Top Banner

of 85

BPSK probability of error

Jun 02, 2018

Download

Documents

Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
  • 8/10/2019 BPSK probability of error

    1/85

    ECE414 Wireless Communications, University of Waterloo, Winter 2012 1

    Bandpass Transmission Techniques

    for Wireless Communication

    Chapter 3

  • 8/10/2019 BPSK probability of error

    2/85

    ECE414 Wireless Communications, University of Waterloo, Winter 2012 2

    Outline

    Introduction to Digital Communications

    Signal (Vector) Space Representations

    Digital Modulation Schemes (M-ASK, M-PSK, M-FSK)

    Performance Measures for Modulation Schemes

    - Bandwidth (spectral) efficiency

    - Power efficiency

    - Temporal characteristics (e.g., dynamic power range, peak/average ratio)

    Power Spectral Density of Digital Modulation Schemes

    Error Rate Performance of Digital Modulation Schemes

    Comparison of Digital Modulation Schemes in terms of Spectral

    Efficiency and Power Efficiency

    Temporally Efficient Digital Modulation Schemes

  • 8/10/2019 BPSK probability of error

    3/85

    ECE414 Wireless Communications, University of Waterloo, Winter 2012 3

    Original

    message signal(analog)

    Recovered

    message

    signal (analog)

    A/D SourceEncoder

    Modulator

    Channel

    De-

    modulator

    Channel

    Decoder

    Source

    DecoderD/A

    Block Diagram for a Digital Communication System

    ChannelEncoder

    Analog-to-Digital (A/D) Conversion:Analog (i.e., continuous-time

    continuous-amplitude) message signal is converted into a discrete-time discrete-

    amplitude digital signals by time-sampling and amplitude-quantization. The

    resulting signals are then mapped to binary sequences.

  • 8/10/2019 BPSK probability of error

    4/85

    ECE414 Wireless Communications, University of Waterloo, Winter 2012 4

    Source Encoding:Removes the redundant information embedded in the

    message signal, therefore represents the message with as few binary digits as

    possible, i.e., data compression

    Channel Encoding: Introduces redundancy in a controlledmanner which can

    be used at the receiver to overcome the effects of noise, interference and fading.

    Provides noise immunityto transmitted information.

    Source coding and channel coding will notbe studied in this course Modulation:Converts (maps) codewords to high-frequency analog waveforms.

    A certain parameter of the carrier signal (i.e., modulated signal) is varied in

    accordance with message signal (i.e. modulating signal) e.g. amplitude shift keying

    (ASK), phase shift keying (PSK), frequency shift keying (FSK)

    Receiver Blocks: Perform the inverse of the transmitter operations in order to

    recover the original analog message (continuous-time continuous-amplitude) signal.

    In a practical digital communication receiver, there are also additional sub-blocks

    such as channel estimation, synchronization (frame/frequency/phase),

    authentications, crypto, multiplexing, etc.

    Block Diagram for a Digital Communication System (contd)

  • 8/10/2019 BPSK probability of error

    5/85

    ECE414 Wireless Communications, University of Waterloo, Winter 2012 5

    Why is Modulation Required?

    To achieve easy radiation:Dimensions of the transmit/receive antennas are

    limited by the corresponding wavelength. The frequency conversion allows the

    use of practical antenna lengths.

    To accommodate for simultaneous transmission of several basebandsignals:Simultaneous transmission of different baseband signals which are

    possibly overlapping can be facilitated by assigning slightly different frequency

    carriers for each one.

    Modulatio shifts the baseband signal to a higher frequency band, centered at the so-

    calledcarrier frequency

    .

    Large bandwidths require high carrier frequencies: Practical requirements

    in front-end filter design dictates the bandwidth-to-frequency carrier ratio (i.e.,

    fractional bandwidth) be kept within a certain range.

    1.001.0 cf

    B

    cf

    B: Fractional bandwidth

  • 8/10/2019 BPSK probability of error

    6/85

    ECE414 Wireless Communications, University of Waterloo, Winter 2012 6

    To (possibly) expand the bandwidth of the transmitted signal for

    better transmission quality: When the bandwidth increases, the required

    SNR (for fixed noise level, corresponding signal power) to achieve a specific

    transmission rate decreases

    Why is Modulation Required? (cont

    d)

    SNRBC 1log2 12 B

    C

    SNR

    SNRBC 1log2

    Channel capacity Bandwidth Signal-to-noise ratio

    High-rate transmission requires larger bandwidths (therefore, higher

    carrier frequencies): According to Shannon Theorem, channel capacity isdefined as the maximum achievable information rate that can be transmitted

    over the channel. For the additive white Gaussian noise (AWGN) channel,

  • 8/10/2019 BPSK probability of error

    7/85ECE414 Wireless Communications, University of Waterloo, Winter 2012 7

    Signal-Space Representations

    Consider a modulation format where the transmitted signal waveforms belong to

    the modulation set .

    Each of the waveform can be represented as a point (vector) in anN-dimensional

    signal space (sometimes called as vector space) defined by the orthonormal basis

    functions

    Mmm

    ts1

    Nnn

    t1 MN

    s

    Tt0

    jidttt jT

    is

    *

    0

    tstsdtttss nN

    nnmn

    T

    mnm

    s

    1

    ,*

    0,

    Nmmmmm sssts ,2,1, ,...,,s

    The Gram-Schmidt procedure (See Appendix A of the textbook) provides a

    systematic approach to construct the set of orthonormal functions, which span the

    signal space.

  • 8/10/2019 BPSK probability of error

    8/85ECE414 Wireless Communications, University of Waterloo, Winter 2012 8

    21

    2,

    0

    2m

    N

    nnm

    T

    ms sdttsEs

    s

    sk

    t( ),sl t( ) =1

    Ts

    sk

    t( )0

    Ts

    sl t( )*

    dt= sk,s

    l = s

    ks

    l= s

    k,ns*

    l,n

    n=1

    N

    Mmlk ,...2,1,

    d2

    sk

    t( ),sl t( )( )= sk t( ) sl t( ) 2

    dt

    0

    Ts

    = d2

    sk,s

    l( )= sk,n sl,n2

    n=1

    N

    Energy

    Correlation

    Euclidean

    Distance

    Signal-Space Representations (cont

    d)

    Nmmmm sssts ,2,1, ,...,, ms

    Nkkkkk sssts ,2,1, ,...,, s

    Nlllll sssts ,2,1, ,...,, s

  • 8/10/2019 BPSK probability of error

    9/85ECE414 Wireless Communications, University of Waterloo, Winter 2012 9

    M-ary Amplitude Shift Keying (M-ASK)

    tfAts cmm 2cos sTt0 MmMmAm ...2,1,12

    otherwise,0

    0,2cos2 scs TttfTt

    Basis Function(s) (Obtained through Gram-Schmidt procedure)

