APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT
APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT
AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT
FortheProposed1020S.FigueroaStreetProject
1020S.FigueroaStreetLosAngeles,CA
Preparedfor:
HAZENS GROUP – JIA YUAN USA CO., INC. 801SouthFigueroaStreet,Suite1800
LosAngeles,CA90017
Preparedby:
ESAPCR80SLakeAvenue,Suite570
Pasadena,CA91101TEL626.204.6170FAX626.204.6171
June2016
1020S.FigueroaStreetProject AirQualityTechnicalReportESAPCR i
Table of Contents
Page
ACRONYMSANDABBREVIATIONS....................................................................................................................................1
EXECUTIVESUMMARY.....................................................................................................................................................ES‐1
1.0INTRODUCTION...............................................................................................................................................................1 1.1 ExistingConditions..............................................................................................................................................................1 1.2 ProjectDescription...............................................................................................................................................................1
1.2.1HotelTower.......................................................................................................................................................................1 1.2.2ResidentialUses...............................................................................................................................................................2 1.2.3Podium(CommercialUsesandParking)..............................................................................................................2 1.2.4Construction......................................................................................................................................................................2 1.2.5Operation............................................................................................................................................................................2
1.3 ExistingSiteEmissions.......................................................................................................................................................5 1.4 ExistingAirQualityConditions.......................................................................................................................................6
1.4.1RegionalAirQuality.......................................................................................................................................................6 1.4.2LocalAirQuality..............................................................................................................................................................8
2.0REGULATORYSETTINGANDSIGNIFICANCETHRESHOLDS..........................................................................15 2.1 RegulatorySetting.............................................................................................................................................................15
2.1.1Federal..............................................................................................................................................................................15 2.1.2State...................................................................................................................................................................................19 2.1.3Regional............................................................................................................................................................................20 2.1.4Local...................................................................................................................................................................................24
2.2 SignificanceThresholds..................................................................................................................................................25 2.2.1ConstructionEmissions.............................................................................................................................................26 2.2.2OperationalEmissions...............................................................................................................................................27 2.2.3ToxicAirContaminants.............................................................................................................................................28 2.2.4ConsistencywithAirQualityPlansandPolicies.............................................................................................29
3.0METHODOLOGY............................................................................................................................................................31 3.1 ConsistencywithAirQualityPlan...............................................................................................................................31 3.2 ConstructionEmissions...................................................................................................................................................31
3.2.1EmissionsfromConstructionEquipment..........................................................................................................32 3.2.2EmissionsfromOn‐RoadTrips..............................................................................................................................33 3.2.3EmissionsfromArchitecturalCoating................................................................................................................34 3.2.4EmissionsfromPaving..............................................................................................................................................34
3.3 OperationalEmissions.....................................................................................................................................................35 3.3.1AreaSources(ConsumerProductsandCoatings)..........................................................................................36 3.3.2BuildingEnergyUsage...............................................................................................................................................37 3.3.3MobileSourceEmissions..........................................................................................................................................37 3.3.4StationarySourceEmissions...................................................................................................................................39
3.4 ToxicAirContaminantImpacts(ConstructionandOperations)...................................................................40
Table of Contents (Continued)
Page
1020S.FigueroaStreetProject AirQualityTechnicalReportESAPCR ii
3.5 LandUseCharacteristicsandProjectDesignFeatures......................................................................................40 3.5.1LandUseCharacteristics...........................................................................................................................................40 3.5.2ProjectDesignFeatures.............................................................................................................................................44
4.0COMPLIANCEWITHAMBIENTAIRSTANDARDS...............................................................................................47 4.1 RegionalSignificanceThresholds...............................................................................................................................47
4.1.1ConstructionEmissions.............................................................................................................................................47 4.1.2OperationalEmissions...............................................................................................................................................48
4.2 LocalizedSignificanceThresholds..............................................................................................................................50 4.2.1ConstructionEmissions.............................................................................................................................................50 4.2.2OperationalEmissions...............................................................................................................................................51
4.3 LocalizedCarbonMonoxideImpacts.........................................................................................................................51 4.4 ToxicAirContaminants‐Construction....................................................................................................................53 4.5 ToxicAirContaminants‐Operation..........................................................................................................................60
5.0CUMULATIVEANALYSIS.............................................................................................................................................62 5.1 ConstructionImpacts.......................................................................................................................................................62 5.2 OperationalImpacts.........................................................................................................................................................62
6.0SUMMARYOFRESULTS..............................................................................................................................................65 6.1 Construction.........................................................................................................................................................................65 6.2 Operation...............................................................................................................................................................................65
APPENDICES
APPENDIXA:AIRQUALITYWORKSHEETSANDOUTPUTFILES
List of Figures
Figure Page
1 VicinityLocationMap.........................................................................................................................................................3 2 AerialPhotographofProjectSiteandVicinity.........................................................................................................4 3 SensitiveReceptorLocationsNearesttotheProjectSite.................................................................................12 4 ConstructionHealthRiskAssessmentSource‐ReceptorDiagram................................................................57
– PRELIMINARY WORKING DRAFT –
1020S.FigueroaStreetProject AirQualityTechnicalReportESAPCR iii
List of Tables
Table Page
1 EstimatedExistingSiteEmissions(poundsperday)a.........................................................................................5 2 PollutantStandardsandAmbientAirQualityDatafromRepresentativeMonitoringStations..........9 3 AmbientAirQualityStandards....................................................................................................................................16 4 SouthCoastAirBasinAttainmentStatus(LosAngelesCounty)...................................................................18 5 Phase1–MaximumUnmitigatedRegionalConstructionEmissions(poundsperday)a...................47 6 Phase2–MaximumUnmitigatedRegionalConstructionEmissions(poundsperday)a...................48 7 InterimYear–MaximumUnmitigatedRegionalOperationalEmissions(poundsperday)a...........49 8 FullBuildoutYear–MaximumUnmitigatedRegionalOperationalEmissions(poundsper
day)a.......................................................................................................................................................................................49 9 Phase1–MaximumUnmitigatedLocalizedConstructionEmissions(poundsperday)a.................50 10 Phase2–MaximumUnmitigatedLocalizedConstructionEmissions(poundsperday)a.................51 11 InterimYear–MaximumUnmitigatedLocalizedOperationalEmissions(poundsperday)a.........52 12 FullBuildoutYear–MaximumUnmitigatedLocalizedOperationalEmissions(poundsper
day)a.......................................................................................................................................................................................52 13 OEHHARecommendedResidentialDailyBreathingRatesforPointEstimateDose
Calculations(L/kgbodyweight)..............................................................................................................................55 14 OEHHARecommendationsforFractionofTimeatHome(FAH)forEvaluatingResidential
CancerRisk..........................................................................................................................................................................56 15 MaximumCarcinogenicRiskforOff‐SiteSensitiveReceptorsfromConstruction................................59 16 MaximumNon‐CancerChronicImpactsforOff‐SiteSensitiveReceptors.................................................59
1020S.FigueroaStreetProject AirQualityTechnicalReportESAPCR 1
ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS
Acronym Description
ASF agesensitivityfactor
ASHRAE AmericanSocietyofHeating,Refrigerating,andAir‐ConditioningEngineers
AQMP AirQualityManagementPlan
ATCM AirToxicsControlMeasure
BACT BestAvailableControlTechnology
Basin SouthCoastAirBasin
CAA CleanAirAct
CalEEMod CaliforniaEmissionsEstimatorModel
CARB CaliforniaAirResourcesBoard
CEC CaliforniaEnergyCommission
CEUS CommercialEnd‐UseSurvey
CEQA CaliforniaEnvironmentalQualityAct
City CityofLosAngeles
CO carbonmonoxide
CPF CancerPotencyFactor
DPF dieselparticulatefilter
DPM dieselexhaustparticulatematter
EF emissionfactor
EMFAC on‐roadvehicleemissionsfactormodel
FAH fractionoftimeathome
GVWR grossvehicleweightrating
HARP HotspotsAnalysisandReportingProgram
hp horsepower
HRA healthriskassessment
HVAC heating,ventilation,andairconditioning
LAMC LosAngelesMunicipalCode
LOS LevelofService
LST localizedsignificancethreshold
LUT LandUseTransportation
MATESIV MultipleAirToxicsExposureStudy,May2015
MERV MinimumEfficiencyReportingValue
MPO MetropolitanPlanningOrganization
NAAQS NationalAmbientAirQualityStandards
NO nitricoxide
NO2 nitrogendioxide
NOX nitrogenoxides
OEHHA OfficeofEnvironmentalHealthandHazardAssessment
Pb lead
PM2.5 fineparticulates
Acronyms and abbreviations June 2016
1020S.FigueroaStreetProject AirQualityTechnicalReportESAPCR 2
Acronym Description
PM10 particulatematter
ppm partspermillion
RTIP RegionalTransportationImprovementProgram
RTP/SCS RegionalTransportationPlan/SustainableCommunitiesStrategy
SCAG SouthernCaliforniaAssociationofGovernments
SCAQMD SouthCoastAirQualityManagementDistrictSIP StateImplementationPlan
SO2 sulfurdioxide
TAC toxicaircontaminant
µg/m3 microgramspercubicmeter
µm micrometers
URF UnitRiskFactor
USEPA UnitedStatesEnvironmentalProtectionAgency
VDECS VerifiedDieselEmissionControlStrategies
VMT vehiclemilestraveled
VOC volatileorganiccompounds
1020S.FigueroaStreetProject AirQualityTechnicalReportESAPCR ES‐1
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
HazensGroup–JiaYuanUSACo.,Inc.,theApplicant,proposestodevelopthe1020S.FigueroaStreetProject(theProject)onanapproximately2.7acre(116,660squarefeet)‘L’‐shapedsite(ProjectSite)boundedbyS.FigueroaStreettothewest,S.FlowerStreettotheeast,OlympicBoulevardtothenorth,and11thStreettothesouth.InaccordancewiththerequirementsundertheCaliforniaEnvironmentalQualityAct(CEQA),thisTechnical Report provides an estimate of air quality emissions for the Project and predicts the potentialimpacts from construction and operational activities. The report includes the categories and types ofemission sources resulting from the Project, the calculation procedures used in the analysis, and anyassumptionsorlimitations.
TheProjectSiteislocatedinthesouthwestportionoftheDowntowncommunityoftheCityofLosAngeles(City)whichfallswithintheSouthParkdistrictoftheCentralCityCommunityPlanArea.TheProjectwouldconsistofmixed‐useresidential,hotelandcommercialuses.Overall,theProjectwouldatotalofupto300hotelrooms,650residentialcondominiumunits,anduptoapproximately80,000sfofretail,restaurant,andothercommercialuses,foratotalofapproximately1,130,000squarefeetoffloorarea.TheProjectincludesdemolition of all existing on‐site buildings and features, excavation for subterranean parking, andconstructionofbuildings.
ThisreportsummarizesthepotentialfortheProjecttoconflictwithanapplicableairqualityplan,toviolateanairqualitystandardorthreshold,toresultinacumulativelynetincreaseofcriteriapollutantemissions,toexposesensitivereceptorstosubstantialpollutantconcentrations,ortocreateobjectionableodorsaffectingasubstantialnumberofpeople.Thefindingsoftheanalysesareasfollows:
The incremental increase in emissions from construction and operation of the Project would notexceedtheregionaldailyemissionthresholdssetforthbytheSouthCoastAirQualityManagementDistrict(SCAQMD).Thus,theProjectwouldnotresultinaregionalviolationofapplicableairqualitystandardsorjeopardizethetimelyattainmentofsuchstandardsintheSouthCoastAirBasin.
Theincrementalincreaseinon‐siteemissionsfromconstructionandoperationoftheProjectwouldnotexceedthe localizedsignificancethresholdsset forthbytheSCAQMD. Thus, theProjectwouldnotresult ina localizedviolationofapplicableairqualitystandardsorexposeoff‐sitereceptors tosubstantiallevelsofregulatedaircontaminants.
Emissions from the increase in trafficdue tooperationof theProjectwouldnothavea significantimpact upon 1‐hour or 8‐hour local carbon monoxide (CO) concentrations due to mobile sourceemissions.
Project operations would not expose off‐ or on‐site receptors to significant levels of toxic aircontaminants.Construction‐phasedieselparticulateemissionswouldbereducedbyimplementationofProjectDesignFeature (PDF)‐AQ‐1andwouldresult in less thansignificantconstructionhealthriskimpacts.
Projectconstructionandoperationswouldnotresultinsignificantlevelsofodors.
The Projectwould be consistentwith air quality policies set forth by the City of Los Angeles, theSCAQMD,andtheSouthernCaliforniaAssociationofGovernments(SCAG).
TheProjectwouldnotresultinasignificantcumulativeairqualityimpact.
1020S.FigueroaStreetProject AirQualityTechnicalReportESAPCR 1
1.0 INTRODUCTION
1.1 EXISTING CONDITIONS
Theproposed1020S.FigueroaStreetProjectislocatedonanapproximately2.7acre(116,660squarefeet)‘L’‐shapedsite(ProjectSite)boundedbyS.FigueroaStreettothewest,S.FlowerStreettotheeast,OlympicBoulevardtothenorth,and11thStreettothesouth.TheProjectSiteislocatedinthesouthwestportionoftheDowntowncommunityoftheCityofLosAngeles(City)whichfallswithintheSouthParkdistrictoftheCentralCityCommunityPlanArea.TheProjectSiteshowninFigure1,VicinityLocationMap.TheProjectSiteisinahighlyurbanizedandactiveareaadjacenttoLALIVE,StaplesCenterArena,MicrosoftTheater,andincloseproximitytotheLosAngelesConventionCenter.
TheProjectSiteiswellservedbyanetworkofregionaltransportationfacilities.TheProjectSiteislocatedapproximately 0.2 miles north of the Pico Station operated by the Los Angeles County MetropolitanTransportationAuthority(Metro). ThePicoStationservestheBlueLineandtheExpoLine.TheBlueLineprovidesrailservicebetweentheCityofLongBeachandDowntownLosAngeleswithconnectingservicetotheMetroGreenLine(servingNorwalk,RedondoBeach,andLAXviashuttle).RegionalaccesstotheProjectSite isprovidedby thePasadena/HarborFreeway (I‐110/SR110), locatedapproximately0.3miles to thewest; the SantaMonica Freeway (I‐10) located approximately 0.5miles to the south; and, theHollywoodFreeway(US‐101),locatedapproximately1.5milestothenorth.Thesethreefreewaysalsoprovideaccesstothe Golden State/Santa Ana Freeway (I‐5) to the north, and the San Bernardino Freeway (I‐10) and thePomonaFreeway(SR‐60)totheeastandsoutheast,respectively.
The Project Site is currently developed with the Luxe City Center Hotel (Luxe Hotel) on the northwestportionoftheProjectSitewiththeremainderoftheProjectSitedevelopedwithsurfaceparking.TheLuxeHotelisa112,748squarefoot,ninestory,100foottallbuildingthatincludes178guestrooms,amainlobby,meetingrooms,an interior restaurant,an indoor/outdoorbarand loungearea (NixonBarandLounge), afitnesscenter,andaone‐levelparkingdeckwithparkingbelowandabovethedeck,allofwhichwouldbedemolishedandremovedtosupportdevelopmentoftheProject.Figure2,AerialPhotographofProjectSiteandVicinity,showstheProjectSiteandsurroundinglanduses.
1.2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION
TheProjectwouldconsistofmixed‐useresidential,hotelandcommercialuseswithtworesidentialtowersandonehoteltower.PhaseIoftheProjectwouldincludeconstructionofthe34storyHotelTower,locatedonthecornerof11thStreetandS.FigueroaStreetwouldincludeupto300hotelrooms,banquet,conferencespaceandvariousamenities.PhaseIwouldalsoincludeconstructionoftheResidentialTower1thatwouldincludeup to290residentialunitsandwouldbe locatedat thecornerof11thStreetandS.FlowerStreet.DuringPhase2,theResidentialTower2wouldbeconstructedthatwouldincludeupto360residentialunitsandwouldbelocatedatthecornerofS.FigueroaStreetandOlympicBoulevard.
1.2.1 Hotel Tower
ConstructedduringPhaseIoftheProject,onthesouthwestportionoftheProjectSitedirectlyacrossfromStaplesCenter,a34storyHotelTowerisproposedthatwouldhaveamaximumheightof430feet.Itwould
1.0 Introduction June 2016
1020S.FigueroaStreetProject AirQualityTechnicalReportESAPCR 2
be designed as a high‐quality hotelwith up to 300 hotel rooms, alongwith banquet facilities, conferencespaceandamenities,foratotalof280,000sfofhoteluse.Additionalamenitieswouldalsobelocatedatthetop/penthouseleveloftheHotelTower(HotelRooftopAmenityDeck),includingaswimmingpool,bar,spatub,loungingarea,andfunctionspace.
1.2.2 Residential Uses
Developed as part of Phase 1 of the Project, Residential Tower 1would be constructed at the southeastcorneroftheProjectSiteattheintersectionof11thStreetandFlowerStreet.TheResidentialTower1wouldbe 32 stories above grade with a maximum height of 490 feet and would include up to 290 residentialcondominium units consisting of lofts, studios, one‐bedroom, two‐bedroom, three‐bedroom units, andpenthouseunits. Phase2wouldincludeconstructionofResidentialTower2, locatedonthenorthwesternportion of the Project Site at the intersection of S. Figueroa Street and Olympic Boulevard. ResidentialTower2wouldbe38storiesabovegrade,withamaximumheightof540 feet.Phase2would include theconstructionof360unitsconsistingoflofts,studios,one‐bedroom,two‐bedroom,three‐bedroomunits,andpenthouseunits.Amenitiesassociatedwiththeresidentialtowerswouldincludelobbies,fitnesscenters,andrecreationalspace.
1.2.3 Podium (Commercial Uses and Parking)
ThePodiumareawouldincludeupto80,000sfofcommercialuses,including40,000sfofcommercialuseand40,000sfofrestaurantuseslocatedwithintwo‐storiesfronting11thStreet,S.FigueroaStreet,OlympicBoulevard, and S. Flower Street. The Podiumwould be 75 feet in height and levels three and four of thePodiumwouldincluderesidentialunitsandhotelamenities.
1.2.4 Construction
The Project will be constructed in two phases. Construction of Phase 1 of the Project is expected tocommenceinthethirdquarterof2017andwouldbecompletedinthesecondquarterof2020.ConstructionofPhase2oftheProjectwouldbeginimmediatelyafterPhase1andwouldbecompletedinthefirstquarterof2023.Totalcutwouldbeapproximately202,000cubicyardsofsoil1andnofillwouldberequiredontheSite.Adetaileddiscussionof themethodologyused to estimate the construction emissions is provided inSection3.0,Methodology,below.
1.2.5 Operation
TheProjectwould increasethebuilding floorareaontheSiteandassociatedvehicle tripsascomparedtoexistingconditions. Therefore, the incremental increase inairemissions isestimated fortheProject. TheProjectwouldbebuilttomeetorexceedcurrentbuildingenergyefficiencystandards,whichwouldminimizeoperationalemissions.AdetaileddiscussionofthemethodologyusedtoestimatetheoperationalemissionsisprovidedinSection3.0,Methodology,below.
1 Includedinthiscalculationisasoilexpansionfactorof1.25
Los AngelesConvention CenterWest Exhibit Hall
Los AngelesConvention
Center
Staples Center
LA LIVE
PROJECT SITE
FIGURE
Source: ESRI, 2015; PCR Services Corporation, 2015.
0 800 1,600 Feet
1020 S. Figueroa Street Project
Vicinity Location Map1
PROJECTSITE
Olympic Boulevard
W 11th Street
W 12th Street
S Fig
ueroa
Stree
t
W 9th Street
¬«110
S Flo
wer St
reet
Staples Center
MicrosoftTheater
LA LIVE
LA LIVE
The Ritz-Carlton Residences and
JW Marriott (Hotel/Residences)
Construction
Construction
Multi-Family
Multi-Family Multi-
Family
Commercial
Retail/Parking
Multi-Family
Multi-Family Multi-
Family
Multi-Family
Multi-Family
OfficePetroleumBuilding/Office
Restaurant
Mixed Use/Multi-Family
Park
Multi-FamilyCommercial Mixed Use/
Multi-family
Multi-Family
Parking
Hotel
Hotel
OfficeOffice
MedicalOffice
Multi-Family
Salvation ArmyDepartment
of Water and Power
FIGURE
Source: Google Maps, 2015 (Aerial); PCR Services Corporation, 2016.
0 300 Feet1020 S. Figueroa Street Project
Aerial Photograph of Project Site and Vicinityo 2
Project Site
June 2016 1.0 Introduction
1020S.FigueroaStreetProject AirQualityTechnicalReportESAPCR 5
1.3 EXISTING SITE EMISSIONS
TheProjectSiteislocatedwithintheDowntownareaoftheCityofLosAngeles,andiscurrentlydevelopedwith the nine‐story Luxe Hotel and surrounding surface parking lots, which would be demolished andremoved from theProject Site. Air pollutant emissions are currently associatedwith vehicle trips to andfromtheexistingProjectSite,on‐sitecombustionofnaturalgasforheatingandcooking,on‐sitecombustionemissions from landscapingequipment,andon‐site fugitiveemissions fromtheuseofconsumerproductsand architectural coatings. Emissions are estimated using the California Emissions Estimator Model(CalEEMod), which is a statewide land use emissions computer model designed to provide a uniformplatformforgovernmentagencies,landuseplanners,andenvironmentalprofessionalstoquantifypotentialcriteria pollutant and greenhouse gas emissions from a variety of land use projects. CalEEMod wasdeveloped in collaboration with the air districts of California. Regional data (e.g., emission factors, triplengths,meteorology, source inventory, etc.) have been provided by the various California air districts toaccount for local requirements and conditions. The model is considered to be an accurate andcomprehensive tool for quantifying air quality and GHG impacts from land use projects throughoutCalifornia.2BuildingelectricityandnaturalgasusageratesareadjustedtoaccountforpriorTitle24BuildingEnergyEfficiencyStandards.3Mobile sourceemissionsareestimatedbasedonCARB’supdatedversionofthe on‐road vehicle emissions factor (EMFAC) model. The most recent version is EMFAC2014, which“represents ARB's current understanding ofmotor vehicle travel activities and their associated emissionlevels.”4AdetaileddiscussionofthemethodologyusedtoestimatetheemissionsisprovidedinSection3.0,Methodology,below.
TheexistingProjectSiteemissionsaresummarizedinTable1,EstimatedExistingSiteEmissions.Asshown,the primary source of emissions is from transportation. Detailed emissions calculations are provided inAppendixA.
Table 1
Estimated Existing Site Emissions (pounds per day) a
Source VOC NOX CO SO2 PM10 PM2.5
ExistingSiteEmissions Area(ConsumerProducts,Landscaping) 5 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1Energy(NaturalGas) <1 1 1 <1 <1 <1MotorVehicles 2 1 15 <1 7 2TotalExistingSiteEmissions 7 2 16 <1 7 2
a Totals may not add up exactly due to rounding in the modeling calculations Detailed emissions calculations are provided in Appendix A.
Source: ESA PCR, 2016
2 See:http://www.caleemod.com.3 CaliforniaAirResourcesBoard,CalEEModUser'sGuide,AppendixF,Section5,July2013,http://caleemod.com/.AccessedNovember
2015.FactorsforthepriorTitle24standardareextrapolatedbasedonthetechnicalsourcedocumentation.4 California Air Resources Board, Mobile Source Emissions Inventory, http://www.arb.ca.gov/msei/categories.htm#emfac2014.
AccessedApril2016.
1.0 Introduction June 2016
1020S.FigueroaStreetProject AirQualityTechnicalReportESAPCR 6
1.4 EXISTING AIR QUALITY CONDITIONS
1.4.1 Regional Air Quality
The distinctive climate of the Basin is determined primarily by its terrain and geographical location.Regionalmeteorology is dominated by a persistent high pressure areawhich commonly resides over theeasternPacificOcean.Seasonalvariationsinthestrengthandpositionofthispressurecellcausechangesintheweatherpatternsofthearea. Warmsummers,mildwinters, infrequentrainfall,moderatedaytimeon‐shorebreezes, andmoderatehumidity characterize local climatic conditions. Thisnormallymild climaticconditionisoccasionally interruptedbyperiodsofhotweather,winterstorms,andhoteasterlySantaAnawinds.
TheBasinisanareaofhighairpollutionpotential,particularlyfromJunethroughSeptember.Thisconditionis generally attributed to the large amount of pollutant emissions, light winds and shallow verticalatmosphericmixing.Thisfrequentlyreducespollutantdispersion,thuscausingelevatedairpollutionlevels.PollutantconcentrationsintheBasinvarywithlocation,seasonandtimeofday.Ozoneconcentrations,forexample,tendtobeloweralongthecoast,higherinthenearinlandvalleysandlowerinthefarinlandareasoftheBasinandadjacentdesert.
Certainairpollutantshavebeenrecognizedtocausenotablehealthproblemsandconsequentialdamagetothe environment either directly or in reaction with other pollutants, due to their presence in elevatedconcentrationsintheatmosphere.Suchpollutantshavebeenidentifiedandregulatedaspartoftheoverallendeavortopreventfurtherdeteriorationandfacilitateimprovementinairquality.ThefollowingpollutantsareregulatedbytheUnitedStatesEnvironmentalProtectionAgency(USEPA)andaresubjecttoemissionscontrolrequirementsadoptedbyfederal,stateandlocalregulatoryagencies.Thesepollutantsarereferredtoas“criteriaairpollutants”asaresultof thespecificstandards,orcriteria,whichhavebeenadoptedforthem.Abriefdescriptionofthehealtheffectsofthesecriteriaairpollutantsareprovidedbelow.
Ozone(O3):Ozoneisasecondarypollutantformedbythechemicalreactionofvolatileorganiccompoundsand nitrogen oxides (NOX) under favorable meteorological conditions such as high temperature andstagnation episodes. Ozone concentrations are generallyhighestduring the summermonthswhendirectsunlight,lightwind,andwarmtemperatureconditionsarefavorable.Anelevatedlevelofozoneirritatesthelungs and breathing passages, causing coughing and pain in the chest and throat, thereby increasingsusceptibilitytorespiratoryinfectionsandreducingtheabilitytoexercise.Effectsaremoresevereinpeoplewithasthmaandother respiratoryailments. Long‐termexposuremay lead to scarringof lung tissueandmaylowerthelungefficiency.
VolatileOrganicCompounds(VOCs).VOCsaretypicallyformedfromcombustionoffuelsand/orreleasedthroughevaporationoforganicliquids.SomeVOCsarealsoclassifiedbytheStateastoxicaircontaminants.These are compounds comprised primarily of atoms of hydrogen and carbon. Internal combustionassociated with motor vehicle usage is the major source of hydrocarbons, as are architectural coatings.EmissionsofVOCsthemselvesarenot“criteria”pollutants;however,theycontributewithNOXtoformationofO3andareregulatedasO3precursoremissions.
NitrogenDioxide(NO2)andNitrogenOxides(NOX):NOX isa termthat refers toagroupof compoundscontainingnitrogenandoxygen.TheprimarycompoundsofairqualityconcernincludeNO2andnitricoxide
June 2016 1.0 Introduction
1020S.FigueroaStreetProject AirQualityTechnicalReportESAPCR 7
(NO),which canquicklyoxidize in the atmosphere to formNO2.Ambient air quality standardshavebeenpromulgated for NO2, which is a reddish‐brown, reactive gas. The principle form of NOX produced bycombustionisNO,butNOreactsquicklyintheatmospheretoformNO2,creatingthemixtureofNOandNO2referred to as NOX. Major sources of NOX emissions include power plants, large industrial facilities, andmotor vehicles. Emissions of NOX are a precursor to the formation of ground‐level ozone. NO2 canpotentiallyirritatethenoseandthroat,aggravatelungandheartproblems,andmayincreasesusceptibilitytorespiratoryinfections,especiallyinpeoplewithasthma.AccordingtotheCaliforniaAirResourcesBoard(CARB), “NO2 is an oxidizing gas capable of damaging cells lining the respiratory tract. Exposure toNO2alongwithothertraffic‐relatedpollutants,isassociatedwithrespiratorysymptoms,episodesofrespiratoryillnessandimpairedlungfunctioning.Studiesinanimalshavereportedbiochemical,structural,andcellularchangesinthelungwhenexposedtoNO2abovethelevelofthecurrentstateairqualitystandard. Clinicalstudiesofhumansubjects suggest thatNO2exposure to levelsnear the current standardmayworsen theeffectof allergens in allergic asthmatics, especially in children.”5NO2 also contributes to the formationofparticulatematter(PM10). Theterms“NOX”and“NO2”aresometimesusedinterchangeably. However,theterm “NOX” is primarily usedwhen discussing emissions, usually from combustion‐related activities. Theterm “NO2” is primarily used when discussing ambient air quality standards. More specifically, NO2 isregulatedasacriteriaairpollutantundertheCleanAirActandsubjecttotheambientairqualitystandards,whereasNOXandNOarenot.Incaseswherethethresholdsofsignificanceorimpactanalysesarediscussedin the context ofNOX emissions, it is basedon the conservative assumption that allNOX emissionswouldoxidizeintheatmospheretoformNO2.
CarbonMonoxide (CO): Carbon monoxide is primarily emitted from combustion processes and motorvehicles due to incomplete combustion of fuel. Elevated concentrations of CO weaken the heart'scontractionsandlowertheamountofoxygencarriedbytheblood.Itisespeciallydangerousforpeoplewithchronic heart disease. Inhalation of CO can cause nausea, dizziness, and headaches at moderateconcentrationsandcanbefatalathighconcentrations.
SulfurDioxide(SO2): MajorsourcesofSO2includepowerplants,largeindustrialfacilities,dieselvehicles,and oil‐burning residential heaters. Emissions of sulfur dioxide aggravate lung diseases, especiallybronchitis. It also constricts the breathing passages, especially in asthmatics and people involved inmoderatetoheavyexercise.Sulfurdioxidepotentiallycauseswheezing,shortnessofbreath,andcoughing.High levelsofparticulates appear toworsen theeffectof sulfurdioxide, and long‐termexposures tobothpollutantsleadstohigherratesofrespiratoryillness.
ParticulateMatter(PM10andPM2.5):Thehumanbodynaturallypreventstheentryoflargerparticlesintothebody. However,smallparticles including fugitivedust,withanaerodynamicdiameterequal toor lessthantenmicrons(PM10)andevensmallerparticleswithanaerodynamicdiameterequaltoorlessthan2.5microns(PM2.5),canenterthebodyandaretrappedinthenose,throat,andupperrespiratorytract.Thesesmallparticulatescouldpotentiallyaggravateexistingheartandlungdiseases,changethebody'sdefensesagainst inhaledmaterials, and damage lung tissue. The elderly, children, and thosewith chronic lung orheartdiseasearemostsensitivetoPM10andPM2.5.Lungimpairmentcanpersistfortwotothreeweeksafterexposuretohighlevelsofparticulatematter.Sometypesofparticulatescouldbecometoxicafterinhalationduetothepresenceofcertainchemicalsandtheirreactionwithinternalbodyfluids.Theelderly,children,
5 California Air Resources Board, “Nitrogen Dioxide – Overview,” http://www.arb.ca.gov/research/aaqs/caaqs/no2‐1/no2‐1.htm.
AccessedMay2016.
1.0 Introduction June 2016
1020S.FigueroaStreetProject AirQualityTechnicalReportESAPCR 8
andthosewithchroniclungorheartdiseasearemostsensitivetoPM10andPM2.5.Inchildren,studieshaveshownassociationsbetweenPMexposureandreduced lungfunctionand increasedrespiratorysymptomsand illnesses.6 Lung impairment can persist for two to three weeks after exposure to high levels ofparticulatematter. Some typesofparticulates couldbecome toxicafter inhalationdue to thepresenceofcertainchemicalsandtheirreactionwithinternalbodyfluids.
Lead (Pb): Lead is emitted from industrial facilities and from the sanding or removal of old lead‐basedpaint.Smeltingorprocessingthemetalistheprimarysourceofleademissions,whichisprimarilyaregionalpollutant. Leadaffects thebrainandotherpartsof thebody'snervous system. Exposure to lead inveryyoungchildrenimpairsthedevelopmentofthenervoussystem,kidneys,andbloodformingprocessesinthebody.
1.4.2 Local Air Quality
1.4.2.1 Existing Ambient Air Quality in the Surrounding Area
The SCAQMDmaintains a network of air qualitymonitoring stations located throughout the Air Basin tomeasureambientpollutantconcentrations.ThemonitoringstationmostrepresentativeoftheProjectSiteisthe Central Los Angeles County Monitoring Station, located at 1630 North Main Street, Los Angeles, CA90012.Criteriapollutantsmonitoredatthisstationincludeozone,NO2,CO,SO2,PM10,andPM2.5.Themostrecent data available from the SCAQMD for this monitoring station are from years 2010 to 2014.7 ThepollutantconcentrationdatafortheseyearsaresummarizedinTable2,PollutantStandardsandAmbientAirQualityDatafromRepresentativeMonitoringStations.
1.4.2.2 Existing Health Risk in the Surrounding Area
BetweenJuly2012andJune2013,theSCAQMDconductedtheMultipleAirToxicsExposureStudy(MATESIV), which is a follow‐up to previous air toxics studies conducted in the Air Basin. TheMATES IV FinalReport was issued in May 2015. The study, based on actual monitored data throughout the Air Basin,consisted of several elements. These included amonitoring program, an updated emissions inventory ofTACs,andamodelingeffort tocharacterizecarcinogenicriskacross theAirBasin fromexposure toTACs.Thestudyappliedatwo‐kilometer(1.24‐mile)gridovertheAirBasinandreportedcarcinogenicriskwithineachgridspace(coveringanareaoffoursquarekilometersor1.54squaremiles).ThestudyconcludedthattheaverageofthemodeledairtoxicsconcentrationsmeasuredateachofthemonitoringstationsintheAirBasin equates to a background cancer risk of approximately 418 in 1,000,000 primarily due to dieselexhaust, which is about 65 percent lower than the previous MATES III cancer risk.8 Subsequent to theSCAQMD’s risk calculations estimates performed for MATES IV, the California Environmental ProtectionAgencyOffice of EnvironmentalHealthHazardAssessment (OEHHA) updated themethods for estimating
6 California Air Resources Board, “Particulate Matter – Overview,” http://www.arb.ca.gov/research/aaqs/caaqs/pm/pm.htm.
AccessedMay2016.7 SouthCoastAirQualityManagementDistrict,HistoricalDatabyYear,http://www.aqmd.gov/smog/historicaldata.htm. Accessed
April2016.8 SouthCoastAirQualityManagementDistrict,FinalReport–MultipleAirToxicsExposureStudyintheSouthCoastAirBasin,(2015)
ES‐2.
June 2016 1.0 Introduction
1020S.FigueroaStreetProject AirQualityTechnicalReportESAPCR 9
Table 2
Pollutant Standards and Ambient Air Quality Data from Representative Monitoring Stations
Pollutant/Standard 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
O3(1‐hour)MaximumConcentration(ppm)Days>CAAQS(0.09ppm)
0.0981
0.0870
0.0930
0.0810
0.1133
O3(8‐hour)MaximumConcentration(ppm)
4thHigh8‐hourConcentration(ppm)Days>CAAQS(0.070ppm)Days>NAAQS(0.075ppm)
0.0800.06411
0.0650.06000
0.0770.06821
0.0690.06000
0.0940.07272
NO2(1‐hour)MaximumConcentration(ppm)
98thPercentileConcentration(ppm)NO2(Annual)
AnnualArithmeticMean(0.030ppm)
0.0890.071
0.025
0.1100.067
0.023
0.0770.069
0.025
0.0900.063
0.022
0.0820.067
0.022CO(1‐hour)
MaximumConcentration(ppm)CO(8‐hour)
MaximumConcentration(ppm)
3
2.3
‐‐
2.4
‐‐
1.9
‐‐
2.0
3
2.0SO2(1‐hour)
MaximumConcentration(ppm)99thPercentileConcentration(ppm)
SO2(24‐hour)MaximumConcentration(ppm)
0.010‐‐
0.015
0.0200.011‐‐
0.0050.005‐‐
0.0060.005‐‐
0.0050.004‐‐
PM10(24‐hour)MaximumConcentration(µg/m3)Samples>CAAQS(50µg/m3)Samples>NAAQS(150µg/m3)
PM10(AnnualAverage)AnnualArithmeticMean(20µg/m3)
4200
27.1
531029
8040
30.2
5710
29.5
6630
30.6PM2.5(24‐hour)
MaximumConcentration(µg/m3)98thPercentileConcentration(µg/m3)
Samples>NAAQS(35µg/m3)PM2.5(Annual)
AnnualArithmeticMean(12µg/m3)
39.227.12
11.9
49.331.54
13.00
58.731.84
12.55
43.129.01
11.95
59.934.56
12.36Lead
Maximum30‐dayaverage(µg/m3) 0.020 0.012 0.014 0.013 0.013
Notes: ppm = parts per million; µg/m3 = micrograms per cubic meter
Sources: South Coast Air Quality Management District, Historical Data by Year, http://www.aqmd.gov/home/library/air‐quality‐data‐studies/historical‐data‐by‐year. Accessed April 2016; California Air Resources Board, Air Quality Data Statistics, http://www.arb.ca.gov/adam/. Accessed April 2016; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, AirData, http://www.epa.gov/airdata/ad_rep_mon.html. Accessed April 2016.
1.0 Introduction June 2016
1020S.FigueroaStreetProject AirQualityTechnicalReportESAPCR 10
cancerrisks.9Theupdatedmethodutilizeshigherestimatesofcancerpotencyduringearly lifeexposuresand uses different assumptions for breathing rates and length of residential exposures. When combinedtogether,SCAQMDstaffestimatesthatrisksforthesameinhalationexposurelevelwillbeabout2.5to2.7times higher using the updatedmethods. This would be reflected in the average lifetime air toxics riskestimated from the monitoring sites data going from 418 per million to 1,023 per million.10 Under theupdatedOEHHAmethodology,adoptedinMarchof2015,therelativereductioninriskfromtheMATESIVresultscomparedtoMATESIIIwouldbethesame(about65percent).
Approximately68percentoftheriskisattributedtodieselparticulateemissions,approximately22percentto other toxics associated with mobile sources (including benzene, butadiene, and formaldehyde), andapproximately10percentofallairbornecarcinogenicriskisattributedtostationarysources(whichincludeindustriesandothercertainbusinesses,suchasdrycleanersandchromeplatingoperations).11Thestudyalso found lower ambient concentrations of most of the measured air toxics compared to the levelsmeasuredinthepreviousstudyconductedduring2004and2006.Specifically,benzeneand1,3‐butadiene,pollutants generated mainly from vehicles, were down 35 percent and 11 percent, respectively.12 Thereductionswereattributedtoairqualitycontrolregulationsandimprovedemissioncontroltechnologies.Inadditiontoairtoxics,MATESIVincludedcontinuousmeasurementsofblackcarbonandultrafineparticles(particlessmallerthan0.1micronsinsize),whichareemittedbycombustionofdieselfuels.Samplingsiteslocatednearheavily‐traffickedfreewaysornear industrialareaswerecharacterizedby increased levelsofblackcarbonandultrafineparticlescomparedtomoreruralsites.
As part of the MATES IV, the SCAQMD prepared maps that show regional trends in estimated outdoorinhalationcancerriskfromtoxicemissions,aspartofanongoingefforttoprovideinsightintorelativerisks.Themapsrepresenttheestimatednumberofpotentialcancerspermillionpeopleassociatedwithalifetimeofbreathingairtoxics(24hoursperdayoutdoorsfor70years).Thebackgroundpotentialcancerriskpermillionpeople in theProjectareausing theupdateOEHHAmethodology isestimatedat1,516permillion(comparedtoanoverallSouthCoastAirBasin‐wideriskof1,023permillion).13Generally,theriskfromairtoxics is lower near the coastline: it increases inland,with higher risks concentrated near diesel sources(e.g.,freeways,airports,andports).
1.4.2.3 Sensitive Receptors
Certainpopulationgroups,suchaschildren,elderly,andacutelyandchronicallyillpersons(especiallythosewithcardio‐respiratorydiseases),areconsideredmoresensitivetothepotentialeffectsofairpollutionthanothers. Sensitive land useswithin 500 feet of the Project Site are shown inFigure3, SensitiveReceptorLocationsNearesttotheProjectSite,andincludethefollowing:
9 CaliforniaEnvironmentalProtectionAgency,OfficeofHealthHazardAssessment,AirToxicsHotSpotsProgram,RiskAssessment
Guidelines,GuidanceManualforPreparationofHealthRiskAssessments,(2015).10 SouthCoastAirQualityManagementDistrict,FinalReport–MultipleAirToxicsExposureStudyintheSouthCoastAirBasin,(2015)
2‐11.11 SouthCoastAirQualityManagementDistrict,FinalReport–MultipleAirToxicsExposureStudyintheSouthCoastAirBasin,(2015)
ES‐2.12 SouthCoastAirQualityManagementDistrict,FinalReport–MultipleAirToxicsExposureStudyintheSouthCoastAirBasin,(2015)
6‐1.13 SouthCoastAirQualityManagementDistrict,MultipleAirToxicsExposure Study,MATES IVCarcinogenicRisk InteractiveMap,
http://www.aqmd.gov/home/library/air‐quality‐data‐studies/health‐studies/mates‐iv.AccessedMay2016.
June 2016 1.0 Introduction
1020S.FigueroaStreetProject AirQualityTechnicalReportESAPCR 11
Multi‐Family Residential Dwellings at LA LIVE: The Ritz‐Carlton Residences are located across S.FigueroaStreetwestoftheProjectSite.
Multi‐FamilyResidentialDwellings:Severalhighrisemixed‐useresidentialbuildingsare locatedtothe north of the Project Site across from Olympic Boulevard. Mid‐ and high‐rise multi‐familyresidentialarealsolocatedeastoftheProjectSitefrontingonS.FlowerStreet.High‐riseresidentialbuildingsarelocatedapproximately300feettothesouthoftheProjectSiteacrossfrom11thStreet.
FutureResidentialUses:Mixed‐useprojectsthatincorporateresidentialusesincludetheFigCentralproject and the Circa project. These projects are currently under construction and are locatedapproximately80feetand700feetthesouthoftheProjectSiterespectively.
Future Residential Uses: Mixed‐use project that incorporates residential uses at the proposedOlympicTowerproject.Theprojectisnotcurrentlyunderconstructionandislocatedapproximately140feetnorthoftheProjectSite.
AllotherairqualitysensitivereceptorsarelocatedatgreaterdistancesfromtheProjectSite,andwouldbelessimpactedbyProjectemissions.Impactsarequantifiedfortheabovesensitivereceptors.
Olympic Boulevard
W 11th Street
W 12th Street
S Fig
ueroa
Stree
t
W 9th Street
S Flo
wer St
reet
LA LIVE
LA LIVE
The Ritz-Carlton Residences and
JW Marriott (Hotel/Residences)
Construction
Construction
Multi-Family
Multi-Family
Multi-Family
Commercial
Retail/Parking
Multi-Family
Multi-Family Multi-
Family
Multi-Family
Office
PetroleumBuilding/Office
Restaurant
Mixed Use/Multi-Family
Multi-FamilyCommercial
Mixed Use/Multi-family
Multi-Family
Parking
Hotel
Hotel
Departmentof Water
and Power
FIGURE
Source: Google Maps, 2015 (Aerial); PCR Services Corporation, 2016.
0 200 400 Feet1020 S. Figueroa Street Project
Sensitive Receptor LocationsNearest to the Project Siteo 3
Project SiteSensitive Receptor500-ft Buffer fromProject Site
June 2016 1.0 Introduction
1020S.FigueroaStreetProject AirQualityTechnicalReportESAPCR 13
Thispageintentionallyblank.
1020S.FigueroaStreetProject AirQualityTechnicalReportESAPCR 15
2.0 REGULATORY SETTING AND SIGNIFICANCE THRESHOLDS
2.1 REGULATORY SETTING
Anumberofstatutes,regulations,plansandpolicieshavebeenadoptedwhichaddressairqualityconcerns.TheProjectSiteandvicinityissubjecttoairqualityregulationsdevelopedandimplementedatthefederal,State,and local levels. At the federal level, theUnitedStatesEnvironmentalProtectionAgency(USEPA) isresponsible for implementationofthefederalCleanAirAct(CAA). Someportionsof theCAA(e.g.,certainmobile source requirements and other requirements) are implemented directly by the USEPA. OtherportionsoftheCAA(e.g.,stationarysourcerequirements)areimplementedthroughdelegationofauthoritytoStateandlocalagencies.
Anumberof plans andpolicieshave been adoptedby various agencies that address air quality concerns.ThoseplansandpoliciesthatarerelevanttotheProjectarediscussedbelow.
2.1.1 Federal
The federal CleanAirAct of 1963was the first federal legislation regarding air pollution control andhasbeenamendednumeroustimesinsubsequentyears,withthemostrecentamendmentsoccurringin1990.At the federal level, theUSEPA is responsible for implementation of certain portions of theCleanAirActincluding mobile source requirements. Other portions of the Clean Air Act, such as stationary sourcerequirements,areimplementedbystateandlocalagencies.
TheCleanAirActestablishesfederalairqualitystandards,knownasNationalAmbientAirQualityStandards(NAAQS)andspecifies futuredates forachievingcompliance. The1990AmendmentstotheCleanAirActidentifyspecificemissionreductiongoalsforareasnotmeetingtheNAAQS.Theseamendmentsrequirebothademonstrationofreasonablefurtherprogresstowardattainmentandincorporationofadditionalsanctionsfor failure toattainor tomeet interimmilestones. Title I (NonattainmentProvisions)andTitle II (MobileSourceProvisions)oftheCleanAirActaremostapplicabletothedevelopmentandoperationsoftheProject.TitleIprovisionswereestablishedwiththegoalofattainingtheNAAQSforthefollowingcriteriapollutants:(1)O3;(2)NO2;(3)CO;(4)SO2;(5)PM10;and(6) lead. Table3,AmbientAirQualityStandards,showstheNAAQScurrentlyineffectforeachcriteriapollutant.
The Project is located within the South Coast Air Basin, which is an area designated as non‐attainmentbecause it does not currentlymeet NAAQS for certain pollutants regulated under the Clean Air Act. TheCleanAirActsetscertaindeadlinesformeetingtheNAAQSwithintheBasinincluding:(1)1‐hourO3bytheyear2010;(2)8‐hourO3bytheyear2024;14(3)PM10bytheyear2006;and(4)PM2.5bytheyear2015.OntheNAAQSatallmonitoringstationsandtheUSEPAapprovedtherequestforre‐designationtoattainmentJune11,2007,theUSEPAreclassifiedtheAirBasinasafederal“attainment”areaforCOandapprovedthe
14 The8‐hourozoneattainmentdeadlineforthe1997standardof80partsperbillionis2024.The8‐hourozoneattainmentdeadline
forthe2008standardof75partsperbillionis2032.
2.0 Regulatory Setting and Significance Thresholds June 2016
1020S.FigueroaStreetProject AirQualityTechnicalReportESAPCR 16
Table 3
Ambient Air Quality Standards
Pollutant Average
Time California Standards a National Standards b
Concentration c Method d Primary c,e Secondary c,f Method g
O3h1Hour
0.09ppm(180µg/m3)
UltravioletPhotometry
— SameasPrimaryStandard
UltravioletPhotometry
8Hour 0.070ppm(137µg/m3)
0.070 ppm(137µg/m3)
NO2i
1Hour 0.18ppm(339µg/m3) GasPhase
Chemi‐luminescence
100ppb(188µg/m3)
NoneGasPhaseChemi‐luminescenceAnnual
ArithmeticMean
0.030ppm(57µg/m3)
53ppb(100µg/m3)
SameasPrimaryStandard
CO
1Hour20ppm
(23mg/m3)Non‐Dispersive
InfraredPhotometry(NDIR)
35ppm(40mg/m3)
None Non‐DispersiveInfrared
Photometry(NDIR)
8Hour9.0ppm
(10mg/m3)9ppm
(10mg/m3)8Hour(LakeTahoe)
6ppm(7mg/m3)
— —
SO2j
1Hour0.25ppm
(655µg/m3)
UltravioletFluorescence
75ppb(196µg/m3) —
UltravioletFluorescence;
Spectrophotometry(Pararosaniline
Method)9
3Hour — —0.5ppm(1300µg/m3)
24Hour 0.04ppm(105µg/m3)
0.14ppm(forcertainareas)j
—
AnnualArithmeticMean
— 0.030ppm(forcertainareas)j
—
PM10k
24Hour 50µg/m3GravimetricorBetaAttenuation
150µg/m3SameasPrimaryStandard
InertialSeparationandGravimetric
Analysis
AnnualArithmeticMean
20µg/m3 —
PM2.5k
24Hour NoSeparateStateStandard 35µg/m3SameasPrimaryStandard InertialSeparation
andGravimetricAnalysisAnnual
ArithmeticMean
12µg/m3 GravimetricorBetaAttenuation
12.0µg/m3k 15µg/m3
Leadl,m
30DayAverage
1.5µg/m3
AtomicAbsorption
— —
HighVolumeSamplerand
AtomicAbsorption
CalendarQuarter
—1.5µg/m3 (for
certainareas)m Sameas
PrimaryStandardRolling3‐
MonthAveragem
‐‐ 0.15µg/m3
VisibilityReducingParticlesn
8Hour
Extinctioncoefficientof0.23perkilometer—visibilityoftenmilesormore(0.07—30milesormoreforLakeTahoe)duetoparticles
whenrelativehumidityislessthan
NoFederalStandards
September 2016 2.0 Regulatory Setting and Significance Thresholds
Table 3 (Continued)
Ambient Air Quality Standards
1020S.FigueroaStreetProject AirQualityTechnicalReportESAPCR 17
Pollutant Average
Time California Standards a National Standards b
Concentration c Method d Primary c,e Secondary c,f Method g
70percent.Method:BetaAttenuationandTransmittance
throughFilterTape.Sulfates(SO4)
24Hour 25µg/m3Ion
ChromatographyHydrogenSulfide
1Hour0.03ppm(42µg/m3)
UltravioletFluorescence
VinylChloridel
24Hour0.01ppm(26µg/m3)
GasChromatography
a California standards for ozone, carbon monoxide (except 8‐hour Lake Tahoe), sulfur dioxide (1 and 24 hour), nitrogen dioxide, and
particulate matter (PM10, PM2.5, and visibility reducing particles), are values that are not to be exceeded. All others are not to be equaled or exceeded. California ambient air quality standards are listed in the Table of Standards in Section 70200 of Title 17 of the California Code of Regulations.
b National standards (other than ozone, particulate matter, and those based on annual arithmetic mean) are not to be exceeded more than once a year. The ozone standard is attained when the fourth highest 8‐hour concentration measured at each site in a year, averaged over three years, is equal to or less than the standard. For PM10, the 24 hour standard is attained when the expected number of days per calendar year with a 24‐hour average concentration above 150 micrograms/per cubic meter (μg/m3) is equal to or less than one. For PM2.5, the 24 hour standard is attained when 98 percent of the daily concentrations, averaged over three years, are equal to or less than the standard.
c Concentration expressed first in units in which it was promulgated. Equivalent units given in parentheses are based upon a reference temperature of 25°C and a reference pressure of 760 torr. Most measurements of air quality are to be corrected to a reference temperature of 25°C and a reference pressure of 760 torr; ppm in this table refers to ppm by volume, or micromoles of pollutant per mole of gas.
d Any equivalent procedure which can be shown to the satisfaction of the California Air Resources Board to give equivalent results at or near the level of the air quality standard may be used.
e National Primary Standards: The levels of air quality necessary, with an adequate margin of safety to protect the public health. f National Secondary Standards: The levels of air quality necessary to protect the public welfare from any known or anticipated adverse
effects of a pollutant. g Reference method as described by the USEPA. An “equivalent method” of measurement may be used but must have a “consistent
relationship to the reference method” and must be approved by the USEPA. h On October 1, 2015, the national 8‐hour ozone primary and secondary standards were lowered from 0.075 to 0.070 ppm. i To attain the 1‐hour national standard, the 3‐year average of the annual 98th percentile of the 1‐hour daily maximum concentrations
at each site must not exceed 100 ppb. j On June 2, 2010, a new 1‐hour SO2 standard was established and the existing 24‐hour and annual primary standards were revoked. To
attain the 1‐hour national standard, the 3‐year average of the annual 99th percentile of the 1‐hour daily maximum concentrations at each site must not exceed 75 ppb. The 1971 SO2 national standards (24‐hour and annual) remain in effect until one year after an area is designated for the 2010 standard, except that in areas designated non‐attainment for the 1971 standards, the 1971 standards remain in effect until implementation plans to attain or maintain the 2010 standards are approved.
k On December 14, 2012, the national annual PM2.5 primary standard was lowered from 15 μg/m3 to 12.0 μg/m3. l The California Air Resources Board has identified lead and vinyl chloride as 'toxic air contaminants' with no threshold level of exposure
for adverse health effects determined. These actions allow for the implementation of control measures at levels below the ambient concentrations specified for these pollutants.
m The national standard for lead was revised on October 15, 2008 to a rolling 3‐month average. The 1978 lead standard (1.5 μg/m3 as a quarterly average) remains in effect until one year after an area is designated for the 2008 standard, except that in areas designated non‐attainment for the 1978 standard, the 1978 standard remains in effect until implementation plans to attain or maintain the 2008 standard are approved.
n In 1989, the California Air Resources Board converted both the general statewide 10‐mile visibility standard and the Lake Tahoe 30‐mile
visibility standard to instrumental equivalents, which are "extinction of 0.23 per kilometer" and "extinction of 0.07 per kilometer" for the statewide and Lake Tahoe Air Basin standards, respectively.
Source: California Air Resources Board, Ambient Air Quality Standards (10/1/15), http://www.arb.ca.gov/research/aaqs/aaqs2.pdf.
Accessed January 2016.
2.0 Regulatory Setting and Significance Thresholds September 2016
1020S.FigueroaStreetProject AirQualityTechnicalReportESAPCR 18
COmaintenanceplanfortheAirBasin.15TheAirBasinpreviouslyexceededtheNAAQSforPM10,buthasmeteffectiveJuly26,2013.16TheAirBasindoesnotmeettheNAAQSforO3andPM2.5andisclassifiedasbeinginnon‐attainment forthesepollutants. Table4,SouthCoastAirBasinAttainmentStatus(LosAngelesCounty),liststhecriteriapollutantsandtheirrelativeattainmentstatus.
TheCleanAirActalsospecifies futuredates forachievingcompliancewith theNAAQSandmandates thatstatessubmitandimplementaStateImplementationPlan(SIP)forlocalareasnotmeetingthesestandards.Theseplansmust includepollution controlmeasures that demonstrate how the standardswould bemet.The1990amendmentstotheCleanAirActidentifyspecificemissionreductiongoalsforbasinsnotmeetingthe NAAQS. These amendments require both a demonstration of reasonable further progress towardattainmentandincorporationofadditionalsanctionsforfailuretoattainortomeetinterimmilestones.
