2-69.0) 0 . (.-.) 9 12.5% (4.3-20.6)

Rural NV 1 8.5% (0.0-25.1) 3 25.6% (0.0-52.1) 0 . (.-.) 6 58.2% (27.3-89.1) 1 7.7% (0.0-22.8) 11 13.1% (5.0-21.1)

Total 21 33.2% (20.6-45.8) 10 13.6% (5.2-22.1) 8 17.5% (5.0-30.1) 18 25.5% (14.2-36.9) 6 10.1% (2.0-18.2) 63 100.0% (_-_)


Yes 11 40.7% (19.6-61.9) 4 13.9% (0.0-27.9) 6 27.8% (6.1-49.5) 3 9.2% (0.0-20.2) 2 8.4% (0.0-20.1) 26 73.7% (55.3-92.1)

No 3 25.6% (0.0-56.0) 1 7.5% (0.0-23.2) 1 29.3% (0.0-75.3) 2 23.5% (0.0-57.1) 1 14.2% (0.0-41.7) 8 26.3% (7.9-44.7)

Total 14 36.7% (18.7-54.8) 5 12.2% (1.0-23.4) 7 28.2% (8.1-48.3) 5 13.0% (0.8-25.2) 3 9.9% (0.0-21.2) 34 100.0% (_-_)


Yes 2 28.5% (0.0-66.7) 1 16.7% (0.0-49.7) 1 20.4% (0.0-59.0) 2 34.4% (0.0-77.7) . . . 6 26.1% (3.9-48.3)

No 3 18.6% (0.0-41.6) 3 15.0% (0.0-34.1) 4 51.7% (16.5-87.0) 3 14.6% (0.0-33.1) . . . 13 73.9% (51.7-96.1)

Total 5 21.2% (1.2-41.2) 4 15.5% (0.0-32.0) 5 43.6% (13.0-74.1) 5 19.8% (0.7-38.8) . . . 19 100.0% (_-_)



104

Q19. How much money are you normally paid per hour?

<$7.55 $7.56-$12 $12 or more Don't Know/Refused Total



Gender

Female 4 14.3% (0.3-28.2) 17 70.2% (51.6-88.9) 1 3.3% (0.0-9.8) 3 12.2% (0.0-26.0) 25 43.4% (29.8-56.9)

Male 4 8.7% (0.0-17.3) 26 74.1% (59.6-88.6) 5 11.7% (0.8-22.7) 3 5.5% (0.0-11.9) 38 56.6% (43.1-70.2)

Total 8 11.1% (3.3-18.9) 43 72.4% (60.8-84.0) 6 8.1% (1.2-14.9) 6 8.4% (1.3-15.5) 63 100.0% (_-_)

Age

<=18 2 24.4% (0.0-59.2) 3 75.6% (40.8-100.0) 0 . (.-.) 0 . (.-.) 5 13.9% (1.6-26.2)

Age 19 or older 6 8.9% (1.6-16.3) 40 71.9% (59.8-84.0) 6 9.4% (1.5-17.2) 6 9.8% (1.7-17.9) 58 86.1% (73.8-98.4)

Total 8 11.1% (3.3-18.9) 43 72.4% (60.8-84.0) 6 8.1% (1.2-14.9) 6 8.4% (1.3-15.5) 63 100.0% (_-_)

Race

White 3 9.7% (0.0-20.6) 19 73.5% (57.5-89.6) 3 8.8% (0.0-18.8) 3 8.0% (0.0-17.1) 28 39.0% (26.2-51.8)

Non White 5 12.0% (1.2-22.8) 24 71.7% (55.7-87.7) 3 7.6% (0.0-16.9) 3 8.7% (0.0-18.8) 35 61.0% (48.2-73.8)

Total 8 11.1% (3.3-18.9) 43 72.4% (60.8-84.0) 6 8.1% (1.2-14.9) 6 8.4% (1.3-15.5) 63 100.0% (_-_)

Region

South NV 6 11.9% (2.2-21.6) 32 77.6% (64.7-90.4) 2 3.4% (0.0-8.3) 3 7.1% (0.0-15.4) 43 74.5% (63.6-85.4)

North NV 0 . (.-.) 8 91.7% (75.4-100.0) 1 8.3% (0.0-24.6) 0 . (.-.) 9 12.5% (4.3-20.6)

Rural NV 2 17.0% (0.0-39.6) 3 24.7% (0.0-50.7) 3 34.3% (1.2-67.4) 3 23.9% (0.0-49.2) 11 13.1% (5.0-21.1)

Total 8 11.1% (3.3-18.9) 43 72.4% (60.8-84.0) 6 8.1% (1.2-14.9) 6 8.4% (1.3-15.5) 63 100.0% (_-_)


Yes 4 14.9% (0.0-29.9) 20 79.9% (63.7-96.2) 1 2.4% (0.0-7.4) 1 2.7% (0.0-8.3) 26 73.7% (55.3-92.1)

No 2 18.0% (0.0-44.1) 3 44.3% (1.2-87.5) 2 23.5% (0.0-57.1) 1 14.2% (0.0-41.7) 8 26.3% (7.9-44.7)

Total 6 15.7% (2.8-28.7) 23 70.6% (53.6-87.5) 3 8.0% (0.0-18.1) 2 5.7% (0.0-14.2) 34 100.0% (_-_)


Yes 1 14.2% (0.0-43.2) 4 73.0% (36.0-100.0) 1 12.8% (0.0-39.2) 0 . (.-.) 6 26.1% (3.9-48.3)

No 1 5.0% (0.0-15.9) 11 90.0% (74.5-100.0) 0 . (.-.) 1 5.0% (0.0-15.9) 13 73.9% (51.7-96.1)

Total 2 7.4% (0.0-18.7) 15 85.5% (69.9-100.0) 1 3.3% (0.0-10.6) 1 3.7% (0.0-11.7) 19 100.0% (_-_)



105

Q20a. Benefits: Paid federal or state holidays Yes No Don't Know/Refused Total

N % C.I.(95%) N % C.I.(95%) N % C.I.(95%) N % C.I.(95%)


Gender

Female 9 37.9% (17.6-58.2) 12 45.9% (25.3-66.5) 4 16.2% (1.0-31.5) 25 43.4% (29.8-56.9)

Male 15 37.7% (19.9-55.4) 18 48.8% (30.5-67.1) 5 13.5% (1.9-25.1) 38 56.6% (43.1-70.2)

Total 24 37.8% (24.4-51.1) 30 47.5% (33.9-61.2) 9 14.7% (5.3-24.0) 63 100.0% (_-_)

Age

<=18 3 57.8% (8.4-100.0) 2 42.2% (0.0-91.6) 0 . (.-.) 5 13.9% (1.6-26.2)

Age 19 or older 21 34.5% (21.6-47.5) 28 48.4% (34.7-62.2) 9 17.1% (6.5-27.6) 58 86.1% (73.8-98.4)

Total 24 37.8% (24.4-51.1) 30 47.5% (33.9-61.2) 9 14.7% (5.3-24.0) 63 100.0% (_-_)

Race

White 7 23.7% (7.4-40.0) 15 52.3% (32.9-71.6) 6 24.0% (7.0-41.1) 28 39.0% (26.2-51.8)

Non White 17 46.7% (28.1-65.4) 15 44.5% (25.8-63.2) 3 8.7% (0.0-18.8) 35 61.0% (48.2-73.8)

Total 24 37.8% (24.4-51.1) 30 47.5% (33.9-61.2) 9 14.7% (5.3-24.0) 63 100.0% (_-_)

Region

South NV 17 39.1% (22.8-55.3) 18 43.5% (27.0-60.0) 8 17.4% (5.7-29.2) 43 74.5% (63.6-85.4)

North NV 3 35.6% (2.2-69.0) 5 50.7% (16.3-85.1) 1 13.7% (0.0-38.9) 9 12.5% (4.3-20.6)

Rural NV 4 32.4% (4.0-60.9) 7 67.6% (39.1-96.0) 0 . (.-.) 11 13.1% (5.0-21.1)

Total 24 37.8% (24.4-51.1) 30 47.5% (33.9-61.2) 9 14.7% (5.3-24.0) 63 100.0% (_-_)


Yes 13 53.2% (31.6-74.9) 8 28.8% (9.8-47.7) 5 18.0% (2.4-33.6) 26 73.7% (55.3-92.1)

No 3 21.9% (0.0-48.8) 4 64.0% (27.2-100.0) 1 14.2% (0.0-41.7) 8 26.3% (7.9-44.7)

Total 16 45.0% (25.5-64.5) 12 38.0% (18.6-57.4) 6 17.0% (3.4-30.6) 34 100.0% (_-_)


Yes 3 48.6% (3.7-93.5) 3 51.4% (6.5-96.3) 0 . (.-.) 6 26.1% (3.9-48.3)

No 5 41.8% (5.9-77.7) 7 53.2% (17.3-89.1) 1 5.0% (0.0-15.9) 13 73.9% (51.7-96.1)

Total 8 43.6% (14.6-72.5) 10 52.7% (23.7-81.7) 1 3.7% (0.0-11.7) 19 100.0% (_-_)



106

Q20b. Benefits: Paid vacation Yes No Don't Know/Refused Total

N % C.I.(95%) N % C.I.(95%) N % C.I.(95%) N % C.I.(95%)


Gender

Female 8 33.3% (13.6-53.0) 14 52.7% (32.0-73.5) 3 14.0% (0.0-28.9) 25 43.4% (29.8-56.9)

Male 17 48.0% (29.7-66.3) 19 47.2% (29.0-65.4) 2 4.8% (0.0-11.7) 38 56.6% (43.1-70.2)

Total 25 41.6% (28.0-55.2) 33 49.6% (35.9-63.3) 5 8.8% (1.1-16.5) 63 100.0% (_-_)

Age

<=18 1 31.1% (0.0-80.5) 3 55.5% (6.0-100.0) 1 13.3% (0.0-39.9) 5 13.9% (1.6-26.2)

Age 19 or older 24 43.3% (29.6-57.0) 30 48.6% (34.9-62.4) 4 8.0% (0.1-16.0) 58 86.1% (73.8-98.4)

Total 25 41.6% (28.0-55.2) 33 49.6% (35.9-63.3) 5 8.8% (1.1-16.5) 63 100.0% (_-_)

Race

White 11 42.3% (23.0-61.6) 16 53.6% (34.2-73.0) 1 4.1% (0.0-12.2) 28 39.0% (26.2-51.8)

Non White 14 41.2% (22.6-59.8) 17 47.0% (28.4-65.7) 4 11.8% (0.3-23.2) 35 61.0% (48.2-73.8)

Total 25 41.6% (28.0-55.2) 33 49.6% (35.9-63.3) 5 8.8% (1.1-16.5) 63 100.0% (_-_)

Region

South NV 19 42.9% (26.5-59.2) 19 45.3% (28.8-61.9) 5 11.8% (1.5-22.0) 43 74.5% (63.6-85.4)

North NV 3 41.0% (6.3-75.7) 6 59.0% (24.3-93.7) 0 . (.-.) 9 12.5% (4.3-20.6)

Rural NV 3 35.1% (2.0-68.3) 8 64.9% (31.7-98.0) 0 . (.-.) 11 13.1% (5.0-21.1)

Total 25 41.6% (28.0-55.2) 33 49.6% (35.9-63.3) 5 8.8% (1.1-16.5) 63 100.0% (_-_)


Yes 9 37.0% (14.9-59.0) 14 52.0% (30.0-74.0) 3 11.1% (0.0-23.9) 26 73.7% (55.3-92.1)

No 2 24.3% (0.0-58.3) 5 61.6% (21.8-100.0) 1 14.2% (0.0-41.7) 8 26.3% (7.9-44.7)

Total 11 33.6% (14.7-52.6) 19 54.5% (34.9-74.1) 4 11.9% (0.0-23.8) 34 100.0% (_-_)


Yes 2 35.8% (0.0-79.7) 4 64.2% (20.3-100.0) 0 . (.-.) 6 26.1% (3.9-48.3)

No 4 38.1% (2.1-74.2) 8 56.9% (20.9-92.8) 1 5.0% (0.0-15.9) 13 73.9% (51.7-96.1)

Total 6 37.5% (8.5-66.5) 12 58.8% (29.7-87.8) 1 3.7% (0.0-11.7) 19 100.0% (_-_)



107

Q20c. Benefits: Health insurance Yes No Don't Know/Refused Total

N % C.I.(95%) N % C.I.(95%) N % C.I.(95%) N % C.I.(95%)


Gender

Female 10 41.7% (21.2-62.3) 12 47.6% (26.9-68.3) 3 10.7% (0.0-22.9) 25 43.4% (29.8-56.9)

Male 23 59.3% (41.2-77.4) 12 33.0% (15.4-50.7) 3 7.7% (0.0-16.4) 38 56.6% (43.1-70.2)

Total 33 51.7% (38.0-65.4) 24 39.4% (25.9-52.9) 6 9.0% (1.7-16.2) 63 100.0% (_-_)

Age

<=18 2 44.5% (0.0-94.0) 3 55.5% (6.0-100.0) 0 . (.-.) 5 13.9% (1.6-26.2)

Age 19 or older 31 52.8% (39.1-66.6) 21 36.7% (23.4-50.0) 6 10.4% (2.1-18.7) 58 86.1% (73.8-98.4)

Total 33 51.7% (38.0-65.4) 24 39.4% (25.9-52.9) 6 9.0% (1.7-16.2) 63 100.0% (_-_)

Race

White 13 46.7% (27.3-66.0) 11 38.6% (19.8-57.4) 4 14.7% (0.9-28.6) 28 39.0% (26.2-51.8)

Non White 20 54.9% (36.2-73.6) 13 39.9% (21.3-58.4) 2 5.3% (0.0-13.0) 35 61.0% (48.2-73.8)

Total 33 51.7% (38.0-65.4) 24 39.4% (25.9-52.9) 6 9.0% (1.7-16.2) 63 100.0% (_-_)

Region

South NV 23 50.8% (34.2-67.3) 15 38.7% (22.3-55.1) 5 10.5% (1.3-19.8) 43 74.5% (63.6-85.4)

North NV 4 49.3% (14.9-83.7) 5 50.7% (16.3-85.1) 0 . (.-.) 9 12.5% (4.3-20.6)

Rural NV 6 59.1% (28.4-89.7) 4 32.4% (4.0-60.9) 1 8.5% (0.0-25.1) 11 13.1% (5.0-21.1)

Total 33 51.7% (38.0-65.4) 24 39.4% (25.9-52.9) 6 9.0% (1.7-16.2) 63 100.0% (_-_)


Yes 14 54.4% (32.7-76.0) 9 35.2% (14.6-55.7) 3 10.5% (0.0-22.6) 26 73.7% (55.3-92.1)

No 5 52.8% (10.1-95.4) 2 39.7% (0.0-84.0) 1 7.6% (0.0-23.3) 8 26.3% (7.9-44.7)

Total 19 54.0% (34.4-73.5) 11 36.3% (17.0-55.7) 4 9.7% (0.0-19.6) 34 100.0% (_-_)


Yes 3 48.6% (3.7-93.5) 2 37.1% (0.0-81.3) 1 14.2% (0.0-43.2) 6 26.1% (3.9-48.3)

No 9 65.4% (29.8-100.0) 3 29.5% (0.0-65.2) 1 5.0% (0.0-15.9) 13 73.9% (51.7-96.1)

Total 12 61.0% (32.3-89.8) 5 31.5% (2.9-60.2) 2 7.4% (0.0-18.7) 19 100.0% (_-_)



108

Q20d. Benefits: Paid sick leave Yes No Don't Know/Refused Total

N % C.I.(95%) N % C.I.(95%) N % C.I.(95%) N % C.I.(95%)


Gender

Female 6 23.6% (6.1-41.1) 14 52.2% (31.4-72.9) 5 24.2% (5.6-42.8) 25 43.4% (29.8-56.9)

Male 11 31.0% (13.3-48.6) 22 55.5% (37.2-73.8) 5 13.5% (1.9-25.1) 38 56.6% (43.1-70.2)

Total 17 27.8% (15.1-40.4) 36 54.1% (40.3-67.8) 10 18.1% (7.5-28.7) 63 100.0% (_-_)

Age

<=18 1 31.1% (0.0-80.5) 4 68.9% (19.5-100.0) 0 . (.-.) 5 13.9% (1.6-26.2)

Age 19 or older 16 27.3% (15.0-39.5) 32 51.7% (37.9-65.5) 10 21.1% (9.2-33.0) 58 86.1% (73.8-98.4)

Total 17 27.8% (15.1-40.4) 36 54.1% (40.3-67.8) 10 18.1% (7.5-28.7) 63 100.0% (_-_)

Race

White 7 23.5% (7.4-39.6) 17 59.7% (40.6-78.8) 4 16.7% (1.5-32.0) 28 39.0% (26.2-51.8)

Non White 10 30.5% (12.7-48.4) 19 50.5% (31.7-69.2) 6 19.0% (4.6-33.5) 35 61.0% (48.2-73.8)

Total 17 27.8% (15.1-40.4) 36 54.1% (40.3-67.8) 10 18.1% (7.5-28.7) 63 100.0% (_-_)

Region

South NV 12 28.4% (13.1-43.7) 22 49.5% (33.0-66.1) 9 22.1% (8.6-35.5) 43 74.5% (63.6-85.4)

North NV 1 8.3% (0.0-24.6) 7 78.1% (49.6-100.0) 1 13.7% (0.0-38.9) 9 12.5% (4.3-20.6)

Rural NV 4 42.8% (10.0-75.7) 7 57.2% (24.3-90.0) 0 . (.-.) 11 13.1% (5.0-21.1)

Total 17 27.8% (15.1-40.4) 36 54.1% (40.3-67.8) 10 18.1% (7.5-28.7) 63 100.0% (_-_)


Yes 5 22.0% (1.1-42.8) 15 53.4% (31.2-75.5) 6 24.7% (6.1-43.3) 26 73.7% (55.3-92.1)

No 3 31.1% (0.0-67.1) 4 54.8% (13.7-95.8) 1 14.2% (0.0-41.7) 8 26.3% (7.9-44.7)

Total 8 24.4% (6.5-42.2) 19 53.7% (34.1-73.3) 7 21.9% (6.3-37.6) 34 100.0% (_-_)


Yes 2 27.0% (0.0-64.0) 4 73.0% (36.0-100.0) 0 . (.-.) 6 26.1% (3.9-48.3)

No 4 38.1% (2.1-74.2) 8 56.9% (20.9-92.8) 1 5.0% (0.0-15.9) 13 73.9% (51.7-96.1)

Total 6 35.2% (6.5-63.9) 12 61.1% (32.3-89.9) 1 3.7% (0.0-11.7) 19 100.0% (_-_)



