Community Profile 2013 Tulsa County

COMMUNITY PROFILE 2013TULSA COUNTY

Commissioned by the Metropolitan Human Services Commission

Prepared by the Community Service CouncilJanuary 2013

TULSA COUNTY

Demographic Trends Economics and Employment Health Indicators

Dem

og

rap

hic

s

DEMOGRAPHIC TRENDS

DEMOGRAPHIC TRENDS

Population change--migration to suburban areas of Tulsa and Oklahoma City MSA with an overall decrease in new births

Age--aging population Race and ethnicity--more culturally

diverse Living arrangements--transitional for

family living arrangement

Dem

og

rap

hic

s

Dem

og

rap

hic

s

Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa

Population Trends for Total Population and Under Age 5Tusla County, 1980 through 2030

Source: US Census Bureau, 1980, 1990, 2000, & 2010 Censuses; Population Estimates Program.

1980 1990 2000 2010 2011(est.)

2020(proj.)

2030(proj.)

0

100,000

200,000

300,000

400,000

500,000

600,000

700,000

Under age 5 36,714 38,835 41,434 44,711 45,795 41,651 41,573

Total Population 470,593 503,341 563,299 603,403 610,599 631,433 658,541


Dem

og

rap

hic

sRace Comparison for Total Population and Children under 5

Oklahoma and Tulsa County, 2010

Source: US Census Bureau, 2010 Census.

59.3%

8.2%11.0%

1.6%

19.8%54.9%

12.6%

7.3%

2.5%

22.8%

72.2%

7.4%

8.6%

1.7%

10.1%

69.2%

10.7%

6.0%

2.3%

11.7%

White Black American Indian Asian Other/2+ races

Oklahoma Tulsa County

Under 5

Total Population

N = 591,982

N = 48,035N = 266,547

N = 3,642,361

Hispanic16.8%

Hispanic20.6%

Hispanic8.9%

Hispanic11.0%


Population Trends and Projections by Age GroupTulsa County, 1970 - 2030

Source: US Census Bureau, 1970, 1980, 1990, 2000, & 2010 Censuses; US Census Bureau, Population Estimates Division, Population Projections, 2000 - 2030.

6.3

6.6

7.4

7.4

7.7

7.7

8.5

16.6

17.1

18.2

18.9

18.4

19.8

25.9

9.2

9.7

9.7

10

10.1

13.5

10.7

47.8

50.5

52.6

51.9

52.2

49.1

46.2

17.5

14.1

10.4

10.4

10.4

9

8.1

2030

2020

2010

2000

1990

1980

1970

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Percent of population

0-4 5-17 18-24 25-64 65-84 85+

1.9

1.4

1.2

.9

.6

Pr o

ject

ions 2.5

2.1

Dem

ogra

phic

s


Living Arrangements of Related Children Under 18Tulsa County, 1970, 1980, 1990, 2000 & 2009-11 Estimates

Source: US Census Bureau, 1970, 1980, 1990, and 2000 Censuses; US Census Bureau, American Community Survey 2009-11.

Married Couple Male-headed Female-headed Other relatives0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100% 1970 1980 1990 2000 2009-11 est.

1970 82% 1% 11% 4%

1980 74% 2% 16% 6%

1990 71% 3% 18% 5%

2000 65% 5% 21% 7%

2009-11 est. 60% 6% 24% 8%

Children living with 1 or both parents

Dem

ogra

phic

s

ECONOMICS AND EMPLOYMENT

Ratio of Income to Poverty LevelPercentage of Total Population and Children

Tulsa County, 2007-11

Source: US Census Bureau, 2007-11 American Community Survey.

Total population Under 18 Under 6 6-170%

25%

50%

75%

Percentage of population

Below 100% Below 185% Below 200%

Below 100% 15.1% 22.6% 27% 20.2%

Below 185% 32.4% 43.7% 50.1% 40.2%

Below 200% 35.2% 46.8% 53.1% 43.4%

EC

ON

OM

ICS

& E

MP

LO

YM

EN

T

Family of Three, Tulsa County, 2012*

Source: Oklahoma Association of Community Action Agencies and the Oklahoma Asset Building Coalition, December 2009, The Self-Sufficiency Standard for Oklahoma 2009; 2012 HHS Poverty Guidelines, Federal Register, Vol. 77, No. 17, January 26, 2012, pp. 4034-4035; Oklahoma State Dept. of Human Services; U.S. Census Bureau, 2009-11 American Community Survey.

