G G G G G G G G G ^ _ ^ _ ^ _ ^ _ ^ _ ^ _ ^ _ ^ _ ^ _ ^ _ ^ _ ^ _ ^ _ ^ _ ^ _ ^ _ ^ _ ^ _ ^ _ ^ _ ^ _ ^ _ ^ _ ^ _ ^ _ ^ _ ^ _ ^ _ ^ _ ^ _ ^ _ ^ _ ^ _ ^ _ ^ _ ^ _ ^ _ ^ _ ^ _ ^ _ ^ _ ^ _ ^ _ ^ _ ^ _ ^ _ ^ _ ^ _ ^ _ ^ _ ^ _ ^ _ ^ _ ^ _ ^ _ ^ _ ^ _ ^ _ ^ _ ^ _ ^ _ ^ _ ^ _ ^ _ ^ _ ^ _ ^ _ ^ _ ^ _ ^ _ ^ _ ^ _ ^ _ ^ _ ^ _ ^ _ ^ _ ^ _ ^ _ ^ _ ^ _ ^ _ ^ _ ^ _ ^ _ ^ _ ^ _ ^ _ ^ _ ^ _ ^ _ ^ _ ^ _ ^ _ ^ _ ^ _ ^ _ ^ _ ^ _ ^ _ ^ _ ^ _ ^ _ ^ _ ^ _ ^ _ ^ _ ^ _ ^ _ ^ _ ^ _ ^ _ ^ _ ^ _ M O - P A C E X P Y 1 S T S T L A M A R B L V D U S H W Y 1 8 3 USH WY290 FM1327B R O D I E L A FM967STATEHWY71SL AUGHTERL A F M 6 2 0 R D FM 2 2 4 4R D C O N G R E S S A V FM969M A N C H A C A R D 7THSTB U R N E T R D WILLIAMCANNONDR51STSTC A P I T A L O F T E X A S H W Y BRAKERLASH45A I R P O R T B L V D I H 3 5 FM2222RDSTASSNEYLABENWHITEBLVDF M 9 7 3 R D 12 THS T C A M E R O N R D F M 1 8 2 6 R D M ANORRD M E T R I C B L V D OLTORFST45THSTSOUTHWESTPKWYF M 2 7 6 9 R D 5THSTF M 1 6 2 6 D E S S A U R D BURLESONRD6THSTS P R I N G D A L E R D Q U I N L A N P A R K R D E D B L U E S T E I N B L V D CESARCHAVEZSTPARMERLAM CN E I LD R D E C K E R L A N E BEECAVESRDRUNDBERGLAYAGERLAKOENIGLAJOLLYVILLERDDUVALRDM AR TINLU THERKINGBL VD NUTTYBROWNRDM O N T O P O L I S D R D E S S A U R O A D B A L C O N E S D R 15THSTENFIELDRDNORTHLANDDRG U A D A L U P E S T 26THSTTODDLAANDERSONLAHOWARDLASCENICLOOP R E D R I V E R S T BULLICKHOLLOWRDF M 6 8 5 PARMERBASTROPHWYRIVERSIDEDRFERGUSONLAE X P O S I T I O N B L V D W E S T G A T E B L V D FITZHUGHRDANDERSON MILL RD 11THSTBARTONSPRINGSRD24THSTF M 9 7 3 LOYOLALAT H E R M A L D R RIVERSIDEDR51STSTUSHWY1831 S T S T B U R N E T R D B U R N E T R D RIVERSIDEDRF M 1 8 2 6 R D M A N O R R D USHWY183FM1626 PARMERLAFM6 2 0R D HOWARDLASTATEHWY71F M 9 7 3 R D F M 9 7 3 R D USHWY290 PARMERLA4.4B Barton Hills ES & Zilker ES 3.9 C Sanchez ES 3.9 A Brooke ES 3.9 B1 Ortega ES 3.9 B2 Oak Springs ES 3.6 Pease ES AISD Facility Master Plan Task Force Options for Community Meetings - January 12 & 13, 2011 3.4 12.4 Assign the remaining 2008 undesignated ES to north central (in addition to 2004 Bond Program ES) 0.17 Three new undesignated elementary schools in future bond program 8.2 B Pearce MS 0.19 New High School (land funded in previous bond program) 16.2 2.2 C Joslin ES 0.18 New Middle School (land funded in previous bond program)
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
8/8/2019 Austin ISD Community Meeting # 3 Options Handout
FACILITY MASTER PLAN O PTIONS – COMMUNITY MEETINGS JANUARY 12 & 13, 2011
1
OPTION 2.2 C :
Close Joslin ES and reassign stud ent pop ulation into Sunset Va lley ES. Rea ssign a portion o f the Sunset Va lleystud ent p op ulation into Boone ES and Cunn ingha m ES to b a lanc e utilizat ion.
