Top Banner
Comparative Analysis Two Potential Sites for a New High School
18
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Comparative Analysis Two Potential Sites for a New High School.

Comparative AnalysisTwo Potential Sites for a New High School

Page 2: Comparative Analysis Two Potential Sites for a New High School.

Purpose of Focus Group

To gather input to guide the School Board in making a decision regarding the location of a new Woodland High School.

Page 3: Comparative Analysis Two Potential Sites for a New High School.

Process of Focus Group

The Charrette Protocol

1. Detailed Introduction of the Problem

2. Focusing Questions: “Ask & Answer”

3. Conversation on the Problem4. Debriefing: “What we heard”

Page 4: Comparative Analysis Two Potential Sites for a New High School.

The Problem

The School Board must decide where to locate a new Woodland High School.

There are two viable options.

The Board desires community input to help them decide.

Page 5: Comparative Analysis Two Potential Sites for a New High School.

Dike Access RoadExisting Campus

Two Options…

Page 6: Comparative Analysis Two Potential Sites for a New High School.

Existing Campus

Page 7: Comparative Analysis Two Potential Sites for a New High School.

Dike Access Road

Page 8: Comparative Analysis Two Potential Sites for a New High School.

Zoning and Regulatory Constraints

• Each site will be exposed to the normal regulatory agency oversight.

• The Dike Access Road site will have the additional scrutiny of the Corps of Engineers and Department of Ecology because of wetlands on the premises.

Page 9: Comparative Analysis Two Potential Sites for a New High School.

Geotechnical Conditions

• Both sites have less than optimal soils.

• The Dike Access Road site will probably require surcharging and mass grading that the existing campus may not.

• Further investigation will be needed during the design process.

Page 10: Comparative Analysis Two Potential Sites for a New High School.

Wetlands

• Wetlands cover 4.97 acres plus buffers on the Dike Access Road site. They must be built around or mitigated off-site.– Off-site mitigation will increase costs.– On-site mitigation limits available land for

future expansion

• The existing campus appears to have no such constraints.

Page 11: Comparative Analysis Two Potential Sites for a New High School.

Utility Infrastructure

• Each site will require the extension of existing utility lines including water & electricity.

• Initial conversations with city officials indicate the Dike Access Road site may be more costly because of the off-site utility construction.

• The existing campus may require the replacement of one or two existing sanitary sewer pump stations.

• The Dike Access Road site may be more conducive to sharing utility costs with development on adjacent properties.

Page 12: Comparative Analysis Two Potential Sites for a New High School.

Roads, Parking and Traffic

• The Dike Access Road site will require more extensive off-site road and frontage improvements than the existing campus.

• The Dike Access Road site allows for the possibility of sharing some costs with neighboring properties that are also under construction.

Page 13: Comparative Analysis Two Potential Sites for a New High School.

Reuse of Existing Facilities

• Building on the existing campus will allow for the option to reuse certain existing facilities such as the performing arts center, track, fields and parking.

• Building on the Dike Access Road site will allow for the continued use of the existing student transportation (school bus) facility.

Page 14: Comparative Analysis Two Potential Sites for a New High School.

Future Construction Expansion

• The Dike Access Road site offers the possibility of expansion in the future for additional buildings such as a new stadium.

• Building on the existing site will limit the opportunities for future expansion as Woodland schools grow.

Page 15: Comparative Analysis Two Potential Sites for a New High School.

Site Planning Constraints

• The primary planning constraints at the Dike Access Road site are related to the mitigation of wetlands and poor soil conditions.

• The primary planning constraints at the existing campus are related to the relocation and building of a new transportation center.

Page 16: Comparative Analysis Two Potential Sites for a New High School.

Projected Development Schedule

• The development of a new high school on the Dike Access Road site would take approximately 48 months; 6 months longer than the existing site due to the wetlands entitlement process and site surcharging requirements.

• Development on the existing campus would take approximately 42 months

Page 17: Comparative Analysis Two Potential Sites for a New High School.

Operating Considerations

• Building on the existing campus would require no modifications to the current transportation system or school bell schedules.

• Building on the Dike Access Road Site would require one of two primary options, both generate additional operating costs:– Modification of bell schedules to allow busses to

route from the current campus.

– A two-tier bus schedule, where busses run one route for primary and middle School Students and one route for intermediate school and high school students.

Page 18: Comparative Analysis Two Potential Sites for a New High School.

Current Site Dike Access Road Site

(In millions)

Basic Construction Cost: $ 43.0 $ 45.5

Grading, soils, wetlands: $ 0.0 $ 2.0

Stadium Upgrades/Options: $ 3.0 $ 0.95

Offsite Improvements: $ 1.4 $ 2.25

Rebuild Transportation Center: $ 1.9 $ 0.0Improvements to existing middle/high school facilities:

$ 1.5 $ 1.5

Development Costs: $18.0 $ 18.75

Less estimated state funding: ($ 13.0) ($ 13.0)

Estimated Local Cost: $55.8 $ 57.95

Cost Comparison