Top Banner
Defining the Epidemiology of a Novel GIST Multiple Tumor Syndrome: Results of a Population-Based Analysis Jason K. Sicklick, MD, Grace L. Ma, Joel M. Baumgartner, MD, Lisa Madlensky, PhD, CGC, Chih-Min Tang, PhD, Adam M. Burgoyne, MD, PhD, Jonathan C. Trent, MD, PhD, Maria E. Martinez, PhD, and James D. Murphy, MD, MS
21

Defining the Epidemiology of a Novel GIST Multiple Tumor Syndrome: Results of a Population-Based Analysis Jason K. Sicklick, MD, Grace L. Ma, Joel M. Baumgartner,

Dec 18, 2015

Download

Documents

Deirdre Bennett
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Defining the Epidemiology of a Novel GIST Multiple Tumor Syndrome: Results of a Population-Based Analysis Jason K. Sicklick, MD, Grace L. Ma, Joel M. Baumgartner,

Defining the Epidemiology of a Novel GIST Multiple Tumor Syndrome:Results of a Population-Based Analysis

Jason K. Sicklick, MD, Grace L. Ma, Joel M. Baumgartner, MD, Lisa Madlensky, PhD, CGC, Chih-Min Tang, PhD, Adam M. Burgoyne, MD, PhD, Jonathan C. Trent, MD, PhD, Maria E. Martinez, PhD,

and James D. Murphy, MD, MS

Page 2: Defining the Epidemiology of a Novel GIST Multiple Tumor Syndrome: Results of a Population-Based Analysis Jason K. Sicklick, MD, Grace L. Ma, Joel M. Baumgartner,

Relevant Disclosures

Consultant/Speaker for Novartis Pharmaceuticals (JKS, 2013).

Consultant for Novartis Pharmaceuticals (JCT, 2013)

Page 3: Defining the Epidemiology of a Novel GIST Multiple Tumor Syndrome: Results of a Population-Based Analysis Jason K. Sicklick, MD, Grace L. Ma, Joel M. Baumgartner,

Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor• Approximately 95% of GISTs are considered non-hereditary

or sporadic.1-5

• Results of several descriptive, single institution case series suggest that patients with sporadic GIST develop synchronous or metachronous malignancies with frequencies far exceeding the often-cited 1-in-9 lifetime chance of developing 2 primary cancers.6

38 x 25 x 12 cm

1. Agaimy, A. and Hartmann, A. Pathologe 2010; 31(6): 430-7.2. Neuhann, T.M., Mansmann, V., Merkelbach-Bruse, S., et al. Am J Surg Pathol 2013; 37(6): 898-905.3. Kuroda, N., Tanida, N., Hirota, S., et al. Ann Diagn Pathol 2011; 15(5): 358-61.4. Ponti, G., Luppi, G., Martorana, D., et al. Oncol Rep 2010; 23(2): 437-44.5. Stratakis, C.A. and Carney, J.A. J Intern Med 2009; 266(1): 43-52.6. Kosary, C., LAG, R., and Miller, B., SEER Cancer statistics review 1973–1992: tables and graphs, National

Cancer Institute, N., Editor. 1995: Bethesda, MD.

Page 4: Defining the Epidemiology of a Novel GIST Multiple Tumor Syndrome: Results of a Population-Based Analysis Jason K. Sicklick, MD, Grace L. Ma, Joel M. Baumgartner,

Increased Frequency of Other Cancers

• 2006: Literature review of studies compromising 4,813 GIST patients, reported the frequency of additional malignancies was 4.5% to 33%.1

• 2010: Largest single institution study of 783 confirmed these findings, with 20.3% GIST patients developing ≥1 additional malignancies. 2

38 x 25 x 12 cm

1. Agaimy, A., Wunsch, P.H., Sobin, L.H., Lasota, J., and Miettinen, M. Semin Diagn Pathol 2006; 23(2): 120-9.

2. Pandurengan RK, Dumont AG, Araujo DM, Ludwig JA, Ravi V, Patel S, Garber J, Benjamin RS, Strom SS, and Trent JC. Ann Oncol 2010; 21(10): 2107-11.