109

Q20e. Benefits: Retirement plan Yes No Don't Know/Refused Total

N % C.I.(95%) N % C.I.(95%) N % C.I.(95%) N % C.I.(95%)


Gender

Female 9 37.4% (17.2-57.7) 12 47.6% (26.9-68.3) 4 15.0% (0.6-29.3) 25 43.4% (29.8-56.9)

Male 14 39.8% (21.6-58.0) 20 49.5% (31.3-67.8) 4 10.7% (0.3-21.1) 38 56.6% (43.1-70.2)

Total 23 38.8% (25.2-52.3) 32 48.7% (35.0-62.4) 8 12.5% (3.9-21.1) 63 100.0% (_-_)

Age

<=18 1 31.1% (0.0-80.5) 3 55.5% (6.0-100.0) 1 13.3% (0.0-39.9) 5 13.9% (1.6-26.2)

Age 19 or older 22 40.0% (26.4-53.6) 29 47.6% (33.9-61.3) 7 12.4% (3.4-21.4) 58 86.1% (73.8-98.4)

Total 23 38.8% (25.2-52.3) 32 48.7% (35.0-62.4) 8 12.5% (3.9-21.1) 63 100.0% (_-_)

Race

White 10 35.6% (17.0-54.2) 13 45.3% (26.0-64.5) 5 19.1% (3.6-34.7) 28 39.0% (26.2-51.8)

Non White 13 40.8% (22.1-59.5) 19 50.9% (32.1-69.6) 3 8.3% (0.0-17.9) 35 61.0% (48.2-73.8)

Total 23 38.8% (25.2-52.3) 32 48.7% (35.0-62.4) 8 12.5% (3.9-21.1) 63 100.0% (_-_)

Region

South NV 15 37.1% (20.9-53.4) 22 49.8% (33.3-66.4) 6 13.0% (2.7-23.4) 43 74.5% (63.6-85.4)

North NV 3 35.6% (2.2-69.0) 5 50.7% (16.3-85.1) 1 13.7% (0.0-38.9) 9 12.5% (4.3-20.6)

Rural NV 5 51.4% (19.4-83.3) 5 40.1% (9.7-70.5) 1 8.5% (0.0-25.1) 11 13.1% (5.0-21.1)

Total 23 38.8% (25.2-52.3) 32 48.7% (35.0-62.4) 8 12.5% (3.9-21.1) 63 100.0% (_-_)


Yes 7 31.1% (9.1-53.2) 13 47.1% (25.4-68.9) 6 21.7% (4.8-38.7) 26 73.7% (55.3-92.1)

No 5 52.8% (10.1-95.4) 3 47.2% (4.6-89.9) 0 . (.-.) 8 26.3% (7.9-44.7)

Total 12 36.8% (17.5-56.1) 16 47.2% (27.6-66.7) 6 16.0% (3.1-29.0) 34 100.0% (_-_)


Yes 3 48.6% (3.7-93.5) 3 51.4% (6.5-96.3) 0 . (.-.) 6 26.1% (3.9-48.3)

No 5 43.1% (7.2-79.1) 6 46.8% (11.0-82.7) 2 10.0% (0.0-25.5) 13 73.9% (51.7-96.1)

Total 8 44.6% (15.6-73.6) 9 48.0% (19.0-77.0) 2 7.4% (0.0-18.7) 19 100.0% (_-_)



110

Q20f. Benefits: Meals Yes No Don't Know/Refused Total

N % C.I.(95%) N % C.I.(95%) N % C.I.(95%) N % C.I.(95%)


Gender

Female 8 30.9% (12.0-49.9) 15 59.4% (39.0-79.8) 2 9.7% (0.0-22.7) 25 43.4% (29.8-56.9)

Male 11 29.7% (12.5-46.9) 25 65.5% (47.9-83.1) 2 4.8% (0.0-11.7) 38 56.6% (43.1-70.2)

Total 19 30.2% (17.5-43.0) 40 62.8% (49.5-76.2) 4 6.9% (0.0-13.8) 63 100.0% (_-_)

Age

<=18 2 44.5% (0.0-94.0) 3 55.5% (6.0-100.0) 0 . (.-.) 5 13.9% (1.6-26.2)

Age 19 or older 17 27.9% (15.8-40.1) 37 64.0% (50.9-77.2) 4 8.0% (0.1-16.0) 58 86.1% (73.8-98.4)

Total 19 30.2% (17.5-43.0) 40 62.8% (49.5-76.2) 4 6.9% (0.0-13.8) 63 100.0% (_-_)

Race

White 7 25.9% (8.8-42.9) 20 70.0% (52.1-87.9) 1 4.1% (0.0-12.2) 28 39.0% (26.2-51.8)

Non White 12 33.0% (15.3-50.8) 20 58.3% (39.8-76.8) 3 8.7% (0.0-18.8) 35 61.0% (48.2-73.8)

Total 19 30.2% (17.5-43.0) 40 62.8% (49.5-76.2) 4 6.9% (0.0-13.8) 63 100.0% (_-_)

Region

South NV 15 34.6% (18.7-50.4) 24 56.1% (39.7-72.6) 4 9.3% (0.1-18.5) 43 74.5% (63.6-85.4)

North NV 3 27.1% (0.0-55.6) 6 72.9% (44.4-100.0) 0 . (.-.) 9 12.5% (4.3-20.6)

Rural NV 1 8.5% (0.0-25.1) 10 91.5% (74.9-100.0) 0 . (.-.) 11 13.1% (5.0-21.1)

Total 19 30.2% (17.5-43.0) 40 62.8% (49.5-76.2) 4 6.9% (0.0-13.8) 63 100.0% (_-_)


Yes 7 30.6% (8.7-52.5) 16 57.8% (35.5-80.0) 3 11.6% (0.0-25.2) 26 73.7% (55.3-92.1)

No 2 21.7% (0.0-52.6) 6 78.3% (47.4-100.0) 0 . (.-.) 8 26.3% (7.9-44.7)

Total 9 28.2% (9.9-46.6) 22 63.2% (44.0-82.3) 3 8.6% (0.0-18.7) 34 100.0% (_-_)


Yes 1 16.7% (0.0-49.7) 5 83.3% (50.3-100.0) 0 . (.-.) 6 26.1% (3.9-48.3)

No 6 48.1% (12.2-84.1) 6 46.8% (10.9-82.7) 1 5.0% (0.0-15.9) 13 73.9% (51.7-96.1)

Total 7 39.9% (11.0-68.8) 11 56.3% (27.4-85.3) 1 3.7% (0.0-11.7) 19 100.0% (_-_)



111

Q20g. Benefits: Daycare Yes No Don't Know/Refused Total

N % C.I.(95%) N % C.I.(95%) N % C.I.(95%) N % C.I.(95%)


Gender

Female 4 17.1% (1.1-33.1) 20 78.1% (60.4-95.7) 1 4.8% (0.0-14.3) 25 43.4% (29.8-56.9)

Male 1 2.8% (0.0-8.5) 35 93.2% (85.3-100.0) 2 4.0% (0.0-9.5) 38 56.6% (43.1-70.2)

Total 5 9.0% (1.1-16.9) 55 86.6% (77.4-95.8) 3 4.3% (0.0-9.5) 63 100.0% (_-_)

Age

<=18 0 . (.-.) 5 100.0% (100.0-100.0) 0 . (.-.) 5 13.9% (1.6-26.2)

Age 19 or older 5 10.5% (1.4-19.5) 50 84.5% (74.1-94.9) 3 5.0% (0.0-11.0) 58 86.1% (73.8-98.4)

Total 5 9.0% (1.1-16.9) 55 86.6% (77.4-95.8) 3 4.3% (0.0-9.5) 63 100.0% (_-_)

Race

White 2 7.0% (0.0-16.7) 26 93.0% (83.3-100.0) 0 . (.-.) 28 39.0% (26.2-51.8)

Non White 3 10.3% (0.0-21.7) 29 82.6% (68.9-96.2) 3 7.1% (0.0-15.6) 35 61.0% (48.2-73.8)

Total 5 9.0% (1.1-16.9) 55 86.6% (77.4-95.8) 3 4.3% (0.0-9.5) 63 100.0% (_-_)

Region

South NV 4 10.6% (0.4-20.8) 36 83.6% (71.7-95.4) 3 5.8% (0.0-12.8) 43 74.5% (63.6-85.4)

North NV 0 . (.-.) 9 100.0% (100.0-100.0) 0 . (.-.) 9 12.5% (4.3-20.6)

Rural NV 1 8.5% (0.0-25.1) 10 91.5% (74.9-100.0) 0 . (.-.) 11 13.1% (5.0-21.1)

Total 5 9.0% (1.1-16.9) 55 86.6% (77.4-95.8) 3 4.3% (0.0-9.5) 63 100.0% (_-_)


Yes 2 8.9% (0.0-21.5) 22 85.7% (71.2-100.0) 2 5.4% (0.0-13.2) 26 73.7% (55.3-92.1)

No 0 . (.-.) 8 100.0% (100.0-100.0) 0 . (.-.) 8 26.3% (7.9-44.7)

Total 2 6.6% (0.0-16.0) 30 89.4% (78.6-100.0) 2 4.0% (0.0-9.8) 34 100.0% (_-_)


Yes 0 . (.-.) 6 100.0% (100.0-100.0) 0 . (.-.) 6 26.1% (3.9-48.3)

No 1 7.2% (0.0-22.6) 10 82.7% (61.1-100.0) 2 10.1% (0.0-25.6) 13 73.9% (51.7-96.1)

Total 1 5.3% (0.0-16.7) 16 87.2% (71.4-100.0) 2 7.4% (0.0-18.8) 19 100.0% (_-_)



112

Q20h. Benefits: Clothes/Uniform allowance Yes No Don't Know/Refused Total

N % C.I.(95%) N % C.I.(95%) N % C.I.(95%) N % C.I.(95%)


Gender

Female 11 44.7% (24.1-65.4) 11 44.6% (23.9-65.2) 3 10.7% (0.0-22.9) 25 43.4% (29.8-56.9)

Male 19 57.2% (39.8-74.6) 17 38.9% (21.9-55.8) 2 4.0% (0.0-9.5) 38 56.6% (43.1-70.2)

Total 30 51.8% (38.2-65.4) 28 41.3% (28.1-54.6) 5 6.9% (0.6-13.1) 63 100.0% (_-_)

Age

<=18 4 86.7% (60.1-100.0) 1 13.3% (0.0-39.9) 0 . (.-.) 5 13.9% (1.6-26.2)

Age 19 or older 26 46.2% (32.4-59.9) 27 45.9% (32.2-59.6) 5 8.0% (0.8-15.2) 58 86.1% (73.8-98.4)

Total 30 51.8% (38.2-65.4) 28 41.3% (28.1-54.6) 5 6.9% (0.6-13.1) 63 100.0% (_-_)

Race

White 12 44.5% (25.2-63.8) 14 49.0% (29.6-68.4) 2 6.5% (0.0-15.5) 28 39.0% (26.2-51.8)

Non White 18 56.5% (38.3-74.6) 14 36.4% (19.1-53.8) 3 7.1% (0.0-15.6) 35 61.0% (48.2-73.8)

Total 30 51.8% (38.2-65.4) 28 41.3% (28.1-54.6) 5 6.9% (0.6-13.1) 63 100.0% (_-_)

Region

South NV 22 54.2% (37.9-70.5) 17 38.1% (22.4-53.8) 4 7.7% (0.0-15.6) 43 74.5% (63.6-85.4)

North NV 4 46.2% (11.8-80.5) 5 53.8% (19.5-88.2) 0 . (.-.) 9 12.5% (4.3-20.6)

Rural NV 4 43.7% (10.8-76.5) 6 47.8% (16.0-79.6) 1 8.5% (0.0-25.1) 11 13.1% (5.0-21.1)

Total 30 51.8% (38.2-65.4) 28 41.3% (28.1-54.6) 5 6.9% (0.6-13.1) 63 100.0% (_-_)


Yes 9 39.8% (17.4-62.1) 15 54.9% (32.7-77.0) 2 5.4% (0.0-13.2) 26 73.7% (55.3-92.1)

No 6 85.6% (64.2-100.0) 1 6.8% (0.0-21.0) 1 7.6% (0.0-23.3) 8 26.3% (7.9-44.7)

Total 15 51.8% (32.4-71.2) 16 42.2% (23.4-61.0) 3 6.0% (0.0-13.0) 34 100.0% (_-_)


Yes 3 52.6% (7.8-97.3) 2 33.2% (0.0-75.6) 1 14.2% (0.0-43.2) 6 26.1% (3.9-48.3)

No 8 72.6% (46.0-99.3) 3 17.3% (0.0-39.0) 2 10.0% (0.0-25.5) 13 73.9% (51.7-96.1)

Total 11 67.4% (43.3-91.5) 5 21.5% (1.2-41.7) 3 11.1% (0.0-25.0) 19 100.0% (_-_)



113

Q20i. Benefits: Other Yes No Don't Know/Refused Total

N % C.I.(95%) N % C.I.(95%) N % C.I.(95%) N % C.I.(95%)


Gender

Female 1 4.8% (0.0-14.3) 23 90.3% (77.3-100.0) 1 4.8% (0.0-14.3) 25 43.4% (29.8-56.9)

Male 4 11.2% (0.0-22.4) 29 79.2% (65.5-92.8) 5 9.7% (1.1-18.3) 38 56.6% (43.1-70.2)

Total 5 8.4% (0.8-16.0) 52 84.0% (74.5-93.5) 6 7.6% (1.2-13.9) 63 100.0% (_-_)

Age

<=18 0 . (.-.) 5 100.0% (100.0-100.0) 0 . (.-.) 5 13.9% (1.6-26.2)

Age 19 or older 5 9.8% (1.1-18.5) 47 81.4% (70.6-92.2) 6 8.8% (1.5-16.1) 58 86.1% (73.8-98.4)

Total 5 8.4% (0.8-16.0) 52 84.0% (74.5-93.5) 6 7.6% (1.2-13.9) 63 100.0% (_-_)

Race

White 1 4.1% (0.0-12.2) 26 93.3% (83.8-100.0) 1 2.6% (0.0-7.7) 28 39.0% (26.2-51.8)

Non White 4 11.2% (0.0-22.5) 26 78.1% (63.7-92.4) 5 10.8% (0.9-20.6) 35 61.0% (48.2-73.8)

Total 5 8.4% (0.8-16.0) 52 84.0% (74.5-93.5) 6 7.6% (1.2-13.9) 63 100.0% (_-_)

Region

South NV 4 8.0% (0.0-16.1) 34 83.2% (72.1-94.3) 5 8.8% (0.7-16.9) 43 74.5% (63.6-85.4)

North NV 0 . (.-.) 9 100.0% (100.0-100.0) 0 . (.-.) 9 12.5% (4.3-20.6)

Rural NV 1 18.9% (0.0-51.4) 9 73.4% (40.4-100.0) 1 7.7% (0.0-22.8) 11 13.1% (5.0-21.1)

Total 5 8.4% (0.8-16.0) 52 84.0% (74.5-93.5) 6 7.6% (1.2-13.9) 63 100.0% (_-_)


Yes 2 8.9% (0.0-21.5) 22 85.7% (71.2-100.0) 2 5.4% (0.0-13.2) 26 73.7% (55.3-92.1)

No 2 24.3% (0.0-58.3) 6 75.7% (41.7-100.0) 0 . (.-.) 8 26.3% (7.9-44.7)

Total 4 13.0% (0.0-26.0) 28 83.0% (69.1-97.0) 2 4.0% (0.0-9.8) 34 100.0% (_-_)


Yes 1 14.2% (0.0-43.2) 5 85.8% (56.8-100.0) 0 . (.-.) 6 26.1% (3.9-48.3)

No 0 . (.-.) 11 89.9% (74.4-100.0) 2 10.1% (0.0-25.6) 13 73.9% (51.7-96.1)

Total 1 3.7% (0.0-11.7) 16 88.8% (75.0-100.0) 2 7.4% (0.0-18.8) 19 100.0% (_-_)



114

Q21. What is the main reason you are not currently working?

Attending school Employer could not

accommodate my disability

Fired or laid off from previous job

Could not find any job Could not find the kind

of job I wanted Could not find a job I was

qualified for


Overall Total Total 8 16.9% (5.3-28.5) 2 4.0% (0.0-9.8) 5 10.1% (1.0-19.3) 11 20.8% (8.6-33.0) 5 9.6% (0.9-18.4) 2 7.6% (0.0-19.2)

Gender

Female 3 17.2% (0.0-36.0) 1 4.2% (0.0-12.5) 1 6.7% (0.0-19.7) 5 24.9% (4.3-45.4) 2 10.6% (0.0-25.5) 1 4.2% (0.0-12.5)

Male 5 16.7% (2.0-31.3) 1 4.0% (0.0-11.9) 4 12.7% (0.0-25.5) 6 17.8% (3.3-32.2) 3 9.0% (0.0-19.5) 1 10.1% (0.0-29.0)

Total 8 16.9% (5.3-28.5) 2 4.0% (0.0-9.8) 5 10.1% (1.0-19.3) 11 20.8% (8.6-33.0) 5 9.6% (0.9-18.4) 2 7.6% (0.0-19.2)

Age

<=18 0 . (.-.) 0 . (.-.) 0 . (.-.) 1 15.1% (0.0-47.2) 0 . (.-.) 1 42.4% (0.0-100.0)

Age 19 or older 8 19.6% (6.6-32.6) 2 4.7% (0.0-11.4) 5 11.8% (1.3-22.2) 10 21.7% (8.7-34.6) 5 11.2% (1.2-21.1) 1 2.0% (0.0-6.2)

Total 8 16.9% (5.3-28.5) 2 4.0% (0.0-9.8) 5 10.1% (1.0-19.3) 11 20.8% (8.6-33.0) 5 9.6% (0.9-18.4) 2 7.6% (0.0-19.2)

Race

White 3 16.5% (0.0-34.2) 2 10.1% (0.0-24.1) 2 11.1% (0.0-26.2) 5 22.9% (4.1-41.6) 1 5.4% (0.0-16.1) 1 4.4% (0.0-13.3)

Non White 5 17.1% (1.8-32.5) 0 . (.-.) 3 9.5% (0.0-20.9) 6 19.4% (3.5-35.3) 4 12.4% (0.0-25.2) 1 9.7% (0.0-27.9)

Total 8 16.9% (5.3-28.5) 2 4.0% (0.0-9.8) 5 10.1% (1.0-19.3) 11 20.8% (8.6-33.0) 5 9.6% (0.9-18.4) 2 7.6% (0.0-19.2)

Region

South NV 6 18.5% (3.8-33.1) 0 . (.-.) 3 9.2% (0.0-20.0) 9 25.3% (9.1-41.6) 4 11.4% (0.0-22.9) 1 8.3% (0.0-24.1)

North NV 2 20.6% (0.0-47.3) 2 21.2% (0.0-48.3) 2 19.2% (0.0-44.8) 0 . (.-.) 1 8.7% (0.0-25.7) 1 9.2% (0.0-27.2)

Rural NV 0 . (.-.) 0 . (.-.) 0 . (.-.) 2 27.9% (0.0-66.0) 0 . (.-.) 0 . (.-.)

