Top Banner
Assessing Mobile Touch Interfaces for Tetraplegics Tiago Guerreiro Hugo Nicolau Joaquim Jorge Daniel Gonçalves
44

Assessing mobile touch interfaces for tetraplegics

Jul 04, 2015

Download

Documents

Hugo Nicolau
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Assessing mobile touch interfaces for tetraplegics

Assessing Mobile Touch Interfaces

for Tetraplegics

Tiago Guerreiro

Hugo NicolauJoaquim Jorge

Daniel Gonçalves

Page 2: Assessing mobile touch interfaces for tetraplegics

Mobile evolution …

Page 3: Assessing mobile touch interfaces for tetraplegics

Touch Interfaces

…Le a d in g t o

Page 4: Assessing mobile touch interfaces for tetraplegics

pleasant

Page 5: Assessing mobile touch interfaces for tetraplegics

Tactile feedback

loss of tactile feedback

Page 6: Assessing mobile touch interfaces for tetraplegics

Loss of physical stability

Page 7: Assessing mobile touch interfaces for tetraplegics

hard to select targets

Page 8: Assessing mobile touch interfaces for tetraplegics

it occurs to everyone

Page 9: Assessing mobile touch interfaces for tetraplegics

… and motor impaired

Page 10: Assessing mobile touch interfaces for tetraplegics

require less strength

Page 11: Assessing mobile touch interfaces for tetraplegics

Adapt to users’ needs

Page 12: Assessing mobile touch interfaces for tetraplegics

Wobbrock, EdgeWrite, 2003

Froehlich, Barrier Pointing, 2007

Page 13: Assessing mobile touch interfaces for tetraplegics

Provide the knowledge to build better touch interfaces

Page 14: Assessing mobile touch interfaces for tetraplegics

…We p e r f o rm e d

Page 15: Assessing mobile touch interfaces for tetraplegics

…Te s t e d s e v e r a l

InteractionTechniques

Page 16: Assessing mobile touch interfaces for tetraplegics

…S c r e e n a r e a s

… c o r n e r s

Page 17: Assessing mobile touch interfaces for tetraplegics

…S c r e e n a r e a s

… e d g e s

Page 18: Assessing mobile touch interfaces for tetraplegics

…S c r e e n a r e a s

… m id d le a r e a s

Page 19: Assessing mobile touch interfaces for tetraplegics

7 mm

… a n d t a r g e t s iz e s

12 mm 17 mm

Page 20: Assessing mobile touch interfaces for tetraplegics

Ta p p in g

Page 21: Assessing mobile touch interfaces for tetraplegics

C r o s s in g

Page 22: Assessing mobile touch interfaces for tetraplegics

E x it in g

Page 23: Assessing mobile touch interfaces for tetraplegics

G e s t u r in g

Page 24: Assessing mobile touch interfaces for tetraplegics

15 participants28-64 years old

C4-C7 lesion level6 left-handed

never used touchscreens

Page 25: Assessing mobile touch interfaces for tetraplegics

…F o c u s o n

Tapping

Page 26: Assessing mobile touch interfaces for tetraplegics

Ta r g e t S iz e

0H Targe t s iz e has no influe nce on task e rrors

Page 27: Assessing mobile touch interfaces for tetraplegics

Ta r g e t S iz e

Page 28: Assessing mobile touch interfaces for tetraplegics

Ta r g e t S iz e

0H Targe t s iz e has no influe nce on task e rrors

[F=25.110 p<.001]

Page 29: Assessing mobile touch interfaces for tetraplegics

C o r n e r Ta r g e t s

H0Task errors are not dependent on the target’s position (corner vs center)

Page 30: Assessing mobile touch interfaces for tetraplegics

7mm 12mm 17mm35%

35%

27%

27%

22%

22%

4 5 % 2 4 % 2 0 %

35%

35%

27%

27%

22%

22%

C o r n e r Ta r g e t s

Page 31: Assessing mobile touch interfaces for tetraplegics

C o r n e r Ta r g e t s

0H Task errors are not dependent on the target’s position (corner vs center)

[p>.05]

Page 32: Assessing mobile touch interfaces for tetraplegics

E d g e Ta r g e t s

0H Task e rrors are not de pe nde nt on the targe t’s pos ition (e dge v s ce nte r)

Page 33: Assessing mobile touch interfaces for tetraplegics

7mm 12mm 17mm

4 5 % 2 3 % 2 2 %

45%

4 0 % 45%

23%

2 6 % 23%

22%

19 % 22%

4 5 % 2 3 % 2 2 %

E d g e Ta r g e t s

Page 34: Assessing mobile touch interfaces for tetraplegics

E d g e Ta r g e t s

0H Task e rrors are not de pe nde nt on the targe t’s pos ition (e dge v s ce nte r)

[p>.05]

Page 35: Assessing mobile touch interfaces for tetraplegics

7mm 12mm 17mm

E d g e Ta r g e t s

5 3 % 2 7 % 2 0 %

6 1% 3 3 %

28%

11% 2 4 %

22%

11% 11%

22%

3 7 % 3 0 % 13 %

4 4 % 3 3 % 3 1%

37%

4 4 % 4 1%

4 1% 2 7 % 7

%52%

2 3 % 1 8%

5 3 % 11% 7 %

Left

Right

Page 36: Assessing mobile touch interfaces for tetraplegics

Ve r t ic a l A r e a s

0H Task e rrors are not de pe nde nt on the targe t’s pos ition (top v s bottom v s ce nte r)

Page 37: Assessing mobile touch interfaces for tetraplegics

45% 28% 27%

39% 28% 24%

43% 19% 12%

7mm 12mm 17mm

Ve r t ic a l A r e a s

Page 38: Assessing mobile touch interfaces for tetraplegics

Ve r t ic a l A r e a s

0H Task e rrors are not de pe nde nt on the targe t’s pos ition (top v s bottom v s ce nte r)

Largest [p<.05]Medium [p<.01]

Page 39: Assessing mobile touch interfaces for tetraplegics

. . .S u g g e s t io n s f o r

Tapping

Page 40: Assessing mobile touch interfaces for tetraplegics

…R e g a r d in g t a r g e t s iz e

12 mm

Page 41: Assessing mobile touch interfaces for tetraplegics

, …H o w e v e r e r r o r r a t e s a r e s t i l l

High

Page 42: Assessing mobile touch interfaces for tetraplegics

…R e g a r d in g t a r g e t p o s it io n

Support

Page 43: Assessing mobile touch interfaces for tetraplegics

Remaining interaction techniques

Differences between able-bodied and tetraplegics

F u t u r e Wo r k

Page 44: Assessing mobile touch interfaces for tetraplegics

The EndHugo [email protected]