Copyright: People of Barapalli, Arjunpur, Balarampur, Kiyapalla and Panaspur and Vasundhara and Indian Institute of Science Conserving Bio-Diversity A Decade's Experience of Dhani Panch M ouja Jungle Surakshya Samiti Vasundhara Orissa Biodiversity Conservation Prioritisation Project
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Copyright: People of Barapalli, Arjunpur, Balarampur, Kiyapalla and Panaspur and Vasundhara and
Indian Institute of Science
C o n serv in g B io -D iv ersity
A D e c a d e ' s E x p e r i e n c e o f D han i P anch M ou ja Jungle Surakshya Sam iti
V asundhara O ris sa
Biodiversity Conservation Prioritisation
Project
Copyright: People of Barapalli, Arjunpur, Balarampur, Kiyapalla and Panaspur and Vasundhara and
Indian Institute of Science
Site Report of five villages
involved in protection & management
of Dhani South Reserve Forest
Edited by
Rekha Panigrahi and Y. Giri Rao
Research team: Late Sri Sukesh Chandra Ukil, Y. Giri Rao, Rekha Panigrahi, Ashok K. Nayak
Copyright: People of Barapalli, Arjunpur, Balarampur, Kiyapalla and Panaspur and Vasundhara and
Indian Institute of Science
A ck n o w led g m en ts
The research team would like to thank Prof. Madhav Gadgil and his team for their support during the study. We would like to specially thank Pramod, Utkarsh and Smita for their inputs to the process.
The research has benefited from the theoretical and logistical inputs from Vishesh and Sudipto of the HPA and the WWF respectively.
The local staff of the forest department made significant contributions to the undertaking of the research.
Special thanks are due to village men and women in the five villages involved in protection of Dhani forests i.e. Barapalli, Arjunpur, Balarampur, Kiyapalla and Panaspur.
The Team would like to thank Knowledgeable Individuals, Committee members, Harijan women of Arjunpur village, Tribal women of Panaspur & Kiyapalla villages, Forest watcher and all others who helped us a lot to cany out the study in the villages. Particularly useful were the help and guidance of the local medicineman Sri Banambar Das, pioneer of the forest protection initiative Sri Kanduri Pradhan and the FPC President Sri Biranchi Das. Special thanks are due to the Harijan women, notably Smt. Magi Dei and Smt. Rangalata, who provided us with a close understanding of the role of women in sustainable ` tilization of the forests.
Copyright: People of Barapalli, Arjunpur, Balarampur, Kiyapalla and Panaspur and Vasundhara and
Indian Institute of Science
C O N T E N T S
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
ABBREVIATIONS I
INTRODUCTION 1
METHODOLOGY 3
PEOPLESCAPE 6
USER GROUPS & LIVELIHOOD PATTERN 11
LIFESCAPE 13
HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE 15
MANAGEMENT OPTION 21
DEVELOPMENT ASPIRATIONS 26
ISSUES & SUGGESTED SOLUTIONS 29
CONSERVATION STRATEGY 31
GENDER 34
ANNEXURE 39
Copyright: People of Barapalli, Arjunpur, Balarampur, Kiyapalla and Panaspur and Vasundhara and
Indian Institute of Science
A B B R E V IA T IO N S
CFM - Community Forest Management
FD - Forest department
Govt. – Government
JFM - Joint Forest Management
LSE - Landscape Element
MFP - Minor Forest Produce
NTFP – Non-Timber Forest Produce
NFEC – Non-Formal Education Centre
NGO - Non-Government Organisation
OFDC – Orissa Forest Development Corporation
Pvt. – Private
RF - Reserve Forest
SFP -Social Forestry Project
VFPC – Village Forest Protection Committee
Copyright: People of Barapalli, Arjunpur, Balarampur, Kiyapalla and Panaspur and Vasundhara and
Indian Institute of Science
VSS - Van Samrakshan Samiti
Copyright: People of Barapalli, Arjunpur, Balarampur, Kiyapalla and Panaspur and Vasundhara and
Indian Institute of Science
.
Copyright: People of Barapalli, Arjunpur, Balarampur, Kiyapalla and Panaspur and Vasundhara and
Indian Institute of Science
INTRODUCTION
Background and Objectives
The Biodiversity Conservation Prioritization Project (BCPP) was undertaken by
WWF-India in association with other NGOs and Government at various levels for
India with the support and collaboration of Biodiversity Support Program. This
Biodiversity Conservation Prioritization exercise is different from such efforts in
the past by attempting to be participatory and attempting to incorporate community
perspective in the Project.
While different subgroups under the BCPP worked on what and where, the
strategies subgroup addressed the issue of how. The Conservation Strategies
Sub-Group attempted to document local level community conservation priorities
and strategies to address these local level conservation priorities. This sub-group
documented these priorities and initiated discussion on strategies at different sites
in seven states in India i.e. Bihar, Orissa, Andamans, Assam, Rajasthan, Karnataka
and Himachal Pradesh. This sub-group aimed at documenting the perceptions of
various sections and interest groups on bio-diversity conservation, with a view to
discuss a range of viable strategic options for bio-diversity conservation at different
levels with these different sections of society, in Orissa.
Vasundhara as being a part of the strategies sub-group worked towards developing
an understanding of how to conserve by exploring the concept of Bio-diversity
Conservation at some sites in Orissa. PRAVA, a group based at Balasore which
took the primary responsibility of taking up this exercise at Simlipal site.
The project had two main components:
I. Documenting knowledge and perception of local communities and different
sections within the local community about biodiversity and conservation at
Copyright: People of Barapalli, Arjunpur, Balarampur, Kiyapalla and Panaspur and Vasundhara and
Indian Institute of Science
the village/Panchayat level using community Bio-diversity Register (CBR) as
a methodology.
II. Facilitating discussions on the differing perceptions of various sections and
interest groups at different levels-village level/Panchayat/cluster to district, state
level with a view to record different perceptions as well as facilitating
discussion on strategies for bio-diversity conservation reconciling different
interest groups priorities and perceptions.
Community Forest Management in Orissa
In Orissa, many communities have taken up active protection and management
of forests on their own initiative. These community initiatives were prompted by
forest degradation and forest produce scarcity. Community concern generated due to
forest degradation was translated into active forest protection efforts. There are
cases of community forest protection arrangement initiated as far back as 1940s.
Over time, faced with increasing forest scarcity, more and more rural communities
have taken up forest protection in the State. These efforts became widespread in mid
1970s and 1980s. According to one estimate at least 4000 villages in Orissa (total
number of villages in Orissa 60,000) are protecting over 2,50,000 hectares of forest
(approx. 5% of the total forest area of Orissa) (Singhs, 1993 ).
In NAYAGARH district (Ranpur block) in Orissa, around 120 villages have
spontaneously took to active protection of forests. These community based forest
management systems display remarkable ingenuity. Each group of villages
present its own management system. The villagers have organised themselves into
informal and formal organisations. These community organisations over the time
have matured to manage the forest resources sustainably.
Site Overview
Dhani R.F located in Ranpur block of Nayagarh district is an unique case of
Community forest management system. It is unique in context of its strong
community institutional structure and a case where a cluster of five villages have
been unitedly protecting and managing the forest since a decade. Protection by the
villagers was initiated at the time when the forest was completely degraded. Its
Copyright: People of Barapalli, Arjunpur, Balarampur, Kiyapalla and Panaspur and Vasundhara and
Indian Institute of Science because of their untiring efforts & initiatives that Dhani has regenerated a good
forest cover. The forest protection institution evolved effective protection and
extraction regulation arrangements promoting forest regeneration. The
management system developed by the community offers equal benefits sharing and
decision making between all castes, general, harijan and the tribals.
Parts of Dhani R.F. is being protected by "Dhani South Panch Mouja Jungle
Suraksha Samiti" comprising of five villages viz. Barapalli, Arjunpur, Balarampur,
Kiyapalla and Panaspur. The five villages are involved in the protection of
approximately 839.75 hectares of compartment 5 & 6 of Dhani R.F. Dhani R.F.
has dry type mixed forest. Dhani also has some almost pure patches of bamboo.
Eventhough the Working plan classifies this forest as scrub forest in degraded
condition, very good regeneration has come up due to active protection by villagers.
The protection initiative has been recognised and lauded internationally. There has
been a steady flow of researchers from other parts of the country and also from
abroad. People from the forest department of Orissa and also from other states have
been sent to learn from the Dhani experience. The Orissa Forest Department has also
appreciated the efforts. The protection initiative that started in 1987 is now in the
process of being formalized in to a Joint Forest Management System. For its
pioneering efforts towards community based forest management the villages have
been conferred with the Prakruti Mitra Award, the highest award in the state in the
field of environmental protection.
The Dhani Success Story has been picturised in to a documentary film by the state
Government to be used as a model for participatory forest management. The major
Newspapers of the state have also highlighted the Dhani success story. Dhani has
featured as the example of successful forest conservation in various national and
international workshops. The Dhani Case study has appeared in various publications
in India and abroad, the most noteworthy being the report of IUCN, the World
Conservation Union.
Copyright: People of Barapalli, Arjunpur, Balarampur, Kiyapalla and Panaspur and Vasundhara and
Indian Institute of Science
METHODOLOGY
This study is mainly based on developing an understanding of peoples' association
with natural ecosystems and their comprehension about its management. In Orissa,
five sites have been selected from different ecological regimes. In this particular site
the study has been carried out in a cluster of five forest protecting villages.
Team Composition
As a nodal agency for Orissa, Vasundhara facilitated cooperation between
various NGOs (including local NGOs and village level organisations and the forest
department and its wild life wing) for this project. The research team comprises of
professionals, school teachers and village youths.
Method of study
This site is in Vasundhara's operational area where efforts are being made for
strengthening community initiatives and community organizations involved in forest
protection. Efforts are being made to facilitate interaction and exchange amongst
forest protecting villages, and these efforts have led to formation of a block level
federation of forest protecting villages.
As Vasundhara have been trying to strengthen community initiatives in the area so
a good rapport has been built with the villagers. A group meeting was first called
with the forest protecting committee members and objectives and purpose of the
study were made clear.
The study has been carried out on the guidelines provided by the Shrustigyan
manual with slight modifications.
The methods involved:
a) Intensive field visits in the five villages. Field study with different user groups
and knowledgeable individuals helped to understand different aspects
related to biodiversity.
b) Identification of User group on the basis of livelihood activities attached with
the resource.
Copyright: People of Barapalli, Arjunpur, Balarampur, Kiyapalla and Panaspur and Vasundhara and
Indian Institute of Science c) Information collection through
• Primary source
• Individual interviews of User group members, Committee members,
Knowledgeable
individuals and government officials.
• Household interviews of direct & indirect user groups.
• Small group discussions with user groups and others.
• Large group meetings with user groups, village leaders and knowledgeable
individuals.
• Secondary source
Reports, Puri district (Orissa) gazetteer was referred.
d) PRA Excersise
Social map of individual villages, Forest map and LSE map were prepared by the
villagers showing the presence of different resources in the locality.
Different field exercises were conducted to gather informations like timeline
on history of forest protection, ranking of species, prioritisation exercises(of
various LSEs, species) etc.
The team made a few visits to the forest area for field identification of the
species used by the user groups and other species found in the forest.
e) Compilation and Analysis of data
The researchers maintained field notes to record the informations. Everyday after
the field visits informations were compiled for further analysis.
f) Validating the data
Repeated meetings and interviews were conducted with different individuals
and user groups to validate the collected data.
g) Presentation of the Findings
Copyright: People of Barapalli, Arjunpur, Balarampur, Kiyapalla and Panaspur and Vasundhara and
Indian Institute of Science
The collected informations were displayed before the people in a combined
meeting of all the villages.
Tools used:
Interviews
Individual interview
Household interview
Field visits
Mapping
PRA exercises
Group discussions
Combined group discussions
Knowledgeable Individuals And Their Expertise
During the study we had been able to identify a number of persons who have deep
knowledge about the forest. The villagers have taken the initiative for enumeration
of tree species present in their forest. The watchman appointed by the Forest
Protection Committee has prepared a list of 260 plant species present in their forest.