Total 8 16.9% (5.3-28.5) 2 4.0% (0.0-9.8) 5 10.1% (1.0-19.3) 11 20.8% (8.6-33.0) 5 9.6% (0.9-18.4) 2 7.6% (0.0-19.2)


Yes 2 11.1% (0.0-27.3) . . . 3 19.2% (0.0-41.6) 3 13.6% (0.0-30.0) 1 4.5% (0.0-14.1) 0 . (.-.)

No 4 34.2% (1.0-67.3) . . . 1 6.8% (0.0-21.0) 2 15.3% (0.0-37.7) 0 . (.-.) 2 34.1% (0.0-75.6)

Total 6 20.4% (3.6-37.2) . . . 4 14.2% (0.0-29.0) 5 14.3% (1.0-27.6) 1 2.7% (0.0-8.4) 2 13.7% (0.0-34.5)


Yes 1 30.5% (0.0-88.5) 0 . (.-.) 1 41.9% (0.0-100.0) 0 . (.-.) 1 27.6% (0.0-82.1) . . .

No 2 14.2% (0.0-35.6) 1 6.9% (0.0-21.7) 2 19.3% (0.0-46.5) 4 24.8% (0.0-50.6) 1 10.9% (0.0-33.6) . . .

Total 3 17.1% (0.0-37.7) 1 5.7% (0.0-18.0) 3 23.3% (0.0-49.2) 4 20.5% (0.0-41.9) 2 13.8% (0.0-34.8) . . .



115

Q21. What is the main reason you are not currently working?

Lack of transportation Could not work because of

family commitments

Did not want to lose health insurance from

another source Other Disability Total



Gender

Female 2 13.5% (0.0-31.4) 2 8.0% (0.0-19.4) 1 6.7% (0.0-19.7) 0 . (.-.) 1 4.2% (0.0-12.5) 19 42.3% (26.2-58.4)

Male 0 . (.-.) 2 15.8% (0.0-36.6) 0 . (.-.) 2 6.3% (0.0-15.5) 2 7.7% (0.0-18.5) 26 57.7% (41.6-73.8)

Total 2 5.7% (0.0-13.7) 4 12.5% (0.0-25.8) 1 2.8% (0.0-8.5) 2 3.7% (0.0-9.0) 3 6.2% (0.0-13.4) 45 100.0% (_-_)

Age

<=18 0 . (.-.) 1 42.4% (0.0-100.0) 0 . (.-.) 0 . (.-.) 0 . (.-.) 3 13.7% (0.0-29.1)

Age 19 or older 2 6.6% (0.0-15.8) 3 7.8% (0.0-17.1) 1 3.3% (0.0-9.8) 2 4.2% (0.0-10.3) 3 7.2% (0.0-15.4) 42 86.3% (70.9-100.0)

Total 2 5.7% (0.0-13.7) 4 12.5% (0.0-25.8) 1 2.8% (0.0-8.5) 2 3.7% (0.0-9.0) 3 6.2% (0.0-13.4) 45 100.0% (_-_)

Race

White 0 . (.-.) 2 8.5% (0.0-20.4) 0 . (.-.) 1 5.4% (0.0-16.1) 3 15.6% (0.0-32.4) 20 39.9% (24.4-55.4)

Non White 2 9.5% (0.0-22.6) 2 15.2% (0.0-35.4) 1 4.7% (0.0-14.0) 1 2.5% (0.0-7.6) 0 . (.-.) 25 60.1% (44.6-75.6)

Total 2 5.7% (0.0-13.7) 4 12.5% (0.0-25.8) 1 2.8% (0.0-8.5) 2 3.7% (0.0-9.0) 3 6.2% (0.0-13.4) 45 100.0% (_-_)

Region

South NV 1 4.0% (0.0-12.0) 2 11.0% (0.0-27.3) 1 4.0% (0.0-12.0) 2 5.2% (0.0-12.8) 1 3.1% (0.0-9.3) 30 70.2% (55.9-84.4)

North NV 0 . (.-.) 0 . (.-.) 0 . (.-.) 0 . (.-.) 2 21.2% (0.0-48.3) 10 19.1% (7.5-30.8)

Rural NV 1 27.1% (0.0-72.9) 2 45.0% (0.0-94.0) 0 . (.-.) 0 . (.-.) 0 . (.-.) 5 10.7% (0.8-20.6)

Total 2 5.7% (0.0-13.7) 4 12.5% (0.0-25.8) 1 2.8% (0.0-8.5) 2 3.7% (0.0-9.0) 3 6.2% (0.0-13.4) 45 100.0% (_-_)


Yes 1 8.5% (0.0-25.7) 2 23.4% (0.0-55.2) 1 8.5% (0.0-25.7) 1 4.5% (0.0-14.1) 1 6.5% (0.0-20.0) 15 59.8% (36.4-83.2)

No 0 . (.-.) 0 . (.-.) 0 . (.-.) 1 9.7% (0.0-29.5) 0 . (.-.) 10 40.2% (16.8-63.6)

Total 1 5.1% (0.0-15.5) 2 14.0% (0.0-34.8) 1 5.1% (0.0-15.5) 2 6.6% (0.0-16.5) 1 3.9% (0.0-12.0) 25 100.0% (_-_)


Yes . . . 0 . (.-.) 0 . (.-.) . . . . . . 3 17.5% (0.0-38.6)

No . . . 1 12.9% (0.0-39.0) 1 10.9% (0.0-33.6) . . . . . . 12 82.5% (61.4-100.0)

Total . . . 1 10.6% (0.0-32.6) 1 9.0% (0.0-27.9) . . . . . . 15 100.0% (_-_)



116

Q22. Do you receive health insurance coverage from ANY source? Not currently employed?


N % C.I.(95%) N % C.I.(95%) N % C.I.(95%) N % C.I.(95%)


Gender

Female 18 58.5% (40.2-76.8) 10 32.5% (15.0-49.9) 3 9.1% (0.0-19.4) 31 45.8% (32.8-58.8)

Male 22 55.2% (36.6-73.7) 12 35.4% (16.9-53.9) 4 9.5% (0.0-19.3) 38 54.2% (41.2-67.2)

Total 40 56.7% (43.6-69.8) 22 34.0% (21.2-46.9) 7 9.3% (2.1-16.4) 69 100.0% (_-_)

Age

<=18 4 51.7% (6.4-97.0) 2 48.3% (3.0-93.6) 0 . (.-.) 6 15.8% (3.3-28.2)

Age 19 or older 36 57.6% (44.7-70.6) 20 31.4% (19.2-43.5) 7 11.0% (2.7-19.3) 63 84.2% (71.8-96.7)

Total 40 56.7% (43.6-69.8) 22 34.0% (21.2-46.9) 7 9.3% (2.1-16.4) 69 100.0% (_-_)

Race

White 20 65.1% (47.8-82.4) 9 29.0% (12.5-45.6) 2 5.9% (0.0-14.0) 31 39.3% (27.0-51.6)

Non White 20 51.2% (33.1-69.4) 13 37.3% (19.2-55.3) 5 11.5% (1.0-22.0) 38 60.7% (48.4-73.0)

Total 40 56.7% (43.6-69.8) 22 34.0% (21.2-46.9) 7 9.3% (2.1-16.4) 69 100.0% (_-_)

Region

South NV 27 59.2% (43.0-75.5) 14 34.0% (17.9-50.1) 4 6.7% (0.0-13.7) 45 71.2% (60.2-82.2)

North NV 8 54.3% (28.0-80.5) 5 33.0% (8.1-57.8) 2 12.8% (0.0-29.8) 15 18.1% (9.1-27.0)

Rural NV 5 43.8% (9.4-78.2) 3 35.9% (1.2-70.7) 1 20.3% (0.0-54.9) 9 10.7% (3.3-18.1)

Total 40 56.7% (43.6-69.8) 22 34.0% (21.2-46.9) 7 9.3% (2.1-16.4) 69 100.0% (_-_)


Yes 16 70.6% (51.0-90.2) 7 26.6% (7.5-45.6) 1 2.9% (0.0-8.7) 24 63.6% (44.4-82.8)

No 4 27.1% (0.4-53.9) 6 62.0% (31.3-92.7) 2 10.8% (0.0-26.7) 12 36.4% (17.2-55.6)

Total 20 54.8% (35.5-74.0) 13 39.5% (20.1-58.8) 3 5.8% (0.0-12.6) 36 100.0% (_-_)


Yes 2 40.8% (0.0-88.6) 3 59.2% (11.4-100.0) 0 . (.-.) 5 21.3% (2.0-40.6)

No 8 43.1% (13.8-72.5) 5 39.1% (7.5-70.7) 2 17.8% (0.0-42.1) 15 78.7% (59.4-98.0)

Total 10 42.6% (17.4-67.8) 8 43.4% (16.7-70.1) 2 14.0% (0.0-33.5) 20 100.0% (_-_)



117

Q23a. Ever received: Job placement Yes No Total

N % C.I.(95%) N % C.I.(95%) N % C.I.(95%)


Gender

Female 25 57.6% (42.3-72.9) 19 42.4% (27.1-57.7) 44 42.5% (32.4-52.7)

Male 32 48.1% (34.3-61.9) 33 51.9% (38.1-65.7) 65 57.5% (47.3-67.6)

Total 57 52.1% (41.8-62.4) 52 47.9% (37.6-58.2) 109 100.0% (_-_)

Age

<=18 5 57.7% (19.3-96.1) 3 42.3% (3.9-80.7) 8 13.7% (4.3-23.1)

Age 19 or older 52 51.2% (41.0-61.5) 49 48.8% (38.5-59.0) 101 86.3% (76.9-95.7)

Total 57 52.1% (41.8-62.4) 52 47.9% (37.6-58.2) 109 100.0% (_-_)

Race

White 22 45.6% (31.2-60.0) 27 54.4% (40.0-68.8) 49 39.9% (30.2-49.7)

Non White 35 56.5% (42.3-70.7) 25 43.5% (29.3-57.7) 60 60.1% (50.3-69.8)

Total 57 52.1% (41.8-62.4) 52 47.9% (37.6-58.2) 109 100.0% (_-_)

Region

South NV 43 57.6% (45.1-70.0) 31 42.4% (30.0-54.9) 74 72.9% (64.4-81.4)

North NV 9 46.2% (23.1-69.4) 10 53.8% (30.6-76.9) 19 15.2% (8.5-21.8)

Rural NV 5 26.5% (5.0-47.9) 11 73.5% (52.1-95.0) 16 12.0% (5.9-18.0)

Total 57 52.1% (41.8-62.4) 52 47.9% (37.6-58.2) 109 100.0% (_-_)


Yes 31 79.2% (66.4-92.0) 10 20.8% (8.0-33.6) 41 67.8% (53.7-81.9)

No 7 26.9% (6.6-47.3) 11 73.1% (52.7-93.4) 18 32.2% (18.1-46.3)

Total 38 62.4% (47.9-76.8) 21 37.6% (23.2-52.1) 59 100.0% (_-_)


Yes 5 60.8% (27.4-94.2) 4 39.2% (5.8-72.6) 9 22.4% (7.7-37.0)

No 16 58.8% (35.3-82.2) 9 41.2% (17.8-64.7) 25 77.6% (63.0-92.3)

Total 21 59.2% (39.5-78.9) 13 40.8% (21.1-60.5) 34 100.0% (_-_)

Currently Employed

Yes 37 59.4% (46.0-72.7) 26 40.6% (27.3-54.0) 63 57.3% (47.0-67.6)

No 19 41.4% (25.5-57.2) 26 58.6% (42.8-74.5) 45 42.7% (32.4-53.0)

Total 56 51.7% (41.3-62.0) 52 48.3% (38.0-58.7) 108 100.0% (_-_)



118

Q23b. Ever received: Job coaching Yes No Don't Know/Refused Total

N % C.I.(95%) N % C.I.(95%) N % C.I.(95%) N % C.I.(95%)


Gender

Female 25 56.0% (40.6-71.4) 19 44.0% (28.6-59.4) 0 . (.-.) 44 42.5% (32.4-52.7)

Male 29 47.3% (33.4-61.1) 35 51.6% (37.8-65.5) 1 1.1% (0.0-3.3) 65 57.5% (47.3-67.6)

Total 54 51.0% (40.7-61.3) 54 48.4% (38.1-58.7) 1 0.6% (0.0-1.9) 109 100.0% (_-_)

Age

<=18 6 75.6% (42.6-100.0) 2 24.4% (0.0-57.4) 0 . (.-.) 8 13.7% (4.3-23.1)

Age 19 or older 48 47.0% (36.8-57.3) 52 52.2% (42.0-62.5) 1 0.7% (0.0-2.2) 101 86.3% (76.9-95.7)

Total 54 51.0% (40.7-61.3) 54 48.4% (38.1-58.7) 1 0.6% (0.0-1.9) 109 100.0% (_-_)

Race

White 22 45.7% (31.4-60.1) 27 54.3% (39.9-68.6) 0 . (.-.) 49 39.9% (30.2-49.7)

Non White 32 54.4% (40.3-68.5) 27 44.5% (30.4-58.6) 1 1.1% (0.0-3.2) 60 60.1% (50.3-69.8)

Total 54 51.0% (40.7-61.3) 54 48.4% (38.1-58.7) 1 0.6% (0.0-1.9) 109 100.0% (_-_)

Region

South NV 38 54.3% (41.8-66.7) 35 44.9% (32.5-57.3) 1 0.9% (0.0-2.6) 74 72.9% (64.4-81.4)

North NV 12 58.6% (35.3-81.8) 7 41.4% (18.2-64.7) 0 . (.-.) 19 15.2% (8.5-21.8)

Rural NV 4 21.2% (1.6-40.8) 12 78.8% (59.2-98.4) 0 . (.-.) 16 12.0% (5.9-18.0)

Total 54 51.0% (40.7-61.3) 54 48.4% (38.1-58.7) 1 0.6% (0.0-1.9) 109 100.0% (_-_)


Yes 28 72.2% (57.8-86.7) 12 26.1% (11.9-40.3) 1 1.7% (0.0-5.1) 41 67.8% (53.7-81.9)

No 10 50.1% (22.7-77.4) 8 49.9% (22.6-77.3) 0 . (.-.) 18 32.2% (18.1-46.3)

Total 38 65.1% (51.2-78.9) 20 33.8% (20.0-47.5) 1 1.1% (0.0-3.5) 59 100.0% (_-_)


Yes 6 67.9% (35.4-100.0) 3 32.1% (0.0-64.6) 0 . (.-.) 9 22.4% (7.7-37.0)

No 12 46.3% (23.0-69.6) 12 51.0% (27.6-74.3) 1 2.7% (0.0-8.3) 25 77.6% (63.0-92.3)

Total 18 51.1% (31.4-70.9) 15 46.8% (27.0-66.6) 1 2.1% (0.0-6.4) 34 100.0% (_-_)

Currently Employed

Yes 37 59.1% (45.7-72.5) 25 39.8% (26.4-53.1) 1 1.1% (0.0-3.3) 63 57.3% (47.0-67.6)

No 16 39.0% (22.7-55.3) 29 61.0% (44.7-77.3) 0 . (.-.) 45 42.7% (32.4-53.0)

Total 53 50.5% (40.1-60.9) 54 48.9% (38.5-59.2) 1 0.6% (0.0-1.9) 108 100.0% (_-_)



119

Q23c. Ever received: Other support from vocational rehabilitation employees other than

counselor

Yes No Total

N % C.I.(95%) N % C.I.(95%) N % C.I.(95%)


Gender

Female 29 67.4% (53.0-81.8) 15 32.6% (18.2-47.0) 44 42.5% (32.4-52.7)

Male 42 65.4% (52.3-78.4) 23 34.6% (21.6-47.7) 65 57.5% (47.3-67.6)

Total 71 66.2% (56.5-75.9) 38 33.8% (24.1-43.5) 109 100.0% (_-_)

Age

<=18 6 75.6% (42.6-100.0) 2 24.4% (0.0-57.4) 8 13.7% (4.3-23.1)

Age 19 or older 65 64.7% (54.9-74.6) 36 35.3% (25.4-45.1) 101 86.3% (76.9-95.7)

Total 71 66.2% (56.5-75.9) 38 33.8% (24.1-43.5) 109 100.0% (_-_)

Race

White 30 63.7% (50.0-77.4) 19 36.3% (22.6-50.0) 49 39.9% (30.2-49.7)

Non White 41 67.9% (54.6-81.2) 19 32.1% (18.8-45.4) 60 60.1% (50.3-69.8)

Total 71 66.2% (56.5-75.9) 38 33.8% (24.1-43.5) 109 100.0% (_-_)

Region

South NV 53 71.4% (60.1-82.7) 21 28.6% (17.3-39.9) 74 72.9% (64.4-81.4)

North NV 12 65.1% (43.1-87.0) 7 34.9% (13.0-56.9) 19 15.2% (8.5-21.8)

Rural NV 6 36.2% (11.0-61.5) 10 63.8% (38.5-89.0) 16 12.0% (5.9-18.0)

Total 71 66.2% (56.5-75.9) 38 33.8% (24.1-43.5) 109 100.0% (_-_)


Yes 31 73.9% (58.0-89.9) 10 26.1% (10.1-42.0) 41 67.8% (53.7-81.9)

No 14 77.1% (55.3-98.9) 4 22.9% (1.1-44.7) 18 32.2% (18.1-46.3)

Total 45 74.9% (62.0-87.9) 14 25.1% (12.1-38.0) 59 100.0% (_-_)


Yes 6 71.2% (40.9-100.0) 3 28.8% (0.0-59.1) 9 22.4% (7.7-37.0)

No 18 73.4% (54.0-92.8) 7 26.6% (7.2-46.0) 25 77.6% (63.0-92.3)

Total 24 72.9% (56.3-89.4) 10 27.1% (10.6-43.7) 34 100.0% (_-_)

Currently Employed

Yes 45 74.1% (62.7-85.4) 18 25.9% (14.6-37.3) 63 57.3% (47.0-67.6)

No 26 57.1% (41.1-73.1) 19 42.9% (26.9-58.9) 45 42.7% (32.4-53.0)

Total 71 66.8% (57.1-76.5) 37 33.2% (23.5-42.9) 108 100.0% (_-_)



120

Q23d. Have you EVER received THIRD PARTY CONTRACTOR OR VENDOR SERVICES from

the Vocational Rehabilitation program?