$75,495

$58,854

$38,277

$10,309$15,312

$19,090

$35,317

$21,410

WelfareWage

MinimumWage

PovertyWage

185% PovertyWage

Median FamilyIncome

(2006-08 ACS)

$0

$20,000

$40,000

$60,000

$80,000Annual Wage

Self-Sufficiency Wage = $39,978 ($18.93/hr)

Comparison of Wages: Self-Sufficiency, Welfare, Minimum, Poverty, 185% of Poverty, and Median Family Income

($4.88/hr) ($7.25/hr) ($9.04/hr) ($16.72/hr)

Notes: For the self-sufficiency wage, family of three consists of one adult, one preschooler and one schoolage child. Hourly wages given assume full-time, year-round employment. The 2009 poverty guidelines are being used until at least March 1, 2010. Welfare wage is the combined value of TANF, SNAP, & WIC.

Married-couple families w/ children <18($35.75/hr)

All families w/ children <18

Male-headed families w/ children <18

Female-headed families w/ children <18

($18.12/hr)

($27.87/hr)

($10.14/hr)

Eco

nom

ics

& E

mp

loym

en

t

Participation in Public Assistance ProgramsNumber of Participants and Percentage of Population Participating

Tulsa County, 2012

Source: Oklahoma Dept. of Human Services, Statistical Bulletin, September 2012; Oklahoma State Dept. of Education, Low Income Report for 2011-12; US Census Bureau, 2010 Census; Oklahoma State Department of Health-WIC Service, Caseload Report, October 2012; Oklahoma Health Care Authority, Monthly Enrollment Fast Facts November 2012.

121,054

79,699

3,974

8,854

3,485

85,722

2,581

35,153

6,116

19.8%

51.2%

17.4%

18.1%

10.1%

13.9%

1.7%

53.1%

9.2%

Soonercare Total (185%/100%)

Soonercare <19 (185%)

WIC Infants (185%)

WIC age 1-5 (185%)

Child Care Subsidy <5 (185%)

SNAP Total (130%)

TANF <18 (50%)

Elem. School Free Lunch (130%)

Elem. School Reduced Lunch (185%)

050,000100,000150,000

Number of Participants

0% 20% 40% 60%

Percent of Population

Eco

nom

ics

& E

mp

loym

en

t


Educational Attainment for Persons Age 25 & OlderTulsa County, 2009-11 Estimates

Source: US Census Bureau, American Community Survey 2009-11.

11.5%

26.2%

24.7%

8.2%

20.1%

6.3%

2.1%

0.9%

Less than high school

High school graduate

Some college

Associate degree

Bachelor's degree

Master's degree

Professional school degree

Doctorate degree

0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30%

Percent of persons 25+

Eco

nom

ics

& E

mp

loym

en

t


Unemployment RatesTulsa County and Tulsa MSA, 1990 - 2012

Source: U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics.

1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Sept. 2012

0.0

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

6.0

7.0

8.0

Tulsa Co. 4.3 5.1 5.6 6.1 5.4 4.0 3.3 3.4 3.2 3.4 2.8 3.3 5.0 6.0 4.9 4.2 3.9 3.9 3.6 6.8 7.5 6.7 5.2

Tulsa MSA 4.8 5.7 6.0 6.4 5.8 4.4 3.6 3.7 3.6 3.5 2.9 3.4 5.0 6.1 5.1 4.4 4.0 4.0 3.7 7.1 7.7 6.9 5.3

Eco

nom

ics

& E

mp

loym

en

t

CHILD INDICATORS

WHY ARE CHILDREN AT RISK?

Lack of health insurance Limited access to preventative

services Living in high risk families Living in a state with a high level of

premature death


Ch

ild In

dic

ato

rs

THE ADVERSE CHILDHOOD EXPERIENCES (ACE) STUDY

Major American research project that poses the question of whether and how childhood experiences affect adult health decades later

Provides compelling evidence that: Adverse childhood experiences are surprisingly common ACE’s happen even in “the best of families” ACE’s have long-term, damaging consequences

Findings reveal powerful relationships between emotional experiences as children and physical and mental health as adults

Source: The Adverse Childhood Experiences Study website: www.acestudy.org, “About the Adverse Childhood Experiences Study.”

