Top Banner
Forward looking statements are not guarantees of performance. They involve risks, uncertainties and assumptions. The future results and securities values of Kinder Morgan Inc. and Kinder Morgan Energy Partners, L.P. (collectively known as “Kinder Morgan”) may differ materially from those expressed in the forward-looking statements contained throughout this presentation. Many of the factors that will determine these results and values are beyond Kinder Morgan's ability to control or predict. These statements are necessarily based upon various assumptions involving judgments with respect to the future, including, among others, the ability to achieve synergies and revenue growth; national, international, regional and local economic, competitive and regulatory conditions and developments; technological developments; capital markets conditions; inflation rates; interest rates; the political and economic stability of oil producing nations; energy markets; weather conditions; business and regulatory or legal decisions; the pace of deregulation of retail natural gas and electricity and certain agricultural products; the timing and success of business development efforts; and other uncertainties. You are cautioned not to put undue reliance on any forward-looking statement. KMP Natural Gas Pipelines Bill Allison
120

Business Units

Feb 14, 2017

Download

Documents

ngobao
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Business Units

Forward looking statements are not guarantees of performance. They involve risks, uncertainties andassumptions. The future results and securities values of Kinder Morgan Inc. and Kinder Morgan EnergyPartners, L.P. (collectively known as “Kinder Morgan”) may differ materially from those expressed in theforward-looking statements contained throughout this presentation. Many of the factors that will determinethese results and values are beyond Kinder Morgan's ability to control or predict. These statements arenecessarily based upon various assumptions involving judgments with respect to the future, including,among others, the ability to achieve synergies and revenue growth; national, international, regional andlocal economic, competitive and regulatory conditions and developments; technological developments;capital markets conditions; inflation rates; interest rates; the political and economic stability of oilproducing nations; energy markets; weather conditions; business and regulatory or legal decisions; the paceof deregulation of retail natural gas and electricity and certain agricultural products; the timing and successof business development efforts; and other uncertainties. You are cautioned not to put undue reliance onany forward-looking statement.

KMP Natural Gas PipelinesBill Allison

Page 2: Business Units

1

KMP Natural Gas PipelinesKMP Natural Gas Pipelines

Terminals18%

Products Pipelines

38%CO2

Pipelines11%

Natural Gas Pipelines

33%

Tejas24%

Trailblazer11%

Red Cedar/ Other Rockies12%

KMIGT26%

KMTP27%

KMP/KMR Natural Gas Pipelines (a)

(a) Assumes first quarter closing for Tejas

Page 3: Business Units

2

Natural Gas Pipelines Distributable CashNatural Gas Pipelines Distributable Cash

$0

$50

$100

$150

$200

$250

$300

$350

2001 2002E

TejasRed Cedar/OtherTrailblazerKMTPKMIGT

44%

25%

12%18%

26%

27%

11%

12%

24%

$218.4

$331.8

52% increase

(a) Assumes first quarter closing for Tejas

Page 4: Business Units

3

KMIGT – System Map

W Y O M I N G

C O L O R A D O

N E B R A S K A

K A N S A S

Denver

Cheyenne Omaha

Kansas City

CasperSAND DRAW

CASPER

PXPLABONTE GUERNSEY

CHEYENNE HUB(Rockport)

BIG SPRINGS

NORTH PLATTE

PXPSTERLING

BEECHERISLAND

COZADLEXINGTON

GRAND ISLAND

ALBION

HOLDREGECLAY CENTER

PXPLATON

PXPHERNDON

COLBY STOCKTON

OTISSCOTT CITY

HOLCOMB

LAKIN

SYRACUSE

HUNTSMAN

PXP

GLENROCK

PowderRiverBasin

Wind RiverBasin

NE Colorado

Hugoton

Page 5: Business Units

4

KMIGT KMIGT –– System Overview System Overview

� 6,100 miles of pipeline with total capacity of 825,000/d

� 26 Compressor stations totaling 147,000 Hp

� 100 receipt points and ~ 9,000 delivery points

� Dual Purpose Pipeline System– Traditional system consists of high-pressure distribution network

primarily serving small towns, industrials and agricultural customers in rural WY, CO, KS, and NE. Total delivery capacity ~ 570,000 Dth/day.

– The Pony Express (PXP) system is a long-haul single barrel pipeline from Rocky Mountain supply basins to large Mid-Continent markets (pipeline interconnects and large LDCs). Total delivery capacity255,000 Dth/day.

Page 6: Business Units

5

KMIGT KMIGT ––System OverviewSystem Overview

� Huntsman Gas Storage facility– Located upstream of market area and near Cheyenne Hub.– Total Capacity of 8Bcf– 106,000 Dth/day withdrawal capacity– 60,000 Dth/day injection capacity

� Principal Supply Basins– Directly connected to the Wind River and Powder River Basins, NE

Colorado and Hugoton Basins.– Access to additional supply sources at Glenrock and Cheyenne Hub,

Trailblazer, and NNG.

Page 7: Business Units

6

KMIGTKMIGT-- CustomersCustomers� Total customers = 110

� Average Annual Revenue size $1.1 million

� Customer Sample List– Oneok Energy– Dynegy– Kinder Morgan Inc.(Retail)– Midwest Energy, Inc.– Missouri Gas Energy– Public Service Company of

Colorado

� Average length of contract term is 10 years

Customer Mix Based of MDQ

63%5%

32% LDC's/IndustrialProducersMarketers

Page 8: Business Units

7

KMIGT - Contract Expirations

YearMDQDth/d

2002 60,300 7.3%2003 35,763 4.3%2004 24,809 3.0%2005 2,000 0.2%2006 30,600 3.7%2007 5,052 0.6%2008 172,200 20.1%

330,724 39.2%

% of Capacity Sold

Page 9: Business Units

8

KMIGT KMIGT –– Volumes / Load ProfileVolumes / Load Profile

2000 2001 2002

Total MDth Through-put 204,877 202,578 203,700

Average Dth/day 561,300 555,000 558,100

Utilization 68% 67% 68%

Peak Day Winter 567,000 652,000 N/A

Peak Day Summer 540,000 625,000 N/A

1. Heating needs drive winter through-put and irrigation / agricultural needs drive summer through-put

2. PXP through-put driven by basis differentials between producing regions in the west and mid-continent markets

Page 10: Business Units

9

KMIGTKMIGT

Competition

� Little significant competition for Traditional Markets in WY, CO, NE, and KS

Regulation

� Through its January 2000 rate settlement, KMIGT rates locked in place through 12/04

� No environmental, health or safety issues

� No significant impact from proposed OPS regulation on pipeline safety

Page 11: Business Units

10

KMIGT Strategies and AdvantagesKMIGT Strategies and AdvantagesStrategy:

� Maintain stable earnings and small growth in traditional markets in WY, CO, NE, and KS not served by other pipes

� Continuous process improvements resulting lower fuel consumption, gas loss on the system, and utilization of operational capacity.

� Create more capacity between the supply rich Wyoming Powder River Basin and Mid-continent pipes and Kansas City.

� Expand Huntsman storage capacity to serve Wyoming producers, marketers, and Front Range markets

Advantages:

� Since the early 1930’s, KMIGT’s strategy was to serve rural communities in our traditional market area. This single supplier strategy remains very effective and our close relationship with these communities is our #1 asset.

� Service rate assurance through 12/04.

� Long term contracts.

� Winter heating season and summer irrigation season.

� Growing Powder River Supply Basin.

Page 12: Business Units

11

KMIGT Historical Performance KMIGT Historical Performance ($Millions)($Millions)

2000 2001 2002

Gross Margin $115.3 $125.2 $121.7

Direct O&M $20.4 $22.3 $23.2

EBITDA $91.8 $98.3 $93.2

� 90% of KMIGT’s transportation and storage services are sold on a demand basis

� KMIGT’s PXP capacity utilization continues to increase from less than 60% in 1999 to ~85% in 2001.

� 2002 will continue to benefit from large basis differentials between supply rich Wyoming basins and Mid-continent markets.

� All expiring contracts will be rolled over at existing rates.

� Increases in electric power costs in Wyoming offset by benefits from system optimization and cost containment.