    Signal-Space (Vector Space) Representation (Obtained through the use ofbasis functions)

    2smmm TAts s

    mlpmtfj

    mcmm AtseAtfAts c ,

    2Re2cos

    Baseband (Equivalent Lowpass) Representation

    1-dimensional

    22

    0

    2sm

    T

    ms TAdttsEs

    m Signal Energy

  • 8/10/2019 BPSK probability of error

    10/85

    ECE414 Wireless Communications, University of Waterloo, Winter 2012 10

    M-ASK (cont

    d)

    Examples of M-ASK

    Signal Constellations

    M=4

    Bandpass Modulation Signal

    Equivalent Lowpass Signal

    11 10 00 01

  • 8/10/2019 BPSK probability of error

    11/85

    ECE414 Wireless Communications, University of Waterloo, Winter 2012 11

    M-ary Phase Shift Keying (M-PSK)

    mcm tfAts 2cos sTt0 MmMmm ...2,1,12

    otherwise,0

    0,2cos21

    scs TttfTt

    otherwise,0

    0,2sin22

    scs TttfTt

    Basis Functions

    Signal-Space Representation

    msmsmm TATAts sin2,cos2 s

    mcm jlpmtfjj

    mcm AetseAetfAts

    ,2

    Re2cos

    Baseband (Equivalent Lowpass) Representation

    2-dimensional

    220

    2s

    T

    mss TAdttsEEs

    m Signal Energy

  • 8/10/2019 BPSK probability of error

    12/85

    ECE414 Wireless Communications, University of Waterloo, Winter 2012 12

    tfAts

    tfAts

    c

    c

    2cos0

    2cos1

    2

    1

    Example: Binary Phase Shift Keying (BPSK)

    sEsE t1

    t2 1 0 1 1 0

    1 0 1 1 0

    A

    -A

    A

    -A

    0,2 sEs

    Signal-Space Representation

    0,1 sEs

    t

    t

    Bandpass Modulation Signal

    Equivalent Lowpass Signal

  • 8/10/2019 BPSK probability of error

    13/85

    ECE414 Wireless Communications, University of Waterloo, Winter 2012 13

    Example: Quadrature Phase Shift Keying (QPSK)

    s

    s

    s

    s

    Es

    Es

    Es

    Es

    ,0232cos11

    0,2cos10

    ,022cos01

    0,2cos00

    44

    33

    22

    11

    tfAts

    tfAts

    tfAts

    tfAts

    c

    c

    c

    c

    sEsE t1

    t2Signal-SpaceRepresentation

    sE

    sE

  • 8/10/2019 BPSK probability of error

    14/85

    ECE414 Wireless Communications, University of Waterloo, Winter 2012 14

    Quadrature Amplitude Modulation (QAM)

    tfAtfAts cimcrmm 2sin2cos ,,

    Am,r,Am,i: Information-bearing signal amplitudes of the quadrature carriers

    sTt0Mm ,...2,1

    Alternatively, QAM can be considered as a combination of ASK and PSK.

    2,

    2, imrmm AAA rmimm AAarctg ,,

    mcmm tfAts 2cos where sTt0Mm ,...2,1

    Examples of QAM

    Signal Constellations

  • 8/10/2019 BPSK probability of error

    15/85

    ECE414 Wireless Communications, University of Waterloo, Winter 2012 15

    QAM (cont

    d)

    tfj

    imrmcimcrmm

    c

    ejAAtfAtfAts

    2

    ,,,, Re2sin2cos

    mjarctgmimrmlpm eAjAAts ,,,

    otherwise,00,2cos21 scs TttfTt

    otherwise,00,2sin22 scs TttfTt

    Basis Functions

    Signal-Space Representation

    2,2 ,, simsrmmm TATAts s 2-dimensional

    Baseband (Equivalent Lowpass) Representation

    22 ,2 ,0

    2simrm

    T

    ms TAAdttsEs

    m

    Signal Energy

  • 8/10/2019 BPSK probability of error

    16/85

    ECE414 Wireless Communications, University of Waterloo, Winter 2012 16

    M-ary Frequency Shift Keying (M-FSK)

    tffAts mcm 2cos sTt0 Mmfmfm ...2,1,

    tfjlpmtfjtfj

    mcmmcm AetseAetffAts

    2,

    22Re2cos

    Cross Correlation

    flkTjT

    ftlkj

    slk e

    flkT

    flkTdte

    T

    s

    sin1

    0

    2,

    flkT

    flkT

    lk

    2

    2sin

    ,

    Baseband (Equivalent Lowpass) Representation

    0, lkFor andTf 21 lk

    Tf 21Therefore, the minimum frequency separation between adjacent signals for

    orthogonality of theMsignals is

  • 8/10/2019 BPSK probability of error

    17/85

    ECE414 Wireless Communications, University of Waterloo, Winter 2012 17

    M-FSK (cont

    d)

    0......0011 sEts s

    Tf 21Assuming frequency separation , the signal-space representationfor theM-FSK signals are given asN-dimensional vectors, whereN=M.

    otherwise,0

    0,2cos2 smcsm

    TttffTt

    0......0022 sEts s

    sMM

    Ets ......000 s

    .

    .

    .

    220

    2s

    T

    mss TAdttsEEs

    mwhere

  • 8/10/2019 BPSK probability of error

    18/85

    ECE414 Wireless Communications, University of Waterloo, Winter 2012 18

    Performance Measures for Modulation Schemes

    Bandwidth (spectral) efficiency:How much bandwidth is needed for a

    given data rate?

    zBits/sec/Hlog2

    W

    TM

    W

    R sss

    : Bandwidth efficiency

    : Data rate W: Bandwidth

    The bandwidth depends on the modulation scheme and pulse shaping. Power

    spectral density (PSD) is typically used to determine the bandwidth of the

    transmitted signal. There are various definitions for bandwidth:

    Main lobe (null-to-null) bandwidth: The width of the main spectral lobe.

    Fractional power-containment bandwidth: The frequency interval that

    contains (1-) of the total signal power, e.g. 99.9% of the total power.

    Bounded PSD bandwidth: The frequency interval where the PSD stays

    above a prescribed certain threshold, e.g. sidelobes peaks 40 dB below its

    maximum value

    Roughly speaking, bandwidth of the modulation scheme is proportional to

    the dimension number.

    s

    sR

  • 8/10/2019 BPSK probability of error

    19/85

    ECE414 Wireless Communications, University of Waterloo, Winter 2012 19

    Power efficiency:How much power is needed for reliable transmission with a

    specified fidelity?

    The fidelity for a digital communication system is usually measured in terms of

    symbol- or bit-error probability. For a given SNR, we aim to achieve a low error

    probability (how low? it depends on the application).

