AS AVALIAÇÕES GLOBAL E REGIONAL DO IPBES E O MAES I Isabel Sousa Pinto Carlos Guerra Ponto Focal IPBES Portugal Instituto de Ciencias Agrárias e CLA IPBES Regional Assessment ECA Ambientais Mediterranicas Universidade do Porto Universidade de Évora MAES Mapping and Assessment of Ecosystems and their Services
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
AS AVALIAÇÕES GLOBAL E
REGIONAL DO IPBES E O MAES
I
Isabel Sousa Pinto Carlos Guerra Ponto Focal IPBES Portugal Instituto de Ciencias Agrárias e
Prioritize key capacity building needs, and provide
and call for financial and other support for priority
needs
• Knowledge
generation
Identify knowledge needs of policymakers, and
catalyse efforts to generate new knowledge
including:
• Be scientifically independent and ensure credibility, relevance and
legitimacy;
• Provide policy-relevant information, but not policy-prescriptive
advice;
• Recognize and respect the contribution of indigenous and local
knowledge;
• Ensure the full use of national, subregional and regional
assessments and knowledge by a bottom-up approach
• Collaborate with existing initiatives, including multilateral
environment agreements, United Nations bodies and networks of
scientists and knowledge holders
IPBES’ Operating Principles
Secretariat (including Technical Support Units)
Multidisciplinary Expert Panel (MEP)
Responsible for carrying out the scientific and
technical functions of the work programme,
Bureau
Responsible for overseeing the
administrative functions of IPBES
Plenary: Decision-making body
Responsible for the overall work programme, working through Bureau and MEP
Task forces on capacity-building,
knowledge and data, and indigenous
and local knowledge
Expert groups for assessments,
policy support tools and other studies
Key structures of IPBES
Stakeholder involvement
Plataforma Portuguesa IPBES
WWW.ipbes.pt
IPBES Conceptual Framework
IPBES 1st work programme
Objective 1: Strengthen the capacity and knowledge foundations of
the science-policy interface to implement key IPBES functions
Objective 2: Strengthen the
science-policy interface on
biodiversity and ecosystem
services at and across the
sub-regional, regional and
global levels
Objective 3: Strengthen
the knowledge-policy
interface with regard to
thematic and
methodological issues
Objective 4: Communicate and evaluate
IPBES activities, deliverables and findings
The work programmme is entirely based on requests from governments and stakeholders
Objective 4 Communicate and evaluate Platform activities, deliverables and findings:
a) Catalogue of relevant assessments
b) Development of an information and data management plan
c) Catalogue of policy support tools and methodologies
d) Set of communication, outreach and engagement strategies, products and processes
e) Reviews of the effectiveness of guidance, procedures, methods and approaches to inform future development of the Platform
Objective 1 Strengthen the capacity and knowledge foundations of the science-policy interface to implement key functions of the Platform: a) Priority capacity-building-needs to implement the Platform work programme are matched with resources through catalysing financial and in-kind
support b) Capacities needed to implement the Platform work programme are developed with support provided by network on capacity-building c) Procedures and approaches for working with indigenous and local knowledge systems d) Priority knowledge and data needs for policy-making are addressed through catalysing efforts to generate new knowledge and networking
Objective 2 Strengthen the SPI across the subregional, regional and global levels: a) Guide on production and integration of
assessments from and across all scales
b) Regional/Subregional assessments on biodiversity and ecosystem services
c) Global assessment on biodiversity and ecosystem services
Objective 3 Strengthen the SPI regarding thematic and methodological issues: a) Thematic assessment on pollination and food production
b) Thematic assessments on land degradation and restoration; on invasive alien species; and on sustainable use.