Background
• Tota l population for Joslin, Sunset Va lley, Boo ne and Cunningha m a ttendanc e zones is 1,936 stud ents.• Tota l capac ity of four sc hoo ls is 2,314 elem enta ry stud ents, lea ving an exce ss of 378 sea ts.•
Current b ound a ries result in a projec ted pe rc ent of p op ulation for the 2014-15 sc hoo l year of:o 95% - Joslin ESo 67% - Boone ESo 104% - Cunningha m ESo 97% - Sunset Va lley ES
Rationale
• Joslin ES has a perma nen t c apac ity of 374 stud ent s, the low est o f the four sc hoo ls.• Joslin ES ha s a Fac ility Co nd ition Index (FCI) of 44.1%, similar to Cunning ha m and Sunset Va lley ES. Boone
ES has a low FCI of 17.4%
Impact
• An estimate d 475 students wo uld be a ffec ted by this prop osal.• An estimated annual savings of $1,266,595 and an estimated capital cost avoidance of $8,466,116
c ould be rea lized .• The p rop osed op tion wo uld result in a projec ted pe rc ent o f po pulat ion for the 2014-15 sc hool yea r of:
o 88% - Boone ESo 117% - Cunningha m ESo 118% - Sunset Va lley ES
Existing Bound aries Proposed Bound a ries
Advantages
• Annual cost savings and capital costavoidance
Disadvantages
• Affects a large number of students andfamilies due to the need to also moveSunset Va lley stud ents to Boo ne andCunningham
• Sunset Valley and Cunningha m ove rc apa c ity by 2014-15 sc hoo l year
8/8/2019 Austin ISD Community Meeting # 3 Options Handout
41.1% Sunset Va lley ES 561 (0.0628) 550 98% 587 105% 620 111% 662 118% 161
1,940 1,819 1,936 1,927 2,052 475
Yrs
10
101
10
Total
Total
Total
Action
Rec eive stud ents from Sunset Va lley
Rec eive stud ents from Sunset Va lley
Close Joslin a nd reassign stud ent pop ulat ion to Sunset Va lley
Rec eive stud ents from Joslin and reassign a portion of stud ent p op ulat ion to Boo ne ESand Cunningha m ES
Cost or Savings Categories Amount Extended Inc ludes
Op era tiona l Sa ving s $519,359 $5,193,590 M &O, Food Servic e, Eq uip ., etc .
Salaries and Benef its Savings $761,432 $7,614,320 Admin., Clerica l , Custodia l, e tc .Mo ving Costs ($14,196) ($14,196) Associated with closureTransporta tion $0 $0 No new routes required
$1,266,595 $12,793,714
Capital Cost Avoidance Amount
Defic ienc ies 1 - 5 for Joslin 8,466,116$
8,466,116$
Future Bond Impac t Amount
-$
$0
8/8/2019 Austin ISD Community Meeting # 3 Options Handout
FACILITY MASTER PLAN O PTIONS – COMMUNITY MEETINGS JANUARY 12 & 13, 2011
3
OPTION 3.6:
Close Pea se ES and rea ssign stud ent p op ulation to hom e e leme nta ry sc hool.
