This article appeared in a journal published by Elsevier. The attached copy is furnished to the author for internal non-commercial research and education use, including for instruction at the authors institution and sharing with colleagues. Other uses, including reproduction and distribution, or selling or licensing copies, or posting to personal, institutional or third party websites are prohibited. In most cases authors are permitted to post their version of the article (e.g. in Word or Tex form) to their personal website or institutional repository. Authors requiring further information regarding Elsevier’s archiving and manuscript policies are encouraged to visit: http://www.elsevier.com/copyright
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
This article appeared in a journal published by Elsevier. The attachedcopy is furnished to the author for internal non-commercial researchand education use, including for instruction at the authors institution
and sharing with colleagues.
Other uses, including reproduction and distribution, or selling orlicensing copies, or posting to personal, institutional or third party
websites are prohibited.
In most cases authors are permitted to post their version of thearticle (e.g. in Word or Tex form) to their personal website orinstitutional repository. Authors requiring further information
regarding Elsevier’s archiving and manuscript policies areencouraged to visit:
Self-bioremediation of cork-processing wastewaters by(chloro)phenol-degrading bacteria immobilised onto residualcork particles
I. del Castillo, P. Hernandez, A. Lafuente, I.D. Rodrıguez-Llorente, M.A. Caviedes,E. Pajuelo*
Departamento de Microbiologıa y Parasitologıa, Facultad de Farmacia, Universidad de Sevilla, c/Profesor Garcıa Gonzalez, 2,
41012 Sevilla, Spain
a r t i c l e i n f o
Article history:
Received 15 September 2011
Received in revised form
16 December 2011
Accepted 18 December 2011
Available online 30 December 2011
Keywords:
Phenol
Chlorophenols
Bacteria
Biofilms
Cork-processing wastewater
Bioremediation
a b s t r a c t
Cork manufacturing is a traditional industry in Southern Europe, being the main applica-
tion of this natural product in wine stoppers and insulation. Cork processing begins at
boiling the raw material. As a consequence, great volumes of dark wastewaters, with
elevated concentrations of chlorophenols, are generated, which must be depurated
through costly physicochemical procedures before discarding them into public water
courses. This work explores the potential of bacteria, isolated from cork-boiling waters
storage ponds, in bioremediation of the same effluent. The bacterial population present in
cork-processing wastewaters was analysed by DGGE; low bacterial biodiversity was found.
Aerobic bacteria were isolated and investigated for their tolerance against phenol and two
chlorophenols. The most tolerant strains were identified by sequencing 16S rDNA. The
phenol-degrading capacity was investigated by determining enzyme activities of the
phenol-degrading pathway. Moreover, the capacity to form biofilms was analysed in
a microtitre plate assay. Finally, the capacity to form biofilms onto the surface of residual
small cork particles was evaluated by acridine staining followed by epifluorescence
microscopy and by SEM. A low-cost bioremediation system, using phenol-degrading
bacteria immobilised onto residual cork particles (a by-product of the industry) is
proposed for the remediation of this industrial effluent (self-bioremediation).
ª 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Abbreviations: BLAST, Basic Local Alignment Search Tool; BOD, biological oxygen demand; BOX-PCR, PCR based on primers targetingthe highly conserved repetitive DNA sequences of BOX elements; CFU, colony forming unit; COD, chemical oxygen demand; DGGE,denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis; DTT, dithiothreitol; EPA, Environmental Protection Agency (US); MTC, maximum toleratedconcentration; NADH, nicotinamide-adenine-dinucletotide (reduced form); OD, optical density; PMSF, phenyl-methyl-sulfonyl fluoride;SEM, scanning electron microscopy; SP, storage pond (residual water of the storage pond); SPE, storage pond e “enriched” (residual waterof the storage pond after enrichment with 10% TSB); TAE, Tris-acetate-EDTA buffer for electrophoresis; TP, treatment pool (residualwater of the treatment pool); TPE, treatment pool e “enriched” (residual water of the treatment pool after enrichment with 10% TSB);TRITC, fluorescence filter for the detection of the fluorochrome tetramethylrhodamine isothiocyanate; TSA, trypticase-soya agar; TSB,trypticase-soya broth.* Corresponding author. Tel.: þ34 954556924; fax: þ34 954628162.E-mail address: [email protected] (E. Pajuelo).