N % C.I.(95%) N % C.I.(95%) N % C.I.(95%) N % C.I.(95%)


Gender

Female 5 10.3% (1.3-19.2) 37 86.3% (76.4-96.3) 2 3.4% (0.0-8.1) 44 42.5% (32.4-52.7)

Male 12 20.0% (8.6-31.4) 51 76.8% (65.0-88.7) 2 3.2% (0.0-7.6) 65 57.5% (47.3-67.6)

Total 17 15.9% (8.2-23.5) 88 80.9% (72.8-89.0) 4 3.3% (0.0-6.5) 109 100.0% (_-_)

Age

<=18 2 25.6% (0.0-59.2) 6 74.4% (40.8-100.0) 0 . (.-.) 8 13.7% (4.3-23.1)

Age 19 or older 15 14.3% (7.3-21.3) 82 81.9% (74.2-89.6) 4 3.8% (0.0-7.5) 101 86.3% (76.9-95.7)

Total 17 15.9% (8.2-23.5) 88 80.9% (72.8-89.0) 4 3.3% (0.0-6.5) 109 100.0% (_-_)

Race

White 11 23.4% (11.0-35.8) 34 68.4% (54.9-81.9) 4 8.2% (0.3-16.1) 49 39.9% (30.2-49.7)

Non White 6 10.8% (1.2-20.5) 54 89.2% (79.5-98.8) 0 . (.-.) 60 60.1% (50.3-69.8)

Total 17 15.9% (8.2-23.5) 88 80.9% (72.8-89.0) 4 3.3% (0.0-6.5) 109 100.0% (_-_)

Region

South NV 6 9.8% (1.5-18.2) 65 86.6% (77.5-95.6) 3 3.6% (0.0-7.7) 74 72.9% (64.4-81.4)

North NV 9 49.4% (26.2-72.7) 10 50.6% (27.3-73.8) 0 . (.-.) 19 15.2% (8.5-21.8)

Rural NV 2 10.1% (0.0-23.8) 13 84.6% (67.8-100.0) 1 5.3% (0.0-15.6) 16 12.0% (5.9-18.0)

Total 17 15.9% (8.2-23.5) 88 80.9% (72.8-89.0) 4 3.3% (0.0-6.5) 109 100.0% (_-_)


Yes 7 19.2% (4.3-34.1) 33 78.4% (63.1-93.7) 1 2.4% (0.0-7.3) 41 67.8% (53.7-81.9)

No 2 8.7% (0.0-21.1) 15 86.8% (71.6-100.0) 1 4.5% (0.0-13.6) 18 32.2% (18.1-46.3)

Total 9 15.8% (4.7-26.9) 48 81.1% (69.4-92.8) 2 3.1% (0.0-7.5) 59 100.0% (_-_)


Yes 2 28.5% (0.0-62.4) 7 71.5% (37.6-100.0) 0 . (.-.) 9 22.4% (7.7-37.0)

No 5 22.9% (1.5-44.3) 19 73.7% (51.9-95.5) 1 3.4% (0.0-10.4) 25 77.6% (63.0-92.3)

Total 7 24.2% (5.9-42.4) 26 73.2% (54.6-91.7) 1 2.7% (0.0-8.1) 34 100.0% (_-_)

Currently Employed

Yes 11 18.6% (7.3-29.8) 51 79.8% (68.3-91.3) 1 1.6% (0.0-4.8) 63 57.3% (47.0-67.6)

No 6 12.5% (2.8-22.3) 37 84.1% (73.4-94.7) 2 3.4% (0.0-8.2) 45 42.7% (32.4-53.0)

Total 17 16.0% (8.3-23.8) 88 81.6% (73.6-89.7) 3 2.4% (0.0-5.1) 108 100.0% (_-_)



121

Q24. How dissatisfied or satisfied were you with the job placement services you received from the Vocational Rehabilitation program?





Gender

Female 2 9.7% (0.0-22.8) 2 7.4% (0.0-18.2) 5 20.5% (3.5-37.4) 9 33.6% (14.2-53.0) 7 28.8% (9.9-47.7) 25 47.0% (32.6-61.4)

Male 1 3.3% (0.0-9.9) 2 5.6% (0.0-13.6) 4 18.9% (0.4-37.4) 9 29.3% (10.3-48.4) 16 42.9% (23.8-62.0) 32 53.0% (38.6-67.4)

Total 3 6.3% (0.0-13.5) 4 6.5% (0.0-13.1) 9 19.6% (7.0-32.2) 18 31.3% (17.8-44.9) 23 36.3% (22.9-49.6) 57 100.0% (_-_)

Age

<=18 0 . (.-.) 0 . (.-.) 2 42.2% (0.0-91.7) 1 31.1% (0.0-80.6) 2 26.7% (0.0-63.8) 5 15.2% (1.9-28.5)

Age 19 or older 3 7.5% (0.0-15.8) 4 7.6% (0.0-15.3) 7 15.6% (4.5-26.6) 17 31.4% (18.0-44.7) 21 38.0% (24.1-51.9) 52 84.8% (71.5-98.1)

Total 3 6.3% (0.0-13.5) 4 6.5% (0.0-13.1) 9 19.6% (7.0-32.2) 18 31.3% (17.8-44.9) 23 36.3% (22.9-49.6) 57 100.0% (_-_)

Race

White 1 5.0% (0.0-14.9) 2 8.5% (0.0-20.3) 5 23.0% (4.6-41.5) 6 25.2% (6.8-43.6) 8 38.3% (16.9-59.6) 22 34.9% (21.8-48.0)

Non White 2 7.0% (0.0-16.7) 2 5.4% (0.0-13.3) 4 17.8% (1.0-34.5) 12 34.6% (16.4-52.8) 15 35.2% (18.3-52.1) 35 65.1% (52.0-78.2)

Total 3 6.3% (0.0-13.5) 4 6.5% (0.0-13.1) 9 19.6% (7.0-32.2) 18 31.3% (17.8-44.9) 23 36.3% (22.9-49.6) 57 100.0% (_-_)

Region

South NV 3 7.9% (0.0-16.7) 3 6.5% (0.0-14.2) 7 20.6% (5.8-35.3) 13 30.7% (15.0-46.4) 17 34.4% (19.4-49.4) 43 80.5% (70.4-90.6)

North NV 0 . (.-.) 0 . (.-.) 1 13.8% (0.0-39.3) 3 31.3% (0.3-62.3) 5 54.9% (20.8-89.0) 9 13.5% (4.7-22.2)

Rural NV 0 . (.-.) 1 20.0% (0.0-56.2) 1 20.0% (0.0-56.2) 2 40.0% (0.0-84.3) 1 20.0% (0.0-56.2) 5 6.1% (0.6-11.5)

Total 3 6.3% (0.0-13.5) 4 6.5% (0.0-13.1) 9 19.6% (7.0-32.2) 18 31.3% (17.8-44.9) 23 36.3% (22.9-49.6) 57 100.0% (_-_)


Yes . . . 2 5.2% (0.0-12.8) 4 19.0% (0.5-37.5) 8 27.2% (8.3-46.2) 17 48.6% (28.4-68.7) 31 86.1% (75.5-96.7)

No . . . 0 . (.-.) 2 31.5% (0.0-68.9) 4 55.3% (16.2-94.4) 1 13.3% (0.0-38.8) 7 13.9% (3.3-24.5)

Total . . . 2 4.5% (0.0-11.0) 6 20.7% (4.0-37.5) 12 31.1% (13.8-48.4) 18 43.6% (25.9-61.4) 38 100.0% (_-_)


Yes . . . 0 . (.-.) 1 23.5% (0.0-66.5) 2 30.9% (0.0-72.5) 2 45.7% (0.0-94.5) 5 22.9% (2.7-43.2)

No . . . 2 11.2% (0.0-27.7) 2 13.2% (0.0-32.8) 4 32.0% (0.4-63.7) 8 43.6% (14.8-72.4) 16 77.1% (56.8-97.3)

Total . . . 2 8.6% (0.0-21.4) 3 15.5% (0.0-33.8) 6 31.8% (5.5-58.0) 10 44.1% (19.2-69.0) 21 100.0% (_-_)

Currently Employed

Yes 2 6.2% (0.0-15.0) 3 7.3% (0.0-16.0) 4 11.5% (0.2-22.8) 12 34.8% (17.2-52.5) 16 40.1% (23.1-57.1) 37 65.8% (51.8-79.8)

No 1 6.8% (0.0-20.1) 1 5.2% (0.0-15.6) 4 31.0% (4.4-57.6) 6 26.2% (5.8-46.6) 7 30.8% (9.0-52.5) 19 34.2% (20.2-48.2)

Total 3 6.4% (0.0-13.7) 4 6.6% (0.0-13.3) 8 18.2% (5.6-30.7) 18 31.9% (18.1-45.6) 23 36.9% (23.4-50.5) 56 100.0% (_-_)



122

Q25. How dissatisfied or satisfied were you with the job coaching services you received

from the Vocational Rehabilitation program?





Gender

Female 1 3.4% (0.0-10.2) 1 5.0% (0.0-14.8) 6 21.7% (5.0-38.3) 7 27.1% (8.7-45.4) 10 42.9% (22.1-63.6) 25 46.7% (31.7-61.7)

Male 0 . (.-.) 0 . (.-.) 5 20.1% (1.3-39.0) 8 28.5% (8.6-48.4) 16 51.4% (29.6-73.1) 29 53.3% (38.3-68.3)

Total 1 1.6% (0.0-4.8) 1 2.3% (0.0-7.0) 11 20.9% (8.2-33.5) 15 27.8% (14.2-41.5) 26 47.4% (32.3-62.4) 54 100.0% (_-_)

Age

<=18 0 . (.-.) 0 . (.-.) 2 32.2% (0.0-74.2) 1 23.7% (0.0-64.6) 3 44.1% (0.0-88.1) 6 20.3% (5.0-35.7)

Age 19 or older 1 2.0% (0.0-6.0) 1 2.9% (0.0-8.8) 9 18.0% (6.5-29.4) 14 28.9% (15.3-42.5) 23 48.2% (33.1-63.3) 48 79.7% (64.3-95.0)

Total 1 1.6% (0.0-4.8) 1 2.3% (0.0-7.0) 11 20.9% (8.2-33.5) 15 27.8% (14.2-41.5) 26 47.4% (32.3-62.4) 54 100.0% (_-_)

Race

White 1 4.4% (0.0-13.2) 0 . (.-.) 5 21.1% (3.8-38.5) 7 30.7% (10.8-50.6) 9 43.7% (22.0-65.5) 22 35.8% (22.2-49.5)

Non White 0 . (.-.) 1 3.6% (0.0-10.9) 6 20.7% (3.5-37.9) 8 26.2% (8.1-44.4) 17 49.4% (29.3-69.6) 32 64.2% (50.5-77.8)

Total 1 1.6% (0.0-4.8) 1 2.3% (0.0-7.0) 11 20.9% (8.2-33.5) 15 27.8% (14.2-41.5) 26 47.4% (32.3-62.4) 54 100.0% (_-_)

Region

South NV 1 2.0% (0.0-6.1) 1 3.0% (0.0-9.0) 7 20.4% (5.2-35.7) 11 28.6% (12.3-45.0) 18 45.9% (28.1-63.8) 38 77.6% (66.7-88.5)

North NV 0 . (.-.) 0 . (.-.) 2 14.5% (0.0-34.1) 3 25.2% (0.0-50.8) 7 60.3% (31.5-89.1) 12 17.4% (7.5-27.3)

Rural NV 0 . (.-.) 0 . (.-.) 2 50.0% (0.0-100.0) 1 25.0% (0.0-68.8) 1 25.0% (0.0-68.8) 4 5.0% (0.0-10.0)

Total 1 1.6% (0.0-4.8) 1 2.3% (0.0-7.0) 11 20.9% (8.2-33.5) 15 27.8% (14.2-41.5) 26 47.4% (32.3-62.4) 54 100.0% (_-_)


Yes 1 3.0% (0.0-9.0) . . . 3 8.0% (0.0-17.6) 7 30.3% (9.5-51.2) 17 58.6% (37.3-80.0) 28 75.2% (59.0-91.4)

No 0 . (.-.) . . . 4 52.4% (15.3-89.5) 4 29.7% (0.0-59.4) 2 17.9% (0.0-43.1) 10 24.8% (8.6-41.0)

Total 1 2.2% (0.0-6.8) . . . 7 19.0% (3.6-34.5) 11 30.2% (12.8-47.6) 19 48.5% (29.9-67.2) 38 100.0% (_-_)


Yes . . . . . . 1 15.3% (0.0-46.1) 4 63.7% (19.7-100.0) 1 21.0% (0.0-60.5) 6 29.7% (5.7-53.7)

No . . . . . . 3 20.0% (0.0-44.4) 3 25.1% (0.0-54.2) 6 54.9% (20.1-89.6) 12 70.3% (46.3-94.3)

Total . . . . . . 4 18.6% (0.0-37.9) 7 36.6% (10.3-62.8) 7 44.8% (15.8-73.9) 18 100.0% (_-_)

Currently Employed

Yes 1 2.4% (0.0-7.2) 0 . (.-.) 6 15.7% (3.2-28.2) 11 27.0% (12.0-41.9) 19 54.9% (37.4-72.4) 37 67.0% (52.0-82.1)

No 0 . (.-.) 1 7.2% (0.0-21.4) 5 32.4% (4.3-60.5) 4 31.2% (2.6-59.7) 6 29.2% (5.8-52.6) 16 33.0% (17.9-48.0)

Total 1 1.6% (0.0-4.9) 1 2.4% (0.0-7.1) 11 21.2% (8.3-34.1) 15 28.3% (14.5-42.2) 25 46.4% (31.2-61.6) 53 100.0% (_-_)



123

Q26. How dissatisfied or satisfied were you with the other vocational rehabilitation

services you received from the Vocational Rehabilitation program?





Gender

Female 0 . (.-.) 2 7.0% (0.0-16.7) 7 24.7% (8.1-41.3) 11 39.0% (20.2-57.7) 9 29.4% (12.1-46.6) 29 43.3% (30.6-56.0)

Male 1 2.4% (0.0-7.3) 1 2.6% (0.0-7.7) 7 19.6% (4.6-34.5) 18 43.3% (25.8-60.8) 15 32.2% (17.0-47.3) 42 56.7% (44.0-69.4)

Total 1 1.4% (0.0-4.1) 3 4.5% (0.0-9.6) 14 21.8% (10.7-32.9) 29 41.4% (28.6-54.3) 24 31.0% (19.6-42.3) 71 100.0% (_-_)

Age

<=18 0 . (.-.) 0 . (.-.) 2 32.2% (0.0-73.8) 2 47.5% (2.5-92.4) 2 20.3% (0.0-49.0) 6 15.6% (3.4-27.9)

Age 19 or older 1 1.6% (0.0-4.9) 3 5.3% (0.0-11.4) 12 19.9% (9.4-30.3) 27 40.3% (27.7-52.9) 22 32.9% (20.9-44.9) 65 84.4% (72.1-96.6)

Total 1 1.4% (0.0-4.1) 3 4.5% (0.0-9.6) 14 21.8% (10.7-32.9) 29 41.4% (28.6-54.3) 24 31.0% (19.6-42.3) 71 100.0% (_-_)

Race

White 1 3.6% (0.0-10.7) 2 7.0% (0.0-16.5) 6 20.5% (5.5-35.6) 7 23.1% (7.6-38.7) 14 45.8% (27.3-64.2) 30 38.4% (26.4-50.5)

Non White 0 . (.-.) 1 2.9% (0.0-8.7) 8 22.6% (7.2-37.9) 22 52.8% (35.4-70.2) 10 21.7% (8.5-34.9) 41 61.6% (49.5-73.6)

Total 1 1.4% (0.0-4.1) 3 4.5% (0.0-9.6) 14 21.8% (10.7-32.9) 29 41.4% (28.6-54.3) 24 31.0% (19.6-42.3) 71 100.0% (_-_)

Region

South NV 1 1.8% (0.0-5.3) 2 3.8% (0.0-9.3) 13 26.4% (12.8-39.9) 22 42.4% (27.4-57.5) 15 25.6% (13.4-37.8) 53 78.6% (68.9-88.2)

North NV 0 . (.-.) 1 9.8% (0.0-28.4) 1 7.1% (0.0-21.0) 6 47.8% (18.4-77.2) 4 35.3% (6.7-63.9) 12 14.9% (6.6-23.2)

Rural NV 0 . (.-.) 0 . (.-.) 0 . (.-.) 1 14.6% (0.0-42.3) 5 85.4% (57.7-100.0) 6 6.5% (1.0-12.0)

Total 1 1.4% (0.0-4.1) 3 4.5% (0.0-9.6) 14 21.8% (10.7-32.9) 29 41.4% (28.6-54.3) 24 31.0% (19.6-42.3) 71 100.0% (_-_)


Yes . . . 1 2.9% (0.0-8.8) 5 17.1% (2.7-31.5) 13 44.5% (24.6-64.3) 12 35.5% (17.4-53.7) 31 66.9% (50.2-83.6)

No . . . 0 . (.-.) 4 34.0% (2.1-66.0) 6 41.8% (9.9-73.7) 4 24.2% (0.5-47.8) 14 33.1% (16.4-49.8)

Total . . . 1 1.9% (0.0-5.9) 9 22.7% (7.8-37.6) 19 43.6% (26.6-60.6) 16 31.8% (17.1-46.5) 45 100.0% (_-_)


Yes . . . . . . 3 46.7% (3.2-90.3) 2 33.2% (0.0-74.6) 1 20.0% (0.0-57.2) 6 21.8% (3.9-39.7)

No . . . . . . 4 30.1% (1.5-58.8) 8 46.8% (18.0-75.7) 6 23.0% (3.3-42.8) 18 78.2% (60.3-96.1)

Total . . . . . . 7 33.7% (9.6-57.9) 10 43.9% (19.4-68.3) 7 22.4% (5.0-39.8) 24 100.0% (_-_)

Currently Employed

Yes 1 2.2% (0.0-6.5) 2 4.7% (0.0-11.5) 6 16.4% (2.8-29.9) 19 41.8% (25.7-57.9) 17 34.9% (20.1-49.8) 45 63.5% (51.1-75.9)

No 0 . (.-.) 1 4.0% (0.0-11.9) 8 31.2% (12.0-50.4) 10 40.7% (19.3-62.2) 7 24.1% (7.1-41.0) 26 36.5% (24.1-48.9)

Total 1 1.4% (0.0-4.1) 3 4.5% (0.0-9.6) 14 21.8% (10.7-32.9) 29 41.4% (28.6-54.3) 24 31.0% (19.6-42.3) 71 100.0% (_-_)



124

Q26n. How dissatisfied or satisfied were you with the third party contractor or vender services you received from the Vocational

Rehabilitation program?