� No major expansion projects included in KMIGT 2002 operating plan

Page 13: Business Units

12

KMIGT 2002 Plan RisksKMIGT 2002 Plan Risks

� Maintaining recently achieved FL&U rates

� Managing Regulatory uncertainty

Page 14: Business Units

13

KMIGT Projects / ExpansionKMIGT Projects / ExpansionAdvantage Pipeline:

� 1.3 MMDthd of coal bed methane production expected to develop in the Wyoming Powder River Basin by 2004.

� Pipeline infrastructure exists to gather and transport this volume to the Cheyenne Hub (Weld County, CO), but Cheyenne will have insufficient take-away capacity.

� Mid-continent supplies have declined, raising prices relative to Cheyenne.

� KMIGT is proposing a new 24”, 386 mile pipeline from Cheyenne to NGPL (eastern KS)– 330,000 Dth/d capacity, expandable to 450,000.– Utilizes available 120,000 Dth/d capacity on Pony Express from NGPL to

Kansas City to access higher-value markets.– $230 million capital expenditure, in-service fall 2004.– Build only with adequate through-put agreements in place.

Page 15: Business Units

14

KMIGT Proposed Advantage Pipeline

Proposed Advantage PipelineProposed CompressionKMIGTKMIGT CompressionHuntsman Storage

L E G E N D

W Y O M I N G

C O L O R A D O

N E B R A S K A

K A N S A S

Denver

Casper

Cheyenne Omaha

Kansas City

SAND DRAW

CASPER

PXPLABONTE GUERNSEY

CHEYENNE HUB(Rockport)

BIG SPRING

S

NORTH PLATT

EPXPSTERLING

BEECHERISLAND

COZADLEXINGTON

GRAND ISLAND

ALBION

HOLDREGECLAY CENTER

PXPLATON

PXPHERNDON

COLBY STOCKTON

OTIS

PALCO

SCOTT CITY

HOLCOMBLAKIN

SYRACUSE

70

HUNTSMAN

PXPProposed Pipeline

NGPL

ANR

PEPL

MCMC

WNGWNG

NNG

Page 16: Business Units

15

Huntsman Expansion:

� New supplies and pipelines at Cheyenne Hub create demand for newstorage and hub services.

� KMIGT Huntsman storage facilities and pipeline capacity from Huntsman to Cheyenne can be expanded to provide these new services, while still supporting on-system markets.

� $32 million expansion will provide 6 Bcf incremental firm storage capacity with up to 75,000 Dth/d delivery and 45,000 Dth/d receipt capacity to/from Cheyenne.

� Currently negotiating with anchor shipper for full capacity and ten-year term.

KMIGT Projects / ExpansionKMIGT Projects / Expansion

Page 17: Business Units

16

CheyenneHub

HuntsmanStorage

75,000 Dth/d withdrawal45,000 Dth/d injection

TPC

XCEL

WIC

KMIGT

CIG To Neb.

To K.C.

KMIGT - Proposed Storage Expansion

Page 18: Business Units

17

KMIGT Projects / ExpansionKMIGT Projects / Expansion

Northeast Colorado Pipeline (“NECO”)

� Gas production from Yuma County, CO is a good supply source for KMIGT markets.

� Production is constrained by the existing small diameter KMIGT pipeline system and limited other outlets.

� KMIGT is currently marketing a new 12”, 95 mile pipeline from Northeast CO back to the existing system.– 25,000 and 40,000 Dth/d capacity options.– $18-30 million capital expenditure.– Enables system deliveries to the north or south.

� Uses existing KMIGT production area pipelines to minimize additional G&P infrastructure.

� Build only with adequate throughput agreements

Page 19: Business Units

18

KMIGT Proposed NECO Pipeline

W Y O M I N G

C O L O R A D O

N E B R A S K A

K A N S A S

Denver

Casper

Cheyenne Omaha

Kansas City

SAND DRAW

CASPER

PXPLABONTE GUERNSEY

CHEYENNE HUB(Rockport)

BIG SPRINGS

NORTH PLATTE

PXPSTERLING

BEECHERISLAND

COZADLEXINGTON

GRAND ISLAND

ALBION

HOLDREGECLAY CENTER

PXPLATON

PXPHERNDON

COLBY STOCKTON

OTIS

PALCO

SCOTT CITY

HOLCOMB

LAKIN

SYRACUSE

HUNTSMAN

PXP

WNG

Proposed NECO Pipeline

KMIGTKMIGT CompressionHuntsman Storage

L E G E N D

Page 20: Business Units

19

KMIGT Long Term OutlookKMIGT Long Term Outlook

� Opportunities– Internal Growth projects: Advantage, Storage Expansion, NECO

� Regulatory Environment– Stable rates for at least 3 years– Minimum impact from Order 637 or NOPR on affiliate interaction

� Supply– Powder River Basin in Wyoming and NE Colorado will replace

shrinking supplies from the Hugoton Basin.

Page 21: Business Units

20

KMIGT SummaryKMIGT Summary

� Stable 2001 operating results,continuing through 2002 and beyond.

� Serving rural loads, 90% + revenue generated through long term demand based contracts, cost containment, and ability to capture niche opportunities will continue

Page 22: Business Units

21

Trailblazer OverviewTrailblazer Overview

� 436 miles of 36” pipe

� 10,000 HP at one compressor station

� Certificated capacity o f 522,000 Dth./day

� Fully contracted at max rate ($0.12/Dth.)

Page 23: Business Units

22

Casper

Cheyenne

Denver

Omaha

CHEYENNE HUB

602

NGPL

106

195

196601

603

N E B R A S K A

W Y O M I N G

C O L O R A D OK A N S A S70

25

80

76

80

NGPL

NNGWNG

CIG

Trailblazer Pipeline

TrailblazerCompressor StationMajor Interconnect LocationReceiptDelivery

L E G E N D

Page 24: Business Units

23

Trailblazer ExpansionTrailblazer Expansion

� Capacity: Expand TB by 324,000 Dth./day– Total capacity will be 846,000 Dth./day

� Facilities: Install 50,000 HP at three stations

� Cost: $55 million

� In-Service: June, 2002

� Revenue: $25.1 million per year

Page 25: Business Units

24

Trailblazer Financial Performance Trailblazer Financial Performance (a)(a)

Projected2000 2001 2002

Revenue $30.6 $27.9 $46.1

Direct Expenses 10.3 6.7 15.3

EBITDA 26.3 25.4 36.0

Operating Income 20.3 21.2 30.8

(a) Reflects 100% of asset. Currently, KMP ownership is 66%, but it has reached agreement to acquire the additional 33% interest pending bankruptcy court approval.

Page 26: Business Units

25

Trailblazer Fourth Quarter HighlightsTrailblazer Fourth Quarter Highlights

� Completed contract to buy Enron’s one-third of Trailblazer– Pending approval by bankruptcy court

� Letter of intent with CIG to buy its right to become an equity partner

� Expansion project is on schedule, on budget

Page 27: Business Units

26

� Approximately 2,500 miles of pipeline

� 5 Compressor Stations – 52k HP

� Seller and transporter of natural gas

� Total capacity 2.4 Bcf/day

� Capacity utilized in 2001 – 1.7 Bcf/day

� Storage Capacity 22 Bcf

Kinder Morgan Texas Pipeline (“KMTP”)

Page 28: Business Units

27

Kinder Morgan Texas Pipeline

DallasFt. Worth

Austin

San Antonio Houston

Corpus Christi

Beaumont

Kinder Morgan Texas PipelineL E G E N D

Page 29: Business Units

28

� Full Service Texas Intrastate Pipeline (Gas Utility)– Buy or Sell– Transport– Storage

� No Marketing Affiliate

� Customer deals with one person for all needs

� Long term relationships

KMTP - Strategy

Page 30: Business Units

29

� Entex

� Houston Lighting & Power (HL&P)

� Calpine

� Southern Union

� Houston Ship Channel and Beaumont/Port Arthur area Industrial Customers

KMTP – Strong Customer Base

Page 31: Business Units

30

Internal:

� Electric Generation

� Local Distribution Companies (LDC’s)

� Industrial Market

� Supply Base Expansion

Project:

� North Texas Pipeline– Capacity: 300,000 dth./day– Facilities: 86 Miles of 36”– Costs: $69 Million– In Service: June 1, 2003 (Interruptible Service in early 2003)– North Texas Pipeline Revenues: 12.7 Million/year for 30 years.

