Top Banner
Ray Casper - Foundations Engineer John Scanlon - Structural Engineer Jimmy Mounnarat - Fluid System Engineer Igor Babushkin - Solar Thermal Engineer Preliminary Design Review Austin Texas
20

Preliminary Design Review Austin Texas

Jan 19, 2016

Download

Documents

Calais

Preliminary Design Review Austin Texas. Ray Casper - Foundations Engineer John Scanlon - Structural Engineer Jimmy Mounnarat - Fluid System Engineer Igor Babushkin - Solar Thermal Engineer. PDR Agenda. Introduction Floor plan layout House elevation drawings Foundation analysis - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Preliminary Design Review Austin Texas

Ray Casper - Foundations EngineerJohn Scanlon - Structural EngineerJimmy Mounnarat - Fluid System EngineerIgor Babushkin - Solar Thermal Engineer

Preliminary Design Review

Austin Texas

Page 2: Preliminary Design Review Austin Texas

PDR Agenda• Introduction• Floor plan layout• House elevation drawings• Foundation analysis• Roof Truss analysis• Hydronic subsystem analysis• Heat Transfer analysis• Building and Flat Plate Collector• F-Chart analysis

Page 3: Preliminary Design Review Austin Texas

Floor Plan Layout

Page 4: Preliminary Design Review Austin Texas

House Elevation Drawings

Page 5: Preliminary Design Review Austin Texas

Foundation Options

Poured Concrete Cement Block Low labor costQuickerRequires more materialPrevents water intrusionBetter heat retention

Low material costHigh Labor CostJoints allow for water

intrusionWeaker

Page 6: Preliminary Design Review Austin Texas

Foundation Calculations 8’ Soil Depth 50’ x 30’ foundation 15 degree slope MMax on 50’ North wall

Soil Density 100lb/ft3

House load = 200lb/ft2

8 inch thick poured FOSCOMPRESSION = 87.2

FOSBENDING = 2.2

Page 7: Preliminary Design Review Austin Texas

Roof Truss Analysis

A “Double Howe” truss using 2X8 beams proved to be suitable for our application.Roof pitch is variable depending upon FPC placement.

Page 8: Preliminary Design Review Austin Texas

Hydronic Subsystem Analysis

• Schematic

• Head Loss, Pump size, Performance Curves

• Copper vs CPVC

• Cost Comparison

Page 9: Preliminary Design Review Austin Texas

Hydronic Schematic

http://www.backwoodshome.com/articles/hackleman65.html

Page 10: Preliminary Design Review Austin Texas

Head Loss

• Max Head Loss per system 51.4 ft.• Assuming 3 FPC’s.

Pump Size• 2 pump options in series.

• Taco pump – 2 x $219.75

• Grundfos pump – 2 x $269.75

Page 11: Preliminary Design Review Austin Texas

Taco Cast Iron Model 009-F5

Page 12: Preliminary Design Review Austin Texas

Grundfos UP26-96F

Page 13: Preliminary Design Review Austin Texas

Cost Analysis

• Copper vs CPVC ~ 33%• Copper – corrodes, promotes

corrosion, expensive.• CPVC – higher reistance to heated

water, no soldering, no corrosion, cheaper.

• Pumps ~ 19%

Page 14: Preliminary Design Review Austin Texas

Heat Transfer Analysis

Page 15: Preliminary Design Review Austin Texas

Solar Thermal

Compare Two FPC’s Determine Number of Panels

Determine Angle

Page 16: Preliminary Design Review Austin Texas

Alternative Energy– AE-26

• Roof angle is Bestat around 31 degrees

• Best area is around 54 ft2

Page 17: Preliminary Design Review Austin Texas

Economics of the AE-26

Chose 6 Panels because of theThermal Output Data

Panel : $825.00Price per ft2: $34.88Area: 25.35 ft2

Page 18: Preliminary Design Review Austin Texas

Sun Earth, Inc -- EP-21

• Very strange slop calculation,28 degrees is best slope

• Collector Panel area seems to be the best at 41.11 ft2

Page 19: Preliminary Design Review Austin Texas

Economics of the EP-21

• Similarly to the previous choice, 6 panels are chosen

Panel: 609.97Price per ft2: $34.88Area: 21.35 ft2

Page 20: Preliminary Design Review Austin Texas

Questions?