Top Banner
Transition Coast Survey Development Laboratory National Ocean Service, NOAA Mary Erickson March 2011
12

Coast Survey Development Laboratory National Ocean Service, NOAA Mary Erickson March 2011.

Dec 27, 2015

Download

Documents

Clementine Ward
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Coast Survey Development Laboratory National Ocean Service, NOAA Mary Erickson March 2011.

Transition

Coast Survey Development Laboratory National Ocean Service,

NOAA

Mary EricksonMarch 2011

Page 2: Coast Survey Development Laboratory National Ocean Service, NOAA Mary Erickson March 2011.

The Developing NOAA Strategy

Space

Time

Phenomena of Interest

Space

Time

Observing Systems

Observations & OSSEIOOS, NESDIS, OAR, JCSDA

Data Assimilation & OSENESDIS, NWS, OAR, JCSDA

Operational Ocean and Coastal Forecast GuidanceNOS, NWS Ops

Products and Services

Research Operations

Giant Bluefin TunaHAB Bulletin

ENSO Update

Page 3: Coast Survey Development Laboratory National Ocean Service, NOAA Mary Erickson March 2011.

The Pathway from Research to Operations and Applications

Actively manage these interfaces, through community

modeling partnerships

Research and Development

Academia, IOOS Regional Associations, Research components of NOAA & other Fed Agencies

Private Sector

Evaluation and Testing,

Development, Transition to Operations

OperationsValue Added

Product Development

Page 4: Coast Survey Development Laboratory National Ocean Service, NOAA Mary Erickson March 2011.

“Operational” defined

Requirements-driven; ◦ Meets a well defined mission need

Timely and Reliable;◦ Runs regularly & automatically in real time (24x7)

Demonstrates improvement; decreased uncertainty

Can fit well in the operational framework◦ Standardized formats, methodologies

Integrated QC (integrity guaranteed) Stability & commitment for the model life-cycle

Page 5: Coast Survey Development Laboratory National Ocean Service, NOAA Mary Erickson March 2011.

A community approach…◦ Allows for open discussion of strengths and

weaknesses of different models◦ Elucidates the requirements of a common

shared infrastructure◦ Allows model improvements to be shared

effectively◦ Advances the science (R2O/ O2R)◦ Leverages resources and amplifies the voice of

the community

The Community Approach

Page 6: Coast Survey Development Laboratory National Ocean Service, NOAA Mary Erickson March 2011.

1. Define criteria for transition and actively use these guidelines in partnership activities Includes methods, standards and criteria for

evaluating modeling systems (skill scores, etc.) Support transition through NOAA modeling

involvement in key partnerships with academia, state and local governments, and industry.

Examples: ROMS; ADCIRC; HYCOM communities2. Create environments for evaluation and

prototyping; shared datasets Working, high quality grids, forcing, observations,

in a shared resource Example: Grid catalog; Delaware Bay Model

Evaluation Environment

Goals and Shared Practices

Page 7: Coast Survey Development Laboratory National Ocean Service, NOAA Mary Erickson March 2011.

3. Articulate “best” data management practices Ex: Model outputs in standard formats for ingest into GIS for analysis, mapping, and visualization

4. Follow and develop community framework and infrastructure: Earth System Modeling Framework- Model coupling, numerics, gridding techniques, etc.

5. Systems Approach: Integrating streamflow, runoff, water levels, waves, currents, T, S, etc.

Ocean and atmosphere systems linkedPhysical-biochemical systems linked

Goals and Shared Practices

Page 8: Coast Survey Development Laboratory National Ocean Service, NOAA Mary Erickson March 2011.

Early involvements of Operations Center; agreed to operational or “applications” pathway

Clear plans and schedules; business case (ties back to customer value)

Clear funding for full life-cycle, including O+M

Routine check-in with key stakeholders – including management

Anticipate the unexpected

Other ingredients for successful transition

Page 9: Coast Survey Development Laboratory National Ocean Service, NOAA Mary Erickson March 2011.

NOS/NOAA Marine Modeling Requirements

o Support of safe & efficient navigation o Water levels for under-keel clearanceo Currents for right-of-way, maneuverabilityo Future-chart w/forecast water levels and real timeo bathymetry

o Inundation o Storm Surgeo Sea Level Rise

o Note also: Coastal flooding, tsunami

o Emergency response HAZMAT Homeland Security Search & Rescue

o For environmentally sound management of the coastal zone

Ecosystem applications Marine geospatial applications (CMSP) Energy, Arctic

Salinity

SST

Page 10: Coast Survey Development Laboratory National Ocean Service, NOAA Mary Erickson March 2011.

Already seeing benefits from improved communication and awareness of operational constructs.

Which sets of issues are we trying to improve on? Which part of the cycle?

Interdisciplinary is key; and its hard

Discussion Points (one perspective)

Page 11: Coast Survey Development Laboratory National Ocean Service, NOAA Mary Erickson March 2011.

Backup

Page 12: Coast Survey Development Laboratory National Ocean Service, NOAA Mary Erickson March 2011.

Coastal Ocean Modeling FrameworkConsists of middleware to manage workflow

PURPOSE: Simplify Data Handling & Maintenance Provide a Single System for all Locations Provide a Single Source Graphics and Web Pages Share Skill Assessment and Evaluation Tools Provide a Single NOS Model Image to Users

(NetCDF) Various Models considered

◦ ADCIRC, ECOM, EFDC, ELCIRC, FVCOM, MECCA, POM, QUODDY, ROMS

◦ NOS has selected ROMS and FVCOM as the basis for new OFSsto select two or three “corporate” models