Top Banner
Computerized Physician Order Entry: a focus on medication prescription Nicolette de Keizer & Saeid Eslami Dept Medical Informatics University of Amsterdam
32

Computerized Physician Order Entry: a focus on medication prescription Nicolette de Keizer & Saeid Eslami Dept Medical Informatics University of Amsterdam.

Dec 11, 2015

Download

Documents

Declan Cregg
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Computerized Physician Order Entry: a focus on medication prescription Nicolette de Keizer & Saeid Eslami Dept Medical Informatics University of Amsterdam.

Computerized Physician Order Entry: a focus on medication prescription

Nicolette de Keizer & Saeid EslamiDept Medical InformaticsUniversity of Amsterdam

Page 2: Computerized Physician Order Entry: a focus on medication prescription Nicolette de Keizer & Saeid Eslami Dept Medical Informatics University of Amsterdam.

Outline

Definition and context Advantages of CPOE Disadvantages of CPOE Outcome measures and examples Same system other outcome

Page 3: Computerized Physician Order Entry: a focus on medication prescription Nicolette de Keizer & Saeid Eslami Dept Medical Informatics University of Amsterdam.

What is Computerized Physician Order Entry (CPOE)?

Ordering of tests, medications, and treatments for patient care using computers

Involves electronic communication of the orders

Often use rules-based methods for checking appropriateness of care

Page 4: Computerized Physician Order Entry: a focus on medication prescription Nicolette de Keizer & Saeid Eslami Dept Medical Informatics University of Amsterdam.

CPOE, EHR and DSS

EHR

Documentation

Medication

Test reports (EKG, PFT)Radiology, lab results

CPOE

DSS

Page 5: Computerized Physician Order Entry: a focus on medication prescription Nicolette de Keizer & Saeid Eslami Dept Medical Informatics University of Amsterdam.

CPOE

Has a positive influence on patients’ outcome

Has a negative influence on patients’ outcome

Page 6: Computerized Physician Order Entry: a focus on medication prescription Nicolette de Keizer & Saeid Eslami Dept Medical Informatics University of Amsterdam.

CPOE Advantages

Automate ordering process Reduces Order Errors

Standardized, legible complete orders

DSS/Alerts Data collected on variances in

practice

Page 7: Computerized Physician Order Entry: a focus on medication prescription Nicolette de Keizer & Saeid Eslami Dept Medical Informatics University of Amsterdam.

Case Example

Metformin is prescribed to a patient with an elevated creatinine level. A drug-lab interaction alert warns that

use of this medication could result in an increased risk of fatal lactic acidosis.

Page 8: Computerized Physician Order Entry: a focus on medication prescription Nicolette de Keizer & Saeid Eslami Dept Medical Informatics University of Amsterdam.

Case Example

A physician prescribes warfarin for a patient with chronic atrial fibrillation.

System: vitamin K rich food likely to interfere with

the efficacy of the drug. Specific patient information

Page 9: Computerized Physician Order Entry: a focus on medication prescription Nicolette de Keizer & Saeid Eslami Dept Medical Informatics University of Amsterdam.

Example DSS in CPOE – medication prescription

Allergy Age (check drug name and dose) Duplicate drugs on active orders,

not one-time Severe drug interactions

Drug-drug, drug-food Dose maximum Drugs with opposite actions

Page 10: Computerized Physician Order Entry: a focus on medication prescription Nicolette de Keizer & Saeid Eslami Dept Medical Informatics University of Amsterdam.

CPOE Disadvantages

Errors still possible Alerts Multiple steps Access

Page 11: Computerized Physician Order Entry: a focus on medication prescription Nicolette de Keizer & Saeid Eslami Dept Medical Informatics University of Amsterdam.

PubMed indexed papers on CPOE

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

<2000 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006

no. of papers

Page 12: Computerized Physician Order Entry: a focus on medication prescription Nicolette de Keizer & Saeid Eslami Dept Medical Informatics University of Amsterdam.

