Top Banner
Delays in Fibrinolytic Administration for Acute ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction: Results from the Acute Coronary Treatment and Interventions Outcomes Network Registry – Get With the Guidelines (ACTION Registry®-GWTG TM ) Seth Glickman, MD 1 ; Charles Cairns, MD 1 ; Anita Chen, MS 2 ; Christopher Granger, MD 2 ; Christopher Cannon, MD 3 ; Elizabeth Fraulo, MS 2 ; Eric Peterson, MD, MPH 2 , Matthew Roe, MD 2 1. Department of Emergency Medicine, University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill 2. Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 3. Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA ,
18

Delays in Fibrinolytic Administration for Acute ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction: Results from the Acute Coronary Treatment and Interventions.

Dec 14, 2015

Download

Documents

Justina Bryan
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Delays in Fibrinolytic Administration for Acute ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction: Results from the Acute Coronary Treatment and Interventions.

Delays in Fibrinolytic Administration for Acute ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial

Infarction: Results from the Acute Coronary Treatment and Interventions Outcomes Network Registry – Get With

the Guidelines (ACTION Registry®-GWTGTM)

Seth Glickman, MD1; Charles Cairns, MD1; Anita Chen, MS2; Christopher Granger, MD2; Christopher Cannon, MD3; Elizabeth Fraulo, MS2; Eric Peterson,

MD, MPH2, Matthew Roe, MD2

1. Department of Emergency Medicine, University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill

2. Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC3. Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA

,

Page 2: Delays in Fibrinolytic Administration for Acute ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction: Results from the Acute Coronary Treatment and Interventions.

Disclosures

• Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Physician Faculty Scholar Award (Glickman PI)

• American Heart Association PRT Outcomes Research Center Project Grant (Glickman, Granger, Co PIs)

• NCDR-American College of Cardiology

Page 3: Delays in Fibrinolytic Administration for Acute ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction: Results from the Acute Coronary Treatment and Interventions.

Background

• Reperfusion therapy STEMI reduces mortality in a time-dependent manner – PCI– Fibrinolytic therapy

• 2007 AHA/ACC STEMI Guidelines– “STEMI patients presenting to a hospital without PCI

capability and who cannot be transferred to undergo PCI within 90 minutes should be treated with fibrinolytic therapy within 30 minutes as a systems goal”

Page 4: Delays in Fibrinolytic Administration for Acute ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction: Results from the Acute Coronary Treatment and Interventions.

Background – Challenges to First medical contact to PCI in 90 minutes

• Patients in rural areas far from PCI Centers– Only 1200/5000 hospitals are PCI capable

• 4% of STEMI patients who are transferred achieve DTB <90 minutes1

– ↑ 13% with statewide regionalization efforts2

• Method of choice for primary reperfusion in these patients may be fibrinolysis

1 Nallamothu BK et al. Circulation. 20052 Jollis JG et al. JAMA. 2007

Page 5: Delays in Fibrinolytic Administration for Acute ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction: Results from the Acute Coronary Treatment and Interventions.

Objectives

• Assess the performance of fibrinolytic therapy within the 30 minute guideline in contemporary practice

• Evaluate patient characteristics associated with the timeliness of fibrinolysis

• Determine association of DTN times with patient outcomes

Page 6: Delays in Fibrinolytic Administration for Acute ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction: Results from the Acute Coronary Treatment and Interventions.

Methods – Study population

• ACTION –GWTG Registry

• January 2007-June 200830,193 patients with STEMI at 286 hospitals

• Fibrinoytic therapy - 3,219 STEMI patients in 178 hospitals

Page 7: Delays in Fibrinolytic Administration for Acute ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction: Results from the Acute Coronary Treatment and Interventions.

Methods – Variables• Co-variates

– Patient demographics (age, race, gender)– Medical history– Clinical characteristics on presentation

• Outcomes– Time to fibrinolysis– In-hospital events

• Mortality

• Composite outcome – Mortality, stroke, cardiogenic shock

Page 8: Delays in Fibrinolytic Administration for Acute ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction: Results from the Acute Coronary Treatment and Interventions.

Methods – Statistical analysis

• Association of patient factors and time to fibrinolysis– Linear generalized estimating equations (GEE)

• Association of time to fibrinolysis and outcomes– GEE model

Page 9: Delays in Fibrinolytic Administration for Acute ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction: Results from the Acute Coronary Treatment and Interventions.

Demographics Presentation characteristics

Age (year), median, IQR 59.0 (51.0-68.0) Clinical symptoms

Gender, male 2358 (73.3) Signs of CHF 299 (9.3)

Race, white 2804 (87.1) Heart rate >100 bpm 392 (12.2)

Insurance status, private 1835 (57.0) Systolic BP <90 mmHg 173 (5.4)

Body mass index (kg/m2) 28.3 (25.3-32.2) Transported by EMS 988 (30.7)

Medical history Hospital characteristics

Hypertension 1823 (56.6) Non-PCI (versus PCI) 2872 (89.2)

Diabetes mellitus 614 (19.1) Region

Current/recent smoker 1512 (47.0) West 432 (13.4)

Dyslipidemia 1545 (48.0) Northeast 298 (9.3)

Prior MI 589 (18.3) Midwest 1041 (32.2)

South 1448 (45.0)

Patient Characteristics (n=3,219)

Page 10: Delays in Fibrinolytic Administration for Acute ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction: Results from the Acute Coronary Treatment and Interventions.