    Symbol error probability (SEP) is in general easier to evaluate. Bit error

    probability (BEP) depends on the mapping of source bits onto modulation signals.

    A bound on BEP is given as

    Performance Measures for Modulation Schemes (cont

    d)

    ePeP

    M

    ePb

    2log Two common mapping forms are natural mappingand Gray mapping.

    In Gray mapping, the neighbour points differ in only one digit. It should be

    noted that Gray mapping is not possible for every signal constellation.

  • 8/10/2019 BPSK probability of error

    20/85

    ECE414 Wireless Communications, University of Waterloo, Winter 2012 20

    Temporal efficiency: How wide are the time variations of the transmitted signal?

    Temporal efficiency=Peak power/Average power

    The choice of amplifier depends on the temporal characteristics of the signal.

    Other considerations:

    Hardware/software implementation complexity & cost of implementation

    Sensitivity to interference

    Robustness to impairments encountered in a wireless channel

    Performance Measures for Modulation Schemes (cont

    d)

    In most practical scenarios, these performance measures conflict with each

    other. The communication system designer should be able to find the best trade-

    offfor a given application under specific constraints.

  • 8/10/2019 BPSK probability of error

    21/85

    ECE414 Wireless Communications, University of Waterloo, Winter 2012 21

    Comparison of Spectral Efficiency of Modulation Schemes

    M-PSK and QAM

    bits/seclog

    rateData 2

    T

    M

    Hz2

    nulltonullBWT

    s=Data rate

    BW=

    1

    2log2M bits/sec/Hz[ ]

    M-FSK

    bits/seclograteData 2TM

    Hz2

    roughlyBWT

    M

    s=Data rate

    BW=

    2log2MM

    bits/sec/Hz[ ]

    M: Modulation order, Constellation size

  • 8/10/2019 BPSK probability of error

    22/85

    ECE414 Wireless Communications, University of Waterloo, Winter 2012 22

    Power Spectral Density (PSD)

    In practical, pulse shaping should be considered for a precise bandwidth

    measurement and considered in the spectral efficiency calculations.

    Power spectral density (PSD) describes the distribution of signal power in

    the frequency domain. If the baseband equivalent of the transmitted signal

    sequence is given as

    ksk kTtpatg ka : Baseband modulation symbol

    sT : Signal interval tp : Pulse shape

    ffPT

    f as

    g 21

    then the PSD ofg(t) is given as

    Ra

    n( )=1

    2E a

    ka

    k+n

    *

    tpFfP

    sfnTjn

    aa enRf 2

    where

    See Ch.4 ofDigital Communications

    by Proakis for the proof

  • 8/10/2019 BPSK probability of error

    23/85

    ECE414 Wireless Communications, University of Waterloo, Winter 2012 23

    Example: PSD of BPSK with Rectangle Pulse Shaping

    k

    sk kTtpatg Aak

    0,0

    0,

    0,

    0, 2

    *

    2

    *

    n

    nA

    naEaE

    naE

    aaEnRnkk

    k

    nkka

    22 AenRnRFf sfnTjn

    aaa

    p(t)

    T/2 T

    Autocorrelation of data sequence

    Pulse shaping

    t

    p t( ) =t

    Ts / 2

    Ts

    FT P f( ) =Tssinc fTs( ) e

    j 2 f Ts 2( )

    P f( )= Tssinc fTs( )

    Baseband equivalent of BPSK sequence

    Independent data symbols are assumed

  • 8/10/2019 BPSK probability of error

    24/85

    ECE414 Wireless Communications, University of Waterloo, Winter 2012 24

    g f( )=P f( )

    2

    Ts a f( )=A

    2Tssinc2 fTs( )

    Example: PSD of BPSK with Rectangle Pulse Shaping (contd)

    PSD of baseband BPSK sequence

  • 8/10/2019 BPSK probability of error

    25/85

    ECE414 Wireless Communications, University of Waterloo, Winter 2012 25

    PSD of bandpass BPSK sequence

    ccFT ffGffGfS *21 tfjcetgts 2Re

    scsscs

    cgcgs

    TffTATffTA

    fffff

    2222

    *

    sinc4

    1sinc

    4

    1

    4

    1

    Example: PSD of BPSK with Rectangle Pulse Shaping (contd)

    Bandpass BPSK sequence and its Fourier transform (spectral density)

    Null-to-null bandwidth

    SeeTutorial 1

    See Ch.4 ofDigital Communications

    by Proakis for the proof

  • 8/10/2019 BPSK probability of error

    26/85

    ECE414 Wireless Communications, University of Waterloo, Winter 2012 26

    Example: PSD of QAM with Rectangle Pulse Shaping

    kskk kTtpjbatg AAba kk 3,,

    Baseband equivalent of QAM sequence

    0,0

    0,100,

    0,22

    n

    nA

    njbajbaE

    njbaE

    jbajbaEnR

    nknkkk

    kk

    nknkkka

    Autocorrelation of data sequence

    PSD of baseband QAM sequence

    fTTAfg 22 sinc10

    PSD of bandpass QAM sequence

    scsscss TffTATffTAf 2222 sinc

    4

    10sinc

    4

    10

    Note that PSD of QAM has the

    same general form as BPSK.

  • 8/10/2019 BPSK probability of error

    27/85

    ECE414 Wireless Communications, University of Waterloo, Winter 2012 27

    Some Practical Pulse Shapes

    Below are some pulse shapes commonly used in communication systems:

    TtT

    tAtp

    0,sin

    Half-Sinusoid Pulse

    21sinc

    21-sinc

    2fTfTeATfP fTj

    Full-Cosine Pulse

    TtTtA

    tp

    0cos12

    1sinc1sinc2sinc4

    fTfTfTeAT

    fP fTj

  • 8/10/2019 BPSK probability of error

    28/85

    ECE414 Wireless Communications, University of Waterloo, Winter 2012 28

    Some Practical Pulse Shapes (cont

    d)

    Gaussian Pulse

    22

    22ln

    2exp TtBAtp

    2

    2

    2lnexp

    2

    2ln

    B

    fe

    T

    AfP fTj

    where B is defined as the 3dB bandwidth of pulse

    Raised Cosine Pulse

    22241

    cossin

    Tt

    Tt

    Tt

    Tttp

    Tf

    Tf

    TTf

    TTT

    fT

    fP

    2

    1,0

    2

    1

    2

    1,

    2

    1cos1

    2

    2

    10,

    10 : Roll-off factor

  • 8/10/2019 BPSK probability of error

    29/85

    ECE414 Wireless Communications, University of Waterloo, Winter 2012 29

    Comparison of Pulse Shapes

    Time-Domain

    Gaussian

    Half-sinusoid

    Full-cosine

    Square

  • 8/10/2019 BPSK probability of error

    30/85

    ECE414 Wireless Communications, University of Waterloo, Winter 2012 30

    Comparison of Pulse Shapes (contd)

    Frequency-Domain

    Square

    Gaussian

    Half-sinusoid

    Full-cosine

    2/T

    3/T

    4/T

    Square

    BW=2/T

    Half-sinusoid

    BW=3/TFull-cosine

    BW=4/T

  • 8/10/2019 BPSK probability of error

    31/85

    ECE414 Wireless Communications, University of Waterloo, Winter 2012 31

    Comparison of Pulse Shapes (contd)

    Raised Cosine

    10

    : Roll-off factor

    TBWT

    21

    1/T

    2/T

    TBW

    1

  • 8/10/2019 BPSK probability of error

    32/85

    ECE414 Wireless Communications, University of Waterloo, Winter 2012 32

    For a given SNR (i.e. a given signal power for fixed noise power), we aim to

    achieve a low error probability. To calculate error probability,first we need to

    identify the receiver structure.