Available online at www.sciencedirect.com
journal homepage: www.elsevier .com/locate/watres
wat e r r e s e a r c h 4 6 ( 2 0 1 2 ) 1 7 2 3e1 7 3 4
0043-1354/$ e see front matter ª 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.doi:10.1016/j.watres.2011.12.038
Author's personal copy
1. Introduction
Industrialisation is the main source of huge amounts of toxic
compounds being released to the biosphere, threatening
public health, wild life, and the environment. The list of toxic
compounds or elements published by US-EPA (Environmental
Protection Agency, www.epa.gov/oppt/p2home/) includes
over 6000 substances. Among them, phenolic compounds and
therein haloaromatic compounds (such as chlorophenols and
pentachlorophenol) are some of the most recalcitrant
organics, being degradation more difficult as the degree of
halogenation increases (Janssen et al., 2005; Solyanikova and
Golovleva, 2004).
Main uses of cork are the production of wine stoppers and
the utilisation as insulation material for thermal-, acoustic-
and electrical-insulation. The largest cork production and
manufacturing in the world is concentrated in the Mediter-
ranean basin. Spain is one of the most important cork
producers (22% of the total world production), together with
Portugal (the first one), Italy, Greece, Tunisia and Morocco. In
particular, in Southern Spain, around 40,000 tons cork per year
are produced. First step in cork manufacturing is focused on
cleaning and softening the raw material. For this purpose,
cork is boiled at 95�e100 �C for around 1 h in big treatment
pools. The same water can be used in 15e20 treatments, and
at the end, a dark wastewater resulting from this process is
collected in big storage ponds near the companies for later
depuration. Cork boiling water is characterised by high
chemical oxygen demand (COD), biological oxygen demand
(BOD) and phenol and polyphenols content, in the range of
4.5e5.5 g l�1, 1.1e1.8 g l�1 and 0.6e0.9 g l�1, respectively, and
by an acidic pH around 5 (Benitez et al., 2003; Domınguez et al.,
2007; Pintor et al., 2011). Phenolic fraction contains
compounds such as phenol, tannin fraction together with
gallic, protocatechuic, vanillic, syringic and ellagic acids, 2,4,6-
trichloroanisol and pentachlorophenol, (Benitez et al., 2003,
2006). Some of these compounds are among the most toxic
substances, as considered by EPA.
Chemical depuration treatments are expensive (Mendonca
et al., 2004), so little companies associate in order to share the
costs. Sometimes, wastewaters are stored in big ponds near
the manufacturing companies, and later on, transported to
a central treatment unit for reclamation using physicochem-
ical procedures. Physicochemical treatment of cork-boiling
water includes ozonation (Benitez et al., 2003; Lan et al.,
2008), Fenton oxidation, (Beltran de Heredia et al., 2004;
Guedes et al., 2003), flocculation (Domınguez et al., 2007) and
filtration techniques (Benitez et al., 2006, 2008; Bernardo et al.,
2011) or combinations of these methods, in order to decrease
the chemical oxygen demand (COD) in 75e85%. Any alterna-
tive treatment that can substitute all or part of these steps is of
great interest to the cork industry, since it can significantly
decrease the cost of wastewater treatment, especially if
alternative techniques can be applied in situ.
Bioremediation, i.e., the use of living organisms for envi-
ronmental cleaning, is an ecological and low-cost alternative
to the most traditional physicochemical remediation tech-
niques (Dıaz, 2004; Galvao et al., 2005; Stapleton and Singh,
2002). Major limitations are the bioavailability of organic
matter and finding efficient biodegraders. Many microorgan-
isms being able to degrade phenolic compounds have been
described, both in aerobic (Pseudomonas, Burkholderia, Sphin-
gomonas, Ralstonia, Arthrobacter, Acinetobacter, Alcaligenes) or
When a bioremediation procedure is to be designed, it
would bemore attractive if a supplementary economical value
could be added. This is an important task, since a great
amount of small cork particles are usually on the floor of the
cork industries as a result of the different cork treatments and
trucks transit, which are not used, being in fact a residual
product of the industry. In our case, the self-bioremediation
system proposed has several advantages; the first one is
using native bacteria for wastewater treatment, and the
second one is using cork particles, a residue of the industry, as
the carrier for bacteria immobilisation. Additional studies are
being carried out in order to know the phenolics-degrading
ability of some of these strains in “real” cork-processing
wastewaters. Preliminary results show that degradation of
total polyphenols (expressed as tannic acid or caffeic acid)
reached 60e80%, depending on the strain and the
Table 3 e Enzyme activities of the phenol-degrading pathway in crude extract obtained from bacteria isolated from cork-processing wastewaters. Bacteria were cultivated for 10 days in the presence of 2.5 mM phenol as the sole carbon source.The last column represents the percentage of phenol remaining in the supernatant of the cultures after 26 h incubation inthe presence of phenol (see Fig. 3).
