Top Banner
Cholera in 1849 and Cholera in 1849 and the Biopsychosocial the Biopsychosocial Model: Historical Model: Historical Analysis or Analysis or Anachronism? Anachronism? The Snowflakes of MSU: Peter Vinten-Johansen Howard Brody Nigel Paneth Steve Rachman Michael Rip
32

Cholera in 1849 and the Biopsychosocial Model: Historical Analysis or Anachronism?

Feb 25, 2016

Download

Documents

Kane

Cholera in 1849 and the Biopsychosocial Model: Historical Analysis or Anachronism?. The Snowflakes of MSU: Peter Vinten-Johansen Howard Brody Nigel Paneth Steve Rachman Michael Rip. The Argument. One can draw useful analogies between: Today’s biopsychosocial model of human health, and - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Cholera in 1849 and the Biopsychosocial Model: Historical Analysis or Anachronism?

Cholera in 1849 and the Cholera in 1849 and the Biopsychosocial Model: Biopsychosocial Model:

Historical Analysis or Historical Analysis or Anachronism?Anachronism?

The Snowflakes of MSU:Peter Vinten-Johansen

Howard BrodyNigel Paneth

Steve RachmanMichael Rip

Page 2: Cholera in 1849 and the Biopsychosocial Model: Historical Analysis or Anachronism?

The ArgumentThe ArgumentOne can draw useful analogies

between: – Today’s biopsychosocial model of

human health, and – The scientific approaches used by John

Snow to study both cholera transmission and inhalation anesthesia in 1846-56?

Page 3: Cholera in 1849 and the Biopsychosocial Model: Historical Analysis or Anachronism?

The Argument--IIThe Argument--IIThe BPS modelJohn Snow and his careerMethods of studying anesthesiaMethods of studying cholera

transmissionSnow’s theoretical synthesis (“continuous

molecular changes”)

Page 4: Cholera in 1849 and the Biopsychosocial Model: Historical Analysis or Anachronism?
Page 5: Cholera in 1849 and the Biopsychosocial Model: Historical Analysis or Anachronism?

Engel, 1977: BPS ModelEngel, 1977: BPS ModelSystems (part-whole relations)Multilevel hierarchy (atoms to

biosphere)“Ripple effects” among levelsPatterns of information flow

(feedback loops)Anti-reductionistic

Page 6: Cholera in 1849 and the Biopsychosocial Model: Historical Analysis or Anachronism?

BPS: SourcesBPS: SourcesGeneral systems theory (von

Bertalanffy, Laszlo)– Cybernetics (von Neumann),

information theory, game theory“Holistic” biology (Dubos, Mayr)All grounded in mid-20th-century

thought

Page 7: Cholera in 1849 and the Biopsychosocial Model: Historical Analysis or Anachronism?
Page 8: Cholera in 1849 and the Biopsychosocial Model: Historical Analysis or Anachronism?

John Snow: Early LifeJohn Snow: Early LifeBorn 1813, YorkFather: Laborer/farmerMother: IllegitimateApprentice in Newcastle, 1827-32Cared for coal miners in 1831-32 cholera

epidemic

Page 9: Cholera in 1849 and the Biopsychosocial Model: Historical Analysis or Anachronism?

John Snow: Life (cont.)John Snow: Life (cont.)Newcastle medical school, 1832-34Assistant, Newcastle and Yorkshire,

1834-36Walked to London (via Bath), 1836Hunterian school and Westminster

Hospital, 1836-38MRCS/LSA, 1838General practice, Soho, 1838

Page 10: Cholera in 1849 and the Biopsychosocial Model: Historical Analysis or Anachronism?

John Snow: Later lifeJohn Snow: Later life Active in Westminster Medical Society MD, Univ. of London, 1844 Begins anesthetic research and practice, 1847 On the Mode of Communication of Cholera, 1849 Attends Queen Victoria, 1853, 1857 Broad Street Pump, 1854 President, Medical Society of London, 1855 Completes On Chloroform, 1858 Death of apoplexy, 1858

Page 11: Cholera in 1849 and the Biopsychosocial Model: Historical Analysis or Anachronism?

Snow on EtherSnow on EtherDec. 1846: Sees ether used in LondonJan. 1847: Displays data on relation

between concentration and temperature; working on apparatus

September 1847: Publishes On Ether, 80 cases, describes degrees of anesthesia

Page 12: Cholera in 1849 and the Biopsychosocial Model: Historical Analysis or Anachronism?

How?How?Snow’s research, 1838-46, ideally

prepared him for ether:– Studies of respiration and asphyxia– Studies of chemistry and physics of gases– Properties of inhaled medications and

poisons– Design of new apparatus

Page 13: Cholera in 1849 and the Biopsychosocial Model: Historical Analysis or Anachronism?

Snow’s Approach to EtherSnow’s Approach to EtherChemical level: problem in defining

physics and chemistry e.g. concentration-temperature relationships

Physiological level: animal experiments with different concentrations of gases

Clinical level: correlate bedside observations with animal experiments to predict degrees of anesthesia

Page 14: Cholera in 1849 and the Biopsychosocial Model: Historical Analysis or Anachronism?

Ether and ChloroformEther and Chloroform Define a class of agents with similar properties

(“narcotism”), of which anesthesia only one effect

Calculate precise serum concentrations of agent when inhaled at given concentration in air

Correlate serum concentration with clinically observed effects

Hardly anyone else doing this work in 1847-58

Page 15: Cholera in 1849 and the Biopsychosocial Model: Historical Analysis or Anachronism?

Snow and Cholera: 1848-9Snow and Cholera: 1848-9Cholera must be communicable person-to-

person based on geographic distributionA local affection of alimentary canal;

dehydration produces systemic symptomsAssumed to be inhaled by lungs– why must

this be true?