The herbalman of Barapalli village helped in documenting the medicinal species and
their use for curing varied animal diseases. The ex-president of Forest Protection
Committee who facilitated and took a leading role in the protection activity
shared his experience on the community's initiatives and the history of
protection efforts. In our discussions with tribal and harijan women they showed a
wide knowledge and interest on forest. They informed about various forest produces
available and the distribution of plant species in different areas in the forest.
Many expert in agriculture acknowledged us with information on various
agricultural activities. Some villagers helped in mapping and locating various
landscape elements present in the villages.
Knowledgeable Individuals Age Expertise Kanduri Pradhan 60 Ex-President of FPC Masi Dei 45 President Manila Samiti Mahendra 30 Forest Watchman
Copyright: People of Barapalli, Arjunpur, Balarampur, Kiyapalla and Panaspur and Vasundhara and
Indian Institute of Science Banambar Das 70 Herbalman Avina Pradhan 65 Farmer Brahmachari Das 58 Health Inspector Biranchi Das 45 President of FPC Duryodhan Das 35 Fanner Rangalata Dei 40 Member of VSS
VILLAGE PROFILE Arjunpur Barapalli Balarampur Kiyapalla Panasadih
Panchayat Kerandatangi
Block Raj Ranpur
Tahasil Raj Ranpur
District Nayagarh
Post office Patia (Mal)
Police station Raj Ranpur
Forest Division
Puri
Range office Tangi
No.of H.H. 73 62 35 30 14
Castewise Household
General 52 43 04 — — S.C. 21 19 11 — —
S.T. -- — 20 30 14
Population 412 408 205 163 56
Castewise Population General 322 325 21 — —
S.C. 90 83 68 — --
S.T. -- — 116 163 56 Occupation 'A G , W L ,
SLC, DF
AG,WL,SLC DF, SH
AG,WL,BU, SLC,FPC,
AG,WL, FPC AG, WL, TC
Institutions School(upto class VII), Temple
Youth club, Dairy unit, Temple
Temple Mahila samiti, Non-formal education centre
Temple
Copyright: People of Barapalli, Arjunpur, Balarampur, Kiyapalla and Panaspur and Vasundhara and
Indian Institute of Science Village resources
Pond, Wells, Stream, Tubewells, Gramya Jungle,Grazing land, Social Forestry Plantation
cashewnut plantations, orchard, grazing lands etc.
People have listed around 250 plant species, 28 animal species, 40 birds, 19 reptiles and
a number of insects inhabiting the forest (a list of these wild species is given in the
annexure). This shows people's wide knowledge about the bio-diversity.
Ownership, Use and Composition
Dhani forest have the status of Reserve Forest. The forest abounds a number of herbs,
shrubs, big trees with wild animals such as mammals, birds, reptiles, insects. The forest
is protected and managed collectively by the local communities. The villagers collect
fuelwood for self use from the forest . Besides, wood for house building, bamboo ,
creepers, berries, fruits, tubers are also derived from the forest. Tribal and harijan
families depend largely on forest produces to earn a living. Fuel wood gathering
and Siali leaves collection are major economic activities undertaken by the tribal and
harijan women respectively.
These villages also have some Gramya Jungle falling within their respective village boundary. These are part of protected forest. Though normally they are supposed to be under village control, there is considerable contusion on the access & control over these forests. Protected forests are under the authority of Revenue department and managed collectively with Forest department. However, no management plans and schemes are prepared for managing these forests. The village people meet their fuel wood requirements , wood for cremation purpose from these patches but extraction of forest products for economic purpose is strictly restricted
Catties of the village graze in revenue plots/ Gochar, Dhani R.F, Gramya jungle.
Kalucha, Neem , Kochila, Kendu, Geringa, Achu, are some of the tree species
commonly found in gochar lands.
Balarampur village have a common orchard of mango and jackfruit species. The
villagers collectively manage the orchard and derive fruits, leaves for fuelwood.
Village Gramya Jungle
Arjunpur Pokhari mundiya
BarapalliBilei mundiya
Kiyapalla Ban mundia
Copyright: People of Barapalli, Arjunpur, Balarampur, Kiyapalla and Panaspur and Vasundhara and
Indian Institute of Science Agricultural fields cover a major land area. General caste people are in possession
of large land holdings where as a very few tribal and harijan families have lands and
that too very small holdings. People chiefly cultivate traditional variety of paddy. In
large only one crop is grown during monsoons throughout the year. Only a few
farmers cultivate vegetables and high yield paddy variety in summer.
Arjunpur, Barapalli and Kiyapalla have village ponds combinedly managed by the
villagers. The ponds are usually used for bathing purpose and significantly for fish
farming. Pond water is also used to irrigate the vegetable fields.
Values:
The forest has regenerated a good vegetation cover as a result of years of peoples'
toiling efforts and hardship. All the village people meet their fuelwood demand and
other forest produce needs from Dhani forest. The forest also contributes to day
to day livelihood of low class. Thus for the people of Dhani villages the forest is
more than trees and is valued for the array of products & services which it provides.
Trees like Peepal, Banyan, Mango, Sahada, Neem, Bael, Ashoka etc., are attached
with religious value and so cutting of these trees is prohibited. During festive
occasions people worship these trees.
While some other species such as Harida, Bahada, Aonla ,Neem , Patalagaruda,
Sahajamari, Khirakanchini, Bhuinkakahru, Krushna and animals like Gayala (Wild
buffalo), Kochik-khai(Common grey hornbill), Baduri (Bat) were prioritised for
having medicinal value.
HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE
Historical Bench marks L Pre- Independence period ( King's tenure) ii Post - Independence period iii Period after Forest protection
i. Pre-Independence period ( king's tenure)
a) Forest Administration:
Copyright: People of Barapalli, Arjunpur, Balarampur, Kiyapalla and Panaspur and Vasundhara and
Indian Institute of Science Before Independence , the area was ruled under the princely state of Ranpur king. The
king acted as the local chiefs under the British rule . For administrative purpose the
forest areas were divided into, Reserve forest and Village forest. The Reserve forest
area were divided into 'A' and 'B' classes type. People had no right on 'A class
Reserve Forest' of any kind. This forest was kept for revenue earning. However, poor
low caste forest dependent groups collected only fruits, roots and fibres from the
Reserve Forest for their own use free of payment. Where as 'B class Reserve Forest'
was used to meet the needs of the tenants. From this patch people got timber at half the
schedule of rates.
The king had a separate administration to manage the Reserve Forest. Rangers, foresters
and forest guards were appointed to look after the forest. The Village Forest was under
the Revenue Department but in case of any forest offences it was taken up by the Forest
Department.
b) Species Distribution'.
Sal ( Shorea robusta) constituted the principal species in the forest. The trees generally
found in association with Sal were Asan ,Bahada, Harida, Mahul, Jamun, Kendu, Piasal,
Kasi, Sidha, Sisoo Kumbhi, Kusum, Kurum and Sunari. The common shrubs found
were Flemingia chappar, Indigofera pulchella, Wendlandia tinctoria, Woodfordia
fruiticosa, Diospyros sylvaticae, the climber species included Milletia auriculata,
Siali(Bauhinia vahilii), Butea parviflora, Combretum decandrum etc. The minor produce
of local importance were Harida, Bahada, Aonla, Kamalagundi, Sunari-bark, Kochila
and Kendu leaves. The forest was abundant with number of wild animals such as tiger,
Jackal, Beer, Male cat, Antelope, Porcupine, Deer etc.
c) Existing Rights:
Permission for extraction of all sorts of forest produce except game was existent. The
tenants were allowed to collect bamboo and timber for plough implements and house
repairs on permits on payment of half royalty from the protected forests and on full
royalty from the B class reserve forest. At times the King allowed the people to collect
their requirements free of any payment in lieu of 'Bhet and Begari’ 2 rendered by them.
Copyright: People of Barapalli, Arjunpur, Balarampur, Kiyapalla and Panaspur and Vasundhara and
Indian Institute of Science ----------------------------
2 Begari is a oriya term which means free labour rendered by the people as a service to the
King.
Bhet signifies gift given to the King ( people used to give the first produce grown in their
land-paddy, vegetable or any new produce to the King).
Copyright: People of Barapalli, Arjunpur, Balarampur, Kiyapalla and Panaspur and Vasundhara and
Indian Institute of Science Every year the king issued permit for a period of one month for collection of forest
products. Kandha and Sabar people (tribes found in this area) enjoyed special
concessions in having access and rights on the forest which included :
ð The right to collect free and without permit dry fallen branches of any species
for fuel.
ð Right to collect free and without permission edible fruits, roots, leaves, creepers
and grass for their own use only. Other castes too received the rights to
collect these produces but only after getting permit.
ð The right to take wood and bamboo for agricultural implements and
house construction on permit which was issued free of cost.
ð The right to graze cattle and buffaloes upto a maximum of 8 animals per tenant
free and without permission. Calves were free to graze . However this practice
has been suspended since the abolition of Bhet and Begari.
d) Conservation Efforts
The King's regime had stringent rules and regulations which prevented the people
from exploiting the resource. In case of violating the rules the forest offenders were
strictly punished. People cited certain cases when the offenders were put behind
bars for collecting unripe fruits. Hunting of wild animals was strictly restricted for
the Praja (common people). Only the royal family held the privilege of hunting.
The tribals usually accompanied the King for hunting expedition during which
these people were able to derive animal meat.
Some trees in the protected forests, were declared as reserved trees(as mentioned in
Ranpur Forest rules).
Copyright: People of Barapalli, Arjunpur, Balarampur, Kiyapalla and Panaspur and Vasundhara and Indian
Institute of Science
People were not allowed to cut the reserved trees
without permission. However, after getting
permission one can collect reserved trees only for
own consumption and not for sale. People were
free to collect fruits and flowers of the declared
reserved trees without permission except
Mango, Jackfruit, Tamarind, Kamlagundi,
Kochila, Harida, Bahada and Aonla. The tenants
were also allowed to take the un-prohibited trees
from the village forests for their own use
without permissioa There existed
strict restriction on selling or exporting trees without a permit. The process of alienation of
forest communities from the forests began during the British period. The declaration of
Reserve Forest overlooked the customary local rights of the people. The industrial and
commercial interests were instrumental causative factors for such alienation. After
independence, the same interests were considered as national interests and continued to be
pursued.
ii Post -Independence period
After Independence , the princely state of Ranpur merged in Orissa and formed a part of
the district of Puri. Forests came under the jurisdiction of Forest department.
History of forest degradation & its impact:
Even after independence revenue objectives of Government continued. Forests
continued to be regarded as national resource and so was reserved for national needs.
On the other hand with the increasing population there was an expansion in habitation
and agricultural lands. Meanwhile rapid industralisation and urbanisation in the nearby
areas (Cuttack, Khurda, Bhubaneswar) continued which led to a massive demand of
timber. Further the village people practiced "podu " cultivation in the lower portion of
hill . All these led to rampant cutting of big trees. In the year 1961-62 the forest was
given coupe to Private contractors to harvest timber. This resulted in destruction of a
Recorded Protected Trees Sal Tinia Sidha Mango Kurum Gambhari Harida Bandhan Ghodalnja Piasal Arjun Jackfruit Bheroo Jamun Khair Bahada Kangra Kainya Sisoo Palas Kasi
Kochila Harida
Copyright: People of Barapalli, Arjunpur, Balarampur, Kiyapalla and Panaspur and Vasundhara and Indian
Institute of Science vast forest cover in the low lying areas. The cleared areas were converted into
agricultural lands by the local people. People cultivated mandiya (millet), maize,
vegetables etc and received good produce from the fertile lands. Later on, FD took up
teak plantation in a part of the harvested area (teak species was for the first time
introduced in the area). For the second time the forest was again given coupe to
OFDC (in the year 1979-80). This time there was clear felling, the forest being
completely devoid of large trees. Local people received no share in the harvested
produce. This made them feel that since the forest in any case would get cut and they
may not be able to receive any benefit, so they thought to cut the remaining trees and
have the wood. This resulted in complete degradation of the forest cover.
