Brambles - bwts.com.auBrambles shares, the cost base must be reduced using the factor = Original cost of Brambles shares – (No of Brambles shares ÷ 5 × 4.15). When Brambles advise
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Important I am publishing stock investment journals of stocks I own (or consider owning, but decide against doing so) only to provide examples to teach the way I think about investing. In doing so, I am neither making nor implying any recommendation for anyone to invest in this or any other stock.
Therefore, the stock discussed in this journal may not be a suitable investment for you at this or any other time. I will only be discussing its suitability, or otherwise, for my investment plan.
You need to assess the relevance of anything in this journal to your investment plan, seeking advice from a licensed adviser if you are not able to make such an assessment for yourself.
Navigation
To navigate this PDF file, open the navigation bar
by clicking this icon at the left of the screen:
Terms and acronyms used in this journal See the Glossary page on the Free Resources menu for definitions. There are also articles on some of the ratios on the Fundamental Analysis Articles page on the Copyright Materials page.
If I use a term or acronym that is not in the Glossary, please email me for an explanation and I will add it to the Glossary page.
The ratios used in my analysis are set out in the document Ratios Used in my Analysis on the Stock Investment Journals page on the Building Wealth Resources menu. It includes a basic definition of annualised data.
How I found this stock Brambles had come up a while ago on my weekly scans for stocks making new 52-week highs. It was on my watch list, but had not quite met my investment plan criteria (a bit too highly priced).
My recent change in thinking about the absence of ideal stocks to buy has caused me to relax my criteria until such time as good opportunities emerge, when I will switch out of solid stocks like this one into better prospects.
1. There has not been much growth over the longer term. 2. The business is clearly cyclical and this pattern can be seen in the earnings. 3. The last two years have seen rising earnings, though dividends have been held steady. This
leaves scope for increasing dividends once the new strategies and demerger of Recall are bedded down.
Return on equity is shown in the graph below:
As expected, there is also cyclicality in return on equity. After a sharp fall, return on equity has stabilised in the low 20% range, well above my cost of capital (12.5%) and my hurdle rate for stock selection (15%). As will be noted in the next section, StockDoctor calculates a higher return on equity than Morningstar, whose data I used for the above graph.
I am buying this stock with the knowledge that it is overpriced on my normal criteria and possibly lower growth than I aim to find. This short-term deviation from my investment plan is fully discussed in my Weekly Market and Portfolio Journal of 23 August 2013.
ASX CodeModelStage
Mkt Av AssessmentPlan Req V Plan
Price Earnings Ratio 21.33 17.29 High My plan is to switch to stocks that better meet my criteria as and when they emerge.
Dividend Yield 2.91% 4.00% Low As for PER
Franking 30% Yes Not OK
My plan prefers fully franked dividends or higher than average dividends to compensate. In this case, Brambles earnings may get a lift in earnings and dividends from a fall in the AUD to partially compensate.
Return on Equity 22.4% >15% OKThis is the Morningstar ratio. StockDoctor makes it 31.3%. I don't know the reason for the difference.
Debt/Equity Ratio 95% <60% OK Interest cover is 8 times, so I am reasonably confident Brambles can service its debt OK.
Mkt Capitalisation $13.9b >$100m OKLiquidity (22-day Av) $40-60m Enough OK
The above chart to 19 August (when I bought Brambles) shows the wide accumulation pattern that formed after the low of 2009.
The price has broken out of the pattern and is trending upward. In recent months it has formed a sideways trading range as it waited for the full year earnings report, which will be released on 22 August. I was travelling overseas at the time and had I been home I might have waited to see the profit report. My travel schedule was not going to let me do that easily, so I had to act while I had a safe internet connection to make the purchase.
J FMAMJ J ASOND2008
JFMAMJ J ASOND2009
J FMAM J J ASOND2010
JFMAMJ J ASOND2011
J FMAMJ J ASOND2012
J FMAMJ J ASOND2013
4.00
5.00
6.00
7.00
8.00
9.00
10.00W @ W 311008-190813 BXB - BRAMBLES LTD > +1.3% +0.11 to 8.90
Managing the investment The full year earnings were announced on 22 August 2013. The price spiked lower, but held above my stops and closed well of the lows:
Since then, to the close of 4 September 2013, the price has recovered somewhat as shown on the chart below:
Clearly, the challenge now is for the price to deal with the strong resistance represented by the sideways pattern of trading that sits above it.