Ch

ild In

dic

ato

rs

THE ADVERSE CHILDHOOD EXPERIENCES (ACE) STUDY PYRAMID

Early Death

Disease, Disability and Social Problems

Adoption of Health-

risk

Behaviors

Social, Emotional and

Cognitive

Impairment

Disrupted Neurodevelopment

Adverse Childhood Experiences

Ch

ild In

dic

ato

rs

Conception

Death

Mechanisms by which Adverse Childhood Experiences Influence Health and Well-being throughout the Lifespan

Source: The Adverse Childhood Experiences Study website: www.acestudy.org, “About the Adverse Childhood Experiences Study.”

ADVERSE CHILDHOOD EXPERIENCES…

Recurrent physical abuse

Recurrent emotional abuse

Sexual abuse An alcohol or drug

abuser An incarcerated

household member

Someone who is chronically depressed, suicidal, institutionalized or mentally ill

Mother being treated violently

One or no parents Emotional or

physical neglectSource: The Adverse Childhood Experiences Study website: www.acestudy.org, “What are Adverse Childhood Experieinces (ACE’s).”

Ch

ild In

dic

ato

rs

…GROWING UP IN A HOUSEHOLD WITH:

…LEAD TO HEALTH-RISK BEHAVIORS…

Smoking Overeating Physical inactivity Heavy alcohol use Drug use Promiscuity

Source: The Adverse Childhood Experiences Study website: www.acestudy.org

Ch

ild In

dic

ato

rs

…WHICH CAUSE DISEASE, DISABILITY AND SOCIAL PROBLEMS IN ADULTHOOD

Heart disease Cancer Chronic lung and

liver disease Stroke Diabetes Sexually transmitted

diseases

Nicotine addiction Alcoholism Drug addiction Obesity Depression Suicide Injuries Unintentional

pregnancy

Source: Felitti, Vincent J., “The Relationship of Adverse Childhood Experiences to Adult Health: Turning gold into lead;” CDC Media Relations, May 14, 1998, “Adult Health Problems Linked to Traumatic Childhood Experiences.”

Ch

ild In

dic

ato

rs

Ch

ild In

dic

ato

rs


Summary of Risk Factors for InfantsTulsa County and Oklahoma, 2008

Source: Oklahoma State Department of Health, Vital Statistics.

12%

43.9%

8%

23.2%

7%

1.8%

31.5%

17.6%

12.2%

13.7%

42.3%

5.4%

21.4%

6.9%

1.4%

34.8%

20.5%

11%

Teen mother(age 15-19)

Unmarried mother

Poor prenatal care(3rd trimester/no care)

Mother w/ <12th gradeeducation

Low birthweight(1500-2499 grams)

Very low birthweight(<1500 grams)

Short birth spacing(<24 mos. apart)

Very short birth spacing(<18 mos. apart)

Premature(<37 weeks gest.)

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50%

Percent of Births

Tulsa Co.

Oklahoma

Tulsa County births: 9,530 Oklahoma births: 54,753

Ch

ild In

dic

ato

rs


Characteristics of Births to Teen Mothers (Age 15-19)Tulsa County and Oklahoma, 2008


87.7%

10.4%

59%

7.7%

2%

61.1%

39.9%

12.3%

20.9%

2.8%

81.6%

7.1%

54.1%

7.9%

1.8%

67.6%

46.9%

11.6%

20.8%

3.6%

Unmarried

Poor prenatal care(3rd trimester/no care)

Mother w/ <12th gradeeducation

Low birthweight(1500-2499 grams)

Very low birthweight(<1500 grams)

Short birth spacing(<24 mos. apart)

Very short birth spacing(<18 mos. apart)

Premature(<37 weeks gest.)

1+ previous births

2+ previous births

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Percent of Teen Births

Tulsa Co.

Oklahoma

Tulsa County births to teens: 1,152Tulsa County teen birth rate: 60.3 (per 100,000 females age 15-19)

Oklahoma births to teens: 7,492Oklahoma teen birth rate: 61.6 (per 100,000 females age 15-19)


Resident Births to Teens Age 15-17 and 18-19Tulsa County, 1980, 1990, 2000 and 2008


1980 1990 2000 20080

250

500

750

1,000

Number of births

0

40

80

120

160Specific birth rate

Births 15-17 547 385 419 376

Births 18-19 897 810 858 776

Birth rate 15-17 48.5 38.6 35.2 31.1

Birth rate 18-19 106.4 119.2 108 110.3

Note: Specific birth rate is the number of births to females in specified age group per 1,000 females in age group.

