Taking Six Sigma & Lean beyond projects North Shore-LIJ Health System ncy Riebling, MS., MT(ASCP) rector of Operational Performance Solutions
Dec 13, 2014
Taking Six Sigma & Lean beyond projects
North Shore-LIJ Health System
Nancy Riebling, MS., MT(ASCP)Director of Operational Performance Solutions
Health System HospitalCompetitor Hospital
Key:
North Shore-LIJ Overview
15 Hospitals* -3 Tertiary
-10 Community
-Children
-Psychiatric
16 Long Term Care Facilities* Home Care (539,800 visits) Hospice Core Lab Ambulance Transport Research Institute
-200 Scientists
-$36 Million in Grants
31% Market Share 5.5 M Population Served 1.7 M Ambulatory Visits 239,400 Discharges 473,100 Emergency Visits 1,216 Residents
-99 Residency Programs
-5 Medical School Affiliations
-1,300 Medical Students
7,500 Nurses 8,000 Physicians
1,380 Faculty
$4.5 Billion in Revenue –
A-Rated Oblig. Grp.
3rd Largest Secular Health
System in U.S.
38,000 Employees
-L.I.’s Largest Employer
Ambulatory Care Network
Physician Network
Developing a Medical
School in Partnership with
Hofstra University* Includes affiliates
State of QualityState of Quality
Despite our best efforts, serious quality and safety Despite our best efforts, serious quality and safety
problems persist. Many problems are highly visible and problems persist. Many problems are highly visible and
stakeholders are demanding excellence.stakeholders are demanding excellence.
Mark Chassin, MD, FACP, MPP, Mark Chassin, MD, FACP, MPP, MPHMPH
President, The Joint Commission President, The Joint Commission
The Big Challenge
To transform health care to high reliability---
with rates of adverse events and breakdowns
in safety processes comparable to the best
high reliability organizations in the world
Mark Chassin, MD, FACP, MPP, MPH
President, The Joint Commission
The Question Becomes..….The Question Becomes..….
• How do we become aligned with this new environment?
• What are the Human Capital requirements essential for organizational success?
Becoming A Responsive Learning Organization…
• Directing
• Controlling
• Decision Making
• Change Initiating
• “Turf”
• Silos
Top Down Top Down
Bottom Up
Lead
ership
Lead
ership
Em
plo
yee
sE
mp
loye
es
Le
ade
rsh
ipL
ead
ers
hip
Traditional
• Guiding
• Leading
• Communicating Vision
• Developing Strategy
• A system approach to team decision making
• Disciplined Problem-solving
• Systematic organizational change
• Empowered cross functional teams and individuals
Ideal
The Path To Integration And StandardizationThe Path To Integration And Standardization
Progress to Date
Non-Clinical Clinical
• Human Resources• Employee/Development• Finance/Audit• Strategic Planning• Compliance• Legal• Contracting• Real Estate/Construction• Community Health Investment
• Quality Standards• Leadership• Nursing Strategy• Departmental
Integration• Academic Affairs• Clinical Service Line
Strategy• Faculty Practice
Emerging Process Improvement Methodologies: Six Sigma, Lean, ISO, Baldrige
Each possess a distinct philosophy, vocabulary and method but all emphasize the need to make all aspects of care better and more reliable than they currently are.
High reliability concepts help focus attention on the mindset and culture that is essential for any of these approaches to work.
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, 2008
http://www.ahrq.gov/qual/hroadvice/hroadvice1.htm
Deployment Timeline for Operational Performance Solutions
2001 -2003
• Planning • Six Sigma, • CAP • FTD
• Learning • Six Sigma• CAP• FTD
• Developing• Capstone
2003 -2005
• Deploying & Integrating• Six Sigma• CAP• FTD• Capstone
• Learning Lean
2006 -2009
• Deploying & Integrating• Lean
• Integrating and Refining• Six Sigma• CAP• FTD• Capstone•System Value Analysis Teams•Labor Management Process Improvement Teams
How: From Theory to Practice• Essential Requirements
Focus on people at the ground level Build teams – teach tools Directly connect with companies’ business imperatives Promote and mandate transferability of “best practices”
• The Tools – (In context of overall employee development program)
• The Report-Out
FTD
LEAN
Capstone
Six Sigma
Fast Track Decision making facilitates problem solving activities with stakeholders to identify solutions in a compressed time frame.
