Chloroplast Photooxidation-Induced Transcriptome ... · PDF fileChloroplast Photooxidation-Induced Transcriptome Reprogramming in ... desaturase inhibition play an important role in
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Chloroplast Photooxidation-Induced TranscriptomeReprogramming in Arabidopsis immutans WhiteLeaf Sectors1[W][OA]
Maneesha R. Aluru, Jaroslaw Zola, Andrew Foudree, and Steven R. Rodermel*
Department of Genetics, Development, and Cell Biology (M.R.A., A.F., S.R.R.) and Department of Electricaland Computer Engineering (J.Z.), Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa 50011
Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) immutans (im) has green and white sectoring due to the action of a nuclear recessive gene,IMMUTANS. The green sectors contain normal-appearing chloroplasts, whereas the white sectors contain abnormalchloroplasts that lack colored carotenoids due to a defect in phytoene desaturase activity. Previous biochemical and molecularcharacterizations of the green leaf sectors revealed alterations suggestive of a source-sink relationship between the green andwhite sectors of im. In this study, we use an Affymetrix ATH1 oligoarray to further explore the nature of sink metabolism in imwhite tissues. We show that lack of colored carotenoids in the im white tissues elicits a differential response from a largenumber of genes involved in various cellular processes and stress responses. Gene expression patterns correlate with therepression of photosynthesis and photosynthesis-related processes in imwhite tissues, with an induction of Suc catabolism andtransport, and with mitochondrial electron transport and fermentation. These results suggest that energy is derived via aerobicand anaerobic metabolism of imported sugar in im white tissues for growth and development. We also show that oxidativestress responses are largely induced in im white tissues; however, im green sectors develop additional energy-dissipatingmechanisms that perhaps allow for the formation of green sectors. Furthermore, a comparison of the transcriptomes of imwhite and norflurazon-treated white leaf tissues reveals global as well as tissue-specific responses to photooxidation. Weconclude that the differences in the mechanism of phytoene desaturase inhibition play an important role in differentiatingthese two white tissues.
Green-white variegation in the Arabidopsis (Arabi-dopsis thaliana) immutans (im) mutant is induced by anuclear recessive gene, IMMUTANS (IM). The greensectors contain cells with morphologically normalchloroplasts, whereas plastids in cells of the whitesectors lack pigments and organized lamellar struc-tures (Wetzel et al., 1994). The extent of white sectorformation in im is dependent upon the illumination con-ditions during growth: increased light intensity causesenhanced white sector formation (nearly all-whiteplants), while nearly all-green plants are produced bygrowth under low-light conditions (for review, seeAluru et al., 2006).
Early biochemical experiments showed that whitesectors of im accumulate phytoene, indicating that thephytoene desaturase (PDS) step of carotenogenesis isblocked in the mutant (Wetzel et al., 1994). Cloning ofIM by map-based and T-DNA-tagging procedures
revealed that the gene product is homologous toalternative oxidase (AOX) of mitochondrial innermembranes (Carol et al., 1999; Wu et al., 1999). Infact, it is now well established that IM, like AOX,serves as a terminal (quinol) oxidase in thylakoidmembranes, where it accepts electrons from plasto-quinol and transfers them to molecular oxygen togenerate water (Cournac et al., 2000; Carol and Kuntz,2001; Joet et al., 2002; Aluru et al., 2006; Rosso et al.,2006). IM is expressed ubiquitously in Arabidopsisand has been suggested to play a global role in plastidmetabolism (Aluru et al., 2001; Yu et al., 2007).
One process where IM acts as a terminal oxidase isduring the desaturation reactions of carotenogenesis:electrons from phytoene are transferred to the plasto-quinone pool via PDS and then to molecular oxygenvia IM (Josse et al., 2000). Accordingly, it has beenhypothesized that a lack of IM would lead to over-reduction of the plastoquinone pool and to an accu-mulation of phytoene, preventing the formation ofcolored carotenoids (Joet et al., 2002; Aluru et al., 2006;Rosso et al., 2006). Since colored carotenoids protectchloroplasts against reactive oxygen species (ROS)-induced photooxidation by quenching triplet chloro-phyll and singlet oxygen (Demmig-Adams et al.,1996), this suggests that the plastids in im white(imW) sectors are photooxidized. This notion is con-sistent with results from plants treated with norflur-azon (NF), which have photobleached plastids and an
1 This work was supported by the U.S. Department of Energy(Energy Biosciences grant no. DE–FG02–94ER20147 to S.R.R.).
* Corresponding author; e-mail [email protected] author responsible for distribution of materials integral to the
findings presented in this article in accordance with the policydescribed in the Instructions for Authors (www.plantphysiol.org) is:Steven R. Rodermel ([email protected]).
[W] The online version of this article contains Web-only data.[OA] Open Access articles can be viewed online without a sub-
904 Plant Physiology, June 2009, Vol. 150, pp. 904–923, www.plantphysiol.org � 2009 American Society of Plant Biologists www.plantphysiol.orgon May 15, 2018 - Published by Downloaded from
albino phenotype due to the inhibition of PDS activity(Tonkyn et al., 1992; Brietenbach et al., 2001; DallaVecchia et al., 2001).Green and white cells of im have the same genotype
(im/im), and an important question of our research is,how do the green sectors form? To gain insight intothis question, we have characterized im green (imG)sectors by morphological, biochemical, and global geneexpression studies (Aluru et al., 2001, 2007). Thesestudies showed that compared with wild-type Arabi-dopsis leaves, imG sectors have anatomical and molec-ular alterations indicative of a high-light-acclimatedplant: mesophyll cell sizes are enlarged, and photopro-tective genes, such as those involved in oxidative stressand phenylpropanoid and flavonoid biosynthesis, aresignificantly induced (Aluru et al., 2001, 2007). The imGsectors also have enhanced photosynthetic rates andincreased Rubisco and Suc-P synthase activities. Theseincreases result in an increase in starch and Suc accumu-lation. We hypothesized that these alterations are due tosource-sink interactions between the green and whitesectors that might serve to optimize plant growth. Insupport of this hypothesis, imW sectors accumulate lowlevels of Suc and have increased acid invertase activitiescompared with imG sectors, suggesting that there mightbe a Suc gradient between these two tissue types, withSuc being transported from green to white in response tosink demand. Therefore, one question motivating thecurrent studies is the nature of “sink metabolism” in thewhite leaf tissues of im.As a first approach to address this question, we
performed global transcript profiling of white im leafsectors using the 22K ATH1 Arabidopsis array. To ourknowledge, a comprehensive transcriptome analysisof the metabolic adaptations occurring in maturewhite leaf tissues has not yet been reported. In fact,only one other study detailing genome-wide changesrelating to metabolism and transport in sink tissueshas been published (Deeken et al., 2006). These studieswere performed in Arabidopsis tumors and showedthat tumors import sugars and amino acids fromuninfected tissues and generate energy mainly byanaerobic metabolism via fermentation for rapidgrowth and development. Our studies show the utili-zation of similar strategies by imW leaf sectors, but ourdata further suggest that imW tissues use a combina-tion of various energy-producing mechanisms forgrowth and development.To gain further insight into the molecular phenotype
of imW tissues, we compared the transcriptomes ofimWand imG and the transcriptomes of imWand NF-treated white Arabidopsis leaf tissues. Because the twowhite tissue types have many morphological, bio-chemical, and molecular similarities (Brown et al.,2001; Rodermel, 2001; Gray et al., 2002; Sullivan andGray, 2002; Surpin et al., 2002), our initial hypothesiswas that they would have similar, if not identical,molecular phenotypes. Surprisingly, we found thatthere are distinct as well as shared gene expressionpatterns between NF-treated and imW tissues.