Somewhat Dissatisfied Somewhat Satisfied Very Satisfied Don't Know/Refused Total



Gender

Female 1 14.5% (0.0-44.8) 0 . (.-.) 2 41.2% (0.0-90.7) 2 44.3% (0.0-94.8) 5 27.5% (3.0-52.1)

Male 1 8.4% (0.0-26.2) 6 56.8% (23.0-90.6) 4 26.4% (0.0-54.0) 1 8.4% (0.0-26.2) 12 72.5% (47.9-97.0)

Total 2 10.1% (0.0-25.4) 6 41.1% (11.3-71.0) 6 30.5% (5.6-55.4) 3 18.3% (0.0-39.8) 17 100.0% (_-_)

Age

<=18 0 . (.-.) 1 70.0% (5.1-100.0) 1 30.0% (0.0-94.9) 0 . (.-.) 2 22.1% (0.0-52.5)

Age 19 or older 2 12.9% (0.0-32.1) 5 32.9% (5.9-60.0) 5 30.6% (4.6-56.6) 3 23.5% (0.0-49.3) 15 77.9% (47.5-100.0)

Total 2 10.1% (0.0-25.4) 6 41.1% (11.3-71.0) 6 30.5% (5.6-55.4) 3 18.3% (0.0-39.8) 17 100.0% (_-_)

Race

White 2 17.1% (0.0-41.8) 3 30.4% (0.0-61.9) 4 34.2% (2.9-65.5) 2 18.3% (0.0-44.1) 11 59.0% (29.0-88.9)

Non White 0 . (.-.) 3 56.5% (6.7-100.0) 2 25.2% (0.0-63.9) 1 18.3% (0.0-55.4) 6 41.0% (11.1-71.0)

Total 2 10.1% (0.0-25.4) 6 41.1% (11.3-71.0) 6 30.5% (5.6-55.4) 3 18.3% (0.0-39.8) 17 100.0% (_-_)

Region

South NV 0 . (.-.) 3 55.9% (8.0-100.0) 2 27.4% (0.0-67.0) 1 16.6% (0.0-50.6) 6 45.2% (15.4-74.9)

North NV 1 12.9% (0.0-39.0) 3 33.6% (0.0-68.8) 3 30.7% (0.0-64.1) 2 22.9% (0.0-54.1) 9 47.2% (18.5-75.9)

Rural NV 1 52.6% (0.0-100.0) 0 . (.-.) 1 47.4% (0.0-100.0) 0 . (.-.) 2 7.6% (0.0-19.3)

Total 2 10.1% (0.0-25.4) 6 41.1% (11.3-71.0) 6 30.5% (5.6-55.4) 3 18.3% (0.0-39.8) 17 100.0% (_-_)


Yes 0 . (.-.) 4 63.8% (16.1-100.0) 3 36.2% (0.0-83.9) . . . 7 82.3% (52.3-100.0)

No 1 40.9% (0.0-100.0) 0 . (.-.) 1 59.1% (0.0-100.0) . . . 2 17.7% (0.0-47.7)

Total 1 7.2% (0.0-24.9) 4 52.5% (6.4-98.6) 4 40.2% (0.0-84.0) . . . 9 100.0% (_-_)


Yes 0 . (.-.) 1 50.0% (0.0-100.0) 1 50.0% (0.0-100.0) 0 . (.-.) 2 26.4% (0.0-71.9)

No 1 11.7% (0.0-43.5) 3 74.4% (25.2-100.0) 0 . (.-.) 1 13.9% (0.0-50.6) 5 73.6% (28.1-100.0)

Total 1 8.6% (0.0-31.7) 4 68.0% (20.6-100.0) 1 13.2% (0.0-46.7) 1 10.2% (0.0-36.9) 7 100.0% (_-_)

Currently Employed

Yes 1 6.0% (0.0-19.1) 5 52.7% (15.8-89.5) 4 30.1% (0.0-61.2) 1 11.3% (0.0-34.6) 11 66.6% (40.5-92.6)

No 1 18.2% (0.0-53.9) 1 18.2% (0.0-53.9) 2 31.3% (0.0-72.2) 2 32.3% (0.0-74.0) 6 33.4% (7.4-59.5)

Total 2 10.1% (0.0-25.4) 6 41.1% (11.3-71.0) 6 30.5% (5.6-55.4) 3 18.3% (0.0-39.8) 17 100.0% (_-_)



125

Q27. Have you received any assistive technology devices?

Yes No Total

N % C.I.(95%) N % C.I.(95%) N % C.I.(95%)


Gender

Female 13 27.0% (13.6-40.4) 31 73.0% (59.6-86.4) 44 43.3% (33.1-53.6)

Male 16 28.6% (15.2-42.1) 47 71.4% (57.9-84.8) 63 56.7% (46.4-66.9)

Total 29 27.9% (18.3-37.5) 78 72.1% (62.5-81.7) 107 100.0% (_-_)

Age

<=18 3 43.6% (5.1-82.1) 5 56.4% (17.9-94.9) 8 14.0% (4.4-23.5)

Age 19 or older 26 25.4% (16.5-34.3) 73 74.6% (65.7-83.5) 99 86.0% (76.5-95.6)

Total 29 27.9% (18.3-37.5) 78 72.1% (62.5-81.7) 107 100.0% (_-_)

Race

White 14 30.0% (16.5-43.6) 33 70.0% (56.4-83.5) 47 38.8% (29.0-48.5)

Non White 15 26.6% (13.4-39.7) 45 73.4% (60.3-86.6) 60 61.2% (51.5-71.0)

Total 29 27.9% (18.3-37.5) 78 72.1% (62.5-81.7) 107 100.0% (_-_)

Region

South NV 18 26.3% (14.6-37.9) 55 73.7% (62.1-85.4) 73 73.4% (64.8-81.9)

North NV 7 42.4% (18.5-66.2) 11 57.6% (33.8-81.5) 18 14.5% (7.9-21.0)

Rural NV 4 20.6% (1.4-39.9) 12 79.4% (60.1-98.6) 16 12.2% (6.0-18.4)

Total 29 27.9% (18.3-37.5) 78 72.1% (62.5-81.7) 107 100.0% (_-_)


Yes 13 40.3% (21.9-58.6) 26 59.7% (41.4-78.1) 39 66.7% (52.1-81.2)

No 4 13.9% (0.0-28.0) 14 86.1% (72.0-100.0) 18 33.3% (18.8-47.9)

Total 17 31.5% (17.1-45.8) 40 68.5% (54.2-82.9) 57 100.0% (_-_)


Yes 4 44.6% (8.1-81.1) 4 55.4% (18.9-91.9) 8 19.8% (5.8-33.7)

No 12 49.4% (26.0-72.8) 13 50.6% (27.2-74.0) 25 80.2% (66.3-94.2)

Total 16 48.5% (28.3-68.6) 17 51.5% (31.4-71.7) 33 100.0% (_-_)

Currently Employed

Yes 17 26.9% (14.6-39.1) 45 73.1% (60.9-85.4) 62 57.4% (47.0-67.8)

No 12 29.9% (14.5-45.4) 32 70.1% (54.6-85.5) 44 42.6% (32.2-53.0)

Total 29 28.2% (18.5-37.8) 77 71.8% (62.2-81.5) 106 100.0% (_-_)



126

Q27a. Have you received devices to help with your hearing?

Yes No Total

N % C.I.(95%) N % C.I.(95%) N % C.I.(95%)


Gender

Female 4 6.6% (0.1-13.1) 40 93.4% (86.9-99.9) 44 43.3% (33.1-53.6)

Male 5 12.7% (0.7-24.6) 58 87.3% (75.4-99.3) 63 56.7% (46.4-66.9)

Total 9 10.0% (2.6-17.5) 98 90.0% (82.5-97.4) 107 100.0% (_-_)

Age

<=18 2 35.9% (0.0-74.4) 6 64.1% (25.6-100.0) 8 14.0% (4.4-23.5)

Age 19 or older 7 5.8% (1.5-10.2) 92 94.2% (89.8-98.5) 99 86.0% (76.5-95.6)

Total 9 10.0% (2.6-17.5) 98 90.0% (82.5-97.4) 107 100.0% (_-_)

Race

White 6 11.3% (2.5-20.1) 41 88.7% (79.9-97.5) 47 38.8% (29.0-48.5)

Non White 3 9.2% (0.0-20.2) 57 90.8% (79.8-100.0) 60 61.2% (51.5-71.0)

Total 9 10.0% (2.6-17.5) 98 90.0% (82.5-97.4) 107 100.0% (_-_)

Region

South NV 5 10.1% (0.5-19.7) 68 89.9% (80.3-99.5) 73 73.4% (64.8-81.9)

North NV 1 5.3% (0.0-15.5) 17 94.7% (84.5-100.0) 18 14.5% (7.9-21.0)

Rural NV 3 15.4% (0.0-32.2) 13 84.6% (67.8-100.0) 16 12.2% (6.0-18.4)

Total 9 10.0% (2.6-17.5) 98 90.0% (82.5-97.4) 107 100.0% (_-_)


Yes 4 18.2% (0.4-35.9) 35 81.8% (64.1-99.6) 39 66.7% (52.1-81.2)

No 3 10.3% (0.0-22.4) 15 89.7% (77.6-100.0) 18 33.3% (18.8-47.9)

Total 7 15.5% (2.7-28.3) 50 84.5% (71.7-97.3) 57 100.0% (_-_)


Yes 2 22.7% (0.0-52.6) 6 77.3% (47.4-100.0) 8 19.8% (5.8-33.7)

No 6 25.8% (4.1-47.6) 19 74.2% (52.4-95.9) 25 80.2% (66.3-94.2)

Total 8 25.2% (6.8-43.7) 25 74.8% (56.3-93.2) 33 100.0% (_-_)

Currently Employed

Yes 6 10.5% (0.9-20.1) 56 89.5% (79.9-99.1) 62 57.4% (47.0-67.8)

No 3 9.7% (0.0-21.8) 41 90.3% (78.2-100.0) 44 42.6% (32.2-53.0)

Total 9 10.1% (2.6-17.7) 97 89.9% (82.3-97.4) 106 100.0% (_-_)



127

Q27b. Devices to help with your vision Yes No Total

N % C.I.(95%) N % C.I.(95%) N % C.I.(95%)


Gender

Female 10 20.8% (8.6-33.0) 34 79.2% (67.0-91.4) 44 43.3% (33.1-53.6)

Male 8 15.2% (4.3-26.1) 55 84.8% (73.9-95.7) 63 56.7% (46.4-66.9)

Total 18 17.6% (9.5-25.7) 89 82.4% (74.3-90.5) 107 100.0% (_-_)

Age

<=18 2 25.6% (0.0-59.2) 6 74.4% (40.8-100.0) 8 14.0% (4.4-23.5)

Age 19 or older 16 16.3% (8.7-24.0) 83 83.7% (76.0-91.3) 99 86.0% (76.5-95.6)

Total 18 17.6% (9.5-25.7) 89 82.4% (74.3-90.5) 107 100.0% (_-_)

Race

White 10 21.6% (9.4-33.8) 37 78.4% (66.2-90.6) 47 38.8% (29.0-48.5)

Non White 8 15.1% (4.3-25.9) 52 84.9% (74.1-95.7) 60 61.2% (51.5-71.0)

Total 18 17.6% (9.5-25.7) 89 82.4% (74.3-90.5) 107 100.0% (_-_)

Region

South NV 11 16.4% (6.6-26.2) 62 83.6% (73.8-93.4) 73 73.4% (64.8-81.9)

North NV 4 25.4% (3.8-47.0) 14 74.6% (53.0-96.2) 18 14.5% (7.9-21.0)

Rural NV 3 15.9% (0.0-33.2) 13 84.1% (66.8-100.0) 16 12.2% (6.0-18.4)

Total 18 17.6% (9.5-25.7) 89 82.4% (74.3-90.5) 107 100.0% (_-_)


Yes 6 20.1% (4.1-36.1) 33 79.9% (63.9-95.9) 39 66.7% (52.1-81.2)

No 2 7.1% (0.0-17.3) 16 92.9% (82.7-100.0) 18 33.3% (18.8-47.9)

Total 8 15.8% (4.2-27.4) 49 84.2% (72.6-95.8) 57 100.0% (_-_)


Yes 1 10.9% (0.0-32.6) 7 89.1% (67.4-100.0) 8 19.8% (5.8-33.7)

No 7 32.1% (9.3-54.9) 18 67.9% (45.1-90.7) 25 80.2% (66.3-94.2)

Total 8 27.9% (8.7-47.1) 25 72.1% (52.9-91.3) 33 100.0% (_-_)

Currently Employed

Yes 10 18.7% (7.2-30.2) 52 81.3% (69.8-92.8) 62 57.4% (47.0-67.8)

No 8 16.6% (5.3-27.9) 36 83.4% (72.1-94.7) 44 42.6% (32.2-53.0)

Total 18 17.8% (9.6-26.0) 88 82.2% (74.0-90.4) 106 100.0% (_-_)



128

Q27c. Devices to help with getting around Yes No Total

N % C.I.(95%) N % C.I.(95%) N % C.I.(95%)


Gender

Female 1 1.5% (0.0-4.4) 43 98.5% (95.6-100.0) 44 43.3% (33.1-53.6)

Male 1 1.7% (0.0-5.2) 62 98.3% (94.8-100.0) 63 56.7% (46.4-66.9)

Total 2 1.6% (0.0-4.0) 105 98.4% (96.0-100.0) 107 100.0% (_-_)

Age

<=18 0 . (.-.) 8 100.0% (100.0-100.0) 8 14.0% (4.4-23.5)

Age 19 or older 2 1.9% (0.0-4.6) 97 98.1% (95.4-100.0) 99 86.0% (76.5-95.6)

Total 2 1.6% (0.0-4.0) 105 98.4% (96.0-100.0) 107 100.0% (_-_)

Race

White 2 4.2% (0.0-10.1) 45 95.8% (89.9-100.0) 47 38.8% (29.0-48.5)

Non White 0 . (.-.) 60 100.0% (100.0-100.0) 60 61.2% (51.5-71.0)

Total 2 1.6% (0.0-4.0) 105 98.4% (96.0-100.0) 107 100.0% (_-_)

Region

South NV 0 . (.-.) 73 100.0% (100.0-100.0) 73 73.4% (64.8-81.9)

North NV 1 6.8% (0.0-19.8) 17 93.2% (80.2-100.0) 18 14.5% (7.9-21.0)

Rural NV 1 5.3% (0.0-15.6) 15 94.7% (84.4-100.0) 16 12.2% (6.0-18.4)

Total 2 1.6% (0.0-4.0) 105 98.4% (96.0-100.0) 107 100.0% (_-_)


Yes 0 . (.-.) 39 100.0% (100.0-100.0) 39 66.7% (52.1-81.2)

No 1 3.5% (0.0-10.7) 17 96.5% (89.3-100.0) 18 33.3% (18.8-47.9)

Total 1 1.2% (0.0-3.6) 56 98.8% (96.4-100.0) 57 100.0% (_-_)


Yes 0 . (.-.) 8 100.0% (100.0-100.0) 8 19.8% (5.8-33.7)

No 1 2.7% (0.0-8.2) 24 97.3% (91.8-100.0) 25 80.2% (66.3-94.2)

Total 1 2.2% (0.0-6.6) 32 97.8% (93.4-100.0) 33 100.0% (_-_)

Currently Employed

Yes 2 2.9% (0.0-6.9) 60 97.1% (93.1-100.0) 62 57.4% (47.0-67.8)

No 0 . (.-.) 44 100.0% (100.0-100.0) 44 42.6% (32.2-53.0)

Total 2 1.6% (0.0-4.0) 104 98.4% (96.0-100.0) 106 100.0% (_-_)



129

Q27d. Devices to help make your home or workplace more accessible


N % C.I.(95%) N % C.I.(95%) N % C.I.(95%) N % C.I.(95%)


Gender

Female 1 1.5% (0.0-4.4) 43 98.5% (95.6-100.0) 0 . (.-.) 44 43.3% (33.1-53.6)

Male 2 2.3% (0.0-5.5) 60 96.1% (91.5-100.0) 1 1.6% (0.0-4.9) 63 56.7% (46.4-66.9)

Total 3 1.9% (0.0-4.2) 103 97.1% (94.3-100.0) 1 0.9% (0.0-2.8) 107 100.0% (_-_)

Age

<=18 0 . (.-.) 8 100.0% (100.0-100.0) 0 . (.-.) 8 14.0% (4.4-23.5)

Age 19 or older 3 2.3% (0.0-4.8) 95 96.7% (93.3-100.0) 1 1.1% (0.0-3.2) 99 86.0% (76.5-95.6)

Total 3 1.9% (0.0-4.2) 103 97.1% (94.3-100.0) 1 0.9% (0.0-2.8) 107 100.0% (_-_)

Race

White 1 1.7% (0.0-5.0) 45 95.9% (90.2-100.0) 1 2.4% (0.0-7.1) 47 38.8% (29.0-48.5)

Non White 2 2.1% (0.0-5.1) 58 97.9% (94.9-100.0) 0 . (.-.) 60 61.2% (51.5-71.0)

Total 3 1.9% (0.0-4.2) 103 97.1% (94.3-100.0) 1 0.9% (0.0-2.8) 107 100.0% (_-_)

Region

South NV 2 1.8% (0.0-4.3) 70 97.0% (93.4-100.0) 1 1.3% (0.0-3.8) 73 73.4% (64.8-81.9)

North NV 0 . (.-.) 18 100.0% (100.0-100.0) 0 . (.-.) 18 14.5% (7.9-21.0)

Rural NV 1 5.3% (0.0-15.6) 15 94.7% (84.4-100.0) 0 . (.-.) 16 12.2% (6.0-18.4)

Total 3 1.9% (0.0-4.2) 103 97.1% (94.3-100.0) 1 0.9% (0.0-2.8) 107 100.0% (_-_)


Yes 1 1.8% (0.0-5.4) 38 98.2% (94.6-100.0) . . . 39 66.7% (52.1-81.2)

No 2 7.1% (0.0-17.3) 16 92.9% (82.7-100.0) . . . 18 33.3% (18.8-47.9)

Total 3 3.6% (0.0-7.7) 54 96.4% (92.3-100.0) . . . 57 100.0% (_-_)


Yes 1 10.9% (0.0-32.6) 7 89.1% (67.4-100.0) . . . 8 19.8% (5.8-33.7)

No 2 5.4% (0.0-13.3) 23 94.6% (86.7-100.0) . . . 25 80.2% (66.3-94.2)

Total 3 6.5% (0.0-14.2) 30 93.5% (85.8-100.0) . . . 33 100.0% (_-_)

Currently Employed

Yes 3 3.4% (0.0-7.3) 59 96.6% (92.7-100.0) . . . 62 57.4% (47.0-67.8)

No 0 . (.-.) 44 100.0% (100.0-100.0) . . . 44 42.6% (32.2-53.0)