TitleIIoftheCleanAirActpertainstomobilesources,suchascars,trucks,buses,andplanes.Reformulatedgasoline,automobilepollutioncontroldevices,andvaporrecoverynozzlesongaspumpsarea fewof themechanismstheUSEPAusestoregulatemobileairemissionsources.TheprovisionsofTitleIIhaveresultedintailpipeemissionstandardsforvehicles,whichhavestrengthenedinrecentyearstoimproveairquality.6 “ApprovalandPromulgationofImplementationPlansandDesignationofAreasforAirQualityPlanningPurposes:California,Final
Rule.”FederalRegister72(11May2007):26718‐26721
7 FederalRegister,Vol.78,No.123,June26,2013,38223‐38226.
Table 4
South Coast Air Basin Attainment Status (Los Angeles County)
Pollutant National Standards California Standards
Ozone(1‐hourstandard) N/Aa Non‐attainment–ExtremeOzone(8‐hourstandard) Non‐attainment– Extreme Non‐Attainment
CarbonMonoxide Attainment AttainmentNitrogenDioxide Attainment AttainmentSulfurDioxide Attainment Attainment
PM10 Attainment Non‐attainmentPM2.5 Non‐attainment Non‐attainmentLead Non‐attainment Attainment
VisibilityReducingParticles N/A UnclassifiedSulfates N/A Attainment
HydrogenSulfide N/A UnclassifiedVinylChloride N/A N/Ab
N/A = not applicable a The NAAQS for 1‐hour ozone was revoked on June 15, 2005 for all areas except Early Action Compact areas. b In 1990 the California Air Resources Board identified vinyl chloride as a toxic air contaminant and determined
that it does not have an identifiable threshold. Therefore, the California Air Resources Board does not monitor or make status designations for this pollutant.
Source: United States Environmental Protection Agency, The Green Book Non‐attainment Areas for Criteria
Pollutants, http://www.epa.gov/oaqps001/greenbk/index.html. Accessed April 2016; California Air Resources Board, Area Designations Maps/State and National, http://www.arb.ca.gov/desig/adm/adm.htm. Accessed April 2016.
September 2016 2.0 Regulatory Setting and Significance Thresholds
1020S.FigueroaStreetProject AirQualityTechnicalReportESAPCR 19
Forexample,thestandardsforNOXemissionshaveloweredsubstantiallyandthespecificationrequirementsforcleanerburninggasolinearemorestringent.
2.1.2 State
2.1.2.1 California Clean Air Act
TheCaliforniaCleanAirAct,signedintolawin1988,requiresallareasoftheStatetoachieveandmaintainthe CAAQS by the earliest practical date. The CAAQS apply to the same criteria pollutants as the federalCleanAirActbutalsoincludeState‐identifiedcriteriapollutants,whichincludesulfates,visibility‐reducingparticles, hydrogen sulfide, and vinyl chloride. CARB has primary responsibility for ensuring theimplementation of the California Clean Air Act, responding to the federal Clean Air Act planningrequirementsapplicabletothestate,andregulatingemissionsfrommotorvehiclesandconsumerproductswithinthestate.Table2showstheCAAQScurrentlyineffectforeachofthecriteriapollutantsaswellastheotherpollutantsrecognizedbythestate.AsshowninTable2,theCAAQSincludemorestringentstandardsthantheNAAQSformostofthecriteriaairpollutants.
Health and Safety Code Section 39607(e) requires CARB to establish and periodically review areadesignationcriteria.Table3providesasummaryoftheattainmentstatusoftheLosAngelesCountyportionof the Air Basin with respect to the state standards. The Air Basin is designated as attainment for theCalifornia standards for sulfates and unclassified for hydrogen sulfide and visibility‐reducing particles.Becausevinylchlorideisacarcinogenictoxicaircontaminant,CARBdoesnotclassifyattainmentstatusforthispollutant.
2.1.2.2 California Air Resources Board Air Quality and Land Use Handbook
TheCARBpublished theAirQualityandLandUseHandbook in April 2005 to serve as a general guide forconsidering impacts tosensitive receptors from facilities thatemitTACemissions. Therecommendationsprovidedthereinarevoluntaryanddonotconstitutearequirementormandateforeitherlanduseagenciesorlocalairdistricts. Thegoaloftheguidancedocumentistoprotectsensitivereceptors,suchaschildren,the elderly, acutely ill, and chronically ill persons, from exposure to TAC emissions. Some examples ofCARB’ssitingrecommendationsincludethefollowing:(1)avoidsitingsensitivereceptorswithin500feetofafreeway,urbanroadwith100,000vehiclesperday,orruralroadswith50,000vehiclesperday;(2)avoidsiting sensitive receptors within 1,000 feet of a distribution center (that accommodates more than 100trucksperday,morethan40truckswithoperatingtransportrefrigerationunitsperday,orwheretransportrefrigerationunit operations exceed300hoursperweek); and (3) avoid siting sensitive receptorswithin300feetofanydrycleaningoperationusingperchloroethyleneandwithin500feetofoperationswithtwoormoremachines.
2.1.2.3 California Air Resources Board On‐Road and Off‐Road Vehicle Rules
In2004,CARBadoptedanAirborneToxicControlMeasure(ATCM)tolimitheavy‐dutydieselmotorvehicleidling in order to reduce public exposure to diesel PM and other Toxic Air Contaminants (TACs). Themeasureappliestodiesel‐fueledcommercialvehicleswithgrossvehicleweightratingsgreaterthan10,000pounds that are licensed to operate onhighways, regardless ofwhere they are registered. Thismeasuredoesnotallowdiesel‐fueledcommercialvehiclestoidleformorethan5minutesatanygiventime.
2.0 Regulatory Setting and Significance Thresholds September 2016
1020S.FigueroaStreetProject AirQualityTechnicalReportESAPCR 20
In2008CARBapprovedtheTruckandBusregulationtoreduceNOX,PM10,andPM2.5emissionsfromexistingdiesel vehicles operating in California. The requirementswere amended inDecember2010 and apply tonearlyalldieselfueledtrucksandbusseswithagrossvehicleweightratinggreaterthan14,000pounds.Forthelargesttrucksinthefleet,thosewithagrossvehicleweightratinggreaterthan26,000pounds,therearetwomethods to complywith the requirements. The firstway is for the fleetowner to retrofit or replaceengines,startingwiththeoldestenginemodelyear,tomeet2010enginestandards,orbetter.Thisisphasedover8years,startingin2015andwouldbefullyimplementedby2023,meaningthatalltrucksoperatingintheStatesubjecttothisoptionwouldmeetorexceedthe2010engineemissionstandardsforNOXandPMby2023.Thesecondoption,ifchosen,requiresfleetowners,startingin2012,toretrofitaportionoftheirfleetwith diesel particulate filters achieving at least 85percent removal efficiency, so that by January1, 2016their entire fleet is equipped with diesel particulate filters. However, diesel particulate filters do nottypically lowerNOX emissions. Thus, fleet owners choosing the secondoptionmust still complywith the2010engineemissionstandardsfortheirtrucksandbussesby2020.
In addition to limitingexhaust from idling trucks,CARB recentlypromulgatedemission standards foroff‐road diesel construction equipment of greater than 25 horsepower (hp) such as bulldozers, loaders,backhoesandforklifts,aswellasmanyotherself‐propelledoff‐roaddieselvehicles.TheregulationadoptedbytheCARBonJuly26,2007,aimstoreduceemissionsbyinstallationofdieselsootfiltersandencouragingthe retirement, replacement, or repowerofolder, dirtier engineswithneweremission controlledmodels.Implementationisstaggeredbasedonfleetsize(whichisthetotalofalloff‐roadhorsepowerundercommonownership or control), with the largest fleets to begin compliance January 1, 2014. Each fleet mustdemonstrate compliance through one of twomethods. The first option is to calculate andmaintain fleetaverageemissionstargets,whichencouragestheretirementorrepoweringofolderequipmentandrewardsthe introduction of newer cleaner units into the fleet. The second option is to meet the Best AvailableControl Technology (BACT) requirements by turning over or installing Verified Diesel Emission ControlStrategies(VDECS)onacertainpercentageofitstotalfleethorsepower.ThecomplianceschedulerequiresthatBACTturnoversorretrofits(VDECSinstallation)befullyimplementedby2023inallequipmentinlargeandmediumfleetsandacross100percentofsmallfleetsby2028.
2.1.3 Regional
2.1.3.1 South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD)
Asindicatedpreviously,theCityofLosAngelesislocatedwithintheSouthCoastAirBasin.TheSCAQMDhasjurisdictionoveranareaofapproximately10,743squaremiles.ThisareaincludesallofOrangeCounty,LosAngelesCountyexcept for theAntelopeValley, thenon‐desertportionofwesternSanBernardinoCounty,andthewesternandCoachellaValleyportionsofRiversideCounty.TheBasinisasub‐regionoftheSCAQMDjurisdiction.Whileairqualityinthisareahasimproved,theBasinrequirescontinueddiligencetomeetairqualitystandards.
TheSCAQMDhasadoptedaseriesofAirQualityManagementPlans(AQMP)tomeettheCAAQSandNAAQS.SCAQMDandCARBhaveadoptedthe2012AQMPwhichincorporatesthelatestscientificandtechnologicalinformation and planning assumptions, including the Southern California Association of Governments(SCAG) 2012 Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy (RTP/SCS), and updated
September 2016 2.0 Regulatory Setting and Significance Thresholds
1020S.FigueroaStreetProject AirQualityTechnicalReportESAPCR 21
emissioninventorymethodologiesforvarioussourcecategories.17TheFinal2012AQMPwasadoptedbytheAQMD Governing Board on December 7, 2012. Control measure IND‐01 was approved for adoption andinclusionintheFinal2012AQMPattheFebruary1,2013GoverningBoardmeeting.
Therefore, the2012AQMPis themostappropriateplantouse forconsistencyanalysis. TheAQMPbuildsupon other agencies’ plans to achieve federal standards for air quality in the Basin. It incorporates acomprehensivestrategyaimedatcontrollingpollutionfromallsources,includingstationarysources,andon‐road and off‐road mobile sources. The 2012 AQMP builds upon improvements in previous plans, andincludes new and changing federal requirements, implementation of new technology measures, and thecontinueddevelopmentofeconomicallysound,flexiblecomplianceapproaches.Inaddition,ithighlightsthesignificant amount of emission reductions needed and the urgent need to identify additional strategies,especially in the area of mobile sources, to meet all federal criteria pollutant standards within the timeframesallowedunderthefederalCleanAirAct.
The2012AQMP’skeyundertaking is tobringtheBasin intoattainmentwithNAAQSfor24‐hourPM2.5by2014.Italsointensifiesthescopeandpaceofcontinuedairqualityimprovementeffortstowardmeetingthe20238‐hourozonestandarddeadlinewithnewmeasuresdesignedtoreducerelianceontheCAASection182(e)(5) long‐termmeasures for NOX and VOC reductions. SCAQMD expects exposure reductions to beachieved through implementation of new and advanced control technologies as well as improvement ofexistingtechnologies.
Thecontrolmeasures in the2012AQMPconsistof fourcomponents: (1)Basin‐wideandEpisodicShort‐term PM2.5 Measures; (2) Contingency Measures; (3) 8‐hour Ozone Implementation Measures; and (4)TransportationandControlMeasuresprovidedbySCAG. ThePlanincludeseightshort‐termPM2.5controlmeasures, 16 stationary source8‐hourozonemeasures, 10 early actionmeasures formobile sources andsevenearlyactionmeasuresareproposedtoacceleratenear‐zeroandzeroemissiontechnologiesforgoodsmovementrelatedsources,andfiveon‐roadandfiveoff‐roadmobilesourcecontrolmeasures. Ingeneral,theDistrict’scontrolstrategyforstationaryandmobilesourcesisbasedonthefollowingapproaches: (1)availablecleanertechnologies;(2)bestmanagementpractices;(3)incentiveprograms;(4)developmentandimplementation of zero‐ near‐zero technologies and vehicles and control methods; and (5) emissionreductions frommobilesources. Controlstrategies intheAQMPwithpotentialapplicabilitytoshort‐termemissionsfromconstructionactivitiesassociatedwiththeProjectincludestrategiesdenotedintheAQMPasONRD‐04 and OFFRD‐01,which are intended to reduce emissions from on‐road and off‐road heavy‐dutyvehiclesandequipment.DescriptionsofmeasuresONRD‐04andOFFRD‐01areprovidedbelow:
ONRD‐04 –AcceleratedRetirement ofOlderOn‐RoadHeavy‐DutyVehicles: This proposed measureseeks toreplaceupto1,000heavy‐dutyvehiclesperyearwithnewerornewvehicles thatataminimum,meetthe2010on‐roadheavy‐dutyNOXexhaustemissionsstandardof0.2gramsperbrakehorsepower‐hour(g/bhp‐hr).Giventhatexceedancesofthe24‐hourPM2.5airqualitystandardoccurintheMiraLomaregion,priority will be placed on replacing older diesel trucks that operate primarily at the warehouse anddistribution centers located in the Mira Loma area. Funding assistance of up to $35,000 per vehicle isproposedandtheleveloffundingwilldependupontheNOXemissionscertificationlevelofthereplacementvehicle. In addition, a provision similar to the Surplus Off‐RoadOption for NOX (SOON) provision of the
17 SouthCoastAirQualityManagementDistrict,2012AirQualityManagementPlan,http://www.aqmd.gov/home/library/clean‐air‐
plans/air‐quality‐mgt‐plan/final‐2012‐air‐quality‐management‐plan.AccessedApril2016.
2.0 Regulatory Setting and Significance Thresholds September 2016
1020S.FigueroaStreetProject AirQualityTechnicalReportESAPCR 22
statewide In‐UseOff‐RoadFleetVehicleRegulationwill be sought to ensure that additionalNOX emissionreductionbenefitsareachieved.
OFFRD‐01–ExtensionoftheSoonProvisionforConstruction/IndustrialEquipment:Thismeasureseekstocontinue the Surplus Off‐Road Option for NOX (SOON) provision of the statewide In‐Use Off‐Road FleetVehicleRegulationbeyond2014throughthe2023timeframe.InordertoimplementtheSOONprograminthis timeframe, funding of up to $30 million per year would be sought to help fund the repower orreplacement of older Tier 0 and Tier 1 equipment, with reductions that are considered surplus to thestatewideregulationwithTier4orcleanerengines.
SeveralSCAQMDrulesadoptedtoimplementportionsoftheAQMPmayapplytoconstructionoroperationoftheProject. Forexample,SCAQMDRule403requirestheimplementationofbestavailablefugitivedustcontrolmeasuresduringactiveconstructionperiodscapableofgeneratingfugitivedustemissionsfromon‐siteearth‐movingactivities,construction/demolitionactivities,andconstructionequipmenttravelonpavedand unpaved roads. Also, SCAQMD Rule 1113 limits the amount of volatile organic compounds fromarchitecturalcoatingsandsolvents,whichlowerstheemissionsofodorouscompounds.TheProjectmaybesubjecttothefollowingSCAQMDrulesandregulations:
Regulation IV – Prohibitions: This regulation sets forth the restrictions for visible emissions, odornuisance, fugitive dust, various air emissions, fuel contaminants, start‐up/shutdown exemptions andbreakdownevents.ThefollowingisalistofruleswhichmayapplytotheProject:
Rule402–Nuisance:Thisrulestatesthatapersonshallnotdischargefromanysourcewhatsoeversuch quantities of air contaminants or othermaterial which cause injury, detriment, nuisance, orannoyancetoanyconsiderablenumberofpersonsortothepublic,orwhichendangerthecomfort,repose,healthorsafetyofanysuchpersonsorthepublic,orwhichcause,orhaveanaturaltendencytocause,injuryordamagetobusinessorproperty.
Rule403–FugitiveDust: Thisrulerequiresprojects toprevent,reduceormitigate fugitivedustemissions fromasite. Rule403restrictsvisible fugitivedusttotheprojectproperty line,restrictsthenetPM10emissionstolessthan50microgramspercubicmeter(µg/m3)andrestrictsthetrackingoutofbulkmaterialsontopublicroads. Additionally,projectsmustutilizeoneormoreofthebestavailable control measures (identified in the tables within the rule). Mitigation measures mayincludeaddingfreeboardtohaulvehicles,coveringloosematerialonhaulvehicles,watering,usingchemicalstabilizersand/orceasingallactivities. Finally,acontingencyplanmayberequired ifsodeterminedbytheUSEPA.
RegulationXI–SourceSpecificStandards: RegulationXI setsemissions standards for specific sources.ThefollowingisalistofruleswhichmayapplytotheProject:
Rule1113–ArchitecturalCoatings:Thisrulerequiresmanufacturers,distributors,andendusersofarchitecturalandindustrialmaintenancecoatingstoreduceVOCemissionsfromtheuseofthesecoatings,primarilybyplacinglimitsontheVOCcontentofvariouscoatingcategories.
Rule1134–EmissionsofOxidesofNitrogenfromStationaryGasTurbines: ThisrulespecifiesNOXemissionslimits,monitoring,sourcetesting,andrecordkeepingrequirementsforstationarygasturbines0.3megawatt(MW)andlarger.
September 2016 2.0 Regulatory Setting and Significance Thresholds
1020S.FigueroaStreetProject AirQualityTechnicalReportESAPCR 23
Rule1138–ControlofEmissionsfromRestaurantOperations:Thisrulespecifiesemissionsandodorcontrolrequirementsforcommercialcookingoperationsthatusechain‐drivencharbroilerstocookmeat.
Rule1146.2–EmissionsofOxidesofNitrogen fromLargeWaterHeatersandSmallBoilersand Process Heaters: This rule requires manufacturers, distributors, retailers, refurbishers,installers, andoperatorsofnewandexistingunits to reduceNOXemissions fromnatural gas‐firedwaterheaters,boilers,andprocessheatersasdefinedinthisrule.
Rule1186–PM10EmissionsfromPavedandUnpavedRoads,andLivestockOperations: Thisruleappliestoownersandoperatorsofpavedandunpavedroadsandlivestockoperations.Theruleis intended to reduce PM10 emissions by requiring the cleanup of material deposited onto pavedroads,useofcertifiedstreetsweepingequipment,andtreatmentofhigh‐useunpavedroads(seealsoRule403).
Rule1403–AsbestosEmissionsfromDemolition/RenovationActivities:Thisrulerequiresownersandoperatorsofanydemolitionorrenovationactivityandtheassociateddisturbanceofasbestos‐containingmaterials, any asbestos storage facility, or any activewaste disposal site to implementwork practice requirements to limit asbestos emissions from building demolition and renovationactivities,includingtheremovalandassociateddisturbanceofasbestos‐containingmaterials.
RegulationXIII–NewSourceReview(NSR):RegulationXIIIsetsrequirementsforpreconstructionreviewrequiredunderboth federal and state statutes fornewandmodified sources located in areas thatdonotmeet the Clean Air Act standards ("non‐attainment" areas). NSR applies to both individual permits andentirefacilities.AnypermitthathasanetincreaseinemissionsisrequiredtoapplyBACT.FacilitieswithanetincreaseinemissionsarerequiredtooffsettheemissionincreasebyuseofEmissionReductionCredits(ERCs).Theregulationprovidesfortheapplication,eligibility,registration,useandtransferofERCs.Forlowemittingfacilities,theSCAQMDmaintainsaninternalbankthatcanbeusedtoprovidetherequiredoffsets.In addition, certain facilities are subject toprovisions that requirepublic notice andmodeling analysis todeterminethedownwindimpactpriortopermitissuance.
The SCAQMDpublished aCEQAAirQualityHandbook (theHandbook) inNovember1993 to provide localgovernmentswithguidanceforanalyzingandmitigatingproject‐specificairqualityimpacts.TheHandbookprovidesstandards,methodologies,andproceduresforconductingairqualityanalysesinCEQAdocumentsand was used extensively in the preparation of this analysis. However, the SCAQMD is currently in theprocessof replacing theHandbookwith theAirQualityAnalysisGuidanceHandbook. While thisprocess isunderway, the SCAQMD recommends that the lead agency avoid using the screening tables in theHandbook’sChapter6,becausethetableswerederivedusinganobsoleteversionofCARB’smobilesourceemissionfactorinventory,andthetripgenerationcharacteristicofthelandusesidentifiedinthesescreeningtableswerebasedonthefiftheditionoftheITETripGenerationManual, insteadofthemostcurrentsixthedition. Additionally, the lead agency should avoid using the on‐roadmobile source emission factors inTableA9‐5‐J1 throughA9‐5‐L in theHandbook. TheSCAQMD instead recommendsusingotherapprovedmodels to calculate emissions from landuseprojects, such asCalEEMod.18 To assist the lead agency, thisassessmentfollowsSCAQMD’srecommendations.
18 South Coast Air Quality Management District, CEQA Air Quality Handbook (1993),
http://www.aqmd.gov/home/regulations/ceqa/air‐quality‐analysis‐handbook/ceqa‐air‐quality‐handbook‐(1993). Accessed April2016.
2.0 Regulatory Setting and Significance Thresholds September 2016
1020S.FigueroaStreetProject AirQualityTechnicalReportESAPCR 24
In June 2003, the SCAQMDpublished a document called theLocalizedSignificanceThresholdMethodologythat is intended toprovidevoluntaryguidance for leadagencies inanalyzing localizedairquality impactsfromprojects.19ThedocumentwasrevisedinJuly2008toincorporateadditionalguidanceregardingPM2.5emissions.20 The Localized SignificanceThresholdMethodology was also used in the preparation of thisassessment.
The SCAQMD has also adopted land use planning guidelines in the May 2005 Guidance Document forAddressingAirQuality Issues inGeneral Plans and Local Planning21which, like the CARB Handbook, alsoconsiders impacts to sensitive receptors from facilities that emit TACs. SCAQMD’s distancerecommendations are the same as those provided by CARB (e.g., the same siting criteria for distributioncentersanddrycleaningfacilities). TheSCAQMD’sdocumentintroduceslanduse‐relatedpoliciesthatrelyon design and distance parameters to manage potential health risk. These guidelines are voluntaryinitiativesrecommendedforconsiderationbylocalplanningagencies.
TheSCAQMDreleasedtheDraft2016AQMPonJune30,2016forpublicreviewandcomments.ThepublicreviewperiodendedAugust4,2016andthepublichearingisscheduledforDecember2,2016atwhichtimetheSCAQMDGoverningBoardwill consider approving theAQMP. Key elementsof theDraft2016AQMPinclude implementing fair‐share emissions reductions strategies at the federal, state, and local levels;establishingpartnerships,funding,andincentivestoacceleratedeploymentofzeroandnear‐zero‐emissionstechnologies; and taking credit from co‐benefits from greenhouse gas, energy, transportation and otherplanningefforts.ThestrategiesincludedintheDraft2016AQMPareintendedtodemonstrateattainmentoftheNationalAmbientAirQualityStandards(NAAQS)forthefederalnon‐attainmentpollutants(ozoneandPM2.5).
2.1.3.2 Regional Comprehensive Plan and Guide and Congestion Management Plan
SCAG is the regional planning agency for Los Angeles, Orange, Ventura, Riverside, San Bernardino andImperial Counties and addresses regional issues relating to transportation, the economy, communitydevelopment and the environment. SCAG is the federally designatedmetropolitan planning organization(MPO)forthemajorityofthesouthernCaliforniaregionandisthelargestMPOinthenation.Withregardtoairqualityplanning,SCAGhaspreparedtheRTPandRegionalTransportationImprovementProgram(RTIP),which address regional development and growth forecasts and form the basis for the land use andtransportationcontrolportionsoftheAQMPandareutilizedinthepreparationoftheairqualityforecastsand consistency analysis included in the AQMP. The RTP, RTIP, and AQMP are based on projectionsoriginatingwithinlocaljurisdictions.
2.1.4 Local
Local jurisdictions, such as the City of Los Angeles, have the authority and responsibility to reduce airpollution through its land use decision‐making authority. Specifically, the City is responsible for theassessmentandmitigationofairemissionsresultingfromitslandusedecisions.TheCity’sGeneralPlanAir
19 SouthCoastAirQualityManagementDistrict,FinalLocalizedSignificanceThresholdMethodology,(2008).20 SouthCoastAirQualityManagementDistrict,FinalMethodology toCalculateParticulateMatter (PM)2.5andPM2.5Significance
Thresholds,(2006).21 South CoastAirQualityManagementDistrict,GuidanceDocument forAddressingAirQuality Issues inGeneral Plans and Local
Planning,(May2005),http://www.aqmd.gov/prdas/aqguide/aqguide.html.AccessedApril2016.
September 2016 2.0 Regulatory Setting and Significance Thresholds
1020S.FigueroaStreetProject AirQualityTechnicalReportESAPCR 25
QualityElementincludesCitywidegoals,objectives,andpoliciesrelatedtoairqualityresources.Anumberof these goals, objectives, and policies are relevant to the Project and are related to traffic mobility,minimizingparticulate emissions fromconstructionactivities,discouraging single‐occupancyvehicle trips,managingtrafficcongestionduringpeakhours,andincreasingenergyefficiencyinCityfacilitiesandprivatedevelopments.
TheCity of LosAngeles is also responsible for the implementation of transportation controlmeasures asoutlinedintheAQMP. Throughcapital improvementprograms, localgovernmentscanfundinfrastructurethat contributes to improved air quality by requiring such improvements as bus turnouts as appropriate,installationofenergy‐efficientstreetlights,andsynchronizationoftrafficsignals. InaccordancewithCEQArequirementsand theCEQAreviewprocess, theCityassesses theairquality impactsofnewdevelopmentprojects, requires mitigation of potentially significant air quality impacts by conditioning discretionarypermitsandmonitorsandenforcesimplementationofsuchmitigationmeasures.
The City has adopted regulations regarding the filtration of outdoor air for indoor environments.Subsections99.05.504.5.3and99.04.504.6oftheLosAngelesMunicipalCode(LAMC)requirethatbuildingslocatedwithin 1,000 feet of a freewayprovide regularly occupied areas of the buildingwith air filtrationmediaforoutsideandreturnairthatmeetsorexceedstheAmericanSocietyofHeating,Refrigerating,andAir‐ConditioningEngineers(ASHRAE)Standard52.2MinimumEfficiencyReportingValue(MERV)of13,tothe satisfactionof theCityofLosAngelesDepartmentofBuildingandSafety. PerASHRAEStandard52.2(2012),MERV13wouldresultinaremovalefficiencyof50percentforparticlesfrom0.3to1.0micrometers(µm),85percentfor1.0to3.0µm,and90percentfor3.0to10.0µm.22
2.2 SIGNIFICANCE THRESHOLDS
PursuanttoAppendixGoftheStateCEQAGuidelines,theProjectwouldresultinasignificantimpactrelatedtoairqualityifitwould:
a. Conflictwithorobstructtheimplementationoftheapplicableairqualityplan;
b. Violateanyairqualitystandardorcontributesubstantiallytoanexistingorprojectedairqualityviolation;
c. Resultinacumulativelyconsiderablenetincreaseofanycriteriapollutantforwhichtheprojectregion is nonattainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard(includingreleasingemissionswhichexceedquantitativethresholdsforozoneprecursors);
d. Exposesensitivereceptorstosubstantialpollutantconcentrations;or
e. Createobjectionableodorsaffectingasubstantialnumberofpeople.
As discussed in the Initial Study, which is contained in Appendix A of the Draft EIR, and in Chapter 6.0,Subsection F, Effects FoundNot to be Significant, of the Draft EIR, the Project would have a less thansignificant impact with regard to odors (item “e”) above. As such, no further analysis of this topic isnecessary.
22 ASHRAE, Method of Testing General Ventilation Air‐Cleaning Devices for Removal Efficiency by Particle Size.
https://www.ashrae.org/File%20Library/docLib/StdsAddenda/52_2_2012_2015Supplement.pdf.AccessedDecember17,2015.
2.0 Regulatory Setting and Significance Thresholds September 2016
1020S.FigueroaStreetProject AirQualityTechnicalReportESAPCR 26
The L.A. CEQAThresholdsGuide incorporates the screening questions, and pursuant to the Appendix Gguideline, defers to threshold guidance establishedby the SCAQMD, in particular to theCEQAAirQualityHandbook. Further, the L.A.CEQAThresholdsGuide provides guidance in the application of the SCAQMDguidance.
TheSCAQMDisintheprocessofdevelopinganAirQualityAnalysisGuidanceHandbooktoreplacetheCEQAAirQualityHandbook. In the interim, supplemental guidance has been adopted by the SCAQMD. Thepotential air quality impacts of the Project are, therefore, evaluated according to numeric indicatorsdevelopedbytheSCAQMDintheCEQAAirQualityHandbookandsupplementalguidancefromtheSCAQMD.23
2.2.1 Construction Emissions
TheSCAQMDhasestablishednumericalemissionindicatorsofsignificanceforconstruction.Thenumericalemission indicators are based on the recognition that the Air Basin is a distinct geographic area with acritical air pollution problem for which ambient air quality standards have been promulgated to protectpublichealth.24Given that construction impacts are temporaryand limited to the constructionphase, theSCAQMDhasestablishednumeric indicatorsof significance specific toconstructionactivity. Basedon theindicatorsintheSCAQMDCEQAAirQualityHandbook,theProjectwouldpotentiallycauseorcontributetoanexceedanceofanambientairqualitystandardifthefollowingwouldoccur:
AQ‐1: RegionalconstructionemissionsfrombothdirectandindirectsourceswouldexceedanyofthefollowingSCAQMDprescribeddailyemissionsthresholds:25
75poundsadayforVOC;
100poundsperdayforNOX;
550poundsperdayforCO;
150poundsperdayforSO2;
150poundsperdayforPM10;or
55poundsperdayforPM2.5.
In addition, the SCAQMD has developed amethodology to assess the potential for localized emissions tocauseanexceedanceofapplicableambientairqualitystandardsorambientconcentration limits. Impactswouldbeconsideredsignificantifthefollowingwouldoccur:
AQ‐2: Maximumdaily localizedemissionsofNOXand/orCOduringconstructionaregreater thanthe applicable localized significance thresholds, resulting in predicted ambient
23 WhiletheSCAQMDCEQAAirQualityHandbookcontainssignificancethresholdsforlead,Projectconstructionandoperationwould
notincludesourcesofleademissionsandwouldnotexceedtheestablishedthresholdsforlead. UnleadedfuelandunleadedpaintshavevirtuallyeliminatedleademissionsfromcommerciallanduseprojectssuchastheProject. Asaresult,leademissionsarenotfurtherevaluatedinthisDraftEIR.
24 SouthCoastAirQualityManagementDistrict,CEQAAirQualityHandbook(1993)6‐2.25 South Coast Air Quality Management District, SCAQMD Air Quality Significance Thresholds, (March 2011),
http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default‐source/ceqa/handbook/scaqmd‐air‐quality‐significance‐thresholds.pdf?sfvrsn=2. AccessedApril2016.
September 2016 2.0 Regulatory Setting and Significance Thresholds
1020S.FigueroaStreetProject AirQualityTechnicalReportESAPCR 27
concentrationsinthevicinityoftheProjectSitegreaterthanthemoststringentambientairqualitystandardsforNO2and/orCO.26
AQ‐3: Maximum daily localized emissions of PM10 and/or PM2.5 during construction are greaterthan the applicable localized significance thresholds, resulting in predicted ambientconcentrations in the vicinity of the Project Site to exceed 10.4 μg/m3 over 24 hours(SCAQMDRule403controlrequirement).
Asdiscussedpreviouslyunder subsection3.a., theSCAQMDhasestablished screening criteria that canbeused to determine the maximum allowable daily emissions that would satisfy the localized significancethresholds and therefore not cause or contribute to an exceedance of the applicable ambient air qualitystandardsorambientconcentrationlimitswithoutproject‐specificdispersionmodeling.Thisanalysisusesthescreeningcriteriatoevaluateimpactsfromlocalizedemissions.
2.2.2 Operational Emissions
TheSCAQMDhasestablishednumericalemission indicatorsof significance foroperations. Thenumericalemission indicators are based on the recognition that the Air Basin is a distinct geographic area with acritical air pollution problem for which ambient air quality standards have been promulgated to protectpublic health.27 The SCAQMD has established numeric indicators of significance in part based on Section182(e) of theCleanAirActwhich identifies10 tonsper year ofVOC as a significance level for stationarysourceemissionsinextremenon‐attainmentareasforozone.28AsshowninTable4,theBasinisdesignatedasextremenon‐attainmentforozone.TheSCAQMDconvertedthissignificanceleveltopoundsperdayforozoneprecursoremissions(10tonsperyear×2,000poundsperton÷365daysperyear=55poundsperday). Thenumeric indicators forotherpollutantsarealsobasedon federalstationarysourcesignificancelevels. Based on the indicators in the SCAQMDCEQAAirQualityHandbook,the Projectwould potentiallycauseorcontributetoanexceedanceofanambientairqualitystandardifthefollowingwouldoccur:
AQ‐4: Operational emissions exceed any of the following SCAQMD prescribed daily regionalnumericindicators:29
55poundsadayforVOC;
55poundsperdayforNOX;
550poundsperdayforCO;
150poundsperdayforSOX;
150poundsperdayforPM10;or
55poundsperdayforPM2.5.26 South Coast Air Quality Management District, Localized Significance Thresholds, (2003, revised 2008),
http://www.aqmd.gov/home/regulations/ceqa/air‐quality‐analysis‐handbook/localized‐significance‐thresholds. Accessed April2016.
27 SouthCoastAirQualityManagementDistrict,CEQAAirQualityHandbook(1993)6‐2.28 SouthCoastAirQualityManagementDistrict,CEQAAirQualityHandbook(1993)6‐1.29 South Coast Air Quality Management District, SCAQMD Air Quality Significance Thresholds, (March 2011),
http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default‐source/ceqa/handbook/scaqmd‐air‐quality‐significance‐thresholds.pdf?sfvrsn=2. AccessedApril2016.TheL.A.CEQAThresholdsGuidealsoincludesathresholdof10tonsperyearofVOCs;however,thisisequivalenttotheSCAQMDdailythresholdof55poundsperday.
2.0 Regulatory Setting and Significance Thresholds September 2016
1020S.FigueroaStreetProject AirQualityTechnicalReportESAPCR 28
In addition, the SCAQMD has developed amethodology to assess the potential for localized emissions tocauseanexceedanceofapplicableambientairqualitystandards.Impactswouldbeconsideredsignificantifthefollowingwouldoccur:
AQ‐5: MaximumdailylocalizedemissionsofNOXand/orCOduringoperationaregreaterthantheapplicablelocalizedsignificancethresholds,resultinginpredictedambientconcentrationsinthevicinityoftheProjectSitegreaterthanthemoststringentambientairqualitystandardsforNO2and/orCO.30
AQ‐6: Maximumdaily localizedemissionsofPM10and/orPM2.5duringoperationaregreater thanthe applicable localized significance thresholds, resulting in predicted ambientconcentrationsinthevicinityoftheProjectSitetoexceed2.5μg/m3over24hours(SCAQMDRule1303allowablechangeinconcentration).
Asdiscussedpreviouslyunder subsection3.a., theSCAQMDhasestablished screening criteria that canbeused to determine the maximum allowable daily emissions that would satisfy the localized significancethresholds and therefore not cause or contribute to an exceedance of the applicable ambient air qualitystandardsorambientconcentrationlimitswithoutproject‐specificdispersionmodeling.Thisanalysisusesthescreeningcriteriatoevaluateimpactsfromlocalizedemissions.
Impactswouldbeconsideredsignificantifthefollowingwouldoccur:
AQ‐7: Thefollowingconditionswouldoccuratanintersectionorroadwaywithinone‐quartermileofasensitivereceptor:
The Project would cause or contribute to an exceedance of the CAAQSone‐houroreight‐hourCOstandardsof20or9.0partspermillion(ppm),respectively;
2.2.3 Toxic Air Contaminants
Basedon theCityofLosAngelesCEQAThresholdsGuide andcriteriaset forthby theSCAQMD, theProjectwould expose sensitive receptors to substantial concentrations of toxic air contaminants if any of thefollowingwouldoccur:31
AQ‐8: The Project emits carcinogenic materials or TACs that exceed the maximum incrementalcancerriskofteninonemillionoracancerburdengreaterthan0.5excesscancercases(inareasgreaterthanorequalto1in1million)oranacuteorchronichazardindexof1.0.
Asdiscussedpreviouslyundersubsection3.a., construction impacts fromTACsareevaluatedqualitativelybecauseof thesporadicand temporarynatureof constructionemissions. TheProjectwouldhave limited
30 South Coast Air Quality Management District, Localized Significance Thresholds, (2003, revised 2008),
http://www.aqmd.gov/home/regulations/ceqa/air‐quality‐analysis‐handbook/localized‐significance‐thresholds. Accessed April2016.
31 SouthCoastAirQualityManagementDistrict,CEQAAirQualityHandbook,Chapter6(DeterminingtheAirQualitySignificanceofaProject) and Chapter 10 (Assessing Toxic Air Pollutants), (1993); SCAQMD Air Quality Significance Thresholds, (March 2011),http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default‐source/ceqa/handbook/scaqmd‐air‐quality‐significance‐thresholds.pdf?sfvrsn=2. AccessedSeptember2015.
September 2016 2.0 Regulatory Setting and Significance Thresholds
1020S.FigueroaStreetProject AirQualityTechnicalReportESAPCR 29
sourcesofTACsassociatedwithoperations. Therefore,aqualitativeassessmentwillbeusedtodeterminewhethertheProjectwouldresultinasignificantimpactbyexceedingtheabove‐referencedstandard.
2.2.4 Consistency with Air Quality Plans and Policies
TheProjectwouldhaveasignificantimpactifitwould:
AQ‐9: Substantiallyconflictwithorobstruct implementationofrelevantairqualitypolicies in theGeneral Plan or other adopted regional and local plans adopted for reducing air qualityimpacts.
1020S.FigueroaStreetProject AirQualityTechnicalReportESAPCR 31
3.0 METHODOLOGY
Theevaluationofpotential impacts toregionaland localairquality thatmayresult fromtheconstructionandlong‐termoperationsoftheProjectisconductedasfollows. AdditionaldetailsareprovidedintheAirQualityTechnicalReportinAppendixA.
3.1 CONSISTENCY WITH AIR QUALITY PLAN
TheSCAQMDisrequired,pursuanttotheCleanAirAct,toreduceemissionsofcriteriapollutantsforwhichtheAirBasin is innon‐attainmentof theNAAQS(e.g.,ozoneandPM2.5). TheSCAQMD’s2012AirQualityManagement Plan contains a comprehensive list of pollution control strategies directed at reducingemissions and achieving the NAAQS. These strategies are developed, in part, based on regional growthprojections prepared by the SCAG. As part of its air quality planning, SCAG has prepared the RegionalComprehensivePlanandGuideandthe2016‐2040RegionalTransportationPlan/SustainableCommunitiesStrategy, which provide the basis for the land use and transportation components of the Air QualityManagementPlanandareusedinthepreparationoftheairqualityforecastsandtheconsistencyanalysisincluded in the Air Quality Management Plan. Both the Regional Comprehensive Plan and Air QualityManagementPlanarebased,inpart,onprojectionsoriginatingwithcountyandcitygeneralplans.
The 2012 Air QualityManagement Planwas prepared to accommodate growth, reduce the high levels ofpollutantswithintheareasunderthejurisdictionofSCAQMD,returncleanairtotheregion,andminimizethe impact on the economy. Projects that are consistent with the assumptions used in the Air QualityManagementPlandonotinterferewithattainmentbecausethegrowthisincludedintheprojectionsutilizedintheformulationoftheAirQualityManagementPlan.Thus,projects,uses,andactivitiesthatareconsistentwith the applicable growth projections and control strategies used in the development of the Air QualityManagement Plan would not jeopardize attainment of the air quality levels identified in the Air QualityManagementPlan,eveniftheyexceedtheSCAQMD’snumericindicators
3.2 CONSTRUCTION EMISSIONS
ConstructionoftheProjecthasthepotentialtogeneratetemporarycriteriapollutantemissionsthroughtheuse of heavy‐duty construction equipment, such as excavators and forklifts, and through vehicle tripsgenerated fromworkers andhaul trucks traveling to and from theProject Site. In addition, fugitivedustemissions would result from demolition and various soil‐handling activities. Mobile source emissions,primarily NOX, would result from the use of construction equipment such as dozers and loaders.Constructionemissionscanvarysubstantiallyfromdaytoday,dependingonthelevelofactivity,thespecifictypeofconstructionactivity,andprevailingweatherconditions.Theassessmentofconstructionairqualityimpactsconsiderseachofthesepotentialsources.
Daily regional emissions during construction are forecasted by assuming a conservative estimate ofconstructionactivities(i.e.,assumingallconstructionoccursat theearliest feasibledate)andapplyingthemobile source and fugitive dust emissions factors. The emissions are estimated using the CalEEMod(Version 2013.2.2) software, an emissions inventory software program recommended by the SCAQMD.CalEEMod is based on outputs from OFFROAD and EMFAC, which are emissions estimation modelsdevelopedbyCARBandusedtocalculateemissionsfromconstructionactivities,includingon‐andoff‐roadvehicles. The input values used in this analysiswere adjusted to beProject‐specific based on equipment
3.0 Methodology September 2016
1020S.FigueroaStreetProject AirQualityTechnicalReportESAPCR 32
types and the construction schedule. These values were then applied to the construction phasingassumptionsused inthecriteriapollutantanalysistogeneratecriteriapollutantemissionsvalues foreachconstruction activity. Detailed construction equipment lists, construction scheduling, and emissionscalculationsareprovidedinAppendixA.
Constructionhaulandvendortruckemissionsduringgrading,concretepourandbuildingconstructionwereevaluatedusingregionalheavy‐dutytruckemissionfactorsfromEMFAC2014.Dailytrucktripsanddefaulttrip lengthdatawereusedtoassessroadwayemissionsfromtruckexhaust,aswellastypicalCARBidlingtimes of local emissions on‐site. Detailed calculations are provided in Appendix A. Construction of theProject would be separated into two consecutive phases. Phase 1 is estimated to take approximately 33months, starting as early as 2017 with completion by 2020. Subphases of construction would includedemolitionof theassociatedparking, siteclearing,grading,excavation, subterraneanparkingandbuildingconstruction. Phase 2 is estimated to take approximately 31 months, starting as early as 2020 withcompletion by 2023. Subphases of construction would include demolition of the existing buildings andassociatedparking,siteclearing,grading,excavation,subterraneanparkingandbuildingconstruction.TheProjectwouldexportapproximately99,800cubicyardsofsoilduringPhase1and102,300cubicyardsofsoilduringPhase2. Constructionwouldgenerateapproximately16,000 square feetofpavingdemolitiondebrisduringPhase1and353,000squarefeetofdemolitiondebris(asphalt,interiorandexteriorbuildingdemolition,andgeneralconstructiondebris)duringPhase2.Emissionsfromtheseactivitiesareestimatedbyconstructionphase. It shouldbenoted that themaximumdailyemissionsarepredictedvalues for theworst‐casedayanddonotrepresenttheemissionsthatwouldoccurforeverydayofProjectconstruction.ThemaximumdailyemissionsarecomparedtotheSCAQMDdailyregionalnumericindicators.
The localized effects from theon‐site portion of the emissions are evaluated at nearby sensitive receptorlocationspotentially impactedby theProject according to theSCAQMD’sLocalizedSignificanceThresholdMethodology (June2003, revised July2008), which reliesonon‐sitemassemission rate screening tablesandproject‐specificdispersionmodeling,whereappropriate.ThelocalizedsignificancethresholdsareonlyapplicabletoNOX,CO,PM10,andPM2.5.ForNOXandCO,thethresholdsarebasedontheambientairqualitystandards.ForPM10andPM2.5,thethresholdsarebasedonrequirementsinSCAQMDRule403,FugitiveDust.TheSCAQMDhasestablishedscreeningcriteriathatcanbeusedtodeterminethemaximumallowabledailyemissionsthatwouldsatisfythelocalizedsignificancethresholdsandthereforenotcauseorcontributetoanexceedance of the applicable ambient air quality standards without project‐specific dispersionmodeling.ThelocalizedanalysisisbasedonthisSCAQMDscreeningcriteria.Thescreeningcriteriadependon:(1)theareainwhichtheprojectislocated,(2)thesizeoftheprojectsite,and(3)thedistancebetweentheprojectsite and the nearest sensitive receptor (e.g., residences, schools, hospitals). The Project Site is located inCentralLosAngelesareaandisapproximately2.7acresinsize.Theoff‐sitereceptorsarelocatedadjacenttotheProjectSitetothenorth,south,andeast.Therefore,thescreeningcriteriaapplicabletoa2‐acresiteintheCentralLosAngelesareawithsensitivereceptorslocated25metersawaywereused.
3.2.1 Emissions from Construction Equipment
Mobilesourceemissions,primarilyNOXandPM,wouldresultfromtheuseofconstructionequipmentsuchas bulldozers, wheeled loaders, and cranes. During the finishing phase, the application of architecturalcoatings(i.e.,paints)andotherbuildingmaterialswouldreleasereactiveorganiccompounds.Constructionemissions can vary substantially from day to day, depending on the level of activity, the specific type of
September 2016 3.0 Methodology
1020S.FigueroaStreetProject AirQualityTechnicalReportESAPCR 33
operation and, for dust, the prevailing weather conditions. The assessment of construction air qualityimpactsconsiderseachofthesepotentialsources.
Truckandconstructionequipmentemissionswillvarywithenginemodelyearsinwhichnewerequipmentwill emit fewerpollutants. As a conservative assumption, theCalEEModmodeluses anemission rate forequipment and truckswhich represents an averagemodel year for available equipmentwithin the basin.TheequipmentmixandconstructiondurationforeachstageisdetailedinAppendixA.CalEEModcalculatestheexhaustemissionsbasedonCARBOFFROADmethodologyusingtheequationpresentedbelow.
ConstructionOff‐RoadEquipment:
EmissionsDiesel[g]=∑i(EFi×Popi×AvgHPi×Loadi×Activityi
Where: EFi = EmissionfactorfromOFFROAD[g/bhp‐hr] Popi = Population[quantityofsameequipmenttype] AvgHPi = Maximumratedaveragehorsepower[hp] Loadi = LoadFactor[dimensionless] Activityi = Hoursofoperation[hours] i = EquipmentType
CalEEMod default methodologies, mentioned in USEPA AP‐42 were also used to describe fugitive dustemissions from construction phases. The CalEEMod tool provides options for specifying equipment,horsepower ratings, load factors, and operational hours per day. Construction equipment lists for eachphase of activity were provided by the applicant and/or applicant’s construction contractor(s) andarchitect(s).
The amount of construction equipment used and the duration of construction activity could have asubstantial effect upon the amount of construction emissions, concentrations and the resulting impactsoccurring at any one time. As such, the emission forecasts provided reflect a specific set of conservativeassumptionsbasedontheexpectedconstructionscenariowhereinarelativelylargeamountofconstructionisoccurringinarelativelyintensivemanner.
3.2.2 Emissions from On‐Road Trips
Constructiongenerateson‐roadvehicleexhaust,evaporative,anddustemissionsfrompersonalvehiclesforworkerandvendorcommuting,andtrucksforsoilandmaterialhauling.TheseemissionsarebasedonthenumberoftripsandVMTalongwithemissionfactorsfromEMFAC.
RunningemissionsforallpollutantsandPMemissionsfromtireandbrakewearweredividedbytheVMTofeachrespectivevehicleclassfromeachscenarioyearandadjustedforunitconversionstoderiveemissionfactorsinunitsofgramsperVMT.Allotheremissions(includingevaporative)weredividedbythenumberoftrips to derive emission factors in units of grams per trip. The emissions from mobile sources werecalculatedwiththetriprates,triplengthsandemissionfactorsforrunningfromEMFACasfollows:
3.0 Methodology September 2016
1020S.FigueroaStreetProject AirQualityTechnicalReportESAPCR 34
ConstructionOn‐RoadTrips:
Emissionspollutant=VMT*EFrunning,pollutant
Where:Emissionspollutant = emissionsfromvehiclerunningforeachpollutant[g]VMT = vehiclemilestraveled[miles]
EFrunning,pollutant = emissionfactorforrunningemissions[g/mile]
3.2.3 Emissions from Architectural Coating
VOCoff‐gassingemissionsresultfromevaporationofsolventscontainedinsurfacecoatings.TheCalEEModtool calculates the VOC evaporative emissions from application of residential and non‐residential surfacecoatingsusingthefollowingequation:
ConstructionArchitecturalCoatingEmissions:
EAC=EFACxF*Apaint
Where:E = emissions[lbVOC]EF = emissionfactor[lb/sqft]A = buildingsurfacearea[sqft].
TheCalEEModtoolassumesthetotalsurfaceforpaintingequals2.7timesthefloorsquarefootageforresidentialand2timesthatfornonresidentialsquarefootagedefinedbytheuser.Allofthelanduseinformationprovidedbyametricotherthansquarefootagewillbeconvertedtosquarefootageusingthedefaultconversionsoruserdefinedequivalence.
F = fractionofsurfacearea[%].
ThedefaultvaluesbasedonSCAQMDmethodsusedintheircoatingrulesare75percentfortheinteriorsurfacesand25percentfortheexteriorshell.Parkingareasarebasedon6percentcoverage.
The emission factor (EF) is based on theVOC content of the surface coatings and is calculated estimatedusingtheequationbelow:
ConstructionSurfaceCoatingEmissionFactor:
EFAC=Cvoc/454[g/lb]x3.785[L/Gal]/180[sqft] Where:
EF = emissionfactor[lb/sqft]C = VOCcontent[g/L].Thisvariesbylocationandyear
Theemission factors for coating categoriesare calculatedusing theequationabovebasedondefaultVOCcontentprovidedbytheairdistrictsorCARB’sstatewidelimits.
3.2.4 Emissions from Paving
While there is no specific screen associatedwith asphalt paving emissions, CalEEMod estimates VOC off‐gassingemissionsassociatedwithasphaltpavingofparkinglotsusingthefollowingequation:
September 2016 3.0 Methodology
1020S.FigueroaStreetProject AirQualityTechnicalReportESAPCR 35
ConstructionPavingEmissions:
EAPEFAPAParking Where: E = emissions[lb] EF = emissionfactor[lb/acre].TheSMAQMDdefaultemissionfactoris2.62lb/acre.
A = areaoftheparkinglot[acre]
3.3 OPERATIONAL EMISSIONS
Operation of the Project has the potential to generate criteria pollutant emissions through vehicle tripstravelingtoandfromtheProjectSite.Inaddition,emissionswouldresultfromareasourceson‐sitesuchasnatural gas combustion, landscaping equipment, and use of consumer products. Stationary sources ofemissions may be generated by on‐site charbroiling associated with food preparation activities at theproposedrestaurantlandusesiftherestaurantweretoinstallcharbroilingequipment.Operationalimpactswere assessed for the Interim Year (2020) when Phase 1 becomes operational concurrent with Phase 2constructionandforfullProjectbuildout(2023).
TheoperationalemissionsareestimatedusingtheCalEEModsoftware.CalEEModwasusedtoforecastthedaily regional emissions from area and stationary sources that would occur during long‐term Projectoperations. In calculating mobile‐source emissions, the trip length values were based on the distancesprovidedinCalEEMod. Thetripdistanceswereappliedtothemaximumdailytripestimates,basedonthetrip rates in the traffic study.32 The trips take into account trip reductions from Project characteristicsincludinginternalcapturefromco‐locatingcommercialandresidentialusesontheProjectSiteandtransitandpedestriantrips.MobileemissionswereestimatedseparatelyusingtheresultingCalEEMod‐calculatedannual vehicle miles traveled (VMT) and regional emission factors from EMFAC2014 because CalEEModreliesontheolderEMFAC2011.DetailsregardingtripreductionareprovidedinAppendixA.
Areasourceemissionsarebasedonnaturalgas(buildingheatingandwaterheaters),landscapingequipment,andconsumerproductusage (includingpaints) ratesprovided inCalEEMod. Natural gasusage factors inCalEEMod are based on the California Energy Commission (CEC) California Commercial EndUse Survey(CEUS) data set,which provides energy demandby building type and climate zone.33 However, since thedata from the CEUS is from 2002, correction factors are incorporated into CalEEMod to account for theappropriateversionoftheTitle24BuildingEnergyEfficiencyStandardsineffect.
Stationary‐sourceemissionsareestimatedseparatelyoutsideoftheCalEEModsoftware.Stationarysourcesmayincludecharbroilingofmeatthatmayoccuron‐siteduringfoodpreparationactivitiesintherestaurantkitchen.StationarysourceemissionsarecalculatedbasedonemissionsfactorsavailablefromtheSCAQMD.Inordertoprovideaconservativeanalysis, itwasassumedthattherestaurantwouldcharbroilmeatwithrelativelyhighemissionfactors(i.e.,hamburgermeatandchicken).ThequantityofmeatcharbroiledintherestaurantisbasedonsurveydatafromtheSCAQMD.TheestimatedemissionsaccountforreductionsfromcompliancewithemissionscontrolrequirementsconsistentwithSCAQMDRule1138.
32 GibsonTransportationConsulting,Inc.,TrafficStudyforthe1020S.FigueroaStreetProject,LosAngeles,California,(2016).33 CaliforniaEnergyCommission,CaliforniaCommercialEnd‐UseSurvey,http://capabilities.itron.com/CeusWeb/Chart.aspx.Accessed
April2016.
3.0 Methodology September 2016
1020S.FigueroaStreetProject AirQualityTechnicalReportESAPCR 36
Operational airquality impacts are assessedbasedon the incremental increase in emissions compared tobaselineconditions.UnderCEQA,thebaselineenvironmentalsettingforanEIRisestablishedatoraroundthetimethattheNoticeofPreparationfortheEIRispublished.Asdiscussedpreviously,theProjectSiteiscurrentlydevelopedwiththenine‐storyLuxeHotelandsurroundingsurfaceparkinglots.Therefore,thenetoperational emissions generated by the proposed Project are equal to the Project’s emissionsminus theexisting Project Site emissions. The maximum daily net emissions from operation of the Project arecomparedtotheSCAQMDdailyregionalnumericindicators.DetailedemissionscalculationsareprovidedinAppendixA.
The localized effects from the on‐site portion of daily emissions from Project operation are evaluated atnearbysensitivereceptorlocationspotentiallyimpactedbytheProjectaccordingtotheSCAQMD’sLocalizedSignificanceThresholdMethodology(June2003,revisedJuly2008).ThelocalizedimpactsfromoperationoftheProjectareassessedsimilartoconstruction,asdiscussedpreviously.
Emissions of CO are produced in greatest quantities from motor vehicle combustion and are usuallyconcentratedatorneargroundlevelbecausetheydonotreadilydisperseintotheatmosphere,particularlyunder cool, stable (i.e., low or no wind) atmospheric conditions. Localized areas where ambientconcentrationsexceedstateand/orfederalstandardsaretermedCOhotspots.ThepotentialfortheProjectto cause or contribute to the formation of off‐site CO hotspots are evaluated based on prior dispersionmodelingofthefourbusiestintersectionsintheAirBasinthathasbeenconductedbytheSCAQMDforitsCOAttainment Demonstration Plan in the AQMP. The analysis compares the intersectionswith the greatestpeak‐hour traffic volumes that would be impacted by the Project to the intersections modeled by theSCAQMD. Project‐impacted intersections with peak‐hour traffic volumes that are lower than theintersectionsmodeled by the SCAQMD, in conjunctionwith lower background CO levels, would result inloweroverallCOconcentrationscomparedtotheSCAQMDmodeledvaluesinitsAQMP.