� Monterrey Pipeline

KMTP – Growth Opportunities

Page 32: Business Units

31

2000 2001 2002

Gross Margin $81.3 $93.3 $112.2

Costs

(w/Lease Buyout) $27.6 $32.4 $ 32.7

Op Income $53.7 $60.9 $ 79.5

Volumes:

Sales: 405 359 416

Transport: 249 250 302

Throughput: 654 609 718

KMTP – Performance ($ Million/Volume BCF)

Page 33: Business Units

32

� Aggressive supply acquisition program

� Market Storage Services

� Increase 3rd Party Transportation

KMTP – 2002 Plan Upside

Page 34: Business Units

Forward looking statements are not guarantees of performance. They involve risks, uncertainties andassumptions. The future results and securities values of Kinder Morgan Inc. and Kinder Morgan EnergyPartners, L.P. (collectively known as “Kinder Morgan”) may differ materially from those expressed in theforward-looking statements contained throughout this presentation. Many of the factors that will determinethese results and values are beyond Kinder Morgan's ability to control or predict. These statements arenecessarily based upon various assumptions involving judgments with respect to the future, including,among others, the ability to achieve synergies and revenue growth; national, international, regional andlocal economic, competitive and regulatory conditions and developments; technological developments;capital markets conditions; inflation rates; interest rates; the political and economic stability of oilproducing nations; energy markets; weather conditions; business and regulatory or legal decisions; the paceof deregulation of retail natural gas and electricity and certain agricultural products; the timing and successof business development efforts; and other uncertainties. You are cautioned not to put undue reliance onany forward-looking statement.

Tejas PipelineDavid Jenkins

Page 35: Business Units

34

� Approximately 3,400 miles of pipeline

� 16 Compressor Stations

� Seller of natural gas as well as transport

� Total capacity 3.5 Bcf/day

� Capacity utilized in 2001 – 2.7 Bcf/day

� 2 natural gas storage fields

Tejas Overview

Page 36: Business Units

35

Tejas Gas

Tejas Joint Venture

L E G E N DDallasFt. Worth

Austin

San Antonio Houston

Corpus Christi

Beaumont

CLEAR LAKE

STORAGESTRATTON RIDGE (TEJAS)

KING RANCH PLANTFANDANGO PLANT

Tejas GasTejas Gas

Page 37: Business Units

36

� Storage

� Treating Plants

� New Markets– Austin– Corpus Christi– Texas City– East Texas

� Expand Beaumont Throughput

� System optimization

� Increases flexibility and reliability for customers

Tejas Synergies

Page 38: Business Units

37

Tejas Financial OverviewTejas Financial Overview� $750 million

� Slightly over 8X 2002 expected DCF

� Slightly under 8X 2002 expected EBITDA

� $0.10 earnings accretion to KMP in 2002

� Fee based storage – 10 year demand contract with Coral for Clear Lake storage facility

� Large customers– Exxon– BP/Amoco– Pemex– Phillips

� Significant cost savings

� Expect to close Q1 2002

Page 39: Business Units

Forward looking statements are not guarantees of performance. They involve risks, uncertainties andassumptions. The future results and securities values of Kinder Morgan Inc. and Kinder Morgan EnergyPartners, L.P. (collectively known as “Kinder Morgan”) may differ materially from those expressed in theforward-looking statements contained throughout this presentation. Many of the factors that will determinethese results and values are beyond Kinder Morgan's ability to control or predict. These statements arenecessarily based upon various assumptions involving judgments with respect to the future, including,among others, the ability to achieve synergies and revenue growth; national, international, regional andlocal economic, competitive and regulatory conditions and developments; technological developments;capital markets conditions; inflation rates; interest rates; the political and economic stability of oilproducing nations; energy markets; weather conditions; business and regulatory or legal decisions; the paceof deregulation of retail natural gas and electricity and certain agricultural products; the timing and successof business development efforts; and other uncertainties. You are cautioned not to put undue reliance onany forward-looking statement.

Natural Gas Pipeline (NGPL) UpdateDeb Macdonald

Page 40: Business Units

39

Natural Gas PipelineNatural Gas PipelinePipeline and Storage System OverviewPipeline and Storage System Overview

AmarilloLine

AmarilloLine

JointVentures

JointVentures

A/GLineA/GLine

Gulf CoastLine

Gulf CoastLine

Joint VenturesJoint Ventures

LouisianaLine

LouisianaLine

Storage Fields

NGPL System� Over 10,000 Miles of Pipe� 61 Compressor Units with

1.0 Million HP

Peak Day Bcf/dDeliverability - Market

Amarillo Line 1.6Gulf Coast Line 1.6Market Storage(delivered) 2.4

Total 5.6Louisiana Line 1.2A/G Line 0.6Field Storage

Lansing 1.1Sayre 0.4

Page 41: Business Units

40

OverviewOverviewNGPL Estimated Earnings Contribution(a)

(a) Segment earnings before allocation of G&A and interest expense.

Power & Other6%

KMP46%

Retail7%

NGPL41%NGPL

48%

Retail8%

KMP35%

Power & Other9%

2001 2002

$346 million $360 million

Page 42: Business Units

41

NGPL StrategiesNGPL Strategies

� Retain traditional customer/revenue base through successful contract renegotiation

� Revenue stream is heavily demand based

� Utilize system in untraditional ways to generate incremental opportunity– Short hauls, back hauls, power plants with related services

� Continue push toward Operational Excellence– Operate pipeline assets at maximum efficiency

Page 43: Business Units

42

NGPL Production Zone NGPL Production Zone Firm Transport Delivery MDQFirm Transport Delivery MDQ

0

500,000

1,000,000

1,500,000

2,000,000

2,500,000

1999 2000 2001 2002

LA MIDC PERM STX TXOK

TXOK 87,779 72,779 302,889 394,917

STX 60,264 60,264 12,514 112,350

PERM 15,000 0 246,390 324,480

MIDC 182,546 189,446 151,206 147,616

LA 1,261,318 1,047,318 1,199,004 1,112,420

Jan-99 Jan-00 Jan-01 Jan-02

Page 44: Business Units

43

NGPL Strategic AdvantagesNGPL Strategic Advantages

� Premium storage flexibility and services

� Supply diversity – Gulf Coast, Midcontinent, and Permian, Rockies Canada

� Infrastructure– Storage at both ends of pipe creates flexibility and opportunity– Integral to Chicago area LDCs and wheeling opportunities

� Low cost structure

Page 45: Business Units

44

Renegotiation of NSSRenegotiation of NSSSummary for 2002Summary for 2002

� To Sell– 43.6 Bcf expiring in 2002– 1.5 Bcf new available in 2002– 45.1 Bcf Total

� Sold– 44.1 Bcf sold– Average term = 5.68 years (5-10+ year contracts)– Average rate = $.4883 (max rate = $.4912)

� Remaining– 1.0 Bcf expiring later in year

Page 46: Business Units

45

Renegotiation of DSSRenegotiation of DSSSummary for 2002Summary for 2002

� To Sell– 2.4 Bcf expiring in 2002

� Sold– 2.4 Bcf sold– Average Term = 4.81 years– Average Rate = $1.254 (max rate = $1.368)

� Remaining– No expirations remaining until 2003

Page 47: Business Units

46

Renegotiation of FTSRenegotiation of FTSSummary for 2002Summary for 2002

� System-wide– 1.8 Bcf/day expiring in 2002 of 5.3 Bcf/d– Top Six Shippers

– El Paso 312,702/day 17.3%– Aquila 395,000/day 21.9%– Marathon 131,000/day 7.3%– Wisc. Elec. 104,133/day 5.8%– MidAmerican 100,000/day 5.5%– NIPSCO 295,100/day 16.4%

74.2%

Page 48: Business Units

47

Renegotiation of FTSRenegotiation of FTSSummary for 2002 (cont’d)Summary for 2002 (cont’d)

� To Major Market Area– 0.31 Bcf/day Amarillo receipt– 0.70 Bcf/day Gulf Coast receipt– 1.01 Bcf/day Total 2002 expirations to market of 3.4 Bcf/d

– 1st Quarter 95,250/day 9.5%– 2nd Quarter 300/day 0.03%– 3rd Quarter 350,000/day 34.6%– 4th Quarter 564,400/day 55.9%

1,010,220/day 100%

Page 49: Business Units

48

NGPL PerformanceNGPL Performance2000 2001 2002

Gross Margin $510.1 $521.4 $541.5

Direct Expense $167.2 $175.1 $181.7

Operating Income (a) $342.9 $346.3 $359.8

EBITDA $427.9 $432.3 $447.1

(a) Before allocation of G&A and interest.

