Top Banner
LHC Emittance Preservation V. Kain, G. Arduini, B. Goddard, B. J. Holzer, J. M. Jowett, M. Meddahi, T. Mertens, F. Roncarolo, M. Schaumann, R. Versteegen, J. Wenninger 1
25

Commissioning of the LHC with beam - CERNˆ’ No measurements at 3.5 TeV for physics beam ... − Not always fully optimized /not publishing the correct value ... o Instrumentation:

Jul 10, 2018

Download

Documents

vokien
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Commissioning of the LHC with beam - CERNˆ’ No measurements at 3.5 TeV for physics beam ... − Not always fully optimized /not publishing the correct value ... o Instrumentation:

LHC

Emittance Preservation

V. Kain, G. Arduini, B. Goddard, B. J. Holzer, J. M. Jowett,

M. Meddahi, T. Mertens, F. Roncarolo, M. Schaumann,

R. Versteegen, J. Wenninger

1

Page 2: Commissioning of the LHC with beam - CERNˆ’ No measurements at 3.5 TeV for physics beam ... − Not always fully optimized /not publishing the correct value ... o Instrumentation:

LHC

Introduction

Performance of collider is measured in luminosity

Will present analysis of emittance preservation from SPS extraction to

start of LHC collisions (mainly 50 ns p+)

2

FfkN

L

*

2

4

Small to maximize

luminostiy

Produce small in injectors → need to

keep small in the LHC

Page 3: Commissioning of the LHC with beam - CERNˆ’ No measurements at 3.5 TeV for physics beam ... − Not always fully optimized /not publishing the correct value ... o Instrumentation:

LHC

Injector Performance

o Impressive performance of injectors

− From design report (25 ns): PSB 2.5 mm – PS 3 mm – SPS 3.5 mm

3

0.5 mm

0.5 mm

50 ns 2011: blow-up PSB to SPS 0.3 – 0.4 mm

Points to be addressed:

o PSB: poorer

performance ring 1,

ring 2

o PS: more blow-up with

higher intensity

o SPS: larger

measurement spread

at extraction

Page 4: Commissioning of the LHC with beam - CERNˆ’ No measurements at 3.5 TeV for physics beam ... − Not always fully optimized /not publishing the correct value ... o Instrumentation:

LHC

Analysed ~ 60 fills between mid July to mid August (50 ns, 1.2 ×1011, *=1.5 m)

Comparison of convoluted emittance from LHC luminosity with SPS wire scan for

144 bunches:

LHC Performance

4

On average ~ 20 - 30 % growth between SPS flattop and

collisions

Page 5: Commissioning of the LHC with beam - CERNˆ’ No measurements at 3.5 TeV for physics beam ... − Not always fully optimized /not publishing the correct value ... o Instrumentation:

LHC

Results of analysis based on SPS/LHC wire scanners, LHC synchrotron light

monitor and luminosity of ATLAS and CMS

o Wire scanners in the SPS:

− Measured in the SPS routinely when setting up (intermediate 12 bunches + nominal 144

bunches)

− No synchronous measurement SPS-LHC

− Large spread in short time scales

o Wire scanners in the LHC:

− Measured routinely intermediate batch (12 bunches)

− Sometimes measured first nominal batch (144 bunches) – intensity limit at 2.5 × 1013 p+

− No measurements at 3.5 TeV for physics beam

Preparation of fill 2240

> 50 % spread

Measurement Limitations 2011 (1)

5

Page 6: Commissioning of the LHC with beam - CERNˆ’ No measurements at 3.5 TeV for physics beam ... − Not always fully optimized /not publishing the correct value ... o Instrumentation:

LHC

Measurement Limitations 2011 (2)

o Continuous beam size measurement with Synchrotron Light Monitor (BSRT):

− Bunch-by-bunch: 3 s per bunch → 69 min (!) per ring;

− Good for relative measurement under same conditions

Absolute calibration not obvious (wire scanners are used for cross-calibration)

Cannot compare data at different energies – cannot see effect of ramp

Could not compare data for different beams/planes

o Emittance from luminosity

− Single emittance value for different beams and planes

− Not always fully optimized /not publishing the correct value

− Assumes Gaussian beams

6

Page 7: Commissioning of the LHC with beam - CERNˆ’ No measurements at 3.5 TeV for physics beam ... − Not always fully optimized /not publishing the correct value ... o Instrumentation:

LHC

Improvements for 2012

o Long list of measurement improvements planned for 2012

o Instrumentation:

− Faster and better calibrated BSRTs

− Commission Beam-gas Ionization Profile Monitor (BGI)

− Pre-prepared wire scanner hardware settings for circulating intensity

− Bunch-by-bunch wire scans in the SPS

o Methods:

− Automatic wire scans during ramp

− Synchronous measurements across the accelerator complex

o Analysis and GUIs:

− Make measured betas available

− More reliable fits

− Write fit results into logging database

7

Page 8: Commissioning of the LHC with beam - CERNˆ’ No measurements at 3.5 TeV for physics beam ... − Not always fully optimized /not publishing the correct value ... o Instrumentation:

LHC

CURRENT UNDERSTANDING

OF LHC EMITTANCE BLOW-UP

8

Page 9: Commissioning of the LHC with beam - CERNˆ’ No measurements at 3.5 TeV for physics beam ... − Not always fully optimized /not publishing the correct value ... o Instrumentation:

LHC

Used:

o Wire scan data from SPS 12 bunches for fills 1960 - 2025

o Wire scan data from LHC beam 1 12 bunches for fills 1960 - 2025

Mismatch at injection?