RESULTS
Transcript Profiling of imW Leaf Sectors
As a first approach to characterize imW sectors, weperformed global transcript profiling using the Affy-metrix ATH1 oligoarray containing approximately22,500 genes. The experiments were conducted intriplicate (three different biological replicates) usingtotal cell RNAs from imW sectors of rosette leaves;wild-type leaves of similar developmental stagesserved as controls. To assess the quality of the micro-array data, scatterplots were generated to compare theexpression values of all chips in a pairwise fashion(e.g. chip im-1 versus chip WT-1). Linear relationshipswere observed in the different comparisons; the threebiological replicates displayed an especially stronglinearity (e.g. chips im-1, im-2, and im-3; SupplementalFig. S1).
We used the software packages R and Bioconductorand Microarray Suite 5.0 to extract expression valuesfrom GeneChips and to normalize the raw probevalues (Bolstad et al., 2003; Irizarray et al., 2003;Gentleman et al., 2005). To avoid the occurrence offalse positives, we further applied a 2-fold cutoff filterand chose genes/ATH1 probe sets with an adjusted Pvalue of 0.05 or less. Figure 1 shows the distribution ofprobe sets/genes on the basis of fold change in tran-script abundance in the imW compared with the wild-type samples. The transcripts of most genes varied inabundance by less than 2-fold (similar to the wildtype), but those of 1,434 probe sets changed in abun-dance by 2-fold or more. Of the 1,434 “differentiallyregulated” genes, 687 were repressed and 747 wereinduced. These results were confirmed by quantitativereal-time reverse transcription (RT)-PCR analyses ofselect genes (Fig. 2).
Functional Classification of im-Responsive Genes
To ascertain the biological significance of the micro-array data, the 1,434 differentially regulated geneswere placed into functional groups using the Arabi-dopsis Munich Information Center for Protein Se-quences (MIPS) classification scheme (http://mips.gsf.de/proj/thal/db/) and gene ontology searches(http://www.arabidopsis.org/; see Supplemental Ta-ble S1 for a complete list). Figure 3 summarizes the dataand shows that all classes of genes are represented;most classes contain induced genes as well as repressedgenes. However, it is notable that nearly all of thedifferentially regulated genes for photosynthesis arerepressed in imW, while nearly all of those for electrontransport, secondary metabolism, and plant develop-ment are induced.
Major Metabolic Pathways Affected in imW Tissues
To obtain a better understanding of the functionalsignificance of the 1,434 differentially regulated genes,
Genome-Wide Analysis of immutans White Leaf Sectors
Plant Physiol. Vol. 150, 2009 905 www.plantphysiol.orgon May 15, 2018 - Published by Downloaded from
we focused on those that play a role in well-charac-terized biochemical pathways of photosynthetic cellsusing MapMan, a bioinformatics tool commonly usedfor microarray data visualization (Thimm et al., 2004);we have previously used this tool for transcriptomicsanalysis of imG sectors (Aluru et al., 2007). Figure 4shows that im-responsive genes are distributed amongall metabolic pathways but that some have moredifferentially regulated genes than others. These path-ways are discussed below.
Photosynthesis
Consistent with the data in Figure 3, one of the moststriking alterations in the transcriptome of imW tissuesinvolves the repression of genes for proteins thatfunction in photosynthesis. Many of the genes (ap-proximately 47 of 120) that mediate the light reactionsof photosynthesis are repressed in imW. An exceptionis cytochrome c6 (AT5G45040), which transfers elec-trons to PSI and is thought to prevent overoxidation ofPSI at its lumenal side and overreduction at its stromalside (Howe et al., 2006). Genes encoding key enzymesof the Calvin cycle and photorespiration are alsorepressed in imW. These include phosphoglyceratekinase (AT1G56190), Fru-bisP aldolase (AT2G21330)Fru-1,6-bisphosphatase (AT3G54050), sedoheptulose-1,7-bisphosphatase (AT3G55800), phosphoribuloki-
nase (AT1G32060), phosphoglycolate phosphatase(AT5G36700), Gly cleavage system H protein(AT1G32470), Gly cleavage system H protein 1(AT2G35370), and carbonic anhydrases (AT3G52720,AT4G33580, and CA1). Furthermore, there is a repres-sion of genes for enzymes that mediate key steps in thebiosynthesis of photosynthetic pigments, such as chlo-rophyll (PORB and PORC; 5- to 10-fold) and carot-enoids (PSY and GGPS; 3- and 2-fold, respectively);PORB and PORC are crucial for the photoconversionof protochlorophyllide to chlorophyllide, which isthen converted to chlorophyll (Masuda et al., 2003).Likewise, PSY is the key regulatory step of caroteno-genesis in plastids (Hirschberg, 2001). An exception tothe repression of key pigment genes is the inductionof FLU, which is a negative regulator of HEMA1(Meskauskiene et al., 2001). HEMA1 catalyzes therate-limiting step in tetrapyrrole biosynthesis; thus,the induction of FLU might be indicative of a decreasein HEMA1 activity.
Taken together, the repression of genes involved inthe light and dark reactions of photosynthesis, photo-respiration, and pigment biosynthesis is consistentwith the fact that imWtissues do not undergo photosyn-thesis. It is worth pointing out that down-regulation ofrbcS (for Rubisco small subunit) is often used as diag-nostic of retrograde signaling (repression in the pres-ence of NF; Nott et al., 2006). However, Figure 4 shows
Figure 2. Quantitative real-time RT-PCR. The expres-sion levels of genes from imWand NF-treated tissueswere measured by real-time RT-PCR. Fold changevalues were calculated according to Hewezi et al.(2008) and represent changes in the twowhite tissuesrelative to the wild type. The data were normalizedusing ACT12 accumulation as a control and areaverages 6 SD of three replicates.
Figure 1. Distribution of transcript changesin imW leaf sectors compared with the wildtype. The distribution includes those geneshaving a 2-fold or more increase (Induced)or decrease (Repressed) in normalized sig-nal intensities and an adjusted P value of0.05 or less.
Aluru et al.
906 Plant Physiol. Vol. 150, 2009 www.plantphysiol.orgon May 15, 2018 - Published by Downloaded from
that rbcS is not differentially regulated in white tissues.This is consistent with previous rbcS transcript accu-mulation data in Arabidopsis microarrays (Strandet al., 2003) and lends confirmation to the reliabilityof our microarray data.
Carbohydrate Metabolism
In accord with the general inhibition of photo-synthesis in the imW tissues, our data show thatgenes for key enzymes of starch biosynthesis anddegradation and of Suc biosynthesis are also stronglyrepressed in imW. Among these are ADP-Glcpyrophosphorylase small subunit (ADG1; 4-fold),starch synthase 1 (AT5G24300), starch-branchingenzyme III (AT2G36390), starch-debranching en-zymes (AT4G09020, AT1G03310, and AT2G36390),AMY3, b-amylase (AT4G00490), 4-a-glucanotransferase(AT5G64860), and Suc-P synthase (25-fold). Theseresults are consistent with previous results from ourlaboratory showing that imW sectors do not accumu-late starch and have low levels of Suc (Aluru et al.,2007). Exceptions to this general repression includegenes for b-amylases (BAM1 and BAM9), which areinduced. b-Amylases were also found to be induced inthe white leaf sectors of the barley (Hordeum vulgare)mutant albostrians (Hess et al., 1998).In stark contrast to the repression of the Suc bio-
synthesis gene, our data show a strong induction ofseveral genes for proteins involved in Suc degrada-tion, such as a Suc synthase (AT5G20830), fructoki-nases (AT5G51830, AT3G54090, and AT1G69200),and invertase(s), including neutral (AT3G06500 andAT1G35580), vacuolar (BFRUCT4), and a cell wallinvertase (BFRUCT1; 4-fold). Expression of the genefor a plastid-localized Glc-6-P/phosphate transporter
(GPT2; 15-fold) and several sugar transporters (STP1;AT5G26340, AT2G43330, AT1G77210, and AT5G27350)is also strongly induced in imW tissues (SupplementalTable S1). Suc synthase, fructokinases, and invertasesare major enzymes that metabolize imported Suc insink tissues and play crucial roles in sink metabolism(Roitsch, 1999; Pego and Smeekens, 2000). Thus, theinduction of these genes and genes mediating sugartransport further supports the notion of a source-sinkrelationship between green and white im leaf sectorsand that imW tissues act as sinks of imported carbo-hydrate, primarily Suc.