Because of forest degradation the local people experienced many difficulties. The
cleared forest patch was no more able to meet the fuelwood demand. People largely felt
the scarcity of fuelwood, house building materials, wood for agricultural implements,
etc. They faced a lot of difficulties in getting wood for cremation purpose. Farmers
faced frequent crop failures. The loss of forest cover resulted to decline in soil fertility
thus yielding poor produce. When there was forest people received good produce from
their fields as the stream and rain water flowing through the forest carried green
manure (dry, fallen, decayed leaves) into the agricultural fields. But with the forest
degradation the lands no more received green manure. Forest dependents were the
worst sufferers. These people not able to get their livelihood from the forest, became
totally dependent on wage labour. At times of scarcity of labour work most of them
migrated out. During these years only people started thinking about the adversity of
forest degradation and its impact on their life.
Driving forces responsible for forest degradation
Impacts of forest degradation
• Growing human population.
• Podu cultivation and conversion of
forest
• lands into agriculture.
• Shortage of fuelwood, timber,
creepers,
• wood for cremation etc.
• Scarcity of rainfall.
Copyright: People of Barapalli, Arjunpur, Balarampur, Kiyapalla and Panaspur and Vasundhara and Indian
Institute of Science
• Extraction of root - stocks .
• Coupe permit to the local contractors
• Felling by the Orissa
Forest
• Development Corporation(OFDC).
• Rapid urbanization in the nearby areas
• Frequent drought.
• Decrease in water level.
• Drying up of streams.
• Loss of livelihood.
• Soil erosion.
• Loss of soil fertility.
iii. Period after Forest protection
Initiation of forest protection(the year 1986-87)
The adverse impacts of forest degradation led to a better understanding of the role of
the forest among the villagers. Few nearby villages had already begun to protect forests
through village level initiative. These examples inspired the Dhani people who
themselves had started thinking about ways to overcome the problem The intervention
of few knowledgeable individuals also helped in developing a resolve among the
villagers to protect the degraded forest area. A series of meetings were held by the
group of knowledgeable individuals on the possible way to tackle the problem and to
initiate protection.
Development of the Institution
On the 10th of September 1987, Dhani South Paancha Mouza Jungle Suraksha Samiti,
the forest committee of the five villages, was formed. The committee discussed
extensively the various problems relating to the forest and their causative factors. The
possible ways to tackle these problems were also discussed in detail and a work plan
was determined by the committee to initiate forest protection. The major hindrance to
the growth and betterment of the forest were identified as follows:
• Taila Cultivation (clearmg the lower regions of the hills and cultivating Brinjal and
Ragi by the villagers resulting in regular destruction of the forest.
Copyright: People of Barapalli, Arjunpur, Balarampur, Kiyapalla and Panaspur and Vasundhara and Indian
Institute of Science • Head loaders/Cycle loaders of fuelwood extracting the remaining vegetation and the
rootstock for sale.
• Heavy grazing pressure inhibiting growth of new vegetation.
• Fuelwood Extraction Pressure from nearby villages whose forests had already been
far too degraded to supply them with household fuel
Dhani South Panch Mouza Jungle Surakhya Samiti was developed for regulating forest
protection as well as management. The committee looks after the protection,
management, utilisation of the forest and related issues such as framing rules, resolving
conflict, taking action against the forest offenders, maintaining records, implementation
of decisions, conducting meetings, interaction with external agencies, disseminating
information etc.
Protection
In the initial period, active patrolling measures were adopted for protection of the area.
A patrolling squad of 10 persons, 2 from each village kept vigilance on the forest. In
case of infringement by outsiders this squad intimated the committee. The patrolling
system was known as Tnengapalli system. One member from each household, a total of
ten persons/pallias3 went to the forest for voluntary patrolling everyday on rotational
basis. In the system a stick (or thenga as called in oriya) was kept infront of the house(s)
on the prior evening which intimated about that households turn to go for patrolling
duty. Subsequently the stick was passed on from one house to the other. Later on
patrolling arrangement was changed to appointing of paid watchman. Initially, one
1 Pallia is the person who has been assigned the patrolling duty.
Copyright: People of Barapalli, Arjunpur, Balarampur, Kiyapalla and Panaspur and Vasundhara and Indian
Institute of Science watchman was appointed and after few months the number of watchmen was increased to two. Remuneration for the watchmen were initially arranged through household contribution( in the form of handful of rice per day for some time and in cash for some time). With the income of the Forest Protection Committee increasing due to taking lease for Cashew harvesting, the system of household contribution was no longer necessary.
Timeline Of Forest Protection Before 1961 - Abundance of forest.
Copyright: People of Barapalli, Arjunpur, Balarampur, Kiyapalla and Panaspur and Vasundhara and Indian
Institute of Science Management When protection started there were few single rules. The main rule that prevailed was 'no extraction of root stocks and no grazing'. Free movement of the villagers in the forest area was completely restricted during the first few years. Subsequently the committee framed rules, defining the rights and duties of the villagers. These rules, patrolling arrangements and penalty system vary with threat perception, condition of forests, seasonal variations in threats, and other factors such as scarcity of forest produce, pressure from other villages etc. There is also seasonal variation in the degree of restriction, to facilitate regeneration in rainy season, and prevent instances of fire in the summer etc.
Due to active protection the forest has regenerated richly. The forest have a good growth of bamboo. After 1992, some bamboo were harvested to generate funds for payment of remuneration to watchers. In 1993, cleaning operation was undertaken to facilitate better growth of forest and extract some fuel- material. There are plans to harvest bamboo from this forest on a rotation basis with the active support of the Forest Department.
After the forest regenerated communities evolved rules for extraction of forest produces for domestic requirement especially fuel, house construction material and wood for funeral purpose. Specific rules were framed for such extraction and distribution amongst the member households.. 4Van Samrakshan Samiti, the forest protection committee formed by FD for joint management of forest. Some of the rules framed by the Dhani South Panch Mouza Committee for protection and management of forest were:
- Coupe given to Pvt. contractors by FD.
- Coupe given to OFDC. - Scarcity of forest
produces. - Combined meetings of
five villages facilitated by notable individuals of
Arjunpur & Barapalli. - Forest protection
committee was formed. - Watcher was appointed.
The committee got registered.
- The committee took the lease of cashew plantation
to raise forest fund. - Paid watchers appointed
- VSS4 formed by the FD which became the first
ever VSS in the whole of Tangi Range.
- Potentiality survey of bamboo by FD. Eco-
restoration scheme carried out by Social Forestry
Project. – VSS got approval from
the FD & management plan was done.
Rs 33000/- was allotted for forest management work as a part of
the Microplan.
1961-62
1972 1982-85
1985-87 1987-88
1989
1992
1993 1994-95
1995
1996
Copyright: People of Barapalli, Arjunpur, Balarampur, Kiyapalla and Panaspur and Vasundhara and Indian
Institute of Science
Rules pertaining to protection and management of forests
Protection initiation phase
• Ten persons alongwith the forest guard would protect the forest.
• If any person from the five villages, engages in destroying the forest then strong
actions with the help of the forest department would be taken against him.
• If a person cuts wood or bamboo with the permission of the committee no action
would be taken against him.Those who would cut without permission would be
subject to severe action by the committee.
Later phase
• The watchmen shall report to the Secretary before going for patrolling.
• All the villagers shall support the Watchmen whenever required.
• If a Watcher takes any bribe then he shall lose his job as well as the last salary.
• Any produce which is found within the boundary of the protected area shall be kept
under the custody of the Committee till a decision on that is taken by the members.
• Forest produce for bonafide needs can be taken from the forest after taking
permission of the committee. If anyone is found bringing any forest produce without
the permission of the committee then he will be punished according to the rules of
the committee. If the forest offenders do not obey the decisions of the committee
then stringent measures will be taken against them
• After permission from the committee villagers from the five villages shall be allowed to
take 100 bamboo at Rs 30/- for their needs. However, these bamboo cannot be sold/
bartered outside the village.
• Hunting is prohibited in the forest. Any person found hunting in the forest will be severely punished.
Forest Condition
Peoples' continuous effort have resulted in regeneration of forest cover in the area
which was once completely degraded. With vegetation, wild life have started coming
back to the forest. According to people there are 250 different plant species or even
more than that in the forest among which the dominating species are Asan, Kalucha,
Kochila, Atundi, Achu, Siali , Kasi , Lembur etc. with some patches of bamboo
Copyright: People of Barapalli, Arjunpur, Balarampur, Kiyapalla and Panaspur and Vasundhara and Indian
Institute of Science growths. The fruit bearing tree species such as Mango, Jackfruit, Jamun which were
excessively found in the earlier period showed a tremendous decline. Wild buffalo,
rabbit, monkey, Jackal, Wolf and many other animal and bird species inhabits the forest
area.
In addition to forest produces villagers perceive a number of other benefits accruing
from their efforts to regenerate the forest. These include the prevention of soil erosion,
increase in soil fertility, rising water table in the area and increase in rainfall. The stream
which had dried up earlier now have again started flowing. These perceived benefits
have strengthened the villager's commitment to forest protection.
Copyright: People of Barapalli, Arjunpur, Balarampur, Kiyapalla and Panaspur and Vasundhara and Indian
Institute of Science
MANAGEMENT OPTIONS The joint protection of Dhani Reserve Forest by five villages have emerged over the
period of continuous and tedious efforts taken by the people. Till the early 60's the flora
and fauna of Dhani hill was undisturbed. After which the forest got destructed with rapid
pace of industralisation and urbanization, coupe-policy of the Govt and increasing
pressure of the growing population. The degradation of forest had an adverse impact on
people's socio-economic life of which the poor people(forest dependents) were the
worst sufferers.
The local people have adopted different management system of the forest based at local
needs, surrounding environment, their experience and ecological knowledge. Broadly
the management system can be divided into following categories, which are:
• Management Through Institution
The five villages have developed an institution named "Dhani South Panch Mouza Jungle Surakhya Samiti" for regulating forest protection as well as management. The committee looks after the protection, management, utilisation and related issues such as framing rules, resolving conflict, taking action against the forest offenders, distribution of benefits, maintaining records, implementation of decisions, conducting meeting, interaction with external agencies, disseminating informations etc.
Composition & Periodicity of the Institution The general body of the committee comprises all the
Rules pertaining to the Functioning Committees 1987 1. A ten member working committee formed to look after
protection of forest. 2. The accounts of the Committee shall be presented once in a
year to the General Body. 1992 1. An advisory committee with 8 members formed to guide
the Executive Committee. 1993
1. The Executive Committee (14 members) shall meet once in a fortnight. Any member of the EC who remains absent from three meetings shall be dismissed. If any member abandons the meeting then a fine of Rs. 5 shall be imposed. If any person does not attend while being in the village, a fine of Rs 1/- will be imposed on him.
1994 1. A five member vigilance sub-committee is formed to check
watcher's activities. 2. An audit committee formed to audit the accounts. 1995 1. The total number of committee members increased to 21.
For the first time women members included in the committee.
2.
3.
4.
Copyright: People of Barapalli, Arjunpur, Balarampur, Kiyapalla and Panaspur and Vasundhara and Indian
Institute of Science elders of the household of the five villages as its member. The general body meets once
in a year to review the activities of the committee, frame rules and regulation, selection
of representatives for the executive body, approval of financial statement and budget for
coming year and other forest related actions.
The executive body comprises of the elected representaives from the five villages. The
number of the representatives varies depending on the size and population of the
village. The executive body meets once in a fortnight to dicuss various issues,
oppurtunities, problems etc.
However in emergency case such as forest offence, framing or amendment of existing
rule, the executive committee can call a meeting of the general body at any time by
serving a notice or by 'Dakua' (the person who intimates about the meeting place and
date to the members).
