Austin ISD Preliminary Draft Ten Year Facility Master Plan

Independent School DistrictAustin

January 12 and 13, 2011

District Wide Facility Master PlanDraft – Working Document

February 8, 2011

EXHIBIT "B"

AUSTIN INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT

District-Wide Facility Master Plan Draft – Working Document

2/9/2011

District-wide Facility Master Plan

Final Report – DRAFT Working Document, 02/09/2011

Acknowledgements .......................................................................................................................................................................... 3

Introduction ........................................................................................................................................................................................ 5

Executive Summary ........................................................................................................................................................................... 6

Facility Recommendations ............................................................................................................................................................. 10

Timeline for Facility Master Plan Implementation ......................................................................................................................... 12

Estimated Budget ...................................................................................................................................................................... 14

Area Facility Options ....................................................................................................................................................................... 15 Additional Recommendations ........................................................................................................................................................ 33

Facility Operation Recommendations .................................................................................................................................... 33

Management Recommendations ........................................................................................................................................... 34

Staffing Recommendations ...................................................................................................................................................... 34

Energy Efficiency Recommendations ...................................................................................................................................... 35

Maintenance Recommendations ............................................................................................................................................ 35

Design Recommendations........................................................................................................................................................ 36

Safety and Security Recommendations .................................................................................................................................. 36

Use Recommendations ................................................................................................................................................................... 37

Technology Recommendations ............................................................................................................................................... 37

Other Recommendations ......................................................................................................................................................... 38

Facility Summary Reports with Facility Master Plan Recommendations ..................................................................................... 39

Elementary Schools (Alpha) ............................................................................................................................................................ 40

Middle Schools (Alpha) ................................................................................................................................................................. 120

High Schools (Alpha) ...................................................................................................................................................................... 139

Special Schools (Alpha) ................................................................................................................................................................. 152

Support Facilities (Alpha) ............................................................................................................................................................... 155

Educational Framework ....................................................................................................................................................................... 169

Planning Guidelines ...................................................................................................................................................................... 169

Programmatic Considerations .................................................................................................................................................... 170

Enrollment Projections ................................................................................................................................................................... 173

Page 1



Historical Enrollment ...................................................................................................................................................................... 173

Birth Data ........................................................................................................................................................................................ 179

Projected Enrollment .................................................................................................................................................................... 180

Capacity Analysis .......................................................................................................................................................................... 182 Utilization ........................................................................................................................................................................................ 184

Facility Condition Analysis ............................................................................................................................................................ 188

Educational Adequacy Assessment ............................................................................................................................................ 190

Building Deficiencies ...................................................................................................................................................................... 191

Facility Options .............................................................................................................................................................................. 193

Criteria .............................................................................................................................................................................................. 193

Appendices Appendix A ........................................................................................................................ FCI White Paper and Facility FCI Charts

Appendix B ...................................................................................................................................................Facility Capacity Charts

Appendix C ......................................................................................................................................... Visioning Workshop Summary

Appendix D .................................................................................................................................... Community Dialogue #1 Results

Appendix E ..................................................................................................................................... Community Dialogue #2 Results

Appendix F ............................................................................................................................... Community Meeting #3 Comments

Appendix G ............................................................................................................. Summary of Facility Options Discussed by FMPTF

Appendix H .................................................................................................................................................................... Glossary of Terms

Page 2



Acknowledgements

We would like to extend our appreciation to the Austin Independent School District Board of Trustees for its commitment

to the Facility Master Planning Process. We realize that the recommendations contained within the plan will create

challenges for the community in the months and years to come. With the support of the school district and community

members, the Austin Independent School District can continue its mission to provide a comprehensive educational

experience that is high quality, challenging, and inspires all students to make a positive contribution to society.

Board of Trustees

Mark Williams, District 5, President

Vincent M. Torres, District 4, Vice President

Lori Moya, District 6, Secretary

Cheryl Bradley, District 1

Sam Guzman, District 2

Christine Brister, District 3

Robert Schneider, District 7

Annette LoVoi, At-Large Position 8

Tamala Barksdale, At-Large Position 9

Austin Independent School District

Dr. Meria Carstarphen, Superintendent of Schools

Lawrence Fryer, Chief Operations Officer

Paul Turner, Executive Director of Facilities

Curt Shaw, Director of Construction Management

Pat Rossett, Assistant Director of Bond Planning

Joe Silva, Assistant Director of Planning

Beth Wilson, Project Facilitator

Page 3



Facility Master Plan Task Force

We take this opportunity to acknowledge the Facility Mater Plan Task Force for its efforts in guiding the planning process.

We thank the members for their dedication and commitment to this process that resulted in the development of the

facility plan for Austin Independent School District.

Co-Chairs: Richard Frazier

Janet Mitchell

John Alawneh

Larry Amaro

Adolphus Anderson

Tony Arnold

Frederick Bentley

Sally Brackett

Chris Carrillo-Spano

Jacqueline Chatham

Tommy Cox

Joey Crumley

Bill De Dufour

Julie Delgado

Janet Dewey

Elizabeth Dickey

Dan Diehl

Freddie B. Dixon, Sr.

Martha Dolman

Jim Evans

Kelly Evans

Frances Vicki Everett

Rene Garganta

Greg Goodman

Annette Gregory

Zoe Griffith

Silas Griggs

Janis Guerrero

Kris Hafezizadeh

Bergeron Harris

Anne M. Heinen

Heath Hignight

Lawrence P. Huang

Linda Johnson

Bob King

J. Laverne Morris-Parker

Lucia Markert

Carolyn Merritt

Paul Mitchell

Susan Moffat

Audrea Moyers

Mark Penniman

Elizabeth Polk

Jacqueline Porter

Pete Price

Douglas Rhodenbaugh

John Rocha

Michelle Rusnak

Dave Sanders

Curt Shaw

David W. Sullivan

Kathie Tovo

Laura Tuma

Paul Turner

Texanna Turner

Chad Williams

Page 4



Introduction

Facility Master Plan Vision Statement

All AISD schools will inspire high student achievement and support common community goals through

equitable, inviting facilities that integrate technology and are optimally used, accessible, sustainable, and

meet highest educational adequacy standards.

The Austin Independent School District is committed to

providing high quality and challenging educational

experiences for all students who are enrolled in its

schools. To ensure this commitment, the District

developed the AISD 2010-2015 Strategic Plan. As part of

Strategy #4 of that plan, key steps 4.5 and 4.7 included

development of a long-range facility master plan as

follows.

Strategy #4 – align resources to accomplish priorities

within a balanced budget

4.5 Develop and implement long-range plans for

facilities, transportation, libraries and technology

that align infrastructure with the district’s

educational plan

4.7 Ensure efficiency and efficacy of existing

facilities before investing in new facilities

This planning process, which is data driven, takes into

consideration enrollments, school building capacities,

educational framework, educational vision, and facility

conditions for 114 school campuses and 12 support

facilities in the District.

The facility master planning process is a proactive

approach to explore long- and short-term academic

and facility options and solutions. Among the most

important components contributing to the success of the

plan is the involvement and input gathered from Austin

community members.

The recommendations contained within will serve as the

basis from which Austin Independent School District

facilities will be transformed into a new generation of

schools that accommodates educational needs today

and in the future. The final Austin Independent School

District Facility Master Plan will serve as a road map that

will address facility conditions, an implementation

timeframe, and project costs.

Page 5



Executive Summary

District Statistics

AISD maintains approximately 87,000 permanent

classroom seats and an additional 16,000 seats in

portable/temporary buildings in 11.5 million square feet

of educational facilities. The enrollment for the 2010-11

school year was approximately 86,000 students. Based

on the latest demographic study, enrollment is projected

to continue to increase to 98,000 by 2020.

Total Enrollment 2010-2011: 85,929

Grades Pre-K-5: 48,167

Grades 6-8: 16,577

Grades 9-12: 20,662

Separate and Special Campuses: 523

114 School Campuses

80 Elementary Schools

19 Middle Schools

12 High Schools

3 Special Schools

12 Support Facilities

Utilization

By the numbers, there is an excess of 1,000 seats in

addition to the capacity in portable buildings. The reality

is that there are some areas experiencing population

growth and others experiencing decline within the

District. Combined with student migration patterns,

there are significantly over- and under-utilized facilities as

a result.

Facility Condition

Approximately $1.1 billion in deficiencies was identified in

the facility condition assessment, including a functional

equity and ADA/TAS analysis, completed in 2010, and

the most recent educational adequacy assessment

completed the summer of 2010. These deficiencies have

been categorized into the following priorities.

Priority 1: Currently Critical (Immediate)

Priority 2: Potentially Critical (To be corrected within one

year)

Priority 3: Necessary / Not Yet Critical (1-2 Years)

Priority 4: Recommended (3-5 Years)

Priority 5: Does Not Meet Current Code/Standards

/Grandfathered

Addressing Growth

The north central and southern areas of AISD continue to

experience the most enrollment growth. The following

new construction programs, funded by current and

previous bond programs, will help address overcrowding

issues.

Baldwin ES – Opened 2010

Early Childhood Center – Opens 2012 and will

relieve Linder ES

New North Central ES – Currently in site selection

process

New ES – Undesignated

In addition, land acquisition and funding have been

approved for a new middle school site in the

Page 6



southeastern part of the District, and a new high school

site in the southern region of the District. The construction

of the middle and high schools is anticipated to be a

part of a future bond program.

As enrollment is projected to increase, it is estimated that

three new elementary schools and additions at seven

elementary schools and one middle school would be

required. Currently, the District targets a 125% utilization

rate as a precipitant for potential new construction or

additions.

Process

In April of 2010, a Facility Master Plan Task Force was

created and an educational planning firm was hired by

AISD in order to develop the District-wide Facility Master

Plan. The Task Force, comprised of parents, community

members, teachers, principals, and AISD staff was

charged with the following tasks.

Monitor the process to ensure equity and fairness

across the District

Review and confirm recommendations and

resolve conflicting recommendations

Prepare information and host community

dialogues and meetings

Review and analyze data

Review and analyze community input

Develop and recommend an Educational

Framework to the Board of Trustees

Develop facility options to improve efficiency and

address student needs

Develop and recommend the district-wide Facility

Master Plan to the Board of Trustees

The Facility Master Plan Task Force held 25 meetings over

the course of 10 months and hosted 11 community

meetings. In addition, the Task Force Co-chairs attended

ten meetings at various school campuses throughout the

District. The community meetings provided invaluable

input to the Task Force throughout the process. Results

and comments from these meetings are available in the

appendix of this report.

Challenges

During the process, the Task Force was faced with

several challenges and complex issues associated with

AISD facilities and planning for the future. The following

outline is meant to provide an understanding and

reflection of the real issues with which the Task Force has

been struggling, and the resulting implications for facility

master planning.

Challenge #1: Accomplishing priorities within a shrinking

budget

In order for AISD to continue operating as it is today, an

assessed budget shortfall between $94 and $100 million

for fiscal year 2012 will have to be addressed. Can

increasing facility efficiency decrease the budget

shortfall, and how can this be balanced with the future

of neighborhood schools, their design, size, and

sustainability?

Challenge #2: Student migration

The number of students previously living within the Austin

urban core, has declined over the past 20 years, resulting

in 25% of schools housing less than 85% of their

Page 7



permanent student capacities. Conversely, there have

been large population increases in the outer areas of the

District, resulting in 50% of schools housing more than

105% of their permanent student capacities.

However, not all under- and over-utilization is a direct

result of population and demographic shifts. Large

numbers of students that travel outside of the boundary

of their assigned school present a challenge when

making future facility decisions. Should long-term

planning address the number of students living within the

attendance area, or should it address the number of

students currently attending that school, including

transfer students? What are the principles of the current

transfer policies and how will they be applied in the

future?

Challenge #3: The role of facility planning in supporting

and complementing educational program planning

AISD strives to maintain academic standards, programs,

and performance consistently throughout the District.

From a facilities perspective, what recommendations

can be made to help move the District toward

increasing graduation rates and eliminating the

achievement gap? Since programs are capable of

changing faster than bricks and mortar, how can

facilities remain flexible and be retrofitted for multi-use

where practical? How can facility decisions positively

impact student achievement? For example, is it more

beneficial to offer duplicate programs, such as fine arts

or career technology education, or is it better to provide

transportation to a single program? What are the cost

implications?

Challenge #4: Boundary adjustment solutions

A logical solution to improve efficiencies among

overcrowded and under-utilized schools is to adjust the

attendance boundaries and assign more or fewer

students as appropriate. In practice, it is not that simple.

In some cases, under-utilization occurs when a large

number of students migrate to schools outside of their

geographical attendance zone. Increasing the size of

the boundary of the under-utilized school will not fix the

problem. In addition, if the aforementioned migrating

students decided to attend their home schools, the result

could be an overcrowded scenario.

In other cases, there are too many overcrowded or

under-enrolled schools adjacent to each other. This

results in a “domino effect” of moving students from one

location to the other in order to increase or decrease

enrollment. In many instances, students would not be

able to attend the school closest to their homes or in their

neighborhoods. In fact, they may have to drive past a

school closer to their home in order to attend another

school to achieve balanced enrollment.

Challenge #5: Balancing short- and long-term needs

Significant resources will be needed to address the

capital projects outlined in this facility plan. In addition

to the funds needed to renovate AISD’s facility inventory,

additional investment in deferred maintenance and

small capital projects will continue as buildings age. At

the same time, new schools will need to be constructed

to accommodate growth.

Page 8



Test_

Page 9



Facility Recommendations

I. Portable Reduction

The annual cost to operate a portable building in AISD

is approximately $4.00 per square foot. The District

currently has 657 portable buildings which equates to

approximately 1,314 classrooms.

The criteria used to identify portable reduction include:

1. A utilization rate (enrollment/permanent

capacity) at the school location that falls

below 85%.

2. Age and condition of the portables

would be used to determine which

portables to take out of service unless

their current location would cause

additional moving costs.

There is a potential to reduce the total number of

portables in the District by 108, using the above criteria

of 85% utilization. Based on a minimum annual

operating cost of $4.00 per square foot, this would

result in an annual savings of $663,552.

II. Funded New Construction

The following new construction projects, funded by

current and previous bond programs, will help address

some overcrowding issues.

Baldwin ES – Opened 2010

Early Childhood Center – Opens 2012 and will

relieve Linder ES

New North Central ES – Currently in site selection

process

New ES – The Facility Master Plan Task Force

recommends locating the 2008 Bond Program

undesignated ES to the North Central area.

District-wide Performing Arts Center

III. Unfunded New Construction and Capital

Improvement

Priority 1 & 2 Needs

Priority 1 & 2 needs identified by the facility condition

assessment during 2007-2010, include currently critical

and potentially critical needs at each school campus

and support facility. The total cost to address these

needs is $366,816,000 phased over eight years.

Functional Equity

A functional equity study was completed by the District

during 2008-2010. This study identified core areas and

some specialized classrooms, within specific school

campuses that did not meet the current educational

specification standards. The cost to resolve these issues is

approximately $120,000,000, phased over eight years.

New Schools and Additions

Land acquisition and funding has been approved for a

new middle school site in the southeastern part of the

District, and a new high school site in south Austin. The

construction of the middle and high schools is

anticipated to be a part of a future bond program.

As enrollment is projected to increase, it is estimated that

two additional elementary schools would be required.

Currently, the District targets a 125% utilization rate as a

Page 10



precipitant for potential new construction or additions.

The unfunded new construction recommendations

include the following:

Three new elementary schools

Seven elementary school classroom additions

One new middle school

One middle school classroom addition

One new high school

IV. Closures/Consolidations/Boundaries

Although the Task Force’s recommendations include the

consideration of school closures because of the severity

of the District’s budget short fall, significant concerns

were expressed by some members of the Task Force

regarding the impact of school closures on communities,

especially in those where recent gains in student

performance could be jeopardized.

Consider consolidating/closing one middle school.

Consider consolidating/closing eight elementary

schools.

V. Programs Recommendations

Relocate Alternative Learning Center (ALC)

possibly in a different quadrant of the city .

Identify a Pre-K-8 school (begin Pre-K-5) to relieve

north central overcrowding. Also, consider this

model in other areas of the district.

Consider moving 6th grade from elementary to

middle school to relieve overcrowding in

elementary schools and under-utilization in middle

schools.

Explore Pre-K Centers to address overcrowding

Conduct intensive planning for School for Young

Men (site TBD based on community input,

feasibility, and availability of funding).

Conduct planning for district open-enrollment

signature programs and vertical team signature

programs, and their equitable geographic

distribution.

Complete analysis of changes to district programs

that generate facility needs.

Conduct planning for Career Tech Hubs (sites TBD

based on community input, feasibility, and

availability of funding).

Consider options for separating some elementary

schools into Pre-K-3 and 4-8 grade configurations

to address overcrowding.

VI. Policy

Seriously consider redrawing boundaries in most

critically overcrowded regions where possible.

Address strict application of transfer policy as it

applies to overcrowding and under-utilization.

VII. Operating Efficiency and Potential Revenue

Do not renew administrative leases that end in

FY’11.

Do not renew administrative leases that end in

FY’14.

Prepare and sell Baker Administrative Center.

Prepare and sell Carruth Administrative Center.

Expand District energy efficiency programs,

including coordinated facilities summer shutdowns

where feasible.

Identify additional energy efficiencies to include in

2012 bond package.

Page 11



Timeline for Facility Master Plan Implementation

FY ‘12 FY ‘13 FY ‘14 FY ‘15 FY ‘16 FY ‘17 FY ‘18 FY ‘19 FY ‘20 FY ‘21

2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21

Seriously consider redrawing boundaries in most critically overcrowded regions where possible

Boundary review and redraw TBD



Open classroom additions at four elementary schools (requires future bond funding, $4.8M each)

Open classroom additions at two elementary schools (requires bond future funding, $4.8M each)

Open classroom addition at one middle school (requires future bond funding, $4.8M) Open classroom addition at one elementary school (requires future bond funding, $4.8M)

Consider consolidating/closing one middle school and four elementary schools

Consider consolidating/closing four elementary schools

Preliminary planning for upcoming bond proposals (every 4 yrs.)

Proposed Bond Program Election (>$500M*)

Proposed Bond Program Election (TBD*)

Proposed Bond Program Election (TBD*)

Open Linder Early Childhood Center (2008 Bond funding available, $21.6M)

Open Performing Arts Center (2008 Bond, funding available, $40M)_ __ Open North Central Elementary School (2004 Bond funding available, $28.1M)

Open new undesignated ES -recommended for North Central (2008 Bond, funding available, $28.1M)__ _ Open new undesignated ES (requires future bond funding, $24.5M)_________ Open new undesignated ES (requires future bond funding, $24.5M)

Open new undesignated ES (requires future bond funding, $24.5M)

Open new Southeast MS (requires future bond funding, $55.7M)

Open new South High School (requires future bond funding, $106.6M)

Relocate Alternative Learning Center (consider possibilities in different quadrant of the city)

Identify pre-k-8 school (begin pre-k-5) to relieve north central elementary school overcrowding. Also, consider this model in other areas of the district.

Consider options for separating some ES into Pk-3rd and 4th – 8th to address overcrowding__ _ Explore 3rd Pre-k center to address overcrowding TBD

Consider moving 6th grade from elementary to middle school to relieve overcrowding and underutilization




Analyze each school to determine if limitations to transfers/choice options are needed

Review application of transfer policy for efficacy and fidelity

Note: In 2015-16 projected student enrollment > 92,000

In 2020-21 projected student enrollment > 98,000

*The Bond Program will focus on Priority 1 and 2 building systems renovations, functional equity improvements, and new schools as indicated by demographic projections and the recommendations of a Bond Advisory Committee that are approved

by the Board of Trustees. The specific dates and total bond election amounts must be approved by the Board of Trustees

Page 12



FY ‘12 FY ‘13 FY ‘14 FY ‘15 FY ‘16 FY ‘17 FY ‘18 FY ‘19 FY ‘20 FY ‘21

2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21

Address Priority 1 and 2 renovations and functional equity improvements (requires future bond funding)








Portable reduction Portable reduction Portable reduction Portable reduction Portable reduction Portable reduction Portable reduction Portable reduction Portable reduction Portable reduction

Do not renew administrative leases that finish in FY’11__ Explore terminating administrative leases that finish in FY’14

Do not renew administrative leases that finish in FY’14

Prepare and sell Baker

Prepare and sell CAC

Expand existing district energy efficiency programs, including coordinated facilities summer shutdowns where feasible___________ Identify additional energy efficiency facility needs to include in 2012 bond package

Reduce energy usage to 95% of baseline

Reduce energy usage to 90% of baseline or lower








Programs

Intensive planning for School for Young Men (site TBD based on community input, feasibility, availability of funding)

Open School for Young Men (if feasible and funding available)

Planning for district open-enrollment signature programs, and vertical team signature programs and their equitable geographic distribution_____________ Complete analysis of changes to district programs that generate facilities needs

Planning for Career Tech Hubs (locations and funding sources TBD)

Open Career Tech Hubs (1 north, 1 south)

Note: In 2015-16 projected student enrollment > 92,000

In 2020-21 projected student enrollment > 98,000

*The Bond Program will focus on Priority 1 and 2 building systems renovations, functional equity improvements, and new schools as indicated by demographic projections and the recommendations of a Bond Advisory Committee that are approved

by the Board of Trustees. The specific dates and total bond election amounts must be approved by the Board of Trustees.

Page 13



FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 FY 2020 FY 2021 TOTAL

I. Operational Cost Savings

Portable Reductions (600,000)$ (600,000)$ (600,000)$ (600,000)$ (600,000)$ (600,000)$ (600,000)$ (600,000)$ (600,000)$ (600,000)$ (6,000,000)$

Total Cost / (Savings) (600,000)$ (600,000)$ (600,000)$ (600,000)$ (600,000)$ (600,000)$ (600,000)$ (600,000)$ (600,000)$ (600,000)$ (6,000,000)$

II. Funded New Construction

Early Childhood Center -$ 21,600,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 21,600,000$

New North Central ES -$ -$ 28,100,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 28,100,000$

Performing Arts Center -$ -$ 40,000,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 40,000,000$

New ES (North Central) -$ -$ -$ 28,100,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 28,100,000$

Total Cost / (Savings) -$ 21,600,000$ 68,100,000$ 28,100,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 117,800,000$

III. Un-Funded New Construction and Capital Improvements

Priority 1 & 2 Needs -$ -$ 45,852,000$ 45,852,000$ 45,852,000$ 45,852,000$ 45,852,000$ 45,852,000$ 45,852,000$ 45,852,000$ 366,816,000$

Functional Equity -$ -$ 15,000,000$ 15,000,000$ 15,000,000$ 15,000,000$ 15,000,000$ 15,000,000$ 15,000,000$ 15,000,000$ 120,000,000$

New Schools

New ES -$ -$ -$ 24,500,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 24,500,000$

New ES -$ -$ -$ 24,500,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 24,500,000$

New ES -$ -$ -$ -$ 24,500,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 24,500,000$

New MS -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 55,700,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 55,700,000$

New HS -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 106,600,000$ -$ -$ -$ 106,600,000$

Additions

4 ES Classroom Additions -$ 19,200,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 19,200,000$

2 ES Classroom Additions -$ -$ 9,600,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 9,600,000$

1 ES Classroom Addition -$ -$ -$ 4,800,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 4,800,000$

1 MS Classroom Addition -$ -$ -$ 4,800,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 4,800,000$

Total Cost / (Savings) -$ -$ 80,052,000$ 119,452,000$ 94,952,000$ 116,552,000$ 167,452,000$ 60,852,000$ 60,852,000$ 60,852,000$ 761,016,000$

Estimated Budget

The following tables provide an estimated budget, including estimated costs or savings by year, for the facility

recommendations. The estimated costs or savings are based on AISD budgeted operating costs and recently completed

facility evaluations.

Page 14



Area Facility Options

The following pages describe, outline, and summarize

facility options by area in the District. The District has

been divided into the 10 following with a map provided

on the following page.

Area 1: Northwest – Anderson HS, Murchison MS, Davis

ES, Doss ES, Hill ES, Summitt ES

Area 2: North Central – Lanier HS, Burnet MS, Dobie MS,

Barrington ES, Cook ES, Graham ES, Hart ES, McBee ES,

Pillow ES, Walnut Creek ES, Wooldridge ES, Wooten ES,

Read Pre-K Center

Area 3: Central West – McCallum HS, Lamar MS,

Brentwood ES, Brown ES, Bryker Woods ES, Casis ES, Gullet

ES, Highland Park ES, Lee ES, Mathews ES, Pickle ES, Reilly

ES, Ridgetop ES

Area 4: Northeast – LASA HS, LBJ HS, Reagan HS, Garcia

MS, Pearce MS, Webb MS, Andrews ES, Blanton ES, Harris

ES, Jordan ES, Maplewood ES, Overton ES, Pecan Springs

ES, Winn ES

Area 5: Central East – Eastside Memorial HS, Kealing MS,

Martin MS, Allan ES, Allison ES, Blackshear ES, Brooke ES,

Campbell ES, Govalle ES, Metz ES, Norman ES, Oak

Springs ES, Ortega ES, Sanchez ES, Sims ES, Zavala ES,

Alternative Learning Center (ALC)

Area 6: Central – Austin HS, Travis HS, Fulmore MS,

O.Henry MS, Barton Hills ES, Becker ES, Dawson ES, Linder

ES, Pease ES, Travis Heights ES, Zilker ES

Area 7: Southwest – Bowie HS, Bailey MS, Gorzycki MS,

Small MS, Baldwin ES, Baranoff ES, Clayton ES, Kiker ES,

Mills ES, Oak Hill ES, Patton ES

Area 8: South – Crockett HS, Bedichek MS, Covington

MS, Boone ES, Cunningham ES, Galindo ES, Joslin ES, St.

Elmo ES, Sunset Valley ES

Area 9: Southeast – Mendez MS, Blazier ES, Houston ES,

Langford ES, Palm ES, Perez ES, Rodriguez ES, Widen ES

Area 10: Far South – Akins HS, Paredes MS, Casey ES,

Cowan ES, Kocurek ES, Menchaca ES, Odom ES, Pleasant

Hill ES, Williams ES

Page 15



Page 16



AREA 1 – NORTHWEST

Anderson High School

Murchison Middle School

Davis, Doss, Hill and Summitt elementary schools

Area Issues

Based on the number of students living in the area for the

2010-11 school year:

The area has a slight deficiency in the number of

seats available at the elementary and middle

school levels.

The number of students migrating into the area is

higher than the number of students migrating out

of the area at all levels.

Space Utilization

Based on the 2010-11 enrollment of schools in the area:

One elementary school, Doss, is severely overcrowded

(above 125% of permanent capacity)

Two elementary schools, Hill and Summitt, are

overcrowded (between 115% and 125% of permanent

capacity)

One elementary school, Davis, is in the target range of

percent of permanent capacity (between 85% and

105%)

The middle school, Murchison, is overcrowded

(between 115% and 125% of permanent capacity)

The high school, Anderson, is in the target range of


105%)

Educational Enhancement

Academic Ratings:

Future Growth

Moderate population growth is projected in this area in

the next five years.

Facility Condition

On average, the facilities have an FCI (Facility Condition

Index) slightly above the District FCI (26.4%).

Master Plan Task Force Options for 10-Year Plan

Construct an eight-classroom addition at one

elementary school.

Construct an eight-classroom addition at one middle

school.

Address priorities 1 & 2 and functional equity

improvements.

Community Impact

Consult with the community regarding boundary

adjustments.

Cost Savings

NA

Exemplary

Doss ES

Hill ES

Summitt ES

Recognized

Davis ES

Murchison MS

Anderson HS

Elementary School Capacity 2,633 Elementary Migration IN - 478

Elementary School Population 2,731 Elementary Migration OUT - 166

Excess / (Deficient) Seats (98) Net Migration - 312

Middle School Capacity 1,113 Middle School Migration IN - 220

Middle School Population 1,171 Middle School Migration OUT - 110

Excess / (Deficient) Seats (58) Net Mirgation - 110

High School Capacity 2,017 High School Migration IN - 391

High School Population 1,962 High School Migration OUT - 257

Excess / (Deficient) Seats 55 Net Migration - 134

Page 17



AREA 2 – NORTH CENTRAL

Lanier High School

Burnet and Dobie middle schools

Barrington, Cook, Graham, Hart, McBee, Pillow,

Walnut Creek, Wooldridge, Wooten elementary

schools and Read Pre-K Center

Area Issues



The area has a severe deficiency in the number of

seats available at the elementary school levels.

The number of students migrating out of the area

is higher than the number of students migrating in,

especially at the elementary and high school

levels.

Efficient Space Utilization

Space Utilization


Nine elementary schools, Barrington, Cook,

Graham, Hart, McBee, Read, Walnut Creek,

Wooldridge and Wooten, are severely

overcrowded (above 125% of permanent

capacity)

One elementary school, Pillow, is overcrowded


One middle school, Burnet, is in the target range

of percent of permanent capacity(between 85%

and 105%), while one middle school, Dobie, is

under enrolled (below 85% of permanent

capacity)

The high school, Lanier, is in the target range of

percent of permanent capacity (between 85%

and 105%)


Academic Ratings:

Future Growth

Highest population growth in district is projected in

this area in the next five years

Facility Condition

On average, the facilities have an FCI slightly less

than the District FCI (26.4%), with two elementary

schools and one middle school requiring more

extensive renovations.

Recognized

Cook ES

Hart ES

McBee ES

Wooten ES

Dobie MS

Exemplary

Graham ES

Pillow ES

Acceptable

Barrington ES

Walnut Creek ES

Wooldridge ES

Burnet MS

Lanier HS


Elementary School Population 8,370 Elementary Migration OUT - 1,587

Excess / (Deficient) Seats (2,802) Net Migration (946)



Excess / (Deficient) Seats 52 Net Migration (210)



Excess / (Deficient) Seats (354) Net Migration (436)

Page 18



Facility Master Plan Task Force Options for 10-Year Plan

Construct two additional elementary schools.

Construct eight-classroom additions at two

elementary schools.


improvements.

Community Impact

Consult with the community regarding middle

school redesign.

Consult with the community regarding boundary

adjustments.

Cost Savings

NA

Page 19



AREA 3 – CENTRAL WEST

McCallum High School

Lamar Middle School

Brentwood, Brown, Bryker Woods, Casis, Gullett,

Highland Park, Lee, Mathews, Pickle, Reilly and

Ridgetop elementary schools.

Area Issues



The area has available seats at the all school

levels.



of the area at all levels.

Attendance zone population is under 300 students

at two elementary schools, Ridgetop and

Mathews.

There are two elementary schools, Bryker Woods

and Ridgetop, that have a permanent capacity

of less than 300 seats.

Space Utilization


Two elementary schools, Bryker Woods and

Gullett, are severely overcrowded (above 125% of

permanent capacity).

Two elementary schools, Casis and Pickle, are

overcrowded (between 115% and 125% of

permanent capacity)

Three elementary schools, Brown, Highland Park

and Ridgetop, are over capacity (between 105%

and 115% of permanent capacity)

Three elementary schools, Lee, Mathews and

Reilly, are within the target range of percent of

permanent capacity (between 85% and 105%)

One elementary school, Brentwood, is under

enrolled (below 85% of permanent capacity)

The middle school, Lamar, is under enrolled (below

85% of permanent capacity)

The high school, McCallum, is overcrowded



Academic Ratings:

Exemplary

Casis ES

Gullett ES

Highland

Park ES

Lee ES

Matthews ES

Ridgetop ES

Recognized

Brentwood ES

Bryker Woods ES

Pickle ES

Reilly ES

Acceptable

Brown ES

Lamar ES

McCallum HS

Elementary School Capacity 4,953 Elementary Migration IN - 1,253




Middle School Population 583 Middle School Migration OUT - 191





Page 20



Future Growth

Moderate population growth is projected in this

area in the next five years.

Facility Condition

On average, the facilities have an FCI slightly

higher than the District FCI (26.4%), with three

elementary schools requiring more extensive

renovations.



improvements.

Community Impact

Consult with community if boundary adjustments

are needed.

Cost Savings

NA

Page 21



AREA 4 – NORTHEAST

LASA, LBJ and Reagan high schools

Garcia, Pearce and Webb middle schools,

Andrews, Blanton, Harris, Jordan, Maplewood,

Overton, Pecan Springs and Winn elementary

schools.

Area Issues



The area has available seats at the middle and

high school levels, but is deficient at the

elementary school level.


is higher than the number of students migrating

into the area at all levels, especially at the middle

and high school levels.

Space Utilization


Three elementary schools, Andrews, Harris and

Jordan, are severely overcrowded (above 125% of


Three elementary schools, Maplewood, Overton

and Pecan Springs, are overcrowded (between

115% and 125% of permanent capacity).

Two elementary schools, Blanton and Winn, are

within the target range of percent of permanent

capacity (between 85% and 105%).

All three middle schools, are under enrolled

(below 85% of permanent capacity).

One high school, Reagan, is under enrolled

(below 85% of permanent capacity), while LBJ

and LASA are within the target range of percent

of permanent capacity (between 85% and 105%)


New Programs for 2011-12:

Early College Prep at one middle school

Early College High School / Early College Start at

two high schools

Academic Ratings:

Exemplary

Blanton ES

LASA HS

Recognized

Andrews

Harris ES

Jordan ES

Overton ES

Winn ES

Acceptable

Maplewood

ES

Pecan Springs

ES

Garcia MS

Pearce MS

Webb MS

LBJ HS

Reagan HS

NORTHEAST



Excess / (Deficient) Seats (705) Net Migration - (164)



Excess / (Deficient) Seats 825 Net Mirgation - (572)


High School Population 2,635 High School Migration OUT - 1,018

Excess / (Deficient) Seats 795 Net Migration - (771)

Page 22



Future Growth

Significant population growth is projected in this

area in the next five years.

Facility Condition

On average, the facilities have an FCI (Facility

Condition Index) lower than the District FCI (26.4%),

with two elementary schools requiring more

extensive renovations


Construct one elementary school.

Construct an eight classroom addition at one

elementary school.

Close /consolidate one middle school.

Adjust boundaries between elementary schools.


improvements.

Community Impact

Consult with community regarding plans for

closure/consolidation of one middle school and its

repurposing.

Cost Savings

Cost savings for closure of one middle school is

$1.8M in M&O savings.

Capital cost avoidance –$7.4M if one middle school

was closed / consolidated.

Page 23



AREA 5 – CENTRAL EAST

Eastside Memorial High School

Kealing and Martin middle schools

Allan, Allison, Blackshear, Brooke, Campbell, Govalle,

Metz, Norman, Oak Springs, Ortega, Sanchez, Sims and

Zavala elementary schools

Alternative Learning Center (ALC).

Area Issues



The area has available seats at all school levels.

The number of students migrating out of the area is

higher than the number of students migrating into the

area at the elementary and high schools levels. The

magnet program at Kealing MS results in a higher “in”

migration at the middle school level.

Attendance zone populations are under 300 students at

three elementary schools, Blackshear, Oak Springs and

Ortega.

Space Utilization


One elementary school, Allison, is over capacity


Three elementary schools, Brooke, Metz and

Sanchez, are within the target range of percent of

permanent capacity (between 85% and 105%)

Nine elementary schools, Allan, Blackshear,

Campbell, Govalle, Norman, Oak Springs, Ortega,

Sims and Zavala are under enrolled (below 85% of

permanent capacity)

One middle school, Kealing, is within the target

range of permanent capacity (between 85% and

105%), while Martin is under enrolled (below 85% of


The high school, Eastside Memorial, is under

enrolled (below 85% of permanent capacity).



Excess / (Deficient) Seats 1,466 Net Migration - (145)







Page 24



Educational Enhancement Academic Ratings:

Future Growth

No significant population growth is projected in

this area in the next five years.

Facility Condition

On average, the facilities have an FCI above the

District FCI (26.4%), with four elementary schools

and two secondary schools requiring more


There are significant structural issues at the

Alternative Learning Center (ALC).

Facility Master Plan Task Force for 10-Year Plan

Consolidate / close four elementary schools.

Construct one replacement elementary school.


improvements.

Community Impact

Consult with community to discuss use /

repurposing of elementary schools to be closed

and the relocation of ALC.

Cost Savings

Cost savings for closure of four elementary school

is $5.1 in M & O savings.

Capital cost avoidance - $25.2M if four

elementary schools were closed / consolidated;

however, it would cost $28M to construct a

replacement elementary school.

Exemplary

Metz ES

Oak Springs

ES

Ortega ES

Sims ES

Recognized

Brooke ES

Norman ES

Sanchez ES

Zavala ES

Acceptable

Allan ES

Allison ES

Blackshear ES

Campbell ES

Govalle ES

Kealing MS

Martin MS

Eastside

Global HS

Unacceptable

Eastside

Green HS

Page 25



AREA 6 – CENTRAL

Austin and Travis high schools

Fulmore and O. Henry middle schools

Barton Hills, Becker, Dawson, Linder, Pease, Travis

Heights and Zilker elementary schools

Area Issues Based on the number of students living in the area for the 2010-11

school year:

The area has available seats at all school levels.



of the area at the elementary and middle school

levels. There are slightly more students migrating

out of the area at the high school level.

Attendance zone populations are under 300

students at four elementary schools, Barton Hills,

Becker and Dawson. Pease has fewer than 300

students who all from other attendance areas.

Two elementary schools, Barton Hills and Pease,

have a permanent capacity of less than 300 seats.

Space Utilization Based on the 2010-11 enrollment of schools in the area:

Two elementary schools, Barton Hills and Linder,

are severely overcrowded (above 125% of

permanent capacity)

Two elementary schools, Travis Heights and Zilker,

are over capacity (between 105% and 115% of


One elementary school, Pease, is within the target

range of percent of permanent capacity

(between 85% and 105%)

Two elementary school, Becker and Dawson, are

under enrolled (below 85% of permanent

capacity)

One middle school, O.Henry, is overcrowded

(above 125% of permanent capacity), while

Fulmore is within the target range of permanent

capacity (between 85% and 105%).

One high school, Austin, is overcrowded (above

125% of permanent capacity), while Travis is under

enrolled (below 85% of permanent capacity).

Educational Enhancement Academic Ratings:

Exemplary

Barton Hills

ES

Becker ES

Dawson ES

Pease ES

Zilker ES

Recognized

Linder ES

Austin HS

Travis

Heights ES

Acceptable

Fulmore MS

O.Henry MS

Travis HS








High School Population 3,860 High School Migration OUT - 1,126


Page 26



Future Growth


area, specifically within the Linder and Travis

Heights attendance zones.

Facility Condition

With the exception of one elementary with a high

FCI, on average, the facilities have an FCI close to

the District FCI (26.4), with three elementary

schools and one middle school requiring more



Consolidate/close three elementary schools.

Address priorities 1& 2 and functional equity

improvements.

Community Impact

Consult with the community regarding the use

closed/consolidated elementary school(s).

Cost Savings

M&O savings ($2.9M)could be realized if three

elementary schools were closed/consolidated.

Capital cost avoidance of $25.2M if three

elementary schools were closed/consolidated.

Page 27



AREA 7 – SOUTHWEST

Bowie high school

Bailey, Gorzycki and Small middle schools

Baldwin, Baranoff, Clayton, Kiker, Mills, Oak Hill and

Patton elementary schools

Area Issues



The area has available seats at the middle school level,

and is slightly deficient at the elementary and high

schools levels.

The number of students migrating into the area is higher

than the number of students migrating out of the area

at all levels.

Space Utilization


Three elementary schools, Kiker, Mills and Patton, are


capacity)

One elementary school, Baranoff, is over capacity

(between 105% and 115% of permanent capacity).

Two elementary schools, Clayton and Oak Hill, are


capacity (between 85% and 105%)

One elementary schools, Baldwin, is under enrolled

(below 85% of permanent capacity)

One middle school, Bailey, is within the target range of


105%).

Two middle schools, Gorzycki and Small are under

enrolled (below 85% of permanent capacity)

One high school, Bowie, is over capacity (between

105% and 115% of permanent capacity).


Academic Ratings:

Recognized

Bailey MS

Bowie HS

Gorzycki MS

Small MS

No Rating

Baldwin ES Exemplary

Baranoff ES

Clayton ES

Kiker ES

Mills ES

Oak Hill ES

Patton ES










Page 28



Future Growth


area at the elementary and middle school levels.

Facility Condition

On average, the facilities have an FCI well below

the District FCI (26.4%).


Construct an eight-classroom addition at one

elementary school.

Adjust boundaries among elementary schools.


improvements.

Community Impact

Consult with community regarding boundary

adjustments.

Cost Savings

NA

Page 29



AREA 8 - SOUTH

Crockett High School,

Bedichek and Covington middle schools,

Boone, Cunningham, Galindo, Joslin, St. Elmo and

Sunset Valley elementary schools.

Area Issues



The area has available seats at the elementary

and high school levels, and is slightly deficient at

the middle schools level.



into the area, especially at the middle and high

school levels.

Space Utilization


Two elementary schools, Galindo and Joslin, are


capacity (between 85% and 105%)

Four elementary schools, Boone, Cunningham, St.

Elmo and Sunset Valley, are under enrolled (below


One middle school, Bedichek, is over capacity


while Covington is under enrolled (below 85% of

permanent capacity

The high school, Crockett, is under enrolled (below


Educational Enhancements

Academic Ratings:

Future Growth

Moderate population growth projected in the

area.

Facility Condition

On average, the facilities have an FCI above the

District FCI (26.4%) with four elementary schools

requiring more extensive renovations.


Consolidate/close one elementary school.

Adjust boundaries between high schools (Akins

and Crockett).

Address Priorities 1 & 2 and functional equity

improvements.

Community Impact

Consult with the community regarding closure and

repurposing of elementary school.

Cost Savings

Cost savings for closure of elementary school is

$1.26M in M&O savings.

Capital cost avoidance –$8.4M.

Exemplary

Joslin ES

Sunset

Valley ES

Recognized

Boone ES

Galindo ES

St. Elmo ES

Acceptable

Cunningham ES

Bedichek MS

Covington MS

Crockett HS










Page 30



AREA 9 – SOUTHEAST

Mendez middle school,

Blazier, Houston, Langford, Palm, Perez, Rodriguez

and Widen elementary schools.

Area Issues



The area is severely deficient in the number of

seats at the elementary level, and is slightly

deficient at the middle school level.



into the area.

Space Utilization


Four elementary schools, Blazier, Houston, Perez and

Rodriguez, are severely overcrowded (over 125% of


Two elementary schools, Langford and Widen, are


capacity).

One elementary school, Palm, is within the target range

of percent of permanent capacity (between 85% and

105%).

The middle school, Mendez, is under enrolled (below

85% of permanent capacity).

There is no high school in this area.

Education Enhancement

Academic Ratings:

Future Growth


area.

Facility Condition

On average, the facilities have an FCI that is

below the District FCI (26.4%), with one elementary

school requiring more extensive renovations.


Evaluate reduction of portables at middle school.

Construct eight-classroom additions at two

elementary schools.

Adjust boundaries among area elementary

schools to reduce overcrowding.

Adjust boundaries among area middle schools.

Address priority 1& 2 and functional equity

improvements

Community Impact

Consult with the community regarding elementary

and middle school boundary adjustments.

Cost Savings

NA

Recognized

Houston ES

Palm ES

Perez ES

Acceptable

Blazier ES

Langford ES

Rodriguez ES

Mendez MS

Widen ES



Excess / (Deficient) Seats (1,472) Net Migration - (362)




Page 31



AREA 10 – FAR SOUTH

Akins High School

Paredes Middle School

Casey, Cowan, Kocurek, Menchaca, Odom,

Pleasant Hill and Williams elementary schools

Area Issues



The area is deficient is the number of seats at the

elementary and high school levels.



into the area, especially at the middle and high

school levels.

Space Utilization


Three elementary schools, Cowan, Odom and Pleasant

Hill, are overcrowded (between 115% and 125% of

permanent capacity)

Two elementary schools, Menchaca and Williams, are

over capacity (between 105% and 115% permanent

capacity)

Two elementary schools, Casey and Kocurek, are within

the target range of percent of permanent capacity

(between 85% and 105%.)

The middle school, Paredes, is under enrolled (below


The high school, Akins, is over capacity (between 105%

and 115% of permanent capacity.


Academic Ratings:

Future Growth

No significant population growth is projected in

the area for the elementary and middle school

levels; however, continued moderate growth is

projected at the high school level.

Facility Condition

On average, the facilities have an FCI below the

District FCI (26.4%), with two elementary schools

requiring more extensive renovations.


Priority 1& 2 and functional equity improvements.

Adjust boundaries between high schools (Akins

and Crockett to reduce overcrowding).

Community Impact

Consult with community regarding high school

boundary adjustments and possible elementary

boundary adjustments.

Cost Savings

NA

Exemplary

Cowan ES

Recognized

Akins HS

Paredes MS

Acceptable

Casey ES

Kocurek ES

Menchaca ES

Odom ES

Pleasant Hill ES

Williams ES Elementary School Capacity 4,286 Elementary Migration IN - 773









Page 32



Additional Recommendations

The Facilities Master Plan Task Force recommends the

following District-wide initiatives and policy

recommendations. Some recommendations may

require additional planning and research from other AISD

departments and outside entities. The Task Force does

not want to lose sight of these very important ideas and

recognizes that the Facility Master Plan is a dynamic

document and should be updated periodically to

incorporate building improvements, updates in

community demographics, and changes in educational

programming.

I. Policy Recommendations

1. Consider school closures only after all other

alternatives and options, both programmatic and

facilities use, have been thoroughly examined

and discussed with the affected communities.

2. Create a community engagement process, led

by the Superintendent and the Senior Leadership

Team, to work directly with the local community

as part of the implementation planning process.

3. Establish a standing committee of parents,

teachers, district staff, and other stakeholders

(e.g., City, Chamber of Commerce, realtors) to

track and maintain the Facility Master Plan over

time.

4. Conduct campus assessments for future bond

work in consultation with each school's Campus

Advisory Council to ensure accurate, first-hand

knowledge of campus conditions and priorities.

For continuity, each campus will maintain a

Facilities Improvement Plan documenting prior

campus evaluations, including a Principal's Log,

in which the principal or his/her designee will

record relevant discussions regarding how the

campus facilities are functioning and note any

concerns for future administrators and CACs.

5. When new schools or consolidations are being

considered, first evaluate existing District sites

(both presently undeveloped or in use) and

determine if any are candidates for new

construction, renovation, or re-construction. This

may assist the District in locating schools in better

locations than can be achieved with the

purchase of new land.

6. Continue to identify ways to improve

collaborative planning with the City of Austin.

[See AISD/COA/Travis County joint resolution that

specifically commits these entities to

collaboration on planning efforts that include

AISD's Facilities Master Plan and the City's

Comprehensive Plan.]

Page 33



7. District Departments/staff should be moved into

available spaces at under-utilized schools so that

the District may sell valuable property, avoid

leasing buildings and allow for all schools to

remain open.

8. Aggressively pursue joint-use opportunities for

existing underutilized campuses, as well as new

facilities; potential partners include the City of

Austin, Central Health/CommUnityCare, and arts

organizations and other nonprofit organizations.

9. Closed schools should be reused by the District or

another governmental entity for office/

administrative use, or by another educational

user, and then returned to use as AISD

instructional space when student population

growth makes it prudent.

10. Review current District transfer policies and

implementation, in particular using campus’

“permanent capacity”, as opposed to

“functional capacity” when evaluating available

space.

11. Analyze current “out migration” trends from

campus/zones to understand the underlying

issues, AND then address those issues in order to

support the return of students to their

neighborhood schools.