Taking the Fat Out – process improvement methodology focusing on value-added activities and removal of those activities which undermine optimal performance
At the conclusion of core management training, participants study real problems and create solutions in their home facilities
Data driven, statistically validated methodology for quality measurement and improvement based upon customer needs and reduction of variation and process defects
Standardized processes are the foundation for continuous improvement, quality, and employee empowerment
• Standardize Best Practices
• Allow creative and individual expression to improve upon a standard
• Use repeatable, stable methods to maintain predictability of the output of your processes
• Add value to the organization by developing people and grow leaders who understand the work, live the philosophy and teach it to others.
• Innovators go outside the comfort zone – learn from multiple industries (e.g.. Toyota, GE, etc.)
GOAL
FTD Lean Capstone Six Sigma
Issues
How Much Time Is Needed 1 day <30 days 6-8 Weeks 4-6 months
Excessive Waste X X
Need to Increase Flexibility X
Data Available X X X
Data Needs to be Collected X X
Chronic Issue X X X
Long Cycle Times X X X
Excessive Process Defects X X
Excessive Motion X
Excess Inventory X
Need to Increase Capacity X X X X
Multidisciplinary Team Available X X
Complex Problem X
Multiple Step Process X X X
Excessive Or Hidden Rework X X
Excessive Process Variation X
Asses Value-added Activities X
Excessive Bureaucracy X X X
Rapid Implementation Needed X X
Know Current Process Capability X
Long Term Control Mechanism X XThe Center for Learning & Innovation c
Operational Performance Solutions Decision Matrix
LEAN / LEAN / Six Sigma Six Sigma
MethodologyMethodology
LEAN / LEAN / Six Sigma Six Sigma
MethodologyMethodology
Change Change Acceleration Acceleration
ProcessProcess
Change Change Acceleration Acceleration
ProcessProcessEffective Effective ResultsResults
Effective Effective ResultsResults
Fast Track Decision-MakingFast Track Decision-MakingFast Track Decision-MakingFast Track Decision-Making
Lean Six Sigma and Fast Track Decision-Making ensure a quality solution, while CAP greatly increases the organization’s acceptance of change.
The Effectiveness (E) of the result is equal to the Quality (Q) of the solution times the Acceptance (A) of the idea and the degree of Accountability (A).
Proven method for results
Q Q x x A A22 = E = EQuality X Acceptance & Accountability =
Effectiveness
Systematic Approaches to Process Improvement
Role of the MBB/BB
• Full-time position, 100% dedicated to supporting improvement teams
• Expert resources for multiple teams
• Provide coaching, training on a periodic basis, technical tools, process improvement methods, and teamwork issues
HOW DO WE GO BEYOND A PROJECT MENTALITY?
Value AnalysisProcess
TSI/S
IS/R
IS
Data
System D
irector Team
s
Site Leadership
Pro
cure
men
t
Cor
pora
te
Fina
nce
CMO &
COO
Value Analysis Process
Category/MetricService
Skill of person who took blood-IP
Quality
1 hr TAT from time of draw - IP
Financial Performance
Salary dollars compared to budgetSupply expense compared to budget
Service
Skill of person who took blood-IP Press Ganey Scores based on Press Ganey
Quality
1 hr TAT from time of draw - IP Lean Analysis
Operational Performance
Salary dollars compared to budgetSupply expense compared to budget
+-=
Trend
XXXXXXXX Hospital
Source Definition
Annual GoalYTD Actual
YTD ActualYTD
Stretch Goal
YTD Actual Annual Goal Stretch Goal
%ile Score %ile
Budget Variance
Score
# Top PerfsTotal
Indicators Top 10% Top 10%
84
# Top PerfsTotal
Indicators
Score %ile
# Top PerfsTotal
Indicators Top 10%
60min
DRAFT
Trend
Trend
North Shore-Long Island Jewish Health System
Departmental Metrics (Ancillary)For the Period Ending mm/dd/yyyy
87
DecliningConstant
People Soft Monthly Expense ReportsPeople Soft Monthly Expense Reports
Source Definition
Source Definition
Trend LegendImproving
Time of draw to time resulted
LEANLEAN
Project Title: Laboratory 60 min Turn Around Time from Point of Draw to Result ReleaseProject Description: Utilizing Lean-Six Sigma methodologies we analyzed all three phases involved with blood specimen collection to result release. The first phase, phlebotomy process had extended turn around times well beyond our target upper specification limit (USL) of 20 minutes. Both the accessioning and technical (analytical) components also had elevated TATs above our target USL of 40 minutes. Hospital/Organization: Franklin, Forest Hills, Southside, Plainview, Syosset
Process Owner: Joe Castagnaro / Mike Eller / Bob Filangeri / Nick Videtto
Black Belt: Laure TriaMaster Black Belt: Nancy RieblingTeam: Multiple team members from all facilities (Hospitals and Core)
Project Title: Laboratory 60 min Turn Around Time from Point of Draw to Result ReleaseProject Description: Utilizing Lean-Six Sigma methodologies we analyzed all three phases involved with blood specimen collection to result release. The first phase, phlebotomy process had extended turn around times well beyond our target upper specification limit (USL) of 20 minutes. Both the accessioning and technical (analytical) components also had elevated TATs above our target USL of 40 minutes. Hospital/Organization: Franklin, Forest Hills, Southside, Plainview, Syosset
Process Owner: Joe Castagnaro / Mike Eller / Bob Filangeri / Nick Videtto
Black Belt: Laure TriaMaster Black Belt: Nancy RieblingTeam: Multiple team members from all facilities (Hospitals and Core)
Six Sigma/LeanSustainability Report out
Project Status
December 2007
Labor Management Projects
• In unionized hospitals incorporating the tools of six sigma & lean to solve issues.