Page 16: Cholera in 1849 and the Biopsychosocial Model: Historical Analysis or Anachronism?

Snow’s TheorySnow’s TheoryCausal agent of cholera ingestedMultiplies in gut Causes symptoms of disease by irritating

mucous membraneShed in evacuationsHousehold spread: dirty handsArea spread: drinking water

Page 17: Cholera in 1849 and the Biopsychosocial Model: Historical Analysis or Anachronism?

Budd, Brittain, Swayne 1849Budd, Brittain, Swayne 1849

Microscopic particle must cause cholera

Therefore must search for evidence at microscopic level

Identified “cholera fungus”Identification quickly refuted

Page 18: Cholera in 1849 and the Biopsychosocial Model: Historical Analysis or Anachronism?

Snow, 1849Snow, 1849

Molecular

Cellular

Organ/System

Household

Community

“Continuous molecular changes”(self-replication of vital processes)

Can’t identify agent; analogy toova of intestinal worms

Irritation > Diarrhea > Dehydration

Spread by poor hygiene

Spread by contaminated drinkingwater

Page 19: Cholera in 1849 and the Biopsychosocial Model: Historical Analysis or Anachronism?

Snow on Cholera, 1849Snow on Cholera, 1849Move from levels where “collateral

sciences” least developed to levels allowing better tools for investigation

Ova of worms: analogy of functional properties

Cf. “Cholera fungus”: identified a structure but had no idea of function

Page 20: Cholera in 1849 and the Biopsychosocial Model: Historical Analysis or Anachronism?

Cholera Deaths per 10,000 Cholera Deaths per 10,000 Households (Snow, 1855)Households (Snow, 1855)

01020304050607080

Lambeth Co. Southwark & Vauxhall Co.

(first weeks of epidemic)

Page 21: Cholera in 1849 and the Biopsychosocial Model: Historical Analysis or Anachronism?

Snow’s Method, 1849-1855Snow’s Method, 1849-1855Ultimately discovered that statistics was a

sounder basis for investigation than microscopy

Reasoned across levels to deduce likely effects at neighborhood and community levels

Then gathered data to confirm or disconfirm hypotheses

Page 22: Cholera in 1849 and the Biopsychosocial Model: Historical Analysis or Anachronism?

Continuous Molecular Continuous Molecular Changes, 1853Changes, 1853

Page 23: Cholera in 1849 and the Biopsychosocial Model: Historical Analysis or Anachronism?

CMC, 1853CMC, 1853Annual oration to Medical Society of

LondonRare opportunity to speak at theoretical-

speculative levelOpportunity to link (successful)

anesthesia research with (so far rejected) cholera theory

Page 24: Cholera in 1849 and the Biopsychosocial Model: Historical Analysis or Anachronism?

CMC, 1853-- IICMC, 1853-- II“Molecular” = smallest level of

organization, “insensible” (very small) distances between particles acting on each other

“Change” = constant flux at molecular level in either living or non-living matter (common chemical basis of vital and non-vital)

Page 25: Cholera in 1849 and the Biopsychosocial Model: Historical Analysis or Anachronism?

CMC, 1853--IIICMC, 1853--III“Continuous” = molecular processes

peculiar to living things; never commence anew without continuity with previous processes of same type

Combustion/oxidation– a bridging process, exists in both living and non-living matter

Page 26: Cholera in 1849 and the Biopsychosocial Model: Historical Analysis or Anachronism?

Anesthesia: Counter-AffinityAnesthesia: Counter-Affinity

A B

C

C exerts pull on A and prevents A from combining with B,without itself combining

Page 27: Cholera in 1849 and the Biopsychosocial Model: Historical Analysis or Anachronism?

Anesthesia TheoryAnesthesia Theory

C = anesthetic agentA <-> B = oxidation process

responsible for maintaining consciousness and sensation

Reversible interference with normal bodily process

Page 28: Cholera in 1849 and the Biopsychosocial Model: Historical Analysis or Anachronism?

CMC and Epidemic CMC and Epidemic DiseasesDiseases

Causative agent of disease enters bodyBy CMC, replicates itself inside bodyHijacks normal body processes of

oxidation, etc. to support its own replication

Disruption of normal body processes causes symptoms of disease (irreversible in extreme cases)

Page 29: Cholera in 1849 and the Biopsychosocial Model: Historical Analysis or Anachronism?

““Communication”Communication”“Mode of Communication” of epidemic

diseases“Communication” among molecules

accounting for continuity of vital processes– infections agents as packets of information (computer viruses?)

Social and cultural communication as analogous flows of information

Page 30: Cholera in 1849 and the Biopsychosocial Model: Historical Analysis or Anachronism?

The communication of certain molecular changestaking place in the brain is by no means confined to…parents and offspring, but extends collaterallyin all directions, by means of vibrations in the air…If the brain of an animal is in a particular state ofmolecular action, from any object that excites fearor joy, it may cause a similar state in the brain ofothers of the species, by uttering a cry or merelyassuming a particular demeanour.

Page 31: Cholera in 1849 and the Biopsychosocial Model: Historical Analysis or Anachronism?

The faculty of speech gives man a power ofcommunicating his complex feelings and ideas, far exceeding that of lower animals; and theinvention of literature has greatly increased this power in civilized nations. By speech, not onlycan fresh sensations and ideas be communicated,but also that continuation of them calledremembrance, by which they revive after, it may be a long interval of suspended animation.

Page 32: Cholera in 1849 and the Biopsychosocial Model: Historical Analysis or Anachronism?

Snow’s Social VisionSnow’s Social VisionAccording to Snow, his oration “On

Continuous Molecular Changes” was itself an example of continuous molecular change in human organisms and human society

Both chemical and social processes viewed as governed by patterns of information flow (“communication”)