Energy Production
Glycolysis. Genes that encode enzymes for the initialand committed steps of the glycolytic pathway (forreview, see Plaxton, 1996) are repressed in imW. Theseinclude two phosphoglucomutases (AT1G70730 andAT1G70820), two phosphofructokinase family proteins(AT5G56630 and AT2G22480), and a pyruvate kinase(AT5G08570). Transcription of phosphoenolpyruvate(PEP) carboxylases (PPC1 and PPC2) and PEP carboxykinase involved in the conversion of PEP to oxaloacetate(OAA) is also repressed in imW, suggesting that carbonfrom the breakdown of Glc/Fru does not enter the tri-carboxylicacid (TCA)cycle through thePEPcarboxylasereaction. On the other hand, a member of the pyruvatekinase family (AT3G49160) is induced in imW.
Fermentation. Genes for enzymes involved in fer-mentation, including those for pyruvate decarboxylase(AT5G17380), alcohol dehydrogenase (ADH1; 11-fold),and an aldehyde dehydrogenase (AT1G54100; 10-fold), are significantly induced in imW tissues (forreview, see Plaxton, 1996).
Figure 3. Functional classes of genes. The1,434 im-responsive genes were assigned tofunctional classes based on the ArabidopsisMIPS classification scheme (http://mips.gsf.de/proj/thal/db/) and gene ontology searches(http://www.arabidopsis.org/). A detailed clas-sification of genes is given in SupplementalTable S1.
Genome-Wide Analysis of immutans White Leaf Sectors
Plant Physiol. Vol. 150, 2009 907 www.plantphysiol.orgon May 15, 2018 - Published by Downloaded from
Oxidative Pentose-P Pathway. Although only a fewgenes for enzymes of the oxidative pentose-P pathwayare significantly altered in imW, transcription of twoof the key enzymes of the pathway, Glc-6-P 1-dehy-drogenase (AT1G09420; 3.8-fold) and 6-phosphoglu-conolactonase (AT1G13700; 3-fold; Kruger and vonSchaewen, 2003) as well as a nonphotosynthetic tissue-specific ferredoxin are significantly induced. As ex-pected, a plastidic Glc-6-P dehydrogenase (G6PD/APG1), which is expressed mostly in developing or-gans but is absent in nonphotosynthetic tissues (Krugerand von Schaewen, 2003), is repressed in the imWtissues.
TCA Cycle. The expression of most of the genescoding for enzymes of the TCA cycle (for review, seeFernie et al., 2004) is not significantly altered in imWtissues. Exceptions to this include repression of afumarase (AT2G47510; 3-fold) and induction of suc-cinate dehydrogenase (AT5G66760) and a cytosolic
ATP-citrate synthase lyase (AT1G09430) that convertscitrate to OAA.
Mitochondrial Electron Transport. Only a few genesfor proteins of mitochondrial electron transport (forreview, see Fernie et al., 2004) are significantly alteredin imW. These include genes for proteins associatedwith complex II and complex IV and the alternativeelectron transport pathway, such as an electron trans-fer ubiquinone oxidoreductase (AT2G43400), succinatedehydrogenase (AT5G66760), cytochrome c oxidaseassembly protein (AT1G53030), and alternative oxi-dases (AOX1A and AOX1D; 2- and 13-fold respec-tively). All of these genes are induced. Accompanyingthese increases, expression levels of mitochondrialmetabolite transport genes (AT3G51870, AT5G27520,and AT4G28390) are also induced.
Gluconeogenesis/Glyoxylate Cycle. Genes mediatingsteps of the gluconeogenesis/glyoxylate cycle, such asa pyruvate, orthodiphosphate dikinase (AT4G15530),
Figure 4. MapMan display of transcript profiling data. MapMan software (Thimm et al., 2004) was used to visualize changes intranscript abundance of the differentially regulated genes associated with major metabolic pathways from imW tissues. Inducedgenes are indicated in blue, and repressed genes are shown in red. White squares represent genes whose expression is unalteredversus the wild type. CHO, Carbohydrate.
Aluru et al.
908 Plant Physiol. Vol. 150, 2009 www.plantphysiol.orgon May 15, 2018 - Published by Downloaded from
the glyoxysomal citrate synthases (AT3G58750 andAT2G42790; 2- to 5-fold), and Ala:glyoxylate amino-transferase (AT2G38400), are induced in the imWtissues (Eastmond and Graham, 2001).In summary, relatively few genes involved in energy
production show 2-fold or more differential regulationin imW tissues; fermentation is a notable exceptionwhere genes involved in all steps of this process areinduced. Nevertheless, alterations in the expression ofgenes for key enzymes in the oxidative pentose-Ppathway, the gluconeogenesis/glyoxylate cycle, andmitochondrial electron transport are consistent withthe notion that both aerobic and anaerobic metabolismare up-regulated in imW, perhaps as a way to com-pensate energetically for a lack of photosynthesis inthe white tissues.
Nitrogen Metabolism
The first step in nitrogen metabolism is reduction ofnitrate, which is taken up by nitrate transporters.Transcription of a dual-affinity nitrate transporter(NRT 1.1) involved in both low- and high-affinitynitrate uptake is reduced in imW, while another nitratetransporter (ATNRT2.6), which has been shown to beinsensitive to nitrate levels (Orsel et al., 2002; Chopinet al., 2007), is strongly induced in imW. Expression oftwo additional genes for key enzymes of nitrate as-similation, nitrite reductase (NIR1; 3-fold) and Glnsynthetase (GS2; 3-fold), is strongly repressed in imW(Vincentz et al., 1993; Supplemental Table S1).Consistent with the idea that imW sectors are
perturbed in nitrogen metabolism, transcription froma large number of imW-responsive genes that mediatesteps in amino acid biosynthesis is significantly al-tered. For example, ATCYSD2, ATBCAT-3, ATBCAT-5,AT3G02020, AT5G23010, AT4G23600, and AT1G15410are repressed, while genes involved in Pro (P5CS1; 4.5-fold), Asn (ASN1; 124-fold), Glu (GDH1 and GDH2;2- and 13-fold, respectively), and branched-chainamino acid synthesis (ATBCAT-2; 30-fold) are induced.The induction of ASN1 and GDH1 has previously beenshown to be a response to carbon limitation and toa change in the ratio of organic nitrogen to carbon inleaf tissues (Lam et al., 1996). Accompanying thesechanges, genes whose products are involved in proteinand amino acid catabolism are generally induced inthe imW tissues (Fig. 4; Supplemental Table S1). Ex-amples include AT3G19390, AT3G10450, AT5G43580,AT2G45240, Pro oxidase, AT1G53580, and AT5G54080.Expression of several amino acid and oligopeptidetransporters (AAP1, AAT1, LHT7, AT1G31820, AT2G41190, AT1G22570, and AT4G21680; Fischer et al.,1998; Kerry et al., 2002) is also induced in imW tissues.Taken together, these data support the notion that
nitrogen metabolism is impaired in imW tissues andthat this is accompanied by changes in amino acidmetabolism, with a general decrease in amino acidbiosynthesis and an increase in amino acid catabo-lism.
Sulfur Metabolism
Genes mediating the first two steps in sulfur assim-ilation, including ATP sulfurylase (APS3; 5-fold) andAPS kinase (AKN1; 5-fold), are repressed in imW, sug-gesting a decrease in sulfur assimilation in imW tissues.These results correlate with the repression of genesinvolved in the synthesis of sulfur compounds in plantssuch as glucosinolates (AT5G23010, AT4G13770, andAT3G14210), Cys (AT3G13110, AT5G28020, AT2G43750,and AT3G59760), and nitrogenmetabolism (Supplemen-tal Table S1). The formation of Cys is a connecting stepbetween sulfur and nitrogen assimilation in plants(Saito, 2004).