Ch

ild In

dic

ato

rs


Infant Mortality RatesTulsa County and Oklahoma, 1980 through 2008


1980

1981

1982

1983

1984

1985

1986

1987

1988

1989

1990

1991

1992

1993

1994

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

0

5

10

15Number of infant deaths per 1,000 live births

Tulsa County Oklahoma

Tulsa County 10.412.3 1010.7 9.810.7 9.9 8.8 10.4 9.5 9 9.2 8.3 10.3 9.7 9.3 9.1 6.9 6.9 7.1 9 7 8.8 7.5 6.6 8.2 8.7 9.4 7.5

Oklahoma 12.311.411.910.310.210.6 9.9 9.2 8.7 8.1 9 9.3 8.4 8.5 8.4 8.3 8.4 7.4 8.5 8.5 8.4 7.2 8.1 7.8 7.9 8.1 8 8.6 7.3

From 2003 through 2008, there was an average of 76 infant deaths per year in Tulsa County, for a rate of 8.0 per 1,000 live births. In Oklahoma, the average was 421 infant deaths, for a rate of 8.0.

“Healthy People 2010” goal = 5.0 per 1,000

Ch

ild In

dic

ato

rs


Average Daily Membership and Percentage of Children Enrolled in Special Education, by School District

Tulsa County County, School Year 2010-11

Source: Oklahoma State Department of Education, Education Oversight Board, Office of Accountability, Profiles 2011 Reports.

Berryhill Bixby BrokenArrow

Collinsville Glenpool Jenks Keystone Liberty Owasso SandSprings

Skiatook Sperry Tulsa Union0

10,000

20,000

30,000

40,000

50,000ADM

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%Percent in Special Education

ADM % Spec. Ed.

ADM 1,208.9 5,013.2 16,675.5 2,652.6 2,384.6 10,044 384.6 596.4 9,107.5 5,102.3 2,541.8 1,219.8 40,808.2 14,835.1

% Spec. Ed. 9% 14.2% 14.5% 12.9% 12.6% 14.8% 14.9% 16.2% 10.4% 12.7% 12.7% 12.5% 14.6% 10.2%

Tulsa County total ADM = 112,575; percentage in special education = 13.4%

Ch

ild In

dic

ato

rs


DHS Licensed Child Care Services Provided to Children Under Age 5, by Age

Tulsa County, September 2001 - September 2012

Source: Oklahoma Department of Human Services, Monthly Statistical Bulletins.

Sept2001

Sept2002

Sept2003

Sept2004

Sept2005

Sept2006

Sept2007

Sept2008

Sept2009

Sept2010

Sept2011

Sept2012

0

200

400

600

800

1,000

1,200

1,400

Age <1 489 597 615 729 718 795 621 582 600 528 452 458

Age 1 983 941 1,004 1,173 1,018 1,027 989 926 873 925 758 670

Age 2 1,034 1,099 1,168 1,242 1,161 1,099 1,083 991 1,022 1,002 994 803

Age 3 1,097 1,064 1,185 1,306 1,140 1,039 1,101 1,026 1,006 1,026 940 890

Age 4 956 1,039 1,038 1,245 1,088 930 952 894 847 806 764 664

Ch

ild In

dic

ato

rs

Child Deaths Due to AbuseOklahoma, Fiscal Years 1978 - 2010

Source: Oklahoma Dept. of Human Services, Children & Family Services Division.

75

12 13

1821

16 16

24

31

2325

18

38

2023

3134

29

4245

47 48

3835

27

51

40

32

3941

52

38

1978

197 9

1 98 0

1 98 1

1 98 2

1 98 3

1 98 4

1 98 5

1 98 6

1 98 7

1 98 8

1 98 9

1 99 0

1 99 1

1 99 2

1 99 3

1 99 4

1 99 5

1 99 6

1 99 7

1 99 8

1 99 9

2 00 0

2 00 1

2 00 2

2 00 3

2 00 4

2 00 5

2 00 6

2 00 7

2 00 8

2 00 9

2 01 0

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

CH

IL

D I

ND

IC

AT

OR

S

CHILD ABUSE & NEGLECT

In Tulsa County in FY 2011, there were 4,362 reports of child abuse and/or neglect accepted for investigation or assessment. 6,526 children were involved in these reports (duplicated count).