• Collaborative teams- union & management
• Breakthrough Strategy
Rapid Cycle
Projects
Methods to Achieve Results
ImprovedPerformance
Improverelations
Sponsor: Donna KubeProcess Owners: Virginia Dignam
Donna Kube Project Mentors: Antz Joseph
Clyde Riggins
Sponsor: Donna KubeProcess Owners: Virginia Dignam
Donna Kube Project Mentors: Antz Joseph
Clyde Riggins
Team Co-Leaders:Virginia Dignam
•Team Members:Gerry Baldwin, MaterialsMilton Dykes, LabEllen Farber, RespiratoryErin Granville, DietarySteven Meier, TransportJarid Paehter, MD - ResidentGail Ruben, RNRob Voce, RadiologyTara Zahtila, MD - Resident
Team Co-Leaders:Virginia Dignam
•Team Members:Gerry Baldwin, MaterialsMilton Dykes, LabEllen Farber, RespiratoryErin Granville, DietarySteven Meier, TransportJarid Paehter, MD - ResidentGail Ruben, RNRob Voce, RadiologyTara Zahtila, MD - Resident
Project Scope:The project will focus on 1 east PCU unit on all shifts
Project Scope:The project will focus on 1 east PCU unit on all shifts
Project Description / Problem Statement:Low Press Ganey scores reflect our customer’s dissatisfaction regarding noise. Current the db noise level on the PCU can reach a high of 65 db. This has contributed to a Press Ganey score of 65.4
Project Description / Problem Statement:Low Press Ganey scores reflect our customer’s dissatisfaction regarding noise. Current the db noise level on the PCU can reach a high of 65 db. This has contributed to a Press Ganey score of 65.4
Potential Benefits:• Improve patients ability to rest and heal• improve satisfaction scores
Potential Benefits:• Improve patients ability to rest and heal• improve satisfaction scores
Project Goal:Reduce the current high db noise level from 65 to 59 as well as increasing the Press Ganey score on the unit on noise level.
Project Goal:Reduce the current high db noise level from 65 to 59 as well as increasing the Press Ganey score on the unit on noise level.
Plainview
North Shore-Long Island Jewish Health System
The Effectiveness (E) of the result is equal to the Quality (Q) of the solution times the Acceptance (A) of the idea and the degree of Accountability (A).
Q Q x x AA22 = E = EQuality X Acceptance & Accountability =
Effectiveness
SYSTEM QUALITY INITIATIVES
“Just in time learning”
Population health improvementPopulation health improvementPopulation health improvementPopulation health improvement
IMPERATIVESIMPERATIVES
Reduce unnecessary variationReduce unnecessary variationand overuse in careand overuse in care
Reduce unnecessary variationReduce unnecessary variationand overuse in careand overuse in care
ACTIONABLE INITIATIVESACTIONABLE INITIATIVES Increase use of evidence based medicine and
national protocols and guidelines (Sepsis)
Reduce healthcare acquired infections (central line)
Eliminate wrong site surgery and retained
foreign bodies
Improve care coordination andImprove care coordination andpatient safetypatient safety
Improve care coordination andImprove care coordination andpatient safetypatient safety
Increase Mammography screening
Increase Colonoscopy screening
Increase Diabetes screening
Integrate the continuum of careIntegrate the continuum of careIntegrate the continuum of careIntegrate the continuum of care
Deployment of Collaborative Care Model
Implementation of “Who’s in charge?”
