Top Banner
Baseline Analysis Report Integrated Tourism Master Plan for Lombok Vol.1 Task A Draft Site Management Plan of Rinjani-Lombok Geopark PT. AECOM Indonesia Ver.02 12 July 2019
18

Baseline Analysis Report - p3tb.pu.go.id

Oct 19, 2021

Download

Documents

dariahiddleston
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Baseline Analysis Report - p3tb.pu.go.id

Baseline Analysis Report Integrated Tourism Master Plan for Lombok

Vol.1 Task A – Draft Site Management Plan of Rinjani-Lombok Geopark

PT. AECOM Indonesia

Ver.02 – 12 July 2019

Page 2: Baseline Analysis Report - p3tb.pu.go.id

Quality Information

Project Name : Integrated Tourism Master Plan for Lombok

Project No. : JKTD18082

Document Name : Baseline Analysis Report Vol.1

Prepared by Checked by Verified by Approved by

Syauqi Asyraf Faiz Aryo Kuncoro Sacha Schwarzkopf Utami Prastiana

Revision History

Version Submission Date Details Authorized Name Position

Ver. 01 13 Dec 2018 AR Dep. TL

Ver. 02 12 July 2019 AR Dep. TL

Distribution List

#Hard Copies PDF Required Association/Company Name

Page 3: Baseline Analysis Report - p3tb.pu.go.id

3

Disclaimer

AECOM devoted effort consistent with (i) the level of diligence ordinarily exercised by competent professionals practicing in the area under the same or similar circumstances, and (ii) the time and budget available for its work, to ensure that the data contained in this report is accurate as of the date of its preparation. This study is based on estimates, assumptions and other information developed by AECOM from its independent research effort, general knowledge of the industry, and information (including without limitation, any information pertaining to the financial parameters which includes but is not limited to the weighted average debt and equity, cost of equity, cost of debt and other similar information as contained in this study) as provided by and/or derived from consultations with the client and the client’s representatives and other third party(ies). AECOM has relied upon and presumed that such information is both accurate and complete. AECOM has not verified as it is not in the position to verify such information, and therefore AECOM is unable to accept any responsibility and/or liability for, the accuracy and completeness of any such information used in the preparation or presentation of this study. No responsibility is assumed whatsoever for inaccuracies in reporting by the Client, the Client’s agents and representatives, or any third – party data source used in preparing or presenting this study. AECOM further assumes no duty to update the information contained herein unless it is separately retained to do so pursuant to a written agreement signed by AECOM and the Client. AECOM’s findings represent its professional judgement. Therefore, neither AECOM nor its parent corporation, or its affiliates, (a) makes any warranty, expressed or implied, with respect to the use of any information, any calculations herein based on such information or the methods as disclosed in this document or (b) assumes any liability with respect to the use of any information, any calculations herein based on such information or the methods as disclosed in this document. Any recipient of this document, by their acceptance or use of this document, releases AECOM , its parent corporation, and its and their affiliates from any liability for direct, indirect, consequential or special loss or damage whether arising in contract, warranty, express or implied, tort or otherwise, and irrespective of fault, negligence and strict liability arising from the use of any information, any calculations herein based on such information or the methods as disclosed in this document.” This report may not be used in conjunction with any public or private offering of securities, debt, equity or other similar purpose where it may be relied upon to any degree by any person other than the Client. This study may not be used for purposes other than those for which it was prepared or for which prior written consent has been obtained from AECOM. Possession of this study does not carry with the right of publication or the right to use the name of “AECOM” in any manner without the prior written consent of AECOM. No party may abstract, excerpt or summarize

