Top Banner
Singapore Management University Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University Research Collection Lee Kong Chian School Of Business Lee Kong Chian School of Business 4-2011 Are You a Value Creation Negotiator? Michael BENOLIEL Singapore Management University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: hps://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research Part of the Human Resources Management Commons , and the Organizational Behavior and eory Commons is News Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Lee Kong Chian School of Business at Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Research Collection Lee Kong Chian School Of Business by an authorized administrator of Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University. For more information, please email [email protected]. Citation BENOLIEL, Michael. Are You a Value Creation Negotiator?. (2011). Business Times. 44. Research Collection Lee Kong Chian School Of Business. Available at: hps://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/3306 brought to you by CORE View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk provided by Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
2

Are You a Value Creation Negotiator?

Jun 05, 2022

Download

Documents

dariahiddleston
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Are You a Value Creation Negotiator?

Singapore Management UniversityInstitutional Knowledge at Singapore Management UniversityResearch Collection Lee Kong Chian School OfBusiness Lee Kong Chian School of Business

4-2011

Are You a Value Creation Negotiator?Michael BENOLIELSingapore Management University, [email protected]

Follow this and additional works at: https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research

Part of the Human Resources Management Commons, and the Organizational Behavior andTheory Commons

This News Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Lee Kong Chian School of Business at Institutional Knowledge at SingaporeManagement University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Research Collection Lee Kong Chian School Of Business by an authorized administratorof Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University. For more information, please email [email protected].

CitationBENOLIEL, Michael. Are You a Value Creation Negotiator?. (2011). Business Times. 44. Research Collection Lee Kong Chian SchoolOf Business.Available at: https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/3306

brought to you by COREView metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk

provided by Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University

Page 2: Are You a Value Creation Negotiator?

LV SMU Publication: The Business Times, p 44 Date: 13 April 201 1 Headline: M&As: Are you a value-creation negotiator?

BLOOMBERG

Bad deal: The dismal record of M&As shows acquirers have wiped more value off their market cap through failures in due diligence during the negotiation process than through lapses in any other part of the deal. In the case of the merger between AOL and Time Warner, some US$200 billion in shareholder value had vanished

M&As: Are you a value- ? creation negotiator.

Effective negotiation is about skilfully creating sustainable and mutual value for all parties By MICHAEL BENOLIEL

I T was in 1716 that French diplo- mat Francois de Callieres wrote the world's first book on negotia- tion, on the manners of negotiating with princes. It was in this book that he famously observed that the fate of the greatest states depends almost entirely on the good or bad

conduct of their negotiators. It appears that his comments have

stood the test of time, for even ib today's increasingly competitive global economy, the fate of an organisation depends largely on the skill and conduct of its negotiators.

To appreciate the critical role of skilled negotiators, one has to look no further than at the dismal record of mergers and acquisitions (M&As), especially recent high-profile deals. Acquifers have wiped more value off their market capitalisation through failures in due diligence during the negotiation process than through laps- es in any other part of the deal.

For example, despite the grand promis- es of the "transformative" mega merger be- tween AOL (previously known as America Online) and Time Warner, some US3200 billion in shareholder value had vanished. Similarly, the USS5.8 billion acquisition of Rubbermaid by NeweJ was described by Businessweek as the "merger from hell" as it effectively robbed Newell's sharehold- ers of 50 per cent of their investment, and Rubbermaid shareholders of a further 35 per cent.

After the acquisition, Newell's former chief executive officer (CEO) admitted that Newell had overpaid. In another transac- tion, Quaker Oats acquired Snapple for US$1.7 billion, which some industry ana- lysts said was as much as US$1 billion too

much. Twenty-eight months later, Quaker Oats sold Snapple to Triarc Companies for less than 20 per cent of what it had paid.

Are these examples outliers? Perhaps not. A study by KPMG International in 1999 looked at shareholder returns on cor- porate mergers relative to the perform- ance of other companies in the same indus- try one year after the announcement of the merger.

Using this commonly cited standard of success, it found that 83 per cent of merg- ers failed to unlock value.

While tbere are many reasons why M W fail to unlock value, an analysis of these factors reveals that the most major mistakes are related to the negotiators' be- haviour. These include: hubris: over- optimism; information availability bias; confirmatory bias; escalation of commit- ment; and "deal fever" - individuals pro- duce many deals because they are evaluat- ed on the basis of the number of the deals done and not on the basis of their intrinsic value.

Pressure tactic In a recent survey. 250 global executives involved in M&As admitted that there were breakdowns in their due-diligence pro- cesses, and half of these individuals report- ed that this resulted in important issues not being detected.

Among the most common mistakes . they reported was a failure to understand that the targeted companies had "per- fumed" themselves for sale just before they were acquired. For example, in the acquisi- tion of Rubbermaid by Newell, Rubber- maid used a classic time pressure tactic and gave Newell only three weeks to per-. form its.due diligence. Instead of negotiat-

ing a more reasonable time period. Newell accepted the short deadline and expedited the process.

It was only much later that Newell dis- covered that Rubbermaid "perfumed" its balance sheet and intlated its worth before closing the deal by stuffing the distribution channels with heavy promotions and deep discpunts.

But not all companies perform as dra- matically poorly as AOL and Time Warner, Newell and Rubbermaid, or Quaker Oats and Snapple. What distinguishes the more successful f m s from the less successful ones is that they have, what I call, a clear and disciplined negotiation thesis.

Need for precision While the concept of having a disciplined negotiation thesis is straightforward, ap- parently, in the world of deal-making, it is not. "You'd be surprised how many negoti- ators don't know what they want with the kind of precision that a negotiation de- mands," former US trade representative Charlene Barshefsky told this writer. She added: "Consequently, they end up with either no deals or bad deals." This was the case of Robert Campeau, a

Canadian businessman who sought to ac- quire Federated Department Stores. Mter initiating a hostile takeover, the bidding war against Macy's, another interested ac- quirer. escalated.

In his last "push" to win the bidding war. Mr Campeau topped Macy's already high offer by roughly US$500 million. Two years after the takeover, Mr Campeau declared bankruptcy. He could not walk away.

Succkssful deal makers, in contrast, know precisely what their objectives are - the 'must-have" (deal breakers) and the

" l i e to have", and are d~sciplined in their quest to create sustainpble value.

They, like former Kellogg CEO Carlos Gutierrez, condition themselves to walk away from the table if and when it is appar- ent that their objectives are not going to be met. When Mr Gutiemez negotiated the ac- quisition of Keebler, a deal which he said he "desperately wanted", he said: 'I condi- tioned myselfmentalty that I might not get it and that helped me to stand firm on my price."

Deal-making is not about getting the deals and signing the contracts. Effective negotiation ultimately is about skilfully cre- ating sustainable and mutual value for all the negotiating parties. Among the serially successful deal makers are Bain & Compa- ny, a top-tier private equity firm; Cinven, a leading European private equity firm; and Nestle, a SwisA conglomerate and textbook acquirer.

These companies know how to avoid the traps of deal-making, especially due diligence, and how to create value through superior pegotiation capabilities.

In this article, I stressed the critical, and yet unrecognised, value of negotiation as a core organisational capability and core ~rofessional competency. In part two of this article, I will highlight why many negotiators fail in the most cribcal task of negotiation -performing effective due dili- gence.

The writer is an associate professor of organisational behauiour and human

resources practice at Singapore Management University and teaches

negotiation. He is the author, w-author and editor of several negotiation books,

including his newly published 'Negotiation Excellence - Successful Deal

Making'

Source: The Business Times O Singapore Press Holdings Limited. Permission required for reproduction.