Top Banner
Case Report Management of Ureterolithiasis in a Patient with Crossed Unfused Renal Ectopia Koichi Kodama, 1 Yasukazu Takase, 1 and Hiroki Tatsu 2 1 Department of Urology, Toyama City Hospital, Toyama 939-8511, Japan 2 Department of Radiology, Toyama City Hospital, Toyama 939-8511, Japan Correspondence should be addressed to Koichi Kodama; [email protected] Received 22 February 2016; Revised 16 April 2016; Accepted 26 May 2016 Academic Editor: Elijah O. Kehinde Copyright © 2016 Koichi Kodama et al. is is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Crossed renal ectopia is a rare congenital anomaly in which both kidneys are situated on one side and fused together in 85%–90% of cases. e management of urinary calculi in patients with crossed renal ectopia continues to pose challenges to urologists because the aberrant anatomy may make access and clearance of the calculi more difficult to accomplish. Here, we report a case of inferior crossed renal ectopia, without fusion, and a ureteral stone in which the patient was treated successfully by extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. 1. Introduction Crossed renal ectopia is a rare congenital anomaly in which both kidneys are situated on one side and fused together in 85%–90% of cases. e management of urinary calculi in patients with crossed renal ectopia continues to pose challenges to urologists because the aberrant anatomy may make access and clearance of the calculi more difficult to accomplish. e treatment options for these calculi in such situations include extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL), percutaneous lithotomy, and laparoscopy [1–3]. ere have been reports on the effectiveness and safety of ureteroscopy with laser lithotripsy for the management of renal calculi [4]. Here, we report a case of inferior crossed renal ectopia without fusion and ureterolithiasis in which the patient was treated successfully by ESWL. 2. Case Presentation A 32-year-old man presented with right flank pain. He had an unremarkable medical history. e patient described a stab- bing pain on the right side of his back. On detailed physical examination, no congenital anomaly was found. Urinalysis revealed microscopic hematuria. Ultrasonography showed that both kidneys were on the right side of the abdomen. Fatty liver and slight dilatation of the pelvicalyceal system of the kidney located cranially, which was caused by a ureteral stone, were also found. Unenhanced computerized tomography (CT) of the abdomen showed leſt-to-right crossed renal ectopia and a 5 mm stone in the proximal ureter of the kidney located cranially (Figure 1). e crossed ectopic kidney was located inferior to the nonectopic kidney without fusion. e ureter of the ectopic kidney was placed transversely and anteriorly to the promontory. In addition, a leſt inferior vena cava (IVC) with hemiazygos continuation was also found. However, no anatomical peculiarities were detected in CT that could have been a cause for the development of stone. ESWL under continuous ultrasound imaging was performed as an outpatient procedure. One month aſter the ESWL session, intravenous urography confirmed the absence of any residual stones (Figure 2). Laboratory data suggested that the patient had no risk factors for urinary calculi. Stone composition could not be identified because the small stone fragments were not caught. 3. Discussion Crossed renal ectopia is a rare congenital anomaly in which both kidneys are situated on one side. e ureter of the crossed ectopic kidney recrosses the midline and enters the bladder on the opposite but normal side. is is thought to result from the abnormal development and migration of the Hindawi Publishing Corporation Case Reports in Urology Volume 2016, Article ID 1847213, 3 pages http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/1847213
4

Case Report Management of Ureterolithiasis in a Patient ...downloads.hindawi.com/journals/criu/2016/1847213.pdf · Case Report Management of Ureterolithiasis in a Patient with Crossed

Aug 31, 2019

Download

Documents

dariahiddleston
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Case Report Management of Ureterolithiasis in a Patient ...downloads.hindawi.com/journals/criu/2016/1847213.pdf · Case Report Management of Ureterolithiasis in a Patient with Crossed

Case ReportManagement of Ureterolithiasis in a Patient withCrossed Unfused Renal Ectopia

Koichi Kodama,1 Yasukazu Takase,1 and Hiroki Tatsu2

1Department of Urology, Toyama City Hospital, Toyama 939-8511, Japan2Department of Radiology, Toyama City Hospital, Toyama 939-8511, Japan

Correspondence should be addressed to Koichi Kodama; [email protected]

Received 22 February 2016; Revised 16 April 2016; Accepted 26 May 2016

Academic Editor: Elijah O. Kehinde

Copyright © 2016 Koichi Kodama et al.This is an open access article distributed under the Creative CommonsAttribution License,which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Crossed renal ectopia is a rare congenital anomaly in which both kidneys are situated on one side and fused together in 85%–90% ofcases. The management of urinary calculi in patients with crossed renal ectopia continues to pose challenges to urologists becausethe aberrant anatomy may make access and clearance of the calculi more difficult to accomplish. Here, we report a case of inferiorcrossed renal ectopia, without fusion, and a ureteral stone in which the patient was treated successfully by extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy.

