Top Banner
Benchmarking Discussion AICAD Development Conference Monday, July 16, 2012 Travis Carley Corporate Vice President CCS
10

Benchmarking Discussion

Jan 02, 2016

Download

Documents

kasper-edwards

Benchmarking Discussion. Travis Carley Corporate Vice President CCS. AICAD Development Conference Monday, July 16, 2012. Benchmarking. External Benchmarking Resources. Quantitative Questions. The essential element of benchmarking is measurement Allows for apples to apples comparison - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Benchmarking Discussion

Benchmarking Discussion

AICAD Development Conference

Monday, July 16, 2012

Travis Carley

Corporate Vice President

CCS

Page 3: Benchmarking Discussion

33

External Benchmarking Resources

Page 4: Benchmarking Discussion

44

Quantitative Questions

The essential element of benchmarking is measurement

Allows for apples to apples comparison

Thoughtful data categories provide the ability to undertake a wide range of analysis

Standard categories should be used in keeping with other national and industry benchmarking

Categories should remain standard year over year

Page 5: Benchmarking Discussion

55

By Source and by Revenue

Philanthropic Revenue FY2011 FY2012  Major Individual Gifts ($10,000+) (Excluding Trustee Giving) $- $- IndividualTrustee Giving $- $-  Direct Mail $- $-  Online Giving $- $-  Phone Solicitation $- $-  Alumni Giving $- $-  Parent Giving $- $-  Class/Anniversary Giving $- $-  Student/Recent Grad. Giving $- $-  Other Individual Giving $- $-  Bequests/Planned Gifts $- $-  Foundation Gifts $- $- FoundationCorporate Gifts, Corporate Foundation Grants, Cause Marketing $- $- CorporateMatching Gifts $- $-  Special Events $- $- OtherAll Other Philanthropic Support* $- $-  Total Support $- $-  Please describe what is included in All Other Philanthropic Support:    

Page 6: Benchmarking Discussion

66

Trustee Giving Detail

Trustee Giving Information FY2011 FY2012

Annual trustee goal $- $-

Number of trustee members $- $-

Number of trustee donors $- $-

Total amount raised $- $-

Page 7: Benchmarking Discussion

77

Staffing and Efficiency

Fundraising Staff (Using 0.5 FTE Increments) FY2011 FY2012

Support Staff (Assistants, Data Entry Associates, etc.) - -

Professional Support Staff (Prospect Researcher, Development Communications, Stewardship, etc.) - -

Professional Fundraisers (VP of Development/CDO, MG Officers, Annual Fund Staff, Grant Writers, etc.) - - Total - -

Development Expenses FY2011 FY2012

Development Staff $- $-

Development Operations $- $-

Development Vendors $- $-

Development - Other $- $-

Total Expenses $- $-

Page 8: Benchmarking Discussion

88

Qualitative Questions

General

Alumni Giving

Phone and Mail

Faculty and Staff

Matching Gifts

Leadership Giving

Student and Recent Grads Giving

Class and/or anniversary giving

Online giving

Other

Captures what is not in the numbers

Allows for identification of trends and new approaches

Offers insight into how results are achieved

Addresses current issues and relevant topics for peer discussion

Page 9: Benchmarking Discussion

1212

Comments and Discussion

Page 10: Benchmarking Discussion

1313

Thank You!

Travis W. CarleyCorporate Vice [email protected]

www.ccsfundraising.com

Follow us: twitter.com/ccsfundraising

Like Us: Facebook.com/ccsfundraising

Link Us In: http://linkd.in/hZhTWq