Team STEPPS Deployment
Improved medication management
Increase medication reconciliation on
admission and discharge Increase appropriate use of post acute care
Improve discharge planning and follow-up
Increase stakeholder trust byIncrease stakeholder trust byengaging patients and familiesengaging patients and familiesIncrease stakeholder trust byIncrease stakeholder trust by
engaging patients and familiesengaging patients and families
Enhanced Transparency Create a Culture of Safety Involve patients and families in all decisions
Improve Palliative and End-of-Life care
Reduce unnecessaryReduce unnecessaryvariation and overusevariation and overuse
in carein care
Reduce unnecessaryReduce unnecessaryvariation and overusevariation and overuse
in carein care
Who is In Charge?Who is In Charge?
North Shore Long Island Jewish Health North Shore Long Island Jewish Health SystemSystem
September 2008September 2008
Sponsor •Michael Dowling
National Center for Healthcare Leadership
Team: Top Physician & Nursing leaders
ProblemPatient safety, service excellence and operational efficiency were being adversely affected by both the inability to clearly identify the name of the individual responsible for coordinating and directing the care provided to a patient as well as the inconsistency of that individual assuming the responsibilities inherent in that designation
Core Management-Future Leaders
The North Shore-LIJ WayMyers-Briggs Type IndicatorEffective Leadership Communicating with Impact & Influence Quality Management Tools for Operational Improvement
Four Required Classes from your Leadership Track One example:Performance Management Business WritingSystems ThinkingThe OZ Principle
To Graduate from Program:
• Complete all ten classes within 12 months of start of 1st program class
• Full participation on a Capstone project including reporting-out
• Participation, completion and submission to CLI of a three (3) month follow-up template
Project Goal:
• Reduce the inappropriate PT referral rate from 18% to 5%.
Project Goal:
• Reduce the inappropriate PT referral rate from 18% to 5%.
Potential Benefits:• Increase operational efficiencies of PT resources• Improve response time for required services• Increase patient, staff, and physician satisfaction• Decrease length of stay
Potential Benefits:• Increase operational efficiencies of PT resources• Improve response time for required services• Increase patient, staff, and physician satisfaction• Decrease length of stay
Project Scope:
• 3 Cohen and 3 DSU
• All Physical Therapy Referrals
• 7 days a week
Project Scope:
• 3 Cohen and 3 DSU
• All Physical Therapy Referrals
• 7 days a week
Project Description/Problem Statement:Inappropriate Physical Therapy (PT) referrals are defined as those occurrences where PT has been ordered and subsequently been determined by thetherapist as unnecessary. Consequently, this leads to inefficiencies in the use of PT resources as well as delay of service for those patients requiring PT. Currently, 18% of all referrals ordered are consideredinappropriate.
Project Description/Problem Statement:Inappropriate Physical Therapy (PT) referrals are defined as those occurrences where PT has been ordered and subsequently been determined by thetherapist as unnecessary. Consequently, this leads to inefficiencies in the use of PT resources as well as delay of service for those patients requiring PT. Currently, 18% of all referrals ordered are consideredinappropriate.
Team Members:• Jackie Baranowski-Guido• Mary Christman• Gloria Lopez• Joan Matthews• Keith Saunders
Team Members:• Jackie Baranowski-Guido• Mary Christman• Gloria Lopez• Joan Matthews• Keith Saunders
Facility: Manhasset Project Title: Reduction of Inappropriate
Physical Therapy Referrals Sponsor: Darice Brodsky Process Owner: Richie Singson, PT Department
Penelope McGuinness, 3 DSU Mary Ellen Meehan, 3 Cohen Mentor: Antz JosephProject Start Date: June 18, 2007
Facility: Manhasset Project Title: Reduction of Inappropriate
Physical Therapy Referrals Sponsor: Darice Brodsky Process Owner: Richie Singson, PT Department
Penelope McGuinness, 3 DSU Mary Ellen Meehan, 3 Cohen Mentor: Antz JosephProject Start Date: June 18, 2007
Other Programs
• Hofstra University/NSLIJ MBA
• Pediatric Fellow’s Critical Care Program
• Administrative Fellows Program
Operational Performance
Solutions
Six Sigma Lean
FTD System Initiatives
Labor Management
Value Analysis
Simulation
LOS of ortho patients
OR infection rate
Transfer of monitored patients
Role of the MT
Employee Health Service TAT
HR-Termination Process
LIJ
Plainview
Syosset
Forest Hills
Southside
Zucker/Hillside
Franklin
Housekeeping
Lab
Radiology
Linen
Periop
Lab Accessionin
Zucker-Hillside/LIJ ED TAT
Bed Management
Who’s in charge
Sepsis
Forest Hills ED
2009 Initiatives
Capstone
Infectious Disease
Number of phlebotomy sticks on Ped Patients
HRRetirement Process
QUESTIONS ?QUESTIONS ?