Total 3 2.0% (0.0-4.2) 103 98.0% (95.8-100.0) . . . 106 100.0% (_-_)



130

Q27e. Devices to help with your communication


N % C.I.(95%) N % C.I.(95%) N % C.I.(95%) N % C.I.(95%)


Gender

Female 3 7.1% (0.0-15.2) 41 92.9% (84.8-100.0) 0 . (.-.) 44 43.3% (33.1-53.6)

Male 3 4.0% (0.0-8.7) 59 94.3% (88.7-100.0) 1 1.6% (0.0-4.9) 63 56.7% (46.4-66.9)

Total 6 5.4% (0.9-9.8) 100 93.7% (89.0-98.5) 1 0.9% (0.0-2.8) 107 100.0% (_-_)

Age

<=18 0 . (.-.) 8 100.0% (100.0-100.0) 0 . (.-.) 8 14.0% (4.4-23.5)

Age 19 or older 6 6.2% (1.1-11.3) 92 92.7% (87.2-98.2) 1 1.1% (0.0-3.2) 99 86.0% (76.5-95.6)

Total 6 5.4% (0.9-9.8) 100 93.7% (89.0-98.5) 1 0.9% (0.0-2.8) 107 100.0% (_-_)

Race

White 2 4.2% (0.0-10.1) 44 93.4% (86.0-100.0) 1 2.4% (0.0-7.1) 47 38.8% (29.0-48.5)

Non White 4 6.1% (0.0-12.3) 56 93.9% (87.7-100.0) 0 . (.-.) 60 61.2% (51.5-71.0)

Total 6 5.4% (0.9-9.8) 100 93.7% (89.0-98.5) 1 0.9% (0.0-2.8) 107 100.0% (_-_)

Region

South NV 4 5.1% (0.0-10.2) 68 93.7% (88.0-99.4) 1 1.3% (0.0-3.8) 73 73.4% (64.8-81.9)

North NV 1 6.8% (0.0-19.8) 17 93.2% (80.2-100.0) 0 . (.-.) 18 14.5% (7.9-21.0)

Rural NV 1 5.3% (0.0-15.6) 15 94.7% (84.4-100.0) 0 . (.-.) 16 12.2% (6.0-18.4)

Total 6 5.4% (0.9-9.8) 100 93.7% (89.0-98.5) 1 0.9% (0.0-2.8) 107 100.0% (_-_)


Yes 3 6.9% (0.0-15.1) 36 93.1% (84.9-100.0) . . . 39 66.7% (52.1-81.2)

No 1 3.5% (0.0-10.7) 17 96.5% (89.3-100.0) . . . 18 33.3% (18.8-47.9)

Total 4 5.8% (0.0-11.8) 53 94.2% (88.2-100.0) . . . 57 100.0% (_-_)


Yes 0 . (.-.) 8 100.0% (100.0-100.0) . . . 8 19.8% (5.8-33.7)

No 3 10.5% (0.0-23.1) 22 89.5% (76.9-100.0) . . . 25 80.2% (66.3-94.2)

Total 3 8.4% (0.0-18.6) 30 91.6% (81.4-100.0) . . . 33 100.0% (_-_)

Currently Employed

Yes 3 3.4% (0.0-7.3) 59 96.6% (92.7-100.0) . . . 62 57.4% (47.0-67.8)

No 3 8.1% (0.0-17.0) 41 91.9% (83.0-100.0) . . . 44 42.6% (32.2-53.0)

Total 6 5.4% (0.9-9.9) 100 94.6% (90.1-99.1) . . . 106 100.0% (_-_)



131

Q27f. Devices to help with something else that was not already mentioned above


N % C.I.(95%) N % C.I.(95%) N % C.I.(95%) N % C.I.(95%)


Gender

Female 1 1.7% (0.0-4.9) 43 98.3% (95.1-100.0) 0 . (.-.) 44 43.3% (33.1-53.6)

Male 3 4.6% (0.0-9.9) 59 93.7% (87.6-99.9) 1 1.6% (0.0-4.9) 63 56.7% (46.4-66.9)

Total 4 3.3% (0.0-6.7) 102 95.7% (91.9-99.5) 1 0.9% (0.0-2.8) 107 100.0% (_-_)

Age

<=18 0 . (.-.) 8 100.0% (100.0-100.0) 0 . (.-.) 8 14.0% (4.4-23.5)

Age 19 or older 4 3.9% (0.0-7.7) 94 95.0% (90.7-99.4) 1 1.1% (0.0-3.2) 99 86.0% (76.5-95.6)

Total 4 3.3% (0.0-6.7) 102 95.7% (91.9-99.5) 1 0.9% (0.0-2.8) 107 100.0% (_-_)

Race

White 2 5.1% (0.0-12.0) 44 92.5% (84.3-100.0) 1 2.4% (0.0-7.1) 47 38.8% (29.0-48.5)

Non White 2 2.2% (0.0-5.4) 58 97.8% (94.6-100.0) 0 . (.-.) 60 61.2% (51.5-71.0)

Total 4 3.3% (0.0-6.7) 102 95.7% (91.9-99.5) 1 0.9% (0.0-2.8) 107 100.0% (_-_)

Region

South NV 1 0.9% (0.0-2.6) 71 97.8% (94.8-100.0) 1 1.3% (0.0-3.8) 73 73.4% (64.8-81.9)

North NV 3 18.6% (0.0-37.8) 15 81.4% (62.2-100.0) 0 . (.-.) 18 14.5% (7.9-21.0)

Rural NV 0 . (.-.) 16 100.0% (100.0-100.0) 0 . (.-.) 16 12.2% (6.0-18.4)

Total 4 3.3% (0.0-6.7) 102 95.7% (91.9-99.5) 1 0.9% (0.0-2.8) 107 100.0% (_-_)


Yes 2 3.8% (0.0-9.1) 37 96.2% (90.9-100.0) . . . 39 66.7% (52.1-81.2)

No 0 . (.-.) 18 100.0% (100.0-100.0) . . . 18 33.3% (18.8-47.9)

Total 2 2.5% (0.0-6.1) 55 97.5% (93.9-100.0) . . . 57 100.0% (_-_)


Yes 0 . (.-.) 8 100.0% (100.0-100.0) . . . 8 19.8% (5.8-33.7)

No 2 5.7% (0.0-14.0) 23 94.3% (86.0-100.0) . . . 25 80.2% (66.3-94.2)

Total 2 4.6% (0.0-11.2) 31 95.4% (88.8-100.0) . . . 33 100.0% (_-_)

Currently Employed

Yes 3 4.1% (0.0-8.9) 59 95.9% (91.1-100.0) . . . 62 57.4% (47.0-67.8)

No 1 2.3% (0.0-6.9) 43 97.7% (93.1-100.0) . . . 44 42.6% (32.2-53.0)

Total 4 3.4% (0.0-6.7) 102 96.6% (93.3-100.0) . . . 106 100.0% (_-_)



132

Q28. Overall, how would you rate the quality of those assistive technology

DEVICES you received?

Poor Fair Good Excellent Total



Gender

Female 3 29.9% (0.9-59.0) 1 6.1% (0.0-18.6) 2 12.5% (0.0-30.3) 7 51.4% (21.5-81.3) 13 41.9% (21.3-62.6)

Male 1 4.0% (0.0-12.3) 6 46.9% (16.2-77.6) 5 27.6% (3.6-51.7) 4 21.5% (0.0-43.0) 16 58.1% (37.4-78.7)

Total 4 14.9% (0.1-29.6) 7 29.8% (7.5-52.1) 7 21.3% (5.5-37.1) 11 34.0% (14.8-53.2) 29 100.0% (_-_)

Age

<=18 1 17.6% (0.0-54.8) 2 82.4% (45.2-100.0) 0 . (.-.) 0 . (.-.) 3 21.8% (0.0-44.6)

Age 19 or older

3 14.1% (0.0-30.1) 5 15.2% (1.7-28.6) 7 27.2% (8.6-45.9) 11 43.5% (22.6-64.5) 26 78.2% (55.4-100.0)

Total 4 14.9% (0.1-29.6) 7 29.8% (7.5-52.1) 7 21.3% (5.5-37.1) 11 34.0% (14.8-53.2) 29 100.0% (_-_)

Race

White 0 . (.-.) 0 . (.-.) 6 45.5% (17.2-73.7) 8 54.5% (26.3-82.8) 14 41.7% (21.4-62.1)

Non White 4 25.5% (0.8-50.3) 7 51.2% (20.5-81.8) 1 4.0% (0.0-12.3) 3 19.3% (0.0-41.5) 15 58.3% (37.9-78.6)

Total 4 14.9% (0.1-29.6) 7 29.8% (7.5-52.1) 7 21.3% (5.5-37.1) 11 34.0% (14.8-53.2) 29 100.0% (_-_)

Region

South NV 4 21.5% (0.5-42.6) 6 39.5% (10.7-68.2) 4 17.3% (0.0-34.8) 4 21.7% (0.7-42.7) 18 69.0% (50.9-87.1)

North NV 0 . (.-.) 1 11.7% (0.0-34.9) 2 32.1% (0.0-70.3) 4 56.2% (16.6-95.8) 7 22.0% (5.8-38.1)

Rural NV 0 . (.-.) 0 . (.-.) 1 25.6% (0.0-71.5) 3 74.4% (28.5-100.0) 4 9.0% (0.0-18.4)

Total 4 14.9% (0.1-29.6) 7 29.8% (7.5-52.1) 7 21.3% (5.5-37.1) 11 34.0% (14.8-53.2) 29 100.0% (_-_)


Yes 4 28.4% (0.0-57.1) 4 43.2% (7.1-79.3) 3 17.2% (0.0-38.6) 2 11.3% (0.0-28.6) 13 85.3% (69.1-100.0)

No 0 . (.-.) 1 25.7% (0.0-73.9) 0 . (.-.) 3 74.3% (26.1-100.0) 4 14.7% (0.0-30.9)

Total 4 24.2% (0.0-48.7) 5 40.6% (8.3-72.9) 3 14.6% (0.0-32.8) 5 20.5% (0.5-40.6) 17 100.0% (_-_)


Yes 0 . (.-.) 2 49.1% (0.0-100.0) 0 . (.-.) 2 50.9% (0.0-100.0) 4 18.2% (0.0-37.8)

No 2 20.5% (0.0-49.0) 2 26.6% (0.0-64.6) 3 21.2% (0.0-46.8) 5 31.7% (2.1-61.3) 12 81.8% (62.2-100.0)

Total 2 16.8% (0.0-40.4) 4 30.7% (0.0-62.8) 3 17.3% (0.0-38.3) 7 35.2% (8.2-62.2) 16 100.0% (_-_)

Currently Employed

Yes 2 11.3% (0.0-27.6) 3 24.9% (0.0-54.2) 4 19.9% (0.1-39.7) 8 43.9% (16.6-71.2) 17 54.7% (33.2-76.3)

No 2 19.2% (0.0-44.8) 4 35.8% (1.8-69.7) 3 23.0% (0.0-48.3) 3 22.1% (0.0-47.2) 12 45.3% (23.7-66.8)

Total 4 14.9% (0.1-29.6) 7 29.8% (7.5-52.1) 7 21.3% (5.5-37.1) 11 34.0% (14.8-53.2) 29 100.0% (_-_)



133

Q29a. Who first told you about the transition student services available to you from Nevada

Department of Employment Training and Rehabilitation?

Parent Friend Teacher School counselor Total



Gender

Female 3 29.9% (0.9-59.0) 1 6.1% (0.0-18.6) 2 12.5% (0.0-30.3) 7 51.4% (21.5-81.3) 13 41.9% (21.3-62.6)

Male 1 4.0% (0.0-12.3) 6 46.9% (16.2-77.6) 5 27.6% (3.6-51.7) 4 21.5% (0.0-43.0) 16 58.1% (37.4-78.7)

Total 4 14.9% (0.1-29.6) 7 29.8% (7.5-52.1) 7 21.3% (5.5-37.1) 11 34.0% (14.8-53.2) 29 100.0% (_-_)

Age

<=18 1 17.6% (0.0-54.8) 2 82.4% (45.2-100.0) 0 . (.-.) 0 . (.-.) 3 21.8% (0.0-44.6)

Age 19 or older 3 14.1% (0.0-30.1) 5 15.2% (1.7-28.6) 7 27.2% (8.6-45.9) 11 43.5% (22.6-64.5) 26 78.2% (55.4-100.0)

Total 4 14.9% (0.1-29.6) 7 29.8% (7.5-52.1) 7 21.3% (5.5-37.1) 11 34.0% (14.8-53.2) 29 100.0% (_-_)

Race

White 0 . (.-.) 0 . (.-.) 6 45.5% (17.2-73.7) 8 54.5% (26.3-82.8) 14 41.7% (21.4-62.1)

Non White 4 25.5% (0.8-50.3) 7 51.2% (20.5-81.8) 1 4.0% (0.0-12.3) 3 19.3% (0.0-41.5) 15 58.3% (37.9-78.6)

Total 4 14.9% (0.1-29.6) 7 29.8% (7.5-52.1) 7 21.3% (5.5-37.1) 11 34.0% (14.8-53.2) 29 100.0% (_-_)

Region

South NV 4 21.5% (0.5-42.6) 6 39.5% (10.7-68.2) 4 17.3% (0.0-34.8) 4 21.7% (0.7-42.7) 18 69.0% (50.9-87.1)

North NV 0 . (.-.) 1 11.7% (0.0-34.9) 2 32.1% (0.0-70.3) 4 56.2% (16.6-95.8) 7 22.0% (5.8-38.1)

Rural NV 0 . (.-.) 0 . (.-.) 1 25.6% (0.0-71.5) 3 74.4% (28.5-100.0) 4 9.0% (0.0-18.4)

Total 4 14.9% (0.1-29.6) 7 29.8% (7.5-52.1) 7 21.3% (5.5-37.1) 11 34.0% (14.8-53.2) 29 100.0% (_-_)


Yes 4 28.4% (0.0-57.1) 4 43.2% (7.1-79.3) 3 17.2% (0.0-38.6) 2 11.3% (0.0-28.6) 13 85.3% (69.1-100.0)

No 0 . (.-.) 1 25.7% (0.0-73.9) 0 . (.-.) 3 74.3% (26.1-100.0) 4 14.7% (0.0-30.9)

Total 4 24.2% (0.0-48.7) 5 40.6% (8.3-72.9) 3 14.6% (0.0-32.8) 5 20.5% (0.5-40.6) 17 100.0% (_-_)


Yes 0 . (.-.) 2 49.1% (0.0-100.0) 0 . (.-.) 2 50.9% (0.0-100.0) 4 18.2% (0.0-37.8)

No 2 20.5% (0.0-49.0) 2 26.6% (0.0-64.6) 3 21.2% (0.0-46.8) 5 31.7% (2.1-61.3) 12 81.8% (62.2-100.0)

Total 2 16.8% (0.0-40.4) 4 30.7% (0.0-62.8) 3 17.3% (0.0-38.3) 7 35.2% (8.2-62.2) 16 100.0% (_-_)

Currently Employed

Yes 2 11.3% (0.0-27.6) 3 24.9% (0.0-54.2) 4 19.9% (0.1-39.7) 8 43.9% (16.6-71.2) 17 54.7% (33.2-76.3)

No 2 19.2% (0.0-44.8) 4 35.8% (1.8-69.7) 3 23.0% (0.0-48.3) 3 22.1% (0.0-47.2) 12 45.3% (23.7-66.8)

Total 4 14.9% (0.1-29.6) 7 29.8% (7.5-52.1) 7 21.3% (5.5-37.1) 11 34.0% (14.8-53.2) 29 100.0% (_-_)



134

Q30. Based on your experiences with the transition student services you received, how unlikely or likely would you be to

recommend these services to other students who might need them?

Very unlikely Somewhat unlikely Neither likely nor

unlikely Somewhat likely Very likely Don't Know/Refused Total



Gender

Female 5 10.6% (1.3-19.9) 3 7.5% (0.0-15.9) 6 11.1% (2.2-19.9) 14 34.4% (19.4-49.3) 16 36.4% (21.6-51.3) 0 . (.-.) 44 43.3% (33.1-53.6)

Male 3 4.9% (0.0-10.5) 4 5.0% (0.0-10.0) 3 3.2% (0.0-6.9) 18 24.4% (13.6-35.2) 34 60.8% (47.8-73.8) 1 1.6% (0.0-4.9) 63 56.7% (46.4-66.9)

Total 8 7.4% (2.2-12.5) 7 6.1% (1.5-10.7) 9 6.6% (2.2-11.1) 32 28.7% (19.6-37.8) 50 50.3% (39.8-60.7) 1 0.9% (0.0-2.8) 107 100.0% (_-_)

Age

<=18 0 . (.-.) 1 6.4% (0.0-19.3) 0 . (.-.) 1 6.4% (0.0-19.3) 6 87.2% (68.8-100.0) 0 . (.-.) 8 14.0% (4.4-23.5)

Age 19 or older 8 8.6% (2.7-14.5) 6 6.0% (1.1-11.0) 9 7.7% (2.6-12.8) 31 32.3% (22.5-42.1) 44 44.3% (33.9-54.6) 1 1.1% (0.0-3.2) 99 86.0% (76.5-95.6)

Total 8 7.4% (2.2-12.5) 7 6.1% (1.5-10.7) 9 6.6% (2.2-11.1) 32 28.7% (19.6-37.8) 50 50.3% (39.8-60.7) 1 0.9% (0.0-2.8) 107 100.0% (_-_)

Race

White 6 12.8% (3.0-22.6) 2 4.4% (0.0-10.5) 5 8.9% (1.2-16.6) 13 27.7% (14.5-40.9) 20 43.8% (29.2-58.5) 1 2.4% (0.0-7.1) 47 38.8% (29.0-48.5)

Non White 2 4.0% (0.0-9.4) 5 7.1% (0.6-13.6) 4 5.2% (0.0-10.5) 19 29.4% (17.1-41.7) 30 54.3% (40.3-68.3) 0 . (.-.) 60 61.2% (51.5-71.0)

Total 8 7.4% (2.2-12.5) 7 6.1% (1.5-10.7) 9 6.6% (2.2-11.1) 32 28.7% (19.6-37.8) 50 50.3% (39.8-60.7) 1 0.9% (0.0-2.8) 107 100.0% (_-_)

Region

South NV 5 7.1% (0.9-13.3) 7 8.3% (2.0-14.6) 3 3.7% (0.0-7.9) 23 30.3% (19.1-41.5) 34 49.4% (36.7-62.0) 1 1.3% (0.0-3.8) 73 73.4% (64.8-81.9)

North NV 2 10.5% (0.0-24.6) 0 . (.-.) 3 14.3% (0.0-29.9) 5 27.9% (6.5-49.4) 8 47.2% (23.3-71.2) 0 . (.-.) 18 14.5% (7.9-21.0)

