CityMatCH Annual Conference Portland, Oregon September 14, 2018 Cradle Kalamazoo - Collective Impact in Action Catherine L. Kothari PhD 1 , Grace Lubwama DPP 2 , Terra Bautista 3 , Deb Lenz 3 , Joia Creer Perry MD 4 , Carmen Green MPH 4 , Katie Corbit 3 , Lisa Graves MD 1 1 Western Michigan University Homer Stryker M.D. School of Medicine, 2 YWCA of Kalamazoo 3 Kalamazoo Health and Community Services, 4 National Birth Equity Collaborative
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
CityMatCH Annual ConferencePortland, Oregon
September 14, 2018
Cradle Kalamazoo - Collective Impact in Action
Catherine L. Kothari PhD1, Grace Lubwama DPP2, Terra Bautista3, Deb Lenz3, Joia Creer Perry MD4, Carmen Green MPH4, Katie Corbit3, Lisa Graves MD1
1Western Michigan University Homer Stryker M.D. School of Medicine, 2YWCA of Kalamazoo 3Kalamazoo Health and Community Services, 4National Birth Equity Collaborative
Getting in the Door and Staying There Lisa Graves MD Associate Dean, WMed & Cradle Clinical lead
Kalamazoo CountyThree Year Moving Average Infant Mortality Rate, By Race
-1997 to 2017*-
9.8
13.214.0
20.819.5
20.9
18.016.016.8
16.819.219.5
18.317.615.5
14.215.3
11.013.0
7.0 6.5 7.28.6 8.5
6.45.4 4.6 5.0 4.8 5.5 5.7
4.8 3.9 3.9 4.7 4.73.2 3.6
1997
-199
9
1998
-200
0
1999
-200
1
2000
-200
2
2001
-200
3
2002
-200
4
2003
-200
5
2004
-200
6
2005
-200
7
2006
-200
8
2007
-200
9
2008
-201
0
2009
-201
1
2010
-201
2
2011
-201
3
2012
-201
4
2013
-201
5
2014
-201
6
2015
-201
7
blackwhite
Met Healthy People 2020
Goal of 6.0 IMR
*2014-2016 & 2015-2017 are estimated, not the official rates.
3.6 RR
COLLECTIVE IMPACT – The Goal
“Large-scale social change requires broad cross-sector coordination….”
Kania, J. & Kramer, M. (2011) Collective Impact. Stanford Social Innovation Review. Winter, 2011.
COLLECTIVE IMPACT – The Challenges
Kania, J. & Kramer, M. (2011) Collective Impact. Stanford Social Innovation Review. Winter, 2011.
• No one solution or organization will be able to solve infant mortality by themselves.
• Cradle’s overall goal is to improve infant mortality, knowing that only 10-20% of health is impacted by clinical care.
10-20% 80-90%
• Build awareness
• Build Community Partners
• Identify the issue in the community
• Learn from the past
GETTING STARTED
PHASE 1: GENERATING IDEAS AND DIALOGUE: 2014
ACTIVITIES• One-on-one meetings with stakeholders
• Kickoff Conference (November, 2014)
• Media coverage
Equity Focus Data-Driven Collective
ImpactCommunity Engagement
PHASE 1: GENERATING IDEAS AND DIALOGUE: 2014
PHASE 2: STRATEGIC PROCESS: 2015
ROOTED IN STRATEGY
• Identify priority areas
• Identify strategic partners
• Analyze baseline data and key issues
• Map the landscape and use data to make case
ACTIVITIES• Community Workshops (March & May,
2015)
• Fundraising
• Research Race X SES further
• Strategic Planning Consultant / Process
Funding:
Equity Focus Data-Driven Collective
ImpactCommunity Engagement
CRADLE GOALS
• Cradle Kalamazoo: In the next 10 years, Cradle is organizing strategies to create zero disparities in infant mortality and an overall infant mortality rate of less of 3.0 per 1,000 lives births
Shared ProsperityK-12 & KzooPromise
Early Edu.Cradle Kzoo
0 5 yrs Puberty Pregnancy Life Course
Overall well-being of all children & families in Kalamazoo
ALIGNING STRATEGY WITH CAUSE
Problem Cause1. Fragmented Systems of care2. Stress from poverty & discrimination3. Lack of opportunity & access4. Health Literacy
