8/3/2010 1 Stewart Carlyle Bushong, Sc.D. Baylor College of Medicine Houston, Texas [email protected] …because one size does not fit all Stewart Carlyle Bushong, Sc.D. Baylor College of Medicine Houston, Texas [email protected]
May 16, 2018
8/3/2010
1
Stewart Carlyle Bushong, Sc.D.Baylor College of Medicine
Houston, [email protected]
…because one size does not fit all
Stewart Carlyle Bushong, Sc.D.Baylor College of Medicine
Houston, [email protected]
8/3/2010
2
ObjectivesRadiation Sources and IntensityRadiation Dose-Response RelationshipsALARA C di l P i i lALARA – Cardinal PrinciplesDeterministic/Stochastic Imaging Modalities (R&F, CT, DR)Imaging Economics
®
8/3/2010
3
8/3/2010
4
®
®
8/3/2010
5
®
®
8/3/2010
6
8/3/2010
7
8/3/2010
8
8/3/2010
9
8/3/2010
10
8/3/2010
11
8/3/2010
12
8/3/2010
13
8/3/2010
14
8/3/2010
15
8/3/2010
16
8/3/2010
17
8/3/2010
18
ObjectivesRadiation Sources and IntensityRadiation Dose-Response RelationshipsALARA C di l P i i lALARA – Cardinal PrinciplesDeterministic/Stochastic Imaging Modalities (R&F, CT, DR)Imaging Economics
8/3/2010
19
…because one size does not fit allThe Alliance for Radiation
Safety in Pediatric Imaging13 societies with representation from radiology, pediatrics, and medical physicsThe risk of death from cancer is about 1 in 5The risk is cumulative; each CT increases risk by 1/1000
8/3/2010
20
8/3/2010
21
8/3/2010
22
ObjectivesRadiation Sources and IntensityRadiation Dose-Response RelationshipsALARA C di l P i i lALARA – Cardinal PrinciplesDeterministic/Stochastic Imaging Modalities (R&F, CT, DR)Imaging Economics
8/3/2010
23
Radiation UnitsExposure……….. mR …… mGyTissue Dose………mrad…...mGyEff ti D SEffective Dose… mrem…..mSv
Resp
onse
Dose
8/3/2010
24
Resp
onse
BB
DoseDeterministic
Stochastic
NaturalIncidence
20%
0%
DeterministicNon-LinearThresholdS it i ith dSeverity increases with dose
StochasticLinearNon-ThresholdI id i ith dIncidence increases with dose
8/3/2010
25
Resp
onse
BB
DoseDeterministic
Stochastic
20%
0%
NaturalIncidence
Resp
onse
BB
DoseDeterministic
Stochastic
20%
0%50mSv
NaturalIncidence
Resp
onse
BB
DoseDeterministic
Stochastic
20%
0%50mSv
NaturalIncidence
8/3/2010
26
Resp
onse
BB
LymphocyteDepression
DoseDeterministic
Stochastic
20%
0%50mSv 100mSv
NaturalIncidence
Resp
onse
BB
LymphocyteDepression Local
TissueEffects
DoseDeterministic
Stochastic
20%
0%50mSv 100mSv 1000mSv
NaturalIncidence
8/3/2010
27
Resp
onse
BB
LymphocyteDepression Local
TissueEffects
DoseDeterministic
Stochastic
20%
0%50mSv 100mSv
DeterministicEffects
1000mSv
NaturalIncidence
Resp
onse
BB
LymphocyteDepression Local
TissueEffects
StochasticEffects
DoseDeterministic
Stochastic
20%
0%50mSv 100mSv
DeterministicEffects
1000mSv
NaturalIncidence
8/3/2010
28
Resp
onse
BB
LymphocyteDepression Local
TissueEffects
StochasticEffects
Hormesis
DoseDeterministic
Stochastic
20%
0%50mSv 100mSv
DeterministicEffects
1000mSv
Hormesis
NaturalIncidence
Resp
onse
BB
LymphocyteDepression Local
TissueEffects
StochasticEffects
Hormesisdi l
DoseDeterministic
Stochastic
20%
0%50mSv 100mSv
DeterministicEffects
1000mSv
o es sMedical imaging
NaturalIncidence
ObjectivesRadiation Sources and IntensityRadiation Dose-Response RelationshipsALARA C di l P i i lALARA – Cardinal PrinciplesDeterministic/Stochastic Imaging Modalities (R&F, CT, DR)Imaging Economics
8/3/2010
29
ALARAAt Last Another Raise AlreadyAny Little Annoyance Requires AttentionAfter Love in the Afternoon Repeat AgainAfter Love in the Afternoon Repeat AgainAs Long as Repeating AllowsAs Low As Reasonably Achievable
Cardinal PrinciplesTimeDistanceShieldingShielding
8/3/2010
30
More Is Not Often Better…
When CT is the right exam:Child size the kVp and mAOne scan (single phase) is often enoughScan only the indicated area
ObjectivesRadiation Sources and IntensityRadiation Dose-Response RelationshipsALARA C di l P i i lALARA – Cardinal PrinciplesDeterministic/StochasticImaging Modalities (R&F, CT, DR)Imaging Economics
8/3/2010
31
DeterministicNon-LinearThresholdS it i ith dSeverity increases with dose
StochasticLinearNon-ThresholdI id i ith dIncidence increases with dose
8/3/2010
32
8/3/2010
33
ObjectivesRadiation Sources and IntensityRadiation Dose-Response RelationshipsALARA C di l P i i lALARA – Cardinal PrinciplesDeterministic/Stochastic Imaging Modalities (R&F, CT, DR)Imaging Economics
8/3/2010
34
8/3/2010
35
8/3/2010
36
8/3/2010
37
8/3/2010
38
8/3/2010
39
Frush – Strategies for Dose Reduction
Consider other modality: MRI, USLimit IV contrast phasesLimit scan rangeLimit scan rangeReduce mAReduce kVpMinimize use of pitch <1.0Consider shielding: thyroid, breast, gonadsUse tube current modulation
8/3/2010
40
8/3/2010
41
Effective Dose
Radiography ….. 0.1 mSvNuclear Medicine ….. 1 mSv
Fluoroscopy ….. 5 mSvComputed Tomography ….. 10 mSv
ObjectivesRadiation Sources and IntensityRadiation Dose-Response RelationshipsALARA C di l P i i lALARA – Cardinal PrinciplesDeterministic/Stochastic Imaging Modalities (R&F, CT, DR)Imaging Economics
8/3/2010
42
Inflation……………….3%/yr
Healthcare…………....9%/yr
Medical Imaging........18%/yr
8/3/2010
43
8/3/2010
44
8/3/2010
45
ObjectivesRadiation Sources and IntensityRadiation Dose-Response RelationshipsALARA C di l P i i lALARA – Cardinal PrinciplesDeterministic/Stochastic Imaging Modalities (R&F, CT, DR)Imaging Economics
8/3/2010
46
8/3/2010
47