J FMAMJ J ASOND2008
JFMAMJ J ASOND2009
J FMAM J J ASOND2010
JFMAMJ J ASOND2011
J FMAMJ J ASOND2012
J FMAMJ J ASOND2013
4.00
5.00
6.00
7.00
8.00
9.00
10.00W @ W 031008-220813 BXB - BRAMBLES LTD > +1.3% +0.11 to 8.90
J FMAMJ J ASOND2008
JFMAMJ J ASOND2009
J FMAM J J ASOND2010
JFMAMJ J ASOND2011
J FMAMJ J ASOND2012
J FMAMJ J ASOND2013
4.00
5.00
6.00
7.00
8.00
9.00
10.00W @ W 311008-060913 BXB - BRAMBLES LTD > +1.3% +0.11 to 8.90
Updated to 29 October 2013 Since the beginning of September, Brambles has overcome the resistance and by 28 October 2013 had made a new high for the trend:
I decided to raise my stops to just below the August low:
Low price used to base stops $8.14 Soft stop (one minimum bid lower) $8.13 Hard stop (2% below soft stop) $7.97
This was only a relatively minor movement, but was consistent with my investment plan. The chart now looked like this:
J FMAMJ J ASOND2008
JFMAMJ J ASOND2009
J FMAM J J ASOND2010
JFMAMJ J ASOND2011
J FMAMJ J ASOND2012
J FMAMJ J ASOND2013
4.00
5.00
6.00
7.00
8.00
9.00
10.00W @ W 241208-011113 BXB - BRAMBLES LTD > +1.9% +0.18 to 9.64
J FMAMJ J ASOND2008
JFMAMJ J ASOND2009
J FMAM J J ASOND2010
JFMAMJ J ASOND2011
J FMAMJ J ASOND2012
J FMAMJ J ASOND2013
4.00
5.00
6.00
7.00
8.00
9.00
10.00W @ W 241208-011113 BXB - BRAMBLES LTD > +1.9% +0.18 to 9.64
Updated to 10 December 2013 On 10 December 2013, Brambles began trading ex the demerger of Recall Holdings.
This is Brambles advice on the tax implications:
And
I have waited a few days to see if Brambles advised the apportionment factor, but they do not seem to have done so. This means that, until they do so, I need to make my own calculation.
This is what I have done:
1. There is no adjustment necessary to the number of Brambles shares held. 2. Recall Holdings began trading at $4.15 on 10 December 2013. I have used this as the cost
base for the Recall Holdings shares pending Brambles advice on the apportionment factor. 3. Recall Holdings shares were issued one for each five Brambles shares. So, for each parcel of
Brambles shares, the cost base must be reduced using the factor = Original cost of Brambles shares – (No of Brambles shares ÷ 5 × 4.15).
When Brambles advise the apportionment factor, I can finalise this adjustment. The above is necessary now for portfolio management purposes.
Note that there were some special arrangements for small holders and foreign shareholders, but these do not apply to me and I have not considered them above.
Updated to 27 December 2013 After the demerger of Recall Holdings, it was necessary to adjust the stops for Brambles. There was no pressing need to do so. Instead I waited for the adjusted chart once the demerger had been reflected in the database Manager. I took the opportunity to raise the stop very slightly to under the low of the low of the last trough in the trend:
Low price (adjusted) used to base stops $7.68 Soft stop (one minimum bid lower) $6.67 Hard stop (2% below soft stop) $7.51
JFMAMJ J ASOND2009
JFMAMJ J ASOND2010
J FMAM J J ASOND2011
J FMAMJ J ASOND2012
J FMAMJ J ASOND2013
JFMAMJ J A SOND2014
3.804.00
5.00
6.00
7.00
8.00
9.00
10.00W @ W 270209-271213 BXB - BRAMBLES LTD > -0.3% -0.03 to 9.18
Updated to 3 January 2014 With Brambles making new highs for the trend, I decided to invest a third tranche of 2% of capital. However, the demerger of Recall Holdings had reduced the cost of my first two tranches of 2% of capital, so that my holding was only 3.64% of capital. The intent in investing a third tranche of 2% of capital was to bring my holding to 6% of capital invested. The way I dealt with this in the position size calculation was to make the final tranche 6% - 3.64% = 2.36% of capital:
The position size calculator also adjusts the Maximum risk from 0.5% of capital to 0.59% to recognise the increased size of the tranche from 2% to 2.35% of capital.