    The receiver consists of a demodulator and a detector:

    The demodulator converts the received waveform r(t) into aNdimensional

    vector whereN is the dimension of the signal-space for the

    given modulation type.

    The detector decides which of the possibleMsignal waveforms was

    transmitted based on r, whereMis the constellation size.

    Optimum Receiver for AWGN

    Nrrr ,..., 21r

    Demodulator Detector tr r m

    s tsm

    tn nsr m tntstr m

  • 8/10/2019 BPSK probability of error

    33/85

    ECE414 Wireless Communications, University of Waterloo, Winter 2012 33

    Optimum Receiver for AWGN (contd)

    Correlation-type demodulator Matched-filter demodulator

    For details, see ProakisDigital CommunicationsChapter 5

  • 8/10/2019 BPSK probability of error

    34/85

    ECE414 Wireless Communications, University of Waterloo, Winter 2012 34

    Optimum Receiver for AWGN (contd)

    We want to design a signal detector that makes a decision based on the

    observation of the vector rsuch that the probability of a correct decision is

    maximized. The optimal decision rule is based on the maximization of so-called

    aposteriori probabilities

    rsmp : The probability of choosing smm=1,2Mbased on the observation of r

    This decision criterion is called theMaximum A Posteriori Probability (MAP) rule.

    mMm

    mmMm

    mm

    Mm

    mMm

    p

    pp

    p

    pp

    p

    sr

    ssr

    r

    ssr

    rs

    ...2,1

    ...2,1

    ...2,1

    ...2,1

    max

    max

    max

    max

    Bayes Theorem

    rp : Common for all

    Mp m 1s , i.e. Equally probablemessages

    The conditional pdf is called the likelihood functionand the decision

    criterion based on the maximization of over theM signals is called the

    maximum likelihood(ML) criterion.

    mp sr mp sr

  • 8/10/2019 BPSK probability of error

    35/85

    ECE414 Wireless Communications, University of Waterloo, Winter 2012 35

    nsr m

    0

    2

    02

    2

    2

    2exp

    1

    2exp

    2

    1

    02 N

    n

    N

    nnf k

    N

    kk

    For an AWGN channel, the components of the noise vector nare zero-mean Gaussian random variables with varianceN0/2

    N

    kkmkN

    N

    kkmk

    N

    kkmk

    N

    kkmkm

    srNN

    srNN

    srfsrpp

    1

    2,

    02

    0

    1

    2,

    00

    1,

    1,

    1exp

    1

    1exp1

    sr

    The received signal will have a Gaussian conditional distribution

    Optimum Receiver for AWGN (contd)

    Nk ...2,1

  • 8/10/2019 BPSK probability of error

    36/85

    ECE414 Wireless Communications, University of Waterloo, Winter 2012 36

    21

    2, minminmax m

    m

    N

    kkmk

    mm

    msrp srsr

    The ML rule is then given as

    The ML receiver decides in favor of the signal which is closest in Euclidean

    distance to the received vector, r.

    Optimum Receiver for AWGN (contd)

    2222minmin mm

    mm

    mssrrsr

    Expanding the decision rule,

    where is the signal energy. Neglecting terms which do not affect

    the decision and under the assumption that constant-energy modulation set

    (e.g. PSK) is used

    2mmE s

    mm

    mm

    srsr maxmin2

    Distancemetrics

    Correlationmetrics

  • 8/10/2019 BPSK probability of error

    37/85

    ECE414 Wireless Communications, University of Waterloo, Winter 2012 37

    Example: Error Probability for BPSK

    11 2cos0 tfAtsb c 22 2cos1 tfAtsb c

    01where

    2where

    tfTEtfAts cc 2cos22cos1

    tfTEtfAts cc 2cos22cos2

    tsts 12

    Unlike otherM-PSK forM>2, we can represent this special form of BPSKsignal as 1-dimensional signal. The basis function is given as

    otherwise,0

    0,2cos21

    TttfTt c

    tr dt

    T

    0

    .

    Euclidean

    Distance

    Decoder

    t1

    Therefore, the optimal receiver has the following form of

    r

    i.e. antipodal signaling

  • 8/10/2019 BPSK probability of error

    38/85

    ECE414 Wireless Communications, University of Waterloo, Winter 2012 38

    Example: Error Probability for BPSK (contd)

    Assumes1(t) is sent. Under the assumption of AWGN, the received signal

    twtstr 1

    The output of demodulator

    nEdtttwtsdtttrTT

    0

    110

    1

    where

    2,0~ 00

    1 NNdtttwnTdef

    Assumes2(t) is sent. The output of demodulator is now

    nEdtttrT

    0

    1

  • 8/10/2019 BPSK probability of error

    39/85

    ECE414 Wireless Communications, University of Waterloo, Winter 2012 39

    Example: Error Probability for BPSK

    Eb

    Eb

    1

    0

    0

    0

    1r

    Here we have two possible alternatives, therefore we can use a zero threshold

    detectoras an optimal detector.