Lipid and Fatty Acid Metabolism
Very few genes involved in lipid and fatty acidmetabolism are significantly altered in imW. In gen-eral, genes for phospholipid and galactolipid bio-synthesis (AT4G29890, AT1G62430, AT1G73600,AT1G48600, and AT3G11670) are repressed, whilethose involved in lipid degradation, such as lipases(AT5G16120, AT5G14180, AT3G62590, etc.) and fattyacid b-oxidation family genes (ACX1, AT3G51840,AT3G06810, and AT4G14430), are induced in imWtissues. An exception to the general repression of lipidbiosynthesis is the induction of a gene encoding anoleosin (AT5G56100). Oleosins are found on the sur-face of seed oil bodies and function as lipid storagereserves for the germinating seedlings (Ohlrogge andJaworski, 1997). In contrast, genes mediating fatty acidbiosynthesis and elongation are variably regulated inimW. For example, two AMP-binding proteins(AT5G16370 and AT5G27600), a peroxisomal CoA syn-thetase (AT3G48990), and a b-ketoacyl-CoA synthasefamily protein (AT2G28630; 2.7-fold) are induced,while other genes (b-hydroxyacyl-ACP dehydratase,ACP2, acyl-ACP thioesterase, and stearoyl-ACP de-saturase) are repressed.
Although these alterations in lipid metabolism arecomplex, the data are consistent with the idea thatlipid metabolism is impaired in imW tissues, with adecrease in lipid biosynthesis and an increase in lipiddegradation, while fatty acid metabolism is variablyregulated in these tissues.
Plant Defense and Stress Response
Consistent with the hypothesis that lack of carot-enoids in imW leaf tissues results in photooxidativedamage due to the production of ROS (Brown et al.,2001; Rodermel, 2001; Gray et al., 2002), the productsof many im-responsive genes are involved in oxidativestress responses (Fig. 4; Supplemental Table S1). Someof the prominent examples include genes for proteinsinvolved in the following.
General Oxidative Stress Response Genes, Which AreLargely Induced. For example, expression of copper-zinc superoxide dismutases (CCS1 and CSD2; 3- and
Genome-Wide Analysis of immutans White Leaf Sectors
Plant Physiol. Vol. 150, 2009 909 www.plantphysiol.orgon May 15, 2018 - Published by Downloaded from
5-fold, respectively), Fe-superoxide dismutase (FSD3;2.3-fold), glutathione peroxidase (AT4G31870), ferritin1 (ATFER1), heat shock protein 70 (HSP70), and aputative peroxidase (AT5G39580) is induced in imW,whereas transcription of a Fe-superoxide dismutase(FSD1; 2-fold) and catalase (CAT3) is repressed in imWtissues (Karpinski et al., 1993; Baier and Dietz, 2005).
Secondary Metabolism Genes, Which Are Largely In-duced. These include genes involved in phenylpropa-noid and flavonoid biosynthesis (PAL1, PAL2, ATC4H,F3H, CCoAMT, and CAD), cinnamoyl-CoA reductase(AT2G33590), and a flavonol synthase required foranthocyanin biosynthesis. Phenylpropanoids and fla-vonoids are frequently produced in response to bioticand abiotic stresses, including high light/UV, pathogenattack, wounding, and low temperature (Dixon andPaiva, 1995; Winkel-Shirley, 2002).
Ascorbate/Glutathione Cycle and Ascorbate BiosynthesisGenes, Some of Which Are Induced. These include aglutathione peroxidase (AT4G31870), stromal ascorbateperoxidase (sAPX; 2.5-fold), a glutathione reductase(AT3G24170), a glutathione peroxidase (AT2G31570),and MIOX2 and MIOX4 (Lorence et al., 2004). Incontrast, genes for thylakoid ascorbate peroxidase(tAPX; 2.5-fold) and a putative dehydroascorbate re-ductase (DHAR; 3-fold) are repressed in imW.
Pro Biosynthesis and Catabolism Genes, Some of WhichAre Induced in imW Tissues. These include D1-pyrroline5-carboxylate synthase (P5CS1) and Pro oxidase(AT3G30775; 25-fold). Pro is known to function as anosmoprotectant and as a hydroxyl radical scavengerduring water and salt stress conditions (Kiyosue et al.,1996).
Alternative Pathway of Electron Transport Genes, Someof Which Are Induced. As mentioned earlier, AOX1Aand AOX1D are strongly induced in imW. AOX1A andAOX1D are known to be some of the most stress-responsive proteins among the mitochondrial proteins(Clifton et al., 2006).
Other Plant Defense and Stress-Related Response Genes,Which Are Variably Regulated. Genes for several otherclasses of plant defense and stress-related proteins,including those associated with heat, abscisic acid,cold, dehydration, Suc, and salt stress, are differen-tially regulated: some are induced while others arerepressed (Supplemental Table S1; Cheong et al., 2002;Mahalingam et al., 2003).
Taken together, the differential regulation of a largenumber of plant defense and stress-related genes isremarkable and signifies that imW tissues are understress, especially oxidative stress.
Transcript Profiling: imW versus NF-TreatedWhite Tissues
Although we hypothesize that sink-source interac-tions play an important role in determining the mo-lecular phenotype of imWsectors, the above data showthat these interactions are likely integrated with oxi-dative and other stress responses that arise due to the
nature of the primary lesion in im (i.e. photooxidation)due to a lack of colored carotenoids. Therefore, to gainfurther insight into the molecular phenotype of imW,we compared transcript profiles of NF-treated wild-type Arabidopsis leaves and imW leaves. Consistentwith the idea that imW and NF-treated leaf tissueshave a similar phenotype, previous studies demon-strated that both white tissues (1) have similar levels ofPDSmRNA and protein, (2) accumulate phytoene dueto inhibition of the PDS step of carotenogenesis, (3)have plastids with similar chloroplast ultrastructure,and (4) have decreased levels of nuclear mRNAs forvarious photosynthetic proteins (Reiß et al., 1983;Susek and Chory, 1992; Wetzel et al., 1994; Wetzeland Rodermel, 1998; Surpin et al., 2002). The whiteleaves from both tissue types are also anatomicallysimilar: mesophyll cells are smaller and more numer-ous with fewer air spaces than normal, and the pali-sade cells fail to expand (Fig. 5A). In contrast to thesestriking similarities, there are also differences. Forexample, transcription of Lhcb (as monitored by anLhcb promoter:GUS transgene) is significantly moredown-regulated in NF-treated versus imW cells, sug-gesting that retrograde signaling might be different inthe two tissue types (Meehan et al., 1996).
Previous global transcript profiling experiments ofNF-treated Arabidopsis have been conducted withwhite cotyledon tissues from seedlings germinated inthe presence of NF (Strand et al., 2003; Mochizukiet al., 2008; Moulin et al., 2008). However, in ourstudies, we used expanding white leaf tissues from4-week-old plants sprayedwith the herbicide (Fig. 5, Aand B). We felt that this would provide a more com-pelling developmental context, since the imW sectorscame from expanding im leaves (Fig. 5, A–C).
We first compared microarray data from NF-treatedand wild-type samples. Like imW in Figure 1, theexpression of many genes was similar to that in wild-type Arabidopsis green leaves, but 1,044 genes/probesets were differentially regulated 2-fold or more in NF-treated white tissues versus the wild type (Supple-mental Table S2). Of these, 721 genes were repressedand 323 genes were induced. We next performedcluster analysis of the 2-fold or more differentiallyregulated genes from the two white tissues (NF versusthe wild type [1,044 genes] and imW versus the wildtype [1,434 genes]) as a first approach to assess sim-ilarities and differences between imW and NF-treatedtissues. This analysis resulted in six clusters (Supple-mental Fig. S2; Supplemental Table S3). Many genesare regulated similarly in the imW and NF-treatedtissues: in cluster 1, 759 genes from both tissues arerepressed significantly compared with the wild type,while in cluster 3, 205 genes are induced significantlyin both tissues. Clusters 2 and 4, on the other hand,define genes that are induced or repressed uniquely inimWversus the other two tissue types (728 genes), andclusters 5 and 6 define genes that are induced orrepressed uniquely in the NF-treated tissues versusimW and wild-type tissues (179 genes). Interestingly,
Aluru et al.