Rural NV 1 5.3% (0.0-15.6) 0 . (.-.) 3 15.4% (0.0-32.2) 4 20.1% (1.2-39.0) 8 59.2% (34.2-84.3) 0 . (.-.) 16 12.2% (6.0-18.4)

Total 8 7.4% (2.2-12.5) 7 6.1% (1.5-10.7) 9 6.6% (2.2-11.1) 32 28.7% (19.6-37.8) 50 50.3% (39.8-60.7) 1 0.9% (0.0-2.8) 107 100.0% (_-_)


Yes 3 7.7% (0.0-16.6) 1 2.3% (0.0-6.8) 1 1.8% (0.0-5.4) 11 27.5% (12.2-42.7) 23 60.8% (43.9-77.7) 0 . (.-.) 39 66.7% (52.1-81.2)

No 1 4.2% (0.0-12.6) 1 3.6% (0.0-10.8) 2 7.5% (0.0-18.2) 6 25.5% (4.8-46.2) 7 54.1% (27.7-80.6) 1 5.1% (0.0-15.3) 18 33.3% (18.8-47.9)

Total 4 6.5% (0.0-13.1) 2 2.7% (0.0-6.6) 3 3.7% (0.0-8.0) 17 26.8% (14.5-39.1) 30 58.6% (44.4-72.8) 1 1.7% (0.0-5.1) 57 100.0% (_-_)


Yes 0 . (.-.) 1 10.9% (0.0-32.6) 2 25.0% (0.0-56.8) 3 31.7% (0.0-64.6) 2 32.4% (0.0-69.4) . . . 8 19.8% (5.8-33.7)

No 3 9.7% (0.0-21.2) 0 . (.-.) 2 5.1% (0.0-12.6) 7 26.3% (7.2-45.4) 13 58.9% (36.8-80.9) . . . 25 80.2% (66.3-94.2)

Total 3 7.8% (0.0-17.0) 1 2.2% (0.0-6.6) 4 9.0% (0.0-18.3) 10 27.3% (10.7-44.0) 15 53.6% (33.9-73.4) . . . 33 100.0% (_-_)

Currently Employed

Yes 2 3.8% (0.0-9.0) 4 5.9% (0.0-11.8) 6 7.1% (1.4-12.9) 21 32.7% (20.2-45.2) 29 50.6% (36.9-64.2) 0 . (.-.) 62 57.4% (47.0-67.8)

No 6 12.4% (2.6-22.2) 3 6.5% (0.0-14.1) 3 6.1% (0.0-13.3) 10 21.8% (9.0-34.6) 21 50.9% (34.7-67.2) 1 2.2% (0.0-6.6) 44 42.6% (32.2-53.0)

Total 8 7.5% (2.3-12.6) 7 6.1% (1.5-10.8) 9 6.7% (2.2-11.2) 31 28.0% (19.0-37.1) 50 50.7% (40.3-61.2) 1 0.9% (0.0-2.8) 106 100.0% (_-_)



135

Q33. Which of the Vocational

Rehabilitation locations did you receive all OR a majority of your services

from?

Carson City (1933 North Carson Street)

Elko (172 6th Street) Ely (1500 Ave F #1) Fallon (121 Industrial Way Henderson (119 Water

Street)

Las Vegas (3016 West Charleston Boulevard - Suite

200; “West Bay”)

Las Vegas (3405 South Maryland Parkway)

North Las Vegas (2827 Las Vegas Boulevard

North; “North Town”)

N % C.I.(95%) N % C.I.(95%) N % C.I.(95%) N % C.I.(95%) N % C.I.(95%) N % C.I.(95%) N % C.I.(95%) N % C.I.(95%)

Overall Total Total 3 2.6% (0.0-5.7) 3 1.8% (0.0-3.9) 1 0.8% (0.0-2.5) 6 4.6% (0.7-8.6) 5 5.0% (0.6-9.3) 32 31.9% (22.1-41.7) 10 11.7% (4.2-19.1) 9 8.6% (2.2-14.9)

Gender

Female 2 4.6% (0.0-11.2) 1 1.5% (0.0-4.4) 1 1.9% (0.0-5.6) 4 5.9% (0.1-11.8) 1 2.8% (0.0-8.3) 15 39.0% (23.6-54.3) 6 16.5% (4.4-28.6) 1 2.8% (0.0-8.3)

Male 1 1.0% (0.0-3.1) 2 2.1% (0.0-5.0) 0 . (.-.) 2 3.6% (0.0-9.0) 4 6.6% (0.2-13.1) 17 26.5% (14.1-38.8) 4 7.9% (0.0-17.2) 8 13.1% (2.9-23.3)

Total 3 2.6% (0.0-5.7) 3 1.8% (0.0-3.9) 1 0.8% (0.0-2.5) 6 4.6% (0.7-8.6) 5 5.0% (0.6-9.3) 32 31.9% (22.1-41.7) 10 11.7% (4.2-19.1) 9 8.6% (2.2-14.9)

Age

<=18 0 . (.-.) 0 . (.-.) 0 . (.-.) 0 . (.-.) 0 . (.-.) 3 32.0% (0.0-66.8) 2 25.6% (0.0-59.2) 1 18.0% (0.0-49.7)

Age 19 or older

3 3.0% (0.0-6.7) 3 2.1% (0.0-4.5) 1 1.0% (0.0-2.9) 6 5.4% (0.8-10.0) 5 5.8% (0.8-10.8) 29 31.9% (22.0-41.8) 8 9.4% (2.9-15.9) 8 7.1% (2.1-12.1)

Total 3 2.6% (0.0-5.7) 3 1.8% (0.0-3.9) 1 0.8% (0.0-2.5) 6 4.6% (0.7-8.6) 5 5.0% (0.6-9.3) 32 31.9% (22.1-41.7) 10 11.7% (4.2-19.1) 9 8.6% (2.2-14.9)

Race

White 2 3.5% (0.0-8.3) 3 4.7% (0.0-10.0) 1 2.1% (0.0-6.3) 5 8.1% (1.1-15.2) 4 9.6% (0.6-18.6) 10 23.1% (10.4-35.7) 0 . (.-.) 1 2.4% (0.0-7.1)

Non White 1 2.1% (0.0-6.1) 0 . (.-.) 0 . (.-.) 1 2.4% (0.0-7.0) 1 2.0% (0.0-6.0) 22 37.6% (23.8-51.4) 10 19.1% (7.4-30.9) 8 12.6% (2.7-22.4)

Total 3 2.6% (0.0-5.7) 3 1.8% (0.0-3.9) 1 0.8% (0.0-2.5) 6 4.6% (0.7-8.6) 5 5.0% (0.6-9.3) 32 31.9% (22.1-41.7) 10 11.7% (4.2-19.1) 9 8.6% (2.2-14.9)

Region

South NV 0 . (.-.) 0 . (.-.) 1 1.1% (0.0-3.4) 0 . (.-.) 5 6.8% (0.9-12.7) 32 43.6% (31.1-56.2) 10 15.9% (6.0-25.9) 9 11.7% (3.2-20.3)

North NV 1 5.3% (0.0-15.5) 0 . (.-.) 0 . (.-.) 0 . (.-.) 0 . (.-.) 0 . (.-.) 0 . (.-.) 0 . (.-.)

Rural NV 2 15.1% (0.0-35.6) 3 14.8% (0.0-31.2) 0 . (.-.) 6 37.7% (11.8-63.6) 0 . (.-.) 0 . (.-.) 0 . (.-.) 0 . (.-.)

Total 3 2.6% (0.0-5.7) 3 1.8% (0.0-3.9) 1 0.8% (0.0-2.5) 6 4.6% (0.7-8.6) 5 5.0% (0.6-9.3) 32 31.9% (22.1-41.7) 10 11.7% (4.2-19.1) 9 8.6% (2.2-14.9)


Yes 0 . (.-.) 1 1.6% (0.0-4.8) . . . 2 3.6% (0.0-8.6) 2 5.1% (0.0-12.3) 12 30.6% (14.7-46.4) 4 9.9% (0.0-19.8) 4 13.0% (0.0-27.3)

No 2 7.4% (0.0-18.0) 0 . (.-.) . . . 1 3.5% (0.0-10.7) 1 5.1% (0.0-15.3) 5 30.6% (4.2-57.0) 1 13.8% (0.0-38.7) 2 7.1% (0.0-17.4)

Total 2 2.5% (0.0-6.0) 1 1.1% (0.0-3.2) . . . 3 3.5% (0.0-7.7) 3 5.1% (0.0-11.0) 17 30.6% (16.8-44.3) 5 11.2% (0.4-21.9) 6 11.1% (0.8-21.3)


Yes 1 9.8% (0.0-29.5) . . . . . . 0 . (.-.) 0 . (.-.) 2 21.9% (0.0-50.9) 0 . (.-.) 1 10.9% (0.0-32.6)

No 0 . (.-.) . . . . . . 4 14.0% (0.0-28.9) 2 8.9% (0.0-21.6) 7 33.3% (10.2-56.4) 1 2.7% (0.0-8.3) 2 6.6% (0.0-16.2)

Total 1 1.9% (0.0-6.0) . . . . . . 4 11.3% (0.0-23.2) 2 7.2% (0.0-17.4) 9 31.0% (11.5-50.6) 1 2.2% (0.0-6.6) 3 7.4% (0.0-16.3)

Currently Employed

Yes 1 1.0% (0.0-3.1) 3 3.2% (0.0-6.8) 1 1.4% (0.0-4.3) 2 2.2% (0.0-5.2) 2 3.3% (0.0-7.8) 16 29.5% (16.5-42.5) 9 16.0% (5.9-26.0) 5 6.2% (0.7-11.7)

No 2 4.8% (0.0-11.7) 0 . (.-.) 0 . (.-.) 4 8.1% (0.0-16.5) 3 7.4% (0.0-15.7) 16 35.9% (20.6-51.3) 1 6.0% (0.0-17.5) 4 12.1% (0.0-25.0)

Total 3 2.6% (0.0-5.8) 3 1.8% (0.0-3.9) 1 0.8% (0.0-2.5) 6 4.7% (0.7-8.7) 5 5.0% (0.6-9.4) 32 32.2% (22.3-42.1) 10 11.8% (4.3-19.3) 9 8.7% (2.3-15.1)



136

Q33. Which of the Vocational

Rehabilitation locations did you receive all OR a majority of your services

from?

Reno (1325 Corporate Boulevard; “Corporate

Office”)

Reno (4001 South Virginia Street; “Old

Town Mall”)

Sparks (1675 East Prater Way)

Winnemucca (475 West Haskell, #2)

Other Location Don't Know/Refused Total



Gender

Female 5 8.3% (1.1-15.5) 1 1.7% (0.0-4.9) 1 1.8% (0.0-5.2) 1 1.5% (0.0-4.4) 3 7.1% (0.0-15.2) 2 4.7% (0.0-11.3) 44 43.6% (33.3-54.0)

Male 9 13.7% (4.9-22.6) 1 1.1% (0.0-3.2) 1 1.8% (0.0-5.2) 2 3.6% (0.0-9.0) 6 11.2% (1.2-21.2) 5 7.8% (1.0-14.6) 62 56.4% (46.0-66.7)

Total 14 11.4% (5.4-17.3) 2 1.3% (0.0-3.2) 2 1.8% (0.0-4.2) 3 2.7% (0.0-6.0) 9 9.4% (2.7-16.1) 7 6.4% (1.7-11.2) 106 100.0% (_-_)

Age

<=18 0 . (.-.) 0 . (.-.) 0 . (.-.) 0 . (.-.) 2 24.4% (0.0-57.4) 0 . (.-.) 8 14.0% (4.4-23.7)

Age 19 or older

14 13.2% (6.5-20.0) 2 1.5% (0.0-3.7) 2 2.0% (0.0-4.9) 3 3.1% (0.0-7.0) 7 7.0% (1.7-12.2) 7 7.5% (2.0-13.0) 98 86.0% (76.3-95.6)

Total 14 11.4% (5.4-17.3) 2 1.3% (0.0-3.2) 2 1.8% (0.0-4.2) 3 2.7% (0.0-6.0) 9 9.4% (2.7-16.1) 7 6.4% (1.7-11.2) 106 100.0% (_-_)

Race

White 9 20.8% (8.5-33.1) 0 . (.-.) 2 4.5% (0.0-10.7) 2 3.2% (0.0-7.6) 3 6.4% (0.0-13.5) 5 11.7% (1.9-21.5) 47 39.0% (29.2-48.8)

Non White 5 5.3% (0.6-10.1) 2 2.2% (0.0-5.2) 0 . (.-.) 1 2.4% (0.0-7.0) 6 11.4% (1.4-21.3) 2 3.1% (0.0-7.5) 59 61.0% (51.2-70.8)

Total 14 11.4% (5.4-17.3) 2 1.3% (0.0-3.2) 2 1.8% (0.0-4.2) 3 2.7% (0.0-6.0) 9 9.4% (2.7-16.1) 7 6.4% (1.7-11.2) 106 100.0% (_-_)

Region

South NV 0 . (.-.) 0 . (.-.) 0 . (.-.) 0 . (.-.) 8 12.0% (3.1-20.8) 7 8.8% (2.3-15.3) 72 73.2% (64.6-81.8)

North NV 13 73.6% (52.9-94.3) 2 9.1% (0.0-21.5) 2 12.1% (0.0-28.1) 0 . (.-.) 0 . (.-.) 0 . (.-.) 18 14.6% (8.0-21.2)

Rural NV 1 5.3% (0.0-15.7) 0 . (.-.) 0 . (.-.) 3 21.8% (0.0-45.5) 1 5.3% (0.0-15.7) 0 . (.-.) 16 12.3% (6.0-18.5)

Total 14 11.4% (5.4-17.3) 2 1.3% (0.0-3.2) 2 1.8% (0.0-4.2) 3 2.7% (0.0-6.0) 9 9.4% (2.7-16.1) 7 6.4% (1.7-11.2) 106 100.0% (_-_)


Yes 4 8.0% (0.0-16.0) 1 1.6% (0.0-5.0) . . . 0 . (.-.) 6 18.2% (2.8-33.6) 3 8.5% (0.0-18.0) 39 66.7% (52.1-81.2)

No 1 5.4% (0.0-16.2) 1 3.9% (0.0-11.9) . . . 2 11.4% (0.0-28.0) 2 11.6% (0.0-27.6) 0 . (.-.) 18 33.3% (18.8-47.9)

Total 5 7.1% (0.6-13.6) 2 2.4% (0.0-5.9) . . . 2 3.8% (0.0-9.5) 8 16.0% (4.3-27.7) 3 5.6% (0.0-12.1) 57 100.0% (_-_)


Yes 1 12.9% (0.0-37.7) 1 12.1% (0.0-35.7) 1 16.6% (0.0-47.4) 0 . (.-.) 0 . (.-.) 1 15.7% (0.0-45.1) 8 19.8% (5.8-33.7)

No 1 3.0% (0.0-9.1) 0 . (.-.) 1 3.2% (0.0-9.7) 2 5.1% (0.0-12.6) 3 17.0% (0.0-37.9) 2 6.1% (0.0-15.1) 25 80.2% (66.3-94.2)

Total 2 4.9% (0.0-12.1) 1 2.4% (0.0-7.3) 2 5.8% (0.0-14.3) 2 4.1% (0.0-10.1) 3 13.7% (0.0-30.8) 3 8.0% (0.0-17.5) 33 100.0% (_-_)

Currently Employed

Yes 9 12.1% (4.2-19.9) 0 . (.-.) 0 . (.-.) 3 4.7% (0.0-10.4) 7 14.2% (3.3-25.0) 4 6.4% (0.2-12.5) 62 57.8% (47.3-68.2)

No 5 10.7% (1.5-19.9) 2 3.2% (0.0-7.6) 2 4.2% (0.0-10.1) 0 . (.-.) 2 3.1% (0.0-7.5) 2 4.5% (0.0-11.0) 43 42.2% (31.8-52.7)

Total 14 11.5% (5.5-17.5) 2 1.3% (0.0-3.2) 2 1.8% (0.0-4.3) 3 2.7% (0.0-6.0) 9 9.5% (2.7-16.3) 6 5.6% (1.1-10.1) 105 100.0% (_-_)



137

Q34. How did you first find out about the Vocational Rehabilitation Program services

available to you from the Nevada Department of Employment Training and

Rehabilitation?

