Top Banner
Last Update Tir AP1387, July AD2008 Copyright © 2005–2008 Caevandish All rights reserved. Defining Automatic Seismic Static Load Cases in ETABS and SAP2000 for Iran’s Code of Practices (AP1384AD2005 Edition) UBC 94 Seismic AutoLateral Load Parameters Prepared for ISEA , by V. Sarmast, Dey AP1384, December AD2005 Use “User Coefficient” for “Auto Lateral Load” in “Define Static Load Case Names” dialog box. Use these parameters: Base Shear Coefficient, ܥ ܫܤܣ (from Code) Building Height Exp., ܭൌ1 Use UBC 94 for Auto Lateral Load in Define Static Load Case Names dialog box. Use these parameters: Time Period: User Defined, (from Code) Factors: Numerical Coefficient, ሺfrom Codeሻ Seismic Coefficients: Seismic Zone Factor, , User Defined, ܣ(from Code) Seismic Coefficients: Site Coefficient () and Importance Factor (ܫ): Use following table based on “Soil Type”, “Seismic Zone (ܣ)”, and “Importance Factor (ܫ)” from Code: Parameters from Code ETABS Parameters Soil Type Seismic Zone (ܣ) Time Period () (in seconds) I All Zones 0.10 0.40 2.0 0.9090 ൈ ܫ0.40 1.0 1.0858 ൈ ܫII All Zones 0.10 0.50 2.0 0.9090 ൈ ܫ0.50 1.2 1.0499 ൈ ܫIII All Zones 0.15 0.70 2.0 1.0000 ൈ ܫ0.70 1.5 1.1563 ൈ ܫIV 1 and 2 ( ܣൌ 0.35, 0.30) 0.15 0.8668 2.0 1.0000 ൈ ܫ0.8668 1.00 2.0 1.1000 ൈ ܫ1.00 2.0 1.1000 ൈ ܫ3 and 4 ( ܣൌ 0.25, 0.20) 0.15 0.8668 2.0 1.1818 ൈ ܫ0.8668 1.00 2.0 1.3000 ൈ ܫ1.00 2.0 1.3000 ൈ ܫNote: For 1.85, must control that 0.1ܫܣ. If it’s not satisfied, the multiplier value of ܫmay be increased. UBC 94 Factors for Approximate and Program Calculated Methods Prepared for ISEA , by V. Sarmast, Tir AP1385, July AD2006 Structural System ܥ(in metres) ܥ(in feet) Empirical Method (Method A) * Program Calculated Method ** Not Increased 25% Increased Zone 4 Zone 1, 2, or 3 Steel Moment Resisting Frames 0.08 0.0328 0.0410 0.0316 0.0293 Concrete Moment Resisting Frames 0.07 0.0287 0.0359 0.0276 0.0256 Other Structural Systems 0.05 0.0205 0.0256 0.0197 0.0183 * ௦ௗ ** ௦ௗ min ሺ , Where ܥ ܪ and 1.3, 0.35 ሺZone 4ሻ 1.4, ൏ 0.30 ሺZone 1, 2, or 3ሻ
1

Defining Automatic Seismic Static Load Cases in ETABS and SAP2000

Apr 02, 2015

Download

Documents

jaimont0029
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Defining Automatic Seismic Static Load Cases in ETABS and SAP2000

Last Update Tir AP1387, July AD2008 

Copyright © 2005–2008 Caevandish All rights reserved. 

    Defining Automatic Seismic Static Load Cases in ETABS and SAP2000     for Iran’s Code of Practices (AP1384‐AD2005 Edition) 

UBC 94 Seismic Auto­Lateral Load Parameters Prepared for ISEA™, by V. Sarmast, Dey AP1384, December AD2005 

   Use “User Coefficient” for “Auto Lateral Load” in “Define Static Load Case Names” dialog box. Use these parameters:

• Base Shear Coefficient, (from Code)

• Building Height Exp., 1

 Use UBC 94 for Auto Lateral Load in Define Static Load Case Names dialog box. Use these parameters:

• Time Period: User Defined, (from Code)

• Factors: Numerical Coefficient, from Code

• Seismic Coefficients: Seismic Zone Factor, , User Defined, (from Code)

• Seismic Coefficients: Site Coefficient ( ) and Importance Factor ( ): Use following table based on “Soil Type”, “Seismic Zone ( )”, and “Importance Factor ( )” from Code:

Parameters from Code ETABS Parameters Soil Type Seismic Zone ( ) Time Period ( ) (in seconds)

I All Zones 0.10 0.40 2.0 0.9090 0.40 1.0 1.0858

II All Zones 0.10 0.50 2.0 0.9090 0.50 1.2 1.0499

III All Zones 0.15 0.70 2.0 1.0000 0.70 1.5 1.1563

IV

1 and 2 ( 0.35, 0.30)

0.15 0.8668 2.0 1.0000 0.8668 1.00 2.0 1.1000 1.00 2.0 1.1000

3 and 4 ( 0.25, 0.20)

0.15 0.8668 2.0 1.1818 0.8668 1.00 2.0 1.3000 1.00 2.0 1.3000

Note: For 1.85, must control that 0.1 . If it’s not satisfied, the multiplier value of may be increased.

UBC 94   Factors for Approximate and Program Calculated Methods Prepared for ISEA™, by V. Sarmast, Tir AP1385, July AD2006 

Structural System (in metres) (in feet) Empirical Method (Method A)* Program Calculated Method** Not Increased 25% Increased Zone 4 Zone 1, 2, or 3

Steel Moment Resisting Frames 0.08  0.0328 0.0410 0.0316  0.0293Concrete Moment Resisting Frames 0.07  0.0287 0.0359 0.0276  0.0256Other Structural Systems 0.05  0.0205 0.0256 0.0197  0.0183

*

** min  ,

Where  

and 1.3, 0.35 Zone 41.4, 0.30 Zone 1, 2, or 3