Top Banner
preferred media sources, and they give detailed instructions on how to attain that end and thereby influence public discourse on controversial topics with a science context. If you want to put in your two cents on nuclear power, stem-cell re- search, directed-energy weapons, or the creation of new life forms in the labora- tory, and if you have the necessary ex- pertise to do so, this book is for you. But even if you prefer to remain safely cloistered in the peaceful halls of academia, you may nevertheless benefit from what Hayes and Grossman have to say. In my experience, much of the way the media operate is counterintuitive to physicists. When 95% of experts in a field agree on a topic, reporters will quote one or more of them, but may also include remarks by someone whose work is not taken seriously by fellow professionals but who is chosen because he or she disputes the majority position. To some journalists, that approach pro- vides needed “balance.” Usually when a reporter calls a scientist to ask a ques- tion, the journalist actually wants to know the answer. Yet it’s also common for a reporter to know what answer he or she wishes to quote and call a scien- tist who is likely to take that position. The book also discusses the art of writ- ing good press rel eases. A scientis t who writes an article begins by introducing the subject of the research and may make the error of following that practice in drafting a press release about the results. A communication s pro fessiona l kno ws that a press release must begin with the  bottom line: What was disco ver ed? The context then follows. Hayes and Gross- man even advise scientists to speak in clichés during certain media interactions. It’s contrary to what we were taught in school, but the approach is sometimes ap- propriate, as the authors cogently ex- plain. All of these “crazy” practices, as physicists might say, are in accord with the rules of journalism. All kinds of journalists work in dif- ferent ways, and it helps to know the differences, too. Talking “on back- ground” implies various rules on how reporters use the information, depend- ing on their affiliatio ns. A local televi- sion news corresponden t arrives at your office, records a quick stand-up inter- view, and is gone in 15 minutes. The re- sulting sound bite of your comments will last about 20 seconds on the nightly news. Another reporter may spend a day with you and write a feature article. Hayes and Grossman note that many researchers are critical of the daily press: Scientists don’t like the selection of sci- ence topics, the singling out of a few sci- entists for comment, the omission of prior research, and the loose way in which the carefully nuanced conclusions of a research paper are expanded to  broa d, new conte xts. Many resea rcher s think that scientific significance should  be the pri me crit erio n for fea turi ng a re- search result in the mass media, and they don’t understand why it emphatically is not. But such critics should realize that when it comes to newspapers, “if there were a paper written the way they would like it, nobody would read it,” according to a British scientist quoted in Hayes and Grossman’s book. If researchers read  A Scientist’s Guide to Talking with the Media  , it will help them to understand. Stephen P. Maran Chevy Chase, Maryland Concepts in Thermal Physics Stephen J. Blundell and Katherine M. Blundell Oxford U. Press, New York, 2006. $85.00, $45.00 paper (464 pp.). ISBN 978-0-19-856769 -1, ISBN 978-0-19-856770-7 paper Students’ first exposu re to s tatisti cal mechanics and thermodynamics is al- ways tricky. The mathematical ma- chinery is quite simple, but the con- cepts are somewhat outside the frame- work set up in other physics courses. Moreover, with so many results de- rived from so few assumptions, it is im- portant that the presentation be clear and logical. Concepts in Thermal Physics  by Stephen J. Blundell and Katherine M. Blundell fulfills that need admirably, and their textbook will be very useful for an undergraduate course in thermo- dynamics and statistical mechanics. The authors, who teach in the physics department at Oxford Univer- sity, first cover basic statistical ideas, then discuss thermodynamics before returning to statistical mechanics. The approach is a good choice: Thermody- namics can—with a few experimental inputs—be applied in a broad range of disciplines to complex systems for which statistical analyses would be impractical. It is important for physics instructors to not lose sight of that gen- erality. To treat thermodynamics as merely an application of statistical me- chanics is analogous to treating elastic- ity theory as just an application of atomic interactions. However, those who favor beginning with statistical mechanics first, as it is more funda- mental and therefore easier to under- stand, may prefer the second edition of Thermal Physics  by Charles Kittel and Herbert Kroemer (W. H. Freeman, 1980). I also like the fact that the first phys- ical system discussed in the text is a gas rather than a spin chain—the former is associated more with everyday experi- ence. Although the calculations for a spin system are simpler, the treatment of gases is also easy to understand. On a related note, several figures in the See www.pt.ims.ca/1231 1-33 Piezo   Nano   Positioning Moving & Measuring Nanometers PI is the Global Leader in Nanopositioning. ISO 9001 since 1994. 30+ Years Experience. Custom Designs. Global Expert Support. Get the 500 page PI catalog! Capacitance Sensors High Linearity & Bandwidth High-Force Piezo Linear Motors  To 600 N; Resolution <0.1 nm PICMA ® Long Life Actuators Ceramic Coating; High Force PI (Physik Inst rument e) L.P. Tel: (508) 832-3456 www.pi.ws/ptmmn
3

Blundell Phys Today Review

Jun 02, 2018

Download

Documents

swatagoda
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Blundell Phys Today Review

 

preferred media sources, and they givedetailed instructions on how to attainthat end and thereby influence publicdiscourse on controversial topics with ascience context. If you want to put in yourtwo cents on nuclear power, stem-cell re-search, directed-energy weapons, or thecreation of new life forms in the labora-tory, and if you have the necessary ex-pertise to do so, this book is for you.