Strategic Objectives1. Coordinating perinatal home visitation network,
2. Incorporating health equity into practices & policies,
3. Providing reproductive health education,
4. Providing safe sleep education.
PHASE 1: GENERATING IDEAS AND DIALOGUE: 2014
PHASE 2: STRATEGIC PROCESS: 2014-15
PHASE 3: INITIAL ACTION: 2015-16
ORGANIZING
• Facilitate community outreach
• Identify funding• Establish
shared metrics
ACTIVITIES• Announced plan at annual meeting
• Workgroups to develop each objective
• Hired administrative backbone
• Public Health Marketing
• Fundraising
Funding:• Kalamazoo
CountyHealth Plan
• Michigan Health Endowment Fund
Equity Focus Data-Driven Collective
ImpactCommunity Engagement
PHASE 1: GENERATING IDEAS AND DIALOGUE: 2014
PHASE 2: STRATEGIC PROCESS: 2014-15
PHASE 3: INITIAL ACTION: 2015-16PHASE 4: ORGANIZE FOR IMPACT: 2016 - 2018
IMPLEMENTATION
• Create infrastructure and process
• Create common agenda, goals and strategy
• Continue to engage
ACTIVITIES• Baby Hotline
• Implement Data Hub
• Fundraising
• Continuum of care
Funding:
Equity Focus Data-Driven Collective
ImpactCommunity Engagement
CRADLE ACHIEVEMENTS 2014-2018
• Administrative & Data Backbone raised $1.8 million (2014-2018) to support admin, data, and expanded programming
• Coordinated over 400 meetings with 30 community partners at 8 committees
• In 2017-2018, Hosted 22 community events with a total of 784 attendees and volunteers
Safe Sleep• Coordinated
education with home visitation
• Designed standardized education and messaging
Health Equity• Commitment for
IM from City & County Commissions
• Review of equity in initiative
• Funded community engagement & equity work within clinics
Home Visitation
• Built Care Coordination Registry with 7 perinatal HV programs
• Supported care coordination between programs with Frontline meetings
Reproductive Health
• Coordinated education with home visitation
• Designed standardized education and messaging
CRADLE ACHIEVEMENTS 2014-2018
16
WHERE WE STARTED: Cradle’s first structure (2015)
Steering Committee
Data Backbone• Database/Care Coordination Registry• Mom’s Experience Survey• Cradle Kalamazoo Research
Administrative Backbone
• Oversee day-to-day• Marketing• Status of projects
• Funded community engagement & equity work within clinics
Home Visitation
• Built Care Coordination Registry with 6 perinatal HV programs
• Supported care coordination between programs with Frontline meetings
Reproductive Health
• Coordinated education with home visitation
• Designed standardized education and messaging
CRADLE COORDINATION ACHIEVEMENTS
CRADLE Home Visitation Coordination
ClinicClinicClinicClinicClinic
23
CLINIC TO COMMUNITY COORDINATION
ClinicClinicClinicClinicClinic
COORDINATED CARE
“… together we can do so much”
9 data-sharing participants:• Seven home visiting programs• Two CHW programsMultiple community programs
• Early childhood home visiting• Service presentations
48 weekly meetings since 2017
254 Cases reviewed• Thirty-eight brain-storming• Two hundred-sixteen hand-offs
COORDINATED CARE STRATEGIES
1. Clinic to Community• Home Visitation (case managers, doulas, CHWs)• Planning for automatic, universal referral
2. SDOH Collaboration Platform, ASCENSION BORGESS TAV • Promote coordination between clinic & community
resources
3. Community to Clinic• Street outreach, resource linkage & re-engagement • Community education
4. Care Coordination Registry• Updated contact info for enrollment / retention• Referral portal for agencies, clinics, & community
SDOH COLLABORATION PLATFORM
Pilot an electronic care coordination platform
Bridging services
27
Community to clinic
Clinic to Community
Coordinated Care: CHW Strategy
