Top Banner
Demonstration of conditional gate operation using superconducting charge qubits T. Yamamoto, Yu. A. Pashkin, O. Astafiev, Y. Nakamura & J. S. Tsai Presented by Martin Stattin and Vincent Peikert
19

Demonstration of conditional gate operation using superconducting charge qubits

Jan 06, 2016

Download

Documents

Kevin D. Lam

T. Yamamoto, Yu. A. Pashkin, O. Astafiev, Y. Nakamura & J. S. Tsai. Demonstration of conditional gate operation using superconducting charge qubits. Presented by Martin Stattin and Vincent Peikert. Index. 1 Introduction: The one qubit system 1.1 Josephson Junction 1.2 Hamiltonian - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Demonstration of conditional gate operation using superconducting charge qubits

Demonstration of conditional gate operation using superconducting

charge qubitsT. Yamamoto, Yu. A. Pashkin, O.

Astafiev, Y. Nakamura & J. S. Tsai

Presented by Martin Stattin and Vincent Peikert

Page 2: Demonstration of conditional gate operation using superconducting charge qubits

Index• 1 Introduction: The one qubit system• 1.1 Josephson Junction

• 1.2 Hamiltonian

• 1.3 Energy bands with EJ = 0

• 1.4 Energy bands with EJ <> 0

• 2 Experiment• 2.1 Experiment setup

• 2.2 Experiment

• 2.3 Results

• 3 Data analysis• 3.1 Truth table

• 3.2 Data disscussion

• 3.3 Improvements

Page 3: Demonstration of conditional gate operation using superconducting charge qubits

1: Introduction

The one qubit system

Page 4: Demonstration of conditional gate operation using superconducting charge qubits

1.1 Josephson Junction

• Behaves like a circuit with capacitance and inhomogenous inductor

• Josephson energy responsible for coherent tunneling

• Superconducting elements

• Gate electrode in our case also superconducting => very precise charge tuning

Page 5: Demonstration of conditional gate operation using superconducting charge qubits

1.2 Hamiltonian

•Parabolar shape of the electric energy

•Josephson energy as a coupling between charge states => Charge is no good quantum number anymore !

Page 6: Demonstration of conditional gate operation using superconducting charge qubits

1.3 Energy band with EJ = 0

•Charge as a good quantum number•Degeneracy points => no energy needed to tunnel to the box

Page 7: Demonstration of conditional gate operation using superconducting charge qubits

1.3 Energy bands with EJ = 0Change the quantum number from charge to energy !

Page 8: Demonstration of conditional gate operation using superconducting charge qubits

1.4 Energy band with EJ <> 0

•Charge is no good quantum number•degeneracy points splitted up•Possible to reach the degeneracy point by applying a special pulse ! => rabi oscillation (~ to E)

Page 9: Demonstration of conditional gate operation using superconducting charge qubits

1.5 Magnetic flux

=>

The Josephson energy is a function of the magnetic flux !

Page 10: Demonstration of conditional gate operation using superconducting charge qubits

2: Experiment

Page 11: Demonstration of conditional gate operation using superconducting charge qubits

2.1 Experiment setup

[1] [2]

Page 12: Demonstration of conditional gate operation using superconducting charge qubits

2.2 Experiment

[1]

Page 13: Demonstration of conditional gate operation using superconducting charge qubits

2.3 Results

[1][1]

Page 14: Demonstration of conditional gate operation using superconducting charge qubits

3: Data analysis

Page 15: Demonstration of conditional gate operation using superconducting charge qubits

3.1 Truth table

• Implementation of CNOT operation succeeded !

=> compare data with simulation data

Page 16: Demonstration of conditional gate operation using superconducting charge qubits

3.2 Data discussionTarget qubit: •good agreement with the experiment (but a little offset)

Numerical calculation of the density matrix's time evolution

Control qubit:•Discrepency due to the unknown currend channel in the readout scheme

•Pulse induced currend should not exceed 2.4 pA but it does => currend has an extra componentmaybe from higher order Cooper-pair tunnerling

Page 17: Demonstration of conditional gate operation using superconducting charge qubits

3.3 Possible improvements

• Increasing Em

• Decrease the raise/fall time of the pulse by 25 %

=> red lines

Page 18: Demonstration of conditional gate operation using superconducting charge qubits

Source list1. T. Yamamoto, Yu. A. Pashkin, O. Astafiev, Y. Nakamura & J. S. Tsai, ”Demonstration of

conditional gate operation using superconducting charge qubits”, Nature, Vol 425, pp 941-944, oct 2003

2. Yu. A. Pashkin, T. Yamamoto, O. Astafiev, Y. Nakamura, D. Averin & J. S. Tsai, ”Coupling two charge qubits”, NEC Res. and Develop., Vol 44, no 3, pp 273-277, jul 2003

3. Lectures on quantum information systems WS 2006/2007, Wallraff, ETHZ

Page 19: Demonstration of conditional gate operation using superconducting charge qubits

[2]