Funding of the Instituion
Initially the expenses of the committee, salary for watcher etc. were arranged through
household contributions known as "Muthi chaula"(means hand full of rice). In later
periods, when the committee was able to raise its own fund the system of household
contribution stopped. The committee managed to make some fund by taking on lease the
village cashewut plantation and reauctioning it to other party. Besides, the committee also
made some money from the fine amounts imposed against forest offences like cutting
green branches, killing wild animals. The account of the committee is audited yearly by
an independent auditor and the audited accounts is presented before the general body
for approval
Decision Making
All the forest management decisions are taken in the general body meeting, such as how
and when to cany sirvicultural operations (which includes thining, pruning), amendment
or introduce of any rules and regulation, forest development activities, financial matters
etc. The general body of the committee is the decision maker where as the executive
body is the care taker as well as implementor of these decisions.
Copyright: People of Barapalli, Arjunpur, Balarampur, Kiyapalla and Panaspur and Vasundhara and Indian
Institute of Science
• Management Through Protection:
In the initial period of forest management the communities took up complete protection of
the degraded patch. People were restricted from entering into the forest area. No one was
allowed to extract root stocks and graze their cattle in the forest. However the pressure
of the near by villages on the forest for collection of root stocks still existed. So, to
check the outside pressure and keep a close vigil on the forest the communities adopted
patrolling measures/palli system5. In later period the palli system was substituted by
paid watcher. Presently there are two watchers looking after the forest.
Rules regarding protection:
• The watch man shall report to the secretary before going for patrolling.
• If a watcher takes bribe then he shall lose his job as well as the last salary.
• If the watcher wants leave he should inform the committee, other wise he will lose
• his salary.
• All the villagers shall support the watchman whenever required.
• At any time in between 8a.m to 5p.m the vigilance committee may supervise the work of
the watcher without any prior information.
------------------------------- 5 A group of ten persons, one member from each & every household went everyday for
voluntary patrolling on rotational basis.
Copyright: People of Barapalli, Arjunpur, Balarampur, Kiyapalla and Panaspur and Vasundhara and Indian
Institute of Science • Management Through Restriction:
In the initial phase of protection strict restriction was imposed on free movement of
people in the forest area, cattle grazing and extraction of any forest produce. In
subsequent years, some relaxation was brought about in these restrictions. To regulate
the forest in sustainable manner the villagers has adopted some prohibitive measures
like:
• Nobody can enter into forest with an axe.
• Strict restriction on felling of green trees. Any person found involved in it will
strictly be punished and penalised.
• No one can collect or cut timber, bamboo and poles without the permission of the
committee.
• Grazing is not allowed in the forest during the rainy season(July- September) to
allow regeneration.
• People are restricted to enter into forest during summer (March- June) to prevent
the incidence of fire.
• Hunting of wild animals is strictly prohibited.
Rules pertaining to penalty
• The person who violates the rule, is fined. The fine is decided by the working body
of the committee which is the most functional body. Individual involved in cutting green
branches or bamboo without permission is fined by the committee. Such fine amount
varies with varying size and species. The usual fine against cutting valuable timber
species such as Saguan, Dhaura, Sisoo, Asan etc.is fixed as Rs 1001/-. For other trees
the fine amount is Rs. 101/-.
• Strong action would be taken against any person found involved in hunting wild
animals. Help would be taaken from the forest department to take punitive measures
against him.
• Management Through Sustainable Utilisation :
Copyright: People of Barapalli, Arjunpur, Balarampur, Kiyapalla and Panaspur and Vasundhara and Indian
Institute of Science Apart from attempts at conservation though more or less strict protection, the village
communities also have traditions of conservation coupled with sustainable use. After the
regeneration of the forest cover the commiunities allowed sustainable extraction of
forest products to meet their bonafide requirements. Some management practices were
adopted for sustainable utilisation of the resource which includes:
=> Annual cleaning and thining operations before rainy season so that it provides
fuelwood which is generally stored to use during rainy days. For fuelwood no green
trees are allowed for cutting, only shrubs of miscellaneous species and dead, fallen
trees and branches are extracted. The extracted products is equally shared among all
the households of the five villages.
=> People are allowed to collect berries, tubers, lai (climbers), siali leaves,
fuelwood (only dry, fallen, diseased branches & twigs) etc. People can collect green
wood only for funeral purpose. Collection of these forest products are free and
without permission.
=> For bamboo, timber poles for house construction and agricultural implements prior
permission of the committee is requried. To aviod conflict between the user groups and
maximum utilisation of the resource they followed certain extraction modalities.
EXTRACTION MODALITIES
Timber and Poles : The applicant have to apply to the committee for his/ her
requirements mentioning the purpose and quantity. Then a group of committee
members (those known as 'Inquiry Committee' ) enquires the case and after
completion of the requisite work allow the person to collect wood from the forest.
The applicant have to pay a nominal charge for collection which varies in accordance
to the tree size and type of tree species.
Bamboo and Fuelwood : A slightly different system is followed for fuelwood and
bamboo extraction. The decision for cleaning, mining and extraction of bamboo is
taken collectively in the village meeting . Harvesting of bamboo is done in patches.
Copyright: People of Barapalli, Arjunpur, Balarampur, Kiyapalla and Panaspur and Vasundhara and Indian
Institute of Science
Generally matured bamboo are only selected for the extraction. For fuelwood, no green
trees are allowed for cutting, only shurbs of miscellaneous species are allowed.
=> The tribals and harijans whose livelihood is largely dependent on forest produces are
allowed to collect dry, fallen, twigs and branches and siali leaves respectively for
selling.
=> The neighbouring villages (other than the panch mouza) can obtain bamboo and
timber from the forest only after getting permission of the committee and paying an
amount for the forest produces. Such special concession is given on the occassion of
community festivals & only to those villages which do not have forest and to the
individuals for repairing their house in case of fire accidents.
• Management Through Economic Upliftment of the Poorer Sections
Of the five villages the tribal and harijan people of Balarampur, Kiyapalla and Panaspur
villages depend on forest for deriving a subsistence livelihood. They are dependent on
different forest products such as fuelwood, lai or climbers, siali leaves(Bauhinia vahilii),
tubers etc. for their livelihood .The villagers say that there exists a gap between present
demand and supply of the forest produce. This imbalance in future may lead to conflict
over the resource. Therefore there is a need to minimise the dependence and control the
pressure of this group . The committee has taken an initiative to negotiate with the FD,
and other government and non-government agencies to carry out economic
developmental programmes. Following actions has already been initiated:
• A dairy unit has been set up comprising of 40 members.
• Training imparted by FD to women of harijan community for processing
of siali leaves to make leafplates.
M A N A G E M E N T O F O T H E R L A N D SC A P E E L E M E N T S
Agricultural land :
Copyright: People of Barapalli, Arjunpur, Balarampur, Kiyapalla and Panaspur and Vasundhara and Indian
Institute of Science Cultivation being the main occupation, the people of Dhani villages gave high priority to
agricultural fields for better use & management. The pratice of cultivating traditional
paddy variety still exists in the area. People depend on monsoons for water to irrigate
their fields. Because of lack of adequate irrigation facilities the fields remain vacant for
most part of the year. For better land use and effective management of the land
resources, adequate irrigation facilities have to be made through wells, deep well
constructing water structures.
Grazing land :
All the villages have grazing land(gochar) . The grazing land is commonly managed by
the village people. The tribal people of Panaspur village are desirous to plant fruit
bearing trees(especially mango, jackfruit species), acacia, eucalyptus etc. in their grazing
land. People have already initiated efforts in planting seedling of the species. Presently
other villages want to use the grazing land exclusively for grazing purpose.
Gramya Jungle:
Gramya jungle (forests included within the village boundary) is collectively managed by
the individual village. The degradation of the R.F. resulted in severe hardships for the
local people. The villagers felt heavily the scarcity of fuelwood, wood for funeral pyre
and these adverse situations compelled the villagers to protect forest patches within their
village boundary. The village people exercise their rights and concessions on gramya
jungle to collect fuelwood, medicinal herbs, edible fruits, berries, leaves etc. and wood
for cremation. However, timber cutting either for commercial or subsistence is not
allowed.The forest is protected by patrolling on rotational basis by the villagers. Every
household participate in patrolling system. One pallia ( person on patrolling duty )
moves around the forest everyday. No one is allowed to cut green tree from the forest
without permission.
Pond :
Of the five villages only Arjunpur and Kiyapalla have village ponds. The pond is
managed by the village elders. They are mainly used for bathing and more significantly
for fish farming. Cattle bathing is strictly restricted. The expenses for fish farming is met
Copyright: People of Barapalli, Arjunpur, Balarampur, Kiyapalla and Panaspur and Vasundhara and Indian
Institute of Science from household contribution in terms of cash. The pond water at times is used to
irrigate the vegetable fields. The community takes the cleaning activity of the pond after
every two or three years, in which male member of each & every household in the
village participate.
DEVELOPMENT ASPIRATIONS
Legal & Policy issues
The communities have been protecting the forests since a decade, yet they feel insecured
about their rights over the forest. They feel the need for greater legal rights and tenurial
security. In the absence of legal rights the Government continues to deny the rights and
ownership of local people over the forests and forest products. The forest protecting
committee like to have a legal status and recognised as an independent body.
Empowerment
While legal and policy issues are important, equally important are efforts for
strengthening the community institution so that they are in a position to take up
increased management responsibilities. Efforts should be made to involve people in
policy formulation and implementation process to enable them to contribute in
protecting and managing the forest effectively.
Bamboo harvesting
The Forest Department has made a potentiality survey of the forest and an assessment of
the bamboo availability in the forest. It is estimated that approximately one lakh bamboo
can be harvested every year. The department is facilitating necessary administrative
clearances to allow the committee to harvest bamboo. The harvested produce shall be
utilised to meet the needs of the villagers. The committee have a plan to sell the rest
bamboo and the income incurred from the sale of bamboo shall be deposited in the
village fund. This fund shall be utilized to carry out forest and village development
activities.
Copyright: People of Barapalli, Arjunpur, Balarampur, Kiyapalla and Panaspur and Vasundhara and Indian
Institute of Science Income generating activities for direct forest dependents:
The lack of employment opportunity or alternative income has made the poor tribal
people of Kiyapalla village dependent on harvesting fuelwood for sale. Headloading is a
major economic activity carried throughout the year. The majority of headloaders are
tribal women. They had to spend long hours to travel to the forest, in collecting &
selling firewood. They wanted alternative employment to stop cutting firewood.
Livelihood linked to NTFPs
Efforts should be made in the direction to encourage them to seek some alternative
income source utilizing available NTFP's and provided with marketing support to
increase their income from the sale of NTFP's. Processing of NTFP's like aonla, bahada
etc.. making bamboo products, rush mats should be encouraged at local levels. The
tribal women also wanted to do some fruit plantation to obtain a regular income.
The harijan women feels the need of processing siali leaves & make leaf plates to give
value addition. During discussions with the women, they expressed for the need of plate
stitching machine to earn a better income from the sale of leaf plates. The committee is
trying to seek some alternative economic activity for the forest dependent groups. A
proposal for the same was given by the committee in the micro plan prepared with the
joint efforts of the Forest protection committee and the Forest Department. The
department has already initiated imparting training to women on processing of Siali
leaves and has given two leaf plate stitching machines in Arjunpur and Barapalli village.
Agriculture
The main occupation of the villagers is agriculture. Farmers cultivate chiefly paddy in
their fields. Only one crop (during monsoons) is grown throughout the year. Besides
paddy, some grow pulses, sugarcane, vegetables etc. Due to lack of irrigation facilities
the farmers are unable to grow second crops. A need was felt for constructing water
harvesting structures for sustenance of agricultural activties. This would provide the
agriculturists the scope to cultivate cash crops creating opportunities of labor for the
landless and the forest dependent groups.
Copyright: People of Barapalli, Arjunpur, Balarampur, Kiyapalla and Panaspur and Vasundhara and Indian
Institute of Science Other agriculture related aspirations
• In rainy season number of nalas, streamlets, flows through the forest. The water gets
wasted because of absence of water storing structures. If rain water can be stored,
it will help in the enhancement of the agricultural productivity.