Page 5: Defining the Epidemiology of a Novel GIST Multiple Tumor Syndrome: Results of a Population-Based Analysis Jason K. Sicklick, MD, Grace L. Ma, Joel M. Baumgartner,

Increased Frequency of Other Cancers

• Associations reported include:– Desmoids1

– Myeloid leukemias2

– Other GI malignancies discovered incidentally during resections for GIST

– GIST discovered incidentally during resections for other GI malignancies

• Limitations of published studies:– Based on single/multiple institutional series– Reported in a qualitative nature

38 x 25 x 12 cm

1. Dumont, A.G., Rink, L., Godwin, A.K., et al. Ann Oncol 2012; 23(5): 1335-40.2. Miettinen, M., Kraszewska, E., Sobin, L.H., and Lasota, J. Cancer 2008; 112(3): 645-9.

Page 6: Defining the Epidemiology of a Novel GIST Multiple Tumor Syndrome: Results of a Population-Based Analysis Jason K. Sicklick, MD, Grace L. Ma, Joel M. Baumgartner,

Purpose of Study

• To utilize a national cancer registry in the United States to investigate the rates and types of additional cancers in patients with GIST.

38 x 25 x 12 cm

Page 7: Defining the Epidemiology of a Novel GIST Multiple Tumor Syndrome: Results of a Population-Based Analysis Jason K. Sicklick, MD, Grace L. Ma, Joel M. Baumgartner,

Methods• We identified 6,112 patients diagnosed with GIST

between 2001 and 2011 in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database*– GI tumor site codes (C150-C189, C199, C209-C212, C218, C220-

C221, C239-C260, C268-C269, C480-C482, C488)– GIST-specific histology code (ICD-O-3 code 8936).

• Excluded patients with high likelihood of hereditary GIST syndromes by excluding those <20 years old

* SEER covers approximately 28% of the U.S. population

38 x 25 x 12 cm

Page 8: Defining the Epidemiology of a Novel GIST Multiple Tumor Syndrome: Results of a Population-Based Analysis Jason K. Sicklick, MD, Grace L. Ma, Joel M. Baumgartner,

Methods• Standardized Prevalence Ratios (SPRs) Before GIST– SPR = Observed/Expected cases of additional cancers– Expected = (total at-risk person-years) x [limited-

duration cancer prevalence specific to the patients’ age (in 5-y intervals), sex, race, and SEER registry grouping]

• Standardized Incidence Ratios (SIRs) After GIST– SIR = Observed/Expected cases of additional cancers– Expected = (total at-risk person-years) x [cancer

incidence specific to the patient’s age (in 5-year intervals), sex, race, year of GIST diagnosis (in 5-year intervals), and SEER registry grouping]

Page 9: Defining the Epidemiology of a Novel GIST Multiple Tumor Syndrome: Results of a Population-Based Analysis Jason K. Sicklick, MD, Grace L. Ma, Joel M. Baumgartner,

17.5%

82.5%

Additional cancer (N=1071)No cancer (N=5041)

Rate of Additional Cancers• 6,112 GIST patients in SEER• 1,071 (17.5%) had additional cancers.*

38 x 25 x 12 cm

Total observation period for additional cancers:• 123,453 person-years = 101,551 (before GIST) + 21,902 (after GIST)

Page 10: Defining the Epidemiology of a Novel GIST Multiple Tumor Syndrome: Results of a Population-Based Analysis Jason K. Sicklick, MD, Grace L. Ma, Joel M. Baumgartner,

Demographics (N=6,112*)

38 x 25 x 12 cm

Characteristic Number (N) PercentAge at GIST Diagnosis

20 – 39 325 5.3%40 – 49 739 12.1%50 – 59 1,289 21.1%60 – 69 1,553 25.4%70 – 79 1,398 22.9%≥80 808 13.2%

Sex Female 2,860 46.8%Male 3,252 53.2%

Race White / Unknown 4,320 70.7%Black 1,079 17.7%Other 713 11.7%

* 30 patients exlcluded form prior epidemiologic analyses

Page 11: Defining the Epidemiology of a Novel GIST Multiple Tumor Syndrome: Results of a Population-Based Analysis Jason K. Sicklick, MD, Grace L. Ma, Joel M. Baumgartner,