Background
• Pea se ES ha s no a ttendanc e zone ; it is an a ll transfer school.• Tota l c apac ity of Pea se is 293 elementa ry stud ents; it is not c ost effec tive to o perate.
Rationale• Pea se ES ha s a Fac ility Cond ition Index (FCI) of 71.9%, the highest in the District.
Impact
• An estimate d 252 students wo uld be a ffec ted by this proposal.• An estimat ed annual sav ings of $712,296 and an estimat ed c ap ita l co st a voida nc e o f $7,668,770 could
be rea lized .
Existing Bound aries Proposed Bound a ries
Advantages
• Not a neighborhood school, students couldreturn to home school or request a transferto a nother sc hool
• A relatively small number of students andfam ilies affec ted
• Highest FCI in the Distric t• Not co st effective to op erate
Disadvantages
• Historic building.
• Diverse enrollment
8/8/2019 Austin ISD Community Meeting # 3 Options Handout
Cost or Savings Categories Amount Extended Inc ludes
Op era tiona l Sa ving s $296,520 $2,965,200 M &O, Food Servic e, Eq uip ., etc .Salaries and Benef its Savings $435,725 $4,357,250 Admin., Clerica l , Custodia l, e tc .
Associated with closure
Transporta tion $0 $0 No new routes required
$712,296 $7,302,501
Capital Cost Avoidance Amount
Mo ving Costs ($19,949) ($19,949)
-$
$0
Defic ienc ies 1 - 5 for Pease 7,668,770$
7,668,770$
Future Bond Impac t Amount
8/8/2019 Austin ISD Community Meeting # 3 Options Handout
FACILITY MASTER PLAN O PTIONS – COMMUNITY MEETINGS JANUARY 12 & 13, 2011
5
OPTION 3.9 A :
Close Brooke ES and reassign stud ent pop ulation into Zava la ES and Allan ES. Rea ssign a portion o f the Allan ESstude nt p op ulat ion into Norman ES to ba lanc e utilization.
Background
• Tota l population for Broo ke, Zava la, Allan a nd Norma n ES a ttend anc e zones is 1,524 stud ents.• Tota l capac ity of four sc hoo ls is 2,169 elem enta ry stud ent s, lea ving an exce ss of 645 sea ts.
• Current b ound a ries result in a project ed pe rc ent of p op ula tion for the 2014-15 sc hoo l year of:o 110% - Brooke ESo 56% - Zava la ESo 56% - Alla n ESo 74% - Norma n ES
Rationale
• Brooke ES has a perma nent c apac ity of 430 stud ents, the low est o f the four sc hools.
• Brooke ES has a Fac ility Cond ition Ind ex (FCI) of 32.6%, whic h is c om parab le to the other three sc hoo ls.
Impact
• An estima ted 469 stude nts wo uld be affec ted by this proposa l.•
An estimated annual savings of $1,301,382 and an estimated capital cost avoidance of $5,477,387could be realized.• The p rop osed op tion wo uld result in a project ed pe rc ent o f po pulat ion for the 2014-15 sc hool yea r of:
o 104% - Zava la ESo 82% - Alla n ESo 79% - Norma n ES
Existing Bound aries Proposed Bound a ries
Advantages
• Annual savings and cost avoidance fromc losing Brooke ES
• Improves percent of capacity at Allan ESand Zava la ES within ta rge t range
• Slightly imp rove s Norma n ES percent ofcapaci ty
Disadvantages
• Brooke ES students south o f Town Lake stilbused long distances. (could be resolved i3.9 C were ap proved)
• Affect s a relatively large numb er of studentsand families
8/8/2019 Austin ISD Community Meeting # 3 Options Handout
FACILITY MASTER PLAN O PTIONS – COMMUNITY MEETINGS JANUARY 12 & 13, 2011
7
OPTION 3.9 B 1:
Close O rteg a ES and rea ssign stud ent pop ulation into G ova lle ES.