Bacteria Phenol hydroxylase(mU mL�1)
Catechol 1,2-dioxygenase(mU mL�1)
Catechol 2,3-dioxygenase(mU mL�1)
Ratio meta/orthofission
Phenol insupernatant (%)
TP3 2.20 0.40 2.10 5 63
TP4 3.50 0.30 2.00 7 61
TP6 0.07 0.10 5.70 57 53
SP3 0.20 0.05 1.90 38 60
TPE-5A 1.50 0.40 2.50 6 72
SPE-5A 1.80 0.11 4.60 42 49
SPE-9A 4.75 1.43 37.50 26 22
OD
a
t 5
75
nm
Fig. 4 e Evaluation of biofilms formation on a microtitre
plate assay. Bacterial strains were grown in the presence of
minimal medium supplemented with 2.5 mM phenol in
the wells of a 96-well microtitre plate. After 4 days, the
formation of biofilms on the surface of the plate was
evaluated. C: Control without bacteria. Bars represent
standard deviations (n [ 12).
wat e r r e s e a r c h 4 6 ( 2 0 1 2 ) 1 7 2 3e1 7 3 4 1731
Author's personal copy
Fig. 6 e Evaluation of biofilms formation on the surface of cork particles by SEM. A. Structure of a cork particle. B. Control
without bacteria. C. Colonisation of cork surface by strain SPE-9A. D. Colonisation of cork surface by strain TPE-5A.
Fig. 5 e Evaluation of biofilms formation on the surface of cork particles. Cork particles were incubated in the presence of
bacteria in minimal medium supplemented with 2.5 mM phenol. After washing, bacterial attachment was observed by
staining with acridine orange A. Control; cork particle incubated inmediumwithout bacteria, showing the background level
of autofluorescence, B. Cork particle incubated in the presence of bacterial strain SPE-5A, C, D. Close-up of bacterial
attachment to the surface of cork particles; C (TP6) and D (TP4).
wat e r r e s e a r c h 4 6 ( 2 0 1 2 ) 1 7 2 3e1 7 3 41732
Author's personal copy
experimental conditions. Different parameters for improving
Amuda, O.S., Ibrahim, A.O., 2006. Industrial wastewatertreatment using natural material as adsorbent. AfricanJournal of Biotechnology 5 (16), 1483e1487.
Basile, L.A., Erijman, L., 2010. Maintenance of phenol hydroxylasegenotypes at high diversity in bioreactors exposed to stepincreases in phenol loading. FEMS Microbiology Ecology 73,336e348.
Beltran de Heredia, J., Dominguez, J.R., Lopez, R., 2004. Treatmentof cork process by a successive chemical-physical method.Journal of Agriculture and Food Chemistry 52, 4501e4507.
Benitez, F.J., Acero, J.L., Garcia, J., Leal, A.I., 2003. Purification ofcork processing wastewaters by ozone, by activated sludge,and by their two sequential applications. Water Research 37,4081e4090.
Benitez, F.J., Acero, J.L., Leal, A.I., 2006. Application ofmicrofiltrationand ultrafiltration processes to cork processingwastewaters and assessment of the membrane fouling.Separation and Purification Technology 50, 354e364.
Benitez, F.J., Leal, A.I., Real, F.J., Acero, J.L., Roldan, G., 2008.Elimination of organic matter present in wastewaters fromthe cork industry by membrane filtration. Journal of ChemicalTechnology and Biotechnology 83, 309e316.
Bernardo, M., Santos, A., Cantinho, P., Minhalma, M., 2011. Corkindustry wastewater partition by ultra/nanofiltration:
a biodegradation and valorisation study. Water Research 45,904e912.
Bunge, M., Adrian, L., Kraus, A., Opel, M., Lorenz, W.G.,Andreesen, J.R., Gorisch, H., Lechner, U., 2003. Reductivedehalogenation of chlorinated dioxins by an anaerobicbacterium. Nature 421, 357e360.
Cabrera, F., Lopez, R., Martinez-Bordiu, A., Dupuy de Lome, E.,Murillo, J.M., 1996. Land treatment of olive oil mill wastewater.International Biodeterioration and Biodegradation 38,215e225.
Cai, M., Xun, L., 2005. Organization and regulation ofpentachlorophenol-degrading genes in Sphingobiumchlorophenolicum ATCC 39723. Journal of Bacteriology 184 (17),4672e4680.