3.3.1 Area Sources (Consumer Products and Coatings)
Area source emissions were calculated using CalEEMod default assumptions for of the multi‐familyresidential, retail, and restaurant land uses. Area sources include hearths, consumer product use,architecturalcoatings,andlandscapemaintenanceequipment.Emissionsassociatedwithnaturalgasusagein space heating, water heating, and stoves as these are calculated in the building energy use modulediscussedbelow.
3.3.1.1 Consumer Products
Consumer products are chemically formulated products used by household and institutional consumers,including,butnot limited to,detergents; cleaningcompounds;polishes; floor finishes; cosmetics;personalcare products; home, lawn, and gardenproducts; disinfectants; sanitizers; aerosol paints; and automotivespecialtyproducts;butdoesnot includeotherpaintproducts, furniturecoatings,orarchitecturalcoatings.SCAQMDdidanevaluationofconsumerproductusecomparedtothetotalsquarefootageofbuildingsusingdata from CARB consumer product Emission Inventory. To calculate the VOC emissions from consumerproductuse,thefollowingequationwasusedinCalEEMod:
September 2016 3.0 Methodology
1020S.FigueroaStreetProject AirQualityTechnicalReportESAPCR 37
ConsumerProducts:
EmissionsEFBuildingArea
Where:EF=poundsofVOCperbuildingsquarefootperday
Thefactoris2.04x10‐5lbs/sqft/dayforSCAQMDareas.
BuildingArea=Thetotalsquarefootageofallbuildingsincludingresidentialsquarefootage.
3.3.1.2 Architectural Coatings
VOCoff‐gassingemissionsresultfromevaporationofsolventscontainedinsurfacecoatingssuchasinpaintsand primers. The methodology for operations is the same as the construction methodology mentionedabove.
3.3.2 Building Energy Usage
Withregardtoenergyusage, theconsumptionof fossil fuelstogenerateelectricityandtoprovideheatingandhotwatergeneratescriteriapollutants. Futurefuelconsumptionratesareestimatedbasedonspecificsquare footage of themulti‐family residential, retail, and restaurant landuses, aswell aspredictedwatersupply needs of the Project. Energy usage (off‐site electricity generation and on‐site natural gasconsumption) for the Project is calculatedwithin CalEEModusing the CECCEUS data set.34 This data setprovidesenergyintensitiesofdifferentlandusesthroughoutthestateanddifferentclimatezones.However,since the data from the CEUS is from 2002, the CalEEMod software incorporates correction factors toaccountforcompliancewiththeTitle24BuildingStandardsCode.
Naturalgas‐relatedemissionsofcriteriapollutantsassociatedwithoperationoftheProjectarebasedonthesizeofthemulti‐familyresidential,retail,andrestaurant landuses,thenaturalgasdemandfactorsforthelanduses.NaturalgasdemandisbasedondatafromtheCEUS,whichlistsenergydemandbybuildingtype.35However,sincethedatafromtheCEUSisfrom2002,CalEEModincorporatescorrectionfactorstoaccountforcompliancewiththe2008Title24BuildingStandardsCode.SincetheProjectwouldalsoberequiredtomeettheTitle24standardsineffectatthetimeofbuildingpermitapplication,thisanalysisincorporatesanadditional correction factor to account for the updatedTitle 24Building Standards Code. The correctionfactorsareappliedonlytothenewbuildingconstruction.Naturalgasdemandfortheretainedexistingusesdoesnotincorporatetheadditionalcorrectionfactorinordertoaccountfortheageofthebuildings.
3.3.3 Mobile Source Emissions
Thetripdistanceswereappliedtothemaximumdailytripestimates,basedonthetripgenerationratesforeachlanduseprovidedbytheProjectTrafficStudy36toestimatethetotalVMT.TheVMTestimatestakeintoaccount tripandVMTreductions fromProject landusecharacteristics including internalcapture fromco‐locatinglandusesontheProjectSite,pedestriantrips,nearbytransitoptions,andnearbyoff‐siteresidential,commercial,restaurant,entertainment,andofficelanduses.DetailsregardingtripreductionareprovidedinAppendixA.
34 CaliforniaEnergyCommission,CaliforniaCommercialEnd‐UseSurvey,http://capabilities.itron.com/CeusWeb/Chart.aspx.Accessed
April2016.35 California Energy Commission, California Commercial End‐Use Survey,
http://capabilities.itron.com/CeusWeb/ChartsSF/Default2.aspx.AccessedApril2016.36 GibsonTransportationConsulting,Inc.,TrafficStudyforthe1020S.FigueroaStreetProject,LosAngeles,California,(2016).
3.0 Methodology September 2016
1020S.FigueroaStreetProject AirQualityTechnicalReportESAPCR 38
3.3.3.1 Trip Type
Thetriptypebreakdowndescribesthepurposeofthetripgeneratedateachlanduse.Forexample,thetriptypebreakdown indicates thepercentageof tripsgeneratedat single familyhome forwork, for shopping,andforotherpurposes.Multiplyingthetotaltripsforalandusebytriptypebreakdownpercentageyieldstripsofagiventriptype. TwosetsoftriptypebreakdownareusedinCalEEMod–residentialbreakdownandcommercialbreakdown.
Residentialtriptype: Theseincludehome‐work(H‐W),home‐shop(H‐S),orhome‐other(H‐O).Ahome‐worktriprepresentsthetripfromthehometotheworkplace.Ahome‐shoptriprepresentsthetripfromthehometoalandusewhereshoppingtakesplace(generallyretail).Ahome‐otherrepresentsallothertypesoftrips generated from the resident such as school, entertainment, etc. The trip type breakdown is fromdistrict supplied information or the 1999 Caltrans Statewide Travel Survey is used as default or specificinformationobtainedfromthevariousDistricts.
Commercial trip type: These include commercial‐customer (C‐C), commercial‐work (C‐W) andcommercial‐nonwork (C‐NW). A commercial‐customer trip represents a trip made by someone who isvisiting thecommercial landuse topartake in theservicesofferedby theSite. Thecommercial‐work triprepresentsatripmadebysomeonewhoisemployedbythecommercial landusesector. Thecommercial‐nonworktriprepresentsatripassociatedwiththecommerciallanduseotherthanbycustomersorworkers.AnexampleofC‐NWtrips includes tripsmadebydeliveryvehiclesofgoodsassociatedwith the landuse.The trip type breakdown from the number or workers and or truck trips from ITE and an analysis ofinformationprovidedfortheSCABwasusedasdefaulttoassignthetriptypebreakdownsforalllanduses.Ifanexactmatchtoalandusewasnotavailable,datafromasimilarlandusewasusedasasurrogate.
3.3.3.2 Primary Trip Length
InCalEEMod,eachtriptypehasaprimarytriplengthassociatedwithit.Thesetriplengthsarebasedonthelocationandurbanizationselectedontheprojectcharacteristicscreen. Thesevaluesweresuppliedbythedistrictsoruseadefaultaverageforthestate. Eachdistrict(orcounty)alsoassignstriplengthsforurbanandruralsettings.
3.3.3.3 Pass‐by and Diverted Trips
Trip link types further describe the characteristics of the trip attracted to each land use, whether it’s aprimarytrip,adivertedlinktrip,orapass‐bytrip.Forexample,acommercialcustomerpass‐bytripcouldbeapersongoingfromhometoshoponhis/herwaytowork.Inaddition,acommercialcustomerdiverted‐linktripcouldbeapersongoingfromhometowork,andonitswaymakingadiversiontoshop. Pass‐bytripsgeneratevirtuallynoadditional runningemissionsbutcouldgenerateadditional restingandstartupemissions.Divertedtripsgeneratelessrunningemissionscomparedtoprimarytrips,andcanalsogenerateadditionalrestingandstartupemissions.
3.3.3.4 Mobile Source Emission Factors
BecauseCalEEModdoesnotincorporateCARB’smostrecenton‐roademissionsfactormodel,mobilesourceemissionfactorsarebasedonEMFAC2014.Themodelwasrunintheemissionsmode(alsoreferredtoasthe “Burden”mode) and used to generate South Coast Air Basin‐specific vehicle fleet emission factors in
September 2016 3.0 Methodology
1020S.FigueroaStreetProject AirQualityTechnicalReportESAPCR 39
units of grams or metric tons per mile, which is the same methodology used by CalEEMod to generateemission factorsusing thepriorEMFAC2011model. Theseemission factorsare thenapplied to thedailyVMTtoobtaindailymobilesourceemissions.
ModelingfortheProjectwasconductedusingthevehiclefleetmixfortheSouthCoastAirBasinasprovidedinEMFAC2014.Mobilesourceemissionsaregenerallycalculatedasfollows:
Mobile:
Emissions=(∑i(Units×ADT×DTRIP×EF)i)
Where: Units = Numberofvehicles(samevehiclemodelyearandclass) ADT = Averagedailytriprate[trips/day] DTRIP = Tripdistance[miles/trip] EF = Emissionfactor[poundspermile] i = Summationindex
EmissionsfrommotorvehiclesaredependentonmodelyearsandthespecifictypesofvehiclesthatareusedtotraveltoandfromtheProjectSite. Theemissionswerecalculatedusingarepresentativemotorvehiclefleetmix fortheSouthCoastAirBasin fortheopeningyearof theProject. Asdiscussedabove,allvehicletypeswouldvisit theProjectSite; therefore, theuseof themotorvehicle fleetmix for theSouthCoastAirBasinisanappropriatemodelingparameter.
3.3.4 Stationary Source Emissions
Stationary‐sourceemissionsareestimatedseparatelyoutsideoftheCalEEModsoftware.Stationarysourcesmayincludecharbroilingofmeatthatmayoccuron‐siteduring foodpreparationactivities inarestaurantkitchen.StationarysourceemissionsarecalculatedbasedonemissionsfactorsavailablefromtheSCAQMDfor charbroiling.37 In order to provide a conservative analysis, itwas assumed that the restaurantwouldcharbroilmeatwith relatively high emission factors (i.e., hamburger and chickenmeat). The quantity ofmeat charbroiled in the restaurant isbasedonsurveydata from theSCAQMD.38 TheestimatedemissionsaccountforreductionsfromcompliancewithemissionscontrolrequirementsconsistentwithSCAQMDRule1138.Ingeneral,stationary‐sourcecharbroilingemissionsarecalculatedasfollows:
StationarySourceCharbroiling:
Emissions=(∑i(QMEAT×EF×(1‐C)i)
Where: QMEAT = Quantityofmeatproductcharbroiledinaday[pounds/day] EF = Emissionfactor[poundspollutantperpoundsmeat] C = Emissionscontrolfactor[percent] i = Summationindex
37 South Coast Air Quality Management District, Emission Factors for Commercial Cooking Operations,
http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default‐source/rule‐book/Proposed‐Rules/1138/par1138pdsr_appendixi.pdf?sfvrsn=2. Accessed April2016.
38 Ascitedin:SanJoaquinValleyUnifiedAirPollutionControlDistrict,FinalDraftStaffReportRule4692(CommercialCharbroiling),February21,2002.
3.0 Methodology September 2016
1020S.FigueroaStreetProject AirQualityTechnicalReportESAPCR 40
3.4 TOXIC AIR CONTAMINANT IMPACTS (CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATIONS)
The potential for the Project to cause impacts from TACs are evaluated by conducting a screening‐levelanalysis.Thescreening‐levelanalysisconsistsofreviewingtheProject’sSiteplanandProjectdescriptiontoidentifyanynewormodifiedTACemissionsources.IfitisdeterminedthattheProjectwillintroduceanewsourceofTACs,ormodifyanexistingsource,thendownwindsensitivereceptorlocationsareidentifiedandasite‐specificanalysisisconducted.
ThegreatestpotentialforTACemissionsduringconstructionwouldberelatedtodieselparticulatematteremissions associated with heavy‐duty equipment during demolition, excavation and grading activities.ConstructionactivitiesassociatedwiththeProjectwouldbesporadic,transitory,andshortterminnature..OEHHAisresponsiblefordevelopingandrevisingguidelinesforperforminghealthriskassessments(HRAs)undertheState’stheAirToxicsHotSpotsProgramRiskAssessment(AB2588)regulation.InMarch2015,OEHHA adopted revised guidelines that update the previous guidance by incorporating advances in riskassessmentwithconsiderationofinfantsandchildrenusingAgeSensitivityFactors(ASF).TheconstructionHRAwasperformed inaccordancewith therevisedOEHHAAirToxicsHotSpotsProgramGuidanceManualforPreparationofHealthRiskAssessments (OEHHA Guidance).39 The analysis incorporates the estimatedconstructionemissions,aspreviouslydiscussed,anddispersionmodelingusingtheUSEPAAERMODmodelwithmeteorologicaldatafromtheclosestSCAQMDmonitoringstation.
During long‐termoperations,TACscouldbeemittedaspartofperiodicmaintenanceoperations, cleaning,painting,etc.,and fromperiodicvisits fromdelivery trucksandservicevehicles. However, theseusesareexpected to be occasional and result in minimal exposure to off‐site sensitive receptors. As the Projectconsists of residential, hotel, and commercial/restaurant uses, the Project would not include sources ofsubstantiveTACemissionsidentifiedbytheSCAQMDorCARBsitingrecommendations. Thusaqualitativeanalysisisappropriate.
WithregardtooperationalTACemissions,sensitivelandusesandnewsourcesorTACs.TheSCAQMDandCARBprovideguidanceregardingsitingsourcesofTACsnearoff‐sitesensitivereceptors. As theProjectconsists of residential, hotel, retail, and restaurant uses, the Project would not include sources of TACemissionsidentifiedbytheSCAQMDorCARBsitingrecommendations
3.5 LAND USE CHARACTERISTICS AND PROJECT DESIGN FEATURES
3.5.1 Land Use Characteristics
The Project would represent an urban infill development, since it would be undertaken on a currentlydevelopedsite,andwouldbe locatednearexistingoff‐sitecommercialandretaildestinationsand incloseproximitytoexistingpublictransitstops,whichwouldresultinreducedvehicletrips,VMT,andassociatedtransportationemissionscomparedtothestatewideandSouthCoastAirBasinaverage.
TheCaliforniaAirPollutionControlOfficersAssociation(CAPCOA)hasprovidedguidanceformitigatingorreducingemissionsfromlandusedevelopmentprojects. InSeptember2010,CAPCOAreleasedaguidance
39 OfficeofEnvironmentalHealthHazardAssessment,AirToxicsHotSpotsProgramGuidanceManualforPreparationofHealthRisk
Assessments,(2015).
September 2016 3.0 Methodology
1020S.FigueroaStreetProject AirQualityTechnicalReportESAPCR 41
document titledQuantifyingGreenhouseGasMitigationMeasureswhichprovidesemissionreductionvaluesfor recommendedreductionmeasures.40TheCAPCOAguidancedocumentwasutilized in thisanalysis forquantifyingreductionsduetolandusecharacteristicsandProjectDesignFeaturesinCalEEMod.
The landuse characteristics listedbeloware consistentwith theCAPCOAguidancedocument, andwouldreduce vehicle trips to and from the Project Site compared to the statewide and South Coast Air Basinaverage. Theywould therefore result in a corresponding reduction in VMT and associated air pollutantemissions.
IncreasedDensity:Increaseddensity,measuredintermsofpersons,jobs,ordwellingunitsperunitarea, reducesemissionsassociatedwith transportationas it reduces thedistancepeople travel forwork or services and provides a foundation for the implementation of other strategies such asenhanced transit services. This measure corresponds to CAPCOA guidance measure LUT‐1.41According to CAPCOA, the reduction in VMT from this measure applies to urban and suburbansettingsforresidential,retail,office,industrial,andmixed‐useprojects.TheProjectislocatedinanurban infill42locationand ismixed‐use; therefore, thismeasureapplies to theProject. TheProjectwould increasetheProjectSitedensity toapproximately241dwellingunitsperacreand206 jobsperacre(refertoSection4.I,Population,Housing,andEmployment,oftheDraftEIR,whichprovidesemploymentdatausedtoestimatethenumberofjobsperacre).
LocationEfficiency: Location efficiencydescribes the locationof a project relative to the typeofurbanlandscapesuchasanurbanarea,compactinfill,orsuburbancenter.Ingeneral,comparedtothestatewideaverage,aprojectcouldrealizeVMTreductionsupto65percentinanurbanarea,upto30percentinacompactinfillarea,orupto10percentinasuburbancenterforlanduse/locationstrategies.43 This measure corresponds to CAPCOA guidance measure LUT‐2.44 According toCAPCOA, the reduction in VMT from this measure applies to urban and suburban settings forresidential,retail,office,industrial,andmixed‐useprojects.TheProjectislocatedinanurbaninfilllocationandismixed‐use;therefore,thismeasureappliestotheProject. AccordingtotheCAPCOAguidance, factors that contribute to VMT reductions under this measure include the geographiclocationoftheprojectwithintheregion.TheProjectSiterepresentsanurbaninfilllocationwithin
40 CaliforniaAirPollutionControlOfficersAssociation,QuantifyingGreenhouseGasMitigationMeasures,(2010).41 CaliforniaAirPollutionControlOfficersAssociation,QuantifyingGreenhouseGasMitigationMeasures,(2010)155‐158.42 CaliforniaAirPollutionControlOfficersAssociation,QuantifyingGreenhouseGasMitigationMeasures, (2010)59‐60. Theproject
areameetsthecharacteristicsforanurbansettingwithrespecttotypicalbuildingheightsof6storiesormuchhigher,gridstreetpattern,minimalsetbacks,constrainedparking,highparkingprices,highqualityrailservice(i.e.,MetroBlue,Expo,RedandPurpleLines),locationrelativetoregionalcores(5milesorless)andjobs/housingbalance(theCentralCityCommunityPlanAreahasanexistingjobs/housingratioofapproximately7.2).
43 CalEEMod,bydefault,assumesthattripdistancesintheSouthCoastAirBasinareslightlylongerthanthestatewideaverage.Thisisdue to the fact that commute patterns in the South CoastAirBasin involve a substantial portion of the population commutingrelativelyfardistances,whichisdocumentedintheSouthernCaliforniaAssociationofGovernments2016RegionalTransportationPlan(RTP)/SustainableCommunitiesStrategy(SCS). TheRTP/SCSshows that,evenunder futurePlanconditions,upwardsof50percentofallworktripsare10milesorlonger(SCAG,PerformanceMeasuresAppendix,p.7,2012). TheRTP/SCSdoesnotspecifythecurrentpercentageofwork tripsgreater than10miles in theregion,but itcanbeassumed that thepercentage iscurrentlygreaterthan50percentsincethegoaloftheRTP/SCSistoreduceoverallVMTintheregion.Itisthusreasonabletoassumethatthetripdistances inSouthCoastAirBasinareanalogous to thestatewideaveragegiven that thedefaultmodel tripdistances in theSouthCoastAirBasin are slightly longer but still generally similar to the statewide average. Therefore, projects could achievesimilar levelsofVMT reduction (65percent inanurbanarea,30percent ina compact infillarea,or10percent fora suburbancenter)comparedtotheSouthCoastAirBasinaverage.
44 CaliforniaAirPollutionControlOfficersAssociation,QuantifyingGreenhouseGasMitigationMeasures,(2010)159‐161.
3.0 Methodology September 2016
1020S.FigueroaStreetProject AirQualityTechnicalReportESAPCR 42
the Downtown area of the City of Los Angeles. The Project Site is served by existing publictransportationlocatedwithinaquarter‐mile.TheProjectSiteiswithinanactiveurbancenterwithmany existing off‐site commercial, entertainment, hotel, and residential buildings. The locationefficiencyoftheProjectSitewouldresultinsynergisticbenefitsthatwouldreducevehicletripsandVMT compared to the statewide and South Coast Air Basin average and would result incorrespondingreductionsintransportation‐relatedemissions.
IncreasedLandUseDiversityandMixed‐Uses: Locating different types of land uses near oneanother can decrease VMT since trips between land use types are shorter and could beaccommodatedbyalternativemodesoftransportation,suchaspublictransit,bicycles,andwalking.This measure corresponds to CAPCOA guidance measure LUT‐3.45 According to CAPCOA, thereduction in VMT from thismeasure applies to urban and suburban settings (also potentially forruralmaster‐plannedcommunities)formixed‐useprojects.TheProjectislocatedinanurbaninfilllocationandismixed‐use;therefore,thismeasureappliestotheProject. AccordingtotheCAPCOAguidance, factors that contribute toVMT reductionsunder thismeasure include thepercentage ofeach land use type in the project. The Project would co‐locate complementary commercial andresidential landusesinclosetoproximitytoexistingoff‐sitecommercialandresidentialuses. TheProjectwouldincludeon‐siteretailandresidentiallandusesandwouldbelocatedwithinaquarter‐mileofoff‐sitecommercialandresidentialuses,aswellasmajortransitfacilities. TheincreasesinlandusediversityandmixofusesontheProjectSite,aswellasproximitytotransit,wouldreducevehicle tripsandVMTbyencouragingwalkingandnon‐automotive formsof transportation,whichwouldresultincorrespondingreductionsintransportation‐relatedemissions.
Increased Destination Accessibility: This measure corresponds to CAPCOA guidance measureLUT‐4.46 According to CAPCOA, the reduction in VMT from this measure applies to urban andsuburban settings for residential, retail, office, industrial, andmixed‐use projects. The Project islocated inanurbaninfill locationandismixed‐use, includingresidentialandretailuses; therefore,thismeasureapplies to theProject. According to theCAPCOAguidance, factors that contribute toVMT reductions under thismeasure include the distance to downtown ormajor job center. TheProjectwouldbelocatedinanareathatoffersaccesstomultipleothernearbydestinations,includingrestaurant,bar,office,retail,entertainment,movietheater,andresidentialuses. TheProjectSiteisalsolocatednearotherjobcentersintheregionandwithintheDowntownareaitself.Theaccesstomultiple destinations in close proximity to the Project Site would reduce vehicle trips and VMTcompared to the statewide and South Coast Air Basin average, encourage walking and non‐automotiveformsoftransportation,andwouldresultincorrespondingreductionsintransportation‐relatedemissions.
Increased Transit Accessibility: Locating a project with high density near transit facilitiesencouragestheuseoftransitbypeopletravelingtoorfromaprojectsite.Thismeasurecorrespondsto CAPCOA guidance measure LUT‐5.47 According to CAPCOA, the reduction in VMT from thismeasure applies to urban and suburban settings (also potentially for rural settings adjacent to acommuterrailstationwithconvenientaccesstoamajoremploymentcenter)forresidential,retail,office, industrial, andmixed‐use projects. The Project is located in an urban infill location and ismixed‐use;therefore,thismeasureappliestotheProject.AccordingtotheCAPCOAguidance,factors
45 CaliforniaAirPollutionControlOfficersAssociation,QuantifyingGreenhouseGasMitigationMeasures,(2010)162‐166.46 CaliforniaAirPollutionControlOfficersAssociation,QuantifyingGreenhouseGasMitigationMeasures,(2010)167‐170.47 CaliforniaAirPollutionControlOfficersAssociation,QuantifyingGreenhouseGasMitigationMeasures,(2010)171‐175.
September 2016 3.0 Methodology
1020S.FigueroaStreetProject AirQualityTechnicalReportESAPCR 43
thatcontribute toVMTreductionsunder thismeasure includethedistanceto transitstationsneartheProject. TheProjectwouldbe locatedwithinaquarter‐mileofpublic transportation, includingexisting Metro bus routes (e.g., 4, 28, 81, 442, 460, 701, 721, 728, 910/950, Commuter Express422/423/438/448/534,DASHF)andtheMetroBlueandExpoLines,andnearbyaccesstotheMetroRedandPurpleLineswithinone‐halfmile. TheProjectwouldprovideaccess toon‐siteuses fromexisting pedestrian pathways. The Project would also provide parking for bicycles on‐site toencourage utilization of alternative modes of transportation. The increased transit accessibilitywould reduce vehicle trips and VMT versus the statewide and South Coast Air Basin average,encouragewalkingandnon‐automotiveformsoftransportation,andwouldresultincorrespondingreductionsintransportation‐relatedemissions.
ImproveDesignofDevelopment:Improvedstreetnetworkcharacteristicswithinaneighborhoodenhanceswalkabilityandconnectivity.Characteristicsincludestreetaccessibilityusuallymeasuredin terms of number of intersections (e.g., four‐way intersections) per squaremile. Thismeasurecorresponds to CAPCOA guidance measure LUT‐9.48 According to CAPCOA, the reduction in VMTfromthismeasureappliestourbanandsuburbansettingsforresidential,retail,office,industrial,andmixed‐useprojects.TheProjectislocatedinanurbaninfilllocationandismixed‐use;therefore,thismeasureappliestotheProject.TheProjectwouldbelocatedinahighlystreet‐accessibleareawithapproximately76four‐wayintersectionswithinaonemileareaoftheProjectSite,whichexceedsthestandard intersection density assumed in baseline VMT modeling. The increased intersectiondensitywouldreducevehicletripsandVMTversusthestatewideandSouthCoastAirBasinaverage,encouragewalkingandnon‐automotiveformsoftransportation,andwouldresultincorrespondingreductionsintransportation‐relatedemissions.
ProvidePedestrianNetworkImprovements:Providingpedestrianaccessthatminimizesbarriersandlinksaprojectsitewithexistingorplannedexternalstreetsencouragespeopletowalkinsteadofdrive.ThismeasurecorrespondstoCAPCOAguidancemeasureSDT‐1.49AccordingtoCAPCOA,thereduction inVMT fromthismeasureapplies tourban, suburban, andrural settings for residential,retail,office,industrial,andmixed‐useprojects.TheProjectislocatedinanurbaninfilllocationandismixed‐use; therefore, thismeasure applies to the Project. According to the CAPCOA guidance,factorsthatcontributetoVMTreductionsunderthismeasureincludepedestrianaccessconnectivitywithintheprojectandto/fromoff‐sitedestinations. AsdiscussedinSection4.J,TransportationandTraffic,thewalkabilityofexistingfacilitiesisbasedontheavailabilityofpedestrianroutesnecessaryto accomplish daily tasks without the use of an automobile. These attributes are quantified byWalkScore.comandassignedascoreoutof100points.WiththevariouscommercialbusinessesandentertainmentfacilitiesadjacenttoresidentialneighborhoodsoftheDowntownareaandproximitytopublictransit,thewalkabilityoftheDowntownareaisapproximately90points;50thiscomparestothecitywidescoreof64points. Asdiscussed inChapter2.0,ProjectDescription, theProjectwouldimprovethestreet‐levelpedestrianenvironmentandconnectivitywithintheLALIVE,StaplesCenter,the Los Angeles Convention Center and the surrounding streetscape, with the creation of newpedestrianscalefeaturessuchasapublicplazaalongS.Figueroawithstreetlevelretail/restaurantuses,streettreesandlandscaping,publicart,andsignageandlighting. TheProjectwouldpromote
48 CaliforniaAirPollutionControlOfficersAssociation,QuantifyingGreenhouseGasMitigationMeasures,(2010)182‐185.49 CaliforniaAirPollutionControlOfficersAssociation,QuantifyingGreenhouseGasMitigationMeasures,(2010)186‐189.50 WalkScore.com(www.walkscore.com)ratestheProjectSite(1020S.FigueroaStreet)withascoreof90of100possiblepoints(scores
accessedonMarch16,2016fortheDowntownLosAngelesdistrict). WalkScorecalculatesthewalkabilityofspecificaddressesbytakingintoaccounttheeaseoflivingintheneighborhoodwithareducedrelianceonautomobiletravel.
3.0 Methodology September 2016
1020S.FigueroaStreetProject AirQualityTechnicalReportESAPCR 44
pedestrian activities and connections to interior uses. Pedestrian access to the Hotel Tower andlobbywouldbefromahotelmotor‐courton11thStreetandfromthehotellobbyfrontingS.FigueroaStreet. Pedestrian access to the two stories of commercial and restaurant frontage along theperiphery of the Podium fronting 11th Street, S. Figueroa Street, S. Flower Street, and OlympicBoulevard would be directly from those streets at the ground level or via elevators, stairs orescalators.PedestrianaccesstothelobbyforResidentialTower1atthecornerof11thStreetandS.FlowerStreetwouldbefromS.FlowerStreet.PedestrianaccesstothelobbyofResidentialTower2at the corner of S. Figueroa Street and Olympic Boulevard would be from Olympic Boulevard.Pedestrianaccess to the residentialunits in thePodiumat thestreet levelwouldbeviaeither theResidential Tower 1 or Residential Tower 2 residential lobbies. In summary, the Project wouldprovidean internalpedestriannetwork forProjectvisitorsand residents that links to theexistingoff‐site pedestrian network including existing off‐site sidewalks, and would therefore result in asmallreductioninVMTandassociatedtransportation‐relatedemissions.
3.5.2 Project Design Features
TheProjectwouldachieveseveralobjectivesof theCityofLosAngelesGeneralPlanFrameworkElement,Southern California Association of Governments Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable CommunitiesStrategy,andSouthCoastAirQualityManagementDistrictAirQualityManagementPlanforestablishingaregionallandusepatternthatpromotessustainability.TheProjectwouldsupportpedestrianactivityintheDowntownarea,andcontributetoalandusepatternthataddresseshousingneedsandreducesvehicletripsandairpollutionbylocatingresidentialuseswithinanareathathaspublictransit(withaccesstoexistingregional bus and rail service), and employment opportunities, restaurants and entertainment all withinwalkingdistance.
TheProjectwouldbedesigned to incorporategreenbuilding techniquesandothersustainability features.KeyProjectDesignFeatures thatwouldcontribute toenergyefficiencies include theuseof glass/windowareas for ventilation and daylight accessibility, low albedo (high reflectivity) color paving to reduce heatisland effect and drought tolerant landscaping. Other building features would include such items asstormwater retention; installationofheating, ventilation, andair conditioning (HVAC)systems thatutilizeozone‐friendly refrigerants; use of materials and finishes that emit low quantities of VOCs; use of highefficiency fixturesandappliances,waterconservation features;andrecyclingof solidwastes. TheProjectwouldalsoprovidebicycleparkingandpreferredparkingfor fuelefficientorelectricvehicle. TheProjectwould also be designed to complywith the City of LosAngelesGreenBuildingOrdinance. The followingProjectDesignFeatureswouldreduceairpollutantemissionsaswellasgreenhousegasemissions:
PDF‐AQ‐1: GreenBuildingMeasures: TheProjectwouldbedesignedandoperatedtomeetorexceedtheapplicablerequirementsoftheStateofCaliforniaGreenBuildingStandardsCodeandtheCityofLosAngelesGreenBuildingCodeandachievetheequivalentoftheUSGBCLEEDSilverCertificationlevel.Greenbuildingmeasureswouldinclude,butarenotlimitedtothefollowing:
TheProjectwouldimplementaconstructionwastemanagementplantodivertallmixed construction and demolition debris to City certified construction anddemolition waste processors, consistent with the Los Angeles City CouncilapprovedCouncilFile09‐3029;
September 2016 3.0 Methodology
1020S.FigueroaStreetProject AirQualityTechnicalReportESAPCR 45
The Project would be designed to optimize energy performance and reducebuildingenergycostby14percentfornewconstructioncomparedtotheTitle24BuildingEnergyEfficiencyStandardsas specified in theLEED2009EnergyandAtmospherecredit1(EAc1);
The Project would be designed to optimize energy performance and reducebuildingenergycostbyinstallingenergyefficientappliancesthatmeettheUSEPAENERGYSTARratingstandardsorequivalent;
The Project would include double‐paned windows to keep heat out duringsummermonthsandkeepheatinsideduringwintermonths.
The Project would include lighting controls with occupancy sensors to takeadvantageofavailablenaturallight.
TheProjectwouldreduceoutdoorpotablewaterusebyaminimumof50percentcomparedtobaselinewaterconsumption.Reductionswouldbeachievedthroughdrought‐tolerant/Californianativeplantspeciesselection,artificialturf,irrigationsystemefficiency,alternativewatersupplies(e.g.,rainwaterharvestingforuseinlandscaping),and/orsmartirrigationsystems(e.g.,weather‐basedcontrols).
TheProjectwouldreduceindoorpotablewaterusebyaminimumof40percentcomparedtobaselinewaterconsumptionbyinstallingwaterfixturesthatexceedapplicablestandards.
The Project would provide on‐site recycling areas, consistent with City of LosAngeles strategies and ordinances,with the goal of achieving 70 percentwastediversionby2020,and90percentby2025.
ToencouragecarpoolingandtheuseofelectricvehiclesbyProjectresidentsandvisitors,theApplicantshalldesignateaminimumof8percentofon‐siteparkingforcarpooland/oralternative‐fueledvehicles,andtheProjectdesignwillprovidefor the installation of the conduit and panel capacity to accommodate futureelectricvehiclechargingstationsinto10percentoftheparkingspaces.
PDF‐AQ‐2: Construction Measures: The Project shall utilize off‐road diesel‐poweredconstruction equipment thatmeets or exceeds the CARB andUSEPA Tier 4off‐roademissions standards for equipment rated at 50 hp or greater during Projectconstruction.Equipment,suchastowercranes,weldersandpumpsshallbeelectricoralternative fueled (i.e., non‐diesel). To the extent possible, pole powerwill bemadeavailable for use with electric tools, equipment, lighting, etc. Alternative‐fueledgenerators shall be used when commercial models that have the power supplyrequirementstomeettheconstructionneedsoftheProjectarereadilyavailablefromlocal suppliers/vendors. These requirements shall be included in applicable biddocumentsandsuccessfulcontractor(s)mustdemonstrate theability tosupplysuchequipment.Acopyofeachunit’scertifiedtierspecificationormodelyearspecificationandCARBorSCAQMDoperatingpermit(ifapplicable)shallbeavailableuponrequestatthetimeofmobilizationofeachapplicableunitofequipment.
PDF‐AQ‐3: Control ofVOCs: The Project shall utilize low‐emitting materials pursuant to therequirementsoftheLEEDLow‐EmittingMaterialCreditorequivalent.Indoorcoatingsshallbelimitedto50gramsperliterofVOCsorless.
3.0 Methodology September 2016
1020S.FigueroaStreetProject AirQualityTechnicalReportESAPCR 46
InadditiontotheProjectDesignFeatures,theProjectwouldbesubjecttoregulatoryrequirementsofotheragenciessuchastheAQMD.Theserequirementsinclude:
1. Demolition,GradingandConstructionActivities:CompliancewithprovisionsoftheSCAQMDDistrict Rule 403. The Project shall comply with all applicable standards of the SouthernCalifornia Air QualityManagement District, including the following provisions of District Rule403:
All unpaved demolition and construction areas shall bewetted at least twice dailyduring excavation and construction, and temporary dust covers shall be used toreduce dust emissions andmeet SCAQMD District Rule 403.Wetting could reducefugitivedustbyasmuchas50percent.
Theconstructionareashallbekeptsufficientlydampenedtocontroldustcausedbygrading and hauling, and at all times provide reasonable control of dust caused bywind.
All clearing, earth moving, or excavation activities shall be discontinued duringperiodsofhighwinds(i.e.,greaterthan15mph),soastopreventexcessiveamountsofdust.
Alldirt/soilloadsshallbesecuredbytrimming,wateringorotherappropriatemeanstopreventspillageanddust.
All dirt/soil materials transported off‐site shall be either sufficiently watered orsecurelycoveredtopreventexcessiveamountofdust.
General contractors shall maintain and operate construction equipment so as tominimizeexhaustemissions.
Truckshavingnocurrenthaulingactivityshallnotidlebutbeturnedoff.
2. Anti‐IdlingRegulation: InaccordancewithSection2485 inTitle13of theCaliforniaCodeofRegulations, the idling of all diesel‐fueled commercial vehicles (weighing over 10,000pounds)duringconstructionshallbelimitedtofiveminutesatanylocation.
3. FuelRequirements: In accordance with Section 93115 in Title 17 of the California Code ofRegulations,operationofanystationary,diesel‐fueled,compression‐ignitionenginesshallmeetspecifiedfuelandfueladditiverequirementsandemissionstandards.
4. Architectural Coatings: The Project shall comply with SCAQMD Rule 1113 and utilizearchitecturalcoatingsthatmeettheVOCcontentrequirements.
5. Restaurant Odors: The Project shall install odor‐reducing equipment in accordance withSCAQMDRule1138.
1020S.FigueroaStreetProject AirQualityTechnicalReportESAPCR 47
4.0 COMPLIANCE WITH AMBIENT AIR STANDARDS
4.1 REGIONAL SIGNIFICANCE THRESHOLDS
4.1.1 Construction Emissions
Theworst‐casedailyemissionswerecalculatedasmaximumdailyconstructionemissionsforeachphasebyyear. Some individual construction phases do overlap and it should be noted that the maximum dailyemissionsarepredictedvaluesfortheworst‐casedayanddonotrepresenttheemissionsthatwouldoccurforeverydayofconstruction.ConstructionPhase1and2,however,wouldnotoverlap.Detailedemissionscalculations are provided in Appendix A. Results of the criteria pollutant calculations are presented inTable5,Phase1–MaximumUnmitigatedRegionalConstructionEmissions,andTable6,Phase2–MaximumUnmitigatedRegionalConstructionEmissions.Asshowntherein,construction‐relateddailyemissionsforthecriteria and precursor pollutants (VOC, NOX, CO, SOX, PM10, and PM2.5) would not exceed the SCAQMDnumeric indicators. These calculations include appropriate dust control measures required to beimplemented during each phase of development, as required by SCAQMD Rule 403 (Control of FugitiveDust). Construction emission estimates also include emissions reductions from implementation of theProjectDesignFeatures,suchastheuseofequipmentthatmeettheTier4emissionsstandardsforoff‐roadconstruction equipment. Therefore,with respect to regional emissions from Phase 1 and 2 constructionactivities,impactswouldbelessthansignificant.
Table 5
Phase 1 – Maximum Unmitigated Regional Construction Emissions (pounds per day) a
Source VOC NOX CO SO2 PM10 b PM2.5
b
2017–SitePreparation <1 1 7 <1 2 1
2017–Demolition <1 3 16 <1 1 <1
2017–Grading 2 54 40 <1 6 3
2017–Foundation 1 22 25 <1 2 <1
2018–Foundation 1 19 24 <1 2 <1
2018–BuildingConstruction,ArchitecturalCoating 28 14 62 <1 10 3
2019–BuildingConstruction,ArchitecturalCoating,Paving
28 14 67 <1 10 3
2020–BuildingConstruction,ArchitecturalCoating 28 12 55 <1 10 3
MaximumRegional(On‐SiteandOff‐Site)Emissions
28 54 67 <1 10 3
SCAQMDNumericIndicators 75 100 550 150 150 55
Over/(Under) (47) (46) (483) (150) (140) (52)
ExceedsThresholds? No No No No No No
a Totals may not add up exactly due to rounding in the modeling calculations Detailed emissions calculations are provided in Appendix A.
b Emissions include fugitive dust control measures consistent with SCAQMD Rule 403. Source: ESA PCR, 2016
4.0 Compliance with Ambient Air Standards September 2016
1020S.FigueroaStreetProject AirQualityTechnicalReportESAPCR 48
Table 6
Phase 2 – Maximum Unmitigated Regional Construction Emissions (pounds per day) a
Source VOC NOX CO SO2 PM10 b PM2.5
b
2020–Demolition 1 7 24 <1 3 1
2020–Grading 2 38 36 <1 6 2
2020–Foundation 1 15 23 <1 1 <1
2021–Foundation 1 14 23 <1 1 <1
2021–BuildingConstruction,ArchitecturalCoating,Paving
14 10 45 <1 7 2
2022–BuildingConstruction,ArchitecturalCoating 14 9 35 <1 7 2
2023–BuildingConstruction,ArchitecturalCoating 14 6 33 <1 7 2
MaximumRegional(On‐SiteandOff‐Site)Emissions
14 38 45 <1 7 2
SCAQMDNumericIndicators 75 100 550 150 150 55
Over/(Under) (61) (62) (505) (150) (143) (53)
ExceedsThresholds? No No No No No No
a Totals may not add up exactly due to rounding in the modeling calculations Detailed emissions calculations are provided in Appendix A.
b Emissions include fugitive dust control measures consistent with SCAQMD Rule 403. Source: ESA PCR, 2016
4.1.2 Operational Emissions
Operationalemissionswereassessedformobile,area,andstationarysources.Operationalcriteriapollutantemissions were calculated for the Project for an interim year which corresponds to buildout of Phase 1(2020)withconcurrentconstructionofPhase2andthefullbuildoutyear(2023).Dailytripgenerationratesfor theProjectwereprovidedby theProject trafficstudy51and include tripsassociatedwith theproposedcondos,hotel,office,retailspace,andrestaurants.OperationalemissionestimatesalsoincorporatethegreenbuildingdesignfeaturesdetailedinPDF‐AQ‐1,includingindoorandoutdoorwaterreductionandincreasedenergyefficiency.WithregardtoVOCs,SCAQMDRule1113wouldbeenforcedandtheLEEDorequivalentdesignfeaturewouldbeimplementedthatlimitsinteriorarchitecturalcoatingemissionsto50g/L.DetailedemissionscalculationsareprovidedinAppendixA.
ResultsofthecriteriapollutantcalculationsarepresentedinTable7,InterimYear–MaximumUnmitigatedRegionalOperationalEmissionsandTable8,FullBuildoutYear–MaximumUnmitigatedRegionalOperationalEmissions.Theincreaseinoperational‐relateddailyemissions(Projectemissionsminusexistingemissions)forthecriteriaandprecursorpollutants(VOC,NOX,CO,SOX,PM10,andPM2.5)wouldnotexceedtheSCAQMDthresholdsofsignificanceduringinterimoperationswhencombinedwithon‐goingconstructionemissions.
51 GibsonTransportationConsulting,Inc.,TrafficStudyforthe1020S.FigueroaStreetProject,LosAngeles,California,(2016).
September 2016 4.0 Compliance with Ambient Air Standards
1020S.FigueroaStreetProject AirQualityTechnicalReportESAPCR 49
Table 8
Full Buildout Year – Maximum Unmitigated Regional Operational Emissions (pounds per day) a
Source VOC NOX CO SO2 PM10 PM2.5
Phase1and2Operations(FullBuildout) Area(ConsumerProducts,Landscaping) 35 1 54 <1 <1 <1Energy(NaturalGas) <1 4 3 <1 <1 <1Stationary(Charbroiling) <1 – – – 0.9 0.9MotorVehicles 3 2 23 <1 33 9
TotalProjectOn‐SiteandOff‐SiteEmissions 39 8 91 <1 34 10
ExistingOperationalEmissions(removed) 7 2 16 <1 7 2
MaximumNetRegional(On‐SiteandOff‐Site)Emissions
32 6 75 <1 27 8
SCAQMDNumericIndicators 55 55 550 150 150 55
Over/(Under) (23) (49) (475) (150) (123) (48)
ExceedsThresholds? No No No No No No
a Totals may not add up exactly due to rounding in the modeling calculations Detailed emissions calculations are provided in Appendix A.Source: ESA PCR, 2016
Table 7
Interim Year – Maximum Unmitigated Regional Operational Emissions (pounds per day) a
Source VOC NOX CO SO2 PM10 PM2.5
Phase1Operations
Area(ConsumerProducts,Landscaping) 21 <1 24 <1 <1 <1
Energy(NaturalGas) <1 3 2 <1 <1 <1
Stationary(Charbroiling) <1 – – – 0.9 0.9
MotorVehicles 2 1 19 <1 19 5
Phase2MaximumConstructionEmissions 14 38 45 <1 7 2
TotalProjectOn‐SiteandOff‐SiteEmissions 38 43 96 <1 27 8
ExistingOperationalEmissions(removed) 7 2 16 <1 7 2
MaximumNetRegional(On‐SiteandOff‐Site)Emissions
31 41 80 <1 20 6
SCAQMDNumericIndicators 55 55 550 150 150 55
Over/(Under) (24) (14) (470) (150) (130) (49)
ExceedsThresholds? No No No No No No
a Totals may not add up exactly due to rounding in the modeling calculations Detailed emissions calculations are provided in Appendix A. Source: ESA PCR, 2016
4.0 Compliance with Ambient Air Standards September 2016
1020S.FigueroaStreetProject AirQualityTechnicalReportESAPCR 50
Therefore,withrespecttoregionalemissionsfromoperations,impactswouldbelessthansignificantduringinterimoperations.Atfullbuildout,theincreaseinlong‐termoperationalemissionswouldalsonotexceedthresholdsforregionalcriteriapollutantemissions.Therefore,Project‐relatedoperationalemissionswouldresultinaless‐than‐significantimpact.
4.2 LOCALIZED SIGNIFICANCE THRESHOLDS
4.2.1 Construction Emissions
The localized construction air quality analysis was conducted using the methodology described in theSCAQMD Localized Significance Threshold Methodology (June 2003, revised July 2008).52The screeningcriteria provided in the Localized Significance ThresholdMethodology were used to determine localizedconstructionemissions thresholds for theProject. Themaximumdaily localizedemissions foreachof theconstruction phases and localized significance thresholds are presented inTable 9, Phase1–MaximumUnmitigated Localized Construction Emissions and Table 10, Phase 2 –Maximum Unmitigated LocalizedConstructionEmissions. Asshowntherein,maximumlocalizedconstructionemissionsforsensitivereceptorswouldnotexceedthelocalizedthresholdsforNOX,CO,PM10,andPM2.5.Therefore,withrespecttolocalizedconstructionemissions,impactswouldbelessthansignificant.
Table 9
Phase 1 – Maximum Unmitigated Localized Construction Emissions (pounds per day) a
Source NOX CO PM10 b PM2.5
b
2017–SitePreparation 1 6 2 1
2017–Demolition 1 15 1 <1
2017–Grading 8 33 3 1
2017–Foundation 4 21 <1 <1
2018–Foundation 4 21 <1 <1
2018–BuildingConstruction,ArchitecturalCoating 4 21 <1 <1
2019–BuildingConstruction,ArchitecturalCoating,Paving 4 29 <1 <1
2020–BuildingConstruction,ArchitecturalCoating 3 21 <1 <1MaximumLocalized(On‐Site)Emissions 8 33 3 1SCAQMDNumericIndicators 108 1,048 8 5Over/(Under) (100) (1,015) (5) (4)ExceedsThresholds? No No No No
a Totals may not add up exactly due to rounding in the modeling calculations Detailed emissions calculations are provided in Appendix A.
b Emissions include fugitive dust control measures consistent with SCAQMD Rule 403.
Source: ESA PCR, 2016
52 South Coast Air Quality Management District, Localized Significance Thresholds, (2003, revised 2008),
http://www.aqmd.gov/home/regulations/ceqa/air‐quality‐analysis‐handbook/localized‐significance‐thresholds. Accessed April2016.
September 2016 4.0 Compliance with Ambient Air Standards
1020S.FigueroaStreetProject AirQualityTechnicalReportESAPCR 51
Table 10
Phase 2 – Maximum Unmitigated Localized Construction Emissions (pounds per day) a
Source NOX CO PM10 b PM2.5
b
2020–Demolition 2 23 2 <1
2020–Grading 6 32 3 1
2020–Foundation 3 21 <1 <1
2021–Foundation 3 21 <1 <1
2021–BuildingConstruction,ArchitecturalCoating,Paving 3 21 <1 <1
2022–BuildingConstruction,ArchitecturalCoating 2 12 <1 <1
2023–BuildingConstruction,ArchitecturalCoating 2 12 <1 <1MaximumLocalized(On‐Site)Emissions 6 32 3 1SCAQMDNumericIndicators 108 1,048 8 5Over/(Under) (102) (1,016) (5) (4)ExceedsThresholds? No No No No
a Totals may not add up exactly due to rounding in the modeling calculations Detailed emissions calculations are provided in Appendix A.
b Emissions include fugitive dust control measures consistent with SCAQMD Rule 403.
Source: ESA PCR, 2016
4.2.2 Operational Emissions
The localized operational air quality analysis was conducted using the methodology described in theSCAQMDLocalizedSignificanceThresholdMethodology(June2003,revisedJuly2008).Thescreeningcriteriaprovidedin theLocalizedSignificanceThresholdMethodologywereusedtodetermine localizedoperationalemissionsthresholdsfortheProject.Themaximumdailyincreaseinlocalizedemissions(Projectemissionsminus existing emissions) and localized significance thresholds arepresented inTable11, InterimYear–Maximum Unmitigated Localized Operational Emissions and Table 12, Full Buildout Year – MaximumUnmitigated Localized Operational Emissions. As shown therein, the increase in maximum localizedoperationalemissions forsensitivereceptorswouldnotexceedthe localizedthresholds forNOX,CO,PM10,andPM2.5duringboththeinterimyear(2020,Phase1operations)andfullbuildoutyear(2023,Phases1and2 operations). Therefore, with respect to localized operational emissions, impacts would be less thansignificant.
4.3 LOCALIZED CARBON MONOXIDE IMPACTS
The potential for the Project to cause or contribute to CO hotspots is evaluated by comparing Projectintersections(bothintersectiongeometryandtrafficvolumes)withpriorstudiesconductedbytheSCAQMDinsupportoftheirAQMPsandconsideringexistingbackgroundCOconcentrations.Asdiscussedbelow,thiscomparisondemonstratesthattheProjectwouldnotcauseorcontributeconsiderablytotheformationofCOhotspots,thatCOconcentrationsatProjectimpactedintersectionswouldremainwellbelowtheambientairqualitystandards,andthatnofurtherCOanalysisiswarrantedorrequired.AsshownpreviouslyinTable2,COlevelsintheProjectAreaaresubstantiallybelowthefederalandstatestandards.MaximumCOlevelsinrecentyearsare3ppm(one‐houraverage)and2.4ppm(eight‐houraverage)comparedtothethresholdsof
4.0 Compliance with Ambient Air Standards September 2016
1020S.FigueroaStreetProject AirQualityTechnicalReportESAPCR 52
Table 12
Full Buildout Year – Maximum Unmitigated Localized Operational Emissions (pounds per day) a
Source NOX CO PM10 PM2.5
Phase1and2Operations(FullBuildout) Area(ConsumerProducts,Landscaping) 1 54 <1 <1Energy(NaturalGas) 4 3 <1 <1Stationary(Charbroiling) – – 0.9 0.9
TotalProjectOn‐SiteEmissions 5 57 1 1
ExistingOn‐SiteOperationalEmissions(removed) 1 1 <1 <1
MaximumNetLocalized(On‐Site)Emissions 4 56 1 1SCAQMDNumericIndicators 108 1,048 2 2Over/(Under) (104) (992) (2) (2)ExceedsThresholds? No No No No
a Totals may not add up exactly due to rounding in the modeling calculations Detailed emissions calculations are provided in Appendix A.
Source: ESA PCR, 2016
Table 11
Interim Year – Maximum Unmitigated Localized Operational Emissions (pounds per day) a
Source NOX CO PM10 PM2.5
Phase1Operations
Area(ConsumerProducts,Landscaping) <1 24 <1 <1
Energy(NaturalGas) 3 2 <1 <1
Stationary(Charbroiling) – – 0.9 0.9
TotalProjectOn‐SiteEmissions 3 26 1 1
ExistingOperationalOn‐SiteEmissions(removed) 1 1 <1 <1
MaximumNetLocalized(On‐Site)Emissions 2 25 1 1
SCAQMDNumericIndicators 108 1,048 2 2
Over/(Under) (106) (1,023) (1) (1)
ExceedsThresholds? No No No No
a Totals may not add up exactly due to rounding in the modeling calculations Detailed emissions calculations are provided in Appendix A.
Source: ESA PCR, 2016
September 2016 4.0 Compliance with Ambient Air Standards
1020S.FigueroaStreetProject AirQualityTechnicalReportESAPCR 53
20ppm(one‐houraverage)and9.0(eight‐houraverage). CarbonmonoxidedecreaseddramaticallyintheAirBasinwiththeintroductionofthecatalyticconverterin1975.NoexceedancesofCOhavebeenrecordedat monitoring stations in the Air Basin for some time and the Air Basin is currently designated as a COattainmentareaforboththeCAAQSandNAAQS.Thus,itisnotexpectedthatCOlevelsatProject‐impactedintersectionswouldrisetothelevelofanexceedanceofthesestandards.
Additionally,theSCAQMDconductedCOmodelingforthe2003AQMPforthefourworst‐caseintersectionsin the Air Basin. These include: (a)Wilshire Boulevard and Veteran Avenue; (b) Sunset Boulevard andHighlandAvenue;(c)LaCienegaBoulevardandCenturyBoulevard;(d)LongBeachBoulevardandImperialHighway. In the2003AQMP, theSCAQMDnotes that the intersectionofWilshireBoulevard andVeteranAvenue is themost congested intersection inLosAngelesCounty,with an averagedaily traffic volumeofabout100,000vehiclesperday.53Thisintersectionislocatedneartheon‐andoff‐rampstoInterstate405inWestLosAngeles. Theevidenceprovided inTable4‐10ofAppendixVof the2003AQMPshows that thepeakmodeledCOconcentrationduetovehicleemissionsatthesefourintersectionswas4.6ppm(one‐houraverage) and 3.2 (eight‐hour average) at Wilshire Boulevard and Veteran Avenue.54 When added to theexistingbackgroundCOconcentrations,thescreeningvalueswouldbe7.6ppm(one‐houraverage)and5.6ppm(eight‐houraverage).
BasedontheProject’sassociatedTrafficStudy,ofthestudiedintersectionsthatarepredictedtooperateataLevelofService(“LOS”)ofD,E,orFunderfutureoperationalyearplusProjectconditions,oneintersectionwould potentially have peak traffic volumes of approximately 62,000 per day.55 As a result, COconcentrations are expected to be approximately 5.9 ppm (one‐hour average) and 4.4 ppm (eight‐houraverage)orless,whichwouldnotexceedthethresholds.56Totaltrafficvolumesatthemaximumimpactedintersection would likely have to more than double to contribute to a CO hotspot given that vehiclesoperating today have reduced CO emissions as compared to vehicles operating in year 2003 when theSCAQMD conducted the AQMP attainment demonstrationmodeling. Thus, this comparison demonstratesthat the Project would not contribute considerably to the formation of CO hotspots and no further COanalysisisrequired.TheProjectwouldresultinlessthansignificantimpactswithrespecttoCOhotspots.
4.4 TOXIC AIR CONTAMINANTS ‐ CONSTRUCTION
ThegreatestpotentialforTACemissionswouldberelatedtodieselparticulatematteremissionsassociatedwith heavy equipment operations during demolition, grading and excavation, and building constructionactivities.Inaddition,incidentalamountsoftoxicsubstancessuchasoils,solvents,andpaintswouldbeused.
53 South Coast Air Quality Management District, 2003 Air Quality Management Plan, Appendix V: Modeling and Attainment
Demonstrations,(2003)V‐4‐24.54 Theeight‐houraverageisbasedona0.7persistencefactor,asrecommendedbytheSCAQMD.55 GibsonTransportationConsulting, Inc.,TrafficStudy for the1020S.FigueroaStreetProject,LosAngeles,California, (2016). The
traffic volume of approximately 62,000was estimated based on the peak hour intersection volumes under futurewith Projectconditionsandthegeneralassumptionthatpeakhourtripsrepresentapproximately10percentofdailytripvolumes(theFederalHighway Administration considers 10 percent to be a standard assumption; see http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/planning/tmip/publications/other_reports/tod_modeling_procedures/ch02.cfm). The peak value was estimated at the intersection of FigueroaStreetandOlympicBoulevard.