910 Plant Physiol. Vol. 150, 2009 www.plantphysiol.orgon May 15, 2018 - Published by Downloaded from
not a single significant gene was induced in one whitetissue and repressed in the other.Functional classification of genes in cluster 2, the
largest component of genes uniquely induced in imWversus NF-treated tissues, reveals that several differentclasses of genes are induced in imW (SupplementalTable S3, sheet 2). However, it is notable that manygenes belonging to the plant defense, oxidative stress,and secondary metabolism groups are induced in imWversus NF-treated tissues (Table I). It is also interestingthat the expression of several genes involved in plantdevelopment, including DAG, CR88, DRM1, ATPSK4,and UNE6, are induced only in imW. These genes play
important roles in chloroplast biogenesis and in pro-moting germination, plant growth, flowering, anddelayed senescence in Arabidopsis (Chatterjee et al.,1996; Cao et al., 2003; Pagnussat et al., 2005; Zhu et al.,2005; Matsubayashi et al., 2006). The imW-specificinduction of these genes is consistent with the obser-vation that Arabidopsis im develops normally andproduces viable seeds, whereas NF-treated plantssenesce and are not viable for long following treatmentwith NF (at the concentrations used in this study).
We next compared the im- and NF-responsive genesusing the MapMan tool (Figs. 4 and 6). These studiesrevealed that, in general, the two tissue types havevery similar expression profiles, especially with re-spect to the behavior of genes in pathways that werefound to be markedly altered in imW versus the wildtype (Fig. 4). These include (1) photosynthesis, photo-respiration, Suc and starch metabolism, pigment bio-synthesis, amino acid biosynthesis, and nitrate andsulfur assimilation, which are repressed in both tis-sues; (2) amino acid catabolism and ammonia as-similation, which are largely induced; and (3) otherprimary metabolic pathways, including glycolysis,fermentation, and TCA cycle, which are variably reg-ulated in both white tissues.
Despite these similarities, our data show distinctdifferences between the two tissue types. A compar-ison of NF-treated (Fig. 6) versus imW (Fig. 4) tissuesreveals that more genes for the Calvin cycle (11 versusfive), photorespiration (six versus three), tetrapyrrole(five versus two) and amino acid (17 versus 12) bio-synthesis, and nitrate (four versus three) and sulfur(four versus two) assimilation are repressed in the NF-treated versus imW tissues. In contrast, more genes forthe ascorbate/glutathione cycle (four versus one),phenylpropanoid/flavonoid biosynthesis (11 versusthree), and Suc (eight versus four) and amino acid (22versus nine) catabolism are induced in imW versusNF-treated tissues. At the other extreme, our datashow that mitochondrial electron transport is recipro-cally regulated in these two white tissues. Genes forproteins such as NADH-ubiquinone oxidoreductase(complex I), ubiquinol-cytochrome c reductase (com-plex III), and AT3G46430 are repressed in NF-treatedtissues, while other genes of the same pathway areinduced in imW.
In summary, taking into consideration the largenumber of genes (Figs. 4 and 6) whose transcripts donot differ significantly in abundance, we conclude thatthe transcriptomes of imWand NF-treated tissues beara striking resemblance, yet because there are differ-ences, their molecular phenotypes are not identical.
One possibility to explain these differences is thatthey could be due to differences in the mechanism ofinhibition of PDS in the two tissue types. As a firstapproach to test this hypothesis, we grew wild-typeArabidopsis plants on Murashige and Skoog mediumwith varying concentrations of NF. Interestingly, weobserved variegation in wild-type Arabidopsis plantsat NF concentrations ranging from 0.001 to 0.05 mM
Figure 5. A, Anatomy of wild-type leaves and white sectors of im andNF-treated plants. All plants (top) were photographed at the samemagnification (253) 4 weeks after germination (22�C, 100 mmol m22
s21 continuous illumination). Light microscopy (bottom) was per-formed on cross sections of fixed, fully expanded leaves (as in Aluruet al., 2001). Image A, Wild-type Arabidopsis (Columbia). Image B,White leaf tissue from NF-treated wild-type Arabidopsis. Image C,White leaf sector from im. The mesophyll layers of the white tissuescontain abnormal chloroplasts that do not stain as intensely as chlo-roplasts of wild-type leaves. B, Variegated phenotype of wild-typeArabidopsis plants treated with NF. Seeds from wild-type Arabidopsisplants were germinated and grown onMurashige and Skoog plates withor without NF for 3 weeks at 200 mmol m22 s21 continuous illumina-tion. Image A, Wild type. Image B, Wild type with 0.025 mM NF. ImageC, Individual leaf from A. Image D, Individual leaf from B. Bars = 2 mm.
Genome-Wide Analysis of immutans White Leaf Sectors
Plant Physiol. Vol. 150, 2009 911 www.plantphysiol.orgon May 15, 2018 - Published by Downloaded from
Table I. Expression data of a subset of genes in imG and imW leaf sectors and NF-treated white leaf tissues
Fold change values of genes induced or repressed 2-fold or more (P # 0.05) in the three leaf tissues relative to the wild type are shown. Foldchange values of less than 2 are considered unchanged (NC). The complete list of genes is provided in Supplemental Tables S1, S2, and S4.
(Fig. 5B). Below or above these concentrations, theplants were either visually wild type or albino, re-spectively. Moreover, the variegated plants appearedto be smaller in size than wild-type Arabidopsis plantsgrown on plates without NF. This is similar to our
previous observations in Arabidopsis im plants, whichare also smaller in size when compared with wild-typeArabidopsis plants (Aluru et al., 2001). These resultssuggest that the differences in the molecular pheno-types of the two white tissues may, in part, be due to
the differential effects of PDS activity on chloroplastdevelopment and the nature of the mechanism of PDSinhibition in imWand NF-treated tissues.
Transcript Profiling: imW versus imG
Because both green and white sectors of im have thesame genotype (i.e. im/im), we had previously hypoth-esized that imG sectors arise from cells that haveavoided irreversible photooxidative damage, whereaswhite sectors form from cells that are photooxidized.Therefore, to further understand photooxidation inimW cells and the nature of compensating mechanismsthat allow for the formation of imG, we compared thetranscriptomes of imW and imG. Previous global tran-script profiling studies have shown that 1,234 genesinvolved in various cellular processes are 3-fold ormore differentially regulated in imG versus the wild
type (Aluru et al., 2007). To make detailed comparisonsbetween imW and imG, we first updated our previousdata to include 2-fold or more differentially regulatedgenes from imG (versus the wild type). These analyseswere performed as with imW and NF-treated tissuesand show that 1,342 genes are 2-fold or more differen-tial regulated in imG versus the wild type (Supplemen-tal Table S4). We next compared the 2-fold or moredifferentially regulated genes from imG (1,342 genes)with those from imW (1,434 genes) by cluster analysis.This analysis resulted in seven different clusters andshows that there are many similarities and differencesbetween the two tissue types (Supplemental Fig. S3;Supplemental Table S5). Approximately 780 genes aresimilarly regulated in imWand imG (58% of 1,342 genesfrom imG), while the rest are unique to one tissue or theother. Prominent examples of these similarities anddifferences in gene expression corresponding to major
Figure 6. MapMan display of transcript profiling data. MapMan software (Thimm et al., 2004) was used to visualize changes intranscript abundance of the 2-fold or more differentially regulated genes associated with major metabolic pathways from NFwhite tissues. Induced genes are indicated in blue, and repressed genes are shown in red. White squares represent genes whoseexpression is unaltered versus the wild type. CHO, Carbohydrate.
