Top Banner
NICE APPRAISAL ON DRONEDARONE RAIGMORE HOSPITAL SITE VISIT CARDIOLOGY DEPARTMENT MANAGEMENT Three Top Tips ECG CHALLENGE FUTURE TECHNOLOGY NEWS LATEST PRODUCT NEWS Featuring 14 Companies LEFT ATRIAL APPENDAGE OCCLUSION: A Review TAVI’s A Cardiac Surgeon’s Point of View CARDIAC CATH • EP • CRM • ECHO • CT/MRI Issue 27 • Nov/Dec 2010 Subscribe FREE Online CardiologyHD.com
28

Coronary Heart #27

Mar 11, 2016

Download

Documents

CardiologyHD

Edition 27 of Coronary Heart features an interview with cardiac surgeon Mr Babat discussing TAVI's, and a review on left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO). Other features are a site visit to Raigmore Hospital Cardiology Department in Scotland, Latest Product News, ECG Education, Dronedarone, and an interview with Charles Bloe.
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Coronary Heart #27

NICE APPRAISAL ONDRONEDARONE

RAIGMORE HOSPITALSITE VISIT

CARDIOLOGY DEPARTMENTMANAGEMENTThree Top Tips

ECG CHALLENGE

FUTURE TECHNOLOGY NEWS

LATEST PRODUCT NEWSFeaturing 14 Companies

LEFT ATRIAL APPENDAGEOCCLUSION:A Review

TAVI’sA Cardiac Surgeon’s Point of View

CARDIAC CATH • EP • CRM • ECHO • CT/MRI

Issue 27 • Nov/Dec 2010Subscribe FREE OnlineCardiologyHD.com

Page 2: Coronary Heart #27
Page 3: Coronary Heart #27

www.cardiologyhd.com  Nov/Dec 2010 3

Disclaimer:Coronary Heart should never be regarded as an authoritati ve peer reviewed medical journal.  Coronary Heart has been designed as a guide only, to inform readers who work in the cardiology environment about latest news stories and the diff erent techniques used by others around the world.  Whilst all care is taken in reviewing arti cles obtained from various companies and contributors, it is not possible to confi rm the accuracy of all statements.  Therefore it is the reader’s responsibility that any advice provided in this publi-cati on should be carefully checked themselves, by either contacti ng the companies involved or speaking to those with skills in the specifi c area. Readers should always re check claims made in this publicati on before employing them in their own work environment.  Opinions expressed by contributors are their own and not necessarily those of their insti tuti on, Coronary Heart Publishing Ltd or the editorial staff .  

Copyright © 2006 -2010 by Coronary Heart Publishing Ltd.  All rights reserved.  Material may only be reproduced by prior arrangement and with due acknowledgment of Coronary Heart Publishing.  The publicati on of an adverti sement or product review does not imply that a product is recommended by Coronary Heart Publishing Ltd.  

www.cardiologyhd.com  Nov/Dec 2010 5

Latest Product NewsAbbott ’s Groundbreaking Bioresorbable Vascular Scaff old Implanted in First UK Pati entAbbott   enrolled  its  fi rst  UK  heart  pati ent  at  the  University  Hospi-tals of Leicester as part of an internati onal trial to evaluate the per-formance  of  the  company’s  revoluti onary  bioresorbable  vascular scaff old (BVS)  -  the fi rst drug-eluti ng device of  its kind designed to open up a blocked artery without leaving behind a permanent met-al  implant  in  the blood vessel.   This potenti al  restorati on of vessel functi on makes Abbott  ’s  BVS  unique  in  the  treatment  of  coronary artery disease.

The ABSORB EXTEND trial, which will enrol pati ents from 100 centres worldwide, reinforces Abbott  ’s commitment to research and devel-op innovati ve devices for vascular care. “The BVS promises to be an important next step in the treatment of coronary artery disease, and Abbott  is committ ed to making this revoluti onary technology a clini-cal reality,” said Sue Hudson, General Manager, Abbott  Vascular, UK & Ireland.

CYPHER Stent 10 Year Follow-upCordis Corporati on announced at the European Society of Cardiology in Stockholm on August 31st that the results of follow-up tests under-taken  ten years aft er  the fi rst pati ent was  treated with a CYPHER® Sirolimus-eluti ng coronary stent have proven outstanding long-term effi  cacy and safety. 

The fi rst pati ent was treated in 1999 with the CYPHER® stent at the age of 75 aft er her coronary angiography showed a signifi cant, single, de novo lesion in the proximal left  anterior descending (LAD) artery and under-went further invasive follow-up revealing a sustained anti -proliferati ve eff ect of  the CYPHER®  stent by both  angiography and IVUS  examinati on  in  2009.  The  pati ent  also  underwent  an  opti cal coherence tomography (OCT) assessment which revealed a complete coverage of over 90% of  the analysed  struts.  The  follow-up proce-dure was broadcast live during the 2009 meeti ng of the Lati n America Society of Interventi onal Cardiology (SOLACI, Rio de Janeiro - Brazil).

2

1

3

Abbott  ’s New Bioresorbable Vascular Scaff old

>>>

Balloon-like Handling with the New Resolute Integrity StentIn  early  September  2010,  cardiologists  from  Southampton General Hospital were the fi rst in Europe to implant Medtron-ic’s new Resolute Integrity Stent System, the latest drug-elut-ing stent  to hit  the market  in Europe. The Resolute  features a new advanced design, based on conti nuous sinusoid  tech-nology, allowing it to be more fl exible than other stents. This improves deliverability  to navigate through tortuous arteries easily, and once in place mould more successfully to the ves-sel walls.   

Dr  Iain Simpson,  the Consultant cardiologist who performed the fi rst procedure stated  “The new stent is more fl exible for getti  ng around twisty arteries, giving us another opti on when treati ng  pati ents with  coronary  heart  disease  or  those who have suff ered a heart att ack”.  

Recently other cardiologists in Europe have given the stent rave reviews. Dr Hamm in Germany stated, “The Resolute Integrity is the fi rst stent that feels like a balloon.” Whilst Dr Brunner in 

Austria  stated,  “This is  simply  the  best stent on the market.” 

For more informati on contact your Medtronic representati ve

2� Sep/Oct 2010 www.cardiologyhd.com

October 3-6Heart Rhythm Congress 2010Hilton Birmingham MetropoleBirmingham, Englandwww.heartrhythmcongress.com

October29-30

Briti sh Society of Echocardiography Annual Meeti ng & Exhibiti onBournemouth, Englandwww.bsecho.org

November 2Chronic Total Occlusions 7Clinical Educati on Centre, Glenfi eld HospitalLeicester, Englandwww.millbrookconferences.co.uk

November 18-19

Bristol PCI Course 2010The Educati on Centre, Bristol Royal Infi rmaryBristol, Englandwww.millbrookconferences.co.uk

November 22-23

Europe AF 2010London Hilton Metropole Hotel London, Englandwww.europeaf.com

November 25

BLT Course 2010 : Bifurcati on lesion treatmentNati onal Motorcycle MuseumSolihull, Englandwww.millbrookconferences.co.uk

January 26 - 28, 2010

ACI 2011 : Advanced Cardiovascular Interventi on 2011London Hilton Metropole HotelLondon, Englandwww.millbrookconferences.co.uk

1

2

3

4

5

LIKE TO BEFEATURED?

For further details on how your event can be featured here contact us at:

[email protected]

For a list of conferences and events around the globe visit our website:www.cardiologyhd.com

6

7

1

2

3

4

6

5,7

Events

www.cardiologyhd.com  Nov/Dec 2010 27

Questi on on Page: 18

1.  This  12-lead  ECG  shows  characteristi cs  of  Brugada  syndrome. Lead V1 and V2 demonstrate an ‘rSr1’ patt ern with a coved ele-vati on of the ST segment in these leads. This qualifi es as a type 1 Brugada ECG. 

2.  Since  its  introducti on as a clinical enti ty  in 1992,  the Brugada syndrome  has  progressed  from  being  a  rare  disease  to  one that is second only to road traffi  c accidents as a cause of death among young adults in some countries. The syndrome is asso-ciated with a high risk  for sudden cardiac death  in young and otherwise healthy adults, and less frequently in infants and chil-dren. The syndrome is esti mated to be responsible for at least 4% of all sudden deaths and at least 20% of sudden deaths in pati ents with structurally normal hearts. Brugada syndrome is defi niti vely diagnosed when a type 1 coved ST-segment eleva-ti on is observed in at least one right precordial lead (V1 to V3) in the presence or absence of a sodium channel– blocking agent, and in conjuncti on with one of the following: documented ven-tricular  fi brillati on  (VF),  polymorphic  ventricular  tachycardia (VT), a family history of sudden cardiac death at  <45 years old, coved-type ECGs in family members, inducibility of VT with pro-grammed  electrical  sti mulati on,  syncope,  or  nocturnal  agonal respirati on.

3.  Inheritance  of  Brugada  syndrome  occurs  via  an  autosomal dominant  mode  of  transmission.  The  fi rst  and  only  gene to  be  linked  to  Brugada  syndrome  is  SCN5A,  the  gene  that encodes for the α subunit of the cardiac sodium channel gene.

More  than  80  mutati ons  in  SCN5A  have  been  linked  to  the syndrome and about 2 dozen of  these mutati ons have shown to  result  in  loss  of  functi on  because  of  failure  of  the  sodium channel  to  express;  this  can be  seen  as  a  shift   in  the  voltage and  ti me  dependence  of  sodium  channel  current  acti vati on, inacti vati on, or reacti vati on; entry of  the sodium channel  into an  intermediate  state  of  inacti vati on  from  which  it  recovers more slowly; or accelerated inacti vati on of the sodium channel. 

A second locus on chromosome 3, close to but apart from the SCN5A locus, was linked recently to Brugada syndrome in a large pedigree in which the syndrome is autosomal dominant inher-ited and associated with progressive conducti on disease, a low sensiti vity  to procainamide, and a relati vely benign prognosis.

SCN5A mutati ons account for about 18% to 30% of Brugada syn-drome cases. A higher incidence of SCN5A mutati ons has been reported  in  familial  than  in  sporadic  cases.  Of  note,  negati ve SCN5A results do not rule out causal gene mutati ons because, in general,  the promoter region, crypti c splicing mutati ons, or the presence of gross rearrangements is not investi gated.

Full arti cle referenced from: C Antzelevitch, P Brugada et al.  Brugada Syndrome. Report of the Second Consensus. Endorsed by the Heart Rhythm Society and the European Heart Rhythm Associati on. Circulati on. 2005; 111: 659-670.

Ms Sophie BlackmanCoronary Heart Management and CRM Consulti ng Editor 

Head of Clinical Cardiac PhysiologyWest Hertf ordshire NHS Trust United Kingdom

AnswerSophie Blackman’s ECG Challenge

Mr Tim LarnerDirector / FounderLatest Technology & All-Round Computer Geek

Future Technology News >>>The Fraunhofer Insti tute in Germany is working on a new system to measure cardiac pressure “on-demand, anywhere”.  Batt ery-free miniature sensors are implanted into the heart wall with the aid of a catheter and can give physicians up to 200 measurements per second post procedure.

Source: Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft

Tech companies  IMEC & the Holst Center have designed  an  applicati on  for  Android  phones allowing  you  to monitor  your  heart  rate. With sensors att ached to the body via a necklace, the data can be wirelessly transmitt ed to the phone and within seconds provide a detailed ECG and heart  rate monitoring  report. This  can  then be 

stored  or  emailed  to your GP.

Source: IMEC

6 Nov/Dec 2010  www.cardiologyhd.com

Data from Multi ple Clinical Trials of OrbusNeich’s Genous™ Bio-engineered R Stent™ Demonstrate Safety and Eff ecti veness Across Challenging Pati ent Subsets as Presented at TCT 2010 in WashingtonThe results presented include:

•  Subset analyses of the global e-HEALING registry show that the Genous Bio-engineered R stent is safe and eff ecti ve in diabeti c pati ents, elderly pati ents over the age of 80 and in pati ents who stopped dual anti platelet therapy (DAPT) at 30 days.

•  Twelve-month follow-up results from the JACK-EPC clinical trial, an  investi gator-initi ated,  randomized  trial  that  compared  the Genous Bio-engineered R  stent with  bare metal  stents  (BMS) in pati ents with acute coronary syndromes, showed the major adverse cardiac event (MACE) rate in Genous Bio-engineered R stent treated pati ents was 13.3 percent compared to 23.3 per-cent in BMS pati ents.

•  Thirty-day follow-up opti cal coherence tomography (OCT) evalu-ati ons from 13 pati ents treated with the Genous Bio-engineered Cobalt Chromium Stent showed complete endothelializati on in majority of pati ents at 30 days post-implantati on.

For more informati on, visit www.OrbusNeich.com.

LEADERS Three-Year Results Suggest Improved Safety and Effi cacy of BioMatrix Flex™ over Cypher® Select™Three-year results from  the LEADERS trial, showing a conti nuing pos-iti ve trend towards a safety and effi  cacy benefi t for BioMatrix Flex™ compared to Cypher® Select™, were presented at TCT 2010. 

In the all-comers study populati on there were similar outcomes for BioMatrix Flex, Biosensors’ Biolimus A9™-eluti ng stent system with abluminal  biodegradable  polymer,  and  Cypher  Select,  Johnson  & Johnson’s sirolimus-eluti ng stent system with a durable polymer, in respect of MACE (major adverse cardiac events) at three years. There was a diverging trend towards a lower rate of MACE in pati ents treat-ed with BioMatrix Flex versus those treated with Cypher Select when compared to both one and two year results.

Occurrence of very  late stent  thrombosis  (VLST) events was  low: a cumulati ve  0.2%  for  BioMatrix  Flex  out  to  three  years,  compared with 0.9% for Cypher Select observed within the same period. 

Image courtesy Biosensors

4

Nine-month results from PLATINUM clinical program presented at TCTBoston  Scienti fi c  Corporati on  announced  data  from  its PLATINUM  QCA  study,  which  is  designed  to  evaluate  the PROMUS  Element™  Everolimus-Eluti ng  Plati num  Chromium Coronary  Stent.    The  results  provided  nine-month  QCA  and IVUS data supporti ng the safety and effi  cacy of the PROMUS Element Stent.  

Analysis  of  the  data was  presented  by  Ian Meredith,  at  TCT in  Washington,  D.C  who  stated,  “The  nine-month  angio-graphic  and  IVUS  data  from  the  PLATINUM  QCA  study  are impressive  and  show  the  acute  performance  advantages  of the  plati num  chromium  PROMUS  Element  Stent.  With  the same  drug  and  polymer  loading  and  comparable  release kineti cs  as  the PROMUS®  Stent,  the  PROMUS Element  Stent achieved  similar  late  loss  (0.17 mm  ±  0.25 mm)  and  signifi -cantly  bett er  stent  appositi on.    These  results give me  great  confi dence  in  the  transfer-ability  of  the  everolimus  drug  and  its proven clinical outcomes, as well as the potenti al  benefi ts  of  the  new  plati num chromium alloy.”

Contact your local Boston Scienti fi c representa-ti ve for more details.

This Stent Featured in Edition 225

6

10 Nov/Dec 2010  www.cardiologyhd.com

TAVI’sMr Vinayak BabatConsultant in Cardiac SurgeryGuys and St Thomas’ Hospital, London, UK

Cardiac Surgeon Interview

When  do  you  think  the age  criteria  will  shift   so that  younger  pati ents, who  may  wish  for  fem-oral  TAVI  rather  than surgical  AVR,  can  be treated? What about the congenital group?

I think it will take at least 5-10  years  before  we start using it for younger pati ents.  And  the  rea-son  for  that  is  very  sim-ple.  In younger pati ents’ surgical  AVR  at  present is  the  gold  standard. It  is  predictable  and  in younger pati ents the risk is 1-3%. TAVI at present is 

only being used  in  surgically high-risk groups and even here  there are  compromises.  There  are  issues of  positi oning  in  around 5% of pati ents or 2% in experienced hands. The idea of TAVI’s is to reduce the  risk  to  the  pati ents,  and  unti l we  can  reduce  positi oning  risks from 3% to 0% I think we should wait. 

The second questi on in relati on to the congenital group is very inter-esti ng.  There  are  two  types  of  congenital  pati ents.  Firstly  and  the most  common  is  those with  a  bicuspid  valve,  at  present  you  can-not deploy a TAVI without  inferior  results  in  this group due  to  the increased risk of paravalvular leak and coronary occlusion and it is a contra-indicati on. 

But there is another congenital group who have got trileafl et stenosis and I think TAVI might be a bett er opti on here. Kids always grow out of the valve size, so if surgery can be delayed I think there may be an interim applicati on for TAVI in this group.

What is the smallest size femoral sheath that you see being capable of accommodati ng TAVI?

As a surgeon I fi nd this questi on very threatening (laughing), but to be very honest, the Edwards valve used at present is made of bovine pericardium, which is thick, durable and lasts 15-20 years. The thick-ness however takes away the compressibility of the valve and I think the sheath size may get down to 16FR but not more than that. 

There is a chance that there will be 2 types of products available in the  future,  so  that you have a valve  that  is made of porcine valve material or an arti fi cial material like polyurethane; which are thinner but not as durable.  But if you know the life expectancy of a parti cu-lar pati ent is less than 10 years, then you could use a thinner valve; that could  then be deployed through a smaller sheath.  In younger pati ents you would want to use a larger sheath for a more durable valve. 

Do you see the costs coming down so that funding by commissioners stops being a problem?

I think that is a very good questi on, because we have now seen the benefi ts in the clinical setti  ng, we can look at costs two ways. A tra-diti onal operati on on a sick pati ent  incurs greater  in-hospital costs which may then exceed the costs of a TAVI. At the same ti me, more competi ti on will drive down prices.

If treat them either medically or surgically we must look at the total expenditure on the pati ent and include all hospital episodes all hos-pital costs. As cost eff ecti veness data becomes available the business case for TAVI will become much stronger.

Also commissioners need to hear the feedback from community to realize how clinical outcomes, length of stay etc are all improved.

Should all labs undertaking TAVI have (and conti nue to have) vascular surgery on site and available at short noti ce?

In the UK virtually all cardiac surgeons are trained in peripheral vas-cular up to a point, and that’s why the multi -disciplinary approach, which Edwards promotes, has benefi ts. So if you have vascular access problems,  there  is a surgeon available who has had some vascular training. Having vascular surgeons onsite is an additi onal benefi t but I don’t think it is mandatory in all pati ents to have that back-up all the ti me. If we have any doubts in regards to access problems we discuss it with vascular radiologists and surgeons. 

If we think the access site is not suitable for trans-femoral, the beau-ty of the Edwards device is that you can use it trans-apically in the same pati ent. So we don’t push ourselves to limits and take risks that are unnecessary.   If your case selecti on is good you will end up with fewer problems.

Interviewed at Edwards Lifesciences’ European Headquarters in Nyon, Switzerland, by Tim Larner, Director of Coronary Heart Publishing Ltd.

Questi ons by Dr Bernard Clarke, Consultant Cardiologist, Manchester Heart Centre

Photography: Tim LarnerValve Image: Courtesy Edwards Lifesciences

12 Nov/Dec 2010  www.cardiologyhd.com

LAAOLeft Atrial Appendage Occlusion : A Review

Dr Tim Gatt ornaCardiology fellowRoyal Perth HospitalAustralia

Atrial fi brillati on (AF) is the commonest cardiac arrhythmia with a prevalence of 0.9% in the general populati on, increasing to >13% of people over the age of 80.¹ As our populati on ages, 

the prevalence of AF will conti nue to rise with signifi cant clinical and economic implicati ons.2 The most feared and catastrophic complica-ti on of AF is stroke, which is increased fi vefold over an age-matched populati on in sinus rhythm. This is independent of other factors and mostly secondary to thromboembolic events.3

Proven therapies to reduce AF-associated stroke include oral anti co-agulati on with vitamin K antagonists, such as warfarin. However, its narrow therapeuti c window and large number of drug, dietary, and metabolic interacti ons make pati ent response unpredictable and dif-fi cult to manage. This is parti cularly true in older pati ents who are at increased bleeding  and  stroke  risk. Newer pharmacological  agents such as the direct thrombin inhibitor, dabigatran, are promising and show similar stroke protecti on to warfarin with less signifi cant bleed-ing.4 Several ongoing studies are examining the potenti al role of new orally acti ve anti -factor X agents.

Given the problems with available pharmacological therapies there has been an impetus for the development of a device-based soluti on for AF-associated stroke. Such strategies have focussed on occlusion of the left  atrial appendage (LAA).  The reason is that this site is pre-disposed to in-situ thrombus formati on and accounts for the origin of 90% of atrial thrombi in pati ents with non-valvular atrial fi brilla-ti on (NVAF). 5-7The LAA, an embryonic remnant of the original LA, is a multi -lobed, trabeculated structure with considerable anatomical variati on att ached to the LA cavity.  In pati ents with AF  it has been found  to  be  larger  and with  greater  dysfuncti on, which  are mark-ers for increased embolic risk.6, 8-10 Also, previous observati ons have demonstrated that most embolic phenomena were associated with LAA thrombus in pati ents with AF.11,12

Interest  in  LAA  removal  or  occlusion dates  back  to  the  1930s  and can be safely performed during cardiac surgery either with sutures or  staples.13  This  is most  oft en  performed  during  valve  surgery  or during Maze procedures  (the  creati on of  left   atrial  lesion patt erns during open heart  surgery  to eliminate AF),  although  isolated  LAA exclusion via a thoracoscopic approach has been shown to be feasi-ble and safe.14

An  alternati ve,  less  invasive  means  of  LAA  exclusion  using  endo-vascular  techniques  has  been  developed.  Three  diff erent  devices 

have been used to date: percutaneous LAA transcatheter occlusion (PLAATO)  system,  the WATCHMAN  system  and  the  Amplatzer  car-diac plug.   These devices are delivered to the LAA following a per-cutaneous  femoral  transvenous  approach  and  transeptal  puncture under  fl uoroscopic  and  transoesophageal  echocardiographic  (TOE) guidance.