In investing a further 2.36% of capital, I am risking a further 0.42% of capital back to my hard stop.
On 3 January 2014, I bought 6,000 shares at $9.12.
Position size 1st tranche 2nd tranche 3rd trancheTotal Capital 2,172,444 2,241,011 2,310,987
Further Thoughts on the Purpose of Journals There had not seemed to be any pressing need to review and update the Brambles journal since I last raised my stops early in March 2014. However, as discussed in the Amcor journal update to 26 December 2014, this is a long time to go without a comment. In the past I have mostly revised journals on the basis that, after I had dealt with stock selection and position building, their purpose was primarily management of the portfolio stocks with respect to risk management, which was a focus on price alone.
However, as an investor, I am focussed even more on the performance of the business and the journals should therefore record my thinking with respect to all aspects of monitoring the performance of my investments, not just on price for purposes of risk management. For example, in the case of Brambles, I had not made any comment on the earnings report to 30 June 2014. This is so for many stocks in my portfolio, but not all of them. I was reviewing the 30 June earnings reports for my portfolio stocks and was conscious that I might have been writing up my thoughts. However, I was constrained for time by how busy I was travelling around the country, preparing and delivering various speaking engagements this year.
During 2014, I made 29 presentations, one of which was a full day and four of which were half days. At some point this year I spoke in every state (four cities in Queensland) except Tasmania and Northern Territory plus Auckland in New Zealand. An hour and a half presentation can take up to a week to prepare properly. While I emphasise all the time that teaching investing leads to more and better insights for me, I am intending to cut down to some extent on this schedule going forward to better balance my teaching efforts between the website and the speaking platform.
The changes I have made in the content and updating rota for the website were also intended to free up time to focus on quality rather than volume of website updates. Over time I have ideas to improve the website material further and extend it.
Not only are my journals written for my own investment selection and management. They are also intended as teaching tools for those members who wish to follow my thinking using my portfolio as specific and timely examples. Opening the Brambles journal to review the investment and update the journal on my new monthly rota has highlighted how important it is to make regular reviews as detailed in the Amcor journal for my own investing and to improve the teaching/learning content.
On the daily chart, the spike even looks like an error, however, there seems to have been significant volume transacted at the low when I looked at the course of sales that day, so it remains a mystery:
June saw considerable weakness and a retest of the spike low:
DEC2013
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC2014
JAN2015
8.00
9.00
10.00
12.00D @ D 301213-291214 BXB - BRAMBLES LTD > +1.3% +0.14 to 10.79
Brambles announced its results for the year to 30 June 2014 on 20 August 2014. This is my analysis of their performance. In analysing the Brambles accounts, as with Amcor and the demerger of Orora, there is a complication in the demerger of Recall Holdings. While accounts were provided for Recall Holdings in the demerger document they were only pro-forma accounts. I am not persuaded that it is worth the effort to try to unpick it all and get closer to a truly precise/accurate analysis of Brambles past performance, especially as some time has now passed and we are approaching the half year 2015 report, which will be a better guide. This analysis primarily prepares a platform for analysis going forward.
Business Performance
Operating Revenue
The last three years show a steadily rising trend.
J F M AM J J A S O N D2010
J F M A M J J A S ON D2011
J F M A M J J A S O N D2012
J F M A M J J A S ON D2013
J F M A M J J A S ON D2014
4.00
5.00
6.00
7.00
8.00
9.00
10.00EXP MOV AVS 52(0) week 8.9438 W @ W 080110-010814 BXB - BRAMBLES LTD > +1.3% +0.14 to 10.79
The downward trend to 2012 Has been arrested, but growth was less in the last year. Note my preliminary comments on the demerger.
EBITDA
This view basically echoes NPAT in recent years.
Cash Flow There is always a potential problem with profit measures like NPAT and EBITDA, both of which can be manipulated. It can be a sign of problems when cash flow diverges too far from EBITDA. I track both Operating Cash Flow and Free Cash Flow (OCF – Capex).
Operating cash flow is close to EBITDA, though the last year did not reflect the EBITDA rise.
Free cash flow is half or less than EBITDA, which reflects an ongoing significant capital expenditure.
Earnings and Dividend Quality
Earnings per share have risen strongly in the last two years. Dividends have risen less strongly, reducing the payout ratio. This provides greater security for dividends and scope to increase dividends going forward. With a return on equity above my cost of capital (see below) I am not concerned that Brambles is reinvesting retained earnings.
