Community Profile 2007 Community Profile 2007 Education and Economics Education and Economics City of Tulsa January 22, 2007 Prepared for the Tulsa Area United Way Community Investments Process By the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa January, 2007
93
Embed
Community Profile 2007 Education and Economics City of Tulsa January 22, 2007 Prepared for the Tulsa Area United Way Community Investments Process By the.
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Community Profile 2007Community Profile 2007Education and EconomicsEducation and Economics
City of TulsaJanuary 22, 2007
Prepared for the Tulsa Area United Way Community Investments ProcessBy the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa
January, 2007
Demographic Trends in Tulsa Demographic Trends in Tulsa CountyCounty
Population growth in Tulsa County twice the pace of the City of Tulsa between 1990 and 2000; the city has actually lost population since 2000
Growing cultural diversity, particularly among the population <25
Hispanic population continues to expand; since 1991, number of births to Hispanic women have increased 400% to 1,486 in 2005
Population 65+ projected to make up 20% of population by 2030 (up from 12% in 2000)
Demographic Trends in Tulsa Demographic Trends in Tulsa County (cont.)County (cont.)
Population <18 projected to account for 23% of population by 2030 (down from 26% in 2000)
As working age population’s share declines, the 2030 projected dependency ratio climbs to 75 per 100, up from 62 per 100 in 2000
Living arrangements are changing significantly with more children living with a single parent, especially the mother, and living with other relatives, especially grandparents
Larger number of people over 65 years of age are living alone, especially women
Median family income varies by race Large population of mobile renters
Source: US Census 2000, American Community Survey, 2005
What is the Job Climate in What is the Job Climate in Tulsa, Oklahoma, and the US?Tulsa, Oklahoma, and the US?
More jobs than qualified workers (Impending Crisis: Too Many Jobs, Too Few People, 2003)
80% of new jobs require a degree (The End of Work, 2002)
39.2% of Tulsans have a high school degree or less and 23% more have some college (US Census 2005 Estimates)
59% of the University of Oklahoma Bachelor’s degree graduates leave Oklahoma (1999, University of Oklahoma)
The immigrant population….if all stay….will not be enough to fill the job demand
Top Risk Factors for Adults Top Risk Factors for Adults and Families for Poor and Families for Poor
Economic SuccessEconomic Success Single-parent households Low educational attainment Illiteracy Poor health and lack of health insurance Substance abuse/addiction
Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa
Educational Attainment for Persons Age 25 & OlderTulsa County, 2000 & 2005 Estimates
Source: US Census Bureau, 2000 Census; US Census Bureau, American Community Survey 2005.
Level 1 Literacy is the lowest literacy level. Adults at this level display difficulty using certain reading, writing, and computational skills considered necessary for functioning in everyday life.
Oklahoma has a rate of 18%.
Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa
Oklahoma's Rankings in Risk Factors Associated with Poor Health, 1990 and 2006
According to United Health Foundation's State Health Rankings
Source: United Health Foundation.
#44
#14
#23
#31
#24
#21
#8
#32
#46
#46
#33
#38
#24
#34
#41
#35
#22
#43
#40
#30
#44
Personal Behaviors
Prevalence of smoking
Motor vehicle deaths
Prevalence of obesity
High school graduation
Community Environment
Violent crime
Children in poverty
Occupational fatalities
Infectious disease
Health Policies
Lack of health insurance
Adequacy of prenatal care
Per capita public health spending
Immunization coverage
1990 2006
Ranking: 1=best, 50=worst
Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa
Oklahoma's Rankings in Outcomes Associated with Poor Health, 1990 and 2006
According to United Health Foundation's State Health Rankings
Source: United Health Foundation.
#31
#27
#31
#24
#27
#44
#41
#44
#43
#50
#44
#43
Overall ranking
Poor mental health days
Poor physical health days
Infant mortality
Cardiovascular deaths
Cancer deaths
Premature death
1990 2006
Ranking: 1=best, 50=worst
How Do We Increase Tulsa’s How Do We Increase Tulsa’s Economic Potential? Economic Potential?
Long Term GainLong Term GainThink P-16 (prenatal through college)
– Healthy prenatal and early childhood– Prevent abuse and neglect of children– Engage students in school– Prevent student drop-out– Students complete a bachelor’s degree
Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater TulsaPrepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa
Real Hourly Wage by Educational AttainmentUnited States, 1973-2005
Source: Economic Policy Institute website.