Genome-Wide Analysis of immutans White Leaf Sectors
Plant Physiol. Vol. 150, 2009 915 www.plantphysiol.orgon May 15, 2018 - Published by Downloaded from
metabolic pathways are listed in Table I and Supple-mental Figure S4 and are discussed below.
Photosynthesis and Suc and Starch Metabolism
In contrast to imW, expression of genes for proteinsmediating photosynthesis and Suc and starch metabo-lism is not significantly altered in imG. Exceptions tothis include genes involved in the light reactions ofphotosynthesis (approximately 17 genes), which arerepressed (Supplemental Table S4). Previous microar-ray analyses have shown that many of these genes,especially those involved in light harvesting, aredown-regulated by high-light stress in Arabidopsisand are adaptations to avoid light stress (Kimuraet al., 2003). Conversely, ELIP1, ELIP2, and a fewgenes of the Calvin cycle (AT4G14690, AT3G22840,AT2G01140, AT1G71100, and large subunit of Rubisco)are induced in imG. ELIP1 and ELIP2 are chlorophyll-binding proteins activated by high-light stress and arebelieved to be antistress proteins (Kimura et al., 2003),and genes involved in CO2 fixation are induced duringacclimation to high-light conditions (Hihara et al.,2001). The induction of the Calvin cycle genes is alsoconsistent with previous reports from our laboratoryshowing an increase in photosynthetic carbon fixationin imG sectors (Aluru et al., 2007). Interestingly, expres-sion of Suc and starch degradation genes such as BMY7,BFRUCT1, and STP4 is induced in both imWand imG.BFRUCT1 and STP4 are generally expressed in sinktissues. However, previous studies have shown that theexpression of these genes is also induced in sourcetissues as a result of sink demand (Fotopoulos et al.,2003).
Glycolysis, TCA Cycle, and MitochondrialElectron Transport
Genes for proteins mediating glycolysis(AT4G26270, AT5G63680, and AT1G53310) are in-duced in imG, while genes mediating fermentation,except those leading to the formation of acetate frompyruvate (AT1G54100), are not altered (SupplementalTable S4). Similar to imW, genes mediating mitochon-drial electron transport are induced in imG. However,a number of additional genes involved in this pathwayare induced only in imG (Table I; Supplemental TableS4). These results suggest that aerobic respiration, notfermentation, plays an important role in energy pro-duction in imG. The strong induction of mitochondrialelectron transport genes is also necessary to provide aconstant supply of extrachloroplastic ATP needed tomaintain a sustained synthesis and export of Suc from“source” to sink tissues (Noctor et al., 2007).
Nitrogen and Sulfur Metabolism
Genes for proteins mediating nitrogen (AT5G16570and AT5G37600) and sulfur (AT2G14750) metabolismand amino acid synthesis and degradation (e.g.AT1G74710, AT2G24850, AT5G38710, AT3G54640,
and AT4G34710) are induced in imG. An increase innitrogen supply to source tissues has been shown to en-hance the gene expression and activities of many pho-tosynthesis and sugar metabolism enzymes (Singletaryet al., 1990; Martin et al., 2002).
Plant Defense and Oxidative Stress
It is noteworthy that several genes previouslyshown to be induced under high-light conditions areinduced in imG (Table I; Supplemental Table S4). Forexample, genes mediating the ascorbate/glutathionecycle and genes for proteins involved in phenylpro-panoid and flavonoid biosynthesis are significantlyinduced in imG. Although the expression of some ofthese genes is similar in both imW and imG, severalmore genes were significantly induced only in imG. Inparticular, genes involved in anthocyanin biosynthesis(AT4G22870, PAP1, and PAP2) are induced in imG;anthocyanin synthase and PAP2, a transcription factormediating anthocyanin biosynthesis, are inducedmore than 100-fold. Anthocyanin synthesis has beenshown to be increased under high-light conditions andhelps to reduce light intensity within tissues (Rosselet al., 2002; Kimura et al., 2003). Furthermore, severalother peroxidases and pathogenesis-related genes areuniquely induced in imG (Supplemental Table S4).
Taken together, these alterations in gene expressionare consistent with our previous hypothesis that imGsectors act as source tissues for the white leaf sectors.In addition, the unique induction of a large number ofROS scavengers and other genes involved in dissipat-ing absorbed light energy is indicative of the develop-ment of systems for high-light acclimation and/oradaptations to avoid light stress.
DISCUSSION
We had previously proposed that IM activity isparticularly crucial during early chloroplast biogene-sis when components of the photosynthetic apparatusare being synthesized and assembled on the thylakoidmembrane. During this process, IM might serve as analternative electron sink (a “safety valve”) to regulatethylakoid membrane redox and prevent the genera-tion of toxic oxygen radicals and photooxidation of thenascent photosynthetic apparatus (Aluru et al., 2006;Rosso et al., 2006). In im, we assume that some plastidsare able to bypass the requirement for IM and formfunctional chloroplasts, which undergo division andsorting out to form clones of green cells (green sectors).However, other plastids are photooxidized early indevelopment, and these also divide and give rise toclones of white plastids and cells by the process ofsorting out. This results in white sectors.
Photooxidized tissues have been shown to havedecreased expression of nuclear genes for many pho-tosynthetic proteins (Reiß et al., 1983; Susek and Chory1992; Wetzel et al., 1994; Wetzel and Rodermel, 1998;
Aluru et al.
916 Plant Physiol. Vol. 150, 2009 www.plantphysiol.orgon May 15, 2018 - Published by Downloaded from
Surpin et al., 2002). This, in turn, creates major meta-bolic sinks in white tissues and induces stress con-ditions, thus leading to the activation of differentsignaling mechanisms. Therefore, we hypothesize thatthere are multiple strategies and retrograde signalsthat integrate to bring about genome-wide changes inimW tissues. While we recognize that transcript ac-cumulation is only one of a number of factors thatregulate metabolism, the results from our studiesprovide compelling evidence that mRNA abundancemight be a central regulatory factor in the response ofsome pathways to an inhibition of the PDS step ofcarotenogenesis. Figure 7 summarizes the metabolicadaptations, corresponding tomajor transcript changes,observed in imW leaf sectors. Not surprisingly, thesestrategies involve elements found in both sink andphotooxidized tissues.
Nutrient Import into imW Leaf Sectors
Previous investigations in our laboratory demon-strated that the green leaf sectors of im have increasedphotosynthetic rates and Suc levels, whereas the whiteleaf sectors of im have low Suc levels and increasedacid invertase activities, thus pointing toward theexistence of a source-sink relationship between thetwo types of tissues (Aluru et al., 2001, 2007). In thisstudy, global transcript profiling of imG sectors alsoreveals the induction of genes involved in majormetabolic pathways (e.g. glycolysis, mitochondrialelectron transport, nitrogen and sulfur metabolism,and amino acid biosynthesis); these alterations aretypical of a “source” tissue (Singletary et al., 1990;Martin et al., 2002; Noctor et al., 2007). Conversely, ourdata show that photosynthesis genes are significantlyrepressed in imW, indicating a down-regulation ofphotosynthesis in imW tissues, without which there isvery little or no de novo carbohydrate production(Figs. 4 and 7). The notion that carbohydrates areimported into the white tissues from imG sectors,probably as Suc, is substantiated by the strong induc-tion of genes for invertases, fructokinases, and Sucsynthase in addition to various sugar transporters,including a sugar transport protein (STP1; Caspariet al., 1994; Roitsch, 1999; Fig. 7). Invertases have beenshown to influence resource allocation between sourceand sink tissues, and the induction of cell wall inver-tase and hexose transporters in the “sink” white tis-sues is perhaps needed to maintain the flow of Sucfrom source into the white tissues, where they wouldbe hydrolyzed to Glc and Fru and further metabolizedfor growth and maintenance (Roitsch, 1999).Concomitant with the repression of photosynthesis
genes, some key nitrate and sulfur assimilatory genesare repressed in imW tissues (Figs. 4 and 7). Theseresults are in agreement with previous reports dem-onstrating the down-regulation of genes/proteins ofnitrogen and sulfur metabolism with a decrease inphotosynthetic capacity (Masclaux et al., 2000; Deekenet al., 2006). These decreases are also accompanied by a
repression of amino acid biosynthesis genes and by aninduction of genes mediating amino acid degradationin imW. Therefore, we speculate that nitrogen sources,such as amino acids, are most likely obtained by whitegrowing leaf tissues either by protein degradation orby import from the green sectors, perhaps in the formof Gln, Glu, and Asn, which are the chief nitrogencarriers in plants (Gilbert et al., 1998; Lam et al., 2003).This is supported by the induction of several genesmediating amino acid biosynthesis and transport(AAT1, LHT1, LHT7, AAP1, and AAT1) and oligopep-tide transport (YSL1, YSL2, YSL3, and POT familytransporters) in imG and imW and protein catabolismin imW tissues (Supplemental Tables S1 and S4;Fischer et al., 1998; Kerry et al., 2002). Moreover, theinduction of Asn synthetase (ASN1) and Glu dehy-drogenases (GDH1 and GDH2) suggests that the nitro-gen backbones released via catabolism of amino acidsare reassimilated via Glu metabolism and transportedas inertly stored Asn (Lam et al., 1996, 2003; Wonget al., 2004). Increased Pro synthesis (P5CS and Prooxidase) could be a stress response, and Pro accumu-lation in response to stress is a widely reported phe-nomenon (Kiyosue et al., 1996).
