Top Banner

of 48

Conditional Measurements in Cavity QED

Apr 05, 2018

Download

Documents

aspgar
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
  • 7/31/2019 Conditional Measurements in Cavity QED

    1/48

    Conditional Measurements in cavityQED

    Luis A. Orozco

    Joint Quantum InstituteDepartment of Physics

  • 7/31/2019 Conditional Measurements in Cavity QED

    2/48

    University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland:Matthew L. TerracianoRebecca OlsonDavid Norris

    Jietai Jing

    Miami University, Oxford, Ohio:Perry Rice

    James Clemens

    University of Auckland, New ZealandHoward J. Carmichael

    Work supported by:National Science Foundation, National Institute of Standards andTechnology

  • 7/31/2019 Conditional Measurements in Cavity QED

    3/48

    Cavity QED:

    Quantum electrodynamics for pedestrians(Haroche). No need to renormalize. Only one mode

    of the electromagnetic field:

    ATOM(S) + CAVITY MODE

    Perturbative: dissipation >> coupling (Purcell)

    Non Perturbative: dissipation

  • 7/31/2019 Conditional Measurements in Cavity QED

    4/48

    v E d g =Coupling:

    eaPr Sed 02 / 32 / 1 96.555 ==

    d depends on the radial and angular parts of thewavefunctions of the electrons. For the D 2 lines

    in alkali (Rb) it is a few times a 0 (el radio deBohr radius) times the electric charge.

  • 7/31/2019 Conditional Measurements in Cavity QED

    5/48

  • 7/31/2019 Conditional Measurements in Cavity QED

    6/48

    How large is the electric field of a photon in an

    optical cavity as those from Maryland, CalTechor Garching?

    Electric field in a wall plug! ~ 100 V/cm

    It is possible to measure it!

  • 7/31/2019 Conditional Measurements in Cavity QED

    7/48

    ( )MHz3 2.6, 2,2

    2 / ,

    2 ,

    2

    g

    Cavity QED System

  • 7/31/2019 Conditional Measurements in Cavity QED

    8/48

    Jaynes-Cummings Model

    )(21 aaaa H c za

    +++ +++= g

    0,g

    How does a single atom interact with a single mode of theelectromagnetic field?

    1,,0, ge

    No interaction term:

    ground state

    degenerateexcited states

    With interaction term:

    0,g ground state

    ( )1,0,2

    1ge =

    excited states

  • 7/31/2019 Conditional Measurements in Cavity QED

    9/48

  • 7/31/2019 Conditional Measurements in Cavity QED

    10/48

    Dissipative Processes : Loss of a photon from the cavity due to imperfect mirrors.

    : Spontaneous emission from an atom inside the cavity tomodes other than the cavity mode.

    Be careful about impedance matching!

    Dissipation is not always bad. Cavity loss allows us to look inside of the cavity to study the dynamics of the system.

    Can we use spontaneous emission in the same way?

  • 7/31/2019 Conditional Measurements in Cavity QED

    11/48

    eqg

    g pq

    eg

    ggss ,12

    ,22

    ,02

    ,1,022

    ++=

    ),,( and ),,( , gqqg p pa ===

    A photodetection collapses the steady state into thefollowing non-steady state from which the system evolves.

    eqg

    g pqga collapsess ,02

    ,1,0 +=

    ( ) ( ) ( )[ ] 221 ,0,1,0 Oe f g f g +++=

    Conditional dynamics from the system wavefunction

    Field Atomic Polarization

  • 7/31/2019 Conditional Measurements in Cavity QED

    12/48

    Intensity correlation function measurements:

    2)2(

    )(

    )()()(

    t I

    t I t I g

    +=

    Gives the probability of detecting a photon attime t + given that one was detected at time t .This is a conditional measurement:

    I

    I g c

    )()()2(

    =

  • 7/31/2019 Conditional Measurements in Cavity QED

    13/48

  • 7/31/2019 Conditional Measurements in Cavity QED

    14/48

  • 7/31/2019 Conditional Measurements in Cavity QED

    15/48

  • 7/31/2019 Conditional Measurements in Cavity QED

    16/48

  • 7/31/2019 Conditional Measurements in Cavity QED

    17/48

  • 7/31/2019 Conditional Measurements in Cavity QED

    18/48

  • 7/31/2019 Conditional Measurements in Cavity QED

    19/48

  • 7/31/2019 Conditional Measurements in Cavity QED

    20/48

  • 7/31/2019 Conditional Measurements in Cavity QED

    21/48

  • 7/31/2019 Conditional Measurements in Cavity QED

    22/48

  • 7/31/2019 Conditional Measurements in Cavity QED

    23/48

  • 7/31/2019 Conditional Measurements in Cavity QED

    24/48

  • 7/31/2019 Conditional Measurements in Cavity QED

    25/48

  • 7/31/2019 Conditional Measurements in Cavity QED

    26/48

    7 663 536 starts 1 838 544 stops

  • 7/31/2019 Conditional Measurements in Cavity QED

    27/48

    Exchange of excitation:

    Coupled system, maybe entanglement.

  • 7/31/2019 Conditional Measurements in Cavity QED

    28/48

    Classically g(2)

    (0)> g(2

    )() and also |g(2)

    (0)-1|> |g(2

    )()-1|

    antibunched

    Non-classical

  • 7/31/2019 Conditional Measurements in Cavity QED

    29/48

  • 7/31/2019 Conditional Measurements in Cavity QED

    30/48

    Pushed MOT Apparatus

    Magneto-optical trap of 85Rb atoms

    N ~ 10 8 atoms.

    Loading time ~ 50 200 ms. Launched toward the cavity with a resonant

    push beam.

  • 7/31/2019 Conditional Measurements in Cavity QED

    31/48

  • 7/31/2019 Conditional Measurements in Cavity QED

    32/48

    LVIS

    Atom beamAPD

    A PD

    PBS

    B

    Probe

    Drive the cavity with linearly ( ) polarized light.Light emitted in orthogonal direction mustcome from a spontaneous emission.

    Separate the output into two polarizationsto distinguish spontaneous emission from

    cavity drive.

    Experimental Schematic

  • 7/31/2019 Conditional Measurements in Cavity QED

    33/48

    Atomic structure of Rb atoms. Quite different from 2 levels.

  • 7/31/2019 Conditional Measurements in Cavity QED

    34/48

    Atom transit data,

    measured with APD

  • 7/31/2019 Conditional Measurements in Cavity QED

    35/48

  • 7/31/2019 Conditional Measurements in Cavity QED

    36/48

  • 7/31/2019 Conditional Measurements in Cavity QED

    37/48

  • 7/31/2019 Conditional Measurements in Cavity QED

    38/48

  • 7/31/2019 Conditional Measurements in Cavity QED

    39/48

    If the steady state wave function is separable then we should be ableto write the wave function as a product state:

    AC SS =

    ( ) ( eC gC D D D eg +++= 210 210

    ee Ae Ag Ae Ag AgeeegegSS

    01201001201

    +++++=

    If we let A 1G = D 1, A 2g = D 2, and A 0e = C e, then the followingcondition must be satisfied for a product state: A 1e = D 1CE = A OeA1g

    If this is not true There is entanglement!

  • 7/31/2019 Conditional Measurements in Cavity QED

    40/48

  • 7/31/2019 Conditional Measurements in Cavity QED

    41/48

    LVIS ( Low Velocity Intense Source)

    Continuous source of cold atoms ~ 1 atom in cavity at all times! Similar to MOT but with a retro optic in the vacuum with a hole for

    extracting a beam of atoms. Can be pulsed by plugging hole in retro optic with a MOT beam and

    unplugging after a MOT forms.

  • 7/31/2019 Conditional Measurements in Cavity QED

    42/48

    Autocorrelation of Fluorescence Mode

    Traditional Correlation Measurement

    Conditional Average on Oscilloscope

    2

    )2( )0()()()0()( =+

    ++

    bb

    bbbb FFg

  • 7/31/2019 Conditional Measurements in Cavity QED

    43/48

    Quantum Trajectory Theory

    15 photons in driven mode

  • 7/31/2019 Conditional Measurements in Cavity QED

    44/48

  • 7/31/2019 Conditional Measurements in Cavity QED

    45/48

  • 7/31/2019 Conditional Measurements in Cavity QED

    46/48

  • 7/31/2019 Conditional Measurements in Cavity QED

    47/48

    Concurrence Measurements

  • 7/31/2019 Conditional Measurements in Cavity QED

    48/48