1973
1975
1977
1979
1981
1983
1985
1987
1989
1991
1993
1995
1997
1999
2001
2003
2005
$0
$5
$10
$15
$20
$25
$30
$35
Real hourly wage (2005 dollars)
Less than high school High school College degree Advanced degree
Prenatal InterventionsPrenatal Interventions
Healthy StartChildren FirstHealthy Families and Safe CareParents as Teachers
Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa
Summary of Risk Factors for InfantsTulsa County and Oklahoma, 2005
Source: Oklahoma State Department of Health, Vital Statistics.
11.6%
41%
7%
24.6%
6.3%
1.6%
33.5%
19.2%
11%
12.9%
39.1%
5.6%
22.4%
6.6%
1.4%
32.8%
19.1%
10.6%
Teen mother(age 15-19)
Unmarried mother
Poor prenatal care(3rd trimester/no care)
Mother w/ <12th gradeeducation
Low birthweight(1500-2499 grams)
Very low birthweight(<1500 grams)
Short birth spacing(<24 mos. apart)
Very short birth spacing(<18 mos. apart)
Premature(<37 weeks gest.)
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50%
Percent of Births
Tulsa Co.
Oklahoma
Tulsa County births: 9,297Oklahoma births: 51,775
Education Success in PreschoolEducation Success in Preschool
Star Rating System for Quality Educare Head Start Supercenters Pre K 4 All Day Kindergarten
All this makes us Number 1 in US in early childhood efforts
Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa
Children Under Age 5 in Working Parent Households Relying on Care Outside of Parents, by Age
Tulsa County, 2005 (est.)
Sources: National Survey of American Families, Urban Institute, 1997; US Census Bureau, American Community Survey 2005; US Census Bureau, Population Estimates Division.
20,416(76.0%)
6,447(24.0%)
4 Year Olds4,492 (22.0%)
3 Year Olds4,492 (22.0%)
2 Year Olds4,492 (22.0%)
1 Year Olds4,083 (20.0%)
Under 1 Year Olds2,858 (14.0%)
Rely on care outside of
parents
Do NOT rely on care
outside of parents
Notes: "Working parent household:" all parents in family in labor force. Percent distribution by age is an estimate based on that of children receiving DHS child care subsidies.
Of the 26,863 children <5 living in working parent households.....
Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa
Estimated Number of Children Under Age 5 in Working Parent Households Relying on Care Outside of Parents, Using Licensed vs. Unlicensed Care
Tulsa County, October 2006
Sources: National Survey of American Families, Urban Institute, 1997; US Census Bureau, American Community Survey 2005; DHS Statistical Bulletin, October 2006.
20,416(76.0%)
6,447(24.0%)
Licensed12,084 (59.2%)
Unlicensed8,333 (40.8%)
Rely on care outside of
parents
Do NOT rely on care outside of
parents
Of the 26,863 children <5 living in working parent households.....
Many young children cared for in unknown arrangements
Notes: "Working parent household:" all parents in family in labor force. The estimate for children in licensed care is based on the assumptions that the number of children receiving DHS subsidy is 40% of total number in licensed care for children under 1, and 38% for 1 & 2 year olds, and that 90% of children <3 in licensed care live in working parent households. Given recent local research study on “non-parental care,“ many children in licensed care also regularly spend time in unlicensed care.
Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa
Almost two-thirds of all Tulsa County four-year olds are enrolled in public pre-K, as emphasis increasingly turns to assuring quality
Enrollment in Public Pre-K Programs, by Full and Half DayTulsa County, October 2005
Source: Oklahoma State Department of Education; US Census Bureau, Population Estimates Division, 2005 Estimates.
26% 36% 38%Tulsa Co.
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Percent of all four year olds
Full-day Half-day Not enrolled
Tulsa Public Schools had 2,795 children enrolled in pre-K programs in October 2005. Of these, 2,132 were in full-day and 663 were in half-day pre-K.
Total four year olds = 8,954
Education SuccessKindergarten – 12th Grade
Community SchoolsSchool-based ClinicsAlternative EducationCharter Schools
Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa
Many 9th graders do not make it to graduationPercent Change in Average Daily Membership
from 9th Grade to 2005 Graduating ClassTulsa County School Districts
-26%
-20.8%
-10.2%
-9.6%
-8.5%
-14.7%
-8.5%
-24.7%
-18.5%
-23.7%
-11.9%
-29%
-43.7%
-15.9%
Tulsa County
Berryhill
Bixby
Broken Arrow
Collinsville
Glenpool
Jenks
Liberty
Owasso
Sand Springs
Skiatook
Sperry
Tulsa
Union
0% 10%-10%-20%-30%-40%-50%
Source: Oklahoma State Department of Education, Data Services Alternative Education.