CPOE

Has a positive influence on patients’ outcome

Has a negative influence on patients’ outcome

On which outcome measure?

Page 13: Computerized Physician Order Entry: a focus on medication prescription Nicolette de Keizer & Saeid Eslami Dept Medical Informatics University of Amsterdam.

Outcome measures

Adherence to guideline Alerts - user response Time Safety

Medication errors ADEs (mortality)

Cost and Efficiency Medication costs Pharmacists interventions

Satisfaction, usage and usability

Page 14: Computerized Physician Order Entry: a focus on medication prescription Nicolette de Keizer & Saeid Eslami Dept Medical Informatics University of Amsterdam.
Page 15: Computerized Physician Order Entry: a focus on medication prescription Nicolette de Keizer & Saeid Eslami Dept Medical Informatics University of Amsterdam.

Example CPOE improves adherence to guideline

Teich JM et al. Arch Intern Med. 2000 Oct 9;160(18):2713-4.

Page 16: Computerized Physician Order Entry: a focus on medication prescription Nicolette de Keizer & Saeid Eslami Dept Medical Informatics University of Amsterdam.

Example CPOE reduce errors

Potts studied ADE rates in 13,828 medication orders before/after CPOE implementation at Vanderbilt Children’s PICU:

Potts AL, Barr FE, et al. Pediatrics. 2004 Jan;113(1 Pt 1):59-63.

Page 17: Computerized Physician Order Entry: a focus on medication prescription Nicolette de Keizer & Saeid Eslami Dept Medical Informatics University of Amsterdam.

• Brigham and Womens' Hospital, Boston introduced a CPOE

• After implementation, the rate of intercepted Adverse Drug Events (ADE) doubled!

• Reason: The system allowed to easily order much too large dosages of potassium chloride without clear indicating that it be given in divided doses.

• Bates et al The impact of computerized physician order entry on medication error prevention. JAMIA 1999, 6(4), 313-21.

Example CPOE introduces errors

pre period1 period2 period3

Potential ADEs/1000 pt-days

15.8 31.3 59.4 0.5

Page 18: Computerized Physician Order Entry: a focus on medication prescription Nicolette de Keizer & Saeid Eslami Dept Medical Informatics University of Amsterdam.

Example CPOE introduces errors

Association with increased PICU mortality: 2.8% 14 months before CPOE 6.4% 5 months after CPOE

Han YY, Carcillo JA, et al. Pediatrics. 2005 Dec;116(6):1506-12.

Page 19: Computerized Physician Order Entry: a focus on medication prescription Nicolette de Keizer & Saeid Eslami Dept Medical Informatics University of Amsterdam.

Example CPOE reduce costs

Cost: $3.7 million

implementation $ 600,000 to $1.1

million operational costs

Results: Decreased drug costs ADE cost is

approximately $4,700

Brigham and Women’s Experience: Cost-Effective

Kausal R et al. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2006; 13(3): 365-7

Page 20: Computerized Physician Order Entry: a focus on medication prescription Nicolette de Keizer & Saeid Eslami Dept Medical Informatics University of Amsterdam.

CPOE and cost

Huge variation in actual costs based on hospital size and complexity of system Hardware and Software: $1-$5 million Staff training Ongoing maintenance Total costs for large, fully integrated

systems could be up to $60 million Costs will decrease when DSS is

geared to cost reduction

Page 21: Computerized Physician Order Entry: a focus on medication prescription Nicolette de Keizer & Saeid Eslami Dept Medical Informatics University of Amsterdam.

Usability Problems

Potential selection errors Similar medication names Similar patient names Overly trust default values

Influence workflow and communication Physician resistance

Frequent data entry required Must not require additional time Most decision-support steps must be turned off

to encourage use “Not-invented-here” syndrome

Page 22: Computerized Physician Order Entry: a focus on medication prescription Nicolette de Keizer & Saeid Eslami Dept Medical Informatics University of Amsterdam.