this report without prior written consent of AECOM. AECOM has served solely in the capacity of consultant and has not rendered any expert opinion in connection with the subject matter hereof. Any changes made to the study, or any use of the study not specifically identified in the agreement between the Client and AECOM or otherwise expressly approved in writing by AECOM, shall be at the sole risk of the party making such changes or adopting such use. This document was prepared solely for the use by the Client. No party may rely on this report except the Client or a party so authorized by AECOM in writing (including, without limitation, in the form of a reliance letter). Any party who is entitled to rely on this document may do so only on the document in its entirety and not on any excerpt or summary. Entitlement to rely upon this document is conditioned upon the entitled party accepting full responsibility and not holding AECOM liable in any way for any impacts on the forecasts or the earnings from this project resulting from changes in “external” factors such as changes in government policy, in the pricing of commodities and materials, price levels generally, competitive alternatives to the project. The behavior of consumers or competitors and changes on the owners’ policies affecting the operation on their projects This document may include “forward – looking statements”. These statements relate to AECOM’s expectations, beliefs, intentions or strategies regarding the future. These statements may be identified by the use of words like “anticipate,” “believe”, “estimate”, expect”, “intend”, “may”, “plan”, “project”, “will”, “should”, “seek” and similar expressions. The forward – looking statements reflect AECOM’s views and assumptions with respect to future events as of the date of this study and are subject to future economic conditions, and other risks and uncertainties. Actual and future results and trends could be differed materially from those set forth in such statements due to various factors, including, without limitation, those discussed in this study. These factors are beyond AECOM’s ability to control or predict. Accordingly, AECOM makes no warranty or representation that any of the projected values or results contained in this study will actually be achieved. This Study is qualified in its entirety by, and should be considered in light of, these limitations, conditions and considerations.

Page 4: Baseline Analysis Report - p3tb.pu.go.id

4

Prepared for:

Badan Pengembangan Infrastruktur Wilayah

Kementerian Pekerjaan Umum dan Perumahan Rakyat

Prepared by:

PT. AECOM Indonesia

South Quarter Building Tower C 5th Floor

Jl. R.A. Kartini Kav.8 Jakarta Selatan

Jakarta - Indonesia

aecom.com

© 2019 PT AECOM Indonesia. All Rights Reserved.

This document has been prepared by PT AECOM Indonesia (“AECOM”) for sole use of our client

(the “Client”) in accordance with generally accepted consultancy principles, the budget for fees

and the terms of reference agreed between AECOM and the Client. Any information provided by

third parties and referred to herein has not been checked or verified by AECOM, unless

otherwise expressly stated in the document. No third party may rely upon this document without

the prior and express written agreement of AECOM.

Page 5: Baseline Analysis Report - p3tb.pu.go.id

5

Table of Contents

Quality Information ..................................................................................................... 2

Disclaimer .................................................................................................................. 3

Table of Contents ....................................................................................................... 5

Table of Figures ......................................................................................................... 6

Table of Tables .......................................................................................................... 7

1. Overview .............................................................................................................. 8

1.1. General Project Information .......................................................................................... 9

1.2. Introductions ................................................................................................................. 12

2. Assessment of the site ....................................................................................... 13

2.1. Working procedures ..................................................................................................... 13

2.2. Research results ........................................................................................................... 14

2.3. Cultural historic and archaeological data identification .......................................... 15

2.4. Risk assessment ........................................................................................................... 16

2.5. Cultural Evaluation of Rinjani-Lombok Geopark ...................................................... 16

2.6. Artefacts ........................................................................................................................ 17

2.7. Quality of archaeological information ........................................................................ 17

2.8. Significance of information ......................................................................................... 17

2.9. Safeguarding ................................................................................................................. 18

Page 6: Baseline Analysis Report - p3tb.pu.go.id

6

Table of Figures

Figure 1 Boundary of Rinjani – Lombok Geopark Area ................................................................. 10

Page 7: Baseline Analysis Report - p3tb.pu.go.id

7

Table of Tables

No table of figures entries found.

Page 8: Baseline Analysis Report - p3tb.pu.go.id

8

1. Overview

The formulation of Management Plan for Rinjani-Lombok Geopark is based on the Application

Dossier for Membership to UNESCO Global Geopark document that was prepared on January

2016. This Draft Management Plan is formulated referring to the UNESCO Site Management

Plan formulation1. Based on the guideline, a site management plan should contain:

• The Definition of The Site,

• The Administrative Details,

• The Relevant Organizational Structure of Who Is Responsible for What, and Most

Importantly,

• A Discussion of The Site, Including:

- An Assessment of Its Significance,

- A Report on Its Status,

- Its Potential And

- Any Relevant Threats And

- Opportunities.