1,023 children were confirmed victims of child abuse and/or neglect. 115 were abused, 785 were neglected, 123 were victims of both abuse and neglect.

Nearly 7 of every 1,000 children in Tulsa County are victims of abuse and/or neglect. In Oklahoma, the rate is just under 9 of every 1,000 children.

Oklahoma ranks #35 in the nation in the rate of children who are victims of abuse and/or neglect.

Parents make up 77.3% of all perpetrators, followed by “no relation” at 6.3%, step-parents at 6.2%, and grandparents at 3.3%.

Substance abuse is a major contributing factor to child neglect.


Ch

ild In

dic

ato

rs


Age of Children of Confirmed Abuse and NeglectOklahoma, FY 2011

Source: Oklahoma Dept. of Human Services, Children & Family Services Division.

1,274

1,399

2,252

1,869

1,316

(15.7%)

(17.3%)

(27.8%)

(23.0%)

(16.2%)

Under 1 1-2 3-6 7-11 12 & older

Ch

ild In

dic

ato

rs


Elementary School Students Eligible for Free and Reduced Lunch Program

By School District, Tulsa County, 2010-2011 School Year

Source: Oklahoma State Dept. of Education, Low Income Report for 2009-2010.

52.8%

78.2%

64.5%

50.1%

51.4%

50.7%

51.6%

40.1%

43.1%

31.5%

31%

29.9%

24.7%

26.3%

20.5%

8.2%

8.3%

7%

17.2%

13.6%

12.1%

9.7%

12.3%

8.6%

12%

7.4%

7.4%

7.4%

5.4%

4.2%

Tulsa County Total

Tulsa

Sperry

Keystone

Sand Springs

Liberty

Union

Glenpool

Skiatook

Collinsville

Broken Arrow

Berryhill

Owasso

Jenks

Bixby

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Percent of Students Eligible

Free

Reduced

Free lunch eligibility requirement: annual household income below 130% of poverty, which currently is $24,089 for a family of three.

Reduced lunch eligibility requirement: annual household income below 185% of poverty, which currently is $34,281 for a family of three.

Ch

ild In

dic

ato

rs

Juvenile Arrests, by Type of CrimeTulsa County, 2001 through 2011

Source: Oklahoma State Bureau of Investigation, Uniform Crime Reports.

Index crimes Drug related Alcohol related Other crimes0

500

1,000

1,500

2,000

2,500

3,000

3,500Number of arrests

2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

A total of 2,852 juvenile arrests were made in Tulsa County in 2011, for a rate of 85.2 per 1,000 juveniles age 10-17, down from 5,954 arrests for a

rate of 91.9 in 2001.

Includes murder, rape, robbery aggravated

assault, burglary, larceny, and motor vehicle theft.

Includes sale/manufacturing

and possession of drugs.

Includes driving under the influence, liquor law violations, and drunkenness.

Includes other assaults, disorderly conduct, curfew & loitering, runaway and all other non-traffic offenses

Ch

ild In

dic

ato

rs

Pr epar ed by t he Communit y Ser vice Council of G reat er Tulsa

Sour ce: Cent er s f or Disease Cont rol, Yout h Risk Behavior Surveillance Syst em; O klahoma St at e Depar t ment of Healt h, O K2SHARE.

47. 8%

22%

9. 9%

22. 2%

26. 5%

17. 5%

30. 6%

40. 5%

18. 7%

7. 1%

18. 4%

28. 6%

12. 3%

25. 8%

43. 1%

15. 9%

5. 5%

19. 1%

23. 2%

13. 3%

26. 8%

39%

17. 2%

4. 8%

16. 8%

22. 6%

11%

23. 1%

38. 3%

19. 1%

4. 2%

17. 2%

22. 7%

7. 2%

19. 7%

38. 7%

23. 1%

3. 8%

25. 6%

18. 1%

8. 2%

24. 1%

Alcohol

Mar ijuana

Met hamphet amine

O f f er ed/ sold/ givenillegal dr ugs at school

Smoked cigar et t esdur ing past mont h

Dr ove af t er dr inkingalcohol in past mont h

Rode wit h dr inkingdr iver in past mont h

0%10%20%30%40%50%60%

2003 Oklahoma

2005 Oklahoma

2007 Oklahoma

2009 Oklahoma

2011 Oklahoma

2011 US

Youth Risk Behavior Survey:Summary of Alcohol, Other Drug & Tobacco UseHigh S chool S tudents, Oklahoma, 2003 through 2011, and U .S . 2011

Used once or mor e dur ing past 30 days. . .