Financial Risk Financial risk is one of the main risks we have to manage in investing – is the business soundly financed. I start with the working capital ratios, which focus on liquidity.
Current Ratio
The current ratio has slipped a bit, but is still within the range in which Brambles has operated before.
The other important element in assessing whether a business is conservatively and soundly financed is to examine the debt ratios. I calculated a number of debt ratios below.
Debt to Equity
Brambles have reduced the risk level with regard to debt progressively in recent years.
Gearing Managements prefer this measure because it is always lower than debt to equity and looks better. However, it never fools aware analysts and really gives no further information. It is useful to calculate it because when looking at the investor presentations of competing firms for comparison, this is the ratio they will usually show.
Gearing, as with the two previous ratios is a little higher than I would like in a cyclical business, but is being steadily brought back under control.
Interest Cover The other really important debt ratio is interest cover. Interest cover shows the number of times earnings before interest and tax cover interest expenses.
Interest cover has been increased in the last two years and now looks far safer.
Debt to EBITDA Debt to EBITDA shows how many years of operating earnings would be needed to repay debt.
Debt to Free Cash Flow Debt to Free Cash Flow shows how many years of free cash flow would be needed to repay debt.
This ratio blew out in 2011 and 2012, but has not been brought back under control. Like the debt ratios, I would like to see it brought a bit lower over time.
Profitability Since, as an investor, I am buying part ownership of the business, I need to ensure that the business is operating profitably. This is a more demanding ratio and the one I prefer.
Return on Invested Capital The return on invested capital is the return on debt plus equity. If the return on equity is greater, the use of debt financing is contributing to return on equity, otherwise, it is dragging it down.
Debt is boosting return on equity.
In summary, Brambles is turning around its business nicely and is nicely set up to improve even further through the ongoing expansion phase following the world financial crisis and recession.
Leading into the report in August, Brambles share price showed weakness, but by the end of the month has moved just above the high of the range over the last couple of months:
December has seen a very strong upward move that to 29 December is still in progress:
I now think that I could refine my stops marginally, ignoring the spike low, but based on the low of the last down thrust in the long almost year-long sideways pattern:
Low price (adjusted) used to base stops $9.085 Soft stop (one minimum bid lower) $9.08 Hard stop (2% below soft stop) $8.90
Updated to 30 January 2015 When I last updated the journal at the end of December 2014, Brambles was moving higher quite strongly. Early January 2015 saw the price move a little higher. This was followed by a moderate correction. Since then, the price has moved back up into the range of the trading around the top in late December and early January. This is how the chart looks at the end of January 2015:
So, the latest advance has so far held well above support from the 2014 trading range. Nothing that occurred in January has caused me to take any action.
As things stand at the end of January, Brambles is trending upward. There is no cause to revise my stops. I am fully invested at 6% of capital. As happens most of the time in investing, another month has passed without need to take any action, but ongoing monitoring.
It never was my thinking that made the big money for me. It always was my sitting. Jesse Livermore
Updated to 13 March 2015 Through February 2015, up to the eve of its half-year 2015 earnings report, Brambles traded generally sideways, though it made a marginal new high just before the announcement:
Since the earnings report, Brambles has trended upward making some new weekly highs:
While it might be argued that Brambles has made a new high for the trend and I should move my stops up, I am undecided on that point. This is basically a judgement:
1. Brambles share price history has been somewhat volatile, with the occasional spike up or down. I think placing stops must recognise the character of the stock.
2. I would like the new high to be a bit more convincing.
JFMAMJ J ASOND2010
JFMAMJ J ASOND2011
J FMAMJ J ASOND2012
J FMAMJ J ASOND2013
J FMAMJ J ASOND2014
JFMAMJ J A SOND2015
4.00
5.00
6.00
7.00
8.00
9.00
10.00
12.00EXP MOV AVS 260(0) day 9.6215 W @ D 220310-200215 BXB - BRAMBLES LTD > -0.7% -0.08 to 11.35
JFMAMJ J ASOND2010
JFMAMJ J ASOND2011
J FMAMJ J ASOND2012
J FMAMJ J ASOND2013
J FMAMJ J ASOND2014
JFMAMJ J A SOND2015
4.00
5.00
6.00
7.00
8.00
9.00
10.00
12.00EXP MOV AVS 52(0) week 9.8589 W @ W 260310-130315 BXB - BRAMBLES LTD > -0.7% -0.08 to 11.35
As always, if I do not move my stops up, but I see one of my two alternative sell signals, then I would act on those. So, I will leave my stops where they are for the present.