The elements of a site management plan:

1. Executive summary

2. Site definition

• Description and significance

• Delimitation

• Ownership structure and responsible bodies

• Inventories

• Access

3. Management structure

• Legal status of the bodies

• Competencies and responsibilities

• Coordination mechanism between bodies

4. Principles for planning and actions

• Objectives, targets, strategies

• Masterplan of action

5. Provisions for science and research preservation mechanism

• Status report

• Current and possible threats

• Preventive protection

• Monitoring: planned control action

6. Awareness

7. Resources

1 The UNESCO site management plan http://www.unesco.org/new/en/culture/themes/underwater-cultural-heritage/unesco-manual-for-activities-directed-at-underwater-cultural-heritage/unesco-manual/conservation-management/site-management-plan/

Page 9: Baseline Analysis Report - p3tb.pu.go.id

9

• Staff

• Budget

8. Sustainable use and vision for the future

This draft management plan can be used as the starting point of the discussion and formulation

of the Management Plan that need to be discussed with UNESCO and the Authority of Global

Geopark Rinjani under NTB Province Government.

1.1. General Project Information

1. Site Name, Registration Number

The official site name is Rinjani-Lombok Geopark and Mount Rinjani is the central point for the

geopark. Mount Rinjani is one of the highest volcano mountains in Indonesia. The area of Rinjani

Mountain includes more than half of Lombok Island. There is currently no official registration

number for the site.

2. Site location and Coordinates

Rinjani-Lombok Geopark is located at coordinate longitude 116o 0’ 29” - 116o 45’ 58” in the east

and latitude 8o 12’ 10” – 8o 38’ 20” in the south. This site is including more than half of Lombok

Island, but UNESCO and other stakeholders consider expanding the geopark area into the whole

Lombok Island. Rinjani-Lombok Geopark area encompasses five kabupaten/kota which are

Kabupaten Lombok Utara (North Lombok), Kabupaten Lombok Timur (East Lombok), Kabupaten

Lombok Tengah (Central Lombok), Kabupaten Lombok Barat (West Lombok), and Kota

Mataram. Lombok Island is one of the main islands besides Sumbawa Island in Nusa Tenggara

Barat Province, Indonesia.

Page 10: Baseline Analysis Report - p3tb.pu.go.id

10

Figure 1 Boundary of Rinjani – Lombok Geopark Area

3. Geology

The geology of Lombok Island is generally dominated by cal-alkaline voncano from Quarternary

time and covered the Neogene clastic sedimentary rocks, Oligo-Miosen volcanic and Tertiary-

aged breakthrough. There are 2 mountain cones before 13th century, Samalas and Rinjani and

Samalas eruption in 1257 resulted in the formation of huge caldera. The eruption also caused

part of Rinjani's cone collapsed to the caldera of Samalas.

Page 11: Baseline Analysis Report - p3tb.pu.go.id

11

4. Climate

Lombok Island has tropical climate with wet and dry seasons.

5. Flora and fauna

Lombok Island has epidemic flora and fauna transition between Asian and Australian fauna and

flora including epidemic orchid, bald durian, Javan Rusa, Cucak Timor, corals, langur and

monkeys.

6. Human impact

Around Mount Rinjani area, there are many activities such as tourism especially mountain

trekking and landscape view, agriculture, farm, and other activities. Because the eruption of

Mount Rinjani, this area is very fertile for agriculture and it supported by water supply from the

mountain. in this area can also be found many cultural villages and historical heritages. Because

of its attractions, Mount Rinjani become one of main tourism destination in Lombok Island,

7. Size of research area

Rinjani-Lombok Geopark has an area of 2,800 Km2. Lombok Island itself has an area of 4,514

Km2.

8. Height

Mount Rinjani become the second highest volcano mountain in Indonesia with the height of

3,726 meters above sea level.

9. Owner of terrain

Indonesia Government

10. Periods of research

The research for Rinjani geopark submission has been made since 2012 when Rinjani proposed

to be a national geopark and has been made some research and dossier. On 7 October 2013

Rinjani Geopark became National Geopark. In 2014, Geopark Facilitation Team has been

formed to compile dossier for UNESCO Global Geopark. In 2017, Rinjani-Lombok Geopark

became UNESCO Global Geopark.

11. Site definition

Mount Rinjani, 3,726 meters high above sea level, dominates the island’s topography. Rinjani

Eruption in 1257 became one of the largest eruptions in modern time. Mount Rinjani has highest

caldera in Indonesia and has many waterfalls impacts from geological activity in Mount Rinjani.

Because of its ecosystem and natural habitat, there are many epidemic flora and fauna, and also

become cultural activities center in Lombok Island because its heritage and traditional sites.