The fi rst of these was the PLAATO system (ev3, Inc., Plymouth, Min-nesota) (Figure 1) consisti ng of a self-expanding niti nol implant cov-ered  with  an  occlusive  ePTFE  (expanded  polytetrafl uoroethylene) membrane.15  Despite  initi ally  encouraging  results  in  pati ents  who had  contraindicati ons  to  warfarin  device  development  was  halted for fi nancial considerati ons in December 2006.16,17

The second percutaneous LAA exclusion device is the Watchman Left  Atrial Appendage System (Atritech Inc., Plymouth, Minnesota) (Fig-ure  2).  The device  is  a  self-expanding  niti nol  frame  structure with fi xati on barbs and a permeable polyester fabric that covers the atrial side.18 

The pivotal clinical trial evaluati ng this device was the Embolic Pro-tecti on  in  Pati ents with  Atrial  Fibrillati on  (PROTECT-AF)  trial.19 This was a multi centre, prospecti ve, non-inferiority, unblinded  study of pati ents with NVAF who were deemed eligible for warfarin therapy. Pati ents were enrolled in the trial if they had a CHADS2 risk score of 1 or more (ie, at least one of the following: previous stroke or tran-sient ischaemic att ack, congesti ve cardiac failure, diabetes mellitus, 

Figure 1: The PLAATO device

14 Nov/Dec 2010  www.cardiologyhd.com

Journals

Heart FailureSHIFT was a randomised comparison of Ivabradine vs. placebo in sys-tolic heart failure pati ents in sinus rhythm, salami sliced into two par-allel arti cles. It att empts to answer the following questi ons: 1. What is the adverse prognosti c impact of elevated heart rate in systolic heart failure pati ents?  Answer: 16% increased risk of HF events for every fi ve bpm increase in heart rate; 2. Is the elevated heart rate causal or just a marker of other processes? Answer: Yes, increased baseline heart rate is neutralised by treatment; 3. Is heart rate itself a justi -fi able pharmacological  target? Answer: Yes, elevated rates and the benefi t  of  lowering  them  remain prevalent,  despite prior  pharma-cological therapy; 4. Is Ivabradine an eff ecti ve agent in this regard? Answer: Yes, a 5% absolute reducti on of events from 29 to 25% in the ivabradine group at the cost of 4% excess symptomati c bradycardias and  2%  visual  disturbances.  An  accompanying  editorial  welcomes the clarity of data on the impact of heart rate, but expresses cauti on that there may have been inadequate doses of beta blockers in the individuals responding to ivabradine.

Swedberg and others. The Lancet, 2010; 376:9744, 875 – 885.

Böhm and others. The Lancet, 2010; 376:9744, 886 – 894.

Teerlink. The Lancet, 2010; 376:9744, 847 – 84.

It is good, though rare, to see a negati ve trial published in a decent journal. Rolofylline, an adenosine A1-receptor antagonist was test-ed  against  placebo  in  2033  pati ents  with  acute  heart  failure  and impaired  renal  functi on.  It  made  no  diff erence  than  placebo  to the primary  endpoint  (treatment  success,  treatment  failure,  or  no change in the pati ent’s clinical conditi on). Well done to the authors and to the New England Journal of Medicine for publishing it.

Massie and others. NEJM; 2010; 363:1419-28.

Putti ng Lead in Yorkshire PencilsAnother potenti al treatment for use in heart failure and cardiac dis-ease is testosterone. A longitudinal study from a group in Sheffi  eld and Barnsley has demonstrated that pati ents with vascular disease and  testosterone  defi ciency,  who  were  followed  up  for  almost  7 years, had an increased risk of mortality (21%) relati ve to those with normal  testosterone  levels  (12%,  p=0.002).  Having  low  testoster-one levels is common - up to 24% depending on the test used in the populati on studied. The obvious next step is a randomised controlled trial of testosterone replacement therapy in high risk pati ents with testosterone defi ciency.

Malkin and others. Heart 2010; 96:1821e1825.

Toys for GeeksCircumferenti al pulmonary vein ablati on has always been an att rac-ti ve target for custom designed catheters.  In the  last  few years we have had at least one catheter available which seems to be safe and eff ecti ve (PVAC), although concerns have been that it ablates further onto the venous side of the atrium than ideally placed point by point lesions. We now have the fi rst of a series of randomised comparisons; 102 pati ents with paroxysmal atrial fi brillati on were randomised to either mapping, guided point by point, or PVAC pulmonary vein isola-ti on. Procedure and screening ti mes were signifi cantly shorter in the PVAC group, whilst fi rst procedure success rates were comparable in the PVAC and conventi onal arms (77 vs. 71% over a short follow up of 6 months). The PVAC was noted to be unsuited to single common left  sided atria.

Alan Bulava and others. PACE 2010; 33:1039–1046.

Ablati on  of  typical  atrial  fl utt er  is  now  regarded  as  standard  fi rst line therapy and highly successful. In an att empt to improve on this already highly effi  cient procedure, a multi  electrode catheter (TVAC) from the same stable as  the PVAC was used  to ablate  the cavotri-cuspid isthmus in a randomised comparison with 8mm ti p catheter ablati on. Thirty pati ents in each group underwent ablati on with sig-nifi cantly shorter radio frequency (8.5 vs. 14.7 min) and procedure ti mes (40.2 vs. 60.5 min)  in the TVAC group. There was one failure to achieve block in the TVAC group and two late recurrences in each group.

Ali Erdogan and others. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2010; 21:1109-1113.

Resuscitati onIt used to be said it was impossible to conduct meaningful compari-sons of resuscitati on techniques, due the ethical diffi  culti es involved. This has now been thoroughly disproved by the number of studies recently  published  on  the  subject  and  with  yet  another  compari-son of chest compression only vs. classically taught CPR, it is almost becoming boring.

In a comparison of classical CPR vs. chest compressions only vs. no CPR, provided by non-medical bystanders in over 5000 pati ents, sur-vival to hospital discharge was signifi cantly improved by chest com-pressions only (13.3%) when compared to both classical CPR (7.8%) and no CPR  (5.2%).  In  fact,  aft er  appropriate  adjustment,  classical CPR may off er no survival benefi t against no CPR.

Dr John PaiseyJournal ReviewerConsultant Cardiologist, Royal Bournemouth and Christchurch Hospitals NHS Foundati on Trust

Dr Dan McKenzieJournal ReviewerConsultant Cardiologist, Musgrove Park Hospital, Taunton and Somerset NHS Foundati on Trust

16 Nov/Dec 2010  www.cardiologyhd.com

PharmaCardiology

Atrial Fibrillati on (AF)  is characterised by uncoordinated atrial acti vity  with  consequent  deteriorati on  of  atrial  mechanical functi on.  AF is the most common arrhythmia and responsible 

for many hospital admissions.   This  is due to  the aging populati on and an  increase in heart disease.  There are three main objecti ves for the management of pati ents with AF:  rate control, preventi on of thromboembolism, and correcti on of the rhythm disturbance.

Dronedarone marketed as Multaq by Sanofi -Aventi s  is  licensed  for clinically stable adult pati ents with a history of, or current non-per-manent atrial fi brillati on (AF) to prevent recurrence of AF or to lower ventricular  rate.   Dronedarone belongs  to  the benzofuran  class  of anti arrhythmic drugs and is contraindicated in unstable pati ents with NYHA class III and IV heart failure.  Its use is also not recommended in stable pati ents with NYHA class  III heart failure or with  left  ven-tricular ejecti on fracti on less than 35%.

NICE  Guidance  using  the  single  technology  appraisal  process  was published  in August 2010 (www.nice.org.uk/TA197) and this paper aims to give a summary of the main points.

NICE Clinical Guideline 36  in 2006 (management of AF) states that Beta  blockers  in  additi on  to  anti coagulati on  should  be  the  initi al treatment  opti on  for  people  with  symptomati c  paroxysmal  atrial fi brillati on and people with persistent atrial fi brillati on in whom an anti arrhythmic drug is needed to maintain sinus rhythm aft er cardio-version.  Amiodarone, sotalol or a class 1c drug should be used as a second line treatment opti on if standard beta blockers are contrain-dicated or fail to improve symptoms.

Amiodarone was noted  to  be  an  eff ecti ve  anti arrhythmic  drug  for controlling AF but due to high level of toxicity many people were not able  to  tolerate  it.    There were also many pati ents who could not tolerate a 1c anti arrhythmic agent or sotalol who may benefi t from 

dronedarone  instead with  a more  favourable  side  eff ect  profi le  in some pati ents.     The guide recommends initi ati on of dronedarone under the supervision of a specialist in secondary care setti  ng.

Clinical informati on on dosage & administrati on

Treatment with  dronedarone  is  initi ated  at  400mg  twice  a  day  in adults with a morning and evening meal.    If  the pati ent  is already 

NICE Appraisal on Dronedarone for the treatment of non-permanent Atrial Fibrillati on (AF)

Dr Mojgan Sani, DPharm, MBA, MRPharmS

Head of Clinical Pharmacy, Royal Berkshire Foundati on Trust & Nati onal non-medical prescribing Facilitator, Nati onal Prescribing Centre.

Dronedarone is recommended in pati ents with non-permanent AF only in people:

◊  Whose AF is not controlled by fi rst-line therapy (usually including beta blockers), that is, as a second line opti on, 

and

◊  Who have at least one of the following cardiovascular risk factors:

› hypertension requiring drugs of at least two diff erent classes

› diabetes mellitus › previous transient ischaemic att ack, stroke or systemic embolism

› left  atrial diameter of 50mm or greater › left  ventricular ejecti on fracti on less than 40%  or › age 70 years or older, 

and

◊  Who do not have unstable NYHA class III or IV heart failure.

NICE Guidance recommendation for use of Dronedarone

18 Nov/Dec 2010  www.cardiologyhd.com

Clinical Background

This ECG was recorded in at 10mm/mV and 25mm/sec. 

Questi ons1.  What underlying channelopathy is evident on this 

ECG?

2.  Explain the arrhythmic issues associated with this syndrome. 

3.  What is the inherited geneti c mutati on associated with this disorder?

Answer on Page: 27

Ms Sophie BlackmanCoronary Heart Management and CRM Consulti ng Editor 

Head of Clinical Cardiac PhysiologyWest Hertf ordshire NHS Trust United Kingdom

ChallengeSophie Blackman’s ECG

Love our ECG Challenges?

We have 18 ECG Challenges on our website just waiti ng for you to solve, all of which have been featured in this publicati on over the years. 

By popular demand, starti ng in 2011 we will be adding a bonus ECG Challenge online only, for those unable to wait a couple of months between editi ons. Lucky you!! 

CardiologyHD.com

www.cardiologyhd.com  Nov/Dec 2010 19

Management: Three Top TipsMs Sophie BlackmanCoronary Heart Management and CRM Consulti ng Editor 

Head of Clinical Cardiac PhysiologyWest Hertf ordshire NHS Trust 

The  last  few management  arti cles  I  have writt en were  directed  at managers. This week I have my top 3 ti ps for the non-managerial staff  members out there. These ti ps should give you insight that can help your manager out and in turn result in a positi ve working experience for you.  

Remember this: A manager knows who turns up late, and who is lazy, who works hard to escape their emoti onal distress, who is a moti vator, who is working hard and who isn’t.  I  once worked with  someone who would  tell me every day every-thing they had done at work. I used to sit there thinking – yes that is your job, why are you telling me this? Don’t boast to your manager about your workload unless you have gone above and beyond your job descripti on.

If you are the one who goes to the manager to complain about other staff  members work and to  let your manager know how very hard you work comparati vely, then you are the one your manager is keep-ing an eye on. The ti me you spend looking at and complaining about what everyone else is doing (or not doing) is ti me you are not getti  ng on with your own work – why adverti se the fact?

Soluti on: Help your manager by encouraging those around you in a way that moti vates them. Be the moti vator in your team and your manager will  know  it.  They will  thank  you  for  helping  rather  than having to endure you complaining every day which they don’t have ti me for. 

Remember this: A manager will be grateful if you bring them soluti ons not problems. 

It  is easy when a problem emerges to take it straight to your man-ager.  ‘I can’t be expected to do this….’  ‘There  isn’t enough ti me….’ ‘No  I  can’t’.  These  common  statements we hear  from staff  do not help nor impress.

Soluti on: Tell your manager what changes can be made so the prob-lem doesn’t keep occurring.  ‘I’ve noti ced X keeps happening, and I thought it would be a good soluti on if we perhaps did XYZ to make things easier…’ This is one part of the service the manager will now not need to review, it shows you have initi ati ve and some managerial qualiti es and  this  impresses your manager and also  improves your working environment by getti  ng rid of the problems. 

Remember this:  You  don’t  need  to  understand  your  manager’s role completely, but no matt er how good or bad you perceive your manager to be, rest assured they are busier, more stressed and hold more responsibility than you realise. Most managers, even if you do see outward signs of pressure upon them, keep the majority of their stresses and responsibiliti es from you. 

Every piece of work  that a member of your department does ulti -mately rests in the hands of your manager. They have to be the one accountable for errors, mistakes, complaints. Everything that you do as a worker directly aff ects your manager. It either makes their day easier or harder – and this  is  the very simple piece of  informati on you must remember in order to learn how to get what you want from your manager. 

Soluti on:  In the simplest of terms,  if you use your ti me to ensure that  your  managers’  workload  is  not  increased  by  the  somewhat simple yet ti me consuming complicati ons of the working day – then you can help your manager to achieve their targets. Work hard, work accurately and work well. Help those around you and be encouraging of good practi ce. 

* * *

A manager  in  a  busy  cardiac  department  has  a  job  that  is  varied and unpredictable. There is always something that they have to be concentrati ng on, a pressure  from above, or a  target  they have  to achieve. If you can work in a way that supports your manager with some of the more simple tasks then you help them to focus on the part of  their  job  that  is more  concentrated on  your  team and  the work you do, allowing them to be a bett er manager to you. As a man-ager my favourite words to hear are ‘Is there anything I can help you out with?’ I am sure your manager will not mind hearing it once in a while either.  

AssistanceManagement

Give your manager time to do their work

Provide solutions

Remember this:

A manager knows1

2

3

8 Nov/Dec 2010  www.cardiologyhd.com

ProtecX Medical Ltd launches new website.ProtecX  is  pleased  to  announce  the  launch  of  its  new website due to go live at the end of November 2010. 

We are proud to introduce this exciti ng development which as well as allowing customers to view our full range of radiati on protecti on and related products, also incorporates a tool to allow customers to request quotati ons on one or many of the products in our range.

This process has been designed to keep the customer informed of the progress of both the quotati on and subsequent order, through manufacture and delivery status. Customers will be able to uti lise a secure log in to the site to revisit quotes and view their history. The launch of our new website conti nues our aim of service improvement; we hope customers enjoy using this facility. 

Our website can be found at: www.protecx.co.uk 

PERFECTEMP™: An Innovati on In Operati ng Table Pati ent WarmingDot Medical Ltd is delighted to introduce the LMA PerfecT-emp™ under pati ent warming matt ress.

Maintaining  normothermia  in  pati ents  undergoing  opera-ti ons can be a challenge. However the LMA PerfecTemp ™ is a new innovati on off ering warmth beneath the pati ent and advanced  pressure  reducti on  to  combat  hypothermia  and pressure sores. 

The LMA PerfecTemp™ pati ent matt ress is

•  Lightweight

•  Durable

•  Quiet 

•  Delivers controlled and consistent warming

•  Has fi bre opti c sensors to measure temperature between the surface of the skin and the pad.

•  Easy to clean 

•  Radio translucent 

•  Ideal for all operati ons, dialysis units and areas where pati ent warming is imperati ve

For further informati on, contact Dot Medical Ltd: Email: [email protected]: 01625 668811 or Fax: 01625 668855

Siemens introduces new soluti ons at European Cardiology Congress Siemens Healthcare presented  its cardiology soluti ons at  the Euro-pean  Society  of  Cardiology  (ESC)  Congress  2010.    The  innovati ons showcased were designed to provide a higher quality of pati ent care and contribute to reducing costs.

The new 1.5 release of the ACUSON SC2000™ volume imaging ultra-sound system was on show at the Congress, it features a number of innovati ve workfl ow  soluti ons  and off ers  a  complete 2D and  volu-metric  system  to  improve  effi  ciency  in  routi ne  echocardiography examinati ons.   The  recently  launched MAGNETOM® Aera  1.5T and Skyra 3T systems were also presented for their ability to reduce the  complexity  of  cardiac  MR  examinati ons  and  provide  greater image consistency. 

The Congress also dedicated special emphasis on the planning of Transcatheter Aorti c Valve Implantati on (TAVI) procedures with the SOMATOM Defi niti on Flash CT and imaging soft ware syngo.via.  

Siemens held a number of satellite symposia on the latest cardiology treatments at the ECS Congress that can be viewed at www.siemens.com/esc 

Above: New Syngo Aortic ValveGuide imaging software from Siemens Healthcare simplifies workflow for minimally

invasive heart valve implantation.

10

12

11

www.cardiologyhd.com  Nov/Dec 2010 7

New Millar Mikro-Cath™ Disposable Pressure Catheter.The Mikro-Cath  catheter  provides  physicians  with  a  simple device  to  measure  hemodynamic  cardiac  pressures  in  the human  body,  promoti ng  a  bett er  understanding  of  cardiac health for medical research and diagnosti c purposes. 

This  new  catheter  has  many  advantages  over  traditi onal fl uid-fi lled  catheters.  These  include,  high  fi delity  frequency response  >  10  KHz,  no  fl ushing  required,  free  from moti on artefacts and true pressure readings, regardless of pati ent or bed positi on.

The Mikro-Cath 3.5F model off ers versati le pressure measure-ment  for a  variety of applicati ons  including  LVP, RVP, PCWP and aorti c valve gradient pressures. The catheter is indicated for use as a minimally invasive device under short-term lim-ited body contact less than 24 hours. Typical applicati on will be through the femoral artery with the use of an additi onal guiding catheter.

The  catheter  is  shipped  sterile  to eliminate  logisti cal  concerns  of resterilizati on.

This combinati on of aff ordabil-ity,  reduced  procedure  ti me and sterility allows physicians to  bring  Mikro-Tip  accuracy back  into  routi ne  cath  lab procedures. 

Contact PMS (Instruments) Ltd on 01628 773233 or email [email protected] for informati on.

Philips Healthcare recently supplied an Allura FD10 dedicated cardiac system to The University Hospital of Wales. The new equipment comes with a host of innovati on including Stent-Boost, a simple, quick and eff ecti ve tool that enhances stent visualisa-ti on and XperSwing dual-axis rotati onal angiography of the coronary arteries. These assist in accurate stent deployment, reduced contrast and radiati on dose therefore potenti ally shortening procedures and eliminati ng additi onal ones. 

Philips equipment was selected by UHW because it fully supports all their  interventi onal  cardiology  procedures,  including  PPCI,  Pericar-dial  tap  and  emergency procedures.    Penny  Lloyd,  Superintendent Radiographer says, “We like the manoeuvrability of the system and  compact detector head.   We also  like Philips StentBoost and Xper-Swing.  We use StentBoost daily; we fi nd it easy to use and a great tool  for  post-stent  balloon  dilati on  and  for  positi oning  of    second stents.”    

A  second  reason  for  choosing Philips was outstanding  image qual-ity and proven reliability of UHW’s previous Philips system, together with the local engineering support.  Above: Shown here (left to right) Ruth Turner, Cardiovascular Sales Special-

ist, Philips Healthcare, Rob Davies, Regional General Manager, Central & West UK, Philips Healthcare, Dr. A. Buch, Consultant Cardiologist, Becky Williamson, Nurse, Irene Crew, Chief ECG Technician, Anna Stevens, Nurse, Penny Lloyd, Superintendent Radiographer, Jane Robinson, Account Manager, Philips Healthcare, Dr. Andrew Wood, Consultant Radiologist and Maggie Hill, Unit Manager.

The  catheter  is  shipped  sterile  to eliminate  logisti cal  concerns  of 

7

8

H-FABP predicts long term mortality in hs-Troponin negati ve ACS pati ents Results from an independent prospecti ve study of 1080 consecuti ve pati ents presenti ng  to  the ED with  suspected ACS has  shown  that the ischemic cardiac biomarker, heart-type fatt y acid binding protein (H-FABP), substanti ally improves the detecti on of high risk pati ents when Troponin-negati ve, even when a high sensiti vity assay is used. The  study,  recently  published  in  JACC,  was  conducted  by  Profes-sor Alistair Hall &  colleagues  at  Leeds General  Infi rmary. Amongst the large and parti cularly signifi cant subgroup of Troponin negati ve pati ents  (79.2% of  the cohort), a  raised H-FABP  identi fi ed pati ents at  a  very high  risk  for adverse outcomes,  independent of  age and serum creati nine.  H-FABP can now be assessed in combinati on with Troponin, via the new Evidence Multi Stat rapid testi ng instrument - designed & manu-factured by the UK-based diagnosti cs company, Randox.