    0011100,11,0

    bPbbPbPbbP

    bbPbbPeP

    2/110 bPbP

    0110 bbPbbP Due to symmetryEqually probable messages 10 bbPeP

    Under the assumption that b=1 is sent zEr

    drbrfbrPbbP

    0

    11010

    LetP(e) denote the error probability

    EE

    Decision regions

    0 b1

    b

    Bayes Theorem

  • 8/10/2019 BPSK probability of error

    40/85

    40

    Example: Error Probability for BPSK (contd)

    0

    2NEQ

    drbrfbbP

    0

    110

    drNEr

    N

    0 0

    2

    0

    exp1

    20N

    Ery

    dyy

    NE

    02

    2

    2exp

    2

    1

    where Q-function is defined as dyexQx

    y

    22

    2

    1

    E E

  • 8/10/2019 BPSK probability of error

    41/85

    ECE414 Wireless Communications, University of Waterloo, Winter 2012 41

    Example: Error Probability for QPSK

    22cos11

    232cos10

    22cos01

    2cos00

    4

    3

    2

    1

    tfAts

    tfAts

    tfAts

    tfAts

    c

    c

    c

    c

    tr

    dtT

    0

    . Detector

    t1

    dt

    T

    0 .

    t2

    otherwise,0

    0,2cos21

    scs TttfTt

    otherwise,0

    0,2sin22

    scs TttfTt

    2

    4,3,2,1min

    msrs

    m

  • 8/10/2019 BPSK probability of error

    42/85

    ECE414 Wireless Communications, University of Waterloo, Winter 2012 42

    Example: Error Probability for QPSK (contd)

    Under the assumption of AWGN (which exhibits symmetry), rotating and

    moving the signal constellation does not change the error probability. Therefore,

    we can rotate/move our signal constellation in such a way that the resulting

    constellation allows easy mathematical derivation.

    Here, we move our constellation as the targetsignal is located on the origin.

    If there is no symmetry in the signal constellation, this should be repeated for

    each signal.Decision

    regions

    First, we calculate P(c), i.e. the probability of making a correct decision. Then,

    probability of error is simply found as P(e)=1-P(c).

  • 8/10/2019 BPSK probability of error

    43/85

    ECE414 Wireless Communications, University of Waterloo, Winter 2012 43

    Assume that the signal located at the origin has been transmitted. If the

    received signal is in the shaded area, this means we will make a correct decision.

    2

    0

    2

    0

    1

    1

    22

    2,2

    N

    EQ

    N

    EQ

    dnPdnP

    dndnPscP

    s

    s

    QI

    QI

    Example: Error Probability for QPSK (contd)

    sEd 2

    d

    2d

    2d 2,0~ 0

    01 NNdtttwn

    Tdef

    I

    2,0~ 00

    2 NNdtttwnTdef

    Q

    QnP

    2,~ Nn

    QQ 1

  • 8/10/2019 BPSK probability of error

    44/85

    ECE414 Wireless Communications, University of Waterloo, Winter 2012 44

    Due to symmetry,

    4321 scPscPscPscPcP

    2

    00

    2

    2

    00

    222

    21

    NEQ

    NEQ

    N

    EQ

    N

    EQcPeP

    bb

    EE

    ss

    bs

    Example: Error Probability for QPSK (contd)

  • 8/10/2019 BPSK probability of error

    45/85

    ECE414 Wireless Communications, University of Waterloo, Winter 2012 45

    Example: Error Probability for BFSK

    tT

    fAts c2

    12cos0 1

    tr

    dtT

    0

    . Detector

    t1

    dtT

    0

    .

    t2

    2

    4,3,2,1min

    msrs

    m

    tT

    fAts c1

    2cos1 2

    otherwise,00,212cos2

    1scs TttTfTt

    otherwise,0

    0,12cos22

    scs TttTfTt

  • 8/10/2019 BPSK probability of error

    46/85

    ECE414 Wireless Communications, University of Waterloo, Winter 2012 46

    sE t1

    t2

    sE

    Example: Error Probability for BFSK (contd)

    sEd 2

    0N

    EQeP s

    By rotation, it can be easily shown that

    Now, we will study the same problem without rotation:

    Assume was sent. The received signal is 0,11 sEts s QIs nnE ,r

    Decision is based on mm

    mm

    srsr maxmin2

    0

    121

    N

    EQEnPEnnPPeP sssIQsrsrs

    2,0~, 0NNnn IQ 0,0~ NNnnn IQdef

    Due to symmetry,

    01

    N

    EQePeP ss

  • 8/10/2019 BPSK probability of error

    47/85

    ECE414 Wireless Communications, University of Waterloo, Winter 2012 47

    A Union Bound on Error Probability

    2mmd sr

    In most cases, probability of error can not be obtained in closed form.

    Therefore, one needs to find some bounds or approximations which can work for

    any signal constellation.

    We have already shown that the optimal decoder for any signal constellation

    over AWGN is given by the Euclidean distance decoder, i.e.

    M

    mmm

    M

    mm eP

    M

    PePeP11

    1sss meP s : Probability of making a

    decision error when smwas sent

    M

    lmlm

    M

    lmml

    M

    lmmlm

    ll

    ll

    ml

    P

    ddP

    ddPeP

    1

    1

    1

    sss

    s

    ss

    i

    i

    i

    i APAP

    Union Bound (U-B)

    lmP ss : The probability of choosing slinstead of the originally transmitted sm

  • 8/10/2019 BPSK probability of error

    48/85

    ECE414 Wireless Communications, University of Waterloo, Winter 2012 48

    A Union Bound on Error Probability (contd)

    M

    l

    N

    dBUB

    M

    l

    mlBU

    N

    M

    l

    mlM

    l

    mlmm

    ml

    ml

    ml

    mlml

    e

    N

    dQ

    dQPeP

    1

    4

    1 0

    ,

    21

    ,

    1

    0

    2

    ,

    02

    2

    2

    ssss

    U-B: Union Bound

    M

    m

    M

    l

    mlM

    mm

    ml

    N

    dQ

    MeP

    MeP

    1 1 0

    ,

    1 2

    11s

    Assuming equal-probable message signals, the probability of error is

    UB-B: Union-

    Bhattacharyya Bound

    2, mlmld ss where

    2/2xexQ

  • 8/10/2019 BPSK probability of error

    49/85

    ECE414 Wireless Communications, University of Waterloo, Winter 2012 49

    The U-B requires the computation of all distances dl,mamong signals in

    the constellation. A looser bound can be obtained as follows

    0

    min

    1 0

    ,

    21

    2 N

    dQM

    N

    dQeP

    M

    l

    mlBU

    m

    ml

    s

    0

    min

    21

    N

    dQM

    P(e) is dominated by the minimum Euclidean distance of the signal

    constellation.

    A Union Bound on Error Probability (contd)

    M

    m

    M

    l

    mlM

    mm

    ml

    N

    dQ

    MeP

    MeP

    1 10

    ,

    1 2

    11s

    Then the probability of error is found as

    mlml

    dd ,,

    min minwhere is the minimum Euclidean distance of the constellation.