12. Conduct a complete review of the day-to-day

application of the district's transfer policy,

regardless of overcrowding or underutilization.

Include the impact that “out migration” can have

on under-utilized schools as much as “in migration

can impact overcrowded schools.

13. Support the neighborhood school model.

II. Management Recommendations

14. Institute a well-defined system for handling

maintenance requests that is communicated in

writing to all staff at the start of each school year

including:

how and to whom to report a

maintenance issue, and how to receive

the estimated time for a response,

how to track a maintenance request

electronically in real time,

who to contact if the contractor or

maintenance person fails to arrive,

what to do if work is poorly completed or is

incomplete, and

who is responsible for signing off on

completed work.

III. Staffing Recommendations

15. Develop a plan to supervise custodians centrally

to allow more flexibility in the use of resources,

reduce overtime costs through flexible

scheduling, improved supervision and quality

control, and improved facility scheduling and

energy management.

Page 34



16. Consolidate maintenance functions, including

field maintenance for athletic fields, under the

Maintenance Department to provide more

efficient and flexible use of available resources.

IV. Energy Efficiency Recommendations

17. Implement a centrally supervised summer

custodial program to achieve cost reductions by

returning some custodians on each campus,

through attrition, to a 10-month employment

year.

18. Continue the current District focus on energy

usage reduction through more efficient

equipment, technology applications to manage

the operation of buildings more effectively, and

engagement of campus and facility occupants

to assist working toward the goal of reduced

usage.

19. Continue efforts toward a coordinated shutdown

of facilities in the summer months as is feasible.

20. As soon as feasible, fund energy coordinator

position to implement and monitor energy

savings initiatives at campuses. Savings

generated from funding this position would more

than offset the cost.

21. Implement an educational campaign to raise or

lower thermostats in schools four degrees.

(Estimates based on examples project savings of

between 5% and 20%.)

22. Continue to upgrade and improve data and

systems to measure utility usage by campus.

V. Maintenance Recommendations

23. Institute bond counsel-approved strategies to

designate funds for building system renovations in

future bond programs to protect the District’s

capital investments.

24. Include furniture and equipment replacement

schedule in the next bond program scope of

work; invest in high quality equipment that will not

require frequent maintenance or replacement.

25. Institute industry-standard performance measures

for bond programs, per the 2009 MGT Efficiency

Study, to maintain and publish the following types

of data: cost per foot of construction projects

compared to peer districts and regional and

national averages, final estimate compared to

final bid, change-order rate, completion

schedules, consultant ratings.

Page 35



VI. Design Recommendations

26. Engage in public/private partnerships in the siting,

engineering, and design of “healthy” schools and

neighborhood environments that support

increased outdoor physical activities for children

and their families.

27. Explore flexible design for future school facilities to

accommodate population fluctuations. Some

strategies include implementing consistent

building designs with modular components that

may expand or contract with student population

changes, or using a Mobile Technology unit that

allows specialized equipment to be shared by

two or more campuses for a portion of a year.

28. Create flexible learning spaces, where students

can work in groups utilizing the wireless network

with portable devices.

29. Design large-scale facilities to provide suitable

space for multiple uses such as conferences,

meetings, and professional development (ideally

in conjunction with other local governmental

partners to share costs and maintenance).

30. Design, construct and operate high-performance

schools and other facilities that are sensitive to

natural resource use, conserve energy and

water, reduce pollution and waste, promote and

attract active transportation by healthy outdoor

design that includes, but is not limited to, bicycle

racks for students within a two-mile radius of a

campus and outdoor space designed for multi-

purpose neighborhood and community use.

31. The site selection process for high-performance

schools and other faculties should include a

matrix that rewards the availability of mass

transportation options that include, but are not

limited to, Capital Metro buses, commuter rail,

and metro rail to reduce transportation costs and

the carbon footprint of a facility.

32. To avoid the costs of building and maintaining

additional high schools, pursue options such as 7

a.m. to 8 p.m. schedules that offer challenging

curriculums, distance learning, and advanced

placement courses. Online courses could also be

more widely implemented and available to all

students.

VII. Safety and Security Recommendations

33. Make safe walkable routes a priority when

constructing or repurposing school facilities.

34. Assess nighttime security and add security

cameras and lighting in high need areas.

35. Work with appropriate entities to encourage

construction of fences and barriers at railroad

crossings.

Page 36



36. Ensure the installation of adequate public address

and alarm systems in all schools, including all

portables.

37. Address campus traffic issues as identified by the

campus.

VIII. Use Recommendations

38. Increase building rental rates to increase cost-

recovery for community use of schools.

39. Appropriately consolidate students in

underutilized campuses to make available as

much classroom space as possible, and issue

Requests for Proposals to identify educational

groups or childcare providers interested in leasing

excess space and assuming or sharing

maintenance and operation costs.

40. Implement an aggressive marketing campaign to

rent the Burger Activity and Delco Activity centers

to interested parties for conferences, athletic

events, and other activities.

IX. Technology Recommendations

41. Design “Twenty-first Century Classrooms,” media

rich classrooms with projectors, audio system,

document cameras, and interactive tools.

42. Expand the staff use of online meeting software

(live video/audio/screen sharing) to facilitate

communication and allow people in different

spaces to be in the same space virtually. “Green”

meetings reduce employee travel time and have

a smaller carbon footprint.

43. Institute cloud computing with anytime/anywhere

access that works with all computer types and

devices.

44. Use Web 2.0 tools to communicate, collaborate,

and create.

45. Use tools such as video “chat” to expand beyond

the classroom (i.e., virtual field trips, interactions

with other students from across town, or across the

globe).

46. Create a single web entry point (portal) with single

sign-on for all student and teacher resources in

one place.

47. Increase use of online assessment tools to receive

results more quickly and reduce paper usage, i.e.,

dashboards.

48. Improve access to meaningful student data to

guide instructional decisions.

49. Create online courses for students and teacher

professional development which would be

conducted entirely online and blended with face-

to-face and online contact.

Page 37



50. Increase use of mobile computing (including

personal devices such as smart phones) and

mobile devices (netbooks). Fewer desktop

computers (use less energy, smaller foot print,), less

need for dedicated traditional computer lab.

X. Other Recommendations

51. Assess administrative fees for general, sibling, or

tracking school transfers, with no fee for students

qualified for free and reduced lunch, and with

provisions for hardship waivers.

52. Consider the feasibility of sharing administrative

staff or resources and services among small

campuses.

53. Initiate a district-wide boundary assessment and

possible realignment beginning January 2012, to

balance enrollment and improve vertical

alignment.

54. Determine cost effectiveness of duplicating

special programs in different areas of the District

versus providing transportation to a single

program.

Page 38



Facility Summary Data Reports with Facility Master Plan Recommendations

The following pages include a summary of each facility with the information listed below, in alphabetical order by school

type (ES, MS, HS). Support facilities are included subsequent to the school summaries.

School ID number, name, and address

Grades served

Permanent and portable/temporary square

footage

Number of classrooms

Permanent Capacity

2010-11 Enrollment

2010-11 Attendance Zone Population

2015-16 Projected Attendance Zone Population

2010-11 In Migration

2010-11 Out Migration

Site size and number of parking spaces

Individual building data

Facility condition data

Deficiency costs by building system and priority

Facility master plan recommendations

Page 39



Facility Summary Data Reports with Facility Master Plan Recommendations

The following pages include a summary of each facility with the information listed below, in alphabetical order by school

type (ES, MS, HS). Support facilities are included subsequent to the school summaries.

School ID number, name, and address

Grades served

Permanent and portable/temporary square

footage

Number of classrooms

Permanent Capacity

2010-11 Enrollment

2010-11 Attendance Zone Population

2015-16 Projected Attendance Zone Population



Site size and number of parking spaces

Individual building data

Facility condition data

Deficiency costs by building system and priority

Facility master plan recommendations

Page 39

EXHIBIT "B"

School Summary Report2010 Educational Suitability Assessment

M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Magellan Consulting, Inc. 2011

142

Allan ES

142 Allan Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)

2010-11 Utilization (by population) 53%

2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 354 319

Excess/Deficit Seats

2010-11 Out Migration 031

2010-11 In Migration 057

2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 364 309

Utilization (by enrollment) 56% Percent of Capacity

Area (GSF) per student 297 0 297

Gross Area 112,608 112,608

Perm Temp Total

2010-11 Campus Enrollment 379

Permanent Capacity 673

Number of Classrooms 42 0 42

Parking Spaces 72

Gross Site Area (Acres) 19.5

Site Data

School Data

Mechanical 1 1957 1,092 66.3%

Building B 1 1958 10,577 32.1%

Building A 1 1957 100,939 29.9%

Perm Buildings 112,608Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI

Building Data

32.1%

Austin, Texas 78702 1957 AA No

4900 Gonzales Yr. Open Rating Historic

Electrical - $1,960,083 $300,188 $21,979 - $2,282,251

Specialties - - $423,699 $80,329 - $504,028

Interior - - $458,209 $323,054 - $781,263

Plumbing $708,176 - $1,399,232 $11,768 - $2,119,176

Conveyances - - - - - $0

Technology - $87,750 $494,081 - - $581,831

Fire & Life Safety $141,494 $98,779 $2,617 - - $242,889

Site - - $158,480 $85,341 - $243,821

Other $225,024 $136,426 - - $800,915 $1,162,365

Mechanical $57,435 $9,454 $724,886 - - $791,775

Exterior - $2,942 $2,797,431 $36,448 - $2,836,821

Structural - - - - - $0

Roofing - - - - - $0

Total $1,132,129 $2,295,433 $6,758,822 $558,919 $800,915 $11,546,218

* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.

Facility Condition - System by PriorityPriority

System 1 2 3 4 5 Total

Facility Master Plan Recommendations

Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $3,427,562*

District-wide Facility Master Plan - DRAFT 02/08/2011 Austin Independent School District

Page 40

EXHIBIT "B"



101

Allison ES

101 Allison Elementary School Grades Served PK-6 (ES)


2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 585 -99




2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 590 -104



Gross Area 61,426 7,680 69,106

Perm Temp Total




Parking Spaces 61


Site Data

School Data

Building A 1 1955 61,426 20.1%


Building Data

20.3%


515 Vargas Rd. Yr. Open Rating Historic

Electrical - $230,499 $412,417 $11,881 - $654,797

Specialties - - $37,014 $73,394 - $110,407

Interior - $131,348 $250,466 $115,111 - $496,925

Plumbing - - $251,501 $9,629 - $261,130


Technology - $91,138 $447,192 - - $538,330

Fire & Life Safety $106,267 $72,572 $2,617 - - $181,456

Site - $2,222 $67,896 - - $70,119

Other $67,350 $176,405 - - $10,288 $254,043

Mechanical - $823,369 $742,003 - - $1,565,371

Exterior - $435 $49,328 - - $49,763


Roofing - - $7,992 - - $7,992

Total $173,617 $1,527,987 $2,268,426 $210,014 $10,288 $4,190,332







Page 41

EXHIBIT "B"



102

Andrews ES

102 Andrews Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)









Gross Area 58,376 10,752 69,128

Perm Temp Total




Parking Spaces 39


Site Data

School Data

Building B 1 1986 4,422 7.6%

Building A 1 1962 53,954 32.1%


Building Data

29.5%

Austin, Texas 78723 1962 RC No

6801 Northeast Dr. Yr. Open Rating Historic

Electrical - $260,909 $362,040 $35,208 - $658,157

Specialties - - $343,330 $83,069 - $426,399

Interior - $128,866 $481,123 $44,545 - $654,533

Plumbing $239,166 - $327,938 $5,350 - $572,454


Technology - $102,282 $476,976 - - $579,258

Fire & Life Safety $109,536 $73,733 - - - $183,268

Site - $49,858 $150,146 - - $200,004

Other $225,239 $255,049 - - $1,372,504 $1,852,792

Mechanical - $1,372,878 $1,042,888 $22,487 - $2,438,253

Exterior - - $13,720 - - $13,720


Roofing - $20,585 - - - $20,585

Total $573,941 $2,264,160 $3,198,161 $190,659 $1,372,504 $7,599,425







Page 42

EXHIBIT "B"



187

Baldwin ES

187 Baldwin Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)









Gross Area 86,751 86,751

Perm Temp Total




Parking Spaces

Gross Site Area (Acres) .0

Site Data

School Data

Building A 2 2010 86,751


Building Data

0.0%

, Texas 0 No

Yr. Open Rating Historic

Electrical - - - - - $0

Specialties - - - - - $0

Interior - - - - - $0

Plumbing - - - - - $0


Technology - - - - - $0

Fire & Life Safety - - - - - $0

Site - - - - - $0

Other - - - - - $0

Mechanical - - - - - $0

Exterior - - - - - $0


Roofing - - - - - $0

Total $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0





Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $000*


Page 43

EXHIBIT "B"



182

Baranoff ES

182 Baranoff Elementary School Grades Served K-5 (ES)









Gross Area 80,088 6,144 86,232

Perm Temp Total




Parking Spaces 84


Site Data

School Data

Classroom 1 2008 10,996 5.4%

Building A 1 1999 69,092 12.4%


Building Data

11.0%

Austin, Texas 78748 1999 EX No

12009 Buckingham Gate Yr. Open Rating Historic

Electrical - - $95,977 $24,556 - $120,533

Specialties - - $117,320 $225,980 - $343,300

Interior $926 $42,710 $270,274 $9,202 - $323,112

Plumbing - $24,586 $27,074 $18,259 - $69,920

Conveyances - $49,641 - - - $49,641

Technology - $278,827 $631,528 - - $910,355

Fire & Life Safety $126,088 $72,942 $2,617 - - $201,648

Site - - $9,548 - - $9,548

Other $70,859 $89,370 - - $121,554 $281,783

Mechanical - $57,841 $43,918 - - $101,759

Exterior - - $5,556 - - $5,556


Roofing - $4,702 $521,184 - - $525,885

Total $197,873 $620,619 $1,724,996 $277,997 $121,554 $2,943,039





Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $818,493*


Page 44

EXHIBIT "B"



149

Barrington ES

149 Barrington Elementary School Grades Served PK-6 (ES)






2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 1,098 -444



Gross Area 78,971 21,504 100,475

Perm Temp Total




Parking Spaces 68


Site Data

School Data

Building D 1 2010 12,794 0.0%

Building C 1 2010 100

Building B 1 1999 15,285 4.6%

Building A 1 1969 50,792 36.9%


Building Data

21.2%


400 Cooper Drive Yr. Open Rating Historic

Electrical $22,712 $95,267 $178,528 $32,952 - $329,459

Specialties - - $174,501 $127,022 - $301,523

Interior - $11,761 $448,982 $46,058 - $506,802

Plumbing - - $348,757 $50,558 - $399,315

Conveyances - $198,566 - - - $198,566

Technology - $55,147 $523,988 - - $579,135

Fire & Life Safety $143,452 $84,850 - - - $228,302

Site - $7,043 $71,576 $54,752 - $133,371

Other $104,890 $205,872 - - $2,516,731 $2,827,493

Mechanical $58,895 $16,736 $3,233,378 - - $3,309,009

Exterior - - $19,209 - - $19,209


Roofing - $6,812 - - - $6,812

Total $329,948 $682,054 $4,998,919 $311,342 $2,516,731 $8,838,995







Page 45

EXHIBIT "B"



103

Barton Hills ES

103 Barton Hills Elementary School Grades Served K-6 (ES)









Gross Area 38,291 10,752 49,043

Perm Temp Total




Parking Spaces 43


Site Data

School Data

Band 1 2007 3,205 0.5%

Building B 1 1964 2,985 22.0%

Building A 1 1964 32,101 36.3%


Building Data

33.4%


2108 Barton Hills Dr. Yr. Open Rating Historic

Electrical $24,143 $55,790 $367,319 $9,030 - $456,282

Specialties - - $126,541 $28,851 - $155,393

Interior - - $430,620 $9,067 - $439,687

Plumbing $144,398 - $155,949 $17,190 - $317,537

Conveyances - $49,641 - - - $49,641

Technology - $41,851 $188,065 - - $229,916

Fire & Life Safety $85,700 $65,351 - - - $151,052

Site - $4,606 $92,862 - - $97,468

Other $750,812 $1,082,848 - - $14,346 $1,848,006

Mechanical - $19,430 $167,197 - - $186,627

Exterior - - $106,348 $383,049 - $489,397

Structural $15,245 - $769 - - $16,014

Roofing $1,970 - $455,160 - - $457,130

Total $1,022,269 $1,319,518 $2,090,831 $447,186 $14,346 $4,894,150







Page 46

EXHIBIT "B"



104

Becker ES

104 Becker Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)









Gross Area 59,670 3,072 62,742

Perm Temp Total




Parking Spaces 0


Site Data

School Data

Building D 1 1936 1,099 21.6%

Building C 1 1936 1,237 19.1%

Mechanical 1 1939 499 24.0%

Building A 1 1936 56,835 35.7%


Building Data

37.1%

Austin, Texas 78704 1936 EX Yes

906 Milton St. West Yr. Open Rating Historic

Electrical - $174,132 $299,288 $7,366 - $480,786

Specialties - - $76,656 $99,315 - $175,971

Interior - $44,583 $185,538 $78,717 - $308,838

Plumbing $29,802 - $1,459,600 $16,046 - $1,505,449


Technology - $47,064 $354,610 - - $401,674

Fire & Life Safety $94,218 $62,525 - - - $156,743

Site - $4,927 $322,468 $2,225 - $329,620

Other $89,415 $86,448 - - $202,026 $377,889

Mechanical $901,466 $1,168,099 $599,661 - - $2,669,227

Exterior - - $8,103 $19,303 - $27,407

Structural - $7,792 - - - $7,792

Roofing - $537,027 $32,984 $24,829 - $594,840

Total $1,114,902 $2,132,597 $3,338,909 $247,800 $202,026 $7,036,234







Page 47

EXHIBIT "B"



105

Blackshear ES

105 Blackshear Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)









Gross Area 70,726 70,726

Perm Temp Total




Parking Spaces 52


Site Data

School Data

Building A 1 1937 70,726 31.7%


Building Data

34.7%

Austin, Texas 78702 1937 AA Yes

1712 East 11th St. Yr. Open Rating Historic

Electrical - $187,699 $578,074 $25,070 - $790,843

Specialties - - $55,364 $86,450 - $141,814

Interior $4,532 - $385,878 $3,206 - $393,616

Plumbing - - $324,886 $10,698 - $335,584


Technology - $77,782 $332,300 - - $410,082

Fire & Life Safety $101,399 $65,038 $2,617 - - $169,055

Site - - $170,707 $95,689 - $266,396

Other $77,822 $343,085 - - $58,019 $478,927

Mechanical - $1,842,538 $922,533 - - $2,765,071

Exterior - $3,341 $452,580 $575,423 - $1,031,344

Structural $4,394 - - - - $4,394

Roofing - $1,423 $561,069 - - $562,491

Total $188,148 $2,520,906 $3,786,009 $796,536 $58,019 $7,349,617







Page 48

EXHIBIT "B"



106

Blanton ES

106 Blanton Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)









Gross Area 71,817 9,216 81,033

Perm Temp Total




Parking Spaces 75


Site Data

School Data

Greenhouse 1 2004 317 33.5%

Building C 1 2000 11,424 6.4%

Building B 1 1964 3,546 25.0%

Building A 1 1964 56,530 20.8%


Building Data

20.8%


5408 Westminster Dr. Yr. Open Rating Historic

Electrical - $145,055 $825,421 $7,524 - $978,000

Specialties - - $123,565 $145,047 - $268,613

Interior - $106,775 $205,441 $46,975 - $359,191

Plumbing $326,183 - $202,524 $31,163 - $559,870

Conveyances - $99,283 - - - $99,283

Technology - $53,729 $536,877 - - $590,606

Fire & Life Safety $124,149 $89,652 $2,617 - - $216,419

Site - - $455,018 - - $455,018

Other $192,446 $84,158 - - $59,146 $335,750

Mechanical - $587,738 $614,997 - - $1,202,735

Exterior - - $2,793 - - $2,793


Roofing - - - - - $0

Total $642,778 $1,166,391 $2,969,253 $230,709 $59,146 $5,068,277







Page 49

EXHIBIT "B"



185

Blazier ES

185 Blazier Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)









Gross Area 82,897 10,752 93,649

Perm Temp Total




Parking Spaces 95


Site Data

School Data

Building A 1 2008 82,897 4.3%


Building Data

5.1%


8601 Vertex Blvd. Yr. Open Rating Historic

Electrical - - $23,877 $48,516 - $72,393

Specialties - - $31,404 $87,917 - $119,321

Interior - $64,065 $88,422 $12,027 - $164,514

Plumbing - - $138,990 $17,118 - $156,108


Technology - $69,732 $592,476 - - $662,208

Fire & Life Safety $125,254 $44,081 - - - $169,335

Site - - $508 $40,134 - $40,642

Other - - - - - $0

Mechanical $11,527 - - - - $11,527

Exterior - - - - - $0


Roofing - - $21,733 - - $21,733

Total $136,781 $177,879 $897,410 $205,711 $0 $1,417,781







Page 50

EXHIBIT "B"



170

Boone ES

170 Boone Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)









Gross Area 73,690 73,690

Perm Temp Total




Parking Spaces 82


Site Data

School Data

Building B 1 1998 10,017 7.4%

Building A 1 1986 63,673 17.2%


Building Data

17.4%


8101 Croftwood Dr. Yr. Open Rating Historic

Electrical - - $38,018 $34,099 - $72,117

Specialties - - $104,863 $130,565 - $235,429

Interior - - $186,388 $50,972 - $237,360

Plumbing $100,893 - $214,827 $7,492 - $323,212


Technology - $54,170 $629,580 - - $683,750

Fire & Life Safety $105,015 $71,301 - - - $176,316

Site - - - $124,792 - $124,792

Other $273,625 $246,609 - - $318,391 $838,626

Mechanical $1,502 - $1,424,842 - - $1,426,344

Exterior - $9,899 - - - $9,899

Structural - - $8,356 - - $8,356

Roofing - - - - - $0

Total $481,035 $381,979 $2,606,876 $347,921 $318,391 $4,136,202







Page 51

EXHIBIT "B"



107

Brentwood ES

107 Brentwood Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)









Gross Area 62,891 3,072 65,963

Perm Temp Total




Parking Spaces 68


Site Data

School Data

Building B 1 1951 572

Building A 1 1951 62,319 22.1%


Building Data

23.2%


6700 Arroyo Seco Yr. Open Rating Historic

Electrical - $203,390 $179,931 $27,524 - $410,846

Specialties - - $108,798 $106,218 - $215,016

Interior - $868 $682,430 $45,770 - $729,067

Plumbing - - $572,536 $10,701 - $583,236


Technology - $47,732 $448,626 - - $496,358

Fire & Life Safety $99,872 $69,505 - - - $169,376

Site $12,102 - $60,185 - - $72,287

Other $141,131 $399,050 - - $1,442,616 $1,982,797

Mechanical $33,509 $372,314 $787,027 - - $1,192,849

Exterior - - $134,776 - - $134,776

Structural - - $7,945 - - $7,945

Roofing - - - - - $0

Total $286,613 $1,092,859 $2,982,254 $190,212 $1,442,616 $5,994,554







Page 52

EXHIBIT "B"



108

Brooke ES

108 Brooke Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)









Gross Area 52,282 3,858 56,140

Perm Temp Total




Parking Spaces 43


Site Data

School Data

Building A 1 1954 52,282 32.0%


Building Data

32.6%


3100 East 4th St. Yr. Open Rating Historic

Electrical - $447,716 $142,618 $1,900 - $592,234

Specialties - - $42,894 $69,049 - $111,943

Interior - $64,065 $139,423 $324,182 - $527,670

Plumbing $270,219 - $311,932 $27,954 - $610,106

Conveyances - $99,283 - - - $99,283

Technology - $49,308 $406,816 - - $456,124

Fire & Life Safety $90,134 $66,443 - - - $156,577

Site - - $35,849 - - $35,849

Other $84,861 $220,391 - - $37,886 $343,138

Mechanical - - $1,996,427 - - $1,996,427

Exterior - - $89,580 $13,732 - $103,312

Structural - - $1,461 - - $1,461

Roofing - $443,263 - - - $443,263

Total $445,215 $1,390,469 $3,167,000 $436,817 $37,886 $5,477,387







Page 53

EXHIBIT "B"



109

Brown ES

109 Brown Elementary School Grades Served PK-6 (ES)









Gross Area 53,853 9,216 63,069

Perm Temp Total




Parking Spaces 58


Site Data

School Data

Building A 1 1957 53,853 36.2%


Building Data

33.6%


505 W. Anderson Ln. Yr. Open Rating Historic

Electrical - $200,491 $98,504 $32,990 - $331,985

Specialties - - $78,323 $65,369 - $143,692

Interior - $128,130 $56,332 $523,139 - $707,601

Plumbing $433,368 - $679,370 $5,350 - $1,118,089


Technology - $48,342 $393,777 - - $442,119

Fire & Life Safety $106,953 $62,707 - - - $169,660

Site - - $26,737 $40,134 - $66,871

Other $85,828 $84,704 - - $2,665,997 $2,836,529

Mechanical - $782,729 $387,333 - - $1,170,062

Exterior - - $113,675 - - $113,675


Roofing $1,852,585 - $20,585 - - $1,873,170

Total $2,478,734 $1,307,103 $1,854,637 $666,982 $2,665,997 $8,973,453







Page 54

EXHIBIT "B"



110

Bryker Woods ES

110 Bryker Woods Elementary School Grades Served K-6 (ES)









Gross Area 37,517 7,680 45,197

Perm Temp Total




Parking Spaces 33


Site Data

School Data

Multi-Use 1 1949 1,202

Multi-Use 1 1949 451 13.8%

Building B 1 1999 4,874 10.2%

Building A 1 1939 30,990 39.0%


Building Data

34.2%


3309 Kerbey Lane Yr. Open Rating Historic

Electrical $5,774 $258,851 $193,752 $8,554 - $466,931

Specialties - - $72,714 $71,979 - $144,693

Interior - $85,420 $187,324 $86,382 - $359,126

Plumbing - - $550,203 $117,216 - $667,420


Technology - $41,472 $228,241 - - $269,714

Fire & Life Safety $76,664 $56,369 - - - $133,033

Site $11,503 $2,135 - $64,475 - $78,114

Other $95,470 $320,072 - - $44,654 $460,196

Mechanical - $671,437 $737,812 - - $1,409,249

Exterior - $3,842 $594,025 - - $597,867

Structural - - $585 - - $585

Roofing - - $49,869 - - $49,869

Total $189,411 $1,439,598 $2,614,525 $348,606 $44,654 $4,636,795







Page 55

EXHIBIT "B"



111

Campbell ES

111 Campbell Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)









Gross Area 61,793 1,536 63,329

Perm Temp Total




Parking Spaces 71


Site Data

School Data

Building A 1 1992 61,793 19.2%


Building Data

20.8%


2613 Rogers Ave. Yr. Open Rating Historic

Electrical - $79,714 $22,047 $21,308 - $123,068

Specialties - - $93,514 $102,707 - $196,221

Interior - $21,355 $141,699 $44,826 - $207,880

Plumbing - $5,673 $102,748 $8,562 - $116,982


Technology - $51,473 $480,195 - - $531,667

Fire & Life Safety $102,685 $61,978 $2,617 - - $167,280

Site $2,209 - $194,564 $19,758 - $216,531

Other $206,699 $376,708 - - $377,355 $960,762

Mechanical - $159,506 $1,609,266 - - $1,768,771

Exterior - - $1,436 - - $1,436

Structural - - $3,668 - - $3,668

Roofing - - - - - $0

Total $311,592 $756,406 $2,651,752 $197,160 $377,355 $4,294,266







Page 56

EXHIBIT "B"



173

Casey ES

173 Casey Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)









Gross Area 81,506 1,536 83,042

Perm Temp Total




Parking Spaces 90


Site Data

School Data

Building A 1 1998 81,506 15.1%


Building Data

15.8%


9400 Texas Oaks Drive Yr. Open Rating Historic

Electrical - $55,790 $69,561 $20,517 - $145,867

Specialties - - $94,992 $168,573 - $263,566

Interior - $21,355 $103,475 $259,333 - $384,163

Plumbing - - $60,629 $9,631 - $70,260


Technology - $61,817 $571,009 - - $632,826

Fire & Life Safety $118,356 $70,205 $2,617 - - $191,179

Site - - $11,274 - - $11,274

Other $214,476 $191,954 - - $78,748 $485,178

Mechanical - $9,454 $175,204 - - $184,658

Exterior - - - - - $0


Roofing - - - $1,609,070 - $1,609,070

Total $332,832 $410,575 $1,088,761 $2,067,124 $78,748 $3,978,039







Page 57

EXHIBIT "B"



112

Casis ES

112 Casis Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)









Gross Area 77,911 13,824 91,735

Perm Temp Total




Parking Spaces 74


Site Data

School Data

Storage 1 1977 201

Building A 1 1951 77,710 16.6%


Building Data

17.4%


2710 Exposition Blvd. Yr. Open Rating Historic

Electrical $1,398 $139,476 $502,223 $285,421 - $928,518

Specialties - - $280,357 $117,401 - $397,758

Interior - $158,014 $91,098 $192,609 - $441,722

Plumbing - - $883,640 $7,492 - $891,131


Technology - $37,504 $553,409 - - $590,913

Fire & Life Safety $52,902 $47,234 - - - $100,136

Site - - $110,394 $128,950 - $239,343

Other $221,207 - - - $298,311 $519,518

Mechanical $1,143 $225,633 $311,862 - - $538,638

Exterior - - $125,554 - - $125,554

Structural $3,372 - - - - $3,372

Roofing - $23,829 - - - $23,829

Total $280,022 $631,690 $2,858,536 $731,873 $298,311 $4,800,432







Page 58

EXHIBIT "B"



184

Clayton ES

184 Clayton Elementary School Grades Served K-5 (ES)









Gross Area 99,921 6,144 106,065

Perm Temp Total




Parking Spaces 80


Site Data

School Data

Building A 1 2006 99,921 5.6%


Building Data

5.9%


7525 La Crosse Ave. Yr. Open Rating Historic

Electrical - $55,790 $15,442 $18,970 - $90,203

Specialties - - $144,232 $154,373 - $298,605

Interior - - $110,324 $11,953 - $122,276

Plumbing - - $40,274 $30,096 - $70,370

Conveyances - $99,283 - - - $99,283

Technology - $66,669 $727,735 - - $794,404

Fire & Life Safety $136,427 $66,371 - - - $202,798

Site - - $104,860 - - $104,860

Other - - - - - $0

Mechanical - $94,332 - - - $94,332

Exterior - - - - - $0


Roofing - - - - - $0

Total $136,427 $382,446 $1,142,866 $215,392 $0 $1,877,130







Page 59

EXHIBIT "B"



161

Cook ES

161 Cook Elementary School Grades Served K-5 (ES)


2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 1,252 -691







Gross Area 67,344 18,432 85,776

Perm Temp Total




Parking Spaces 102


Site Data

School Data

Building B 1 1998 9,101 6.7%

Building A 1 1974 58,243 34.4%


Building Data

27.3%


1511 Cripple Creek Yr. Open Rating Historic

Electrical $612 $112,040 $498,713 $41,308 - $652,673

Specialties - - $164,394 $60,771 - $225,164

Interior - $22,516 $292,679 $56,423 - $371,617

Plumbing $463,806 $7,984 $672,803 $17,116 - $1,161,710


Technology - $52,591 $514,759 - - $567,349

Fire & Life Safety $139,760 $77,796 - - - $217,556

Site $5,447 $368,828 $71,282 $99,999 - $545,557

Other $104,525 $171,689 - - $3,122,125 $3,398,340

Mechanical $113,579 $2,346,429 $305,774 - - $2,765,782

Exterior - $5,057 $13,275 - - $18,332

Structural - $27,464 $124,896 - - $152,360

Roofing - $23,862 - - - $23,862

Total $827,731 $3,216,256 $2,658,575 $275,616 $3,122,125 $10,100,303







Page 60

EXHIBIT "B"



183

Cowan ES

183 Cowan Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)









Gross Area 70,234 9,216 79,450

Perm Temp Total




Parking Spaces 84


Site Data

School Data

Building A 1 1999 70,234 7.6%


Building Data

9.1%


2817 Kentish Drive Yr. Open Rating Historic

Electrical - $5,580 $32,214 $45,189 - $82,983

Specialties - - $129,283 $76,537 - $205,820

Interior - $21,355 $194,940 $48,518 - $264,812

Plumbing - - $136,947 $23,607 - $160,554

Conveyances - $49,641 - - - $49,641

Technology - $53,321 $543,971 - - $597,292

Fire & Life Safety $122,086 $71,547 - - - $193,633

Site - $4,606 $18,655 $75,046 - $98,307

Other $318,918 $50,165 - - $287,289 $656,372

Mechanical - $76,432 - - - $76,432

Exterior - - - $770 - $770


Roofing - - $54,863 - - $54,863

Total $441,004 $332,647 $1,110,874 $269,668 $287,289 $2,441,481







Page 61

EXHIBIT "B"



113

Cunningham ES

113 Cunningham Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)









Gross Area 71,600 6,144 77,744

Perm Temp Total




Parking Spaces 62


Site Data

School Data

Building B 1 1990 9,722 30.8%

Building A 1 1963 61,878 38.7%


Building Data

39.4%


2200 Berkeley Ave. Yr. Open Rating Historic

Electrical - - $1,233,513 $39,131 - $1,272,644

Specialties - - $111,536 $92,651 - $204,187

Interior - $2,068 $207,688 $46,250 - $256,006

Plumbing - $1,894 $2,102,907 $24,603 - $2,129,403


Technology - $53,939 $547,184 - - $601,123

Fire & Life Safety $118,092 $70,131 - - - $188,222

Site - - $725,547 $272,621 - $998,169

Other $56,081 $392,715 - - $3,523,663 $3,972,459

Mechanical - $74,272 $2,949,674 - - $3,023,946

Exterior $483 - $26,308 - - $26,791

Structural - $1,685 - - - $1,685

Roofing - - - - - $0

Total $174,656 $596,703 $7,904,357 $475,256 $3,523,663 $12,674,635







Page 62

EXHIBIT "B"



179

Davis ES

179 Davis Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)









Gross Area 72,149 4,608 76,757

Perm Temp Total




Parking Spaces 104


Site Data

School Data

Building B 1 1999 9,981 4.7%

Building A 1 1993 62,168 28.3%


Building Data

24.7%


5214 Duval Rd. Yr. Open Rating Historic

Electrical - $44,631 $182,421 $45,586 - $272,638

Specialties - - $163,945 $155,828 - $319,772

Interior $1,219 $21,355 $1,236,077 $53,085 - $1,311,737

Plumbing - - $135,957 $20,398 - $156,355

Conveyances - $49,641 - - - $49,641

Technology - $53,631 $545,092 - - $598,723

Fire & Life Safety $107,138 $67,067 $2,617 - - $176,823

Site - - $1,852 $40,134 - $41,985

Other $267,589 $529,587 - - $172,691 $969,866

Mechanical - $9,454 $1,886,653 - - $1,896,106

Exterior - - $6,076 - - $6,076

Structural - - $3,372 - - $3,372

Roofing - - - - - $0

Total $375,946 $775,366 $4,164,062 $315,031 $172,691 $5,803,095







Page 63

EXHIBIT "B"



114

Dawson ES

114 Dawson Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)









Gross Area 55,301 5,394 60,695

Perm Temp Total




Parking Spaces 56


Site Data

School Data

Building C 1 1991 9,965 10.0%

Building B 1 1986 299 3.3%

Building A 1 1954 45,037 26.3%


Building Data

27.0%


3001 South 1st Yr. Open Rating Historic

Electrical - $535,848 $131,343 $15,763 - $682,954

Specialties - - $342,862 $91,722 - $434,584

Interior $23,515 $85,420 $121,022 $10,149 - $240,106

Plumbing - - $321,199 $6,420 - $327,619


Technology - $46,000 $474,418 - - $520,418

Fire & Life Safety $82,474 $63,151 - - - $145,625

Site - $208,739 $42,588 - - $251,327

Other $714,876 $417,782 - - $1,240,330 $2,372,988

Mechanical - $820,238 $195,656 - - $1,015,894

Exterior - - $58,409 - - $58,409

Structural - - $27,004 - - $27,004

Roofing - $1,297 $32,523 - - $33,821

Total $820,865 $2,178,475 $1,747,025 $124,053 $1,240,330 $6,110,749







Page 64

EXHIBIT "B"



154

Doss ES

154 Doss Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)









Gross Area 60,228 12,288 72,516

Perm Temp Total




Parking Spaces 73


Site Data

School Data

Bldg B 1 2009 4,646 0.6%

Building A 1 1970 55,582 40.5%


Building Data

32.7%


7005 Northledge Dr Yr. Open Rating Historic

Electrical - $93,707 $1,239,975 $30,101 - $1,363,783

Specialties - - $180,004 $126,691 - $306,695

Interior - - $532,670 $50,410 - $583,081

Plumbing - $1,594 $555,353 $15,048 - $571,995

Conveyances - $49,641 - - - $49,641

Technology - $49,792 $441,586 - - $491,378

Fire & Life Safety $109,107 $67,795 - - - $176,901

Site - $4,606 $72,430 $40,134 - $117,170

Other $168,386 $49,256 - - $522,873 $740,515

Mechanical $11,527 $1,855,059 $825,466 - - $2,692,052

Exterior - - $731 - - $731

Structural - $5,493 $68,609 - - $74,102

Roofing - - $409,920 - - $409,920

Total $289,020 $2,176,942 $4,326,744 $262,383 $522,873 $7,577,962







Page 65

EXHIBIT "B"



176

Galindo ES

176 Galindo Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)









Gross Area 85,482 7,680 93,162

Perm Temp Total




Parking Spaces 98


Site Data

School Data

Mechanical 1 2001 900 85.1%

Building A 1 1989 84,582 9.3%


Building Data

11.4%


3800 S. 2nd St. Yr. Open Rating Historic

Electrical $551 $62,382 $47,347 $1,821 - $112,101

Specialties - - $182,951 $148,333 - $331,284

Interior - $87,858 $143,409 $46,940 - $278,208

Plumbing - - $70,598 $40,861 - $111,459

Conveyances - $148,924 - - - $148,924

Technology - $69,224 $647,749 - - $716,973

Fire & Life Safety $136,237 $76,517 - - - $212,754

Site - $4,218 $5,085 - - $9,303

Other $353,824 $145,359 - - $427,229 $926,412

Mechanical $227,913 $23,049 $210,340 - - $461,302

Exterior - - $3,160 - - $3,160


Roofing - - - - - $0

Total $718,525 $617,531 $1,310,639 $237,955 $427,229 $3,311,879







Page 66

EXHIBIT "B"



116

Govalle ES

116 Govalle Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)









Gross Area 77,638 77,638

Perm Temp Total




Parking Spaces 71


Site Data

School Data

Building B 1 1940 501 3.4%

Building A 1 1940 77,137 34.8%


Building Data

36.1%


3601 Govalle Ave. Yr. Open Rating Historic

Electrical - - $318,491 $26,336 - $344,828

Specialties - - $164,526 $500,659 - $665,185

Interior - $13,048 $108,769 $734,337 - $856,155

Plumbing - $29,063 $1,297,172 $8,562 - $1,334,796


Technology - $67,933 $536,415 - - $604,348

Fire & Life Safety $116,822 $67,936 - - - $184,758

Site - $4,606 $45,725 - - $50,331

Other $223,311 $380,254 - - $3,581,856 $4,185,421

Mechanical - $1,834,541 $609,751 - - $2,444,292

Exterior - $18,207 $1,168,634 - - $1,186,841

Structural - $5,080 $9,873 - - $14,952

Roofing - - $38,291 - - $38,291

Total $340,133 $2,420,667 $4,297,646 $1,269,894 $3,581,856 $11,910,197







Page 67

EXHIBIT "B"



159

Graham ES

159 Graham Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)









Gross Area 70,589 10,752 81,341

Perm Temp Total




Parking Spaces 77


Site Data

School Data

Building C 1 2008 11,232 4.4%

Building B 1 1993 14,411 13.6%

Building A 1 1972 44,946 41.0%


Building Data

29.7%


11211 Tom Adams Dr. Yr. Open Rating Historic

Electrical - - $262,635 $15,208 - $277,843

Specialties - $2,119 $83,054 $99,068 - $184,241

Interior - $44,191 $177,156 $252,277 - $473,624

Plumbing $337,809 $771 $252,984 $9,631 - $601,195


Technology - $53,595 $561,452 - - $615,048

Fire & Life Safety $127,799 $73,588 $2,617 - - $204,004

Site $1,180 $91,328 $221,921 $86,383 - $400,812

Other $309,592 $279,998 - - $145,540 $735,129

Mechanical - $3,511,777 $245,364 - - $3,757,141

Exterior - $1,716 $3,157 - - $4,874

Structural - $16,429 $70,378 $296 - $87,103

Roofing - - - - - $0

Total $776,380 $4,075,512 $1,880,720 $462,863 $145,540 $7,341,015







Page 68

EXHIBIT "B"



117

Gullett ES

117 Gullett Elementary School Grades Served K-5 (ES)









Gross Area 39,827 11,525 51,352

Perm Temp Total




Parking Spaces 30


Site Data

School Data

Mechanical 1 1972 179 11.0%

Building A 1 1956 39,648 34.1%


Building Data

30.4%


6310 Treadwell Blvd. Yr. Open Rating Historic

Electrical - $61,370 $774,757 $35,407 - $871,534

Specialties - - $107,868 $120,820 - $228,688

Interior - $51,419 $103,244 $45,619 - $200,283

Plumbing - - $819,095 $36,511 - $855,606

Conveyances - $148,924 - - - $148,924

Technology - $46,009 $370,822 - - $416,831

Fire & Life Safety $88,849 $66,871 - - - $155,719

Site - $10,933 $96,959 $40,134 - $148,025

Other $207,430 $86,329 - - $3,818,868 $4,112,628

Mechanical - $105,829 $1,056,360 - - $1,162,189

Exterior $292 $917 $58,897 - - $60,106


Roofing - $7,113 $96,482 - - $103,595

Total $296,571 $585,713 $3,484,484 $278,491 $3,818,868 $8,464,128







Page 69

EXHIBIT "B"



118

Harris ES

118 Harris Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)









Gross Area 56,066 10,752 66,818

Perm Temp Total




Parking Spaces 33


Site Data

School Data

Building B 1 1998 14,112 10.9%

Building A 1 1955 41,954 31.4%


Building Data

23.9%


1711 Wheless Ln. Yr. Open Rating Historic

Electrical - $5,580 $613,234 $44,635 - $663,448

Specialties - - $174,963 $93,228 - $268,190

Interior - $5,402 $129,986 $8,601 - $143,989

Plumbing - - $564,904 $29,950 - $594,855


Technology - $47,049 $509,762 - - $556,811

Fire & Life Safety $97,111 $80,372 - - - $177,483

Site - - $2,967 $174,752 - $177,718

Other $55,187 $120,231 - - $26,321 $201,740

Mechanical - $93,054 $1,264,887 - - $1,357,940

Exterior - $2,099 $400,297 - - $402,396

Structural - $2,401 - - - $2,401

Roofing - $204,977 $16,363 - - $221,340

Total $152,298 $561,165 $3,677,362 $351,166 $26,321 $4,768,312







Page 70

EXHIBIT "B"



163

Hart ES

163 Hart Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)









Gross Area 81,042 13,824 94,866

Perm Temp Total




Parking Spaces 62


Site Data

School Data

Building B 1 2010 11,175 3.7%

Building A 1 1998 69,867 11.8%


Building Data

10.3%


8301 Furness Yr. Open Rating Historic

Electrical - $126,867 $541,461 $50,734 - $719,063

Specialties - - $125,968 $188,811 - $314,779

Interior $15,616 $27,849 $53,674 $41,169 - $138,308

Plumbing - - $53,823 $20,398 - $74,221

Conveyances - $49,641 - - - $49,641

Technology - $67,824 $659,673 - - $727,497

Fire & Life Safety $143,408 $84,854 - - - $228,262

Site $85,478 - $37,799 $29,425 - $152,702

Other $191,807 $230,451 - - $150,402 $572,660

Mechanical - $60,697 $1,143 - - $61,840

Exterior $2,221 $388 $202 - - $2,811

Structural $824 $3,296 $1,169 - - $5,289

Roofing - - - - - $0

Total $439,353 $651,866 $1,474,912 $330,538 $150,402 $3,047,071







Page 71

EXHIBIT "B"



119

Highland Park ES

119 Highland Park Elementary School Grades Served K-5 (ES)









Gross Area 58,550 9,216 67,766

Perm Temp Total




Parking Spaces 60


Site Data

School Data

Building A 1 1952 58,550 43.5%


Building Data

41.4%


4900 Fairview Yr. Open Rating Historic

Electrical - $259,407 $390,430 $36,116 - $685,953

Specialties $4,193 - $170,611 $82,273 - $257,077

Interior - $64,699 $187,358 $57,497 - $309,553

Plumbing - - $1,052,700 $3,209 - $1,055,909


Technology - $50,681 $518,880 - - $569,560

Fire & Life Safety $106,474 $66,857 - - - $173,331

Site - - $232,569 $40,134 - $272,703

Other $102,408 $145,599 - - $2,241,968 $2,489,976

Mechanical $295,084 $108,099 $2,038,859 - - $2,442,043

Exterior - - $85,237 $1,319,390 - $1,404,627


Roofing - $21,733 $902,460 - - $924,193

Total $508,160 $717,075 $5,579,104 $1,538,618 $2,241,968 $10,584,925







Page 72

EXHIBIT "B"



155

Hill ES

155 Hill Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)









Gross Area 69,626 9,216 78,842

Perm Temp Total




Parking Spaces 74


Site Data

School Data

Building B 1 1990 7,616 16.2%

Building A 1 1970 62,010 32.7%


Building Data

29.0%


8601 Tallwood Drive Yr. Open Rating Historic

Electrical - - $417,152 $69,270 - $486,422

Specialties - - $53,658 $147,077 - $200,735

Interior - $128,130 $124,942 $47,029 - $300,102

Plumbing $89,040 - $769,391 $10,698 - $869,130


Technology - $53,374 $544,165 - - $597,539

Fire & Life Safety $122,357 $83,228 - - - $205,584

Site - - $13,491 $40,134 - $53,624

Other $159,986 $195,096 - - $2,573,608 $2,928,690

Mechanical - $1,180,297 $795,288 - - $1,975,585

Exterior - - $2,925 $10,485 - $13,409


Roofing - - $1,750,257 - - $1,750,257

Total $371,383 $1,640,124 $4,471,269 $324,693 $2,573,608 $9,381,077







Page 73

EXHIBIT "B"



162

Houston ES

162 Houston Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)









Gross Area 81,360 15,360 96,720

Perm Temp Total




Parking Spaces 93


Site Data

School Data

Building D 1 2006 11,380 10.1%

Building C 1 1991 5,303 24.2%

Building B 1 1991 8,863 29.4%

Building A 1 1976 55,814 50.4%


Building Data

36.0%


5409 Ponciana Dr. Yr. Open Rating Historic

Electrical - $301,828 $224,073 $61,942 - $587,843

Specialties - - $205,773 $90,990 - $296,763

Interior - $54,696 $540,035 $62,669 - $657,401

Plumbing - - $680,338 $49,351 - $729,689

Conveyances - $99,283 - - - $99,283

Technology - $63,918 $692,577 - - $756,494

Fire & Life Safety $147,480 $80,500 - - - $227,980

Site - $5,847 $9,453 $40,134 - $55,433

Other $163,516 $390,742 - - $251,318 $805,576

Mechanical $36,988 $4,421,996 $1,127,316 - - $5,586,300

Exterior - - $3,658 $8,855 - $12,514

Structural - - $8,788 - - $8,788

Roofing - - $794,286 - - $794,286

Total $347,984 $5,418,810 $4,286,298 $313,940 $251,318 $10,618,350







Page 74

EXHIBIT "B"



