| BUILDING ACTION SYMPOSIUM COP23, Bonn, 2017 “How to achieve the Paris Agreement? Identifying key ingredients to achieving a low-carbon, energy efficient buildings and construction sector” Breakout group IV – Building data capture and management as a catalyst for moving the sector onto a 2°C pathway. COP23: A. Passer, T. Lützkendorf and R. Frischknecht 09.11.2017 1
16
Embed
BUILDING ACTION SYMPOSIUM COP23, Bonn, 2017 · BUILDING ACTION SYMPOSIUM COP23, Bonn, 2017 “How to achieve the Paris Agreement? Identifying key ingredients to achieving a low-carbon,
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
|
BUILDING ACTION SYMPOSIUM
COP23, Bonn, 2017
“How to achieve the Paris Agreement? Identifying key ingredients to achieving a low-carbon, energy efficient buildings and construction
sector”
Breakout group IV – Building data capture and management as a catalyst for moving the sector onto a 2°C pathway.
COP23: A. Passer, T. Lützkendorf and R. Frischknecht 09.11.2017 1
u www.agnhb.tugraz.at
09.11.2017
COP23: A. Passer, T. Lützkendorf and R. Frischknecht
IEA EBC Annex72: Assessing and influencing life cycle related environmental impacts caused by buildings: how can data help?
|COP23: A. Passer, T. Lützkendorf and R. Frischknecht
Context
09.11.2017 3
Grey carbon ?
Embodied CO2 emissions ?
Embodied carbon ?
Embedded carbon ?
Carbon footprint ?
Global Warming Potential ?
“To harness innovation, enterprise and investment to fast track the development and deployment of climate solutions that will build future
economies with net zero greenhouse gas emissions, in an effort to limit the rise of global temperatures to 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels.” (COP21)
The goal:
• netZeroEnergy
• netZeroEmissions
• netZeroImpacts?
|COP23: A. Passer, T. Lützkendorf and R. Frischknecht
Data needs of different stakeholders
09.11.2017 4
I N F L U E NC E
R E Q U I R E M E N T
I N F O R M A T I O N
S P E C I A L C O N S U L T A N T
F O RL C A S E R V I C E S
T O O L & D A T A B A S E
D E V E L O P E R
P R O D U C T M A N U F A C T U R E R
S U S T A I N A B I L I T Y A S S E S S M E N T
& C E R T I F I C A T I O N
C O N T R A C T O R S & B U I L D E R S
P R O C U R E M E N T
V A L U E R S
C L I E N T & I N V E S T O R
D E S I G N P R O F E S S I O N A L &
C O N S U L T A N T
P O L I C Y M A K E R
Sour
ce: I
EA E
BC A
nnex
57,
TU
Gra
z
|COP23: A. Passer, T. Lützkendorf and R. Frischknecht
Expand scope: Building life cycle
09.11.2017 5
Sour
ce: I
EA E
BC A
nnex
72,
TU
Gra
z
A Life Cycle approach is required!
|
Ty
pic
al
bu
ild
ing
s
Bu
ild
ing
st
oc
k
Lo
w—
Imp
ac
t b
uil
din
gs
embodied impacts
operational impacts
Ty
pic
al
bu
ild
ing
s
Bu
ild
ing
st
oc
k
Lo
w—
Imp
ac
t b
uil
din
gs
Plu
s-
En
er
gy
bu
ild
ing
s
Ne
t-
Ze
ro
bu
ild
ing
s
embodied impacts
operational impacts
COP23: A. Passer, T. Lützkendorf and R. Frischknecht
Life Cycle Performance
09.11.2017 6
Sour
ce: I
EA E
BC A
nnex
72,
TU
Gra
z
Net-Zero life cycle performance is the goal!