For more informati on please email: [email protected]

9

Medtronic data on file. Comparison testing to previous delivery catheter system performed in controlled bench top test environment or simulated use testing in anatomical models. Results may not be indicative of clinical performance. U

C20

1102

619E

E ©

2010

Med

tron

ic, I

nc. A

ll Ri

ghts

Res

erve

d.

Innovating for life. UC

2011

0261

9EE

©20

10 M

edtr

onic

, Inc

. All

Righ

ts R

eser

ved.

MedtRoniC CoReValVeValVeVal e® deliVeRRy Syy SySteMwith aCCutRaktaktak M Stability layeR.

Controlled, Controlled, Accurate Deployment Accurate Deployment now Made ow Made even easier

• Improved Stability

• Improved AccuracyImproved Accuracy

• Improved Ease of UseImproved Ease of UseTesting performed in controlled bench top test environment Testing performed in controlled bench top test environment or simulated use testing in anatomical models.*or simulated use testing in anatomical models.*

www.cardiologyhd.com  Nov/Dec 2010 13

hypertension,  or  were 75  years  or  older).  707 eligible  patients  were randomly  assigned  in  a 2:1  ratio  to  percutane-ous  closure  of  the  LAA and short  term warfarin (45 days) or to long term warfarin  (control  group, target  international nor-malised  ratio  2.0-3.0). Efficacy  was  assessed by  a  primary  composite endpoint  of  stroke,  car-diovascular  death,  and systemic  embolisation. At 1065 patients-years of follow-up the efficacy of percutaneous  closure of the LAA with this device was  non-inferior  to  that of warfarin therapy. The device  was  successfully 

implanted in 91% of those in whom implantation was attempted and 86% of  these patients  (at  45 days  of  follow-up) were  able  to  stop taking warfarin;  followed by  initially 6 months of aspirin and clopi-dogrel after randomisation and then long term aspirin monotherapy. For the control group, a therapeutic INR range (2.0-3.0) was achieved 66% of  the time. There was a higher  rate of adverse safety events in the interventional group than the control group, predominantly a result of peri-procedural complications such as pericardial effusions. As a result of this trial the WATCHMAN device won the recommen-dations of a US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) advisory panel in April 2009, but  is awaiting a further study with more safety and efficacy data before being granted full approval by the FDA.

The third occlusion device, the Amplatzer Cardiac Plug (ACP), is con-structed from a nitinol mesh and Dacron and is currently undergo-ing  clinical  testing.20-22 It  comprises of  the  lobe, which  conforms  to the inner structure of the LAA; the waist, which acts as an articulat-ing, compliant connection; and the disc, which covers  the LAA ori-fice  (see figure 3, Images 1 &2). The device is fully recapturable and repositionable  if necessary. Unlike the WATCHMAN device patients do not  require warfarin  therapy, but  rather  a  short period of dual antiplatelet  therapy  followed by  long  term aspirin  once  successful LAA occlusion has been proven by a follow-up TOE.

AF  significantly  increases  the  risk of  stroke and providing  safe and effective  anticoagulant  therapy  can  be  challenging.  Closure  of the  LAA  provides  an  alternative  strategy  of  stroke  prophylaxis  in patients with NVAF. Routine implantation, however, does not appear 

warranted,  though LAA  occlusion  may  be an  option  in  selected patients with a high risk of  bleeding  complica-tions  from  anticoagula-tion.  It  should  be  noted that  these  warfarin-ineligible  patients  were excluded  in  the  PRO-TECT-AF  trial.  Further larger,  adequately  pow-ered  studies  comparing device  deployment  to optimal  anticoagulation are  needed  to  evaluate 

the  long term safety and efficacy of such occlusion devices. This  is especially true in patients with higher CHADS2 scores or with a previ-ous transient ischemic attack or ischaemic stroke. 

References:

1.  Phillips SJ, Whisnant JP, O’Fallon WM, Frye RL. Prevalence of cardiovas-cular  disease  and diabetes mellitus  in  residents  of  Rochester, Minne-sota. Mayo Clin Proc 1990;65:344–359.

2.  Stewart S, Hart CL, Hole DJ, McMurray JJ. Population prevalence,  inci-dence, and predictors of atrial fibrillation in the Renfrew/Paisley study. Heart 2001:86:516-21

3.  Wolf PA, Abbott RD, Kannel WB. Atrial fibrillation: a major contributor to stroke: the Framingham study. Arch Intern Med 1987;147:1561-64

4.  Connolly SJ, Ezekowiz MD et al. Dabigatran versus Warfarin in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation. NEJM 2009;361(12): 1139-51

5.  Blackshear  JL,  Odell  JA.  Appendage  obliteration  to  reduce  stroke in  cardiac  surgical  patients  with  atrial  fibrillation.  Ann  Thorac  Surg 1996;61:755–759.

6.  Wongcharoen W, Tsao HM, Wu MH, et al. Morphologic characteristics of the left atrial appendage, roof, and septum: implications for the ablation of atrial fibrillation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2006;17:951–956. 

7.  Stollberger  C,  Schneider  B,  Finsterer  J.  Elimination  of  the  left  atrial appendage to prevent stroke or embolism? Anatomic, physiologic, and pathophysiologic considerations. Chest 2003; 124:2356-62

Figure 2: WATCHMAN device

Figure 3: Amplatzer cardiac plug

Image 1: LAA (900 on transoesphageal echocardiogram)

Image 2: Occlusion of the LAA by an Amplatzer cardiac plug (90 degrees on transoesphageal echocardiogram)

continues on page 15

www.cardiologyhd.com  Nov/Dec 2010 15

This  is concordant with other studies we have previously reported, and explanati ons  for  these fi nding may  include;  technical diffi  culty in  delivering  eff ecti ve  respiratory  support,  interference of  arti fi cial respirati on with delivery of CPR, bystanders being put off  by arti fi cial respirati on and effi  cacy of chest compressions in venti lati on.

Bobrow and others. JAMA. 2010; 304(13):1447-1454. Coronary Interventi onBare  metal  stents  (BMS)  have  a  signifi cant  incidence  of  resteno-sis  and were  largely  superseded  by  drug  eluti ng  stents  (DES)  that became available in 2002. There was then global concern regarding the risk of stent thrombosis in pati ents with fi rst generati on DES, fol-lowing presentati ons of two meta-analyses at the ESC in Barcelona, in 2006.  There was a  subsequent  reducti on  in  the use of DES and numerous further studies have been published that have been, on the whole, reassuring. As a result, nati onal guidelines recommended dual anti platelet therapy for a minimum of 12 months in all pati ents receiving DES.

A  recent  prospecti ve,  multi center,  Spanish  registry  of  4,768  ‘real world’  pati ents  demonstrated  a  cumulati ve  incidence  of  defi nite/probable thrombosis for zotarolimus eluti ng stents (ZES – Endeavor / Medtronic) of 1.3% at 1 year and 1.7% at 2 years, and for everolimus eluti ng stents (EES - Xience / Abbott  or Promus / Boston) of 1.4% at 1 year and 1.7% at 2 years (p = 0.8 for ZES vs. EES).   These fi gures are  reassuringly  lower  than with  the fi rst  generati on DES,  but  sti ll emphasise the importance of good stent deployment and adequate dual  anti platelet  therapy.  Interesti ngly,  in  the  subset  of  pati ents with bifurcati on lesions, ZES signifi cantly increased the risk of stent thrombosis compared to EES. Of course, there are now third genera-ti on, biodegradable polymer, nitric oxide producing and endothelial progenitor capture cell-coated stents available as well.

De la Torre Hernandez and others. JACC Cardiol. Intv. 2010;3;911-19.

Another trial has been reported comparing percutaneous coronary interventi on (PCI) and surgical revascularisati on (CABG) for multi ves-sel disease, but this ti me in pati ents with acute coronary syndromes (ACS). The ACUITY trial was originally designed to compare 3 diff er-ent anti thromboti c regimens  in moderate to high risk ACS pati ents (unfracti onated heparin or low molecular weight heparin with a gly-coprotein (GP) IIbIIIa  inhibitor, bivalirudin with a GPIIbIIIa  inhibitor, or bivalirudin alone). Of  the 13,819 pati ents enrolled, 56%  (7,789) underwent PCI and 11% (1,539) had CABG. The remaining 33% were treated medically,  at  the  investi gators  discreti on.  Aft er  propensity matching  (the  latest  trendy  stati sti cal method  to  correct  for  varia-bles) pati ents treated with PCI had lower rates of  stroke, myocardial infarcti on, major bleeding, and renal injury than those treated with CABG, with comparable 1-month and 1-year rates of mortality, but more oft en developed recurrent ischemia requiring repeat revascu-larizati on procedures during follow-up.

Ben-Gal and others. JACC Cardiol. Intv.;3:1059-67.

A registry comparing PCI and CABG in left  main stem disease has also been  reported  this month. The ASAN-MAIN  (Asan Medical Center-Left  Main  Revascularizati on)  study  published  10-year  data  on  350 pati ents with unprotected left  main disease who were treated with either CABG or BMS, and fi ve-year data on 395 pati ents treated with either surgery or a DES (mainly sirolimus eluti ng Cypher stents). Aft er adjustment for variables, results were equivalent between the two methods of revascularisati on, in terms of mortality and a combined end point of death, Q-wave MI, or  stroke. However,  as with other studies (SYNTAX and COMPARE-MAIN), both BMS and DES pati ents were more  likely  to  require  further  revascularisati on during  follow up. In Europe, as part of the newest European Society of Cardiology guidelines, coronary stenti ng of left  main disease is a class IIa, level of evidence B, recommendati on.

Park and others. JACC;56:1366-1375.

References (cont...)

8.  Agmon Y, Khandheria BK, Genti le F, Seward JB. Echocardiograph-ic  assessment  of  the  left   atrial  appendage.  J  Am  Coll  Cardiol 1999;34:1867–1877. 

9.  Predictors of thromboembolism in atrial fi brillati on: II. Echocar-diographic features of pati ents at risk. The Stroke Preventi on in Atrial Fibrillati on Investi gators. Ann Intern Med 1992;116:6–12. 

10.  Transesophageal  echocardiographic  correlates  of  thromboem-bolism  in  high-risk  pati ents with  nonvalvular  atrial  fi brillati on. The Stroke Preventi on in Atrial Fibrillati on Investi gators Commit-tee on Echocardiography. Ann Intern Med 1998;128:639–647.

11.  Garcia-Fernandez MA, Perez-David E, Quiles J, et al. Role of left  atrial appendage obliterati on in stroke reducti on in pati ents with mitral  valve  prosthesis:  A  transesophageal  echocardiographic study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2003;42:1253–1258. 

12.  Belcher  JR,  Somerville  W.  Systemic  embolism  and  left   auric-ular  thrombosis  in  relati on  to  mitral  valvotomy.  Br  Med  J 1955;2:1000–1003. 

13.  Healey JS, Crystal E, Lamy A, et al. Left  Atrial Appendage Occlusion Study (LAAOS): Results of a randomized controlled pilot study of left  atrial appendage occlusion during coronary bypass surgery in pati ents at risk for stroke. Am Heart J 2005;150:288–293. 

14.  Johnson WD, Ganjoo AK, Stone CD, et al. The left  atrial append-age: Our most lethal human att achment! Surgical  implicati ons. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2000;17:718–22. 

15.  Sievert  H,  Lesh  MD,  Trepels  T,  et  al.  Percutaneous  left   atrial appendage transcatheter occlusion to prevent stroke in high-risk pati ents with atrial fi brillati on: Early clinical experience. Circula-ti on 2002;105:1887–1889. 

16.  16. Ostermayer SH, Reisman M, Kramer PH, et al. Percutaneous left   atrial  appendage  transcatheter occlusion  (PLAATO  system) to prevent stroke in high-risk pati ents with non-rheumati c atrial fi brillati on: Results from the internati onal multi -center feasibil-ity trials. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005;46:9–14.

17.  17.Bayard YL, Omran H, Neuzil P, Thuesen L, Pichler M, Rowland E, Ramondo A, Ruzyllo W, Budts W, Montalescot G, Brugada P, Ser-ruys PW, Vahanian A, Piéchaud JF, Bartorelli A, Marco J, Probst P, Kuck KH, Ostermayer SH, Büscheck F, Fischer E, Leetz M, Sievert H.  PLAATO  (Percutaneous  Left  Atrial  Appendage  Transcatheter Occlusion)  for  preventi on of  cardioembolic  stroke  in  non-anti -coagulati on eligible atrial fi brillati on pati ents:  results  from  the European PLAATO study. EuroInterventi on. 2010;6:220-6.

18.  18.  Sick PB,  Schuler G, Hauptmann KE, et al.  Initi al worldwide experience with  the WATCHMAN  left   atrial  appendage  system for  stroke  preventi on  in  atrial  fi brillati on.  J  Am  Coll  Cardiol 2007;49:1490–1495. 

19.  19. Holmes DR, Reddy VY, Turi ZG, Doshi SK, Sievert H, Buchbind-er M, Mullin CM, Sick P; PROTECT AF Investi gators. Percutane-ous closure of the left  atrial appendage versus warfarin therapy for preventi on of stroke in pati ents with atrial fi brillati on: a ran-domised non-inferiority trial. Lancet. 2009; 374:534-4.

20.  20. Park JW, Bethencour A, Sievert H, Santoro G, Meier B, Walsh K,. Lopez-Minquez JR, Meerkin D, Ormerod O, Leithäuser B. Left  atrial appendage closure with Amplatzer cardiac plug for preven-ti on of stroke in atrial fi brillati on – initi al European Experience. Eur. Heart J. 2010;12(suppl A):S14

21.  21.  Rodés-Cabau  J,  Champagne  J,  Bernier  M.  Transcatheter closure  of  the  left   atrial  appendage:  initi al  experience  with the Amplatzer  cardiac plug device. Catheter Cardiovasc  Interv. 2010;76: 86-92.

22.  22. Bass JL. Transcatheter occlusion of the left  atrial appendage--experimental testi ng of a new Amplatzer device. Catheter Car-diovasc Interv. 2010; 76:181-5.

.....conti nued from page 13

www.cardiologyhd.com  Nov/Dec 2010 17

PHARM

A

on any class 1 or 3 antiarrhythmics,  this should be stopped before starting  dronedarone.      No  dose  adjustment  is  necessary  in  the elderly population with renal impairement (except contraindication in severe renal impairement of creatinine clearance of less than 30 ml/min).  No dose adjustment is necessary in patients with mild to moderate hepatic impairement but contraindicated in severe hepatic failure.

The dose  should not  be  taken with  grapefruit  juice  as  it  increases dronedarone  exposure.    Doses  of  digoxin  should  be  reduced  by 50%  if  concurrently  used with  dronedarone.    There  are  a  number of other clinical drugs interactions.  Pharmacists should refer to the SPC to ensure safety of polypharmacy when they have a patient on dronedarone.

The most  frequent  adverse  effects  include  an  elevated  blood  cre-atinine  level  and  prolongation  of  QT  interval.    Other  common adverse events may include diarrhoea, nausea, vomiting, fatigue and asthenia.

Clinical effectiveness from trials 

The  four  main  clinical  trials  (ATHENA,  EURIDID,  ADONIS  and  DIO-NYSOS)  demonstrated  the  superior  efficacy  of  dronedarone  over placebo but also showed less efficacy against amiodarone and other antiarrhythmic agents.

EURIDIS  (EURopean  trial  In  atrial  fibrillation  patients  receiving Dronedarone  for  the  maIntenance  of  Sinus  rhythm)  and  ADONIS (American-Australian-African  trial with DronedaONe  In  atrial  fibril-lation patients for the maintenance of Sinus rhythm) were phase III multicentre,  parallel,  randomised  double  blind,  placebo-controlled trials of the same design and were reported together.  A total of 612 patients were recruited into the EURIDIS trial and 625 patients into the ADONIS trial.  Both dronedarone and placebo were given in addi-tion  to  standard first-line  therapy of beta blocker and anticoagula-tion.  Patients had paroxysmal or persistent atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter.  The primary endpoint was the first documented recurrence of  AF  lasting  at  least  10  minutes.    Secondary  endpoints  included symptoms  related  to  AF  during  recordings  and  mean  ventricular rate during first recurrence.  The results showed that fewer people in the dronedarone arm had AF recurrence at 12 months than pla-cebo (p<0.001).   These trials also reported a  lower ventricular rate in the dronedarone compared to placebo.1  Symptomatic recurrence occurred in 37.1% and 47.5% of patients treated with dronedarone or placebo respectively (p=0.006).

ATHENA was also a phase III multicentre, parallel, randomised, dou-ble blind placebo controlled trial of 4,628 patients.  Both dronedar-one and placebo were given in addition to standard first-line therapy of  beta  blocker  and  anticoagulation.    Patients  had  paroxysmal  or persistent atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter with at  least one of  the following  additional  risk  factors  for  a  major  cardiovascular  event.  The primary endpoint was first hospitalisation due  to  cardiovascu-lar events or death from any cause.2  A total of 31.9% of patients in 

the dronedarone group experienced the primary outcome compared to 39.4%  in  the placebo group  (p<0.001).   The  results were driven by a lower hospitalisation rate in the dronedarone group compared to placebo.  This trial reported lower cardiovascular mortality in the dronedarone group compared with placebo but no statistically sig-nificant difference in all cause mortality.2,3

DYONYSOS  was  a  phase  III  randomised  double  blind  trial  of  504 patients,  comparing  dronedarone  with  amiodarone.    Patients  had paroxysmal or persistent atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter  in whom cardioversion  and  antiarrhythmic  treatment  were  indicated  plus anticoagulation.    The  primary  endpoint  was  treatment  failure  as defined by recurrence of AF or premature study drug discontinuation for intolerance or lack of efficacy.  The primary endpoint occurred in 73.9% of patients treated with dronedarone compared to 55.3% for amiodarone (p<0.001).    The absolute difference in primary endpoint between dronedarone and amiodarone was 18.5%.  AF recurred in 36.5%  in  the dronerdarone compared to 24.3%  in  the amiodarone group.    The  trial  reported  fewer deaths  in  the dronedarone group compared to amiodarone, but NICE has drawn no conclusion about the relative effect of dronedarone and amiodarone on mortality due to short follow up of the trial and the small number of deaths in the study.4

NICE Audit support

NICE has also made available an audit tool (www.nice.org.uk/TA197) in order to support measuring current practice in using dronedarone for  the  treatment of  non-permanent AF  against  the  recommenda-tions made.   The standards set against the guidelines are 100% com-licance but NICE recommends that the standards can be flexible and need local discussions with the specialist clinicians.

References1.  Singh BN, Connolly SJ, Crijns HJ, et al.  Dronedarone for maintenance 

of sinus rhythm in atrial fibrillation or flutter.  N Engl J Med 2007; 357: 987-999.

2.  Hohnloser SH, Crijns HJ, van Eickels M, et al.  ATHENA Investigators.  Effect of dronedarone on cardiovascular events in atrial fibrillation.  N Engl J Med 2009; 360: 668-678.

3.  Hohnloser SH, Crijns HJ, van Eickels M, et al.  ATHENA Investigators.  Dronedarone in patients with congestive heart failure: Insights from ATHENA.  European Heart J July 2010; 31 (14): 1717-21

4.  Letteuzey JY, De Ferrari GM, Radzik D, et al.  DIONYSOS Investigators.  A short term, randomised, double blind, parallel group study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of dronedarone versus amiodarone in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation.  Journal Cardiovasc Electrophysiol, June 2010; 21 (6): 597-605.

www.cardiologyhd.com  Nov/Dec 2010 9

We are the fi rst publicati on to be endorsed for CPD by the Soci-ety of Radiographer’s in the UK. We are classed as a varied and topical journal suited to the needs of cardiology radiographers and other practi ti oners in cardiac imaging. May support outcomes 1-14 of CPD Now.

Using the ACIST for TAVI’s at the Harley Street ClinicThe Harley Street Clin-ic  recently  performed their  fi rst  TAVI  case with Drs Ghada Mikhail and  Iqbal  Malik.    It  is thought  that  this  was the  fi rst  of  its  type  in a private medical insti -tuti on using  the ACIST Contrast Management System,  which  allows for precise and variable fl ows of contrast for both small and larger volumes. Cath Lab Manager Stephen Weymouth said,  ‘the whole case went very well and we were pleased that we were able to use the ACIST device for out fi rst TAVI.  It made the case quicker as we did not have to  set up a  separate  injector,  and  safer as  it  is  a  closed  system so there is less chance of air entering the pati ent’.   The Harley Street Clinic is a cardiac centre of excellence which con-ti nues  to  invest  in  its experienced consultants,  staff  and  the  latest technology. The  ACIST  provides  many  advantages  for  the  cardiologist,  includ-ing reduced contrast usage and creati ng a safer environment due to radiati on reducti on and its air detectors.  

For more informati on, please visit www.apc-cardiovascular.co.uk or call 01270 216142

CoreValve Receives FDA Approval for Evaluati onOn 15th October 2010, Medtronic, Inc. announced U.S. Food and  Drug  Administrati on  (FDA)  conditi onal  approval  for  its Investi gati onal  Device  Exempti on  (IDE)  applicati on  and  piv-otal clinical trial protocol to begin evaluati ng the Medtronic CoreValve System for transcatheter aorti c valve implantati on (TAVI).  As we  featured  in  the  previous  editi on  of  Coronary Heart,  the CoreValve  system  is designed  to provide a mini-mally  invasive,  non-surgical  treatment  opti on  for  pati ents 

with symptomati c, severe aorti c stenosis who are at high risk, or are ineligible, for open-heart surgery.