12. Legal status

The Mount Rinjani area is Designated as a conservation area by a Decree of the Ministry of

Forestry Number 280/Kpts-VI/1997 dated May 23, 1997, this conservation area has an area of

41,330 Hectares. It also supported by Presidential Decree No. 9 of 2019 about Geopark

Development. In 2014 and 2017, Mount Rinjani received national and UNESCO Global Geopark

certificate for geopark determination but the legal basis for geopark has not yet too been set.

13. Recognized threats

Page 12: Baseline Analysis Report - p3tb.pu.go.id

12

The main threats to Mount Rinjani area is because of increasing tourism activities. The

conditions of development and management for tourism activities is very limited and cause many

issues and problems such as waste, environmental damage, and endangered flora-fauna.

Development of Rinjani area become other threats because it impacts the carrying capacity and

environmental sustainability

1.2. Introductions

1. Historical context

The old volcano complex is consisted of two complexes which are Punikan Mountain and Nangi

Mountain on the west and Sembalun mountain on the east. Punikan Mountain is estimated to be

among Neogene–Pleistocene age, while Sembalun complex aged 0,45 million years. The

youngest volcanic complex is Rinjani Volcano with its volcanic cone to be formed approximately

12.000–6.000 years ago. There are 2 mountain cones, Samalas and Rinjani and Samalas

eruption in 1257 resulted in the formation of huge caldera. The eruption also caused part of

Rinjani's cone collapsed to the caldera of Samalas. Samalas' caldera, which is filled with water, a

combination of meteoric water and hydrothermal, formed a warm water pond named Segara

Anak. In the middle of the caldera emerges a young volcanic cone called Rombongan Mountain

and Barujari Mountain.

Page 13: Baseline Analysis Report - p3tb.pu.go.id

13

2. Assessment of the site

1. Description of research assignment

The main objectives in carrying out research is to assess the site’s significance for the

management plan.

2. Research objectives

this research has some objectives:

• Completing the requirement of Rinjani-Lombok Geopark application as UNESCO Global

geopark

• Identification the issues and problems of development and management in Rinjani-

Lombok Geopark so that Rinjani-Lombok Geopark can be developed efficiently and

effectively

• Integration all the Rinjani-Lombok Geopark’s potential to support increased welfare of

community and region and it can develop well.

3. Aims and wishes of the sponsor

Using only non-intrusive methods to:

• Assess the significance of the site

• Investigate the site formation process

• Determine the function of the ship

• Collect information and record for future studies in the protection of underwater cultural

heritage

4. Evaluation in between

There would be periodic monitoring of the area to this activity

2.1. Working procedures

1. Research methods

Non-intrusive survey at the Rinjani-Lombok Geopark using direct observation:

• Measurements

• Geological survey

• Mapping

• Photo and video documentations

• Interviews

• Observation and identification of activities

Survey method is using direct observation where several maps was produced.

As the central point of Rinjani-Lombok's Geopark, Mount Rinjani has a lot of influence in the geo-

heritage formation on Lombok Island. In the process of forming Mount Rinjani, there are also

many unique relics and geological structures that are characteristic. Samalas eruption became

one of the biggest eruptions in the modern era. As a result, the geological structure of Lombok

Island originates from Mount Rinjani. Quaternary-Recent volcano in the northern part of the

Page 14: Baseline Analysis Report - p3tb.pu.go.id

14

island, lowland in the middle, stretches west-to-east and is also sedimentary basin, and

undulating lands from Tertiary rocks formation in the south.

Based on survey dan research, The old volcano complex is consisted of two complexes which

are Punikan Mountain and Nangi Mountain on the west and Sembalun mountain on the east.

Punikan Mountain is estimated to be among Neogene–Pleistocene age, while Sembalun

complex aged 0,45 million years (Pleistocene-Holocene) with the remaining caldera composed of

andesite lava and pyroclastic.

Surveys and research are carried out with direct observation and also based on the results of

studies, history, and interviews with various parties. The basis of the profile of Rinjani-Lombok

Geopark is based on satellite imagery and also mapping the face of the earth.

From the basic maps that have been made, an explanation of the potential, conditions, and

analysis of Geopark Rinjani-Lombok is carried out such as mapping geological structures,

mapping of heritage sites and geology sites, mapping the potential of geology tourism

destinations, and other mapping.

2. Imposed work conditions

Each surveyor conducts surveys directly by taking certain rock and soil samples. After that, the

age, type, characteristics and other information will be examined. The survey was conducted at

each potential point that was spread evenly on Lombok Island, especially at points that were

considered to have their own geological characteristics.