|
IEA EBC Annex 57 - Evaluation of Embodied Energy and CO2 Equivalent Emissions for Building Construction
§ Methodology, Comparability and Documentation
§ Guidelines for Designers and Consultants, Construction Products Manufacturers, Policy Makers and Educators
COP23: A. Passer, T. Lützkendorf and R. Frischknecht
Large scale building assessment to derive Paris compatible benchmarks for buildings
COP23: A. Passer, T. Lützkendorf and R. Frischknecht
Case study sample to derive benchmarks
09.11.2017 9
0
100
200
300
400
500
600Scho
olA
Scho
olB
Scho
olC
Scho
olD
Scho
olE
retirem
enth
omeA
retirem
enth
omeB
resid
entia
lbuildingA
resid
entia
lbuildingB
resid
entia
lbuildingC
resid
entia
lbuildingD
Scho
olF
Scho
olG
Scho
olH
retirem
enth
omeC
resid
entia
lbuildingE
resid
entia
lbuildingF
resid
entia
lbuildingG
resid
entia
lbuildingH
resid
entia
lbuildingI
resid
entia
lbuildingJ
resid
entia
lbuildingK
resid
entia
lbuildingL
resid
entia
lbuildingN
resid
entia
lbuildingO
resid
entia
lbuildingP
resid
entia
lbuildingQ
resid
entia
lbuildingR
resid
entia
lbuildingS
resid
entia
lbuildingT
Primaryenergydem
and,nonre
newable[M
Joil-eq/m
2 a]
Construction Operation Mobility
Sour
ce: F
risch
knec
ht, R
., et
al.:
IEA
EBC
Ann
ex 5
7 (2
016)
|COP23: A. Passer, T. Lützkendorf and R. Frischknecht
Requirement
09.11.2017 10
6 DL I F E C Y C L E
5 DC O S T S
3 DG E O M E T R Y
M O D E L D E S I G NP R O C E S S
4 DT I M E
ENVIRONMENT
B U D G E TL C S A
L
FECYCLE PERFO
RMANCE
COMMUNICATIO
N
I
BIM
AS
CO
MM
ON
TO
OL
Sour
ce: P
asse
r, Al
exan
der,
TU G
raz
2016
BIM as common tool!
|
Data is only useful if,
• It is able to highlight the relevant issues and challenges
• It supports stakeholders in the assessment and improvement
• It is reliable and tested
• It fits the question/problem
The availability and reliability of appropriate data becomes a prerequisite for calculating, assessing, influencing and proving climate-neutrality of buildings!
COP23: A. Passer, T. Lützkendorf and R. Frischknecht
Conclusions
09.11.2017 11
|
We need:
• Evolution of scope: Integration of full life cycle to avoid emission leaking (focusing on either construction or operation) and to identify benefits and trade-offs along the life cycle of buildings (production, construction, operation, dismantling)
• Establishment of additional building characteristics: GHG emissions in the life cycle / carbon footprint and other environmental impacts
• Provision of life cycle based information on products (LCA/EPD/PEF) to the public and incentives for low carbon manufacturing
• Comprehensive case study evaluation for analysis of interdependencies and development of design recommendations
• Derivation of Paris compatible benchmarks for buildings (different building types); they may be dynamic and be lowered with time
• Empirical data on the economic advantages of nZEB buildings (RICS)
COP23: A. Passer, T. Lützkendorf and R. Frischknecht
Recommendation
09.11.2017 12
|
Conclusions from iiSBE report (2017):
Its sheer impossible for the Built environment to stay within a max CO2 emission budget under a 2 degree scenario, unless the built environment will:
• Change for and the primarily use of biobased materials
• Limit materials input in general and for retrofit for ZEB specifically
• Have the building supply industry change firstly for renewable energy based production
• Have household energy demand to be reduced significantly
• Speed up development of new RE conversion technologies
COP23: A. Passer, T. Lützkendorf and R. Frischknecht
iiSBE report: A (near) 0-CO2 built environment
09.11.2017 13
|COP23: A. Passer, T. Lützkendorf and R. Frischknecht
Thank you
09.11.2017 14
“Our scarcest resource is not oil, metals, clean air, capital labor, or technology. It is our willingness to listen to each other and learn from each other
and to seek the truth rather than seek to be right.”Donella Meadows
Thank you for your attention!
The Austrian participation in IEA EBC Annex 72 is co-funded by following institutions and programs:
|COP23: A. Passer, T. Lützkendorf and R. Frischknecht
WG Sustainable Construction, TU Graz – Mission
09.11.2017 15
Visit: http://agnhb.tugraz.at/
Working Group Sustainable Construction
Institute of Technology and Testing of Building MaterialsGraz University of Technology
“Our research is dedicated to sustainability assessment methods and the workflows within the building design process to improve the applicability of assessment methods
in the built environment as well as their successful implementation within full scale demonstration projects.
In our interdisciplinary projects our foci lie on the optimization of the environmental and economic performance by the use of life cycle assessment, life cycle costing,
system analysis and multi- criteria assessment methods within digital design processes.”
|
• Sustainable design and process integration§ Life Cycle Assessment (LCA)
§ Life Cycle Cost Assessment (LCCA)
§ Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM)
§ Building Information Modeling (BIM)
COP23: A. Passer, T. Lützkendorf and R. Frischknecht
WG Sustainable Construction, TU Graz – Research Agenda