Now to bring my assessment of the business up to date:
Financial Risk and Liquidity
Working Capital
These ratios strengthened slightly in the last period and they remain within the range of the previous eight years. 2006 was an outlier due to a high receivables balance that year.
This ratio is not of great relevance for this business.
These ratios are within the range of recent periods.
Debt levels have risen in the last period due to acquisitions. They now look uncomfortably high for a company with a cyclical business and I would like to see some reduction in coming periods.
That said, interest cover has been maintained at a safe level for this stage in the cycle.
Debt remains quite low relative to EBITDA. Free cash flow was negative in the most recent period due to purchase of subsidiaries, which I regard as capex.
0
50
100
150
200
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Debt to Equity % Net Debt to Equity % Gearing %
-30.0
-20.0
-10.0
0.0
10.0
20.0
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Debt to EBITDA (times) Debt to Free Cash Flow (times)
Return on equity is above my hurdle rate of 15% and has been maintained with a slight reduction, after increasing in 2014. Debt contributes to return to shareholders.
Earnings per share have been increasing strongly. Dividends have crept up, decreasing the payout ratio, making dividends more sustainable.
0.0
5.0
10.0
15.0
20.0
25.0
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Operating Profit Margin % Net Profit Margin %
0.0
10.0
20.0
30.0
40.0
50.0
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Return on Assets % Return on Invested Capital % Return on Equity %
Updated to 8 May 2015 Since my last review, Brambles share price made a new high for the trend. It has then pulled back into the top of the previous sideways pattern and is consolidating:
As previously discussed, I am wary of raising my stops, especially as Brambles has a tendency to spiky moves at times. Also we are coming into a period of the year that is often volatile.
Brambles released a nine-month update and confirmed guidance on 21 April 2015:
Updated to 22 June 2015 On 20 May 2015, Brambles announced:
The purchase price implied an enterprise value to EBITDA multiple of 7.3 times, which is not unduly high and suggests this was a disciplined expansion. This seems to be a continuation of Brambles strategy of acquisition to complement its organic growth by acquisition of market leading operations. In a press report, Deutsche Bank estimated Rentapack’s gross margin as 44%, compared to 25% in the existing Brambles business.
Since my last review, Brambles share price has slipped somewhat, but not seriously, in a weak market:
Updated to 30 July 2015 Since the last review, there have been no news announcements concerning Brambles.
The share price has been correcting somewhat in a downward-sloping sideways move:
So far, this has held above support represented roughly by the 2014 highs as we saw around the start of 2015. There is, of course always a risk in over-analysing a chart and with support and resistance levels, we are dealing with an ill-defined band rather than a precise level. So, I am still happy to have my stops where they are, but will make a judgement if the support level were to come under serious threat.
These ratios remain in the range of the last nine years.
Not really relevant for Brambles – shown for completeness.
Working capital remains in the range of the last nine years.
Debt and Equity
Debt has increased due to acquisitions and to fund capital expenditure. It remains in the range of the previous five years, but may be a concern if it kept rising.
Return on equity is above my cost of capital and rising.
The grossed-up dividend yield is lower than I would like, but still healthy against my cost.
Market Liquidity
Brambles is a large, liquid stock.
Risk Management
Chart Analysis
The market seems to have been disappointed in Brambles leading up to an after the results announcement. In the ongoing correction, Brambles share price has come back quite a way towards my stops and has probed deeper into the support levels on the chart:
All Ordinaries index Average 6.16%Brambles 3.24%
Grossed up Dividend Yield
Market LiquidityMarket Capitalisation $m 15,278Av Buy/sell spread % 0.2Annual Turnover % 60.8Annual Turnover $m 9,289Av trade/day last year $000 37,156Av trade/day last 20 days $000 39,412Top 20 Ownership % 84.6
Share traders will, of course work off the daily chart and have a far shorter timeframe than I do as an investor. Traders who bought the breakout later 2014, will now have sold a few months ago. This is because traders are only exploiting changes in share price and tend to ignore dividends and the progress of the underlying business. Traders do not have the mindset of investors who see themselves as part owners of the business. Investors are buying ownership of the business, not trading the price of its shares. This is not intended to be a value statement about trading and investing. It is simply an important perspective that informs why traders and investors think quite differently.