178

Jordan ES

178 Jordan Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)









Gross Area 74,460 12,288 86,748

Perm Temp Total




Parking Spaces 114


Site Data

School Data

Building B 1 2008 12,205 4.5%

Building A 1 1992 62,255 25.4%


Building Data

22.0%


6711 Johnny Morris Rd. Yr. Open Rating Historic

Electrical - $156,212 $406,010 $49,071 - $611,292

Specialties - - $144,437 $130,980 - $275,417

Interior - $21,355 $249,074 $55,637 - $326,066

Plumbing - $79,525 $161,718 $30,096 - $271,339

Conveyances - $99,283 - - - $99,283

Technology - $54,550 $646,026 - - $700,576

Fire & Life Safety $118,309 $76,247 - - - $194,556

Site - $5,980 $153,950 $40,134 - $200,064

Other $209,863 $437,570 - - $366,415 $1,013,847

Mechanical $16,073 $33,156 $2,256,940 - - $2,306,169

Exterior - - $32,022 - - $32,022

Structural - - $6,370 - - $6,370

Roofing - - - - - $0

Total $344,244 $963,877 $4,056,546 $305,917 $366,415 $6,037,001







Page 75

EXHIBIT "B"



120

Joslin ES

120 Joslin Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)









Gross Area 44,826 7,680 52,506

Perm Temp Total




Parking Spaces 56


Site Data

School Data

Building C 1 1986 3,250 4.6%

Building B 1 1957 10,642 39.6%

Building A 1 1954 30,934 56.5%


Building Data

44.1%


4500 Manchaca Rd. Yr. Open Rating Historic

Electrical - $47,787 $613,768 $5,227 - $666,782

Specialties - - $91,288 $84,871 - $176,158

Interior - $106,775 $156,756 $238,803 - $502,335

Plumbing $253,206 - $488,637 $14,976 - $756,819

Conveyances - $99,283 - - - $99,283

Technology - $47,435 $358,949 - - $406,384

Fire & Life Safety $88,812 $59,839 $2,617 - - $151,268

Site - $165,935 $4,802 - - $170,737

Other $15,415 $142,381 - - $1,576,163 $1,733,958

Mechanical - $751,392 $909,349 $171,550 - $1,832,291

Exterior - - $1,232,954 - - $1,232,954

Structural - $6,269 $1,537 - - $7,806

Roofing - $535,503 $193,838 - - $729,341

Total $357,433 $1,962,599 $4,054,494 $515,428 $1,576,163 $8,466,116







Page 76

EXHIBIT "B"



180

Kiker ES

180 Kiker Elementary School Grades Served K-5 (ES)









Gross Area 76,332 15,360 91,692

Perm Temp Total




Parking Spaces 90


Site Data

School Data

Building B 1 2007 12,783 4.2%

Building A 1 1992 63,549 19.6%


Building Data

16.3%


5913 La Crosse Ave. Yr. Open Rating Historic

Electrical - - $9,906 $29,467 - $39,374

Specialties - - $215,347 $61,320 - $276,667

Interior - $128,130 $343,012 $41,886 - $513,028

Plumbing - - $200,216 $11,770 - $211,986


Technology - $54,681 $646,497 - - $701,179

Fire & Life Safety $126,090 $78,994 - - - $205,083

Site - - $10,449 $87,037 - $97,485

Other $276,715 $577,848 - - $270,058 $1,124,621

Mechanical - - $1,460,014 - - $1,460,014

Exterior $62,649 - $590 - - $63,239

Structural - $3,302 - - - $3,302

Roofing - $20,585 - - - $20,585

Total $465,453 $863,540 $2,886,032 $231,480 $270,058 $4,716,563







Page 77

EXHIBIT "B"



172

Kocurek ES

172 Kocurek Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)









Gross Area 78,528 1,536 80,064

Perm Temp Total




Parking Spaces 70


Site Data

School Data

Building B 1 1998 10,499 7.8%

Building A 1 1986 68,029 26.7%


Building Data

25.4%


9800 Curlew Dr. Yr. Open Rating Historic

Electrical - $160,129 $85,511 $20,237 - $265,877

Specialties - - $170,132 $130,463 - $300,595

Interior - - $121,380 $45,109 - $166,489

Plumbing - - $170,382 $36,585 - $206,967

Conveyances - $148,924 - - - $148,924

Technology - $67,872 $659,846 - - $727,718

Fire & Life Safety $112,894 $69,086 - - - $181,980

Site - $20,597 $118,823 $73,933 - $213,354

Other $163,863 $320,146 - - $84,409 $568,417

Mechanical - $264,419 $3,016,136 - - $3,280,555

Exterior - $258 $21,688 $7,965 - $29,911

Structural - - $3,472 $22,830 - $26,303

Roofing - $7,927 - - - $7,927

Total $276,757 $1,059,358 $4,367,370 $337,123 $84,409 $6,125,017







Page 78

EXHIBIT "B"



168

Langford ES

168 Langford Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)









Gross Area 78,250 16,896 95,146

Perm Temp Total




Parking Spaces 83


Site Data

School Data

Building C 1 2010 11,831 3.5%

Building B 1 1996 8,753 15.8%

Building A 1 1980 57,666 48.2%


Building Data

33.5%


2206 Blue Meadow Yr. Open Rating Historic

Electrical - $274,142 $345,120 $52,952 - $672,214

Specialties - - $158,946 $120,358 - $279,303

Interior - $24,894 $436,963 $45,997 - $507,854

Plumbing $194,476 - $466,878 $30,024 - $691,378

Conveyances - $49,641 - - - $49,641

Technology - $55,232 $651,423 - - $706,655

Fire & Life Safety $148,475 $81,228 - - - $229,703

Site - $45,535 $75,331 $42,669 - $163,535

Other $156,258 $239,586 - - $292,964 $688,809

Mechanical $23,055 $5,212,923 $470,507 - - $5,706,485

Exterior - $79,485 $202 - - $79,688

Structural - - $2,170 - - $2,170

Roofing - - - - - $0

Total $522,264 $6,062,668 $2,607,540 $292,001 $292,964 $9,777,436







Page 79

EXHIBIT "B"



121

Lee ES

121 Lee Elementary School Grades Served K-6 (ES)









Gross Area 46,265 768 47,033

Perm Temp Total




Parking Spaces 35


Site Data

School Data

Building D 1 1939 1,310 22.5%

Library 1 1998 5,679 7.9%

Mechanical 1 1939 460 12.8%

Building A 1 1939 38,816 41.5%


Building Data

40.7%


3308 Hampton Rd. Yr. Open Rating Historic

Electrical - $145,055 $437,497 $24,197 - $606,750

Specialties - $227,364 $67,925 $101,699 - $396,988

Interior - $3,267 $289,684 $48,675 - $341,626

Plumbing - $38,562 $951,773 $25,675 - $1,016,010


Technology - $47,901 $407,694 - - $455,595

Fire & Life Safety $73,630 $55,635 - - - $129,265

Site - $6,267 $69,158 - - $75,426

Other $353,154 $292,571 - - $36,675 $682,400

Mechanical - $792,855 $976,847 - - $1,769,702

Exterior - $137,099 $17,506 - - $154,605

Structural - $32,808 - - - $32,808

Roofing - $69,180 $7,013 - - $76,193

Total $426,784 $1,848,564 $3,225,098 $200,247 $36,675 $5,737,368







Page 80

EXHIBIT "B"



160

Linder ES

160 Linder Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)









Gross Area 69,250 16,896 86,146

Perm Temp Total




Parking Spaces 86


Site Data

School Data

Building A 1 1972 69,250 22.0%


Building Data

19.7%


2800 Metcalfe Rd. Yr. Open Rating Historic

Electrical - $87,923 $75,235 $27,921 - $191,079

Specialties - - $240,305 $141,453 - $381,758

Interior - $85,420 $186,968 $156,894 - $429,282

Plumbing - - $282,747 $7,489 - $290,237


Technology - $53,083 $517,073 - - $570,155

Fire & Life Safety $138,680 $77,410 - - - $216,090

Site - - $194,146 $40,134 - $234,280

Other $32,036 $142,186 - - $5,522,354 $5,696,576

Mechanical - $1,145,115 $1,370,191 - - $2,515,306

Exterior - - $397 - - $397

Structural - - $48,399 - - $48,399

Roofing - - - - - $0

Total $170,717 $1,591,137 $2,915,462 $373,892 $5,522,354 $10,573,560







Page 81

EXHIBIT "B"



122

Maplewood ES

122 Maplewood Elementary School Grades Served PK-6 (ES)









Gross Area 45,390 9,216 54,606

Perm Temp Total




Parking Spaces 42


Site Data

School Data

Storage 1 1952 572 5.7%

Building A 1 1951 44,818 37.8%


Building Data

36.5%


3808 Maplewood Ave. Yr. Open Rating Historic

Electrical - $145,055 $286,640 $9,109 - $440,803

Specialties - - $136,924 $67,809 - $204,733

Interior - $67,415 $297,758 $65,761 - $430,934

Plumbing $1,223,858 - $351,787 $6,422 - $1,582,067


Technology - $43,627 $285,586 - - $329,213

Fire & Life Safety $76,274 $61,452 - - - $137,727

Site - $8,593 $509,397 - - $517,990

Other $121,573 $203,563 - - $1,440,006 $1,765,142

Mechanical - - $1,765,702 - - $1,765,702

Exterior - - $98,285 - - $98,285

Structural - - $2,844 - - $2,844

Roofing - $101,303 - - - $101,303

Total $1,421,706 $631,008 $3,734,924 $149,102 $1,440,006 $7,376,745







Page 82

EXHIBIT "B"



123

Mathews ES

123 Mathews Elementary School Grades Served PK-6 (ES)









Gross Area 42,112 3,070 45,182

Perm Temp Total




Parking Spaces 0


Site Data

School Data

Building D 1 1996 100 3.4%


Building B 1 1948 391

Building A 1 1916 41,573 32.0%


Building Data

31.8%


906 West Lynn St. Yr. Open Rating Historic

Electrical - $199,892 $141,617 $25,227 - $366,737

Specialties - - $118,107 $91,283 - $209,390

Interior - $109,029 $96,250 $34,351 - $239,630

Plumbing - $4,991 $891,961 $6,420 - $903,372


Technology - $52,122 $337,778 - - $389,900

Fire & Life Safety $55,849 $54,246 - - - $110,095

Site - - $69,246 - - $69,246

Other $41,079 $125,550 - - $2,232,330 $2,398,958

Mechanical $6,971 $977,180 $687,427 $15,202 - $1,686,780

Exterior - - $12,088 $113,496 - $125,584

Structural - $8,430 - - - $8,430

Roofing - - - - - $0

Total $103,898 $1,531,441 $2,354,476 $285,980 $2,232,330 $6,508,124







Page 83

EXHIBIT "B"



165

McBee ES

165 McBee Elementary School Grades Served K-5 (ES)









Gross Area 69,717 9,216 78,933

Perm Temp Total




Parking Spaces 90


Site Data

School Data

Building A 1 1999 69,717 7.3%


Building Data

7.9%


1001 West Braker Lane Yr. Open Rating Historic

Electrical - $81,656 $30,695 $45,032 - $157,383

Specialties - - $167,598 $62,784 - $230,382

Interior - $89,744 $84,538 $124,613 - $298,894

Plumbing - - $37,720 $9,631 - $47,351


Technology - $49,166 $577,456 - - $626,622

Fire & Life Safety $117,796 $75,825 - - - $193,621

Site $54,404 $1,308 $1,112 - - $56,824

Other $60,968 $99,797 - - $57,384 $218,148

Mechanical - $21,645 $29,969 - - $51,614

Exterior - - $1,716 - - $1,716


Roofing - - $4,268 - - $4,268

Total $233,168 $419,140 $935,073 $242,060 $57,384 $1,886,824







Page 84

EXHIBIT "B"



147

Menchaca ES

147 Menchaca Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)









Gross Area 59,978 10,752 70,730

Perm Temp Total




Parking Spaces 83


Site Data

School Data

Building A 1 1975 59,978 40.1%


Building Data

36.3%


12120 Manchaca Rd. Yr. Open Rating Historic

Electrical - $88,453 $40,491 $50,379 - $179,322

Specialties - - $102,211 $90,546 - $192,757

Interior - $128,130 $255,635 $462,745 - $846,511

Plumbing - - $560,898 $16,048 - $576,946


Technology - $125,045 $455,240 - - $580,285

Fire & Life Safety $102,512 $41,970 - - - $144,482

Site - $42,176 $111,016 $73,933 - $227,126

Other $134,935 $224,219 - - $82,611 $441,764

Mechanical - $3,757,829 $730,614 - - $4,488,442

Exterior - - $4,712 - - $4,712

Structural - - $877 - - $877

Roofing - $11,666 $25,768 - - $37,434

Total $237,446 $4,419,488 $2,287,461 $693,652 $82,611 $7,720,657







Page 85

EXHIBIT "B"



124

Metz ES

124 Metz Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)









Gross Area 61,905 3,072 64,977

Perm Temp Total




Parking Spaces 45


Site Data

School Data

Building A 1 1993 61,905 29.1%


Building Data

29.5%


84 Robert T. Martinez, Jr. Yr. Open Rating Historic

Electrical - $211,049 $23,656 $21,704 - $256,409

Specialties - - $136,198 $154,598 - $290,796

Interior - $42,710 $68,003 $52,813 - $163,525

Plumbing - - $108,586 $8,559 - $117,145


Technology - $52,126 $513,620 - - $565,747

Fire & Life Safety $84,706 $64,395 $2,617 - - $151,718

Site $1,481 $654 $14,812 $2,225 - $19,172

Other $159,506 $475,748 - - $213,073 $848,327

Mechanical - $138,412 $1,871,641 - - $2,010,054

Exterior - $2,221 - - - $2,221


Roofing - $1,488,646 $373 - - $1,489,018

Total $245,693 $2,475,960 $2,739,507 $239,898 $213,073 $5,914,131







Page 86

EXHIBIT "B"



181

Mills ES

181 Mills Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)









Gross Area 81,368 12,288 93,656

Perm Temp Total




Parking Spaces 104


Site Data

School Data

Building A 1 1998 81,368 12.7%


Building Data

12.6%


6201 Davis Ln. Yr. Open Rating Historic

Electrical $454 $129,501 $20,194 $26,219 - $176,368

Specialties - - $136,728 $216,156 - $352,884

Interior - $85,420 $216,415 $12,904 - $314,739

Plumbing - - $99,786 $6,422 - $106,208

Conveyances - $49,641 - - - $49,641

Technology - $65,331 $691,892 - - $757,223

Fire & Life Safety $140,775 $78,130 - - - $218,905

Site - - $4,271 $140,421 - $144,692

Other $113,354 $300,224 - - $163,005 $576,583

Mechanical - $30,001 $735,357 $202,621 - $967,978

Exterior - - $12,051 - - $12,051

Structural - - $2,701 - - $2,701

Roofing - - - - - $0

Total $254,583 $738,249 $1,919,394 $604,743 $163,005 $3,679,974







Page 87

EXHIBIT "B"



150

Norman ES

150 Norman Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)









Gross Area 58,519 1,536 60,055

Perm Temp Total




Parking Spaces 74


Site Data

School Data

Classroom 1 2007 13,827 4.4%

Building A 1 1970 44,692 38.6%


Building Data

32.2%


4001 Tannehill Ln. Yr. Open Rating Historic

Electrical - $209,477 $378,944 $31,881 - $620,302

Specialties - - $47,268 $51,613 - $98,881

Interior - - $499,495 $43,010 - $542,505

Plumbing $222,755 - $339,444 $8,562 - $570,761


Technology - $46,535 $386,706 - - $433,241

Fire & Life Safety $87,986 $60,327 - - - $148,313

Site - - $87,439 $114,067 - $201,506

Other $163,681 $125,797 - - $1,520,636 $1,810,114

Mechanical - $1,300,661 $1,169,207 - - $2,469,868

Exterior - - - - - $0

Structural - $1,873 - - - $1,873

Roofing - - $400,347 - - $400,347

Total $474,423 $1,744,670 $3,308,851 $249,133 $1,520,636 $7,297,712







Page 88

EXHIBIT "B"



148

Oak Hill ES

148 Oak Hill Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)









Gross Area 75,784 10,752 86,536

Perm Temp Total




Parking Spaces 97


Site Data

School Data

Building B 1 1984 16,210 19.3%

Building A 1 1974 59,574 40.2%


Building Data

33.4%


6101 Patton Ranch Rd. Yr. Open Rating Historic

Electrical - $11,159 $1,261,583 $50,338 - $1,323,079

Specialties - - $175,418 $85,095 - $260,513

Interior - $42,710 $1,072,114 $180,232 - $1,295,056

Plumbing $167,045 - $1,114,606 $27,814 - $1,309,465


Technology - $54,881 $640,716 - - $695,597

Fire & Life Safety $116,414 $75,574 - - - $191,988

Site - $8,459 $125,036 $73,933 - $207,429

Other $294,450 $261,725 - - $46,822 $602,998

Mechanical - $2,369,967 $334,717 - - $2,704,684

Exterior - - $37,741 - - $37,741

Structural - - $3,335 - - $3,335

Roofing - - - - - $0

Total $577,910 $2,824,475 $4,765,267 $417,412 $46,822 $8,631,886







Page 89

EXHIBIT "B"



125

Oak Springs ES

125 Oak Springs Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)









Gross Area 47,102 6,144 53,246

Perm Temp Total




Parking Spaces 47


Site Data

School Data

Building B 1 1984 3,971 14.9%

Building A 1 1958 43,131 26.5%


Building Data

26.5%


3601 Webberville Rd. Yr. Open Rating Historic

Electrical - $55,790 $361,078 $36,872 - $453,741

Specialties - - $72,897 $88,134 - $161,030

Interior - $85,420 $169,551 $75,624 - $330,596

Plumbing - $248,158 $147,291 $18,257 - $413,706

Conveyances - $49,641 - - - $49,641

Technology - $29,465 $311,196 - - $340,661

Fire & Life Safety $86,125 $59,691 - - - $145,816

Site - - $128,812 - - $128,812

Other $220,372 $142,261 - - $30,328 $392,960

Mechanical $129,699 $1,004,248 $497,533 - - $1,631,481

Exterior - - $160,769 - - $160,769


Roofing - $12,365 $4,355 - - $16,719

Total $436,196 $1,687,039 $1,853,482 $218,887 $30,328 $4,225,932







Page 90

EXHIBIT "B"



156

Odom ES

156 Odom Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)









Gross Area 61,009 13,824 74,833

Perm Temp Total




Parking Spaces 72


Site Data

School Data

Building A 1 1970 61,009 20.4%


Building Data

19.2%


1010 Turtle Creek Blvd. Yr. Open Rating Historic

Electrical - $214,246 $322,340 $23,526 - $560,111

Specialties - - $142,742 $140,859 - $283,601

Interior - $106,775 $158,078 $115,343 - $380,196

Plumbing - - $742,105 $24,603 - $766,707


Technology - $47,014 - - - $47,014

Fire & Life Safety $117,601 $44,656 $2,617 - - $164,874

Site - $47,393 $18,972 - - $66,364

Other $197,192 $231,175 - - $75,095 $503,462

Mechanical - $89,478 $1,387,846 - - $1,477,324

Exterior - - $202 - - $202

Structural - $5,518 - - - $5,518

Roofing - - $41,171 - - $41,171

Total $314,793 $786,254 $2,816,072 $304,331 $75,095 $4,296,545







Page 91

EXHIBIT "B"



126

Ortega ES

126 Ortega Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)









Gross Area 47,302 3,072 50,374

Perm Temp Total




Parking Spaces 36


Site Data

School Data

Administration 1 1968 2,143 5.3%

Building C 1 1959 5,146 56.4%

Building B 1 1966 20,907 30.8%

Building A 1 1959 19,106 50.2%


Building Data

40.2%


1135 Garland Ave. Yr. Open Rating Historic

Electrical - $123,275 $385,431 $33,545 - $542,250

Specialties - - $109,465 $73,315 - $182,779

Interior $317 $21,355 $71,244 $49,806 - $142,722

Plumbing $241,411 - $546,555 $19,326 - $807,292

Conveyances - $49,641 - - - $49,641

Technology - $44,049 $361,196 - - $405,245

Fire & Life Safety $81,278 $57,173 - - - $138,451

Site - - $41,511 $18,303 - $59,814

Other $150,185 $144,467 - - $55,295 $349,948

Mechanical $49,160 $898,122 $985,704 - - $1,932,985

Exterior - - $1,040 - - $1,040

Structural - - $101,906 $3,845 - $105,751

Roofing $981 $1,337,475 $25,714 - - $1,364,170

Total $523,332 $2,675,557 $2,629,766 $198,140 $55,295 $6,082,090







Page 92

EXHIBIT "B"



189

Overton ES

189 Overton Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)









Gross Area 91,163 12,288 103,451

Perm Temp Total




Parking Spaces 175


Site Data

School Data

Building A 1 2007 91,163 3.9%


Building Data

4.8%


7201 Colony Loop Dr. Yr. Open Rating Historic

Electrical - $55,790 $14,514 $11,169 - $81,473

Specialties - - $45,799 $96,956 - $142,756

Interior - $42,710 $94,741 $48,367 - $185,818

Plumbing - - $67,857 $14,979 - $82,836

Conveyances - $49,641 - - - $49,641

Technology - $52,063 $572,427 - - $624,490

Fire & Life Safety $129,148 $43,854 - - - $173,002

Site - - $5,287 $114,067 - $119,354

Other - - - - - $0


Exterior - - - - - $0


Roofing - - $14,805 - - $14,805

Total $129,148 $244,058 $815,429 $285,538 $0 $1,474,175







Page 93

EXHIBIT "B"



171

Palm ES

171 Palm Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)









Gross Area 79,082 3,072 82,154

Perm Temp Total




Parking Spaces 90


Site Data

School Data

Building B 1 2005 10,963 7.0%

Building A 1 1987 68,119 10.2%


Building Data

11.1%


7601 Dixie Dr. Yr. Open Rating Historic

Electrical - $163,064 $54,695 $45,744 - $263,504

Specialties - - $113,500 $98,369 - $211,869

Interior - $23,156 $115,133 $69,249 - $207,538

Plumbing - - $179,032 $10,701 - $189,732


Technology - $64,029 $618,895 - - $682,925

Fire & Life Safety $117,288 $70,637 $2,617 - - $190,543

Site - $18,391 $37,763 $40,134 - $96,287

Other $209,088 $379,374 - - $200,736 $789,198

Mechanical - $9,454 $161,906 - - $171,359

Exterior $242 - $8,822 $38,694 - $47,758


Roofing - $6,899 - - - $6,899

Total $326,618 $735,004 $1,292,363 $302,890 $200,736 $2,857,612







Page 94

EXHIBIT "B"



143

Patton ES

143 Patton Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)









Gross Area 76,687 10,752 87,439

Perm Temp Total




Parking Spaces 109


Site Data

School Data

Building A 1 1986 76,687 18.3%


Building Data

18.1%


6001 Westcreek Dr. Yr. Open Rating Historic

Electrical $480 $95,192 $49,465 $30,576 - $175,713

Specialties - - $128,110 $93,252 - $221,363

Interior $741 $149,485 $75,223 $40,077 - $265,525

Plumbing - - $163,075 $8,562 - $171,637


Technology - $54,860 $623,617 - - $678,477

Fire & Life Safety $131,145 $75,540 - - - $206,685

Site - $13,373 $4,610 - - $17,982

Other $148,665 $726,882 - - $309,114 $1,184,662

Mechanical $272,094 $961,395 $869,063 - - $2,102,552

Exterior - $2,114 $1,067 - - $3,181


Roofing - - - - - $0

Total $553,125 $2,078,840 $1,914,231 $172,467 $309,114 $5,027,777







Page 95

EXHIBIT "B"



128

Pease ES

128 Pease Elementary School Grades Served K-6 (ES)

2010-11 Utilization (by population) n/a

2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 293




2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 293



Gross Area 35,624 35,624

Perm Temp Total




Parking Spaces 45


Site Data

School Data

Building B 1 1998 4,870 15.9%

Building A 1 1876 30,754 72.9%


Building Data

71.9%


1106 Rio Grande Yr. Open Rating Historic

Electrical $60,013 $399,673 $591,784 $1,900 - $1,053,370

Specialties $10,939 - $91,691 $59,933 - $162,563

Interior - - $592,321 $8,135 - $600,456

Plumbing - - $860,135 $20,327 - $880,462


Technology - $72,214 $244,011 - - $316,225

Fire & Life Safety $60,070 $49,702 - $453,498 - $563,270

Site - $152,808 $593,903 $168,709 - $915,419

Other $213,415 $95,838 - - $51,831 $361,083

Mechanical $19,972 $1,741,016 $343,436 - - $2,104,423

Exterior - $12,413 $409,919 - - $422,332

Structural - - $35,507 - - $35,507

Roofing - $253,659 - - - $253,659

Total $364,408 $2,777,323 $3,762,707 $712,502 $51,831 $7,668,770







Page 96

EXHIBIT "B"



129

Pecan Springs ES

129 Pecan Springs Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)









Gross Area 56,992 9,216 66,208

Perm Temp Total




Parking Spaces 63


Site Data

School Data

Building B 1 1990 10,783 24.0%

Building A 1 1957 46,209 48.7%


Building Data

42.4%


3100 Rogge Ln. Yr. Open Rating Historic

Electrical - $150,635 $1,495,356 $38,734 - $1,684,725

Specialties - - $147,312 $78,011 - $225,323

Interior - $21,355 $237,152 $108,654 - $367,161

Plumbing - - $703,710 $20,398 - $724,108

Conveyances - $49,641 - - - $49,641

Technology - $50,268 $475,845 - - $526,112

Fire & Life Safety $99,554 $63,610 - - - $163,165

Site - - $11,743 $298,033 - $309,776

Other $104,559 $277,133 - - $90,134 $471,826

Mechanical - $42,908 $1,671,891 - - $1,714,799

Exterior - - $990,402 - - $990,402


Roofing - $20,585 $25,119 $1,176,056 - $1,221,760

Total $204,113 $676,135 $5,758,530 $1,719,886 $90,134 $8,448,798







Page 97

EXHIBIT "B"



190

Perez ES

190 Perez Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)









Gross Area 82,223 15,360 97,583

Perm Temp Total




Parking Spaces 106


Site Data

School Data

Building A 1 2006 82,223 9.4%


Building Data

9.0%


7500 S. Pleasant Valley Rd. Yr. Open Rating Historic

Electrical - $23,827 $58,015 $22,813 - $104,655

Specialties - - $151,024 $107,721 - $258,745

Interior - $42,710 $89,567 $11,718 - $143,996

Plumbing $431,564 - $119,257 $8,557 - $559,377


Technology - $68,359 $587,513 - - $655,872

Fire & Life Safety $132,552 $81,267 - - - $213,819

Site - - $7,999 - - $7,999

Other - - - - - $0

Mechanical $642,083 - $3,280 - - $645,363

Exterior - - $11,450 - - $11,450


Roofing - - - - - $0

Total $1,206,199 $216,162 $1,028,106 $150,809 $0 $2,601,276







Page 98

EXHIBIT "B"



164

Pickle ES

164 Pickle Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)









Gross Area 120,862 6,144 127,006

Perm Temp Total




Parking Spaces 132


Site Data

School Data

Building A 1 2001 120,862 5.1%


Building Data

5.8%


1101 Wheatley Avenue Yr. Open Rating Historic

Electrical - - $88,466 $10,218 - $98,684

Specialties - - $120,738 $77,413 - $198,152

Interior - $64,457 $93,358 $43,330 - $201,145

Plumbing - - $118,451 $23,607 - $142,058

Conveyances - $49,641 - - - $49,641

Technology - $78,233 $637,697 - - $715,930

Fire & Life Safety $178,166 $91,255 - - - $269,421

Site - - $31,650 $193,425 - $225,074

Other $88,926 $160,756 - - $116,853 $366,535

Mechanical - $28,582 - - - $28,582

Exterior - - $12,894 - - $12,894

Structural - - $3,616 - - $3,616

Roofing - - $2,429 - - $2,429

Total $267,092 $472,925 $1,109,300 $347,992 $116,853 $2,314,161







Page 99

EXHIBIT "B"



151

Pillow ES

151 Pillow Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)









Gross Area 54,247 10,752 64,999

Perm Temp Total




Parking Spaces 53


Site Data

School Data

Building A 1 1969 54,247 46.3%


Building Data

41.0%


3025 Crosscreek Dr. Yr. Open Rating Historic

Electrical - $969 $728,511 $51,488 - $780,968

Specialties - - $179,417 $126,230 - $305,647

Interior - $64,065 $447,627 $44,466 - $556,158

Plumbing - $1,216 $1,493,977 $55,933 - $1,551,126

Conveyances - $49,641 - - - $49,641

Technology - $49,648 $441,067 - - $490,715

Fire & Life Safety $107,100 $66,281 - - - $173,381

Site - $97,541 $66,323 $15,011 - $178,875

Other $116,352 $178,920 - - $2,141,509 $2,436,780

Mechanical - $41,700 $1,878,340 - - $1,920,039

Exterior - - $30,260 - - $30,260


Roofing - - $1,602,128 - - $1,602,128

Total $223,451 $549,981 $6,867,650 $293,128 $2,141,509 $10,075,720







Page 100

EXHIBIT "B"



130

Pleasant Hill ES

130 Pleasant Hill Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)









Gross Area 65,729 7,680 73,409

Perm Temp Total




Parking Spaces 71


Site Data

School Data

Building A 1 1985 65,729 20.1%


Building Data

19.6%


6405 Circle S Rd. Yr. Open Rating Historic

Electrical - - $60,358 $25,744 - $86,101

Specialties - - $149,903 $57,475 - $207,378

Interior - $106,775 $74,243 $11,393 - $192,411

Plumbing - - $96,882 $6,420 - $103,302


Technology - $52,104 $524,022 - - $576,126

Fire & Life Safety $110,106 $68,128 - - - $178,234

Site - $1,550 $82,599 - - $84,149

Other $228,868 $162,817 - - $389,803 $781,488

Mechanical - $193,219 $2,242,412 - - $2,435,632

Exterior - - $14,892 - - $14,892


Roofing - - - - - $0

Total $338,974 $584,593 $3,245,311 $101,031 $389,803 $4,659,712







Page 101

EXHIBIT "B"



131

Lucy Read Pre-K

131 Lucy Read Pre-K School Grades Served ()

Site Data

School Data

Building B 1 1961 3,069 5.8%

Building A 1 1961 61,575 10.5%


Building Data

Electrical - $156,212 $242,226 $34,575 - $433,012

Specialties - - $26,858 $65,901 - $92,758

Interior - - $110,683 $10,593 - $121,277

Plumbing - - $137,325 $3,211 - $140,537


Technology - $40,408 $395,364 - - $435,772

Fire & Life Safety $119,486 $70,631 $2,617 - - $192,735

Site - - - $40,134 - $40,134

Other $71,846 $230,214 - - $9,470 $311,530

Mechanical - $576,178 $13,501 - - $589,679

Exterior - - $51,949 - - $51,949


Roofing - - - - - $0

Total $191,332 $1,073,643 $980,523 $154,414 $9,470 $2,409,383






Page 102

EXHIBIT "B"



132

Reilly ES

132 Reilly Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)









Gross Area 41,646 6,144 47,790

Perm Temp Total




Parking Spaces 45


Site Data

School Data

Building A 1 1954 41,646 29.3%


Building Data

27.9%


405 Denson Dr. Yr. Open Rating Historic

Electrical - $172,496 $85,634 $41,902 - $300,032

Specialties - - $48,642 $67,475 - $116,117

Interior - $32,360 $97,077 $48,191 - $177,628

Plumbing $270,219 - $121,730 $5,350 - $397,300


Technology - $46,630 $306,036 - - $352,667

Fire & Life Safety $66,358 $57,152 - - - $123,510

Site - $4,606 $54,280 $40,134 - $99,019

Other $39,270 $206,426 - - $11,517 $257,213

Mechanical - $274,430 $1,367,980 - - $1,642,410

Exterior - - $368,299 - - $368,299

Structural - $72,327 - - - $72,327

Roofing - $71,742 - - - $71,742

Total $375,848 $938,169 $2,449,679 $203,051 $11,517 $3,978,263







Page 103

EXHIBIT "B"



133

Ridgetop ES

133 Ridgetop Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)









Gross Area 35,585 4,608 40,193

Perm Temp Total




Parking Spaces 32


Site Data

School Data

Building B 1 1939 400 8.1%

Building A 1 1939 35,185 29.9%


Building Data

31.2%


5005 Caswell Ave. Yr. Open Rating Historic

Electrical - $157,434 $62,616 $3,642 - $223,693

Specialties - - $101,584 $422,259 - $523,843

Interior - $42,710 $29,297 $451,012 - $523,019

Plumbing - - $150,484 $22,463 - $172,948


Technology - $45,420 $154,913 - - $200,332

Fire & Life Safety $71,510 $53,744 - - - $125,254

Site - $243,522 $75,461 - - $318,982

Other $93,975 $164,484 - - $22,541 $281,000

Mechanical - $598,001 $759,217 - - $1,357,218

Exterior - - $21,397 - - $21,397

Structural - - $4,502 - - $4,502

Roofing - - $3,940 - - $3,940

Total $165,485 $1,305,314 $1,363,411 $899,377 $22,541 $3,756,128







Page 104

EXHIBIT "B"



174

Rodriguez ES

174 Rodriguez Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)









Gross Area 79,918 16,932 96,850

Perm Temp Total




Parking Spaces 114


Site Data

School Data

Classroom 1 2006 10,004 7.8%

Building A 1 1999 69,914 7.2%


Building Data

8.0%


4400 Franklin Park Dr. Yr. Open Rating Historic

Electrical - - $36,759 $32,319 - $69,078

Specialties - - $163,736 $209,404 - $373,140

Interior - $132,079 $110,060 $11,709 - $253,847

Plumbing - - $86,792 $9,631 - $96,424


Technology - $50,944 $639,948 - - $690,892

Fire & Life Safety $149,657 $81,989 - - - $231,647

Site - $7,621 $141,062 $42,669 - $191,353

Other $80,146 $236,132 - - $64,181 $380,459

Mechanical - $62,720 $21,281 - - $84,001

Exterior - - $534 - - $534

Structural - $238 - - - $238

Roofing - - $985 - - $985

Total $229,804 $571,723 $1,201,157 $305,732 $64,181 $2,372,597







Page 105

EXHIBIT "B"



127

Sanchez ES

127 Sanchez Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)









Gross Area 78,131 6,144 84,275

Perm Temp Total




Parking Spaces 70


Site Data

School Data

Building A 1 1976 78,131 27.2%


Building Data

26.8%


73 San Marcos Yr. Open Rating Historic

Electrical - $254,788 $574,116 $54,024 - $882,927

Specialties - - $149,714 $110,084 - $259,798

Interior - $21,355 $629,419 $114,981 - $765,754

Plumbing - $5,336 $168,493 $21,394 - $195,223

Conveyances - $7,768 - - - $7,768

Technology - $60,612 $519,647 - - $580,259

Fire & Life Safety $102,706 $64,720 - - - $167,425

Site $1,177 - $71,710 $40,134 - $113,020

Other $65,580 $174,732 - - $2,701,170 $2,941,482

Mechanical - $3,149,421 $357,542 - - $3,506,963

Exterior - $435 $3,633 - - $4,068


Roofing - - - - - $0

Total $169,463 $3,739,168 $2,474,272 $340,616 $2,701,170 $9,424,688







Page 106

EXHIBIT "B"



139

Sims ES

139 Sims Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)









Gross Area 44,337 6,144 50,481

Perm Temp Total




Parking Spaces 66


Site Data

School Data

Building F 1 1956 292 74.3%

Building E 1 1956 7,503 29.2%

Building D 1 1956 4,570 51.1%

Building C 1 1956 2,482 32.9%

Building B 1 1961 17,056 31.9%

Building A 1 1956 12,434 50.9%


Building Data

38.3%


1203 Springdale Rd. Yr. Open Rating Historic

Electrical - $178,641 $630,997 $31,881 - $841,520

Specialties - - $194,276 $86,504 - $280,780

Interior - $85,420 $209,259 $10,727 - $305,406

Plumbing $574,623 - $772,506 $12,837 - $1,359,967


Technology - $47,124 $339,322 - - $386,446

Fire & Life Safety $83,676 $58,028 - - - $141,704

Site - $31,481 $130,753 $129,820 - $292,054

Other $195,428 $165,575 - - $748,483 $1,109,485

Mechanical - - $1,539,650 - - $1,539,650

Exterior - $289 $27,666 $2,221 - $30,175

Structural - $7,498 - - - $7,498

Roofing - $190,661 $9,533 - - $200,194

Total $853,727 $764,716 $3,853,963 $273,990 $748,483 $6,494,878







Page 107

EXHIBIT "B"



136

St. Elmo ES

136 St. Elmo Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)









Gross Area 48,212 3,072 51,284

Perm Temp Total




Parking Spaces 60


Site Data

School Data

Building A 1 1960 48,212 41.6%


Building Data

44.6%


600 W. St. Elmo Rd. Yr. Open Rating Historic

Electrical - $156,212 $277,126 $40,873 - $474,211

Specialties - - $160,543 $71,399 - $231,942

Interior - $21,355 $166,724 $14,646 - $202,725

Plumbing - - $1,296,374 $28,881 - $1,325,255


Technology - $48,230 $344,348 - - $392,579

Fire & Life Safety $79,866 $57,477 - - - $137,343

Site - $797 $48,045 $82,803 - $131,645

Other $436,826 $244,366 - - $1,342,548 $2,023,740

Mechanical - $354,726 $754,316 - - $1,109,042

Exterior - - $1,484,314 - - $1,484,314


Roofing - $634,713 - - - $634,713

Total $516,693 $1,517,877 $4,531,790 $238,602 $1,342,548 $8,147,509







Page 108

EXHIBIT "B"



138

Summitt ES

138 Summitt Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)









Gross Area 75,902 10,752 86,654

Perm Temp Total




Parking Spaces 107


Site Data

School Data

Building B 1 1989 9,966 22.6%

Building A 1 1986 65,936 28.5%


Building Data

26.4%


12207 Brigadoon Ln. Yr. Open Rating Historic

Electrical $1,224 - $287,592 $27,883 - $316,699

Specialties - - $242,491 $103,664 - $346,155

Interior - $28,770 $312,702 $107,046 - $448,518

Plumbing $67,453 - $162,629 $18,257 - $248,338

Conveyances - $49,641 - - - $49,641

Technology - $54,765 $631,730 - - $686,495

Fire & Life Safety $130,660 $75,368 - - - $206,028

Site - - $131,854 - - $131,854

Other $254,903 $482,340 - - $234,180 $971,423

Mechanical - $2,725,017 $859,228 - - $3,584,245

Exterior - - - - - $0


Roofing - - - - - $0

Total $454,240 $3,415,902 $2,628,225 $256,850 $234,180 $6,989,397







Page 109

EXHIBIT "B"



158

Sunset Valley ES

158 Sunset Valley Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)









Gross Area 66,467 3,072 69,539

Perm Temp Total




Parking Spaces 86


Site Data

School Data

Building B 1 1996 9,169 10.9%

Building A 1 1971 57,298 46.1%


Building Data

41.1%


3000 Jones Rd. Yr. Open Rating Historic

Electrical $5,012 $97,298 $389,217 $31,881 - $523,409

Specialties - - $98,494 $106,358 - $204,852

Interior - $42,710 $229,960 $81,622 - $354,292

Plumbing - - $465,882 $16,046 - $481,928


Technology - $52,638 $514,926 - - $567,564

Fire & Life Safety $104,397 $71,096 $2,617 - - $178,109

Site - $23,148 $223,578 - - $246,726

Other $61,362 $150,333 - - $2,104,101 $2,315,796

Mechanical - $2,514,744 $1,388,745 - - $3,903,489

Exterior - - $22,439 - - $22,439


Roofing - - $1,804,352 - - $1,804,352

Total $170,770 $2,951,967 $5,140,210 $235,908 $2,104,101 $10,602,957







Page 110

EXHIBIT "B"



140

Travis Heights ES

140 Travis Heights Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)









Gross Area 59,589 4,608 64,197

Perm Temp Total




Parking Spaces 44


Site Data

School Data

Building C 1 1994 14,021 19.1%

Building B 1 1985 4,992 33.2%

Building A 1 1938 40,576 37.1%


Building Data

36.4%


2010 Alameda Dr. Yr. Open Rating Historic

Electrical $708 $201,183 $385,584 $14,099 - $601,574

Specialties - - $79,247 $85,654 - $164,901

Interior - $64,065 $159,525 $67,889 - $291,478

Plumbing $206,194 - $591,645 $14,976 - $812,815


Technology - $56,634 $494,206 - - $550,839

Fire & Life Safety $99,299 $63,515 - - - $162,814

Site $201,167 $166,361 $2,109 $1,112 - $370,749

Other $435,073 $626,691 - - $1,052,121 $2,113,885

Mechanical - $1,907,086 $694,812 - - $2,601,898

Exterior - - $2,778 $321,483 - $324,261


Roofing - - - - - $0

Total $942,440 $3,085,534 $2,409,904 $505,213 $1,052,121 $7,995,213







Page 111

EXHIBIT "B"



141

Walnut Creek ES

141 Walnut Creek Elementary School Grades Served K-6 (ES)









Gross Area 79,536 16,896 96,432

Perm Temp Total




Parking Spaces 94


Site Data

School Data

Building B 1 1999 34,499 5.2%

Building A 1 1961 45,037 25.4%


Building Data

15.2%


401 W. Braker Ln. Yr. Open Rating Historic

Electrical $1,224 $216,949 $268,133 $18,535 - $504,841

Specialties - - $157,043 $118,152 - $275,195

Interior $610 $3,560 $53,758 $57,599 - $115,526

Plumbing $130,087 - $139,086 $5,350 - $274,523


Technology - $55,279 $601,051 - - $656,330

Fire & Life Safety $149,776 $81,314 - - - $231,090

Site - $4,606 $67,837 - - $72,444

Other $83,310 $44,022 - - $10,090 $137,422

Mechanical - $654,561 $482,290 - - $1,136,851

Exterior $2,890 - $837,033 - - $839,923


Roofing $1,499 $124,656 - - - $126,155

Total $369,397 $1,184,947 $2,606,231 $199,636 $10,090 $4,370,301







Page 112

EXHIBIT "B"



175

Widen ES

175 Widen Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)









Gross Area 74,523 15,360 89,883

Perm Temp Total




Parking Spaces 92


Site Data

School Data

Building B 1 1989 10,857 6.9%

Building A 1 1986 63,666 14.4%


Building Data

12.8%


5605 Nuckols Crossing Yr. Open Rating Historic

Electrical - $137,522 $136,454 $11,802 - $285,779

Specialties - - $280,128 $92,380 - $372,508

Interior - $106,775 $131,066 $87,980 - $325,821

Plumbing - $748 $134,172 $8,562 - $143,482


Technology - $55,257 $615,502 - - $670,759

Fire & Life Safety $152,816 $80,016 $2,617 - - $235,450

Site - - $111,624 $4,049 - $115,673

Other $188,366 $334,723 - - $244,825 $767,913

Mechanical $1,766 $136,930 $601,976 - - $740,673

Exterior - $2,640 $13,732 - - $16,372

Structural $1,801 - $1,144 $2,648 - $5,593

Roofing - - - - - $0

Total $344,749 $854,612 $2,028,416 $207,421 $244,825 $3,680,022







Page 113

EXHIBIT "B"



166

Williams ES

166 Williams Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)









Gross Area 64,846 9,216 74,062

Perm Temp Total




Parking Spaces 107


Site Data

School Data

Building A 1 1976 64,846 37.4%


Building Data

36.9%


500 Mairo Yr. Open Rating Historic

Electrical - $156,212 $812,293 $46,853 - $1,015,358

Specialties $24,162 - $200,976 $162,006 - $387,145

Interior - $106,775 $464,375 $11,930 - $583,081

Plumbing - - $812,938 $60,184 - $873,122

Conveyances - $248,207 - - - $248,207

Technology - $51,800 $522,926 - - $574,726

Fire & Life Safety $114,412 $68,848 - - - $183,260

Site - - $132,390 $129,820 - $262,210

Other $68,453 $164,915 - - $1,784,696 $2,018,065

Mechanical - $3,364,894 $124,994 - - $3,489,887

Exterior - - $37,251 $223,445 - $260,696


Roofing - - $20,585 - - $20,585

Total $207,027 $4,161,651 $3,128,729 $634,239 $1,784,696 $9,916,341







Page 114

EXHIBIT "B"



157

Winn ES

157 Winn Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)









Gross Area 62,087 3,072 65,159

Perm Temp Total




Parking Spaces 66


Site Data

School Data

Building B 1 1990 9,970 19.8%

Building A 1 1970 52,117 20.1%


Building Data

22.9%


3500 Susquehanna Ln. Yr. Open Rating Historic

Electrical - $139,476 $136,299 $36,239 - $312,013

Specialties - - $182,446 $84,899 - $267,345

Interior - $42,710 $212,348 $188,858 - $443,916

Plumbing - - $709,008 $9,629 - $718,637


Technology - $51,835 $479,005 - - $530,840

Fire & Life Safety $100,345 $63,878 - - - $164,223

Site $1,255 - $107,297 $40,134 - $148,686

Other $347,515 $281,701 - - $6,577,791 $7,207,006

Mechanical - $458,519 $748,631 - - $1,207,150

Exterior - - $10,312 - - $10,312

Structural - $2,248 - - - $2,248

Roofing - - - - - $0

Total $449,115 $1,040,367 $2,585,347 $359,758 $6,577,791 $11,012,376







Page 115

EXHIBIT "B"



152

Wooldridge ES

152 Wooldridge Elementary School Grades Served K-5 (ES)









Gross Area 68,543 19,968 88,511

Perm Temp Total




Parking Spaces 60


Site Data

School Data

Building B 1 1998 9,738 12.5%

Building A 1 1969 58,805 34.3%


Building Data

26.0%


1412 Norseman Terrace Yr. Open Rating Historic

Electrical - $127,754 $744,954 $55,369 - $928,077

Specialties - - $245,253 $66,737 - $311,991

Interior - $21,355 $115,574 $163,182 - $300,111

Plumbing $279,864 - $991,130 $10,698 - $1,281,692


Technology - $52,683 $500,564 - - $553,247

Fire & Life Safety $141,507 $85,010 - - - $226,517

Site - $4,606 $37,700 $64,475 - $106,781

Other $234,894 $282,741 - - $3,072 $520,707

Mechanical - $1,955,836 $598,166 - - $2,554,002

Exterior - $5,265 $58,900 - - $64,165

Structural - $1,501 - - - $1,501

Roofing - - - - - $0

Total $656,264 $2,536,750 $3,292,242 $360,461 $3,072 $6,848,790







Page 116

EXHIBIT "B"