56 TheexpectedCOconcentrationsarecalculatedbasedontheratioof62,000/100,000multipliedbythescreeningvaluesof4.6ppm(one‐houraverage)and3.2ppm(eight‐houraverage)andaddingthebackgroundconcentrations.ActualCOvaluewouldlikelybelessthantheexpectedvaluesreportedintheanalysisastheaverageCOemissionsfrommotorvehiclesoperatingtodayhavedeclinedascomparedtomotorvehiclesoperatinginyear2003.
4.0 Compliance with Ambient Air Standards September 2016
1020S.FigueroaStreetProject AirQualityTechnicalReportESAPCR 54
TheseproductswouldcomplywithallapplicableSCAQMDrulesfortheirmanufactureanduse.TheProjectwillbesubject toseveralSCAQMDrulesdesignedto limitexposuretoTACsduringconstructionactivities.The Project would be required to comply with the CARB Air Toxics Control Measure that limits dieselpoweredequipmentandvehicle idling tonomore than5minutesata location, and theCARB In‐UseOff‐Road Diesel Vehicle Regulation; compliance with these would minimize emissions of TACs duringconstruction. The Project would also complywith the requirements of SCAQMD Rule 1403 if asbestos isfound during the renovation and construction activities. Furthermore, the Project would voluntarilyimplementthecontrolmeasuresdescribedinPDF‐AQ‐2.
OEHHAisresponsiblefordevelopingandrevisingguidelinesforperformingHRAsundertheState’stheAirToxics Hot Spots Program Risk Assessment (AB 2588) regulation. InMarch 2015, OEHHA adopted newguidelines which updates the previous guidance by incorporating advances in risk assessment withconsideration of infants and children using Age Sensitivity Factors (ASF). These changes also take intoaccount the sensitivity of children to TAC emissions, different breathing rates, and time spent at home.Children have a higher breathing rate compared to adults and would likely spend more time at homeresulting in longer exposure durations. On June 5, 2015, SCAQMD incorporated these guidelines in torelevantrulesdesignedforpermittingofstationarysources.57Althoughconstructionwouldbetemporary,construction impacts associatedwith TACs are addressed quantitatively in a refinedHRA. TheHRAwasperformed inaccordancewith theOEHHAAirToxicsHotSpotsProgramGuidanceManualforPreparationofHealth Risk Assessments (OEHHA Guidance).58 The analysis incorporates the estimated constructionemissions, as previously discussed, and dispersion modeling using the USEPA AERMOD model withmeteorologicaldatafromtheclosestSCAQMDmonitoringstation.
Thecancerriskvalues fordieselparticulatematter(DPM)considersexposurevia the inhalationpathway.Thepotential exposure throughotherpathways (e.g., ingestion) requires substance and site‐specific data,and the specific parameters for DPM are not known for these pathways.59 The OEHHA guidelinesrecommends the incorporation of several factors to quantify the carcinogenic compound dose via theinhalation pathway. Once determined, the dose ismultiplied by the compound‐specific inhalation cancerpotency factor to derive the cancer risk estimate. The dose takes into account the concentration at asensitivereceptor.Thecancerpotencyfactoriscompound‐specific.Inperforminghealthriskcalculations,carcinogeniccompoundsarenotconsideredtohavethresholdlevels(i.e.,doselevelsbelowwhichtherearenorisks).Anyexposure,therefore,willhavesomeassociatedrisk.Incrementalhealthrisksassociatedwithexposuretocarcinogeniccompoundsisdefinedintermsoftheprobabilityofdevelopingcancerasaresultofexposure to a chemical at a given concentration. Under a deterministic approach (i.e., point estimatemethodology),thecancerriskprobabilityisdeterminedbymultiplyingthechemical’sannualconcentrationbyitsunitriskfactor(URF). TheURFforDPMrecommendedbytheScientificReviewPanel60is3.0x10‐4permicrogrampercubicmeter(µg/m3).ThisvaluecorrespondstoaCancerPotencyFactor(CPF)of1.1permilligram/kilogram (bodyweight)perday (mg/kg(bw)‐day). TheURF forDPMmeans that for receptors
57 South Coast Air Quality Management District, Minutes of the June 5, 2015 Meeting, http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default‐
source/Agendas/Governing‐Board/2015/2015‐Jul10‐001.pdf?sfvrsn=8,AccessedSeptember28,201558 OfficeofEnvironmentalHealthHazardAssessment,AirToxicsHotSpotsProgramGuidanceManualforPreparationofHealthRisk
Assessments,(2015).59 CaliforniaAirResourcesBoard,ReporttotheAirResourcesBoardontheProposed IdentificationofDieselExhaustasaToxicAir
Contaminant,PartAExposureAssessment,ApprovedbytheScientificReviewPanel,(1998).60 TheScientificReviewPanel ischargedwithevaluating the riskassessmentsof substancesproposed for identificationas toxicair
contaminantsbyCARB,OEHHA,andtheDepartmentofPesticideRegulation(DPR),andthereviewofguidelinespreparedbyOEHHA.
September 2016 4.0 Compliance with Ambient Air Standards
1020S.FigueroaStreetProject AirQualityTechnicalReportESAPCR 55
withanannualaverageconcentrationof1µg/m3 in theambientair, theprobabilityof contractingcancerover a 70‐year lifetime of exposure is 300 in 1million. The URF also assumes that a person is exposedcontinuously for a 70 year lifetime. This approach for calculating cancer risk is intended to result inconservative(i.e.,healthprotective)estimatesofhealthimpactsandisusedforassessingriskstosensitivereceptors.Theestimationofcancerriskusesthefollowingalgorithms:
Risk=Doseinhalation×InhalationCPF×ASF (Equation1)Where: Doseinhalation=CAIR×DBR×A×EF×ED×FAH/AT (Equation2) InhalationCPF=inhalationcancerpotencyfactor ASF=agesensitivityfactorWhere: CAIR=concentrationofcompoundinairinmicrogramspercubicmeter(µg/m3) DBR=breathingrateinliterperkilogramofbodyweightperday(L/kg‐bodyweight/day) A=inhalationabsorptionfactor(1forDPM) EF=exposurefrequencyindaysperyear(day/year) ED=exposuredurationinyears(year) FAH=fractionoftimeathome AT=averagingtimeperiodoverwhichexposureisaveragedindays(day)
TheOEHHArecommendedvaluesfortheparameterslistedabovewereusedintheHRAanalysis.Thedailybreathingrate(DBR)usedintheanalysiswasbasedonwasbasedonOEHHArecommendationswhichvarydependingonagewhichareshowninTable13,OEHHARecommendedResidentialDailyBreathingRatesforPointEstimateDoseCalculations(L/kgbodyweight). The recommended exposure frequency (EF) is 350daysperyearwhichisequivalentto0.96(350days/365daysayear).Theinhalationabsorptionfactor(A)isassumedtobe1forinhalationbasedriskassessment.
As indicated inEquation1above,eachagegrouphasdifferentexposureparameterswhichrequirecancerrisktobecalculatedseparatelyforeachagegroup.Valuesforfractionoftimeathome(FAH)arepresentedinTable14,OEHHARecommendationsforFractionofTimeatHome(FAH)forEvaluatingResidentialCancerRisk. Once dose is calculated, cancer risk is calculated by accounting for cancer potency of the specificpollutant,andtheagesensitivityfactor(ASF).
Non‐cancerchronicimpactswereassessedbasedontheHazardIndex.Theevaluationofchronicimpactsisbased on themaximum annual emissions over a 12‐months period of construction activity. The chronic
Table 13
OEHHA Recommended Residential Daily Breathing Rates for Point Estimate Dose Calculations (L / kg body weight)
3rd Trimester 0<2 Years 2<9 Years 2<16 Years 16<30 Years
Average 225 658 535 452 21095thPercentile 361 1090 861 745 335
Source: OEHHA Air Toxics Hot Spots Program Guidance Manual. February 2015.
4.0 Compliance with Ambient Air Standards September 2016
1020S.FigueroaStreetProject AirQualityTechnicalReportESAPCR 56
HazardIndexiscalculatedbydividingthemaximummodeledannualaverageconcentrationatthemaximumimpacted sensitive receptor by the Reference Exposure Level (REL). The REL is the concentration at orbelowwhichnoadversehealtheffectsareanticipated.Forexample,OEHHAhasrecommendedanambientconcentrationof 5µg/m3 as the chronic inhalationREL forDPMexhaust. Therefore, a sensitive receptorexposedtoanannualaverageDPMconcentrationof5µg/m3or lesswouldnotresult inachronic impact.Non‐cancerchronicimpactsaffectspecifictargetorgansystems(alsocalledtoxicologicalendpoints),suchastheeye,nervoussystem,reproductivesystem,andrespiratorysystem.ThechronichealthimpactwiththemaximumHazardIndexforthesametargetorgansystemisusedforimpactdetermination.
Sensitive receptors used for modeling were placed at the location of sensitive receptor (i.e., residential)buildingsneartotheProjectSite. Heavy‐dutyequipmentandtrucksweremodeledasvolumesourcesandwerelocatedontheProjectSiteandonroadwaysthattruckswouldpotentiallytravelonwithina0.25miledistance of the Project Site. Figure 4, Construction Health Risk Assessment Source‐Receptor Diagram,providesadiagramshowingthelocationsofsourceofProjectconstruction‐relatedDPMemissionswithinao.25mileoftheProjectSiteandnearbysensitivereceptors.HealthriskcalculationswereperformedusingaspreadsheettoolconsistentwiththeOEHHAGuidanceandCARBHotspotsAnalysisandReportingProgram(HARP) version 2 spreadsheet methodology. Table 15,MaximumCarcinogenicRisk forOff‐SiteSensitiveReceptors from Construction, summarizes the carcinogenic risk for representative receptors locatedthroughouttheProjectSitevicinity.Forcarcinogenicexposures, thecancerrisk fromDPMemissionsfromconstruction of the Project is estimated to result in amaximum carcinogenic risk of less than 8 per onemillion.Themaximumimpactwouldoccuratsensitivelanduses(residences)directlysouthoftheProjectSite. Asdiscussedpreviously, the lifetimeexposureunderOEHHAguidelines takes intoaccountearly life(infantandchildren)exposure.Itshouldbenotedthatthecalculatedcancerriskconservativelyassumesthatexposure of sensitive receptors (residential uses) would not have any mitigation, such as mechanicalfiltration.Asthemaximumimpactwouldbelessthantheriskthresholdof10inonemillion,impactswouldbeconsideredlessthansignificant.
Potential non‐cancer effects of chronic (i.e., long term) DPM exposureswere evaluated using the HazardIndexapproachasdescribedintheOEHHAGuidance.Ahazardindexequaltoorgreaterthan1.0representsasignificantchronichealthhazard.AsshowninTable16,MaximumNon‐CancerChronicImpactsforOff‐SiteSensitiveReceptors,nearbyoff‐sitesensitivereceptorswouldnotbeexposedtochronicimpactsthatwouldexceed the thresholdof1.0. Themaximum impactwouldoccurat sensitive receptorsdirectlyeastof theProjectSite.Therefore,non‐cancerchronicimpactswouldbeconsideredlessthansignificant.Theprocessofassessinghealthrisksandimpactsincludesadegreeofuncertainty.Thelevelofuncertaintydependson
Table 14
OEHHA Recommendations for Fraction of Time at Home (FAH) for Evaluating Residential Cancer Risk
Age Range Fraction of Time at Residence
3rdTrimesterand0<2Years 0.852<16Years 0.7216‐70Years 0.73
Source: OEHHA Air Toxics Hot Spots Program Guidance Manual. February 2015.
FIGUREConstruc on Health Risk Assessment
Source-Receptor Diagram1020 S. Figueroa Street Project 4
Source: PCR Services Corpora on, 2016.
0 0.3 km
N
P C R
4.0 Compliance with Ambient Air Standards September 2016
1020S.FigueroaStreetProject AirQualityTechnicalReportESAPCR 58
Thispageintentionallyblank.
September 2016 4.0 Compliance with Ambient Air Standards
1020S.FigueroaStreetProject AirQualityTechnicalReportESAPCR 59
Table 15
Maximum Carcinogenic Risk for Off‐Site Sensitive Receptors from Construction
SensitiveReceptorMaximumCancerRisk(#inonemillion)
Residence–South/SoutheastofProjectSite 7.9MaximumIndividualCancerRiskThreshold 10
ExceedsThreshold? No
Source: ESA PCR, 2016
Table 16
Maximum Non‐Cancer Chronic Impacts for Off‐Site Sensitive Receptors
Sensitive Receptor Chronic Hazard Index
Residence–South/SoutheastofProjectSite 0.009TotalHazardIndex 1.0Exceedsthreshold? No
Source: ESA PCR, 2016
the availability of data and the extent towhich assumptions are relied upon in caseswhere the data areincompleteorunknown.AllHRAsrelyuponscientificstudiestoreducethelevelofuncertainty;however,itis not possible to completely eliminate uncertainty from the analysis. Where assumptions are used tosubstituteforincompleteorunknowndata,itisstandardpracticeinperformingHRAstoerronthesideofhealthprotectiontoavoidunderestimatingorunderreportingtherisk to thepublic. Ingeneral, sourcesofuncertainty thatmay lead toanoverestimationoranunderestimationof therisk includeextrapolationoftoxicity data in animals to humans and uncertainty in the exposure estimates. In addition to uncertainty,thereexists“anaturalrangeorvariabilityinmeasuredparametersdefiningtheexposurescenario”andthatthe“thegreatestquantitativeimpactisvariationamongthehumanpopulationinsuchpropertiesasheight,weight, food consumption, breathing rates, and susceptibility to chemical toxicants.”61As mentionedpreviously, it is typical to err on the side of health protection by assessing risk on the most sensitivepopulations, suchaschildrenand theelderly,bymodelingpotential impactsbasedonhigh‐endbreathingrates,byincorporatingagesensitivityfactors,andbynottakingintoaccountexposurereductionmeasures,suchasmechanicalairfiltrationbuildingsystems.
TheProjectSitepreviouslyhadagasstationandautorepairshopattheintersectionofFigueroaStreetandOlympic Boulevard, which were removed from the Project Site in 1990 and replaced with the existingsurfaceparkinglot.Duringremovalofthegasstation,soilcontaminationwasreportedattheundergroundstorage tanks (USTs) and fuel dispensers. A vapor extraction system (VES) remediation system removed
61 CaliforniaEnvironmentalProtectionAgency,OfficeofHealthHazardAssessment,AirToxicsHotSpotsProgram,RiskAssessment
Guidelines,GuidanceManualforPreparationofHealthRiskAssessments,(2015)1‐5.
4.0 Compliance with Ambient Air Standards September 2016
1020S.FigueroaStreetProject AirQualityTechnicalReportESAPCR 60
90percentofthetotalestimatedgasolinethatleakedfromthestationandLAFDissuedaNoFurtherActionletteronJune10,1994.A530‐gallondieselUST,transitionpump,andassociatedundergroundpipingwereabandoned in place below the existing hotel driveway and landscaped median under a Covenant andAgreementwiththeCity.Petroleumhydrocarbonswereidentifiedinshallowsoilsamplesinthevicinityofthe abandonedUST and associated piping. Refer to Section 4.E,HazardsandHazardousMaterials, of theDraftEIR foradditionaldetails. Asdiscussed inSection4.E, the removalof these soils and infrastructurewouldlikelyrequirespecialhandlingduringexcavation,includingadditionalanalyticalcharacterization,soilsegregation, and transport off‐site to be recycled/disposed of in accordancewith Federal, State and localregulations. TheProjectwould implementMitigationMeasuresMM‐HAZ‐1 (SoilManagementPlan),MM‐HAZ‐2(HealthandSafetyPlan),andMM‐HAZ‐3(AdditionalSiteTesting) toensurethatanycontaminatedsoils are properly identified, excavated and disposed of off‐site in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 1166(VolatileOrganicCompoundEmissionsfromDecontaminationofSoil),toavoidsignificantimpactsorriskstoworkersorthepublicintheeventthatelevatedlevelsofsubsurfacegasesareencounteredduringgradingandexcavation,and toconductadditional subsurfacesoilandsoil gassamplingand testing inaccordancewith the recommendations of the SummaryReport forLimitedSoilandSoilGas Investigation,LuxeHotel,prepared by Terra‐Petra and dated April 10, 2016. Recommendations pertaining to remediation, publichealth,andworkersafetybasedontheadditionalsamplingandtestingwouldbeincorporatedintotheSoilManagement Plan. Implementation of MM‐HAZ‐1, MM‐HAZ‐2, and MM‐HAZ‐3 would ensure thatcontaminated soils and materials are removed from the Project Site and transported in a manner thatminimizes or prevents the potential for contaminated soils and materials from becoming airborne orotherwisereleasedintotheenvironment.Asaresult,healthimpactsfromcontaminatedsoilsandmaterialswouldnotsubstantiallycontributetoconstructionhealthrisksandwouldbelessthansignificant.
4.5 TOXIC AIR CONTAMINANTS ‐ OPERATION
Project operations would generate only minor amounts of diesel emissions from delivery trucks andincidentalmaintenanceactivities. Truckswouldcomplywith theapplicableprovisionsof theCARBTruckandBusregulationtominimizeandreducePMandNOXemissionsfromexistingdieseltrucks.Therefore,theProjectoperationswouldnotbeconsideredasubstantialsourceofdieselparticulates.
In addition, Project operationswould only result inminimal emissions of air toxics frommaintenance orotherongoing activities, such as from theuseof architectural coatings andotherproducts. TheProject’srestaurantusescouldpotentiallygenerateTACsifcharbroilingactivitiesoccurattherestaurant,whichhasthepotentialtogeneratesmallamountsofchemicalsthatareknownorsuspectedbytheStateofCaliforniatocausehumanhealth impacts.62However, restaurantcharbroiling in theAirBasinwouldberequired tocomplywith SCAQMD Rule 1138 (Control of Emissions from Restaurant Operations), which requires theinstallationofemissionscontrolsoncharbroilers. Theemissionscontrolswouldreduce thealreadysmallamounts of TAC emissions associatedwith charbroiling by approximately 83 percent,63such that adversehealthimpactsarenotexpectedtooccuratnearbysensitivereceptors.Asaresult,toxicorcarcinogenicairpollutants are not expected to occur in any meaningful amounts in conjunction with operation of theproposedlanduseswithintheProjectSite. BasedontheusesexpectedontheProjectSite,potential long‐
62 U.S.EnvironmentalProtectionAgency,PolycyclicAromaticHydrocarbons(PAHs),January2008,http://www.epa.gov/osw/hazard/
wastemin/minimize/factshts/pahs.pdf.AccessedApril2016.63 U.S.EnvironmentalProtectionAgency,Methods forDevelopingaNationalEmission Inventory forCommercialCookingProcesses:
TechnicalMemorandum,(2003).
September 2016 4.0 Compliance with Ambient Air Standards
1020S.FigueroaStreetProject AirQualityTechnicalReportESAPCR 61
termoperationalimpactsassociatedwiththereleaseofTACswouldbeminimalandwouldnotbeexpectedtoexceedtheSCAQMDthresholdsofsignificance.Therefore,impactswouldbelessthansignificant.
1020S.FigueroaStreetProject AirQualityTechnicalReportESAPCR 62
5.0 CUMULATIVE ANALYSIS
The Project would result in the emission of criteria pollutants forwhich the region is in non‐attainmentduringbothconstructionandoperation. TheBasinfailstomeetnationalstandardsforO3,PM10andPM2.5,andthereforeisconsideredafederal“non‐attainment”areaforthesepollutants.
AsshowninTable5,Table6,Table7,andTable8,regionalemissionscalculatedforProjectconstructionandoperationsarelessthantheapplicableSCAQMDdailysignificancethresholds.Thethresholdsaredesignedto assist the region in attaining the applicable State and national ambient air quality standards. Thesestandardsapply tobothprimary(criteriaandprecursor)andsecondarypollutants (ozone). Although theProjectSiteislocatedinaregionthatisinnon‐attainmentforozoneandPM10,theemissionsassociatedwiththe Project would not be cumulatively considerable as the emissions would fall below SCAQMD dailysignificance thresholds. Inaddition, theProjectwouldbeconsistentwith theAQMP,which is intended tobringtheBasinintoattainmentforallcriteriapollutants.
5.1 CONSTRUCTION IMPACTS
ThereareanumberofcumulativeprojectsintheProjectareathathavenotyetbeenbuiltorarecurrentlyunder construction. Since the Applicant has no control over the timing or sequencing of the cumulativeprojects, any quantitative analysis to ascertain daily construction emissions that assumes multiple,concurrent construction projects would be speculative. For this reason, the SCAQMD’s methodology toassessaproject’scumulativeimpactdiffersfromthecumulativeimpactsmethodologyemployedelsewherein this technical report. The SCAQMD recommends that project‐specific air quality impacts be used todeterminethepotentialcumulativeimpactstoregionalairquality.
With respect to the Project’s short‐term construction‐related air quality emissions and cumulativeconditions, the SCAQMD has developed strategies to reduce criteria pollutant emissions outlined in theAQMPpursuant to the federalCleanAirActmandates. Assuch,constructionof theProjectwouldcomplywithSCAQMDRule403 requirementsand theATCM to limitheavydutydieselmotorvehicle idling tonomorethan5minutesatanygiventime. Inaddition, theProjectwouldutilizeaconstructioncontractor(s)that complieswith required and applicableBACTand the In‐UseOff‐RoadDiesel VehicleRegulation. PerSCAQMDrulesandmandates,aswellastheCEQArequirementthatsignificantimpactsbemitigatedtotheextent feasible, these same requirements (i.e., Rule 403 compliance, the implementation of all feasiblemitigation measures, and compliance with adopted AQMP emissions control measures) would also beimposedonconstructionprojects in theAirBasin,whichwouldincludeeachof thecumulativeprojects inthe Project Area. As shown above in Table5, Table 6, Table 9, and Table 10, regional and localizedconstructionemissionsassociatedwith theProjectwouldnotexceed theSCAQMDnumeric indicators. Assuch,theProject’scontributiontocumulativelysignificantconstructionimpactstoairqualitywouldnotbecumulativelyconsiderableandcumulativeimpactswouldbelessthansignificantforregionalandlocalizedcriteriapollutantsduringconstruction.
5.2 OPERATIONAL IMPACTS
The SCAQMD’s approach for assessing cumulative impacts related to operations or long‐termimplementation is based on attainment of ambient air quality standards in accordance with therequirements of the federal and State CleanAir Acts. As discussed earlier, the SCAQMDhas developed acomprehensiveplan,theAQMP,whichaddressestheregion’scumulativeairqualitycondition.
September 2016 5.0 Cumulative Analysis
1020S.FigueroaStreetProject AirQualityTechnicalReportESAPCR 63
Asignificantimpactmayoccurifaprojectwouldaddacumulativelyconsiderablecontributionofafederalorstate non‐attainment pollutant. Because the Los Angeles County portion of the Air Basin is currently innonattainmentforozone,NO2,PM10,andPM2.5,cumulativeprojectscouldexceedanairqualitystandardorcontributetoanexistingorprojectedairqualityexceedance.Cumulativeimpactstoairqualityareevaluatedunder two sets of thresholds for CEQA and the SCAQMD. In particular, Section 15064(h)(3) of theCEQAGuidelines provides guidance in determining the significance of cumulative impacts. Specifically, Section15064(h)(3)statesinpartthat:
“Aleadagencymaydeterminethataproject’sincrementalcontributiontoacumulativeeffectis not cumulatively considerable if the project will comply with the requirements in apreviouslyapproved plan ormitigationprogramwhich provides specific requirements thatwillavoidorsubstantiallylessenthecumulativeproblem(e.g.,waterqualitycontrolplan,airqualityplan, integratedwastemanagementplan)within the geographicarea inwhich theprojectislocated. Suchplansorprogramsmustbespecifiedinlaworadoptedbythepublicagency with jurisdiction over the affected resources through a public review process toimplement, interpret, or make specific the law enforced or administered by the publicagency…”
ForpurposesofthecumulativeairqualityanalysiswithrespecttoCEQAGuidelinesSection15064(h)(3),theProject’sincrementalcontributiontocumulativeairqualityimpactsisdeterminedbasedoncompliancewiththeSCAQMDadopted2012AQMP.TheProjectwouldnotconflictwithorobstructimplementationofAQMPandwouldbeconsistentwiththegrowthprojectionsintheAQMP.
Nonetheless, SCAQMD no longer recommends relying solely upon consistency with the AQMP as anappropriate methodology for assessing cumulative air quality impacts. The SCAQMD recommends thatproject‐specific air quality impacts be used to determine the potential cumulative impacts to regional airquality. As discussed previously, the Projectwould not exceed the SCAQMD regional numeric indicators.Therefore, theProject’s incrementalcontributionto long‐termemissionsofnon‐attainmentpollutantsandozoneprecursors, considered togetherwith cumulative projects,wouldnot be cumulatively considerable,andthereforethecumulativeimpactoftheProjectwouldbelessthansignificant.
1020S.FigueroaStreetProject AirQualityTechnicalReportESAPCR 65
6.0 SUMMARY OF RESULTS
Air pollutant emissions associatedwith the Project have been evaluated to determine the level of impactfromconstructionactivitiesandfutureoperationsoftheProject.
6.1 CONSTRUCTION
Construction of the Project has the potential to create air quality impacts through the use of heavy‐dutyconstruction equipment and through vehicle trips generated from constructionworkers traveling to andfrom the Project Site. In addition, fugitive dust emissions would result from grading and constructionactivities. However,useof typical construction equipment (in termsof size andage/emission standards)andcompliancewithRule403requirements(regardingdustcontrolmeasuressuchaswateringtwicedailyand track out prevention measures), minimizes air emissions to the extent warranted. In addition, theProjectwouldimplementPDF‐AQ‐1,PDF‐AQ‐2,andPDF‐AQ‐3tominimizeconstruction‐relatedemissions.
As shown in Table 5 and 6, regional construction emissions would not exceed the SCAQMD numericindicators.Therefore,impactsrelatedtoregionalconstructionemissionswouldbelessthansignificant.AsshowninTable9and10localizedemissionswouldnotexceedtheSCAQMDnumericindicators.Therefore,impactsrelatedtolocalizedconstructionemissionswouldbelessthansignificant.AsshowninTable15andTable 16, construction‐related health impacts would not exceed the thresholds and would be less thansignificant.Asaresult,Project‐relatedconstructionimpactswouldbelessthansignificant.
6.2 OPERATION
Air pollutant emissions associated with Project operations would be generated by the consumption ofnaturalgasandbytheoperationofon‐roadvehicles.AsshowninTable7,Table8,Table11,andTable12,regionalandlocalizedemissionsassociatedwiththeProjectwouldnotexceedtheSCAQMDdailysignificancethresholds. Inaddition, theProjectwouldnotresult inaCOhotspot,oremitunhealthy levelsof toxicaircontaminants and odiferous emissions. Furthermore, the Projectwould be consistentwith applicable airqualityplansandpolicies.Therefore,impactsrelatedtoProjectoperationalemissionsandconsistencywithapplicableairqualitymanagementplans,policies,orregulationswouldbelessthansignificant.
APPENDIX A AIR QUALITY WORKSHEETS AND OUTPUT FILES
1020S.FigueroaStreetAirQualityTechnicalReportAppendixA,AirQualityWorksheetsA.1 ConstructionEmissions(CalEEModandEMFAC2014)
EmissionsModelInputs
CalEEModOutput
TruckEmissions(EMFAC2014)
A.2 OperationalEmissions(CalEEMod)
EmissionsModelInputs
CalEEModOutput–Existing
CalEEModOutput–Project
A.3 OperationalEmissions(EMFAC2014)
ExistingandProject(InterimandFullBuildout)TripandVMTReductions
ExistingandProject(InterimandFullBuildout)MobileSourceEmissions
A.4 OperationalProjectCharbroilerEmissions
A.5 SouthCoastAirQualityManagementDistrictRule403
A.6 ConstructionHealthRiskAssessmentCalculations
AppendixA.1ConstructionEmissions(CalEEModandEMFAC2014)
EmissionsModelInputs
CalEEModOutput
TruckEmissions(EMFAC2014)
1020 S. Figueroa Street Project EIRAir Quality and Greenhouse Gas Assessment
Project Information
Land Use Units Res. Pop.Existing Uses
Hotel 178 rooms 112,748 sf
Project Phase 1Residential + Amenities 290 DU 352,000 sf 473
Loft/Studio 141 DU1‐Bedroom 73 DU2‐Bedroom 68 DU3‐Bedroom 4 DUPenthouse 4 DU
Retail/Commercial 15.0 ksf 15,000 sfRestaurant 15.0 ksf 15,000 sf
Hotel 300 rooms 280,000 sf
Above‐Grade Parking Structure ‐ spaces ‐ sfSubterranean Parking Structure 437 spaces 174,800 sfOpen Space 29.3 ksf 0.67 acre
Project Phase 2Residential + Amenities 360 DU 418,000 sf 587
Loft/Studio 167 DU1‐Bedroom 94 DU2‐Bedroom 91 DU3‐Bedroom 4 DUPenthouse 4 DU
Commercial 25.0 ksf 25,100 sfRestaurant 25.0 ksf 25,100 sf
Above‐Grade Parking Structure ‐ spaces ‐ sfSubterranean Parking Structure 362 spaces 144,800 sfOpen Space 20.5 ksf 0.47 acrePlaza Area 5.0 ksf 5,000 sf
Lot Area (acres)/Developed Area (sf) 2.70 acres 116,660 sfSources: Hazens Group, March 2016; PCR Services Corporation, March 2016
Enclosed Parking with ElevatorUnenclosed Parking with Elevator
City Park
High‐rise Apartment
CalEEMod Land Use Type
High‐rise Apartment
Strip Mall
Hotel
Quality Restaurant
Hotel
City Park
Strip MallQuality Restaurant
Unenclosed Parking with ElevatorEnclosed Parking with Elevator
Surface Parking
Construction Schedule and California Emissions Estimator Model (CalEEMod) Inputs
CalEEMod Construction Phase Start Date End Date No. Work Days
Demo (SF)
Demo Truck
Capacity (CY)
Demo Truck Total One‐Way Trips
Demo Truck Daily One‐Way Trips
Soil Export a
(CY)Soil Import
(CY)
Soil Haul Truck
Capacity (CY)
Soil Haul Truck Total One‐Way Trips
Soil Haul Truck Daily One‐Way Trips
Concrete Mat
Volume a
(CY)
Concrete Truck
Capacity (CY)
Concrete Truck Total One‐Way Trips
Concrete Truck Daily One‐Way Trips
Vendor One‐Way
Trips/Max Day b
Worker One‐Way
Trips/Max Day c
Phase 1Site Preparation 8/8/2017 8/14/2017 5 10 Site Demolition 8/15/2017 8/28/2017 10 16,000 11 20 5 15 Mass Grading/Excavation 8/29/2017 11/7/2017 51 99,800 ‐ 14 14,258 160 30 Foundation 11/8/2017 1/16/2018 50 9,500 9 2,112 50 25 Building Construction 1/17/2018 5/29/2020 618 100 700 Paving d 6/10/2019 7/8/2019 21 10 Architectural Coating 10/4/2018 4/7/2020 394 100
Phase 2Existing Hotel Demolition 6/29/2020 10/6/2020 72 353,000 11 1,957 25 20 Mass Grading/Excavation 10/7/2020 11/24/2020 35 102,300 ‐ 14 14,615 160 15 Foundation 11/25/2020 1/22/2021 43 8,600 9 1,912 50 20 Building Construction 1/25/2021 3/15/2023 558 100 500 Paving d 11/9/2021 12/6/2021 20 10 Architectural Coating 8/9/2021 1/13/2023 375 70
Notes:
a. Soil export quantities and foundation concrete mat quantities provided by Hazens Group (December 2015).
b. Vendor trips are associated with the Building Construction phase and are based on CalEEMod assumptions.c. Worker trips are based on CalEEMod assumptions.
d. Phase assumed to be part of the "Exterior Skin‐Podium (L1) Exterior Buildout and Store Fronts" construction activities.
Sources: Hazens Group, Februrary 2016; PCR Services Corporation, Februrary 2016
1020 S. Figueroa Street Project EIRAir Quality and Greenhouse Gas Assessment
Project Information
Phase 1 Start 100 Haul Trucks Concrete Trucks Vendor Trucks WorkersSite Preparation 8/8/2017 8/14/2017 10Site Demolition 8/15/2017 8/28/2017 5 15Mass Grading/Excavation 8/29/2017 11/7/2017 160 30Foundation 11/8/2017 1/16/2018 50 25Building Construction 1/17/2018 5/29/2020 100 700 810 <‐ Max DayPaving 6/10/2019 7/8/2019 10Architectural Coating 10/4/2018 4/7/2020 100
Phase 2Existing Hotel Demolition 6/29/2020 10/6/2020 25 20Mass Grading/Excavation 10/7/2020 11/24/2020 160 15Foundation 11/25/2020 1/22/2021 50 20Building Construction 1/25/2021 3/15/2023 100 500 580 <‐ Max DayPaving 11/9/2021 12/6/2021 10Architectural Coating 8/9/2021 1/13/2023 70
Trucks per Day
1020 S. Figueroa Street Project EIRAir Quality and Greenhouse Gas Assessment
Construction Equipment and California Emissions Estimator Model (CalEEMod) Inputs
Construction Equipment
Heavy‐Duty EquipmentNo. of Heavy‐
Duty EquipmentHours of
Operation/DayHours of
Operation/WeekPhase 1Site Preparation Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8 40
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 8 40Demolition Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8 40
Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 8 40Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 8 40
Mass Grading/Excavation Excavators 2 8 40Graders 1 8 40Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8 40Scrapers 1 8 40Bore/Drill Rig 1 8 40Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 8 40
Foundation Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 8 40Pump 4 8 40
Building Construction Cranes (Electric) 1 8 40Forklifts 3 8 40Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 8 40Welders (Electric) 1 8 40Generator Sets 1 8 40Pump 2 8 40
Architectural Coating Air Compressors 1 6 30Paving Pavers 1 8 40
Rollers 1 8 40Paving Equipment 1 8 40
Phase 2Demolition Excavators 1 8 40
Rubber Tired Dozers 2 8 40Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 8 40Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 8 40
Mass Grading/Excavation Excavators 2 8 40Graders 1 8 40Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8 40Scrapers 1 8 40Bore/Drill Rig 1 8 40Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 8 40
Foundation Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 8 40Pump 4 8 40
Building Construction Cranes (Electric) 1 8 40Forklifts 3 8 40Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 8 40Welders (Electric) 1 8 40Generator Sets 1 8 40Pumps (Electric) 2 8 40
Architectural Coating Air Compressors 1 6 30Paving Pavers 1 8 40
Rollers 1 8 40Paving Equipment 1 8 40
Source: PCR Services Corporation, 2016
Construction Phase
1020 S. Figueroa Street Project EIRResource Loaded Construction Schedule
last updated:6/3/2015
On‐Site/Off‐Road EquipmentMonth 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 9 10 11 12 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 3 5 7 9 10 11 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Phase: PHASE 1 PHASE 2Site PreparationRubber Tired Dozers 1 1 1 1Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 1 1 1
DemolitionExcavators 1 1 1Rubber Tired Dozers 1 2 2 2Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 1 1 1Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 3 3 3Water Trucks 1 1 1 1
Mass Grading/ExcavationExcavators 2 2 2 2 2Graders 1 1 1 1 1Rubber Tired Dozers 1 1 1 1 1Scrapers 1 1 1 1 1Bore‐Drill Rig 1 1 1 1 1Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 2 2 2 2Water Trucks 1 1 1 1 1
FoundationTractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 2 2 2 2 2Pump 4 4 4 4 4 4
Building ConstructionCranes (Electric) 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3Forklifts 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1Welders (Electric) 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3Generator Sets 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1Pump 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Architectural CoatingsAir Compressors 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Paving Pavers 1 1 1 1Rollers 1 1 1 1Paving Equipment 1 1 1 1Source: PCR Services Corporation, 2016
2019 20208 1 2 4 6 8
2021 20222017 2018
1020 S. Figueroa Street Project EIRAir Quality and Greenhouse Gas Assessment
Construction Equipment and California Emissions Estimator Model (CalEEMod) Inputs
Architectural Coating Area Calculations
CalEEMod assumes the total surface for architectural coating equals:
Residential Coating Area 2.7 times the floor square footage75% interior25% exterior
Nonresidential Coating Area 2 times the square footage75% interior25% exterior
Parking Lot Coating Area 6% of the square footage0% exterior for subterranean
Source: SCAQMD, CEQA Air Quality Handbook, (1993) A9‐124.
Phase 1
Area (sf) Interior (sf) Exterior (sf)Residential 352,000 712,800 237,600
Total Residential 712,800 237,600 ENTER VALUES ABOVE INTO CALEEMOD
Area (sf) Interior (sf) Exterior (sf)Hotel 280,000 420,000 140,000 Commercial 15,000 22,500 7,500 Quality Restaurant 15,000 900 7,500 Above‐Grade Parking Structure ‐ ‐ ‐ Subterranean Parking Structure 174,800 10,488 ‐
Total Non‐Residential 453,888 155,000 ENTER VALUES ABOVE INTO CALEEMOD
Non‐Residential Land Uses
Residential Land UsesLand Use
Land Use
Phase 2
Area (sf) Interior (sf) Exterior (sf)Residential 418,000 846,450 282,150
Total Residential 846,450 282,150
Area (sf) Interior (sf) Exterior (sf)Commercial 25,100 37,650 12,550 Quality Restaurant 25,100 37,650 12,550 Above‐Grade Parking Structure ‐ ‐ ‐ Subterranean Parking Structure 144,800 8,688 ‐
Total Non‐Residential 83,988 25,100 ENTER VALUES ABOVE INTO CALEEMOD
Land Use
Residential Land UsesLand Use
Non‐Residential Land Uses
1020 S. Figueroa Street Project EIRAir Quality and Greenhouse Gas Assessment
Phase 1: DemolitionDemolition ScheduleStart Date 8/15/2017End Date 8/28/2017Work Days 10
Demolition QuantitiesLand Use Amount UnitsSidewalk 16 KSF
Demolition VolumeTotal Sidewalk Area (KSF) 16 Sidewalk Thickness (ft) 0.5 Building Volume (ft3) 8,000 Building Volume (CY) 296.30 Debris Volume (CY) 100 (rounded, estimated)
Truck Size (CY) 11 Total Truck Trips 10 (rounded, estimated)Total Truck Trips (one‐way) 20 Daily Truck Trips 2 trips/day
Phase 2: DemolitionDemolition ScheduleStart Date 6/29/2020End Date 10/6/2020Work Days 72
Demolition QuantitiesLand Use Amount UnitsExisting Hotel Demo 332 KSFSidewalk 21 KSF
Demolition VolumeTotal Sidewalk Area (KSF) 21 Sidewalk Thickness (ft) 0.5 Building Volume (ft3) 10,500 Building Volume (CY) 388.89 Debris Volume (CY) 100 (rounded, estimated)
Truck Size (CY) 11 Total Truck Trips 10 (rounded, estimated)Total Truck Trips (one‐way) 20
Existing Hotel Demo (one‐way) 1,937 Sidewalk Demo (one‐way) 20 Total Truck Trips (one‐way) 1,957 Daily Truck Trips 28 trips/day
Off-road Equipment - See "Hazen AQ Construction Model Inputs"
1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data
Project Characteristics -
Land Use - See "Hazen AQ Construction Model Inputs"
Construction Phase - See "Hazen AQ Construction Model Inputs"
Off-road Equipment -
Off-road Equipment - See "Hazen AQ Construction Model Inputs"
CO2 Intensity (lb/MWhr)
1227.89 CH4 Intensity (lb/MWhr)
0.029 N2O Intensity (lb/MWhr)
0.006
31
Climate Zone 11 Operational Year 2020
Utility Company Los Angeles Department of Water & Power
1.2 Other Project Characteristics
Urbanization Urban Wind Speed (m/s) 2.2 Precipitation Freq (Days)
Strip Mall 15.00 1000sqft 0.34 15,000.00 0
Apartments High Rise 290.00 Dwelling Unit 4.68 352,000.00 829
Quality Restaurant 15.00 1000sqft 0.34 15,000.00 0
Hotel 300.00 Room 10.00 280,000.00 0
City Park 0.47 Acre 0.67 20,300.00 0
Population
Enclosed Parking with Elevator 437.00 Space 3.93 174,800.00 0
1.1 Land Usage
Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 1 of 1 Date: 4/19/2016 12:12 PM
LUXE Hotel - Phase 1 Construction
South Coast Air Basin, Summer
1.0 Project Characteristics
tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00
tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00
tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00
tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 3.00
tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00
tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00
tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 2.00
tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00
tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00
tblArchitecturalCoating ConstArea_Nonresidential_Interior 757,650.00 453,888.00
tblAreaCoating Area_Nonresidential_Interior 757650 453888
Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value
tblArchitecturalCoating ConstArea_Nonresidential_Exterior 252,550.00 155,000.00
Water And Wastewater -
Solid Waste -
Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation - See "Hazen AQ Construction Model Inputs"
Area Mitigation -
Energy Mitigation -
Water Mitigation -
Demolition - See "Hazen AQ Construction Model Inputs"
Grading - See "Hazen AQ Construction Model Inputs"
Architectural Coating - See "Hazen AQ Construction Model Inputs"
Vehicle Trips -
Woodstoves - No hearths
Area Coating - Parking lot square footage adjustment in AQ Construction Model Inputs
Off-road Equipment - See "Hazen AQ Construction Model Inputs"
Off-road Equipment - See "Hazen AQ Construction Model Inputs"
Off-road Equipment - See "Hazen AQ Construction Model Inputs"
Off-road Equipment - See "Hazen AQ Construction Model Inputs"
Trips and VMT - See "Hazen AQ Construction Model Inputs"
tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 5/6/2020 7/8/2019
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 10.00 5.00
tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 12/2/2021 4/7/2020
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 20.00 50.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 20.00 21.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 20.00 10.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 30.00 51.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 20.00 394.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 300.00 618.00
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Final
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Final
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Final
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Final
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Final
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Final
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Final
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Final
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Final
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Final
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Final
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Final
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Final
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Final
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Final
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Final
tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00
tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 9.00
tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00
tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 3.00
tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 6.00
tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber 13.00 15.00
tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripNumber 114.00 0.00
tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber 5.00 10.00
tblTripsAndVMT HaulingTripNumber 73.00 0.00
tblTripsAndVMT HaulingTripNumber 12,475.00 0.00
tblOffRoadEquipment UsageHours 7.00 8.00
tblProjectCharacteristics OperationalYear 2014 2020
tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 1.00 0.00
tblOffRoadEquipment UsageHours 7.00 8.00
tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 3.00 1.00
tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 4.00 1.00
tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 3.00 1.00
tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 2.00 1.00
tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 2.00 1.00
tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 2.00 1.00
tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 2.00 1.00
tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 2.00 0.00
tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 2.00 1.00
tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 2.00 0.00
tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 3.00 0.00
tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 2.00 0.00
tblLandUse LotAcreage 0.47 0.67
tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 1.00 0.00
tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 435,600.00 280,000.00
tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 290,000.00 352,000.00
tblGrading MaterialExported 0.00 99,800.00
tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 20,473.20 20,300.00
tblConstructionPhase PhaseStartDate 4/8/2020 6/10/2019
tblGrading AcresOfGrading 76.50 2.70
tblConstructionPhase PhaseStartDate 5/30/2020 10/4/2018
0.0000 41,393.5615
41,393.5615
4.4589 0.0000 41,487.1991
33.5730 7.4003 40.9732 10.5828 7.0110 17.5938Total 95.3287 134.8673 223.5520 0.5027
0.0000 11,030.1141
11,030.1141
0.7428 0.0000 11,045.7133
8.9421 1.2130 10.1552 2.3715 1.1742 3.54572020 29.3531 21.1202 55.4382 0.1434
0.0000 12,600.3241
12,600.3241
1.1330 0.0000 12,624.1173
9.0539 1.7927 10.8466 2.4011 1.7162 4.11742019 30.4873 30.5399 65.9009 0.1559
0.0000 11,736.5916
11,736.5916
0.8249 0.0000 11,753.9138
8.9421 1.5984 10.5405 2.3715 1.5481 3.91962018 30.2624 25.2342 61.8527 0.1436
0.0000 6,026.5317
6,026.5317 1.7582 0.0000 6,063.4548
6.6349 2.7961 9.4310 3.4387 2.5724 6.01112017 5.2260 57.9731 40.3602 0.0598
NBio- CO2
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year lb/day lb/day
Exhaust PM10
PM10 Total
Fugitive PM2.5
Exhaust PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2
2.0 Emissions Summary
2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission)
Unmitigated Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10
tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber 84.00 100.00
tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber 8.00 10.00
tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber 15.00 25.00
tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber 419.00 700.00
tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber 20.00 30.00
21
Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 0
Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 2.7
7 Paving Paving 6/10/2019 7/8/2019 5
618
6 Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 10/4/2018 4/7/2020 5 394
5 Building Construction Building Construction 1/17/2018 5/29/2020 5
51
4 Foundation Paving 11/8/2017 1/16/2018 5 50
3 Grading Grading 8/29/2017 11/7/2017 5
5
2 Demolition Demolition 8/15/2017 8/28/2017 5 10
End Date Num Days Week
Num Days Phase Description
1 Site Preparation Site Preparation 8/8/2017 8/14/2017 5
3.0 Construction Detail
Construction Phase
Phase Number
Phase Name Phase Type Start Date
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0011.45 93.94 26.35 19.31 93.82 49.00
NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent Reduction
11.75 87.13 1.29 0.00
Exhaust PM10
PM10 Total
Fugitive PM2.5
Exhaust PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10
0.0000 41,393.5615
41,393.5615
4.4589 0.0000 41,487.1991
29.7303 0.4485 30.1787 8.5395 0.4330 8.9725Total 84.1246 17.3523 220.6743 0.5027
0.0000 11,030.1141
11,030.1141
0.7428 0.0000 11,045.7133
8.9421 0.1112 9.0533 2.3715 0.1063 2.47772020 27.5455 4.2953 56.3839 0.1434
0.0000 12,600.3241
12,600.3241
1.1330 0.0000 12,624.1172
9.0539 0.1308 9.1847 2.4011 0.1257 2.52692019 27.8694 5.1571 67.9984 0.1559
0.0000 11,736.5916
11,736.5916
0.8249 0.0000 11,753.9138
8.9421 0.1129 9.0550 2.3715 0.1077 2.47922018 27.9159 4.8056 62.4985 0.1436
0.0000 6,026.5317
6,026.5317 1.7582 0.0000 6,063.4548
2.7922 0.0936 2.8857 1.3954 0.0934 1.48872017 0.7938 3.0943 33.7935 0.0598
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total
Fugitive PM2.5
Exhaust PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Mitigated Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10
Exhaust PM10
Foundation Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 8.00 97 0.37
Foundation Rollers 0 8.00 80 0.38
Foundation Pumps 4 8.00 84 0.74
Foundation Paving Equipment 0 8.00 130 0.36
Foundation Pavers 0 8.00 125 0.42
Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 8.00 97 0.37
Grading Scrapers 1 8.00 361 0.48
Grading Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8.00 255 0.40
Grading Graders 1 8.00 174 0.41
Grading Excavators 2 8.00 162 0.38
Grading Bore/Drill Rigs 1 8.00 205 0.50
Demolition Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 8.00 97 0.37
Demolition Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8.00 255 0.40
Demolition Excavators 0 8.00 162 0.38
Demolition Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 8.00 81 0.73
Site Preparation Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 8.00 97 0.37
Load Factor
Site Preparation Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8.00 255 0.40
OffRoad Equipment
Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power
Acres of Paving: 0
Residential Indoor: 712,800; Residential Outdoor: 237,600; Non-Residential Indoor: 453,888; Non-Residential Outdoor: 155,000
6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDTPaving 3 10.00 0.00 0.00 14.70
14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT
6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT
Architectural Coating 1 100.00 0.00 0.00
Building Construction 7 700.00 0.00 0.00 14.70
14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT
6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT
Foundation 6 25.00 0.00 0.00
Grading 8 30.00 0.00 0.00 14.70
14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT
6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT
Demolition 5 15.00 0.00 0.00
Site Preparation 2 10.00 0.00 0.00 14.70
Worker Trip Length
Vendor Trip Length
Hauling Trip Length
Worker Vehicle Class
Vendor Vehicle Class
Hauling Vehicle Class
Trips and VMT
Phase Name Offroad Equipment Count
Worker Trip Number
Vendor Trip Number
Hauling Trip Number
Paving Rollers 1 8.00 80 0.38
Paving Paving Equipment 1 8.00 130 0.36
Paving Pavers 1 8.00 125 0.42
Architectural Coating Air Compressors 1 6.00 78 0.48
Building Construction Welders 0 8.00 46 0.45
Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 8.00 97 0.37
Building Construction Pumps 2 8.00 84 0.74
Building Construction Generator Sets 1 8.00 84 0.74
Building Construction Forklifts 3 8.00 89 0.20
Building Construction Cranes 0 8.00 226 0.29
114.4058 114.4058 5.6300e-003
114.52390.1118 9.0000e-004
0.1127 0.0296 8.3000e-004
0.0305Total 0.0374 0.0470 0.5870 1.4200e-003
114.4058 114.4058 5.6300e-003
114.52390.1118 9.0000e-004
0.1127 0.0296 8.3000e-004
0.0305Worker 0.0374 0.0470 0.5870 1.4200e-003
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total
Fugitive PM2.5
Exhaust PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10
Exhaust PM10
1,228.2737
1,228.2737 0.3763 1,236.1768
6.0221 0.8418 6.8639 3.3102 0.7744 4.0847Total 1.5071 16.2365 12.3344 0.0120
1,228.2737
1,228.2737 0.3763 1,236.1768
0.8418 0.8418 0.7744 0.7744Off-Road 1.5071 16.2365 12.3344 0.0120
0.0000 0.00006.0221 0.0000 6.0221 3.3102 0.0000 3.3102Fugitive Dust
CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive PM2.5
Exhaust PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Total CO2
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10
Exhaust PM10
PM10 Total
Use Cleaner Engines for Construction Equipment
Use Soil Stabilizer
Water Exposed Area
Reduce Vehicle Speed on Unpaved Roads
Clean Paved Roads
3.2 Site Preparation - 2017
3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction
2,457.4682
2,457.4682 0.6235 2,470.5620
1.6062 1.6062 1.5022 1.5022Off-Road 2.7216 26.5855 20.8712 0.0245
0.0000 0.00001.5750 0.0000 1.5750 0.2385 0.0000 0.2385Fugitive Dust
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total
Fugitive PM2.5
Exhaust PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
3.3 Demolition - 2017
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10
Exhaust PM10
114.4058 114.4058 5.6300e-003
114.52390.1118 9.0000e-004
0.1127 0.0296 8.3000e-004
0.0305Total 0.0374 0.0470 0.5870 1.4200e-003
114.4058 114.4058 5.6300e-003
114.52390.1118 9.0000e-004
0.1127 0.0296 8.3000e-004
0.0305Worker 0.0374 0.0470 0.5870 1.4200e-003
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total
Fugitive PM2.5
Exhaust PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10
Exhaust PM10
0.0000 1,228.2737
1,228.2737 0.3763 1,236.1768
2.3486 0.0195 2.3681 1.2910 0.0195 1.3105Total 0.1459 0.6323 6.2998 0.0120
0.0000 1,228.2737
1,228.2737 0.3763 1,236.1768
0.0195 0.0195 0.0195 0.0195Off-Road 0.1459 0.6323 6.2998 0.0120
0.0000 0.00002.3486 0.0000 2.3486 1.2910 0.0000 1.2910Fugitive Dust
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total
Fugitive PM2.5
Exhaust PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10
Exhaust PM10
171.6086 171.6086 8.4400e-003
171.78590.1677 1.3500e-003
0.1690 0.0445 1.2400e-003
0.0457Worker 0.0561 0.0705 0.8806 2.1200e-003
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total
Fugitive PM2.5
Exhaust PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10
Exhaust PM10
0.0000 2,457.4682
2,457.4682 0.6235 2,470.5620
0.6142 0.0379 0.6522 0.0930 0.0379 0.1309Total 0.2845 1.2326 14.8426 0.0245
0.0000 2,457.4682
2,457.4682 0.6235 2,470.5620
0.0379 0.0379 0.0379 0.0379Off-Road 0.2845 1.2326 14.8426 0.0245
0.0000 0.00000.6142 0.0000 0.6142 0.0930 0.0000 0.0930Fugitive Dust
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total
Fugitive PM2.5
Exhaust PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10
Exhaust PM10
171.6086 171.6086 8.4400e-003
171.78590.1677 1.3500e-003
0.1690 0.0445 1.2400e-003
0.0457Total 0.0561 0.0705 0.8806 2.1200e-003
171.6086 171.6086 8.4400e-003
171.78590.1677 1.3500e-003
0.1690 0.0445 1.2400e-003
0.0457Worker 0.0561 0.0705 0.8806 2.1200e-003
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total
Fugitive PM2.5
Exhaust PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10
Exhaust PM10
2,457.4682
2,457.4682 0.6235 2,470.5620
1.5750 1.6062 3.1812 0.2385 1.5022 1.7407Total 2.7216 26.5855 20.8712 0.0245
0.0000 5,683.3145
5,683.3145 1.7414 5,719.8830
0.0909 0.0909 0.0909 0.0909Off-Road 0.6815 2.9532 32.0324 0.0556
0.0000 0.00002.4568 0.0000 2.4568 1.3064 0.0000 1.3064Fugitive Dust
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total
Fugitive PM2.5
Exhaust PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10
Exhaust PM10
343.2173 343.2173 0.0169 343.57180.3353 2.7000e-003
0.3380 0.0889 2.4900e-003
0.0914Total 0.1123 0.1411 1.7611 4.2500e-003
343.2173 343.2173 0.0169 343.57180.3353 2.7000e-003
0.3380 0.0889 2.4900e-003
0.0914Worker 0.1123 0.1411 1.7611 4.2500e-003
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total
Fugitive PM2.5
Exhaust PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10
Exhaust PM10
5,683.3145
5,683.3145 1.7414 5,719.8830
6.2995 2.7934 9.0929 3.3498 2.5699 5.9197Total 5.1137 57.8321 38.5991 0.0556
5,683.3145
5,683.3145 1.7414 5,719.8830
2.7934 2.7934 2.5699 2.5699Off-Road 5.1137 57.8321 38.5991 0.0556
0.0000 0.00006.2995 0.0000 6.2995 3.3498 0.0000 3.3498Fugitive Dust
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total
Fugitive PM2.5
Exhaust PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
3.4 Grading - 2017
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10
Exhaust PM10
171.6086 171.6086 8.4400e-003
171.78590.1677 1.3500e-003
0.1690 0.0445 1.2400e-003
0.0457Total 0.0561 0.0705 0.8806 2.1200e-003
286.0144 286.0144 0.0141 286.30990.2794 2.2500e-003
0.2817 0.0741 2.0700e-003
0.0762Worker 0.0936 0.1175 1.4676 3.5400e-003
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total
Fugitive PM2.5
Exhaust PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10
Exhaust PM10
3,128.6682
3,128.6682 0.4099 3,137.2763
1.7164 1.7164 1.6798 1.6798Total 3.0279 24.2164 20.1142 0.0325
0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Paving 0.0000
3,128.6682
3,128.6682 0.4099 3,137.2763
1.7164 1.7164 1.6798 1.6798Off-Road 3.0279 24.2164 20.1142 0.0325
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total
Fugitive PM2.5
Exhaust PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
3.5 Foundation - 2017
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10
Exhaust PM10
343.2173 343.2173 0.0169 343.57180.3353 2.7000e-003
0.3380 0.0889 2.4900e-003
0.0914Total 0.1123 0.1411 1.7611 4.2500e-003
343.2173 343.2173 0.0169 343.57180.3353 2.7000e-003
0.3380 0.0889 2.4900e-003
0.0914Worker 0.1123 0.1411 1.7611 4.2500e-003
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total
Fugitive PM2.5
Exhaust PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10
Exhaust PM10
0.0000 5,683.3145
5,683.3145 1.7414 5,719.8830
2.4568 0.0909 2.5477 1.3064 0.0909 1.3973Total 0.6815 2.9532 32.0324 0.0556
0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Paving 0.0000
3,117.6902
3,117.6902 0.3833 3,125.7397
1.4777 1.4777 1.4479 1.4479Off-Road 2.6591 21.9585 19.8947 0.0325
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total
Fugitive PM2.5
Exhaust PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
3.5 Foundation - 2018
Unmitigated Construction On-SiteROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10Exhaust PM10
286.0144 286.0144 0.0141 286.30990.2794 2.2500e-003
0.2817 0.0741 2.0700e-003
0.0762Total 0.0936 0.1175 1.4676 3.5400e-003
286.0144 286.0144 0.0141 286.30990.2794 2.2500e-003
0.2817 0.0741 2.0700e-003
0.0762Worker 0.0936 0.1175 1.4676 3.5400e-003
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total
Fugitive PM2.5
Exhaust PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10
Exhaust PM10
0.0000 3,128.6682
3,128.6682 0.4099 3,137.2763
0.0452 0.0452 0.0452 0.0452Total 0.3391 1.4693 20.9096 0.0325
0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Paving 0.0000
0.0000 3,128.6682
3,128.6682 0.4099 3,137.2763
0.0452 0.0452 0.0452 0.0452Off-Road 0.3391 1.4693 20.9096 0.0325
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total
Fugitive PM2.5
Exhaust PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10
Exhaust PM10
286.0144 286.0144 0.0141 286.30990.2794 2.2500e-003
0.2817 0.0741 2.0700e-003
0.0762Total 0.0936 0.1175 1.4676 3.5400e-003
3,117.6902
3,117.6902 0.3833 3,125.7397
1.4777 1.4777 1.4479 1.4479Total 2.6591 21.9585 19.8947 0.0325
275.3719 275.3719 0.0131 275.64610.2794 2.1900e-003
0.2816 0.0741 2.0200e-003
0.0761Total 0.0844 0.1066 1.3335 3.5400e-003
275.3719 275.3719 0.0131 275.64610.2794 2.1900e-003
0.2816 0.0741 2.0200e-003
0.0761Worker 0.0844 0.1066 1.3335 3.5400e-003
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total
Fugitive PM2.5
Exhaust PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10