Number change in ADM
-22
-29
-109
-12
-22
-62
-14
-111
-115
-30
-29
-1,424
-159
-2,137
Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa
Attrition rates high for every race & Hispanic OriginAttrition Rates from 9th Grade to 12th Grade for 2004 Graduating Class,
based on October 1 Enrollment Totals, by Race and Hispanic Origin
Tulsa County
-21.2%
-44.2%
-21.3%
-39.4%
White Black Native American Hispanic Origin
0%
-10%
-20%
-30%
-40%
-50%
Source: Oklahoma State Department of Education, Data Services Alternative Education.
(-1,169)
(-655)
(-177)
(-167)
TULSA
BIXBY
SKIATOOK
OWASSO
SPERRY
BROKEN ARROW
JENKS
LIBERTY
COLLINSVILLE
KEYSTONE
UNION
SAND SPRINGS
GLENPOOL
LEONARD
BERRYHILL
28.6
12.6
7.921.1
8.2
12.0
2.4
NA
3.8
4.3
11.0
13.0
14.8
1.3
NA
Dropout RateLess than 5%5 - 9.9%10 - 19.9%20%+
Dropout RatesGraduating Class of 2005
Tulsa County School Districts
Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa (November 2006).
N
EW
S
Source: Education Oversight Board, Office of Accountability, Department of Education.
-43.7
-9.6
-11.9 -8.5
-18.5
-10.2
-29.0
-24.7
-23.7
-15.9
-14.7
-20.8
TULSA
BIXBY
SKIATOOK
OWASSO
SPERRY
BROKEN ARROW
JENKS
LIBERTY
COLLINSVILLE
KEYSTONEUNION
SAND SPRINGS
GLENPOOL
LEONARD
BERRYHILL
NA
NA
-8.5Attrition Rate> -10%-10 to -19.9%-20 to -29.9%-30% or less
N
EW
S
Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa (November 2006).
Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa (November 2006).
Percent of Civilian Non-Institutionalized
Males Age 16-64Unemployed or
Not in Labor Force
6
3
1
2
8
5
7
9
4
Ga
rnet
t
Min
go
Yal
e
Har
vard
Pe
oria
145
th E
. A
ve.
Mem
oria
l
U.S
. 75
Pe
oria
N
EW
S
186th St. N.
211th St.
181st St.
101st St.
131st St.
31st St.
36th St. N.
126th St. N.
96th St. N.
Uni
on
33r
d W
. A
ve.
Admiral Pl.
61st St.
66th St. N.
81s
t W
. A
ve.
By Census Tract, Tulsa County, 2000
Source: US Census Bureau, 2000 Census.
Number of persons01 - 2425 - 4950 - 99100+
Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa (November 2006).
Number of Persons Age 16-19
Not in School and Not High School
Graduates
6
3
1
2
8
5
7
9
4
Ga
rnet
t
Min
go
Yal
e
Har
vard
Pe
oria
145
th E
. A
ve.
Mem
oria
l
U.S
. 75
Pe
oria
N
EW
S
186th St. N.
211th St.
181st St.
101st St.
131st St.
31st St.
36th St. N.
126th St. N.
96th St. N.
Uni
on
33r
d W
. A
ve.
Admiral Pl.
61st St.
66th St. N.
81s
t W
. A
ve.
By Census Tract, Tulsa County, 2000
Source: US Census Bureau, 2000 Census.
Percent of persons0%0.1 - 9.9%10 - 19.9%20 - 29.9%30%+
Percent of Persons Age 16-19
Not in School and Not High School
Graduates
Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa (November 2006).
6
3
1
2
8
5
7
9
4
Ga
rnet
t
Min
go
Yal
e
Har
vard
Pe
oria
145
th E
. A
ve.
Mem
oria
l
U.S
. 75
Pe
oria
N
EW
S
186th St. N.
211th St.
181st St.
101st St.
131st St.
31st St.
36th St. N.
126th St. N.
96th St. N.
Uni
on
33r
d W
. A
ve.
Admiral Pl.
61st St.
66th St. N.