144

Wooten ES

144 Wooten Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)









Gross Area 53,689 18,432 72,121

Perm Temp Total




Parking Spaces 37


Site Data

School Data

Building A 1 1955 53,689 66.1%


Building Data

56.2%


1406 Dale Yr. Open Rating Historic

Electrical - $1,409,389 $60,569 $11,248 - $1,481,205

Specialties - - $145,753 $132,609 - $278,362

Interior $5,198 $313,900 $173,390 $44,338 - $536,826

Plumbing $469,996 $1,009,843 $683,568 $31,163 - $2,194,571

Conveyances - $99,283 - - - $99,283

Technology - $48,984 $471,209 - - $520,193

Fire & Life Safety $119,270 $71,393 - - - $190,662

Site - $1,112 $600,277 $322,375 - $923,764

Other $437,749 $518,995 - - $1,159,269 $2,116,013

Mechanical - $37,918 $2,974,774 - - $3,012,692

Exterior $1,537 $5,198 $989,383 - - $996,119


Roofing - $869,684 - - - $869,684

Total $1,033,751 $4,385,700 $6,098,924 $541,732 $1,159,269 $13,219,375







Page 117

EXHIBIT "B"



145

Zavala ES

145 Zavala Elementary School Grades Served PK-6 (ES)









Gross Area 69,333 69,333

Perm Temp Total




Parking Spaces 12


Site Data

School Data

Building A 1 1937 69,333 28.8%


Building Data

31.2%


310 Robert Martinez, Jr. Yr. Open Rating Historic

Electrical $5,100 $89,265 $578,418 $65,592 - $738,375

Specialties - $13,163 $157,349 $91,473 - $261,985

Interior - - $260,945 $236,385 - $497,329

Plumbing $505,507 - $1,731,549 $6,420 - $2,243,476


Technology - $56,381 $504,384 - - $560,765

Fire & Life Safety $100,572 $64,748 $2,617 - - $167,937

Site - $1,196 $285,274 - - $286,470

Other $197,619 - - - $76,545 $274,164

Mechanical - $184,809 $1,186,345 - - $1,371,153

Exterior - - $38,935 $14,187 - $53,122


Roofing - $798 - - - $798

Total $808,799 $410,359 $4,745,816 $414,056 $76,545 $6,455,575







Page 118

EXHIBIT "B"



146

Zilker ES

146 Zilker Elementary School Grades Served PK-6 (ES)









Gross Area 50,941 10,752 61,693

Perm Temp Total




Parking Spaces 54


Site Data

School Data

Vocational 1 1950 597 45.8%

Library 1 1990 5,488 22.0%

Gymnasium 1 1961 2,827 46.1%

Building A 1 1950 42,029 63.5%


Building Data

55.0%


1900 Bluebonnet Lane Yr. Open Rating Historic

Electrical - $83,685 $466,878 $23,564 - $574,127

Specialties - - $181,621 $98,504 - $280,125

Interior - $22,794 $233,797 $511,261 - $767,852

Plumbing $401,750 $453,178 $1,231,355 $9,629 - $2,095,911


Technology - $44,347 $360,804 - - $405,151

Fire & Life Safety $98,303 $63,990 $2,617 - - $164,909

Site - - $632,521 $210,344 - $842,866

Other $243,324 $873,679 - - $2,565,129 $3,682,132

Mechanical - $204,753 $2,049,476 - - $2,254,229

Exterior $24,894 - $344,625 - - $369,519


Roofing - $1,156,604 $56,360 - - $1,212,964

Total $768,270 $2,903,030 $5,560,055 $853,301 $2,565,129 $12,649,785







Page 119

EXHIBIT "B"



059

Bailey MS

059 Bailey Middle School Grades Served 6-8 (MS)






2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 1,048 128



Gross Area 148,143 10,752 158,895

Perm Temp Total

2010-11 Campus Enrollment 1,041

Permanent Capacity 1,176


Parking Spaces 138


Site Data

School Data

Building A 1 1993 148,143 14.2%


Building Data

16.4%


4020 Lost Oasis Hollow Yr. Open Rating Historic

Electrical - - $242,787 $3,406 - $246,192

Specialties - - $161,190 $142,753 - $303,943

Interior - $149,485 $94,214 $72,955 - $316,654

Plumbing - - $236,111 $24,615 $1,568 $262,294

Conveyances - $49,641 - - - $49,641

Technology - $197,531 $972,186 - - $1,169,717

Fire & Life Safety $233,448 $125,051 $14,217 - - $372,716

Site - $13,797 $27,289 $824,676 - $865,762

Other $470,451 $392,173 - - $173,780 $1,036,404

Mechanical $14,691 $1,769,423 $1,889,503 - - $3,673,618

Exterior - - $220,269 $192,392 - $412,661


Roofing - - - - - $0

Total $718,590 $2,697,101 $3,857,767 $1,260,797 $175,348 $8,709,604







Page 120

EXHIBIT "B"



054

Bedichek MS

054 Bedichek Middle School Grades Served 6-8 (MS)









Gross Area 130,600 27,018 157,618

Perm Temp Total




Parking Spaces 140


Site Data

School Data

Building C 1 1997 9,909 5.5%

Gymnasium 1 1972 28,847 50.9%

Building A 1 1972 91,844 30.1%


Building Data

30.4%


6800 Bill Hughes Rd. Yr. Open Rating Historic

Electrical - - $554,802 $92,282 - $647,084

Specialties - - $90,013 $238,298 - $328,311

Interior $224 $192,195 $777,850 $331,731 - $1,301,999

Plumbing - - $417,426 $30,027 - $447,452

Conveyances $214,837 $49,641 - - - $264,479

Technology - $97,631 $886,402 - - $984,033

Fire & Life Safety $305,625 $162,630 $10,469 - - $478,724

Site - - $192,275 $824,676 - $1,016,951

Other $330,347 $96,558 - - $13,573,742 $14,000,646

Mechanical $5,200,844 $2,584,586 $1,231,358 - - $9,016,787

Exterior - - $2,929 - - $2,929

Structural - $11,113 - - - $11,113

Roofing - $751,119 - - - $751,119

Total $6,051,876 $3,945,474 $4,163,524 $1,517,014 $13,573,742 $29,251,629







Page 121

EXHIBIT "B"



046

Burnet MS

046 Burnet Middle School Grades Served 6-8 (MS)









Gross Area 137,768 18,432 156,200

Perm Temp Total




Parking Spaces 50


Site Data

School Data

Mechanical 1 1969 1,025 0.4%

Building A 1 1961 136,743 38.1%


Building Data

37.0%


8401 Hathaway Yr. Open Rating Historic

Electrical - $284,750 $2,593,935 $72,232 - $2,950,918

Specialties - - $398,072 $287,254 - $685,326

Interior - $220,015 $393,331 $20,695 - $634,041

Plumbing $315,941 $3,631 $455,103 $28,960 - $803,635

Conveyances - $49,641 - - - $49,641

Technology - $82,434 $854,942 - - $937,377

Fire & Life Safety $217,661 $119,840 $2,617 - - $340,118

Site - $114,714 $3,688 $1,052,251 - $1,170,654

Other $146,741 $176,985 - - $1,181,923 $1,505,649

Mechanical - $6,740,553 $1,631,819 - - $8,372,373

Exterior - $658,450 $8,270 - - $666,720

Structural - $3,472 $1,853 - - $5,325

Roofing - - $1,960,943 - - $1,960,943

Total $680,343 $8,454,488 $8,304,574 $1,461,392 $1,181,923 $20,082,718







Page 122

EXHIBIT "B"



057

Covington MS

057 Covington Middle School Grades Served 6-8 (MS)









Gross Area 173,636 4,608 178,244

Perm Temp Total




Parking Spaces 122


Site Data

School Data

Vocational 1 1986 18,307 17.8%

Auditorium 1 1986 20,672 19.1%

Building A 1 1986 134,657 17.8%


Building Data

18.6%


3700 Convict Hill Rd Yr. Open Rating Historic

Electrical - $297,742 $374,659 $66,064 - $738,464

Specialties - - $218,812 $314,103 - $532,914

Interior - $21,355 $125,006 $187,566 - $333,928

Plumbing - - $366,484 $31,967 - $398,450

Conveyances - $49,641 - - - $49,641

Technology - $97,536 $975,699 - - $1,073,235

Fire & Life Safety $247,938 $156,334 $33,669 - - $437,941

Site - $243 $220,213 $79,540 - $299,996

Other $442,312 $330,814 - - $1,412,579 $2,185,706

Mechanical $271,148 $2,997,320 $2,777,473 - - $6,045,940

Exterior - $6,006 $31,080 - - $37,086

Structural - - $1,775 - - $1,775

Roofing - $146,046 $1,050 - - $147,096

Total $961,398 $4,103,037 $5,125,919 $679,240 $1,412,579 $12,282,173







Page 123

EXHIBIT "B"



055

Dobie MS

055 Dobie Middle School Grades Served 6-8 (MS)









Gross Area 134,563 6,144 140,707

Perm Temp Total




Parking Spaces 120


Site Data

School Data

Building B 1 2006 10,564 7.8%

Building A 1 1973 123,999 13.7%


Building Data

15.7%


1200 E. Rundberg Ln. Yr. Open Rating Historic

Electrical $22,712 $200,845 $696,953 $26,695 - $947,204

Specialties - - $300,442 $286,623 - $587,065

Interior $42,171 $6,076 $651,349 $19,849 - $719,444

Plumbing $86,955 - $559,840 $38,660 - $685,455

Conveyances - $99,283 - - - $99,283

Technology - $116,153 $817,034 - - $933,187

Fire & Life Safety $205,797 $104,739 $7,852 - - $318,388

Site - $2,437 $229,980 $779,468 - $1,011,886

Other $172,266 $209,938 - - $5,893,686 $6,275,891

Mechanical $274,000 $706,326 $550,219 - - $1,530,545

Exterior $15,417 - - - - $15,417

Structural $5,402 - - - - $5,402

Roofing - - - $12,482 - $12,482

Total $824,720 $1,445,797 $3,813,669 $1,163,776 $5,893,686 $13,141,649







Page 124

EXHIBIT "B"



043

Fulmore MS

043 Fulmore Middle School Grades Served 6-8 (MS)









Gross Area 159,699 7,680 167,379

Perm Temp Total




Parking Spaces 85


Site Data

School Data

Building D 1 2002 13,392 7.5%

Vocational 1 1980 18,500 52.4%

Cafeteria 1 1980 55,143 37.8%

Building A 1 1911 72,664 43.2%


Building Data

39.9%


201 East Mary Yr. Open Rating Historic

Electrical - $5,580 $4,806,824 $574,802 - $5,387,205

Specialties - - $150,593 $341,284 - $491,878

Interior - $55,487 $613,894 $483,943 - $1,153,324

Plumbing $506,149 - $1,253,927 $94,647 - $1,854,724

Conveyances - $49,641 $8,858 - - $58,499

Technology - $122,392 $973,199 - - $1,095,590

Fire & Life Safety $237,738 $150,179 $35,577 - - $423,494

Site $3,001 $4,218 $435,203 $16,796 - $459,218

Other $866,429 $694,429 - - $353,775 $1,914,633

Mechanical - $7,353,742 $1,845,434 - - $9,199,177

Exterior - $2,011 $115,018 - - $117,028

Structural - $3,151 $31,127 - - $34,279

Roofing $4,239 - $27,564 - - $31,803

Total $1,617,557 $8,440,831 $10,297,217 $1,511,473 $353,775 $22,220,853







Page 125

EXHIBIT "B"



056

Garcia MS

056 Garcia Middle School Grades Served 6-8 (MS)









Gross Area 160,764 160,764

Perm Temp Total




Parking Spaces 160


Site Data

School Data

Building A 1 2008 160,764 4.5%


Building Data

4.7%


7414 Johnny Morris Rd. Yr. Open Rating Historic

Electrical - - $86,118 $4,515 - $90,633

Specialties - - $39,734 $156,485 - $196,219

Interior - - $105,789 $65,660 - $171,449

Plumbing - - $116,926 $30,029 - $146,955

Conveyances - $49,641 - - - $49,641

Technology - $108,594 $1,089,676 - - $1,198,270

Fire & Life Safety $341,779 $83,119 $38,970 - - $463,868

Site - - - - - $0

Other - - - - - $0

Mechanical - $133,965 - - - $133,965

Exterior - - - - - $0


Roofing - - - - - $0

Total $341,779 $375,320 $1,477,213 $256,690 $0 $2,451,001







Page 126

EXHIBIT "B"



062

Gorzycki MS

062 Gorzycki Middle School Grades Served 6-8 (MS)









Gross Area 175,543 175,543

Perm Temp Total




Parking Spaces 160


Site Data

School Data

Building A 1 2009 175,543 4.4%


Building Data

4.6%


7412 West Slaughter Ln. Yr. Open Rating Historic

Electrical - - $127,097 $2,376 - $129,472

Specialties - - $33,711 $300,646 - $334,357

Interior - - $108,064 $73,924 - $181,987

Plumbing - - $157,202 $18,190 - $175,392


Technology - $138,695 $1,099,309 - - $1,238,004

Fire & Life Safety $309,464 $87,857 $5,235 - - $402,556

Site - - - $40,134 - $40,134

Other - - - - - $0

Mechanical - $103,990 $20,852 - - $124,842

Exterior - - - - - $0


Roofing - - - - - $0

Total $309,464 $330,542 $1,551,469 $435,269 $0 $2,626,743







Page 127

EXHIBIT "B"



044

Kealing MS

044 Kealing Middle School Grades Served 6-8 (MS)


2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 541 1,027







Gross Area 192,181 192,181

Perm Temp Total




Parking Spaces 160


Site Data

School Data

Building C 1 2007 34,819 3.6%

Gym/Café/Aud 1 1986 55,783 22.0%

Building A 1 1986 101,579 18.5%


Building Data

17.8%


1607 Pennsylvania Ave. Yr. Open Rating Historic

Electrical $67,252 $180,541 $313,476 $33,349 - $594,617

Specialties - - $175,692 $449,683 - $625,375

Interior - $30,226 $364,756 $127,864 - $522,845

Plumbing - - $503,134 $28,962 - $532,097

Conveyances $8,858 $49,641 - - - $58,499

Technology - $150,808 $1,362,779 - - $1,513,586

Fire & Life Safety $260,502 $149,268 $44,560 - - $454,330

Site - - $82,009 $322,375 - $404,383

Other $39,330 $284,944 - - $464,321 $788,595

Mechanical - $414,668 $2,119,963 - - $2,534,631

Exterior - - $129,828 - - $129,828


Roofing - $3,530,397 - - - $3,530,397

Total $375,942 $4,790,494 $5,096,196 $962,232 $464,321 $11,689,185







Page 128

EXHIBIT "B"



045

Lamar MS

045 Lamar Middle School Grades Served 6-8 (MS)









Gross Area 121,371 4,608 125,979

Perm Temp Total




Parking Spaces 106


Site Data

School Data

Mechanical 1 2000 2,004 0.1%

Building C 1 2000 5,354 7.9%

Band 1 2000 9,032 5.6%

Building A 1 1955 104,981 18.8%


Building Data

19.2%


6201 Wynona Yr. Open Rating Historic

Electrical $197,826 $307,218 $139,583 $47,865 - $692,493

Specialties - - $121,330 $149,732 - $271,062

Interior - $85,501 $243,886 $24,393 - $353,780

Plumbing $2,903 $557,289 $806,107 $18,193 - $1,384,491


Technology - $116,800 $852,286 - - $969,086

Fire & Life Safety $169,084 $115,092 $17,966 - - $302,142

Site $5,195 - $29,823 $869,155 - $904,172

Other $191,867 $230,959 - - $19,344 $442,170

Mechanical $290,910 $1,247,215 $700,617 - - $2,238,742

Exterior $847 $433,743 - - - $434,590

Structural $9,432 - $39,783 - - $49,215

Roofing - - - - - $0

Total $868,064 $3,093,816 $2,951,381 $1,109,337 $19,344 $8,041,942







Page 129

EXHIBIT "B"



051

Martin MS

051 Martin Middle School Grades Served 6-8 (MS)









Gross Area 107,983 10,752 118,735

Perm Temp Total




Parking Spaces 94


Site Data

School Data

Gym/Café/Aud 1 1966 52,693 29.8%

Building A 1 1966 55,290 40.7%


Building Data

34.5%


1601 Haskell Yr. Open Rating Historic

Electrical - $2,018,450 $667,931 $35,746 - $2,722,127

Specialties - - $99,298 $306,386 - $405,683

Interior - $130,569 $900,382 $44,881 - $1,075,831

Plumbing - $596,239 $1,063,034 $36,516 - $1,695,789

Conveyances - $99,283 - - - $99,283

Technology - $103,356 $719,130 - - $822,486

Fire & Life Safety $182,171 $101,186 $16,480 - - $299,837

Site - $775 $128,147 $86,678 - $215,600

Other $123,167 $325,108 - - $2,902,231 $3,350,506

Mechanical $224,290 $4,765,063 $388,840 - - $5,378,194

Exterior - $435 $110,908 $112,950 - $224,293

Structural - - $1,302 $8,681 - $9,982

Roofing - - - - - $0

Total $529,628 $8,140,464 $4,095,451 $631,836 $2,902,231 $16,299,611







Page 130

EXHIBIT "B"



058

Mendez MS

058 Mendez Middle School Grades Served 6-8 (MS)









Gross Area 173,382 13,824 187,206

Perm Temp Total




Parking Spaces 139


Site Data

School Data

Vocational 1 1987 17,552 19.2%

Auditorium 1 1987 20,672 14.1%

Building A 1 1987 135,158 12.5%


Building Data

15.0%


5106 Village Square Yr. Open Rating Historic

Electrical - $132,718 $990,129 $26,774 - $1,149,620

Specialties - - $153,360 $314,681 - $468,041

Interior - $60,253 $235,743 $17,936 - $313,933

Plumbing - - $154,472 $36,518 - $190,990

Conveyances - $108,141 - - - $108,141

Technology - $125,787 $1,090,662 - - $1,216,449

Fire & Life Safety $271,136 $157,700 $58,777 - - $487,613

Site - $3,144 $30,858 $482,213 - $516,215

Other $396,215 $406,857 - - $1,452,455 $2,255,527

Mechanical $412,860 $3,475,547 $10,551 - - $3,898,957

Exterior - $193 $3,653 $25,747 - $29,594


Roofing - $5,877 - - - $5,877

Total $1,080,210 $4,476,217 $2,728,204 $903,869 $1,452,455 $10,640,955







Page 131

EXHIBIT "B"



052

Murchison MS

052 Murchison Middle School Grades Served 6-8 (MS)









Gross Area 123,348 16,256 139,604

Perm Temp Total




Parking Spaces 124


Site Data

School Data

Greenhouse 1 1979 896 10.8%

Storage 1 1987 367

Building B 1 1998 16,628 5.8%

Building A 1 1967 105,457 24.5%


Building Data

20.1%


3700 North Hills Dr. Yr. Open Rating Historic

Electrical - - $793,678 $63,925 - $857,603

Specialties - - $330,166 $225,844 - $556,010

Interior - $170,840 $184,603 $724,559 - $1,080,002

Plumbing $86,955 - $469,564 $25,685 - $582,203


Technology - $78,856 $882,096 - - $960,952

Fire & Life Safety $214,865 $135,922 $41,521 - - $392,308

Site - - $17,512 - - $17,512

Other $151,066 $228,101 - - $8,153,256 $8,532,423

Mechanical $32,241 $303,841 $3,200,218 - - $3,536,300

Exterior - $5,383 $337 - - $5,720

Structural $2,810 - - - - $2,810

Roofing - $819,716 - - - $819,716

Total $487,937 $1,742,658 $5,919,695 $1,040,012 $8,153,256 $17,343,558







Page 132

EXHIBIT "B"



047

O. Henry MS

047 O. Henry Middle School Grades Served 6-8 (MS)









Gross Area 124,320 6,144 130,464

Perm Temp Total




Parking Spaces 103


Site Data

School Data

Building A 1 1953 124,320 11.3%


Building Data

13.0%


2610 West 10th St. Yr. Open Rating Historic

Electrical - $244,583 $266,248 $86,974 - $597,805

Specialties - - $82,367 $204,056 - $286,423

Interior - $85,420 $158,448 $37,802 - $281,670

Plumbing - - $1,954,926 $34,313 - $1,989,239

Conveyances - $49,641 - - - $49,641

Technology - $92,335 $808,610 - - $900,945

Fire & Life Safety $191,584 $127,909 $15,349 - - $334,841

Site - - $490,406 $5,561 - $495,967

Other $95,479 $93,514 - - $3,229,843 $3,418,835

Mechanical - $187,659 $89,395 - - $277,054

Exterior - $725 $49,612 - - $50,337

Structural - - $33,856 - - $33,856

Roofing - - $65,137 - - $65,137

Total $287,063 $881,787 $4,014,354 $368,706 $3,229,843 $8,781,752







Page 133

EXHIBIT "B"



061

Paredes MS

061 Paredes Middle School Grades Served 6-8 (MS)









Gross Area 148,695 6,144 154,839

Perm Temp Total




Parking Spaces 108


Site Data

School Data

Gymnasium 1 2000 34,358 5.1%

Band 1 2000 9,072 8.9%

Cafeteria 1 2000 15,854 4.3%

Building C 1 2000 4,035 27.9%


Building A 1 2000 79,374 9.9%


Building Data

11.0%


10100 S. Mary Moore Searight Dr. Yr. Open Rating Historic

Electrical - - $449,283 $71,212 - $520,495

Specialties - - $93,998 $1,064,189 - $1,158,186

Interior - $29,667 $214,395 $101,633 - $345,695

Plumbing - - $330,677 $42,936 - $373,613

Conveyances - $148,924 - - - $148,924

Technology - $104,752 $1,036,362 - - $1,141,114

Fire & Life Safety $228,900 $150,096 $56,160 - - $435,155

Site - $99,871 $121,562 $208,564 - $429,998

Other $277,115 $460,476 - - $274,674 $1,012,265

Mechanical $133,382 $85,083 $18,278 - - $236,742

Exterior - - $6,745 - - $6,745


Roofing - $36,100 - - - $36,100

Total $639,397 $1,114,968 $2,327,460 $1,488,533 $274,674 $5,845,031







Page 134

EXHIBIT "B"



048

Pearce MS

048 Pearce Middle School Grades Served 6-8 (MS)









Gross Area 132,596 1,536 134,132

Perm Temp Total




Parking Spaces 82


Site Data

School Data

Auditorium 1 1958 8,637 4.2%

Building A 1 1958 123,959 15.0%


Building Data

15.2%


6401 N. Hampton Dr. Yr. Open Rating Historic

Electrical - - $862,081 $42,854 - $904,935

Specialties - - $152,749 $176,304 - $329,053

Interior - $28,343 $228,645 $120,791 - $377,779

Plumbing - - $1,079,726 $18,193 - $1,097,919

Conveyances - $49,641 - - - $49,641

Technology - $122,320 $849,279 - - $971,599

Fire & Life Safety $191,660 $103,728 $17,966 - - $313,354

Site - $136,893 $200,295 - - $337,189

Other $184,723 $38,956 - - $778,495 $1,002,174

Mechanical $424,494 $570,030 $238,457 - - $1,232,982

Exterior - - $439,716 - - $439,716


Roofing - $387,171 - - - $387,171

Total $800,877 $1,437,083 $4,068,914 $358,142 $778,495 $7,443,511







Page 135

EXHIBIT "B"



028

Ann Richards School

028 Ann Richards School Grades Served 6-9 (MS)









Gross Area 130,240 7,424 137,664

Perm Temp Total




Parking Spaces 90


Site Data

School Data

Building D 1 2010 7,000 4.6%

Band 1 1998 3,471 11.8%

Mechanical 1 1958 1,114 3.2%

Building A 1 1958 118,655 35.0%


Building Data

32.2%


2206 Prather Ln. Yr. Open Rating Historic

Electrical - $195,266 $493,696 $24,159 - $713,121

Specialties - - $76,149 $233,139 - $309,289

Interior - - $212,462 $181,719 - $394,181

Plumbing $1,216,601 - $1,714,379 $13,914 - $2,944,894


Technology - $148,770 $789,429 - - $938,199

Fire & Life Safety $201,671 $132,686 $11,600 - - $345,957

Site - $2,658 $92,455 $322,375 - $417,487

Other $82,916 $100,972 - - $126,188 $310,076

Mechanical - $1,997,171 $4,758,516 - - $6,755,687

Exterior - - $32,701 - - $32,701

Structural $7,066 $10,864 $6,455 - - $24,385

Roofing - $2,660 $1,447,650 - - $1,450,310

Total $1,508,254 $2,591,046 $9,635,493 $775,306 $126,188 $14,636,287







Page 136

EXHIBIT "B"



060

Small MS

060 Small Middle School Grades Served 6-8 (MS)









Gross Area 160,599 4,608 165,207

Perm Temp Total




Parking Spaces 108


Site Data

School Data

Building A 1 1999 160,599 6.6%


Building Data

6.9%


4801 Monterey Oaks Blvd. Yr. Open Rating Historic

Electrical - $173,490 $223,754 $31,131 - $428,375

Specialties - - $158,002 $272,576 - $430,577

Interior - $64,065 $142,138 $8,628 - $214,831

Plumbing - $30,214 $102,766 $41,871 - $174,851

Conveyances - $99,283 - - - $99,283

Technology - $100,499 $1,022,152 - - $1,122,650

Fire & Life Safety $233,877 $142,267 $8,983 - - $385,126

Site $832 - $136,337 - - $137,169

Other $93,147 $137,739 - - $162,029 $392,915

Mechanical $26,588 $431,732 $42,561 - - $500,882

Exterior - $4,284 $6,119 - - $10,403


Roofing - - - - - $0

Total $354,444 $1,183,574 $1,842,811 $354,205 $162,029 $3,897,063







Page 137

EXHIBIT "B"



053

Webb MS

053 Webb Middle School Grades Served 6-8 (MS)









Gross Area 120,987 9,216 130,203

Perm Temp Total




Parking Spaces 93


Site Data

School Data

Building B 1 2008 10,854 0.2%

Building A 1 1961 110,133 26.1%


Building Data

25.1%


601 E. St. Johns Yr. Open Rating Historic

Electrical - $107,683 $1,006,111 $98,064 - $1,211,858

Specialties - - $134,682 $213,638 - $348,320

Interior - $131,246 $219,613 $258,925 - $609,785

Plumbing $279,864 - $613,744 $18,195 - $911,803


Technology - $59,544 $656,548 - - $716,092

Fire & Life Safety $180,725 $108,863 $22,069 - - $311,657

Site - $32,456 $68,081 $824,676 - $925,213

Other $239,808 $168,085 - - $733,661 $1,141,554

Mechanical - $3,663,738 $653,287 - - $4,317,025

Exterior - $144 $42,468 - - $42,612

Structural $1,774 - - - - $1,774

Roofing - $915,170 - $1,206 - $916,377

Total $702,171 $5,186,931 $3,416,602 $1,414,705 $733,661 $11,454,070







Page 138

EXHIBIT "B"



017

Akins HS

017 Akins High School Grades Served 9-12 (HS)









Gross Area 324,950 31,616 356,566

Perm Temp Total




Parking Spaces 659


Site Data

School Data

Classroom 1 2008 17,266 5.3%

Greenhouse 1 2004 3,079 3.2%

Cafeteria 1 2000 21,733 1.3%

Gymnasium 1 2000 48,566 2.0%

Theatre 1 2000 39,881 4.2%

Building A 1 2000 194,425 8.0%


Building Data

6.5%


10701 South 1st St. Yr. Open Rating Historic

Electrical - $7,162 $175,205 $65,510 - $247,877

Specialties - - $243,956 $598,275 - $842,231

Interior - $42,710 $551,282 $48,002 - $641,994

Plumbing - - $267,011 $85,304 - $352,315

Conveyances - $99,283 - - - $99,283

Technology - $210,114 $1,966,674 - - $2,176,788

Fire & Life Safety $671,824 $277,782 $8,983 - - $958,589

Site $8,006 $1,530 - $655,397 - $664,932

Other $274,429 $543,674 - - $134,171 $952,274

Mechanical - $520,965 $59,616 - - $580,581

Exterior - - $129,395 - - $129,395


Roofing - $13,363 - - - $13,363

Total $954,259 $1,716,584 $3,402,121 $1,452,488 $134,171 $7,659,622







Page 139

EXHIBIT "B"



009

Anderson HS

009 Anderson High School Grades Served 9-12 (HS)


2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 1,962 411







Gross Area 309,329 1,536 310,865

Perm Temp Total




Parking Spaces 760


Site Data

School Data

Library 1 2000 17,078 2.7%

Gym/Café/Aud 1 1973 121,018 36.7%

Building A 1 1973 171,233 33.9%


Building Data

33.9%


8403 Mesa Drive Yr. Open Rating Historic

Electrical - $717,293 $950,278 $57,350 - $1,724,921

Specialties - - $391,446 $576,918 - $968,364

Interior $3,678 $352,284 $3,431,791 $944,800 - $4,732,553

Plumbing $172,062 $292,453 $636,882 $125,657 - $1,227,053

Conveyances - $358,670 - - - $358,670

Technology - $312,614 $2,218,774 - - $2,531,388

Fire & Life Safety $470,913 $363,018 $29,211 - - $863,142

Site - $4,669 $136,181 $51,280 - $192,130

Other $223,608 $501,829 - - $7,822,456 $8,547,893

Mechanical - $11,645,993 $771,481 - - $12,417,474

Exterior $2,067 - $462,026 - - $464,092

Structural - - $61,757 - - $61,757

Roofing - $96,476 - - - $96,476

Total $872,327 $14,645,298 $9,089,827 $1,756,005 $7,822,456 $34,185,912







Page 140

EXHIBIT "B"



002

Austin HS

002 Austin High School Grades Served 9-12 (HS)









Gross Area 307,089 7,680 314,769

Perm Temp Total




Parking Spaces 544


Site Data

School Data

Theatre 1 2000 23,571 3.1%

Gym/Café/Aud 1 1975 283,518 31.4%


Building Data

30.3%


1715 W. Cesar Chavez Yr. Open Rating Historic

Electrical - $20,527 $4,314,241 $39,527 - $4,374,295

Specialties - - $209,276 $615,356 - $824,632

Interior - $21,355 $4,242,696 $2,540,593 - $6,804,644

Plumbing - - $2,691,810 $35,372 - $2,727,183

Conveyances - $337,711 - - - $337,711

Technology - $290,897 $1,862,990 - - $2,153,887

Fire & Life Safety $444,850 $274,031 $32,183 - - $751,064

Site - - $531,086 $811,547 - $1,342,633

Other $383,831 $458,131 - - $8,187,414 $9,029,376

Mechanical $891,141 $5,676,021 $2,448,378 - - $9,015,540

Exterior $20,833 $539 $36,126 $112,707 - $170,205

Structural - $35,970 - - - $35,970

Roofing - $1,420,421 - - - $1,420,421

Total $1,740,655 $8,535,603 $16,368,786 $4,155,102 $8,187,414 $38,987,561







Page 141

EXHIBIT "B"



013

Bowie HS

013 Bowie High School Grades Served 9-12 (HS)









Gross Area 417,702 19,968 437,670

Perm Temp Total




Parking Spaces 678


Site Data

School Data

Gym/Café/Aud 1 1988 107,282 18.7%

Mechanical 1 1988 5,462 47.5%

Vocational 1 1988 27,588 50.2%

Greenhouse 1 1988 913 11.1%

Greenhouse 1 1988 634 15.8%

Building B 1 1988 261,135 23.9%



Building Data

31.3%


4103 Slaughter Ln. Yr. Open Rating Historic

Electrical - $467,936 $613,437 $21,465 - $1,102,839

Specialties - $4,947 $551,033 $11,602,340 - $12,158,320

Interior - $30,929 $2,757,279 $3,016,216 - $5,804,424

Plumbing - - $1,588,886 $160,177 - $1,749,063

Conveyances - $99,283 - - - $99,283

Technology - $329,391 $2,529,387 - - $2,858,778

Fire & Life Safety $607,200 $366,573 $101,563 - - $1,075,335

Site - $36,278 $13,022 - - $49,300

Other $535,544 $1,629,203 $19,318 - $884,595 $3,068,659

Mechanical - $12,273,635 $4,660,249 - - $16,933,885

Exterior - $1,999 $89,170 $101,542 - $192,711

Structural - - $52,083 $25,949 - $78,032

Roofing - $4,399 - $483 - $4,882

Total $1,142,743 $15,244,574 $12,975,427 $14,928,171 $884,595 $45,175,511







Page 142

EXHIBIT "B"



008

Crockett HS

008 Crockett High School Grades Served 9-12 (HS)









Gross Area 335,087 10,752 345,839

Perm Temp Total




Parking Spaces 666


Site Data

School Data

Theatre 1 1988 12,929 48.9%

Gym/Café/Aud 1 1969 322,158 28.7%


Building Data

30.5%


5601 Manchaca Road Yr. Open Rating Historic

Electrical - $139,476 $4,322,064 $112,680 - $4,574,220

Specialties - - $250,847 $1,031,862 - $1,282,709

Interior - $110,354 $2,135,857 $90,119 - $2,336,330

Plumbing $86,955 $1,894,088 $2,707,524 $146,206 - $4,834,773

Conveyances - $49,641 - - - $49,641

Technology - $231,149 $1,881,006 - - $2,112,155

Fire & Life Safety $480,657 $324,155 $61,394 - - $866,207

Site $4,218 $9,966 $999,378 $199,650 - $1,213,212

Other $1,057,058 $386,480 - - $186,183 $1,629,721

Mechanical $193,260 $7,594,793 $5,595,876 - - $13,383,929

Exterior - $3,931 $460,633 - - $464,564

Structural - $5,402 - - - $5,402

Roofing - - $212,664 $1,263,126 - $1,475,790

Total $1,822,148 $10,749,436 $18,627,243 $2,843,643 $186,183 $34,228,652







Page 143

EXHIBIT "B"



019

Eastside Memorial High Schools (EMHSJC)

019 Eastside Memorial High Schools (EMHSJC) Grades Served 9-12 (HS)









Gross Area 267,140 2,976 270,116

Perm Temp Total




Parking Spaces 228


Site Data

School Data

Green Tech 1 1998 25,816 1.6%

Mechanical 1 1998 248

Classroom 1 1986 24,940 7.4%

Theatre 1 1986 10,851 34.5%

Gym/Café/Aud 1 1960 205,285 29.9%


Building Data

25.6%

Austin, Te 78721 0 NR No

1012 Arthur Stiles Yr. Open Rating Historic

Electrical - $4,288,045 $332,662 $162,664 - $4,783,370

Specialties $271 - $864,657 $374,364 - $1,239,291

Interior $334 $176,082 $316,049 $31,050 - $523,515

Plumbing $2,404,889 $2,193,334 $119,797 $76,745 - $4,794,766

Conveyances - $99,283 - - - $99,283

Technology - $122,906 $1,313,795 - - $1,436,701

Fire & Life Safety $343,950 $148,014 $38,970 - - $530,934

Site $608 - $259,355 - - $259,963

Other $386,864 $277,245 - - $213,544 $877,654

Mechanical $51,875 $1,067,064 $37,306 - - $1,156,245

Exterior - $3,456,001 $301,327 $4,120 - $3,761,448

Structural - - - $1,946 - $1,946

Roofing - $70,262 $2,983,943 - - $3,054,205

Total $3,188,792 $11,898,236 $6,567,860 $650,888 $213,544 $22,519,320







Page 144

EXHIBIT "B"



015

Garza Independence HS

015 Garza Independence High School Grades Served 11-12 (HS)









Gross Area 44,754 9,480 54,234

Perm Temp Total




Parking Spaces 36


Site Data

School Data

Building E 1 1939 248

Building D 1 1939 48

Mechanical 1 1939 493 0.4%

Building B 1 1965 11,435 11.5%

Building A 1 1939 32,530 35.5%


Building Data

28.9%


1600 Chicon Street Yr. Open Rating Historic

Electrical - $223,161 $649,189 $67,527 - $939,876

Specialties - - $31,488 $235,513 - $267,002

Interior - $240,448 $223,257 $146,780 - $610,485

Plumbing $2,638 - $282,904 $26,530 - $312,073


Technology - $60,658 $310,505 - - $371,163

Fire & Life Safety $144,862 $66,414 $10,469 - - $221,745

Site - $33,901 $38,624 $40,134 - $112,659

Other $383,919 $17,142 - - $198,632 $599,694

Mechanical $199,108 $296,459 $51,405 - - $546,972

Exterior - - $252,129 - - $252,129

Structural - - $942 - - $942

Roofing - $1,033,698 - - - $1,033,698

Total $730,527 $1,971,881 $1,850,912 $516,483 $198,632 $5,268,436







Page 145

EXHIBIT "B"



004

Lanier HS

004 Lanier High School Grades Served 9-12 (HS)









Gross Area 262,640 19,978 282,618

Perm Temp Total




Parking Spaces 329


Site Data

School Data

Storage 1 2008 120

Storage 1 2008 280

Storage 1 2008 4,000 0.0%

Storage 1 2008 300

Classroom 1 2009 8,605 6.1%

Vocational 1 1966 23,968 8.3%

Greenhouse 1 1968 600 16.3%

Greenhouse 1 1968 922 17.0%

Greenhouse 1 1966 922 17.0%

Mechanical 1 1966 4,680 79.8%

Vocational 1 1988 17,918 26.5%

Gymnasium 1 1966 49,133 18.7%

Theatre 1 1988 16,226

Building A 1 1966 134,966 26.6%


Building Data

21.4%


1201 Payton Gin Rd Yr. Open Rating Historic

Electrical - $224,289 $2,273,883 $155,096 - $2,653,268

Specialties - $162 $109,311 $610,386 - $719,858

Interior - $25,163 $1,406,682 $146,335 - $1,578,180

Plumbing $10,801 $649,516 $649,896 $405,324 - $1,715,537

Conveyances - $99,283 - - - $99,283

Technology - $138,856 $1,479,163 - - $1,618,020

Fire & Life Safety $421,914 $318,665 $84,442 $53,927 - $878,948

Site $5,002 - $40 $26,586 - $31,628

Mechanical $709,276 $912,774 $3,619,709 $240,758 - $5,482,517

Exterior - - $938,853 - - $938,853


Roofing - $1,893,475 $1,389,414 - - $3,282,889






Page 146

EXHIBIT "B"



004

Lanier HS

Other $175,164 $324,594 - - $176,389 $676,147


Total $1,322,157 $4,586,776 $11,951,394 $1,638,411 $176,389 $19,675,128


Page 147

EXHIBIT "B"



014

Johnson (LBJ) HS

014 Johnson (LBJ) High School Grades Served 9-12 (HS)









Gross Area 291,406 12,288 303,694

Perm Temp Total




Parking Spaces 598


Site Data

School Data

Theatre 1 2006 16,140 9.6%

Gym/Café/Aud 1 1974 275,266 15.7%


Building Data

15.5%


7309 Lazy Creek Dr. Yr. Open Rating Historic

Electrical - - $2,383,711 $103,648 - $2,487,359

Specialties - - $307,899 $497,563 - $805,461

Interior - $128,130 $273,895 $1,143,379 - $1,545,403

Plumbing $86,955 - $443,282 $67,050 - $597,288

Conveyances - $49,641 $238,429 - - $288,070

Technology - $217,495 $1,656,802 - - $1,874,297

Fire & Life Safety $396,356 $226,467 $77,941 - - $700,763

Site - $53,582 $104,860 - - $158,442

Other $599,423 $453,755 - - $96,326 $1,149,504

Mechanical - $4,170,314 $1,228,562 - - $5,398,877

Exterior - - $18,350 $110,561 - $128,911

Structural - - $122,523 - - $122,523

Roofing - $2,932 $70,454 - - $73,386

Total $1,082,734 $5,302,317 $6,926,707 $1,922,200 $96,326 $15,330,284







Page 148

EXHIBIT "B"



005

McCallum HS

005 McCallum High School Grades Served 9-12 (HS)









Gross Area 242,667 16,896 259,563

Perm Temp Total




Parking Spaces 301


Site Data

School Data

Building H 1 2010 3,000 5.0%

Storage 1 1978 464

Storage 1 1993 3,732 0.0%

Mechanical 1 1953 1,139

Gymnasium 1 1987 18,939 14.9%

Theatre 1 1987 28,997 9.7%

Mechanical 1 1953 2,364 10.8%

Building A 1 1953 184,032 23.4%


Building Data

19.8%


5600 Sunshine Dr. Yr. Open Rating Historic

Electrical $26,177 $111,580 $684,807 $76,795 - $899,360

Specialties - - $357,122 $528,359 - $885,480

Interior $6,534 $252,666 $444,662 $37,302 - $741,164

Plumbing - - $521,263 $104,347 - $625,610

Conveyances - $99,283 - - - $99,283

Technology - $207,162 $1,471,162 - - $1,678,325

Fire & Life Safety $382,481 $257,141 $52,833 - - $692,455

Site - $1,671 $1,673 - - $3,344

Other $299,502 $346,116 - - $2,262,115 $2,907,733

Mechanical - $469,522 $6,859,945 $615,536 - $7,945,003

Exterior $9,259 $5,115 - - - $14,374

Structural $149,521 - $2,468 - - $151,989

Roofing $16,328 $2,055,562 $120,293 - - $2,192,184

Total $889,802 $3,805,820 $10,516,228 $1,362,340 $2,262,115 $18,836,304







Page 149

EXHIBIT "B"



006

Reagan HS

006 Reagan High School Grades Served 9-12 (HS)









Gross Area 249,609 3,072 252,681

Perm Temp Total




Parking Spaces 447


Site Data

School Data

Vocational 1 1987 42,262 24.5%

Classroom 1 1967 42,718 10.4%

Building G 1 1965 24,939 13.7%

Mechanical 1 1965 4,549 8.4%

Vocational 1 1965 17,949 15.5%

Band 1 1965 2,982 9.8%

Gymnasium 1 1965 47,562 16.4%

Building B 1 1965 60,797 21.7%



Building Data

22.1%


7104 Berkman Dr. Yr. Open Rating Historic

Electrical - $290,110 $3,174,735 $202,900 - $3,667,745

Specialties - - $804,179 $503,119 - $1,307,298

Interior - $42,710 $1,052,579 $65,128 - $1,160,417

Plumbing $86,955 - $760,828 $41,511 - $889,295

Conveyances - $49,641 - - - $49,641

Technology - $161,834 $1,431,591 - - $1,593,425

Fire & Life Safety $363,053 $207,769 $47,598 - - $618,421

Site - - $812,519 $2,292,227 - $3,104,746

Other $679,181 $849,386 - - $348,003 $1,876,570

Mechanical $79,120 $113,444 $3,936,964 $15,617 - $4,145,144

Exterior - - $16,637 - - $16,637


Roofing - - - - - $0

Total $1,208,310 $1,714,894 $12,037,630 $3,120,501 $348,003 $18,429,338







Page 150

EXHIBIT "B"



007

Travis HS

007 Travis High School Grades Served 9-12 (HS)









Gross Area 285,098 9,696 294,794

Perm Temp Total




Parking Spaces 451


Site Data

School Data

Mechanical 1 1975 1,600 29.0%

Mechanical 1 1953 2,273 33.9%

Mechanical 1 1971 492 22.5%

Vocational 1 1975 8,049 26.6%

Gymnasium 1 1953 47,962 22.1%

Gym/Café/Aud 1 1953 224,722 31.3%


Building Data

30.0%


1211 E. Oltorf Yr. Open Rating Historic

Electrical - - $3,721,040 $150,106 - $3,871,146

Specialties - - $149,836 $559,681 - $709,518

Interior - $32,033 $1,355,675 $436,067 - $1,823,774

Plumbing $221,287 - $1,296,050 $86,379 - $1,603,716

Conveyances - $99,283 - - - $99,283

Technology - $143,401 $1,700,776 - - $1,844,176

Fire & Life Safety $412,008 $358,380 $55,450 - - $825,838

Site $8,435 $358,112 $485,606 - - $852,153

Other $270,043 $315,501 - - $682,408 $1,267,952

Mechanical $119,848 $575,471 $13,203,202 - - $13,898,521

Exterior - $34,640 $1,142,699 $35,140 - $1,212,479

Structural - $4,163 $22,830 - - $26,993

Roofing - $10,286 $681,548 $575,445 - $1,267,279

Total $1,031,621 $1,931,268 $23,814,714 $1,842,818 $682,408 $29,302,829







Page 151

EXHIBIT "B"



852

Clifton Center

852 Clifton Center Grades Served Alt. Ed. (Alt. Ed.)







Utilization (by enrollment) n/a Percent of Capacity

Area (GSF) per student #Error n/a n/a

Gross Area 39,039 1,536 40,575

Perm Temp Total

2010-11 Campus Enrollment n/a



Parking Spaces 71


Site Data

School Data

Building B 1 1977 3,840 2.6%

Building A 1 1977 35,199 40.5%


Building Data

41.4%

Austin, Texas 78752 1977 NR No

1519 Coronado Hills Dr. Yr. Open Rating Historic

Electrical - - $868,543 $5,148 - $873,691

Specialties - - $380,249 $191,515 - $571,763

Interior - $21,355 $124,258 $116,858 - $262,472

Plumbing - - $72,791 $57,050 - $129,841

Conveyances - $248,207 - - - $248,207

Technology - $59,277 $140,628 - - $199,905

Fire & Life Safety $54,766 $50,688 $8,983 - - $114,437

Site - $79,594 $88,237 $381,866 - $549,698

Other $200,538 $91,510 - - $36,615 $328,663

Mechanical $14,094 $1,243,247 $893,990 - - $2,151,332

Exterior - $8,729 $7,897 - - $16,626


Roofing - $20,585 - - - $20,585

Total $269,399 $1,823,193 $2,585,577 $752,437 $36,615 $5,467,221







Page 152

EXHIBIT "B"



012

Ridgeview ALC

012 Ridgeview ALC Grades Served 6-12 (Alt. Ed.)









Gross Area 88,677 9,216 97,893

Perm Temp Total




Parking Spaces 120


Site Data

School Data

Building C 1 1968 3,201 47.0%

Building B 1 1970 1,167 22.4%

Building A 1 1953 84,309 40.7%


Building Data

38.7%

Austin, Texas 78702 1953 NR Yes

901 Neal Yr. Open Rating Historic

Electrical - $156,212 $1,172,947 $3,406 - $1,332,565

Specialties - - $233,156 $99,651 - $332,807

Interior - - $318,518 $328,993 - $647,510

Plumbing - - $577,119 $9,634 - $586,753


Technology - $74,845 $378,576 - - $453,421

Fire & Life Safety $163,727 $107,266 $16,480 - - $287,473

Site - - $57,810 $40,134 - $97,944

Other $230,098 $90,170 - - $32,018 $352,286

Mechanical $213,640 $693,247 $4,635,098 - - $5,541,985

Exterior - - $132,297 $1,000,183 - $1,132,480

Structural - $21,088 $7,827 - - $28,915

Roofing - - $1,468,016 - - $1,468,016

Total $607,465 $1,142,828 $8,997,845 $1,481,999 $32,018 $12,262,155







Page 153

EXHIBIT "B"