Ever used. . .

Ch

ild In

dic

ato

rs


Source: Centers for Disease Control, Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance System; Oklahoma State Department of Health, OK2SHARE.

50%

5.8%

64.3%

17.7%

7%

14.2%

49.3%

6.5%

61.7%

16.4%

7.9%

15.9%

38.2%

50.9%

5.8%

59.6%

16.7%

5.9%

15.2%

49.6%

51.1%

4.7%

56.7%

22.7%

7%

16.4%

47.4%

50.5%

5%

57.1%

20.5%

6.3%

16.3%

50.8%

47.4%

6.2%

60.2%

18%

7.8%

15.2%

49.5%

Ever hadsexual intercourse

Had sex before age 13

Used condom last time

Used birth controlpills last time

Attempted suicidein past year

Overweight(according to BMI)

Physical activity for60 min/day 5 of past 7 days

0% 20% 40% 60% 80%

2003 Oklahoma

2005 Oklahoma

2007 Oklahoma

2009 Oklahoma

2011 Oklahoma

2011 US

Youth Risk Behavior Survey:Summary of Sexual Behaviors, Suicide & Physical Health

High School Students, Oklahoma, 2003 through 2011, and U.S. 2011

na

Ch

ild In

dic

ato

rs


Health StatusOklahoma and United States, 1996 - 2012

Source: United Health Foundation, “America’s Health Rankings.“

'96 '97 '98 '99 '00 '01 '02 '03 '04 '05 '06 '07 '08 '09 '10 '11 '120%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

Per

cen t

ad u

l ts r

e por

ting

fair

o r p

o or

he a

lt h

0

10

20

30

40

50

State rank

Oklahoma Rank US

Oklahoma 13.1% 14% 13.4% 12.6% 17.4% 15.3% 19.6% 17.7% 17.8% 19.7% 18.7% 20.2% 19.2% 18.7% 20.2% 20.5% 19.6%

Rank 26 32 28 25 42 34 45 41 41 44 42 46 43 42 42 45 41

US 12.9% 12.9% 12.8% 12.6% 13% 13.9% 14% 14.7% 14.7% 14.9% 14.8% 14.7% 14.9% 14.4% 14.5% 14.7% 16.9%

Ch

ild In

dic

ato

rs


Prevalence of ObesityOklahoma and United States, 1990 - 2012


'90 '91 '92 '93 '94 '95 '96 '97 '98 '99 '00 '01 '02 '03 '04 '05 '06 '07 '08 '09 '10 '11 '120%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

Per

cen t

of

pop

ulat

ion

esti m

ated

to

be o

b es e

0

10

20

30

40

50

State rank

Oklahoma Rank US

Ch

ild In

dic

ato

rs


Prevalence of SmokingOklahoma and United States, 1990 - 2012


'90 '91 '92 '93 '94 '95 '96 '97 '98 '99 '00 '01 '02 '03 '04 '05 '06 '07 '08 '09 '10 '11 '120%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

Per

cen t

of

pop

ulat

ion

ove r

18

tha t

sm

o ke

reg

u la r

ly

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

State rank

Oklahoma Rank US

Ch

ild In

dic

ato

rs

Health Insurance Status, by AgeU.S. & Oklahoma, 2010-11

Source: Kaiser Family Foundation, StateHealthFacts.org; Oklahoma Health Care Authority, Oklahoma County Chartbook, May 2009.