81s
t W
. A
ve.
By Census Tract, Tulsa County, 2000
Source: US Census Bureau, 2000 Census.
Number of personsLess than 100100 - 199200 - 299300 - 399400+
Source: US Census Bureau, 2000 Census.
By Census Tract, Tulsa County, 2000
Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa (November 2006).
81s
t W
. A
ve.
66th St. N.
61st St.
Admiral Pl.
33r
d W
. A
ve.
Uni
on
96th St. N.
126th St. N.
36th St. N.
31st St.
131st St.
101st St.
181st St.
211th St.
186th St. N.
N
EW
S
Pe
oria U.S
. 75
Mem
oria
l
145
th E
. A
ve.
Pe
oria
Har
vard
Yal
e
Min
go
Ga
rnet
t
6
3
1
28
5
7
9
4
Distribution of PersonsAge 62 to 70
Area of StudyNumber of
MajorsPercentage of
Majors
Business 19 58 %
Engineering 24 73 %
Humanities 19 58 %
Natural Sciences 18 55 %
Professional Studies
18 55 %
Social Sciences 18 55 %
Total 116
Expected Percentage
59 %
Area of Study of University of Oklahoma Students Area of Study of University of Oklahoma Students Leaving OklahomaLeaving Oklahoma
•Source: Migration After College: The Spatial Distribution of Recent OU Graduates, Emily McCauley, March 1999 , University of Oklahoma
Reasons to Leave and Stay in OklahomaReasons to Leave and Stay in Oklahoma
Oklahoma is loosing 20% of its graduates each year to Texas and other enticing states.
Economic opportunity is cited most often as the top reason to move to a location. Students rank it first 44% of the time.
Students who are from Oklahoma and who plan to remain in Oklahoma (31%) rank economic opportunity as the top reason for their locational decision 41% of the time.
Source: Migration After College: The Spatial Distribution of Recent OU Graduates, Emily McCauley, March 1999 , University of Oklahoma
0
2,500
5,000
7,500
10,000
12,500
15,000
17,500
20,000
22,500
25,000
'50
'52
'54
'56
'58
'60
'62
'64
'66
'68
'70
'72
'74
'76
'78
'80
'82
'84
'86
'88
'90
'92
'94
'96
'98
'00
'02
'04
Oklahoma’s prison population was relatively stable until 1980 when laws passed to curb illegal drug use
came into effectOklahoma’s Prison Population
1950-2005
Source: Oklahoma State Department of Corrections, Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa for the Metropolitan Human Services Commission in Tulsa.
Note: Number of inmates in Oklahoma prisons, data as of June 30 of each year
Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa
Community Profile 2007
is available o n the website of
The Community Service Councilo f Greater Tulsa: www.csctulsa.org
AppendixAppendix
Slides which support statements offered regarding demographics and
human development
Economic Potential Economic Potential of Tulsa is at a Turning Pointof Tulsa is at a Turning Point
Middle class is disappearingMany households lack adequate
incomeStress of inadequate income and
related conditions is widespreadStarting life in Tulsa for many is risky
business
Economic Potential Economic Potential of Tulsa is at a Turning Pointof Tulsa is at a Turning Point
Populations of aging and persons with disabilities are large and growing
Health challenges are critical to individual and community well-being
Poor human conditions impact crime and growing incarcerations
Overall progress in human development is tied to educational success
The Middle Class is DisappearingThe Middle Class is Disappearing
~Lower income groups greatly expand, middle shrinks,
highest income group increases dramatically
Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa
Source: Hodgkinson, Harold, "The Client," Education Demographer, 1988.
1900 - 1940 1940 - 1990 1990 - ?0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Poor - 75%
Poor - 20%Poor - 10%
Rich - 20%
Middle - 60%
Rich - 5% Rich - 10%
Middle - 20%
Middle - 80%
The trend: housing patterns and income mirror the job structure, with more rich, more poor, and fewer in the middle -- the "hourglass effect"
The Overall Dominant Trend...The Shrinking Middle Class
Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa
Source: US Census Bureau, American Community Survey 2005.
Distribution of Wealth: Household IncomeU.S., Oklahoma, Tulsa MSA and Tulsa County, 2005 Estimates
43.5%53.1% 49.4% 48.8%
40.1%
37.5%38.6% 38.5%
16.3%9.4% 12% 12.7%
U.S. Oklahoma TAUW Tulsa Co.0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
<$40,000/year
$40,000-$99,999/year
$100,000+/year
1% of U.S. households have
39.3% of the assets, making the U.S. the #1 country in the
world in inequality of income.
Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa
Income disparity between rich and poor grows wider beyond 1993
Mean Family Income by Quintile and Top 5% (2003 dollars)United States, 1966-2003
Source: Economic Policy Institute website.
1966
1968
1970
1972
1974
1976
1978
1980
1982
1984
1986
1988
1990
1992
1994
1996
1998
2000
2002
$0
$50,000
$100,000
$150,000
$200,000
$250,000
$300,000
Real hourly wage (2003 dollars)
Lowest Second Middle Fourth Highest Top 5%
Many Households Lack Many Households Lack Adequate IncomeAdequate Income
~More and more households lack adequate income to meet
living needs
Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa
Family of Three, Tulsa County, 2006
Source: Wider Opportunities for Women, with Community Action Project of Tulsa County, "The Self-Sufficiency Standard for Oklahoma;" 2006 HHS Poverty Guidelines, Federal Register, Vol. 71, No. 15, January 24, 2006, pp. 3848-3849; Bureau of Labor Statistics, Consumer Price Index, November 2006. Oklahoma State Dept. of Human Services; U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey, 2005.
$8,400$10,712
$16,600
$30,710
$45,268
WelfareWage
MinimumWage
PovertyWage
185% PovertyWage
Median Family Income
(2005 est.)
$0
$10,000
$20,000
$30,000
$40,000
$50,000
$60,000Annual Wage
Self-Sufficiency Wage = $37,762 ($18.15/hr.)
Note: For the self-sufficiency wage, family of three consists of one adult, one preschooler and one schoolage child. The hourly wages given assume employment at 40 hours per week and 52 weeks per year.
Comparison of Wages: Self-Sufficiency, Welfare, Minimum, Poverty, 185% of Poverty, and Median Family Income
All families with children <18
($4.04/hr.)($5.15/hr.)
($7.98/hr.)
($14.76/hr.)
($21.76/hr.)
Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa
Labor Force Participation among Adults, Age 20-64Tulsa County, 2005 Estimates
Source: US Census Bureau, American Community Survey 2005.; Oklahoma Employment Security Commission.
268,21379.2%
70,39620.8%
In armed forces
Employed
Unemployed
492 (0.2%)
251,470 (93.8%)
16,251 (6.1%)
NOT in labor force
In labor force
Unemployment rate (all ages) for October 2006 = 3.5%.
Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa
Unemployment RatesTulsa MSA, 1991 - 2006
Source: U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics.
Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater TulsaPrepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa
Real Hourly Wage by Educational AttainmentUnited States, 1973-2005
Source: Economic Policy Institute website.
1973
1975
1977
1979
1981
1983
1985
1987
1989
1991
1993
1995
1997
1999
2001
2003
2005
$0
$5
$10
$15
$20
$25
$30
$35
Real hourly wage (2005 dollars)
Less than high school High school College degree Advanced degree
Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa
Real Hourly Wage by Educational Attainment, by SexUnited States, 2005
Source: Economic Policy Institute website.
$11
$14
$25
$31
$11
$16
$28
$36
$9
$12
$21
$27
Less than high school High school College degree Advanced degree$0
$10
$20
$30
$40Real hourly wage (2005 dollars)
Both sexes Men Women
Stress of Inadequate Income and Related Stress of Inadequate Income and Related Conditions is WidespreadConditions is Widespread
~Based on following key indicators~Based on following key indicators::
Poverty Families with children headed by women Youth 16-19 not in school or high school
graduates Men 16-64 not employed or in labor force
Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa
Participation in Public Assistance ProgramsNumber of Participants and Percentage of Population Participating
Tulsa County, August, 2006
Source: Oklahoma Dept. of Human Services, County Profiles August, 2006; Oklahoma State Dept. of Education, Low Income Report for 2005-2006; US Census Bureau, Pop. Estimates Division, 2005 Estimates; Oklahoma State Department of Health-WIC Service, Caseload Report, August, 2006.