251

Rosedale

251 Rosedale School Grades Served Alt. Ed. (Alt. Ed.)









Gross Area 37,112 7,680 44,792

Perm Temp Total




Parking Spaces 43


Site Data

School Data

Building C 1 1940 658 15.4%

Building B 1 1939 460 8.5%

Building A 1 1939 35,994 32.2%


Building Data

32.1%

Austin, Texas 78756 1939 NR No

2117 W. 49th St. Yr. Open Rating Historic

Electrical - $191,593 $223,515 $27,644 - $442,752

Specialties - - $55,191 $72,979 - $128,170

Interior - - $242,360 $73,485 - $315,845

Plumbing $262,464 - $176,849 $32,233 - $471,546

Conveyances - $99,283 - - - $99,283

Technology - $58,809 $230,056 - - $288,865

Fire & Life Safety $79,199 $50,972 - - - $130,171

Site - - $342,217 $40,134 - $382,351

Other $120,098 $134,431 - - $68,255 $322,784

Mechanical - $58,248 $1,495,485 - - $1,553,733

Exterior $7,439 $3,845 $539,718 $5,265 - $556,266


Roofing - - $20,585 - - $20,585

Total $469,200 $597,181 $3,325,976 $251,739 $68,255 $4,712,351







Page 154

EXHIBIT "B"



252

Baker Center

252 Baker Center Grades Served ()

Site Data

School Data

Building C 1 1911 458 105.5%

Building B 1 1952 1,600

Building A 1 1911 63,810 16.7%


Building Data

Electrical - - $254,525 - - $254,525


Interior $25,137 $14,887 $96,850 - - $136,875

Technology - $65,935 $59,028 - - $124,963

Fire & Life Safety $82,553 $47,900 - - - $130,453

Plumbing - - $153,424 - - $153,424

Exterior - - $460,754 - - $460,754


Other - - - - $202,910 $202,910

Mechanical $174,525 $1,546,744 $133,115 - - $1,854,384

Structural - - $9,828 - - $9,828

Roofing - - - - - $0

Site - - $48,529 - - $48,529

Total $282,216 $1,675,465 $1,216,053 $0 $202,910 $3,376,645





Page 155

EXHIBIT "B"



951

Burger Athletic Complex

951 Burger Athletic Complex Grades Served ()

Site Data

School Data

Press Box 1 1977 2,005

Building N 1 1977 31,266 6.6%

Building M 1 1977 31,119 0.6%

Ticket Booth 1 1977 59 77.8%

Press Box 1 1977 12,255 2.2%

Ticket Booth 1 1977 59

Ticket Booth 1 1977 142 23.4%

Restroom 1 1977 5,832 1.1%

Concession 1 1977 4,927 0.9%

Restroom 1 1977 5,839 2.4%

Ticket Booth 1 1977 142 23.4%

Restroom 1 1977 5,839 1.4%

Concession 1 1977 4,927 0.9%

Restroom 1 1977 5,832 9.7%

Building A 1 1977 70,370 39.7%


Building Data

Electrical - $71,969 $74,588 - - $146,556


Interior - - $115,126 - - $115,126

Technology - $94,415 - - - $94,415

Fire & Life Safety $226,365 $18,870 - - - $245,235

Plumbing - - $253,154 - - $253,154

Exterior - - $1,460 $35,546 - $37,005

Specialties $255 - - - - $255

Mechanical - $6,914,460 $257,795 - - $7,172,255


Roofing - - - - - $0

Site - - $2,779,986 - - $2,779,986





Page 156

EXHIBIT "B"



951

Burger Athletic Complex

Other $962,809 $48,068 - - $42,012 $1,052,889

Total $1,189,429 $7,147,782 $3,482,107 $35,546 $42,012 $11,896,876


Page 157

EXHIBIT "B"



941

Carruth Administration Center

941 Carruth Administration Center Grades Served ()

Site Data

School Data

Parking 1 1991 6,007 32.0%

Building E 1 1991 17,216 14.4%

Building D 1 1991 15,948 22.1%

Building C 1 1991 11,821 21.6%

Building B 1 1991 21,687 19.3%

Building A 1 1991 61,310 15.6%


Building Data

Electrical $12,316 $191,396 $1,110,222 - - $1,313,934

Conveyances - $8,858 - - - $8,858

Interior - - $228,761 $80,035 - $308,797

Technology - $82,843 $120,077 - - $202,919

Fire & Life Safety $167,931 $114,175 - - - $282,106

Plumbing - - $272,701 $188,256 - $460,957

Exterior - $62,417 $7,731 - - $70,148


Other - - - - - $0

Mechanical - $435,423 $3,686,340 - - $4,121,762

Structural - $4,340 - - - $4,340

Roofing - $3,992 $11,352 - - $15,344

Site - - $10,702 - - $10,702

Total $180,247 $903,444 $5,447,886 $268,291 $0 $6,799,867





Page 158

EXHIBIT "B"



922

Central Warehouse

922 Central Warehouse Grades Served ()

Site Data

School Data

Warehouse 1 1983 96,303 5.1%


Building Data

Electrical - $250,372 $373,350 - - $623,723


Interior - - $18,684 - - $18,684

Technology - $61,092 $86,304 - - $147,397

Fire & Life Safety $120,698 $63,963 - - - $184,661

Plumbing - - $25,442 - - $25,442

Exterior $5,297 $4,407 $96,762 - - $106,465

Specialties - - $100,831 - - $100,831

Other $14,187 - - - $11,195 $25,381

Mechanical $122,115 $23,850 - - - $145,964


Roofing $6,369 - - - - $6,369

Site - - $24,499 - - $24,499

Total $268,665 $403,684 $725,872 $0 $11,195 $1,409,416





Page 159

EXHIBIT "B"



949

Delco Activity Center

949 Delco Activity Center Grades Served ()

Site Data

School Data

Building A 1 2003 60,294 3.4%


Building Data

Electrical $32,980 - - - - $32,980


Interior - $1,324 $1,030 - - $2,354

Technology - $39,758 - - - $39,758

Fire & Life Safety $90,397 $34,099 - - - $124,496

Plumbing - - - - - $0

Exterior - - $231 $10,355 - $10,585


Other $136,246 $48,763 - - - $185,009

Mechanical - $32,431 $120,555 - - $152,987

Structural - $73,564 - - - $73,564

Roofing - - - - - $0

Site - $24,018 - - - $24,018

Total $259,623 $253,956 $121,816 $10,355 $0 $645,750





Page 160

EXHIBIT "B"



948

House Park

948 House Park Grades Served ()

Site Data

School Data

Building N 1 1938 573 11.2%

Building M 1 1938 573 11.2%

Building L 1 1936 11,331 0.8%

Building K 1 1939 12,473 1.0%

Building J 1 1940 249

Building I 1 1940 215

Building H 1 1963 240 94.4%

Building G 1 2000 64

Building F 1 1940 96 17.9%

Building E 1 1963 358



Building B 1 1986 2,106

Building A 1 1940 3,325


Building Data

Electrical - - $17,520 - - $17,520


Interior - - $4,162 - - $4,162

Technology - $32,753 - - - $32,753


Plumbing - - $7,805 - - $7,805

Exterior $36,134 $5,870 - - - $42,005


Other $101,092 - - - $157,489 $258,581

Mechanical - $31,411 - - - $31,411


Roofing - - $1,596 - - $1,596

Site - - $653,465 - - $653,465

Total $137,227 $70,034 $684,548 $0 $157,489 $1,049,297





Page 161

EXHIBIT "B"



959

Nelson Field Bus Terminal

959 Nelson Field Bus Terminal Grades Served ()

Site Data

School Data

Building A 1 1995 13,093 4.9%


Building Data



Interior - $21,355 $3,908 - - $25,263

Technology - $40,439 - - - $40,439

Fire & Life Safety $3,560 $20,127 - - - $23,687

Plumbing - - - - - $0

Exterior - - $26,055 - - $26,055

Specialties - $9,220 - - - $9,220

Other $7,663 - - - $24,167 $31,830

Mechanical - $61,039 $17,529 - - $78,569


Roofing - - $12,467 - - $12,467

Site $58,975 - - - - $58,975

Total $70,197 $152,181 $59,959 $0 $24,167 $306,504





Page 162

EXHIBIT "B"



281

Nelson Field

281 Nelson Field Grades Served ()

Site Data

School Data

Building P 1 1963 10,269 2.0%

Building O 1 1963 19,455 0.0%

Building N 1 1963 21,773 0.6%


Building L 1 1963 80 29.8%


Storage 1 1963 800 19.9%

Restroom 1 1963 320 56.7%

Restroom 1 1963 320 51.8%

Concession 1 1963 796 7.5%

Restroom 1 1963 374 59.2%

Restroom 1 1963 320 58.7%

Restroom 1 1963 320 48.2%

Concession 1 1963 796 93.5%

Restroom 1 1963 374 59.6%



Building Data

Electrical - - $121,639 - - $121,639


Interior - - $75,565 - - $75,565



Plumbing - - $255,724 - - $255,724

Exterior - - $100,568 - - $100,568


Mechanical - - $147,102 - - $147,102


Roofing - $14,226 - - - $14,226

Site - - $740,737 - - $740,737





Page 163

EXHIBIT "B"



281

Nelson Field

Other $422,773 $241,232 - - $91,966 $755,971

Total $422,773 $255,458 $1,441,334 $0 $91,966 $2,211,531


Page 164

EXHIBIT "B"



950

Noack Sports Complex

950 Noack Sports Complex Grades Served ()

Site Data

School Data

Press Box 1 2004 96

Press Box 1 2004 96


Press Box 1 2004 101

Press Box 1 2004 101

Concession 1 2004 1,520 4.1%

Restroom 1 2004 1,242 0.4%


Building Data



Interior - - - - - $0



Plumbing - - - - - $0

Exterior - - - - - $0


Other $126,224 - - - - $126,224



Roofing - - - - - $0

Site - - - - - $0

Total $126,224 $0 $0 $0 $0 $126,224





Page 165

EXHIBIT "B"



942

Pleasant Hill Annex

942 Pleasant Hill Annex Grades Served ()

Site Data

School Data

Building C 1 1987 159 5.3%

Building B 1 1957 3,290 54.0%

Building A 1 1936 22,310 36.2%


Building Data

Electrical - $155,294 $59,367 - - $214,661


Interior - - $85,623 $73,776 - $159,398



Plumbing $248,059 - $85,108 - - $333,166

Exterior - - $1,016,733 - - $1,016,733

Specialties - - $21,742 - - $21,742

Other $18,918 - - - - $18,918

Mechanical - $20,497 $84,743 - - $105,240

Structural - $4,969 - - - $4,969

Roofing $3,042 - $888,035 - - $891,077

Site - - $17,409 $20,813 - $38,222

Total $270,019 $180,761 $2,258,760 $94,588 $0 $2,804,127





Page 166

EXHIBIT "B"



960

Saegert Transportation

960 Saegert Transportation Grades Served ()

Site Data

School Data

Building D 1 1975 11,900


Building B 1 1975 2,660

Building A 1 1975 12,219 35.1%


Building Data

Electrical - $44,212 $49,909 - - $94,121


Interior - $77,872 $68,333 - - $146,205

Technology - $40,222 - - - $40,222

Fire & Life Safety $18,874 $20,127 - - - $39,001

Plumbing - - $5,124 $68,136 - $73,261

Exterior - - $153,989 $102,047 - $256,036

Specialties - - $3,397 - - $3,397

Other $20,001 - - - $28,659 $48,661

Mechanical $77,097 $2,690 $19,539 - - $99,326


Roofing $12,467 - $479,127 - - $491,594

Site - - $607,498 - - $607,498

Total $128,439 $185,122 $1,386,917 $170,184 $28,659 $1,899,321





Page 167

EXHIBIT "B"



962

Service Center - Bldg & Grds

962 Service Center - Building & Grounds Grades Served ()

Site Data

School Data

Building E 1 2007 8,203


Building C 1 2000 6,602 4.8%

Building B 1 1991 11,219 6.9%

Building A 1 1991 27,435 15.3%


Building Data

Electrical - $93,720 $88,086 - - $181,806


Interior - - $8,822 $22,790 - $31,612

Technology - $50,669 $64,667 - - $115,336

Fire & Life Safety $68,063 $61,178 - - - $129,241

Plumbing - - - - - $0

Exterior - $5,265 - $12,535 - $17,800

Specialties - - $46,404 - - $46,404

Other $102,465 - - - $135,726 $238,190

Mechanical - $247,021 $600,307 - - $847,328

Structural - - $33,741 - - $33,741

Roofing - - $4,395 $8,920 - $13,315

Site - - $11,800 - - $11,800

Total $170,528 $457,852 $858,222 $44,245 $135,726 $1,666,573





Page 168

EXHIBIT "B"



Educational Framework

The following Educational Framework was used as a

planning tool to aid in decision making by the Facility

Master Plan Task Force. It was not a mandate, but a set

of guidelines, and was intended to be flexible in order to

align resources that will provide optimal learning

environments for all AISD students. The guiding principle

for teaching and learning, as set by the Board of Trustees,

is performance-based empowerment and earned

autonomy.

1. Planning Guidelines

A. Priorities for Decision Making and Optimal

Learning Environments

1) Safety and Security

2) Equitable Learning Opportunities for All

Students - Ensure that all facilities offer

Alternative Learning Education programs

and are in full compliance with the

Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA).

3) Quality Facility Conditions

a. Physical condition and safety

b. Support for academic programs

c. Indoor-air quality – e.g. proper

ventilation, monitoring of indoor pollutants

d. Natural lighting

e. Environmental condition

f. Green Building concepts – e.g. energy,

water and materials efficiency

g. Application of current and emerging

technology – e.g. wireless networks

h. Site acreage

i. Campus layout and organization

j. Neighborhood accessibility

k. Feeder pattern impact

4) School Performance - The Board may

consider a campus intervention, including

closure or repurposing, for schools that have

not met academic criteria established by

the District, state or federal accountability

systems.

5) Facility Utilization

a. Facility condition

b. Capacity

c. Enrollment

d. Economic efficiency

e. Intensity of use

Page 169

EXHIBIT "B"



B. Facility Utilization Alternatives

1) Portable/Temporary Classrooms – The

Facility Master Plan seeks to reduce the

number of portable/temporary classrooms.

When additional classrooms are needed

and are anticipated to be needed over

time, the Facility Master Plan will include

plans to replace portable/temporary

buildings with permanent buildings.

2) Shared Use of Facilities – The AISD Facility

Master Plan will, wherever possible, provide

access to school facilities for outside

programs in order to create and promote

successful community-school partnerships.

C. School Closure, Consolidation and Boundaries –

The AISD Facility Master Plan Task Force will

consider recommending options for adjusting

boundaries and the consolidation or repurposing

of schools to balance enrollment with capacity,

to ensure an optimal learning environment for all

students, and to realize necessary economic

efficiencies. The AISD Facility Master Plan Task

Force will continue to consider criteria and

options for schools that are not successful in

providing adequate and/or equitable learning

environments.

1) Transfer Policy – When possible, reduce the

number of transfers to align with the efficient

use of facilities.

2. Programmatic Considerations

A. School Size

1) The following school-size targets are

guidelines based on community input that,

fiscally, may be achievable only through

creative design concepts, such as multiple

schools sharing the same campus. It is

unlikely that every large school will reduce its

enrollment to match these specifications.

Therefore, it is necessary to exercise flexibility

with these general guideline, which should

also be applied to site-specific and/or

program-specific facilities. The utilization

target is 85% - 105%.

Elementary Schools 300-500 students

Middle Schools 600-800 students

High Schools 1,500-2,000 students

2) The following school size standards have

been utilized by AISD for construction of new

school facilities since the 1996 Bond Program.

Elementary Schools 720-800 students

Middle Schools 1,100 students

High Schools 2,200-2,400 students

B. Grade Configuration – The current AISD grade

configuration for each facility will remain.

Recommendations may be developed for

schools in which flexibility in configuration might

better meet student and neighborhood needs.

Page 170

EXHIBIT "B"



C. Student Assignment – When developing facility

options, student assignment would optimally be

based on the following:

Elementary Schools - Neighborhood Schools /

Vertical Alignment

Middle Schools - Neighborhood Schools/ Vertical

Alignment and Choice

(depending upon which option provides the

best level of consistency for students).

High Schools - Vertical Alignment and Choice

D. Transportation of Choice Students –

Transportation should not be provided to

students attending schools outside of their

attendance area by choice, with the exception

of those opting for choice due to No Child Left

Behind or for those students whose applications

have been approved for enrollment in a

Magnet School (Open Enrollment Signature

Program).

E. Fine Arts - The AISD Facility Master Plan Task

Force will seek opportunities to support

increasing and enhancing the availability and

quality of Fine Arts programs.

F. Vertical Team Signature Programs – The AISD

Facility Master Plan Task Force will seek

opportunities to support increasing and

enhancing the availability and quality of

Signature Programs, which are offered in each

school and/or vertical team. These programs are

interest-based, and transportation is not

provided by the District [e.g. International

Baccalaureate, Global Studies, Early College

High School, Early College Start, etc.].

G. Magnet Schools (Open Enrollment Signature

Programs) - The AISD Facility Master Plan Task

Force will seek opportunities to support


quality of Magnet Schools that offer a

specialized curriculum that draws students

across boundaries, requires an application, and

transportation is provided [e.g., LASA, Kealing,

Fulmore, Ann Richards]. The Facility Master Plan

Task Force will utilize community input to assist

the District in developing other categories, if

needed, for programs that do not fit existing

definitions and criteria.

H. Athletic Programs - The AISD Facility Master Plan

Task Force will seek opportunities to support


quality of athletic programs and facilities. The

plan will also address the facilities that receive

more frequent and intensive use.

I. Career and Technical Programs - The AISD

Facility Master Plan Task Force will seek

opportunities to support increasing and

enhancing the availability and quality of Career

and Technical Programs [e.g., Cosmetology,

Culinary Arts, etc.].

J. Pre-Kindergarten/Early Childhood Programs –

Pre-K and early childhood services should be

Page 171

EXHIBIT "B"



expanded to the greatest extent that is

economically feasible to serve all children of the

community.

K. Student Services – The AISD Facility Master Plan

Task Force will seek opportunities to provide

space for student services based on the

demographic and economic needs of the

student population.

L. Administrative Spaces - Administrative buildings

and spaces will be reviewed and

recommendations developed as part of the

comprehensive Facility Master Plan.

Page 172

EXHIBIT "B"



Enrollment Projections

Historical Enrollment

The Austin Independent School District has

experienced a significant increase in enrollment, over

7,500 students, during the past nine years. Since 2002-

03, student enrollment has increased by an average

of approximately 835 students, or 11% each year. The

current school year, 2010-11, had a notable increase

of an additional 933 students. Specifically, enrollment

increased by 610 elementary, 246 middle, and 54

high school students.

The graph below illustrates the progression of

enrollment changes by year.

Historical Enrollment – By Grade Level

The Austin Independent School District experienced

growth from 2002-03 to 2010-11 in all grade levels.

Enrollment in grades Pre-K - 5 increased by a total of

7,233 students. Enrollment in grades 6 - 8 increased by a

total of 88 students. Enrollment in grades 9-12 increased

by a total of 199 students. The graph below and the

chart on the following page indicate enrollment by

grade over the past nine years.

0

10,000

20,000

30,000

40,000

50,000

60,000

AISD Historic Enrollment by Grade Level

2002-03 to 2010-11

PK-5

6-8

"9-12"

Source: AISD Office of Facilities

010,00020,00030,00040,00050,00060,00070,00080,00090,000

100,000

AISD Historic Enrollment 2002-03 to 2010-2011


Page 173

EXHIBIT "B"



Historical Enrollment – By Grade Level

The following chart depicts the progression of increasing enrollment throughout the previous nine years.

Grade 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11

EC & PreK 4,421 4,704 5,125 4,943 4,933 5,053 5,044 5,406 5,564

Kindergarten 6,431 6,728 6,849 7,462 7,309 7,391 7,589 7,668 7,660

1 6,405 6,512 6,898 7,055 7,493 7,297 7,498 7,543 7,644

2 6,115 6,235 6,373 6,669 6,898 7,107 7,027 7,354 7,225

3 6,104 6,013 6,174 6,278 6,571 6,617 6,856 6,796 7,102

4 5,866 5,912 5,897 6,073 6,136 6,254 6,477 6,595 6,679

5 5,592 5,754 5,676 5,823 5,870 5,847 6,028 6,195 6,293

Subtotal PK-5 40,934 41,858 42,992 44,303 45,210 45,566 46,519 47,557 48,167

6 5,582 5,390 5,517 5,379 5,511 5,506 5,519 5,568 5,740

7 5,655 5,517 5,278 5,443 5,344 5,300 5,421 5,425 5,513

8 5,252 5,507 5,423 5,258 5,337 5,278 5,229 5,338 5,324

Subtotal 6-8 16,489 16,414 16,218 16,080 16,192 16,084 16,169 16,331 16,577

9 6,764 6,371 6,512 6,332 6,313 6,371 6,366 6,252 6,127

10 5,093 5,321 4,962 5,337 5,183 5,043 5,084 5,148 5,212

11 4,427 4,389 4,694 4,423 4,576 4,588 4,569 4,644 4,724

12 4,179 4,048 4,126 4,368 4,118 4,590 4,511 4,564 4,599

Subtotal 9-12 20,463 20,129 20,294 20,460 20,190 20,592 20,530 20,608 20,662

Separate Campuses 318 239 271 339 350 329 337 311 332

Special Campuses 207 119 121 113 121 168 175 189 191

Subtotal Sep & Spec 525 358 392 452 471 497 512 500 523

Total 78,411 78,759 79,896 81,295 82,063 82,739 83,730 84,996 85,929


Historical Enrollment

2002-03 to 2010-2011


Page 174

EXHIBIT "B"



SCHOOL NAME 1999-00 2000-01 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11

Allan E S 464 494 492 470 441 436 426 446 398 389 392 379Allison E S 480 485 480 452 467 486 484 509 500 520 520 543Andrews E S 654 652 601 609 581 586 586 615 611 630 573 717Baldwin E S 508Baranoff E S 647 698 777 759 812 782 822 771 788 849 856 876Barrington E S 660 670 655 703 693 778 746 752 821 866 929 996Barton Hills E S 402 362 330 319 343 339 354 360 360 374 375 386Becker E S 307 281 250 257 253 256 265 232 215 214 194 208Blackshear E S 449 417 378 317 357 309 326 277 272 264 239 244Blanton E S 824 701 635 668 622 619 608 563 564 547 555 591Blazier E S - - - - - - - - 445 596 720 775Boone E S 728 673 627 587 559 561 575 553 538 568 502 501Brentwood E S 503 468 436 414 405 389 367 413 433 447 476 495Brooke E S 412 374 360 291 281 337 372 352 344 410 423 439Brown E S 606 651 534 589 548 550 508 517 508 519 506 519Bryker Woods E S 394 422 403 369 371 376 397 427 395 401 398 404Campbell E S 655 646 638 550 498 428 414 400 350 378 396 360Casey E S 565 641 768 858 959 937 955 914 754 665 663 669Casis E S 725 667 626 647 681 677 700 743 780 831 818 825Clayton E S - - - - - - - 599 811 996 974 867Cook E S 1,022 719 713 791 823 903 953 811 845 892 906 901Cowan E S - 393 457 458 500 512 529 557 649 707 741 783Cunningham E S 638 581 613 634 611 581 609 544 538 536 550 512Davis E S 638 618 588 587 644 631 673 671 619 623 694 683Dawson E S 464 447 469 415 420 381 362 371 362 335 335 331Doss E S 666 667 652 659 669 623 627 645 659 677 719 768Galindo E S 749 759 730 715 771 771 790 740 744 727 717 704Govalle E S 630 562 459 480 438 440 416 391 383 419 394 415Graham E S 619 586 573 666 633 713 676 698 678 633 658 761Gullett E S 455 440 423 432 466 457 460 447 464 481 537 541Harris E S 970 931 647 587 589 612 684 716 689 694 740 758Hart E S 652 641 599 613 662 749 923 891 803 835 849 898Highland Park E S 559 536 529 506 501 493 518 530 557 601 632 662Hill E S 772 683 703 701 737 737 740 730 665 701 689 732Houston E S 915 814 839 850 863 872 897 942 923 936 949 917Jordan E S 725 763 800 696 629 624 622 690 619 743 814 833Joslin E S 401 383 394 413 400 377 346 355 350 332 326 363Kiker E S 1,058 771 720 753 836 881 993 711 697 717 904 933

Austin Independent School District Historic Enrollment 1999/2000 - 2010/2011

Historical Enrollment by School

Elementary Schools

Page 175

EXHIBIT "B"



SCHOOL NAME 1999-00 2000-01 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11

Kocurek E S 741 650 623 579 588 606 682 682 654 678 644 660Langford E S 819 855 824 850 828 901 999 835 859 844 841 834Lee E S 371 367 395 359 375 374 383 411 401 406 440 428Linder E S 621 663 724 853 862 1,000 819 874 931 879 842 892Maplewood E S 370 316 331 313 324 342 348 332 346 373 428 406Mathews E S 372 326 345 391 386 409 393 432 418 417 392 405McBee E S - 558 601 638 707 777 822 650 704 758 785 765Menchaca E S 426 543 598 638 664 715 809 898 678 626 698 686Metz E S 662 632 658 602 518 542 661 668 592 553 492 498Mills E S 697 761 815 819 860 912 953 893 974 1,061 1,100 928Norman E S 512 547 504 553 571 598 578 586 397 372 326 333Oak Hill E S 812 781 762 763 814 837 837 896 926 950 1,008 772Oak Springs E S 409 412 383 363 342 289 283 284 317 313 311 274Odom E S 751 741 782 768 746 763 776 785 761 711 688 658Ortega E S 365 357 360 300 290 277 283 280 253 254 286 296Overton E S - - - - - - - - 543 647 715 668Palm E S 628 652 622 693 830 886 991 725 644 662 650 606Patton E S 832 823 833 812 829 804 785 777 745 726 763 914Pease E S 238 248 257 236 238 251 252 247 254 254 252 256Pecan Springs E S 560 592 585 602 569 584 556 545 554 497 516 532Perez E S - - - - - - - 655 742 705 805 886Pickle E S - - 613 594 593 581 638 660 685 710 729 740Pillow E S 481 440 412 405 460 473 524 529 552 563 652 653Pleasant Hill E S 561 525 504 515 532 585 624 655 587 623 632 619Read E C E S - - - - - - - 364 559 549 477 509Reilly E S 309 283 273 245 279 231 254 285 268 258 303 296Ridgetop E S 259 257 239 208 248 230 238 199 211 201 191 219Rodriguez E S 691 723 684 750 725 780 872 901 946 973 955 910St E lmo E S 431 422 439 490 494 484 437 449 421 360 353 585Sanchez E S 503 485 420 390 448 450 659 658 551 610 611 277Sims E S 299 303 332 322 365 388 408 416 417 415 319 304Summitt E S 631 622 596 639 585 629 601 576 559 701 750 854Sunset Valley E S 584 592 564 516 506 505 481 437 435 448 463 451Travis Heights E S 568 501 502 527 457 518 562 573 587 564 525 537Walnut Creek E S 969 994 877 942 983 1,052 1,078 971 955 763 900 916Widen E S 733 804 756 791 765 820 782 796 846 825 794 769Williams E S 709 651 637 606 645 624 616 620 627 694 664 642Winn E S 586 604 629 665 635 621 671 672 514 432 441 463Wooldridge E S 1,062 748 754 718 773 821 806 946 833 841 888 878Wooten E S 632 640 613 593 588 578 603 638 633 682 688 695Zavala E S 419 468 433 432 434 443 462 492 459 439 393 407Zilker E S 421 433 440 496 511 541 480 451 478 495 524 522

E lementary Total 42,442 41,915 41,617 41,791 42,430 43,424 44,729 45,626 45,947 46,885 47,897 48740


Elementary Schools cont.

Page 176

EXHIBIT "B"



Middle Schools

SCHOOL NAME 1999-00 2000-01 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11

Bailey MS 1,529 1,217 1,173 1,144 1,099 1,074 1,134 1,175 1,147 1,206 959 1,041Bedichek MS 1,136 1,004 998 889 904 908 912 1,039 1,150 1,119 1,018 1,054Burnet MS 1,126 1,065 1,063 1,008 1,084 1,045 970 1,005 988 912 969 998Covington MS 752 855 939 945 911 889 862 910 1,014 954 950 805Dobie MS 874 913 921 763 746 739 808 849 517 566 603 630Fulmore MS 764 749 872 957 992 1,054 1,037 1,029 1,045 1,036 1,007 995Garcia MS - - - - - - - - 605 649 689 658Gorzycki MS - - - - - - - - - - 835 963Kealing MS 958 1,058 978 948 1,029 1,277 1,190 1,251 1,215 1,279 1,242 1,233Lamar MS 915 855 798 779 791 701 675 671 741 780 668 604Martin MS 495 622 632 648 736 738 676 702 760 744 691 639Mendez MS 1,313 874 857 828 840 776 840 1,108 1,029 903 871 890Murchison MS 1,236 1,232 1,240 1,213 1,210 1,227 1,257 1,216 1,156 1,156 1,254 1,281O. Henry MS 681 743 866 887 885 801 747 789 881 982 1,005 1,026Paredes MS - 959 1,060 1,208 1,227 1,292 1,330 1,067 989 957 899 930Pearce MS 958 849 859 852 847 801 810 809 580 516 452 329Richards ( 6-8) MS - - - - - - - - 224 334 362 378Small MS 929 1,054 1,080 1,108 1,129 1,088 1,114 1,140 1,167 1,188 944 959Webb MS 805 777 779 789 767 748 663 658 495 522 573 591

Middle School Total 14,471 14,826 15,115 14,966 15,197 15,158 15,025 15,418 15,703 15,803 15,991 16,004


Page 177

EXHIBIT "B"



High Schools

SCHOOL NAME 1999-00 2000-01 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11Akins HS - 1,076 1,544 2,053 2,219 2,257 2,389 2,359 2,507 2,663 2,710 2,720Anderson HS 1,804 1,742 1,763 1,959 1,959 1,997 2,121 2,013 2,093 2,096 2,000 2,089Austin HS 2,167 2,014 2,136 2,149 2,158 2,245 2,207 2,124 2,240 2,343 2,390 2,337Bowie HS 3,045 2,608 2,435 2,370 2,485 2,613 2,699 2,821 2,778 2,768 2,828 2,876Crockett HS 2,529 2,414 2,174 2,099 1,999 1,962 2,038 1,992 1,907 1,857 1,763 1,686E astside HS 1,826 1,479 1,359 1,008 975 1,068 775 760 691 556 679 718Garza HS 318 339 384 347 307 266 280 308 315 301 258 260International HS - - - - - - 258 264 185 202 230 176LASA HS - - - - - - - - 858 860 874 881LBJ HS 1,619 1,654 1,812 1,811 1,717 1,671 1,676 1,703 1,001 1,046 1,018 1,000Lanier HS 1,855 1,762 1,666 1,915 1,794 1,793 1,674 1,619 1,693 1,608 1,594 1,624McCallum HS 1,666 1,652 1,676 1,705 1,709 1,686 1,724 1,706 1,717 1,733 1,793 1,824Reagan HS 1,405 1,394 1,276 1,304 1,169 1,064 1,029 989 973 988 958 901Richards 9th and 10th - - - - - - - - - - 79 150Travis HS 1,709 1,691 1,665 1,718 1,638 1,672 1,590 1,532 1,634 1,509 1,434 1,420

High School Total 19,943 19,825 19,890 20,438 20,129 20,294 20,460 20,190 20,592 20,530 20,608 20,662

Separate Campuses 102 44 311 318 239 271 339 350 329 337 311 332

Special Campuses 159 145 155 207 119 121 113 121 168 175 189 191

District Total 77,117 76,755 77,088 77,720 78,114 79,268 80,666 81,705 82,739 83,730 84,996 85,929


Page 178

EXHIBIT "B"



Birth Data

Historical birth data for the 31 zip codes comprising the

District was collected. The total number of live births for

this area has steadily increased from 1994 to 2008. In

1994, there were 9,175 births compared to 12,733 in 2008.

A slight decline of 45 births followed in 2009. The increase

in births points to continued growth at the elementary

school level. Live birth data is commonly used to predict

future kindergarten enrollment.

0

2,000

4,000

6,000

8,000

10,000

12,000

14,000

Live Births by Yearin Zip Codes within AISD Boundaries

Source: Texas Department of State Health Services & the

Dennis D. Harner and Associates Demographic Analysis &

E nrollment Projections, 2010

Year Births

1994 9,175

1995 9,417

1996 9,650

1997 9,822

1998 10,329

1999 10,829

2000 11,426

2001 11,346

2002 11,160

2003 11,270

2004 11,492

2005 11,383

2006 12,539

2007 12,744

2008 12,733

2009 12,688

Austin Independent School Distr ict

Live Births

1994-2009

Source: Texas Department of State Health Services & the

Dennis D. Harner and Associates Demographic Analysis &

E nrollment Projections, 2010

Page 179

EXHIBIT "B"



Projected Enrollment In 2010, AISD commissioned Dennis D. Harner and Associates

to develop enrollment projections. According to this report,

the total projected enrollment for AISD is expected to

increase by 12,356 students, or 14.4%, from the 2010-11

school year to the 2020-21 school year.

The enrollment forecasts were calculated using a “cohort

survival” method. Each grade (cohort) is advanced from

one year to the next based upon historical trends. Live birth

data is also collected and used to compare the relationship

between kindergarten and enrollment five years later. A

cohort (grade) is advanced from one grade to the next

based upon historical trends. The number of live births, and

subsequently, the number of children, enrolled in

kindergarten, has steadily increased since 2002.

Projected Enrollment – By Grade Level

Projected enrollment for the 2011-12 through 2020-21 school

years shows a steady increase in enrollment in all grade

levels. At the elementary level, which reflects Pre-K through

Grade 5, the projected enrollment shows an increase of

5,225 students from the 2010-11 school year to the 2020-21

school year.

Similarly, the middle school enrollment, which reflects

Grades 6 through 8, shows an increase of 3,334 students. The

high school level, reflecting Grades 9 through 12, shows an

increase of 4,166 students during this same timeframe. The

table below shows projected enrollment by year and grade

level.

Source: Dennis D. Harner & Associates Demographic Analysis and Enrollment Projections, 2010

0

20,000

40,000

60,000

80,000

100,000

120,000

Mid-Range Total Projected Enrollment

2011-12 to 2020-2021

0

10,000

20,000

30,000

40,000

50,000

60,000

AISD Projected Enrollment by Grade Level

2011-12 to 2020-21

PK-5

6-8

9-12

Page 180

EXHIBIT "B"



Projected Enrollment – By Grade Level The following chart depicts the progression of increasing enrollment throughout the next ten years.

Grade 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21

E C & PreK 5,368 5,419 5,471 5,524 5,575 5,628 5,679 5,731 5,782 5,834

Kindergarten 7,773 7,848 7,923 7,998 8,073 8,148 8,223 8,298 8,373 8,448

1 7,757 7,832 7,907 7,982 8,057 8,132 8,207 8,282 8,357 8,432

2 7,426 7,532 7,607 7,682 7,757 7,832 7,907 7,982 8,057 8,132

3 6,988 7,176 7,282 7,357 7,432 7,507 7,582 7,657 7,732 7,807

4 6,926 6,788 6,976 7,082 7,157 7,232 7,307 7,382 7,457 7,532

5 6,423 6,676 6,538 6,726 6,832 6,907 6,982 7,057 7,132 7,207

Subtotal PK-5 48,661 49,271 49,704 50,351 50,883 51,386 51,887 52,389 52,890 53,392

6 5,952 6,073 6,326 6,188 6,376 6,482 6,557 6,632 6,707 6,782

7 5,677 5,877 5,998 6,251 6,113 6,301 6,407 6,482 6,557 6,632

8 5,471 5,617 5,817 5,938 6,191 6,053 6,241 6,347 6,422 6,497

Subtotal 6-8 17,100 17,567 18,141 18,377 18,680 18,836 19,205 19,461 19,686 19,911

9 6,497 6,621 6,767 6,967 7,088 7,341 7,203 7,391 7,497 7,572

10 4,882 5,197 5,321 5,467 5,667 5,788 6,041 5,903 6,091 6,197

11 4,623 4,382 4,697 4,821 4,967 5,167 5,288 5,541 5,403 5,591

12 4,761 4,648 4,407 4,722 4,846 4,992 5,192 5,313 5,566 5,428

Subtotal 9-12 20,763 20,848 21,192 21,977 22,568 23,288 23,724 24,148 24,557 24,788

Total 86,524 87,686 89,037 90,705 92,131 93,510 94,816 95,998 97,133 98,091

Source: Dennis D. Harner & Associates Demographic Analysis and E nrollment Projections, 2010


Mid-Range Projected E nrollment

2010-11 to 2019-20

Page 181

EXHIBIT "B"



Year Constructed Pre 1925 1925 - 1944 1945 - 1964 1965 - 1984 1985 - 1994 1995 - 2004 2005 - 2010

Total Square Feet 209,259 547,147 3,083,806 3,481,972 2,363,533 1,616,514 1,026,591

Building Count 5 33 90 77 65 59 33

Capacity Analysis

How many students can a building accommodate? This

question often arises, and in the development of a

facility master plan, can be one of the most debated

issues. It is not uncommon to review an evaluation of an

existing building only to find that the capacity which was

once assigned to the building is considerably more than

what the building can reasonably accommodate today.

The main reason for this is that the programs in a public

school system and the manner in which they are

delivered have changed significantly since the building

was originally built. More than half the square footage in

AISD was built before 1985. Twenty-five years ago,

computer labs were just beginning to be incorporated

into schools, and severely handicapped students,

previously assigned to specialized facilities, were not yet

mainstreamed into public schools. In addition, state

legislation has mandated smaller student/teacher ratios.

In facility planning, the term design capacity is used to

describe simply counting the number of classrooms in a

building and multiplying by an average class size. Even

though at first glance this seems only to be common

sense, this methodology does not take into account the

programmatic implications of school facilities.

In AISD, functional capacity is reviewed on an annual

basis. Functional capacity is a more realistic analysis of

what a building can accommodate and takes into

account all special programs available at the school

that year, in addition to any portable buildings located

on site, to determine how many students can be

assigned to a particular school campus each school

year.

For master planning purposes, an updated methodology

to the former AISD permanent capacity methodology

was developed and applied. The formula for long-range

planning should reflect District programs, but should be

kept simple and equitable since programs change from

year to year while classroom square footages remain, for

the most part, the same. Permanent capacity does not

incorporate temporary or portable classrooms, but only

permanent space.

Elementary School Permanent Capacity

The elementary program is usually delivered based on

students being assigned to a home room and attending

special programs such as art, music, and physical

education in a specialized classroom. The number of

special classrooms required is reflective of the total

number of students enrolled and is subtracted from the

total number of classrooms since the vacated home

room cannot be utilized by other students.

Age of AISD Permanent Buildings

Page 182

EXHIBIT "B"



A 95% efficiency factor is applied since students do not

always arrive in perfect sets of 22 students. Additionally,

due to reduced class size and increased support space

needs for Title 1 schools, an 85% efficiency factor is

applied to compute permanent capacity at these

facilities.

The following describes the permanent capacity

methodology for elementary schools.

Count permanent classrooms.

Subtract special areas for music, art, etc. (3-7

classrooms based on staffing ratios).

Multiply by 22 (average class size).

Apply 95% efficiency factor; 85% efficiency factor

for Title 1 schools.

Secondary School Permanent Capacity

Unlike elementary schools, at the secondary level

students are not in self-contained environments but are

traveling from one location to another each period. All

classrooms are counted including the specialized

spaces. Since it is difficult to schedule every teaching

space every period of the day, in addition to the

movement to block scheduling, an efficiency factor of

75% is applied.

The following describes the permanent capacity

methodology for secondary schools.

Count permanent classrooms.

Multiply by 28 (average class size).

Apply 75% efficiency factor; 70% efficiency factor

for Title 1 schools.

Core Capacity

Core capacity is defined as those spaces that large

groups of students utilize at some point during the school

day, including the cafeteria, gymnasium, and library. As

part of the new methodology, consideration was given

to lower permanent capacity if the cafeteria or

gymnasium was less than 85% of permanent capacity,

based on the number of classrooms.

The chart below shows the AISD standard for core space

sizes based on the current approved educational

standards.

Grade Level

School Size

(# of students)

Total

Square Feet SF/Student

Total


Total


Elementary 880 4,200 4.77 3,000 3.41 3,500 3.98

Middle 1,100 4,500 4.10 13,400 12.18 4,800 4.36

High 2,400 9,000 3.75 20,720 8.63 8,400 3.50

Source: AISD, Office of Facilities

Cafeteria Gym LibraryCore Space Standards

Page 183

EXHIBIT "B"



Utilization

Utilization, or efficiency, of a school facility, is calculated

by dividing the enrollment of the school by its permanent

capacity. The target range as determined by the Facility

Master Plan Task Force for the purposes of long-range

planning is 85%-105%. Schools below 85% may be able to

provide relief for overcrowded schools or may be

considered as potential candidates for closure or

consolidation. Schools above 105% should be monitored

for additional growth, and schools that exceed 125% are

considered for additions or for relief through the

construction of new schools.

The chart below indicates that district-wide, AISD is within

the 85%-105% target range; however, by grade level, the

elementary schools are above the target and the middle

schools are below. In other words, the District is short

3,833 seats at the elementary level, but has 4,263 too

many at the middle school level.

On an individual basis, there are 29 schools, or 25% of all

school campuses, that fall below 85% of permanent

capacity. Fifty-three schools, or 46% of all school

campuses, operate at above 105%. The map to the right

and the ones on the following pages illustrate the 2010-11

school year enrollment utilization.

Grade Level

2010

Enrollment

Permanent

Capacity

Utilization

Rate

Elementary 48,738 44,905 109%

Middle 16,154 20,417 79%

High 20,512 21,698 95%

Districtwide 85,404 87,020 98%

Source: AISD, Office of Facilities

Page 184

EXHIBIT "B"



Page 185

EXHIBIT "B"



Enrollment versus Population

The population (number of students that live within an

attendance zone) is not always equal to the enrollment

(number of students that attend) of a school. No Child

Left Behind, transfer policies, and open enrollment

signature programs are some of the reasons students

migrate in and out of their assigned attendance zones.

In a few cases in AISD, students migrating into a school

comprise more than 40% of its enrollment. When large

numbers of students travel outside of the boundary of

their assigned school, to attend a different school, it

presents a challenge when planning for long-term facility

needs.

Because the number of students migrating in and out of

an attendance zone may vary year to year, it is

important to also look at the attendance zone

population. Population projections, which are derived

from birth data, census data, and housing stock analysis

are used in long-range planning efforts to identify trends

in growth and decline. Population projections are more

reliable than anticipating the rates of in and out

migration.

The following maps provide the 2010-11 population as a

percent of permanent capacity by school. This provides

a different picture than the enrollment utilization maps on

the preceding pages. For example, a school that falls

below the target utilization of 85% based on enrollment

may in fact be above 85% based on population.

Page 186

EXHIBIT "B"



Page 187

EXHIBIT "B"



= Facility Condition Index (FCI)

FCI Campuses

<10% 19

10-19% 32

20-29% 28

30-39% 35

40-49% 9

50-59% 2

60-69% -

70-79% 1

80-89% -

90-100% -

>100% -

Total 126

Repair

Renovate

Replace

Facility Condition Analysis

Facility condition is the state of repair of the building

infrastructure. Facility condition takes into consideration

all of the building systems from roofs and windows to

electrical and mechanical systems. Although there is a

cost associated with renovating every building

according to current codes and standards, this does not

mean that all schools need massive and immediate

repairs and renovations. Rather, this provides an

understanding of the effort it would take to bring all

facilities up to the same standard.

The facility condition information does provide the

following.

Comparative analysis of building conditions

Approximate cost to address the facility conditions

of all buildings in the District

Understanding of which buildings are in the worse

conditions and that might be slated for more

immediate focus

Since 1991, the facility management industry has used an

index called the Facility Condition Index (FCI) to

benchmark the relative condition of a group of schools.

This index simply divides the identified repair costs in a

facility by the total cost to replace the facility. For

example, take a 100,000 square foot building that might

theoretically cost $10 million to construct new and now

has $1 million in identified repairs. Dividing $1 million by

$10 million results in an FCI of 10 percent. Industry

standards and financial modeling dictate that FCI

numbers above 65% or greater are more cost-effective

to replace than to repair. This is due to efficiency gains

with more modern facilities and the value of the building

at the end of the analysis period.

Of course, FCI is not the only factor used to identify

buildings that need renovation, replacement or even

closure. Historical significance, enrollment trends,

community sentiment, and the availability of capital are

additional factors that are analyzed when making school

facility decisions.

The chart below indicates the distribution of campuses

by ranges of FCI in AISD. Please note that the support

facilities are included. Only one facility, Pease ES, falls

into the replace category; however, two schools, Zilker ES

and Wooten ES are between 50-59% and should be

considered for major renovation or replacement.

Cost of Repairs

Cost of Replacement

Page 188

EXHIBIT "B"



Replacement Costs Cost/Sq.ft. Replacement Cost

PreK Centers 297.47$ 4,783,318$

Elementary School 297.47$ 24,541,275$

Middle School 327.40$ 55,658,000$

High School 323.11$ 106,626,300$

Alt. Ed. School 327.40$ 6,548,000$

Admin 280.61$ 5,612,200$

Support 280.61$ 5,612,200$

Maintenance - Transportation 280.61$ 5,612,200$

Portable Building 138.93$ 213,396$

FCI: The Denominator

The denominator is the bottom part of the equation and

possibly the easiest with which to start. The denominator

is the theoretical cost to replace the facility. It is

important to recognize that this cost is based on the

replacement of a building with another facility that is the

same size and is fully code compliant. If, for example,

you are comparing the FCI on a 3,450 square foot

gymnasium building at a campus, the replacement cost

is the theoretical cost to replace that same 3,450 square

foot building. Since the replacement cost comparison is

primarily driven by the type of facility (elementary school,

middle school, high school, administration, etc.), a set of

cost models have been developed that estimate the

cost per square foot for new construction and are

indicated in the chart to the right. The cost models take

into account national industry averages from a

recognized industry data source called RSMeans®,

adjusted to Austin, Texas, as well as the District’s recent

experience in the Austin construction market. The costs

per square foot are then multiplied by the size of the

school or building under consideration.

FCI: The Numerator

The numerator is the estimated cost to complete the

repairs on the building in its current condition. This repair

cost is generally considered to be like-for-like repairs.

Within reason, the deficient conditions would be repaired

or systems replaced to put the building into fully

serviceable condition to meet current codes.

At AISD, the District retained a firm in 2007 to assess all of

the facilities in the district and develop cost estimates to

make needed repairs. That effort included an

assessment of all facilities using architectural and

engineering assessors to identify deficient conditions in

the buildings.

This survey focused, for the most part, on the condition of

the existing buildings and did not initially include

educational adequacy or functional equity needs. All of

the identified needs were grouped into building systems,

and a Uniformat® cost structure supported by RSMeans®

nationally-based cost data adjusted to the Austin, Texas

area, was employed to develop consistent cost

estimates across all schools. These cost estimates, using

the industry-standard, line- item costs, comprise the

majority of the costs in the AISD facility assessment

database and are included in the numerator of the FCI

calculation.

In addition, ADA (American with Disabilities Act)/TAS

(Texas Accessibility Standards) reports were developed

to address ADA issues against current guidelines during

2008-09. A functional equity study identified core areas

and specialized classroom areas, within specific school

campuses that did not meet AISD educational

specifications. The cost to resolve these issues has been

included in the deficiencies and numerator of the

current FCI numbers.