I set my stops to manage risk. If I set them where a trader would have them, I would risk being stopped out of ownership of good businesses that are performing alright, but market sentiment has moved the price around in the short term.
In setting stops, it is important to start, as we should do with all analysis, with the longer term picture. This is important because different stocks have different personalities, shaped by the traders and investors who move in and out of them in varying timeframes. This is the longer term picture for Brambles:
JFMAMJ J ASOND2010
JFMAMJ J ASOND2011
J FMAMJ J ASOND2012
J FMAMJ J ASOND2013
J FMAMJ J ASOND2014
JFMAMJ J A SOND2015
5.00
6.00
7.00
8.00
9.00
10.00
12.00EXP MOV AVS 52(0) week 10.4407 W @ W 100910-040915 BXB - BRAMBLES LTD > -1.1% -0.11 to 9.84
Notice how the Brambles price moves in nice trends much of the time. However, also notice the tendency for the price to spike down from time to time. This tendency is what guides my thought that my stops should not be too close for this stock.
Now let me look at the recent price action:
Notice how much of 2014 saw the formation of a wide sideways pattern. This should provide support and my stops are under the last low in that support zone. The price has come back in the recent decline into the top of the support zone and bounced weakly. Remember support and resistance are zones, not precise levels.
So, I still feel that my stops are in the right place. I have owned Brambles for two years and my total return over that period is currently sitting at 17.6%. Of course, I would like the price to have stayed higher and kept rising. However, it is the nature of investing that the price will change all the time, but the business may continue to prosper. It is easy to jump at the shadows of traders in the share price and end up selling out of a great business. Brambles is a very good business.
Updated to 10 December 2015 Since the last report Brambles has posted their slides from presentations at the 2015 Investment Market Briefing in Pasadena, California, USA, on 15 and 16 September. Some interesting slides were:
Net Promoter or Net Promoter Score (NPS) is a management tool that can be used to gauge the loyalty of a firm's customer relationships. It serves as an alternative to traditional customer satisfaction research and claims to be correlated with revenue growth.
Net Promoter Score is a customer loyalty metric developed by (and a registered trademark of) Fred Reichheld, Bain & Company, and Satmetrix. It was introduced by Reichheld in his 2003 Harvard Business Review article "One Number You Need to Grow". NPS can be as low as −100 (everybody is a detractor) or as high as +100 (everybody is a promoter). An NPS that is positive (i.e., higher than zero) is felt to be good, and an NPS of +50 is excellent.
Net Promoter Score (NPS) measures the loyalty that exists between a provider and a consumer. The provider can be a company, employer or any other entity. The provider is the entity that is asking the questions on the NPS survey. The consumer is the customer, employee, or respondent to an NPS survey.
Out of my attendance at the Annual General Meeting, I gained better insights into the source of Brambles’ competitive advantage:
1. The density of their distributions system in their major markets is very difficult to counter 2. They are increasingly using technology not just to improve their efficiency, but assist
customers in increasing theirs 3. The width of their distributions system across major markets is of great value to larger multi-
national customers 4. Their range of packaging – pallets/Reusable Plastic Containers and specialised containers is a
major strength and growing 5. The complexity of the service provided deepens their competitive advantage. It is difficult to
Updated to 3 February 2016 There have been no significant news announcements since my last update.
The share price has recovered strongly and is forming a large sideways pattern in the range of the 2000 and 2007-08 highs which is a strong resistance zone:
I am happy to leave my stops where they are, so no action is required at this point on my investment plan.
Both ratios are significantly lower, but I cannot see any signs of stress in the other working capital ratios. Brambles has a relatively short activity cycle.
Shown for completeness only – Brambles has very little inventory.
It could be argued that I might have raised them under the end June 2016 trough low. I am reluctant to move my stops up too aggressively in the current market. I can always reassess that decision if the end June trough were to be taken out at which time I can make a decision in the context of how that occurred.
Brambles is due to report their full year earnings on 18 August 2016.
JFMAMJ J ASOND2011
J FMAMJ J ASOND2012
J FMAMJ J ASOND2013
J FMAMJ J ASOND2014
J FMAMJ J ASOND2015
J FMAMJ J A SOND2016
5.00
6.00
7.00
8.00
9.00
10.00
12.00
14.00EXP MOV AVS 52(0) week 11.7852 W @ W 050811-290716 BXB - BRAMBLES LTD > Steady 13.43