78,641
21,228
52,892
5,530
4,606
8,647
5,146
60,205
2,468
24,755
5,538
13.7%
47.4%
36.5%
8%
51.4%
19.9%
11.5%
10.5%
1.7%
44.5%
10%
Medicaid Total
Medicaid <5
Medicaid <18
Medicaid 65+
WIC Infants
WIC age 1-5
Child Care Subsidy <5
Food Stamps Total
TANF <18
Elem. School Free Lunch(2005-06)
Elem. School Reduced Lunch(2005-06)
025,00050,00075,000100,000
Number of Participants
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60%
Percent of Population
Starting Life in Tulsa for Many Starting Life in Tulsa for Many is Risky Businessis Risky Business
~Combination of many risk factors takes heavy toll and early screening for risk level is
inadequate
Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa
Summary of Risk Factors for InfantsTulsa County and Oklahoma, 2005
Source: Oklahoma State Department of Health, Vital Statistics.
11.6%
41%
7%
24.6%
6.3%
1.6%
33.5%
19.2%
11%
12.9%
39.1%
5.6%
22.4%
6.6%
1.4%
32.8%
19.1%
10.6%
Teen mother(age 15-19)
Unmarried mother
Poor prenatal care(3rd trimester/no care)
Mother w/ <12th gradeeducation
Low birthweight(1500-2499 grams)
Very low birthweight(<1500 grams)
Short birth spacing(<24 mos. apart)
Very short birth spacing(<18 mos. apart)
Premature(<37 weeks gest.)
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50%
Percent of Births
Tulsa Co.
Oklahoma
Tulsa County births: 9,297Oklahoma births: 51,775
Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa
Special Education Students and Students who Received Early Intervention
Oklahoma Public Schools, 2003-04
Source: Oklahoma State Department of Education.
Notspecial
education85%
Specialeducation
15%
Earlyintervention
2.2%
No earlyintervention
97.8%
Small proportion of special education students received early intervention
Total Oklahoma Public School Students
Total Oklahoma Public School Students
Populations of Aging and Persons with Populations of Aging and Persons with Disabilities are Large and GrowingDisabilities are Large and Growing
~~These populations will These populations will significantly test the capacity of significantly test the capacity of
resources needed to enable them resources needed to enable them to be most self-sufficientto be most self-sufficient
Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa
Population Trends and Projections by Age GroupTulsa County, 1970 - 2030
Source: US Census Bureau, 1970, 1980, 1990, & 2000 Censuses; US Census Bureau, Population Estimates Division, Population Projections, 2000 - 2030.
6.3
6.6
6.8
7.4
7.7
7.7
8.5
16.6
17.1
18.2
18.9
18.4
19.8
25.9
9.2
9.7
10.1
10
10.1
13.5
10.7
47.8
50.5
52.5
51.9
52.2
49.1
46.2
17.5
14.1
10.6
10.4
10.4
9
8.1
2030
2020
2010
2000
1990
1980
1970
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Percent of population
0-4 5-17 18-24 25-64 65-84 85+
1.9
1.4
1.2
.9
.6
Pro
ject
ions 2.5
2.1
Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa
Disability Prevalence by Age and Level of DisabilityOklahoma, 1997
Source: U.S. Bureau of the Census, 2001, Americans with Disabilities: 1997 (Aug.-Nov. 1997 data from Survey of Income and Program Participation).
2%
3.4%
11.2%
10.7%
13.4%
22.6%
35.7%
49%
73.6%
4.8%
5.3%
8.1%
13.9%
24.2%
31.8%
57.6%
0 to 2
3 to 5
6 to 14
15-24
25-44
45-54
55-64
65-79
80+
Age Group
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Percent with Specified Level of Disability
Level of disabilityAny Severe
Health Challenges are Critical to Health Challenges are Critical to Individual and Community Well-beingIndividual and Community Well-being
~Inadequate income, high risks of starting life and poor lifestyle
choices contribute to major health concerns
Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa
Age-Adjusted Death RatesTulsa County, Oklahoma and US, 1980 - 2002
Source: CDC Wonder.
1980
1982
1984
1986
1988
1990
1992
1994
1996
1998
2000
2002
800
900
1,000
1,100
1,200
Death rates
Tulsa Co OK US
Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa
Percentage of the Population that is ObeseOklahoma and US, 1990 - 2002
Source: Lapolla, Health Policy Analysis of the Tulsa Metropolitan Area, Center for Health Policy Research and Development, OUCPH, 2005; NCHS, CDC; THD;
1990
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
Percent obese
Oklahoma US
Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa
Percentage of Adults who SmokeTulsa County, Oklahoma and US, 2003
Source: NCHS, CDC; THD;Tulsa County Health Profile; NIH; BRFSS, CDC
22.7%
25.1%
22%
Tulsa Co. Oklahoma US0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
Percent adult smokers
Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa
Health Insurance Status, by AgeOklahoma, 2004-2005
Source: Kaiser Family Foundation.