Background
• Tota l pop ulation fo r Orteg a a nd Go va lle ES a ttendanc e zone s is 713 stud ents.• Tota l ca pac ity of the sc hoo ls is 972 elementa ry stud ent s, lea ving a n excess of 259 sea ts.• Current bound a ries result in a projec ted pe rc ent of p op ulation for the 2014-15 sc hoo l year of:
o 74% - Ortega ESo 80% - Gova lle ES
Rationale
• Ortega ES has a p ermane nt c ap ac ity of 374 students, the lower of the two sc hools.• Ortega ES ha s a Fac ility Co nd ition Ind ex (FCI) of 40.2%, whic h is slight ly highe r than Gova lle ES.
Impact
• An estimat ed 263 stude nts wo uld be a ffect ed by this p rop osal.
• An estimated annual savings of $1,153,873 and an estimated capital cost avoidance of $6,082,090c ould be rea lized .
• The p rop osed op tion wo uld result in a p rojec ted percent of p op ula tion for the 2014-15 schoo l year of:o
126% - Gova lle ESExisting Bound aries Proposed Bound a ries
Advantages
• Sma ll number of stud ents and fa miliesaffected
• Ortega ES ha s a high FCI• Moves Ortega intac t to Gova lle• Ortega and Govalle are within 2 miles of
one another• Annua l savings and c ost avo idanc e
Disadvantages
• Go va lle ES rea c hes 126% of p erma nentc apa c ity b y 2014-15 sc hoo l year.
8/8/2019 Austin ISD Community Meeting # 3 Options Handout
FACILITY MASTER PLAN O PTIONS – COMMUNITY MEETINGS JANUARY 12 & 13, 2011
9
OPTION 3.9 B 2:
Close O ak Springs ES and reassign stud ent p op ulation into Blac kshea r ES.
Background
• Tota l pop ulation for Oa k Sp rings and Blac kshea r ES a ttendanc e zone s is 591stud ent s.• Tota l capac ity of the sc hoo ls is 1,010 elem entary stud ent s, lea ving an excess of 419 sea ts.• Current b ound a ries result in a project ed pe rc ent of p op ula tion for the 2014-15 sc hoo l year of:
o 88% - Oak Sp rings ESo 44% - Blackshe ar ES
Rationale
• Oa k Springs ES ha s a perma nent c apac ity of 411 stud ent s, the lower of the t wo sc hoo ls.• Oak Spring s ES ha s a Fac ility Cond ition Index (FCI) of 26.5%, which is low er than Blac kshea r ES a t 34.7%.
Impact
• An estimat ed 336 stude nts wo uld be affec ted by this proposa l.
• An estimated annual savings of $1,146,969 and an estimated capital cost avoidance of $4,225,932could be realized.
• The p rop osed op tion wo uld result in a p rojec ted pe rc ent o f po pulation for the 2014-15 sc hool yea r of:o
105% - Blac kshe a r ESExisting Bound aries Proposed Bound a ries
Advantages
• Blac kshea r ES percent o f ca pac ity w ithintarget rang e
• Annual cost savings and ca pital avoida nce• Mo ves Oa k Springs intac t to Blac kshea r
Disadvantages
• Parent involvement c ould be mo re d iffic ult
• Long er wa lk to sc hoo l
8/8/2019 Austin ISD Community Meeting # 3 Options Handout
FACILITY MASTER PLAN O PTIONS – COMMUNITY MEETINGS JANUARY 12 & 13, 2011
11
OPTION 3.9 C :
Close Sanc hez ES and rea ssign stud ents north o f Tow n Lake to Zava la a nd Me tz ES. Ad just b ound aries betwe enLinde r and Zava la ES (or Broo ke ES if 3.9 A we re not app rove d ), and between Ma thew s and Zava la ES. Build anew 800-stud ent elem enta ry sc hoo l south of Tow n Lake to rec eive stud ents from Sanc hez, Me tz and TravisHeights ES
Background
• Tota l po pulation for Sanc hez, Me tz, Zava la, Linde r, Travis Heights, and Ma thews a ttend anc e zones is3,377 students.
