Top Banner
10/8/2014 1 Copyright 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Part I Project Initiation 2-2 Project Management Copyright 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Chapter 2 Strategic Management and Project Selection 2-4 Problems With Multiple Projects Delays in one project delays others Inefficient use of resources Bottlenecks in resource availability
14
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
  • 10/8/2014

    1

    Copyright 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

    Part I

    Project Initiation

    22--22

    Project Management

    Copyright 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

    Chapter 2

    Strategic

    Management and

    Project Selection

    22--44

    Problems With Multiple Projects

    Delays in one project delays others

    Inefficient use of resources

    Bottlenecks in resource availability

  • 10/8/2014

    2

    22--55

    Project Results

    30 Percent canceled midstream

    Over half of completed projects came in

    up to190 percent over budget

    Over half of completed projects came in

    up to 220 percent late

    22--66

    Challenges

    Making sure projects are closely tied to

    goals and strategy

    How to handle the growing number of

    projects?

    How to make these projects successful?

    22--77

    Project Management Maturity

    Project management maturity refers to

    the mastery of skills required to manage

    projects competently

    Number of ways to measure

    Most organizations do not do well

    22--88

    Project Selection and Criteria of Choice

    Project selection

    Evaluating

    Choosing

    Implementing

    Same process as other business

    decisions

  • 10/8/2014

    3

    22--99

    Types of Companies

    Companies considering projects fall into two

    broad categories:

    Companies whose core business is completing

    projects

    Companies whose core business is something else

    They can also be broken down as:

    Companies looking at projects to do for others

    Companies looking at projects to do for themselves

    22--1010

    Model Criteria

    Realism

    Capability

    Flexibility

    Ease of use

    Cost

    Easy computerization

    22--1111

    The Nature of Project Selection Models

    Models turn inputs into outputs

    Managers decide on the values for the inputs and evaluate the outputs

    The inputs never fully describe the situation

    The outputs never fully describe the expected results

    Models are tools

    Managers are the decision makers

    22--1212

    Types of Project Selection Models

    Nonnumeric models

    Numeric models

  • 10/8/2014

    4

    22--1313

    Nonnumeric Models

    Models that do not return a numeric value

    for a project to be compared with other

    projects

    These are really not models but rather justifications for projects

    Just because they are not true models

    does not make them all bad

    22--1414

    Types of Nonnumeric Models

    Sacred Cow

    A project, often suggested by the top management,

    that has taken on a life of its own

    Operating Necessity

    A project that is required in order to protect lives or property or to keep the company in operation

    Competitive Necessity

    A project that is required in order to maintain the

    companys position in the marketplace

    22--1515

    Types of Nonnumeric Models Continued

    Product Line Extension

    Often, projects to expand a product line are

    evaluated on how well the new product

    meshes with the existing product line rather

    than on overall benefits

    Comparative Benefit

    Projects are subjectively rank ordered based

    on their perceived benefit to the company

    22--1616

    Numeric Models

    Models that return a numeric value for a

    project that can be easily compared with

    other projects

    Two major categories:

    Profit/profitability

    Scoring

  • 10/8/2014

    5

    22--1717

    Profit/Profitability Models

    Models that look at costs and revenues

    Payback period

    Discounted cash flow (NPV)

    Internal rate of return (IRR)

    Profitability index

    NPV and IRR are the more common

    methods

    22--1818

    Payback Period

    The length of time until the original

    investment has been recouped by the

    project

    A shorter payback period is better

    22--1919

    Payback Period Example

    4000,25$

    000,100$PeriodPayback

    FlowCash Annual

    CostProject PeriodPayback

    22--2020

    Payback Period Drawbacks

    Does not consider time value of money

    More difficult to use when cash flows

    change over time

    Less meaningful for longer periods of

    time (due to time value of money)

  • 10/8/2014

    6

    22--2121

    Discounted Cash Flow

    The value of a stream of cash inflows and

    outflows in todays dollars

    Also know as discounted cash flow or just

    discounting

    Widely used to evaluate projects

    Includes the time value of money

    Includes all inflows and outflows, not just

    the ones through payback point

    22--2222

    Discounted Cash Flow Continued

    Requires a percentage to use to reduce

    future cash flows

    This is known as the discount rate

    The discount rate may also be known as

    a hurdle rate or cutoff rate

    There will usually be one overall discount

    rate for the company

    22--2323

    NPV Formula

    NPV (project) 0

    1 1

    nt

    tt

    FA

    k

    22--2424

    NPV Formula Terms

    A0 Initial cash investment

    Ft Cash flow in time period t (negative for

    outflows)

    k The discount rate

    t The number of years of life

    A higher NPV is better

    Higher the discount rate lower the NPV

  • 10/8/2014

    7

    22--2525

    NPV Example

    939,1$

    03.015.01

    000,25$000,100$ (project) NPV

    8

    1

    tt

    22--2626

    Internal Rate of Return [IRR]

    The discount rate (k) that causes the NPV to be equal to zero

    The higher the IRR, the better While it is technically possible for a series to

    have multiple IRRs, this is not a practical issue

    Finding the IRR requires a financial calculator or computer

    In Excel =IRR(Series,Guess)