Page 50: Business Units

49

NGPL Growth ProjectsNGPL Growth Projects� Horizon Pipeline

– Capacity: 380,000 Dth./day– Facilities: 28 miles of 36”, 42 miles of 36” leased capacity, 8,900 HP at one station– Cost: $79.6 million– In-Service: April, 2002– Revenue:

– Horizon Pipeline = $11.2 million per year– Additional NGPL Upstream Revenue = $2.1 million per year

� St. Louis Lateral– Capacity: 300,000 Dth./day– Facilities: 50 miles of 24”– Cost: $36.4 million– In-Service: July, 2002– NGPL Revenue: $5.0 million per year (Note: St. Louis revenue includes portion of

upstream feeder contracts)

Page 51: Business Units

50

NGPL Growth ProjectsNGPL Growth Projects

� NGPL Permian Expansion– Capacity: 60,500 Dth./day– Facilities: Install 4,000 HP at two stations– Cost: $1.2 million capital, $1.5 million per year lease– In-Service: January, 2002 (in service now)– NGPL Revenue: $4.2 million per year

� North Texas Pipeline:– Additional NGPL upstream transport revenue: $11.4 million per year for 20

years

Page 52: Business Units

51

Gas Fired Generation Development on Natural Gas Pipeline

0

5,000

10,000

15,000

20,000

1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004

Year Plant In Service

Meg

awat

ts Peaker

Baseload

Total

Natural’s Gas Fired Power Generation MarketNatural’s Gas Fired Power Generation MarketMegawatts under construction for inMegawatts under construction for in--service thru 2004...service thru 2004...

’99 – ’01 2002 2003 2004 TotalPeaker 5,163 2,315 300 750 8,528Baseload 2,612 2,315 4,189 -- 9,116Total 7,775 4,630 4,489 750 17,644

Numbers include both plants related directly and indirectly to NGPL

Page 53: Business Units

52

NGPL SummaryNGPL Summary

� NGPL’s primary market is one of the most competitive in the country (Alliance, N. Border, N. Natural, ANR, etc.)

� NGPL faces constant contract renegotiations, but:- Strong historical track record- Very successful recent recontracting

� NGPL Strategies and Strategic Advantages will allow this success to continue

� Relatively stable regulatory environment- With no outstanding safety or environmental exposures

Page 54: Business Units

Product Pipelines

Tom BanniganF o rw a rd lo o k in g s ta te m e n ts a re n o t g u a ra n te e s o f p e rfo rm a n c e . T h e y in v o lv e r isk s , u n c e r ta in tie s a n da ssu m p tio n s . T h e fu tu re re su lts a n d se c u r itie s v a lu e s o f K in d e r M o rg a n In c . a n d K in d e r M o rg a n E n e rg yP a r tn e rs , L .P . (c o lle c tiv e ly k n o w n a s “K in d e r M o rg a n ” ) m a y d if fe r m a te r ia l ly fro m th o se e x p re sse d in th efo rw a rd -lo o k in g s ta te m e n ts c o n ta in e d th ro u g h o u t th is p re se n ta tio n . M a n y o f th e fa c to rs th a t w il l d e te rm in eth e se re su lts a n d v a lu e s a re b e yo n d K in d e r M o rg a n 's a b ili ty to c o n tro l o r p re d ic t. T h e se s ta te m e n ts a re n e c e s sa r ily b a se d u p o n v a r io u s a s su m p tio n s in v o lv in g ju d g m e n ts w ith re sp e c t to th e fu tu re , in c lu d in g ,a m o n g o th e rs , th e a b ility to a c h ie v e sy n e rg ie s a n d re v e n u e g ro w th ; n a tio n a l, in te rn a tio n a l, re g io n a l a n dlo c a l e c o n o m ic , c o m p e titiv e a n d re g u la to ry c o n d itio n s a n d d e v e lo p m e n ts ; te c h n o lo g ic a l d e v e lo p m e n ts ;c a p ita l m a rk e ts c o n d itio n s ; in f la tio n ra te s ; in te re s t ra te s ; th e p o litic a l a n d e c o n o m ic s ta b ility o f o ilp ro d u c in g n a tio n s ; e n e rg y m a rk e ts ; w e a th e r c o n d itio n s ; b u s in e s s a n d re g u la to ry o r le g a l d e c is io n s ; th e p a c e o f d e re g u la tio n o f re ta il n a tu ra l g a s a n d e le c tr ic ity a n d c e r ta in a g r ic u ltu ra l p ro d u c ts ; th e tim in g a n d su c c e s so f b u s in e ss d e v e lo p m e n t e ffo r ts ; a n d o th e r u n c e r ta in tie s . Y o u a re c a u tio n e d n o t to p u t u n d u e re lia n c e o na n y fo rw a rd -lo o k in g s ta te m e n t.

Page 55: Business Units

54

Product Pipelines OverviewProduct Pipelines Overview� Pipeline Transportation

– Over 10,000 mile pipeline system, largest independent products pipeline in the U.S.– Transports over 2MM barrels of products a day– Refined petroleum products: gasoline (59%), diesel (20%),

jet fuel (12.5% commercial/2.5% military)– NGL’s for residential/commercial use and refinery and petrochemical feedstocks (6%)– Serves the highest growth markets in the U.S.

� Terminal Services – 32 terminals nationwide (associated with pipeline operations)– Refined Products, Chemicals and Crude (24), NGL’s (8)

� Transmix Processing– 5 facilities– Serve all major U.S. pipelines– Approximately 65% of non-refining transmix processing market

Page 56: Business Units

55

Product Pipelines Map

Orange County

HoustonPlantationPipe Line

Mid-Continent Chicago

PacificOperations

CypressPipe Line

Pipelines

Products Operations

Transmix FacilitiesCFPL Pipe Line

CalNev Pipe Line

Cochin P/L

Page 57: Business Units

56

Pacific OperationsPacific Operations� 3,900 mile refined products pipeline system and

22 terminals with 15 million barrels of storage

� Predominant market share, transporting bulk of refined products used in CA, AZ and NV

� Transports over 1.1 million barrels per day

� Pacific: 61% Gasoline, 22% Diesel, 17% Jet Fuel

� Rapid population growth driving consumption of refined petroleum products in region

� Refinery hub to population center strategy

� Top 10 shippers account for 82% of volumes and 80% of revenues

Page 58: Business Units

57

Plantation Pipe Line/CFPLPlantation Pipe Line/CFPL

� Asset Overview– 3,300 mile refined products pipeline systems;

transports over 730M bbls/day– Serves fast-growing Southeast and Florida

markets (Atlanta, Charlotte, D.C., Orlando)– 51% ownership of Plantation; Exxon/Mobil is

remaining 49% partner– PPL Volumes: 66% Gasoline,

20% Diesel, 14% Jet Fuel – Top 6 PPL shippers account for 82% of

volumes and 81% of revenues– CFPL Volumes: 66% Gasoline,

13% Diesel, 21% Jet– Top 5 CFPL shippers account for 74% of

volumes and 74% of revenues

TAMPAORLANDO

Page 59: Business Units

58

The North SystemThe North System� 1,600 mile NGL and refined products

pipeline system� Major transporter of products

between central Kansas andChicago refineries

� 8 Midwest truck loading propane terminals

� 50% partner of Heartland Pipeline, gasoline/distillates to markets in Iowa/Nebraska

� Volumes: Propane 41%, Refinery & Chemical Feedstocks 39%, Refined Products 20%

� Top 7 shippers account for 75% volumes and 77% revenues

Page 60: Business Units

59

Cochin Pipe LineCochin Pipe Line

Ft SaskatchewanSaskatchewan

ChicagoChicago

SarniaSarnia

� 1,938 mile NGL pipeline system from Alberta, CN through 7 U.S. states and terminates in Ontario, CN. 4 U.S. propane terminals

� 45% ownership in Cochin: – BP 45%– Conoco 10%

� 69% Propane, 8% Ethane, 23% Ethylene� Top 6 shippers account for 2/3 volume

and revenues

Page 61: Business Units

60

Segment Overview Segment Overview (a)(a)

Product Pipeline Contribution to KMP Distributable Cash

Breakout of Product Pipeline Distributable Cash

Natural Gas

Pipelines33%

CO2 Pipelines

11%

Products Pipelines

38%

Terminals18%

Cochin3%

Plantation9%

North Cypress

5%

Transmix5%CFPL

6%

Pacific53%

West Coast9%

CALNEV10%

(a) Distributable cash flow before allocation of G&A and interest.