The CoreValve System is not yet commercially  available  in  the US,  however  since  March  2007 when  it  obtained  the  CE  Mark, 

it  has  been  implanted  in  more than 12,000 pati ents in 34 countries 

outside the US.

with symptomati c, severe aorti c stenosis who are at high risk, or are ineligible, for open-heart surgery.

it  has  been  implanted  in  more than 12,000 pati ents in 34 countries 

outside the US.

This Product Featured in Edition 26

BARD is our Primary EP Supporter

BARD® EP Fellows CourseBARD®  Electrophysiology  would  like  to  extend  a  special thanks to the presenti ng Consultant Electrophysiologists and the att endees, who parti cipated  in the BARD® EP Mini Case Review Sessions during the recent Heart Rhythm Congress in Birmingham. The interacti ve sessions, for Cardiology SpR’s or Cardiac Physiologists with at  least basic EP knowledge, took place during break ti mes. They proved incredibly popular and were well received by all.

Another EP teaching opportunity occurring soon is a BARD® EP  Fellows  Course,  which  takes  place  during  the  aft ernoon of 21st November, preceding Europe AF 2010,  London.  The Deducti ve  Electrophysiology  course  has  an  Internati onal EP  Faculty.  Registrati on  for  the  Fellows  Course  is  free,  and att endees  can also  get  a  special  discounted  registrati on  fee to  att end  Europe  AF  2010.  Pre  registrati on  for  the  Fellows Course is required. 

Details can be found on the website www.europeaf.com and early registrati on is recommended.

2011 Media Kit available mid NovemberRequest your copy today

Latest Product News Deal150 words + photo£99

See Page 4 for our Contact Details

Coronary Heart News >>>

14

13

15

ContentsNov / Dec 2010

20 Nov/Dec 2010 www.cardiologyhd.com

Site VisitUnited Kingdom

Completed with the assistance of Volcano

Raigmore Hospital is located in Inverness, a rapidly growing city in northern Scotland. Located 254km north of Edinburgh, and 903km north of London, the city is situated at the mouth of the River Ness, which fl ows from the nearby Loch Ness. The populati on is approximately 57,000, with two languages spoken, being English and Scotti sh Gaelic, and is ranked fi ft h out of 189 Briti sh citi es for quality of life.

What are the sizes of your Cardiology Department and Hospital?

Raigmore Hospital is the 600 bedded regional centre for the High-lands of Scotland. Within the Cardiac Unit there is a 6 bedded CCU and 16 bedded step down ward. There is also a dedicated cardiac rehab unit. (The Highland Heartbeat Centre)

What is the geographical intake area and populati on served by your hospital?

NHS Highland covers 41% of the land mass of Scotland, same size as Wales! 300,000 people live in the area but there is a large tourist infl ux. The dispersed populati on makes this one of the least densely populated areas in Europe with some of the most remote pati ents and many island communiti es.

How many staff ? Roles?

We have recently expanded to 4 consultants (2 PCI trained) as well as a fully staff ed CCU, Cath Lab and Cardiac Investi gati ons unit. Cardiac rehab teams are present throughout the area and there are good links with our local district and community hospitals. Types of procedures?

Other than EP, there is a full range of cardiac services available including diagnosti c angiograms, PCI, bradycardiac pacing, ICD, TTE, TOE, cardiac CT, cardiac MRI, and MPS. Types of equipment used?

The current lab used is a Philips modular lab but in March 2011 our new lab complex will be opened with GE cath labs, integrated Vol-cano for IVUS and pressure wire.

Raigmore HospitalRaigmore HospitalOld Perth RoadInvernessIV2 3UJUnited Kingdom

RaigmoreHospital

24 Nov/Dec 2010  www.cardiologyhd.com

Charlie Bloe: Senior Nurse NHS Highlands

Where did you train?

I undertook the BSc Social Sciences and Nurs-ing  Studies  at  the  University  of  Edinburgh between  1979  and  1984.  At  that  ti me  it was also possible to undertake the Nati onal District Nursing Certi fi cate so I completed that training before  job hunti ng. My Criti cal Care qualifi ca-ti ons were obtained at  the Western  Infi rmary school of Nursing in Glasgow. 

Why did you decide to specialise in Cardiology?

It  was  almost  by  default!  I  had  att ended  an interview at Forth Valley Acute Hospitals  for a  job as staff  nurse  in a general medical ward. At a pre interview visit the Nursing Offi  cer, Greta Given, showed me the Medical HDU and combined CCU facility where a vacancy also existed. I was off ered both opti ons and opted for the CCU role. I guess that I therefore owe my career in Cardiology to Greta, who has sadly since passed away.

You spent many years away from clinical practi ce to set up your own successful business, Charles Bloe Training. What brought you back to clinical practi ce and what is your current role?

I’ve always had a passion for teaching but preferred the fl exibility of undertaking ad hoc freelance consultancy work as opposed to a Uni-versity based post. I established Charles Bloe Training 13 years ago and  it quickly became very successful. We deservedly developed a reputati on for providing quality clinical updates for nurses and over a period of ti me I recruited over 30 freelance consultants to deliver the training across the UK and beyond. I also had aspirati ons to explore the  feasibility of web based training and have subsequently devel-oped a portf olio of 30 online clinical courses. The ECG in Acute Coro-nary Syndrome course was awarded fi rst place at the Briti sh Journal of Cardiac Nursing awards in 2008 for Innovati on in Educati on. With so much to do I decided to leave clinical practi ce in 2000 to focus on the training business full ti me. 

During that period I relocated to the Scotti  sh Highlands and in 2008 I happened to meet Prof. Steve Leslie who I had previously worked with at Falkirk Royal Infi rmary. He informed me of the vacant Clinical Ward Manager post at Raigmore Hospital’s CCU facility. Although it was not my  intenti on to return to the  ‘sharp end’ of cardiac care  I was excited by the challenges that Steve highlighted and the vision he had for the service. So here I am!

I’ve only been in post for a litt  le over 2 years and it has been a great move. I have a fantasti c group of staff  who have demonstrated a tre-mendous desire to further develop their roles and we’ve made enor-mous strides in my ti me here. The staff  have been a real credit to me and to themselves. 

I  believe  that  the  service  we  provide  for  cardiac  pati ents  in  NHS Highland is very personalised. We have established a good number of nurse-led initi ati ves such as rapid access chest pain and have uti -lised telemedicine to dramati cally improve pre hospital reperfusion with thrombolysis. ECG’s are transmitt ed from pati ent’s homes, that can be in excess of 2-3 hours away, to the CCU and this has resulted in most eligible pati ents  receiving pre hospital  thrombolysis.  I was delighted when  the nurses and Paramedics of NHS Highlands won an award in the ‘Changing for the Bett er’ category at this years staff  awards for their achievements in this area.

InterviewCardiac Nursing

Mr Dennis SandemanNursing Consulti ng EditorChest Pain Nurse SpecialistNHS Fife, Trustee of the Scotti  sh Heart and Arterial Risk Preventi on (SHARP) charity.

Charlie Bloe (pictured on the right) receives “Innovation through Education” award at the Cardiac Nursing awards in 2008

22 Nov/Dec 2010 www.cardiologyhd.com

How do you believe the integrated Volcano Multi-modality system will benefit your new Catheter Lab?

The Volcano integrated system provides a unified platform includ-ing FFR and IVUS and is integrated with the DICOM System, meaning that all our FFR & IVUS reports are consolidated with the angiograms. This integration assists our Cath Lab Staff as it ensures the workflow in the lab is much smoother and importantly time saving, without the need to bring in different pieces of kit for each procedure. The other advantage means they only need to be trained on one system for all modalities. Having this integrated system will also allow us to take advantage of the future technologies that Volcano are currently developing, including Forward Looking IVUS (FLIVUS) & OCT.

How many procedures are performed a year?

Our lab is projected to undertake approximately 1000 angiograms this year. Over 150 PCI’s were performed in the first 4 months since starting PCI in May 2010, thus we predict we will undertake around 350 in the first year. IVUS and pressure wire are important tools – we performed 19 IVUS and 7 pressure wire studies in the first few months. What is the approximate percentage of cath lab cases performed radially compared with femorally?

85 percent are radial. Does your department offer a Primary Angioplasty Service? If yes, what have been some of the challenges setting it up? If not, is this planned for the future?

Due to the dispersed nature of our population and the presence of only 2 PCI cardiologists, the development of a PPCI service will be a challenge for the cath lab and the ambulance service. Currently we operate a mandated ECG telemetry service to the ambulance ser-vice - where ECGs are telemetered for prehospital thrombolysis. At

present over 90% receive thrombolysis. Overall our PHT rate is 60%. Discussions are under way to offer PPCI to the 60% of the population who live within 1 hour drive time of the lab. Are any of your staff cross-trained (generic workers)? Future?

No, but this is something we are actively looking at to overcome the smaller number of staff in each discipline. This should allows us greater flexibility when opening the lab out of hours.

What new procedures / techniques have you implemented into the department recently? Future?

PCI has been the main focus this year but we have been lucky to attract an established consultant (Peter Clarkson) who is proficient in CRT, and we hope to start this service soon.

What are the benefits to patients attending your facility?

The development of on-site PCI has had an enormous benefit to patients. While we have not developed a PPCI service yet, several patients have had rescue or primary PCI within the cath lab operating times. The treatment of NSTEMI patients has been greatly improved and the turn-over of patients on our cardiac step down ward has quadrupled since the start of the PCI service.

How is your inventory managed?

Stock at present is a paper system with Excel spread sheet support, and a dedicated store person. We are looking into costing and imple-menting a bar code system that will have set levels, max/min, and can re-order with a link to automatic ordering when these levels are at a minimum.

Cath Lab Staff (from left): Dr Jamie Smith, Isobel Adams (Cath Lab Manager), Prof Steve Leslie, Karen Hercher (Cath Lab Nurse), Morag Nicol (Radiographer),

and Margaret-Ann Martin (Physiologist)

www.cardiologyhd.com Nov/Dec 2010 21

Volcano Volcano Fractional Flow ReserveFractional Flow Reserve

Lesion SignificanceLesion Significance

VHVH®® IVUS Imaging IVUS Imaging®® IVUS Imaging®®

Plaque CompositionPlaque Composition

Rotational IVUSRotational IVUSRevolutionRevolution®® 45 MHz 45 MHz ®® 45 MHz ®®

CatheterCatheter

ssssssssssssss55555555555555iiiiiii

| M

ulti-

Modality | One System

|

OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOnnnnnnneeeeeee CCCCCCCooooooommmmmmmppppppppppppppaaaaaaannnnnnn

yyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy

ChromaFloChromaFloChromaFloChromaFloChromaFloChromaFlo®® Imaging Imaging Imaging Imaging Imaging Imaging Imaging ®® Imaging ®®

Stent AppositionStent AppositionStent AppositionStent AppositionStent AppositionStent AppositionStent AppositionStent AppositionStent AppositionStent AppositionStent AppositionAssessmentAssessmentAssessmentAssessmentAssessmentAssessmentAssessmentAssessmentAssessmentAssessmentAssessment

Digital IVUSDigital IVUSDigital IVUSDigital IVUSDigital IVUSDigital IVUSDigital IVUSDigital IVUSDigital IVUSDigital IVUSDigital IVUSEagle EyeEagle EyeEagle EyeEagle EyeEagle EyeEagle EyeEagle Eye®® PlatinumPlatinumPlatinumPlatinumPlatinumPlatinum

Digital IVUSDigital IVUSPlatinum

Digital IVUSDigital IVUSDigital IVUSDigital IVUSPlatinum

Digital IVUSDigital IVUSDigital IVUSDigital IVUSPlatinum

Digital IVUSDigital IVUS

CatheterCatheterCatheterCatheterCatheterCatheterCatheterCatheterCatheterCatheterCatheter

Choose the Right Tool for Every Patient

phone: +32 2 713 18 01 [email protected] www.volcanocorp.comphone: +32 2 713 18 01 [email protected] www.volcanocorp.com

Learn More at

ACI 201126―28 January 2011London Hilton Metropole, UKVolcano will be located at Booth #19

www.cardiologyhd.com  Nov/Dec 2010 25

INTE

RVIE

W

We have a fi rst class cardiac rehabilitati on service located within the purpose built Highland Heartbeat Centre. Add in nurse-led services in  electi ve  cardioversion,  ICD  support  and  pre  and  post  coronary angiography and we have what we believe is a mini centre of excel-lence serving a much dispersed populati on.

I have also  taken on  the  role of Clinical  Lead  for  the cardiac MCN. We are so dependent on our primary care colleagues to deliver pre hospital cardiac care and this post helps me understand the issues in primary care and foster closer links with the GP’s and Paramedics on who we depend so much. How has  the world  of  cardiology  nursing  changed  since  you were away? 

Had I not been involved in providing clinical updates I suspect that the changes would have seemed dramati c in the 8 years I was away from clinical practi ce.

The most obvious change in coronary care in the last decade or so has been the emergence of PCI as the preferred reperfusion strategy in STEMI pati ents.

There has also been a welcome increase in nurse-led initi ati ves and a greater acceptance of this support by our medical colleagues. It is reassuring that we now seldom read publicati ons directly comparing the clinical abiliti es of nurses versus doctors. That wasn’t the case 10 years ago.

It  has  taken  some  ti me  but  the  emergence  of  telemedicine  has allowed collaborati ve decision-making between paramedics and CCU nurses based on 12-lead ECG telemetry that expedites the delivery of  pre  hospital  thrombolysis  in  STEMI.  It  is  important  that  cardiac nursing embraces new technologies and this  is a prime example of that. We’ve been tremendously successful in improving pre hospital thrombolysis delivery by paramedics and GP’s uti lising this technol-ogy coupled with nursing support. It has increased from approx. 20% to over 75% in the last year.

You must have the catheter lab which is the furthest north in the UK. What are the challenges of having a cardiology centre which is based so remotely and how have you and your colleagues in Raigmore dealt with these challenges? 

Yes that is a major issue. We have a populati on of litt  le over 250,000 but  they are dispersed over a geographical area  that’s bigger  than Belgium!  Add  in  remote  country  roads  and  prett y  harsh  winter weather  and  you  begin  to  understand  the  challenges  in  providing acute cardiac care in NHS Highland.

We have two interventi onal cardiologists in Prof. Steve Leslie and Dr. Jamie  Smith. We’ve had a diagnosti c  angio  service  for  some years and commenced PCI in May 2010. However with our relati vely small populati on  and  limited  interventi onal  capacity  we  have  to  take  a 

pragmati c  approach  to  opti mal  reperfusion  for  STEMI  pati ents. Given the long transportati on ti mes it is likely that coronary throm-bolysis will remain our primary reperfusion strategy and that makes the collaborati on between paramedics & GP’s and CCU even more important. The GP’s and paramedics have a pivotal role to play here. However as our service develops we will examine where and when it is feasible to off er PPCI to those pati ents that can be transported here within required ti me limits.

We may have the most remote catchment area in Europe – but we can also boast the most scenic! It’s also a great place to live and work with so many initi ati ves coming to fruiti on. Through necessity we’ve developed roles and practi ces that are the envy of many ‘big centres’. 

What do you do away from work eg hobbies etc...?

What ti me away from work?? Although I have a clinical director who runs my training organisati on I remain as Managing Director and Clin-ical Lead, so I am sti ll required to provide regular input there.

I’ve  relocated  to  a wonderful  part  of  Scotland  and  so  get  out  and about the hills as oft en as  I can.  I am forever hopeful  that my golf handicap may come down, although there is no real cause for hope there!

CardiologyHD.comSee our Management Hot Topics online today:

•  Surviving the Government Spending Cuts

•  Should Food/Gift s from companies be banned?

•  Hats and masks in the cath lab?

•  High Radiati on Dose Protocols

•  On-call Reimbursements

•  Radiographer Uti lisati on in EP

•  Are MBA’s a good idea?

•  Non-Professional Staff 

•  Multi -Skilling in the Cath Lab

•  Future Changes?

www.cardiologyhd.com Nov/Dec 2010 23

How does the lab handle haemostasis?

As the majority of our cases are radial the TR band is our main meth-od. For those pati ent requiring femoral puncture we use either angi-oseal or exoseal depending on the pati ent situati on.

What measures has the department implemented to cut costs?

We are conti nually seeking for competi ti vely price products. Further-more approximately 50% of our PCI cases will be undertaken as day case procedures and this has a cost saving.

What kind of training can new employees expect to receive?

Staff new to the cardiology DCU/Cath Lab can expect to be supernu-mery initi ally and have an appointed member of staff as their mentor to support them in the early stages of learning. They assist with new procedures, guidelines and protocols for the safe delivery of high standards of care. A training pack is given to each member of staff covering anatomy and physiology of the heart plus cardiac interven-ti ons, angiograms, pacing, PCI, ETT, MPS and cardiac rehab. Once familiarised with daycase procedures, and protocols, staff are inte-grated into cath lab working, observing initi ally, followed by scrub-bing in with a senior member of staff . Consultant input in the cath lab also contributes in training staff as scrub nurses, parti cularly as second operators for PCI, with cath lab manager support.

What kinds of conti nuing educati on programs are available to staff ?

We are fortunate at Raigmore to have Charlie Bloe from CB train-ing as our CCU ward manager. Training programs for nurses include, online educati on programmes for ACS, drug calculati ons, IABP, ECG recogniti on and thrombolysis training days. We have an annual con-ference, Heart of the Matt er which is well att ended by those inter-ested in cardiac care in the Highlands. Isobel Adams, our cath lab sister joined us this year and brings great experience from James Cook Hospital in Middlesbrough, which has been extremely valuable when setti ng up the service.

What kinds of competency checks do staff have to undergo once employed?

Competencies for staff have been developed and implemented as a means to assess the knowledge gained by staff during training, where extra support is needed, and to deem a member competent in a parti cular area. For example, the following are assessed by the cath lab manager/clinical educator: pati ent safety and risk, through check lists, orientati on (to know where equipment is and what it’s for), procedures, theoreti cal and practi cal knowledge. A new com-petency being developed is a log for staff covering scrub and second operator in the cath lab, fl ooring (scout nursing), and FFR/IVUS. This will be assessed every 3 months.

How do you deal with late fi nishing of cases?

Currently PCI is limited to morning working only – however as pre-dicted this is insuffi cient capacity, and discussions are ongoing to cre-ate an oncall staff to allow PCI in the aft ernoons.

What is your policy for company reps within the labs?

Reps are encouraged to visit BUT in line with BCIS recommendati ons are only allowed in the lab when specifi c staff training is required.

Reducing radiati on dose is a high priority in the cath labs. What techniques are employed by your radiographers to ensure dosage during cases is kept to a minimum? Also what is the maximum dose limit a pati ent can receive in your labs before it is recorded in their notes, and what is the follow-up process?

Slick PCI operators is clearly the key to reducing radiati on dose! Low dose screening and aquisiti on techniques are used with low screening and aquisiti on ti mes, and collimati on where possible.

We also ensure we use appropriately trained specialist radiographers. All staff must wear correct lead equivalent personal protecti on and radiati on monitoring badges. Use of lead shielding on equipment and the numbers of staff in the lab are kept to a minimum when using radati on. Radiographers noti fy cardiologists when skin dose is 2 Grays (200 DGS). Cardiologists consider staged procedures or where possible change the angle of the tube. The medical physics depart-ment is informed when a high dose occurs, and the Cardiologist is responsible for the medical follow up.

What are the advantages for SpR’s training at your facility?

We provide a truly consultant delivered service (due to lack of SpRs) thus a trainee at Raigmore will be ensured of excellent supervision during their training and exposure to a range of cardiac pati ents.

What is the best part of working at your facility?

The team eff ort to establish PCI has been a great bonding experi-ence. The enthusiasm and skills of the cath lab staff have been par-ti cularly uplift ing, and the transformati on of the pati ent fl ow in the CCU and cardiology ward has only been achievable due to the huge eff ort of the nurses and support staff in these areas.

CardiologyHD.comSee our other Site Visits online today:

• The London Independent Hospital

• St Bartholomew’s Hospital (Barts)

• Hammersmith Hospital

• Kings College Hospital

• Guy’s & St Thomas’ NHS Foundati on Trust

• The Wellington Hospital

• Northampton General Hospital

• West Hertf ordshire Hospitals NHS Trust

• Essex Cardiothoracic Centre

• Freeman Hospital

• The Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital

• Manchester Royal Infi rmary

• Southampton General Hospital

• East Surrey Hospital

• Royal Bournemouth Hospital

• Royal Cornwall Hospital

• Princess of Wales Hospital

• Waterford Regional Hospital (Ireland)

• Christchurch Hospital (New Zealand)

Plus many more from Australia, New Zealand, and the USA.

LatestProductNews

5

Cardiac Surgeon Interview 10

14Journals

16

18

Management Assistance- Three Top Tips

19

20

24

Site Visit- Raigmore Hospital

Nursing Interview- Charles Bloe

ECG Challenge Answer +

26Events Calendar

27

- Mr Babat discusses TAVI’s

Raigmore HospitalSite Visit

Mr Babat discusses TAVI’s

10

20

Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion

12

ECG Challenge

Future Tech News

Pharma

- with Sophie Blackman

- Dronedarone

- A Review

Page 4: Coronary Heart #27

4 Nov/Dec 2010  www.cardiologyhd.com

How to get in touch@ Email

Phone

Post

Circulati on

ExpertsOur Cardiology

Editorial, Subscripti on, & General [email protected]

Adverti sing enquiriesadverti [email protected]

Coronary Heart Publishing Ltd, Peter House, Oxford Street, Manchester, M1 5AN, UK

Editorial, Subscripti on, & General enquires+44 (0) 845 299 6220

Adverti sing enquiries+44 (0) 845 299 6220

Free Distributi on of 2800 copies to named individuals within cardiology in UK/Ireland.Distributed to all cardiology departments (invasive and non-invasive) and cardiologists.