• The people need to be encouraged to practice multiple cropping to maintain soil
fertility & increase their income.
• People would like to use iron plough if provided to them at subsised price by Govt.
• Farmers desire to form cooperative to help in timely supply of seeds, fertilizers, loan
to the small farmers.
• Efforts should be taken to widespread the knowledge on new agricultural techniques
and practices at block & panchayat level by conducting exhibitions and
demonstrations.
Dairy-farming
The dairy fanners have recently taken up cultivation of grass like NV-21, MP Cherry
which makes good cattle fodder. Efforts has already been initiated on experimental basis
and after seeing the feasibility they wish to go for large scale cultivation. An application
has been forwarded to the committee to allow them five acres of land within the forest
area for cultivation.
Protection to wild animals
Wild animals have started coming back to the dense regenerated forest. The forest lack
adequate water bodies. So the animals has to come to the lower land of Dhani to drink
water which increases the probability of hunting. There have been some cases of killing
wild animal in recent days. Panch mouja people wishes to dig water pits inside the dense
forest for the security of wild animals.
Environmental awareness
The elderly people feel that it is necessary to bring environmental awareness in the
society. They say that educational institutions are the best media to bring in
environmental awareness. The students having a strong will to take up the challenges
Copyright: People of Barapalli, Arjunpur, Balarampur, Kiyapalla and Panaspur and Vasundhara and Indian
Institute of Science can educate different societies about environment and its associated problems in a better
way.
Its hightime that compulsory environment education be introduced in schools to ensure
wider dissemination of the importance of healthy environment. Exhibitions on ecology
and environment can be organised in villages to create interests among children and to
involve them.
Youths from Barapalli village suggested for a library in the village for dessiminating
environmental knowledge to the people.
Promoting herbal knowledge
There is a decline in the trend of herbal medicine use and its practice. With advent in
medicine and technology there is a gradual shift from herbal to alleopathy. The
herbalman from Barapalli express his feelings on the necessity of carrying out training on
medicinal herbs at local level.
The efforts & initiatives of five villages to protect and conserve the forest have been
recently recognised by the Government. In 1997 Dhani Panch Mouja was awarded with
the honor of Prakruti Mitra Award (Nature's friend) by the state government.
Copyright: People of Barapalli, Arjunpur, Balarampur, Kiyapalla and Panaspur and Vasundhara and Indian
Institute of Science
ISSUES & SUGGESTED SOLUTIONS
Conflicts within a village or with the outside villages may take place due to distribution
of resource, use/ control over the resource, inequitable benefits sharing and many other
factors. Example of such conflicts though not major are described here.
The initial initiative came from Arjunpur village, which is general caste village and tribal
villages were included because of the consideration that it would not be possible to
protect the forests by excluding them. Also at the initial stage, Kiyapalla village which is a
tribal village was not participating actively in village meetings, the reasons being that for
these people forest was the major and the only source of sustenance and the fear of
losing access to the forest by its protection. The evacuation of these people from the
"Taila" land also contributed to their remaining aloof from the protection efforts.
However steps were taken to involve this village.
The neighboring villages kantasiri, Paiksahi, Jhiripada, Kadamjhola, Godasahi etc. the
predominantly tribal villages, were also dependent on Dhani forest. Initiation of forest
protection by panch mouja committee restricted these people's access over the forest
leading to resentment and constant threat of pilferage. People of outside villages who
violated the rules were fined by the Panch Mouja Committee. Common meetings were
held regularly with these villages to decide the infringement cases. The Forest protection
committee handled the conflict situations and in worst case only sought the help of FD.
The Panchmauja committee in later years facilitated these villages to initiate protection of
a new patch to meet their basic forestry needs. In the year 1991, the villages formed a
committee with the help of Panchmouja committee and have taken up protection of
Compartment 7 & 8 of Dhani south RF adjacent to the protecting forest of five villages.
Conflict over the resource sharing:
Dhani RF forest boundary overlaps the boundary of the revenue village Kadamjhola
along with the village boundary of five protecting villages. Now that the panch mouja
have taken up a big forest patch in the process of forest management the Kadamjhola
village is left with no area. Though in initial years the protecting committee tried to
Copyright: People of Barapalli, Arjunpur, Balarampur, Kiyapalla and Panaspur and Vasundhara and Indian
Institute of Science involve the neighboring village in the protection process but they did not take any
interest in the protection process. Now that the forest has grown up the latter village
wants a share in the protected patch to have their own forest to derive a regular
sustenance .
Inspite of the fact that Kadamjhola village did not participate with the five villages in
protection process for these many years, the panch mauja committee is ready to involve
Kadamjhola for joint protection & management of Dhani forest.
Conflict over the management of the resource:
The general caste villages have dominated the activity of forest protection. The tribal
people feel neglected and left out in the process. They are unhappy with the working of
committee. They speak that for the same type of offence the tribals had to pay greater
fine while the committee have a casual attitude towards the general caste. The tribals
h a v e s to p p ed co m in g to th e m ee tin g s o f th e c o m m ittee . T h is in e q u ity m a y g ra d u a lly c r e a te a
g a p b e tw e e n th e m a n d th e fo re s t p ro te c t io n a c t iv i ty . T h e re s h o u ld b e tra n s p a re n c y in th e
a c tiv itie s o f th e c o m m itte e a n d e q u a l p a rtic ip a tio n fro m a ll th e sectio ns . D ec isio ns o f the
com m ittee shou ld be fair and un b iased tow ard s a ll th e g rou ps.
C on flict over th e u se of resou rce:
1. F u e l-w o o d g a th erin g
W hile the k ab ari trib al o f K iyap alla v illage a re depend en t on head load ing peop le o f o th er c as tes
fro m n e arb y v illa ge s ge n e ra lly c a rry w o o d o n cyc le to se ll. A s th e fo rm e r g ro u p c o lle c t d ry ,
fa lle n tw igs , b ra n c h e s th e y d o n o t g e t a go o d p ric e o f th e ir co llec tio n in c o m p a re d to th e
c o lle c to rs w h o b r in g g re e n w o o d in th e ir c yc le s . T h e k a b a r i w o m e n w a n t th a t th e y sh o u ld b e
a llo w e d to cu t b ra n c h e s o f tree s lik e K a lu c h a , K o ch ila , K eru an e tc ., th a t g ro w s fa s t . T h e S ia li
c o lle c to rs o p p o s e to th is . T h e s e tre e s g iv e s s u p p o rt to S ia li c lim b e rs to sp re ad o u t & c u ttin g
tree s m ay d es tro y s ia li p lan ts . T h e u se r g ro u p s c o u ld n o t c o m e to a n y c o n s e n s u s . T h e re is a ls o
a fe e l in g th a t o n c e tr e e c u tt in g is a llo w e d it m ay le a d to fre e a c ce ss o f th e reso u rc e resu ltin g in
fo res t d es tru c tio n .
2. B am bo o harvestin g
Copyright: People of Barapalli, Arjunpur, Balarampur, Kiyapalla and Panaspur and Vasundhara and Indian
Institute of Science In a d is c u s s io n w ith th e u s e r g ro u p s o n b a m b o o h a rv e s t in g , th e v ie w s o f P a n a s p u r v illa ge
p e o p le se e m ed to b e d iffe ren t fro m o th e r g ro u p s & sh o w e d so m e d eg re e o f d issa tis fac tio n . T h ey
sa id th a t th e y s ta rte d fo res t p ro te c tio n w ith th e o b je c tiv e to m e e t th e fo re stry n e ed s o f lo ca l
p e o p le a n d n o t fo r co m m e rc ia l p u rp o se . T h e ex is tin g ru le s a llo w th e v il la g e rs to c o lle c t o n ly
tw e n ty b a m b o o s in a ye a r w h ic h d o n o t m e e t th e ir n e e d s . S o th e c o m m itte e sh o u ld firs t th in k to
m ee t th e lo c a l n e ed s o f b am b o o & th e n ca n go fo r selling.
T hreat from outside v illages:
T h e fo re s t h a v e g o t a g o o d r e g e n e ra t iv e fo re s t c o v e r a n d h o s ts d iv e r s e s p e c ie s c o m p a re d to
o th e r n ea rb y fo re s ts . M o re o v e r th e tw o fo re st g u a rd s ap p o in ted b y th e c o m m u n ity a re n o t a b le
to k e e p v ig il o v e r a la rg e fo re s t a re a . T h is h a s re s u lte d to in c rea sed th rea ts fro m o u ts id e
v illa ge s. T h e re h av e b e en an in c re a se in c u ttin g tre es a n d k illin g o f w ild an im a ls fro m th e
p ro te c tin g p a tch . T h e c o m m u n ity in s titu tio n n ee d to b e s tre n g h te n e d w ith so m e p e n a l p o w e rs to
ta k e a c tio n a g a in s t th e fo re s t o ffe n d e rs & to s to p th e m fro m c a rry in g il le g a l fo re s t a c tiv it ie s . A
s q u a d c o m m itte e w a s fo rm e d in recen t days to check h un ting o f an im als .
M ism atch b etw een C om m ittee's ru les & G ovt. p olicy:
T h e w o rk in g p la n p rep ared b y F D d e fin e s th e righ ts & a c ce ss o f th e p eo p le o f a d jo in in g v illa ge s
o v er th e fo re s t w h ich c rea te s m isu n d e rs tan d in g b e tw ee n th e p ro tec tin g a n d n o n p ro te c tin g
v illa ge s. S u c h rig h ts go es ag a in s t th e in te re s ts o f P a n ch m o u ja p eo p le w h o h a d b e en p ro tec tin g
th e fo re s t s in c e a d ec a d e . T h e re is a n ee d to c la rify th e le ga l righ ts o f th e co m m u n ities & en su re
g rea te r te n u ria l se cu rity .
A lso in th e w o rk in g p lan D h a n i fo re s t h a s b e en d e c la red as d eg rad ed fo res t. N o w w h e n th e fo re s t
h a s g o t p ro fu s e b a m b o o g ro w th s & th e c o m m u n i ty w a n t to h a rv e s t th e p ro d u ce it h a s to w a it
fo r th e G o v t. c le a ran ce s .
CONSERVATION STRATEGY
For the communities Dhani forest is much more than trees and is valued for the array of
products and services which it provides. The rural populace derive forest products to
meet their domestic requirements. Forest contributes in increasing soil fertility, prevents
soil erosion, helps in water level increase. It also contributes to day to day livelihood of
Copyright: People of Barapalli, Arjunpur, Balarampur, Kiyapalla and Panaspur and Vasundhara and Indian
Institute of Science many landless people. The villagers greatly feel the intrinsic value of Dhani and aspire
to protect & conserve all the species.
People prioritised certain plant species that needs urgent protection and conservation on
the basis of availability and their utility & economic value.
The regenerative forest cover have few trees of Harida, Mango (Mangifera indica)
Sisoo (Dalbergia sisoo). Piyasal (Pterocarpus marsupium). Salapa, Kendu (Diospyros
Religious Species Mango Mansifera indica Osta Ficus religiosa Bael Aeale marmelos Sahada Strebulus asper Bara Ficus bengalensis Ashok Saraca asoca Neem Azadirachata indica
Copyright: People of Barapalli, Arjunpur, Balarampur, Kiyapalla and Panaspur and Vasundhara and Indian
Institute of Science People attached high protection value to the wild animals and birds. The protecting
villages suggested for enforcement of strict laws and punishment against the poachers.
Strategy :
Strengthening Community Institution
The forest protection committee need to have a legal identity and be an independent
body equipped with adequate powers to carry out conservation. The committee have to
be integrated in every stage of the development processes, from their initial setting of
policies to their eventual implementation.
Policy Changes
Forest department act as custodian of forest. The decision making power to manage and
control lies in the hands of the deptartment. It is likely that the external decisions get
imposed over the villager's priority very often demotivating the people. So changes have
to be brought in the present policy giving more rights to people over the forest and
forest products. Steps have to be taken to make the policy more people oriented.