Page 62: Business Units

61

Segment Overview: Regulatory SummarySegment Overview: Regulatory Summary

2000 EARNINGS 2002 ESTIMATED EARNINGS

FERC Regulated 47%

Non Regulated 33%

Intrastate Regulated 20%

Non Regulated 23%

Intrastate Regulated 28% FERC

Regulated 49%

Page 63: Business Units

62

Segment StrategySegment Strategy

� Make use of underutilized capacity to capture demand growth

� Goal is to offset increases in variable costs with productivity improvements

� Cost Reduction Strategies– Power Management– Superior Regulatory Compliance/System Integrity– Leverage KMI/KMP Purchasing Power (Pumps, DRA, Insurance) – Optimize Staffing

– Acquisitions– Plantation Pipe Line Operating Agreement

� Accretive Acquisitions

Page 64: Business Units

63

2001 Results 2001 Results � Segment Earnings up $87.7 MM (40%)

2001 vs. 2000Volumes Revenues (Revenues $1,000)

Pacific +3.2% +7.9% 286,069

Calnev +0.8% +1.9% 48,660

West Coast Terminals +4.9% +5.0% 53,597

Plantation -0.5% -3.7% 156,669

Central Florida Pipe Line -0.9% +0.5% 31,379

North +4.9% +0.7% 35,771

Cypress +2.6% -4.4% 6,645

Page 65: Business Units

64

2002 Overview2002 Overview

� Segment Goals– Increase Revenues by 4.5%– Increase Net Income by 12%– Zero System Releases and Zero On-The-Job Injuries

Page 66: Business Units

65

2002 Plan: Growth Assumptions2002 Plan: Growth Assumptions

� $36.9 Million Segment Operating Income Growth – $20 Million Volume/Market Share Growth (54%)– $8.3 Million (Full Year Calnev) (22%)– $4.7 Million Expansion Projects (13%)– $3.9 Million Price Increases (11%)

� Expansion Projects– Terminal Facilities in LA and Northwest– LAS Fuels Pipeline Expansion– PPL Terminal Connections– PPL System Connections

Page 67: Business Units

66

2002 Plan: Risks2002 Plan: Risks

� Severe Recession

� Slower Air Travel Recovery

� Sustained Mild Weather in East and Midcontinent Affecting Propane/Fuel Oil Demand

Page 68: Business Units

67

2002 Plan: Upside2002 Plan: Upside

� Accelerated Economic Recovery

� Industry Consolidation / Favorable Shifts In Supply

� Increased Imports and Product Price Volatility Stimulate Demand for Terminal Storage

� Greater Volume Growth in High Tariff Markets

Page 69: Business Units

68

Long Term Growth OpportunitiesLong Term Growth Opportunities

� Operate in Growth Markets/High Barriers of Entry

� Improve Market Share

� Pursue Accretive Acquisition Opportunities

Page 70: Business Units

69

Long Term Growth OpportunitiesLong Term Growth OpportunitiesOperate in Growth Markets

� U.S. 2000 Census (1995-2005 Population Growth)

> 50% (California, New Mexico, Arizona, Nevada)

> 40% (Florida)

> 30% (Georgia, North Carolina, Virginia)

� U.S. Products Demand Growth

1.7% CAGR – 1991-2001

Page 71: Business Units

70

Commodity DemandCommodity Demand

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

Mill

ion

Bar

rels

Per

Day

1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001

U.S. Petroleum Products Supplied per Day

Residual Fuel OilJet FuelDistillateGasoline

Sources: EIA; U.S. Petroleum Products Supplied, 2000 to Present 2001. Year 2001 Includes estimated amounts for November and December.

CAGR 1.7%

Page 72: Business Units

71

Commodity DemandCommodity Demand

8.62

3.84

1.670.96

8.8

3.75

1.690.81

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

Mill

ion

Bar

rels

Per

Day

2001 2002 Forecast

U.S. Petroleum Products Supplied per Day

Residual Fuel OilJet FuelDistillateGasoline

Sources: EIA; U.S. Petroleum Products Supplied, 2000 to Present 2001. Year 2001 Includes estimated amounts for November and December.

(15.09 MBD) (15.04 MBD)

Page 73: Business Units

72

Long Term Growth OpportunitiesLong Term Growth OpportunitiesOperate in Growth Markets

� Vehicle Sales Preferences (Millions)* 1988 - 10.4M Cars/4.7M Light Trucks/Minivans/SUVs1997 - 8.3M Cars/6.5M Light Trucks/Minivans/SUVs2001 - For first time, Light Trucks/Minivans/SUVs outsell

passenger cars

� CAFE Standards Unchanged Since 1990– Trucks, SUVs average 5mpg less than cars– Energy Intensity Comparison*

Passenger Car Light Truck/Minivan/SUV3,700 BTUs per passenger mile 4,529 BTUs per passenger mile

– From 1988 to 1997, average vehicle has increased 10% in weight and gained 35 horsepower

*(U.S. DOT Transportation Statistics Annual Report 1999)

Page 74: Business Units

73

Long Term Growth OpportunitiesLong Term Growth Opportunities

Page 75: Business Units

74

Operate in Growth MarketsOperate in Growth Markets

� Transportation Mode Preference*– Urban vehicle miles traveled +83% (1980-1997)– Personal use vehicles account for 90% of all local trips,

80% of all long distance trips (> 100 miles)– Transit ridership (bus and rail) flat from 1980-1997– Urban Congestion**

1982 - 10/70 Major urban areas deemed congested1996 - 39/70 Major urban areas deemed congested

*(U.S. DOT Transportation Statistics Annual Report 1999)**Texas Transportation Institute, 1996 Urban Congestion Study

Page 76: Business Units

75

Long Term Growth OpportunitiesLong Term Growth Opportunities� Improve Market Share

– Customer Service– “One Stop” Logistics– Non-Affiliated Status

� Current Terminal Market Shares – Los Angeles (17%)– Seattle (18%)– Portland (25%)– Phoenix (26%)– San Diego (45%)

� Expand Pipeline Services to Markets Unserved or Underserved

� Pursue Accretive Acquisition Opportunities

Page 77: Business Units

76

SummarySummary

� Stable Assets In Growth Markets

� Exceptional Growth Track Record

� Good Opportunities for Future– Underutilized Assets Allow Growth To Drop to Bottom Line– Acquisition Opportunities Due to Consolidation

Page 78: Business Units

Kinder Morgan Liquid Terminals, LLCJeff Armstrong

Dixon BetzForward looking statements are not guarantees of performance. They involve risks, uncertainties andassumptions. The future results and securities values of Kinder Morgan Inc. and Kinder Morgan EnergyPartners, L.P. (collectively known as “Kinder Morgan”) may differ materially from those expressed in theforward-looking statements contained throughout this presentation. Many of the factors that will determinethese results and values are beyond Kinder Morgan's ability to control or predict. These statements arenecessarily based upon various assumptions involving judgments with respect to the future, including,among others, the ability to achieve synergies and revenue growth; national, international, regional andlocal economic, competitive and regulatory conditions and developments; technological developments;capital markets conditions; inflation rates; interest rates; the political and economic stability of oilproducing nations; energy markets; weather conditions; business and regulatory or legal decisions; the paceof deregulation of retail natural gas and electricity and certain agricultural products; the timing and successof business development efforts; and other uncertainties. You are cautioned not to put undue reliance onany forward-looking statement.

Page 79: Business Units

78

KMLT & KMBT Asset System MapKMLT & KMBT Asset System Map

Bulk Terminals

Terminals Operations

Liquids Terminals

Houston

Superior

Huron

Mic

higa

n

Erie

Ontario

10 Louisiana Bulk Terminals

Page 80: Business Units

Pasadena Terminal

Page 81: Business Units

Carteret Terminal

Page 82: Business Units

SHIPYARD RIVER TERMINALSHIPYARD RIVER TERMINAL19971997

Page 83: Business Units

82

SHIPYARD RIVER TERMINALSHIPYARD RIVER TERMINAL

20012001

Page 84: Business Units

PIER IX TERMINALPIER IX TERMINALNewport News, VANewport News, VA

Page 85: Business Units

84

2002 Terminal Earnings Forecast2002 Terminal Earnings Forecast

CO211%

Natural Gas33%

Product Pipelines

38%Liquid64%

Bulk36%

Terminals18%

Terminal Contribution to 2002

Estimated Breakout of Terminal DCF

Page 86: Business Units

85

Terminal Segment EarningsTerminal Segment Earnings

19M35M 38M

130M

164M

020000400006000080000

100000120000140000160000180000

1998 1999 2000 2001 2002

Acquisitions have driven dramatic growth since 1998

5% stretch in segment budget from acquisitions/projects

Page 87: Business Units

� Terminal growth has been driven by an aggressive acquisition plan.