3. Modus operandi

Only non-intrusive methods were used. Only objects that are seen are surveyed. In addition,

sampling and photographs were carried out to support the research results.

4. Natural science, applied sciences, and other research

Geological survey, biological survey, cultural survey, biodiversity survey, and environment

assessment.

2.2. Research results

1. Environmental research

The research was not comprehensive, but the observations were carried out in sufficient detail

and included several other aspects related to the Rinjani-Lombok Geopark. There were no

significant changes to the survey results. However, with the earthquake at the end of 2018, no

re-surveys have been conducted that have allowed changes in the geology structure which has a

bearing on the assessment of the Rinjani-Lombok Geopark

The threat of geological change also occurs if tourism activities take place on irresponsible

geology sites, resulting in damage and impacts on geological structures. Moreover, the waste

problems also affect the geological structure of Rinjani-Lombok Geopark.

2. Physical condition

The results of the earthquake made Mount Rinjani temporarily closed due to landslides and

potential liquefaction. There are also some new faults and cracks in the cliffs between the walls

of the lake. However, the overall shape and structure of Mount Rinjani is still preserved.

3. Finds visible on ground level

Page 15: Baseline Analysis Report - p3tb.pu.go.id

15

Mount Rinjani especially at its peak will be seen from any location on the island of Lombok as

long as it has sunny weather. In contrast to its hilly area which tends to have dense forests, peak

of Mount Rinjani will have a distinctive rock structure.

4. Completeness

Due to the development that still adopts the principle of sustainability as well as the impact of

human activities that are not yet massive, the Rinjani-Lombok Geopark tends to be more secure

even though many threats are risk for the Rinjani-Lombok Geopark

5. Stratigraphy intact

Rinjani Mountain is stratigraphically standing on Neogene clastic rock sediment (including

limestone) and in the same location of volcanic rock from Oligo-Miocene. The Quaternary

volcano itself mostly produces pyroclastic and is some places mixed with lava.

6. Stability of natural environment

Although the natural environment tends to change - but it does not have much impact on the

Rinjani-Lombok Geopark because Mount Rinjani and the surrounding area serve as

environmental conservation areas on the island of Lombok.

7. State of preservation

The condition of Rinjani-Lombok Geopark is still in good condition even though there are impacts

from tourism activities, earthquake disasters and other potential disasters. Waste management is

one of the issues that must be managed because it is the most threatening thing from the

Rinjani-Lombok Geopark.

2.3. Cultural historic and archaeological data

identification

1. Cultural context

Samalas eruption in 1257 resulted in the formation of huge caldera and became Mount Rinjani

with Segara Anak lake.

2. Century

in 13th century

3. Exact dating

Mount Samalas eruption in 1257. Mount Rinjani (another mountain cones/peak) became the

highest peak in Lombok Island.

4. Type

Two complexes of mountains and Mount Rinjani is one of active volcano in Indonesia

5. Size

Rinjani-Lombok Geopark has area of 2,800 Km2

6. Material

Generally dominated by cal-alkaline volcano from Quarternary time and covered the Neogen

clastic sedimentary rocks, Oligo-Miosen volcanic and Tertiary-aged breakthrough

Page 16: Baseline Analysis Report - p3tb.pu.go.id

16

7. Building tradition

Traditional culture and heritage sites

2.4. Risk assessment

1. Natural impact

Forest fire, earthquake, landslide, liquefaction, and extinct of flora and fauna.

2. Human impact

Waste, human activities, urban development, and environmental destruction.

2.5. Cultural Evaluation of Rinjani-Lombok Geopark

A. Visible

1. Visible as a landscape element

Mount Rinjani offers many beautiful landscapes. Not only mountain landscape, but other

activities around Mount Rinjani become the potential of Rinjani Geopark. besides that, the Rinjani

geopark is also considered to be one of the most beautiful mountaintops. Not only mountain

tourism, in the Rinjani-Lombok Geopark area there are also several heritage sites, submarine

potential, and other geological tours. This means that in the Rinjani-Lombok Geopark area there

are many geological potentials and attractions that cannot be found in other locations. This is the

advantage of Rinjani-Lombok Geopark compared to other geopark in the world.

2. Visible as exposition element

Mount Rinjani is one proof of the enormity of volcanic eruptions that have occurred in Indonesia.