For your free copy subscribe on our website at www.cardiologyhd.com.

Dr Mojgan Sani

Pharmaceuti cal Editor

Head of Clinical Pharmacy, Royal Berkshire Foundati on Trust & Nati onal Non-medical Prescribing Facilitator, Nati onal Prescribing Centre.

Mr Tim LarnerDirector / FounderPrevious Cardiac Radiographer Manager in Australia, & Senior Radiographer at multi ple sites in the UK.

Dr Magdi El-OmarLead Consulti ng EditorConsultant Cardiologist, Manchester Heart Centre, Central Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundati on Trust

Dr Richard EdwardsConsulti ng EditorConsultant Cardiologist, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle-upon-Tyne Hospitals NHS Trust

Mr Ian WrightEP Consulti ng EditorTechnical Head EP, St Mary’s Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust

Dr John PaiseyJournal ReviewerConsultant Cardiologist, Royal Bournemouth and Christchurch Hospitals NHS Foundati on Trust

Dr Dan McKenzieJournal ReviewerConsultant Cardiologist, Musgrove Park Hospital, Taunton and Somerset NHS Foundati on Trust

Dr Simon RedwoodConsulti ng EditorConsultant Cardiologist & Director of the Cath Labs at Guy’s & St Thomas‘ NHS Foundati on Trust

Dr Rodney FoaleConsulti ng EditorConsultant Cardiologist, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust

Mr Adam LunghiEcho Consulti ng EditorSenior Echo ManagerCVS - CardioVascular Services, Australia

Mr Dennis SandemanNursing Consulti ng EditorChest Pain Nurse SpecialistNHS Fife, Trustee of the Scotti  sh Heart and Arterial Risk Preventi on (SHARP) charity.

Ms Sophie BlackmanManagement & CRM Consulti ng EditorHead of Clinical Cardiac Physiology, West Hertf ordshire NHS Trust 

Page 5: Coronary Heart #27

www.cardiologyhd.com  Nov/Dec 2010 5

Latest Product NewsAbbott ’s Groundbreaking Bioresorbable Vascular Scaff old Implanted in First UK Pati entAbbott   enrolled  its  fi rst  UK  heart  pati ent  at  the  University  Hospi-tals of Leicester as part of an internati onal trial to evaluate the per-formance  of  the  company’s  revoluti onary  bioresorbable  vascular scaff old (BVS)  -  the fi rst drug-eluti ng device of  its kind designed to open up a blocked artery without leaving behind a permanent met-al  implant  in  the blood vessel.   This potenti al  restorati on of vessel functi on makes Abbott  ’s  BVS  unique  in  the  treatment  of  coronary artery disease.

The ABSORB EXTEND trial, which will enrol pati ents from 100 centres worldwide, reinforces Abbott  ’s commitment to research and devel-op innovati ve devices for vascular care. “The BVS promises to be an important next step in the treatment of coronary artery disease, and Abbott  is committ ed to making this revoluti onary technology a clini-cal reality,” said Sue Hudson, General Manager, Abbott  Vascular, UK & Ireland.

CYPHER Stent 10 Year Follow-upCordis Corporati on announced at the European Society of Cardiology in Stockholm on August 31st that the results of follow-up tests under-taken  ten years aft er  the fi rst pati ent was  treated with a CYPHER® Sirolimus-eluti ng coronary stent have proven outstanding long-term effi  cacy and safety. 

The fi rst pati ent was treated in 1999 with the CYPHER® stent at the age of 75 aft er her coronary angiography showed a signifi cant, single, de novo lesion in the proximal left  anterior descending (LAD) artery and under-went further invasive follow-up revealing a sustained anti -proliferati ve eff ect of  the CYPHER®  stent by both  angiography and IVUS  examinati on  in  2009.  The  pati ent  also  underwent  an  opti cal coherence tomography (OCT) assessment which revealed a complete coverage of over 90% of  the analysed  struts.  The  follow-up proce-dure was broadcast live during the 2009 meeti ng of the Lati n America Society of Interventi onal Cardiology (SOLACI, Rio de Janeiro - Brazil).

2

1

3

Abbott  ’s New Bioresorbable Vascular Scaff old

>>>

Balloon-like Handling with the New Resolute Integrity StentIn  early  September  2010,  cardiologists  from  Southampton General Hospital were the fi rst in Europe to implant Medtron-ic’s new Resolute Integrity Stent System, the latest drug-elut-ing stent  to hit  the market  in Europe. The Resolute  features a new advanced design, based on conti nuous sinusoid  tech-nology, allowing it to be more fl exible than other stents. This improves deliverability  to navigate through tortuous arteries easily, and once in place mould more successfully to the ves-sel walls.   

Dr  Iain Simpson,  the Consultant cardiologist who performed the fi rst procedure stated  “The new stent is more fl exible for getti  ng around twisty arteries, giving us another opti on when treati ng  pati ents with  coronary  heart  disease  or  those who have suff ered a heart att ack”.  

Recently other cardiologists in Europe have given the stent rave reviews. Dr Hamm in Germany stated, “The Resolute Integrity is the fi rst stent that feels like a balloon.” Whilst Dr Brunner in 

Austria  stated,  “This is  simply  the  best stent on the market.” 

For more informati on contact your Medtronic representati ve

Page 6: Coronary Heart #27

6 Nov/Dec 2010  www.cardiologyhd.com

Data from Multi ple Clinical Trials of OrbusNeich’s Genous™ Bio-engineered R Stent™ Demonstrate Safety and Eff ecti veness Across Challenging Pati ent Subsets as Presented at TCT 2010 in WashingtonThe results presented include:

•  Subset analyses of the global e-HEALING registry show that the Genous Bio-engineered R stent is safe and eff ecti ve in diabeti c pati ents, elderly pati ents over the age of 80 and in pati ents who stopped dual anti platelet therapy (DAPT) at 30 days.

•  Twelve-month follow-up results from the JACK-EPC clinical trial, an  investi gator-initi ated,  randomized  trial  that  compared  the Genous Bio-engineered R  stent with  bare metal  stents  (BMS) in pati ents with acute coronary syndromes, showed the major adverse cardiac event (MACE) rate in Genous Bio-engineered R stent treated pati ents was 13.3 percent compared to 23.3 per-cent in BMS pati ents.

•  Thirty-day follow-up opti cal coherence tomography (OCT) evalu-ati ons from 13 pati ents treated with the Genous Bio-engineered Cobalt Chromium Stent showed complete endothelializati on in majority of pati ents at 30 days post-implantati on.

For more informati on, visit www.OrbusNeich.com.

LEADERS Three-Year Results Suggest Improved Safety and Effi cacy of BioMatrix Flex™ over Cypher® Select™Three-year results from  the LEADERS trial, showing a conti nuing pos-iti ve trend towards a safety and effi  cacy benefi t for BioMatrix Flex™ compared to Cypher® Select™, were presented at TCT 2010. 

In the all-comers study populati on there were similar outcomes for BioMatrix Flex, Biosensors’ Biolimus A9™-eluti ng stent system with abluminal  biodegradable  polymer,  and  Cypher  Select,  Johnson  & Johnson’s sirolimus-eluti ng stent system with a durable polymer, in respect of MACE (major adverse cardiac events) at three years. There was a diverging trend towards a lower rate of MACE in pati ents treat-ed with BioMatrix Flex versus those treated with Cypher Select when compared to both one and two year results.

Occurrence of very  late stent  thrombosis  (VLST) events was  low: a cumulati ve  0.2%  for  BioMatrix  Flex  out  to  three  years,  compared with 0.9% for Cypher Select observed within the same period. 

Image courtesy Biosensors

4

Nine-month results from PLATINUM clinical program presented at TCTBoston  Scienti fi c  Corporati on  announced  data  from  its PLATINUM  QCA  study,  which  is  designed  to  evaluate  the PROMUS  Element™  Everolimus-Eluti ng  Plati num  Chromium Coronary  Stent.    The  results  provided  nine-month  QCA  and IVUS data supporti ng the safety and effi  cacy of the PROMUS Element Stent.  

Analysis  of  the  data was  presented  by  Ian Meredith,  at  TCT in  Washington,  D.C  who  stated,  “The  nine-month  angio-graphic  and  IVUS  data  from  the  PLATINUM  QCA  study  are impressive  and  show  the  acute  performance  advantages  of the  plati num  chromium  PROMUS  Element  Stent.  With  the same  drug  and  polymer  loading  and  comparable  release kineti cs  as  the PROMUS®  Stent,  the  PROMUS Element  Stent achieved  similar  late  loss  (0.17 mm  ±  0.25 mm)  and  signifi -cantly  bett er  stent  appositi on.    These  results give me  great  confi dence  in  the  transfer-ability  of  the  everolimus  drug  and  its proven clinical outcomes, as well as the potenti al  benefi ts  of  the  new  plati num chromium alloy.”

Contact your local Boston Scienti fi c representa-ti ve for more details.

This Stent Featured in Edition 225

6

Page 7: Coronary Heart #27

www.cardiologyhd.com  Nov/Dec 2010 7

New Millar Mikro-Cath™ Disposable Pressure Catheter.The Mikro-Cath  catheter  provides  physicians  with  a  simple device  to  measure  hemodynamic  cardiac  pressures  in  the human  body,  promoti ng  a  bett er  understanding  of  cardiac health for medical research and diagnosti c purposes. 

This  new  catheter  has  many  advantages  over  traditi onal fl uid-fi lled  catheters.  These  include,  high  fi delity  frequency response  >  10  KHz,  no  fl ushing  required,  free  from moti on artefacts and true pressure readings, regardless of pati ent or bed positi on.

The Mikro-Cath 3.5F model off ers versati le pressure measure-ment  for a  variety of applicati ons  including  LVP, RVP, PCWP and aorti c valve gradient pressures. The catheter is indicated for use as a minimally invasive device under short-term lim-ited body contact less than 24 hours. Typical applicati on will be through the femoral artery with the use of an additi onal guiding catheter.

The  catheter  is  shipped  sterile  to eliminate  logisti cal  concerns  of resterilizati on.

This combinati on of aff ordabil-ity,  reduced  procedure  ti me and sterility allows physicians to  bring  Mikro-Tip  accuracy back  into  routi ne  cath  lab procedures. 

Contact PMS (Instruments) Ltd on 01628 773233 or email [email protected] for informati on.

Philips Healthcare recently supplied an Allura FD10 dedicated cardiac system to The University Hospital of Wales. The new equipment comes with a host of innovati on including Stent-Boost, a simple, quick and eff ecti ve tool that enhances stent visualisa-ti on and XperSwing dual-axis rotati onal angiography of the coronary arteries. These assist in accurate stent deployment, reduced contrast and radiati on dose therefore potenti ally shortening procedures and eliminati ng additi onal ones. 

Philips equipment was selected by UHW because it fully supports all their  interventi onal  cardiology  procedures,  including  PPCI,  Pericar-dial  tap  and  emergency procedures.    Penny  Lloyd,  Superintendent Radiographer says, “We like the manoeuvrability of the system and  compact detector head.   We also  like Philips StentBoost and Xper-Swing.  We use StentBoost daily; we fi nd it easy to use and a great tool  for  post-stent  balloon  dilati on  and  for  positi oning  of    second stents.”    

A  second  reason  for  choosing Philips was outstanding  image qual-ity and proven reliability of UHW’s previous Philips system, together with the local engineering support.  Above: Shown here (left to right) Ruth Turner, Cardiovascular Sales Special-

ist, Philips Healthcare, Rob Davies, Regional General Manager, Central & West UK, Philips Healthcare, Dr. A. Buch, Consultant Cardiologist, Becky Williamson, Nurse, Irene Crew, Chief ECG Technician, Anna Stevens, Nurse, Penny Lloyd, Superintendent Radiographer, Jane Robinson, Account Manager, Philips Healthcare, Dr. Andrew Wood, Consultant Radiologist and Maggie Hill, Unit Manager.

The  catheter  is  shipped  sterile  to eliminate  logisti cal  concerns  of 

7

8

H-FABP predicts long term mortality in hs-Troponin negati ve ACS pati ents Results from an independent prospecti ve study of 1080 consecuti ve pati ents presenti ng  to  the ED with  suspected ACS has  shown  that the ischemic cardiac biomarker, heart-type fatt y acid binding protein (H-FABP), substanti ally improves the detecti on of high risk pati ents when Troponin-negati ve, even when a high sensiti vity assay is used. The  study,  recently  published  in  JACC,  was  conducted  by  Profes-sor Alistair Hall &  colleagues  at  Leeds General  Infi rmary. Amongst the large and parti cularly signifi cant subgroup of Troponin negati ve pati ents  (79.2% of  the cohort), a  raised H-FABP  identi fi ed pati ents at  a  very high  risk  for adverse outcomes,  independent of  age and serum creati nine.  H-FABP can now be assessed in combinati on with Troponin, via the new Evidence Multi Stat rapid testi ng instrument - designed & manu-factured by the UK-based diagnosti cs company, Randox.

For more informati on please email: [email protected]

9

Page 8: Coronary Heart #27

8 Nov/Dec 2010  www.cardiologyhd.com

ProtecX Medical Ltd launches new website.ProtecX  is  pleased  to  announce  the  launch  of  its  new website due to go live at the end of November 2010. 

We are proud to introduce this exciti ng development which as well as allowing customers to view our full range of radiati on protecti on and related products, also incorporates a tool to allow customers to request quotati ons on one or many of the products in our range.

This process has been designed to keep the customer informed of the progress of both the quotati on and subsequent order, through manufacture and delivery status. Customers will be able to uti lise a secure log in to the site to revisit quotes and view their history. The launch of our new website conti nues our aim of service improvement; we hope customers enjoy using this facility. 

Our website can be found at: www.protecx.co.uk 

PERFECTEMP™: An Innovati on In Operati ng Table Pati ent WarmingDot Medical Ltd is delighted to introduce the LMA PerfecT-emp™ under pati ent warming matt ress.

Maintaining  normothermia  in  pati ents  undergoing  opera-ti ons can be a challenge. However the LMA PerfecTemp ™ is a new innovati on off ering warmth beneath the pati ent and advanced  pressure  reducti on  to  combat  hypothermia  and pressure sores. 

The LMA PerfecTemp™ pati ent matt ress is

•  Lightweight

•  Durable

•  Quiet 

•  Delivers controlled and consistent warming

•  Has fi bre opti c sensors to measure temperature between the surface of the skin and the pad.

•  Easy to clean 

•  Radio translucent 

•  Ideal for all operati ons, dialysis units and areas where pati ent warming is imperati ve

For further informati on, contact Dot Medical Ltd: Email: [email protected]: 01625 668811 or Fax: 01625 668855

Siemens introduces new soluti ons at European Cardiology Congress Siemens Healthcare presented  its cardiology soluti ons at  the Euro-pean  Society  of  Cardiology  (ESC)  Congress  2010.    The  innovati ons showcased were designed to provide a higher quality of pati ent care and contribute to reducing costs.

The new 1.5 release of the ACUSON SC2000™ volume imaging ultra-sound system was on show at the Congress, it features a number of innovati ve workfl ow  soluti ons  and off ers  a  complete 2D and  volu-metric  system  to  improve  effi  ciency  in  routi ne  echocardiography examinati ons.   The  recently  launched MAGNETOM® Aera  1.5T and Skyra 3T systems were also presented for their ability to reduce the  complexity  of  cardiac  MR  examinati ons  and  provide  greater image consistency. 

The Congress also dedicated special emphasis on the planning of Transcatheter Aorti c Valve Implantati on (TAVI) procedures with the SOMATOM Defi niti on Flash CT and imaging soft ware syngo.via.  

Siemens held a number of satellite symposia on the latest cardiology treatments at the ECS Congress that can be viewed at www.siemens.com/esc 

Above: New Syngo Aortic ValveGuide imaging software from Siemens Healthcare simplifies workflow for minimally

invasive heart valve implantation.

10

12

11

Page 9: Coronary Heart #27

www.cardiologyhd.com  Nov/Dec 2010 9

We are the fi rst publicati on to be endorsed for CPD by the Soci-ety of Radiographer’s in the UK. We are classed as a varied and topical journal suited to the needs of cardiology radiographers and other practi ti oners in cardiac imaging. May support outcomes 1-14 of CPD Now.

Using the ACIST for TAVI’s at the Harley Street ClinicThe Harley Street Clin-ic  recently  performed their  fi rst  TAVI  case with Drs Ghada Mikhail and  Iqbal  Malik.    It  is thought  that  this  was the  fi rst  of  its  type  in a private medical insti -tuti on using  the ACIST Contrast Management System,  which  allows for precise and variable fl ows of contrast for both small and larger volumes. Cath Lab Manager Stephen Weymouth said,  ‘the whole case went very well and we were pleased that we were able to use the ACIST device for out fi rst TAVI.  It made the case quicker as we did not have to  set up a  separate  injector,  and  safer as  it  is  a  closed  system so there is less chance of air entering the pati ent’.   The Harley Street Clinic is a cardiac centre of excellence which con-ti nues  to  invest  in  its experienced consultants,  staff  and  the  latest technology. The  ACIST  provides  many  advantages  for  the  cardiologist,  includ-ing reduced contrast usage and creati ng a safer environment due to radiati on reducti on and its air detectors.  

For more informati on, please visit www.apc-cardiovascular.co.uk or call 01270 216142

CoreValve Receives FDA Approval for Evaluati onOn 15th October 2010, Medtronic, Inc. announced U.S. Food and  Drug  Administrati on  (FDA)  conditi onal  approval  for  its Investi gati onal  Device  Exempti on  (IDE)  applicati on  and  piv-otal clinical trial protocol to begin evaluati ng the Medtronic CoreValve System for transcatheter aorti c valve implantati on (TAVI).  As we  featured  in  the  previous  editi on  of  Coronary Heart,  the CoreValve  system  is designed  to provide a mini-mally  invasive,  non-surgical  treatment  opti on  for  pati ents 

with symptomati c, severe aorti c stenosis who are at high risk, or are ineligible, for open-heart surgery.

The CoreValve System is not yet commercially  available  in  the US,  however  since  March  2007 when  it  obtained  the  CE  Mark, 

it  has  been  implanted  in  more than 12,000 pati ents in 34 countries 

outside the US.

with symptomati c, severe aorti c stenosis who are at high risk, or are ineligible, for open-heart surgery.

it  has  been  implanted  in  more than 12,000 pati ents in 34 countries 

outside the US.

This Product Featured in Edition 26

BARD is our Primary EP Supporter

BARD® EP Fellows CourseBARD®  Electrophysiology  would  like  to  extend  a  special thanks to the presenti ng Consultant Electrophysiologists and the att endees, who parti cipated  in the BARD® EP Mini Case Review Sessions during the recent Heart Rhythm Congress in Birmingham. The interacti ve sessions, for Cardiology SpR’s or Cardiac Physiologists with at  least basic EP knowledge, took place during break ti mes. They proved incredibly popular and were well received by all.

Another EP teaching opportunity occurring soon is a BARD® EP  Fellows  Course,  which  takes  place  during  the  aft ernoon of 21st November, preceding Europe AF 2010,  London.  The Deducti ve  Electrophysiology  course  has  an  Internati onal EP  Faculty.  Registrati on  for  the  Fellows  Course  is  free,  and att endees  can also  get  a  special  discounted  registrati on  fee to  att end  Europe  AF  2010.  Pre  registrati on  for  the  Fellows Course is required. 

Details can be found on the website www.europeaf.com and early registrati on is recommended.

2011 Media Kit available mid NovemberRequest your copy today

Latest Product News Deal150 words + photo£99

See Page 4 for our Contact Details

Coronary Heart News >>>

14

13

15

Page 10: Coronary Heart #27

10 Nov/Dec 2010  www.cardiologyhd.com

TAVI’sMr Vinayak BabatConsultant in Cardiac SurgeryGuys and St Thomas’ Hospital, London, UK

Cardiac Surgeon Interview

When  do  you  think  the age  criteria  will  shift   so that  younger  pati ents, who  may  wish  for  fem-oral  TAVI  rather  than surgical  AVR,  can  be treated? What about the congenital group?

I think it will take at least 5-10  years  before  we start using it for younger pati ents.  And  the  rea-son  for  that  is  very  sim-ple.  In younger pati ents’ surgical  AVR  at  present is  the  gold  standard. It  is  predictable  and  in younger pati ents the risk is 1-3%. TAVI at present is 

only being used  in  surgically high-risk groups and even here  there are  compromises.  There  are  issues of  positi oning  in  around 5% of pati ents or 2% in experienced hands. The idea of TAVI’s is to reduce the  risk  to  the  pati ents,  and  unti l we  can  reduce  positi oning  risks from 3% to 0% I think we should wait. 

The second questi on in relati on to the congenital group is very inter-esti ng.  There  are  two  types  of  congenital  pati ents.  Firstly  and  the most  common  is  those with  a  bicuspid  valve. At  present  you  can-not deploy a TAVI without  inferior  results  in  this group due  to  the increased risk of paravalvular leak and coronary occlusion, and it is a contra-indicati on. 

But there is another congenital group who have got trileafl et stenosis and I think TAVI might be a bett er opti on here. Kids always grow out of the valve size, so if surgery can be delayed I think there may be an interim applicati on for TAVI in this group.

What is the smallest size femoral sheath that you see being capable of accommodati ng TAVI?