Exhaust PM10
0.0000 3,117.6902
3,117.6902 0.3833 3,125.7397
0.0452 0.0452 0.0452 0.0452Total 0.3391 1.4693 20.9096 0.0325
0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Paving 0.0000
0.0000 3,117.6902
3,117.6902 0.3833 3,125.7397
0.0452 0.0452 0.0452 0.0452Off-Road 0.3391 1.4693 20.9096 0.0325
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total
Fugitive PM2.5
Exhaust PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10
Exhaust PM10
275.3719 275.3719 0.0131 275.64610.2794 2.1900e-003
0.2816 0.0741 2.0200e-003
0.0761Total 0.0844 0.1066 1.3335 3.5400e-003
275.3719 275.3719 0.0131 275.64610.2794 2.1900e-003
0.2816 0.0741 2.0200e-003
0.0761Worker 0.0844 0.1066 1.3335 3.5400e-003
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total
Fugitive PM2.5
Exhaust PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10
Exhaust PM10
0.0000 2,643.2424
2,643.2424 0.3802 2,651.2273
0.0389 0.0389 0.0389 0.0389Total 0.2918 1.2646 17.9959 0.0274
0.0000 2,643.2424
2,643.2424 0.3802 2,651.2273
0.0389 0.0389 0.0389 0.0389Off-Road 0.2918 1.2646 17.9959 0.0274
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total
Fugitive PM2.5
Exhaust PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10
Exhaust PM10
7,710.4130
7,710.4130 0.3657 7,718.0918
7.8244 0.0613 7.8856 2.0751 0.0567 2.1317Total 2.3619 2.9858 37.3365 0.0991
7,710.4130
7,710.4130 0.3657 7,718.0918
7.8244 0.0613 7.8856 2.0751 0.0567 2.1317Worker 2.3619 2.9858 37.3365 0.0991
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total
Fugitive PM2.5
Exhaust PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10
Exhaust PM10
2,643.2424
2,643.2424 0.3802 2,651.2273
1.3778 1.3778 1.3328 1.3328Total 2.3694 19.8161 17.3282 0.0274
2,643.2424
2,643.2424 0.3802 2,651.2273
1.3778 1.3778 1.3328 1.3328Off-Road 2.3694 19.8161 17.3282 0.0274
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total
Fugitive PM2.5
Exhaust PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
3.6 Building Construction - 2018
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10
Exhaust PM10
7,418.0838
7,418.0838 0.3423 7,425.2717
7.8244 0.0602 7.8845 2.0751 0.0558 2.1308Total 2.1739 2.7386 34.3141 0.0989
7,418.0838
7,418.0838 0.3423 7,425.2717
7.8244 0.0602 7.8845 2.0751 0.0558 2.1308Worker 2.1739 2.7386 34.3141 0.0989
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total
Fugitive PM2.5
Exhaust PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10
Exhaust PM10
2,630.6068
2,630.6068 0.3637 2,638.2449
1.1896 1.1896 1.1506 1.1506Total 2.0973 18.0678 17.1707 0.0274
2,630.6068
2,630.6068 0.3637 2,638.2449
1.1896 1.1896 1.1506 1.1506Off-Road 2.0973 18.0678 17.1707 0.0274
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total
Fugitive PM2.5
Exhaust PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
3.6 Building Construction - 2019
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10
Exhaust PM10
7,710.4130
7,710.4130 0.3657 7,718.0918
7.8244 0.0613 7.8856 2.0751 0.0567 2.1317Total 2.3619 2.9858 37.3365 0.0991
7,710.4130
7,710.4130 0.3657 7,718.0918
7.8244 0.0613 7.8856 2.0751 0.0567 2.1317Worker 2.3619 2.9858 37.3365 0.0991
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total
Fugitive PM2.5
Exhaust PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10
Exhaust PM10
2,613.9647
2,613.9647 0.3505 2,621.3259
1.0338 1.0338 0.9999 0.9999Total 1.8870 16.5343 17.0511 0.0274
2,613.9647
2,613.9647 0.3505 2,621.3259
1.0338 1.0338 0.9999 0.9999Off-Road 1.8870 16.5343 17.0511 0.0274
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total
Fugitive PM2.5
Exhaust PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
3.6 Building Construction - 2020
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10
Exhaust PM10
7,418.0838
7,418.0838 0.3423 7,425.2717
7.8244 0.0602 7.8845 2.0751 0.0558 2.1308Total 2.1739 2.7386 34.3141 0.0989
7,418.0838
7,418.0838 0.3423 7,425.2717
7.8244 0.0602 7.8845 2.0751 0.0558 2.1308Worker 2.1739 2.7386 34.3141 0.0989
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total
Fugitive PM2.5
Exhaust PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10
Exhaust PM10
0.0000 2,630.6068
2,630.6068 0.3637 2,638.2449
0.0389 0.0389 0.0389 0.0389Total 0.2918 1.2646 17.9959 0.0274
0.0000 2,630.6068
2,630.6068 0.3637 2,638.2449
0.0389 0.0389 0.0389 0.0389Off-Road 0.2918 1.2646 17.9959 0.0274
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total
Fugitive PM2.5
Exhaust PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10
Exhaust PM10
7,117.8636
7,117.8636 0.3242 7,124.6715
7.8244 0.0598 7.8842 2.0751 0.0555 2.1305Total 2.0377 2.5393 31.9862 0.0988
7,117.8636
7,117.8636 0.3242 7,124.6715
7.8244 0.0598 7.8842 2.0751 0.0555 2.1305Worker 2.0377 2.5393 31.9862 0.0988
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total
Fugitive PM2.5
Exhaust PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10
Exhaust PM10
0.0000 2,613.9647
2,613.9647 0.3505 2,621.3259
0.0389 0.0389 0.0389 0.0389Total 0.2918 1.2646 17.9959 0.0274
0.0000 2,613.9647
2,613.9647 0.3505 2,621.3259
0.0389 0.0389 0.0389 0.0389Off-Road 0.2918 1.2646 17.9959 0.0274
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total
Fugitive PM2.5
Exhaust PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10
Exhaust PM10
7,117.8636
7,117.8636 0.3242 7,124.6715
7.8244 0.0598 7.8842 2.0751 0.0555 2.1305Total 2.0377 2.5393 31.9862 0.0988
7,117.8636
7,117.8636 0.3242 7,124.6715
7.8244 0.0598 7.8842 2.0751 0.0555 2.1305Worker 2.0377 2.5393 31.9862 0.0988
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total
Fugitive PM2.5
Exhaust PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Unmitigated Construction Off-SiteROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10Exhaust PM10
0.0000 281.4485 281.4485 0.0267 282.01023.9600e-003
3.9600e-003
3.9600e-003
3.9600e-003
Total 24.9248 0.1288 1.8324 2.9700e-003
0.0000 281.4485 281.4485 0.0267 282.01023.9600e-003
3.9600e-003
3.9600e-003
3.9600e-003
Off-Road 0.0297 0.1288 1.8324 2.9700e-003
0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Archit. Coating 24.8951
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total
Fugitive PM2.5
Exhaust PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10
Exhaust PM10
1,101.4876
1,101.4876 0.0522 1,102.5845
1.1178 8.7500e-003
1.1265 0.2964 8.1000e-003
0.3045Total 0.3374 0.4265 5.3338 0.0142
1,101.4876
1,101.4876 0.0522 1,102.5845
1.1178 8.7500e-003
1.1265 0.2964 8.1000e-003
0.3045Worker 0.3374 0.4265 5.3338 0.0142
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total
Fugitive PM2.5
Exhaust PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10
Exhaust PM10
281.4485 281.4485 0.0267 282.01020.1506 0.1506 0.1506 0.1506Total 25.1938 2.0058 1.8542 2.9700e-003
281.4485 281.4485 0.0267 282.01020.1506 0.1506 0.1506 0.1506Off-Road 0.2986 2.0058 1.8542 2.9700e-003
0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Archit. Coating 24.8951
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total
Fugitive PM2.5
Exhaust PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
3.7 Architectural Coating - 2018
Unmitigated Construction On-SiteROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10Exhaust PM10
281.4481 281.4481 0.0238 281.94730.1288 0.1288 0.1288 0.1288Total 25.1616 1.8354 1.8413 2.9700e-003
281.4481 281.4481 0.0238 281.94730.1288 0.1288 0.1288 0.1288Off-Road 0.2664 1.8354 1.8413 2.9700e-003
0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Archit. Coating 24.8951
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total
Fugitive PM2.5
Exhaust PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
3.7 Architectural Coating - 2019
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10
Exhaust PM10
1,101.4876
1,101.4876 0.0522 1,102.5845
1.1178 8.7500e-003
1.1265 0.2964 8.1000e-003
0.3045Total 0.3374 0.4265 5.3338 0.0142
1,101.4876
1,101.4876 0.0522 1,102.5845
1.1178 8.7500e-003
1.1265 0.2964 8.1000e-003
0.3045Worker 0.3374 0.4265 5.3338 0.0142
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total
Fugitive PM2.5
Exhaust PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10
Exhaust PM10
1,059.7263
1,059.7263 0.0489 1,060.7531
1.1178 8.6000e-003
1.1264 0.2964 7.9700e-003
0.3044Worker 0.3106 0.3912 4.9020 0.0141
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total
Fugitive PM2.5
Exhaust PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10
Exhaust PM10
0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0238 281.94733.9600e-003
3.9600e-003
3.9600e-003
3.9600e-003
Total 24.9248 0.1288 1.8324 2.9700e-003
0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0238 281.94733.9600e-003
3.9600e-003
3.9600e-003
3.9600e-003
Off-Road 0.0297 0.1288 1.8324 2.9700e-003
0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Archit. Coating 24.8951
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total
Fugitive PM2.5
Exhaust PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10
Exhaust PM10
1,059.7263
1,059.7263 0.0489 1,060.7531
1.1178 8.6000e-003
1.1264 0.2964 7.9700e-003
0.3044Total 0.3106 0.3912 4.9020 0.0141
1,059.7263
1,059.7263 0.0489 1,060.7531
1.1178 8.6000e-003
1.1264 0.2964 7.9700e-003
0.3044Worker 0.3106 0.3912 4.9020 0.0141
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total
Fugitive PM2.5
Exhaust PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10
Exhaust PM10
0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0218 281.90573.9600e-003
3.9600e-003
3.9600e-003
3.9600e-003
Off-Road 0.0297 0.1288 1.8324 2.9700e-003
0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Archit. Coating 24.8951
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total
Fugitive PM2.5
Exhaust PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10
Exhaust PM10
1,016.8377
1,016.8377 0.0463 1,017.8102
1.1178 8.5400e-003
1.1263 0.2964 7.9200e-003
0.3044Total 0.2911 0.3628 4.5695 0.0141
1,016.8377
1,016.8377 0.0463 1,017.8102
1.1178 8.5400e-003
1.1263 0.2964 7.9200e-003
0.3044Worker 0.2911 0.3628 4.5695 0.0141
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total
Fugitive PM2.5
Exhaust PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10
Exhaust PM10
281.4481 281.4481 0.0218 281.90570.1109 0.1109 0.1109 0.1109Total 25.1373 1.6838 1.8314 2.9700e-003
281.4481 281.4481 0.0218 281.90570.1109 0.1109 0.1109 0.1109Off-Road 0.2422 1.6838 1.8314 2.9700e-003
0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Archit. Coating 24.8951
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total
Fugitive PM2.5
Exhaust PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
3.7 Architectural Coating - 2020
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10
Exhaust PM10
1,059.7263
1,059.7263 0.0489 1,060.7531
1.1178 8.6000e-003
1.1264 0.2964 7.9700e-003
0.3044Total 0.3106 0.3912 4.9020 0.0141
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total
Fugitive PM2.5
Exhaust PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10
Exhaust PM10
1,104.4866
1,104.4866 0.3495 1,111.8250
0.4047 0.4047 0.3723 0.3723Total 0.7129 7.4677 7.1826 0.0112
0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Paving 0.0000
1,104.4866
1,104.4866 0.3495 1,111.8250
0.4047 0.4047 0.3723 0.3723Off-Road 0.7129 7.4677 7.1826 0.0112
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total
Fugitive PM2.5
Exhaust PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
3.8 Paving - 2019
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10
Exhaust PM10
1,016.8377
1,016.8377 0.0463 1,017.8102
1.1178 8.5400e-003
1.1263 0.2964 7.9200e-003
0.3044Total 0.2911 0.3628 4.5695 0.0141
1,016.8377
1,016.8377 0.0463 1,017.8102
1.1178 8.5400e-003
1.1263 0.2964 7.9200e-003
0.3044Worker 0.2911 0.3628 4.5695 0.0141
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total
Fugitive PM2.5
Exhaust PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10
Exhaust PM10
0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0218 281.90573.9600e-003
3.9600e-003
3.9600e-003
3.9600e-003
Total 24.9248 0.1288 1.8324 2.9700e-003
105.9726 105.9726 4.8900e-003
106.07530.1118 8.6000e-004
0.1126 0.0296 8.0000e-004
0.0304Total 0.0311 0.0391 0.4902 1.4100e-003
105.9726 105.9726 4.8900e-003
106.07530.1118 8.6000e-004
0.1126 0.0296 8.0000e-004
0.0304Worker 0.0311 0.0391 0.4902 1.4100e-003
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total
Fugitive PM2.5
Exhaust PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10
Exhaust PM10
0.0000 1,104.4866
1,104.4866 0.3495 1,111.8250
0.0183 0.0183 0.0183 0.0183Total 0.1373 0.5948 8.4638 0.0112
0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Paving 0.0000
0.0000 1,104.4866
1,104.4866 0.3495 1,111.8250
0.0183 0.0183 0.0183 0.0183Off-Road 0.1373 0.5948 8.4638 0.0112
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total
Fugitive PM2.5
Exhaust PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10
Exhaust PM10
105.9726 105.9726 4.8900e-003
106.07530.1118 8.6000e-004
0.1126 0.0296 8.0000e-004
0.0304Total 0.0311 0.0391 0.4902 1.4100e-003
105.9726 105.9726 4.8900e-003
106.07530.1118 8.6000e-004
0.1126 0.0296 8.0000e-004
0.0304Worker 0.0311 0.0391 0.4902 1.4100e-003
Off-road Equipment - See "Hazen AQ Construction Model Inputs"
1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data
Project Characteristics -
Land Use - See "Hazen AQ Construction Model Inputs"
Construction Phase - See "Hazen AQ Construction Model Inputs"
Off-road Equipment -
Off-road Equipment - See "Hazen AQ Construction Model Inputs"
CO2 Intensity (lb/MWhr)
1227.89 CH4 Intensity (lb/MWhr)
0.029 N2O Intensity (lb/MWhr)
0.006
31
Climate Zone 11 Operational Year 2020
Utility Company Los Angeles Department of Water & Power
1.2 Other Project Characteristics
Urbanization Urban Wind Speed (m/s) 2.2 Precipitation Freq (Days)
Strip Mall 15.00 1000sqft 0.34 15,000.00 0
Apartments High Rise 290.00 Dwelling Unit 4.68 352,000.00 829
Quality Restaurant 15.00 1000sqft 0.34 15,000.00 0
Hotel 300.00 Room 10.00 280,000.00 0
City Park 0.47 Acre 0.67 20,300.00 0
Population
Enclosed Parking with Elevator 437.00 Space 3.93 174,800.00 0
1.1 Land Usage
Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 1 of 1 Date: 4/19/2016 12:10 PM
LUXE Hotel - Phase 1 Construction
South Coast Air Basin, Winter
1.0 Project Characteristics
tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00
tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00
tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00
tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 3.00
tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00
tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00
tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 2.00
tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00
tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00
tblArchitecturalCoating ConstArea_Nonresidential_Interior 757,650.00 453,888.00
tblAreaCoating Area_Nonresidential_Interior 757650 453888
Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value
tblArchitecturalCoating ConstArea_Nonresidential_Exterior 252,550.00 155,000.00
Water And Wastewater -
Solid Waste -
Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation - See "Hazen AQ Construction Model Inputs"
Area Mitigation -
Energy Mitigation -
Water Mitigation -
Demolition - See "Hazen AQ Construction Model Inputs"
Grading - See "Hazen AQ Construction Model Inputs"
Architectural Coating - See "Hazen AQ Construction Model Inputs"
Vehicle Trips -
Woodstoves - No hearths
Area Coating - Parking lot square footage adjustment in AQ Construction Model Inputs
Off-road Equipment - See "Hazen AQ Construction Model Inputs"
Off-road Equipment - See "Hazen AQ Construction Model Inputs"
Off-road Equipment - See "Hazen AQ Construction Model Inputs"
Off-road Equipment - See "Hazen AQ Construction Model Inputs"
Trips and VMT - See "Hazen AQ Construction Model Inputs"
tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 5/6/2020 7/8/2019
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 10.00 5.00
tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 12/2/2021 4/7/2020
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 20.00 50.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 20.00 21.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 20.00 10.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 30.00 51.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 20.00 394.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 300.00 618.00
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Final
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Final
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Final
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Final
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Final
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Final
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Final
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Final
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Final
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Final
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Final
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Final
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Final
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Final
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Final
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Final
tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00
tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 9.00
tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00
tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 3.00
tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 6.00
tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber 13.00 15.00
tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripNumber 114.00 0.00
tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber 5.00 10.00
tblTripsAndVMT HaulingTripNumber 73.00 0.00
tblTripsAndVMT HaulingTripNumber 12,475.00 0.00
tblOffRoadEquipment UsageHours 7.00 8.00
tblProjectCharacteristics OperationalYear 2014 2020
tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 1.00 0.00
tblOffRoadEquipment UsageHours 7.00 8.00
tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 3.00 1.00
tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 4.00 1.00
tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 3.00 1.00
tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 2.00 1.00
tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 2.00 1.00
tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 2.00 1.00
tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 2.00 1.00
tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 2.00 0.00
tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 2.00 1.00
tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 2.00 0.00
tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 3.00 0.00
tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 2.00 0.00
tblLandUse LotAcreage 0.47 0.67
tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 1.00 0.00
tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 435,600.00 280,000.00
tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 290,000.00 352,000.00
tblGrading MaterialExported 0.00 99,800.00
tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 20,473.20 20,300.00
tblConstructionPhase PhaseStartDate 4/8/2020 6/10/2019
tblGrading AcresOfGrading 76.50 2.70
tblConstructionPhase PhaseStartDate 5/30/2020 10/4/2018
0.0000 39,775.9624
39,775.9624
4.4589 0.0000 39,869.6001
33.5730 7.4003 40.9732 10.5828 7.0110 17.5938Total 95.4584 135.8058 213.0305 0.4809
0.0000 10,520.1991
10,520.1991
0.7428 0.0000 10,535.7983
8.9421 1.2130 10.1552 2.3715 1.1742 3.54572020 29.3912 21.4017 52.1699 0.1362
0.0000 12,063.6230
12,063.6230
1.1330 0.0000 12,087.4162
9.0539 1.7927 10.8466 2.4011 1.7162 4.11742019 30.5291 30.8490 62.4214 0.1487
0.0000 11,186.9721
11,186.9721
0.8249 0.0000 11,204.2943
8.9421 1.5984 10.5405 2.3715 1.5481 3.91962018 30.3099 25.5682 58.2224 0.1365
0.0000 6,005.1682
6,005.1682 1.7582 0.0000 6,042.0913
6.6349 2.7961 9.4310 3.4387 2.5724 6.01112017 5.2282 57.9870 40.2168 0.0595
NBio- CO2
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year lb/day lb/day
Exhaust PM10
PM10 Total
Fugitive PM2.5
Exhaust PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2
2.0 Emissions Summary2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission)
Unmitigated Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10
tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber 84.00 100.00
tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber 8.00 10.00
tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber 15.00 25.00
tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber 419.00 700.00
tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber 20.00 30.00
21
Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 0
Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 2.7
Acres of Paving: 0
7 Paving Paving 6/10/2019 7/8/2019 5
618
6 Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 10/4/2018 4/7/2020 5 394
5 Building Construction Building Construction 1/17/2018 5/29/2020 5
51
4 Foundation Paving 11/8/2017 1/16/2018 5 50
3 Grading Grading 8/29/2017 11/7/2017 5
5
2 Demolition Demolition 8/15/2017 8/28/2017 5 10
End Date Num Days Week
Num Days Phase Description
1 Site Preparation Site Preparation 8/8/2017 8/14/2017 5
3.0 Construction Detail
Construction Phase
Phase Number
Phase Name Phase Type Start Date
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0011.45 93.94 26.35 19.31 93.82 49.00
NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent Reduction
11.74 86.53 1.35 0.00
Exhaust PM10
PM10 Total
Fugitive PM2.5
Exhaust PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10
0.0000 39,775.9624
39,775.9624
4.4589 0.0000 39,869.6000
29.7303 0.4485 30.1787 8.5395 0.4330 8.9725Total 84.2544 18.2909 210.1528 0.4809
0.0000 10,520.1991
10,520.1991
0.7428 0.0000 10,535.7983
8.9421 0.1112 9.0533 2.3715 0.1063 2.47772020 27.5837 4.5768 53.1157 0.1362
0.0000 12,063.6230
12,063.6230
1.1330 0.0000 12,087.4162
9.0539 0.1308 9.1847 2.4011 0.1257 2.52692019 27.9112 5.4663 64.5189 0.1487
0.0000 11,186.9721
11,186.9721
0.8249 0.0000 11,204.2943
8.9421 0.1129 9.0550 2.3715 0.1077 2.47922018 27.9635 5.1396 58.8682 0.1365
0.0000 6,005.1682
6,005.1682 1.7582 0.0000 6,042.0913
2.7922 0.0936 2.8857 1.3954 0.0934 1.48872017 0.7960 3.1081 33.6500 0.0595
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total
Fugitive PM2.5
Exhaust PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Mitigated Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10
Exhaust PM10
Paving Paving Equipment 1 8.00 130 0.36
Paving Pavers 1 8.00 125 0.42
Architectural Coating Air Compressors 1 6.00 78 0.48
Building Construction Welders 0 8.00 46 0.45
Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 8.00 97 0.37
Building Construction Pumps 2 8.00 84 0.74
Building Construction Generator Sets 1 8.00 84 0.74
Building Construction Forklifts 3 8.00 89 0.20
Building Construction Cranes 0 8.00 226 0.29
Foundation Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 8.00 97 0.37
Foundation Rollers 0 8.00 80 0.38
Foundation Pumps 4 8.00 84 0.74
Foundation Paving Equipment 0 8.00 130 0.36
Foundation Pavers 0 8.00 125 0.42
Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 8.00 97 0.37
Grading Scrapers 1 8.00 361 0.48
Grading Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8.00 255 0.40
Grading Graders 1 8.00 174 0.41
Grading Excavators 2 8.00 162 0.38
Grading Bore/Drill Rigs 1 8.00 205 0.50
Demolition Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 8.00 97 0.37
Demolition Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8.00 255 0.40
Demolition Excavators 0 8.00 162 0.38
Demolition Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 8.00 81 0.73
Site Preparation Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 8.00 97 0.37
Load Factor
Site Preparation Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8.00 255 0.40
OffRoad Equipment
Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power
Residential Indoor: 712,800; Residential Outdoor: 237,600; Non-Residential Indoor: 453,888; Non-Residential Outdoor: 155,000
1,228.2737
1,228.2737 0.3763 1,236.1768
6.0221 0.8418 6.8639 3.3102 0.7744 4.0847Total 1.5071 16.2365 12.3344 0.0120
1,228.2737
1,228.2737 0.3763 1,236.1768
0.8418 0.8418 0.7744 0.7744Off-Road 1.5071 16.2365 12.3344 0.0120
0.0000 0.00006.0221 0.0000 6.0221 3.3102 0.0000 3.3102Fugitive Dust
CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive PM2.5
Exhaust PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Total CO2
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10
Exhaust PM10
PM10 Total
Use Cleaner Engines for Construction Equipment
Use Soil Stabilizer
Water Exposed Area
Reduce Vehicle Speed on Unpaved Roads
Clean Paved Roads
3.2 Site Preparation - 2017
6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT
3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction
Paving 3 10.00 0.00 0.00 14.70
14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT
6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT
Architectural Coating 1 100.00 0.00 0.00
Building Construction 7 700.00 0.00 0.00 14.70
14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT
6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT
Foundation 6 25.00 0.00 0.00
Grading 8 30.00 0.00 0.00 14.70
14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT
6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT
Demolition 5 15.00 0.00 0.00
Site Preparation 2 10.00 0.00 0.00 14.70
Worker Trip Length
Vendor Trip Length
Hauling Trip Length
Worker Vehicle Class
Vendor Vehicle Class
Hauling Vehicle Class
Trips and VMT
Phase Name Offroad Equipment Count
Worker Trip Number
Vendor Trip Number
Hauling Trip Number
Paving Rollers 1 8.00 80 0.38
107.2846 107.2846 5.6300e-003
107.40280.1118 9.0000e-004
0.1127 0.0296 8.3000e-004
0.0305Total 0.0382 0.0516 0.5392 1.3300e-003
107.2846 107.2846 5.6300e-003
107.40280.1118 9.0000e-004
0.1127 0.0296 8.3000e-004
0.0305Worker 0.0382 0.0516 0.5392 1.3300e-003
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total
Fugitive PM2.5
Exhaust PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Mitigated Construction Off-SiteROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10Exhaust PM10
0.0000 1,228.2737
1,228.2737 0.3763 1,236.1768
2.3486 0.0195 2.3681 1.2910 0.0195 1.3105Total 0.1459 0.6323 6.2998 0.0120
0.0000 1,228.2737
1,228.2737 0.3763 1,236.1768
0.0195 0.0195 0.0195 0.0195Off-Road 0.1459 0.6323 6.2998 0.0120
0.0000 0.00002.3486 0.0000 2.3486 1.2910 0.0000 1.2910Fugitive Dust
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total
Fugitive PM2.5
Exhaust PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10
Exhaust PM10
107.2846 107.2846 5.6300e-003
107.40280.1118 9.0000e-004
0.1127 0.0296 8.3000e-004
0.0305Total 0.0382 0.0516 0.5392 1.3300e-003
107.2846 107.2846 5.6300e-003
107.40280.1118 9.0000e-004
0.1127 0.0296 8.3000e-004
0.0305Worker 0.0382 0.0516 0.5392 1.3300e-003
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total
Fugitive PM2.5
Exhaust PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10
Exhaust PM10
0.0000 2,457.4682
2,457.4682 0.6235 2,470.5620
0.6142 0.0379 0.6522 0.0930 0.0379 0.1309Total 0.2845 1.2326 14.8426 0.0245
0.0000 2,457.4682
2,457.4682 0.6235 2,470.5620
0.0379 0.0379 0.0379 0.0379Off-Road 0.2845 1.2326 14.8426 0.0245
0.0000 0.00000.6142 0.0000 0.6142 0.0930 0.0000 0.0930Fugitive Dust
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total
Fugitive PM2.5
Exhaust PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10
Exhaust PM10
160.9269 160.9269 8.4400e-003
161.10420.1677 1.3500e-003
0.1690 0.0445 1.2400e-003
0.0457Total 0.0573 0.0775 0.8088 1.9900e-003
160.9269 160.9269 8.4400e-003
161.10420.1677 1.3500e-003
0.1690 0.0445 1.2400e-003
0.0457Worker 0.0573 0.0775 0.8088 1.9900e-003
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total
Fugitive PM2.5
Exhaust PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10
Exhaust PM10
2,457.4682
2,457.4682 0.6235 2,470.5620
1.5750 1.6062 3.1812 0.2385 1.5022 1.7407Total 2.7216 26.5855 20.8712 0.0245
2,457.4682
2,457.4682 0.6235 2,470.5620
1.6062 1.6062 1.5022 1.5022Off-Road 2.7216 26.5855 20.8712 0.0245
0.0000 0.00001.5750 0.0000 1.5750 0.2385 0.0000 0.2385Fugitive Dust
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total
Fugitive PM2.5
Exhaust PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
3.3 Demolition - 2017
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10
Exhaust PM10
321.8538 321.8538 0.0169 322.20830.3353 2.7000e-003
0.3380 0.0889 2.4900e-003
0.0914Total 0.1145 0.1549 1.6177 3.9800e-003
321.8538 321.8538 0.0169 322.20830.3353 2.7000e-003
0.3380 0.0889 2.4900e-003
0.0914Worker 0.1145 0.1549 1.6177 3.9800e-003
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total
Fugitive PM2.5
Exhaust PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10
Exhaust PM10
5,683.3145
5,683.3145 1.7414 5,719.8830
6.2995 2.7934 9.0929 3.3498 2.5699 5.9197Total 5.1137 57.8321 38.5991 0.0556
5,683.3145
5,683.3145 1.7414 5,719.8830
2.7934 2.7934 2.5699 2.5699Off-Road 5.1137 57.8321 38.5991 0.0556
0.0000 0.00006.2995 0.0000 6.2995 3.3498 0.0000 3.3498Fugitive Dust
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total
Fugitive PM2.5
Exhaust PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
3.4 Grading - 2017
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10
Exhaust PM10
160.9269 160.9269 8.4400e-003
161.10420.1677 1.3500e-003
0.1690 0.0445 1.2400e-003
0.0457Total 0.0573 0.0775 0.8088 1.9900e-003
160.9269 160.9269 8.4400e-003
161.10420.1677 1.3500e-003
0.1690 0.0445 1.2400e-003
0.0457Worker 0.0573 0.0775 0.8088 1.9900e-003
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total
Fugitive PM2.5
Exhaust PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10
Exhaust PM10
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
3,128.6682
3,128.6682 0.4099 3,137.2763
1.7164 1.7164 1.6798 1.6798Total 3.0279 24.2164 20.1142 0.0325
0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Paving 0.0000
3,128.6682
3,128.6682 0.4099 3,137.2763
1.7164 1.7164 1.6798 1.6798Off-Road 3.0279 24.2164 20.1142 0.0325
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total
Fugitive PM2.5
Exhaust PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
3.5 Foundation - 2017
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10
Exhaust PM10
321.8538 321.8538 0.0169 322.20830.3353 2.7000e-003
0.3380 0.0889 2.4900e-003
0.0914Total 0.1145 0.1549 1.6177 3.9800e-003
321.8538 321.8538 0.0169 322.20830.3353 2.7000e-003
0.3380 0.0889 2.4900e-003
0.0914Worker 0.1145 0.1549 1.6177 3.9800e-003
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total
Fugitive PM2.5
Exhaust PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10
Exhaust PM10
0.0000 5,683.3145
5,683.3145 1.7414 5,719.8830
2.4568 0.0909 2.5477 1.3064 0.0909 1.3973Total 0.6815 2.9532 32.0324 0.0556
0.0000 5,683.3145
5,683.3145 1.7414 5,719.8830
0.0909 0.0909 0.0909 0.0909Off-Road 0.6815 2.9532 32.0324 0.0556
0.0000 0.00002.4568 0.0000 2.4568 1.3064 0.0000 1.3064Fugitive Dust
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total
Fugitive PM2.5
Exhaust PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10
Exhaust PM10
268.2115 268.2115 0.0141 268.50690.2794 2.2500e-003
0.2817 0.0741 2.0700e-003
0.0762Total 0.0954 0.1291 1.3481 3.3200e-003
268.2115 268.2115 0.0141 268.50690.2794 2.2500e-003
0.2817 0.0741 2.0700e-003
0.0762Worker 0.0954 0.1291 1.3481 3.3200e-003
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total
Fugitive PM2.5
Exhaust PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Mitigated Construction Off-SiteROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10Exhaust PM10
0.0000 3,128.6682
3,128.6682 0.4099 3,137.2763
0.0452 0.0452 0.0452 0.0452Total 0.3391 1.4693 20.9096 0.0325
0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Paving 0.0000
0.0000 3,128.6682
3,128.6682 0.4099 3,137.2763
0.0452 0.0452 0.0452 0.0452Off-Road 0.3391 1.4693 20.9096 0.0325
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total
Fugitive PM2.5
Exhaust PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Mitigated Construction On-SiteROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10Exhaust PM10
268.2115 268.2115 0.0141 268.50690.2794 2.2500e-003
0.2817 0.0741 2.0700e-003
0.0762Total 0.0954 0.1291 1.3481 3.3200e-003
268.2115 268.2115 0.0141 268.50690.2794 2.2500e-003
0.2817 0.0741 2.0700e-003
0.0762Worker 0.0954 0.1291 1.3481 3.3200e-003
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total
Fugitive PM2.5
Exhaust PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10
Exhaust PM10
0.0000 3,117.6902
3,117.6902 0.3833 3,125.7397
0.0452 0.0452 0.0452 0.0452Total 0.3391 1.4693 20.9096 0.0325
0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Paving 0.0000
0.0000 3,117.6902
3,117.6902 0.3833 3,125.7397
0.0452 0.0452 0.0452 0.0452Off-Road 0.3391 1.4693 20.9096 0.0325
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total
Fugitive PM2.5
Exhaust PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10
Exhaust PM10
258.1963 258.1963 0.0131 258.47050.2794 2.1900e-003
0.2816 0.0741 2.0200e-003
0.0761Total 0.0858 0.1171 1.2200 3.3100e-003
258.1963 258.1963 0.0131 258.47050.2794 2.1900e-003
0.2816 0.0741 2.0200e-003
0.0761Worker 0.0858 0.1171 1.2200 3.3100e-003
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total
Fugitive PM2.5
Exhaust PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10
Exhaust PM10
3,117.6902
3,117.6902 0.3833 3,125.7397
1.4777 1.4777 1.4479 1.4479Total 2.6591 21.9585 19.8947 0.0325
0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Paving 0.0000
3,117.6902
3,117.6902 0.3833 3,125.7397
1.4777 1.4777 1.4479 1.4479Off-Road 2.6591 21.9585 19.8947 0.0325
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total
Fugitive PM2.5
Exhaust PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
3.5 Foundation - 2018
Unmitigated Construction On-SiteROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10Exhaust PM10
7,229.4960
7,229.4960 0.3657 7,237.1748
7.8244 0.0613 7.8856 2.0751 0.0567 2.1317Total 2.4035 3.2780 34.1600 0.0928
7,229.4960
7,229.4960 0.3657 7,237.1748
7.8244 0.0613 7.8856 2.0751 0.0567 2.1317Worker 2.4035 3.2780 34.1600 0.0928
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total
Fugitive PM2.5
Exhaust PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Unmitigated Construction Off-SiteROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10Exhaust PM10
2,643.2424
2,643.2424 0.3802 2,651.2273
1.3778 1.3778 1.3328 1.3328Total 2.3694 19.8161 17.3282 0.0274
2,643.2424
2,643.2424 0.3802 2,651.2273
1.3778 1.3778 1.3328 1.3328Off-Road 2.3694 19.8161 17.3282 0.0274
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total
Fugitive PM2.5
Exhaust PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
3.6 Building Construction - 2018
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10
Exhaust PM10
258.1963 258.1963 0.0131 258.47050.2794 2.1900e-003
0.2816 0.0741 2.0200e-003
0.0761Total 0.0858 0.1171 1.2200 3.3100e-003
258.1963 258.1963 0.0131 258.47050.2794 2.1900e-003
0.2816 0.0741 2.0200e-003
0.0761Worker 0.0858 0.1171 1.2200 3.3100e-003
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total
Fugitive PM2.5
Exhaust PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10
Exhaust PM10
2,630.6068
2,630.6068 0.3637 2,638.2449
1.1896 1.1896 1.1506 1.1506Total 2.0973 18.0678 17.1707 0.0274
2,630.6068
2,630.6068 0.3637 2,638.2449
1.1896 1.1896 1.1506 1.1506Off-Road 2.0973 18.0678 17.1707 0.0274
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total
Fugitive PM2.5
Exhaust PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
3.6 Building Construction - 2019
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10
Exhaust PM10
7,229.4960
7,229.4960 0.3657 7,237.1748
7.8244 0.0613 7.8856 2.0751 0.0567 2.1317Total 2.4035 3.2780 34.1600 0.0928
7,229.4960
7,229.4960 0.3657 7,237.1748
7.8244 0.0613 7.8856 2.0751 0.0567 2.1317Worker 2.4035 3.2780 34.1600 0.0928
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total
Fugitive PM2.5
Exhaust PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10
Exhaust PM10
0.0000 2,643.2424
2,643.2424 0.3802 2,651.2273
0.0389 0.0389 0.0389 0.0389Total 0.2918 1.2646 17.9959 0.0274
0.0000 2,643.2424
2,643.2424 0.3802 2,651.2273
0.0389 0.0389 0.0389 0.0389Off-Road 0.2918 1.2646 17.9959 0.0274
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total
Fugitive PM2.5
Exhaust PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10
Exhaust PM10
6,954.2681
6,954.2681 0.3423 6,961.4560
7.8244 0.0602 7.8845 2.0751 0.0558 2.1308Total 2.2100 3.0058 31.3071 0.0926
6,954.2681
6,954.2681 0.3423 6,961.4560
7.8244 0.0602 7.8845 2.0751 0.0558 2.1308Worker 2.2100 3.0058 31.3071 0.0926
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total
Fugitive PM2.5
Exhaust PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10
Exhaust PM10
0.0000 2,630.6068
2,630.6068 0.3637 2,638.2449
0.0389 0.0389 0.0389 0.0389Total 0.2918 1.2646 17.9959 0.0274
0.0000 2,630.6068
2,630.6068 0.3637 2,638.2449
0.0389 0.0389 0.0389 0.0389Off-Road 0.2918 1.2646 17.9959 0.0274
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total
Fugitive PM2.5
Exhaust PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10
Exhaust PM10
6,954.2681
6,954.2681 0.3423 6,961.4560
7.8244 0.0602 7.8845 2.0751 0.0558 2.1308Total 2.2100 3.0058 31.3071 0.0926
6,954.2681
6,954.2681 0.3423 6,961.4560
7.8244 0.0602 7.8845 2.0751 0.0558 2.1308Worker 2.2100 3.0058 31.3071 0.0926
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total
Fugitive PM2.5
Exhaust PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10
Exhaust PM10
0.0000 2,613.9647
2,613.9647 0.3505 2,621.3259
0.0389 0.0389 0.0389 0.0389Total 0.2918 1.2646 17.9959 0.0274
0.0000 2,613.9647
2,613.9647 0.3505 2,621.3259
0.0389 0.0389 0.0389 0.0389Off-Road 0.2918 1.2646 17.9959 0.0274
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total
Fugitive PM2.5
Exhaust PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10
Exhaust PM10
6,671.6880
6,671.6880 0.3242 6,678.4958
7.8244 0.0598 7.8842 2.0751 0.0555 2.1305Total 2.0711 2.7856 29.1264 0.0926
6,671.6880
6,671.6880 0.3242 6,678.4958
7.8244 0.0598 7.8842 2.0751 0.0555 2.1305Worker 2.0711 2.7856 29.1264 0.0926
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total
Fugitive PM2.5
Exhaust PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10
Exhaust PM10
2,613.9647
2,613.9647 0.3505 2,621.3259
1.0338 1.0338 0.9999 0.9999Total 1.8870 16.5343 17.0511 0.0274
2,613.9647
2,613.9647 0.3505 2,621.3259
1.0338 1.0338 0.9999 0.9999Off-Road 1.8870 16.5343 17.0511 0.0274
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total
Fugitive PM2.5
Exhaust PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
3.6 Building Construction - 2020
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10
Exhaust PM10
281.4485 281.4485 0.0267 282.01020.1506 0.1506 0.1506 0.1506Total 25.1938 2.0058 1.8542 2.9700e-003
281.4485 281.4485 0.0267 282.01020.1506 0.1506 0.1506 0.1506Off-Road 0.2986 2.0058 1.8542 2.9700e-003
0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Archit. Coating 24.8951
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total
Fugitive PM2.5
Exhaust PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
3.7 Architectural Coating - 2018
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10
Exhaust PM10
6,671.6880
6,671.6880 0.3242 6,678.4958
7.8244 0.0598 7.8842 2.0751 0.0555 2.1305Total 2.0711 2.7856 29.1264 0.0926
6,671.6880
6,671.6880 0.3242 6,678.4958
7.8244 0.0598 7.8842 2.0751 0.0555 2.1305Worker 2.0711 2.7856 29.1264 0.0926
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total
Fugitive PM2.5
Exhaust PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10
Exhaust PM10
1,032.7851
1,032.7851 0.0522 1,033.8821
1.1178 8.7500e-003
1.1265 0.2964 8.1000e-003
0.3045Total 0.3434 0.4683 4.8800 0.0133
1,032.7851
1,032.7851 0.0522 1,033.8821
1.1178 8.7500e-003
1.1265 0.2964 8.1000e-003
0.3045Worker 0.3434 0.4683 4.8800 0.0133
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total
Fugitive PM2.5
Exhaust PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10
Exhaust PM10
0.0000 281.4485 281.4485 0.0267 282.01023.9600e-003
3.9600e-003
3.9600e-003
3.9600e-003
Total 24.9248 0.1288 1.8324 2.9700e-003
0.0000 281.4485 281.4485 0.0267 282.01023.9600e-003
3.9600e-003
3.9600e-003
3.9600e-003
Off-Road 0.0297 0.1288 1.8324 2.9700e-003
0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Archit. Coating 24.8951
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total
Fugitive PM2.5
Exhaust PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10
Exhaust PM10
1,032.7851
1,032.7851 0.0522 1,033.8821
1.1178 8.7500e-003
1.1265 0.2964 8.1000e-003
0.3045Total 0.3434 0.4683 4.8800 0.0133
1,032.7851
1,032.7851 0.0522 1,033.8821
1.1178 8.7500e-003
1.1265 0.2964 8.1000e-003
0.3045Worker 0.3434 0.4683 4.8800 0.0133
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total
Fugitive PM2.5
Exhaust PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10
Exhaust PM10
0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0238 281.94733.9600e-003
3.9600e-003
3.9600e-003
3.9600e-003
Total 24.9248 0.1288 1.8324 2.9700e-003
0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0238 281.94733.9600e-003
3.9600e-003
3.9600e-003
3.9600e-003
Off-Road 0.0297 0.1288 1.8324 2.9700e-003
0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Archit. Coating 24.8951
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total
Fugitive PM2.5
Exhaust PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10
Exhaust PM10
993.4669 993.4669 0.0489 994.49371.1178 8.6000e-003
1.1264 0.2964 7.9700e-003
0.3044Total 0.3157 0.4294 4.4724 0.0132
993.4669 993.4669 0.0489 994.49371.1178 8.6000e-003
1.1264 0.2964 7.9700e-003
0.3044Worker 0.3157 0.4294 4.4724 0.0132
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total
Fugitive PM2.5
Exhaust PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10
Exhaust PM10
281.4481 281.4481 0.0238 281.94730.1288 0.1288 0.1288 0.1288Total 25.1616 1.8354 1.8413 2.9700e-003
281.4481 281.4481 0.0238 281.94730.1288 0.1288 0.1288 0.1288Off-Road 0.2664 1.8354 1.8413 2.9700e-003
0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Archit. Coating 24.8951
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total
Fugitive PM2.5
Exhaust PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
3.7 Architectural Coating - 2019
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10
Exhaust PM10
281.4481 281.4481 0.0218 281.90570.1109 0.1109 0.1109 0.1109Total 25.1373 1.6838 1.8314 2.9700e-003
281.4481 281.4481 0.0218 281.90570.1109 0.1109 0.1109 0.1109Off-Road 0.2422 1.6838 1.8314 2.9700e-003
0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Archit. Coating 24.8951
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total
Fugitive PM2.5
Exhaust PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
3.7 Architectural Coating - 2020
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10
Exhaust PM10
993.4669 993.4669 0.0489 994.49371.1178 8.6000e-003
1.1264 0.2964 7.9700e-003
0.3044Total 0.3157 0.4294 4.4724 0.0132
993.4669 993.4669 0.0489 994.49371.1178 8.6000e-003
1.1264 0.2964 7.9700e-003
0.3044Worker 0.3157 0.4294 4.4724 0.0132
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total
Fugitive PM2.5
Exhaust PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10
Exhaust PM10
953.0983 953.0983 0.0463 954.07081.1178 8.5400e-003
1.1263 0.2964 7.9200e-003
0.3044Total 0.2959 0.3979 4.1609 0.0132
953.0983 953.0983 0.0463 954.07081.1178 8.5400e-003
1.1263 0.2964 7.9200e-003
0.3044Worker 0.2959 0.3979 4.1609 0.0132
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total
Fugitive PM2.5
Exhaust PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10
Exhaust PM10
0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0218 281.90573.9600e-003
3.9600e-003
3.9600e-003
3.9600e-003
Total 24.9248 0.1288 1.8324 2.9700e-003
0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0218 281.90573.9600e-003
3.9600e-003
3.9600e-003
3.9600e-003
Off-Road 0.0297 0.1288 1.8324 2.9700e-003
0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Archit. Coating 24.8951
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total
Fugitive PM2.5
Exhaust PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10
Exhaust PM10
953.0983 953.0983 0.0463 954.07081.1178 8.5400e-003
1.1263 0.2964 7.9200e-003
0.3044Total 0.2959 0.3979 4.1609 0.0132
953.0983 953.0983 0.0463 954.07081.1178 8.5400e-003
1.1263 0.2964 7.9200e-003
0.3044Worker 0.2959 0.3979 4.1609 0.0132
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total
Fugitive PM2.5
Exhaust PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10
Exhaust PM10
0.0000 1,104.4866
1,104.4866 0.3495 1,111.8250
0.0183 0.0183 0.0183 0.0183Total 0.1373 0.5948 8.4638 0.0112
0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Paving 0.0000
0.0000 1,104.4866
1,104.4866 0.3495 1,111.8250
0.0183 0.0183 0.0183 0.0183Off-Road 0.1373 0.5948 8.4638 0.0112
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total
Fugitive PM2.5
Exhaust PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10
Exhaust PM10
99.3467 99.3467 4.8900e-003
99.44940.1118 8.6000e-004
0.1126 0.0296 8.0000e-004
0.0304Total 0.0316 0.0429 0.4472 1.3200e-003
99.3467 99.3467 4.8900e-003
99.44940.1118 8.6000e-004
0.1126 0.0296 8.0000e-004
0.0304Worker 0.0316 0.0429 0.4472 1.3200e-003
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total
Fugitive PM2.5
Exhaust PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10
Exhaust PM10
1,104.4866
1,104.4866 0.3495 1,111.8250
0.4047 0.4047 0.3723 0.3723Total 0.7129 7.4677 7.1826 0.0112
0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Paving 0.0000
1,104.4866
1,104.4866 0.3495 1,111.8250
0.4047 0.4047 0.3723 0.3723Off-Road 0.7129 7.4677 7.1826 0.0112
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total
Fugitive PM2.5
Exhaust PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
3.8 Paving - 2019
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10
Exhaust PM10
99.3467 99.3467 4.8900e-003
99.44940.1118 8.6000e-004
0.1126 0.0296 8.0000e-004
0.0304Total 0.0316 0.0429 0.4472 1.3200e-003
99.3467 99.3467 4.8900e-003
99.44940.1118 8.6000e-004
0.1126 0.0296 8.0000e-004
0.0304Worker 0.0316 0.0429 0.4472 1.3200e-003
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total
Fugitive PM2.5
Exhaust PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10
Exhaust PM10
Off-road Equipment - See "Hazen AQ Construction Model Inputs"
1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data
Project Characteristics -
Land Use - See "Hazen AQ Construction Model Inputs"
Construction Phase - See "Hazen AQ Construction Model Inputs"
Off-road Equipment -
Off-road Equipment - See "Hazen AQ Construction Model Inputs"
CO2 Intensity (lb/MWhr)
1227.89 CH4 Intensity (lb/MWhr)
0.029 N2O Intensity (lb/MWhr)
0.006
31
Climate Zone 11 Operational Year 2023
Utility Company Los Angeles Department of Water & Power
1.2 Other Project Characteristics
Urbanization Urban Wind Speed (m/s) 2.2 Precipitation Freq (Days)
Strip Mall 25.00 1000sqft 0.57 25,000.00 0
Apartments High Rise 360.00 Dwelling Unit 5.81 418,000.00 587
Quality Restaurant 25.00 1000sqft 0.57 25,000.00 0
City Park 0.47 Acre 0.47 20,500.00 0
Parking Lot 5.00 1000sqft 0.11 5,000.00 0
Population
Enclosed Parking with Elevator 362.00 Space 3.26 144,800.00 0
1.1 Land Usage
Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 1 of 1 Date: 4/19/2016 11:56 AM
LUXE Hotel - Phase 2 Construction
South Coast Air Basin, Summer
1.0 Project Characteristics
tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00
tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 3.00
tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00
tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 4.00
tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00
tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00
tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 3.00
tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00
tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00
tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 3.00
tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00
tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00
tblAreaCoating Area_Residential_Exterior 282150 236513
tblAreaCoating Area_Residential_Interior 846450 709540
tblArchitecturalCoating ConstArea_Nonresidential_Interior 323,175.00 83,988.00
tblAreaCoating Area_Nonresidential_Interior 323175 60000
Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation - See "Hazen AQ Construction Model Inputs"
Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value
tblArchitecturalCoating ConstArea_Nonresidential_Exterior 107,725.00 25,100.00
Demolition - See "Hazen AQ Construction Model Inputs"
Grading - See "Hazen AQ Construction Model Inputs"
Architectural Coating - See "Hazen AQ Construction Model Inputs"
Vehicle Trips -
Water And Wastewater -
Solid Waste -
Off-road Equipment - See "Hazen AQ Construction Model Inputs"
Off-road Equipment - See "Hazen AQ Construction Model Inputs"
Off-road Equipment - See "Hazen AQ Construction Model Inputs"
Off-road Equipment - See "Hazen AQ Construction Model Inputs"
Trips and VMT - See "Hazen AQ Construction Model Inputs"
tblFireplaces NumberGas 306.00 246.50
tblFireplaces NumberNoFireplace 36.00 29.00
tblConstructionPhase PhaseStartDate 1/23/2021 1/25/2021
tblConstructionPhase PhaseStartDate 1/14/2023 11/9/2021
tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 2/10/2023 12/6/2021
tblConstructionPhase PhaseStartDate 3/16/2023 8/9/2021
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 20.00 43.00
tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 8/21/2024 1/13/2023
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 20.00 72.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 30.00 35.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 20.00 375.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 300.00 558.00
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Final
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Final
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Final
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Final
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Final
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Final
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Final
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Final
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Final
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Final
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Final
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Final
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Final
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Final
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Final
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Final
tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00
tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 8.00
tblProjectCharacteristics OperationalYear 2014 2023
tblSolidWaste SolidWasteGenerationRate 165.60 133.40
tblOffRoadEquipment UsageHours 7.00 8.00
tblOffRoadEquipment UsageHours 7.00 8.00
tblOffRoadEquipment PhaseName Demolition
tblOffRoadEquipment PhaseName Foundation
tblOffRoadEquipment PhaseName Foundation
tblOffRoadEquipment PhaseName Building Construction
tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 0.00 2.00
tblOffRoadEquipment PhaseName Grading
tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 0.00 4.00
tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 0.00 3.00
tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 1.00 0.00
tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 0.00 1.00
tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 2.00 1.00
tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 3.00 1.00
tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 2.00 0.00
tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 2.00 1.00
tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 2.00 0.00
tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 2.00 1.00
tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 2.00 0.00
tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 2.00 1.00
tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 1.00 0.00
tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 3.00 1.00
tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 360,000.00 418,000.00
tblLandUse Population 1,030.00 587.00
tblGrading MaterialExported 0.00 102,300.00
tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 20,473.20 20,500.00
tblFireplaces NumberWood 18.00 14.50
tblGrading AcresOfGrading 52.50 2.70
tblWoodstoves NumberCatalytic 18.00 14.50
tblWoodstoves NumberNoncatalytic 18.00 14.50
tblWater OutdoorWaterUseRate 484,362.31 290,617.38
tblWater OutdoorWaterUseRate 1,134,982.18 680,989.31
tblWater IndoorWaterUseRate 1,851,813.04 1,111,087.82
tblWater OutdoorWaterUseRate 14,787,131.03 11,911,855.55
tblWater IndoorWaterUseRate 23,455,449.22 18,894,667.43
tblWater IndoorWaterUseRate 7,588,342.81 4,553,005.69
tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber 349.00 500.00
tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber 8.00 10.00
tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber 20.00 15.00
tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber 15.00 20.00
tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripNumber 75.00 0.00
tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber 18.00 20.00
tblTripsAndVMT HaulingTripNumber 1,606.00 0.00
tblTripsAndVMT HaulingTripNumber 12,788.00 0.00
tblSolidWaste SolidWasteGenerationRate 22.81 13.69
tblSolidWaste SolidWasteGenerationRate 26.25 15.75
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0015.20 91.65 25.43 24.14 91.35 44.61
NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent Reduction
12.82 85.67 -1.28 0.00
Exhaust PM10
PM10 Total
Fugitive PM2.5
Exhaust PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10
0.0000 28,507.9415
28,507.9415
3.6939 0.0000 28,585.5134
21.9027 0.3335 22.2361 6.4571 0.3227 6.7799Total 42.2093 11.5634 146.1101 0.3639
0.0000 7,177.3208
7,177.3208 0.5179 0.0000 7,188.1968
6.3713 0.0740 6.4453 1.6897 0.0705 1.76022023 13.6883 2.5319 33.4877 0.0979
0.0000 7,262.7412
7,262.7412 0.5310 0.0000 7,273.8914
6.3713 0.0741 6.4453 1.6897 0.0705 1.76022022 13.7667 2.6379 34.7913 0.0979
0.0000 8,536.7378
8,536.7378 0.8985 0.0000 8,555.6069
6.4830 0.0933 6.5763 1.7193 0.0897 1.80902021 14.0291 3.3860 45.1133 0.1105
0.0000 5,531.1418
5,531.1418 1.7465 0.0000 5,567.8183
2.6771 0.0922 2.7693 1.3584 0.0921 1.45052020 0.7252 3.0076 32.7178 0.0577
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total
Fugitive PM2.5
Exhaust PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Mitigated Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10
Exhaust PM10
0.0000 28,507.9416
28,507.9416
3.6939 0.0000 28,585.5134
25.8277 3.9920 29.8197 8.5123 3.7289 12.2412Total 48.4149 80.7038 144.2637 0.3639
0.0000 7,177.3208
7,177.3208 0.5179 0.0000 7,188.1968
6.3713 0.5015 6.8728 1.6897 0.4777 2.16742023 14.4549 10.1419 32.9183 0.0979
0.0000 7,262.7412
7,262.7412 0.5310 0.0000 7,273.8914
6.3713 0.5771 6.9484 1.6897 0.5496 2.23932022 14.6168 10.9917 34.2645 0.0979
0.0000 8,536.7378
8,536.7378 0.8985 0.0000 8,555.6069
6.4830 1.0069 7.4899 1.7193 0.9477 2.66702021 15.4688 18.4245 43.3764 0.1105
0.0000 5,531.1418
5,531.1418 1.7465 0.0000 5,567.8183
6.6021 1.9065 8.5086 3.4136 1.7540 5.16762020 3.8745 41.1457 33.7046 0.0577
NBio- CO2
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year lb/day lb/day
Exhaust PM10
PM10 Total
Fugitive PM2.5
Exhaust PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2
2.0 Emissions Summary
2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission)
Unmitigated Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10
Foundation Paving Equipment 0 8.00 130 0.36
Foundation Pavers 0 8.00 125 0.42
Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 8.00 97 0.37
Grading Scrapers 1 8.00 361 0.48
Grading Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8.00 255 0.40
Grading Graders 1 8.00 174 0.41
Grading Excavators 2 8.00 162 0.38
Grading Bore/Drill Rigs 1 8.00 205 0.50
Demolition Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 8.00 97 0.37