� Terminal multiples tend to be lower than those paid for pipeline assets.

� We have completed nine acquisitions since 1998.

� To date, every acquisition has met or exceeded the original acquisition plan.

� Success in achieving plan is driven by cost cuts and additional business from our customer base.

Acquisition Review Acquisition Review -- TerminalsTerminals

Page 88: Business Units

Acquisition Review($ In Millions)1998 - 2001

2001Annualized Acquisition Over

Investment EBITDA Plan (Under)Hall-Buck Marine 100.0 15.9 14.9 1.0

Pier IX 28.0 5.5 4.9 0.6

SRT Original 2.0 Blue Circle 1.3 2nd Dock 3.1

35.0 6.8 6.4 0.4

Milwaukee Bulk 25.0 5.0 4.9 0.1Delta 120.0 20.0 18.5 1.5Pinney Dock 41.5 6.7 6.5 0.2

Vopak 44.0 9.6 8.0 1.6

GATX-Liquid Terminals 461.8 79.2 73.7 5.5

TOTALS: 855.3 148.7 137.8 10.9

EBITDA MULTIPLE: 5.75

KINDER MORGAN TERMINALS

Page 89: Business Units

Terminals Overview Terminals Overview

�� Bulk TerminalsBulk Terminals– 33 Dry Bulk Terminals Operated– 2,000,000 Tons of Covered Storage; 14,000,000 Tons of Open Storage– 55,000,000 Tons of Product Handled– Own River Consulting, Inc., a nationally recognized bulk material handling

design and construction management firm with $25M in annual revenue.– Largest independent dry bulk terminal operator in the U.S.– Capacity to Handle Over 100,000,000 Tons Per Year.

Page 90: Business Units

89

Bulk TerminalsBulk Terminals� Tonnage Handled = 55 Million Tons

� Major Industries By Commodity:– Coal 28.0 Million 51%– Petcoke 7.8 Million 14%– Fertilizers 4.0 Million 7%– Iron Ore 3.8 Million 7%– Salt 2.5 Million 5%– Cement 2.2 Million 4%– Other 6.7 Million 12%

55.0 Million 100%

Page 91: Business Units

90

� 14% Petroleum Coke - Terminaling- In Plant Services at Refineries- Domestic and Export

� 51% Coal - Terminaling- West Coast (Rail to Barge; Export)- East Coast (Rail to Barge; Export)- Import

� 4% Cement-Terminaling- Imports

IndustriesIndustries� 7% Fertilizer - Terminaling

- Import, Export, and Domestic

� 5% Salt - Terminaling- Domestic and Import

� 7% Iron Ore - Terminaling- Domestic and Imports

� 12% Other- Domestic, Imports, and Exports

Page 92: Business Units

91

Market Share (2001)Market Share (2001)� Petroleum Coke (Waterborne)

9.9 Million Tons U.S. Production2.3 Million Tons Handled (23%)

� Coal- U.S. Exports 34.0 Million Tons

3.32 Million by KMBT (10%)-Domestic Consumption (Qtrs. 1 & 2)

238.5 Million Tons11.9 Million by KMBT (5%)

� Salt (for Ice Control)-19.7 Million Tons Distributed-2.5 Million by KMBT (13%)

� Cement Imports U.S. (Qtrs. 1-3)- 17.6 Million Tons- 1.5 Million by KMBT (8%)

� Iron Ore (Great Lakes Region)- 31.0 Million Tons Direct Ship.- 2.45 Million by KMBT (8%)

� Fertilizers- 6.6 Mil. Tons Potash U.S. Import for Qtrs. 1-3

.620 Mil. Tons by KMBT (9%)- 7.2 Mil Tons Phosphate Exports

.948 Mil Tons by KMBT (13%)

Page 93: Business Units

92

� Petroleum Coke- Refineries- Traders/Marketers- End Users (Utilities; Industrial

Users)

� Coal- Utilities (Domestic and Foreign)- Producers- Traders/Marketers

� Cement - Producers- Ready Mix Cooperatives

CustomersCustomers� Fertilizer - Producers

� Salt - Producers

� Iron Ore- Steel Companies- Producers

Page 94: Business Units

93

Customer Base: Bulk TerminalsCustomer Base: Bulk Terminals

40.4%68.2MTOTALS:

1.8%3.0MESSROC CEMENT111.8%3.0MWISCONSIN ELECTRIC121.6%2.7MPCS131.5%2.6ME. I. DUPONT140.4%2.2MHONEYWELL15

2.2%3.7MTAMPA ELECTRIC62.0%3.3MBLUE CIRCLE CEMENT71.9%3.2MLAXT81.9%3.2MHOLCIM91.8%3.0MINDIANA KENTUCKY ELECTRIC10

TOTAL 2001 REVENUE: $168,680,000

2.5%4.2MMASSEY COAL52.7%4.6MEXXONMOBIL43.8%6.5MALCOA34.8%8.1MANSAC28.8%14.9MTVA1

PERCENT2001 REVENUE ($)CUSTOMER NAMERANK

Page 95: Business Units

94

� Petroleum Coke- Aimcor- Trans Global Solutions (TGS)- Traders/Marketers (e.g. Koch,

Oxbow)

� Coal- Railroads- Public Ports- Regional Terminals

w/ Regional Operators

� Cement- Private Terminals of Major Cement

Companies- Regional Terminals with Regional

Operators

Competitors by IndustryCompetitors by Industry

� Fertilizer- Private Terminals of Major

Fertilizer Companies

- Public Ports w/ or w/o Regional Operator

� Salt - Regional Terminals with

Regional Operators

� Iron Ore- Railroads- Private Terminals of Integrated

Steel Companies- Regional Terminals with Regional

Operators

No National Competitors

Page 96: Business Units

95

� Location, Location, Location- Provide Terminals w/ Logistic Advantage

� Service, Service, Service-Provide superior customer services

� Focus on Acquisitions that benefit from KMP’s unique Financial Structure- Qualifying Revenues and Low Cost of Capital- Acquisition- New Construction- Monetization

� Take Advantage of Economies of Scale- Low Cost Operations and Management

� Increase Market Share in Each Industry Segment

KMBT’s Strategic FocusKMBT’s Strategic Focus

Page 97: Business Units

96

� Diversification- Business covers numerous dry bulk industries helping to avoid cycle effects

� Target Multiple Commodity Facilities(Liquid, Bulk, & Others)

� Capitalize on Benefits from Recent KMLT Acquisitions w/- Low Dock Utilization- Available Real Estate- Geographical/Logistical Advantage

� Market Increment Volumes2nd Customers for Existing Site (ex. SRT)

KMBT’s Strategic FocusKMBT’s Strategic Focus

Page 98: Business Units

97

� Acquisitions- East Coast - Short Term- Miss. River/Gulf Coast/Midwest - Mid Term

� New Construction- Customer Requirements- Location Advantages

KMBT’s Geographic FocusKMBT’s Geographic Focus

Page 99: Business Units

98

� Inside the Fence Growth

� Acquisition of New Terminals

� Construction of New Terminals

KMBT’s Growth StrategiesKMBT’s Growth Strategies

Page 100: Business Units

99

� Achieve Benefits from Recent KMLT Acquisitions- Logistical/Geographical Advantages- Facilities w/ Low Dock Utilization and

Available Real Estate

� Market Incremental Volumes2nd Customers for Existing Sites (ex. SRT)

Existing Terminal StrategiesExisting Terminal Strategies

Page 101: Business Units

KINDER MORGAN LIQUIDS TERMINALS LLC (KMLT)

Forward looking statements are not guarantees of performance. They involve risks, uncertainties and assumptions. The future results and securities values of Kinder Morgan Inc and Kinder Morgan Energy Partners, L.P. (collectively known as “Kinder Morgan”) may differ materially from those expressed in the forward-looking statements contained throughout this presentation. Many of the factors that will determine these results and values are beyond Kinder Morgan’s ability to control or predict. These statements are necessarily based upon various assumptions involving judgments with respect to the future, including, among others, the ability to achieve synergies and revenue growth; national, international, regional and local economic, competitive and regulatory conditions and developments; technological developments; capital markets conditions; inflation rates; interest rates;the political and economic stability of all producing nations; energy markets; weather conditions; business and regulatory or legal decisions; the pace of deregulation of retail natural gas and electricity and certain agricultural products; the timing and success of business development efforts; and other uncertainties. You are cautioned not to put undue reliance on any forward-looking statement.