• Health information systems has to deal with the actors, the artefacts, and their interaction.

CPOE as a Sociotechnical intervention

CPOE =socio-technical systems

Page 23: Computerized Physician Order Entry: a focus on medication prescription Nicolette de Keizer & Saeid Eslami Dept Medical Informatics University of Amsterdam.

Same system other outcome

Upperman vs. Han same hospital: Pittsburgh Childrens

Hospital other outcome measure: ADE vs mortality

Han vs. Del Beccaro Same CPOE Different hospitals Same outcome measure (mortality)

Upperman et al. J Pediar Surg. 2005;40:57–59; Han et al. Pediatrics. 2005 Dec;116(6):1506-12; Del Beccaro. Pediatrics 2006;118;290-295.

Page 24: Computerized Physician Order Entry: a focus on medication prescription Nicolette de Keizer & Saeid Eslami Dept Medical Informatics University of Amsterdam.

Upperman et alPre-CPOE Post-CPOE

Verbal order regulatory compliance

80% 95%*

All ADEs 0.3 0.37

Harmfull ADEs 0.05 0.03*

* p<0.05

Page 25: Computerized Physician Order Entry: a focus on medication prescription Nicolette de Keizer & Saeid Eslami Dept Medical Informatics University of Amsterdam.

Han et al

Pre-CPOE Post-CPOE

Mortality 2.80% 6.57%*

* p<0.05

Page 26: Computerized Physician Order Entry: a focus on medication prescription Nicolette de Keizer & Saeid Eslami Dept Medical Informatics University of Amsterdam.

Del Becarro et al

Pre-CPOE Post-CPOE

Mortality 4.22% 3.46%

Same results for:

• transported patients

• congenital cardiovascular disease patients

Page 27: Computerized Physician Order Entry: a focus on medication prescription Nicolette de Keizer & Saeid Eslami Dept Medical Informatics University of Amsterdam.

Upperman vs Han

Surrogate outcome measures such as medication errors and ADEs are not sufficient

More studies on mortality are necessary

Page 28: Computerized Physician Order Entry: a focus on medication prescription Nicolette de Keizer & Saeid Eslami Dept Medical Informatics University of Amsterdam.

Han vs. Del Beccaro

Methodological differences: Han used unbalanced before after

periods Del Beccaro did not correct for case

mix differences in before vs after period Populations Han vs. Del Beccaro were

not comparable

Page 29: Computerized Physician Order Entry: a focus on medication prescription Nicolette de Keizer & Saeid Eslami Dept Medical Informatics University of Amsterdam.

Han vs. Del Beccaro

Pittsburgh implemented too fast without pilot and usability testing: Order entry only allowed when patient

physically entered hospital All medication in central pharmacy Pharmacy processed order only after

complete activation by nurse Go live without necessary order sets

Page 30: Computerized Physician Order Entry: a focus on medication prescription Nicolette de Keizer & Saeid Eslami Dept Medical Informatics University of Amsterdam.

Han vs. Del Beccaro

Seattle hospital learned from Pittsburgh Factors influencing successful

implementation: response time and user time meeting information needs (e.g.using order

sets) multidimensional integration with workflow Involvement leaders, support staff, clinicians training improvement through evaluation and learning

Page 31: Computerized Physician Order Entry: a focus on medication prescription Nicolette de Keizer & Saeid Eslami Dept Medical Informatics University of Amsterdam.

Will a CPOE improve quality of care?

Yes if you implement it the right way!!

Page 32: Computerized Physician Order Entry: a focus on medication prescription Nicolette de Keizer & Saeid Eslami Dept Medical Informatics University of Amsterdam.

Successful CPOE implementation

Technical Infrastructure: EHR Drug information database DSS

Sociotechnical implementation strategy Usability pilots Teams of informaticians, physicians, nurses, clerks,

therapists Strong leader and good project management Training and support

R. Gardner: “implementation is 90% organizational and political and 10% technical”