c) Policy support tools and methodologies for scenarios analysis and modelling of biodiversity and ecosystem services based on an assessment and a guide
d) Policy support tools and methodologies regarding value, valuation and accounting of biodiversity and ecosystem services based on an assessment and a guide
Diverse conceptualization of values of biodiversity and ecosystem services
Progress since 2014
Portuguese Participation • Vânia Proença – IST, ULisboa - Policy support tools and methodologies for
scenario analysis and modelling • Isabel Sousa Pinto –Ciimar, FC UPorto - Scoping Regional and Sub-
regional Assessments • Ana Mendes –UÉvora - Scoping of Land Degradation and Restoration • • Isabel Sousa Pinto Ciimar, FCUP– Coordinating Lead Author – ECA • Cristina Marta-Pedroso IST, UL - Leading Author - ECA – Regional and Sub
Regional Assessment of Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services from Europe and Central Asia
• Vânia Proença IST, ULisboa- Leading Author ECA • Carlos Guerra, UÉvora – Young Scholar – ECA
• Ana Mendes – Leading Author - Land Degradation and Restoration • Francisco Moreira ISA, ULisboa - Leading Author - Land Degradation and
Restoration • Isabel Sousa Pinto Ciimar, FCUP - Scoping for the Global Assessment
Regional Assessments
• Scoping – August 2014 • Outcomes of scoping process • 5 Regions were identified:
• Africa,
• The Americas,
• Asia-Pacific,
• Europe and Central Asia,
• Open Oceans
Not approved by IPBES 3
Approved by IPBES 3
Chapter 1: Setting the scene
Chapter 2: Nature’s benefits to people and quality of life
Chapter 3: Status, trends and future dynamics of biodiversity and ecosystems underpinning nature’s benefits to people
Chapter 4: Direct and indirect drivers of change in the context of different perspectives on quality of life
Chapter 5: Integrated and cross-scale analysis of interactions of the natural world and human society
Chapter 6: Options for governance, institutional arrangements and private and public decision making across scales and sectors
Regional Assessment of Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services
Status and trend – drivers – scenarios – (policy) options
Regional and Sub-Regional Assessment of Biodiversity
and Ecosystem Services for Europe and Central Asia
(ECA)
Western Europe
Central Europe
Eastern Europe
Central Asia
Chapter 1: Setting the scene
Regional Assessment Chapters
Chapter 2: Nature’s benefits to people and quality of life
Regional Assessment Chapters
Chapter 3: Status, trends and future dynamics of biodiversity and ecosystems underpinning nature’s benefits to people
Regional Assessment Chapters
Chapter 4: Direct and indirect drivers of change in the context of different perspectives on quality of life
Regional Assessment Chapters
Chapter 5: Integrated and cross-scale analysis of interactions of the natural world and human society
Regional Assessment Chapters
Chapter 6: Options for governance, institutional arrangements and private and public decision making across scales and sectors
• I. Understanding global opportunities for sustainable development in human-nature interactions
• II. Status and trends in human-nature interactions at global level
• III. Understanding the progress towards meeting major international goals
• IV. Plausible futures of human-nature interactions
• V. Scenarios and pathways towards sustainable futures
• VI. Opportunities for decision-makers
MAES Mapping and Assessment of Ecosystems
and their Services
Currently done
Currently in progress
EU Missing
ECA Missing
Ecosystem Service Assessments in
ECA
MAES Mapping and Assessment of Ecosystems
and their Services
Currently done
Currently in progress
EU Missing
Ecosystem Service Assessments in Europe
MAES Mapping and Assessment of Ecosystems
and their Services
Portuguese terrestrial ecosystems
Portuguese marine ecosystems
MAES Mapping and Assessment of Ecosystems
and their Services
There is a perception within IPBES that the ES framework is limited. In IPBES there is the intention to assess the links between biodiversity, ecosystem services and its benefits to people. Relevant valuation perspectives were raised.
Nature Biodiversity
Assessments
Ecosystem Service
Assessments
Benefits from Nature
IPBES
pre MEA MEA, TEEB, MAES, …
MAES Mapping and Assessment of Ecosystems
and their Services
Possible links?
Different conceptual frameworks Need to establish eventual links
MAES Mapping and Assessment of Ecosystems
and their Services
National Reports
European Reports
The work done within MAES at different levels (National and European) can be useful for the IPBES Europe and Central Asia Assessment as it actively contribute to the pool of data and knowledge available about ecosystems and their services (state and trends).