Co-ordination Among GOs, NGOs & Community
At the Govt. level, financial decentralisation, accountability of officials, coordination
between different departments and programs and harmonisation of policies and laws,
need to be achieved. The local community institutions can be given the power to
exercise ownership right over the natural resources and channelise fund for forest
development activities. State level discussions with NGO's, FD, different government
departments and communities need to be coordinated to carry out a feasible
conservation strategy.
Participation/Involvement of locals
The local people ought to be considered as the stake holders and not merely as the
beneficiaries. Their role have to be recognised in planning and implementation of the
policy, if communities are to be effective managers of the resources around them.
Copyright: People of Barapalli, Arjunpur, Balarampur, Kiyapalla and Panaspur and Vasundhara and Indian
Institute of Science Women are the major forest user group and are mostly affected by the rules and
restrictions made by the committee. Greater participation of women groups have to be
encouraged in committee's activity and decision making. The forest protection
committee should call for a greater representation of this group.
Alternative Employment Opportunities
The direct forest dependent groups have to be provided with alternatives to earn a
living. Steps need to be taken by the committee & the FD to help the people derive
livelihood by utilizing NTFP's. The communities have to be assured that they get a better
price from the sale of NTFP's.
Awareness -
With the empowerment of the people it is necessary to bring in environmentasl
awareness in the society. This requires the spread of the knowledge of the bio-diversity,
its usage and conservation. School villages and education institutions can better take up
the documentation and enhance the knowledge. Bio-diversity study needs to be made an
integral part of our education system.
Suggested role by the communities for the key actors in forest protection and
management:
Forest Department:
• The Forest department needs to play a supportive role.
• Provide technical inputs on silvicultural operations, processing of NTFP's etc.
• Help the forest protecting villages by taking actions against the forest offenders.
• Decentralise the fund allocation to the committee to carry out forest development
activities.
• Take up plantation programs in the area where there is no forest.
• Build up market linkages for sale NTFP's.
Copyright: People of Barapalli, Arjunpur, Balarampur, Kiyapalla and Panaspur and Vasundhara and Indian
Institute of Science • Create awareness among the people .
• Increase interaction between different government agencies and panchayat.
Panchayat:
• Build coordination between forest protection committee, FD, and other
• Government agencies.
• Allocate funds to the village committee for forest developmental activities .
• Act as a conflict resolving mechanism (resolve inter village conflicts).
• Initiate protection activities in non-protecting villages.
NGOs:
• Policy advocacy.
• Disseminate policy level informations at local level.
• Facilitate interaction between the Government, FD and the Committee .
• Establish linkages between forest protecting villages.
• Create awareness among the people about bio-diversity.
• Help the committee in processing and marketing forest products.
• Provide trairming support to community for capability enhancement, upgradation of skill.
Copyright: People of Barapalli, Arjunpur, Balarampur, Kiyapalla and Panaspur and Vasundhara and Indian
Institute of Science
•
GENDER
Impact of forest degradation & community forest protection on Kabari and Harijan women
Phase of forest abundance In the initial phase when forests was abundant, Kabari people used to depend completely
on forests for their survival. Men and women went together to the forest for collection
of forest products. Majority of forest products collected during that time were for direct
consumption and only a few products were bartered for some essential things.
Phase of forest degradation
Due to degradation of forests, forest products became scarce. In this period Kabari
community looked out for alternatives for sustenance.In the initial period men took up
labour work in the nearby towns and cities. Later on, they moved to far off places &
stayed outside for months. This trend culminated in the male members of the community
going out for "Dadan"(seasonal migration) for five to six months every year to far off
places. During these days they leave their family behind in the village and it became the
responsibility of women to take care of the family. Having no other options women had
to depend on the degrading forest. They started selling some forest produce to meet the
needs of the family. At times she worked as daily labourer in agricultural fields to
arrange food for the family. Thus women besides doing household activities like bringing
water, cooking food, child care etc, started playing a major role in sharing the
responsibility as a breadwinner of the house.
Further forests degradation put a lot of strain on women. With the receding forest cover
the female members now had to travel long distances to collect forest
produces(especially fuelwood) for self use and for selling.
Phase of forest protection
The initial stages of forest protection imposed strict restriction on collecting forest
products. Restriction on extraction of forest produces especially the fuelwood hitted the
poor households of tribal and harijan community the most as they cannot afford to buy
Copyright: People of Barapalli, Arjunpur, Balarampur, Kiyapalla and Panaspur and Vasundhara and Indian
Institute of Science fuelwood for cooking. Because of strict closure of the forest they traveled more and
more to far off places to other forests to bring fuelwood, bamboo and other required
forest produces. But as the forest protection gathered momentum, the access to these
forests also got marginalised and this put a blow on their source of forest dependent
livelihood.
After the initiation of forest protection the committee framed rules and regulations to
control access over the forest and for the sustainable use of the forest produces. The
rules permitted for extraction of certain forest produces in the later period when the
there was a good regeneration of forest cover. People were allowed to collect dry, fallen
twigs and branches for fuelwood use. Extracting green wood for personal use without
the permission of the Dhani panch mouja committee and for selling purpose was strictly
prohibited. However, the tribal and harijan communities were given special provisions.
The tribal community is allowed to extract fuelwood for sale but they can only collect
dry, fallen twigs and branches and no green wood. Where as the women of harijan
community collect and sell Siali (Bauhinia vahilii) leaves to make their livelihood.
Change in Gender Roles:
Earlier both men and women of tribal commmunity went to forest to collect forest
produces for the household consumption. There was no major distinction between their
contribution to the sustenance of the family. Later on, with forest degradation men
gradually moved away from the forest activity and traveled to far off places to earn
money. With men being away from the family the responsibilities of women increased.
They engaged themselves in livelihood activity. Tribal/kabari and harijan community
women apart from their day long forest activities, have the sole responsibility of doing
other household chores. They spend most of their time in forest going for collection and
selling the produces. As a result of this, the children tend to get neglected and the
burden of household chores fells on girl-children.
The day in the life of a woman is tedious. She has to perform many duties and multiple
roles as a mother, wife and daughter-in-law as well as the main bread earners (A study
done on "Impact of forest degradation on Kabari women" by Vasundhara).
Major forest livelihood activities performed by women:
Copyright: People of Barapalli, Arjunpur, Balarampur, Kiyapalla and Panaspur and Vasundhara and Indian
Institute of Science 1. Fuelwood gathering
Fuelwood gathering is a primary economic activity of the tribal families contributing a
larger share to the family income performed by female members of the households. A
tribal woman's day in Kiyapalla village begins early in the morning long before sunrise.
She performs all the domestic activities like cooking food, cleaning house, bringing
water, taking care of children, looking after the cattle etc. Besides, she also engage
herself in livelihood activities to feed her family.
She put in 8-9 hours everyday travelling to the forest for collecting fuelwood. She
usually leave for the forest early in the morning around 8 am after doing all the domestic
activities and return in the afternoon at around 3 pm. After having her food(usually
water rice with left over curry) she again sit down to chop wood and make bundles to
sell in the next day. She spends another 5-6 hours in selling the collected produce in the
nearest market (8 Kms) in Tangi and Chandpur. Sometimes she is able to sell the wood
in local villages but she fetch a lower price than selling in the market. This shows the
hectic days of a tribal women which she spend in all 365 days in a year. In view of the
fact that she spends so much time in doing such a strenous activity she hardly earns Rs
25-30 from the sale of the produce in a day that hardly meets the expense of one time
food and that too only rice.
2. Siali leaves collection
Harijan women are dependent on collection & sale of siali leaves for livelihood. Besides
they also manage to get some labour work in agricultural fields during crop seasons.
They too bear the poor state as the tribal women. Women undergo hardships and put lot
of strain for the survival of their family. She is able to make only Rs 25-30 in a day after
spending long hours in the forest. Periodical changes is observed in collection amount
with seasonal variations. During summer and winters the collection gets reduced and
they hardly collects 500-600 leaves in a day. The leaves are dried, tied into bundles (5
leaves in 1 bundle) and stocked to be sold in a day once a week. Women go in a group
to Tangi/Chandpur market and sell the produce either in hotels or to the leaf plate
making traders. Sometimes local traders from neighbouring villages collect leaves from
their home but they generally pay less price.
Copyright: People of Barapalli, Arjunpur, Balarampur, Kiyapalla and Panaspur and Vasundhara and Indian
Institute of Science
ACTIVITY SCHEDULE OF A DAY
TIME ACTIVITIES
Around 5.00 am Get up from bed
5.00-8.00 am Clean the house and cattle shed Wash utensils Feed the cattle Fetch water Cook food and serve
8.00-3.00 pm Have her food ( water rice) Go to forest for collection of fuelwood / Siali leaves
3.00-6.00 pm Return from the forest Take bath and have meal ( water rice with left over curry) Settle to chop wood pieces & make bundles/Dry Siali leaves and tie into bundles In the marketing day go to Tangi/Chandpur to sell the produce
6.00-10.00 pm Clean house Bring water Feed cattle Cook food and serve
10.00pm Go to bed
Social restrictions
An adult women in tribal and harijan communities carry out both the inhouse and
outside activities. Women of families in these communities enjoysgreater social mobility
to go out of home and earn a living. Livelihood activities like collection of forest
produces and selling are carried out by the female members. A girl child indulge in
domestic activities from her early childhood. She collects firewood from the plantation
area/the gramya jungle(village forest) when she is hardly of 7-8 years. With their
mothers away in the forest girl-children holds the burden of household chores looking
after their younger brother and sisters. And at the age of 10-11 years she start going to
the forest with her mother to earn a living.
Women of higher caste(Khandayat community) are subjected to greater social
restriction. They generally confine their movements to domestic chores. The economic
Copyright: People of Barapalli, Arjunpur, Balarampur, Kiyapalla and Panaspur and Vasundhara and Indian
Institute of Science activities are considered as men's affairs. It is considered as shame if the female members
of the house moves out to make a living. The married and aged women are not
subjected to the same extent of social subjugation as the unmarried girls. Even when the
young girls go to fetch water they move through the back door of the house.
Development aspirations
As the villages initiated forest protection the free access over the forest got
marginalised. The tribal women/fuelwood gatherers were forbidden to enter to the
forest with axe or any other instruments. This hit their major & the sole livelihood
means. The livelihood has been further adversely affected by the adoption of selling
firewood as occupation by castes other than tribals. These people bring wood in cycles
and bullock carts and as the kabari women carry wood on heads are unable to meet the
market demand. Added to, they are very often subjected to verbal harassment by the
watcher appointed by the forest protection committee and have to pay heavy fine. They
expressed that thay feel offensive to face these situations.
Also the Siali collectors are unhappy doing the tedious forest activity. Their dependence
on forests can be compensated if some alternative income source can be sort out for
them with Government's support. However, they suggested that if income generating
activities like processing units of Aonla, Bahada, making bamboo crafts & khajur(date-
palm leaves) mats if can be designed and promoted then dependence on forest for
livelihood can be reduced.
Decision making process
in Family
In tribal and harijan households as women are involved in earning so they decide and
manage how to spend money in arranging day to day food for the family. In the time
when men migrate out for months the entire responsibility of the family members is
carried by female of the house. In the family women have a stand in decision making but
the major decisions are always taken by the menfolk. But in case of higher caste the
male members take all the decisions and women follow to what the men say.
in Community
Copyright: People of Barapalli, Arjunpur, Balarampur, Kiyapalla and Panaspur and Vasundhara and Indian
Institute of Science The cultural factors existing in the village inhibit the women from participating in forest
protection activity. Women have no say in the decisions which determine the forest
management and extraction patterns. On the other hand women have less exposure and
contact with the outside world than men. This inhibit women's participation.
The fact that the forest dependent women come from the lower caste further adds to the
inhibiting factor.
It is felt that there is a need to involve women in the protection activity and encouraged
to participate actively in the process. Kabari and harijan women the forest dependents
are the ones who are largely affected by the decisions taken and the rules formed by the
committee. So the protection process can be made more effective and sustainable
involving this group.