But even if you prefer to remainsafely cloistered in the peaceful halls ofacademia, you may nevertheless benefitfrom what Hayes and Grossman have tosay. In my experience, much of the waythe media operate is counterintuitive tophysicists. When 95% of experts in afield agree on a topic, reporters willquote one or more of them, but may alsoinclude remarks by someone whosework is not taken seriously by fellowprofessionals but who is chosen becausehe or she disputes the majority position.To some journalists, that approach pro-vides needed “balance.” Usually whena reporter calls a scientist to ask a ques-tion, the journalist actually wants toknow the answer. Yet it’s also commonfor a reporter to know what answer heor she wishes to quote and call a scien-tist who is likely to take that position.

The book also discusses the art of writ-ing good press releases. A scientist whowrites an article begins by introducingthe subject of the research and may makethe error of following that practice indrafting a press release about the results.A communications professional knowsthat a press release must begin with the

 bottom line: What was discovered? Thecontext then follows. Hayes and Gross-man even advise scientists to speak inclichés during certain media interactions.It’s contrary to what we were taught inschool, but the approach is sometimes ap-propriate, as the authors cogently ex-plain. All of these “crazy” practices, asphysicists might say, are in accord withthe rules of journalism.

All kinds of journalists work in dif-ferent ways, and it helps to know thedifferences, too. Talking “on back-ground” implies various rules on howreporters use the information, depend-ing on their affiliations. A local televi-sion news correspondent arrives at youroffice, records a quick stand-up inter-view, and is gone in 15 minutes. The re-sulting sound bite of your commentswill last about 20 seconds on the nightlynews. Another reporter may spend aday with you and write a feature article.

Hayes and Grossman note that manyresearchers are critical of the daily press:Scientists don’t like the selection of sci-ence topics, the singling out of a few sci-entists for comment, the omission ofprior research, and the loose way inwhich the carefully nuanced conclusionsof a research paper are expanded to

 broad, new contexts. Many researchersthink that scientific significance should

 be the prime criterion for featuring a re-search result in the mass media, and theydon’t understand why it emphatically isnot. But such critics should realize thatwhen it comes to newspapers, “if therewere a paper written the way they wouldlike it, nobody would read it,” accordingto a British scientist quoted in Hayes andGrossman’s book. If researchers read  AScientist’s Guide to Talking with the Media ,it will help them to understand.

Stephen P. MaranChevy Chase, Maryland

Concepts inThermal Physics

Stephen J. Blundell andKatherine M. BlundellOxford U. Press, New York, 2006.$85.00, $45.00 paper (464 pp.).ISBN 978-0-19-856769-1,ISBN 978-0-19-856770-7 paper 

Students’ first exposure to statisticalmechanics and thermodynamics is al-

ways tricky. Themathematical ma-chinery is quitesimple, but the con-cepts are somewhatoutside the frame-work set up in otherphysics courses.Moreover, with somany results de-rived from so few assumptions, it is im-portant that the presentation be clearand logical. Concepts in Thermal Physics

 by Stephen J. Blundell and Katherine M.Blundell fulfills that need admirably,and their textbook will be very usefulfor an undergraduate course in thermo-dynamics and statistical mechanics.

The authors, who teach in thephysics department at Oxford Univer-sity, first cover basic statistical ideas,then discuss thermodynamics beforereturning to statistical mechanics. Theapproach is a good choice: Thermody-namics can—with a few experimentalinputs—be applied in a broad range ofdisciplines to complex systems forwhich statistical analyses would beimpractical. It is important for physicsinstructors to not lose sight of that gen-erality. To treat thermodynamics asmerely an application of statistical me-chanics is analogous to treating elastic-ity theory as just an application ofatomic interactions. However, thosewho favor beginning with statisticalmechanics first, as it is more funda-mental and therefore easier to under-stand, may prefer the second edition ofThermal Physics  by Charles Kittel andHerbert Kroemer (W. H. Freeman,1980).