    Minimum Euclidean

    distancebound

  • 8/10/2019 BPSK probability of error

    50/85

    ECE414 Wireless Communications, University of Waterloo, Winter 2012 50

    An Approximation for Error Probability

    As an alternative, we can also the following approximate upper bound

    0

    min,

    ~

    1 0

    ,

    2

    2 min N

    dQN

    N

    dQeP md

    M

    l

    mlBU

    m

    ml

    s

    Approximate upper bound

    mdN min, : Number of signals at distance dminfrom sm

    0

    min

    2min N

    dQNd

    M

    m

    mdd N

    M

    N

    1

    ,minmin

    1

    M

    mmeP

    MeP

    1

    1s

    M

    mmd

    N

    dQN

    M 1 0

    min,

    2

    1~min

  • 8/10/2019 BPSK probability of error

    51/85

    ECE414 Wireless Communications, University of Waterloo, Winter 2012 51

    Error Probability for M-PSK

    sE

    MMEMEd bs 2

    2

    22

    min sinlog4sin4

    2,2

    2,1

    min M

    MNd

    2,sinlog2

    2

    2,2

    22

    0

    0

    MM

    MN

    EQ

    MN

    EQ

    eP

    b

    b

    Replacing and into the formula on p.50, we obtain2mind mindN

  • 8/10/2019 BPSK probability of error

    52/85

    ECE414 Wireless Communications, University of Waterloo, Winter 2012 52

    Error Probability for M-PSK (cont

    d)

    Error rate degrades asMincreases.

    Recall that spectral efficiency increases asMincreases.

  • 8/10/2019 BPSK probability of error

    53/85

    ECE414 Wireless Communications, University of Waterloo, Winter 2012 53

    Error Probability for QAM

    tfAtfAts cimcrmm 2sin2cos ,, 2,2 ,, simsrmm TATA s

    AAAA imrm 3,, ,,

    sssss TAEEEE29

    151230

    sssss TAEEEE2

    10965

    sssss

    ssss

    TAEEEE

    EEEE

    25

    1413117

    8421

    s

    M

    m

    ss TAE

    M

    Emavg

    2

    1

    51

    avg

    bs

    avg b

    EE

    ss EETAd5

    8

    5

    222

    4

    min

    0s 1s 2s 3s

    4s 5s 6s 7s

    8s 9s 10s 11s

    12s 13s 14s 15s

    mind

  • 8/10/2019 BPSK probability of error

    54/85

    ECE414 Wireless Communications, University of Waterloo, Winter 2012 54

    Error Probability for QAM (cont

    d)

    0s 1s 2s 3s

    4s 5s 6s 7s

    8s 9s 10s 11s

    12s 13s 14s 15s

    2 neighbours

    3 neighbours

    4 neighbours

    151230 ,,, ssss

    10965 ,,, ssss

    11714138421 ,,,,,,, ssssssss

    2 neighbours

    4 neighbours

    3 neighbours

    00

    min

    5

    43

    2

    ~min N

    EQ

    N

    dQNeP

    avgb

    d

    Using the result from p.50, we obtain an approximate upper bound

    31

    1min,min

    M

    mdd m

    NM

    N

    3 neighbours

  • 8/10/2019 BPSK probability of error

    55/85

    ECE414 Wireless Communications, University of Waterloo, Winter 2012 55

    Error Probability for QAM (cont

    d)

    Power efficiency decreases with increasingM, but not early as fast asM-PSK.

    Recall that spectral efficiency increases asMincreases.

  • 8/10/2019 BPSK probability of error

    56/85

    ECE414 Wireless Communications, University of Waterloo, Winter 2012 56

    tffAts mcm 2cos sTt0 MmTmfm ...2,1,2

    Error Probability for M-FSK

    Each signal occupies its own

    dimension. Therefore, each

    signal hasM-1neighbours,

    separated from each other by

    sEd 2min

    0

    2

    0

    log11N

    MEQMNEQMeP bs

  • 8/10/2019 BPSK probability of error

    57/85

    ECE414 Wireless Communications, University of Waterloo, Winter 2012 57

    Error Probability for M-FSK (cont

    d)

    AsMincreases, power efficiency improves (i.e. lessEbis

    required).

    Recall that spectral efficiency decreases asMincreases.

    ForM=2, BFSK requires 3dB more energy/bit to achieve the sameP(e)asBPSK.

    In other words, BPSK is 3dB more power efficient that BFSK.

    0

    2

    N

    EQeP b

    BPSK

    0NEQeP b

    BFSK

  • 8/10/2019 BPSK probability of error

    58/85

    ECE414 Wireless Communications, University of Waterloo, Winter 2012 58

    Comparison of Power Efficiency of Modulation Schemes

    We will use BPSK/QPSK as a benchmark with which to compare the

    power efficiency of other modulation schemes.

    BPSK/QPSK has . Now, define the power efficiency of a

    modulation scheme (relative to BPSK/QPSK) asbEd 4

    2min

    b

    P

    E

    d

    4

    log102min

    10

  • 8/10/2019 BPSK probability of error

    59/85

    ECE414 Wireless Communications, University of Waterloo, Winter 2012 59

    Differential Phase Shift Keying (DPSK)

    So far, we assumed that coherent demodulation is performed, i.e. that the

    carrier phase is perfectly known at the receiver. This normally requires carrier

    phase estimation.

    An alternative is differentially encoding, where the data is encoded in

    phase difference from one symbol to the next. Assuming binary signalling,

    kkkkk baabd 11,11,0

    dk 0 1 1 1 0 1

    bk +1 -1 -1 -1 +1 -1

    ak +1 +1 -1 +1 -1 -1 +1

    This diagram mightcorrespond to either

    PSK or DPSK!

  • 8/10/2019 BPSK probability of error

    60/85

  • 8/10/2019 BPSK probability of error

    61/85

    ECE414 Wireless Communications, University of Waterloo, Winter 2012 61

    Error Probability of DPSK

    tAats ckcos kTtTk 1

    kk

    j

    TkT

    j

    Tk

    NaATedttNdtaAedttyy TNNNk 02,0~

    tNAea jk

    211 kkdef

    yy 212 kkdef

    yy Defining the decision variable

    can be written as

    2221* 1Resgn kkk yyz

    110Re11 21*

    1 kkkkkk bPbyyPbbPeP

    tjytyty QI

  • 8/10/2019 BPSK probability of error

    62/85

    ECE414 Wireless Communications, University of Waterloo, Winter 2012 62

    We need to find statistical properties of and :1

    2

    22/ 111 kkkkj NNaaATe

    22/ 112 kkkkj NNaaATe

    2/11 kkj aaATeE

    2/12 kkj aaATeE

    TNNNNNEEEVar kkkk 0*112111 41 TNNNNNEEEVar kkkk 0*112222

    4

    1

    Error Probability of DPSK (cont

    d)

    211 kkdef

    yy 212 kkdef

    yy

    First, we recall the definitions

    E P b bili f DPSK ( d)

  • 8/10/2019 BPSK probability of error

    63/85

    ECE414 Wireless Communications, University of Waterloo, Winter 2012 63

    kkk baa 1 Encoding scheme:

    +1 +1 +1 +1 0

    -1 +1 -1 0 -1

    -1 -1 +1 -1 0

    +1 -1 -1 0 1

    ka 1ka kb 21 kk aa 21 kk aa

    01 E

    jATeE 2

    TNVar 01

    TNVar 02

    211 ,0~, NIR

    22 ,cos~ ATNR 2

    2 ,sin~ ATNI

    Rician:Rayleigh,: 21

    Under the assumption that is sent1kb

    202 TNwhere

    IR j 111

    IR j 222

    Complex Gaussian

    Complex Gaussian

    Error Probability of DPSK (cont

    d)

  • 8/10/2019 BPSK probability of error

    64/85

    E P b bilit f DPSK ( t d)

  • 8/10/2019 BPSK probability of error

    65/85

    ECE414 Wireless Communications, University of Waterloo, Winter 2012 65

    dxmx

    Imxxm

    dxx

    Ixx

    dIeP

    20

    2

    22

    0 22

    2

    202

    22

    02

    202

    22

    0

    22

    2

    2exp

    2exp

    2

    1

    22exp

    2

    1

    2

    exp

    2

    exp

    2def

    x

    Variable change

    2def

    m

    =1

    0

    0

    2

    exp21

    2exp

    2

    1

    NE

    N

    TA

    222 TAdttsET

    Error Probability of DPSK (cont

    d)

    202 TN

    AT

    E P b bilit f DPSK ( t d)

  • 8/10/2019 BPSK probability of error

    66/85

    ECE414 Wireless Communications, University of Waterloo, Winter 2012 66

    0 2 4 6 8 10 1210

    -6

    10-5

    10-4

    10-3

    10-2

    10-1

    100

    Coherent vs. Differential PSK

    SNR [dB]

    BER

    CoherentDifferential

    Error Probability of DPSK (cont

    d)

    There is some performance degradation due to differential detection,but now a less complex receiver can be used (i.e. no need for phase

    tracking).

  • 8/10/2019 BPSK probability of error

    67/85

    ECE414 Wireless Communications, University of Waterloo, Winter 2012 67

    Temporal Characteristics of Modulation Schemes

    So far, we have considered pulse shapes which are strictly limited in the

    symbol interval. By using a pulse shape to spill overinto adjacent symbol

    intervals, better spectral efficiency can be achieved, however this also results in

    intersymbol interference (ISI).

    The following block diagram is commonly used for studying ISI. Assuming

    matched filter type implementation for the demodulator,

    tw

    thT thC thR

    slTtDetector

    ksk kTtpatg

    ActualChannel

    EquivalentChannel

    sseqk

    kl lTnTklhaz where thththh RCTeq thtwtn R

    T l Ch t i ti f M d l ti S h ( t d)

  • 8/10/2019 BPSK probability of error

    68/85

    ECE414 Wireless Communications, University of Waterloo, Winter 2012 68

    Temporal Characteristics of Modulation Schemes (cont

    d)

    Here, we use in pulse shapes which spill over adjacent symbols. This will

    bring ISI terms:

    otherwise,0

    0,1 nnTh seq

    constant

    sleq T

    l

    fH

    This condition is known as Nyquist pulse-shaping criterionor Nyquist

    condition for zero ISI.

    sseqlk

    keqlsseqk

    kl lTnTklhahalTnTklhaz

    0

    ISI terms The condition for no ISI is

    In frequency domain, this requires

    See proof Proakis Digital CommunicationsChapter 9

    T l Ch t i ti f M d l ti S h ( t d)

  • 8/10/2019 BPSK probability of error

    69/85

    ECE414 Wireless Communications, University of Waterloo, Winter 2012 69

    Temporal Characteristics of Modulation Schemes (cont

    d)

    WTs

    2

    1

    WTs

    2

    1

    For this case, there is no choice forHeqto satisfy Nyquist criterion.

    sleq

    T

    lfH

    sleq

    T

    lfH

    otherwise,0

    , WfTfH

    seq

    For this case, there is only one solution:

    W: Bandwidth of equivalent ch.

    In the following, we consider three distinct cases:

  • 8/10/2019 BPSK probability of error

    70/85

    Temporal Characteristics of Modulation Schemes (cont d)

  • 8/10/2019 BPSK probability of error

    71/85

    ECE414 Wireless Communications, University of Waterloo, Winter 2012 71

    Temporal Characteristics of Modulation Schemes (cont

    d)

    Under the matched-filter assumption (i.e. which maximizes the output

    signal-to-noise ratio), the transmit and receive filters satisfy

    fHfH RT

    Under the ideal channel assumption , i.e.

    fHfHfH eqRT

    1fHC

    For raised-cosineequivalent channel response, we can divide it into two

    root-raised-cosine(RRC) filters.

    s

    sss

    ss

    ss

    RCRRC

    Tf

    Tf

    TTfTT

    TfT

    fHfH

    2

    1,0

    2

    1

    2

    1,2

    1cos2

    2

    1,

    Temporal Characteristics of BPSK

  • 8/10/2019 BPSK probability of error

    72/85

    ECE414 Wireless Communications, University of Waterloo, Winter 2012 72

    Temporal Characteristics of BPSK

    sk k kTtpatg

    Consider the baseband BPSK modulated signal with RRC pulse shape

    1ka

    Eye patternis a sketch ofg(t) for all possible combinations of ,...,, 321 aaa

    Minimum instantaneous

    power=0

    Maximum instantaneous

    power=(1.6)2=4.1 [dB]

    Dynamic range=4.1 [dB]

    Average power=1=0 [dB] dB1.4powerAvg.powerPeak

    For this example, we observe large dynamic range of instantaneous power

    and large peak/average ratio. These make the design of TX power amplifier

    difficult.

    Temporal Characteristics of QPSK

  • 8/10/2019 BPSK probability of error

    73/85

    ECE414 Wireless Communications, University of Waterloo, Winter 2012 73

    The QPSK signal with pulse shaping can be written as

    tkTtpbtkTtpatg ck skck sk sincos

    1, kk ba

    The instantaneous power of the QPSK signal is

    22

    ksk

    ksk kTtpbkTtpa

    Hence, a QPSK signal suffers similar time-domain problems as a BPSK

    signal. Now assume, different pulses are used for I&Q channels. If Q channel

    pulse is delayed by 1/2 symbol relative to I channel pulse, i.e.

    the instantaneous power is

    2sTtptq

    22

    2 kssk

    ksk TkTtpbkTtpa

    Both terms can not pass through zero simultaneously, hence significantly

    increasing the minimum instantaneous power and reducing dynamic range of the

    signal. PSD and BER remain unchanged. This is known as Offset QPSK (OQPSK).