9

Emittances conserved at injection within measurement

accuracy

LHC/SPS = 1.07 ± 0.11 LHC/SPS = 0.99 ± 0.12

Page 10: Commissioning of the LHC with beam - CERNˆ’ No measurements at 3.5 TeV for physics beam ... − Not always fully optimized /not publishing the correct value ... o Instrumentation:

LHC

o Comparing beam 1 with beam 2 wire scans of 12 bunches

Beam 1 versus Beam 2

10

Using the measured beta functions at wire scanners:

Beam 1 and beam 2 emittances are consistent

LHC1/LHC2 = 0.96 ± 0.08 LHC1/LHC2 = 1.06 ± 0.08

Page 11: Commissioning of the LHC with beam - CERNˆ’ No measurements at 3.5 TeV for physics beam ... − Not always fully optimized /not publishing the correct value ... o Instrumentation:

LHC

Growth @ 450 GeV

o Emittances are growing at injection – reasonably consistent with IBS although

slighty faster

11

Fill 1897, beam 1

BSRT gated over 12 bunches Fill 2028, beam 1

BSRT gated over single bunch

Simulations of IBS, uncoupled

T. Mertens

Horizontal emittance: ~ 10 % in 20 minutes

Filling about 30 minutes → D/ 0 – 10% in H

More studies to come in 2012 to understand

faster growth of bunch length and transverse

emittance

Page 12: Commissioning of the LHC with beam - CERNˆ’ No measurements at 3.5 TeV for physics beam ... − Not always fully optimized /not publishing the correct value ... o Instrumentation:

LHC

→ Effect on bunch-by-bunch luminosity

12

Specific luminosity 10 %

lower for first bunches

consistent with growth

injection A. Ryd, CMS

Page 13: Commissioning of the LHC with beam - CERNˆ’ No measurements at 3.5 TeV for physics beam ... − Not always fully optimized /not publishing the correct value ... o Instrumentation:

LHC

o Cannot use BSRT data, BGI was not commissioned

o Dedicated fills are necessary: low number of bunches to do wire scans through

the ramp

First indication: Abort gap cleaning test fill (12+12+12 bunches, 50 ns)

Used measured at injection and flattop and linear interpolation between

The Ramp

13

Blow-up during the ramp: measurement indicates > 20 % all planes

H0 = 1.6 mm

V0 = 1.4 mm

H0 = 1.6 mm

V0 = 1.3 mm

Page 14: Commissioning of the LHC with beam - CERNˆ’ No measurements at 3.5 TeV for physics beam ... − Not always fully optimized /not publishing the correct value ... o Instrumentation:

LHC

The Ramp - continued

Last BI MD in 2011:

Ramp of 4 bunches per ring – different emittances

Unfortunately no useful wire scan data for beam 1

14

> 20 %

emittance D ~ 1 mm emittance D ~ 0.7 mm

Relative growth different,

but…different emittances grow by the same amount

Although larger than for 12 bunch trains

Page 15: Commissioning of the LHC with beam - CERNˆ’ No measurements at 3.5 TeV for physics beam ... − Not always fully optimized /not publishing the correct value ... o Instrumentation:

LHC

Possible sources for growth @ ramp o Ramp still needs to be further optimized

− Chromaticity,…

o Effect of reduced damper gain during ramp?

15

Example proton Fill 2254 (1380 bunches per beam)

BBQ hor Beam 1amplitude

damper gain hor beam 1(linear scale) HIGH @450 GeVbefore prepare for ramp

ramp (energy)

drop of dampergain

increase of damper(electronic) gain in rampTo maintain approx.same damping rate

increased BBQ amplitude= more residual beam oscillations=> potentially leading to blow-up;but signal needed for tune feedbackwhich is switched on here

rampprepare forramp

Injection plateau

Reduce damper gain

before ramp for tune

feedback →Increase of BBQ

amplitude

W. Hofle

Page 16: Commissioning of the LHC with beam - CERNˆ’ No measurements at 3.5 TeV for physics beam ... − Not always fully optimized /not publishing the correct value ... o Instrumentation:

LHC

Effect of damper gain change

Emittance evolution during fill with single bunch (loss map fill).

