Top Banner
Bomb Calorimeter Lab Mike Martin, Pete Strader, and Kevin Healy
13

Bomb Calorimeter Lab Mike Martin, Pete Strader, and Kevin Healy.

Dec 24, 2015

Download

Documents

Rafe Cox
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Bomb Calorimeter Lab Mike Martin, Pete Strader, and Kevin Healy.

Bomb Calorimeter LabMike Martin, Pete Strader, and Kevin Healy

Page 2: Bomb Calorimeter Lab Mike Martin, Pete Strader, and Kevin Healy.

Purpose

• To see if modifications to bomb calorimeters would increase efficiency• Part I: Testing the calorimeters thermal

qualities of insulation and speed of heating• Part II: Seeing if modifications gave a

closer estimate of a fuel’s heat capacity.

Page 3: Bomb Calorimeter Lab Mike Martin, Pete Strader, and Kevin Healy.

The CalorimetersLeft to Right: Aluminum Insulated, Fiberglass Insulated, and Control

Page 4: Bomb Calorimeter Lab Mike Martin, Pete Strader, and Kevin Healy.

Temperature over Time

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 120

10

20

30

40

50

60

ControlFiberAluminum

Page 5: Bomb Calorimeter Lab Mike Martin, Pete Strader, and Kevin Healy.

Thermal Testing

• Using a Bunsen Burner with a consistent flame, we tested how long it took for each calorimeter to reach 50° Celsius and how long before each began loosing heat over a period of 15 -20 minutes. • The Chart has been shortened to when the

most insulated began to loose heat.

Page 6: Bomb Calorimeter Lab Mike Martin, Pete Strader, and Kevin Healy.

Aluminum and Fiber Glass InstallationCalorimeters under construction

Page 7: Bomb Calorimeter Lab Mike Martin, Pete Strader, and Kevin Healy.

I – Butanol Lamp with Aluminum Insulated Canister

Page 8: Bomb Calorimeter Lab Mike Martin, Pete Strader, and Kevin Healy.

Thermal Energy to Heat Water

Fuel Control Fiberglass Aluminum

Methanol 4.598 kJ/g 4.598 kJ/g 4.18 kJ/g

Butural 5.016 kJ/g 5.434 kJ/g 4.18 kJ/g

Page 9: Bomb Calorimeter Lab Mike Martin, Pete Strader, and Kevin Healy.

Heat of Combustion

Fuel Ideal/ Expected Control Fiberglass Aluminum Foil

Methanol 64.09 kJ/g 11.495 kJ/g 11.495 kJ/g 13.934 kJ/g

Butural 75.87 kJ/g 16.72 kJ/g 18.113 kJ/g 13.934 kJ/g

Page 10: Bomb Calorimeter Lab Mike Martin, Pete Strader, and Kevin Healy.

Materials

• Three aluminum cans • A roll of tinfoil• Fiberglass insulation • i-butanol • Methanol • Two stoppers with wicks • Match book or lighter

• 3 very large soup cans • Glass thermometer • 6 stands with rings

attached • Stop watch • Tap water • Scale

Page 11: Bomb Calorimeter Lab Mike Martin, Pete Strader, and Kevin Healy.

Conclusion • We found that tinfoil was the best insulator for methanol and

the fiberglass was the best insulator for i-buterol. However neither were close to the ideal target energy output for their respective fuels. This can be attributed to the lack of ideal conditions in which to conduct the experiment.

• We found that the insulated bombcalorimeters took longer to reach 50 degrees C than the control. The Fiberglass insulator took the longest to heat to 50 C.

• Finally we found that both the tinfoil and the fiberglass insulators retained the heat longer than the control. The fiberglass insulator however was much more efficient than the tinfoil insulator. This fits because it also took longer to heat up to 50 C.

Page 12: Bomb Calorimeter Lab Mike Martin, Pete Strader, and Kevin Healy.

Equations and Ideal Data• Heat absorbed by the water (calories) = Mass of water (grams)

x Temperature change (oC) x 1.00 cal/g oC

• i-Butanol: 75.87 KJ/g• Methanol: 64.09 KJ/g

Single Bonds kJ/mol

H—C 416

C—C 356

C—O 336

O--H 467

Page 13: Bomb Calorimeter Lab Mike Martin, Pete Strader, and Kevin Healy.

Hypothesis

•Modifications to the bomb calorimeters will increase the speed of heating the water and the retention of the water’s heat.