Results – Distribution of DTN times

Median DTN 34.0 minutes (IQR 22.0 - 54.0)1,432/3,219, 44.5% met the ACC/AHA guideline ≤ 30 minutes

Page 11: Delays in Fibrinolytic Administration for Acute ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction: Results from the Acute Coronary Treatment and Interventions.

Variable Adjusted

Estimate*

95% CI

(Lower)

95% CI

(Upper)

p-value:

(Individual)

p-value:

(Global)

Patient demographics

Women (vs. men)

Age (year)

17.8 11.9 24.1 <.0001

55 to 64 (vs. <55) -0.3 -5.6 5.3 0.9086 0.0434

65 to 74 (vs. <55) -1.1 -8.6 7.1 0.7875

≥75 (vs. <55) 12.0 1.8 23.2 0.0200

White (vs. other race) -6.7 -14.2 1.4 0.1039

Presentation features

Transported by EMS -19.3 -24.5 -13.7 <.0001

Systolic blood pressure <90 mmHg -10.8 -19.4 -1.3 0.0263

Time or presentation

Weekday, evening (vs. Weekday, day) 4.0 -3.1 11.7 0.2756 0.0156

Weekday, night (vs. Weekday, day) 12.0 3.8 20.9 0.0036

Weekend, day (vs. Weekday, day) 1.1 -8.0 11.3 0.8181

Weekend, evening (vs. Weekday, day) 2.8 -6.3 12.7 0.5605

Weekend, night (vs. Weekday, day) 13.4 3.0 24.8 0.0104

Page 12: Delays in Fibrinolytic Administration for Acute ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction: Results from the Acute Coronary Treatment and Interventions.

Outcome Outcome (%) Adjusted OR

(95% CI)

p-value

Death 3.1% vs 4.4% 0.79 (0.50-1.25) 0.3126

Death /shock /stroke 6.2% vs 8.8% 0.74 (0.56-0.98) 0.0356

Association of DTN time and Outcomes: ≤30 minutes versus >30 minutes

Page 13: Delays in Fibrinolytic Administration for Acute ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction: Results from the Acute Coronary Treatment and Interventions.

Potential Limitations• Selection bias (voluntary registry)

– Underestimates treatment delays

• Observational study– Unmeasured confounders

• Physician experience and treatment preferences• Systems factors

• Sicker patients = longer treatment delays– Yet patients in shock treated as quickly

Page 14: Delays in Fibrinolytic Administration for Acute ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction: Results from the Acute Coronary Treatment and Interventions.

Conclusions

• Timely fibrinolytic therapy associated with better outcomes

• DTN time < 30 min seen < one-half patients– Delays in women, elderly, and after-hours presentations

• Efforts to optimize STEMI care, including regional systems, should focus on shortening reperfusion times for patients who receive primary fibrinolysis as well as those who receive primary PCI

Page 15: Delays in Fibrinolytic Administration for Acute ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction: Results from the Acute Coronary Treatment and Interventions.

Back up slides

Page 16: Delays in Fibrinolytic Administration for Acute ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction: Results from the Acute Coronary Treatment and Interventions.

Potential reasons for treatment delays• Delay in diagnosis

– Atypical signs and symptoms

– Door to ECG times, minutes• Women, median 9 (IQR 4 to 14)• Men, median 5 (IQR 2 to 12)

• System factors at small, rural hospitals– Training of emergency providers (board certification)

– Variation in protocols – e.g. CXR, cardiology consultation

• Patient factors– Variation in provider and patient risk preferences

Page 17: Delays in Fibrinolytic Administration for Acute ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction: Results from the Acute Coronary Treatment and Interventions.

Variable Level Median 25th % 75th% p-value

Presentation characteristics

Systolic BP (mmHg) ≥90 mmHg 34.0 22.0 54.0 0.1622

<90 mmHg 31.0 23.0 46.0

Transported by No 36.0 24.0 57.0 <.0001

Yes 28.0 19.0 45.0

Time of Presentation Weekday, day 32.0 21.0 52.0 0.0077

Weekday, evening 33.0 22.0 52.0

Weekday, night 36.0 25.0 58.0

Weekend, day 33.0 22.5 45.5

Weekend, evening 33.0 21.5 57.0

Weekend, night 35.0 25.0 57.0

Hospital characteristics

Region West 36.0 23.5 60.0 0.0005

Northeast 35.0 23.0 54.0

Midwest 35.0 24.0 55.0

South 32.0 21.0 51.0

Type of hospital PCI 27.0 17.0 52.0 <.0001

Non-PCI 35.0 23.0 54.0

Page 18: Delays in Fibrinolytic Administration for Acute ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction: Results from the Acute Coronary Treatment and Interventions.

Variable Median 25th

Percentile

75th

Percentile

p-value

(Global)

Patient characteristics

Age (year) <55 31.0 21.0 50.0 <.0001

55-64 33.0 22.0 51.0

65-74 35.0 24.0 55.0

≥75 41.0 25.0 67.0

Gender Male 32.0 21.0 50.0 <.0001

Female 38.0 25.0 61.5

Race Caucasian 34.0 22.0 53.0 0.8096

Black 34.0 21.0 66.0

Asian 32.0 14.0 57.0

Hispanic 34.5 21.0 52.0

Other 35.0 21.0 60.0