Energy Production in imW Tissues
Our studies show that genes encoding proteins ofcomplexes II and IV of the mitochondrial electrontransport chain and mitochondrial metabolite trans-porters, including an ATP/ADP translocator, are in-duced in imW tissues, suggesting an increase inaerobic respiration (Figs. 4 and 7). Furthermore, theinduction of Glu dehydrogenases (GDH1 and GDH2)suggests that Glu metabolism plays an active role inmitochondrial oxygen consumption by providing in-termediates for the TCA cycle and releasing NH3
+ forreassimilation (Lam et al., 1996; Aubert et al., 2001).
The repression of genes for some of the proteins ofglycolysis (phosphofructokinase and pyruvate kinase)and the TCA cycle (fumarase) suggests that thesepathways might be down-regulated in imW (Figs. 4and 7). This is in contrast to recent studies showingsignificant induction of glycolytic genes in Arabidop-sis tumors, which represent sink tissues (Deeken et al.,2006). However, the fact that multiple enzymes areutilized by plants to catalyze essential steps of theglycolytic pathway (an inorganic pyrophosphate-dependent phosphofructokinase and phosphatasecan also catalyze reactions catalyzed by the ATP-dependent phosphofructokinase and pyruvate kinase,respectively) and that intermediates for the TCA cycleare obtained from several different sources (e.g. theglyoxylate cycle and Glumetabolism)means that thereis flexibility in maintaining flow through these path-ways (Fernie et al., 2004). The strong induction ofgenes for all steps of the fermentation process (pyru-vate decarboxylase and alcohol dehydrogenase), how-ever, is striking and suggests that an up-regulation ofthis pathway is part of the strategy that imW tissues
Genome-Wide Analysis of immutans White Leaf Sectors
Plant Physiol. Vol. 150, 2009 917 www.plantphysiol.orgon May 15, 2018 - Published by Downloaded from
utilize to obtain energy (Fig. 7). These results areconsistent with recent microarray data from Arabi-dopsis tumors, which were shown to have increased
fermentation as well as mitochondrial respiration. Anincrease in fermentation activity in these tissues wasattributed to a lack of intracellular air spaces in intact
Figure 7. Schematic representation of the metabolic adaptations corresponding to major transcript changes in imW leaf sectors.See text for details. Red arrows indicate up-regulation, while blue arrows indicate down-regulation of metabolic pathways and/orsteps in the metabolic pathway. Dashed lines represent hypothetical changes occurring in the imW tissues. Circles representtransporters: 1, sugar transporter; 2, metabolite transporter; 3, ATP/ADP translocator; 4, amino acid or oligopeptide transporter.ETC, Electron transport chain; OPPP, oxidative pentose-P pathway.
Aluru et al.
918 Plant Physiol. Vol. 150, 2009 www.plantphysiol.orgon May 15, 2018 - Published by Downloaded from
tumors (Deeken et al., 2006). Figure 5A shows that cellsin the white leaf tissues of im are smaller and containfewer air spaces compared with green leaves of wild-type Arabidopsis. We conclude that lack of photosyn-thetic ATP production in the nongreen plastids of imWresults in energy generation through the combinedinduction of both aerobic and anaerobic metabolism(Fig. 7).It should be noted that fermentation may not only
play a key role in ATP production in imWbut may alsoprovide acetate units for the glyoxylate cycle (Fig. 7).The repression of PEP carboxylases, which generateOAA from glycolytic intermediates, also suggests thatthe glyoxylate cycle may act to replenish the TCAcycle, especially under conditions in which two-carbon compounds such as acetate and ethanol areavailable for oxidative metabolism. In agreement withthis, our data show induction of an aldehyde dehy-drogenase and genes mediating fatty acid b-oxidationand the glyoxylate cycle (Figs. 4 and 7). Previousinvestigations have shown that acetate units generatedfrom pyruvate by aldehyde dehydrogenase and/orfrom the breakdown of lipids by lipases andb-oxidationgenes are utilized via the glyoxylate cycle to provideintermediates for the TCA cycle (Eastmond andGraham, 2001). In general, lipids are considered to bepoor substrates for respiration in higher plants. How-ever, as observed in some germinating seedlings,when the demand for carbon skeletons increases dueto low concentrations of sugars, which is the case inimW sectors, the capacity to catabolize lipids maybecome crucial for the normal growth and develop-ment of Arabidopsis im (Eastmond et al., 2000).
Plant Defense and Stress Responses in imW Leaf Tissues
Our data show that there is an induction in imWofseveral oxidative stress genes, such as CCS1, CSD2,FSD3, AOX1A, and AOX1D, as well as of genesmediating steps in the ascorbate/glutathione cycleand in phenylpropanoid and flavonoid biosynthesis.Notable exceptions to these are tAPX, FSD1, andCAT3, which are repressed in imW tissues. Repressionof tAPX could be due to the lack of proper thylakoidmembrane structures in white plastids, whereas re-pression of FSD1 and CAT3 could be a response to thelight environment (Redinbaugh et al., 1990; Kliebensteinet al., 1998). The imG sectors also show an induction ofa whole battery of genes involved in oxidative stressprotection as well as phenylpropanoid and flavonoidbiosynthesis (Table I). One interesting observation isthat many of these changes are common to both thegreen and white sectors of im (Aluru et al., 2007). Onepossible explanation for our data is that these altera-tions are first manifested during early chloroplastbiogenesis in imG and white cells and that insufficientlevels of photoprotective compounds during thesestages result in some cells (white cells) being moresusceptible to high-light conditions than others (greencells). This notion is further supported by the fact that
the nonphotosynthetic pigments not only dissipateexcess photon energy but also have antioxidant andROS-scavenging activities that protect against oxida-tive stress (for review, see Edreva, 2005).
Several other plant defense and stress responsegenes were also observed to be differentially regulatedin imW tissues (Supplemental Table S1). These includegenes for proteins involved in heat, abscisic acid, cold,dehydration, Suc, and salt stresses as well as pathogen-related responses. A similar situation was observed inthe barley mutant albostrians, where several stress- andpathogenesis-related genes were induced in the whiteleaf sectors versus the wild type (Hess et al., 1998).Although it is not clear, the differential regulation ofmany of these stress- and defense-related genes in imWcould be a response to high light, the nutritional statusof the white cell (e.g. low carbon), developmentalprocesses, and/or the undifferentiated state of thewhite plastid, which could be interpreted by the whitecell as multiple stress events, thus leading to the acti-vation of different signal transduction pathways, aspreviously suggested by Hess et al. (1998).
im and NF-Treated White Leaves Have Overlapping ButDistinct Transcriptomes
Although transcriptomics studies of NF-treated tis-sues lacking PDS activity exist, these studies wereperformed with different plant systems (4- to 6-d-oldArabidopsis seedlings) that consisted mainly of coty-ledons and were also focused mostly on the analysisof specific metabolic pathways, not comprehensiveanalysis of the transcriptome (Strand et al., 2003;Mochizuki et al., 2008; Moulin et al., 2008). Becausechloroplast development in cotyledons is different inmany ways from that in true leaves (Shimada et al.,2007), we generated global gene expression data fromNF-treated white leaf tissues to provide a valid com-parison with our transcriptomics data from imWleaves.