Demolition Rubber Tired Dozers 2 8.00 255 0.40
Demolition Excavators 1 8.00 162 0.38
Load Factor
Demolition Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 8.00 81 0.73
Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 0
Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 2.7
Acres of Paving: 0
Residential Indoor: 846,450; Residential Outdoor: 282,150; Non-Residential Indoor: 83,988; Non-Residential Outdoor: 25,100
OffRoad Equipment
Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power
375
6 Paving Paving 11/9/2021 12/6/2021 5 20
5 Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 8/9/2021 1/13/2023 5
43
4 Building Construction Building Construction 1/25/2021 3/15/2023 5 558
3 Foundation Paving 11/25/2020 1/22/2021 5
72
2 Grading Grading 10/7/2020 11/24/2020 5 35
End Date Num Days Week
Num Days Phase Description
1 Demolition Demolition 6/29/2020 10/6/2020 5
3.0 Construction Detail
Construction Phase
Phase Number
Phase Name Phase Type Start Date
3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction
Use Cleaner Engines for Construction Equipment
Use Soil Stabilizer
Water Exposed Area
Reduce Vehicle Speed on Unpaved Roads
Clean Paved Roads
14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT
6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT
Paving 3 10.00 0.00 0.00
Architectural Coating 1 70.00 0.00 0.00 14.70
14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT
6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT
Building Construction 5 500.00 0.00 0.00
Foundation 6 20.00 0.00 0.00 14.70
14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT
6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT
Grading 8 15.00 0.00 0.00
Demolition 7 20.00 0.00 0.00 14.70
Worker Trip Length
Vendor Trip Length
Hauling Trip Length
Worker Vehicle Class
Vendor Vehicle Class
Hauling Vehicle Class
Trips and VMT
Phase Name Offroad Equipment Count
Worker Trip Number
Vendor Trip Number
Hauling Trip Number
Paving Rollers 1 8.00 80 0.38
Paving Paving Equipment 1 8.00 130 0.36
Paving Pavers 1 8.00 125 0.42
Architectural Coating Air Compressors 1 6.00 78 0.48
Building Construction Welders 0 8.00 46 0.45
Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 8.00 97 0.37
Building Construction Pumps 0 8.00 84 0.74
Building Construction Generator Sets 1 8.00 84 0.74
Building Construction Forklifts 3 8.00 89 0.20
Building Construction Cranes 0 8.00 226 0.29
Foundation Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 8.00 97 0.37
Foundation Rollers 0 8.00 80 0.38
Foundation Pumps 4 8.00 84 0.74
0.0000 3,733.8882
3,733.8882 1.0535 3,756.0113
1.8822 0.0610 1.9432 0.2850 0.0610 0.3460Total 0.4575 1.9826 22.8175 0.0387
0.0000 3,733.8882
3,733.8882 1.0535 3,756.0113
0.0610 0.0610 0.0610 0.0610Off-Road 0.4575 1.9826 22.8175 0.0387
0.0000 0.00001.8822 0.0000 1.8822 0.2850 0.0000 0.2850Fugitive Dust
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total
Fugitive PM2.5
Exhaust PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10
Exhaust PM10
203.3675 203.3675 9.2600e-003
203.56200.2236 1.7100e-003
0.2253 0.0593 1.5800e-003
0.0609Total 0.0582 0.0726 0.9139 2.8200e-003
203.3675 203.3675 9.2600e-003
203.56200.2236 1.7100e-003
0.2253 0.0593 1.5800e-003
0.0609Worker 0.0582 0.0726 0.9139 2.8200e-003
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total
Fugitive PM2.5
Exhaust PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Unmitigated Construction Off-SiteROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10Exhaust PM10
3,733.8882
3,733.8882 1.0535 3,756.0113
4.8261 1.6496 6.4757 0.7307 1.5335 2.2642Total 3.2226 32.3834 29.7480 0.0387
3,733.8882
3,733.8882 1.0535 3,756.0113
1.6496 1.6496 1.5335 1.5335Off-Road 3.2226 32.3834 29.7480 0.0387
0.0000 0.00004.8261 0.0000 4.8261 0.7307 0.0000 0.7307Fugitive Dust
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total
Fugitive PM2.5
Exhaust PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
3.2 Demolition - 2020
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10
Exhaust PM10
152.5257 152.5257 6.9500e-003
152.67150.1677 1.2800e-003
0.1690 0.0445 1.1900e-003
0.0457Total 0.0437 0.0544 0.6854 2.1200e-003
152.5257 152.5257 6.9500e-003
152.67150.1677 1.2800e-003
0.1690 0.0445 1.1900e-003
0.0457Worker 0.0437 0.0544 0.6854 2.1200e-003
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total
Fugitive PM2.5
Exhaust PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Unmitigated Construction Off-SiteROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10Exhaust PM10
5,378.6161
5,378.6161 1.7396 5,415.1467
6.4344 1.9052 8.3397 3.3691 1.7528 5.1219Total 3.8309 41.0913 33.0192 0.0555
5,378.6161
5,378.6161 1.7396 5,415.1467
1.9052 1.9052 1.7528 1.7528Off-Road 3.8309 41.0913 33.0192 0.0555
0.0000 0.00006.4344 0.0000 6.4344 3.3691 0.0000 3.3691Fugitive Dust
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total
Fugitive PM2.5
Exhaust PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
3.3 Grading - 2020
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10
Exhaust PM10
203.3675 203.3675 9.2600e-003
203.56200.2236 1.7100e-003
0.2253 0.0593 1.5800e-003
0.0609Total 0.0582 0.0726 0.9139 2.8200e-003
203.3675 203.3675 9.2600e-003
203.56200.2236 1.7100e-003
0.2253 0.0593 1.5800e-003
0.0609Worker 0.0582 0.0726 0.9139 2.8200e-003
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total
Fugitive PM2.5
Exhaust PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10
Exhaust PM10
3,093.6753
3,093.6753 0.3437 3,100.8919
1.0951 1.0951 1.0738 1.0738Total 2.1184 18.3264 19.6096 0.0325
0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Paving 6.7000e-003
3,093.6753
3,093.6753 0.3437 3,100.8919
1.0951 1.0951 1.0738 1.0738Off-Road 2.1117 18.3264 19.6096 0.0325
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total
Fugitive PM2.5
Exhaust PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
3.4 Foundation - 2020
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10
Exhaust PM10
152.5257 152.5257 6.9500e-003
152.67150.1677 1.2800e-003
0.1690 0.0445 1.1900e-003
0.0457Total 0.0437 0.0544 0.6854 2.1200e-003
152.5257 152.5257 6.9500e-003
152.67150.1677 1.2800e-003
0.1690 0.0445 1.1900e-003
0.0457Worker 0.0437 0.0544 0.6854 2.1200e-003
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total
Fugitive PM2.5
Exhaust PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10
Exhaust PM10
0.0000 5,378.6161
5,378.6161 1.7396 5,415.1467
2.5094 0.0909 2.6003 1.3140 0.0909 1.4048Total 0.6815 2.9532 32.0324 0.0555
0.0000 5,378.6161
5,378.6161 1.7396 5,415.1467
0.0909 0.0909 0.0909 0.0909Off-Road 0.6815 2.9532 32.0324 0.0555
0.0000 0.00002.5094 0.0000 2.5094 1.3140 0.0000 1.3140Fugitive Dust
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total
Fugitive PM2.5
Exhaust PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10
Exhaust PM10
203.3675 203.3675 9.2600e-003
203.56200.2236 1.7100e-003
0.2253 0.0593 1.5800e-003
0.0609Total 0.0582 0.0726 0.9139 2.8200e-003
203.3675 203.3675 9.2600e-003
203.56200.2236 1.7100e-003
0.2253 0.0593 1.5800e-003
0.0609Worker 0.0582 0.0726 0.9139 2.8200e-003
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total
Fugitive PM2.5
Exhaust PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10
Exhaust PM10
0.0000 3,093.6753
3,093.6753 0.3437 3,100.8919
0.0452 0.0452 0.0452 0.0452Total 0.3458 1.4693 20.9096 0.0325
0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Paving 6.7000e-003
0.0000 3,093.6753
3,093.6753 0.3437 3,100.8919
0.0452 0.0452 0.0452 0.0452Off-Road 0.3391 1.4693 20.9096 0.0325
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total
Fugitive PM2.5
Exhaust PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10
Exhaust PM10
203.3675 203.3675 9.2600e-003
203.56200.2236 1.7100e-003
0.2253 0.0593 1.5800e-003
0.0609Total 0.0582 0.0726 0.9139 2.8200e-003
203.3675 203.3675 9.2600e-003
203.56200.2236 1.7100e-003
0.2253 0.0593 1.5800e-003
0.0609Worker 0.0582 0.0726 0.9139 2.8200e-003
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total
Fugitive PM2.5
Exhaust PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10
Exhaust PM10
0.0000 3,093.9428
3,093.9428 0.3306 3,100.8849
0.0452 0.0452 0.0452 0.0452Total 0.3458 1.4693 20.9096 0.0325
0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Paving 6.7000e-003
0.0000 3,093.9428
3,093.9428 0.3306 3,100.8849
0.0452 0.0452 0.0452 0.0452Off-Road 0.3391 1.4693 20.9096 0.0325
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total
Fugitive PM2.5
Exhaust PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10
Exhaust PM10
200.2461 200.2461 8.8700e-003
200.43230.2236 1.7100e-003
0.2253 0.0593 1.5900e-003
0.0609Total 0.0551 0.0679 0.8598 2.8300e-003
200.2461 200.2461 8.8700e-003
200.43230.2236 1.7100e-003
0.2253 0.0593 1.5900e-003
0.0609Worker 0.0551 0.0679 0.8598 2.8300e-003
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total
Fugitive PM2.5
Exhaust PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10
Exhaust PM10
3,093.9428
3,093.9428 0.3306 3,100.8849
0.9340 0.9340 0.9161 0.9161Total 1.9029 16.6317 19.4830 0.0325
0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Paving 6.7000e-003
3,093.9428
3,093.9428 0.3306 3,100.8849
0.9340 0.9340 0.9161 0.9161Off-Road 1.8962 16.6317 19.4830 0.0325
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total
Fugitive PM2.5
Exhaust PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
3.4 Foundation - 2021
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10
Exhaust PM10
5,006.1519
5,006.1519 0.2217 5,010.8070
5.5888 0.0428 5.6316 1.4822 0.0397 1.5219Total 1.3777 1.6965 21.4948 0.0708
5,006.1519
5,006.1519 0.2217 5,010.8070
5.5888 0.0428 5.6316 1.4822 0.0397 1.5219Worker 1.3777 1.6965 21.4948 0.0708
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total
Fugitive PM2.5
Exhaust PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10
Exhaust PM10
1,368.0271
1,368.0271 0.2727 1,373.7547
0.5306 0.5306 0.5016 0.5016Total 0.9327 8.5993 9.4485 0.0143
1,368.0271
1,368.0271 0.2727 1,373.7547
0.5306 0.5306 0.5016 0.5016Off-Road 0.9327 8.5993 9.4485 0.0143
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total
Fugitive PM2.5
Exhaust PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
3.5 Building Construction - 2021
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10
Exhaust PM10
200.2461 200.2461 8.8700e-003
200.43230.2236 1.7100e-003
0.2253 0.0593 1.5900e-003
0.0609Total 0.0551 0.0679 0.8598 2.8300e-003
200.2461 200.2461 8.8700e-003
200.43230.2236 1.7100e-003
0.2253 0.0593 1.5900e-003
0.0609Worker 0.0551 0.0679 0.8598 2.8300e-003
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total
Fugitive PM2.5
Exhaust PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10
Exhaust PM10
1,368.3660
1,368.3660 0.2707 1,374.0498
0.4467 0.4467 0.4227 0.4227Total 0.8355 7.7686 9.3751 0.0143
1,368.3660
1,368.3660 0.2707 1,374.0498
0.4467 0.4467 0.4227 0.4227Off-Road 0.8355 7.7686 9.3751 0.0143
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total
Fugitive PM2.5
Exhaust PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
3.5 Building Construction - 2022
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10
Exhaust PM10
5,006.1519
5,006.1519 0.2217 5,010.8070
5.5888 0.0428 5.6316 1.4822 0.0397 1.5219Total 1.3777 1.6965 21.4948 0.0708
5,006.1519
5,006.1519 0.2217 5,010.8070
5.5888 0.0428 5.6316 1.4822 0.0397 1.5219Worker 1.3777 1.6965 21.4948 0.0708
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total
Fugitive PM2.5
Exhaust PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10
Exhaust PM10
0.0000 1,368.0271
1,368.0271 0.2727 1,373.7547
0.0214 0.0214 0.0214 0.0214Total 0.1603 0.6945 9.8832 0.0143
0.0000 1,368.0271
1,368.0271 0.2727 1,373.7547
0.0214 0.0214 0.0214 0.0214Off-Road 0.1603 0.6945 9.8832 0.0143
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total
Fugitive PM2.5
Exhaust PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10
Exhaust PM10
4,923.6203
4,923.6203 0.2123 4,928.0778
5.5888 0.0427 5.6316 1.4822 0.0396 1.5218Total 1.3048 1.5918 20.2419 0.0707
4,923.6203
4,923.6203 0.2123 4,928.0778
5.5888 0.0427 5.6316 1.4822 0.0396 1.5218Worker 1.3048 1.5918 20.2419 0.0707
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total
Fugitive PM2.5
Exhaust PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10
Exhaust PM10
0.0000 1,368.3660
1,368.3660 0.2707 1,374.0498
0.0214 0.0214 0.0214 0.0214Total 0.1603 0.6945 9.8832 0.0143
0.0000 1,368.3660
1,368.3660 0.2707 1,374.0498
0.0214 0.0214 0.0214 0.0214Off-Road 0.1603 0.6945 9.8832 0.0143
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total
Fugitive PM2.5
Exhaust PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10
Exhaust PM10
4,923.6203
4,923.6203 0.2123 4,928.0778
5.5888 0.0427 5.6316 1.4822 0.0396 1.5218Total 1.3048 1.5918 20.2419 0.0707
4,923.6203
4,923.6203 0.2123 4,928.0778
5.5888 0.0427 5.6316 1.4822 0.0396 1.5218Worker 1.3048 1.5918 20.2419 0.0707
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total
Fugitive PM2.5
Exhaust PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10
Exhaust PM10
0.0000 1,368.7036
1,368.7036 0.2686 1,374.3436
0.0214 0.0214 0.0214 0.0214Total 0.1603 0.6945 9.8832 0.0143
0.0000 1,368.7036
1,368.7036 0.2686 1,374.3436
0.0214 0.0214 0.0214 0.0214Off-Road 0.1603 0.6945 9.8832 0.0143
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total
Fugitive PM2.5
Exhaust PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10
Exhaust PM10
4,848.3940
4,848.3940 0.2039 4,852.6769
5.5888 0.0427 5.6315 1.4822 0.0396 1.5218Total 1.2361 1.4988 19.0983 0.0707
4,848.3940
4,848.3940 0.2039 4,852.6769
5.5888 0.0427 5.6315 1.4822 0.0396 1.5218Worker 1.2361 1.4988 19.0983 0.0707
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total
Fugitive PM2.5
Exhaust PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10
Exhaust PM10
1,368.7036
1,368.7036 0.2686 1,374.3436
0.3820 0.3820 0.3617 0.3617Total 0.7649 7.1303 9.3351 0.0143
1,368.7036
1,368.7036 0.2686 1,374.3436
0.3820 0.3820 0.3617 0.3617Off-Road 0.7649 7.1303 9.3351 0.0143
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total
Fugitive PM2.5
Exhaust PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
3.5 Building Construction - 2023
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10
Exhaust PM10
700.8613 700.8613 0.0310 701.51300.7824 5.9900e-003
0.7884 0.2075 5.5500e-003
0.2131Total 0.1929 0.2375 3.0093 9.9100e-003
700.8613 700.8613 0.0310 701.51300.7824 5.9900e-003
0.7884 0.2075 5.5500e-003
0.2131Worker 0.1929 0.2375 3.0093 9.9100e-003
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total
Fugitive PM2.5
Exhaust PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10
Exhaust PM10
281.4481 281.4481 0.0193 281.85370.0941 0.0941 0.0941 0.0941Total 12.3082 1.5268 1.8176 2.9700e-003
281.4481 281.4481 0.0193 281.85370.0941 0.0941 0.0941 0.0941Off-Road 0.2189 1.5268 1.8176 2.9700e-003
0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Archit. Coating 12.0893
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total
Fugitive PM2.5
Exhaust PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
3.6 Architectural Coating - 2021
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10
Exhaust PM10
4,848.3940
4,848.3940 0.2039 4,852.6769
5.5888 0.0427 5.6315 1.4822 0.0396 1.5218Total 1.2361 1.4988 19.0983 0.0707
4,848.3940
4,848.3940 0.2039 4,852.6769
5.5888 0.0427 5.6315 1.4822 0.0396 1.5218Worker 1.2361 1.4988 19.0983 0.0707
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total
Fugitive PM2.5
Exhaust PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10
Exhaust PM10
281.4481 281.4481 0.0183 281.83290.0817 0.0817 0.0817 0.0817Total 12.2938 1.4085 1.8136 2.9700e-003
281.4481 281.4481 0.0183 281.83290.0817 0.0817 0.0817 0.0817Off-Road 0.2045 1.4085 1.8136 2.9700e-003
0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Archit. Coating 12.0893
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total
Fugitive PM2.5
Exhaust PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
3.6 Architectural Coating - 2022
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10
Exhaust PM10
700.8613 700.8613 0.0310 701.51300.7824 5.9900e-003
0.7884 0.2075 5.5500e-003
0.2131Total 0.1929 0.2375 3.0093 9.9100e-003
700.8613 700.8613 0.0310 701.51300.7824 5.9900e-003
0.7884 0.2075 5.5500e-003
0.2131Worker 0.1929 0.2375 3.0093 9.9100e-003
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total
Fugitive PM2.5
Exhaust PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10
Exhaust PM10
0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0193 281.85373.9600e-003
3.9600e-003
3.9600e-003
3.9600e-003
Total 12.1190 0.1288 1.8324 2.9700e-003
0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0193 281.85373.9600e-003
3.9600e-003
3.9600e-003
3.9600e-003
Off-Road 0.0297 0.1288 1.8324 2.9700e-003
0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Archit. Coating 12.0893
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total
Fugitive PM2.5
Exhaust PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10
Exhaust PM10
689.3068 689.3068 0.0297 689.93090.7824 5.9800e-003
0.7884 0.2075 5.5500e-003
0.2131Total 0.1827 0.2229 2.8339 9.9000e-003
689.3068 689.3068 0.0297 689.93090.7824 5.9800e-003
0.7884 0.2075 5.5500e-003
0.2131Worker 0.1827 0.2229 2.8339 9.9000e-003
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total
Fugitive PM2.5
Exhaust PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10
Exhaust PM10
0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0183 281.83293.9600e-003
3.9600e-003
3.9600e-003
3.9600e-003
Total 12.1190 0.1288 1.8324 2.9700e-003
0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0183 281.83293.9600e-003
3.9600e-003
3.9600e-003
3.9600e-003
Off-Road 0.0297 0.1288 1.8324 2.9700e-003
0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Archit. Coating 12.0893
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total
Fugitive PM2.5
Exhaust PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10
Exhaust PM10
689.3068 689.3068 0.0297 689.93090.7824 5.9800e-003
0.7884 0.2075 5.5500e-003
0.2131Total 0.1827 0.2229 2.8339 9.9000e-003
689.3068 689.3068 0.0297 689.93090.7824 5.9800e-003
0.7884 0.2075 5.5500e-003
0.2131Worker 0.1827 0.2229 2.8339 9.9000e-003
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total
Fugitive PM2.5
Exhaust PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10
Exhaust PM10
0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0168 281.80173.9600e-003
3.9600e-003
3.9600e-003
3.9600e-003
Total 12.1190 0.1288 1.8324 2.9700e-003
0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0168 281.80173.9600e-003
3.9600e-003
3.9600e-003
3.9600e-003
Off-Road 0.0297 0.1288 1.8324 2.9700e-003
0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Archit. Coating 12.0893
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total
Fugitive PM2.5
Exhaust PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10
Exhaust PM10
678.7752 678.7752 0.0286 679.37480.7824 5.9800e-003
0.7884 0.2075 5.5500e-003
0.2131Total 0.1731 0.2098 2.6738 9.9000e-003
678.7752 678.7752 0.0286 679.37480.7824 5.9800e-003
0.7884 0.2075 5.5500e-003
0.2131Worker 0.1731 0.2098 2.6738 9.9000e-003
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total
Fugitive PM2.5
Exhaust PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10
Exhaust PM10
281.4481 281.4481 0.0168 281.80170.0708 0.0708 0.0708 0.0708Total 12.2809 1.3030 1.8111 2.9700e-003
281.4481 281.4481 0.0168 281.80170.0708 0.0708 0.0708 0.0708Off-Road 0.1917 1.3030 1.8111 2.9700e-003
0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Archit. Coating 12.0893
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total
Fugitive PM2.5
Exhaust PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
3.6 Architectural Coating - 2023
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10
Exhaust PM10
100.1230 100.1230 4.4300e-003
100.21610.1118 8.6000e-004
0.1126 0.0296 7.9000e-004
0.0304Total 0.0276 0.0339 0.4299 1.4200e-003
100.1230 100.1230 4.4300e-003
100.21610.1118 8.6000e-004
0.1126 0.0296 7.9000e-004
0.0304Worker 0.0276 0.0339 0.4299 1.4200e-003
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total
Fugitive PM2.5
Exhaust PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Unmitigated Construction Off-SiteROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10Exhaust PM10
1,080.1265
1,080.1265 0.3493 1,087.4625
0.3326 0.3326 0.3060 0.3060Total 0.6298 6.3303 7.1764 0.0112
0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Paving 0.0144
1,080.1265
1,080.1265 0.3493 1,087.4625
0.3326 0.3326 0.3060 0.3060Off-Road 0.6154 6.3303 7.1764 0.0112
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total
Fugitive PM2.5
Exhaust PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
3.7 Paving - 2021
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10
Exhaust PM10
678.7752 678.7752 0.0286 679.37480.7824 5.9800e-003
0.7884 0.2075 5.5500e-003
0.2131Total 0.1731 0.2098 2.6738 9.9000e-003
678.7752 678.7752 0.0286 679.37480.7824 5.9800e-003
0.7884 0.2075 5.5500e-003
0.2131Worker 0.1731 0.2098 2.6738 9.9000e-003
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total
Fugitive PM2.5
Exhaust PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10
Exhaust PM10
100.1230 100.1230 4.4300e-003
100.21610.1118 8.6000e-004
0.1126 0.0296 7.9000e-004
0.0304Total 0.0276 0.0339 0.4299 1.4200e-003
100.1230 100.1230 4.4300e-003
100.21610.1118 8.6000e-004
0.1126 0.0296 7.9000e-004
0.0304Worker 0.0276 0.0339 0.4299 1.4200e-003
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total
Fugitive PM2.5
Exhaust PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10
Exhaust PM10
0.0000 1,080.1265
1,080.1265 0.3493 1,087.4625
0.0183 0.0183 0.0183 0.0183Total 0.1517 0.5948 8.4638 0.0112
0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Paving 0.0144
0.0000 1,080.1265
1,080.1265 0.3493 1,087.4625
0.0183 0.0183 0.0183 0.0183Off-Road 0.1373 0.5948 8.4638 0.0112
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total
Fugitive PM2.5
Exhaust PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10
Exhaust PM10
Off-road Equipment - See "Hazen AQ Construction Model Inputs"
1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data
Project Characteristics -
Land Use - See "Hazen AQ Construction Model Inputs"
Construction Phase - See "Hazen AQ Construction Model Inputs"
Off-road Equipment -
Off-road Equipment - See "Hazen AQ Construction Model Inputs"
CO2 Intensity (lb/MWhr)
1227.89 CH4 Intensity (lb/MWhr)
0.029 N2O Intensity (lb/MWhr)
0.006
31
Climate Zone 11 Operational Year 2023
Utility Company Los Angeles Department of Water & Power
1.2 Other Project Characteristics
Urbanization Urban Wind Speed (m/s) 2.2 Precipitation Freq (Days)
Strip Mall 25.00 1000sqft 0.57 25,000.00 0
Apartments High Rise 360.00 Dwelling Unit 5.81 418,000.00 587
Quality Restaurant 25.00 1000sqft 0.57 25,000.00 0
City Park 0.47 Acre 0.47 20,500.00 0
Parking Lot 5.00 1000sqft 0.11 5,000.00 0
Population
Enclosed Parking with Elevator 362.00 Space 3.26 144,800.00 0
1.1 Land Usage
Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 1 of 1 Date: 4/19/2016 11:54 AM
LUXE Hotel - Phase 2 Construction
South Coast Air Basin, Winter
1.0 Project Characteristics
tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00
tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 3.00
tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00
tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 4.00
tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00
tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00
tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 3.00
tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00
tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00
tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 3.00
tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00
tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00
tblAreaCoating Area_Residential_Exterior 282150 236513
tblAreaCoating Area_Residential_Interior 846450 709540
tblArchitecturalCoating ConstArea_Nonresidential_Interior 323,175.00 83,988.00
tblAreaCoating Area_Nonresidential_Interior 323175 60000
Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation - See "Hazen AQ Construction Model Inputs"
Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value
tblArchitecturalCoating ConstArea_Nonresidential_Exterior 107,725.00 25,100.00
Demolition - See "Hazen AQ Construction Model Inputs"
Grading - See "Hazen AQ Construction Model Inputs"
Architectural Coating - See "Hazen AQ Construction Model Inputs"
Vehicle Trips -
Water And Wastewater -
Solid Waste -
Off-road Equipment - See "Hazen AQ Construction Model Inputs"
Off-road Equipment - See "Hazen AQ Construction Model Inputs"
Off-road Equipment - See "Hazen AQ Construction Model Inputs"
Off-road Equipment - See "Hazen AQ Construction Model Inputs"
Trips and VMT - See "Hazen AQ Construction Model Inputs"
tblFireplaces NumberGas 306.00 246.50
tblFireplaces NumberNoFireplace 36.00 29.00
tblConstructionPhase PhaseStartDate 1/23/2021 1/25/2021
tblConstructionPhase PhaseStartDate 1/14/2023 11/9/2021
tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 2/10/2023 12/6/2021
tblConstructionPhase PhaseStartDate 3/16/2023 8/9/2021
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 20.00 43.00
tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 8/21/2024 1/13/2023
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 20.00 72.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 30.00 35.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 20.00 375.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 300.00 558.00
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Final
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Final
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Final
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Final
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Final
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Final
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Final
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Final
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Final
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Final
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Final
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Final
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Final
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Final
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Final
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Final
tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00
tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 8.00
tblProjectCharacteristics OperationalYear 2014 2023
tblSolidWaste SolidWasteGenerationRate 165.60 133.40
tblOffRoadEquipment UsageHours 7.00 8.00
tblOffRoadEquipment UsageHours 7.00 8.00
tblOffRoadEquipment PhaseName Demolition
tblOffRoadEquipment PhaseName Foundation
tblOffRoadEquipment PhaseName Foundation
tblOffRoadEquipment PhaseName Building Construction
tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 0.00 2.00
tblOffRoadEquipment PhaseName Grading
tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 0.00 4.00
tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 0.00 3.00
tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 1.00 0.00
tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 0.00 1.00
tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 2.00 1.00
tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 3.00 1.00
tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 2.00 0.00
tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 2.00 1.00
tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 2.00 0.00
tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 2.00 1.00
tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 2.00 0.00
tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 2.00 1.00
tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 1.00 0.00
tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 3.00 1.00
tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 360,000.00 418,000.00
tblLandUse Population 1,030.00 587.00
tblGrading MaterialExported 0.00 102,300.00
tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 20,473.20 20,500.00
tblFireplaces NumberWood 18.00 14.50
tblGrading AcresOfGrading 52.50 2.70
tblWoodstoves NumberCatalytic 18.00 14.50
tblWoodstoves NumberNoncatalytic 18.00 14.50
tblWater OutdoorWaterUseRate 484,362.31 290,617.38
tblWater OutdoorWaterUseRate 1,134,982.18 680,989.31
tblWater IndoorWaterUseRate 1,851,813.04 1,111,087.82
tblWater OutdoorWaterUseRate 14,787,131.03 11,911,855.55
tblWater IndoorWaterUseRate 23,455,449.22 18,894,667.43
tblWater IndoorWaterUseRate 7,588,342.81 4,553,005.69
tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber 349.00 500.00
tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber 8.00 10.00
tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber 20.00 15.00
tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber 15.00 20.00
tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripNumber 75.00 0.00
tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber 18.00 20.00
tblTripsAndVMT HaulingTripNumber 1,606.00 0.00
tblTripsAndVMT HaulingTripNumber 12,788.00 0.00
tblSolidWaste SolidWasteGenerationRate 22.81 13.69
tblSolidWaste SolidWasteGenerationRate 26.25 15.75
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0015.20 91.65 25.43 24.14 91.35 44.61
NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent Reduction
12.80 85.11 -1.34 0.00
Exhaust PM10
PM10 Total
Fugitive PM2.5
Exhaust PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10
0.0000 27,431.0782
27,431.0782
3.6939 0.0000 27,508.6501
21.9027 0.3335 22.2361 6.4571 0.3227 6.7799Total 42.2825 12.0951 139.5819 0.3482
0.0000 6,828.4658
6,828.4658 0.5179 0.0000 6,839.3419
6.3713 0.0740 6.4453 1.6897 0.0705 1.76022023 13.7113 2.6945 31.4318 0.0927
0.0000 6,909.2518
6,909.2518 0.5310 0.0000 6,920.4020
6.3713 0.0741 6.4453 1.6897 0.0705 1.76022022 13.7906 2.8119 32.6517 0.0928
0.0000 8,171.7798
8,171.7798 0.8985 0.0000 8,190.6489
6.4830 0.0933 6.5763 1.7193 0.0897 1.80902021 14.0547 3.5758 42.8419 0.1053
0.0000 5,521.5809
5,521.5809 1.7465 0.0000 5,558.2574
2.6771 0.0922 2.7693 1.3584 0.0921 1.45052020 0.7259 3.0129 32.6565 0.0575
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total
Fugitive PM2.5
Exhaust PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Mitigated ConstructionROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10Exhaust PM10
0.0000 27,431.0782
27,431.0782
3.6939 0.0000 27,508.6501
25.8277 3.9920 29.8197 8.5123 3.7289 12.2412Total 48.4881 81.2355 137.7355 0.3482
0.0000 6,828.4658
6,828.4658 0.5179 0.0000 6,839.3419
6.3713 0.5015 6.8728 1.6897 0.4777 2.16742023 14.4778 10.3046 30.8624 0.0927
0.0000 6,909.2518
6,909.2518 0.5310 0.0000 6,920.4020
6.3713 0.5771 6.9484 1.6897 0.5496 2.23932022 14.6407 11.1657 32.1249 0.0928
0.0000 8,171.7798
8,171.7798 0.8985 0.0000 8,190.6489
6.4830 1.0069 7.4899 1.7193 0.9477 2.66702021 15.4944 18.6143 41.1050 0.1053
0.0000 5,521.5809
5,521.5809 1.7465 0.0000 5,558.2574
6.6021 1.9065 8.5086 3.4136 1.7540 5.16762020 3.8752 41.1509 33.6433 0.0575
NBio- CO2
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year lb/day lb/day
Exhaust PM10
PM10 Total
Fugitive PM2.5
Exhaust PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2
2.0 Emissions Summary
2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission)
Unmitigated Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10
Foundation Paving Equipment 0 8.00 130 0.36
Foundation Pavers 0 8.00 125 0.42
Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 8.00 97 0.37
Grading Scrapers 1 8.00 361 0.48
Grading Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8.00 255 0.40
Grading Graders 1 8.00 174 0.41
Grading Excavators 2 8.00 162 0.38
Grading Bore/Drill Rigs 1 8.00 205 0.50
Demolition Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 8.00 97 0.37
Demolition Rubber Tired Dozers 2 8.00 255 0.40
Demolition Excavators 1 8.00 162 0.38
Load Factor
Demolition Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 8.00 81 0.73
Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 0
Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 2.7
Acres of Paving: 0
Residential Indoor: 846,450; Residential Outdoor: 282,150; Non-Residential Indoor: 83,988; Non-Residential Outdoor: 25,100
OffRoad Equipment
Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power
375
6 Paving Paving 11/9/2021 12/6/2021 5 20
5 Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 8/9/2021 1/13/2023 5
43
4 Building Construction Building Construction 1/25/2021 3/15/2023 5 558
3 Foundation Paving 11/25/2020 1/22/2021 5
72
2 Grading Grading 10/7/2020 11/24/2020 5 35
End Date Num Days Week
Num Days Phase Description
1 Demolition Demolition 6/29/2020 10/6/2020 5
3.0 Construction Detail
Construction Phase
Phase Number
Phase Name Phase Type Start Date
3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction
Use Cleaner Engines for Construction Equipment
Use Soil Stabilizer
Water Exposed Area
Reduce Vehicle Speed on Unpaved Roads
Clean Paved Roads
14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT
6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT
Paving 3 10.00 0.00 0.00
Architectural Coating 1 70.00 0.00 0.00 14.70
14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT
6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT
Building Construction 5 500.00 0.00 0.00
Foundation 6 20.00 0.00 0.00 14.70
14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT
6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT
Grading 8 15.00 0.00 0.00
Demolition 7 20.00 0.00 0.00 14.70
Worker Trip Length
Vendor Trip Length
Hauling Trip Length
Worker Vehicle Class
Vendor Vehicle Class
Hauling Vehicle Class
Trips and VMT
Phase Name Offroad Equipment Count
Worker Trip Number
Vendor Trip Number
Hauling Trip Number
Paving Rollers 1 8.00 80 0.38
Paving Paving Equipment 1 8.00 130 0.36
Paving Pavers 1 8.00 125 0.42
Architectural Coating Air Compressors 1 6.00 78 0.48
Building Construction Welders 0 8.00 46 0.45
Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 8.00 97 0.37
Building Construction Pumps 0 8.00 84 0.74
Building Construction Generator Sets 1 8.00 84 0.74
Building Construction Forklifts 3 8.00 89 0.20
Building Construction Cranes 0 8.00 226 0.29
Foundation Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 8.00 97 0.37
Foundation Rollers 0 8.00 80 0.38
Foundation Pumps 4 8.00 84 0.74
0.0000 3,733.8882
3,733.8882 1.0535 3,756.0113
1.8822 0.0610 1.9432 0.2850 0.0610 0.3460Total 0.4575 1.9826 22.8175 0.0387
0.0000 3,733.8882
3,733.8882 1.0535 3,756.0113
0.0610 0.0610 0.0610 0.0610Off-Road 0.4575 1.9826 22.8175 0.0387
0.0000 0.00001.8822 0.0000 1.8822 0.2850 0.0000 0.2850Fugitive Dust
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total
Fugitive PM2.5
Exhaust PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Mitigated Construction On-SiteROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10Exhaust PM10
190.6197 190.6197 9.2600e-003
190.81420.2236 1.7100e-003
0.2253 0.0593 1.5800e-003
0.0609Total 0.0592 0.0796 0.8322 2.6400e-003
190.6197 190.6197 9.2600e-003
190.81420.2236 1.7100e-003
0.2253 0.0593 1.5800e-003
0.0609Worker 0.0592 0.0796 0.8322 2.6400e-003
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total
Fugitive PM2.5
Exhaust PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Unmitigated Construction Off-SiteROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10Exhaust PM10
3,733.8882
3,733.8882 1.0535 3,756.0113
4.8261 1.6496 6.4757 0.7307 1.5335 2.2642Total 3.2226 32.3834 29.7480 0.0387
3,733.8882
3,733.8882 1.0535 3,756.0113
1.6496 1.6496 1.5335 1.5335Off-Road 3.2226 32.3834 29.7480 0.0387
0.0000 0.00004.8261 0.0000 4.8261 0.7307 0.0000 0.7307Fugitive Dust
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total
Fugitive PM2.5
Exhaust PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
3.2 Demolition - 2020
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10
Exhaust PM10
142.9647 142.9647 6.9500e-003
143.11060.1677 1.2800e-003
0.1690 0.0445 1.1900e-003
0.0457Total 0.0444 0.0597 0.6241 1.9800e-003
142.9647 142.9647 6.9500e-003
143.11060.1677 1.2800e-003
0.1690 0.0445 1.1900e-003
0.0457Worker 0.0444 0.0597 0.6241 1.9800e-003
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total
Fugitive PM2.5
Exhaust PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10
Exhaust PM10
5,378.6161
5,378.6161 1.7396 5,415.1467
6.4344 1.9052 8.3397 3.3691 1.7528 5.1219Total 3.8309 41.0913 33.0192 0.0555
5,378.6161
5,378.6161 1.7396 5,415.1467
1.9052 1.9052 1.7528 1.7528Off-Road 3.8309 41.0913 33.0192 0.0555
0.0000 0.00006.4344 0.0000 6.4344 3.3691 0.0000 3.3691Fugitive Dust
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total
Fugitive PM2.5
Exhaust PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
3.3 Grading - 2020
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10
Exhaust PM10
190.6197 190.6197 9.2600e-003
190.81420.2236 1.7100e-003
0.2253 0.0593 1.5800e-003
0.0609Total 0.0592 0.0796 0.8322 2.6400e-003
190.6197 190.6197 9.2600e-003
190.81420.2236 1.7100e-003
0.2253 0.0593 1.5800e-003
0.0609Worker 0.0592 0.0796 0.8322 2.6400e-003
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total
Fugitive PM2.5
Exhaust PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10
Exhaust PM10
3,093.6753
3,093.6753 0.3437 3,100.8919
1.0951 1.0951 1.0738 1.0738Total 2.1184 18.3264 19.6096 0.0325
0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Paving 6.7000e-003
3,093.6753
3,093.6753 0.3437 3,100.8919
1.0951 1.0951 1.0738 1.0738Off-Road 2.1117 18.3264 19.6096 0.0325
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total
Fugitive PM2.5
Exhaust PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
3.4 Foundation - 2020
Unmitigated Construction On-SiteROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10Exhaust PM10
142.9647 142.9647 6.9500e-003
143.11060.1677 1.2800e-003
0.1690 0.0445 1.1900e-003
0.0457Total 0.0444 0.0597 0.6241 1.9800e-003
142.9647 142.9647 6.9500e-003
143.11060.1677 1.2800e-003
0.1690 0.0445 1.1900e-003
0.0457Worker 0.0444 0.0597 0.6241 1.9800e-003
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total
Fugitive PM2.5
Exhaust PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10
Exhaust PM10
0.0000 5,378.6161
5,378.6161 1.7396 5,415.1467
2.5094 0.0909 2.6003 1.3140 0.0909 1.4048Total 0.6815 2.9532 32.0324 0.0555
0.0000 5,378.6161
5,378.6161 1.7396 5,415.1467
0.0909 0.0909 0.0909 0.0909Off-Road 0.6815 2.9532 32.0324 0.0555
0.0000 0.00002.5094 0.0000 2.5094 1.3140 0.0000 1.3140Fugitive Dust
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total
Fugitive PM2.5
Exhaust PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10
Exhaust PM10
190.6197 190.6197 9.2600e-003
190.81420.2236 1.7100e-003
0.2253 0.0593 1.5800e-003
0.0609Total 0.0592 0.0796 0.8322 2.6400e-003
190.6197 190.6197 9.2600e-003
190.81420.2236 1.7100e-003
0.2253 0.0593 1.5800e-003
0.0609Worker 0.0592 0.0796 0.8322 2.6400e-003
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total
Fugitive PM2.5
Exhaust PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Mitigated Construction Off-SiteROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10Exhaust PM10
0.0000 3,093.6753
3,093.6753 0.3437 3,100.8919
0.0452 0.0452 0.0452 0.0452Total 0.3458 1.4693 20.9096 0.0325
0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Paving 6.7000e-003
0.0000 3,093.6753
3,093.6753 0.3437 3,100.8919
0.0452 0.0452 0.0452 0.0452Off-Road 0.3391 1.4693 20.9096 0.0325
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total
Fugitive PM2.5
Exhaust PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Mitigated Construction On-SiteROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10Exhaust PM10
190.6197 190.6197 9.2600e-003
190.81420.2236 1.7100e-003
0.2253 0.0593 1.5800e-003
0.0609Total 0.0592 0.0796 0.8322 2.6400e-003
190.6197 190.6197 9.2600e-003
190.81420.2236 1.7100e-003
0.2253 0.0593 1.5800e-003
0.0609Worker 0.0592 0.0796 0.8322 2.6400e-003
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total
Fugitive PM2.5
Exhaust PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10
Exhaust PM10
0.0000 3,093.9428
3,093.9428 0.3306 3,100.8849
0.0452 0.0452 0.0452 0.0452Total 0.3458 1.4693 20.9096 0.0325
0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Paving 6.7000e-003
0.0000 3,093.9428
3,093.9428 0.3306 3,100.8849
0.0452 0.0452 0.0452 0.0452Off-Road 0.3391 1.4693 20.9096 0.0325
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total
Fugitive PM2.5
Exhaust PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10
Exhaust PM10
187.6613 187.6613 8.8700e-003
187.84750.2236 1.7100e-003
0.2253 0.0593 1.5900e-003
0.0609Total 0.0560 0.0744 0.7815 2.6500e-003
187.6613 187.6613 8.8700e-003
187.84750.2236 1.7100e-003
0.2253 0.0593 1.5900e-003
0.0609Worker 0.0560 0.0744 0.7815 2.6500e-003
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total
Fugitive PM2.5
Exhaust PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10
Exhaust PM10
3,093.9428
3,093.9428 0.3306 3,100.8849
0.9340 0.9340 0.9161 0.9161Total 1.9029 16.6317 19.4830 0.0325
0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Paving 6.7000e-003
3,093.9428
3,093.9428 0.3306 3,100.8849
0.9340 0.9340 0.9161 0.9161Off-Road 1.8962 16.6317 19.4830 0.0325
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total
Fugitive PM2.5
Exhaust PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
3.4 Foundation - 2021
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10
Exhaust PM10
4,691.5328
4,691.5328 0.2217 4,696.1880
5.5888 0.0428 5.6316 1.4822 0.0397 1.5219Total 1.3998 1.8601 19.5367 0.0663
4,691.5328
4,691.5328 0.2217 4,696.1880
5.5888 0.0428 5.6316 1.4822 0.0397 1.5219Worker 1.3998 1.8601 19.5367 0.0663
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total
Fugitive PM2.5
Exhaust PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10
Exhaust PM10
1,368.0271
1,368.0271 0.2727 1,373.7547
0.5306 0.5306 0.5016 0.5016Total 0.9327 8.5993 9.4485 0.0143
1,368.0271
1,368.0271 0.2727 1,373.7547
0.5306 0.5306 0.5016 0.5016Off-Road 0.9327 8.5993 9.4485 0.0143
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total
Fugitive PM2.5
Exhaust PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
3.5 Building Construction - 2021
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10
Exhaust PM10
187.6613 187.6613 8.8700e-003
187.84750.2236 1.7100e-003
0.2253 0.0593 1.5900e-003
0.0609Total 0.0560 0.0744 0.7815 2.6500e-003
187.6613 187.6613 8.8700e-003
187.84750.2236 1.7100e-003
0.2253 0.0593 1.5900e-003
0.0609Worker 0.0560 0.0744 0.7815 2.6500e-003
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total
Fugitive PM2.5
Exhaust PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10
Exhaust PM10
1,368.3660
1,368.3660 0.2707 1,374.0498
0.4467 0.4467 0.4227 0.4227Total 0.8355 7.7686 9.3751 0.0143
1,368.3660
1,368.3660 0.2707 1,374.0498
0.4467 0.4467 0.4227 0.4227Off-Road 0.8355 7.7686 9.3751 0.0143
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total
Fugitive PM2.5
Exhaust PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
3.5 Building Construction - 2022
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10
Exhaust PM10
4,691.5328
4,691.5328 0.2217 4,696.1880
5.5888 0.0428 5.6316 1.4822 0.0397 1.5219Total 1.3998 1.8601 19.5367 0.0663
4,691.5328
4,691.5328 0.2217 4,696.1880
5.5888 0.0428 5.6316 1.4822 0.0397 1.5219Worker 1.3998 1.8601 19.5367 0.0663
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total
Fugitive PM2.5
Exhaust PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10
Exhaust PM10
0.0000 1,368.0271
1,368.0271 0.2727 1,373.7547
0.0214 0.0214 0.0214 0.0214Total 0.1603 0.6945 9.8832 0.0143
0.0000 1,368.0271
1,368.0271 0.2727 1,373.7547
0.0214 0.0214 0.0214 0.0214Off-Road 0.1603 0.6945 9.8832 0.0143
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total
Fugitive PM2.5
Exhaust PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10
Exhaust PM10
4,613.5418
4,613.5418 0.2123 4,617.9994
5.5888 0.0427 5.6316 1.4822 0.0396 1.5218Total 1.3258 1.7444 18.3650 0.0662
4,613.5418
4,613.5418 0.2123 4,617.9994
5.5888 0.0427 5.6316 1.4822 0.0396 1.5218Worker 1.3258 1.7444 18.3650 0.0662
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total
Fugitive PM2.5
Exhaust PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10
Exhaust PM10
0.0000 1,368.3660
1,368.3660 0.2707 1,374.0498
0.0214 0.0214 0.0214 0.0214Total 0.1603 0.6945 9.8832 0.0143
0.0000 1,368.3660
1,368.3660 0.2707 1,374.0498
0.0214 0.0214 0.0214 0.0214Off-Road 0.1603 0.6945 9.8832 0.0143
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total
Fugitive PM2.5
Exhaust PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10
Exhaust PM10
4,613.5418
4,613.5418 0.2123 4,617.9994
5.5888 0.0427 5.6316 1.4822 0.0396 1.5218Total 1.3258 1.7444 18.3650 0.0662
4,613.5418
4,613.5418 0.2123 4,617.9994
5.5888 0.0427 5.6316 1.4822 0.0396 1.5218Worker 1.3258 1.7444 18.3650 0.0662
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total
Fugitive PM2.5
Exhaust PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10
Exhaust PM10
0.0000 1,368.7036
1,368.7036 0.2686 1,374.3436
0.0214 0.0214 0.0214 0.0214Total 0.1603 0.6945 9.8832 0.0143
0.0000 1,368.7036
1,368.7036 0.2686 1,374.3436
0.0214 0.0214 0.0214 0.0214Off-Road 0.1603 0.6945 9.8832 0.0143
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total
Fugitive PM2.5
Exhaust PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Mitigated Construction On-SiteROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10Exhaust PM10
4,542.3809
4,542.3809 0.2039 4,546.6637
5.5888 0.0427 5.6315 1.4822 0.0396 1.5218Total 1.2562 1.6415 17.2949 0.0662
4,542.3809
4,542.3809 0.2039 4,546.6637
5.5888 0.0427 5.6315 1.4822 0.0396 1.5218Worker 1.2562 1.6415 17.2949 0.0662
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total
Fugitive PM2.5
Exhaust PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10
Exhaust PM10
1,368.7036
1,368.7036 0.2686 1,374.3436
0.3820 0.3820 0.3617 0.3617Total 0.7649 7.1303 9.3351 0.0143
1,368.7036
1,368.7036 0.2686 1,374.3436
0.3820 0.3820 0.3617 0.3617Off-Road 0.7649 7.1303 9.3351 0.0143
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total
Fugitive PM2.5
Exhaust PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
3.5 Building Construction - 2023
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10
Exhaust PM10
656.8146 656.8146 0.0310 657.46630.7824 5.9900e-003
0.7884 0.2075 5.5500e-003
0.2131Total 0.1960 0.2604 2.7351 9.2800e-003
656.8146 656.8146 0.0310 657.46630.7824 5.9900e-003
0.7884 0.2075 5.5500e-003
0.2131Worker 0.1960 0.2604 2.7351 9.2800e-003
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total
Fugitive PM2.5
Exhaust PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10
Exhaust PM10
281.4481 281.4481 0.0193 281.85370.0941 0.0941 0.0941 0.0941Total 12.3082 1.5268 1.8176 2.9700e-003
281.4481 281.4481 0.0193 281.85370.0941 0.0941 0.0941 0.0941Off-Road 0.2189 1.5268 1.8176 2.9700e-003
0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Archit. Coating 12.0893
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total
Fugitive PM2.5
Exhaust PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
3.6 Architectural Coating - 2021
Unmitigated Construction On-SiteROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10Exhaust PM10
4,542.3809
4,542.3809 0.2039 4,546.6637
5.5888 0.0427 5.6315 1.4822 0.0396 1.5218Total 1.2562 1.6415 17.2949 0.0662
4,542.3809
4,542.3809 0.2039 4,546.6637
5.5888 0.0427 5.6315 1.4822 0.0396 1.5218Worker 1.2562 1.6415 17.2949 0.0662
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total
Fugitive PM2.5
Exhaust PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Mitigated Construction Off-SiteROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10Exhaust PM10
281.4481 281.4481 0.0183 281.83290.0817 0.0817 0.0817 0.0817Total 12.2938 1.4085 1.8136 2.9700e-003
281.4481 281.4481 0.0183 281.83290.0817 0.0817 0.0817 0.0817Off-Road 0.2045 1.4085 1.8136 2.9700e-003
0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Archit. Coating 12.0893
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total
Fugitive PM2.5
Exhaust PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
3.6 Architectural Coating - 2022
Unmitigated Construction On-SiteROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10Exhaust PM10
656.8146 656.8146 0.0310 657.46630.7824 5.9900e-003
0.7884 0.2075 5.5500e-003
0.2131Total 0.1960 0.2604 2.7351 9.2800e-003
656.8146 656.8146 0.0310 657.46630.7824 5.9900e-003
0.7884 0.2075 5.5500e-003
0.2131Worker 0.1960 0.2604 2.7351 9.2800e-003
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total
Fugitive PM2.5
Exhaust PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Mitigated Construction Off-SiteROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10Exhaust PM10
0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0193 281.85373.9600e-003
3.9600e-003
3.9600e-003
3.9600e-003
Total 12.1190 0.1288 1.8324 2.9700e-003
0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0193 281.85373.9600e-003
3.9600e-003
3.9600e-003
3.9600e-003
Off-Road 0.0297 0.1288 1.8324 2.9700e-003
0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Archit. Coating 12.0893
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total
Fugitive PM2.5
Exhaust PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10
Exhaust PM10
645.8959 645.8959 0.0297 646.51990.7824 5.9800e-003
0.7884 0.2075 5.5500e-003
0.2131Total 0.1856 0.2442 2.5711 9.2700e-003
645.8959 645.8959 0.0297 646.51990.7824 5.9800e-003
0.7884 0.2075 5.5500e-003
0.2131Worker 0.1856 0.2442 2.5711 9.2700e-003
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total
Fugitive PM2.5
Exhaust PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10
Exhaust PM10
0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0183 281.83293.9600e-003
3.9600e-003
3.9600e-003
3.9600e-003
Total 12.1190 0.1288 1.8324 2.9700e-003
0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0183 281.83293.9600e-003
3.9600e-003
3.9600e-003
3.9600e-003
Off-Road 0.0297 0.1288 1.8324 2.9700e-003
0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Archit. Coating 12.0893
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total
Fugitive PM2.5
Exhaust PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10
Exhaust PM10
645.8959 645.8959 0.0297 646.51990.7824 5.9800e-003
0.7884 0.2075 5.5500e-003
0.2131Total 0.1856 0.2442 2.5711 9.2700e-003
645.8959 645.8959 0.0297 646.51990.7824 5.9800e-003
0.7884 0.2075 5.5500e-003
0.2131Worker 0.1856 0.2442 2.5711 9.2700e-003
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total
Fugitive PM2.5
Exhaust PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10
Exhaust PM10
0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0168 281.80173.9600e-003
3.9600e-003
3.9600e-003
3.9600e-003
Total 12.1190 0.1288 1.8324 2.9700e-003
0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0168 281.80173.9600e-003
3.9600e-003
3.9600e-003
3.9600e-003
Off-Road 0.0297 0.1288 1.8324 2.9700e-003
0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Archit. Coating 12.0893
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total
Fugitive PM2.5
Exhaust PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10
Exhaust PM10
635.9333 635.9333 0.0286 636.53290.7824 5.9800e-003
0.7884 0.2075 5.5500e-003
0.2131Total 0.1759 0.2298 2.4213 9.2700e-003
635.9333 635.9333 0.0286 636.53290.7824 5.9800e-003
0.7884 0.2075 5.5500e-003
0.2131Worker 0.1759 0.2298 2.4213 9.2700e-003
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total
Fugitive PM2.5
Exhaust PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10
Exhaust PM10
281.4481 281.4481 0.0168 281.80170.0708 0.0708 0.0708 0.0708Total 12.2809 1.3030 1.8111 2.9700e-003
281.4481 281.4481 0.0168 281.80170.0708 0.0708 0.0708 0.0708Off-Road 0.1917 1.3030 1.8111 2.9700e-003
0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Archit. Coating 12.0893
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total
Fugitive PM2.5
Exhaust PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
3.6 Architectural Coating - 2023
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10
Exhaust PM10
93.8307 93.8307 4.4300e-003
93.92380.1118 8.6000e-004
0.1126 0.0296 7.9000e-004
0.0304Total 0.0280 0.0372 0.3907 1.3300e-003
93.8307 93.8307 4.4300e-003
93.92380.1118 8.6000e-004
0.1126 0.0296 7.9000e-004
0.0304Worker 0.0280 0.0372 0.3907 1.3300e-003
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total
Fugitive PM2.5
Exhaust PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Unmitigated Construction Off-SiteROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10Exhaust PM10
1,080.1265
1,080.1265 0.3493 1,087.4625
0.3326 0.3326 0.3060 0.3060Total 0.6298 6.3303 7.1764 0.0112
0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Paving 0.0144
1,080.1265
1,080.1265 0.3493 1,087.4625
0.3326 0.3326 0.3060 0.3060Off-Road 0.6154 6.3303 7.1764 0.0112
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total
Fugitive PM2.5
Exhaust PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
3.7 Paving - 2021
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10
Exhaust PM10
635.9333 635.9333 0.0286 636.53290.7824 5.9800e-003
0.7884 0.2075 5.5500e-003
0.2131Total 0.1759 0.2298 2.4213 9.2700e-003
635.9333 635.9333 0.0286 636.53290.7824 5.9800e-003
0.7884 0.2075 5.5500e-003
0.2131Worker 0.1759 0.2298 2.4213 9.2700e-003
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total
Fugitive PM2.5
Exhaust PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Mitigated Construction Off-SiteROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10Exhaust PM10
93.8307 93.8307 4.4300e-003
93.92380.1118 8.6000e-004
0.1126 0.0296 7.9000e-004
0.0304Total 0.0280 0.0372 0.3907 1.3300e-003
93.8307 93.8307 4.4300e-003
93.92380.1118 8.6000e-004
0.1126 0.0296 7.9000e-004
0.0304Worker 0.0280 0.0372 0.3907 1.3300e-003
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total
Fugitive PM2.5
Exhaust PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10
Exhaust PM10
0.0000 1,080.1265
1,080.1265 0.3493 1,087.4625
0.0183 0.0183 0.0183 0.0183Total 0.1517 0.5948 8.4638 0.0112
0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Paving 0.0144
0.0000 1,080.1265
1,080.1265 0.3493 1,087.4625
0.0183 0.0183 0.0183 0.0183Off-Road 0.1373 0.5948 8.4638 0.0112
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total
Fugitive PM2.5
Exhaust PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10
Exhaust PM10
LUXE Hotel ProjectConstruction Schedule, Demolition and Soil Excavation Quantities, and Vehicle Trips
Construction Phase Start Date End Date No. Work Days
Demo (SF) a
Demo Truck Capacity (CY)
Demo Truck Total One‐Way Trips
Demo Truck Daily One‐Way Trips
Soil Export(CY) a
Soil Import (CY)
Soil Haul Truck
Capacity (CY)
Soil Haul Truck Total One‐Way Trips
Soil Haul Truck Daily One‐Way Trips
Concrete Mat Volume
(CY)
Concrete Truck
Capacity (CY)
Concrete Truck Total One‐Way Trips
Concrete Truck Daily One‐Way Trips
Concrete Mat Volume
a
(CY)
Concrete Truck
Capacity (CY)
Concrete Truck Total One‐Way Trips
Concrete Truck Daily One‐Way Trips
Vendor One‐Way
Trips/Max Day b
Worker One‐Way
Trips/Max Day c
Phase 1Site Preparation 8/8/2017 8/14/2017 5 10 Site Demolition 8/15/2017 8/28/2017 10 16,000 11 20 5 15 Mass Grading/Excavation 8/29/2017 11/7/2017 51 99,800 ‐ 14 14,258 160 30 Foundation 11/8/2017 1/16/2018 50 9,500 9 2,112 50 9,500 9 2,112 50 25 Building Construction 1/17/2018 5/29/2020 618 100 700 Paving d 6/10/2019 7/8/2019 21 10 Architectural Coating 10/4/2018 4/7/2020 394 100
Phase 2Existing Hotel Demolition 6/29/2020 10/6/2020 72 353,000 11 1,957 25 20 Mass Grading/Excavation 10/7/2020 11/24/2020 35 102,300 ‐ 14 14,615 160 15 Foundation 11/25/2020 1/22/2021 43 8,600 9 1,912 50 8,600 9 1,912 50 20 Building Construction 1/25/2021 3/15/2023 558 100 500 Paving d 11/9/2021 12/6/2021 20 10 Architectural Coating 8/9/2021 1/13/2023 375 70
Notes:
a. Soil export quantities and foundation concrete mat quantities provided by Hazens Group (December 2015).
b. Vendor trips are associated with the Building Construction phase and are based on CalEEMod assumptions.c. Worker trips are based on CalEEMod assumptions.
d. Phase assumed to be part of the "Exterior Skin‐Podium (L1) Exterior Buildout and Store Fronts" construction activities.