1,648,530 (47.9%)
137,050 (4.0%)444,630 (12.9%)
553,150 (16.1%)
659,370 (19.2%)
424,880 (47.2%)
36,520 (4.1%)
283,680 (31.5%)
23,450 (2.6%)
130,780 (14.5%)
1,222,600 (59.3%)
100,090 (4.9%)123,040 (6.0%)
90,420 (4.4%)
524,320 (25.4%)
1,050 (0.2%)440 (0.1%)
37,910 (7.8%)
439,280 (91.0%)
4,270 (0.9%)
Employer Individual Medicaid Medicare/Other Public Uninsured
Total Population Under Age 19
Age 19-64 Age 65 & over
Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa
Oklahoma's Rankings in Risk Factors Associated with Poor Health, 1990 and 2006
According to United Health Foundation's State Health Rankings
Source: United Health Foundation.
#44
#14
#23
#31
#24
#21
#8
#32
#46
#46
#33
#38
#24
#34
#41
#35
#22
#43
#40
#30
#44
Personal Behaviors
Prevalence of smoking
Motor vehicle deaths
Prevalence of obesity
High school graduation
Community Environment
Violent crime
Children in poverty
Occupational fatalities
Infectious disease
Health Policies
Lack of health insurance
Adequacy of prenatal care
Per capita public health spending
Immunization coverage
1990 2006
Ranking: 1=best, 50=worst
Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa
Oklahoma's Rankings in Outcomes Associated with Poor Health, 1990 and 2006
According to United Health Foundation's State Health Rankings
Source: United Health Foundation.
#31
#27
#31
#24
#27
#44
#41
#44
#43
#50
#44
#43
Overall ranking
Poor mental health days
Poor physical health days
Infant mortality
Cardiovascular deaths
Cancer deaths
Premature death
1990 2006
Ranking: 1=best, 50=worst
Poor Human Conditions Impact Poor Human Conditions Impact Crime and Growing Crime and Growing
IncarcerationsIncarcerations
~Trends greatly affected by substance abuse
0
2,500
5,000
7,500
10,000
12,500
15,000
17,500
20,000
22,500
25,000
'50
'52
'54
'56
'58
'60
'62
'64
'66
'68
'70
'72
'74
'76
'78
'80
'82
'84
'86
'88
'90
'92
'94
'96
'98
'00
'02
'04
Oklahoma’s prison population was relatively stable until 1980 when laws passed to curb illegal drug use
came into effectOklahoma’s Prison Population
1950-2005
Source: Oklahoma State Department of Corrections, Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa for the Metropolitan Human Services Commission in Tulsa.
Note: Number of inmates in Oklahoma prisons, data as of June 30 of each year
Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa
Methamphetamine Labs Seized by AuthoritiesOklahoma and City of Tulsa, 1994 - 2005
Source: Oklahoma State Bureau of Narcotics and Dangerous Drugs Website, Tulsa Police Department Website.
Level 1 Literacy is the lowest literacy level. Adults at this level display difficulty using certain reading, writing, and computational skills considered necessary for functioning in everyday life.
Oklahoma has a rate of 18%.
Education Success: Preschool
Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa
Children Under Age 5 in Working Parent Households Relying on Care Outside of Parents, by Age
Tulsa County, 2005 (est.)
Sources: National Survey of American Families, Urban Institute, 1997; US Census Bureau, American Community Survey 2005; US Census Bureau, Population Estimates Division.
20,416(76.0%)
6,447(24.0%)
4 Year Olds4,492 (22.0%)
3 Year Olds4,492 (22.0%)
2 Year Olds4,492 (22.0%)
1 Year Olds4,083 (20.0%)
Under 1 Year Olds2,858 (14.0%)
Rely on care outside of
parents
Do NOT rely on care
outside of parents
Notes: "Working parent household:" all parents in family in labor force. Percent distribution by age is an estimate based on that of children receiving DHS child care subsidies.
Of the 26,863 children <5 living in working parent households.....
Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa
Estimated Number of Children Under Age 5 in Working Parent Households Relying on Care Outside of Parents, Using Licensed vs. Unlicensed Care
Tulsa County, October 2006
Sources: National Survey of American Families, Urban Institute, 1997; US Census Bureau, American Community Survey 2005; DHS Statistical Bulletin, October 2006.