I also like the fact that the first phys-ical system discussed in the text is a gasrather than a spin chain—the former isassociated more with everyday experi-ence. Although the calculations for aspin system are simpler, the treatmentof gases is also easy to understand. Ona related note, several figures in the

See www.pt.ims.ca/12311-33

Piezo   •  Nano   •  Positioning

Moving & Measuring Nanometers

PI is the Global Leader

in Nanopositioning.

ISO 9001 since 1994.

30+ Years Experience.

Custom Designs.

Global Expert Support.

Get the 500 page PI catalog!

Capacitance Sensors

High Linearity & Bandwidth

High-Force Piezo Linear Motors

 To 600 N; Resolution <0.1 nm

PICMA ® Long Life Actuators

Ceramic Coating; High Force

PI (Physik Instrumente) L.P.

Tel: (508) 832-3456

www.pi.ws/ptmmn

Page 2: Blundell Phys Today Review

 

October 2007 Physics Today   61

 book contain actual experimental data,which are welcome because they makethe discussions more relevant. Somefigures that seem to include experimen-tal data do not have any references (forexample, 9.12). Such omissions should

 be corrected.The 37 chapters are short, and each

covers a single concept. In general, Ifound the presentation remarkablyclear. But there are exceptions: Thediscussion of magnetic systems—including the change from B dm to m dB(in which m is the magnetic momentand B is the magnetic field)—is far tooshort, as is the coverage of how molec-ular degrees of freedom freeze out. I donot think the chapter on informationtheory will be useful to readers who donot already know the material. Thechapter on photons is unnecessary be-cause all the results can be obtainedmore efficiently through statistical me-chanics rather than through classicalthermodynamics, as the authors revealin a subsequent chapter. And the char-acterization of heat as “energy in tran-sit” is quite misleading.

Of more serious concern is the chap-ter on phase transitions, which is ex-tremely outdated. With a numericaltreatment of simple examples, such aspercolation and the Ising model in twodimensions, it should be possible for atextbook to explain the fundamental con-cept that a phase transition is a qualita-tive change that is apparent only at themacroscopic level. It should also be pos-sible to introduce the basic idea ofscaling at second-order phase transi-tions and provide a short discussion ofMonte Carlo simulations. Unfortunately,the Blundells’ coverage falls short; thus,instructors will have to provide supple-mental material on the topic.

The section on kinetic theory is in-terposed before the treatment of ther-modynamics. The authors point outthat teaching the section is optional andcan be delayed or omitted. Apart fromthe section’s first two chapters, theirsuggestion is useful, particularly if the

 book is used in a one-term course. Butin any case, it would be helpful if the

 book were to clearly explain where inthe section the ideal-gas approximationis made. For instance, I could not findany discussion of why the treatment ofpressure in chapter 6 is only valid forideal gases, which is not the case for theMaxwell–Boltzmann distribution asdescribed in chapter 5.

Although the problems at the end ofeach chapter are well chosen, it wouldhelp if more were included, especiallyproblems that apply the concepts todifferent disciplines. The chapters on

special topics that discuss applicationsare nice, but unfortunately they willlikely be dropped in a one-term course.Overall, Concepts in Thermal Physics pro-vides an excellent introduction to ther-modynamics and statistical mechanics.It deserves serious consideration as atextbook for any undergraduate courseon those topics. And the fact that a rea-sonably priced paperback edition isalso available will be welcome news forstudents.

Onuttom NarayanUniversity of California, Santa Cruz

See www.pt.ims.ca/12311-34

 L A S E R T E L . C O M 

 First in QCW Array Solutions

 First in Reliability 

With a patented monolithic array design, no other array provider can

achieve Lasertel’s combination of output power and extreme environment 

operating capabilities. Lasertel’s compact packaging consists entirely of

CTE-matched materials and In-free hard solders for unparalleled reliability

 in demanding applications.

7775 N. Casa Grande Hwy.

Tucson, AZ 85743, USA

 Phone: +1 520-744-5700 

Tollfree: 1-877-844-1444

 First in Performance

Lasertel’s high-brightness QCW stack

array packages consistently exceed

customer expectations with indus-

try-leading single bar brightness and

 bar pitch. Leading the industry as the

 brightness of 16kW/cm 2 , Lasertel

sets the new brightness benchmark 

at 32kW/cm 2.

 For details, check us out online or call today! 

acousticsMusimathics: The Mathe-matical Foundations ofMusic. Vol. 2. G. Loy. MIT

Press, Cambridge, MA, 2007. $50.00 (562pp.). ISBN 978-0-262-12285-6

Springer Handbook of Acoustics. T. D.Rossing, ed. Springer, New York, 2007.$199.00 (1182 pp.). ISBN 978-0-387-30446-5, CD-ROM

newbooks

Page 3: Blundell Phys Today Review