Television Internet Friend Relative Other Community Resource Don’t Know/Refused Total



Gender

Female 0 . (.-.) 1 1.9% (0.0-5.6) 2 3.4% (0.0-8.1) 5 10.3% (1.2-19.5) 35 81.6% (70.0-93.2) 1 2.8% (0.0-8.3) 44 43.6% (33.3-54.0)

Male 1 1.2% (0.0-3.5) 0 . (.-.) 3 3.9% (0.0-8.4) 2 2.7% (0.0-6.6) 53 86.9% (78.2-95.6) 3 5.4% (0.0-11.7) 62 56.4% (46.0-66.7)

Total 1 0.7% (0.0-1.9) 1 0.8% (0.0-2.5) 5 3.7% (0.4-6.9) 7 6.0% (1.4-10.6) 88 84.6% (77.5-91.6) 4 4.3% (0.0-8.6) 106 100.0% (_-_)

Age

<=18 0 . (.-.) 0 . (.-.) 0 . (.-.) 0 . (.-.) 8 100.0% (100.0-100.0) 0 . (.-.) 8 14.0% (4.4-23.7)

Age 19 or older 1 0.8% (0.0-2.3) 1 1.0% (0.0-2.9) 5 4.3% (0.5-8.1) 7 7.0% (1.7-12.3) 80 82.1% (74.1-90.0) 4 4.9% (0.0-9.9) 98 86.0% (76.3-95.6)

Total 1 0.7% (0.0-1.9) 1 0.8% (0.0-2.5) 5 3.7% (0.4-6.9) 7 6.0% (1.4-10.6) 88 84.6% (77.5-91.6) 4 4.3% (0.0-8.6) 106 100.0% (_-_)

Race

White 0 . (.-.) 1 2.1% (0.0-6.3) 3 6.2% (0.0-13.1) 5 9.2% (1.2-17.2) 37 80.1% (68.7-91.6) 1 2.4% (0.0-7.1) 47 39.0% (29.2-48.8)

Non White 1 1.1% (0.0-3.2) 0 . (.-.) 2 2.1% (0.0-5.0) 2 4.0% (0.0-9.5) 51 87.4% (78.6-96.3) 3 5.4% (0.0-11.8) 59 61.0% (51.2-70.8)

Total 1 0.7% (0.0-1.9) 1 0.8% (0.0-2.5) 5 3.7% (0.4-6.9) 7 6.0% (1.4-10.6) 88 84.6% (77.5-91.6) 4 4.3% (0.0-8.6) 106 100.0% (_-_)

Region

South NV 1 0.9% (0.0-2.7) 1 1.1% (0.0-3.4) 3 3.3% (0.0-7.1) 3 4.6% (0.0-9.9) 61 86.2% (78.2-94.3) 3 3.8% (0.0-8.3) 72 73.2% (64.6-81.8)

North NV 0 . (.-.) 0 . (.-.) 1 4.1% (0.0-12.2) 1 5.3% (0.0-15.5) 16 90.6% (77.8-100.0) 0 . (.-.) 18 14.6% (8.0-21.2)

Rural NV 0 . (.-.) 0 . (.-.) 1 5.3% (0.0-15.7) 3 15.4% (0.0-32.2) 11 67.6% (42.3-92.9) 1 11.8% (0.0-33.2) 16 12.3% (6.0-18.5)

Total 1 0.7% (0.0-1.9) 1 0.8% (0.0-2.5) 5 3.7% (0.4-6.9) 7 6.0% (1.4-10.6) 88 84.6% (77.5-91.6) 4 4.3% (0.0-8.6) 106 100.0% (_-_)


Yes 1 1.8% (0.0-5.4) 1 2.3% (0.0-6.8) 2 4.3% (0.0-10.6) 3 9.3% (0.0-19.6) 31 79.8% (66.3-93.3) 1 2.6% (0.0-7.7) 39 66.7% (52.1-81.2)

No 0 . (.-.) 0 . (.-.) 1 4.5% (0.0-13.6) 1 3.5% (0.0-10.7) 15 84.0% (65.6-100.0) 1 7.9% (0.0-23.1) 18 33.3% (18.8-47.9)

Total 1 1.2% (0.0-3.6) 1 1.5% (0.0-4.5) 3 4.4% (0.0-9.5) 4 7.4% (0.0-14.7) 46 81.2% (70.3-92.1) 2 4.3% (0.0-10.5) 57 100.0% (_-_)


Yes 0 . (.-.) . . . 0 . (.-.) 0 . (.-.) 8 100.0% (100.0-100.0) 0 . (.-.) 8 19.8% (5.8-33.7)

No 1 2.7% (0.0-8.3) . . . 3 10.0% (0.0-21.8) 3 8.3% (0.0-18.2) 16 72.4% (54.2-90.7) 2 6.6% (0.0-16.2) 25 80.2% (66.3-94.2)

Total 1 2.2% (0.0-6.6) . . . 3 8.0% (0.0-17.5) 3 6.6% (0.0-14.6) 24 77.9% (63.3-92.5) 2 5.3% (0.0-13.0) 33 100.0% (_-_)

Currently Employed

Yes 1 1.1% (0.0-3.4) 0 . (.-.) 4 5.0% (0.0-9.9) 5 7.1% (0.7-13.4) 50 82.2% (72.2-92.1) 2 4.7% (0.0-11.0) 62 57.8% (47.3-68.2)

No 0 . (.-.) 1 2.0% (0.0-5.9) 1 2.0% (0.0-5.9) 2 4.8% (0.0-11.5) 37 87.5% (77.6-97.4) 2 3.8% (0.0-9.2) 43 42.2% (31.8-52.7)

Total 1 0.7% (0.0-2.0) 1 0.8% (0.0-2.5) 5 3.7% (0.4-7.0) 7 6.1% (1.4-10.7) 87 84.4% (77.3-91.6) 4 4.3% (0.0-8.6) 105 100.0% (_-_)



138

Q35. Was Vocational Rehabilitation Program information given to you in your preferred

format?

Yes No Don’t Know/Refused Total

N % C.I.(95%) N % C.I.(95%) N % C.I.(95%) N % C.I.(95%)


Gender

Female 28 63.0% (47.9-78.0) 15 34.2% (19.5-49.0) 1 2.8% (0.0-8.3) 44 43.6% (33.3-54.0)

Male 40 67.5% (54.6-80.5) 18 27.4% (15.0-39.9) 4 5.0% (0.0-10.0) 62 56.4% (46.0-66.7)

Total 68 65.5% (55.7-75.4) 33 30.4% (20.9-40.0) 5 4.0% (0.3-7.8) 106 100.0% (_-_)

Age

<=18 6 74.4% (40.8-100.0) 2 25.6% (0.0-59.2) 0 . (.-.) 8 14.0% (4.4-23.7)

Age 19 or older 62 64.1% (54.1-74.1) 31 31.2% (21.5-40.8) 5 4.7% (0.4-9.0) 98 86.0% (76.3-95.6)

Total 68 65.5% (55.7-75.4) 33 30.4% (20.9-40.0) 5 4.0% (0.3-7.8) 106 100.0% (_-_)

Race

White 31 67.6% (53.9-81.2) 14 28.5% (15.4-41.7) 2 3.9% (0.0-9.4) 47 39.0% (29.2-48.8)

Non White 37 64.3% (50.7-77.8) 19 31.6% (18.4-44.8) 3 4.1% (0.0-9.1) 59 61.0% (51.2-70.8)

Total 68 65.5% (55.7-75.4) 33 30.4% (20.9-40.0) 5 4.0% (0.3-7.8) 106 100.0% (_-_)

Region

South NV 45 63.1% (50.9-75.3) 23 32.2% (20.4-44.1) 4 4.7% (0.0-9.5) 72 73.2% (64.6-81.8)

North NV 14 78.9% (59.7-98.0) 4 21.1% (2.0-40.3) 0 . (.-.) 18 14.6% (8.0-21.2)

Rural NV 9 64.5% (40.7-88.3) 6 30.7% (8.1-53.3) 1 4.8% (0.0-14.2) 16 12.3% (6.0-18.5)

Total 68 65.5% (55.7-75.4) 33 30.4% (20.9-40.0) 5 4.0% (0.3-7.8) 106 100.0% (_-_)


Yes 28 73.1% (58.1-88.1) 9 21.8% (8.0-35.6) 2 5.1% (0.0-12.6) 39 66.7% (52.1-81.2)

No 12 66.4% (40.0-92.9) 6 33.6% (7.1-60.0) 0 . (.-.) 18 33.3% (18.8-47.9)

Total 40 70.9% (57.4-84.3) 15 25.7% (12.7-38.7) 2 3.4% (0.0-8.5) 57 100.0% (_-_)


Yes 5 66.0% (31.8-100.0) 3 34.0% (0.0-68.2) 0 . (.-.) 8 19.8% (5.8-33.7)

No 16 69.6% (49.9-89.3) 6 19.9% (3.5-36.4) 3 10.5% (0.0-23.1) 25 80.2% (66.3-94.2)

Total 21 68.9% (51.6-86.2) 9 22.7% (7.7-37.7) 3 8.4% (0.0-18.6) 33 100.0% (_-_)

Currently Employed

Yes 40 68.7% (56.6-80.7) 20 29.2% (17.3-41.0) 2 2.2% (0.0-5.2) 62 57.8% (47.3-68.2)

No 28 62.7% (46.5-78.9) 13 32.8% (16.9-48.7) 2 4.5% (0.0-11.0) 43 42.2% (31.8-52.7)

Total 68 66.2% (56.3-76.0) 33 30.7% (21.1-40.3) 4 3.1% (0.0-6.4) 105 100.0% (_-_)



139

Q35a. In what format would you have preferred to receive information about the

Vocational Rehabilitation program??

Large Font Braille Electronically Alternative Language Other Don’t Know/Refused Total



Gender

Female 2 12.5% (0.0-30.5) 0 . (.-.) 5 36.9% (9.9-63.9) 0 . (.-.) 4 25.5% (1.7-49.3) 4 25.0% (1.4-48.7) 15 49.1% (29.7-68.5)

Male 2 10.3% (0.0-25.2) 2 8.4% (0.0-20.6) 7 36.9% (11.8-61.9) 1 4.2% (0.0-12.9) 4 20.1% (0.4-39.9) 2 20.1% (0.0-49.0) 18 50.9% (31.5-70.3)

Total 4 11.4% (0.0-23.0) 2 4.3% (0.0-10.5) 12 36.9% (18.5-55.3) 1 2.1% (0.0-6.6) 8 22.8% (7.3-38.3) 6 22.5% (4.0-41.1) 33 100.0% (_-_)

Age

<=18 0 . (.-.) 0 . (.-.) 1 30.0% (0.0-91.4) 0 . (.-.) 0 . (.-.) 1 70.0% (8.6-100.0) 2 11.8% (0.0-28.8)

Age 19 or older 4 12.9% (0.0-25.9) 2 4.9% (0.0-11.9) 11 37.8% (18.9-56.7) 1 2.4% (0.0-7.4) 8 25.8% (9.0-42.7) 5 16.1% (1.8-30.5) 31 88.2% (71.2-100.0)

Total 4 11.4% (0.0-23.0) 2 4.3% (0.0-10.5) 12 36.9% (18.5-55.3) 1 2.1% (0.0-6.6) 8 22.8% (7.3-38.3) 6 22.5% (4.0-41.1) 33 100.0% (_-_)

Race

White 2 14.7% (0.0-35.0) 0 . (.-.) 5 40.5% (12.4-68.6) 0 . (.-.) 4 27.9% (2.8-53.0) 3 16.9% (0.0-35.9) 14 36.6% (18.9-54.4)

Non White 2 9.5% (0.0-23.5) 2 6.8% (0.0-16.6) 7 34.8% (11.0-58.6) 1 3.4% (0.0-10.4) 4 19.8% (0.3-39.3) 3 25.8% (0.0-52.3) 19 63.4% (45.6-81.1)

Total 4 11.4% (0.0-23.0) 2 4.3% (0.0-10.5) 12 36.9% (18.5-55.3) 1 2.1% (0.0-6.6) 8 22.8% (7.3-38.3) 6 22.5% (4.0-41.1) 33 100.0% (_-_)

Region

South NV 1 5.2% (0.0-15.6) 2 5.5% (0.0-13.6) 11 44.3% (21.7-67.0) 1 2.8% (0.0-8.5) 5 21.1% (3.1-39.1) 3 21.1% (0.0-43.7) 23 77.5% (63.4-91.6)

North NV 2 51.7% (0.0-100.0) 0 . (.-.) 1 24.9% (0.0-69.8) 0 . (.-.) 1 23.4% (0.0-66.5) 0 . (.-.) 4 10.1% (0.0-20.4)

Rural NV 1 17.2% (0.0-49.5) 0 . (.-.) 0 . (.-.) 0 . (.-.) 2 32.8% (0.0-72.3) 3 50.0% (7.7-92.3) 6 12.4% (2.1-22.7)

Total 4 11.4% (0.0-23.0) 2 4.3% (0.0-10.5) 12 36.9% (18.5-55.3) 1 2.1% (0.0-6.6) 8 22.8% (7.3-38.3) 6 22.5% (4.0-41.1) 33 100.0% (_-_)


Yes 1 7.6% (0.0-24.1) 1 8.2% (0.0-26.0) 3 40.7% (2.2-79.3) 1 8.2% (0.0-26.0) 3 35.3% (0.0-72.3) 0 . (.-.) 9 56.5% (23.7-89.2)

No 0 . (.-.) 1 10.6% (0.0-34.6) 1 15.3% (0.0-48.1) 0 . (.-.) 2 22.4% (0.0-58.1) 2 51.7% (0.0-100.0) 6 43.5% (10.8-76.3)

Total 1 4.3% (0.0-13.7) 2 9.3% (0.0-23.7) 4 29.7% (1.2-58.1) 1 4.6% (0.0-14.9) 5 29.7% (2.5-56.9) 2 22.5% (0.0-56.2) 15 100.0% (_-_)


Yes . . . 2 64.4% (0.0-100.0) 0 . (.-.) . . . 1 35.6% (0.0-100.0) 0 . (.-.) 3 29.6% (0.0-66.2)

No . . . 0 . (.-.) 2 41.3% (0.0-93.9) . . . 3 45.2% (0.0-96.1) 1 13.5% (0.0-45.0) 6 70.4% (33.8-100.0)

Total . . . 2 19.1% (0.0-49.6) 2 29.1% (0.0-70.5) . . . 4 42.3% (1.2-83.4) 1 9.5% (0.0-31.9) 9 100.0% (_-_)

Currently Employed

Yes 2 7.5% (0.0-18.2) 1 3.9% (0.0-11.9) 7 38.5% (14.8-62.1) 1 3.9% (0.0-11.9) 5 27.7% (5.4-49.9) 4 18.6% (0.2-37.0) 20 54.9% (35.3-74.5)

No 2 16.1% (0.0-38.1) 1 4.8% (0.0-14.6) 5 35.0% (6.4-63.6) 0 . (.-.) 3 16.8% (0.0-36.5) 2 27.3% (0.0-60.6) 13 45.1% (25.5-64.7)

Total 4 11.4% (0.0-23.0) 2 4.3% (0.0-10.5) 12 36.9% (18.5-55.3) 1 2.1% (0.0-6.6) 8 22.8% (7.3-38.3) 6 22.5% (4.0-41.1) 33 100.0% (_-_)



140

Q36. How frequently did you receive any natural support while you were in the Vocational Rehabilitation Program?

Never Seldom Sometimes Often Don’t Know/Refused Total



Gender

Female 10 24.6% (11.0-38.3) 4 8.8% (0.1-17.6) 12 26.8% (13.2-40.5) 18 39.7% (24.6-54.8) 0 . (.-.) 44 43.6% (33.3-54.0)

Male 12 18.4% (8.2-28.5) 6 10.6% (0.8-20.5) 22 36.3% (22.4-50.2) 21 33.0% (19.9-46.1) 1 1.7% (0.0-5.0) 62 56.4% (46.0-66.7)

Total 22 21.1% (12.8-29.4) 10 9.9% (3.1-16.6) 34 32.2% (22.2-42.1) 39 35.9% (26.0-45.9) 1 0.9% (0.0-2.8) 106 100.0% (_-_)

Age

<=18 0 . (.-.) 1 18.0% (0.0-49.7) 2 35.9% (0.0-74.4) 5 46.1% (8.5-83.8) 0 . (.-.) 8 14.0% (4.4-23.7)

Age 19 or older 22 24.6% (15.3-33.8) 9 8.5% (2.9-14.2) 32 31.6% (21.9-41.2) 34 34.3% (24.4-44.1) 1 1.1% (0.0-3.2) 98 86.0% (76.3-95.6)

Total 22 21.1% (12.8-29.4) 10 9.9% (3.1-16.6) 34 32.2% (22.2-42.1) 39 35.9% (26.0-45.9) 1 0.9% (0.0-2.8) 106 100.0% (_-_)

Race

White 9 20.0% (8.0-31.9) 4 7.5% (0.2-14.9) 13 27.2% (14.1-40.2) 20 42.9% (28.3-57.5) 1 2.4% (0.0-7.1) 47 39.0% (29.2-48.8)

Non White 13 21.9% (10.5-33.2) 6 11.4% (1.4-21.3) 21 35.4% (21.5-49.3) 19 31.4% (18.3-44.6) 0 . (.-.) 59 61.0% (51.2-70.8)

Total 22 21.1% (12.8-29.4) 10 9.9% (3.1-16.6) 34 32.2% (22.2-42.1) 39 35.9% (26.0-45.9) 1 0.9% (0.0-2.8) 106 100.0% (_-_)

Region

South NV 16 21.5% (11.6-31.5) 7 10.7% (2.1-19.4) 20 29.0% (17.1-41.0) 28 37.5% (25.3-49.6) 1 1.3% (0.0-3.8) 72 73.2% (64.6-81.8)

North NV 3 18.6% (0.0-37.8) 1 5.3% (0.0-15.5) 9 48.2% (24.4-72.1) 5 27.9% (6.5-49.4) 0 . (.-.) 18 14.6% (8.0-21.2)

Rural NV 3 21.8% (0.0-45.5) 2 10.1% (0.0-23.8) 5 31.9% (6.7-57.1) 6 36.2% (11.0-61.5) 0 . (.-.) 16 12.3% (6.0-18.5)

Total 22 21.1% (12.8-29.4) 10 9.9% (3.1-16.6) 34 32.2% (22.2-42.1) 39 35.9% (26.0-45.9) 1 0.9% (0.0-2.8) 106 100.0% (_-_)


Yes 8 21.9% (7.6-36.2) 6 18.0% (2.6-33.3) 9 19.7% (6.8-32.6) 16 40.4% (22.9-57.9) . . . 39 66.7% (52.1-81.2)

No 5 22.2% (2.4-41.9) 0 . (.-.) 7 52.9% (26.2-79.7) 6 24.9% (4.8-45.0) . . . 18 33.3% (18.8-47.9)

Total 13 22.0% (10.4-33.6) 6 12.0% (1.2-22.7) 16 30.8% (16.3-45.2) 22 35.3% (21.3-49.2) . . . 57 100.0% (_-_)


Yes 3 36.5% (0.8-72.2) 2 23.8% (0.0-54.7) 2 28.7% (0.0-63.8) 1 10.9% (0.0-32.6) . . . 8 19.8% (5.8-33.7)

No 3 14.9% (0.0-31.6) 2 13.1% (0.0-33.3) 11 43.1% (19.9-66.4) 9 28.8% (10.0-47.6) . . . 25 80.2% (66.3-94.2)

Total 6 19.2% (3.8-34.6) 4 15.3% (0.0-32.4) 13 40.3% (20.3-60.2) 10 25.3% (9.7-40.9) . . . 33 100.0% (_-_)

Currently Employed

Yes 8 14.1% (4.6-23.5) 9 16.1% (5.1-27.1) 20 31.6% (18.7-44.5) 25 38.3% (25.3-51.2) . . . 62 57.8% (47.3-68.2)

No 14 31.2% (16.5-46.0) 1 1.6% (0.0-4.7) 14 33.7% (17.8-49.6) 14 33.5% (17.7-49.3) . . . 43 42.2% (31.8-52.7)

Total 22 21.3% (12.9-29.7) 10 10.0% (3.2-16.7) 34 32.5% (22.5-42.5) 39 36.3% (26.3-46.3) . . . 105 100.0% (_-_)



141

Appendix G:

Open Ended Response

Themes



142

Question 31: Based on your experiences with the student

transition program, are there any specific CHANGES that

you think could be made in order to IMPROVE the

program?

Needs of Clients

More individual attention and more communication with counselors.

Follow up on clients after job placement.

Respond to clients’ needs in a more timely fashion.

Job Placement Needs

Greater effort to find jobs clients desire.

Help students find jobs.



143

Question 32: Based on your experiences with the student

transition program, are there any specific POSITIVE

aspects that should be continued or expanded in the future?

Employment Opportunities

Continue to help clients find employment.

Continue the job assessment program.

Expand the number of job options.

Staff/Counselors

Continue to create structure.

Continue having face-to-face interactions with clients.

Department of Employment, Training and Rehabilitation ...nvdetr.org/Rehab pages/survey_reports/Survey_Transition_Student... · Department of Employment, Training and Rehabilitation,

Documents