Sources: Hazens Group, Februrary 2016; PCR Services Corporation, Februrary 2016
LUXE Hotel ProjectOn‐Road Truck Regional Emissions
On‐Road Truck Regional Running Emissions
Daily Work Days Work Hours One‐Way Running Emissions Factor Regional EmissionsConstruction Phase Source Year One‐Way per Year per Day Trip Distance (grams/mile) (pounds/day)
Truck Trips per Day CO2e(days/year) (hours/day) (miles) ROG NOX CO SO2 PM10 PM2.5 CO2e ROG NOX CO SO2 PM10 PM2.5 (metric tons/year)
Phase 1Site Preparation ‐ 2017 0 5 8 0 0.2010 6.4607 0.7497 0.0160 0.0718 0.0687 1,682.50 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ Site Demolition T7 Single Construction 2017 5 10 8 20 0.2010 6.4607 0.7497 0.0160 0.0718 0.0687 1,682.50 0.04 1.42 0.17 0.00 0.02 0.02 2 Mass Grading/Excavation T7 Single Construction 2017 160 51 8 20 0.2010 6.4607 0.7497 0.0160 0.0718 0.0687 1,682.50 1.42 45.58 5.29 0.11 0.51 0.48 275 Foundation ‐ Year 1 T7 Single Construction 2017 50 38 8 25 0.2010 6.4607 0.7497 0.0160 0.0718 0.0687 1,682.50 0.55 17.80 2.07 0.04 0.20 0.19 80 Foundation ‐ Year 2 T7 Single Construction 2018 50 12 8 25 0.1470 5.5223 0.5703 0.0164 0.0393 0.0376 1,719.62 0.41 15.22 1.57 0.05 0.11 0.10 26 Building Construction ‐ Year 1 On‐Road MHDT/HHDT Trucks 2018 100 249 8 7 0.1791 4.2733 1.1255 0.0141 0.0552 0.0528 1,501.68 0.28 6.59 1.74 0.02 0.09 0.08 262 Building Construction ‐ Year 2 On‐Road MHDT/HHDT Trucks 2019 100 261 8 7 0.1662 4.0394 1.0697 0.0144 0.0489 0.0468 1,539.98 0.26 6.23 1.65 0.02 0.08 0.07 281 Building Construction ‐ Year 3 On‐Road MHDT/HHDT Trucks 2020 100 108 8 7 0.1415 3.6097 0.9920 0.0148 0.0345 0.0330 1,580.79 0.22 5.57 1.53 0.02 0.05 0.05 120 Architectural Coating ‐ Year 1 ‐ 2018 0 324 8 0 0.1791 4.2733 1.1255 0.0141 0.0552 0.0528 1,501.68 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ Architectural Coating ‐ Year 2 ‐ 2019 0 261 8 0 0.1662 4.0394 1.0697 0.0144 0.0489 0.0468 1,539.98 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ Architectural Coating ‐ Year 3 ‐ 2020 0 70 8 0 0.1415 3.6097 0.9920 0.0148 0.0345 0.0330 1,580.79 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ Paving d ‐ 2019 0 21 8 0 0.1662 4.0394 1.0697 0.0144 0.0489 0.0468 1,539.98 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Phase 2Existing Hotel Demolition T7 Single Construction 2020 25 72 8 20 0.1136 4.4601 0.4738 0.0171 0.0212 0.0203 1,790.29 0.13 4.92 0.52 0.02 0.02 0.02 64 Mass Grading/Excavation T7 Single Construction 2020 160 35 8 20 0.1136 4.4601 0.4738 0.0171 0.0212 0.0203 1,790.29 0.80 31.47 3.34 0.12 0.15 0.14 201 Foundation ‐ Year 1 T7 Single Construction 2020 50 27 8 25 0.1136 4.4601 0.4738 0.0171 0.0212 0.0203 1,790.29 0.31 12.29 1.31 0.05 0.06 0.06 60 Foundation ‐ Year 2 T7 Single Construction 2021 50 16 8 25 0.1118 3.9978 0.4791 0.0172 0.0192 0.0184 1,800.48 0.31 11.02 1.32 0.05 0.05 0.05 36 Building Construction ‐ Year 1 On‐Road MHDT/HHDT Trucks 2021 100 245 8 7 0.1168 3.1486 0.9165 0.0152 0.0136 0.0130 1,622.06 0.18 4.86 1.41 0.02 0.02 0.02 278 Building Construction ‐ Year 2 On‐Road MHDT/HHDT Trucks 2022 100 260 8 7 0.1145 2.9646 0.9116 0.0155 0.0124 0.0118 1,655.51 0.18 4.58 1.41 0.02 0.02 0.02 301 Building Construction ‐ Year 3 On‐Road MHDT/HHDT Trucks 2023 100 53 8 7 0.0797 1.7668 0.8481 0.0154 0.0056 0.0053 1,654.08 0.12 2.73 1.31 0.02 0.01 0.01 61 Architectural Coating ‐ Year 1 ‐ 2021 0 105 8 0 0.1168 3.1486 0.9165 0.0152 0.0136 0.0130 1,622.06 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ Architectural Coating ‐ Year 2 ‐ 2022 0 260 8 0 0.1145 2.9646 0.9116 0.0155 0.0124 0.0118 1,655.51 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ Architectural Coating ‐ Year 3 ‐ 2023 0 10 8 0 0.0797 1.7668 0.8481 0.0154 0.0056 0.0053 1,654.08 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ Paving d ‐ 2021 0 20 8 0 0.1168 3.1486 0.9165 0.0152 0.0136 0.0130 1,622.06 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
On‐Road Truck Idling Emissions
Daily Work Days Work Hours Idling Time Idling Emissions Factor Regional EmissionsConstruction Phase Source Year Number of per Year per Day per Truck (grams/hour) (pounds/day)
Trucks CO2e(days/year) (hours/day) (minutes) ROG NOX CO SO2 PM10 PM2.5 CO2e ROG NOX CO SO2 PM10 PM2.5 (metric tons/year)
Phase 1Site Preparation ‐ 2017 0 5 8 15 2.4393 56.1771 10.3466 0.0641 0.2216 0.2120 6,720.16 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ Site Demolition T7 Single Construction 2017 5 10 8 15 2.4393 56.1771 10.3466 0.0641 0.2216 0.2120 6,720.16 0.01 0.15 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 Mass Grading/Excavation T7 Single Construction 2017 160 51 8 15 2.4393 56.1771 10.3466 0.0641 0.2216 0.2120 6,720.16 0.22 4.95 0.91 0.01 0.02 0.02 14 Foundation ‐ Year 1 T7 Single Construction 2017 50 38 8 25 2.4393 56.1771 10.3466 0.0641 0.2216 0.2120 6,720.16 0.11 2.58 0.48 0.00 0.01 0.01 5 Foundation ‐ Year 2 T7 Single Construction 2018 50 12 8 25 1.9800 50.0628 8.2237 0.0632 0.1541 0.1475 6,631.77 0.09 2.30 0.38 0.00 0.01 0.01 2 Building Construction ‐ Year 1 On‐Road MHDT/HHDT Trucks 2018 100 249 8 15 1.6825 48.4813 17.2427 0.0668 0.1491 0.1427 7,062.39 0.09 2.67 0.95 0.00 0.01 0.01 44 Building Construction ‐ Year 2 On‐Road MHDT/HHDT Trucks 2019 100 261 8 15 1.5610 44.5192 16.0614 0.0660 0.1241 0.1188 6,989.52 0.09 2.45 0.89 0.00 0.01 0.01 46 Building Construction ‐ Year 3 On‐Road MHDT/HHDT Trucks 2020 100 108 8 15 1.3726 38.0209 14.3710 0.0652 0.0740 0.0708 6,907.51 0.08 2.10 0.79 0.00 0.00 0.00 19 Architectural Coating ‐ Year 1 ‐ 2018 0 324 8 15 1.6825 48.4813 17.2427 0.0668 0.1491 0.1427 7,062.39 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ Architectural Coating ‐ Year 2 ‐ 2019 0 261 8 15 1.5610 44.5192 16.0614 0.0660 0.1241 0.1188 6,989.52 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ Architectural Coating ‐ Year 3 ‐ 2020 0 70 8 15 1.3726 38.0209 14.3710 0.0652 0.0740 0.0708 6,907.51 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ Paving d ‐ 2019 0 21 8 15 1.5610 44.5192 16.0614 0.0660 0.1241 0.1188 6,989.52 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Phase 2Existing Hotel Demolition T7 Single Construction 2020 25 72 8 15 0.9730 35.1225 3.8999 0.0617 0.0158 0.0151 6,466.46 0.01 0.48 0.05 0.00 0.00 0.00 3 Mass Grading/Excavation T7 Single Construction 2020 160 35 8 15 0.9730 35.1225 3.8999 0.0617 0.0158 0.0151 6,466.46 0.09 3.10 0.34 0.01 0.00 0.00 9 Foundation ‐ Year 1 T7 Single Construction 2020 50 27 8 25 0.9730 35.1225 3.8999 0.0617 0.0158 0.0151 6,466.46 0.04 1.61 0.18 0.00 0.00 0.00 4 Foundation ‐ Year 2 T7 Single Construction 2021 50 16 8 25 0.9340 33.1449 3.7248 0.0611 0.0137 0.0131 6,401.61 0.04 1.52 0.17 0.00 0.00 0.00 2 Building Construction ‐ Year 1 On‐Road MHDT/HHDT Trucks 2021 100 245 8 15 1.1982 28.7657 12.5576 0.0641 0.0182 0.0174 6,793.52 0.07 1.59 0.69 0.00 0.00 0.00 42 Building Construction ‐ Year 2 On‐Road MHDT/HHDT Trucks 2022 100 260 8 15 1.1319 26.9322 11.9202 0.0634 0.0158 0.0151 6,722.53 0.06 1.48 0.66 0.00 0.00 0.00 44 Building Construction ‐ Year 3 On‐Road MHDT/HHDT Trucks 2023 100 53 8 15 0.9446 18.8169 10.8527 0.0610 0.0096 0.0092 6,475.05 0.05 1.04 0.60 0.00 0.00 0.00 9 Architectural Coating ‐ Year 1 ‐ 2021 0 105 8 15 1.1982 28.7657 12.5576 0.0641 0.0182 0.0174 6,793.52 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ Architectural Coating ‐ Year 2 ‐ 2022 0 260 8 15 1.1319 26.9322 11.9202 0.0634 0.0158 0.0151 6,722.53 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ Architectural Coating ‐ Year 3 ‐ 2023 0 10 8 15 0.9446 18.8169 10.8527 0.0610 0.0096 0.0092 6,475.05 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ Paving d ‐ 2021 0 20 8 15 1.1982 28.7657 12.5576 0.0641 0.0182 0.0174 6,793.52 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
On‐Road Truck Fugitive Dust Emissions (Paved Road Dust (RD), Break Wear (BW), Tire Wear (TW))
Daily Work Days Work Hours One‐Way Fugitive Dust Emissions Factor Regional EmissionsConstruction Phase Source Year One‐Way per Year per Day Trip Distance (grams/mile) (pounds/day)
Truck Trips per Day PM10 PM10 PM10 PM2.5 PM2.5 PM2.5 PM10 PM10 PM10 PM2.5 PM2.5 PM2.5(days/year) (hours/day) (miles) RD BW TW RD BW TW RD BW TW RD BW TW
Phase 1Site Preparation ‐ 2017 0 5 8 0 0.2998 0.0617 0.0360 0.0736 0.0265 0.0090 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ Site Demolition T7 Single Construction 2017 5 10 8 20 0.2998 0.0617 0.0360 0.0736 0.0265 0.0090 0.0661 0.0136 0.0079 0.0162 0.0058 0.0020 Mass Grading/Excavation T7 Single Construction 2017 160 51 8 20 0.2998 0.0617 0.0360 0.0736 0.0265 0.0090 2.1154 0.4356 0.2540 0.5192 0.1867 0.0635 Foundation ‐ Year 1 T7 Single Construction 2017 50 38 8 25 0.2998 0.0617 0.0360 0.0736 0.0265 0.0090 0.8263 0.1701 0.0992 0.2028 0.0729 0.0248 Foundation ‐ Year 2 T7 Single Construction 2018 50 12 8 25 0.2998 0.0639 0.0373 0.0736 0.0274 0.0093 0.8263 0.1761 0.1027 0.2028 0.0755 0.0257 Building Construction ‐ Year 1 On‐Road MHDT/HHDT Trucks 2018 100 249 8 7 0.2998 0.0988 0.0245 0.0736 0.0423 0.0061 0.4627 0.1524 0.0378 0.1136 0.0653 0.0094 Building Construction ‐ Year 2 On‐Road MHDT/HHDT Trucks 2019 100 261 8 7 0.2998 0.1025 0.0254 0.0736 0.0439 0.0064 0.4627 0.1582 0.0392 0.1136 0.0678 0.0098 Building Construction ‐ Year 3 On‐Road MHDT/HHDT Trucks 2020 100 108 8 7 0.2998 0.1061 0.0263 0.0736 0.0455 0.0066 0.4627 0.1638 0.0407 0.1136 0.0702 0.0102 Architectural Coating ‐ Year 1 ‐ 2018 0 324 8 0 0.2998 0.0988 0.0245 0.0736 0.0423 0.0061 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ Architectural Coating ‐ Year 2 ‐ 2019 0 261 8 0 0.2998 0.1025 0.0254 0.0736 0.0439 0.0064 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ Architectural Coating ‐ Year 3 ‐ 2020 0 70 8 0 0.2998 0.1061 0.0263 0.0736 0.0455 0.0066 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ Paving d ‐ 2019 0 21 8 0 0.2998 0.1025 0.0254 0.0736 0.0439 0.0064 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Phase 2Existing Hotel Demolition T7 Single Construction 2020 25 72 8 20 0.2998 0.0682 0.0397 0.0736 0.0292 0.0099 0.3305 0.0751 0.0438 0.0811 0.0322 0.0110 Mass Grading/Excavation T7 Single Construction 2020 160 35 8 20 0.2998 0.0682 0.0397 0.0736 0.0292 0.0099 2.1154 0.4808 0.2804 0.5192 0.2061 0.0701 Foundation ‐ Year 1 T7 Single Construction 2020 50 27 8 25 0.2998 0.0682 0.0397 0.0736 0.0292 0.0099 0.8263 0.1878 0.1095 0.2028 0.0805 0.0274 Foundation ‐ Year 2 T7 Single Construction 2021 50 16 8 25 0.2998 0.0692 0.0404 0.0736 0.0297 0.0101 0.8263 0.1908 0.1113 0.2028 0.0818 0.0278 Building Construction ‐ Year 1 On‐Road MHDT/HHDT Trucks 2021 100 245 8 7 0.2998 0.1096 0.0273 0.0736 0.0470 0.0068 0.4627 0.1691 0.0421 0.1136 0.0725 0.0105 Building Construction ‐ Year 2 On‐Road MHDT/HHDT Trucks 2022 100 260 8 7 0.2998 0.1127 0.0281 0.0736 0.0483 0.0070 0.4627 0.1740 0.0434 0.1136 0.0746 0.0108 Building Construction ‐ Year 3 On‐Road MHDT/HHDT Trucks 2023 100 53 8 7 0.2998 0.1157 0.0289 0.0736 0.0496 0.0072 0.4627 0.1786 0.0446 0.1136 0.0765 0.0112 Architectural Coating ‐ Year 1 ‐ 2021 0 105 8 0 0.2998 0.1096 0.0273 0.0736 0.0470 0.0068 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ Architectural Coating ‐ Year 2 ‐ 2022 0 260 8 0 0.2998 0.1127 0.0281 0.0736 0.0483 0.0070 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ Architectural Coating ‐ Year 3 ‐ 2023 0 10 8 0 0.2998 0.1157 0.0289 0.0736 0.0496 0.0072 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ Paving d ‐ 2021 0 20 8 0 0.2998 0.1096 0.0273 0.0736 0.0470 0.0068 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Summary of On‐Road Truck Regional Emissions
Regional Emissions(pounds/day)
Construction Phase Source Year PM10 PM10 PM10 PM2.5 PM2.5 PM2.5 CO2eROG NOX CO SO2 Dust Exh Total Dust Exh Total (metric tons/year)
Phase 1A Site Preparation ‐ 2017 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ B Site Demolition T7 Single Construction 2017 0.05 1.58 0.19 0.00 0.09 0.02 0.10 0.02 0.02 0.04 2 C Mass Grading/Excavation T7 Single Construction 2017 1.63 50.53 6.20 0.12 2.80 0.53 3.33 0.77 0.50 1.27 288 D Foundation ‐ Year 1 T7 Single Construction 2017 0.67 20.38 2.54 0.05 1.10 0.21 1.30 0.30 0.20 0.50 85 E Foundation ‐ Year 2 T7 Single Construction 2018 0.50 17.52 1.95 0.05 1.11 0.12 1.22 0.30 0.11 0.41 27 F Building Construction ‐ Year 1 On‐Road MHDT/HHDT Trucks 2018 0.37 9.27 2.69 0.03 0.65 0.09 0.75 0.19 0.09 0.28 306 G Building Construction ‐ Year 2 On‐Road MHDT/HHDT Trucks 2019 0.34 8.69 2.54 0.03 0.66 0.08 0.74 0.19 0.08 0.27 327 H Building Construction ‐ Year 3 On‐Road MHDT/HHDT Trucks 2020 0.29 7.67 2.32 0.03 0.67 0.06 0.72 0.19 0.05 0.25 138 F Architectural Coating ‐ Year 1 ‐ 2018 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ G Architectural Coating ‐ Year 2 ‐ 2019 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ H Architectural Coating ‐ Year 3 ‐ 2020 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ G Paving d ‐ 2019 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Phase 2I Existing Hotel Demolition T7 Single Construction 2020 0.14 5.40 0.58 0.02 0.45 0.02 0.47 0.12 0.02 0.15 67 J Mass Grading/Excavation T7 Single Construction 2020 0.89 34.56 3.69 0.13 2.88 0.15 3.03 0.80 0.14 0.94 210 K Foundation ‐ Year 1 T7 Single Construction 2020 0.36 13.90 1.48 0.05 1.12 0.06 1.18 0.31 0.06 0.37 64 L Foundation ‐ Year 2 T7 Single Construction 2021 0.35 12.54 1.49 0.05 1.13 0.05 1.18 0.31 0.05 0.36 38 M Building Construction ‐ Year 1 On‐Road MHDT/HHDT Trucks 2021 0.25 6.44 2.11 0.03 0.67 0.02 0.70 0.20 0.02 0.22 320 N Building Construction ‐ Year 2 On‐Road MHDT/HHDT Trucks 2022 0.24 6.06 2.06 0.03 0.68 0.02 0.70 0.20 0.02 0.22 345 O Building Construction ‐ Year 3 On‐Road MHDT/HHDT Trucks 2023 0.18 3.76 1.91 0.03 0.69 0.01 0.70 0.20 0.01 0.21 70 M Architectural Coating ‐ Year 1 ‐ 2021 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ N Architectural Coating ‐ Year 2 ‐ 2022 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ O Architectural Coating ‐ Year 3 ‐ 2023 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ M Paving d ‐ 2021 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Phase 1A Site Preparation ‐ 2017 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ B Demolition ‐ 2017 0.1 1.6 0.2 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.77 C Grading ‐ 2017 1.6 50.5 6.2 0.1 2.8 0.5 3.3 0.8 0.5 1.3 288.29 D Foundation ‐ 2017 0.7 20.4 2.5 0.0 1.1 0.2 1.3 0.3 0.2 0.5 85.24 E Foundation ‐ 2018 0.5 17.5 1.9 0.0 1.1 0.1 1.2 0.3 0.1 0.4 27.45 F Building Construction and Architectural Coating ‐ 2018 0.4 9.3 2.7 0.0 0.7 0.1 0.7 0.2 0.1 0.3 305.71 G Building Construction, Architectural Coating, and Paving ‐ 2019 0.3 8.7 2.5 0.0 0.7 0.1 0.7 0.2 0.1 0.3 326.96 H Building Construction and Architectural Coating ‐ 2020 0.3 7.7 2.3 0.0 0.7 0.1 0.7 0.2 0.1 0.2 138.16
Phase 2I Demolition ‐ 2020 0.1 5.4 0.6 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.5 0.1 0.0 0.1 67.36 J Grading ‐ 2020 0.9 34.6 3.7 0.1 2.9 0.2 3.0 0.8 0.1 0.9 209.57 K Foundation ‐ 2020 0.4 13.9 1.5 0.0 1.1 0.1 1.2 0.3 0.1 0.4 64.06 L Foundation ‐ 2021 0.4 12.5 1.5 0.1 1.1 0.1 1.2 0.3 0.1 0.4 38.14 M Building Construction, Architectural Coating, and Paving ‐ 2021 0.2 6.4 2.1 0.0 0.7 0.0 0.7 0.2 0.0 0.2 319.79 N Building Construction and Architectural Coating ‐ 2022 0.2 6.1 2.1 0.0 0.7 0.0 0.7 0.2 0.0 0.2 345.00 O Building Construction and Architectural Coating ‐ 2023 0.2 3.8 1.9 0.0 0.7 0.0 0.7 0.2 0.0 0.2 69.95
LUXE Hotel ProjectOn‐Road Truck Localized (On‐Site Idling) Emissions
On‐Road Truck On‐Site Idling Emissions
Daily Work Days Work Hours Idling Time Idling Emissions Factor Regional EmissionsConstruction Phase Source Year Number of per Year per Day per Truck (grams/hour) (pounds/day)
Trucks CO2e(days/year) (hours/day) (minutes) ROG NOX CO SO2 PM10 PM2.5 CO2e ROG NOX CO SO2 PM10 PM2.5 (metric tons/year)
A Site Preparation ‐ 2017 0 5 8 15 2.4393 56.1771 10.3466 0.0641 0.2216 0.2120 6,720.16 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ B Site Demolition T7 Single Construction 2017 5 10 8 15 2.4393 56.1771 10.3466 0.0641 0.2216 0.2120 6,720.16 0.01 0.15 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 C Mass Grading/Excavation T7 Single Construction 2017 160 51 8 15 2.4393 56.1771 10.3466 0.0641 0.2216 0.2120 6,720.16 0.22 4.95 0.91 0.01 0.02 0.02 14 D Foundation ‐ Year 1 T7 Single Construction 2017 50 38 8 25 2.4393 56.1771 10.3466 0.0641 0.2216 0.2120 6,720.16 0.11 2.58 0.48 0.00 0.01 0.01 5 E Foundation ‐ Year 2 T7 Single Construction 2018 50 12 8 25 1.9800 50.0628 8.2237 0.0632 0.1541 0.1475 6,631.77 0.09 2.30 0.38 0.00 0.01 0.01 2 F Building Construction ‐ Year 1 On‐Road MHDT/HHDT Trucks 2018 100 249 8 15 1.6825 48.4813 17.2427 0.0668 0.1491 0.1427 7,062.39 0.09 2.67 0.95 0.00 0.01 0.01 44 G Building Construction ‐ Year 2 On‐Road MHDT/HHDT Trucks 2019 100 261 8 15 1.5610 44.5192 16.0614 0.0660 0.1241 0.1188 6,989.52 0.09 2.45 0.89 0.00 0.01 0.01 46 H Building Construction ‐ Year 3 On‐Road MHDT/HHDT Trucks 2020 100 108 8 15 1.3726 38.0209 14.3710 0.0652 0.0740 0.0708 6,907.51 0.08 2.10 0.79 0.00 0.00 0.00 19 F Architectural Coating ‐ Year 1 ‐ 2018 0 324 8 15 1.6825 48.4813 17.2427 0.0668 0.1491 0.1427 7,062.39 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ G Architectural Coating ‐ Year 2 ‐ 2019 0 261 8 15 1.5610 44.5192 16.0614 0.0660 0.1241 0.1188 6,989.52 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ H Architectural Coating ‐ Year 3 ‐ 2020 0 70 8 15 1.3726 38.0209 14.3710 0.0652 0.0740 0.0708 6,907.51 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ G Paving d ‐ 2019 0 21 8 15 1.5610 44.5192 16.0614 0.0660 0.1241 0.1188 6,989.52 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
I Existing Hotel Demolition T7 Single Construction 2020 25 72 8 15 0.9730 35.1225 3.8999 0.0617 0.0158 0.0151 6,466.46 0.01 0.48 0.05 0.00 0.00 0.00 3 J Mass Grading/Excavation T7 Single Construction 2020 160 35 8 15 0.9730 35.1225 3.8999 0.0617 0.0158 0.0151 6,466.46 0.09 3.10 0.34 0.01 0.00 0.00 9 K Foundation ‐ Year 1 T7 Single Construction 2020 50 27 8 25 0.9730 35.1225 3.8999 0.0617 0.0158 0.0151 6,466.46 0.04 1.61 0.18 0.00 0.00 0.00 4 L Foundation ‐ Year 2 T7 Single Construction 2021 50 16 8 25 0.9340 33.1449 3.7248 0.0611 0.0137 0.0131 6,401.61 0.04 1.52 0.17 0.00 0.00 0.00 2 M Building Construction ‐ Year 1 On‐Road MHDT/HHDT Trucks 2021 100 245 8 15 1.1982 28.7657 12.5576 0.0641 0.0182 0.0174 6,793.52 0.07 1.59 0.69 0.00 0.00 0.00 42 N Building Construction ‐ Year 2 On‐Road MHDT/HHDT Trucks 2022 100 260 8 15 1.1319 26.9322 11.9202 0.0634 0.0158 0.0151 6,722.53 0.06 1.48 0.66 0.00 0.00 0.00 44 O Building Construction ‐ Year 3 On‐Road MHDT/HHDT Trucks 2023 100 53 8 15 0.9446 18.8169 10.8527 0.0610 0.0096 0.0092 6,475.05 0.05 1.04 0.60 0.00 0.00 0.00 9 M Architectural Coating ‐ Year 1 ‐ 2021 0 105 8 15 1.1982 28.7657 12.5576 0.0641 0.0182 0.0174 6,793.52 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ N Architectural Coating ‐ Year 2 ‐ 2022 0 260 8 15 1.1319 26.9322 11.9202 0.0634 0.0158 0.0151 6,722.53 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ O Architectural Coating ‐ Year 3 ‐ 2023 0 10 8 15 0.9446 18.8169 10.8527 0.0610 0.0096 0.0092 6,475.05 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ M Paving d ‐ 2021 0 20 8 15 1.1982 28.7657 12.5576 0.0641 0.0182 0.0174 6,793.52 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Phase 1A Site Preparation ‐ 2017 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ B Demolition ‐ 2017 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 C Grading ‐ 2017 0.2 5.0 0.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 13.7 D Foundation ‐ 2017 0.1 2.6 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.3 E Foundation ‐ 2018 0.1 2.3 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.7 F Building Construction and Architectural Coating ‐ 2018 0.1 2.7 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 44.0 G Building Construction, Architectural Coating, and Paving ‐ 2019 0.1 2.5 0.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 45.6 H Building Construction and Architectural Coating ‐ 2020 0.1 2.1 0.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 18.7
Phase 2I Demolition ‐ 2020 0.0 0.5 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.9 J Grading ‐ 2020 0.1 3.1 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 9.1 K Foundation ‐ 2020 0.0 1.6 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.6 L Foundation ‐ 2021 0.0 1.5 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.1 M Building Construction, Architectural Coating, and Paving ‐ 2021 0.1 1.6 0.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 41.6 N Building Construction and Architectural Coating ‐ 2022 0.1 1.5 0.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 43.7 O Building Construction and Architectural Coating ‐ 2023 0.1 1.0 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 8.6
LUXE Hotel ProjectOn‐Road Truck Emissions Rate for Dispersion Modeling
Health Risk Assessment On‐Road Truck Running Emissions Rates
Daily Work Days Work Hours One‐WayRunning
Emissions Factor
Emissions Rate during Work
PeriodConstruction Phase DPM Source Year One‐Way per Year per Day Trip Distance (grams/mile) (grams/second)
Truck Trips per Day(days/year) (hours/day) (miles) PM10 PM10
Phase 1Site Preparation ‐ 2017 0 5 8 0.736 0.0718 0.00E+00Site Demolition T7 Single Construction 2017 5 10 8 0.736 0.0718 9.16E‐06Mass Grading/Excavation T7 Single Construction 2017 160 51 8 0.736 0.0673 2.75E‐04Foundation ‐ Year 1 T7 Single Construction 2017 50 38 8 0.736 0.0673 8.59E‐05Foundation ‐ Year 2 T7 Single Construction 2018 50 12 8 0.736 0.0552 7.05E‐05Building Construction ‐ Year 1 On‐Road MHDT/HHDT Trucks 2018 100 249 8 0.736 0.0552 1.41E‐04Building Construction ‐ Year 2 On‐Road MHDT/HHDT Trucks 2019 100 261 8 0.736 0.0357 9.12E‐05Building Construction ‐ Year 3 On‐Road MHDT/HHDT Trucks 2020 100 108 8 0.736 0.0212 5.42E‐05Architectural Coating ‐ Year 1 ‐ 2018 0 324 8 0.736 0.0393 0.00E+00Architectural Coating ‐ Year 2 ‐ 2019 0 261 8 0.736 0.0357 0.00E+00Architectural Coating ‐ Year 3 ‐ 2020 0 70 8 0.736 0.0212 0.00E+00Paving d ‐ 2019 0 21 8 0.736 0.0357 0.00E+00
Average Rate for Phase 1 Construction: 1.26E‐03Work Days: 734
Phase 2Existing Hotel Demolition T7 Single Construction 2020 25 72 8 1.143 0.0212 2.11E‐05Mass Grading/Excavation T7 Single Construction 2020 160 35 8 1.143 0.0345 2.19E‐04Foundation ‐ Year 1 T7 Single Construction 2020 50 27 8 1.143 0.0345 6.84E‐05Foundation ‐ Year 2 T7 Single Construction 2021 50 16 8 1.143 0.0192 3.81E‐05Building Construction ‐ Year 1 On‐Road MHDT/HHDT Trucks 2021 100 245 8 1.143 0.0192 7.62E‐05Building Construction ‐ Year 2 On‐Road MHDT/HHDT Trucks 2022 100 260 8 1.143 0.0167 6.62E‐05Building Construction ‐ Year 3 On‐Road MHDT/HHDT Trucks 2023 100 53 8 1.143 0.0054 2.14E‐05Architectural Coating ‐ Year 1 ‐ 2021 0 105 8 1.143 0.0192 0.00E+00Architectural Coating ‐ Year 2 ‐ 2022 0 260 8 1.143 0.0167 0.00E+00Architectural Coating ‐ Year 3 ‐ 2023 0 10 8 1.143 0.0054 0.00E+00Paving d ‐ 2021 0 20 8 1.143 0.0192 0.00E+00
Average Rate for Phase 2 Construction: 4.19E‐05Work Days: 708
Source: PCR Services Corporation, 2016
Health Risk Assessment On‐Road Truck Idling Emissions Rates
Daily Work Days Work Hours Idling TimeIdling Emissions
Factor
Emissions Rate during Work
PeriodConstruction Phase DPM Source Year Number of per Year per Day per Truck (grams/hour) (grams/second)
Trucks(days/year) (hours/day) (minutes) PM10 PM10
Phase 1Site Preparation ‐ 2017 0 5 8 15 0.2216 0.00E+00Site Demolition T7 Single Construction 2017 5 10 8 15 0.2216 9.62E‐06Mass Grading/Excavation T7 Single Construction 2017 160 51 8 15 0.1798 2.50E‐04Foundation ‐ Year 1 T7 Single Construction 2017 50 38 8 25 0.1798 1.30E‐04Foundation ‐ Year 2 T7 Single Construction 2018 50 12 8 25 0.1491 1.08E‐04Building Construction ‐ Year 1 On‐Road MHDT/HHDT Trucks 2018 100 249 8 15 0.1491 1.29E‐04Building Construction ‐ Year 2 On‐Road MHDT/HHDT Trucks 2019 100 261 8 15 0.1334 1.16E‐04Building Construction ‐ Year 3 On‐Road MHDT/HHDT Trucks 2020 100 108 8 15 0.0158 1.37E‐05Architectural Coating ‐ Year 1 ‐ 2018 0 324 8 15 0.1541 0.00E+00Architectural Coating ‐ Year 2 ‐ 2019 0 261 8 15 0.1334 0.00E+00Architectural Coating ‐ Year 3 ‐ 2020 0 70 8 15 0.0158 0.00E+00Paving d ‐ 2019 0 21 8 15 0.1334 0.00E+00
Average Rate for Phase 1 Construction: 1.26E‐03Work Days: 734
Phase 2Existing Hotel Demolition T7 Single Construction 2020 25 72 8 15 0.0158 3.42E‐06Mass Grading/Excavation T7 Single Construction 2020 160 35 8 15 0.0740 1.03E‐04Foundation ‐ Year 1 T7 Single Construction 2020 50 27 8 15 0.0740 3.21E‐05Foundation ‐ Year 2 T7 Single Construction 2021 50 16 8 25 0.0137 9.93E‐06Building Construction ‐ Year 1 On‐Road MHDT/HHDT Trucks 2021 100 245 8 25 0.0137 1.99E‐05Building Construction ‐ Year 2 On‐Road MHDT/HHDT Trucks 2022 100 260 8 15 0.0118 1.02E‐05Building Construction ‐ Year 3 On‐Road MHDT/HHDT Trucks 2023 100 53 8 15 0.0019 1.62E‐06Architectural Coating ‐ Year 1 ‐ 2021 0 105 8 15 0.0137 0.00E+00Architectural Coating ‐ Year 2 ‐ 2022 0 260 8 15 0.0118 0.00E+00Architectural Coating ‐ Year 3 ‐ 2023 0 10 8 15 0.0019 0.00E+00Paving d ‐ 2021 0 20 8 15 0.0137 0.00E+00
Average Rate for SEQ Construction Activity/Taxiway: 1.08E‐05Work Days: 708
Source: PCR Services Corporation, 2016
LUXE Hotel ProjectOn‐Road Truck Emission Factors (Aggregate Model Year, Aggregate Speeds)
EMFAC2014 (v1.0.7) Emission RatesRegion Type: Sub‐AreaRegion: Los Angeles (SC)Calendar Years: 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023Season: AnnualVehicle Classification: EMFAC2011 CategoriesUnits: miles/day for VMT, trips/day for Trips, g/mile for RUNEX, PMBW and PMTW, g/trip for STREX, HTSK and RUNLS, g/vehicle/hour for IDLEX, RESTL and DIURN
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27
CRITERIA AIR POLLUTANTS GREENHOUSE GASESRegion CalYr VehClass MdlYr Speed Fuel ROG_RUNEX ROG_IDLEX NOx_RUNEX NOx_IDLEX CO_RUNEX CO_IDLEX SO2_RUNEX SO2_IDLEX PM10_BW PM10_TW PM10_RUNEX PM10_IDLEX PM2.5_BW PM2.5_TW PM2.5_RUNEX PM2.5_IDLEX CO2_RUNEX CO2_IDLEX CH4_RUNEX CH4_IDLEX CO2e_RUNEX CO2e_IDLEX
Los Angeles County (SC) 2017 T7 single construction Aggregated Aggregated All 0.2010 2.4393 6.4607 56.1771 0.7497 10.3466 0.0160 0.0641 0.0617 0.0360 0.0718 0.2216 0.0265 0.0090 0.0687 0.2120 1,682.27 6,717.33 0.0093 0.1133 1,682.50 6,720.16 Los Angeles County (SC) 2018 T7 single construction Aggregated Aggregated All 0.1470 1.9800 5.5223 50.0628 0.5703 8.2237 0.0164 0.0632 0.0639 0.0373 0.0393 0.1541 0.0274 0.0093 0.0376 0.1475 1,719.45 6,629.47 0.0068 0.0920 1,719.62 6,631.77 Los Angeles County (SC) 2019 T7 single construction Aggregated Aggregated All 0.1395 1.8138 5.2121 46.8318 0.5526 7.5222 0.0167 0.0625 0.0660 0.0385 0.0357 0.1334 0.0283 0.0096 0.0342 0.1276 1,751.30 6,553.65 0.0065 0.0842 1,751.46 6,555.76 Los Angeles County (SC) 2020 T7 single construction Aggregated Aggregated All 0.1136 0.9730 4.4601 35.1225 0.4738 3.8999 0.0171 0.0617 0.0682 0.0397 0.0212 0.0158 0.0292 0.0099 0.0203 0.0151 1,790.16 6,465.33 0.0053 0.0452 1,790.29 6,466.46 Los Angeles County (SC) 2021 T7 single construction Aggregated Aggregated All 0.1118 0.9340 3.9978 33.1449 0.4791 3.7248 0.0172 0.0611 0.0692 0.0404 0.0192 0.0137 0.0297 0.0101 0.0184 0.0131 1,800.35 6,400.53 0.0052 0.0434 1,800.48 6,401.61 Los Angeles County (SC) 2022 T7 single construction Aggregated Aggregated All 0.1093 0.8932 3.5874 31.0120 0.4820 3.5401 0.0172 0.0604 0.0703 0.0410 0.0167 0.0118 0.0301 0.0102 0.0160 0.0113 1,806.13 6,331.29 0.0051 0.0415 1,806.26 6,332.33 Los Angeles County (SC) 2023 T7 single construction Aggregated Aggregated All 0.0724 0.5123 1.4332 15.7439 0.4229 1.8973 0.0169 0.0576 0.0712 0.0415 0.0054 0.0019 0.0305 0.0104 0.0052 0.0018 1,766.65 6,032.38 0.0034 0.0238 1,766.74 6,032.98
Los Angeles County (SC) 2017 MHDT/HHDT Aggregated Aggregated All 0.1987 1.8352 4.5768 52.8409 1.2131 18.6009 0.0138 0.0675 0.0956 0.0237 0.0673 0.1798 0.0410 0.0059 0.0644 0.1720 1,462.69 7,127.20 0.0566 0.3591 1,464.11 7,136.18 Los Angeles County (SC) 2018 MHDT/HHDT Aggregated Aggregated All 0.1791 1.6825 4.2733 48.4813 1.1255 17.2427 0.0141 0.0668 0.0988 0.0245 0.0552 0.1491 0.0423 0.0061 0.0528 0.1427 1,500.25 7,053.85 0.0573 0.3416 1,501.68 7,062.39 Los Angeles County (SC) 2019 MHDT/HHDT Aggregated Aggregated All 0.1662 1.5610 4.0394 44.5192 1.0697 16.0614 0.0144 0.0660 0.1025 0.0254 0.0489 0.1241 0.0439 0.0064 0.0468 0.1188 1,538.52 6,981.37 0.0584 0.3260 1,539.98 6,989.52 Los Angeles County (SC) 2020 MHDT/HHDT Aggregated Aggregated All 0.1415 1.3726 3.6097 38.0209 0.9920 14.3710 0.0148 0.0652 0.1061 0.0263 0.0345 0.0740 0.0455 0.0066 0.0330 0.0708 1,579.32 6,899.75 0.0589 0.3106 1,580.79 6,907.51 Los Angeles County (SC) 2021 MHDT/HHDT Aggregated Aggregated All 0.1168 1.1982 3.1486 28.7657 0.9165 12.5576 0.0152 0.0641 0.1096 0.0273 0.0136 0.0182 0.0470 0.0068 0.0130 0.0174 1,620.57 6,786.08 0.0594 0.2977 1,622.06 6,793.52 Los Angeles County (SC) 2022 MHDT/HHDT Aggregated Aggregated All 0.1145 1.1319 2.9646 26.9322 0.9116 11.9202 0.0155 0.0634 0.1127 0.0281 0.0124 0.0158 0.0483 0.0070 0.0118 0.0151 1,653.99 6,715.52 0.0609 0.2806 1,655.51 6,722.53 Los Angeles County (SC) 2023 MHDT/HHDT Aggregated Aggregated All 0.0797 0.9446 1.7668 18.8169 0.8481 10.8527 0.0154 0.0610 0.1157 0.0289 0.0056 0.0096 0.0496 0.0072 0.0053 0.0092 1,652.56 6,468.37 0.0608 0.2671 1,654.08 6,475.05
Source: California Air Resources Board, EMFAC2014, http://www.arb.ca.gov/emfac/2014/. Accessed February 2016.
LUXE Hotel ProjectRoad Dust Emission Factors
Paved Road Dust Emission Factors (Assumes No Precipitation)
Formula: EFDust,P = (k (sL)0.91 × (W)1.02)
Where:EFDust,P = Paved Road Dust Emission Factor (having the same units as k)k = particle size multipliersL = road surface silt loading (g/m2)W = average fleet vehicle weight (tons) (CARB uses 2.4 tons as a fleet average vehicle weight factor)
Emission Factor (grams per VMT)PM10 PM2.5
k 0.9979 0.2449sL 0.1 0.1W 2.4 2.4
EFDust,P 3.00E‐01 7.36E‐02
Unpaved Road Dust Emission Factors (Assumes No Precipitation)
Formula: EFDust,U = (k ( s / 12)1 × (Sp / 30)0.5 / (M / 0.5)0.2) ‐ C)
Where:EFDust,U = Unpaved Road Dust Emission Factor (having the same units as k)k = particle size multipliers = surface material silt content (%)Sp = mean vehicle speed (mph)M = surface material moisture content (%)C = Emission Factor for 1980s vehicle fleet exhaust, brake wear, and tire wear
Emission Factor (grams per VMT)PM10 PM2.5
k 816.47 81.65s 4.3% 4.3%Sp 15 15M 0.5% 0.5%C 0.00047 0.00036
EFDust,U 5.20E+00 5.19E‐01
Sources:SCAQMD, CalEEMod, Version 2011.1.CARB, Entrained Dust from Paved Road Travel: Emission Estimation Methodology Background Document , (1997).USEPA, AP‐42 , Fifth Edition, Volume I, Chapter 13.2.1 ‐ Paved Roads, (2011).PCR Services Corporation, 2013.
AppendixA.2OperationalEmissions(CalEEMod)
EmissionsModelInputs
CalEEModOutput–Existing
CalEEModOutput–Project
1020 S. Figueroa Street Project EIRAir Quality and Greenhouse Gas Assessment
Trip Generation Rates
Land Use Units Res. Pop. Trips/dayTrip Rate (trips/unit) Trips/day
Trip Rate (trips/unit)
Existing Uses (2015)Hotel 178 rooms 112,748 sf 1,090 6.12 1,090 6.12Above‐Grade Parking Structure ‐ spaces ‐ sfSubterranean Parking Structure 86 spaces 34,400 sfSurface Parking Lot 198 spaces 79,200 sf
Interim Year (Phase 1 ends 2020)Residential + Amenities 290 DU 352,000 sf 473 1,054 3.63 949 3.27
Retail/Commercial 15.0 ksf 15,000 sf 564 37.60 314 20.93Restaurant 15.0 ksf 15,000 sf 1,678 111.87 934 62.27
Hotel 300 rooms 280,000 sf 1,838 6.13 1,654 5.51
Above‐Grade Parking Structure ‐ spaces ‐ sfSubterranean Parking Structure 437 spaces 174,800 sfOpen Space 29.3 ksf 0.67 acre
Full Buildout (Phase 1 + 2 ends 2023)Residential + Amenities 650 DU 770,000 sf 1060 2,139 3.29 1,925 2.96
Commercial 40.0 ksf 40,000 sf 1,503 37.58 836 20.90Restaurant 40.0 ksf 40,000 sf 4,476 111.90 2,490 62.25
Hotel 300 rooms 280,000 sf 1,838 6.13 1,654 5.51
Above‐Grade Parking Structure ‐ spaces ‐ sfSubterranean Parking Structure 799 spaces 319,600 sfOpen Space 49.8 ksf 1.14 acrePlaza Area 5.0 ksf 5,000 sf
Lot Area (acres)/Developed Area (sf) 2.70 acres 116,660 sfSources: Hazens Group, March 2016; PCR Services Corporation, March 2016 Source: Traffic Study, March 2016; PCR Services Corporation, March 2016
Notes:Reductions from transit were accounted for in trip rates.However, transit/walk‐in reductions were taken by CalEEMod using defaults.
Hotel
Quality Restaurant
Unenclosed Parking with ElevatorEnclosed Parking with Elevator
City ParkSurface Parking
Strip Mall
Enclosed Parking with ElevatorCity Park
High‐rise Apartment
Unenclosed Parking with Elevator
Strip MallQuality Restaurant
Hotel
Mitigated
CalEEMod Land Use Type
Hotel
High‐rise Apartment
Unmitigated
Surface Parking
Unenclosed Parking with ElevatorEnclosed Parking with Elevator
Vechicle Emission Factors -
Area Coating - See "Luxe Hotel Operational Inputs"
Energy Use -
Energy Mitigation -
1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data
Project Characteristics - LADWP, 2015 Power Integrated Resource Plan, Table C-1, (2015) C-12.