As a surgeon I fi nd this questi on very threatening (laughing), but to be very honest, the Edwards valve used at present is made of bovine pericardium, which is thick, durable and lasts 15-20 years. The thick-ness however takes away the compressibility of the valve and I think the sheath size may get down to 16FR but not more than that. 

There is a chance that there will be 2 types of products available in the  future,  so  that you have a valve  that  is made of porcine valve material or an arti fi cial material like polyurethane; which are thinner but not as durable.  But if you know the life expectancy of a parti cu-lar pati ent is less than 10 years, then you could use a thinner valve; that could  then be deployed through a smaller sheath.  In younger pati ents you would want to use a larger sheath for a more durable valve. 

Do you see the costs coming down so that funding by commissioners stops being a problem?

I think that is a very good questi on, because we have now seen the benefi ts in the clinical setti  ng, we can look at costs two ways. A tra-diti onal operati on on a sick pati ent  incurs greater  in-hospital costs which may then exceed the costs of a TAVI. At the same ti me, more competi ti on will drive down prices.

If we treat them either medically or surgically we must look at the total expenditure on  the pati ent and  include all hospital episodes, all hospital costs. As cost eff ecti veness data becomes available the business case for TAVI will become much stronger.

Also commissioners need to hear the feedback from the community to realize how clinical outcomes, length of stay etc are all improved.

Should all labs undertaking TAVI have (and conti nue to have) vascular surgery on site and available at short noti ce?

In the UK virtually all cardiac surgeons are trained in peripheral vas-cular up to a point, and that’s why the multi -disciplinary approach, which Edwards promotes, has benefi ts. So if you have vascular access problems,  there  is a surgeon available who has had some vascular training. Having vascular surgeons onsite is an additi onal benefi t but I don’t think it is mandatory in all pati ents to have that back-up all the ti me. If we have any doubts in regards to access problems we discuss it with vascular radiologists and surgeons. 

If we think the access site is not suitable for trans-femoral, the beau-ty of the Edwards device is that you can use it trans-apically in the same pati ent. So we don’t push ourselves to limits and take risks that are unnecessary.   If your case selecti on is good you will end up with fewer problems.

Interviewed at Edwards Lifesciences’ European Headquarters in Nyon, Switzerland, by Tim Larner, Director of Coronary Heart Publishing Ltd.

Questi ons by Dr Bernard Clarke, Consultant Cardiologist, Manchester Heart Centre

Photography: Tim LarnerValve Image: Courtesy Edwards Lifesciences

Page 11: Coronary Heart #27

Medtronic data on file. Comparison testing to previous delivery catheter system performed in controlled bench top test environment or simulated use testing in anatomical models. Results may not be indicative of clinical performance. U

C20

1102

619E

E ©

2010

Med

tron

ic, I

nc. A

ll Ri

ghts

Res

erve

d.

Innovating for life. UC

2011

0261

9EE

©20

10 M

edtr

onic

, Inc

. All

Righ

ts R

eser

ved.

MedtRoniC CoReValVeValVeVal e® deliVeRRy Syy SySteMwith aCCutRaktaktak M Stability layeR.

Controlled, Controlled, Accurate Deployment Accurate Deployment now Made ow Made even easier

• Improved Stability

• Improved AccuracyImproved Accuracy

• Improved Ease of UseImproved Ease of UseTesting performed in controlled bench top test environment Testing performed in controlled bench top test environment or simulated use testing in anatomical models.*or simulated use testing in anatomical models.*

Page 12: Coronary Heart #27

12 Nov/Dec 2010  www.cardiologyhd.com

LAAOLeft Atrial Appendage Occlusion : A Review

Dr Tim Gatt ornaCardiology fellowRoyal Perth HospitalAustralia

Atrial fi brillati on (AF) is the commonest cardiac arrhythmia with a prevalence of 0.9% in the general populati on, increasing to >13% of people over the age of 80.¹ As our populati on ages, 

the prevalence of AF will conti nue to rise with signifi cant clinical and economic implicati ons.2 The most feared and catastrophic complica-ti on of AF is stroke, which is increased fi vefold over an age-matched populati on in sinus rhythm. This is independent of other factors and mostly secondary to thromboembolic events.3

Proven therapies to reduce AF-associated stroke include oral anti co-agulati on with vitamin K antagonists, such as warfarin. However, its narrow therapeuti c window and large number of drug, dietary, and metabolic interacti ons make pati ent response unpredictable and dif-fi cult to manage. This is parti cularly true in older pati ents who are at increased bleeding  and  stroke  risk. Newer pharmacological  agents such as the direct thrombin inhibitor, dabigatran, are promising and show similar stroke protecti on to warfarin with less signifi cant bleed-ing.4 Several ongoing studies are examining the potenti al role of new orally acti ve anti -factor X agents.

Given the problems with available pharmacological therapies there has been an impetus for the development of a device-based soluti on for AF-associated stroke. Such strategies have focussed on occlusion of the left  atrial appendage (LAA).  The reason is that this site is pre-disposed to in-situ thrombus formati on and accounts for the origin of 90% of atrial thrombi in pati ents with non-valvular atrial fi brilla-ti on (NVAF). 5-7The LAA, an embryonic remnant of the original LA, is a multi -lobed, trabeculated structure with considerable anatomical variati on att ached to the LA cavity.  In pati ents with AF  it has been found  to  be  larger  and with  greater  dysfuncti on, which  are mark-ers for increased embolic risk.6, 8-10 Also, previous observati ons have demonstrated that most embolic phenomena were associated with LAA thrombus in pati ents with AF.11,12

Interest  in  LAA  removal  or  occlusion dates  back  to  the  1930s  and can be safely performed during cardiac surgery either with sutures or  staples.13  This  is most  oft en  performed  during  valve  surgery  or during Maze procedures  (the  creati on of  left   atrial  lesion patt erns during open heart  surgery  to eliminate AF),  although  isolated  LAA exclusion via a thoracoscopic approach has been shown to be feasi-ble and safe.14

An  alternati ve,  less  invasive  means  of  LAA  exclusion  using  endo-vascular  techniques  has  been  developed.  Three  diff erent  devices 

have been used to date: percutaneous LAA transcatheter occlusion (PLAATO)  system,  the WATCHMAN  system  and  the  Amplatzer  car-diac plug.   These devices are delivered to the LAA following a per-cutaneous  femoral  transvenous  approach  and  transeptal  puncture under  fl uoroscopic  and  transoesophageal  echocardiographic  (TOE) guidance.

The fi rst of these was the PLAATO system (ev3, Inc., Plymouth, Min-nesota) (Figure 1) consisti ng of a self-expanding niti nol implant cov-ered  with  an  occlusive  ePTFE  (expanded  polytetrafl uoroethylene) membrane.15  Despite  initi ally  encouraging  results  in  pati ents  who had  contraindicati ons  to  warfarin  device  development  was  halted for fi nancial considerati ons in December 2006.16,17

The second percutaneous LAA exclusion device is the Watchman Left  Atrial Appendage System (Atritech Inc., Plymouth, Minnesota) (Fig-ure  2).  The device  is  a  self-expanding  niti nol  frame  structure with fi xati on barbs and a permeable polyester fabric that covers the atrial side.18 

The pivotal clinical trial evaluati ng this device was the Embolic Pro-tecti on  in  Pati ents with  Atrial  Fibrillati on  (PROTECT-AF)  trial.19 This was a multi centre, prospecti ve, non-inferiority, unblinded  study of pati ents with NVAF who were deemed eligible for warfarin therapy. Pati ents were enrolled in the trial if they had a CHADS2 risk score of 1 or more (ie, at least one of the following: previous stroke or tran-sient ischaemic att ack, congesti ve cardiac failure, diabetes mellitus, 

Figure 1: The PLAATO device

Page 13: Coronary Heart #27

www.cardiologyhd.com  Nov/Dec 2010 13

hypertension,  or  were 75  years  or  older).  707 eligible  patients  were randomly  assigned  in  a 2:1  ratio  to  percutane-ous  closure  of  the  LAA and short  term warfarin (45 days) or to long term warfarin  (control  group, target  international nor-malised  ratio  2.0-3.0). Efficacy  was  assessed by  a  primary  composite endpoint  of  stroke,  car-diovascular  death,  and systemic  embolisation. At 1065 patients-years of follow-up the efficacy of percutaneous  closure of the LAA with this device was  non-inferior  to  that of warfarin therapy. The device  was  successfully 

implanted in 91% of those in whom implantation was attempted and 86% of  these patients  (at  45 days  of  follow-up) were  able  to  stop taking warfarin;  followed by  initially 6 months of aspirin and clopi-dogrel after randomisation and then long term aspirin monotherapy. For the control group, a therapeutic INR range (2.0-3.0) was achieved 66% of  the time. There was a higher  rate of adverse safety events in the interventional group than the control group, predominantly a result of peri-procedural complications such as pericardial effusions. As a result of this trial the WATCHMAN device won the recommen-dations of a US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) advisory panel in April 2009, but  is awaiting a further study with more safety and efficacy data before being granted full approval by the FDA.

The third occlusion device, the Amplatzer Cardiac Plug (ACP), is con-structed from a nitinol mesh and Dacron and is currently undergo-ing  clinical  testing.20-22 It  comprises of  the  lobe, which  conforms  to the inner structure of the LAA; the waist, which acts as an articulat-ing, compliant connection; and the disc, which covers  the LAA ori-fice  (see figure 3, Images 1 &2). The device is fully recapturable and repositionable  if necessary. Unlike the WATCHMAN device patients do not  require warfarin  therapy, but  rather  a  short period of dual antiplatelet  therapy  followed by  long  term aspirin  once  successful LAA occlusion has been proven by a follow-up TOE.

AF  significantly  increases  the  risk of  stroke and providing  safe and effective  anticoagulant  therapy  can  be  challenging.  Closure  of the  LAA  provides  an  alternative  strategy  of  stroke  prophylaxis  in patients with NVAF. Routine implantation, however, does not appear 

warranted,  though LAA  occlusion  may  be an  option  in  selected patients with a high risk of  bleeding  complica-tions  from  anticoagula-tion.  It  should  be  noted that  these  warfarin-ineligible  patients  were excluded  in  the  PRO-TECT-AF  trial.  Further larger,  adequately  pow-ered  studies  comparing device  deployment  to optimal  anticoagulation are  needed  to  evaluate 

the  long term safety and efficacy of such occlusion devices. This  is especially true in patients with higher CHADS2 scores or with a previ-ous transient ischemic attack or ischaemic stroke. 

References:

1.  Phillips SJ, Whisnant JP, O’Fallon WM, Frye RL. Prevalence of cardiovas-cular  disease  and diabetes mellitus  in  residents  of  Rochester, Minne-sota. Mayo Clin Proc 1990;65:344–359.

2.  Stewart S, Hart CL, Hole DJ, McMurray JJ. Population prevalence,  inci-dence, and predictors of atrial fibrillation in the Renfrew/Paisley study. Heart 2001:86:516-21

3.  Wolf PA, Abbott RD, Kannel WB. Atrial fibrillation: a major contributor to stroke: the Framingham study. Arch Intern Med 1987;147:1561-64

4.  Connolly SJ, Ezekowiz MD et al. Dabigatran versus Warfarin in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation. NEJM 2009;361(12): 1139-51

5.  Blackshear  JL,  Odell  JA.  Appendage  obliteration  to  reduce  stroke in  cardiac  surgical  patients  with  atrial  fibrillation.  Ann  Thorac  Surg 1996;61:755–759.

6.  Wongcharoen W, Tsao HM, Wu MH, et al. Morphologic characteristics of the left atrial appendage, roof, and septum: implications for the ablation of atrial fibrillation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2006;17:951–956. 

7.  Stollberger  C,  Schneider  B,  Finsterer  J.  Elimination  of  the  left  atrial appendage to prevent stroke or embolism? Anatomic, physiologic, and pathophysiologic considerations. Chest 2003; 124:2356-62

Figure 2: WATCHMAN device

Figure 3: Amplatzer cardiac plug

Image 1: LAA (900 on transoesphageal echocardiogram)

Image 2: Occlusion of the LAA by an Amplatzer cardiac plug (90 degrees on transoesphageal echocardiogram)

continues on page 15

Page 14: Coronary Heart #27

14 Nov/Dec 2010  www.cardiologyhd.com

Journals

Heart FailureSHIFT was a randomised comparison of Ivabradine vs. placebo in sys-tolic heart failure pati ents in sinus rhythm, salami sliced into two par-allel arti cles. It att empts to answer the following questi ons: 1. What is the adverse prognosti c impact of elevated heart rate in systolic heart failure pati ents?  Answer: 16% increased risk of HF events for every fi ve bpm increase in heart rate; 2. Is the elevated heart rate causal or just a marker of other processes? Answer: Yes, increased baseline heart rate is neutralised by treatment; 3. Is heart rate itself a justi -fi able pharmacological  target? Answer: Yes, elevated rates and the benefi t  of  lowering  them  remain prevalent,  despite prior  pharma-cological therapy; 4. Is Ivabradine an eff ecti ve agent in this regard? Answer: Yes, a 5% absolute reducti on of events from 29 to 25% in the ivabradine group at the cost of 4% excess symptomati c bradycardias and  2%  visual  disturbances.  An  accompanying  editorial  welcomes the clarity of data on the impact of heart rate, but expresses cauti on that there may have been inadequate doses of beta blockers in the individuals responding to ivabradine.

Swedberg and others. The Lancet, 2010; 376:9744, 875 – 885.

Böhm and others. The Lancet, 2010; 376:9744, 886 – 894.

Teerlink. The Lancet, 2010; 376:9744, 847 – 84.

It is good, though rare, to see a negati ve trial published in a decent journal. Rolofylline, an adenosine A1-receptor antagonist was test-ed  against  placebo  in  2033  pati ents  with  acute  heart  failure  and impaired  renal  functi on.  It  made  no  diff erence  than  placebo  to the primary  endpoint  (treatment  success,  treatment  failure,  or  no change in the pati ent’s clinical conditi on). Well done to the authors and to the New England Journal of Medicine for publishing it.

Massie and others. NEJM; 2010; 363:1419-28.

Putti ng Lead in Yorkshire PencilsAnother potenti al treatment for use in heart failure and cardiac dis-ease is testosterone. A longitudinal study from a group in Sheffi  eld and Barnsley has demonstrated that pati ents with vascular disease and  testosterone  defi ciency,  who  were  followed  up  for  almost  7 years, had an increased risk of mortality (21%) relati ve to those with normal  testosterone  levels  (12%,  p=0.002).  Having  low  testoster-one levels is common - up to 24% depending on the test used in the populati on studied. The obvious next step is a randomised controlled trial of testosterone replacement therapy in high risk pati ents with testosterone defi ciency.

Malkin and others. Heart 2010; 96:1821e1825.

Toys for GeeksCircumferenti al pulmonary vein ablati on has always been an att rac-ti ve target for custom designed catheters.  In the  last  few years we have had at least one catheter available which seems to be safe and eff ecti ve (PVAC), although concerns have been that it ablates further onto the venous side of the atrium than ideally placed point by point lesions. We now have the fi rst of a series of randomised comparisons; 102 pati ents with paroxysmal atrial fi brillati on were randomised to either mapping, guided point by point, or PVAC pulmonary vein isola-ti on. Procedure and screening ti mes were signifi cantly shorter in the PVAC group, whilst fi rst procedure success rates were comparable in the PVAC and conventi onal arms (77 vs. 71% over a short follow up of 6 months). The PVAC was noted to be unsuited to single common left  sided atria.

Alan Bulava and others. PACE 2010; 33:1039–1046.

Ablati on  of  typical  atrial  fl utt er  is  now  regarded  as  standard  fi rst line therapy and highly successful. In an att empt to improve on this already highly effi  cient procedure, a multi  electrode catheter (TVAC) from the same stable as  the PVAC was used  to ablate  the cavotri-cuspid isthmus in a randomised comparison with 8mm ti p catheter ablati on. Thirty pati ents in each group underwent ablati on with sig-nifi cantly shorter radio frequency (8.5 vs. 14.7 min) and procedure ti mes (40.2 vs. 60.5 min)  in the TVAC group. There was one failure to achieve block in the TVAC group and two late recurrences in each group.

Ali Erdogan and others. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2010; 21:1109-1113.

Resuscitati onIt used to be said it was impossible to conduct meaningful compari-sons of resuscitati on techniques, due the ethical diffi  culti es involved. This has now been thoroughly disproved by the number of studies recently  published  on  the  subject  and  with  yet  another  compari-son of chest compression only vs. classically taught CPR, it is almost becoming boring.

In a comparison of classical CPR vs. chest compressions only vs. no CPR, provided by non-medical bystanders in over 5000 pati ents, sur-vival to hospital discharge was signifi cantly improved by chest com-pressions only (13.3%) when compared to both classical CPR (7.8%) and no CPR  (5.2%).  In  fact,  aft er  appropriate  adjustment,  classical CPR may off er no survival benefi t against no CPR.

Dr John PaiseyJournal ReviewerConsultant Cardiologist, Royal Bournemouth and Christchurch Hospitals NHS Foundati on Trust

Dr Dan McKenzieJournal ReviewerConsultant Cardiologist, Musgrove Park Hospital, Taunton and Somerset NHS Foundati on Trust

Page 15: Coronary Heart #27

www.cardiologyhd.com  Nov/Dec 2010 15

This  is concordant with other studies we have previously reported, and explanati ons  for  these fi nding may  include;  technical diffi  culty in  delivering  eff ecti ve  respiratory  support,  interference of  arti fi cial respirati on with delivery of CPR, bystanders being put off  by arti fi cial respirati on and effi  cacy of chest compressions in venti lati on.

Bobrow and others. JAMA. 2010; 304(13):1447-1454. Coronary Interventi onBare  metal  stents  (BMS)  have  a  signifi cant  incidence  of  resteno-sis  and were  largely  superseded  by  drug  eluti ng  stents  (DES)  that became available in 2002. There was then global concern regarding the risk of stent thrombosis in pati ents with fi rst generati on DES, fol-lowing presentati ons of two meta-analyses at the ESC in Barcelona, in 2006. There was a  subsequent  reducti on  in  the use of DES and numerous further studies have been published that have been, on the whole, reassuring. As a result, nati onal guidelines recommended dual anti platelet therapy for a minimum of 12 months in all pati ents receiving DES.

A  recent  prospecti ve,  multi center,  Spanish  registry  of  4,768  ‘real world’  pati ents  demonstrated  a  cumulati ve  incidence  of  defi nite/probable thrombosis for zotarolimus eluti ng stents (ZES – Endeavor / Medtronic) of 1.3% at 1 year and 1.7% at 2 years, and for everolimus eluti ng stents (EES - Xience / Abbott  or Promus / Boston) of 1.4% at 1 year and 1.7% at 2 years (p = 0.8 for ZES vs. EES).   These fi gures are  reassuringly  lower  than with  the fi rst  generati on DES,  but  sti ll emphasise the importance of good stent deployment and adequate dual  anti platelet  therapy.  Interesti ngly,  in  the  subset  of  pati ents with bifurcati on lesions, ZES signifi cantly increased the risk of stent thrombosis compared to EES. Of course, there are now third genera-ti on, biodegradable polymer, nitric oxide producing and endothelial progenitor capture cell-coated stents available as well.

De la Torre Hernandez and others. JACC Cardiol. Intv. 2010;3;911-19.

Another trial has been reported comparing percutaneous coronary interventi on (PCI) and surgical revascularisati on (CABG) for multi ves-sel disease, but this ti me in pati ents with acute coronary syndromes (ACS). The ACUITY trial was originally designed to compare 3 diff er-ent anti thromboti c regimens  in moderate to high risk ACS pati ents (unfracti onated heparin or low molecular weight heparin with a gly-coprotein (GP) IIbIIIa  inhibitor, bivalirudin with a GPIIbIIIa  inhibitor, or bivalirudin alone). Of  the 13,819 pati ents enrolled, 56%  (7,789) underwent PCI and 11% (1,539) had CABG. The remaining 33% were treated medically,  at  the  investi gators  discreti on.  Aft er  propensity matching  (the  latest  trendy  stati sti cal method  to  correct  for  varia-bles) pati ents treated with PCI had lower rates of  stroke, myocardial infarcti on, major bleeding, and renal injury than those treated with CABG, with comparable 1-month and 1-year rates of mortality, but more oft en developed recurrent ischemia requiring repeat revascu-larizati on procedures during follow-up.

Ben-Gal and others. JACC Cardiol. Intv.;3:1059-67.

A registry comparing PCI and CABG in left  main stem disease has also been  reported  this month. The ASAN-MAIN  (Asan Medical Center-Left  Main  Revascularizati on)  study  published  10-year  data  on  350 pati ents with unprotected left  main disease who were treated with either CABG or BMS, and fi ve-year data on 395 pati ents treated with either surgery or a DES (mainly sirolimus eluti ng Cypher stents). Aft er adjustment for variables, results were equivalent between the two methods of revascularisati on, in terms of mortality and a combined end point of death, Q-wave MI, or  stroke. However,  as with other studies (SYNTAX and COMPARE-MAIN), both BMS and DES pati ents were more  likely  to  require  further  revascularisati on during  follow up. In Europe, as part of the newest European Society of Cardiology guidelines, coronary stenti ng of left  main disease is a class IIa, level of evidence B, recommendati on.

Park and others. JACC;56:1366-1375.

References (cont...)

8.  Agmon Y, Khandheria BK, Genti le F, Seward JB. Echocardiograph-ic  assessment  of  the  left   atrial  appendage.  J  Am  Coll  Cardiol 1999;34:1867–1877. 