Our data reveal that many genes in NF-treatedtissues are regulated similar to the wild type. Wealso observed global responses to photooxidation inNF-treated and imW tissues at the levels of photosyn-thesis and carbohydrate, amino acid, nitrogen, andsulfur metabolism, indicating several similarities inthe metabolic adaptations of these two tissue types(Figs. 4 and 6). Despite these general similarities, wefound that 907 genes (48%) are differentially regu-lated in only one of the two tissue types. Many ofthese differences are im specific: cluster 2 shows that602 genes are uniquely induced in imW versus NF-treated tissues (Supplemental Fig. S2). In particular,our data show that several genes involved in oxida-tive stress and plant development are uniquely in-duced in imW (Fig. 3; Supplemental Table S3, sheet 2).These changes are perhaps necessary for propergrowth and development of the plant and for theformation of green cells during early chloroplastbiogenesis.
Genome-Wide Analysis of immutans White Leaf Sectors
Plant Physiol. Vol. 150, 2009 919 www.plantphysiol.orgon May 15, 2018 - Published by Downloaded from
While many of the primary metabolic pathways aresimilarly repressed in both tissue types (Figs. 4 and 6),more genes in a particular pathway are repressed inNF-treated tissues versus imW. One instance where thisholds true involves the tetrapyrrole biosynthesis path-way. Two of the genes from the chlorophyll branch ofthe pathway (PORB and PORC) are repressed in imW,whereas five genes from the chlorophyll as well as theheme branches of the pathway are repressed in NF-treated tissues. Although our results are somewhatsimilar to recent reports from NF-treated tissues, thosestudies also demonstrated severe repression of severalother genes of the tetrapyrrole biosynthesis pathway(Mochizuki et al., 2008; Moulin et al., 2008). One expla-nation could be that these studies were conductedusing 4- to 6-d-old seedlings, not mature leaves, andthat perhaps the tetrapyrrole biosynthesis genes areaffected early in leaf development. Consistent with thisnotion, previous experiments have shown that expres-sion of HEMA1, which catalyzes the rate-limiting stepin the tetrapyrrole biosynthesis pathway, is less sensi-tive to NF treatment at later stages of plant develop-ment (McCormac and Terry, 2004). A striking differenceis also found in the regulation of mitochondrial electrontransport, which is reciprocally regulated in the twowhite tissues. In contrast, genes for fermentation (py-ruvate decarboxylase) are induced in both tissue types(Figs. 4 and 6). These results suggest that perhaps NF-treated tissues gain energy mainly by anaerobic respi-ration via fermentation.
NF-Treated and imW Leaf Tissues: Why AreThey Different?
One simple explanation for the differences betweenimWand NF-treated white tissues could be that genesrespond to the same retrograde signal but with differ-ent sensitivities in the two white tissues. This may beparticularly true in cases where a single gene is dif-ferentially regulated 2-fold or more in one white tissueand less than 2-fold but 1-fold or greater in anotherwhite tissue (Fig. 4; Supplemental Table S1). A secondreason could be that the effect of a mutation in im wasmanifested early in plant development, whereas NFwas applied much later in plant development. Thus,the developmental timing of PDS inhibition could bean important factor contributing to these differences.A third explanation could be due to the fact that imWsectors are randomly interspersed with the photosyn-thetically active green leaf sectors while NF-treatedtissues are not. This could, perhaps, lead to differencesin the source-sink interactions between the two tissuetypes. Therefore, we speculate that a comparison ofimW tissues and white tissues from the variegatedNF-treated leaf may show fewer differences in geneexpression between the two white tissues than thoseshown in this study. Another reason could be thedifferences in the mechanism of PDS inhibition: whileNF affects PDS activity, directly resulting only inphytoene accumulation, IM affects all reactions that
transfer electrons into plastoquinone; thus, the redoxstatus of the plastoquinone pool might be different inthese two tissues. Plastoquinone is known to be apotent retrograde signaling molecule (Rodermel, 2001;Nott et al., 2006). Consistent with this idea, Figure 5Bshows that the PDS activity, and hence the redox statusof the plastoquinone pool, can be manipulated bychanging the concentration of NF. Although the resultsfrom Figure 5B are similar to those previously ob-served with Arabidopsis PDS antisense and RNAinterference mutants (Busch et al., 2002; Wang et al.,2005), to our knowledge, variegation in NF-treatedtissues has not been reported previously. The resultsfrom Figure 5B also suggest that the mechanism ofvariegation in these mutants and NF-treated wild-typeplants is similar to that in im and support our previoushypothesis that there is a threshold of electron capacityneeded for phytoene desaturation to occur and greensectors to form (Wu et al., 1999). Below this threshold,carotenoids cannot be formed in sufficient quantity toprevent light-induced photooxidation and formationof the white sectors.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Plant Material and Growth Conditions
Seeds from wild-type Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana ecotype Columbia)
were surface sterilized and plated on Murashige and Skoog plates with or
without the bleaching herbicide, NF. The seeds were subjected to a dark/cold
treatment for 2 d at 4�C before incubating the plates at 150 mmol m22 s21
continuous illumination. Plants were grown with varying concentrations of
NF (0.1, 0.05, 0.025, 0.01, and 0.005 mM) for 3 weeks before photographing. The
experiment was repeated twice, and each experiment was conducted in
duplicate to confirm leaf variegation.
For global transcript profiling studies, seeds from wild-type Arabidopsis
(Columbia ecotype) and the spotty allele of im (Wetzel et al., 1994) were
germinated and grown at 22�C under continuous illumination, first at 15
mmol m22 s21 for 5 d, then at 100 mmol m22 s21 for the rest of their growth. NF-
treated seedlings were obtained by spraying 3-week-old wild-type seedlings
once per day for 7 d with a 5 mM NF solution (Sigma-Aldrich). White sectors of
NF-treated and im plants were dissected from leaves of prebolting-stage plants.
Leaf tissues were frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at –80�C until use.
RNA Isolation and Probe Preparation for
Arabidopsis Oligoarrays
Total RNA was isolated from frozen tissue samples using the TRIzol
reagent (GIBCO BRL). Three independent RNA preparations were made from
pooled samples of each of the four tissue types (wild type, imW, imG, and NF
white). Probes for Arabidopsis oligoarrays were made from 10 mg of total
RNA following instructions in the Affymetrix GeneChip Expression Analysis
Manual. The probes were then sent to the University of Iowa DNA Facility for
hybridization, staining, and scanning of Affymetrix 22K ATH1 oligoarrays.
For quantitative real-time RT-PCR, first-strand cDNA was synthesized
from DNase I-treated total RNA using the first-strand cDNA synthesis kit
(Invitrogen). Real-time RT-PCR was then performed with the synthesized
cDNAs according to the method given by Hewezi et al. (2008).
Microarray Data Analysis
Expression values were extracted from 12 ATH1 GeneChips (three repli-
cates of each of the four tissue types: wild type, NF-treated white, imG, and
imW) using the standard MAS 5.0 algorithm; implementation was provided
by the R and Bioconductor packages (Gentleman et al., 2005). Default settings
for MAS 5.0 were as suggested in the Bioconductor package. For normaliza-
Aluru et al.
920 Plant Physiol. Vol. 150, 2009 www.plantphysiol.orgon May 15, 2018 - Published by Downloaded from