20,416(76.0%)
6,447(24.0%)
Licensed12,084 (59.2%)
Unlicensed8,333 (40.8%)
Rely on care outside of
parents
Do NOT rely on care outside of
parents
Of the 26,863 children <5 living in working parent households.....
Many young children cared for in unknown arrangements
Notes: "Working parent household:" all parents in family in labor force. The estimate for children in licensed care is based on the assumptions that the number of children receiving DHS subsidy is 40% of total number in licensed care for children under 1, and 38% for 1 & 2 year olds, and that 90% of children <3 in licensed care live in working parent households. Given recent local research study on “non-parental care,“ many children in licensed care also regularly spend time in unlicensed care.
Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa
Almost two-thirds of all Tulsa County four-year olds are enrolled in public pre-K, as emphasis increasingly turns to assuring quality
Enrollment in Public Pre-K Programs, by Full and Half DayTulsa County, October 2005
Source: Oklahoma State Department of Education; US Census Bureau, Population Estimates Division, 2005 Estimates.
26% 36% 38%Tulsa Co.
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Percent of all four year olds
Full-day Half-day Not enrolled
Tulsa Public Schools had 2,795 children enrolled in pre-K programs in October 2005. Of these, 2,132 were in full-day and 663 were in half-day pre-K.
Total four year olds = 8,954
Education Success: Kindergarten – 12th Grade
Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa
Percent growth in area school districts varies greatlyPercent Change in Average Daily Membership
Tulsa County School Districts, 1997-2005
Source: Oklahoma State Department of Education, Data Services; Education Oversight Board, Office of Accountability: Profiles State Reports
12.5%
30.5%
2.9%
33.9%
2.5%
4.2%
7.7%
-19.2%7.7%
33%
-3.6%16.8%
12.8%
0.2%
16.3%
6.8%
Berryhill
Bixby
Broken Arrow
Collinsville
Glenpool
Jenks
Keystone
Leonard
Liberty
Owasso
Sand Springs
Skiatook
Sperry
Tulsa
Union
Tulsa County
0% 10% 20% 30% 40%-10%-20%-30%-40%
Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa
Growth in Hispanic students greatly contributes to changes in enrollment
Percent Change in Enrollment of Students of Hispanic Origin from 1998 to 2004Tulsa County School Districts
Source: Oklahoma State Department of Education, Data Services; Education Oversight Board, Office of Accountability: Profiles State Reports
60%
44.6%
151.1%
-25%43.5%
138.5%
-57.1%0%
133.3%
80.9%
57.5%
27.3%
450%
149.9%
146.1%
137%
Berryhill
Bixby
Broken Arrow
Collinsville
Glenpool
Jenks
Keystone
Leonard
Liberty
Owasso
Sand Springs
Skiatook
Sperry
Tulsa
Union
Tulsa County
0% 100% 200% 300% 400% 500%-100%-200%
Hispanic enrollment 2004:
24
6
0
21
284
137
42
55
6,023
1,506
9,514
162
570
15
99
570
Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa
Many 9th graders do not make it to graduationPercent Change in Average Daily Membership
from 9th Grade to 2005 Graduating ClassTulsa County School Districts
-26%
-20.8%
-10.2%
-9.6%
-8.5%
-14.7%
-8.5%
-24.7%
-18.5%
-23.7%
-11.9%
-29%
-43.7%
-15.9%
Tulsa County
Berryhill
Bixby
Broken Arrow
Collinsville
Glenpool
Jenks
Liberty
Owasso
Sand Springs
Skiatook
Sperry
Tulsa
Union
0% 10%-10%-20%-30%-40%-50%
Source: Oklahoma State Department of Education, Data Services Alternative Education.
Number change in ADM
-22
-29
-109
-12
-22
-62
-14
-111
-115
-30
-29
-1,424
-159
-2,137
Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa
Attrition rates high for every race & Hispanic OriginAttrition Rates from 9th Grade to 12th Grade for 2004 Graduating Class,
based on October 1 Enrollment Totals, by Race and Hispanic Origin
Tulsa County
-21.2%
-44.2%
-21.3%
-39.4%
White Black Native American Hispanic Origin
0%
-10%
-20%
-30%
-40%
-50%
Source: Oklahoma State Department of Education, Data Services Alternative Education.