1. Introduction

Crossed renal ectopia is a rare congenital anomaly in whichboth kidneys are situated on one side and fused togetherin 85%–90% of cases. The management of urinary calculiin patients with crossed renal ectopia continues to posechallenges to urologists because the aberrant anatomy maymake access and clearance of the calculi more difficultto accomplish. The treatment options for these calculi insuch situations include extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy(ESWL), percutaneous lithotomy, and laparoscopy [1–3].There have been reports on the effectiveness and safety ofureteroscopy with laser lithotripsy for the management ofrenal calculi [4]. Here, we report a case of inferior crossedrenal ectopia without fusion and ureterolithiasis in which thepatient was treated successfully by ESWL.

2. Case Presentation

A 32-year-oldman presented with right flank pain. He had anunremarkable medical history. The patient described a stab-bing pain on the right side of his back. On detailed physicalexamination, no congenital anomaly was found. Urinalysisrevealed microscopic hematuria. Ultrasonography showedthat both kidneyswere on the right side of the abdomen. Fattyliver and slight dilatation of the pelvicalyceal system of the

kidney located cranially, whichwas caused by a ureteral stone,were also found. Unenhanced computerized tomography(CT) of the abdomen showed left-to-right crossed renalectopia and a 5mm stone in the proximal ureter of the kidneylocated cranially (Figure 1). The crossed ectopic kidney waslocated inferior to the nonectopic kidney without fusion.The ureter of the ectopic kidney was placed transverselyand anteriorly to the promontory. In addition, a left inferiorvena cava (IVC) with hemiazygos continuation was alsofound. However, no anatomical peculiarities were detectedin CT that could have been a cause for the developmentof stone. ESWL under continuous ultrasound imaging wasperformed as an outpatient procedure. One month after theESWL session, intravenous urography confirmed the absenceof any residual stones (Figure 2). Laboratory data suggestedthat the patient had no risk factors for urinary calculi. Stonecomposition could not be identified because the small stonefragments were not caught.

3. Discussion

Crossed renal ectopia is a rare congenital anomaly in whichboth kidneys are situated on one side. The ureter of thecrossed ectopic kidney recrosses the midline and enters thebladder on the opposite but normal side. This is thought toresult from the abnormal development and migration of the

Hindawi Publishing CorporationCase Reports in UrologyVolume 2016, Article ID 1847213, 3 pageshttp://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/1847213

Page 2: Case Report Management of Ureterolithiasis in a Patient ...downloads.hindawi.com/journals/criu/2016/1847213.pdf · Case Report Management of Ureterolithiasis in a Patient with Crossed

2 Case Reports in Urology

(a) (b)

Figure 1: Coronal (a) and sagittal (b) sections of unenhanced computed tomography of the abdomen show left-to-right crossed unfusedrenal ectopia and a 5 mm stone (arrows) in the proximal ureter of the kidney located cranially. A left inferior vena cava is also seen.

Figure 2: One month after the extracorporeal shock wave lithot-ripsy, intravenous urography confirms the absence of any residualstone. The ureter of the ectopic kidney is seen to cross the midlineand enter into the urinary bladder at the normal position.

ureteric bud and metanephric blastema during the fourthweek to eighth week of gestation. In general, crossed renalectopia is found incidentally when patients are investigatedfor other abdominal pathologies, and it can have variouspresentations. In some cases, it may be associated withurinary calculi, recurrent infections, and hydronephrosis.There is a male predominance of 3 : 2, and left-to-rightcrossover occurs more frequently than right-to-left crossover[5].

Crossed unfused renal ectopia is a rare type of renalfusion anomaly. McDonald and McClellan classified crossedrenal ectopia into (i) crossed ectopia with fusion, (ii) crossedectopiawithout fusion, (iii) unilateral crossed ectopia (associ-ated with unilateral renal agenesis), and (iv) bilateral crossedectopia without fusion (both ureters cross the midline) [6].

The kidneys are fused together in 85%–90% of cases [7]. Theincidence of the unfused variety has been reported to be 1 in75,000 autopsies [8].

It is important to note that renal ectopia is frequentlyassociated with congenital anomalies of other organ systems.Genetic factors may also play a role [9]. In the present case,the left IVC ascended and joined the renal vein of the ectopickidney.The IVC crossed to the right side at approximately thelevel of the renal artery of the nonectopic kidney, crossingin front of the aorta. The demonstration of accompanyinganomalies as well as a congenital renal anomaly would alsobe important for operative planning before renal and aorticsurgery [10].