Rates of Additional Cancers

38 x 25 x 12 cmTime of Additional Cancers Percent Cancer Before GIST (N=645) 60.7% Cancer During Same Month or After GIST (N=485) 45.7% Cancers Before and After GIST (N=68) 6.4%

Number of Additional Cancers Percent 1 Additional Cancer (N=913) 86.0% >1 Additional Cancer (N=149) 14.0% >2 Additional Cancers (N=16) 1.5%

Page 12: Defining the Epidemiology of a Novel GIST Multiple Tumor Syndrome: Results of a Population-Based Analysis Jason K. Sicklick, MD, Grace L. Ma, Joel M. Baumgartner,

Genitourin

ary

Gastrointesti

nal

Breast

Hematologic

Cutaneous

Sarco

ma

Respira

tory

Neuroendocri

ne

Head and Neck

Thyroid

Hepatopancreatobilia

ry

Meso

thelioma

Nervous

Other0.0%

5.0%

10.0%

15.0%

20.0%

25.0%

30.0%

35.0%

40.0%

45.0%

39.7%

15.2% 15.2%

6.5% 5.4% 4.6% 4.4%2.8% 2.1% 1.8% 0.9% 0.3% 0.1% 0.9%

Perc

ent

of a

dditi

onal

mal

igna

ncie

s by

ana

tom

ic s

ite

(%)

Additional Cancers Before GIST

Page 13: Defining the Epidemiology of a Novel GIST Multiple Tumor Syndrome: Results of a Population-Based Analysis Jason K. Sicklick, MD, Grace L. Ma, Joel M. Baumgartner,

Genitourin

ary

Gastrointesti

nal

Respira

tory

Breast

Hematologic

Hepatopancreatobilia

ry

Neuroendocri

ne

Thyroid

Sarco

ma

Cutaneous

Head and Neck

Nervous

Meso

thelioma

Other0.0%

5.0%

10.0%

15.0%

20.0%

25.0%

30.0%

35.0%

40.0%

45.0%

29.4%

19.4%

13.1%

7.1% 6.5% 5.4%3.5% 3.1% 2.9% 2.7% 1.9% 0.6% 0.4% 1.2%

Perc

ent

of a

dditi

onal

mal

igna

ncie

s by

ana

tom

ic s

ite

(%)

Additional Cancers After GIST

Page 14: Defining the Epidemiology of a Novel GIST Multiple Tumor Syndrome: Results of a Population-Based Analysis Jason K. Sicklick, MD, Grace L. Ma, Joel M. Baumgartner,

Genitourin

ary

Gastrointesti

nal

Breast

Respira

tory

Hematologic

Cutaneous

Sarco

ma

Neuroendocri

ne

Hepatopancreatobilia

ry

Thyroid

Head and Neck

Nervous

Meso

thelioma

Other0.0%

5.0%

10.0%

15.0%

20.0%

25.0%

30.0%

35.0%

40.0%

45.0%

35.3%

17.0%

11.8%

8.1%6.5%

4.2% 3.8% 3.1% 2.8% 2.4% 2.0%0.3% 0.3% 1.0%

Perc

ent

of a

dditi

onal

mal

igna

ncie

s by

ana

tom

ic s

ite

(%)

Additional Cancers Before +After GIST

Page 15: Defining the Epidemiology of a Novel GIST Multiple Tumor Syndrome: Results of a Population-Based Analysis Jason K. Sicklick, MD, Grace L. Ma, Joel M. Baumgartner,

Standard Prevalence/Incidence Rates

* Other female genitourinary (GU) includes vulvar cancer (N=4), vaginal cancer (N=1), fallopian tube (N=2), and NOS (N=1).** Hepatobiliary adenocarcinoma includes liver adenocarcinoma (N=2), intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (N=1), extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (N=1), and ampullary adenocarcinoma (N=4).