The primary community institution did not have any female representatives. But after the
committee being registered as VSS by the FD under JFM women have been enrolled as
members. Presently where there are 21 members in Dhani Panch Mouja committee only
3 are females. Though they have been included as the members but they have never been
consulted while taking any decisions or forming rules for the management of the forest.
There is a growing concern about gender equity in terms of women representation their
and participation in the management of the common forest resource more among the
forest dependent women groups and wish to get involved in the process.
FOREST PRODUCTS COLLECTED
WHO COLLECTS PURPOSE WHO SELLS
WHERE
MC FC MA FA Self Use Sale
FW from gramya jungle
T&H Gen. T & H
T & H √
FW from Dhani forest
Gen. T & H
T & H √ √
FW from Dhani forest
KT √ √ Women Local villages, Tangi/ Chandpur
Siali leaves H √ √ Women Local traders, Tangi/ Chandpur
Copyright: People of Barapalli, Arjunpur, Balarampur, Kiyapalla and Panaspur and Vasundhara and Indian
Institute of Science
Edible leaves T & H √ √ Women Local villages
Kendu leaves KT √ √ Women Local traders
Khajur leaves KnT KnT √ √ Men & Women
Local villages
Mushrooms T & H √ √ Women
Berries from Dhani forest
T & H √ √
Berries from GJ
T&H √ √
Tubers KnT T & H √ √ Women Local villages
Creeper (lai) Gen. T & H
T & H √ √
Creeper (lai) T T & H √ √ Women Local villages, Tangi Chandpur
Tooth sticks T & H √ √ Women Local villages
F C - FE M A L E C H IL D F A - FE M A L E A D U L T G E N . - G E N E R A L C A S T E
K N T - K A N D H A T R IB E T - TR TB A LS (IN C L U D IN G K A B A R I & K A N D H A T R IB E )
M C - M A L E C H IL D M A - M A L E A D U L T H - H A R U A N S K - K A B A R I T R IB E F W - FU E LW O O D
Copyright: People of Barapalli, Arjunpur, Balarampur, Kiyapalla and Panaspur and Vasundhara and Indian
Institute of Science
ANNEXURE
Landscape Elements Map a. i
Balarampur Habitation Map a. ii
Arjunpur Habitation Map a. iii
Panasapur Habitation Map a. iv
Barapalli Habitation Map a. v
Forest Resource Map a. vi
Identified Landscape Elements b. i
List of Forest Products Collected b. ii
List of Prioritised Wild Species b. iii
List of Plants c. i
List of Animals c. ii
List of Birds c. iii
List of Reptiles c. iv
List of Insects & Fishes c. v
Pictorial Representation of Institutional Arrangements d. i
Flow Diagram of Forest Fund d. ii Annexures a.i-a v – End of document
Copyright: People of Barapalli, Arjunpur, Balarampur, Kiyapalla and Panaspur and Vasundhara and Indian
Institute of Science
Aimexure- b. i
ID E N T IF IE D L A N D S C A P E E L E M E N T S Landscape Elements
Local Name Present Ownership
Use Pattern
D hani R .F Dhani mundia People & FD Forest Produces, Grazing
P ro tec ted F o re s t
Gramya Jungle Revenue department
Collection of Forest Produces, Grazing
P lan ta ti on Kaju jungle Acacia jungle
FD & OFDC Forest Produces
O rch ard Tota Village Grazing, fuelwood
G razing Land
Gochar Village Grazing
C heck D am Bandha Village Irrigation
S tream Jharana Village Irrigation, bathing
P ad d y F ie ld s Chasa jami Village Paddy Cultivation, Other seasonal crops, Grazing
W ell Kuan Village Drinking Water
Pond Pokhari Village Pisiculture, Irrigation to vegetable fields, bathing
H abita tion Gaon Village Homestead land
G rass L an d Anabadi Village Grazing
Thicket Padar Village Collection of Forest Produces, Grazing
Annexure-c.i
PLANT SPECIES LIST:
SI.N O Local Name Habit Form Scientific Name
01 Ankukoli Herb Alengium hexapetalum
02 Acacia Tree Acasia formis
03 Achu Tree Morinda pubescence 04 Agabathu Herb
05 Agara Shrub
06 Agasti Herb Sesbania grandiflora
Copyright: People of Barapalli, Arjunpur, Balarampur, Kiyapalla and Panaspur and Vasundhara and Indian
Institute of Science 07 Amari Shrub Ipomea sepiaria
08 Amba Tree Mangifera indica 09 Ankaranti Herb Solanum xanthocarpum
10 Ankul Tree Alangium lamarckii
11 Aonla Tree Emblica officinalis
12 Arakha Shrub Calotropis procera
13 Arjamapudi Tree
14 Arjuna Tree Termirialia arjuna 15 Asan Tree Terminalia tomentosa
16 Asaruda Herb
17 Ashoka Tree Saraca asoca
18 Aswastha Tree Ficus religiosa
19 Atundi Climber Combretun decandrum
20 Bakula Tree Mimusops elengi
21 Baaunsa(kanta) Grass Bambusa arundinacea 22 Bada limba Tree Azadirachta indica
23 Badhiaak Tree Annona squamosa
24 Bahada Tree Terminalia bellerica
25 Bahadabhadaliya Herb
26 Balikhai Herb
27 Banamali Tree Millingtonia hortensis
28 Banasabati Herb 29 Barabakula Tree Dalbergia paniculata
F u elw o o d C o llec to rs Livelihood Dhaman, Bhurukundi, Giringa, Chaluniya, Phatabarang, Atundi, Kalucha, Bamboo.
T u b er C o llec to rs Self consumption & for sale
Tunga, Karaba, Pichuli.
Copyright: People of Barapalli, Arjunpur, Balarampur, Kiyapalla and Panaspur and Vasundhara and Indian
Institute of Science
D airy farm ers & o th ers Fodder Phasi leaves, Peepal leaves, Grass
H erb alm an Medicine Harida, Bahada, Amla, Neem, Patalagaruda, Sahajamari, Khirakanchini, Bhuinkakharu, Krushna.
A n im a ls
A ll Protection from outside threat
Tiger
A ll Ecological importance Maximum animal species
H erb alm an Medicine Buffalo, Bat
B ir d s
H erb alm an Medicine Kochilakhai
All Ecological importance Maximum bird species
30 Bara gachha Tree Ficus bengalensis
31 Bara koli Tree Zizyphus mauritiana
32 Baruana Tree Crateva relegiosa
33 Basanga Shrub Adhatoda zeylanica
34 Begunia Tree Vitax negundo
35 Bela Tree Aegle marmelos
36 Benta Tree
37 Bhalia Tree Semecarpus anacardium
38 Bhendiya mardana Tree
39 Bherasunga Tree Murraya koengi
40 Bheroo Tree Swetina macrophylla
41 Bhooinimba Herb Andrographis paniculata
42 Bhooinkakharu Climber
43 Bhrungraj Herb Wedelia calendula
44 Bhuinkhajuri Shrub
Copyright: People of Barapalli, Arjunpur, Balarampur, Kiyapalla and Panaspur and Vasundhara and Indian
Institute of Science
45 Bhurukundi Tree
46 Brahmi Grass
47 Chaakundi Tree
48 Chaaladhua Tree Enythrina stricta
49 Chakunda Tree Casia siamea
50 Chandan Tree Santalum album
51 Chara Tree Buchanania lanzan
52 Chatuari Climber
53 Chemani Climber
54 Chirugudia Climber
55 Chitaparu Herb Plumbago zeylanika
56 Dala singa Tree
57 Dhalaabegunia Shrub
58 Dhaman Tree Greura tiliaefolia
59 Dhanitiri Grass
60 Dhariti Grass
61 Dhaura Tree Annogeissus latifolia
62 Duba Ghasa Grass Cynodon dactylon
63 Eucalyptus Tree Eucalyptus spps
64 Gaikiria Climber
65 Gambhari Tree Gmelina arborea
66 Ganga siuli Tree Nyctanthes arborescens
67 Gandali Tree Sterculia urens
68 Gandha palasa Tree& Climber
69 Gandhana Tree & Shrub
70 Garagarra Shrub
71 Gayasa Herb Leucema leucocephala
72 Gharapudi Herb
73 Gheekuanri Herb Aloe vera
74 Gika Shrub Caesalpinia decapetala
75 Gohira Tree Acacia leucophylaea
76 Gohira Tree Acacia leucophloca
77 Gopa kanhu Climber
78 Guluchi Climber (Orchid) Tinospora cordifolia
79 Haragouri Climber
Copyright: People of Barapalli, Arjunpur, Balarampur, Kiyapalla and Panaspur and Vasundhara and Indian
Institute of Science
80 Harida Tree Terminalia chebula
81 Hartal Shrub
82 Hinjal Tree Baringtonia acutangula
83 Harh-Kacha Herb Acanthus ilicifolius
84 Indrajala Shrub Holarrhena antidysentrica
85 Indramaricha Herb
86 Ishwarajata Herb Uraria picta
87 Jada Tree
88 Jaisandha Tree
89 Jajangi Tree
90 Jammu Tree Szygium cumini
91 Jari Tree Ficus retusa
92 Jatajatia Shrub
93 Jharapana Tree
94 Jharajhampa Tree
95 Jhaun Tree Casuariana spp
96 Jhumpuri Shrub Streblus taxoides
97 Juahmari Herb
98 Kadamba Tree Anthocephalus cadamba
99 Kaindra Climber Abrus precatorius
100 Kainya Tree Tamarindus indica
101 Kaitha Tree Limonia acidisima
102 Kala begunia Shrub
103 Kalchua Tree Dispynes sylvatica
104 Kalibeti Creeper Anamirta coculus
105 Kamala gundi Tree Mallotus phillippinensis
106 Kanda Tree
107 Kandu alu Climber Atylosia cajanfolia
108 Kanisiri Grass
109 Kankanamali Tree
110 Kans Tree Hymenodictylon excelsum
111 Kanta koli Tree Flacourita indica
112 Karaba Climber Dioscorea pentaphylla
113 Karanj Tree Pongania pinata
114 Karikantia Shrub
Copyright: People of Barapalli, Arjunpur, Balarampur, Kiyapalla and Panaspur and Vasundhara and Indian
Institute of Science
115 Karuda Tree Chlorxdlylon sweitnia
116 Kashatandi Grass Saccharum spontaneum
117 Kasi Tree Bridellia retusa
118 Katakat Tree Pueraria tuberosa
119 Katha menjuati Shrub
120 Keli kadamba Tree
121 Kendu Tree Diospyros metanoxylon
122 Kerandakoli Herb Carissa carandas
123 Kesarqaia Herb
124 Ketaki Tree Ebenacea
125 Khair Tree Acacia catechu
126 Khakada Tree Casearia elliptica
127 Khalua Climber
128 Kharakhari Tree
129 Kharisiju Tree
130 Khira baincha Tree
131 Khira kanchini Herb
132 Khira koli Shrub Carissa spinarum
133 Khunta palasa Climber Butea superba
134 Kiya Shrub Smilax zeylanica
135 Kochila Tree Strychnosnux- vomica
136 Kota kolia Climber Caaesalpinia bondue
137 Kujala Tree Acacia catechu
138 Kumbhatua Shrub
139 Kumvi Tree Careya arorea
140 Kuradia Shrub
141 Kuruma Tree
142 Laajakoli Herb
143 Lal sweta gulubasa Tree
144 Lambaniswar Tree
145 Lankaamba Tree Anacardium occidental
146 Lekhankoli Tree Uvaria hamilton
147 Lembu Shrub
148 Leutia Herb
149 Maankada kendu Tree Dispyrus malabarica
Copyright: People of Barapalli, Arjunpur, Balarampur, Kiyapalla and Panaspur and Vasundhara and Indian
Institute of Science
Madanamastaka 150
Herb
151 Madarangaa Herb
152 Maha Shrub
153 Mahalimba Tree Melia composita
154 Maharadaa Tree
155 Mahula Tree Madhuca latifolia
156 Mai Tree Lannea coromandalica
157 Majurugodia Tree
158 Malanda Tree Adina cardifolia
159 Mandaara Tree
160 Manga Tree
161 Masaania Tree
162 Massu Tree
163 Mathura Tree
164 Matikinia Tree Mitragyna parvifloraa
165 Mayurchulia Herb
166 Naatagacha Climber
167 Naraguni Tree Atalantia monophylla
168 Naturi Climber
169 Nila ghasa Grass
170 Olua Herb
171 Paaladhva Tree Erythrina variegata
172 Paatala garuda Herb Rauwolfia serpentina
173 Paatuli Tree Lagerstroemia reginae
174 Paga siju Shrub
175 Pagaairi Climber
176 Palasa Tree Butea monosperma