Page 102: Business Units

101

Industry Overview: Industry Overview: North American Market ShareNorth American Market Share� Independent Bulk Liquid Terminal Companies

– Total = 328,721,000– KM = 53,940,000– Market Share of 16.4%

� Total Storage Capacity – Independent & Captive = 730,000,000 – KM = 53,000,000– KM Market Share of 7.26%

� The Top Ten Companies Represent 76.5% of the Total Independent Tankage

1) Kinder Morgan 16.4%2) Williams 15.4%3) ST Services 11.8%4) IMTT 9.4%5) Vopak (Paktank) 4.9%

6) Oiltanking of Houston Inc. 4.4%7) TransMontalgne Inc. 4.0%8) TePPco 3.9%9) Petroleum Fuel & Terminal Co. 3.5%10) Houston Fuel Oil Terminal Co. 2.8%

Source: 2001 World Refining, September 2001

Page 103: Business Units

102

Terminal OverviewTerminal Overview

� Liquids Terminals– Eleven (11) Liquid Terminals

– 35,000,000 barrels of storage– 457,000,000 barrels of Petroleum Products Throughput– 34,500,000 barrels of Chemical and Other Products Throughput

– Combined with KMP Products Pipeline – we are the largest independent liquid terminal operators in North America based on storage capacity.

– Revenue is 50% from Petroleum; 50% from Chemicals.

Page 104: Business Units

103

Segment Overview:Segment Overview:Liquids Terminals Liquids Terminals -- 20012001

100%491M100%35.0M11Total1.5%2.5M3%1.0M3Other

.6%3M3%1.2M1Philadelphia

1.6%8M8%2.9M1New Orleans

3%13.5M9%3.1M2Chicago

21%105M25%8.6M2New Jersey

73%359M52%18.2M2Houston

PercentageBarrelsPercentageBarrelsNo.Location

ThroughputStorage

1Capacity BreakdownChemical 7.8MPetroleum 24.3MOther 2.7M

Page 105: Business Units

104

Segment Overview:Segment Overview:Liquids Terminals Throughput for 2002Liquids Terminals Throughput for 2002

502M30M173M300M11Total

3M2M0M1M3Other

2M2M0M0M1Philadelphia

3M3M0M0M1New Orleans

16M5M5.4M6M2Chicago

108M7M15.1M86M2New Jersey

370M11M152M207M2Houston

TotalChemicalDistillateGasoline/Gasoline Blendstock

No.Location

Throughput

Page 106: Business Units

105

Industry Overview:Industry Overview:KMLT Regional Market ShareKMLT Regional Market Share

Midwest

Total 115

Independent 50

KM 3.1

KM % Total 3.0%

KM% Independent 6%

Gulf

Total 256

Independent 86

KM 18.2

KM % Total 7%

KM % Independent 21%

Northeast

Total 184

Independent 51

KM 10

KM % Total 5.5%

KM % Independent 19.7%

Southeast

Total 78

Independent 22

KM 2.8

KM % Total 3.6%

KM % Independent 12.9%

Source: A.T. Kearny, ILTA

Page 107: Business Units

106

KMLT Carteret TerminalKMLT Carteret Terminal

• Vessel Loading/Unloading• Pipeline Receipt/Shipment• Tank Car Loading/Unloading• Tank Truck Loading/Unloading• Tank Truck Weighing• Product Blending• Product Heating

• Servicing Body of Water Arthur Kill• Servicing Railroads CSX, Norfolk Southern• Servicing Major Roadways NJ Turnpike, Routes 1 & 9• Pipelines (receiving) Sun, Colonial, Harbor• Pipelines (injecting) Buckeye, Colonial

Terminal Address Business Office

78 Lafayette Street One Terminal RoadCarteret, New Jersey 07008 Carteret, New Jersey 07008

732-541-5161 732-541-5161732-541-5856 Fax 732-969-3575 Fax

Transportation Modes

Terminal Addresses

Terminal Services

• Vapor Recovery/Incineration• Additive Handling/Injection• Denatured Spirits Handling• Nitrogen Blanketing• Automated Truck Racks• Fire & HAZ-MAT team on-site• Additional Services Available

• Petroleum 68,899,196 84,866,823• Chemical 3,563,287 3,651,737

Terminal Specifications

Size 197 AcresTotal Storage Capacity 6,347,589 bblsNo. of Tanks 261Range of Tanks 2,000 gals - 260,000 bblsNo. of Ship Docks 2 (36’ MLW & 37’ MLW)No. of Barge Docks 4Commodities Handled Petroleum and Chemicals

Throughput (inbound) (bbls) 2000 2001

Number of Moves (2001)

• Ships 328• Barges 1,228

• Trucks 35,579• Railcars 2,811

Page 108: Business Units

107

KMLT Argo TerminalKMLT Argo Terminal

Terminal Specifications

Argo Terminal Business Address

8500 West 68th St 8500 West 68th St Argo, Illinois 60501-0409 Argo, Illinois 60501-0409

708-458-1330 708-458-1330 708-496-2540 Fax 708-496-2540 Fax

Transportation Modes

Terminal Addresses

Terminal Services

Size 145 AcresTotal Storage Capacity 2,313,391 bblsNo. of Tanks 215Range of Tanks 50,000 gals to 80,000 bblsNo. of Ship Docks N/ANo. of Barge Docks 3Commodities Handled Chemicals, Petroleum, and Residual

Fuel Oil

• Petroleum 7,146,822 8,198,669• Chemical 3,527,348 3,473,865

• Vessel Loading/Unloading• Pipeline Receipt/Injection• KMLT Laboratory Testing• Tank Car Loading/Unloading• Tank Truck Loading/Unloading• Tank Truck Weighing• Product Blending

• Servicing Body of Water Sanitary & Ship Canal• Servicing Railroads Canadian National• Servicing Major Roadways Archer Avenue (Rte. 171),

I-294 & I-55• Pipelines (receiving) TEPPCO, Westshore• Pipelines (injecting) TEPPCO

• Product Heating• Vapor Recovery/Incineration• Additive Handling/Injection• Denatured Spirits Handling• Nitrogen Blanketing• Automated Truck Rack• Additional Services Available

Throughput (inbound)(bbls) 2000 2001

Page 109: Business Units

108

KMLT Harvey Terminal KMLT Harvey Terminal (Port of New Orleans)(Port of New Orleans)

• Bulk Liquid Storage • Warehousing • Cold Storage• Direct Transfers• Drumming Services• Package Filling

• Chemicals 2,724,639 2,469,136• Vegetable Oils 2,951,230 4,253,936• Animal Fats 730,504 306,772• Agriculture 277,934 330,233• Oil Fields 77,576 599,983

Terminal Specifications

Size 100 acresTotal Storage Capacity 2,929,396 bblsNo. of Tanks 178 Tanks Range of Tanks 416 bbls to 200,000 bbls No. of Ship / Barge Docks 3 / 1Commodities Handled Chemicals, Vegetable Oils,

Animal Fats, Agricultural, Oil Field

• Servicing Body of Water• Servicing Railroads Union Pacific Railroad• Servicing Major Roadways• Pipelines (receiving) N/A• Pipelines (injecting) N/A

New Orleans Terminal Business Office

3540 River Road 3540 River RoadHarvey, LA 70058 Harvey, LA 70058

P.O. Box 581 P.O. Box 581Harvey, LA 70059 Harvey, LA 70059

504-340-4911504-348-1893Fax

Transportation Modes

Terminal Addresses

Terminal Services

• Products are shipped and received through dedicated pipelines to each tank.