Page 189

EXHIBIT "B"



Educational Adequacy Total

Capacity 1,476,141$

Support for Programs 8,738,417$

Technology 74,371,610$

Security and Supervision 34,273,456$

Instructional Aids 53,308,580$

Learning Environment 3,862,200$

Physical Characteristics 4,715,934$

Relationship of Spaces 4,078,391$

Subtotal 184,824,729$

Educational Adequacy Assessment

As part of this master planning effort, AISD conducted an

educational adequacy assessment of all schools. An

educational adequacy assessment evaluates how well

the campus is equipped to deliver the instructional

program.

During the summer of 2010, a team of assessors went to

each school and collected an inventory of each space

at the classroom level. This data was then compared to

the District developed standards to identify when an

individual space did not meet a specific level of

compliance. When an item did not meet the standard,

the condition was noted and a line item was added to

the assessment database with a budget to correct that

condition.

This applied a standards-based approach to determine

the overall educational adequacy by evaluating eight

overall criteria as follows. Capacity: Ability of the facility to meet the needs of

the student population. Support for Programs: Provision of special spaces or

classrooms to support the instructional program. Technology: Presence of infrastructure, data

distribution, and equipment. Supervision & Security: Extent to which physical

configurations help or hinder building operation. Instructional Aids: Presence of necessary equipment

within teaching spaces. Physical Characteristics: Sizes and shapes of

teaching spaces. Learning Environment: Degree to which learning

areas are comfortable, well-lit, odor-free,

controllable and quiet.

Relationship of Spaces: Proximity of instructional

spaces to support areas such as libraries, labs, and

lecture halls.

The chart below identifies the educational adequacy

deficiency costs by the eight overall criteria.

Technology, instructional aids, and security and

supervision make up the greatest need in terms of

educational adequacy.

Page 190

EXHIBIT "B"



Building Deficiencies

The combination of the building condition and the educational adequacy items currently represents over 41,000 line

items districtwide. Deficiencies are categorized by the following priorities.

Priority 1: currently critical (immediate need, i.e., fire safety systems)

Priority 2: potentially critical (to be corrected within one year, i.e., major HVAC equipment, security systems)

Priority 3: necessary/not yet critical (1-2 years, i.e., site lighting, sanitation sewer, educational adequacy)

Priority 4: recommended (3-5 years, i.e., finishes, educational adequacy)

Priority 5: does not meet current code/standards/grandfathered (i.e., functional equity, 3rd tier ADA/TAS)

The chart below lists the facility type and the costs associated with correcting priorities 1 through 5. Logically, the greatest

need is at the elementary schools since this makes up the largest number of schools and the most square footage in the

District.

Renovation Costs by Priority, by Campus

Type Priority 1 Priority 2 Priority 3 Priority 4 Priority 5 Total

Schools

PreK Centers 191,332$ 1,073,643$ 980,523$ 154,414$ 9,470$ 2,409,383$

Elementary Schools 36,850,040$ 126,853,351$ 240,721,823$ 32,284,740$ 70,573,429$ 507,283,384$

Middle Schools 19,139,713$ 64,431,627$ 84,687,913$ 17,692,534$ 40,887,549$ 226,839,336$

High Schools 15,986,074$ 82,102,687$ 134,128,848$ 36,189,051$ 21,192,236$ 289,598,897$

Alternative Education 1,346,064$ 3,563,202$ 14,909,398$ 2,486,176$ 136,888$ 22,441,727$

Total Schools 73,513,225$ 278,024,510$ 475,428,505$ 88,806,914$ 132,799,572$ 1,048,572,726$

Other District Facilities

Support Facilities 2,135,276$ 7,727,230$ 5,729,806$ 45,901$ 291,467$ 15,929,679$

Administrative 732,481$ 2,759,670$ 8,922,699$ 362,880$ 202,910$ 12,980,639$

Maintenance and Transportation Facilities637,830$ 1,198,839$ 3,030,970$ 214,429$ 199,746$ 5,281,814$

Total Other Facilities 3,505,587$ 11,685,739$ 17,683,474$ 623,209$ 694,123$ 34,192,133$

Grand Total 77,018,812$ 289,710,249$ 493,111,980$ 89,430,123$ 133,493,695$ 1,082,764,859$

Page 191

EXHIBIT "B"



The chart below provides a crosstab by building system. The greatest building system deficiency, as is typically the case,

is in the area of Heating Ventilation and Air Conditioning (HVAC). Please note that the “Other” building system category

includes functional equity and ADA/TAS compliance.

A summary of building system by priority by individual school campus is available in Appendix A of this report.

District-wide Crosstab by Priority by System

Building System 1 2 3 4 5 Total

Site 471,675$ 2,914,648$ 20,346,691$ 15,618,350$ -$ 39,351,363$

Roofing 1,899,480$ 21,445,208$ 21,855,335$ 4,671,615$ -$ 49,871,638$

Exterior 192,501$ 5,000,393$ 21,363,122$ 4,950,036$ -$ 31,506,052$

Structure 201,641$ 389,747$ 985,404$ 66,195$ -$ 1,642,988$

Interior 130,752$ 7,443,680$ 44,907,605$ 20,490,803$ -$ 72,972,840$

HVAC 13,061,988$ 161,859,344$ 150,114,352$ 1,283,770$ -$ 326,319,454$

Plumbing 14,861,306$ 8,129,887$ 65,597,836$ 3,829,778$ 1,568$ 92,420,375$

Electrical 488,670$ 24,917,566$ 69,854,337$ 5,273,377$ -$ 100,533,950$

Technology -$ 9,936,855$ 77,335,604$ -$ -$ 87,272,458$

Fire and Safety 19,377,531$ 11,607,150$ 1,133,648$ 507,425$ -$ 32,625,754$

Conveyances 223,695$ 5,139,951$ 247,287$ -$ -$ 5,610,933$

Specialties 39,820$ 256,975$ 19,351,440$ 32,738,773$ -$ 52,387,008$

Other 26,069,754$ 30,668,847$ 19,318$ -$ 133,492,127$ 190,250,046$

Total 77,018,812$ 289,710,249$ 493,111,980$ 89,430,123$ 133,493,695$ 1,082,764,859$

Facility Condition Assessment Priority

Page 192

EXHIBIT "B"



Facility Options

Using the Educational Framework as guiding principles,

the Facility Master Plan Task Force began the

complicated task of developing facility options and

scenarios in order to meet their charge of developing

recommendations to improve facility efficiencies through

objective data analysis and community input.

The information and data considered included the

following.

Current condition of buildings (FCI)

Educational adequacy of schools

Current and proposed instructional programs

Current and projected population growth and

decline

Lease obligations, current and possible use of

buildings, and administrative facilities

The following criteria were used for decision making.

Educational enhancement – meet the

educational needs of all students

Efficient space utilization – optimum utilization

range was between 85%-105% of permanent

capacity

Cost savings – decrease M&O expenses or capital

cost avoidance of correcting building

deficiencies and building operating costs per

student

Future growth – account for future population

growth/decreases

Facility condition – facility condition index rating

Over the course of seven months, 108 options that were

developed by the Task Force, consultants, and staff,

were reviewed and evaluated by the Task Force.

An outline of the 108 options is provided in Appendix G of

this report.

Page 193

EXHIBIT "B"


District-Wide Facility Master Plan

Appendix A FCI White Paper and Facility FCI Charts

White Paper:

Facility Condition Index (FCI) at Austin ISD

The assessment of school facilities and the development of long-range master plans, is Magellan

Consulting’s core business. District-wide master plans, by their very nature, recommend changes across

a district. In nearly every district in which we work, there are building condition and student capacity

challenges. Often, there exists enough capacity across the district when compared to total student

enrollment; however, that capacity is rarely in the right place. In the last five years, every large urban

district we have worked with has faced considerable loss of enrollment district-wide which eventually

necessitates reducing overall footprint and closing schools. We typically see changes in educational

programs that make the alignment of facilities a challenge, as curriculum and delivery methods are ever-

evolving. Nearly 90 percent of our country’s 21st century schools were designed and constructed in the

20th century, most in the mid 20th century, under an industrial age factory model with a long row of

classrooms down a double-loaded corridor. The condition of schools, with the exception of very

wealthy districts, is declining across the country. The recent economic climate is exacerbates this

problem as maintenance funds are decreasing. Texas the new education funding system in Texas is

placing greater emphasis on the use of Maintenance and Operations (M&O) funds. Unfortunately,

deferred maintenance does not go away with reduced funding, and the unmet need continues to build

until the cost to repair eventually exceeds the cost to replace the facility.

Commonly, communities have a widespread perception that school districts shape, hide, or manipulate

building condition data to obtain a desired result. This perception may even result in a law suit, which

creates the necessity to engage in projects that are driven by legal requirements. While years ago there

may have been school districts that were guilty of these charges, particularly in the era of racial

segregation and the court-ordered desegregation that followed, the fact is that we have not seen data

manipulation at any of the districts in which we have worked for over a decade.

School district administrators and facility staffs continually request that we simplify the data and planning

parameters. The process of engaging the community offers a broad spectrum of individuals who want to

participate. These diverse groups of individuals may speak different languages, have different educational

backgrounds, different levels of school planning experience. Some may have a deep understanding of

mathematics and can easily read charts and graphs, while others will not. The main challenge herein, is

that the amount and type of data used in the planning process is very complex. Depending upon the

issue, capacity can include a variety of factors. Capacity may include only permanent space, or it may

include both permanent and temporary space. Capacity can be adjusted for smaller class sizes, and

utilization can affect capacity when smaller class sizes are required for special needs students. In

addition, the Facility Condition Index FCI may include only current costs, or it may include a forecast of

future system replacements that are going to occur within the next three to five years. Enrollment data

is often complicated by official enrollment, staffing enrollment, average daily membership, and even the

time of year. Although there is often a desire to simplify the information presented, it is not

always possible to do so while maintaining access to the kinds of data that are presented in

the complex planning process. The variables in data mean to the outside individual that numbers

may be different from one context to another. Capacities change from year to year, buildings

deteriorate on a daily basis, and enrollment fluctuates. School planners are always working with a

moving target.

Page 1

FCI Campuses

<10%

10-19%

20-29%

30-39%

40-49%

50-59%

60-69%

70-79%

80-89%

90-100%

>100%

Repair

Renovate

Replace

Since 1991, the facility management industry has used an index called the FCI to benchmark the relative

condition of a group of schools. This index simply divides the identified repair costs in a facility by the

total cost to replace the facility. For example, take a 100,000 square foot building that might

theoretically cost $10 million to construct new and now has $1 million

in identified repairs. Dividing $1 million by $10 million results in an

FCI of 10 percent. The National Association of College and University

Business Officers has suggested for college planning that an FCI of less

than 5 percent is good, an FCI between 5 and 10 percent is fair, and an

FCI greater than 10 percent is poor. In K-12 public school planning,

the gulf between 10 percent and 100 percent is just not stratified

enough. For several years, Magellan Consulting has used the chart

displayed to the right, with clients to provide a little more gradation.

We often find district-wide FCI averages in the 20 to 30 percent range.

Schools in the 30 to 60 percent range are probably the most difficult

to plan for long-term. Financial modeling has shown that over a 30-

year period, schools that fall in the 65 percent or greater range are

more cost-effective to replace than to repair. This is due to efficiency

gains with more modern facilities and the value of the building at the

end of the analysis period. Of course, FCI is not the only factor used

to identify buildings that need renovation, replacement or even

closure. Historical significance, enrollment trends, community

sentiment, and the availability of capital are additional factors that are

analyzed when making school facility decision.

The FCI calculation, while seemingly simple, yields a consistent result that can commonly be compared

across districts, as the same factors are almost always considered in deriving the numerator and the

denominator. It should also be noted that there are nuances regarding the process for calculating FCI

that must be understood.

FCI: The Denominator

The denominator is the bottom part of the equation and possibly the easiest with which to start. The

denominator is the theoretical cost to replace the facility. It is important to recognize that this cost is

based on the replacement of a building with another facility that is the same size and is fully

code compliant. If, for example, you are comparing the FCI on a 3,450 square foot gymnasium building

at a campus, the replacement cost is the theoretical cost to replace that same 3,450 square foot

building. For the purpose of FCI, it is not important whether the district actually replaces that building.

Depending on campus type and other factors that might include joint use, the district might decided to

replace the 3,450 building with a 12,000 square foot gymnasium building that would be built to the

district’s current educational specifications and cost considerably more. For the purposes of FCI, we

are trying to establish a benchmark to compare a group of facilities so the repair costs are compared to

the theoretical cost to replace that same facility.

Since the replacement cost comparison is primarily driven by the type of facility (elementary school,

middle school, high school, administration, etc.), a set of cost models have been developed that estimate

the cost per square foot for new construction. The cost models take into account national industry

averages from a recognized industry data source called RSMeans®, adjusted to Austin, Texas, as well as

Page 2

the district’s recent experience in the Austin construction market. The costs per square foot are then

multiplied by the size of the school or building under consideration.

“Construction Cost” is a term that may mean different things to different people. To contractors,

construction cost generally means the amount they are paid to construct the building, and that figure

generally does not include a contingency for unforeseen conditions. To the school district facilities staff,

construction cost typically refers to the planning budget to construct the building plus a small

contingency for unforeseen conditions and may also include the cost to bring utilities to a site. To the

school board, construction cost often means the total costs spent on the project which includes the

architects’ fees and the cost to manage the overall construction program. Therefore, it is important to

be careful which costs to include in the replacement cost denominator calculation. For FCI purposes,

we include all of the costs associated with completing the project for the amount of funding that is

required in total. That includes the base construction cost (often referred to as “hard costs”); plus

inflation; plus professional fees; plus administrative costs for testing, surveys, and advertising; plus

management costs; plus contingencies; plus escalation to an estimated mid-point of construction (often

referred to as “soft costs”). These total costs are significantly more than the base construction cost

paid to the contractor. The following table shows the average costs used in determining the

replacement cost for AISD, based on the building type and the buildings’ gross square footage measured

to the outside of exterior walls.

FCI: The Numerator

The numerator is the top part of the equation and is a little more complicated. The numerator is the

estimated cost to complete the repairs on the building in its current condition. This repair cost is

generally considered to be like-for-like repairs. Within reason, the deficient conditions would be

repaired or systems replaced to put the building into fully serviceable condition to meet current codes.

This is where it gets complicated. In determining which costs to include in the repair cost, one has to

consider if the same conditions would be included in the replacement facility. Classroom additions, for

instance, would add square footage to the building. It would not be comparable to include the addition’s

new construction cost portion of the repaired facility to a facility of the same size, unless the square

footage was added to the replacement facility cost estimate. One would not include building needs that

have not yet occurred, also called “projected needs,” as that would be comparing a building’s future

ES MS HS Admin PortableSquare Feet 82,500 170,000 330,000 20,000 1,536

Cost / SqFt 185.54$ 204.20$ 201.53$ 176.65$ 85.97$

Construction Cost 15,306,924.11$ 34,714,158.47$ 66,504,421.68$ 3,532,981.28$ 132,047.22$

A/E Services 1,224,553.93$ 2,777,132.68$ 5,320,353.73$ 317,968.32$ 11,884.25$

Site/Survey 30,613.85$ 69,428.32$ 133,008.84$ 7,065.96$ 264.09$

Permits/Fees 68,881.16$ 156,213.71$ 299,269.90$ 15,898.42$ 198.07$

Testing 114,801.93$ 260,356.19$ 498,783.16$ 26,497.36$ 660.24$

Furn/Fixt/Equip (FF&E) 918,415.45$ 2,082,849.51$ 3,990,265.30$ 141,319.25$ 7,262.60$

Other 612,276.96$ 1,388,566.34$ 2,660,176.87$ 137,654.34$ 6,602.36$

Project Budget 18,276,467$ 41,448,705$ 79,406,279$ 4,179,385$ 158,919$

Program-level contg @ 10% 1,827,647 4,144,871 7,940,628 417,938 15,892

Program Management 1,005,206$ 2,279,679$ 4,367,345$ 229,866$ 8,741$

Escalation - 3 yrs. @ 5% 3,431,999$ 7,783,337$ 14,911,101$ 784,815$ 29,842$

Total Program Cost 24,541,319$ 55,656,592$ 106,625,354$ 5,612,004$ 213,393$

Cost Per Square Feet 297.47$ 327.39$ 323.11$ 280.60$ 138.93$

Page 3

state to that of what would be replaced today. Generally, studies or hazardous material costs that might

be encountered even under a demolition scenario would not be included.

At AISD, the district retained a firm in 2006 to assess all of the facilities in the district and develop cost

estimates to make needed repairs. That effort included a walkthrough of all facilities using architects and

engineers to identify deficient conditions in the buildings. This survey focused, for the most part, on the

condition of the existing buildings and did not include educational adequacy or functional equity type

needs (more on that later). All of the identified needs were grouped into building systems, and a

Uniformat® cost structure supported by RSMeans® nationally-based cost data adjusted to the Austin,

Texas area was employed to develop consistent cost estimates across all schools. These cost estimates,

using the industry standard line item costs, comprise the majority of the costs in the AISD facility

assessment database and are included in the numerator of the FCI calculation. The construction cost

value of all of these deficient conditions, prior to adding soft costs for professional fees, contingency, and

escalation total approximately $444.9 million.

However, the facility condition assessment did not focus on what the assessment industry calls

“educational adequacy” items. Where a building assessment focuses on the condition of the building and

what is broken, an educational adequacy assessment focuses on how well the school supports the

instructional mission and looks objectively at what is missing. As part of this master planning effort,

AISD conducted an educational adequacy assessment of all schools. This assessment made use of the

district’s educational specifications, supplemented with information collected during a three-day

workshop that involved numerous staff, principals, and teachers. A set of standards was developed for

each school type, the buildings typically found on the campus, and for each instructional space. These

standards identified in detail the size of the teaching spaces, the number of students in each space,

physical conditions, plumbing requirements, the number of computer outlets and electrical plugs, and

the type of instructional support for each space, in addition to safety and supervision considerations.

During the summer of 2010, a team of assessors went to each school and collected an inventory of each

space at the classroom level. This data was then compared to the previously developed standards to

identify when an individual space did not meet a specific standard. When an item did not meet the

standard, the condition was noted and a line item was added to the assessment database with a budget

to correct that condition. This has resulted in the identification of approximately $113.5 million in

educational adequacy-related deficiencies.

The combination of the building condition and the educational adequacy items currently represents over

41,000 line items district-wide. Base costs must added up to provide a total that is comparable to the

replacement cost total program budgets use as the denominator of the calculation. Again, the design

and construction industry commonly refers to these costs as “soft costs.” The soft costs factoring is

done at a deficiency level, and every deficiency receives a specific cost allocation. The facilities staff of

AISD has conducted a review of recent projects to gain a better understanding of the associated costs

based on a variety of different types of repairs. The district has an established default soft costs factor

that is added to deficiencies of a standard nature. However, air conditioning and mechanical-related

deficiencies are typically done by mechanical contractors that may require additional engineering

requirements. For this reason, a separate model was established for all HVAC/mechanical repairs. For

life safety-related deficiencies, including security cameras and alarms, the costs are primarily equipment

related and do not have requirements for design and engineering so they too have their own model.

The deficiencies noted for ADA repairs were developed under a slightly different cost structure so a

different factor is applied to these items to provide consistent cost estimates at the project level.

Finally, the functional equity needs for additions and new construction on existing campuses have their

Page 4

own soft cost model. The following chart shows the percentage factors that are applied to every $100

of estimated repair cost to derive the total repair cost figure used in calculating the FCI.

The total facility condition cost totals approximately $963.1 million after adding soft costs to the costs

for correcting deficient building and ADA conditions and the educational adequacy costs. During the

August work sessions, the need was approximated at $875 million, but at that time it was believed that

the need would eventually be lowered as data was reviewed. The $875 million figure really represented

the total construction cost (hard cost) required to correct current deficiencies. Indeed the comparable

cost has decreased to about $558.4 million; however, the overall total need is now about $1.08 billion,

including functional equity needs at 44 campuses (discussed in more detail below). Since the August

worksession:

1 Deficiencies have been reviewed and, in some cases, modified by AISD facilities staff (part of

ongoing AISD facility management procedures) – decreased cost.

2 Overlapping cost between ADA studies and building condition deficiencies have been addressed

– decreased cost.

3 Overlapping cost between functional equity deficiencies, ADA deficiencies, and building

condition deficiencies have been addressed – decreased cost.

4 Overlapping cost between educational adequacy deficiencies and building condition deficiencies

have been addressed – decreased cost.

5 Location factor that adjusts RSMeans® data to the Austin area has been corrected – decreased

cost.

6 Algorithm that applies the location factor to RSMeans® data has been corrected – decreased

cost.

7 Revised soft cost models have been developed and applied to accurately reflect the total cost

required to correct deficiencies in a potential capital improvement program – increased cost.

Default HVAC Life Safety ADA EquityCost Basis 100.00$ 100.00$ 100.00$ 100.00$ 100.00$

Construction Cost 138.46$ 138.46$ 103.46$ 196.37$ 196.37$

A/E Services 20.77$ 20.77$ 4.14$ 29.46$ 29.46$

Permits/Fees 0.62$ 0.62$ 0.47$ 0.88$ 0.88$

Testing 0.42$ 0.42$ -$ 0.59$ 0.59$

Other 23.26$ 28.11$ 1.34$ 32.99$ 32.99$

Project Budget 184$ 188$ 109$ 260$ 260$

Program-level contg @ 10% 18 19 11 26 26

Program Management 10$ 10$ 6$ 14$ 14$

Escalation - 3 yrs. @ 5% 34$ 35$ 21$ 49$ 49$

Total Program Cost 246$ 253$ 147$ 350$ 350$

Soft Cost Factor (%) 78% 83% 42% 78% 78%

Page 5

Functional equity needs are different from educational adequacy needs. Educational adequacy is an

analysis of the existing conditions to determine if they meet the district’s educational specifications and

to determine which corrections can logically be made to achieve the standards in an existing structure.

Functional equity is an analysis comparing the area allocations for areas within the school to determine if

they meet the current educational specifications based on the target number of students at the school.

This analysis has resulted in the recommendation for additions to expand libraries, gymnasiums,

cafeterias, administration spaces, and classrooms at several locations. These additions constitute new

space and are therefore not included in the calculation of the FCI. A summary of the functional equity

improvements, although not included in the FCI calculation, is included for reference below.

A B C D

Means Estimates Construction Cost Soft Cost Total (B+C)

ADA Compliance 38,749,957$ 40,067,456$ 30,435,239$ 70,502,695$

Building Condition 304,472,387$ 404,854,077$ 302,743,840$ 707,597,917$

Educational Suitability 93,543,573$ 113,518,330$ 71,508,880$ 185,027,210$

436,765,917$ 558,439,863$ 404,687,959$ 963,127,822$

Compares to $875M

Functional Equity 58,358,503$ 68,256,105$ 51,471,929$ 119,728,034$

495,124,420$ 626,695,968$ 456,159,888$ 1,082,855,856$

Page 6

Functional Equity Additions / Renovations

School Number and Name Library Gym Cafeteria Admin Classroom Total

009 Anderson HS - 7,558,381 - - 737,651 8,296,032

002 Austin HS 93,707 1,000,768 - 341,590 6,583,925 8,019,990

005 McCallum HS 1,056,715 974,456 - - - 2,031,171

007 Travis HS - 497,614 - - - 497,614

054 Bedichek MS 1,226,494 1,200,183 - 279,273 10,809,492 13,515,442

046 Burnet MS - - 1,121,709 - - 1,121,709

057 Covington MS - - - - 1,256,499 1,256,499

055 Dobie MS - 4,791,499 778,272 - 290,814 5,860,584

051 Martin MS 830,896 1,996,919 - - - 2,827,815

058 Mendez MS - - - - 1,323,155 1,323,155

052 Murchison MS 382,212 - 791,197 252,361 6,564,076 7,989,847

047 O. Henry MS - - 702,568 - 2,492,687 3,195,256

048 Pearce MS - - - - 751,499 751,499

053 Webb MS - - - 703,953 - 703,953

142 Allan ES 756,946 - - - - 756,946

102 Andrews ES 1,197,967 110,786 - - - 1,308,753

149 Barrington ES - 2,377,285 119,095 - - 2,496,380

107 Brentwood ES - 720,110 718,725 - - 1,438,834

109 Brown ES 101,554 2,561,928 - - - 2,663,482

161 Cook ES - 2,949,680 115,402 - - 3,065,082

113 Cunningham ES - 2,543,464 115,402 812,893 - 3,471,759

114 Dawson ES - 913,985 - 284,351 - 1,198,336

154 Doss ES - - - 486,074 - 486,074

116 Govalle ES 847,514 2,460,375 - 177,258 - 3,485,146

117 Gullett ES 1,154,714 482,843 1,442,527 698,414 1,307,276 5,085,774

119 Highland Park ES - 886,289 796,275 - 517,002 2,199,566

155 Hill ES - 2,404,981 135,713 - - 2,540,694

162 Houston ES - 191,106 - - - 191,106

120 Joslin ES 960,146 - 580,704 - - 1,540,850

160 Linder ES 2,901,672 2,331,124 109,863 - 109,863 5,452,522

122 Maplewood ES - - 1,315,585 - 76,858 1,392,443

123 Mathews ES - - - 47,777 2,160,329 2,208,105

150 Norman ES 516,771 - 268,195 670,256 - 1,455,222

151 Pillow ES 1,140,404 - - 979,995 - 2,120,400

130 Pleasant Hill ES - - - 33,697 249,269 282,966

136 St. Elmo ES - 809,200 - - 517,002 1,326,202

127 Sanchez ES - 2,441,910 168,026 - - 2,609,936

139 Sims ES - 717,340 - - - 717,340

158 Sunset Valley ES - 1,955,836 - 101,554 - 2,057,390

140 Travis Heights ES - - - 978,611 - 978,611

166 Williams ES - 1,695,489 - - - 1,695,489

157 Winn ES 2,880,438 2,654,250 839,205 - 124,634 6,498,528

144 Wooten ES - 406,216 - 704,415 - 1,110,631

146 Zilker ES - 2,409,598 - - - 2,409,598

Figures have been adjusted to eliminate overlap between Condition Assessment and ADA Studies

Page 7

FCI Results

For AISD, the FCI calculations include the building condition assessment results, the educational

adequacy assessment results, and the type one and two ADA compliance considerations and then

compare them to the cost of replacing the same facility. These FCI figures provide a benchmark that can

be used to consistently compare AISD facilities district-wide. The planning team refers to the FCI to aid

in decision making when a school or building is subject to renovation, when a change in educational

program is contemplated, or when the school is targeted for replacement, consolidation, or closure for

efficiency reasons. It is not the principle driver, but rather a supporting consideration to guide the

district and hopefully prohibit the district from making additional investment into a building that is close

to or has reached the end of its serviceable life. The following chart is a summary of all of the district’s

facilities by FCI. The one school that falls in the 70-79 percent range is Pease Elementary, a historic

location celebrated as the longest operating public school in the state.

District Wide Facility Condition Index (FCI) by Campus

FCI Campuses

<10% 17

10-19% 33

20-29% 28

30-39% 36

40-49% 9

50-59% 2

60-69% -

70-79% 1

80-89% -

90-100% -

>100% -

Total 126

-

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

<10% 10-19% 20-29% 30-39% 40-49% 50-59% 60-69% 70-79% 80-89% 90-100% >100%

Co

un

t

Repair

Renovate

Replace

Page 8

AISD School/Facility FCI Summary Total minus NCTuesday, 25 January 201

Priorities 1-5 and Some ADA

No. Campus Name

Grades

Served

School

Type Historic * Age Site

Total Permanent Priority 1 Priority 2

Total Priority1 and 2 Priority 3 Priority 4 Priority 5

Total Facility Condition Cost

FCI Related Facility Cost

Total Replacement

Cost FCI Functional Equity

Educational

Adequacy

Life Cycle2010

Life Cycle2011

Life Cycle2012

Life Cycle2013

Life Cycle2014

Life Cycle2015

Pre-K131 Lucy Read Pre-K School PK Pre-K 1961 9.9 64,644 191,332$ 1,073,643$ 1,264,975$ 980,523$ 154,414$ 9,470$ 2,409,383$ 2,399,913$ 21,971,173$ 10.9% -$ 715,064$ -$ 2,090,886$ 6,442,088$ -$ -$ -$

Elementary Schools128 Pease Elementary School K-6 ES Historical 1876 2.8 35,624 364,408$ 2,777,323$ 3,141,731$ 3,762,707$ 712,502$ 51,831$ 7,668,770$ 7,616,940$ 10,597,089$ 71.9% -$ 743,252$ -$ 86,265$ 77,670$ 1,253,802$ -$ 33,826$ 144 Wooten Elementary School PK-5 ES 1955 6.7 53,689 1,033,751$ 4,385,700$ 5,419,450$ 6,098,924$ 541,732$ 1,159,269$ 13,219,375$ 12,060,106$ 21,453,872$ 56.2% 1,110,631$ 1,403,037$ -$ 1,883,347$ 63,872$ 1,951,276$ -$ 1,191,773$ 146 Zilker Elementary School PK-6 ES 1950 11.8 50,941 768,270$ 2,903,030$ 3,671,300$ 5,560,055$ 853,301$ 2,565,129$ 12,649,785$ 10,084,656$ 18,351,848$ 55.0% 2,409,599$ 1,023,970$ -$ 1,270,160$ 92,992$ 4,073,372$ -$ -$ 136 St. Elmo Elementary School PK-5 ES 1960 9.4 48,212 516,693$ 1,517,877$ 2,034,569$ 4,531,790$ 238,602$ 1,342,548$ 8,147,509$ 6,804,962$ 15,255,478$ 44.6% 1,326,203$ 1,045,047$ -$ -$ 137,545$ 3,902,096$ 990,535$ -$ 120 Joslin Elementary School PK-5 ES 1954 5.1 44,826 357,433$ 1,962,599$ 2,320,031$ 4,054,494$ 515,428$ 1,576,163$ 8,466,116$ 6,889,953$ 15,618,987$ 44.1% 1,540,851$ 905,386$ 40,015$ 398,891$ 2,860,759$ -$ 39,682$ 165,640$ 129 Pecan Springs Elementary School PK-5 ES 1957 7.6 56,992 204,113$ 676,135$ 880,248$ 5,758,530$ 1,719,886$ 90,134$ 8,448,798$ 8,358,664$ 19,694,928$ 42.4% -$ 1,346,708$ 689,378$ -$ 176,873$ 2,745,381$ -$ 627,731$ 119 Highland Park Elementary School K-5 ES 1952 6.3 58,550 508,160$ 717,075$ 1,225,235$ 5,579,104$ 1,538,618$ 2,241,968$ 10,584,925$ 8,342,957$ 20,158,386$ 41.4% 2,199,567$ 1,112,435$ 314,065$ 103,539$ 5,348,882$ -$ -$ -$ 158 Sunset Valley Elementary School PK-5 ES 1971 10.4 66,467 170,770$ 2,951,967$ 3,122,737$ 5,140,210$ 235,908$ 2,104,101$ 10,602,957$ 8,498,856$ 20,685,803$ 41.1% 2,057,391$ 1,005,839$ 3,359$ 146,650$ 5,795,758$ -$ 63,689$ -$ 151 Pillow Elementary School PK-5 ES 1969 10.0 54,247 223,451$ 549,981$ 773,433$ 6,867,650$ 293,128$ 2,141,509$ 10,075,720$ 7,934,211$ 19,335,286$ 41.0% 2,120,401$ 1,237,573$ -$ -$ 90,861$ 4,133,647$ -$ 349,553$ 121 Lee Elementary School K 6 ES 1939 4 8 46 265 426 784$ 1 848 564$ 2 275 348$ 3 225 098$ 200 247$ 36 675$ 5 737 368$ 5 700 693$ 13 990 931$ 40 7% $ 1 268 395$ 91 681$ 308 338$ 403 875$ 1 264 372$ $ 331 335$

Cost included in Priority 1-5 Future system renewals (reviewed each year and converted to deficiency or revised)

121 Lee Elementary School K-6 ES 1939 4.8 46,265 426,784$ 1,848,564$ 2,275,348$ 3,225,098$ 200,247$ 36,675$ 5,737,368$ 5,700,693$ 13,990,931$ 40.7% -$ 1,268,395$ 91,681$ 308,338$ 403,875$ 1,264,372$ -$ 331,335$ 126 Ortega Elementary School PK-5 ES 1959 7.4 47,302 523,332$ 2,675,557$ 3,198,889$ 2,629,766$ 198,140$ 55,295$ 6,082,090$ 6,026,795$ 14,984,780$ 40.2% -$ 794,706$ 15,997$ 291,824$ 6,634,577$ -$ -$ -$ 113 Cunningham Elementary School PK-5 ES 1963 8.8 71,600 174,656$ 596,703$ 771,359$ 7,904,357$ 475,256$ 3,523,663$ 12,674,635$ 9,122,729$ 23,126,547$ 39.4% 3,471,761$ 1,336,362$ -$ 2,720,304$ 106,948$ 6,961,969$ -$ 66,716$ 139 Sims Elementary School PK-5 ES 1956 8.4 44,337 853,727$ 764,716$ 1,618,443$ 3,853,963$ 273,990$ 748,483$ 6,494,878$ 5,746,396$ 15,016,609$ 38.3% 717,340$ 928,787$ 33,570$ 294,150$ 3,658,941$ 294,150$ 518,859$ 294,150$ 104 Becker Elementary School PK-5 ES Historical 1936 3.7 59,670 1,114,902$ 2,132,597$ 3,247,499$ 3,338,909$ 247,800$ 202,026$ 7,036,234$ 6,917,872$ 18,663,896$ 37.1% -$ 977,746$ 248,039$ 92,188$ 5,315,724$ -$ 290,561$ -$ 166 Williams Elementary School PK-5 ES 1976 14.0 64,846 207,027$ 4,161,651$ 4,368,677$ 3,128,729$ 634,239$ 1,784,696$ 9,916,341$ 8,121,348$ 22,031,262$ 36.9% 1,695,490$ 1,806,830$ 450,882$ 940,290$ 444,986$ 3,622,459$ -$ 1,214,247$ 122 Maplewood Elementary School PK-6 ES 1951 6.4 45,390 1,421,706$ 631,008$ 2,052,714$ 3,734,924$ 149,102$ 1,440,006$ 7,376,745$ 5,936,739$ 16,243,675$ 36.5% 1,392,443$ 648,571$ -$ 1,719,406$ 835,697$ 3,479,313$ 835,697$ 835,697$ 140 Travis Heights Elementary School PK-5 ES 1938 3.2 59,589 942,440$ 3,085,534$ 4,027,975$ 2,409,904$ 505,213$ 1,052,121$ 7,995,213$ 6,943,092$ 19,096,715$ 36.4% 978,611$ 991,804$ 19,612$ 436,973$ 3,640,462$ -$ 826,657$ 496,703$ 147 Menchaca Elementary School PK-5 ES 1975 19.8 59,978 237,446$ 4,419,488$ 4,656,934$ 2,287,461$ 693,652$ 82,611$ 7,720,657$ 7,638,046$ 21,040,089$ 36.3% -$ 1,093,862$ 518,626$ 143,304$ 6,136,714$ -$ -$ 583,851$ 116 Govalle Elementary School PK-5 ES 1940 8.4 77,638 340,133$ 2,420,667$ 2,760,800$ 4,297,646$ 1,269,894$ 3,581,856$ 11,910,197$ 8,328,341$ 23,095,017$ 36.1% 3,485,148$ 935,305$ -$ 122,350$ 5,137,491$ -$ 1,447,255$ 867,147$ 162 Houston Elementary School PK-5 ES 1976 13.8 81,360 347,984$ 5,418,810$ 5,766,794$ 4,286,298$ 313,940$ 251,318$ 10,618,350$ 10,367,032$ 28,771,349$ 36.0% 191,106$ 1,698,239$ -$ 488,820$ 4,324,456$ -$ 1,304,328$ -$ 105 Blackshear Elementary School PK-5 ES Historical 1937 5.3 70,726 188,148$ 2,520,906$ 2,709,054$ 3,786,009$ 796,536$ 58,019$ 7,349,617$ 7,291,599$ 21,038,900$ 34.7% -$ 705,474$ -$ 555,087$ 89,894$ 5,532,658$ -$ -$ 110 Bryker Woods Elementary School K-6 ES 1939 6.3 37,517 189,411$ 1,439,598$ 1,629,010$ 2,614,525$ 348,606$ 44,654$ 4,636,795$ 4,592,141$ 13,444,775$ 34.2% -$ 863,756$ 11,448$ 568,960$ 3,319,342$ 27,506$ 593,451$ 418,713$ 109 Brown Elementary School PK-6 ES 1957 10.1 53,853 2,478,734$ 1,307,103$ 3,785,837$ 1,854,637$ 666,982$ 2,665,997$ 8,973,453$ 6,307,456$ 18,761,168$ 33.6% 2,663,484$ 801,611$ 152,017$ 100,081$ 6,899,273$ -$ -$ -$ 168 Langford Elementary School PK-5 ES 1980 10.7 78,250 522,264$ 6,062,668$ 6,584,931$ 2,607,540$ 292,001$ 292,964$ 9,777,436$ 9,484,473$ 28,303,131$ 33.5% -$ 1,519,228$ 2,006,009$ 37,112$ 3,199,932$ -$ -$ -$ 103 Barton Hills Elementary School K-6 ES 1964 9.9 38,291 1,022,269$ 1,319,518$ 2,341,787$ 2,090,831$ 447,186$ 14,346$ 4,894,150$ 4,879,804$ 14,588,847$ 33.4% -$ 439,914$ 37,728$ -$ -$ 2,130,211$ 466,339$ 614,444$ 148 Oak Hill Elementary School PK-5 ES 1974 13.7 75,784 577,910$ 2,824,475$ 3,402,384$ 4,765,267$ 417,412$ 46,822$ 8,631,886$ 8,585,063$ 25,741,908$ 33.4% -$ 1,650,197$ -$ -$ 1,709,600$ 4,588,158$ 2,982,219$ -$ 154 Doss Elementary School PK-5 ES 1970 9.7 60,228 289,020$ 2,176,942$ 2,465,962$ 4,326,744$ 262,383$ 522,873$ 7,577,962$ 7,055,089$ 21,571,372$ 32.7% 486,074$ 867,630$ 632,852$ -$ 4,578,304$ -$ -$ -$ 108 Brooke Elementary School PK-5 ES 1954 5.9 52,282 445,215$ 1,390,469$ 1,835,684$ 3,167,000$ 436,817$ 37,886$ 5,477,387$ 5,439,501$ 16,699,995$ 32.6% -$ 888,465$ 1,364,384$ 74,085$ 2,801,622$ -$ -$ -$ 150 Norman Elementary School PK-5 ES 1970 10.2 58,519 474,423$ 1,744,670$ 2,219,093$ 3,308,851$ 249,133$ 1,520,636$ 7,297,712$ 5,747,841$ 17,864,592$ 32.2% 1,455,222$ 880,325$ -$ -$ -$ 2,797,099$ -$ 900,415$ 142 Allan Elementary School PK-5 ES 1957 19.5 112,608 1,132,129$ 2,295,433$ 3,427,562$ 6,758,822$ 558,919$ 800,915$ 11,546,218$ 10,745,303$ 33,497,560$ 32.1% 756,946$ 1,511,428$ -$ -$ 977,818$ 6,233,347$ -$ 3,570,928$ 123 Mathews Elementary School PK-6 ES Historical 1916 2.3 42,112 103,898$ 1,531,441$ 1,635,339$ 2,354,476$ 285,980$ 2,232,330$ 6,508,124$ 4,275,795$ 13,440,313$ 31.8% 2,208,106$ 841,669$ 1,847$ -$ 2,255,558$ -$ 1,522$ 119,956$ 133 Ridgetop Elementary School PK-5 ES 1939 5.0 35,585 165,485$ 1,305,314$ 1,470,799$ 1,363,411$ 899,377$ 22,541$ 3,756,128$ 3,733,587$ 11,956,232$ 31.2% -$ 492,082$ 221,688$ -$ 5,005,802$ -$ -$ -$ 145 Zavala Elementary School PK-6 ES 1937 3.4 69,333 808,799$ 410,359$ 1,219,158$ 4,745,816$ 414,056$ 76,545$ 6,455,575$ 6,435,876$ 20,624,524$ 31.2% -$ 1,032,634$ -$ 531,642$ 58,130$ 5,407,954$ -$ 707,726$ 117 Gullett Elementary School K-5 ES 1956 17 9 39 827 296 571$ 585 713$ 882 284$ 3 484 484$ 278 491$ 3 818 868$ 8 464 128$ 4 645 259$ 15 275 706$ 30 4% 3 778 500$ 1 100 391$ 1 081$ -$ 11 690$ 1 732 507$ -$ 327 370$ 117 Gullett Elementary School K-5 ES 1956 17.9 39,827 296,571$ 585,713$ 882,284$ 3,484,484$ 278,491$ 3,818,868$ 8,464,128$ 4,645,259$ 15,275,706$ 30.4% 3,778,500$ 1,100,391$ 1,081$ -$ 11,690$ 1,732,507$ -$ 327,370$ 159 Graham Elementary School PK-5 ES 1972 9.9 70,589 776,380$ 4,075,512$ 4,851,892$ 1,880,720$ 462,863$ 145,540$ 7,341,015$ 7,195,475$ 24,196,550$ 29.7% -$ 874,097$ 124,863$ 2,802,585$ 849,306$ 742,041$ -$ -$ 124 Metz Elementary School PK-5 ES 1993 6.4 61,905 245,693$ 2,475,960$ 2,721,653$ 2,739,507$ 239,898$ 213,073$ 5,914,131$ 5,701,058$ 19,328,741$ 29.5% -$ 958,961$ 68,927$ -$ 1,403,848$ -$ -$ -$ 102 Andrews Elementary School PK-5 ES 1962 7.7 58,376 573,941$ 2,264,160$ 2,838,101$ 3,198,161$ 190,659$ 1,372,504$ 7,599,425$ 6,064,356$ 20,563,542$ 29.5% 1,308,754$ 1,030,292$ 88,953$ 394,762$ 6,962,219$ -$ -$ -$ 155 Hill Elementary School PK-5 ES 1970 8.9 69,626 371,383$ 1,640,124$ 2,011,507$ 4,471,269$ 324,693$ 2,573,608$ 9,381,077$ 6,807,469$ 23,453,170$ 29.0% 2,540,696$ 921,105$ -$ 256,321$ 1,566,379$ 5,912,141$ -$ -$ 132 Reilly Elementary School PK-5 ES 1954 10.8 41,646 375,848$ 938,169$ 1,314,017$ 2,449,679$ 203,051$ 11,517$ 3,978,263$ 3,966,747$ 14,216,116$ 27.9% -$ 623,670$ 1,984,128$ 77,697$ 2,011,030$ -$ 93,968$ -$ 161 Cook Elementary School K-5 ES 1974 12.7 67,344 827,731$ 3,216,256$ 4,043,986$ 2,658,575$ 275,616$ 3,122,125$ 10,100,303$ 6,978,178$ 25,515,832$ 27.3% 3,065,083$ 1,093,546$ 149,147$ 175,750$ 3,616,650$ 627,220$ 1,706,117$ 73,864$ 114 Dawson Elementary School PK-5 ES 1954 8.7 55,301 820,865$ 2,178,475$ 2,999,340$ 1,747,025$ 124,053$ 1,240,330$ 6,110,749$ 4,870,418$ 18,054,973$ 27.0% 1,198,337$ 812,429$ -$ 1,400,324$ 6,444,952$ -$ -$ -$ 127 Sanchez Elementary School PK-5 ES 1976 9.2 78,131 169,463$ 3,739,168$ 3,908,630$ 2,474,272$ 340,616$ 2,701,170$ 9,424,688$ 6,723,519$ 25,069,329$ 26.8% 2,609,937$ 1,158,542$ 59,241$ -$ 8,682,783$ -$ 1,406,822$ -$ 125 Oak Springs Elementary School PK-5 ES 1958 8.6 47,102 436,196$ 1,687,039$ 2,123,235$ 1,853,482$ 218,887$ 30,328$ 4,225,932$ 4,195,604$ 15,839,115$ 26.5% -$ 712,476$ 50,075$ -$ 1,264,660$ 4,258,589$ 224,809$ 408,824$ 138 Summitt Elementary School PK-5 ES 1986 14.5 75,902 454,240$ 3,415,902$ 3,870,142$ 2,628,225$ 256,850$ 234,180$ 6,989,397$ 6,811,521$ 25,777,010$ 26.4% -$ 1,075,677$ -$ -$ 129,685$ 2,574,244$ -$ 686,055$ 152 Wooldridge Elementary School K-5 ES 1969 11.6 68,543 656,264$ 2,536,750$ 3,193,014$ 3,292,242$ 360,461$ 3,072$ 6,848,790$ 6,845,718$ 26,329,413$ 26.0% -$ 961,821$ 678,807$ -$ 6,795,166$ 27,837$ -$ -$ 172 Kocurek Elementary School PK-5 ES 1986 12.3 78,528 276,757$ 1,059,358$ 1,336,115$ 4,367,370$ 337,123$ 84,409$ 6,125,017$ 6,040,608$ 23,816,680$ 25.4% -$ 1,239,761$ 91,267$ -$ 3,798,724$ 49,204$ -$ 29,218$ 179 Davis Elementary School PK-5 ES 1993 13.2 72,149 375,946$ 775,366$ 1,151,312$ 4,164,062$ 315,031$ 172,691$ 5,803,095$ 5,630,404$ 22,832,945$ 24.7% -$ 1,062,050$ -$ -$ -$ 2,419,567$ -$ -$ 118 Harris Elementary School PK-5 ES 1955 7.3 56,066 152,298$ 561,165$ 713,463$ 3,660,999$ 351,166$ 26,321$ 4,751,949$ 4,725,627$ 19,876,385$ 23.8% -$ 1,301,321$ 1,015,949$ 698,136$ 3,607,043$ 66,135$ 396,793$ -$ 107 Brentwood Elementary School PK-5 ES 1951 16.7 62,891 286,613$ 1,092,859$ 1,379,472$ 2,982,254$ 190,212$ 1,442,616$ 5,994,554$ 4,551,938$ 19,622,049$ 23.2% 1,438,835$ 973,002$ -$ 795,083$ -$ 701,828$ -$ 1,527,839$ 157 Winn Elementary School PK-5 ES 1970 10.0 62,087 449,115$ 1,040,367$ 1,489,481$ 2,585,347$ 359,758$ 6,577,791$ 11,012,376$ 4,434,586$ 19,382,881$ 22.9% 6,498,531$ 1,369,856$ 523,437$ -$ 7,060,275$ -$ 231,324$ -$ 178 Jordan Elementary School PK-5 ES 1992 11.5 74,460 344,244$ 963,877$ 1,308,122$ 4,056,546$ 305,917$ 366,415$ 6,037,001$ 5,670,585$ 25,804,974$ 22.0% -$ 1,294,151$ -$ -$ -$ 477,383$ 652,541$ -$ 149 Barrington Elementary School PK-6 ES 1969 12.1 78,971 329,948$ 682,054$ 1,012,002$ 4,998,919$ 311,342$ 2,516,731$ 8,838,995$ 6,322,264$ 29,888,351$ 21.2% 2,496,381$ 1,146,187$ 659,256$ 117,344$ 5,539,758$ -$ 74,998$ -$ 111 Campbell Elementary School PK-5 ES 1992 9.7 61,793 311,592$ 756,406$ 1,067,999$ 2,651,752$ 197,160$ 377,355$ 4,294,266$ 3,916,911$ 18,838,511$ 20.8% -$ 766,024$ -$ -$ -$ 1,895,752$ -$ 2,025,350$ 106 Blanton Elementary School PK-5 ES 1964 8.0 71,817 642,778$ 1,166,391$ 1,809,169$ 2,969,253$ 230,709$ 59,146$ 5,068,277$ 5,009,131$ 24,104,928$ 20.8% -$ 1,313,917$ -$ -$ -$ 3,624,957$ 1,061,108$ 930,511$ 101 Allison Elementary School PK-6 ES 1955 10.7 61,426 173,617$ 1,527,987$ 1,701,604$ 2,267,769$ 210,014$ 10,288$ 4,189,675$ 4,179,387$ 20,556,998$ 20.3% -$ 907,125$ 888,898$ -$ 8,461,598$ -$ -$ -$ 160 Linder Elementary School PK-5 ES 1972 9.1 69,250 170,717$ 1,591,137$ 1,761,854$ 2,915,462$ 373,892$ 5,522,354$ 10,573,560$ 5,051,207$ 25,625,896$ 19.7% 5,452,525$ 876,187$ 3,359$ -$ 8,379,961$ -$ 1,350,196$ -$ 130 Pleasant Hill Elementary School PK-5 ES 1985 10.1 65,729 338,974$ 584,593$ 923,566$ 3,245,311$ 101,031$ 389,803$ 4,659,712$ 4,269,909$ 21,837,014$ 19.6% 282,966$ 767,791$ -$ -$ 2,570,985$ -$ -$ 5,994,478$ 156 Odom Elementary School PK-5 ES 1970 8.6 61,009 314,793$ 786,254$ 1,101,047$ 2,816,072$ 304,331$ 75,095$ 4,296,545$ 4,221,450$ 22,017,089$ 19.2% -$ 783,022$ -$ 1,334,139$ 8,441,635$ -$ 512,483$ -$ 156 Odom Elementary School PK 5 ES 1970 8.6 61,009 314,793$ 786,254$ 1,101,047$ 2,816,072$ 304,331$ 75,095$ 4,296,545$ 4,221,450$ 22,017,089$ 19.2% $ 783,022$ $ 1,334,139$ 8,441,635$ $ 512,483$ $ 143 Patton Elementary School PK-5 ES 1986 24.1 76,687 553,125$ 2,078,840$ 2,631,965$ 1,914,231$ 172,467$ 309,114$ 5,027,777$ 4,718,662$ 26,010,525$ 18.1% -$ 969,016$ -$ 1,372,576$ 3,133,495$ -$ -$ -$ 170 Boone Elementary School PK-5 ES 1986 12.5 73,690 481,035$ 381,979$ 863,014$ 2,606,876$ 347,921$ 318,391$ 4,136,202$ 3,817,811$ 21,920,602$ 17.4% -$ 991,368$ -$ -$ -$ 3,443,712$ -$ 895,710$ 112 Casis Elementary School PK-5 ES 1951 14.2 77,911 280,022$ 631,690$ 911,712$ 2,858,536$ 731,873$ 298,311$ 4,800,432$ 4,739,853$ 27,288,458$ 17.4% -$ 1,460,287$ -$ -$ -$ 3,846,609$ -$ 1,341,617$ 180 Kiker Elementary School K-5 ES 1992 12.4 76,332 465,453$ 863,540$ 1,328,993$ 2,886,032$ 231,480$ 270,058$ 4,716,563$ 4,446,505$ 27,275,667$ 16.3% -$ 945,244$ -$ 49,378$ -$ 1,803,758$ 653,545$ 431,025$ 173 Casey Elementary School PK-5 ES 1998 17.9 81,506 332,832$ 410,575$ 743,407$ 1,088,761$ 2,067,124$ 78,748$ 3,978,039$ 3,899,292$ 24,702,547$ 15.8% -$ 930,563$ 518,353$ 51,673$ -$ 597,958$ -$ 1,498,305$ 141 Walnut Creek Elementary School K-6 ES 1961 11.5 79,536 369,397$ 1,184,947$ 1,554,343$ 2,606,231$ 199,636$ 10,090$ 4,370,301$ 4,360,210$ 28,685,677$ 15.2% -$ 1,064,371$ -$ 182,264$ 873,879$ 7,597,851$ 519,490$ 597,440$ 175 Widen Elementary School PK-5 ES 1986 10.7 74,523 344,749$ 854,612$ 1,199,361$ 2,028,416$ 207,421$ 244,825$ 3,680,022$ 3,435,197$ 26,737,543$ 12.8% -$ 1,026,980$ -$ -$ 4,337,553$ 554,102$ 46,033$ -$ 181 Mills Elementary School PK-5 ES 1998 10.7 81,368 254,583$ 738,249$ 992,832$ 1,919,394$ 604,743$ 163,005$ 3,679,974$ 3,516,969$ 27,859,900$ 12.6% -$ 1,316,271$ 103,612$ 51,585$ 1,005,499$ 381,318$ -$ -$ 176 Galindo Elementary School PK-5 ES 1989 10.8 85,482 718,525$ 617,531$ 1,336,056$ 1,310,639$ 237,955$ 427,229$ 3,311,879$ 3,148,934$ 27,712,949$ 11.4% -$ 1,255,082$ -$ 802,301$ 3,869,834$ -$ 33,159$ -$ 171 Palm Elementary School PK-5 ES 1987 13.2 79,082 326,618$ 735,004$ 1,061,621$ 1,292,363$ 302,890$ 200,736$ 2,857,612$ 2,700,989$ 24,438,393$ 11.1% -$ 1,129,509$ -$ 982,017$ 3,159,142$ -$ -$ 202,415$ 182 Baranoff Elementary School K-5 ES 1999 15.6 80,088 197,873$ 620,619$ 818,493$ 1,724,996$ 277,997$ 121,554$ 2,943,039$ 2,821,485$ 25,651,479$ 11.0% -$ 1,069,123$ -$ 61,673$ -$ 68,331$ 2,131,585$ 289,094$ 163 Hart Elementary School PK-5 ES 1998 15.7 81,042 439,353$ 651,866$ 1,091,219$ 1,474,912$ 330,538$ 150,402$ 3,047,071$ 2,896,669$ 28,219,837$ 10.3% -$ 1,071,119$ -$ -$ 1,389,062$ -$ -$ -$ 183 Cowan Elementary School PK-5 ES 1999 22.5 70,234 441,004$ 332,647$ 773,651$ 1,110,874$ 269,668$ 287,289$ 2,441,481$ 2,154,192$ 23,634,032$ 9.1% -$ 1,007,303$ 2,592$ -$ 46,308$ -$ 909,058$ -$ 190 Perez Elementary School PK-5 ES 2006 28.0 82,223 1,206,199$ 216,162$ 1,422,361$ 1,028,106$ 150,809$ -$ 2,601,276$ 2,601,276$ 29,028,065$ 9.0% -$ 1,027,736$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 174 Rodriguez Elementary School PK-5 ES 1999 15.0 79,918 229,804$ 571,723$ 801,527$ 1,201,157$ 305,732$ 64,181$ 2,372,597$ 2,308,416$ 28,810,020$ 8.0% -$ 1,238,887$ 181,326$ -$ 1,235,929$ -$ -$ 129,961$ 165 McBee Elementary School K-5 ES 1999 10.9 69,717 233,168$ 419,140$ 652,308$ 935,073$ 242,060$ 57,384$ 1,886,824$ 1,829,440$ 23,236,719$ 7.9% -$ 883,087$ 103,424$ -$ 905,719$ 326,716$ -$ -$ 184 Clayton Elementary School K-5 ES 2006 16.8 99,921 136,427$ 382,446$ 518,872$ 1,142,866$ 215,392$ -$ 1,877,130$ 1,877,130$ 31,551,211$ 5.9% -$ 1,404,862$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 164 Pickle Elementary School PK-5 ES 2001 17.5 120,862 267,092$ 472,925$ 740,017$ 1,109,300$ 347,992$ 116,853$ 2,314,161$ 2,197,309$ 37,780,539$ 5.8% -$ 1,225,897$ -$ 76,624$ 2,213,511$ -$ -$ -$ 185 Blazier Elementary School PK-5 ES 2008 15.4 82,897 136,781$ 177,879$ 314,660$ 897,410$ 205,711$ -$ 1,417,781$ 1,417,781$ 27,857,817$ 5.1% -$ 978,883$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 189 Overton Elementary School PK-5 ES 2007 70.4 91,163 129,148$ 244,058$ 373,207$ 815,429$ 285,538$ -$ 1,474,175$ 1,474,175$ 30,773,624$ 4.8% -$ 1,014,803$ 11,178$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 187 Baldwin Elementary School PK-5 ES 2010 - -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