149,350,600(48.5%)

15,416,100(5.0%)

50,670,200(16.5%)

39,996,700(13.0%)

3,846,400(1.2%)

48,611,600(15.8%)

39,136,100(49.9%)

3,112,700(4.0%)

27,361,400(34.9%)

1,135,000(1.4%)

7,633,900(9.7%)

109,524,600(58.3%)

12,057,800(6.4%)

19,609,300(10.4%)

6,526,400(3.5%)

40,281,600(21.4%)

1711300(46.0%)

156300(4.2%)

594100(16.0%)

538500(14.5%)

79100(2.1%)

638500(17.2%)

438200(45.2%)

42700(4.4%)

392400(40.5%)

96500(10.0%)

1276000(58.1%)

112100(5.1%)

156500(7.1%)

114300(5.2%)

538700(24.5%)

Employer Individual Medicaid Medicare Other public Uninsured

Total Population Under Age 19 Age 19-64

Estimated uninsured non-elderly population of Tulsa County (2008) = 16.1%(Oklahoma Health Care Authority, May 2009)

United States

Oklahoma

HE

AL

TH

I

ND

IC

AT

OR

S


1 95 0

1 95 5

1 96 0

1 96 5

1 97 0

1 97 5

1 98 0

1 98 5

1 99 0

1 99 5

2 00 0

2 00 5

2 01 0

2 01 1

0

5,000

10,000

15,000

20,000

25,000

30,000Prison population

Oklahoma’s Prison PopulationFiscal Years 1950 - 2011

Source: Oklahoma Department of Corrections.

US incarceration rates (2011): Male: 938 per 100,000 people Female: 67 per 100, 000 people Total: 497 per 100,000 people

Oklahoma incarceration rates (2011): Male: 1,244 per 100,000 people Female: 142 per 100,000 people Total: 686 per 100,000 people

Cri

me

& I

ncar

cera

tion

Oklahoma's Rankings in Health Determinants, 2012 (part 1)According to United Health Foundation's State Health Rankings

Note: Missing data values represent years in which variables were not measured/ranked.


#47

#12

#45

#25

#39

#42

#11

#24

#29

Personal Behaviors

Prevalence of smoking

Prevalence of Binge Drinking

Prevalence of obesity

Community & Environment

High school graduation

Violent crime

Occupational fatalities

Infectious disease

Children in poverty

Air pollution

#0 #10 #20 #30 #40 #50

1992 2002 2012

Ranking: 1=best, 50=worst

HE

AL

TH

I

ND

IC

AT

OR

S

Oklahoma's Rankings in Health Determinants, 2012 (part 2)According to United Health Foundation's State Health Rankings

Notes: Missing data values represent years in which variables were not measured/ranked. Updated data for “early prenatal care” were not available. Shown results are for 1991, 2001, & 2011.


#35

#15

#20

#47

#49

#45

#42

Public & Health Policies

Lack of health insurance

Public health funding (per capita)

Immunization coverage

Clinical Care

Early prenatal care

Primary Care Physicians

Preventable Hospitalizations

All Determinants

#0 #10 #20 #30 #40 #50

1992 2002 2012


HE

AL

TH

I

ND

IC

AT

OR

S

Oklahoma's Rankings in Health Outcomes, 2012According to United Health Foundation's State Health Rankings

Note: Missing data values represent years in which variables were not measured/ranked.


#46

#40

#20

#39

#48

#42

#46

#44

Poor mental health days

Poor physical health days

Geographic disparity

Infant mortality

Cardiovascular deaths

Cancer deaths

Premature death

All Health Outcomes

#0 #10 #20 #30 #40 #50

1992 2002 2012


Oklahoma’s overall health ranking for 2012 is # 43

HE

AL

TH

I

ND

IC

AT

OR

S

ADVERSE CHILDHOOD EXPERIENCESTULSA COUNTY RANKINGS

Parental separation or divorce 49 Incarcerated household member

76 Mentally ill household member 77 Substance abusing household member 76* Violence against mother 57 Psychological, physical & sexual abuse 12 Emotional & physical neglect 4

Overall ranking 31

Rankings: 1 = best, 77 = worst*Indicates a tie with at least one other county

Source: Oklahoma 2009 KIDS COUNT Factbook (2005-2007 rankings), Oklahoma Institute for Child Advocacy

Ch

ild In

dic

ato

rs

…IN SUMMARY

COMMUNITY PROFILE 2013TULSA COUNTY

Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater TulsaJanuary 2013

…is available on our website:www.csctulsa.org

Presentation are available from Jan Figart

[email protected]

http://www.csctulsa.org/

Community Profile 2013 Tulsa County

Documents

tulsa county population

population of children

total population

hispanic population

population of rural

tulsa countycommissioned

jumpstart tulsa

state of oklahoma