Throughput (inbound)(bbls) 2000 2001

Page 110: Business Units

109

KMLT Galena Park TerminalKMLT Galena Park Terminal

Terminal Specifications

Galena Park Terminal Business Address

906 Clinton Drive 405 Clinton DriveP.O. Box 486 P.O. Box 465Galena Park, Texas 77547 Galena Park, Texas 77547-0465

713-455-1231 713-450-0400713-450-7485 Fax 713-450-0450 Fax

Transportation Modes

Terminal Addresses

Terminal Services

• Vessel Loading/Unloading• Pipeline Receipt/Shipment• KMLT Laboratory Testing• Tank Car Loading/Unloading• Tank Truck Loading/Unloading• Tank Truck Weighing• Product Blending

• Petroleum 22,083,561 19,699,000• Chemical 6,370,632 9,658,000

Size 415 AcresTotal Storage Capacity 3,890,000 bblsNo. of Tanks 100Range of Tanks 10,000 - 187,000 bblsNo. of Ship Docks 3No. of Barge Docks 4Commodities Handled Petroleum and Chemicals

• Servicing Body of Water Houston Ship Channel• Servicing Railroads Union Pacific• Servicing Major Roadways I-10 and I-610• Pipelines (receiving) Equistar, Texmark, Valero, Texas

Petrochemical, KMLT CrossChannels, Arco P/L, ExxonMobil Chemical, BP/Arco, Dynegy

• Pipelines (injecting) KMLT Cross Channel and LCR

• Product Heating• Product Chilling• Free Trade Zone (FTZ)• Vapor Recovery/Incineration• Additive Handling / Injection• Nitrogen Blanketing• Automated Truck Rack• Additional Services Available

Throughput (inbound) (bbls) 2000 2001

Number of Moves (2001)

• Ships 361• Barges 1,420

• Trucks 9,713• Railcars 4,467

Page 111: Business Units

110

KMLT Pasadena TerminalKMLT Pasadena Terminal

Terminal Specifications

Pasadena Terminal Business Address

530 N. Witter 405 Clinton DrivePasadena, Texas 77506-0351 P.O. Box 46577506-0351 Galena Park, Texas 77547-0486

713-473-9271 713-450-0400713-473-0155 Fax 713-450-0450 Fax

Transportation Modes

Terminal Addresses

Terminal Services

• Vessel Loading/Unloading• Pipeline Receipt/Shipment• KMLT Laboratory Testing• Tank Truck Loading/Unloading• Product Blending• Vapor Recovery/Incineration

• Petroleum 313,877,590 328,277,000• Chemical 1,231,410 1,214,000

Size 174 AcresTotal Storage Capacity 13,040,000 bblsNo. of Tanks 102Range of Tanks 5,000 - 300,000 bblsNo. of Ship/Barge Docks 1 / 3Truck Loading Facility 6 Bays, Fully Automated Truck RackCommodities Handled Petroleum and Chemicals

• Servicing Body of Water Houston Ship Channel • Servicing Major Roadways State Hwy. 225, I-10, I-610• Pipelines (receiving) Amoco, Coastal, Marathon, KMLT

Cross Channels, Crown, Dynegy,Exxon, LCR, Phillips Reliant /HL&P,Shell, Valero, Explorer (proposed)

• Pipelines (injecting) APCO, Chevron, Colonial, Orion,KMLT Cross Channels, Explorer,LCR, Phillips, Reliant/HL&P,Seaway, Teppco, Eagle, Coastal,Longhorn, Centennial (proposed)

• Additive Handling/Injection• Free Trade Zone• Nitrogen Blanketing• Automated Truck Rack• Additional Services Available

Throughput (inbound) (bbls) 2000 2001

Number of Moves (2001)• Ships 357• Barges 1,255

• Trucks 89,330• Railcars 0

Page 112: Business Units

111

Industry Overview:Industry Overview:Customer BaseCustomer Base

Total 2001 Revenue

48%49%

3%

Petroleum Chemical Ancillary

90.1% of Total Revenues are for Contracts Greater than 1 Year

TOP CUSTOMERS 2001 REVENUE

DOW CHEMICAL COMPANY 7.83%BP AMOCO CORPORATION 7.44%MIECO PRODUCT SERVICES, LP 6.56%VALERO 5.99%GEORGE E WARREN CORPORATION 5.57%BASF CORPORATION 4.91%KOCH PETROLEUM GROUP 3.96%SHELL CHEMICAL COMPANY 3.46%SUNOCO 2.68%RUBICON, INC. 2.52%MONSANTO COMPANY 2.31%DUKE ENERGY 2.23%ADM 2.15%EASTMAN CO. 2.07%CELANESE LTD. 2.04%

Page 113: Business Units

112

Chemical Market FundamentalsChemical Market Fundamentals

0 09 89 69 49 29 08 88 68 48 28 0

8 68 48 28 07 87 67 47 27 06 8

C ap ac ity U tiliza tio n - C h em ica lsP e rc e n t

H isto rica lAvera g e

N o te : S h a d e d A re a sR e p re se n t R e c e ss io n P e r io d s

JC U 2 8

L o w est R a te S in ce 1 9 8 2 R ecessio n !

Source: DuPont Company

Page 114: Business Units

113

Chemical ImportsChemical Imports

Source: Years 1995 – 2000 American Chemistry CouncilYear 2001 was extrapolated from January – October

$0$10,000$20,000$30,000$40,000$50,000$60,000$70,000$80,000$90,000

$100,000

1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001

(Mill

ions

of D

olla

rs)

Page 115: Business Units

114

Petroleum Market FundamentalsPetroleum Market FundamentalsUS Distillate InventoriesUS Distillate Inventories

90

100

110

120

130

140

150

160

Dec-97 Jun-98 Dec-98 Jun-99 Dec-99 Jun-00 Dec-00 Jun-01 Dec-01

Mill

ion

Bar

rels

Actual

Normal Range

Sources: EIA; Stocks of Distillate Fuel Oil by PetroleumAdministration for Defense District (PADD), 2000 to Present

Page 116: Business Units

115

Petroleum Market FundamentalsPetroleum Market FundamentalsGasoline InventoriesGasoline Inventories

175

200

225

250

Jan-98 Jul-98 Jan-99 Jul-99 Jan-00 Jul-00 Jan-01 Jul-01 Jan-02

Milli

on B

arre

ls

Gasoline Actual

NOTE: Colored Band is Normal Stock Range

Sources: EIA; Projections: Short-Term Energy Outlook, March 2001 and EIA; Stocks of Motor Gasoline by Petroleum Administration for Defense District (PADD), (Million Barrels) 2000 to Present

Page 117: Business Units

116

Excess Capacity is GoneExcess Capacity is Gone

02468

101214161820

1973

1975

1977

1979

1981

1983

1985

1987

1989

1991

1993

1995

1997

1999

2001

Thou

sand

Bar

rels

Per

Cal

enda

r Day

U.S. Operable Capacity & Gross Inputs

Operable Capacity

Gross Inputs

Page 118: Business Units

117

U.S. East Coast is Dependent on U.S. East Coast is Dependent on Gasoline ImportsGasoline Imports

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

3500

PADD 1 PADD 2 PADD 3 PADD 4 PADD 5

Thou

sand

Bar

rels

Per D

ay

Gasoline Demand

Impo

rts

Kinder Morgan market share equals 33%

Page 119: Business Units

118

TEPPCOLonghorn

Orion

Explorer

Kinder Morgan

Colonial

Pipeline Routes:

SeawayPhillipsKaneb & ChaseWilliamsAspen

New Construction

Centennial

(CALNEV, CFPL, PLANTATIONKMP (WEST)

Eagle/Citgo

KMLT Delivery Market AccessKMLT Delivery Market Access

Page 120: Business Units

119

KMLT Focus 2002KMLT Focus 2002� Performance Management and Efficient Safe Operations

– Spills– 676 barrels in 2001 (0.0013767%)

602 barrels were from Tropical Storm Allison (0.0000154%– Accidents

– Six (6) lost work days

� Grow existing business within our fence line.– 830,000 barrels in Houston, TX– 400,000 barrels in Carteret, NJ– New freezer storage in Harvey, LA

� Increase Facility Connectivity– Centennial Pipeline is from Pasadena, TX– Buckeye Pipeline in Carteret, NJ– Midway Pipeline in Argo, IL

� Expand outside the fence line into new markets and services– Stolt -– Boswell -– Laser -