9.  Predictors of thromboembolism in atrial fi brillati on: II. Echocar-diographic features of pati ents at risk. The Stroke Preventi on in Atrial Fibrillati on Investi gators. Ann Intern Med 1992;116:6–12. 

10.  Transesophageal  echocardiographic  correlates  of  thromboem-bolism  in  high-risk  pati ents with  nonvalvular  atrial  fi brillati on. The Stroke Preventi on in Atrial Fibrillati on Investi gators Commit-tee on Echocardiography. Ann Intern Med 1998;128:639–647.

11.  Garcia-Fernandez MA, Perez-David E, Quiles J, et al. Role of left  atrial appendage obliterati on in stroke reducti on in pati ents with mitral  valve  prosthesis:  A  transesophageal  echocardiographic study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2003;42:1253–1258. 

12.  Belcher  JR,  Somerville  W.  Systemic  embolism  and  left   auric-ular  thrombosis  in  relati on  to  mitral  valvotomy.  Br  Med  J 1955;2:1000–1003. 

13.  Healey JS, Crystal E, Lamy A, et al. Left  Atrial Appendage Occlusion Study (LAAOS): Results of a randomized controlled pilot study of left  atrial appendage occlusion during coronary bypass surgery in pati ents at risk for stroke. Am Heart J 2005;150:288–293. 

14.  Johnson WD, Ganjoo AK, Stone CD, et al. The left  atrial append-age: Our most lethal human att achment! Surgical  implicati ons. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2000;17:718–22. 

15.  Sievert  H,  Lesh  MD,  Trepels  T,  et  al.  Percutaneous  left   atrial appendage transcatheter occlusion to prevent stroke in high-risk pati ents with atrial fi brillati on: Early clinical experience. Circula-ti on 2002;105:1887–1889. 

16.  16. Ostermayer SH, Reisman M, Kramer PH, et al. Percutaneous left   atrial  appendage  transcatheter occlusion  (PLAATO  system) to prevent stroke in high-risk pati ents with non-rheumati c atrial fi brillati on: Results from the internati onal multi -center feasibil-ity trials. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005;46:9–14.

17.  17.Bayard YL, Omran H, Neuzil P, Thuesen L, Pichler M, Rowland E, Ramondo A, Ruzyllo W, Budts W, Montalescot G, Brugada P, Ser-ruys PW, Vahanian A, Piéchaud JF, Bartorelli A, Marco J, Probst P, Kuck KH, Ostermayer SH, Büscheck F, Fischer E, Leetz M, Sievert H.  PLAATO  (Percutaneous  Left  Atrial  Appendage  Transcatheter Occlusion)  for  preventi on of  cardioembolic  stroke  in  non-anti -coagulati on eligible atrial fi brillati on pati ents:  results  from  the European PLAATO study. EuroInterventi on. 2010;6:220-6.

18.  18.  Sick PB,  Schuler G, Hauptmann KE, et al.  Initi al worldwide experience with  the WATCHMAN  left   atrial  appendage  system for  stroke  preventi on  in  atrial  fi brillati on.  J  Am  Coll  Cardiol 2007;49:1490–1495. 

19.  19. Holmes DR, Reddy VY, Turi ZG, Doshi SK, Sievert H, Buchbind-er M, Mullin CM, Sick P; PROTECT AF Investi gators. Percutane-ous closure of the left  atrial appendage versus warfarin therapy for preventi on of stroke in pati ents with atrial fi brillati on: a ran-domised non-inferiority trial. Lancet. 2009; 374:534-4.

20.  20. Park JW, Bethencour A, Sievert H, Santoro G, Meier B, Walsh K,. Lopez-Minquez JR, Meerkin D, Ormerod O, Leithäuser B. Left  atrial appendage closure with Amplatzer cardiac plug for preven-ti on of stroke in atrial fi brillati on – initi al European Experience. Eur. Heart J. 2010;12(suppl A):S14

21.  21.  Rodés-Cabau  J,  Champagne  J,  Bernier  M.  Transcatheter closure  of  the  left   atrial  appendage:  initi al  experience  with the Amplatzer  cardiac plug device. Catheter Cardiovasc  Interv. 2010;76: 86-92.

22.  22. Bass JL. Transcatheter occlusion of the left  atrial appendage--experimental testi ng of a new Amplatzer device. Catheter Car-diovasc Interv. 2010; 76:181-5.

.....conti nued from page 13

Page 16: Coronary Heart #27

16 Nov/Dec 2010  www.cardiologyhd.com

PharmaCardiology

Atrial Fibrillati on (AF)  is characterised by uncoordinated atrial acti vity  with  consequent  deteriorati on  of  atrial  mechanical functi on.  AF is the most common arrhythmia and responsible 

for many hospital admissions.   This  is due to  the aging populati on and an  increase in heart disease.  There are three main objecti ves for the management of pati ents with AF:  rate control, preventi on of thromboembolism, and correcti on of the rhythm disturbance.

Dronedarone marketed as Multaq by Sanofi -Aventi s  is  licensed  for clinically stable adult pati ents with a history of, or current non-per-manent atrial fi brillati on (AF) to prevent recurrence of AF or to lower ventricular  rate.   Dronedarone belongs  to  the benzofuran  class  of anti arrhythmic drugs and is contraindicated in unstable pati ents with NYHA class III and IV heart failure.  Its use is also not recommended in stable pati ents with NYHA class  III heart failure or with  left  ven-tricular ejecti on fracti on less than 35%.

NICE  Guidance  using  the  single  technology  appraisal  process  was published  in August 2010 (www.nice.org.uk/TA197) and this paper aims to give a summary of the main points.

NICE Clinical Guideline 36  in 2006 (management of AF) states that Beta  blockers  in  additi on  to  anti coagulati on  should  be  the  initi al treatment  opti on  for  people  with  symptomati c  paroxysmal  atrial fi brillati on and people with persistent atrial fi brillati on in whom an anti arrhythmic drug is needed to maintain sinus rhythm aft er cardio-version.  Amiodarone, sotalol or a class 1c drug should be used as a second line treatment opti on if standard beta blockers are contrain-dicated or fail to improve symptoms.

Amiodarone was noted  to  be  an  eff ecti ve  anti arrhythmic  drug  for controlling AF but due to high level of toxicity many people were not able  to  tolerate  it.    There were also many pati ents who could not tolerate a 1c anti arrhythmic agent or sotalol who may benefi t from 

dronedarone  instead with  a more  favourable  side  eff ect  profi le  in some pati ents.     The guide recommends initi ati on of dronedarone under the supervision of a specialist in secondary care setti  ng.

Clinical informati on on dosage & administrati on

Treatment with  dronedarone  is  initi ated  at  400mg  twice  a  day  in adults with a morning and evening meal.    If  the pati ent  is already 

NICE Appraisal on Dronedarone for the treatment of non-permanent Atrial Fibrillati on (AF)

Dr Mojgan Sani, DPharm, MBA, MRPharmS

Head of Clinical Pharmacy, Royal Berkshire Foundati on Trust & Nati onal non-medical prescribing Facilitator, Nati onal Prescribing Centre.

Dronedarone is recommended in pati ents with non-permanent AF only in people:

◊  Whose AF is not controlled by fi rst-line therapy (usually including beta blockers), that is, as a second line opti on, 

and

◊  Who have at least one of the following cardiovascular risk factors:

› hypertension requiring drugs of at least two diff erent classes

› diabetes mellitus › previous transient ischaemic att ack, stroke or systemic embolism

› left  atrial diameter of 50mm or greater › left  ventricular ejecti on fracti on less than 40%  or › age 70 years or older, 

and

◊  Who do not have unstable NYHA class III or IV heart failure.

NICE Guidance recommendation for use of Dronedarone

Page 17: Coronary Heart #27

www.cardiologyhd.com  Nov/Dec 2010 17

PHA

RMA

on any class 1 or 3 antiarrhythmics,  this should be stopped before starting  dronedarone.      No  dose  adjustment  is  necessary  in  the elderly population with renal impairement (except contraindication in severe renal impairement of creatinine clearance of less than 30 ml/min).  No dose adjustment is necessary in patients with mild to moderate hepatic impairement but contraindicated in severe hepatic failure.

The dose  should not  be  taken with  grapefruit  juice  as  it  increases dronedarone  exposure.    Doses  of  digoxin  should  be  reduced  by 50%  if  concurrently  used with  dronedarone.    There  are  a  number of other clinical drugs interactions.  Pharmacists should refer to the SPC to ensure safety of polypharmacy when they have a patient on dronedarone.

The most  frequent  adverse  effects  include  an  elevated  blood  cre-atinine  level  and  prolongation  of  QT  interval.    Other  common adverse events may include diarrhoea, nausea, vomiting, fatigue and asthenia.

Clinical effectiveness from trials 

The  four  main  clinical  trials  (ATHENA,  EURIDID,  ADONIS  and  DIO-NYSOS)  demonstrated  the  superior  efficacy  of  dronedarone  over placebo but also showed less efficacy against amiodarone and other antiarrhythmic agents.

EURIDIS  (EURopean  trial  In  atrial  fibrillation  patients  receiving Dronedarone  for  the  maIntenance  of  Sinus  rhythm)  and  ADONIS (American-Australian-African  trial with DronedaONe  In  atrial  fibril-lation patients for the maintenance of Sinus rhythm) were phase III multicentre,  parallel,  randomised  double  blind,  placebo-controlled trials of the same design and were reported together.  A total of 612 patients were recruited into the EURIDIS trial and 625 patients into the ADONIS trial.  Both dronedarone and placebo were given in addi-tion  to  standard first-line  therapy of beta blocker and anticoagula-tion.  Patients had paroxysmal or persistent atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter.  The primary endpoint was the first documented recurrence of  AF  lasting  at  least  10  minutes.    Secondary  endpoints  included symptoms  related  to  AF  during  recordings  and  mean  ventricular rate during first recurrence.  The results showed that fewer people in the dronedarone arm had AF recurrence at 12 months than pla-cebo (p<0.001).   These trials also reported a  lower ventricular rate in the dronedarone compared to placebo.1  Symptomatic recurrence occurred in 37.1% and 47.5% of patients treated with dronedarone or placebo respectively (p=0.006).

ATHENA was also a phase III multicentre, parallel, randomised, dou-ble blind placebo controlled trial of 4,628 patients.  Both dronedar-one and placebo were given in addition to standard first-line therapy of  beta  blocker  and  anticoagulation.    Patients  had  paroxysmal  or persistent atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter with at  least one of  the following  additional  risk  factors  for  a  major  cardiovascular  event.  The primary endpoint was first hospitalisation due  to  cardiovascu-lar events or death from any cause.2  A total of 31.9% of patients in 

the dronedarone group experienced the primary outcome compared to 39.4%  in  the placebo group  (p<0.001).   The  results were driven by a lower hospitalisation rate in the dronedarone group compared to placebo.  This trial reported lower cardiovascular mortality in the dronedarone group compared with placebo but no statistically sig-nificant difference in all cause mortality.2,3

DYONYSOS  was  a  phase  III  randomised  double  blind  trial  of  504 patients,  comparing  dronedarone  with  amiodarone.    Patients  had paroxysmal or persistent atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter  in whom cardioversion  and  antiarrhythmic  treatment  were  indicated  plus anticoagulation.    The  primary  endpoint  was  treatment  failure  as defined by recurrence of AF or premature study drug discontinuation for intolerance or lack of efficacy.  The primary endpoint occurred in 73.9% of patients treated with dronedarone compared to 55.3% for amiodarone (p<0.001).    The absolute difference in primary endpoint between dronedarone and amiodarone was 18.5%.  AF recurred in 36.5%  in  the dronerdarone compared to 24.3%  in  the amiodarone group.    The  trial  reported  fewer deaths  in  the dronedarone group compared to amiodarone, but NICE has drawn no conclusion about the relative effect of dronedarone and amiodarone on mortality due to short follow up of the trial and the small number of deaths in the study.4

NICE Audit support

NICE has also made available an audit tool (www.nice.org.uk/TA197) in order to support measuring current practice in using dronedarone for  the  treatment of  non-permanent AF  against  the  recommenda-tions made.   The standards set against the guidelines are 100% com-licance but NICE recommends that the standards can be flexible and need local discussions with the specialist clinicians.

References1.  Singh BN, Connolly SJ, Crijns HJ, et al.  Dronedarone for maintenance 

of sinus rhythm in atrial fibrillation or flutter.  N Engl J Med 2007; 357: 987-999.

2.  Hohnloser SH, Crijns HJ, van Eickels M, et al.  ATHENA Investigators.  Effect of dronedarone on cardiovascular events in atrial fibrillation.  N Engl J Med 2009; 360: 668-678.

3.  Hohnloser SH, Crijns HJ, van Eickels M, et al.  ATHENA Investigators.  Dronedarone in patients with congestive heart failure: Insights from ATHENA.  European Heart J July 2010; 31 (14): 1717-21

4.  Letteuzey JY, De Ferrari GM, Radzik D, et al.  DIONYSOS Investigators.  A short term, randomised, double blind, parallel group study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of dronedarone versus amiodarone in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation.  Journal Cardiovasc Electrophysiol, June 2010; 21 (6): 597-605.

Page 18: Coronary Heart #27

18 Nov/Dec 2010  www.cardiologyhd.com

Clinical Background

This ECG was recorded in at 10mm/mV and 25mm/sec. 

Questi ons1.  What underlying channelopathy is evident on this 

ECG?

2.  Explain the arrhythmic issues associated with this syndrome. 

3.  What is the inherited geneti c mutati on associated with this disorder?

Answer on Page: 27

Ms Sophie BlackmanCoronary Heart Management and CRM Consulti ng Editor 

Head of Clinical Cardiac PhysiologyWest Hertf ordshire NHS Trust United Kingdom

ChallengeSophie Blackman’s ECG

Love our ECG Challenges?

We have 18 ECG Challenges on our website just waiti ng for you to solve, all of which have been featured in this publicati on over the years. 

By popular demand, starti ng in 2011 we will be adding a bonus ECG Challenge online only, for those unable to wait a couple of months between editi ons. Lucky you!! 

CardiologyHD.com

Page 19: Coronary Heart #27

www.cardiologyhd.com  Nov/Dec 2010 19

Management: Three Top TipsMs Sophie BlackmanCoronary Heart Management and CRM Consulti ng Editor 

Head of Clinical Cardiac PhysiologyWest Hertf ordshire NHS Trust 

The  last  few management  arti cles  I  have writt en were  directed  at managers. This week I have my top 3 ti ps for the non-managerial staff  members out there. These ti ps should give you insight that can help your manager out and in turn result in a positi ve working experience for you.  

Remember this: A manager knows who turns up late, and who is lazy, who works hard to escape their emoti onal distress, who is a moti vator, who is working hard and who isn’t.  I  once worked with  someone who would  tell me every day every-thing they had done at work. I used to sit there thinking – yes that is your job, why are you telling me this? Don’t boast to your manager about your workload unless you have gone above and beyond your job descripti on.

If you are the one who goes to the manager to complain about other staff  members work and to  let your manager know how very hard you work comparati vely, then you are the one your manager is keep-ing an eye on. The ti me you spend looking at and complaining about what everyone else is doing (or not doing) is ti me you are not getti  ng on with your own work – why adverti se the fact?

Soluti on: Help your manager by encouraging those around you in a way that moti vates them. Be the moti vator in your team and your manager will  know  it.  They will  thank  you  for  helping  rather  than having to endure you complaining every day which they don’t have ti me for. 

Remember this: A manager will be grateful if you bring them soluti ons not problems. 

It  is easy when a problem emerges to take it straight to your man-ager.  ‘I can’t be expected to do this….’  ‘There  isn’t enough ti me….’ ‘No  I  can’t’.  These  common  statements we hear  from staff  do not help nor impress.

Soluti on: Tell your manager what changes can be made so the prob-lem doesn’t keep occurring.  ‘I’ve noti ced X keeps happening, and I thought it would be a good soluti on if we perhaps did XYZ to make things easier…’ This is one part of the service the manager will now not need to review, it shows you have initi ati ve and some managerial qualiti es and  this  impresses your manager and also  improves your working environment by getti  ng rid of the problems. 

Remember this:  You  don’t  need  to  understand  your  manager’s role completely, but no matt er how good or bad you perceive your manager to be, rest assured they are busier, more stressed and hold more responsibility than you realise. Most managers, even if you do see outward signs of pressure upon them, keep the majority of their stresses and responsibiliti es from you. 

Every piece of work  that a member of your department does ulti -mately rests in the hands of your manager. They have to be the one accountable for errors, mistakes, complaints. Everything that you do as a worker directly aff ects your manager. It either makes their day easier or harder – and this  is  the very simple piece of  informati on you must remember in order to learn how to get what you want from your manager. 

Soluti on:  In the simplest of terms,  if you use your ti me to ensure that  your  managers’  workload  is  not  increased  by  the  somewhat simple yet ti me consuming complicati ons of the working day – then you can help your manager to achieve their targets. Work hard, work accurately and work well. Help those around you and be encouraging of good practi ce. 

* * *

A manager  in  a  busy  cardiac  department  has  a  job  that  is  varied and unpredictable. There is always something that they have to be concentrati ng on, a pressure  from above, or a  target  they have  to achieve. If you can work in a way that supports your manager with some of the more simple tasks then you help them to focus on the part of  their  job  that  is more  concentrated on  your  team and  the work you do, allowing them to be a bett er manager to you. As a man-ager my favourite words to hear are ‘Is there anything I can help you out with?’ I am sure your manager will not mind hearing it once in a while either.  

AssistanceManagement

Give your manager time to do their work

Provide solutions

Remember this:

A manager knows1

2

3

Page 20: Coronary Heart #27

20 Nov/Dec 2010  www.cardiologyhd.com

Site VisitUnited Kingdom

Completed with the assistance of Volcano

Raigmore Hospital is located in Inverness, a rapidly growing city in northern Scotland. Located 254km north of Edinburgh, and 903km north of London, the city is situated at the mouth of the River Ness, which fl ows from the nearby Loch Ness. The populati on is approximately 57,000, with two languages spoken, being English and Scotti sh Gaelic, and is ranked fi ft h out of 189 Briti sh citi es for quality of life.

What are the sizes of your Cardiology Department and Hospital?

Raigmore Hospital  is  the 600 bedded regional centre  for  the High-lands of Scotland. Within the Cardiac Unit there is a 6 bedded CCU and 16 bedded step down ward. There  is also a dedicated cardiac rehab unit. (The Highland Heartbeat Centre)

What is the geographical intake area and populati on served by your hospital?

NHS Highland covers 41% of  the  land mass of Scotland,  same size as Wales! 300,000 people live in the area but there is a large tourist infl ux. The dispersed populati on makes this one of the least densely populated areas  in Europe with some of the most remote pati ents and many island communiti es.

How many staff ? Roles?

We have recently expanded to 4 consultants (2 PCI trained) as well as a fully staff ed CCU, Cath Lab and Cardiac Investi gati ons unit. Cardiac rehab  teams are present  throughout  the area and  there  are  good links with our local district and community hospitals. Types of procedures?

Other  than  EP,  there  is  a  full  range  of  cardiac  services  available including diagnosti c angiograms, PCI, bradycardiac pacing, ICD, TTE, TOE, cardiac CT, cardiac MRI, and MPS. Types of equipment used?

The current lab used is a Philips modular lab but in March 2011 our new lab complex will be opened with GE cath labs,  integrated Vol-cano for IVUS and pressure wire.

Raigmore HospitalRaigmore HospitalOld Perth RoadInvernessIV2 3UJUnited Kingdom

RaigmoreHospital

Page 21: Coronary Heart #27

www.cardiologyhd.com  Nov/Dec 2010 21

Volcano Fractional Flow Reserve

Lesion Significance

VH® IVUS Imaging® IVUS Imaging®

Plaque Composition

Rotational IVUSRevolution® 45 MHz ® 45 MHz ®

Catheter

ssssss555555iii |

Mul

ti-M

odality | One System |

OOOOOOOOOnnneee CCCooommmppppppaaannnyyyyyyyyy

ChromaFloChromaFloChromaFlo® Imaging Imaging Imaging ® Imaging ®

Stent AppositionStent AppositionStent AppositionStent AppositionStent AppositionAssessmentAssessmentAssessmentAssessmentAssessment

Digital IVUSDigital IVUSDigital IVUSDigital IVUSDigital IVUSEagle EyeEagle EyeEagle Eye® PlatinumPlatinumPlatinum

Digital IVUSPlatinum

Digital IVUSDigital IVUSPlatinum

Digital IVUSDigital IVUSPlatinum

Digital IVUS

CatheterCatheterCatheterCatheterCatheter

Choose the Right Tool for Every Patient

phone: +32 2 713 18 01 [email protected] www.volcanocorp.com

Learn More at

ACI 201126―28 January 2011London Hilton Metropole, UKVolcano will be located at Booth #19

Page 22: Coronary Heart #27

22 Nov/Dec 2010  www.cardiologyhd.com

How do you believe  the  integrated Volcano Multi-modality  system will benefit your new Catheter Lab? 

The Volcano  integrated  system provides  a  unified platform  includ-ing FFR and IVUS and is integrated with the DICOM System, meaning that all our FFR & IVUS reports are consolidated with the angiograms. This integration assists our Cath Lab Staff as it ensures the workflow in  the  lab  is much smoother and  importantly time saving, without the need to bring in different pieces of kit for each procedure. The other advantage means they only need to be trained on one system for all modalities.  Having this integrated system will also allow us to take advantage of the future technologies that Volcano are currently developing, including Forward Looking IVUS (FLIVUS) & OCT.