The management of urinary calculi in patients withcongenital renal anomalies, such as crossed renal ectopia,continues to pose challenges to urologists because the aber-rant anatomy may make access and clearance of the calculimore difficult to accomplish. ESWL remains the first choice oftreatment for these calculi because it is the least invasive treat-ment modality. However, multiple sessions are often requiredbefore patients become free of calculi [1]. More recently, therehave been reports on the effectiveness and safety of flexibleureteroscopy with laser lithotripsy for the management ofurinary calculi [4]. In the present case, the ureteral stone wasnot on the side of the renal ectopia. If the stone is on theside of the crossed renal ectopia, it needs good pretreatmentplanning, including the need of flexible ureteroscopy. Inthese circumstances, one may even consider stone push-upby flexible ureteroscopy combined with minipercutaneousnephrolithotomy. The choice of treatment for urinary calculiin cases of crossed renal ectopia should be made dependingon the size and position of the urinary calculi and the patient’sanatomy.

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Page 3: Case Report Management of Ureterolithiasis in a Patient ...downloads.hindawi.com/journals/criu/2016/1847213.pdf · Case Report Management of Ureterolithiasis in a Patient with Crossed

Case Reports in Urology 3

References

[1] B. C.Ghosh,M.DeSantis, Y.Kleyner, andY. Zak, “Crossed fusedrenal ectopia with calculi,” Journal of the American College ofSurgeons, vol. 206, no. 4, p. 753, 2008.

[2] N. P. Gupta, S. Mishra, A. Seth, and A. Anand, “Percutaneousnephrolithotomy in abnormal kidneys: single-center experi-ence,” Urology, vol. 73, no. 4, pp. 710–714, 2009.

[3] A. Aminsharifi, R. Niroomand, M. Kroup, and M. M. Hosseini,“Laparoscopic nephrolithotomy in a patient with crossed fusedrenal ectopia,” Nature Reviews Urology, vol. 6, no. 12, pp. 675–679, 2009.

[4] M. Resorlu, M. Kabar, B. Resorlu, O. G. Doluoglu, M. F. Kilinc,and T. Karakan, “Retrograde intrarenal surgery in cross-fusedectopic kidney,” Urology, vol. 85, no. 2, pp. e5–e6, 2015.

[5] S. Solanki, V. Bhatnagar, A. K. Gupta, and R. Kumar, “Crossedfused renal ectopia: challenges in diagnosis and management,”Journal of Indian Association of Pediatric Surgeons, vol. 18, no. 1,pp. 7–10, 2013.

[6] J. H. McDonald and D. S. McClellan, “Crossed renal ectopia,”The American Journal of Surgery, vol. 93, no. 6, pp. 995–1002,1957.

[7] M. Hertz, Z. J. Rubinstein, N. Shahin, and M. Melzer, “Crossedrenal ectopia: clinical and radiological findings in 22 cases,”Clinical Radiology, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 339–344, 1977.

[8] J. Felzenberg and P. F. Nasrallah, “Crossed renal ectopia withoutfusion associated with hydronephrosis in an infant,” Urology,vol. 38, no. 5, pp. 450–452, 1991.

[9] C. Rinat, A. Farkas, and Y. Frishberg, “Familial inheritance ofcrossed fused renal ectopia,” Pediatric Nephrology, vol. 16, no. 3,pp. 269–270, 2001.

[10] B. Glodny, J. Petersen, K. J. Hofmann et al., “Kidney fusionanomalies revisited: clinical and radiological analysis of 209cases of crossed fused ectopia and horseshoe kidney,” BJUInternational, vol. 103, no. 2, pp. 224–235, 2009.

Page 4: Case Report Management of Ureterolithiasis in a Patient ...downloads.hindawi.com/journals/criu/2016/1847213.pdf · Case Report Management of Ureterolithiasis in a Patient with Crossed

Submit your manuscripts athttp://www.hindawi.com

Stem CellsInternational

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

MEDIATORSINFLAMMATION

of

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Behavioural Neurology

EndocrinologyInternational Journal of

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Disease Markers

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

BioMed Research International

OncologyJournal of

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

PPAR Research

The Scientific World JournalHindawi Publishing Corporation http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Immunology ResearchHindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Journal of

ObesityJournal of

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine

OphthalmologyJournal of

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Diabetes ResearchJournal of

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Research and TreatmentAIDS

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Gastroenterology Research and Practice

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Parkinson’s Disease

Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine

Volume 2014Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com