This is also supported by many heritage sites and traditions native of Lombok native. This means

that with good story telling, the Rinjani-Lombok Geopark is not only an attractive attraction but

also has the potential to become for educational activities

3. Memory value

Mount Rinjani is a culture center on Lombok island. Many histories and traditions originated and

developed in the Mount Rinjani area.

4. Historic value

Mount Rinjani is one proof that the development of the indigenous people of Lombok Island

began. An example is the development of the Islamic religion on the island of Lombok which is

characterized by the existence of cultural heritage that still exists today

5. Physical quality

Nature preservation in Gunung Rinjani is still in good category even though there are many

threats and it is needed to reduce the risk of damage.

B. Structural integrity

1. Presence of the mountain

Lombok island is formed Quaternary time with The Pleistocene-Holocene volcanic complex

emerged in Lombok Island due to the subducting process of Australia Continental plate under

Page 17: Baseline Analysis Report - p3tb.pu.go.id

17

Eurasia plate. The Quaternary volcano could further be categorized into old and young

volcanoes complex.

2. Stratigraphical conditions

Rinjani Mountain is stratigraphically standing on Neogene clastic rock sediment (including

limestone) and in the same location of volcanic rock from Oligo-Miocene. The Quaternary

volcano itself mostly produces pyroclastic and is some places mixed with lava.

3. Stability of the natural environment

Although the natural environment tends to change, but it does not have much impact on the

Rinjani-Lombok Geopark because Mount Rinjani and the surrounding area serve as

environmental conservation areas on the island of Lombok.

2.6. Artefacts

1. Organic material

Many other geological and biological attractions are found in the area of Mount Rinjani or in the

whole area of Lombok Island.

2. An-organic

Many historical heritage and heritage sites in the Rinjani-Lombok Geopark area.

2.7. Quality of archaeological information

1. Representative value

Mount Rinjani offers geological wealth not only in the form of geological structures but also in

tourism and it all can be found in the same area.

2. Chronological

Has its own uniqueness even at the world level, especially with the presence of lakes on the

caldera on the mountain.

3. Regional

Even though in Indonesia and Southeast Asia there are many mountains, but information and

natural resources are not like on Mount Rinjani and Lombok Island.

2.8. Significance of information

1. Geographical significance

Mount Rinjani provides a lot of information about the history of the formation of the island of

Lombok and the first population on the island of Lombok. Mount Rinjani also provides important

information regarding the many geological tourism potentials on the island of Lombok.

2. Historical or archaeological significance

Mount Rinjani is the gateway to the spread of Islam on Lombok Island. This is marked by the

establishment of the ancient Bayan Beleq Mosque which is the most popular mosque on the

Page 18: Baseline Analysis Report - p3tb.pu.go.id

18

Lombok Island and became a heritage site. There are many heritage sites and traditions that

have developed in the Gunung Rinjani area.

3. Conclusion

The results of the survey and mapping, that the influence of the Rinjani-Lombok Geopark not

only affects the surrounding Mount Rinjani, but also strongly related to the overall geological

development of the island of Lombok. Therefore, Mount Rinjani also not only affects the overall

geology of the island of Lombok but also affects the traditions and culture, activities, and heritage

inheritance on the island of Lombok.

2.9. Safeguarding

1. Legal

The Mount Rinjani area is Designated as a conservation area by a Decree of the Ministry of

Forestry Number 280/Kpts-VI/1997 dated May 23, 1997, this conservation area has an area of

41,330 hectares. It also supported by Presidential Decree no 9 of 2019 about Geopark

Development. In 2014 and 2017, Mount Rinjani has receive national and UNESCO global

geopark certificate for geopark determination but the legal basis for geopark has not yet to been

set.

2. Physical

Nature preservation in Gunung Rinjani is still in good category even though there are many

threats and it is needed to reduce the risk of damage.

3. Monitoring

A follow-up survey on the addition of the Rinjani-Lombok Geopark area is being carried out in

2018-2019 based on a study conducted in 2014. With the establishment of the Rinjani-Lombok

Geopark management agency, the monitoring process can be scheduled in the future.

4. Visualizing

• Dossier for Rinjani-Lombok Geopark was produced but it will be added with new

delineation

• Site plan was produced

• Masterplan for Rinjani-Lombok Geopark was produced it will be added with new

delineation

• Presentation of the project’s results was given to UNESCO

• Digital photo and video records of the site were taken for UNESCO website and other

promotional materials.