NOTE: While multiple GISTs were characteristic of hereditary GIST syndromes, only 16 additional GIST cases were noted in the SEER cohort, accounting for only 1.3% of second cancers.

Page 16: Defining the Epidemiology of a Novel GIST Multiple Tumor Syndrome: Results of a Population-Based Analysis Jason K. Sicklick, MD, Grace L. Ma, Joel M. Baumgartner,

Timeline for Occurrence95% CI* P<0.05.

>

> 5 yr 1 yr before to 1 after

Page 17: Defining the Epidemiology of a Novel GIST Multiple Tumor Syndrome: Results of a Population-Based Analysis Jason K. Sicklick, MD, Grace L. Ma, Joel M. Baumgartner,

Limitations• Cancers were identified using histology and site-specific codes;

as such, misdiagnosis or miscoding remain potential sources of error.

• We likely underestimated the actual number of patients with GIST in the database, and the diagnoses of second GISTs might be indicative of the miscoding of metastatic disease.

• While we attempted to eliminate patients with hereditary syndromes from our analysis by excluding those diagnosed <20 yo, we had no way of directly identifying these patients.

• As with all studies on 2nd cancers, the elevated incidence and prevalence rates might be partially attributed to detection bias during work-up and treatment, rather than a truly meaningful link.

38 x 25 x 12 cm

Page 18: Defining the Epidemiology of a Novel GIST Multiple Tumor Syndrome: Results of a Population-Based Analysis Jason K. Sicklick, MD, Grace L. Ma, Joel M. Baumgartner,

Summary-1• 17.5% of GIST patients (or 1-in-5.7) developed an

additional cancer– 60.7% Before GIST– 45.7% After GIST– 1-in-16 patients develop cancers Before and After GIST

• Additional cancers were most often diagnosed within 1 year of GIST diagnosis

38 x 25 x 12 cm

Page 19: Defining the Epidemiology of a Novel GIST Multiple Tumor Syndrome: Results of a Population-Based Analysis Jason K. Sicklick, MD, Grace L. Ma, Joel M. Baumgartner,

Summary-2• Before and After– Sarcomas, NET-carcinoid tumors, colorectal

adenocarcinoma, and NHL

• Before Only– Melanomas – Adenocarcinomas of the esophagus, bladder, and

prostate

• After Only– Papillary thyroid cancer, NSCLC, bladder TCC– Adenocarcinomas of the stomach, small intestine,

kidneys, hepatopancreatobiliary system, and female GU tract

38 x 25 x 12 cm

Page 20: Defining the Epidemiology of a Novel GIST Multiple Tumor Syndrome: Results of a Population-Based Analysis Jason K. Sicklick, MD, Grace L. Ma, Joel M. Baumgartner,

Conclusion-1• These data point to the possibility of a new GIST multiple

tumor syndrome, which we believe to be distinct from known disorders such as:– Familial GIST syndromes

• Only 16 additional GIST cases were noted in the SEER cohort, accounting for only 1.3% of second cancers

– Neurofibromatosis type 1 (e.g., GIST, sarcomas, periampullary/PNETs, and pheochromocytoma)• Sarcomas and PNETS comprised only 7.1% (6.9% and 0.2%, respectively) of

the 1,224 additional cancers

– Carney's triad (gastric GIST, pulmonary chondroma, extra-adrenal paraganglioma, adrenal adenomas)• Benign tumors are not coded in SEER

– Carney-Stratakis syndrome (e.g., GIST and paragangliomas)

38 x 25 x 12 cm

Page 21: Defining the Epidemiology of a Novel GIST Multiple Tumor Syndrome: Results of a Population-Based Analysis Jason K. Sicklick, MD, Grace L. Ma, Joel M. Baumgartner,

Conclusion-2• To our knowledge, this is the first population-based study

to quantify the occurrence of specific malignancies before and after GIST.

• We confirmed many previous institutional studies and identified several novel cancer associations, providing a comprehensive description and statistical examination to support the existence of a new GIST multiple tumor syndrome.

• Further investigations are necessary to link these epidemiological findings with relevant clinical decision-making, including screening and prevention.

38 x 25 x 12 cm