Evolution during injection and switch of damper gain during ramp preparation:

16

Effect of damper gain change not clear (data inadequate)!

Required test 2012: change gain and wait at injection

@ 450 GeV

@ 450 GeV

3.5 min

Page 17: Commissioning of the LHC with beam - CERNˆ’ No measurements at 3.5 TeV for physics beam ... − Not always fully optimized /not publishing the correct value ... o Instrumentation:

LHC

o Emittance evolution from BSRT

o Looked at the Abort Gap Cleaning Test Fill (12 + 12 + 12 bunches per ring)

− Integration: 3 s per bunch; averaged over 12 bunches → good resolution

o Blow-up during squeeze for beam 1 H

− Took measured beta at 3.5 m and 1 m from optics team into account!!

− Was there anything different in this fill?

Emittance blow-up at 3.5 TeV

17

Page 18: Commissioning of the LHC with beam - CERNˆ’ No measurements at 3.5 TeV for physics beam ... − Not always fully optimized /not publishing the correct value ... o Instrumentation:

LHC

Blow-up during the squeeze

o Looked at more fills since Evian workshop

− if emittances of all bunches similar → bunch-by-bunch scan of BSRT gives emittance

evolution in time

18

Looked at several fills for end of 2011 → BSRT data consistently shows blow-up for beam 1 H

between * 5 m and 1.5 m. No obvious source.

Needs to be followed up during squeeze commissioning 2012

Bunch emittances similar

Page 19: Commissioning of the LHC with beam - CERNˆ’ No measurements at 3.5 TeV for physics beam ... − Not always fully optimized /not publishing the correct value ... o Instrumentation:

LHC

Dependence on bunch intensity?

19

Approximately constant absolute growth between SPS

extraction and LHC collisions for different bunch intensities

19

Page 20: Commissioning of the LHC with beam - CERNˆ’ No measurements at 3.5 TeV for physics beam ... − Not always fully optimized /not publishing the correct value ... o Instrumentation:

LHC

Ions

o Ions also experience blow-up during the ramp

o Wire scans during the ramp not possible with physics beam

Data taken during quench test on 7th of December, single bunch analyzed

20

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

14:15 14:20 14:25 14:30 14:35 14:40 14:45 14:50

no

rmal

ize

d E

ps.

X (μ

m.r

ad)

Time

Wire Scanner data - B1 - horizontal plane

Ramp

Blow-up of ~ 20 %

Similar to proton trains

Page 21: Commissioning of the LHC with beam - CERNˆ’ No measurements at 3.5 TeV for physics beam ... − Not always fully optimized /not publishing the correct value ... o Instrumentation:

LHC

Summary

o Excellent performance of injectors: 1.9 mm for 1.5 × 1011 p+ per bunch

o Emittances grow 20 % - 30 % from SPS extraction to LHC collisions

o LHC injection: emittances preserved within measurement accuracy

o LHC injection plateau: emittance growth apparent (~ 10 % in 20 minutes for

horizontal plane)

− Continue to minimise time at injection

− Dedicated filling cycle? Reduce time in “prepare ramp”…

o LHC ramp: blow-up in H and V > 20 % (50 ns), more for single bunches

o LHC squeeze: blow-up for beam 1 H, > 20 %

o 2012: understand and (hopefully) correct blow-up

− Expect improvements from measurements, tools and analysis

− Need to sort out during commissioning: INSTRUMENTS, blow-up @squeeze, ramp

optimization, minimize time at injection

− MDs: effect of damper gain and working point,…, IBS

21

Page 22: Commissioning of the LHC with beam - CERNˆ’ No measurements at 3.5 TeV for physics beam ... − Not always fully optimized /not publishing the correct value ... o Instrumentation:

LHC

EXTRA SLIDES

22

Page 23: Commissioning of the LHC with beam - CERNˆ’ No measurements at 3.5 TeV for physics beam ... − Not always fully optimized /not publishing the correct value ... o Instrumentation:

LHC

Challenge for 2012

23

Understand and correct LHC

blow-up

…Make (good) outliers

routine

G. Arduini

Page 24: Commissioning of the LHC with beam - CERNˆ’ No measurements at 3.5 TeV for physics beam ... − Not always fully optimized /not publishing the correct value ... o Instrumentation:

LHC

Beta errors for emittance

o Error emittance only taking error on beta function into account.

o Plot 3 sigma error

24

Page 25: Commissioning of the LHC with beam - CERNˆ’ No measurements at 3.5 TeV for physics beam ... − Not always fully optimized /not publishing the correct value ... o Instrumentation:

LHC

Dependence on bunch intensity?

25 25

H0 = 2.4 mm

V0 = 2.2 mm

Ib = 2.4 x 1011

beam 2 similar

High pile-up MD, fill 2201 (2.4e+11):

Delta similar to BI MD,

but more than with 12 bunch trains

Delta of ~ 1 mm in H

Delta of ~ 0.6 mm in V