    22--2727

    Profitability Index

    a k a Benefit cost ratio

    NPV divided by initial cash investment

    Ratios greater than 1.0 are good

    22--2828

    Advantages of Profitability Models

    Easy to use and understand

    Based on accounting data and forecasts

    Familiar and well understood

    Gives a go/no-go indication

    Can be modified to include risk

  • 10/8/2014

    8

    22--2929

    Disadvantages of Profitability Models

    Ignore nonmonetary factors

    Some ignore time-value of money

    Biased toward the short-term

    Payback ignores cash flow after payback

    IRR can have multiple solutions

    All are sensitive to errors

    Nonlinear

    Dependent on determination of cash flows

    22--3030

    Scoring Models

    Unweighted 01 factor model

    Unweighted factor model

    Weighted factor model

    22--3131

    Unweighted 0-1 Factor Model

    Factors selected

    Listed on a preprinted form

    Raters score the project on each factor

    Each project gets a total score

    Main advantage is that the model uses

    multiple criteria

    Major disadvantages are that it assumes

    all criteria are of equal importance

    22--3232

    Unweighted 0-1 Factor Model Example

    Figure 2-2

  • 10/8/2014

    9

    22--3333

    Unweighted Factor Scoring Model

    Replaces Xs with factor score

    Typically a 1-5 scale

    Column of scores is summed

    Projects with high scores are selected

    22--3434

    Unweighted Weighted Factor Model

    Each factor is weighted the same

    Less important factors are weighted the

    same as important ones

    Easy to compute

    Just total or average the scores

    22--3535

    Weighted Factor Model

    Each factor is weighted relative to its

    importance

    Weighting allows important factors to stand out

    A good way to include nonnumeric data in the

    analysis

    Factors need to sum to one

    All weights must be set up, so higher values

    mean more desirable

    Small differences in totals are not meaningful

    22--3636

    Weighted Factor Model Example

    Figure B Page 60

  • 10/8/2014

    10

    22--3737

    Advantages of Scoring Models

    Allow multiple criteria

    Structurally simple

    Direct reflection of managerial policy

    Easily altered

    Allow for more important factors

    Allow easy sensitivity analysis

    22--3838

    Disadvantages of Scoring Models

    Relative measure

    Linear in form

    Can have large number of criteria

    Unweighted models assume equal

    importance

    22--3939

    Risk Considerations in Project Selection

    Both costs and benefits are uncertain Benefits are more uncertain

    There are many ways of dealing with risk

    Can make estimates about the probability of outcomes Subjective probabilities

    Uncertainty about: Timing

    What will be accomplished?

    Side effects

    Pro forma documents

    22--4040

    The Project Portfolio Process (PPP)

    Links projects directly to the goals and

    strategy of the organization

    Means for monitoring and controlling

    projects

  • 10/8/2014

    11

    22--4141

    Symptoms of a Misaligned Portfolio

    More projects

    Inconsistent determination of benefits

    Projects that dont contribute to the strategy

    Competing projects

    Costs exceed benefits

    No risk analysis of projects

    Lack of tracking against the plan

    No client for project

    22--4242

    Purpose of Project Portfolio Process

    Identify nonprojects

    Prioritize list of projects

    Limit number of projects

    Identify the real options for each project

    Identify projects with good fit

    Identify co-dependent projects

    22--4343

    Purpose of Project Portfolio Process Continued

    Eliminate risky projects

    Eliminate projects that skip the formal selection process

    Keep from overloading the organization

    To balance the resources with needs

    To balance returns

    To balance short-, medium-, and long-term returns

    22--4444

    Project Portfolio Process Steps

    1. Establish a project council

    2. Identify project categories and criteria

    3. Collect project data

    4. Assess resource availability

    5. Reduce the project and criteria set

    6. Prioritize the projects within categories

    7. Select the projects to be funded and held in reserve

    8. Implement the process

  • 10/8/2014

    12

    22--4545

    Step 1: Establish a Project Council

    Senior management

    The project managers of major projects

    The head of the Project Management Office

    Particularly relevant general managers

    Those who can identify key opportunities and risks facing the organization

    Anyone who can derail the PPP later on

    22--4646

    Step 2: Identify Project Categories and Criteria

    Derivate projects

    Platform projects

    Breakthrough projects

    R&D projects

    22--4747

    Step 3: Collect Project Data

    Assemble the data

    Document assumptions

    Screen out weaker projects

    The fewer projects that need to be

    compared and analyzed, the easier the

    work of the council

    22--4848

    Step 4: Assess Resource Availability

    Assess both internal and external

    resources

    Assess labor conservatively

    Timing is particularly important

  • 10/8/2014

    13

    22--4949

    Step 5: Reduce the Project and Criteria Set

    Organizations goals

    Have competence

    Market for offering

    How risky the project is

    Potential partner

    Right resources

    Good fit

    Use strengths

    Synergistic

    Dominated by

    another

    Has slipped in

    desirability

    22--5050

    Step 6: Prioritize the Projects Within Categories

    Apply the scores and criterion weights

    Consider in terms of benefits first and

    resource costs second

    Summarize the returns from the projects

    22--5151

    Step 7: Select the Projects to be Funded and Held in Reserve

    Determine the mix of projects across the

    categories

    Leave some resources free for new

    opportunities

    Allocate the categorized projects in rank

    order

    22--5252

    Step 8: Implement the Process

    Communicate results

    Repeat regularly

    Improve process

  • 10/8/2014

    14

    22--5353

    Project Proposals

    The project proposal is essentially a

    project bid

    Putting together a project proposal

    requires a detailed analysis of the project

    Project proposals can take weeks or

    months to complete

    A more detailed analysis may result in not

    bidding on the project

    22--5454

    Project Proposal Contents

    Cover letter

    Executive summary

    The technical approach

    The implementation plan

    The plan for logistic support and

    administration

    Past experience