Carvalho, M.F., Vasconcelos, I., Bull, A.T., Castro, P.M.L., 2001.A GAC biofilm reactor for the continuous degradation of4-chlorophenol: treatment efficiency and microbialanalysis. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 57,419e426.
Chang, C.C., Tseng, S.K., Chang, C.C., Ho, C.M., 2003. Reductivedechlorination of 2- chlorophenol in a hydrogenotrophic, gas-permeable, silicone membrane bioreactor. BioresourceTechnology 90, 323e328.
Dias-Machado, M., Madeira, L.M., Nogales, B., Nunes, O.C.,Manaia, C.M., 2006. Treatment of cork boiling wastewaterusing chemical oxidation and biodegradation. Chemosphere64, 455e461.
Dıaz, E., 2004. Bacterial degradation of aromatic pollutants:a paradigm of metabolic versatility. InternationalMicrobiology 7, 173e180.
Domınguez, J.R., Gonzalez, T., Garcıa, H.M., Sanchez-Lavado, F.,Beltran De Heredia, J., 2007. Aluminium sulphate as coagulantfor highly polluted cork processing wastewaters: removal oforganic matter. Journal of Hazardous Materials 148, 15e21.
Eker, S., Kargi, F., 2008. COD, 2,4,6-trichlorophenol (TCP) andtoxicity removal from synthetic wastewater in rotatingperforated-tubes biofilm reactor. Journal of HazardousMaterials 159 (2e3), 306e312.
El Fantroussi, S., Agathos, S.N., 2005. Is bioaugmentationa feasible strategy for pollutant removal and site remediation?Current Opinion in Microbiology 8 (3), 268e275.
Favre-Bonte, S., Chamot, E., Kohler, T., Romand, J.A., vanDelden, C., 2007. Autoinducer production and quorum-sensingdependent phenotypes of Pseudomonas aeruginosa varyaccording to isolation site during colonization of intubatedpatients. BMC Microbiology 7 (33), 1471e2180.
Foght, J., Gutnick, D., Westlake, D., 1989. Effect of emulsan onbiodegradation of crude oil by pure and mixed bacterialcultures. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 55, 36e42.
Fromin, N., Hamelin, J., Tarnawski, S., Roesti, D., Jourdain-Miserez, K., Forestier, N., Teyssier-Cuvelle, S., Gillet, F.,Aragno, M., Rossi, P., 2002. Statistical analysis of denaturinggel electrophoresis (DGE) fingerprinting patterns.Environmental Microbiology 4 (11), 634e643.
Furukawa, K., 2003. ‘Super bugs’ for bioremediation. Trends inBiotechnology 21 (5), 187e190.
Furukawa, K., 2006. Oxygenases and dehalogenases: molecular621 approaches to efficient degradation of chlorinatedenvironmental pollutants. Bioscience. Biotechnology andBiochemistry 70 (10), 2335e2348.
Galvao, T.C., Mohn, W.W., de Lorenzo, V., 2005. Exploring themicrobial biodegradation and biotransformation gene pool.Trends in Biotechnology 23, 497e506.
Gil, L., 1996. Cortica: Producao Tecnologia e Aplicacao. InstitutoNacional de Engenharia, Tecnologia e Inovacao, Lisbon.
wat e r r e s e a r c h 4 6 ( 2 0 1 2 ) 1 7 2 3e1 7 3 4 1733
Author's personal copy
Guedes, A.M.F.M., Madeira, L.M.P., Boaventura, R.A.R.,Costa, C.A.V., 2003. Fenton oxidation of cork cookingwastewater: overall kinetic analysis. Water Research 37 (13),3061e3069.
Hanafi, F., Belaoufia, A., Mountadarb, M., Assobheia, O., 2011.Augmentation of biodegradability of olive mill wastewater byelectrochemical pre-treatment: effect on phytotoxicity andoperating cost. Journal of Hazardous Materials 190, 94e99.
Heuer, H., Krsek, M., Baker, P., Smalla, K., Wellington, E.M.H.,1997. Analysis of Actinomycetes communities by specificamplification of genes encoding 16S rRNA and Gel-Electrophoretic separation in denaturing gradients. Appliedand Environmental Microbiology 63 (8), 3233e3241.
Lan, B.Y., Nigmatullin, R., Puma, G.L., 2008. Ozonation kinetics ofcork-processing water in a bubble column reactor. WaterResearch 42, 2473e2482.