Community to Clinic
YWCA
WMED KCHSD
CHW
Inter- AgencyProviders
StaffDepartments
Pregnancy Testing
OB/GYNCare Team
Medical Appointment
Time of Delivery
Clinic to Community
Community Events
Neighborhoods
Community Educational
Classes
Pregnancy Testing
Community Relationships
Community to Clinic
• Increased support for families• Wrap-Around Case Sharing
Awareness
Willingness
Access
Outreach increases community-engagement:
Taking Clinical Continuum-of-Care into Neighborhoods and Homes
Carmen Green MPH (National Birth Equity Collaborative, Cradle Health Equity Consultants)
Overview
• Capacity Building grant from MDHHS – Minority Health
• Goal to eliminate racial and ethnic health disparities through implementing culturally appropriate, evidence-based approaches
Overall Program & Evaluation
• Purpose of this grant is to support goal: ensuring health equity and cultural competency of programs, policies, and providers.
• Partnering with 3 clinical sites (Ascension Borgess, Bronson, Family Health Center) to improve cultural competency of clinical processes and procedures that impact maternal and infant health
MissionTo reduce Black maternal and infant mortality through research, family centered collaboration and advocacy.
GoalReducing black infant mortality rates by 50% in the next 10
years.
Our vision is that every Black infant will celebrate a healthy first birthday
with their families.
birth equity (noun):
1. The assurance of the conditions of optimal births for all people with a willingness to address racial and social inequalities in a sustained effort.
• Physical space: Buildings & design• Health insurance plans accepted by the organization• Reduce implicit bias within organization policies, structures
& in patient care
• Leverage community assets to work together on community issues related to improving health & equity
IHI (Institute for Healthcare Improvement) Framework To Achieve Health Equity
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Wyatt R., Laderman M., Botwinick L., Mate K., Wittington J. Achieving Health Equity: A Guide for Health Care Organizations. IHI White Paper. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Institute for Healthcare Improvement; 2016. (Available at ihi.org)
Develop partnerships with community organizations
Root cause analysis
Some of the underlying reasons for lack of effectiveness of RCAs in improving patient safety include the lack of standardized and explicit processes and techniques to:
• Identify hazards and vulnerabilities that impact patient safety and then prioritize them to determine if action is required
• Identify systems-based corrective actions• Ensure the timely execution of an RCA and formulation of effective
sustainable improvements and corrective actions Ensure follow-through to implement recommendations
• Measure whether corrective actions were successful• Ensure that leadership at all levels of the organization participate in
making certain that RCAs are performed when appropriate, in a timely manner, and that corrective actions are implemented to improve patient safety
Rules to 5 whys
Rule 1. Clearly show the “cause and effect” relationship.Rule 2. Use specific and accurate descriptors for what
occurred, rather than negative and vague words. Avoid negative descriptors such as: Poor; Inadequate; Wrong; Bad; Failed; Careless.
Rule 3. Human errors must have a preceding cause.Rule 4. Violations of procedure are not root causes, but must
have a preceding cause.Rule 5. Failure to act is only causal when there is a pre-
existing duty to act.
“5 Whys” Exercise
EVENT: What happened?
PATTERN: What’s been happening?
ACTION: What are the implications for action?
