Top Banner
Location and Evaluation of Maximum Dynamic Effects on a Simply Supported Beam due to a Quarter-Car Model Authors: Daniel Cantero & Dr. Arturo González (University College Dublin)
17

Authors: Daniel Cantero & Dr. Arturo González (University College Dublin)

Jan 11, 2016

Download

Documents

tamma

Location and Evaluation of Maximum Dynamic Effects on a Simply Supported Beam due to a Quarter-Car Model. Authors: Daniel Cantero & Dr. Arturo González (University College Dublin). 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Overview. 1) Introduction. 2) P-load. 3) Speed Influence. 4) Monte Carlo. 5) Conclusions. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Authors: Daniel Cantero & Dr. Arturo González (University College Dublin)

Location and Evaluation of Maximum Dynamic Effects on a Simply Supported

Beam due to a Quarter-Car Model

Authors:

Daniel Cantero & Dr. Arturo González(University College Dublin)

Page 2: Authors: Daniel Cantero & Dr. Arturo González (University College Dublin)

Overview

1) Introduction

2) P-load

3) Speed Influence

4) Monte Carlo

5) Conclusions

1 2 3 4 5

Page 3: Authors: Daniel Cantero & Dr. Arturo González (University College Dublin)

Introduction

Vehicle/Bridge Interaction

1 2 3 4 5

Maximum Stress not necessarily at mid-span

Page 4: Authors: Daniel Cantero & Dr. Arturo González (University College Dublin)

P-load

1 2 3 4 5

Euler-Bernoulli beam

Constant vertical force at constant speed

Span = 25m Speed = 25 m/s Load = 10 KN

Page 5: Authors: Daniel Cantero & Dr. Arturo González (University College Dublin)

0 5 10 15 20 25

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1

Vehicle position (m)

Nor

mal

ized

Ben

ding

Mom

ent

P-load

Static Bending Moment at mid-span

1 2 3 4 5

Page 6: Authors: Daniel Cantero & Dr. Arturo González (University College Dublin)

0 5 10 15 20 25

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1

Vehicle position (m)

Nor

mal

ized

Ben

ding

Mom

ent

P-load

Total Bending Moment at mid-span(Static + Dynamic)

DAF = 0.9959

1 2 3 4 5

Page 7: Authors: Daniel Cantero & Dr. Arturo González (University College Dublin)

Observation point (m)

Veh

icle

pos

ition

(m

)

0 5 10 15 20 250

5

10

15

20

25

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1

Observation point (m)

Veh

icle

pos

ition

(m

)

0 5 10 15 20 250

5

10

15

20

25

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1

P-load

Total Bending Moment(Static + Dynamic)

FDAF = 1.0648

COP = 11 m

1 2 3 4 5

Page 8: Authors: Daniel Cantero & Dr. Arturo González (University College Dublin)

P-load

FDAF DAF

1 2 3 4 5

Page 9: Authors: Daniel Cantero & Dr. Arturo González (University College Dublin)

FDAF = ( 1 + γ ) · DAF

P-load

Dynamic Amplification Factor DAF = 0.9959

Full length Dynamic Amplification Factor FDAF = 1.0648

γ = 6.92 %

Critical Observation PointCOP = 11 m

COP = 44 %

1 2 3 4 5

Page 10: Authors: Daniel Cantero & Dr. Arturo González (University College Dublin)

Speed Influence

DynamicAmplification

DAF & FDAF

γ valuesCOP

1 2 3 4 5

Page 11: Authors: Daniel Cantero & Dr. Arturo González (University College Dublin)

Monte Carlo

Vehicle parameters ( Speed, Masses, Suspension stiffness and damping, Tyre stiffness)

Bridge lengths ( 8 different spans between 17 and 31 m)

Road profile ( ISO Class A, B and C profiles)

1 2 3 4 5

Page 12: Authors: Daniel Cantero & Dr. Arturo González (University College Dublin)

Monte Carlo

COP

1 2 3 4 5

Page 13: Authors: Daniel Cantero & Dr. Arturo González (University College Dublin)

γ values

Monte Carlo

1 2 3 4 5

Page 14: Authors: Daniel Cantero & Dr. Arturo González (University College Dublin)

Monte Carlo

Mean Values

1 2 3 4 5

Page 15: Authors: Daniel Cantero & Dr. Arturo González (University College Dublin)

Conclusions

1 2 3 4 5

1) Maximum stress can be significantly higher than mid-span stress

2) Maximum stresses occur in between 30 % and 70 % of bridge span

3) Road roughness has big influence

Page 16: Authors: Daniel Cantero & Dr. Arturo González (University College Dublin)

Acknowledgments

Assessment and Rehabilitation of Central European Highway Structures

1 2 3 4 5

Page 17: Authors: Daniel Cantero & Dr. Arturo González (University College Dublin)