• Tota l ca pac ity of the sc hoo ls is 3,559 elementa ry stud ents, lea ving a n excess of 187 sea ts. ClosingSanc hez and c onstruct ing a new eleme nta ry sc hool would increase the c apa c ity to 3,780 sea ts.
• Current bound a ries result in a p rojec ted pe rc ent o f pop ula tion for the 2014-15 sc hoo l year of:o 100% - Sanc he z ESo 89% - Metz ESo 104% - Zava la ES
o 125% - Lind er ESo 126% - Travis Heig ht s ESo 81% - Ma thews ES
Rationale
• Sanc hez ES has a perma nent c apac ity of 580 stud ents.• Sanc hez ES ha s a Fac ility Cond ition Inde x (FCI) o f 26.8%.
Impact• An estimat ed 1,080 stude nts wo uld be affec ted by t his proposa l.
• An estimated annual savings of $1,556,924 and an estimated capital cost avoidance of $9,424,688c ould be rea lized .
• The p rop osed op tion wo uld result in a p rojec ted percent of p op ula tion for the 2014-15 schoo l year of:o 100% - New Elementa ryo 55% - Metz ESo 71% - Zavala ESo 97% - Linder ES
o 98% - Linder Early Childhoodo 109% - Travis Heig ht s ESo 71% - Ma thews ES
Existing Bound aries Proposed Bound a ries
Advantages
• Stud ents south of Tow n Lake would a ttend asc hoo l in their immed iate neighb orhood .
• Provides som e relief for Linder and TravisHeights ES
Disadvantages
• Requires construction of new elementaryschoo l in future b ond prog ram
• Results in Metz, Zavala and Mathews undecapacity in 2014-15 school year.
8/8/2019 Austin ISD Community Meeting # 3 Options Handout
FACILITY MASTER PLAN O PTIONS – COMMUNITY MEETINGS JANUARY 12 & 13, 2011
13
OPTION 4.4 B:
Close Barton Hills and Zilker ES and reassign stud ent p op ulation into Bec ker and Dawson ES.
Background
• Tota l population fo r Barton Hills, Zilker, Bec ker and Dawson a tte nd anc e zones is 1,006 stud ents.• Tota l capac ity of four sc hoo ls is 1,739 elem enta ry stud ents, lea ving an e xcess of 733 sea ts.• Current bound a ries result in a p rojec ted pe rc ent o f pop ula tion for the 2014-15 sc hoo l year of:
o 77% - Barto n Hills ESo 79% - Zilker ESo 44% - Bec ker ESo 52% - Dawson ES
Rationale
• Barton Hills ES has a permanent capacity of 251 students, the lowest of the four schools. It is not costeffec tive to o perate. Zilker ES ha s a p erma nent capac ity of 460 stud ent s.
• Barton Hills ES ha s a Fac ility Cond ition Ind ex (FCI) of 33.5%, simila r to Bec ker and Dawson. Zilker ES ha san FCI of 55.0%, the third h ighe st in the District.
Impact
• An estima ted 513 stude nts wo uld be affec ted by this proposa l.
• An estimated annual savings of $2,266,637 and an estimated capital cost avoidance of $17,543,935c ould be rea lized .
• The p rop osed op tion wo uld result in a project ed pe rc ent o f po pulat ion for the 2014-15 sc hool yea r of:o 107% - Bec ker ESo 96% - Dawson ES
Existing Bound aries Proposed Bound a ries
Advantages
• Improves percent of capacity for Beckerand Dawson
• Not c ost effec tive to op erat e Barton Hills ES• Zilker ES ha s high FCI• High in-migration at both schools, area
po pulat ion does not supp ort either sc hoo ls
Disadvantages
• Stud ents from Ba rton Hills and Zilker w ill needto cross Lamar Blvd. to attend Becker oDawson.