P R E L I M I N A R YFor Discussion Purposes Only - Not for Distribution 1Page 9

AISD School/Facility FCI Summary Total minus NCTuesday, 25 January 201

Priorities 1-5 and Some ADA

No. Campus Name

Grades

Served

School

Type Historic * Age Site

Total Permanent Priority 1 Priority 2

Total Priority1 and 2 Priority 3 Priority 4 Priority 5

Total Facility Condition Cost

FCI Related Facility Cost

Total Replacement

Cost FCI Functional Equity

Educational

Adequacy

Life Cycle2010

Life Cycle2011

Life Cycle2012

Life Cycle2013

Life Cycle2014

Life Cycle2015

Cost included in Priority 1-5 Future system renewals (reviewed each year and converted to deficiency or revised)

Middle Schools043 Fulmore Middle School 6-8 MS 1911 9.8 159,699 1,617,557$ 8,440,831$ 10,058,388$ 10,297,217$ 1,511,473$ 353,775$ 22,220,853$ 21,867,078$ 54,800,107$ 39.9% -$ 1,873,471$ -$ 3,075,170$ 1,093,451$ 10,606,887$ -$ -$ 046 Burnet Middle School 6-8 MS 1961 23.7 137,768 680,343$ 8,454,488$ 9,134,830$ 8,304,574$ 1,461,392$ 1,181,923$ 20,082,718$ 18,900,796$ 51,140,088$ 37.0% 1,121,710$ 2,786,054$ -$ 3,216,939$ 11,921,049$ -$ -$ -$ 051 Martin Middle School 6-8 MS 1966 9.9 107,983 529,628$ 8,140,464$ 8,670,092$ 4,095,451$ 631,836$ 2,902,231$ 16,299,611$ 13,397,380$ 38,873,997$ 34.5% 2,827,816$ 1,488,156$ -$ 724,561$ 3,271,440$ 263,451$ 701,789$ 712,116$ 028 Ann Richards School 6-9 MS 1958 15.3 130,240 1,508,254$ 2,591,046$ 4,099,300$ 9,635,493$ 775,306$ 126,188$ 14,636,287$ 14,510,099$ 45,071,376$ 32.2% -$ 1,975,612$ -$ 1,499,490$ -$ 3,956,665$ -$ 3,047,417$ 054 Bedichek Middle School 6-8 MS 1972 23.3 130,600 6,051,876$ 3,945,474$ 9,997,350$ 4,163,524$ 1,517,014$ 13,573,742$ 29,251,629$ 15,677,887$ 51,604,343$ 30.4% 13,515,449$ 2,467,186$ 4,508$ -$ 2,650,553$ 7,455,003$ -$ 356,468$ 053 Webb Middle School 6-8 MS 1961 15.6 120,987 702,171$ 5,186,931$ 5,889,101$ 3,416,602$ 1,414,705$ 733,661$ 11,454,070$ 10,720,409$ 42,628,637$ 25.1% 703,954$ 2,101,392$ -$ 1,482,994$ 18,362,397$ -$ -$ 304,618$ 052 Murchison Middle School 6-8 MS 1967 26.2 123,348 487,937$ 1,742,658$ 2,230,595$ 5,919,695$ 1,040,012$ 8,153,256$ 17,343,558$ 9,190,302$ 45,706,537$ 20.1% 7,989,851$ 1,754,965$ -$ 870,677$ -$ 3,358,614$ -$ 2,236,239$ 045 Lamar Middle School 6-8 MS 1955 14.3 121,371 868,064$ 3,093,816$ 3,961,880$ 2,951,381$ 1,109,337$ 19,344$ 8,041,942$ 7,905,366$ 41,245,693$ 19.2% -$ 2,294,389$ -$ 3,674,723$ 1,437,410$ 15,314,979$ 499,298$ 604,270$ 057 Covington Middle School 6-8 MS 1986 21.3 173,636 961,398$ 4,103,037$ 5,064,435$ 5,125,919$ 679,240$ 1,412,579$ 12,282,173$ 10,869,594$ 58,357,322$ 18.6% 1,256,500$ 2,218,938$ 105,730$ 1,298,003$ 6,554,733$ -$ -$ -$ 044 Kealing Middle School 6-8 MS 1986 13.2 192,181 375,942$ 4,790,494$ 5,166,436$ 5,096,196$ 962,232$ 464,321$ 11,689,185$ 11,224,864$ 62,920,315$ 17.8% -$ 2,797,674$ -$ -$ 1,276,577$ 3,882,825$ -$ -$ 059 Bailey Middle School 6-8 MS 1993 41.3 148,143 718,590$ 2,697,101$ 3,415,692$ 3,857,767$ 1,260,797$ 175,348$ 8,709,604$ 8,535,824$ 52,022,435$ 16.4% -$ 2,483,427$ -$ 458,549$ 865,089$ 4,530,504$ -$ 115,134$ 055 Dobie Middle School 6-8 MS 1973 20.2 134,563 824,720$ 1,445,797$ 2,270,517$ 3,813,669$ 1,163,776$ 5,893,686$ 13,141,649$ 7,247,963$ 46,067,662$ 15.7% 5,860,587$ 2,605,739$ -$ 944,965$ -$ 7,657,994$ -$ 52,096$ 048 Pearce Middle School 6-8 MS 1958 14.8 132,596 800,877$ 1,437,083$ 2,237,960$ 4,068,914$ 358,142$ 778,495$ 7,443,511$ 6,665,016$ 43,914,998$ 15.2% 751,499$ 1,421,448$ -$ 587,677$ 9,832,350$ 520,548$ 520,548$ 624,798$ 058 Mendez Middle School 6-8 MS 1987 20.7 173,382 1,080,210$ 4,476,217$ 5,556,427$ 2,728,204$ 903,869$ 1,452,455$ 10,640,955$ 9,188,500$ 61,291,493$ 15.0% 1,323,156$ 2,294,128$ -$ -$ 3,450,026$ 349,673$ 2,739,493$ -$ 047 O. Henry Middle School 6-8 MS 1953 13.8 124,320 287,063$ 881,787$ 1,168,849$ 4,014,354$ 368,706$ 3,229,843$ 8,781,752$ 5,551,909$ 42,714,090$ 13.0% 3,195,257$ 1,604,680$ -$ 3,418,941$ 2,491,358$ 21,943,395$ 1,545,281$ 1,545,281$ 061 Paredes Middle School 6-8 MS 2000 78.2 148,695 639,397$ 1,114,968$ 1,754,365$ 2,327,460$ 1,488,533$ 274,674$ 5,845,031$ 5,570,358$ 50,694,496$ 11.0% -$ 3,031,743$ -$ -$ 464,540$ 2,835,877$ -$ 1,357,565$ 060 Small Middle School 6-8 MS 1999 36.5 160,599 354,444$ 1,183,574$ 1,538,017$ 1,842,811$ 354,205$ 162,029$ 3,897,063$ 3,735,034$ 54,088,993$ 6.9% -$ 1,928,150$ -$ -$ 105,768$ -$ 2,899,325$ -$ 056 Garcia Middle School 6-8 MS 2008 41.3 160,764 341,779$ 375,320$ 717,098$ 1,477,213$ 256,690$ -$ 2,451,001$ 2,451,001$ 52,634,348$ 4.7% -$ 1,785,189$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 062 Gorzycki Middle School 6-8 MS 2009 14.2 175,543 309,464$ 330,542$ 640,006$ 1,551,469$ 435,269$ -$ 2,626,743$ 2,626,743$ 57,473,012$ 4.6% -$ 1,948,774$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

High Schools009 Anderson High School 9-12 HS 1973 38.8 309,329 872,327$ 14,645,298$ 15,517,625$ 9,089,827$ 1,756,005$ 7,822,456$ 34,185,912$ 34,060,012$ 100,442,692$ 33.9% 7,696,555$ 5,596,292$ -$ 82,189$ 35,729,898$ 5,104,123$ 1,198,250$ 987,132$ 013 Bowie High School 9-12 HS 1988 66.0 417,702 1,142,743$ 15,244,574$ 16,387,318$ 12,975,427$ 14,928,171$ 884,595$ 45,175,511$ 44,290,916$ 141,414,289$ 31.3% -$ 16,682,721$ 1,616$ 93,586$ 11,966,964$ 7,555,227$ 3,975,742$ 9,402,174$ 008 Crockett High School 9-12 HS 1969 39.5 335,087 1,822,148$ 10,749,436$ 12,571,584$ 18,627,243$ 2,843,643$ 186,183$ 34,228,652$ 34,042,470$ 111,743,044$ 30.5% -$ 3,899,330$ -$ 251,091$ -$ 10,875,954$ -$ 10,241,334$ 002 Austin High School 9-12 HS Historical 1975 44.3 307,089 1,740,655$ 8,535,603$ 10,276,258$ 16,368,786$ 4,155,102$ 8,187,414$ 38,987,561$ 30,800,146$ 101,704,101$ 30.3% 8,019,994$ 4,786,572$ -$ 938,338$ 13,862,778$ -$ -$ 6,362,025$ 007 Travis High School 9-12 HS 1953 34.8 285,098 1,031,621$ 1,931,268$ 2,962,889$ 23,814,714$ 1,842,818$ 682,408$ 29,302,829$ 28,620,421$ 95,250,042$ 30.0% 497,614$ 3,901,369$ -$ 4,228,932$ -$ 18,284,795$ -$ 5,285,709$ 015 Garza Independence High School 11-12 HS 1939 3.1 44,754 730,527$ 1,971,881$ 2,702,408$ 1,850,912$ 516,483$ 198,632$ 5,268,436$ 5,069,804$ 17,523,392$ 28.9% -$ 1,160,890$ -$ 101,402$ 4,156,714$ -$ 184,018$ 221,729$ 029 INTERNATIONAL 9 - 10 HS - -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 019 Eastside Memorial High Schools (EMHSJC) 9-12 HS 1960 27.6 267,140 3,188,792$ 11,898,236$ 15,087,028$ 6,567,860$ 650,888$ 213,544$ 22,519,320$ 22,305,776$ 87,276,402$ 25.6% -$ 2,370,779$ -$ 3,364,966$ 20,164,666$ -$ 191,819$ 842,037$ 006 Reagan High School 9-12 HS 1965 31.8 249,609 1,208,310$ 1,714,894$ 2,923,203$ 12,037,630$ 3,120,501$ 348,003$ 18,429,338$ 18,081,335$ 81,643,031$ 22.1% -$ 5,067,540$ -$ -$ -$ 20,693,397$ -$ 7,497,335$ 004 Lanier High School 9-12 HS 1966 28.5 262,640 1,322,157$ 4,586,776$ 5,908,934$ 11,951,394$ 1,638,411$ 176,389$ 19,675,128$ 19,498,739$ 91,315,888$ 21.4% -$ 3,798,556$ -$ 3,345,650$ 17,256,847$ 1,225,614$ 5,886,803$ 6,291,059$ 018 LASA 9 - 12 HS - -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 005 McCallum High School 9-12 HS 1953 31.1 242,667 889,802$ 3,805,820$ 4,695,621$ 10,516,228$ 1,362,340$ 2,262,115$ 18,836,304$ 16,574,189$ 83,866,651$ 19.8% 2,031,172$ 3,347,251$ 91,096$ -$ -$ 15,204,331$ -$ 625,946$ 014 Johnson (LBJ) High School 9-12 HS 1974 41.4 291,406 1,082,734$ 5,302,317$ 6,385,051$ 6,926,707$ 1,922,200$ 96,326$ 15,330,284$ 15,233,958$ 98,125,689$ 15.5% -$ 3,610,445$ -$ -$ -$ 12,732,059$ 87,309$ 5,590,330$ 017 Akins High School 9-12 HS 2000 57.7 324,950 954,259$ 1,716,584$ 2,670,842$ 3,402,121$ 1,452,488$ 134,171$ 7,659,622$ 7,525,451$ 115,209,011$ 6.5% -$ 4,294,809$ 68,460$ -$ 3,596,030$ 2,361,907$ 174,607$ 8,153,617$

Other Facilities852 Clifton Center Alt. Ed. Alt. Ed. 1977 7.8 39,039 269,399$ 1,823,193$ 2,092,591$ 2,585,577$ 752,437$ 36,615$ 5,467,221$ 5,430,606$ 13,110,071$ 41.4% -$ 1,163,512$ -$ 160,641$ 434,632$ 2,043,490$ -$ 643,786$ 942 Pleasant Hill Annex Admin 1936 2.0 25,759 270,019$ 180,761$ 450,779$ 2,258,760$ 94,588$ -$ 2,804,127$ 2,804,127$ 7,228,209$ 38.8% -$ -$ 18,424$ 651,480$ 91,464$ 2,758,717$ -$ -$ 012 Ridgeview ALC 6-12 Alt. Ed. 1953 19.8 88,677 607,465$ 1,142,828$ 1,750,293$ 8,997,845$ 1,481,999$ 32,018$ 12,262,155$ 12,230,137$ 31,629,925$ 38.7% -$ 843,199$ 89,218$ 152,239$ 60,175$ 4,665,406$ -$ 200,134$ 251 Rosedale School Alt. Ed. Alt. Ed. 1939 4.9 37,112 469,200$ 597,181$ 1,066,381$ 3,325,976$ 251,739$ 68,255$ 4,712,351$ 4,644,096$ 14,472,614$ 32.1% -$ 777,226$ -$ 158,099$ 584,887$ 3,210,952$ -$ -$ 960 Saegert Transportation ance - Transp 1975 10.6 26,916 128,439$ 185,122$ 313,561$ 1,386,917$ 170,184$ 28,659$ 1,899,321$ 1,870,662$ 7,983,889$ 23.4% -$ -$ -$ 5,911,537$ -$ 1,348,116$ -$ 265,210$ 951 Burger Athletic Complex Support 1977 48.1 180,613 1,189,429$ 7,147,782$ 8,337,211$ 3,482,107$ 35,546$ 42,012$ 11,896,876$ 11,854,864$ 50,681,646$ 23.4% -$ -$ 660,037$ 9,602,090$ 21,705,879$ -$ 5,368,527$ 1,568,720$ 941 Carruth Administration Center Admin 1991 2.8 133,989 180,247$ 903,444$ 1,083,691$ 5,447,886$ 268,291$ -$ 6,799,867$ 6,799,867$ 37,598,528$ 18.1% -$ -$ -$ 873,196$ 4,063,829$ -$ 503,680$ -$ 252 Baker Center Admin 1911 4.8 65,868 282,216$ 1,675,465$ 1,957,681$ 1,216,053$ -$ 202,910$ 3,376,645$ 3,173,734$ 18,483,157$ 17.2% -$ -$ -$ 401,718$ 8,936,109$ 307,150$ 3,022,760$ 83,491$ 950 Noack Sports Complex Support 2004 11.2 3,232 126,224$ -$ 126,224$ -$ -$ -$ 126,224$ 126,224$ 906,929$ 13.9% -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 32,778$ -$ 281 Nelson Field Support 1963 20.1 59,005 422,773$ 255,458$ 678,231$ 1,441,334$ -$ 91,966$ 2,211,531$ 2,119,566$ 16,557,338$ 12.8% -$ -$ -$ 904,496$ -$ 13,451,989$ -$ -$ 962 Service Center - Building & Grounds ance - Transp 1991 16.7 54,307 170,528$ 457,852$ 628,380$ 858,222$ 44,245$ 135,726$ 1,666,573$ 1,530,847$ 15,239,037$ 10.0% -$ 15,999$ -$ 135,414$ 541,484$ 1,199,760$ -$ 39,210$ 948 House Park Support 1936 11.1 32,070 137,227$ 70,034$ 207,260$ 684,548$ -$ 157,489$ 1,049,297$ 869,638$ 8,999,133$ 9.7% -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,609,602$ -$ -$ 959 Nelson Field Bus Terminal ance - Transp 1995 6.6 13,093 70,197$ 152,181$ 222,378$ 59,959$ -$ 24,167$ 306,504$ 282,337$ 4,105,030$ 6.9% -$ -$ -$ -$ 78,482$ 72,579$ -$ 303,193$ 922 Central Warehouse ance - Transp 1983 18.7 96,303 268,665$ 403,684$ 672,349$ 725,872$ -$ 11,195$ 1,409,416$ 1,398,222$ 27,023,496$ 5.2% -$ -$ -$ 506,898$ 1,702,606$ 8,491,274$ -$ -$ 949 Delco Activity Center Support 2003 44.1 60,294 259,623$ 253,956$ 513,580$ 121,816$ 10,355$ -$ 645,750$ 645,750$ 16,919,044$ 3.8% -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

TOTAL 12,242,071 77,018,812$ 289,710,249$ 366,729,061$ 493,094,959$ 89,430,123$ 133,493,695$ 1,082,747,839$ 957,325,465$ 4,103,419,060$ 26.4% 119,728,034$ 184,824,729$ 15,200,156$ 80,203,534$ 407,100,902$ 320,001,385$ 51,896,848$ 106,339,797$ 965,542,467$

P R E L I M I N A R YFor Discussion Purposes Only - Not for Distribution 2Page 10



Appendix B Facility Capacity Charts and Population Updates

LOC Elementary

Permanent

Capacity

2010

Enrollment

% of Perm.

Capacity

by Enroll.

2009-10

Population

% of Perm.

Capacity

by Pop.

Classroom

Count

Special

Rooms

(ES Only)

Average

Students

per

Classroom

Efficiency

Factor

Classroom

Capacity

Café Area

(SF)

4.77 SF per

student

Capacity

based on

Café Size

Café /

Classroom

Gym Area

(SF)

3.41 SF per

student

Capacity

based on

Gym Size

Gym /

Classroom

Library

Area (SF)

3.98 SF per

student

Capacity

based on

Library Size

Library /

Classroom

142 Allan 673 379 56% 357 53% 42 6 22 85% 673 5,483 4.77 1,149 171% 6,160 3.41 1,806 268% 6,704 3.98 1,685 250%

101 Allison 486 543 112% 536 110% 30 4 22 85% 486 3,513 4.77 736 151% 2,972 3.41 871 179% 3,636 3.98 914 188%

102 Andrews 486 717 147% 604 124% 31 5 22 85% 486 3,361 4.77 705 145% 3,192 3.41 936 192% 2,217 3.98 557 115%

187 Baldwin 669 508 76% 488 73% 38 6 22 95% 669 4,507 4.77 945 141% 3,183 3.41 933 140% 3,598 3.98 904 135%

182 Baranoff 794 876 110% 881 111% 44 6 22 95% 794 3,845 4.77 806 102% 2,878 3.41 844 106% 2,850 3.98 716 90%

149 Barrington 556 996 179% 909 163% 41 6 22 85% 655 2,574 4.77 540 82% 2,558 3.41 750 115% 2,642 3.98 664 101%

103 Barton Hills 251 386 154% 184 73% 14 2 22 95% 251 2,707 4.77 567 226% 2,329 3.41 683 272% 2,834 3.98 712 284%

104 Becker 524 208 40% 214 41% 33 5 22 85% 524 3,337 4.77 700 134% 3,403 3.41 998 191% 2,116 3.98 532 102%

105 Blackshear 598 244 41% 255 43% 37 5 22 85% 598 3,117 4.77 653 109% 3,054 3.41 896 150% 2,246 3.98 564 94%

106 Blanton 636 591 93% 667 105% 40 6 22 85% 636 3,052 4.77 640 101% 2,531 3.41 742 117% 2,723 3.98 684 108%

185 Blazier 598 775 130% 827 138% 38 6 22 85% 598 5,258 4.77 1,102 184% 3,203 3.41 939 157% 3,480 3.98 874 146%

170 Boone 752 501 67% 496 66% 42 6 22 95% 752 4,052 4.77 850 113% 2,887 3.41 847 113% 3,384 3.98 850 113%

107 Brentwood 585 495 85% 419 72% 33 5 22 95% 585 2,468 4.77 517 88% 2,447 3.41 718 123% 3,078 3.98 773 132%

108 Brooke 430 439 102% 449 104% 27 4 22 85% 430 2,363 4.77 495 115% 2,328 3.41 683 159% 2,743 3.98 689 160%

109 Brown 468 519 111% 480 103% 29 4 22 85% 468 3,944 4.77 827 177% 2,426 3.41 712 152% 3,139 3.98 789 169%

110 Bryker Woods 272 404 149% 283 104% 16 3 22 95% 272 2,296 4.77 481 177% 2,987 3.41 876 322% 2,307 3.98 580 213%

111 Campbell 524 360 69% 377 72% 33 5 22 85% 524 4,129 4.77 866 165% 3,030 3.41 889 170% 2,777 3.98 698 133%

173 Casey 711 669 94% 652 92% 44 6 22 85% 711 4,425 4.77 928 131% 3,055 3.41 896 126% 2,757 3.98 693 97%

112 Casis 669 825 123% 729 109% 38 6 22 95% 669 3,962 4.77 831 124% 2,588 3.41 759 113% 3,736 3.98 939 140%

184 Clayton 836 867 104% 734 88% 47 7 22 95% 836 4,282 4.77 898 107% 3,025 3.41 887 106% 3,576 3.98 898 107%

161 Cook 561 901 161% 1,173 209% 35 5 22 85% 561 3,242 4.77 680 121% 2,365 3.41 694 124% 3,375 3.98 848 151%

183 Cowan 669 783 117% 678 101% 37 5 22 95% 669 4,060 4.77 851 127% 2,985 3.41 875 131% 2,968 3.98 746 111%

113 Cunningham 627 512 82% 632 101% 35 5 22 95% 627 3,363 4.77 705 112% 2,518 3.41 738 118% 3,091 3.98 777 124%

179 Davis 731 683 93% 675 92% 41 6 22 95% 731 3,995 4.77 837 114% 3,047 3.41 894 122% 2,848 3.98 716 98%

114 Dawson 505 331 66% 279 55% 32 5 22 85% 505 2,470 4.77 518 103% 2,338 3.41 686 136% 2,121 3.98 533 106%

154 Doss 543 768 141% 679 125% 30 4 22 95% 543 4,623 4.77 969 178% 3,027 3.41 888 163% 2,925 3.98 735 135%

176 Galindo 711 704 99% 715 101% 44 6 22 85% 711 4,287 4.77 899 126% 3,041 3.41 892 125% 3,545 3.98 891 125%

116 Govalle 598 415 69% 450 75% 37 5 22 85% 598 3,570 4.77 749 125% 2,301 3.41 675 113% 2,225 3.98 559 93%

159 Graham 598 761 127% 759 127% 38 6 22 85% 598 4,280 4.77 897 150% 3,217 3.41 943 158% 3,068 3.98 771 129%

117 Gullett 418 541 129% 340 81% 24 4 22 95% 418 2,195 4.77 460 110% 2,401 3.41 704 168% 2,434 3.98 612 146%

118 Harris 542 758 140% 793 146% 34 5 22 85% 542 3,408 4.77 714 132% 2,267 3.41 665 123% 2,594 3.98 652 120%

163 Hart 711 898 126% 865 122% 44 6 22 85% 711 3,667 4.77 769 108% 3,040 3.41 892 125% 2,848 3.98 716 101%

119 Highland Park 585 662 113% 567 97% 33 5 22 95% 585 2,469 4.77 518 88% 2,514 3.41 737 126% 1,951 3.98 490 84%

155 Hill 627 732 117% 677 108% 35 5 22 95% 627 2,723 4.77 571 91% 2,456 3.41 720 115% 3,357 3.98 844 135%

162 Houston 692 915 132% 911 132% 43 6 22 85% 692 4,951 4.77 1,038 150% 3,483 3.41 1,021 148% 3,645 3.98 916 132%

178 Jordan 655 833 127% 672 103% 41 6 22 85% 655 4,159 4.77 872 133% 2,997 3.41 879 134% 2,807 3.98 705 108%

120 Joslin 374 363 97% 314 84% 24 4 22 85% 374 3,595 4.77 754 202% 2,375 3.41 696 186% 2,080 3.98 523 140%

180 Kiker 752 933 124% 866 115% 42 6 22 95% 752 3,779 4.77 792 105% 3,211 3.41 942 125% 2,782 3.98 699 93%

172 Kocurek 673 660 98% 676 100% 42 6 22 85% 673 4,292 4.77 900 134% 2,962 3.41 869 129% 3,561 3.98 895 133%

168 Langford 692 834 121% 914 132% 43 6 22 85% 692 2,881 4.77 604 87% 2,579 3.41 756 109% 2,519 3.98 633 91%

121 Lee 418 428 102% 293 70% 24 4 22 95% 418 2,059 4.77 432 103% 2,238 3.41 656 157% 2,647 3.98 665 159%

160 Linder 542 892 164% 906 167% 34 5 22 85% 542 2,738 4.77 574 106% 2,507 3.41 735 136% 2,322 3.98 584 108%

122 Maplewood 355 406 114% 302 85% 20 3 22 95% 355 2,470 4.77 518 146% 2,447 3.41 718 202% 1,941 3.98 488 137%

123 Mathews 397 405 102% 299 75% 23 4 22 95% 397 1,906 4.77 400 101% 2,377 3.41 697 176% 2,278 3.98 572 144%

165 McBee 580 765 132% 1,026 177% 36 5 22 85% 580 5,127 4.77 1,075 185% 3,045 3.41 893 154% 2,852 3.98 717 124%

147 Menchaca 606 686 113% 702 116% 34 5 22 95% 606 3,572 4.77 749 124% 2,501 3.41 734 121% 2,442 3.98 614 101%

124 Metz 542 498 92% 481 89% 34 5 22 85% 542 4,045 4.77 848 156% 3,013 3.41 884 163% 2,816 3.98 708 130%

181 Mills 794 928 117% 860 108% 44 6 22 95% 794 3,759 4.77 788 99% 3,052 3.41 895 113% 2,747 3.98 690 87%

150 Norman 486 333 68% 380 78% 30 4 22 85% 486 2,876 4.77 603 124% 2,259 3.41 662 136% 2,647 3.98 665 137%

148 Oak Hill 773 772 100% 783 101% 43 6 22 95% 773 4,567 4.77 957 124% 3,393 3.41 995 129% 3,330 3.98 837 108%

125 Oak Springs 411 274 67% 336 82% 26 4 22 85% 411 2,086 4.77 437 106% 2,985 3.41 875 213% 2,130 3.98 535 130%

156 Odom 542 658 121% 740 136% 34 5 22 85% 542 2,643 4.77 554 102% 2,421 3.41 710 131% 2,877 3.98 723 133%

126 Ortega 374 296 79% 263 70% 24 4 22 85% 374 2,734 4.77 573 153% 2,323 3.41 681 182% 1,468 3.98 369 99%

189 Overton 617 668 108% 904 146% 39 6 22 85% 617 4,148 4.77 870 141% 7,853 3.41 2,303 373% 3,560 3.98 894 145%

171 Palm 673 606 90% 687 102% 42 6 22 85% 673 4,189 4.77 878 130% 3,075 3.41 902 134% 3,757 3.98 944 140%

143 Patton 773 914 118% 894 116% 43 6 22 95% 773 4,849 4.77 1,017 131% 3,067 3.41 899 116% 3,542 3.98 890 115%

128 Pease 293 256 87% 0 0% 17 3 22 95% 293 1,307 4.77 274 94% 2,995 3.41 878 300% 1,468 3.98 369 126%

129 Pecan Springs 486 532 109% 520 107% 30 4 22 85% 486 3,220 4.77 675 139% 2,412 3.41 707 146% 2,986 3.98 750 154%

190 Perez 598 886 148% 864 144% 37 5 22 85% 598 4,158 4.77 872 146% 3,295 3.41 966 161% 3,467 3.98 871 146%

164 Pickle 617 740 120% 618 100% 39 6 22 85% 617 4,363 4.77 915 148% 9,153 3.41 2,684 435% 2,882 3.98 724 117%

151 Pillow 522 653 125% 617 118% 29 4 22 95% 522 2,761 4.77 579 111% 3,069 3.41 900 172% 2,282 3.98 573 110%

130 Pleasant Hill 524 619 118% 662 126% 33 5 22 85% 524 3,991 4.77 837 160% 3,022 3.41 886 169% 3,546 3.98 891 170%

131 Read Pre-K 393 509 129% 0 0% 23 - 18 95% 393 2,982 4.77 625 159% NA 3.41 NA NA 2,148 3.98 540 137%

132 Reilly 318 296 93% 342 108% 20 3 22 85% 318 2,287 4.77 479 151% 2,398 3.41 703 221% 1,637 3.98 411 129%

133 Ridgetop 206 219 106% 123 60% 13 2 22 85% 206 2,309 4.77 484 235% 2,336 3.41 685 333% 1,762 3.98 443 215%

Classroom Capacity

Cafeteria = 4,200 SF / 880 Students

4.77 SF per Student

Gym = 3,000 SF / 880 Students

3.41 SF per Student

Library = 3,500 SF / 880 Students

3.98 SF per Student

AISD Permanent Capacity

11/11/2010 Page 1

174 Rodriguez 711 910 128% 1,044 147% 44 6 22 85% 711 3,714 4.77 779 110% 3,056 3.41 896 126% 2,818 3.98 708 100%

127 Sanchez 580 585 101% 564 97% 36 5 22 85% 580 2,959 4.77 620 107% 2,399 3.41 704 121% 3,028 3.98 761 131%

139 Sims 355 277 78% 366 103% 22 3 22 85% 355 2,599 4.77 545 153% 2,484 3.41 728 205% 2,625 3.98 660 186%

136 St. Elmo 411 304 74% 407 99% 26 4 22 85% 411 2,825 4.77 592 144% 2,259 3.41 662 161% 3,149 3.98 791 192%

138 Summitt 731 854 117% 572 78% 41 6 22 95% 731 3,683 4.77 772 106% 3,064 3.41 898 123% 4,017 3.98 1,009 138%

158 Sunset Valley 561 451 80% 494 88% 35 5 22 85% 561 2,987 4.77 626 112% 2,376 3.41 697 124% 2,952 3.98 742 132%

140 Travis Heights 486 537 110% 556 114% 31 5 22 85% 486 2,992 4.77 627 129% 2,812 3.41 825 170% 1,962 3.98 493 101%

141 Walnut Creek 655 916 140% 918 140% 41 6 22 85% 655 4,721 4.77 990 151% 2,638 3.41 773 118% 3,706 3.98 931 142%

175 Widen 673 769 114% 834 124% 42 6 22 85% 673 3,851 4.77 807 120% 3,051 3.41 895 133% 3,363 3.98 845 126%

166 Williams 561 642 114% 728 130% 35 5 22 85% 561 3,040 4.77 637 114% 2,500 3.41 733 131% 2,923 3.98 734 131%

157 Winn 524 463 88% 601 115% 33 5 22 85% 524 2,565 4.77 538 103% 2,322 3.41 681 130% 2,348 3.98 590 113%

152 Wooldridge 524 878 168% 1,096 209% 33 5 22 85% 524 4,120 4.77 864 165% 2,580 3.41 757 145% 2,319 3.98 583 111%

144 Wooten 468 695 149% 740 158% 29 4 22 85% 468 3,534 4.77 741 158% 2,534 3.41 743 159% 3,036 3.98 763 163%

145 Zavala 580 407 70% 339 58% 36 5 22 85% 580 2,618 4.77 549 95% 2,740 3.41 804 139% 2,714 3.98 682 118%

146 Zilker 460 522 114% 329 72% 26 4 22 95% 460 2,894 4.77 607 132% 2,217 3.41 650 141% 2,703 3.98 679 148%

44,905 48,738 47,366

LOC Middle

Permanent

Capacity

2010

Enrollment

% of Perm.

Capacity

by Enroll.

2009-10

Population

% of Perm.

Capacity

by Pop.

Classroom

Count

Special

Rooms

(ES Only)

Average

Students

per

Classroom

Efficiency

Factor

Classroom

Capacity

Café Area

(SF)

4.10 SF per

student

Capacity

based on

Café Size

Café /

Classroom

Gym Area

(SF)

12.18 SF

per

student

Capacity

based on

Gym Size

Gym /

Classroom

Library

Area (SF)

4.36 SF per

student

Capacity

based on

Library Size

Library /

Classroom

59 Bailey 1,176 1,041 89% 997 85% 56 0 28 75% 1,176 4,752 4.10 1,159 99% 13,668 12.18 1,122 95% 4,013 4.36 920 78%

54 Bedichek 941 1,054 112% 1,171 124% 48 0 28 70% 941 6,348 4.10 1,548 165% 11,555 12.18 949 101% 3,657 4.36 839 89%

46 Burnet 1,039 998 96% 1,163 112% 53 0 28 70% 1,039 5,765 4.10 1,406 135% 11,877 12.18 975 94% 3,243 4.36 744 72%

57 Covington 1,125 805 72% 922 82% 63 0 28 75% 1,323 4,461 4.10 1,088 82% 13,935 12.18 1,144 86% 4,044 4.36 928 70%

55 Dobie 902 630 70% 709 79% 46 0 28 70% 902 4,790 4.10 1,168 130% 11,388 12.18 935 104% 3,553 4.36 815 90%

43 Fulmore 1,078 995 92% 898 83% 55 0 28 70% 1,078 5,452 4.10 1,330 123% 13,196 12.18 1,083 101% 4,127 4.36 947 88%

56 Garcia 1,215 658 54% 801 66% 62 0 28 70% 1,215 5,220 4.10 1,273 105% 15,986 12.18 1,312 108% 4,666 4.36 1,070 88%

62 Gorzycki 1,323 963 73% 943 71% 63 0 28 75% 1,323 4,669 4.10 1,139 86% 15,396 12.18 1,264 96% 5,616 4.36 1,288 97%

44 Kealing 1,333 1,233 93% 563 42% 80 0 28 70% 1,568 4,433 4.10 1,081 69% 12,344 12.18 1,013 65% 4,499 4.36 1,032 66%

45 Lamar 1,008 604 60% 554 55% 48 0 28 75% 1,008 6,725 4.10 1,640 163% 10,575 12.18 868 86% 3,665 4.36 841 83%

51 Martin 804 639 80% 1,070 133% 41 0 28 70% 804 4,022 4.10 981 122% 11,740 12.18 964 120% 2,983 4.36 684 85%

58 Mendez 1,215 890 73% 1,224 101% 62 0 28 70% 1,215 4,501 4.10 1,098 90% 13,699 12.18 1,125 93% 4,044 4.36 928 76%

52 Murchison 1,113 1,281 115% 1,187 107% 53 0 28 75% 1,113 4,879 4.10 1,190 107% 11,857 12.18 974 87% 3,413 4.36 783 70%

47 O. Henry 945 1,026 109% 764 81% 45 0 28 75% 945 5,199 4.10 1,268 134% 10,628 12.18 873 92% 3,147 4.36 722 76%

61 Paredes 1,156 930 80% 1,123 97% 59 0 28 70% 1,156 5,953 4.10 1,452 126% 12,775 12.18 1,049 91% 2,798 4.36 642 55%

48 Pearce 1,078 329 31% 683 63% 55 0 28 70% 1,078 5,057 4.10 1,234 114% 13,147 12.18 1,079 100% 4,293 4.36 985 91%

28 Richards YWL 924 528 57% 0 0% 44 0 28 75% 924 5,272 4.10 1,286 139% 11,751 12.18 965 104% 5,046 4.36 1,157 125%

60 Small 1,239 959 77% 873 70% 59 0 28 75% 1,239 6,244 4.10 1,523 123% 13,899 12.18 1,141 92% 3,142 4.36 721 58%

53 Webb 804 591 74% 692 86% 41 0 28 70% 804 4,348 4.10 1,061 132% 12,023 12.18 987 123% 4,399 4.36 1,009 126%

20,417 16,154 16,337

LOC High

Permanent

Capacity

2010

Enrollment

% of Perm.

Capacity

by Enroll.

2009-10

Population

% of Perm.

Capacity

by Pop.

Classroom

Count

Special

Rooms

(ES Only)

Average

Students

per

Classroom

Efficiency

Factor

Classroom

Capacity

Café Area

(SF)

3.75 SF per

student

School

Capacity

based on

Café Size

Café /

Classroom

Gym Area

(SF)

8.63 SF per

student

School

Capacity

based on

Gym Size

Gym /

Classroom

Library

Area (SF)

3.50 SF per

student

School

Capacity

based on

Library Size

Library /

Classroom

17 Akins 2,394 2,720 114% 3,076 128% 114 0 28 75% 2,394 10,935 3.75 2,916 122% 21,471 8.63 2,488 104% 8,371 3.50 2,392 100%

9 Anderson 2,017 2,089 104% 1,912 95% 113 0 28 75% 2,373 8,178 3.75 2,181 92% 17,068 8.63 1,978 83% 9,864 3.50 2,818 119%

2 Austin 2,205 2,337 106% 1,964 89% 105 0 28 75% 2,205 10,074 3.75 2,686 122% 17,488 8.63 2,026 92% 5,977 3.50 1,708 77%

13 Bowie 2,535 2,876 113% 2,594 102% 142 0 28 75% 2,982 9,200 3.75 2,453 82% 22,036 8.63 2,553 86% 9,862 3.50 2,818 94%

8 Crockett 2,163 1,686 78% 1,927 89% 103 0 28 75% 2,163 8,955 3.75 2,388 110% 17,050 8.63 1,976 91% 7,671 3.50 2,192 101%

19/20/29

EMHSJC /

International 1,548 894 58% 1,310 85% 79 0 28 70% 1,548 8,952 3.75 2,387 154% 16,419 8.63 1,903 123% 6,106 3.50 1,745 113%

15 Garza 321 260 81% 0 0% 18 0 28 75% 378 1,834 3.75 489 129% 2,282 8.63 264 70% 1,223 3.50 349 92%

4 Lanier 1,627 1,624 100% 2,037 125% 83 0 28 70% 1,627 13,513 3.75 3,603 221% 23,465 8.63 2,719 167% 7,677 3.50 2,194 135%

14/18 LBJ / LASA 1,842 1,881 102% 1,110 60% 94 0 28 70% 1,842 8,026 3.75 2,140 116% 18,936 8.63 2,194 119% 8,856 3.50 2,530 137%

5 McCallum 1,596 1,824 114% 1,343 84% 76 0 28 75% 1,596 6,244 3.75 1,665 104% 15,765 8.63 1,827 114% 6,981 3.50 1,994 125%

6 Reagan 1,588 901 57% 1,597 101% 81 0 28 70% 1,588 8,600 3.75 2,293 144% 22,180 8.63 2,570 162% 6,226 3.50 1,779 112%

7 Travis 1,862 1,420 76% 1,994 107% 95 0 28 70% 1,862 9,462 3.75 2,523 136% 14,870 8.63 1,723 93% 7,017 3.50 2,005 108%

21,698 20,512 20,864

Classroom Capacity

Cafeteria = 9,000 SF / 2,400 Students

3.75 SF per Student

Gym = 20,720 SF / 2,400 Students

8.63 SF per Student

Library = 8,400 SF / 2,400 Students

3.50 SF per Student

Classroom Capacity

Cafeteria = 4,500 SF / 1,100 Students

4.10 SF per Student

Gym = 13,400 SF / 1,100 Students

12.18 SF per Student

Library = 4,800 SF / 1,100 Students

4.36 SF per Student

AISD Permanent Capacity

11/11/2010 Page 2

LOC Elementary

Permanent

Capacity

2010

Enrollment

% of Perm.