How many procedures are performed a year? 

Our  lab  is  projected  to undertake approximately  1000 angiograms this year. Over 150 PCI’s were performed in the first 4 months since starting PCI in May 2010, thus we predict we will undertake around 350  in the first year.  IVUS and pressure wire are  important tools – we performed 19 IVUS and 7 pressure wire studies  in the first few months. What  is  the  approximate  percentage  of  cath  lab  cases  performed radially compared with femorally?

85 percent are radial. Does your department offer a Primary Angioplasty Service?  If  yes, what have been some of the challenges setting it up? If not, is this planned for the future?

Due to the dispersed nature of our population and the presence of only 2 PCI cardiologists, the development of a PPCI service will be a challenge for the cath lab and the ambulance service. Currently we operate  a mandated ECG  telemetry  service  to  the  ambulance  ser-vice - where ECGs are telemetered for prehospital thrombolysis. At 

present over 90% receive thrombolysis. Overall our PHT rate is 60%. Discussions are under way to offer PPCI to the 60% of the population who live within 1 hour drive time of the lab. Are any of your staff cross-trained (generic workers)? Future?

No,  but  this  is  something we  are  actively  looking  at  to  overcome the smaller number of staff in each discipline. This should allows us greater flexibility when opening the lab out of hours.

What new procedures / techniques have you implemented into the department recently? Future?

PCI  has been  the main  focus  this  year  but we have been  lucky  to attract an established consultant (Peter Clarkson) who is proficient in CRT, and we hope to start this service soon.

What are the benefits to patients attending your facility?

The  development  of  on-site  PCI  has  had  an  enormous  benefit  to patients. While we have not developed a PPCI  service yet,  several patients have had rescue or primary PCI within the cath lab operating times. The treatment of NSTEMI patients has been greatly improved and  the  turn-over  of  patients  on  our  cardiac  step  down ward  has quadrupled since the start of the PCI service.

How is your inventory managed?

Stock at present is a paper system with Excel spread sheet support, and a dedicated store person. We are looking into costing and imple-menting a bar code system that will have set  levels, max/min, and can re-order with a link to automatic ordering when these levels are at a minimum. 

Cath Lab Staff (from left): Dr Jamie Smith, Isobel Adams (Cath Lab Manager), Prof Steve Leslie, Karen Hercher (Cath Lab Nurse), Morag Nicoll (Radiographer),

and Margaret-Ann Martin (Physiologist)

Page 23: Coronary Heart #27

www.cardiologyhd.com  Nov/Dec 2010 23

How does the lab handle haemostasis?

As the majority of our cases are radial the TR band is our main meth-od. For those pati ent requiring femoral puncture we use either angi-oseal or exoseal depending on the pati ent situati on.

What measures has the department implemented to cut costs?

We are conti nually seeking for competi ti vely price products. Further-more approximately 50% of our PCI cases will be undertaken as day case procedures and this has a cost saving. 

What kind of training can new employees expect to receive?

Staff  new to the cardiology DCU/Cath Lab can expect to be supernu-mery initi ally and have an appointed member of staff  as their mentor to support them in the early stages of learning. They assist with new procedures,  guidelines  and  protocols  for  the  safe  delivery  of  high standards of care. A training pack is given to each member of staff  covering anatomy and physiology of the heart plus cardiac interven-ti ons,  angiograms,  pacing,  PCI,  ETT, MPS  and  cardiac  rehab.  Once familiarised with daycase procedures, and protocols, staff  are  inte-grated  into cath  lab working, observing  initi ally,  followed by scrub-bing  in with a senior member of staff . Consultant  input  in the cath lab also contributes in training staff  as scrub nurses, parti cularly as second operators for PCI, with cath lab manager support.

What kinds of conti nuing educati on programs are available to staff ?

We are  fortunate at Raigmore  to have Charlie Bloe  from CB  train-ing as our CCU ward manager. Training programs for nurses include, online educati on programmes for ACS, drug calculati ons, IABP, ECG recogniti on and thrombolysis training days. We have an annual con-ference, Heart of the Matt er which is well att ended by those inter-ested  in  cardiac  care  in  the Highlands.  Isobel Adams,  our  cath  lab sister  joined  us  this  year  and  brings  great  experience  from  James Cook Hospital in Middlesbrough, which has been extremely valuable when setti  ng up the service.

What  kinds  of  competency  checks  do  staff   have  to  undergo  once employed?

Competencies  for  staff   have  been  developed  and  implemented  as a means  to  assess  the  knowledge  gained  by  staff   during  training, where extra support is needed, and to deem a member competent in a parti cular area. For example, the following are assessed by the cath lab manager/clinical educator: pati ent safety and risk, through check  lists, orientati on (to know where equipment  is and what  it’s for), procedures,  theoreti cal  and practi cal  knowledge. A new com-petency being developed is a log for staff  covering scrub and second operator in the cath lab, fl ooring (scout nursing), and FFR/IVUS. This will be assessed every 3 months.

How do you deal with late fi nishing of cases?  

Currently PCI is limited to morning working only – however as pre-dicted this is insuffi  cient capacity, and discussions are ongoing to cre-ate an oncall staff  to allow PCI in the aft ernoons. 

What is your policy for company reps within the labs?  

Reps are encouraged to visit BUT in line with BCIS recommendati ons are only allowed in the lab when specifi c staff  training is required.

Reducing radiati on dose is a high priority in the cath labs.  What techniques are employed by your radiographers to ensure dosage during cases is kept to a minimum? Also what is the maximum dose limit a pati ent can receive in your labs before it is recorded in their notes, and what is the follow-up process?

Slick  PCI  operators  is  clearly  the  key  to  reducing  radiati on  dose! Low  dose  screening  and  aquisiti on  techniques  are  used  with  low screening  and  aquisiti on  ti mes,  and  collimati on  where  possible. 

We also ensure we use appropriately trained specialist radiographers. All staff  must wear correct lead equivalent personal protecti on and radiati on monitoring badges. Use of lead shielding on equipment and the numbers of staff   in the lab are kept to a minimum when using radati on.  Radiographers  noti fy  cardiologists  when  skin  dose  is  2 Grays (200 DGS). Cardiologists consider staged procedures or where possible change the angle of the tube. The medical physics depart-ment  is  informed when a high dose occurs, and the Cardiologist  is responsible for the medical follow up.

What are the advantages for SpR’s training at your facility?

We provide a truly consultant delivered service (due to lack of SpRs) thus a trainee at Raigmore will be ensured of excellent supervision during their training and exposure to a range of cardiac pati ents.

What is the best part of working at your facility?

The  team eff ort  to  establish  PCI  has been a  great  bonding  experi-ence. The enthusiasm and skills of the cath lab staff  have been par-ti cularly uplift ing, and the transformati on of the pati ent fl ow in the CCU and cardiology ward has only been achievable due to the huge eff ort of the nurses and support staff  in these areas.

CardiologyHD.comSee our other Site Visits online today:

•  The London Independent Hospital

•  St Bartholomew’s Hospital (Barts)

•  Hammersmith Hospital

•  Kings College Hospital

•  Guy’s & St Thomas’ NHS Foundati on Trust

•  The Wellington Hospital

•  Northampton General Hospital

•  West Hertf ordshire Hospitals NHS Trust

•  Essex Cardiothoracic Centre 

•  Freeman Hospital

•  The Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital 

•  Manchester Royal Infi rmary

•  Southampton General Hospital

•  East Surrey Hospital

•  Royal Bournemouth Hospital

•  Royal Cornwall Hospital

•  Princess of Wales Hospital

•  Waterford Regional Hospital (Ireland)

•  Christchurch Hospital (New Zealand)

Plus many more from Australia, New Zealand, and the USA.

Page 24: Coronary Heart #27

24 Nov/Dec 2010  www.cardiologyhd.com

Charlie Bloe: Senior Nurse NHS Highlands

Where did you train?

I undertook the BSc Social Sciences and Nurs-ing  Studies  at  the  University  of  Edinburgh between  1979  and  1984.  At  that  ti me  it was also possible to undertake the Nati onal District Nursing Certi fi cate so I completed that training before  job hunti ng. My Criti cal Care qualifi ca-ti ons were obtained at  the Western  Infi rmary school of Nursing in Glasgow. 

Why did you decide to specialise in Cardiology?

It  was  almost  by  default!  I  had  att ended  an interview at Forth Valley Acute Hospitals  for a  job as staff  nurse  in a general medical ward. At a pre interview visit the Nursing Offi  cer, Greta Given, showed me the Medical HDU and combined CCU facility where a vacancy also existed. I was off ered both opti ons and opted for the CCU role. I guess that I therefore owe my career in Cardiology to Greta, who has sadly since passed away.

You spent many years away from clinical practi ce to set up your own successful business, Charles Bloe Training. What brought you back to clinical practi ce and what is your current role?

I’ve always had a passion for teaching but preferred the fl exibility of undertaking ad hoc freelance consultancy work as opposed to a Uni-versity based post. I established Charles Bloe Training 13 years ago and  it quickly became very successful. We deservedly developed a reputati on for providing quality clinical updates for nurses and over a period of ti me I recruited over 30 freelance consultants to deliver the training across the UK and beyond. I also had aspirati ons to explore the  feasibility of web based training and have subsequently devel-oped a portf olio of 30 online clinical courses. The ECG in Acute Coro-nary Syndrome course was awarded fi rst place at the Briti sh Journal of Cardiac Nursing awards in 2008 for Innovati on in Educati on. With so much to do I decided to leave clinical practi ce in 2000 to focus on the training business full ti me. 

During that period I relocated to the Scotti  sh Highlands and in 2008 I happened to meet Prof. Steve Leslie who I had previously worked with at Falkirk Royal Infi rmary. He informed me of the vacant Clinical Ward Manager post at Raigmore Hospital’s CCU facility. Although it was not my  intenti on to return to the  ‘sharp end’ of cardiac care  I was excited by the challenges that Steve highlighted and the vision he had for the service. So here I am!

I’ve only been in post for a litt  le over 2 years and it has been a great move. I have a fantasti c group of staff  who have demonstrated a tre-mendous desire to further develop their roles and we’ve made enor-mous strides in my ti me here. The staff  have been a real credit to me and to themselves. 

I  believe  that  the  service  we  provide  for  cardiac  pati ents  in  NHS Highland is very personalised. We have established a good number of nurse-led initi ati ves such as rapid access chest pain and have uti -lised telemedicine to dramati cally improve pre hospital reperfusion with thrombolysis. ECG’s are transmitt ed from pati ent’s homes, that can be in excess of 2-3 hours away, to the CCU and this has resulted in most eligible pati ents  receiving pre hospital  thrombolysis.  I was delighted when  the nurses and Paramedics of NHS Highlands won an award in the ‘Changing for the Bett er’ category at this years staff  awards for their achievements in this area.

InterviewCardiac Nursing

Mr Dennis SandemanNursing Consulti ng EditorChest Pain Nurse SpecialistNHS Fife, Trustee of the Scotti  sh Heart and Arterial Risk Preventi on (SHARP) charity.

Charlie Bloe (pictured on the right) receives “Innovation through Education” award at the Cardiac Nursing awards in 2008

Page 25: Coronary Heart #27

www.cardiologyhd.com  Nov/Dec 2010 25

INTE

RVIE

W

We have a fi rst class cardiac rehabilitati on service located within the purpose built Highland Heartbeat Centre. Add in nurse-led services in  electi ve  cardioversion,  ICD  support  and  pre  and  post  coronary angiography and we have what we believe is a mini centre of excel-lence serving a much dispersed populati on.

I have also  taken on  the  role of Clinical  Lead  for  the cardiac MCN. We are so dependent on our primary care colleagues to deliver pre hospital cardiac care and this post helps me understand the issues in primary care and foster closer links with the GP’s and Paramedics on who we depend so much. How has  the world  of  cardiology  nursing  changed  since  you were away? 

Had I not been involved in providing clinical updates I suspect that the changes would have seemed dramati c in the 8 years I was away from clinical practi ce.

The most obvious change in coronary care in the last decade or so has been the emergence of PCI as the preferred reperfusion strategy in STEMI pati ents.

There has also been a welcome increase in nurse-led initi ati ves and a greater acceptance of this support by our medical colleagues. It is reassuring that we now seldom read publicati ons directly comparing the clinical abiliti es of nurses versus doctors. That wasn’t the case 10 years ago.

It  has  taken  some  ti me  but  the  emergence  of  telemedicine  has allowed collaborati ve decision-making between paramedics and CCU nurses based on 12-lead ECG telemetry that expedites the delivery of  pre  hospital  thrombolysis  in  STEMI.  It  is  important  that  cardiac nursing embraces new technologies and this  is a prime example of that. We’ve been tremendously successful in improving pre hospital thrombolysis delivery by paramedics and GP’s uti lising this technol-ogy coupled with nursing support. It has increased from approx. 20% to over 75% in the last year.

You must have the catheter lab which is the furthest north in the UK. What are the challenges of having a cardiology centre which is based so remotely and how have you and your colleagues in Raigmore dealt with these challenges? 

Yes that is a major issue. We have a populati on of litt  le over 250,000 but  they are dispersed over a geographical area  that’s bigger  than Belgium!  Add  in  remote  country  roads  and  prett y  harsh  winter weather  and  you  begin  to  understand  the  challenges  in  providing acute cardiac care in NHS Highland.

We have two interventi onal cardiologists in Prof. Steve Leslie and Dr. Jamie  Smith. We’ve had a diagnosti c  angio  service  for  some years and commenced PCI in May 2010. However with our relati vely small populati on  and  limited  interventi onal  capacity  we  have  to  take  a 

pragmati c  approach  to  opti mal  reperfusion  for  STEMI  pati ents. Given the long transportati on ti mes it is likely that coronary throm-bolysis will remain our primary reperfusion strategy and that makes the collaborati on between paramedics & GP’s and CCU even more important. The GP’s and paramedics have a pivotal role to play here. However as our service develops we will examine where and when it is feasible to off er PPCI to those pati ents that can be transported here within required ti me limits.

We may have the most remote catchment area in Europe – but we can also boast the most scenic! It’s also a great place to live and work with so many initi ati ves coming to fruiti on. Through necessity we’ve developed roles and practi ces that are the envy of many ‘big centres’. 

What do you do away from work eg hobbies etc...?

What ti me away from work?? Although I have a clinical director who runs my training organisati on I remain as Managing Director and Clin-ical Lead, so I am sti ll required to provide regular input there.

I’ve  relocated  to  a wonderful  part  of  Scotland  and  so  get  out  and about the hills as oft en as  I can.  I am forever hopeful  that my golf handicap may come down, although there is no real cause for hope there!

CardiologyHD.comSee our Management Hot Topics online today:

•  Surviving the Government Spending Cuts

•  Should Food/Gift s from companies be banned?

•  Hats and masks in the cath lab?

•  High Radiati on Dose Protocols

•  On-call Reimbursements

•  Radiographer Uti lisati on in EP

•  Are MBA’s a good idea?

•  Non-Professional Staff 

•  Multi -Skilling in the Cath Lab

•  Future Changes?

Page 26: Coronary Heart #27

26 Nov/Dec 2010  www.cardiologyhd.com

November 18-19

Bristol PCI Course 2010The Educati on Centre, Bristol Royal Infi rmaryBristol, Englandwww.millbrookconferences.co.uk

November 22-23

Europe AF 2010London Hilton Metropole Hotel  London, Englandwww.europeaf.com

November 25

BLT Course 2010 : Bifurcati on Lesion TreatmentNati onal Motorcycle MuseumSolihull, Englandwww.millbrookconferences.co.uk

November 25-26

13th Briti sh Society for Heart Failure Autumn Meeti ngQueen Elizabeth II Conference CentreLondon, Englandwww.bsh.org.uk

November 25-26

SHARP Annual Scienti fi c Meeti ngHilton Dunkeld House HotelPerthshire, ScotlandEmail: [email protected]

December 6-7

Heart Att ack: The Challenge IThe MidlandManchester, EnglandEmail: [email protected]

January 26 - 28, 2011

ACI 2011 : Advanced Cardiovascular Interventi on 2011London Hilton Metropole HotelLondon, Englandwww.millbrookconferences.co.uk

1

2

3

4

5

LIKE TO BEFEATURED?

For further details on how your event can be featured here contact us at:

[email protected]

For a list of conferences and events around the globe visit our website:www.cardiologyhd.com

6

712

3

47

6

5

Events

Page 27: Coronary Heart #27

www.cardiologyhd.com  Nov/Dec 2010 27

Questi on on Page: 18

1.  This  12-lead  ECG  shows  characteristi cs  of  Brugada  syndrome. Lead V1 and V2 demonstrate an ‘rSr1’ patt ern with a coved ele-vati on of the ST segment in these leads. This qualifi es as a type 1 Brugada ECG. 

2.  Since  its  introducti on as a clinical enti ty  in 1992,  the Brugada syndrome  has  progressed  from  being  a  rare  disease  to  one that is second only to road traffi  c accidents as a cause of death among young adults in some countries. The syndrome is asso-ciated with a high risk  for sudden cardiac death  in young and otherwise healthy adults, and less frequently in infants and chil-dren. The syndrome is esti mated to be responsible for at least 4% of all sudden deaths and at least 20% of sudden deaths in pati ents with structurally normal hearts. Brugada syndrome is defi niti vely diagnosed when a type 1 coved ST-segment eleva-ti on is observed in at least one right precordial lead (V1 to V3) in the presence or absence of a sodium channel– blocking agent, and in conjuncti on with one of the following: documented ven-tricular  fi brillati on  (VF),  polymorphic  ventricular  tachycardia (VT), a family history of sudden cardiac death at  <45 years old, coved-type ECGs in family members, inducibility of VT with pro-grammed  electrical  sti mulati on,  syncope,  or  nocturnal  agonal respirati on.

3.  Inheritance  of  Brugada  syndrome  occurs  via  an  autosomal dominant  mode  of  transmission.  The  fi rst  and  only  gene to  be  linked  to  Brugada  syndrome  is  SCN5A,  the  gene  that encodes for the α subunit of the cardiac sodium channel gene.

More  than  80  mutati ons  in  SCN5A  have  been  linked  to  the syndrome and about 2 dozen of  these mutati ons have shown to  result  in  loss  of  functi on  because  of  failure  of  the  sodium channel  to  express;  this  can be  seen  as  a  shift   in  the  voltage and  ti me  dependence  of  sodium  channel  current  acti vati on, inacti vati on, or reacti vati on; entry of  the sodium channel  into an  intermediate  state  of  inacti vati on  from  which  it  recovers more slowly; or accelerated inacti vati on of the sodium channel. 

A second locus on chromosome 3, close to but apart from the SCN5A locus, was linked recently to Brugada syndrome in a large pedigree in which the syndrome is autosomal dominant inher-ited and associated with progressive conducti on disease, a low sensiti vity  to procainamide, and a relati vely benign prognosis.

SCN5A mutati ons account for about 18% to 30% of Brugada syn-drome cases. A higher incidence of SCN5A mutati ons has been reported  in  familial  than  in  sporadic  cases.  Of  note,  negati ve SCN5A results do not rule out causal gene mutati ons because, in general,  the promoter region, crypti c splicing mutati ons, or the presence of gross rearrangements is not investi gated.

Full arti cle referenced from: C Antzelevitch, P Brugada et al.  Brugada Syndrome. Report of the Second Consensus. Endorsed by the Heart Rhythm Society and the European Heart Rhythm Associati on. Circulati on. 2005; 111: 659-670.

Ms Sophie BlackmanCoronary Heart Management and CRM Consulti ng Editor 

Head of Clinical Cardiac PhysiologyWest Hertf ordshire NHS Trust United Kingdom

AnswerSophie Blackman’s ECG Challenge

Mr Tim LarnerDirector / FounderLatest Technology & All-Round Computer Geek

Future Technology News >>>The Fraunhofer Insti tute in Germany is working on a new system to measure cardiac pressure “on-demand, anywhere”.  Batt ery-free miniature sensors are implanted into the heart wall with the aid of a catheter and can give physicians up to 200 measurements per second post procedure.

Source: Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft

Tech companies  IMEC & the Holst Center have designed  an  applicati on  for  Android  phones allowing  you  to monitor  your  heart  rate. With sensors att ached to the body via a necklace, the data can be wirelessly transmitt ed to the phone and within seconds provide a detailed ECG and heart  rate monitoring  report. This  can  then be 

stored  or  emailed  to your GP.

Source: IMEC

Page 28: Coronary Heart #27

Horizon Cardiology

FFR support with Horizon Cardiology further improves cath lab workflow and ensures critical data is instantaneously available to cardiologists.

Support for all major FFR vendors’ pressure wires•

Reduce capital expense by eliminating the need to purchase separate FFR analyzers•

Easily incorporate the FFR result to a lesion via an intuitive user interface •

Automatically store FFR pressure waveforms and numeric results in patient’s central cardiac file•

Eliminate time and errors associated with manual data entry•

Horizon Cardiology Delivers Fully Integrated Fractional Flow Reserve (FFR) Support

Please contact our sales team for an onsite demonstration

McKesson (Medcon), UKPremier House 112 Station RoadEdgware, MiddlesexHA8 7BJ United KingdomPhone: 0208 [email protected]/cardiology

Copyright © 2010 McKesson Corporation and/or one of its subsidiaries. All rights reserved. Horizon Cardiology is a trademark of McKesson Corporation and/or one of its subsidiaries.

AllAboutCVIS.com/ffr