177 Panua lai Creeper
178 Pasaruni Creeper Paldinia scandens
179 Pathara giridhini Creeper
180 Phanphania Tree
181 Phasi Tree
182 Phirika Shrub
183 Pimpoli Herb
184 Pita gacha Shrub
Copyright: People of Barapalli, Arjunpur, Balarampur, Kiyapalla and Panaspur and Vasundhara and Indian
Institute of Science
185 Pita keruan Tree
186 Pitaalu Climber Dioscorea wallichi
188 Piya seal Tree Pterocarpus marsupium
189 Poichandi Tree
190 Rahana Tree
191 Rakta pitchi
192 Raktachi taparu Herb Plumbago rosea
193 Sadapa Tree
194 Saguan Tree Tectona grandis
195 Sahada Tree Streblus asper
196 Sahaja Tree
197 Sajana paturia Tree
198 Sal Tree Shorea robusta
199 Salpani Climber
200 Sidha Tree
201 Silai Climber Bauhinia vahilii
202 Simuli Tree Salmalia makbarica
203 Sirish Tree Albizzia lebbeck
204 Sishu Tree Dalbergia latifolia
205 Sunari Tree
206 Sweta gulubasa Tree
207 Sweta kaincha Climber Abrus precatorius
208 Sweta kaniari Tree
209 Sweta kanteikuli Shrub Zigiphus oenoplia
210 Sweta lajukuri Creeper
211 Sweta lal arakha Shrub Calotropis procera
212 Sweta Puruni Creeper
213 Tal Tree Barassus flabelifer
214 Tangini Tree Xyla dolabriformis
215 Thenta kusuma Tree
216 Tinia Tree Albizzia odoratisima
217 Tulasi Shrub
218 Tunda phada Climber
219 Tungaa Climber
Copyright: People of Barapalli, Arjunpur, Balarampur, Kiyapalla and Panaspur and Vasundhara and Indian
Institute of Science
Annexure-c.ii
L IS T O F A N IM A L F A U N A
SI No
Local Name Common English Name Scientific Name
01 B ad a B a g h a Tiger Panthera tigris tigris
02 B a g h a h a ta Leopard cat Felis berigalensis
03 B h a tia ( s m a l l & big)
04 B arha Indian wild boar Sus scrofa cristatus
05 B ajrakap ta Indian pangolin scaly anteater Manis crassicaudats aurita
06 B ad a b ha lu Sloth bear Melursus ursinus ursinus
07 B an a b h u a Jungle cat Felis chaus
08 G u nd uch i m usa Fine striped palm squirrel Funambulus pennanti
09 G adh ia Striped hyaena Hyaena hyaena hyaena
10 G ayala Indian Bison, Gaur Bos gauras gauras
11 G urandi Indian Charotain Tragulus meminna
12 G ada bh alu (sm all) Ratel, Honey badger Mellivora capensis
13 H arina Black buck, Indian antelope Antilope cemicapra
14 Jh inka Indian porcupine Hystrix indica indica 15 K urunga (kutura) Muntjac, Barking deer, Muntiacus muntjak
16 K arlapa tu ria b ag ha Leopard, Panther Panthera pardus
17 K okisiali Indian fox Vulpes bangalenses
18 M usa Bandicoot rat Bandicoot indica
19 M iriga
20 N epali neula Common mongoose Herpestes edwardsi
21 O d ha Smooth Indian otter Lutra perspicillata
22 Saliapatin i Small Indian civet Viverricula indica .
23 Sambar Sambar Cervus unicolor miger
24 Sindhua
Copyright: People of Barapalli, Arjunpur, Balarampur, Kiyapalla and Panaspur and Vasundhara and Indian
Institute of Science 25 T hekua Common Indian hare Lepus nigricollis
Annexure-c.iii
L IS T O F B IR D F A U N A S I N o Local Name C o m m o n E n g l i s h N a m e Scientific Name 1 B an a su a P a rro t
2 Bani C o m m o n m yna Acriddotheres tristis tristis
3 B ali sua L o rik ee t Loriculus vernalis
4 B an a ku k u d a R ed jung le fow l G allus gallus 5 B aia chata i W eaver b irds
6 B aga C o m m o n crane G ru s g ru s 7 B akua sun i
8 C hila E ag le
9 C h a n c h a n a T aw n y eag le A gu ila rapax 10 D ahuka W h ite -b re as ted w a te rh e n A m au ro rn is p h o e n ic u ru s 11 D am ara k au R a v e n C o rvu s corax 12 G o b o ra ch ad ei B u lb u l
13 G an d id ig an chade i
14 H uluhula
15 H alad i b asan ta O rio les
16 H atia guandu ri
17 H u n h u lia p echa B a rre d ju n g le O w le t G laucidium radiatum 18 H arad a ch ad ei C o m m o n g ree n p ig eo n T rero n p h o e n ico p b era 19 Koeli K o e l
20 K ajalpati D ro n g o s
21 K ua H o u s e c ro w C o rv u s sp le n d e n se sp len d en se 22 K arakhia
23 K aunjhara
24 K ochila khai C o m m o n g rey h o rab ill T o ck u s b iro str is 25 K anati chadei
26 K athahana M a h ra tta w o o d p e c k e r D e n d ro c o p o s m ah ra tte n s is 27 K opata S p o tte d d o v e S trep top elia ch in enesis 28 M ach h a ran k a B ro w n h e ad ed s to rk b illed
k ingfish er P ela rgo psis capensis
29 M ayura C o m m o n p e a fo w l P av o c ris ta tu s 30 P an ik u a L ittle co rm o ran t P halacrocorax n iger 31 P e c h a B a rn o w l T yto a lb a 32 P a n d u k a p a ta
33 P ara B lu e ro ck p ig e o n C olum ba livia 34 R aja ban i
Copyright: People of Barapalli, Arjunpur, Balarampur, Kiyapalla and Panaspur and Vasundhara and Indian
Institute of Science 35 S a g u n a V u ltu re
36 S u n a K ap a ta
37 T entei R e d -w a ttle d L a p w in g A nellus ind icus
Annexure-c. iv
IN V E N T O R Y O F R E P T IL E S
Sl No
Local Name Common English Name Scientific Name
1. A hiraja /S ankhachuda King cobra Ophiophagus hannah
2. A jagara Indian python cat snake Python molurus, Boiga
3. A ndua Common garden lizard Calotes versicolor
4. B oda Indian gamma Trigouata oligodorisp
5. C h a m p a n a ga
6. C h a m p ei n e u la Mabuya Mabuya ribro
7. C h a n d ra c h u d a
8. C h itra b o d a
9. D h am a n a
10. D h an da
11. Jhitipti Bark geco Hemidactylus leschenauli
12. K alakuta
13. K an da na liya
14. K ola th ia na ga
15. M atia bo da Rusell's viper Vipera ruselli
16. N au dankiya Common green whip snake Dryophisnastus
17. Pathuria C hiti
18. P o h a la a n d u a Indian chameleon Chameleon zeycaniene
19. R an a Banded krait Bungarus fasciatus
Copyright: People of Barapalli, Arjunpur, Balarampur, Kiyapalla and Panaspur and Vasundhara and Indian
Institute of Science
Annexure-c.v.
L IS T O F IN S E C T S
Sl No Local name Sl. No Local Name 1. Amba dahani 14. Mankadasa
2. Baghua mahumachi 15. Masa
3. Balijanda 16. Nikiti mahumachi
4. Binchani mahumachi 17. Patanga
5. Budhiani 18. Pimpudi
6. Chandrabali 19. Sadhaba bahu
7. Daunsa 20. Sambari
8. Guda poka 21. Sambula
9. Janda 22. Satapuri mahumachi
10. Jhinkari 23. Teluni kachara
11. Julujula 24. Tentuli bicha
12. Kankada bicha 25. Tinka
13. Machi 26.
LIST OF FISH FAUNA Sl. No Local Name Sl. No Local Name
1. Chenga 7. Kuchiya
2. Chingudi 8. Magura
3. Dandei 9. Mina
4. Gadissa 10. Pathara kankada
5. Kerandi 11. Sarana
6. Koi 12. Tudi
Copyright: People of Barapalli, Arjunpur, Balarampur, Kiyapalla and Panaspur and Vasundhara and Indian
Institute of Science
Copyright: People of Barapalli, Arjunpur, Balarampur, Kiyapalla and Panaspur and Vasundhara and Indian
Institute of Science
Copyright: People of Barapalli, Arjunpur, Balarampur, Kiyapalla and Panaspur and Vasundhara and Indian
Institute of Science
Copyright: People of Barapalli, Arjunpur, Balarampur, Kiyapalla and Panaspur and Vasundhara and Indian
Institute of Science
Copyright: People of Barapalli, Arjunpur, Balarampur, Kiyapalla and Panaspur and Vasundhara and Indian
Institute of Science
Copyright: People of Barapalli, Arjunpur, Balarampur, Kiyapalla and Panaspur and Vasundhara and Indian
Institute of Science
NEED
The committee permits Headloading fuelwood, an occupation of the poorest
After a decade of forest protection the Dhani people have been able to allow the poorest
among them to earn their upkeep from headloading fuelwood for sale. The forest are now
strong enough to provide their needs. Cycle loading, however, is strictly prohibited. A cycle
load is roughly thrice a headload and cycle loading means greater impact on the forest but a
lesser number of beneficiaries. The verdict is clear. Poverty can be a license for forest
based employment but one should never try to make too much out of that license.
Identifying the thin line between need and greed and keeping a check on the latter is
the key to better resource use.
Copyright: People of Barapalli, Arjunpur, Balarampur, Kiyapalla and Panaspur and Vasundhara and Indian
Institute of Science
GREED
Too much is too BAD ! This man was caught and fined for cycle loading
Copyright: People of Barapalli, Arjunpur, Balarampur, Kiyapalla and Panaspur and Vasundhara and Indian
Institute of Science
Copyright: People of Barapalli, Arjunpur, Balarampur, Kiyapalla and Panaspur and Vasundhara and Indian
Institute of Science
Forests for Shelter
The village school's asbestos roof came from the Village Forest Fund !
The forest have contributed to the setting up of a sizable common fund. Money from this
has gone in to various developmental activities like improving the school building.
The school has been a hub of environmental discussions, rallies and seminars. The children
of Dhani are thus initiated early in to the movement for a better environment in general
and better forests in particular.
The village milk cooperative started through the efforts of the forest committee. The
villagers have been trying to find out alternatives to forest based employment. The villagers
are also trying to provide the poorer people with cows through various Government
schemes.
Forests ensure the flow of streams and a flood of milk !
Copyright: People of Barapalli, Arjunpur, Balarampur, Kiyapalla and Panaspur and Vasundhara and Indian
Institute of Science
Copyright: People of Barapalli, Arjunpur, Balarampur, Kiyapalla and Panaspur and Vasundhara and Indian
Institute of Science
Community Enterprise. Most NTFP related activities are done in groups ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Non timber forest produce (NTFPs) constitute a profitable and sustainable use of
forests. NTFP income has typically gone augment the incomes of the poorest people and
contributed to improved income distribution. Better processing and marketing hold the key to
their emergence as a much more powerful source of income generation for the poor.
NTFP processing is mostly done by women. All the women of a family work together on
NTFP processing. Small girls learn skills very early in life. Younger boys also pitch in
sometimes but mostly not after they grow up. NTFP processing activities also ensure
that even older people are able to work and contribute to the family income, thus