Overall Program & Evaluation
Phase 1: • Identified 3 clinical sites
• Assessed cultural competency of policies and procedures that impact maternal/infant health (pre-assessment)
• Met with sites to review assessment & talk about needs
• Plan to assess after 1 year (post-assessment consultant evaluation, summary/process report)
Current Work
• Phase 2: Early Access to Care• Updated and documented intake processes & workflow• Created reports with entrance to care data• Updated intake process for first prenatal visit• Working to create & implement unified SDOH
questionnaire • Offered trainings • Post Assessment and review in September
• Sustainability: • Processes and procedures incorporated into each clinic• Connecting with partner agencies for continued training
needs• Incorporate into internal QI processes
Successes & Challenges
Successes • Engagement from clinical
partners• Unified approach to SDOH
across Kalamazoo• Changing culture around
access to care• Support for early access to
care • Median first prenatal visit now
occurring in first trimester
• Interest in trainings • 8 events completed• 2 planned
Challenges• Securing an external
consultant
• Consistent follow-up with multi-sector partners
Best Practices
HRSA MCH CoIINAssociation of Maternal & Child Health Programs (AMCHP)FL, IL, KY, MA, NC, NM, NV, OH, OR, RI, SC, TX, WISocial determinants of health
National Institute for Children’s Health Quality (NICHQ)AR, MS, NY, TNSudden Unexpected Infant Death
Project Concern International (PCI)CoIIN Team States: AZ, CA, NM, TXEarly prenatal care & social determinants of health
University of North Carolina - Chapel HillCA, DE, NC, OKPreconception health
AMCHP Innovation Station
Data as a Health Justice StrategyCathy Kothari PhD (Assoc Prof, WMed & Cradle Epi)
COMMUNITY-BASED, POPULATION HEALTH
RESEARCH
CRADLE-KALAMAZOO DATA BACKBONE
CQI – FIMR
CARE COORDINATION REGISTRY
COMMUNITY-BASED POPULATION HEALTH
RESEARCH
0.0%
10.0%
20.0%
7.7%
10.9%
$ $$$
11.3%
4.3%White Infants
13.0
3.6
Black Infants
*3-year moving average, 2014-2016, Kalamazoo County
3.6 Relative Rate
DISPARITY
Infants of Color have Worse Birth OutcomesLaser on Equity
Infant Mortality RateKalamazoo County, 2010-2017 estimate
Parsing Root Causes: Poverty
Infant Mortality RateKalamazoo County, 2010-2017 estimate
Poverty Risk Not Distributed Equally
Infants of Color
…Regardless of IncomeInfant Mortality Rate
Kalamazoo County, 2010-2017 estimate
Parsing Root Causes: Structural Racism
Race
Structural Discrimination(SES)
Moms Health Experiences Survey Study-Recruited women from postpartum floor-Recruited 10% of county maternal population-Phone survey, 2 months postpartum-Neighborhood & Personal SDOH
30.1%
70.2%
% Exposed to Poverty (N=240)
Women of color(n=94)
White women(n=146) * p<.001
Parsing Root Causes: Poverty
Poverty is deeper among women of color• more likely to be going
hungry• without transportation
Isolated• without a support network• or a network that is just as
deprived
Parsing Root Causes: Segregation
Segregated into poverty-Concentrated poverty in 100% higher density Black neighborhoods(11 of 11 census tracts)
VS
-Concentrated poverty in 21.1% of higher density White neighborhoods(8 of 38 census tracts)
Parsing Root Causes: Interpersonal Racism
Race
Interpersonal Discrimination(EoD scale)
Structural Discrimination(SES)
Experiences of Discrimination Scale*1. How often are you treated with less courtesy or respect2. How often do you receive poorer service than other people3. How often do people act as if they think you are not smart4. How often do people act as if they are afraid of you5. How often are you followed around in stores6. How often are you threatened or harassed
*Discrimination Index: Almost every day, At least once a week, A few times a month, A few times a year, About once a year, Never0 to 30, higher indicates greater discrimination
White26.0%12.3%16.0%9.6%4.1%1.4%
Of Color43.6%22.3%28.7%16.1%16.0%3.2%
% Monthly
* p<.001
Parsing Root Causes: Interpersonal Racism
Interpersonal Discrimination(EoD scale)
Everyday Discrimination Scale (Williams, 2012)
CQI – FIMR
Cradle-Kalamazoo Fetal Infant Mortality Review (FIMR)(mid-2015 through mid-2018)