8/8/2019 Austin ISD Community Meeting # 3 Options Handout
FACILITY MASTER PLAN O PTIONS – COMMUNITY MEETINGS JANUARY 12 & 13, 2011
15
OPTION 8.2 B:
Close Pea rc e M S and rea ssign stude nt p op ula tion into G a rc ia a nd Webb MS. Rea ssign a portion o f the Web bMS stude nt p op ulation into Dob ie MS to b alanc e utilization.
Background
• Tota l popula tion for Pea rc e, Ga rc ia, Webb and Dob ie MS a ttend ance zones is 2,885 stude nts.• Tota l capac ity of four sc hoo ls is 3,998 midd le sc hoo l stud ents, lea ving a n excess of 1,113 sea ts.
• Current bound a ries result in a p rojec ted pe rc ent o f pop ula tion for the 2014-15 sc hoo l year of:o 71% - Pea rce MSo 73% - Ga rc ia MSo 104% - Webb MSo 90% - Dob ie MS
Rationale
• Pea rce MS has a pe rma nent c ap ac ity of 1,078 student, Webb and Dobie b oth ha ve c ap ac ities unde1,000.
• Pea rce MS has a low Fac ility Cond ition Ind ex (FCI) of 15.2%, all midd le sc hoo ls in the a rea have low FCIsthe h ighest being Webb a t 25.1%.
Impact
• An estimat ed 683 stude nts wo uld be a ffect ed by this proposa l.• An estimated annual savings of $1,881,140 and an estimated capital cost avoidance of $7,443,511
c ould be rea lized .• The p rop osed op tion wo uld result in a p rojec ted percent of p op ula tion for the 2014-15 schoo l year of:
o 88% - Ga rc ia MSo 121% - Webb MSo 140% - Dob ie MS
Existing Bound aries Proposed Bound a ries
Advantages
• Annual cost savings and ca pital avoida nce• Because Pearce 6th grade students are
currently attending home elementaryschool, this option would only affect thecurrent 7th grade class attending Pearce,app roxima tely 159 students
Disadvantages
• Long er travel d ista nc es for som e stud ent s• Pea rc e M S c om munity investme nt in an
Ea rly College Prep School.
8/8/2019 Austin ISD Community Meeting # 3 Options Handout
FACILITY MASTER PLAN O PTIONS – COMMUNITY MEETINGS JANUARY 12 & 13, 2011
17
OPTION 3.4:
Rea ssign a po rtion of the Ma plew ood ES student pop ulat ion into Ca mp bell ES to ba lanc e utiliza tion.
Background
• Current b ound a ries result in a project ed pe rc ent of p op ula tion for the 2014-15 sc hoo l year of:o 72% - Ca mpbell ESo 130% - Ma p lewoo d ES
Impact
• An estimat ed 89 stude nts wo uld be affec ted by this prop osal.• The p rop osed op tion wo uld result in a p rojec ted pe rc ent o f po pulation for the 2014-15 sc hool yea r of:
o 90% - Ca mpbell ESo 103% - Ma p lewoo d ES
Existing Bound aries Proposed Bound a ries
Advantages
• Balances percent of capacity at bothschools
Disadvantages
8/8/2019 Austin ISD Community Meeting # 3 Options Handout
FACILITY MASTER PLAN O PTIONS – COMMUNITY MEETINGS JANUARY 12 & 13, 2011
19
OPTION 16.2:
Rea ssign a portion of the Akins HS stud ent pop ulation into Croc kett HS to ba lanc e ut ilizat ion.
Background
• Current b ound a ries result in a project ed pe rc ent of p op ula tion for the 2014-15 sc hoo l year of:o 134% - Akins HSo 91% - Croc ket t HS
Impact
• An estimat ed 220 stude nts wo uld be affec ted by this proposa l.• The p rop osed op tion wo uld result in a p rojec ted pe rc ent o f po pulation for the 2014-15 sc hool yea r of:
o 125% - Akins HSo 102% - Croc ket t HS
Existing Bound aries Proposed Bound a ries
Advantages
• Improves percent of capacity at bothschools
• Imp roves vertica l alignment
Disadvantages
8/8/2019 Austin ISD Community Meeting # 3 Options Handout