Capacity

by Enroll.

2010-11

Population

% of Perm.

Capacity

by Pop.

142 Allan 673 379 56% 354 53%

101 Allison 486 543 112% 585 120%

102 Andrews 486 717 147% 692 142%

187 Baldwin 669 508 76% 557 83%

182 Baranoff 794 876 110% 891 112%

149 Barrington 556 996 179% 955 172%

103 Barton Hills 251 386 154% 203 81%

104 Becker 524 208 40% 226 43%

105 Blackshear 598 244 41% 288 48%

106 Blanton 636 591 93% 630 99%

185 Blazier 598 775 130% 896 150%

170 Boone 752 501 67% 478 64%

107 Brentwood 585 495 85% 456 78%

108 Brooke 430 439 102% 441 103%

109 Brown 468 519 111% 525 112%

110 Bryker Woods 272 404 149% 312 115%

111 Campbell 524 360 69% 367 70%

173 Casey 711 669 94% 763 107%

112 Casis 669 825 123% 731 109%

184 Clayton 836 867 104% 837 100%

161 Cook 561 901 161% 1,252 223%

183 Cowan 669 783 117% 707 106%

113 Cunningham 627 512 82% 573 91%

179 Davis 731 683 93% 666 91%

114 Dawson 505 331 66% 276 55%

154 Doss 543 768 141% 728 134%

176 Galindo 711 704 99% 689 97%

116 Govalle 598 415 69% 452 76%

159 Graham 598 761 127% 825 138%

117 Gullett 418 541 129% 325 78%

118 Harris 542 758 140% 755 139%

163 Hart 711 898 126% 888 125%

119 Highland Park 585 662 113% 599 102%

155 Hill 627 732 117% 714 114%

162 Houston 692 915 132% 897 130%

178 Jordan 655 833 127% 706 108%

120 Joslin 374 363 97% 329 88%

180 Kiker 752 933 124% 883 117%

172 Kocurek 673 660 98% 687 102%

168 Langford 692 834 121% 895 129%

121 Lee 418 428 102% 308 74%

160 Linder 542 892 164% 956 176%

122 Maplewood 355 406 114% 300 84%

123 Mathews 397 405 102% 284 72%

2010 Population Update

01/26/2011 Page 3

165 McBee 580 765 132% 1,031 178%

147 Menchaca 606 686 113% 685 113%

124 Metz 542 498 92% 477 88%

181 Mills 794 928 117% 831 105%

150 Norman 486 333 68% 376 77%

148 Oak Hill 773 772 100% 820 106%

125 Oak Springs 411 274 67% 293 71%

156 Odom 542 658 121% 706 130%

126 Ortega 374 296 79% 266 71%

189 Overton 617 668 108% 948 154%

171 Palm 673 606 90% 637 95%

143 Patton 773 914 118% 908 117%

128 Pease 293 256 87% 0 0%

129 Pecan Springs 486 532 109% 490 101%

190 Perez 598 886 148% 945 158%

164 Pickle 617 740 120% 737 119%

151 Pillow 522 653 125% 651 125%

130 Pleasant Hill 524 619 118% 631 121%

131 Read Pre-K 393 509 129% 0 0%

132 Reilly 318 296 93% 357 112%

133 Ridgetop 206 219 106% 128 62%

174 Rodriguez 711 910 128% 1,045 147%

127 Sanchez 580 585 101% 584 101%

139 Sims 355 277 78% 343 97%

136 St. Elmo 411 304 74% 369 90%

138 Summitt 731 854 117% 623 85%

158 Sunset Valley 561 451 80% 483 86%

140 Travis Heights 486 537 110% 548 113%

141 Walnut Creek 655 916 140% 936 143%

175 Widen 673 769 114% 794 118%

166 Williams 561 642 114% 640 114%

157 Winn 524 463 88% 485 93%

152 Wooldridge 524 878 168% 1,160 222%

144 Wooten 468 695 149% 672 144%

145 Zavala 580 407 70% 347 60%

146 Zilker 460 522 114% 338 74%

44,905 48,738 48,165


01/26/2011 Page 4

LOC Middle

Permanent

Capacity

2010

Enrollment

% of Perm.

Capacity

by Enroll.

2010-11

Population

% of Perm.

Capacity

by Pop.

59 Bailey 1,176 1,041 89% 979 83%

54 Bedichek 941 1,054 112% 1,219 130%

46 Burnet 1,039 998 96% 1,170 113%

57 Covington 1,125 805 72% 905 80%

55 Dobie 902 630 70% 719 80%

43 Fulmore 1,078 995 92% 850 79%

56 Garcia 1,215 658 54% 829 68%

62 Gorzycki 1,323 963 73% 989 75%

44 Kealing 1,333 1,233 93% 541 41%

45 Lamar 1,008 604 60% 583 58%

51 Martin 804 639 80% 1,056 131%

58 Mendez 1,215 890 73% 1,266 104%

52 Murchison 1,113 1,281 115% 1,171 105%

47 O. Henry 945 1,026 109% 804 85%

61 Paredes 1,156 930 80% 1,165 101%

48 Pearce 1,078 329 31% 712 66%

28 Richards YWL 924 528 57% 0 0%

60 Small 1,239 959 77% 876 71%

53 Webb 804 591 74% 731 91%

20,417 16,154 16,565

LOC High

Permanent

Capacity

2010

Enrollment

% of Perm.

Capacity

by Enroll.

2010-11

Population

% of Perm.

Capacity

by Pop.

17 Akins 2,394 2,720 114% 3,092 129%

9 Anderson 2,017 2,089 104% 1,962 97%

2 Austin 2,205 2,337 106% 1,958 89%

13 Bowie 2,535 2,876 113% 2,606 103%

8 Crockett 2,163 1,686 78% 1,883 87%

19/20/29

EMHSJC /

International 1,548 894 58% 1,249 81%

15 Garza 321 260 81% 0 0%

4 Lanier 1,627 1,624 100% 1,981 122%

14/18 LBJ / LASA 1,842 1,881 102% 1,083 59%

5 McCallum 1,596 1,824 114% 1,316 82%

6 Reagan 1,588 901 57% 1,552 98%

7 Travis 1,862 1,420 76% 1,902 102%

21,698 20,512 20,584


01/26/2011 Page 5



Appendix C Visioning Workshop Summary

AUSTIN ISDFacility Master Plan

Visioning Workshop

May 13 & 14, 2010

1

Acknowledgements

Cuningham Group Architecture P.A., as a consultant to DeJONG-RICHTER, prepared this document with the support and assistance of the following Facility Master Plan Vision Workshop participants: John Alawneh AISD - Technology Tony Arnold City of Austin – Parks & Recreation John Blazier Business Partner Kathrin Brewer Austin Partners in Education Bill Caritij AISD - Chief Accountability Meria Carstarphen AISD - Superintendent Nan Clayton Former AISD Board Member Ariel Cloud AISD – Asst. Superintendent Elementary Nicole Conley-Abram AISD - CFO Tommy Cowan Business Partner Paul Cruz Chief of Schools Ashton Cumberbatch Community Seton Hospital Elizabeth Dickey AISD Special Education Bill De Dufour AISD - Technology Richard Frazier AISD – Teacher / Task Force Chair Janna Griffin Asst. Supt. Office - Elementary Janis Guerrero AISD – Community Relations Bergeron Harris AISD – Asst. Supt. Middle Schools Janna Lilly AISD – Special Education Viviana Lopez AISD – Curriculum/Special Projects Eliza May Community Janet Mitchell Community – Task Force Chair Chris Moore City of Austin – Child Safety Jaqui Porter Early Childhood Geronimo Rodriguez Community – Seton Hospital Curt Shaw Director of Construction Management Karen Sperry AISD – Chief of Staff Paul Turner AISD – Executive Director of Facilities Gloria Williams AISD – Community Education Cora Wright City of Austin – Parks & Recreation Other Participants

Pat Rossett Carolyn Staskiewicz

AISD – Assistant Director Bond Services DeJONG-RICHTER

Eric Sheppard Magellan Inc Steven Kapeller BLGY Architecture Benny Hawkins BLGY Architecture Meg Parsons Cuningham Group Architecture, P.A. Tim Dufault Cuningham Group Architecture, P.A.

AUSTIN ISD Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop

2

Table of Contents

Introduction

Day One A. Greatest Hopes B. Provocation I: Sir Ken Robinson C. Issues & Assets

D. Provocation II: School of One E. I See…We See… F. Facility Master Plan Vision Statement G. Provocation III: Environment Matters H. Values: AISD Strategic Plan 2010-2015 Review I. Story Time

Day Two

A. Reflections B. Provocation III: John A. Johnson C. Facility Principles

Appendices A. Day One Presentation

B. Day Two Presentation C. Final Presentation D. Photos

Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop AUSTIN ISD

3

Introduction

This document is the result of a Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop held May 13th & 14th, 2010 with participants from the Austin Independent School District and the community. The purpose of this workshop was to create a Facility Master Plan Vision Statement and Facility Principles. The purpose of a Facility Master Plan is to create a clear and compelling vision of the future for AISD, aligning facilities with learning. A Facility Master Plan Vision Statement creates a filter by which future decisions can be made and Facility Principles create overarching ideas about what‟s important for all schools in AISD. The process used during the Visioning Workshop was interactive and included “Provocations” and small and whole group work. The following is a summary of our work during both days.


4

Greatest Hopes: Day one started with participants sharing their Greatest Hopes for the Facility Master Planning process. Below are some of the hopes shared by participants:


5

Provocation I: Sir Ken Robinson: Do Schools Kill Creativity? http://www.ted.com/talks/lang/eng/ken_robinson_says_schools_kill_creativity.html

Reactions to the video included the following:

Learning occurs in many ways – public education focuses on academic achievement

Career/Vocational Education is not emphasized but some children want – we need to provide the right programs for all children

The system is structurally set up to fail some children – there are ethnocentric, gender, and cultural differences we need to consider

Everyone learns differently

Focus on where students can be successful through application

Plan for the future but not at the expense of today

There is a knowing/doing gap in education – establish the courage to do what we know is right – “thou shalt” …accountability

We continue to build boxes for people to teach in that look the same – we need more flexible, collaborative spaces

We need to respond to changes in the world; we need to be agile and our environment affects us

The challenge is that we have given critical responsibility to one group of adults: teachers; we need to consider the role of parents and the community to create creative thinkers. Open possibilities for kids to learn from and in whole world – engage the community

http://www.ted.com/talks/lang/eng/ken_robinson_says_schools_kill_creativity.html


6

Issues & Assets We discussed and prioritized Issues and Assets in Austin ISD. This was a way to find out what was important to those present and what they thought were key to the success of a Facilities Master Plan. As is noted below on the sheets the key issues identified were:

Equity of facilities and resources across the district

Efficient use of resources throughout the community

Partnering

Future flexibility for teaching in the future

Competition and school choices (Middle class participates in public schools but they have other choices)

School boundaries


7

Provocation II: School of One http://schools.nyc.gov/community/innovation/SchoolofOne/default.htm

The group watched a video on the School of One, a program that started the summer of 2009, in New York City. From the above website: “The mission of School of One is to provide students with personalized, effective, and dynamic classroom instruction so that teachers have more time to focus on the quality of their instruction. To achieve this mission, School of One re-imagines the traditional classroom model. Instead of one teacher and 25-30 students in a classroom, each student participates in multiple instructional modalities, including a combination of teacher-led instruction, one-on-one tutoring, independent learning, and work with virtual tutors. To organize this type of learning, each student receives a unique daily schedule based on his or her academic strengths and needs. As a result, students within the same school or even the same classroom can receive profoundly different instruction as each student‟s schedule is tailored to the skills they need and the ways they best learn. Teachers acquire data about student achievement each day and then adapt their live instructional lessons accordingly By leveraging technology to play a more essential role in planning instruction, teachers have more time to focus on doing what they do best - delivering quality instruction and ensuring that all students learn.”

http://schools.nyc.gov/community/innovation/SchoolofOne/default.htm


8

Activity I: I See…We See… “Vision is the art of seeing the invisible” Jonathan Swift To start the visioning process we asked participants to „imagine it‟s 10 years out, the AISD Facility Master Plan has given the district amazing learning places that reflect the community and help the district accomplish its mission. People visit because its facilities are so successful in accomplishing the goals of the District. Imagine you‟re giving someone a tour – what do you see?‟ Individually participants created I See statements:

One-on-one time with teachers

Entire staff focused and engaged with kids

Teachers focused on teaching the kids and not other issues

Schools are the pride of the community and the first choice of middle class families

Large yet flexible spaces built to fit our growing population

Repurposed spaces that are vintage yet functional for the community

All facilities are beautifully maintained and are supportive of the instructional programs

All schools are painted in bright colors – place of exciting learning

A dramatically reduced number of schools, yet a mix of small, medium, and large facilities

50 years later the space is still current (or can be)

Public and private, city and school district co-location of offices, classrooms, theaters, and meeting areas

Art facilities which involve all our students and the world class Austin arts community in a learning partnership

Shared facilities with the city Zachary Scott Theater, Long Center, AT&T, IBM, CAN. ACC – classroom days around and within the city

Students integrated within the community, downtown, capitol, tech companies, Whole Foods; “what do you do days”

Students a large part of the day as interns and apprentices

Schools have clear feeder patterns and each feeder pattern has a special focus

Engaged, enthusiastic students that want to be there. Eager to explain their love for learning.

Loud sounds from playing and team problems solving

Quiet places for reading and silent learning contemplation

Team sports, yoga, and meditation

Wall-sized white boards for drawing ideas and solutions (graffiti on buildings)

Integrated learning (curriculum) across multiple learning environments

Teachers focused on each child‟s learning style and developing and delivering in small groups to that style on a fundamental goal

Subjects based on student career goals

Teams of students involved in projects using technology

Students in a variety of “work spaces “ to complete team projects

Teachers facilitating the learning for students with technology as a major focus

Fifteen-to eighteen-hour campuses that engage all ages of the community from senior populations to immigrant populations teaching each other, weekend festivals, performing arts with the community

Partnerships with the community, government and schools to achieve educational goals

Schools that are useable by the community – computers, gymnasiums, weight room

Teachers adept at teaching with technology, smart boards that are interactive, advanced projection systems with students to share their work

Computer-directed programs that include collaboration and relationships

Furniture that is moveable and easily configured to adapt to a lesson

Wall space for student work display

Work space for problem solving – environmental issues

Students interacting with each other and the instructor in a well lit, clean, environmentally comfortable space

Recreational and athletic facilities that are available in all communities resulting from partnerships with public and private entities that support youth and adult education


9

Schools that welcome visitors and are responsive to visitors

Classrooms that are interactive include technology but also instructionally interactive – kids engaged with each other and teacher

All students have internet access at home

Staff, students and parents can readily access results and academic plans

Students have exactly the information they need in the best format

Realization of the promise of “instructional TV” to help teachers with complex, real world concepts such velocity, acceleration, gravity, history of Middle Eastern areas, areas on curves, environmental science, poetry etc…

Virtual lab for HS students to work on course credits. Teachers as side facilitators.

As I walk through the facility I see a number of distant learning centers where students and teachers participating in a collaborative learning process. These rooms have state of the art technology.

State of the art facilities on each campus and two district-wide performing art centers

Students attend neighborhood schools as best opportunity

Classroom instruction that accommodates different student learning styles and provides support and enrichment based on student learning needs

Stimulating and inviting learning environments that are fun to be in

Inviting/welcoming face to the facility

Parents working with students throughout the school

Spaces for collaboration between teachers, parents and students

Parents present, actively engaged, knowing learning goals of students

Space for community/parents to be engaged

Outside area is an extension of the learning environment

Students learning in flexible indoor and outdoor spaces

Gardens, fountains and trails instead of carpet and grass

Active learning

Classrooms that make use of indoor and outdoor settings for learning

Students moving and active in the learning process

Students actively engaged in their learning

Classrooms which comfortably hold 30 students in a variety of ways

Students working in small groups collaboratively

I see building design geared towards multi-sensory student engagement

A clean, well maintained visually appealing school for every student

Tables instead of desks

Classrooms are organized into learning centers

Apprenticeships for vocational education

Learners engaged in community activities and project learning

Government classes sponsor a bill/resolution at the capital

Spaces for volunteers from collaborative agencies

Libraries that allow students to access the world beyond their classroom

Community of instructors…local, expert, university, etc…

Space for group performances in every school

Culturally relevant artwork and displays

Technology is natural (organic part of the learning process

Facilities and technology and resources accessible for all

Classrooms where students have access to technology and its use is integrated into all areas

Students skilled at technology for gaining, sharing, linking, creating information

Multiple technology resources in every classroom

Science and math labs which allow for technology and hands on activities

I Pad technology instead of paper

Learning spaces for teachers and administrators

Adequate work space for all staff

Multi use meeting spaces

Less office space – more multi-purpose spaces

All space is special education space based on IEP (Individual Education Plan) for every child


10

Social skills training as part the degree program (such as mediation training)

Flex schedules for students in high school

Young children given the time and opportunity to learn through play

Access to all resources within a school for every student

Curriculum that is differentiated to fit individuals needs and flexible schedules to allow the best use of time

Secondary classrooms that allow for small group work (not just rows of chairs)

A flower bed at the entrance of school, there are trees that have been pruned, and doors have been painted recently and rooms are brightly painted, there are posters on the walls along with student work. The facilities reflect attention to detail

As we enter the library, there is a bank of computers and students working in small groups accessing databases from around the world. The students are engaged and the noise level is amazingly semi quiet.

Technology driven learning in every classroom in AISD facility

Language development academy, producing fluent 2nd and 3rd language proficiency

Fine arts integrated with academics integrated with social learning

Music academy generating music professionals, singers, etc.

Spaces that are student/teacher friendly

Teachers interacting with students

Community advocate centers/service for students and family members

Learning centers for 0 to 4-year olds

All students actively involved in learning

Collaboration between AISD and ACC that produces HS graduates interested in graduation with certificates in medical technology, nursing, construction, etc…

Central headquarters reduced in physical size, in more compact, effective structure

Substantial revenue generated from space use that can be reinvested into important programming

Private and corporate donation to AISD foundation in excess of $50 million

Number-one rated HS in the country in Austin due to technology or live music/jazz, band or other with an awesome facility/stages, media rooms, etc…

I See Wordle www.wordle.net

Wordle is a program that generates “word clouds” from text. The clouds give greater prominence to words that appear more frequently in the source text. The Wordle to the left was generated from all the I See statements

contributed by participants

http://www.wordle.net/


11

In small groups participants then shared these I See… statements and created We See… statements. Listed below are the We see… statements worked on by participants in small groups. These became the basis of the Vision Statement. We see…..

An overall environment that is both encouraging and engaging Purposeful, functional, modular facilities that serve all students needs Facilities “co-purposed” for student and community usage Teachers totally focused on education and innovation

Students in a variety of learning environments with technology support, integrated to ensure development of individual learning styles and goals, supported by community partnerships on an ongoing basis (24/7) Facilities that are inviting, welcoming, flexible enough to accommodate and support a variety of instructional arrangements and incorporates:

instructional technology

family and community access to information

teacher access to information and resources

Facilities with dedicated spaces to foster and engage parents/community Facilities that use the outdoors and indoors in ways that are environmentally responsible and

allows for learning to take place in a variety of ways Facilities that engage with the community to provide extended learning opportunities both within

the school walls and beyond Classrooms large enough to allow for flex grouping and active hands-on learning A variety of multi-use areas Facilities where technology is integrated in every space and accessible to all students and staff Spaces that allow for differentiated instruction and flexible school day

Environment: small group instruction spaces, flower beds, natural light, storage areas and no portable buildings (beautiful physical space high quality learning is norm) Special Programs: Single gender/ single-grade academies, partnerships with higher learning for career/vocational skill development, family resource centers, fine arts, language academies and early childhood centers Technology: Virtual/distance learning, IPad/electronic text-books Central Office: More compact space Revenue: Space used (for partnerships, co-locations in underutilized space) Private and corporate gifts – Austin-based celebrities


12


13

Facility Master Plan Vision Statement

The purpose of a vision statement is to guide the entire process, help set priorities, align resources against priorities and facilitate an efficient decision making process. The following vision statement was created by participants from the work done together:

All AISD schools inspire high student achievement and common community goals through inviting, accessible, and efficient facilities that integrate technology and sustainability. Revised Version:

All AISD schools will inspire high student achievement

and support common community goals through equitable,

inviting facilities that integrate technology and are

optimally used, accessible, sustainable, and meet highest

educational adequacy standards.


14

Provocation III: Environment Matters “The only true voyage of discovery consists not of visiting new places, but seeing with new eyes.” Voltaire As a part of the process of thinking about the future of Austin schools, the group looked at learning styles, the learning environment and current examples of what other districts are doing with their facilities. Below are examples of what was discussed. The presentation is included in the May 13th presentation in the appendix of this document.


15

Values Building on the work that has already been done in the District we reviewed the Austin ISD Strategic Plan and expanded on the Values contained in the Plan: AISD Strategic Plan 2010-2015:

Mission (What We Do) In partnership with parents and our community, AISD exists to provide a comprehensive educational experience that is high quality, challenging, and inspires all students to make a positive contribution to society. Vision (Where We Want to Be) AISD will be nationally recognized as an outstanding school district, instilling a passion for life-long learning in all students. Goals (What We Want to Accomplish)

Goal 1: All students will perform at or above grade level.

Goal 2: Achievement gaps among all student groups will be eliminated.

Goal 3: All students will graduate ready for college, career, and life in a globally competitive economy.

Goal 4: All schools will meet or exceed state accouintability standards, and the district will meet federal standards and exceed state standards.

Strategies (How We Will Achieve Our Goals)

Provide a high-quality, well-rounded educational experience to all students that is rigorous, culturally relevant, healthful, and engaging.

Build strong relationships with students, families, and the community to increase trust and shared responsibility.

Ensure that every classroom has a high-quality, effective educator, supported by high-quality, effective administrators and support staff.

Align resources to accomplish priorities within a balanced budget.

Values (What We Believe In)

Focus on Children

Excellence

Integrity

Equity

Respect

Health and Safety


16


17


18

Story Time As a way to think more about how learning will happen in the future and what role the facilities play, participants were asked to work in small groups and answer the following question:

Imagine it is 2020 and AISD has met its strategic plan goals for 2015 and has addressed many of the key facility needs as defined in the Facility Master Plan of 2010. Imagine you are (a student, a community member, a teacher, a staff member) Describe your typical day in an AISD school – what does your day look like? 1. What are you doing? What is the process of learning and what are the outcomes or expectations? 2. Who are you with? How is your day organized? 3. What is your environment like? Where are you and how do you feel? 4. What makes AISD a special place to learn?


19

Day Two: Reflections While Day One was about creating a Facility Master Plan Vision Statement, Day Two of the workshop was about creating Facility Principles. Facility Principles create overarching ideas about what‟s important for all schools in AISD. To start off Day Two the group reflected on Day One and on a video assigned as homework: Dave Eggers‟ Wish: Once Upon a School. http://www.ted.com/talks/lang/eng/dave_eggers_makes_his_ted_prize_wish_once_upon_a_school.html

http://www.ted.com/talks/lang/eng/dave_eggers_makes_his_ted_prize_wish_once_upon_a_school.html


20

Provocation IV: John A. Johnson From the KnowledgeWorks website: http://www.kwfdn.org/resource_library/_resources/sacc_video_guide.asp

"Schools as Centers of Community: John A. Johnson Achievement Plus Elementary School” is a video case study and discussion guide that assists local leaders and residents in creating constructive, meaningful dialogue on the importance of good school design and ways schools can become centers of their communities. KnowledgeWorks Foundation partnered with the American Architectural Foundation to create the guide and video. Video link: http://www.archfoundation.org/aaf/gsbd/Videos.SCC.htm

http://www.kwfdn.org/resource_library/_resources/sacc_video_guide.asp

http://www.archfoundation.org/aaf/gsbd/Videos.SCC.htm


21

Facility Principles Starting with the Austin ISD 2010-2015 Strategic Plan Strategies, participants worked in small groups to define Facility Principles. Facility Principles are overarching ideas about what‟s important for all schools in the Austin Independent School District. For each of the Strategies groups defined what this meant for facilities. So, for example, if the Austin ISD is committed to an engaging/healthy experience for all students, this means what in terms of facilities.


22

Facility Principles The Austin Independent School District is committed to An engaging/healthy experience for all students … This means…

• All schools will have a space identified to engage parents and be responsive to student needs (learning/language/cultural/socioeconomic)

• All schools will have spaces dedicated to active learning and diverse learning styles

• All schools will be equipped to provide technology resources in classrooms and other learning areas

• Create and maintain clean and attractive grounds that encourage physical activities

• Provide safe entry and exit for cyclists, walkers, skateboarders, etc.

• Develop spaces that promote social and recreational interaction

• Common areas for active, hands-on group activities

• Coordinate and cooperate with other entities (YMCA, YWCA, Parks & Recreation) to share and/or build new facilities (pools, gyms, parks)

• All schools will have good indoor air quality, climate control, and day-lighting

• Our facilities will support high quality, rigorous, well rounded learning


23

Facility Principles The Austin Independent School District is committed to Strong relationships with students/families/community … This means…

• Community hubs for services and programs

• Flexible spaces and hours to accommodate changes in learning styles, instructional delivery supported by technological resources for students, families and communities

• Facilities to provide learning spaces that support student collaboration, teamwork and relationship building


24

Facility Principles The Austin Independent School District is committed to Supporting and engaging high quality effective staff … This means…

• AISD facility decisions promote long-term value

• AISD facilities should be equitable and adequate across the district

• AISD staff and community must have input into facility decisions to ensure adequate resources (examples: space, storage, technology, outlets)

• AISD facilities to provide high quality professional development spaces

• AISD facilities must provide an appropriate environment for staff effectiveness (example: HVAC, light, acoustics, security)

• AISD facilities must include adequate, flexible-use core facilities (library, gym, cafeteria)

• AISD staff must have appropriate access to various spaces to meet student needs of a high quality rigorous educational experience


25

Facility Principles The Austin Independent School District is committed to Aligning resources with priorities… This means…

• Leverage Austin public and private resources for more effective and efficient use of existing and new facilities by:

• Revisit efficiency study

• Align decisions with fiscal impact statement

• “CAN” concept (Community Action Network) to engage various public entities (e.g. UT, ACC, Travis County, Seton, St. David‟s, etc…) for purpose of repurposing facilities including charters and co-location

• Must at least break even or generate revenue

• Strategy for maintenance and operations to support facilities and address deferred, routine, and preventative maintenance

• Develop detailed capital plan schedule/report that includes budget/actuals/completion dates and M & O impact by project

• CAN concept must be integrated into bond planning process to address shared facilities and a more comprehensive set of services

• Develop strategic partnerships to obtain private donations /endowments in excess of $50 million


26


27

Appendices Contained on the following pages are the presentations from both days.


28


29


30


31


32


33


34


35


36


37


38


39


40


41


42


43


44


45


46


47


48


49


50


51


52


53


54


55


56


57


58


59


60


61


62


63


64


65


66


67


68


69


70


71


72


73


74


75


76


77


78


79


80

Photos taken during the Workshop


81


82


83


84


85


86


87


88


89


90


91


92


93



Appendices D, E, and F Appendix D: Community Dialogue #1 Results

Appendix E: Community Dialogue #2 Results

Appendix F: Community Meeting #3 Results

Due to the volume of these reports, see the following link to access this information:

http://rcpt.yousendit.com/1042147173/d50a3fb54a75365c932c5df95adbd0c4

http://rcpt.yousendit.com/1042147173/d50a3fb54a75365c932c5df95adbd0c4



Appendix G Summary of Facility Options Discussed by the FMPTF

Facility Master Plan Task Force - Summary of Options

0.1Cut all bus service for magnet schools and signature programs $1,994,516

0.2Redraw boundaries for the entire district with the greatest weight on vertical alignment Unknown Unknown $0

0.4

Move International HS from Eastside HS to ALC. Relocate ALC students to Blackshear ES. Move Blachsear ES students to Zavala ES Unknown $0 $0

0.5

Repurpose Allan ES as a Pre-K thru 8 and move Allison ES attendance area middle school students from Martin MS to Allan Pre-K-8 Unknown $0 $0

0.6

Repurpose Blackshear ES to a Pre-K - 8 school, and Oak Springs ES as a Pre-K - 6th, move middle school students from these attendance zones from Kealing MS Unknown $0 $0

0.7

Repurpose Campbell ES as a Pre-K -8th school and move middle school students from Kealing MS to Campbell Pre-K-8th Unknown $0 $0

0.8

Repurpose Brentwood ES as a Pre-K-6th school, move sixth grade students in this attendance zone from Lamar MS to Brentwood PreK-6 School Unknown $0 $0

0.9Repurpose Zavala ES to a Pre-K-8th school and move middle school students from Martin MS to the new school Unknown $0 $0

0.10

Add a sixth grade class to Metz ES, Govalle ES, Ortega ES, Norman ES, and Sims ES, move sixth grade students from Martin MS and Garcia MS. Unknown $0 $0

0.11

Assuming all changes in options 0.5 through 0.10 are made, repurpose Martin MS as adminstrative center. Move remaining Martin students to Kealing MS. Remove magnet program from Kealing MS. Move 500 students to Lamar MS and 300 students to Covington MS. Move middle schol population of Cowan ES from Covington MS to Bailey MS. Unknown $0 $0

0.13Reassign portion of students from Small MS to Gorzycki MS $0 $0 $0

0.14

Purchase shopping center with adequate space for all district adminstrative functions and a movie theater for a Performing Arts Center. Sell CAC and discontinue all leases. Rent the PAC when not in use. $0

0.15Charge a fee for general transfers, reducing fee for low-income families Unknown $0 $0

0.16Move the media center and professional library services together with PDC for better utilization of resources Unknown TBD TBD

0.17 Build three new elementary schools - Undesignated $0 $0 $79,700,000

NOTE: Highlighted options were presented at the Community Meetings held on January 12 & 13, 2011

DescriptionOption M&O SavingsCost Avoidance

Future Bond Impact




Future Bond Impact

0.18Build a new middle school - Southeast (land funded from previous bond) $0 $0 $55,700,000

0.19Build a new high school - South (land funded from previous bond) $0 $0 $106,600,000

0.20 School for Young Men

0.21Global option to remove 6th grade from all elementary schools when room is available in middle schools

1.1Consolidate Reilly ES and Ridgetop ES at a new school built on the Reilly ES site $2,076,204 $7,734,391 $24,000,000

1.2 Reassign students from Brown ES to Reilly ES $0 $0 $0

2.1Move a portion of student population from Cowan ES to Boone ES ($72,607) $0 $0

2.2Close Joslin ES and move students to Sunset Valley ES and Boone ES $1,259,273 $8,466,116 $0

2.2AClose Joslin ES and move students to Sunset Valley ES. Move a portion of Sunset Valley ES students to Boone ES $1,259,273 $8,466,116 $0

2.2 B

Close Joslin ES and move students to Sunset Valley ES. Move a portion of Sunset Valley ES students to Boone ES and Cunningham ES. Adjust boundaries between Cowan ES and Boone ES. $1,266,595 $8,466,116 $0

2.2 C

Close Joslin ES and move students to Sunset Valley ES. Move a portion of Sunset Valley ES students to Boone ES and Cunningham ES. $1,266,595 $8,466,116 $0

2.2 D

Close Joslin ES and move students to Sunset Valley ES. Move a portion of Sunset Valley ES students to Boone ES and Cunningham ES. $1,276,967 $8,466,116 $0

2.3Adjust boundaries between Mills ES, Patton ES, and Boone ES ($59,185) $0 $0

2.4Adjust boundaries between Williams ES and Cunningham ES ($2,241) $0 $0

2.5 Adjust boundaries between Odom ES and St Elmo ES $0 $0 $0

3.1Close Oak Springs ES and Zavala ES and consolidate into Blackshear ES and Govalle ES $2,369,043 $10,681,507 $0

3.2Close Allan ES and move students into Govalle ES and Norman ES $1,257,574 $11,546,218 $0

3.2B

Close Allan ES and repurpose as an administrative building. Move student population to Govalle ES and Norman ES, adjust boundaries of Oak Springs ES, Zavala ES, Brooke ES and Ortega ES $1,257,574 $0 $0

3.3

Close Zavala ES and Brooke ES move students into a new elementary school. Close Allan ES and move students into Govalle ES, Norman ES, and Ortega ES $3,843,266 $23,479,180 $28,100,000




Future Bond Impact

3.4 Adjust boundaries for Maplewood ES and Campbell ES $0 $0 $0

3.5Close Oak Springs ES and Ortega ES and consolidate students into Blackshear ES, Sims ES, and Norman ES $2,300,842 $10,308,022 $0

3.6 Close Pease ES $712,296 $7,302,501 $0

3.7Close Govalle ES and Oak Springs ES and move students to Allan ES, Zavala ES, and Blackshear ES $2,510,507 $16,136,129 $0

3.8Repurpose Blackshear ES as a Hutson-Tillotson demonstration school, training site for future teachers $0 $0 $0

3.9 A

Close Brooke ES and move students to Allan ES and Zavala ES. Adjust boundary between Allan ES and Norman ES. $1,301,382 $5,477,387 $0

3.9 B1 Close Ortega ES and move students to Govalle ES. $1,153,873 $6,082,090 $0

3.9 B2Close Oak Springs ES and move students to Blackshear ES. $1,146,969 $4,225,932 $0

3.9 C

Close Sanchez ES and move students north of Town Lake to Zavala ES and Metz ES. Adjust boundaries between Zavala ES and Linder ES. Build a new 800-student elementary south of Town Lake to receive students from Sanchez ES, Metz ES and Travis Heights ES. $1,556,924 $9,424,688

* included in Option 0.17

3.12

Close Allan ES and repurpose as a middle school for Young Men, repurpose Martin MS as a middle school for Young Women. Reassign Allan ES students to Govalle ES, Ortega ES and Norman ES $12,203 $0 $15,389,258

3.13Close Govalle ES and reassign students to Ortega ES, Oak Springs ES and Allan ES $1,363,538 $11,910,197 $0

3.14Close Blackshear ES and reassign students to Oak Springs ES and Zavala ES $984,538 $7,291,599 $0

3.16

Close Govalle ES and reassign students to Brooke ES, Ortega ES and Oak Springs ES. Close Allan ES and reassign students to Brooke ES and Norman ES. Adjust boundaries between Brooke ES and Zavala ES. $2,873,104 $23,456,415 $0

4.1A Close Dawson ES and move students to Becker ES $1,422,157 $6,110,749 $0

4.1BClose Becker ES and move student population to Dawson ES $1,422,157 $7,036,234 $0

4.2Close Becker ES, Barton Hills ES, and Zilker ES and consolidate into new elementary school $3,282,691 $24,580,169 $28,100,000

4.3Adjust boundaries between Becker ES, Dawson ES, Travis Heights ES, and Linder ES ($80,539) $0 $0

4.4AClose Barton Hills ES and Becker ES and move students into Zilker ES and Dawson ES $2,201,810 $11,930,384 $0




Future Bond Impact

4.4BClose Barton Hills ES and Zilker ES and move students to Becker ES and Dawson ES. $2,266,637 $17,543,935 $0

4.5Close Barton Hills ES and Becker ES and move students into Zilker ES and Dawson ES $2,207,301 $11,930,384 $0

4.6Close Barton Hills ES and Joslin ES and move students into Zilker ES and Dawson ES $2,367,541 $13,360,266 $0

4.7Close Barton Hills ES and reassign students to Zilker ES and close Becker ES and reassgin students to Dawson ES $2,207,301 $11,930,384 $0

4.8Reassign a portion of Linder ES to Travis Heights ES and reassign a portion of Travis Heights ES to Becker ES $0 $0 $0

5.1Do not accept transfers into Bryker Woods ES, Casis ES, Gullett ES, and Highland Park ES $0 $0 $0

5.2Discontinue the option to offer 6th grade at Bryker Woods ES $0 $0 $0

5.3Adjust boundaries between Bryker Woods ES, Gullett ES, and Brentwood ES $0 $0 $0

5.4Build new school and adjust boundaries for Highland Park ES, Doss ES, and Hill ES $0 $0 $25,200,000

5.5 Adjust boundaries between Mathews ES and Casis ES $0 $0 $0

6.1Adjust boundaries between Norman ES, Overton ES, and Ortega ES ($1,220) $0 $0

6.3Add Pre-K center to Winn ES to provide relief for Andrews ES, Pecan Springs ES, Jordan ES and Overton ES Unknown $0 $0

7.1

Move Kealing MS magnet program to Martin MS. Move student population of Martin MS into Kealing MS with remaining neighborhood students ($186,096) $0 $0

7.2Reassign O. Henry MS/Austin HS students to Martin MS/Eastside HS $0 $0 $0

7.3 Reassign Martin MS students to Fulmore MS $0 $0 $07.4 Create new K-8 schools at Martin MS and Allan ES $0 $0 $0

8.1Close Webb MS and reassign students into Pearce MS, Dobie MS, and Lamar MS $1,865,782 $11,454,070 $0

8.2A

Close Pearce MS and reassign student population into Garcia MS, Webb MS and Lamar MS. Reassign a portion of Webb MS students to Dobie MS $1,881,140 $7,443,511 $0

8.2B

Close Pearce MS and reassign student population into Garcia and Webb MS. Reassign a portion of Webb students to Dobie. Improve vertical alignment for Webb students $1,881,140 $7,443,511 $0

8.3

Close ALC and move students to Webb MS. Reassign Webb MS students to Dobie MS, Lamar MS, and Pearce MS $1,567,984 $12,262,155 $0




Future Bond Impact

8.4Close Webb MS and repurpose school as a School for Young Men ($98,844) $0 $0

9.1Reassign a portion of Bedichek MS population to Covington MS ($28,677) $0 $0

9.2Adjust boundary between Bedichek MS and Covington MS ($234,298) $0 $0

10.1 Adjust boundary between Reagan HS and McCallum HS $0 $0 $0

10.2

Improve programming at Reagan HS by providing cross-training and mentoring with McCallum staff. Provide nurturing environment to draw students back into Reagan HS. $0 $0 $0

10.3

Give Reagan HS students the option to attend specialized signature programs at McCallum HS with transportation provided. $0 $0

10.4 Close Eastside HS and consolidate into Reagan HS ($539,373) $0 $0

10.5Close Reagan HS and CAC, repurpose Reagan HS as administrative center $0 $0 $0

10.6Close Reagan HS and repurpose as Junior College / ACC Partner $0 $0 $0

11.1Identify surplus portables and build new elementary school in the next bond $0 $0 $0

11.2Repurpose Langford ES as a Pre-K center and adjust boundaries with adjacent schools $0 $0 $0

12.1

Close Dobie MS and repurpose as elementary school to provide relief for Hart ES, Graham ES, Walnut Creek ES and Barrington ES. Reassign Dobie MS students to Webb MS and Pearce MS ($437,477) $0 $0

12.2Discontinue 6th grade at Barrington ES and Walnut Creek ES $0 $0 $0

12.3Adjust boundaries between Wooten ES and Brentwood ES $0 $0 $0

12.4

Assign the remaining 2008 undesignated elementary school to north central Austin (in addition to 2004 Bond Program ES) $0 $0

included in 2008 bond

program

12.5Build a new elementary school in north central Austin (in addition to 2004 Bond Program ES) $0 $0 $28,100,000

12.6

Close Dobie MS and repurpose as an elementary school, reassign students to Webb MS. Adjust boundaries between Webb MS and Pearce MS. Move a portion of student population from Graham ES and Hart ES to new Dobie Elementary. Adjust boundaries between Graham ES and Walnut Creek ES and between Hart ES and Barrington ES TBD $0 $1,056,778




Future Bond Impact

12.7

Repurpose Garcia MS as a 4 - 8 school and reassign a portion of the population (Sims ES and Norman ES attendance areas) to Pearce MS. Reassign Overton ES and Jordan ES 4 - 5 grade to new Garcia 4 - 8.

13.1Adjust boundaries between Maplewood ES and Campbell ES $0 $0 $0

13.2Build new elementary school in Mueller to relieve overcrowding at Andrews ES, Harris ES, and Blanton ES ($58,093) $0 $24,000,000

13.3 Adjust boundaries between Andrews ES and Winn ES ($84,811) $0 $0

13.4Build a Pre-K center to relieve Andrews ES, Winn ES, Blanton ES, Pecan Springs ES, and Blanton ES $0 $0 $21,600,000

14.1 Build a new school west of Clayton ES $0 $0 $25,200,000

14.2Adjust boundaries between Mills ES, Kiker ES, Cowan ES, and Boone ES ($6,120) $0 $0

14.3 Add a K-8th grade school in southwest area Unknown $0

14.4 Adjust boundaries between Clayton ES and Baldwin ES $0 $0 $014.5 Repurpose Boone ES as a PK - 8 school $0 $0 $0

15.1

Repurpose Casey ES as a Pre-K Center and adjust boundaries between Williams ES, Menchaca ES, Casey ES, Odom ES, and Pleasant Hill ES $0 $0 $0

15.2

Build Pre-K center in the Williams ES attendance zone to relieve Williams ES, Casey ES, Menchaca ES, Odom ES, and Pleasant Hill ES $0 $0 $21,600,000

16.1Create a career center and add a magnet program to Crockett HS to attract students Unknown

16.2 Adjust boundaries between Akins HS and Crockett HS $0 $0 $0

17.1Adjust boundaries between Murchison MS, Burnet MS, Dobie MS, and Webb MS ($191,587) $0 $0

17.2

Move middle school population of Lee ES, Campbell ES, and Maplewood ES attendance zones to Lamar MS. Create more room at Kealing MS to expand program and increase diversity ($73,218) $0 $0

17.3Add a fine arts focus to Lamar MS to attract students and increase enrollment Unknown $0 $0

17.4 Close either Pearce MS or Webb MS Unknown $0 $0

17.5Create a sixth grade center with students from Webb MS, Pearce MS, Dobie MS, Garcia MS. $0 $0 Unknown



Appendix H Glossary


Glossary of Terms

i

Glossary

The following is a list of definitions of known abbreviations

and terms used throughout the District-wide Facility

Master Plan Report.

ADA - Americans with Disabilities Act; addresses

modifications of facilities to ensure access for persons

with disabilities.

Attendance Zone – The geographical area from which

students are assigned a school to attend.

Bond Program – The capital improvement efforts

associated with funding generated from a local voter-

approved tax levy for capital spending.

Building - A structure that houses children or equipment

on a school site or campus.

CAC - Carruth Administration Center; AISD’s

administrative headquarters complex.

CAC – Campus Advisory Council; a campus level

advisory council, required by state law, that addresses

the concerns of school communities.

Campus - A campus is a site where one or more

schools/buildings is/are located. For example, an

elementary school can share a site with a middle school;

therefore, it is considered a campus.

Capital Cost Avoidance – Buying less, or buying nothing

at all, to improve a permanent structure or aspect of a

property.

Capital Improvement - The addition or restoration of a

permanent structure or some aspect of a property that

will either enhance the property’s overall value or

increase its useful life.

Cohort - A specific group of students established for

monitoring purposes, particularly over time.

Core Spaces - Large areas within a building that are

utilized by most students throughout the school day, i.e.,

cafeteria, gymnasium, library.

Deficiency - A construction deficiency is an item or

condition that is considered sub-standard or does not

meet current standards or building codes.

Educational Adequacy - An assessment of a facility to

evaluate how well the campus is equipped to deliver the

instructional program. For example, does the facility

have the standard types of technology within the

classroom that a teacher requires for the current

curriculum? Is there the proper amount of white board

space in the classroom? Is there the correct number of

lab stations in a science room and do they have the

proper equipment?

Educational Specifications - Document that describes

the current standards for program areas, equipment


Glossary of Terms

ii

needs, technology needs, square footage, and special

considerations for a new school.

Enrollment - The number of students attending a school.

Facility Condition Assessment - An evaluation of a school

facility that identifies current building and building system

deficiencies.

FCI - Facility Condition Index; an indicator of a facilities

condition obtained by dividing the repair costs by the

replacement cost of the same building.

FF&E - Furniture, Fixtures, and Equipment; the moveable

equipment that is used by the occupants inside a facility.

Generally includes furniture and computers.

Functional Equity - Comparison of identified core areas

and other specialized classroom space and the level at

which they meet the AISD educational specification

standards.

GIS - Geographic Information System; an automated

system for referencing geocoded data, e.g., a database

of addresses for students enrolled in a school system.

HVAC - Heating, Ventilation, and Air Conditioning.

Impervious Cover - Any type of surface that will not allow

rainfall or runoff to soak into the ground (e.g. pavement

or buildings). Local ordinance may limit impervious cover

in developments for environmental protection or runoff

control purposes.

In Migration – Students attending a school that live

outside of that school’s attendance zone.

M&O – Maintenance and Operations; school funding

that pays for day-to-day administrative and operational

costs.

Open Enrollment – A policy or practice that allows

students to attend other AISD outside their assigned

attendance area zone.

Operating Cost - Costs associated with operating a

school facility including administration, custodial and

maintenance supplies and staffing, and food service.

Out Migration - Students leaving their attendance zones

to attend another school in the district.

Permanent Capacity - The number of students a school

can accommodate within its permanent building(s). See

pages 182-183 for additional information.

Portable/Temporary Building - A building designed and

built to be movable rather than as a permanent

structure. A typical portable building in AISD contains

two classrooms.

Priority - A categorization of building deficiencies,

defined as follows.

Priority 1: currently critical (immediate need, i.e., fire

safety systems)


Glossary of Terms

iii

Priority 2: potentially critical (to be corrected within one

year, i.e., major HVAC equipment, security systems)

Priority 3: necessary/not yet critical (1-2 years, i.e., site

lighting, sanitation sewer, educational adequacy)

Priority 4: recommended (3-5 years, i.e., finishes,

educational adequacy)

Priority 5: does not meet current code/standards

/grandfathered (i.e., functional equity, 3rd tier ADA)

School Choice - Refers to a policy or practice that allows

parents and students to attend schools outside their

assigned attendance zones for specific program

offerings or for reasons permitted in the District’s transfer

policy.

School Zone Population - The number of AISD students

living within the attendance zone of a school.

Signature Program – A specialized curriculum

implemented in a vertical team to enhance the vertical

team’s instructional program.

Soft Costs - Generally refers to a collection of costs

added to the construction costs and may include items

like professional fees, construction testing and permitting,

contingencies, or administrative costs.

Site - Geographical location of a school’s building[s].

SQL - Structured Query Language; a form of database

that allows the analysis of data by sorting it into

categories.

TAS – Texas Accessibility Standards; standards set by the

TDLR (Texas Department of Licensing and Regulation) for

accessibility to public buildings and facilities, places of

public accommodation, and commercial facilities, by

individuals with disabilities.

Teaching Space - A room or designated area where

classes or instruction are held.

TBD - To be determined.

Title 1 - Funding provided by the federal government for

schools with high percentages of students who qualify for

free and reduced lunch. The funding must supplement

existing funding provided by the school district for

curriculum, instruction, and related services.

Utilization Factor - The enrollment of a school divided by

its permanent capacity, also known as percent of

permanent capacity.

Vertical Team - A group of campuses consisting of a high

school and its feeder middle and elementary schools.

Austin ISD Preliminary Draft Ten Year Facility Master Plan

Documents

facility recommendations

security recommendations

additional recommendations

management recommendations

staffing recommendations

maintenance recommendations

design recommendations

use recommendations