    Temporal Characteristics of QPSK

    Temporal Characteristics of QPSK (cont d)

  • 8/10/2019 BPSK probability of error

    74/85

    ECE414 Wireless Communications, University of Waterloo, Winter 2012 74

    + =

    jjkk

    ee

    jba

    ,2 434 , jj

    kk

    ee

    jba

    kee

    kee

    jba

    jj

    jj

    kk

    oddfor,,

    evenfor,,

    2

    434

    Another variant of QPSK is /4-QPSK. This modulation scheme is a

    superposition of two QPSK signal constellations offset by /4 relative to each

    other.

    PSD and BER of /4-QPSK are the same as QPSK.

    Temporal Characteristics of QPSK (cont

    d)

    Temporal Characteristics of QPSK (cont d)

  • 8/10/2019 BPSK probability of error

    75/85

    ECE414 Wireless Communications, University of Waterloo, Winter 2012 75

    In QPSK, transitions between opposite points in the signal constellation

    cause the instantaneous power to zero, leading to a large dynamic range.

    The special structure of /4-QPSK avoids transitions which pass the origin,

    reducing dynamic range and peak-to-average power ratio.

    Temporal Characteristics of QPSK (cont

    d)

    Continuous FSK

  • 8/10/2019 BPSK probability of error

    76/85

    ECE414 Wireless Communications, University of Waterloo, Winter 2012 76

    Continuous FSK

    We can get perfect temporal properties by using continuous FSK (CFSK)

    sk k kTtpatg 1ka

    k

    skc

    t

    c kTtqahtfdghtfts 22cos22cos

    where

    dkTptqt

    s

    def

    Instantaneous power= constant

    Dynamic range=0dB

    Peak-to-average power ratio=0dB

    There is no abrupt switching from one phase to another, avoiding phase

    discontinuities.

    h: Modulation index

    Continuous FSK (cont d)

  • 8/10/2019 BPSK probability of error

    77/85

    ECE414 Wireless Communications, University of Waterloo, Winter 2012 77

    1/2Ts

    t

    1/2

    t

    p(t): Frequency pulse

    Ts

    Ts

    Here, we assume a rectangle pulse shape forp(t).

    q(t): Phase pulse

    ns

    sn

    kk

    ksk

    aT

    nTthah

    kTtqaht

    22

    2;

    1

    0

    a

    -3h

    -2h

    -h

    h2h

    3h

    0

    Ts 2Ts 3Ts

    +1

    -1

    +1

    -1

    +1

    -1

    The shaded path illustrates the phases for

    the input sequence {+1,+1,-1}

    ss TntnT 1

    Phase Tree

    Continuous FSK (cont

    d)

    n=0,1,..

  • 8/10/2019 BPSK probability of error

    78/85

    Continuous FSK (cont d)

  • 8/10/2019 BPSK probability of error

    79/85

    ECE414 Wireless Communications, University of Waterloo, Winter 2012 79

    We have already introduced MSK as a special case of modulation family of

    CFSK.

    An MSK signal can be also considered as a special form of OQPSK where

    the rectangular pulses are replaced with half-sinusoidal pulses.

    tfTkTtpatfkTtpats csskkcs

    kk 2sin22cos2

    evenodd

    otherwise,0

    20,2

    cos ss

    TtT

    t

    tp

    The transmission rate on the two orthogonal carriers is 1/2Tsbits/sec so thatthe combined transmission rate is 1/Tsbits/sec.

    Continuous FSK (cont

    d)

    Comparison of MSK QPSK and OQPSK

  • 8/10/2019 BPSK probability of error

    80/85

    ECE414 Wireless Communications, University of Waterloo, Winter 2012 80

    Comparison of MSK, QPSK and OQPSK

    Continuous phase is assured in MSK while 90 and 180 phase changes are

    observable for OQPSK and QPSK respectively.

    Comparison of MSK, QPSK and OQPSK

  • 8/10/2019 BPSK probability of error

    81/85

    ECE414 Wireless Communications, University of Waterloo, Winter 2012 81

    In terms of temporal

    efficiency, MSK obviouslyoutperforms QPSK and

    OQPSK.

    The main lobe of MSK is

    wider than that of QPSK and

    OQPSK and, in terms of null-to-null bandwidth MSK is less

    spectral efficient.

    MSK has lower sidelobes

    than QPSK and OQPSKLess

    adjacent channel interference

    MSK, QPSK and OQPSK

    have the same power efficiency.

    Comparison of MSK, QPSK and OQPSK

    (contd)

    Gaussian MSK

  • 8/10/2019 BPSK probability of error

    82/85

    ECE414 Wireless Communications, University of Waterloo, Winter 2012 82

    Gaussian MSK

    The spectral efficiency of MSK can be further improved by prefiltering.

    sk

    k kTtpatg GaussianLPF

    MSK

    Modulator

    The frequency response function of Gaussian LPF filter is given as

    2ln

    2exp

    2ln

    2

    2

    2lnexp

    2222 tBBth

    B

    ffH

    whereBis 3dB-bandwidth of the filter.

    We are interested in how a rectangle pulse passed through a Gaussian

    LPF will look like.

    Gaussian MSK (cont d)

  • 8/10/2019 BPSK probability of error

    83/85

    ECE414 Wireless Communications, University of Waterloo, Winter 2012 83

    T

    Tt

    T

    TtQtf

    2/2/

    Frequency pulse

    2ln2 BT

    2

    1

    2exp

    2

    111

    2 x

    x

    xxQx

    tq

    Phase pulse

    T

    Tt

    x

    2/

    1

    T

    Tt

    x

    2/

    2

    Phase pulse corresponding to rectangular

    pulse shaping (i.e. no filtering) is also

    included in the figure.

    Gaussian MSK (cont

    d)

    BT: Normalized

    3dB-Bandwidth

    Gaussian MSK (cont d)

  • 8/10/2019 BPSK probability of error

    84/85

    ECE414 Wireless Communications, University of Waterloo, Winter 2012 84

    ForBT, the pulse shape takes its original unfilteredform , i.e. rectangle

    pulse. GMSK

    MSK The frequency pulse has a duration of 2Tsalthough signaling rate is 1/Ts. Such a

    LPF will result in intersymbol interference which requires sequence estimation for

    optimal detection.

    Gaussian MSK (cont

    d)

    BT: Normalized

    3dB-Bandwidthof Gaussian filter

    Gaussian MSK (cont d)

  • 8/10/2019 BPSK probability of error

    85/85

    BTshould be chosen as to find a good

    compromise between spectral efficiencyand ISI.

    AsBTdecreases, the spectral

    efficiency improves (i.e. less bandwith).

    Also sidelobes fall off very rapidly (i.e.

    less adjacent channel interference).

    However, reducingBTresults in ISI

    and error rate performance degrades (i.e.

    observation of an irreducible error floor

    due to ISI) In practical application,BTis typically

    chosen as (0.2, 0.5). GSM systems use

    GMSK withBT=0.35.

    Gaussian MSK (cont

    d)