Maggurran, A.E., 1988. Ecological Diversity and Its Measurement.Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.
Mendonca, E., Pereira, P., Martins, A., Anselmo, A.M., 2004. Fungalbiodegradation and detoxification of cork boiling wastewaters.Engineering In Life Sciences 4 (2), 144e149.
Muyzer, G., de Waal, E.C., Uitterlinden, A.G., 1983. Profiling ofcomplex microbial populations by denaturing gradient gelelectrophoresis analysis of polymerase chain reactionamplified genes coding for 16S rRNA. Applied andEnvironmental Microbiology 59, 695e700.
Parvanov, D., Topalova, Y., 2008. Biodegradation potential ofphenol-resistant bacteria localized in different streamhabitats. Biotechnology & Biotechnology Equipment 22,709e715.
Pintor, A.M.A., Vilar, V.J.P., Boaventura, R.A.R., 2011.Decontamination of cork wastewaters by solar-photo-Fentonprocess using cork bleaching wastewater as H2O2 source.Solar Energy 85, 579e587.
Rahman, R.A., Zahrim, A.Y., Abu Bakar, A., 2007. Chloro-organicsin papermill effluent: identification and removal bysequencing batch biofilm reactor. Journal of Applied Sciences7, 2160e2163.
Rivas, R., Velazquez, E., Willems, A., Vizcaıno, N., Subba-Rao, N.S.,Mateos, P.F., Gillis, M., Martınez-Molina, E., 2002. A newspecies of Devosia that forms a unique nitrogen-fixing root-nodule symbiosis with the aquatic legume Neptunia natans(L.f.) Druce. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 68 (11),5217e5222.
Sandhu, A., Halberson, L.J., Beattie, G.A., 2009. Identification andgenetic characterization of phenol-degrading bacteria fromleaf microbial communities. Microbial Ecology 57, 276e285.
Shieh, W.K., Puhakka, J.A., Melin, E., Tuhkanen, T., 1990.Immobilized-Cell degradation of chlorophenols. Journal ofEnvironmental Engineering 116 (4), 683e687.
Smidt, H., De Vos, W.M., 2004. Anaerobic microbialdehalogenation. Annual Review of Microbiology 58, 43e73.
Solyanikova, I.P., Golovleva, L.A., 2004. Bacterial Degradation ofchlorophenols: pathways, biochemical, and genetic aspects.Journal of Environmental Science and Health B39 (3), 333e351.
Stapleton, R.D., Singh, V.P., 2002. Biotransformations:Bioremediation Technology for Health and EnvironmentalProtection. Elsevier Science, ISBN 978-0444509970.
Tavares, C., Michelon, M., Fernandes de Medeiros, J., Juliano, S.,Veiga, C.A., 2010. Biodegradation of phenol by free andencapsulated cells of a new Aspergillus sp. isolated froma contaminated site in southern Brazil. African Journal ofBiotechnology 9 (40), 6716e6720.
Trevors, J.T., Kevan, P.G., Tam, L., 2010. Microbial diversity acrossa Canadian sub-Arctic, isostatically rebounding, soil transect.Polar Science 4, 81e91.
Van der Meer, J.R., 2008. A genomic view on the evolution ofcatabolic pathways and bacterial adaptation to xenobioticcompounds. In: Dıaz, E. (Ed.), Microbial Biodegradation:Genomics and Molecular Biology, ISBN 978-1-904455-17-2,pp. 219e267.
Vincent, J.M., 1970. A Manual for the Practical Study of Root-nodule Bacteria. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford, UK.
Watanabe, K., Teramoto, M., Futamata, H., Harayama, S., 1998.Molecular detection, isolation, and physiologicalcharacterization of functionally dominant phenol-degradingbacteria in activated sludge. Applied and EnvironmentalMicrobiology 64 (11), 4396e4402.
Weisburg, D.A., Barns, S.M., Land, D.A., Pelletier, D.J., 1991. 16Sribosomal DNA amplification for phylogenetic study. Journalof Bacteriology 173, 697e703.
Wobus, A., Ulrich, S., Roske, I., 1995. Degradation ofchlorophenols by biofilms on semipermeable membranes intwo types of fixed bed reactors. Water Science and Technology32 (8), 205e212.
Zaki, S., 2006. Detection of meta- and ortho-cleavagedioxygenases in bacterial phenol degraders. Journal of AppliedSciences and Environmental Management 10 (3), 75e81.
wat e r r e s e a r c h 4 6 ( 2 0 1 2 ) 1 7 2 3e1 7 3 41734