Land Use - See "LUXE Hotel Operational Inputs"
Vehicle Trips - See Traffic Study
Vechicle Emission Factors -
Vechicle Emission Factors -
CO2 Intensity (lb/MWhr)
1227.89 CH4 Intensity (lb/MWhr)
0.029 N2O Intensity (lb/MWhr)
0.006
31
Climate Zone 11 Operational Year 2015
Utility Company Los Angeles Department of Water & Power
1.2 Other Project Characteristics
Urbanization Urban Wind Speed (m/s) 2.2 Precipitation Freq (Days)
Hotel 178.00 Room 2.70 112,748.00 0
Parking Lot 198.00 Space 0.00 79,200.00 0
Population
Enclosed Parking with Elevator 86.00 Space 0.00 34,400.00 0
1.1 Land Usage
Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 1 of 1 Date: 4/11/2016 3:23 PM
Luxe Hotel Existing Operations
South Coast Air Basin, Summer
1.0 Project Characteristics
8,545.9452
8,545.9452 0.3657 0.0167 8,558.7927
5.5083 0.2203 5.7286 1.4714 0.2070 1.6784Total 9.7421 11.2965 45.4399 0.0870
7,636.5919
7,636.5919 0.3480 7,643.8997
5.5083 0.1625 5.6708 1.4714 0.1492 1.6206Mobile 4.3764 10.5383 44.7547 0.0825
909.2522 909.2522 0.0174 0.0167 914.78580.0576 0.0576 0.0576 0.0576Energy 0.0834 0.7577 0.6365 4.5500e-003
0.1011 0.1011 2.9000e-004
0.10731.8000e-004
1.8000e-004
1.8000e-004
1.8000e-004
Area 5.2824 4.7000e-004
0.0488 0.0000
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total
Fugitive PM2.5
Exhaust PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
2.2 Overall Operational
Unmitigated OperationalROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10Exhaust PM10
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 8.17 6.12
2.0 Emissions Summary
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 8.19 6.12
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 5.95 6.12
tblLandUse LotAcreage 5.93 2.70
tblProjectCharacteristics OperationalYear 2014 2015
tblLandUse LotAcreage 0.77 0.00
tblLandUse LotAcreage 1.78 0.00
tblAreaCoating Area_Nonresidential_Interior 224286 175938
tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 258,456.00 112,748.00
Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value
Total 1,089.36 1,089.36 1,089.36 2,599,399 2,599,399
Parking Lot 0.00 0.00 0.00
Hotel 1,089.36 1,089.36 1089.36 2,599,399 2,599,399
Annual VMT
Enclosed Parking with Elevator 0.00 0.00 0.00
4.2 Trip Summary Information
Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated
Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT
7,636.5919
7,636.5919 0.3480 7,643.8997
5.5083 0.1625 5.6708 1.4714 0.1492 1.6206Unmitigated 4.3764 10.5383 44.7547 0.0825
7,636.5919
7,636.5919 0.3480 7,643.8997
5.5083 0.1625 5.6708 1.4714 0.1492 1.6206Mitigated 4.3764 10.5383 44.7547 0.0825
NBio- CO2
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Exhaust PM10
PM10 Total
Fugitive PM2.5
Exhaust PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2
4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile
4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10
0.00 2.23 2.23 1.00 20.94 2.240.00 5.47 0.21 0.00 5.83 0.72
NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent Reduction
0.18 1.40 0.29 1.10
Exhaust PM10
PM10 Total
Fugitive PM2.5
Exhaust PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10
8,355.5182
8,355.5182 0.3621 0.0132 8,367.2069
5.5083 0.2082 5.7166 1.4714 0.1949 1.6663Total 9.7247 11.1378 45.3066 0.0860
7,636.5919
7,636.5919 0.3480 7,643.8997
5.5083 0.1625 5.6708 1.4714 0.1492 1.6206Mobile 4.3764 10.5383 44.7547 0.0825
718.8253 718.8253 0.0138 0.0132 723.19990.0455 0.0455 0.0455 0.0455Energy 0.0659 0.5990 0.5032 3.5900e-003
0.1011 0.1011 2.9000e-004
0.10731.8000e-004
1.8000e-004
1.8000e-004
1.8000e-004
Area 5.2824 4.7000e-004
0.0488 0.0000
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total
Fugitive PM2.5
Exhaust PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Mitigated Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10
Exhaust PM10
914.78580.0576 909.2522 909.2522 0.0174 0.01674.5500e-003
0.0576 0.0576 0.0576
718.8253 718.8253 0.0138 0.0132 723.1999
NaturalGas Unmitigated
0.0834 0.7577 0.6365
0.0455 0.0455 0.0455 0.0455
Category lb/day lb/day
NaturalGas Mitigated
0.0659 0.5990 0.5032 3.5900e-003
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2eFugitive PM10
Exhaust PM10
PM10 Total
Fugitive PM2.5
Exhaust PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
4.4 Fleet Mix
Historical Energy Use: N
5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy
Exceed Title 24
ROG NOx CO SO2
0.001923 0.002530 0.004314 0.000602 0.002075
5.0 Energy Detail
SBUS MH
0.516610 0.060517 0.179979 0.140587 0.041566 0.006616 0.015092 0.027587
LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY
0.00 0.00 0 0 0
LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1
61.60 19.00 58 38 4
Parking Lot 16.60 8.40 6.90 0.00
0.00 0.00 0 0 0
Hotel 16.60 8.40 6.90 19.40
H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by
Enclosed Parking with Elevator 16.60 8.40 6.90 0.00
4.3 Trip Type Information
Miles Trip % Trip Purpose %
Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W
0.1011 0.1011 2.9000e-004
0.10731.8000e-004
1.8000e-004
1.8000e-004
1.8000e-004
Unmitigated 5.2824 4.7000e-004
0.0488 0.0000
0.1011 0.1011 2.9000e-004
0.10731.8000e-004
1.8000e-004
1.8000e-004
1.8000e-004
Mitigated 5.2824 4.7000e-004
0.0488 0.0000
NBio- CO2
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Exhaust PM10
PM10 Total
Fugitive PM2.5
Exhaust PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2
6.0 Area Detail
6.1 Mitigation Measures Area
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10
718.8253 718.8253 0.0138 0.0132 723.19990.0455 0.0455 0.0455 0.0455Total 0.0659 0.5990 0.5032 3.5900e-003
718.8253 718.8253 0.0138 0.0132 723.19990.0455 0.0455 0.0455 0.0455Hotel 6.11001 0.0659 0.5990 0.5032 3.5900e-003
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Enclosed Parking with Elevator
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total
Fugitive PM2.5
Exhaust PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Mitigated
NaturalGas Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10
Exhaust PM10
909.2522 909.2522 0.0174 0.0167 914.78580.0576 0.0576 0.0576 0.0576Total 0.0834 0.7577 0.6365 4.5500e-003
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Enclosed Parking with Elevator
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
909.2522 909.2522 0.0174 0.0167 914.78580.0576 0.0576 0.0576 0.0576Hotel 7728.64 0.0834 0.7577 0.6365 4.5500e-003
NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day
Exhaust PM10
PM10 Total
Fugitive PM2.5
Exhaust PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2
5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
UnmitigatedNaturalGa
s UseROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
0.1011 0.1011 2.9000e-004
0.10731.8000e-004
1.8000e-004
1.8000e-004
1.8000e-004
Total 5.2824 4.7000e-004
0.0488 0.0000
0.1011 0.1011 2.9000e-004
0.10731.8000e-004
1.8000e-004
1.8000e-004
1.8000e-004
Landscaping 4.8200e-003
4.7000e-004
0.0488 0.0000
0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Consumer Products
4.4817
0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Architectural Coating
0.7959
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
SubCategory lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total
Fugitive PM2.5
Exhaust PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Mitigated
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10
Exhaust PM10
0.1011 0.1011 2.9000e-004
0.10731.8000e-004
1.8000e-004
1.8000e-004
1.8000e-004
Total 5.2824 4.7000e-004
0.0488 0.0000
0.1011 0.1011 2.9000e-004
0.10731.8000e-004
1.8000e-004
1.8000e-004
1.8000e-004
Landscaping 4.8200e-003
4.7000e-004
0.0488 0.0000
0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Consumer Products
4.4817
0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Architectural Coating
0.7959
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
SubCategory lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total
Fugitive PM2.5
Exhaust PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
6.2 Area by SubCategory
Unmitigated
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10
Exhaust PM10
Vechicle Emission Factors -
Area Coating - See "Luxe Hotel Operational Inputs"
Energy Use -
Energy Mitigation -
1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data
Project Characteristics - LADWP, 2015 Power Integrated Resource Plan, Table C-1, (2015) C-12.
Land Use - See "LUXE Hotel Operational Inputs"
Vehicle Trips - See Traffic Study
Vechicle Emission Factors -
Vechicle Emission Factors -
CO2 Intensity (lb/MWhr)
1227.89 CH4 Intensity (lb/MWhr)
0.029 N2O Intensity (lb/MWhr)
0.006
31
Climate Zone 11 Operational Year 2015
Utility Company Los Angeles Department of Water & Power
1.2 Other Project Characteristics
Urbanization Urban Wind Speed (m/s) 2.2 Precipitation Freq (Days)
Hotel 178.00 Room 2.70 112,748.00 0
Parking Lot 198.00 Space 0.00 79,200.00 0
Population
Enclosed Parking with Elevator 86.00 Space 0.00 34,400.00 0
1.1 Land Usage
Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 1 of 1 Date: 4/11/2016 3:22 PM
Luxe Hotel Existing Operations
South Coast Air Basin, Winter
1.0 Project Characteristics
8,169.5758
8,169.5758 0.3660 0.0167 8,182.4293
5.5083 0.2217 5.7300 1.4714 0.2082 1.6796Total 9.9396 11.8374 45.4006 0.0829
7,260.2225
7,260.2225 0.3483 7,267.5362
5.5083 0.1639 5.6723 1.4714 0.1505 1.6219Mobile 4.5738 11.0792 44.7153 0.0783
909.2522 909.2522 0.0174 0.0167 914.78580.0576 0.0576 0.0576 0.0576Energy 0.0834 0.7577 0.6365 4.5500e-003
0.1011 0.1011 2.9000e-004
0.10731.8000e-004
1.8000e-004
1.8000e-004
1.8000e-004
Area 5.2824 4.7000e-004
0.0488 0.0000
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total
Fugitive PM2.5
Exhaust PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
2.2 Overall Operational
Unmitigated Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10
Exhaust PM10
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 8.17 6.12
2.0 Emissions Summary
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 8.19 6.12
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 5.95 6.12
tblLandUse LotAcreage 5.93 2.70
tblProjectCharacteristics OperationalYear 2014 2015
tblLandUse LotAcreage 0.77 0.00
tblLandUse LotAcreage 1.78 0.00
tblAreaCoating Area_Nonresidential_Interior 224286 175938
tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 258,456.00 112,748.00
Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value
Total 1,089.36 1,089.36 1,089.36 2,599,399 2,599,399
Parking Lot 0.00 0.00 0.00
Hotel 1,089.36 1,089.36 1089.36 2,599,399 2,599,399
Annual VMT
Enclosed Parking with Elevator 0.00 0.00 0.00
4.2 Trip Summary Information
Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated
Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT
7,260.2225
7,260.2225 0.3483 7,267.5362
5.5083 0.1639 5.6723 1.4714 0.1505 1.6219Unmitigated 4.5738 11.0792 44.7153 0.0783
7,260.2225
7,260.2225 0.3483 7,267.5362
5.5083 0.1639 5.6723 1.4714 0.1505 1.6219Mitigated 4.5738 11.0792 44.7153 0.0783
NBio- CO2
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Exhaust PM10
PM10 Total
Fugitive PM2.5
Exhaust PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2
4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile
4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10
0.00 2.33 2.33 1.00 20.94 2.340.00 5.44 0.21 0.00 5.79 0.72
NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent Reduction
0.18 1.34 0.29 1.16
Exhaust PM10
PM10 Total
Fugitive PM2.5
Exhaust PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10
7,979.1489
7,979.1489 0.3623 0.0132 7,990.8434
5.5083 0.2096 5.7180 1.4714 0.1962 1.6676Total 9.9221 11.6787 45.2673 0.0819
7,260.2225
7,260.2225 0.3483 7,267.5362
5.5083 0.1639 5.6723 1.4714 0.1505 1.6219Mobile 4.5738 11.0792 44.7153 0.0783
718.8253 718.8253 0.0138 0.0132 723.19990.0455 0.0455 0.0455 0.0455Energy 0.0659 0.5990 0.5032 3.5900e-003
0.1011 0.1011 2.9000e-004
0.10731.8000e-004
1.8000e-004
1.8000e-004
1.8000e-004
Area 5.2824 4.7000e-004
0.0488 0.0000
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total
Fugitive PM2.5
Exhaust PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Mitigated Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10
Exhaust PM10
909.2522 909.2522 0.0174 0.0167 914.78580.0576 0.0576 0.0576 0.0576Hotel 7728.64 0.0834 0.7577 0.6365 4.5500e-003
NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day
Exhaust PM10
PM10 Total
Fugitive PM2.5
Exhaust PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2
914.7858
5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
Unmitigated
NaturalGas Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10
0.0576 909.2522 909.2522 0.0174 0.01674.5500e-003
0.0576 0.0576 0.0576
718.8253 718.8253 0.0138 0.0132 723.1999
NaturalGas Unmitigated
0.0834 0.7577 0.6365
0.0455 0.0455 0.0455 0.0455
Category lb/day lb/day
NaturalGas Mitigated
0.0659 0.5990 0.5032 3.5900e-003
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2eFugitive PM10
Exhaust PM10
PM10 Total
Fugitive PM2.5
Exhaust PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
4.4 Fleet Mix
Historical Energy Use: N
5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy
Exceed Title 24
ROG NOx CO SO2
0.001923 0.002530 0.004314 0.000602 0.002075
5.0 Energy Detail
SBUS MH
0.516610 0.060517 0.179979 0.140587 0.041566 0.006616 0.015092 0.027587
LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY
0.00 0.00 0 0 0
LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1
61.60 19.00 58 38 4
Parking Lot 16.60 8.40 6.90 0.00
0.00 0.00 0 0 0
Hotel 16.60 8.40 6.90 19.40
H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by
Enclosed Parking with Elevator 16.60 8.40 6.90 0.00
4.3 Trip Type Information
Miles Trip % Trip Purpose %
Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W
909.2522 909.2522 0.0174 0.0167 914.78580.0576 0.0576 0.0576 0.0576Total 0.0834 0.7577 0.6365 4.5500e-003
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Enclosed Parking with Elevator
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
0.1011 0.1011 2.9000e-004
0.10731.8000e-004
1.8000e-004
1.8000e-004
1.8000e-004
Total 5.2824 4.7000e-004
0.0488 0.0000
0.1011 0.1011 2.9000e-004
0.10731.8000e-004
1.8000e-004
1.8000e-004
1.8000e-004
Landscaping 4.8200e-003
4.7000e-004
0.0488 0.0000
0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Consumer Products
4.4817
0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Architectural Coating
0.7959
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
SubCategory lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total
Fugitive PM2.5
Exhaust PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
6.2 Area by SubCategory
UnmitigatedROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10Exhaust PM10
0.1011 0.1011 2.9000e-004
0.10731.8000e-004
1.8000e-004
1.8000e-004
1.8000e-004
Unmitigated 5.2824 4.7000e-004
0.0488 0.0000
0.1011 0.1011 2.9000e-004
0.10731.8000e-004
1.8000e-004
1.8000e-004
1.8000e-004
Mitigated 5.2824 4.7000e-004
0.0488 0.0000
NBio- CO2
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Exhaust PM10
PM10 Total
Fugitive PM2.5
Exhaust PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2
6.0 Area Detail
6.1 Mitigation Measures Area
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10
718.8253 718.8253 0.0138 0.0132 723.19990.0455 0.0455 0.0455 0.0455Total 0.0659 0.5990 0.5032 3.5900e-003
718.8253 718.8253 0.0138 0.0132 723.19990.0455 0.0455 0.0455 0.0455Hotel 6.11001 0.0659 0.5990 0.5032 3.5900e-003
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Enclosed Parking with Elevator
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total
Fugitive PM2.5
Exhaust PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Mitigated
NaturalGas Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10
Exhaust PM10
0.1011 0.1011 2.9000e-004
0.10731.8000e-004
1.8000e-004
1.8000e-004
1.8000e-004
Total 5.2824 4.7000e-004
0.0488 0.0000
0.1011 0.1011 2.9000e-004
0.10731.8000e-004
1.8000e-004
1.8000e-004
1.8000e-004
Landscaping 4.8200e-003
4.7000e-004
0.0488 0.0000
0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Consumer Products
4.4817
0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Architectural Coating
0.7959
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
SubCategory lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total
Fugitive PM2.5
Exhaust PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Mitigated
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10
Exhaust PM10
Off-road Equipment -
1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data
Project Characteristics - LADWP, 2015 Power Integrated Resource Plan, Table C-1, (2015) C-12.
Land Use - See "LUXE Hotel Operational Inputs"
Construction Phase -
Off-road Equipment -
Off-road Equipment -
CO2 Intensity (lb/MWhr)
1163 CH4 Intensity (lb/MWhr)
0.029 N2O Intensity (lb/MWhr)
0.006
31
Climate Zone 11 Operational Year 2020
Utility Company Los Angeles Department of Water & Power
1.2 Other Project Characteristics
Urbanization Urban Wind Speed (m/s) 2.2 Precipitation Freq (Days)
Strip Mall 15.00 1000sqft 0.34 15,000.00 0
Apartments High Rise 290.00 Dwelling Unit 4.68 352,000.00 829
Quality Restaurant 15.00 1000sqft 0.34 15,000.00 0
Hotel 300.00 Room 10.00 280,000.00 0
City Park 0.47 Acre 0.47 20,473.20 0
Population
Enclosed Parking with Elevator 437.00 Space 3.93 174,800.00 0
1.1 Land Usage
Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 1 of 1 Date: 4/14/2016 7:11 PM
LUXE Hotel - Interim Year (Phase 1)
South Coast Air Basin, Summer
1.0 Project Characteristics
tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 290,000.00 352,000.00
tblProjectCharacteristics CO2IntensityFactor 1227.89 1163
tblFireplaces NumberWood 14.50 0.00
tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 435,600.00 280,000.00
tblFireplaces NumberGas 246.50 0.00
tblFireplaces NumberNoFireplace 29.00 0.00
tblFireplaces FireplaceHourDay 3.00 0.00
tblFireplaces FireplaceWoodMass 1,019.20 0.00
tblAreaCoating Area_Nonresidential_Interior 757910 453888
tblFireplaces FireplaceDayYear 25.00 0.00
Energy Use -
Waste Mitigation -
Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value
Water And Wastewater - See "LUXE Hotel Operational Inputs"
Solid Waste - See "LUXE Hotel Operational Inputs"
Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation -
Area Mitigation -
Energy Mitigation -
Water Mitigation -
Demolition -
Grading -
Architectural Coating -
Vehicle Trips - See "LUXE Hotel Operational Inputs" and "Project Trip and VMT Reductions"
Woodstoves - No woodstoves nor fireplaces.
Area Coating - Parking lot square footage adjustment as in "AQ Construction Model Inputs"
Off-road Equipment -
Off-road Equipment -
Off-road Equipment -
Off-road Equipment -
Trips and VMT -
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 42.04 29.07
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 6.07 3.63
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 8.19 6.13
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 94.36 86.47
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 7.16 3.63
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 1.59 0.00
tblVehicleTrips HS_TL 5.90 4.03
tblVehicleTrips HW_TL 14.70 10.05
tblVehicleTrips CW_TL 16.60 11.35
tblVehicleTrips HO_TL 8.70 5.95
tblVehicleTrips CW_TL 16.60 11.35
tblVehicleTrips CW_TL 16.60 11.35
tblVehicleTrips CW_TL 16.60 0.00
tblVehicleTrips CW_TL 16.60 0.00
tblVehicleTrips CNW_TL 6.90 4.72
tblVehicleTrips CNW_TL 6.90 4.72
tblVehicleTrips CNW_TL 6.90 0.00
tblVehicleTrips CNW_TL 6.90 4.72
tblVehicleTrips CC_TL 8.40 5.74
tblVehicleTrips CNW_TL 6.90 0.00
tblVehicleTrips CC_TL 8.40 5.74
tblVehicleTrips CC_TL 8.40 5.74
tblVehicleTrips CC_TL 8.40 0.00
tblVehicleTrips CC_TL 8.40 0.00
tblSolidWaste SolidWasteGenerationRate 13.69 14.00
tblSolidWaste SolidWasteGenerationRate 15.75 14.00
tblSolidWaste SolidWasteGenerationRate 0.04 0.00
tblSolidWaste SolidWasteGenerationRate 164.25 234.00
tblProjectCharacteristics OperationalYear 2014 2020
tblSolidWaste SolidWasteGenerationRate 133.40 647.00
tblWoodstoves WoodstoveWoodMass 999.60 0.00
tblWoodstoves NumberNoncatalytic 14.50 0.00
tblWoodstoves WoodstoveDayYear 25.00 0.00
tblWater OutdoorWaterUseRate 680,989.31 105,850.00
tblWoodstoves NumberCatalytic 14.50 0.00
tblWater OutdoorWaterUseRate 845,559.00 1,733,346.67
tblWater OutdoorWaterUseRate 290,617.38 1,733,346.67
tblWater OutdoorWaterUseRate 559,996.23 522,896.67
tblWater OutdoorWaterUseRate 0.00 493,402.13
tblWater IndoorWaterUseRate 1,111,087.82 167,900.00
tblWater OutdoorWaterUseRate 11,911,855.55 4,577,447.97
tblWater IndoorWaterUseRate 7,610,031.00 12,454,374.27
tblWater IndoorWaterUseRate 4,553,005.69 2,749,446.45
tblWater IndoorWaterUseRate 0.00 829,422.31
tblWater IndoorWaterUseRate 0.00 782,637.87
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 44.32 29.07
tblWater IndoorWaterUseRate 18,894,667.43 7,260,779.53
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 8.17 6.13
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 89.95 86.47
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 6.59 3.63
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 1.59 0.00
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 72.16 86.47
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 20.43 29.07
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 1.59 0.00
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 5.95 6.13
0.00 4.17 4.17 2.28 23.21 4.180.00 8.38 0.37 0.00 8.68 1.23
NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent Reduction
0.27 3.20 0.50 1.80
Exhaust PM10
PM10 Total
Fugitive PM2.5
Exhaust PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10
0.0000 21,520.8804
21,520.8804
0.7691 0.0567 21,554.6217
15.4773 0.6476 16.1249 4.1356 0.6229 4.7584Total 32.0962 23.3169 117.2778 0.2548
18,382.7173
18,382.7173
0.6674 18,396.7318
15.4773 0.3193 15.7966 4.1356 0.2946 4.4301Mobile 11.1028 20.4826 91.1977 0.2381
3,094.9150
3,094.9150 0.0593 0.0567 3,113.7501
0.1960 0.1960 0.1960 0.1960Energy 0.2837 2.5559 1.9963 0.0155
0.0000 43.2481 43.2481 0.0425 0.0000 44.13980.1323 0.1323 0.1323 0.1323Area 20.7097 0.2784 24.0838 1.2700e-003
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total
Fugitive PM2.5
Exhaust PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Mitigated Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10
Exhaust PM10
0.0000 22,456.2610
22,456.2610
0.7871 0.0739 22,495.6949
15.4773 0.7068 16.1841 4.1356 0.6821 4.8177Total 32.1819 24.0877 117.8690 0.2595
18,382.7173
18,382.7173
0.6674 18,396.7318
15.4773 0.3193 15.7966 4.1356 0.2946 4.4301Mobile 11.1028 20.4826 91.1977 0.2381
4,030.2956
4,030.2956 0.0773 0.0739 4,054.8233
0.2553 0.2553 0.2553 0.2553Energy 0.3694 3.3267 2.5875 0.0202
0.0000 43.2481 43.2481 0.0425 0.0000 44.13980.1323 0.1323 0.1323 0.1323Area 20.7097 0.2784 24.0838 1.2700e-003
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total
Fugitive PM2.5
Exhaust PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
2.2 Overall Operational
Unmitigated OperationalROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10Exhaust PM10
2.0 Emissions Summary
0.001943 0.002491 0.004392 0.000576 0.002140
SBUS MH
0.510092 0.059583 0.181091 0.139410 0.042694 0.006692 0.016202 0.032692
LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY
64.40 19.00 45 40 15
LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1
69.00 19.00 38 18 44
Strip Mall 11.35 5.74 4.72 16.60
61.60 19.00 58 38 4
Quality Restaurant 11.35 5.74 4.72 12.00
0.00 0.00 0 0 0
Hotel 11.35 5.74 4.72 19.40
48.00 19.00 66 28 6
Enclosed Parking with Elevator 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
19.20 40.60 86 11 3
City Park 0.00 0.00 0.00 33.00
H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by
Apartments High Rise 10.05 4.03 5.95 40.20
4.3 Trip Type Information
Miles Trip % Trip Purpose %
Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W
Total 4,624.80 4,624.80 4,624.80 7,296,747 7,296,747
Strip Mall 436.05 436.05 436.05 567,845 567,845
Quality Restaurant 1,297.05 1,297.05 1297.05 1,268,719 1,268,719
Hotel 1,839.00 1,839.00 1839.00 3,000,443 3,000,443
Enclosed Parking with Elevator 0.00 0.00 0.00
City Park 0.00 0.00 0.00
Annual VMT
Apartments High Rise 1,052.70 1,052.70 1052.70 2,459,740 2,459,740
4.2 Trip Summary Information
Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated
Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT
18,382.7173
18,382.7173
0.6674 18,396.7318
15.4773 0.3193 15.7966 4.1356 0.2946 4.4301Unmitigated 11.1028 20.4826 91.1977 0.2381
18,382.7173
18,382.7173
0.6674 18,396.7318
15.4773 0.3193 15.7966 4.1356 0.2946 4.4301Mitigated 11.1028 20.4826 91.1977 0.2381
NBio- CO2
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Exhaust PM10
PM10 Total
Fugitive PM2.5
Exhaust PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2
4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile
4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10
4,030.2956 4,030.2956
0.0773 0.0739 4,054.8233
0.2553 0.2553 0.2553 0.2553Total 0.3694 3.3267 2.5875 0.0202
637.4672 637.4672 0.0122 0.0117 641.34670.0404 0.0404 0.0404 0.0404Apartments High Rise
5418.47 0.0584 0.4994 0.2125 3.1900e-003
8.2192 8.2192 1.6000e-004
1.5000e-004
8.26925.2000e-004
5.2000e-004
5.2000e-004
5.2000e-004
Strip Mall 69.863 7.5000e-004
6.8500e-003
5.7500e-003
4.0000e-005
1,126.5592 1,126.5592
0.0216 0.0207 1,133.4153
0.0714 0.0714 0.0714 0.0714Quality Restaurant 9575.75 0.1033 0.9388 0.7886 5.6300e-003
2,258.0500 2,258.0500
0.0433 0.0414 2,271.7921
0.1430 0.1430 0.1430 0.1430Hotel 19193.4 0.2070 1.8817 1.5806 0.0113
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Enclosed Parking with Elevator
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000City Park 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day
Exhaust PM10
PM10 Total
Fugitive PM2.5
Exhaust PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2
4,054.8233
5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
Unmitigated
NaturalGas Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10
0.2553 4,030.2956
4,030.2956 0.0773 0.07390.0202 0.2553 0.2553 0.2553
3,094.9150
3,094.9150 0.0593 0.0567 3,113.7501
NaturalGas Unmitigated
0.3694 3.3267 2.5875
0.1960 0.1960 0.1960 0.1960
Category lb/day lb/day
NaturalGas Mitigated
0.2837 2.5559 1.9963 0.0155
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2eFugitive PM10
Exhaust PM10
PM10 Total
Fugitive PM2.5
Exhaust PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
4.4 Fleet Mix
Historical Energy Use: N
5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy
Exceed Title 24
ROG NOx CO SO2
5.0 Energy Detail
44.13980.1323 0.0000 43.2481 43.2481 0.0425 0.00001.2700e-003
0.1323 0.1323 0.1323
43.2481 43.2481 0.0425 0.0000 44.1398
Unmitigated 20.7097 0.2784 24.0838
0.1323 0.1323 0.1323 0.1323 0.0000
Category lb/day lb/day
Mitigated 20.7097 0.2784 24.0838 1.2700e-003
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2eFugitive PM10
Exhaust PM10
PM10 Total
Fugitive PM2.5
Exhaust PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
6.0 Area Detail
6.1 Mitigation Measures Area
Use Low VOC Paint - Residential Interior
No Hearths Installed
ROG NOx CO SO2
3,094.9150 3,094.9150
0.0593 0.0567 3,113.7501
0.1960 0.1960 0.1960 0.1960Total 0.2837 2.5559 1.9963 0.0155
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000City Park 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
463.9058 463.9058 8.8900e-003
8.5000e-003
466.72900.0294 0.0294 0.0294 0.0294Apartments High Rise
3.9432 0.0425 0.3634 0.1546 2.3200e-003
6.1131 6.1131 1.2000e-004
1.1000e-004
6.15033.9000e-004
3.9000e-004
3.9000e-004
3.9000e-004
Strip Mall 0.0519616 5.6000e-004
5.0900e-003
4.2800e-003
3.0000e-005
1,047.8350 1,047.8350
0.0201 0.0192 1,054.2119
0.0664 0.0664 0.0664 0.0664Quality Restaurant 8.9066 0.0961 0.8732 0.7335 5.2400e-003
1,577.0611 1,577.0611
0.0302 0.0289 1,586.6588
0.0999 0.0999 0.0999 0.0999Hotel 13.405 0.1446 1.3142 1.1039 7.8900e-003
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Enclosed Parking with Elevator
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total
Fugitive PM2.5
Exhaust PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Mitigated
NaturalGas Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10
Exhaust PM10
0.0000 43.2481 43.2481 0.0425 0.0000 44.13980.1323 0.1323 0.1323 0.1323Total 20.7097 0.2784 24.0838 1.2700e-003
43.2481 43.2481 0.0425 44.13980.1323 0.1323 0.1323 0.1323Landscaping 0.7384 0.2784 24.0838 1.2700e-003
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hearth 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Consumer Products
16.9740
0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Architectural Coating
2.9973
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
SubCategory lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total
Fugitive PM2.5
Exhaust PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Mitigated
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10
Exhaust PM10
0.0000 43.2481 43.2481 0.0425 0.0000 44.13980.1323 0.1323 0.1323 0.1323Total 20.7097 0.2784 24.0838 1.2700e-003
43.2481 43.2481 0.0425 44.13980.1323 0.1323 0.1323 0.1323Landscaping 0.7384 0.2784 24.0838 1.2700e-003
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hearth 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Consumer Products
16.9740
0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Architectural Coating
2.9973
NBio- CO2
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
SubCategory lb/day lb/day
Exhaust PM10
PM10 Total
Fugitive PM2.5
Exhaust PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2
6.2 Area by SubCategory
UnmitigatedROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Off-road Equipment -
1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data
Project Characteristics - LADWP, 2015 Power Integrated Resource Plan, Table C-1, (2015) C-12.
Land Use - See "LUXE Hotel Operational Inputs"
Construction Phase -
Off-road Equipment -
Off-road Equipment -
CO2 Intensity (lb/MWhr)
1163 CH4 Intensity (lb/MWhr)
0.029 N2O Intensity (lb/MWhr)
0.006
31
Climate Zone 11 Operational Year 2020
Utility Company Los Angeles Department of Water & Power
1.2 Other Project Characteristics
Urbanization Urban Wind Speed (m/s) 2.2 Precipitation Freq (Days)
Strip Mall 15.00 1000sqft 0.34 15,000.00 0
Apartments High Rise 290.00 Dwelling Unit 4.68 352,000.00 829
Quality Restaurant 15.00 1000sqft 0.34 15,000.00 0
Hotel 300.00 Room 10.00 280,000.00 0
City Park 0.47 Acre 0.47 20,473.20 0
Population
Enclosed Parking with Elevator 437.00 Space 3.93 174,800.00 0
1.1 Land Usage
Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 1 of 1 Date: 4/14/2016 7:10 PM
LUXE Hotel - Interim Year (Phase 1)
South Coast Air Basin, Winter
1.0 Project Characteristics
tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 290,000.00 352,000.00
tblProjectCharacteristics CO2IntensityFactor 1227.89 1163
tblFireplaces NumberWood 14.50 0.00
tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 435,600.00 280,000.00
tblFireplaces NumberGas 246.50 0.00
tblFireplaces NumberNoFireplace 29.00 0.00
tblFireplaces FireplaceHourDay 3.00 0.00
tblFireplaces FireplaceWoodMass 1,019.20 0.00
tblAreaCoating Area_Nonresidential_Interior 757910 453888
tblFireplaces FireplaceDayYear 25.00 0.00
Energy Use -
Waste Mitigation -
Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value
Water And Wastewater - See "LUXE Hotel Operational Inputs"
Solid Waste - See "LUXE Hotel Operational Inputs"
Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation -
Area Mitigation -
Energy Mitigation -
Water Mitigation -
Demolition -
Grading -
Architectural Coating -
Vehicle Trips - See "LUXE Hotel Operational Inputs" and "Project Trip and VMT Reductions"
Woodstoves - No woodstoves nor fireplaces.
Area Coating - Parking lot square footage adjustment as in "AQ Construction Model Inputs"
Off-road Equipment -
Off-road Equipment -
Off-road Equipment -
Off-road Equipment -
Trips and VMT -
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 42.04 29.07
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 6.07 3.63
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 8.19 6.13
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 94.36 86.47
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 7.16 3.63
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 1.59 0.00
tblVehicleTrips HS_TL 5.90 4.03
tblVehicleTrips HW_TL 14.70 10.05
tblVehicleTrips CW_TL 16.60 11.35
tblVehicleTrips HO_TL 8.70 5.95
tblVehicleTrips CW_TL 16.60 11.35
tblVehicleTrips CW_TL 16.60 11.35
tblVehicleTrips CW_TL 16.60 0.00
tblVehicleTrips CW_TL 16.60 0.00
tblVehicleTrips CNW_TL 6.90 4.72
tblVehicleTrips CNW_TL 6.90 4.72
tblVehicleTrips CNW_TL 6.90 0.00
tblVehicleTrips CNW_TL 6.90 4.72
tblVehicleTrips CC_TL 8.40 5.74
tblVehicleTrips CNW_TL 6.90 0.00
tblVehicleTrips CC_TL 8.40 5.74
tblVehicleTrips CC_TL 8.40 5.74
tblVehicleTrips CC_TL 8.40 0.00
tblVehicleTrips CC_TL 8.40 0.00
tblSolidWaste SolidWasteGenerationRate 13.69 14.00
tblSolidWaste SolidWasteGenerationRate 15.75 14.00
tblSolidWaste SolidWasteGenerationRate 0.04 0.00
tblSolidWaste SolidWasteGenerationRate 164.25 234.00
tblProjectCharacteristics OperationalYear 2014 2020
tblSolidWaste SolidWasteGenerationRate 133.40 647.00
tblWoodstoves WoodstoveWoodMass 999.60 0.00
tblWoodstoves NumberNoncatalytic 14.50 0.00
tblWoodstoves WoodstoveDayYear 25.00 0.00
tblWater OutdoorWaterUseRate 680,989.31 105,850.00
tblWoodstoves NumberCatalytic 14.50 0.00
tblWater OutdoorWaterUseRate 845,559.00 1,733,346.67
tblWater OutdoorWaterUseRate 290,617.38 1,733,346.67
tblWater OutdoorWaterUseRate 559,996.23 522,896.67
tblWater OutdoorWaterUseRate 0.00 493,402.13
tblWater IndoorWaterUseRate 1,111,087.82 167,900.00
tblWater OutdoorWaterUseRate 11,911,855.55 4,577,447.97
tblWater IndoorWaterUseRate 7,610,031.00 12,454,374.27
tblWater IndoorWaterUseRate 4,553,005.69 2,749,446.45
tblWater IndoorWaterUseRate 0.00 829,422.31
tblWater IndoorWaterUseRate 0.00 782,637.87
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 44.32 29.07
tblWater IndoorWaterUseRate 18,894,667.43 7,260,779.53
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 8.17 6.13
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 89.95 86.47
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 6.59 3.63
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 1.59 0.00
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 72.16 86.47
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 20.43 29.07
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 1.59 0.00
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 5.95 6.13
0.00 4.33 4.33 2.27 23.21 4.350.00 8.36 0.37 0.00 8.66 1.23
NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent Reduction
0.26 3.08 0.48 1.89
Exhaust PM10
PM10 Total
Fugitive PM2.5
Exhaust PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10
0.0000 20,647.7628
20,647.7628
0.7706 0.0567 20,681.5339
15.4773 0.6496 16.1269 4.1356 0.6247 4.7603Total 32.5651 24.2244 121.6730 0.2430
17,509.5997
17,509.5997
0.6688 17,523.6441
15.4773 0.3213 15.7986 4.1356 0.2964 4.4320Mobile 11.5718 21.3902 95.5929 0.2262
3,094.9150
3,094.9150 0.0593 0.0567 3,113.7501
0.1960 0.1960 0.1960 0.1960Energy 0.2837 2.5559 1.9963 0.0155
0.0000 43.2481 43.2481 0.0425 0.0000 44.13980.1323 0.1323 0.1323 0.1323Area 20.7097 0.2784 24.0838 1.2700e-003
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total
Fugitive PM2.5
Exhaust PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Mitigated Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10
Exhaust PM10
0.0000 21,583.1434
21,583.1434
0.7885 0.0739 21,622.6071
15.4773 0.7088 16.1861 4.1356 0.6839 4.8195Total 32.6509 24.9952 122.2641 0.2477
17,509.5997
17,509.5997
0.6688 17,523.6441
15.4773 0.3213 15.7986 4.1356 0.2964 4.4320Mobile 11.5718 21.3902 95.5929 0.2262
4,030.2956
4,030.2956 0.0773 0.0739 4,054.8233
0.2553 0.2553 0.2553 0.2553Energy 0.3694 3.3267 2.5875 0.0202
0.0000 43.2481 43.2481 0.0425 0.0000 44.13980.1323 0.1323 0.1323 0.1323Area 20.7097 0.2784 24.0838 1.2700e-003
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total
Fugitive PM2.5
Exhaust PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
2.2 Overall Operational
Unmitigated Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10
Exhaust PM10
2.0 Emissions Summary
0.001943 0.002491 0.004392 0.000576 0.002140
SBUS MH
0.510092 0.059583 0.181091 0.139410 0.042694 0.006692 0.016202 0.032692
LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY
64.40 19.00 45 40 15
LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1
69.00 19.00 38 18 44
Strip Mall 11.35 5.74 4.72 16.60
61.60 19.00 58 38 4
Quality Restaurant 11.35 5.74 4.72 12.00
0.00 0.00 0 0 0
Hotel 11.35 5.74 4.72 19.40
48.00 19.00 66 28 6
Enclosed Parking with Elevator 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
19.20 40.60 86 11 3
City Park 0.00 0.00 0.00 33.00
H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by
Apartments High Rise 10.05 4.03 5.95 40.20
4.3 Trip Type Information
Miles Trip % Trip Purpose %
Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W
Total 4,624.80 4,624.80 4,624.80 7,296,747 7,296,747
Strip Mall 436.05 436.05 436.05 567,845 567,845
Quality Restaurant 1,297.05 1,297.05 1297.05 1,268,719 1,268,719
Hotel 1,839.00 1,839.00 1839.00 3,000,443 3,000,443
Enclosed Parking with Elevator 0.00 0.00 0.00
City Park 0.00 0.00 0.00
Annual VMT
Apartments High Rise 1,052.70 1,052.70 1052.70 2,459,740 2,459,740
4.2 Trip Summary Information
Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated
Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT
17,509.5997
17,509.5997
0.6688 17,523.6441
15.4773 0.3213 15.7986 4.1356 0.2964 4.4320Unmitigated 11.5718 21.3902 95.5929 0.2262
17,509.5997
17,509.5997
0.6688 17,523.6441
15.4773 0.3213 15.7986 4.1356 0.2964 4.4320Mitigated 11.5718 21.3902 95.5929 0.2262
NBio- CO2
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Exhaust PM10
PM10 Total
Fugitive PM2.5
Exhaust PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2
4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile
4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10
4,030.2956 4,030.2956
0.0773 0.0739 4,054.8233
0.2553 0.2553 0.2553 0.2553Total 0.3694 3.3267 2.5875 0.0202
637.4672 637.4672 0.0122 0.0117 641.34670.0404 0.0404 0.0404 0.0404Apartments High Rise
5418.47 0.0584 0.4994 0.2125 3.1900e-003
8.2192 8.2192 1.6000e-004
1.5000e-004
8.26925.2000e-004
5.2000e-004
5.2000e-004
5.2000e-004
Strip Mall 69.863 7.5000e-004
6.8500e-003
5.7500e-003
4.0000e-005
1,126.5592 1,126.5592
0.0216 0.0207 1,133.4153
0.0714 0.0714 0.0714 0.0714Quality Restaurant 9575.75 0.1033 0.9388 0.7886 5.6300e-003
2,258.0500 2,258.0500
0.0433 0.0414 2,271.7921
0.1430 0.1430 0.1430 0.1430Hotel 19193.4 0.2070 1.8817 1.5806 0.0113
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Enclosed Parking with Elevator
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000City Park 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day
Exhaust PM10
PM10 Total
Fugitive PM2.5
Exhaust PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2
4,054.8233
5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
Unmitigated
NaturalGas Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10
0.2553 4,030.2956
4,030.2956 0.0773 0.07390.0202 0.2553 0.2553 0.2553
3,094.9150
3,094.9150 0.0593 0.0567 3,113.7501
NaturalGas Unmitigated
0.3694 3.3267 2.5875
0.1960 0.1960 0.1960 0.1960
Category lb/day lb/day
NaturalGas Mitigated
0.2837 2.5559 1.9963 0.0155
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2eFugitive PM10
Exhaust PM10
PM10 Total
Fugitive PM2.5
Exhaust PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
4.4 Fleet Mix
Historical Energy Use: N
5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy
Exceed Title 24
ROG NOx CO SO2
5.0 Energy Detail
44.13980.1323 0.0000 43.2481 43.2481 0.0425 0.00001.2700e-003
0.1323 0.1323 0.1323
43.2481 43.2481 0.0425 0.0000 44.1398
Unmitigated 20.7097 0.2784 24.0838
0.1323 0.1323 0.1323 0.1323 0.0000
Category lb/day lb/day
Mitigated 20.7097 0.2784 24.0838 1.2700e-003
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2eFugitive PM10
Exhaust PM10
PM10 Total
Fugitive PM2.5
Exhaust PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
6.0 Area Detail
6.1 Mitigation Measures Area
Use Low VOC Paint - Residential Interior
No Hearths Installed
ROG NOx CO SO2
3,094.9150 3,094.9150
0.0593 0.0567 3,113.7501
0.1960 0.1960 0.1960 0.1960Total 0.2837 2.5559 1.9963 0.0155
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000City Park 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
463.9058 463.9058 8.8900e-003
8.5000e-003
466.72900.0294 0.0294 0.0294 0.0294Apartments High Rise
3.9432 0.0425 0.3634 0.1546 2.3200e-003
6.1131 6.1131 1.2000e-004
1.1000e-004
6.15033.9000e-004
3.9000e-004
3.9000e-004
3.9000e-004
Strip Mall 0.0519616 5.6000e-004
5.0900e-003
4.2800e-003
3.0000e-005
1,047.8350 1,047.8350
0.0201 0.0192 1,054.2119
0.0664 0.0664 0.0664 0.0664Quality Restaurant 8.9066 0.0961 0.8732 0.7335 5.2400e-003
1,577.0611 1,577.0611
0.0302 0.0289 1,586.6588
0.0999 0.0999 0.0999 0.0999Hotel 13.405 0.1446 1.3142 1.1039 7.8900e-003
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Enclosed Parking with Elevator
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total
Fugitive PM2.5
Exhaust PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Mitigated
NaturalGas Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10
Exhaust PM10
0.0000 43.2481 43.2481 0.0425 0.0000 44.13980.1323 0.1323 0.1323 0.1323Total 20.7097 0.2784 24.0838 1.2700e-003
43.2481 43.2481 0.0425 44.13980.1323 0.1323 0.1323 0.1323Landscaping 0.7384 0.2784 24.0838 1.2700e-003
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hearth 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Consumer Products
16.9740
0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Architectural Coating
2.9973
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
SubCategory lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total
Fugitive PM2.5
Exhaust PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Mitigated
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10
Exhaust PM10
0.0000 43.2481 43.2481 0.0425 0.0000 44.13980.1323 0.1323 0.1323 0.1323Total 20.7097 0.2784 24.0838 1.2700e-003
43.2481 43.2481 0.0425 44.13980.1323 0.1323 0.1323 0.1323Landscaping 0.7384 0.2784 24.0838 1.2700e-003
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hearth 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Consumer Products
16.9740
0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Architectural Coating
2.9973
NBio- CO2
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
SubCategory lb/day lb/day
Exhaust PM10
PM10 Total
Fugitive PM2.5
Exhaust PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2
6.2 Area by SubCategory
Unmitigated
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10
1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data
Project Characteristics - LADWP, 2015 Power Integrated Resource Plan, Table C-1, (2015) C-12.
Land Use - See "LUXE Hotel Operational Inputs"
Construction Phase -
Off-road Equipment -
Off-road Equipment -
CO2 Intensity (lb/MWhr)
1163 CH4 Intensity (lb/MWhr)
0.029 N2O Intensity (lb/MWhr)
0.006
31
Climate Zone 11 Operational Year 2023
Utility Company Los Angeles Department of Water & Power
1.2 Other Project Characteristics
Urbanization Urban Wind Speed (m/s) 2.2 Precipitation Freq (Days)
Strip Mall 40.00 1000sqft 0.92 40,000.00 0
Apartments High Rise 650.00 Dwelling Unit 10.48 770,000.00 1060
Quality Restaurant 40.00 1000sqft 0.92 40,000.00 0
Hotel 300.00 Room 10.00 280,000.00 0
City Park 1.14 Acre 1.14 49,800.00 0
Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces 5.00 1000sqft 0.11 5,000.00 0
Population
Enclosed Parking with Elevator 799.00 Space 7.19 319,600.00 0
1.1 Land Usage
Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 1 of 1 Date: 4/14/2016 6:27 PM
LUXE Hotel - Full Buildout Operations
South Coast Air Basin, Summer
1.0 Project Characteristics
tblFireplaces FireplaceHourDay 3.00 0.00
tblFireplaces FireplaceWoodMass 1,019.20 0.00
tblAreaCoating Area_Nonresidential_Interior 1101600 345888
tblFireplaces FireplaceDayYear 25.00 0.00
tblArchitecturalCoating ConstArea_Residential_Exterior 519,750.00 438,750.00
tblArchitecturalCoating ConstArea_Residential_Interior 1,559,250.00 1,316,250.00
Area Mitigation -
Energy Mitigation -
Water Mitigation -
Waste Mitigation -
Vechicle Emission Factors -
Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value
Woodstoves - No woodstoves nor fireplaces.
Area Coating - Parking lot square footage adjustment as in "AQ Construction Model Inputs"
Energy Use -
Water And Wastewater - See "LUXE Hotel Operational Inputs"
Solid Waste - See "LUXE Hotel Operational Inputs"
Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation -
Demolition -
Grading -
Architectural Coating -
Vehicle Trips - See "LUXE Hotel Operational Inputs" and "Project Trip and VMT Reductions"
Vechicle Emission Factors -
Vechicle Emission Factors -
Off-road Equipment -
Off-road Equipment -
Off-road Equipment -
Off-road Equipment -
Off-road Equipment -
Trips and VMT -
tblVehicleTrips CW_TL 16.60 11.35
tblVehicleTrips CW_TL 16.60 0.00
tblVehicleTrips CW_TL 16.60 0.00
tblVehicleTrips CW_TL 16.60 0.00
tblVehicleTrips CNW_TL 6.90 4.72
tblVehicleTrips CNW_TL 6.90 4.72
tblVehicleTrips CNW_TL 6.90 4.72
tblVehicleTrips CNW_TL 6.90 0.00
tblVehicleTrips CNW_TL 6.90 0.00
tblVehicleTrips CNW_TL 6.90 0.00
tblVehicleTrips CC_TL 8.40 5.74
tblVehicleTrips CC_TL 8.40 5.74
tblVehicleTrips CC_TL 8.40 5.74
tblVehicleTrips CC_TL 8.40 0.00
tblVehicleTrips CC_TL 8.40 0.00
tblVehicleTrips CC_TL 8.40 0.00
tblSolidWaste SolidWasteGenerationRate 36.50 37.00
tblSolidWaste SolidWasteGenerationRate 42.00 37.00
tblSolidWaste SolidWasteGenerationRate 0.10 0.00
tblSolidWaste SolidWasteGenerationRate 164.25 234.00
tblProjectCharacteristics OperationalYear 2014 2023
tblSolidWaste SolidWasteGenerationRate 299.00 1,450.00
tblLandUse Population 1,859.00 1,060.00
tblProjectCharacteristics CO2IntensityFactor 1227.89 1163
tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 435,600.00 280,000.00
tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 650,000.00 770,000.00
tblFireplaces NumberWood 32.50 0.00
tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 49,658.40 49,800.00
tblFireplaces NumberGas 552.50 0.00
tblFireplaces NumberNoFireplace 65.00 0.00
tblWater OutdoorWaterUseRate 0.00 805,956.01
tblWater OutdoorWaterUseRate 845,559.00 7,851,670.73
tblWater OutdoorWaterUseRate 26,698,986.59 10,262,792.60
tblWater OutdoorWaterUseRate 1,358,288.74 634,394.33
tblWater IndoorWaterUseRate 12,141,348.50 7,331,857.20
tblWater IndoorWaterUseRate 2,962,900.86 447,733.33
tblWater IndoorWaterUseRate 0.00 1,278,412.99
tblWater IndoorWaterUseRate 7,610,031.00 12,454,374.27
tblWater IndoorWaterUseRate 42,350,116.65 16,278,912.40
tblWater IndoorWaterUseRate 0.00 1,006,280.67
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 89.95 86.48
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 44.32 29.03
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 1.59 0.00
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 8.17 6.13
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 20.43 29.03
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 6.59 3.29
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 5.95 6.13
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 72.16 86.48
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 6.07 3.29
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 1.59 0.00
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 94.36 86.48
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 42.04 29.03
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 1.59 0.00
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 8.19 6.13
tblVehicleTrips HW_TL 14.70 10.05
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 7.16 3.29
tblVehicleTrips HO_TL 8.70 5.95
tblVehicleTrips HS_TL 5.90 4.03
tblVehicleTrips CW_TL 16.60 11.35
tblVehicleTrips CW_TL 16.60 11.35
0.0000 44,155.2014
44,155.2014
2.0454 0.0995 44,229.0005
27.3215 1.4786 28.8001 7.2982 1.4097 8.7079Total 66.5769 62.6817 313.5807 0.4474
38,631.0048
38,631.0048
1.8479 38,669.8097
27.3215 0.8376 28.1590 7.2982 0.7686 8.0668Mobile 30.7513 57.5915 256.4040 0.4174
5,427.3782
5,427.3782 0.1040 0.0995 5,460.4083
0.3437 0.3437 0.3437 0.3437Energy 0.4975 4.4708 3.4179 0.0271
0.0000 96.8184 96.8184 0.0935 0.0000 98.78260.2973 0.2973 0.2973 0.2973Area 35.3281 0.6194 53.7588 2.8400e-003
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total
Fugitive PM2.5
Exhaust PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Mitigated Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10
Exhaust PM10
0.0000 45,440.7547
45,440.7547
2.0700 0.1231 45,522.3775
27.3215 1.5600 28.8815 7.2982 1.4911 8.7893Total 66.6947 63.7336 314.3380 0.4538
38,631.0048
38,631.0048
1.8479 38,669.8097
27.3215 0.8376 28.1590 7.2982 0.7686 8.0668Mobile 30.7513 57.5915 256.4040 0.4174
6,712.9315
6,712.9315 0.1287 0.1231 6,753.7853
0.4252 0.4252 0.4252 0.4252Energy 0.6154 5.5227 4.1752 0.0336
0.0000 96.8184 96.8184 0.0935 0.0000 98.78260.2973 0.2973 0.2973 0.2973Area 35.3281 0.6194 53.7588 2.8400e-003
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total
Fugitive PM2.5
Exhaust PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
2.2 Overall Operational
Unmitigated Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10
Exhaust PM10
2.0 Emissions Summary
tblWoodstoves WoodstoveDayYear 25.00 0.00
tblWoodstoves WoodstoveWoodMass 999.60 0.00
tblWoodstoves NumberCatalytic 32.50 0.00
tblWoodstoves NumberNoncatalytic 32.50 0.00
tblWater OutdoorWaterUseRate 774,979.69 4,622,257.80
tblWater OutdoorWaterUseRate 1,815,971.49 282,266.67
Total 8,597.90 8,597.90 8,597.90 12,893,077 12,893,077
Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces 0.00 0.00 0.00
Strip Mall 1,161.20 1,161.20 1161.20 1,512,170 1,512,170
Quality Restaurant 3,459.20 3,459.20 3459.20 3,383,641 3,383,641
Hotel 1,839.00 1,839.00 1839.00 3,000,443 3,000,443
Enclosed Parking with Elevator 0.00 0.00 0.00
City Park 0.00 0.00 0.00
Annual VMT
Apartments High Rise 2,138.50 2,138.50 2138.50 4,996,822 4,996,822
4.2 Trip Summary Information
Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated
Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT
38,631.0048
38,631.0048
1.8479 38,669.8097
27.3215 0.8376 28.1590 7.2982 0.7686 8.0668Unmitigated 30.7513 57.5915 256.4040 0.4174
38,631.0048
38,631.0048
1.8479 38,669.8097
27.3215 0.8376 28.1590 7.2982 0.7686 8.0668Mitigated 30.7513 57.5915 256.4040 0.4174
NBio- CO2
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Exhaust PM10
PM10 Total
Fugitive PM2.5
Exhaust PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2
4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile
4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10
0.00 2.83 2.83 1.19 19.15 2.840.00 5.22 0.28 0.00 5.46 0.93
NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent Reduction
0.18 1.65 0.24 1.41
Exhaust PM10
PM10 Total
Fugitive PM2.5
Exhaust PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10
6,753.7853
0.4252 6,712.9315
6,712.9315 0.1287 0.12310.0336 0.4252 0.4252 0.4252
5,427.3782
5,427.3782 0.1040 0.0995 5,460.4083
NaturalGas Unmitigated
0.6154 5.5227 4.1752
0.3437 0.3437 0.3437 0.3437
Category lb/day lb/day
NaturalGas Mitigated
0.4975 4.4708 3.4179 0.0271
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2eFugitive PM10
Exhaust PM10
PM10 Total
Fugitive PM2.5
Exhaust PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
4.4 Fleet Mix
Historical Energy Use: N
5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy
Exceed Title 24
ROG NOx CO SO2
0.001923 0.002530 0.004314 0.000602 0.002075
5.0 Energy Detail
SBUS MH
0.516610 0.060517 0.179979 0.140587 0.041566 0.006616 0.015092 0.027587
LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY
0.00 0.00 0 0 0
LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1
64.40 19.00 45 40 15
Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
69.00 19.00 38 18 44
Strip Mall 11.35 5.74 4.72 16.60
61.60 19.00 58 38 4
Quality Restaurant 11.35 5.74 4.72 12.00
0.00 0.00 0 0 0
Hotel 11.35 5.74 4.72 19.40
48.00 19.00 66 28 6
Enclosed Parking with Elevator 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
19.20 40.60 86 11 3
City Park 0.00 0.00 0.00 33.00
H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by
Apartments High Rise 10.05 4.03 5.95 40.20
4.3 Trip Type Information
Miles Trip % Trip Purpose %
Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W
6,712.9315 6,712.9315
0.1287 0.1231 6,753.7853
0.4252 0.4252 0.4252 0.4252Total 0.6154 5.5227 4.1752 0.0336
1,428.8058 1,428.8058
0.0274 0.0262 1,437.5013
0.0905 0.0905 0.0905 0.0905Apartments High Rise
12144.8 0.1310 1.1192 0.4763 7.1400e-003
21.9178 21.9178 4.2000e-004
4.0000e-004
22.05121.3900e-003
1.3900e-003
1.3900e-003
1.3900e-003
Strip Mall 186.301 2.0100e-003
0.0183 0.0153 1.1000e-004
3,004.1579 3,004.1579
0.0576 0.0551 3,022.4407
0.1903 0.1903 0.1903 0.1903Quality Restaurant 25535.3 0.2754 2.5035 2.1029 0.0150
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
2,258.0500 2,258.0500
0.0433 0.0414 2,271.7921
0.1430 0.1430 0.1430 0.1430Hotel 19193.4 0.2070 1.8817 1.5806 0.0113
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Enclosed Parking with Elevator
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000City Park 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day
Exhaust PM10
PM10 Total
Fugitive PM2.5
Exhaust PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2
5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
Unmitigated
NaturalGas Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10
98.78260.2973 0.0000 96.8184 96.8184 0.0935 0.00002.8400e-003
0.2973 0.2973 0.2973
96.8184 96.8184 0.0935 0.0000 98.7826
Unmitigated 35.3281 0.6194 53.7588
0.2973 0.2973 0.2973 0.2973 0.0000
Category lb/day lb/day
Mitigated 35.3281 0.6194 53.7588 2.8400e-003
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2eFugitive PM10
Exhaust PM10
PM10 Total
Fugitive PM2.5
Exhaust PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
6.0 Area Detail
6.1 Mitigation Measures Area
Use Low VOC Paint - Residential Interior
No Hearths Installed
ROG NOx CO SO2
5,427.3782 5,427.3782
0.1040 0.0995 5,460.4083
0.3437 0.3437 0.3437 0.3437Total 0.4975 4.4708 3.4179 0.0271
1,039.7888 1,039.7888
0.0199 0.0191 1,046.1168
0.0659 0.0659 0.0659 0.0659Apartments High Rise
8.8382 0.0953 0.8145 0.3466 5.2000e-003
16.3017 16.3017 3.1000e-004
3.0000e-004
16.40091.0300e-003
1.0300e-003
1.0300e-003
1.0300e-003
Strip Mall 0.138564 1.4900e-003
0.0136 0.0114 8.0000e-005
2,794.2266 2,794.2266
0.0536 0.0512 2,811.2318
0.1770 0.1770 0.1770 0.1770Quality Restaurant 23.7509 0.2561 2.3285 1.9560 0.0140
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
1,577.0611 1,577.0611
0.0302 0.0289 1,586.6588
0.0999 0.0999 0.0999 0.0999Hotel 13.405 0.1446 1.3142 1.1039 7.8900e-003
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Enclosed Parking with Elevator
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000City Park 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total
Fugitive PM2.5
Exhaust PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Mitigated
NaturalGas Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10
Exhaust PM10
0.0000 96.8184 96.8184 0.0935 0.0000 98.78260.2973 0.2973 0.2973 0.2973Total 35.3281 0.6194 53.7588 2.8400e-003
96.8184 96.8184 0.0935 98.78260.2973 0.2973 0.2973 0.2973Landscaping 1.6271 0.6194 53.7588 2.8400e-003
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hearth 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Consumer Products
29.7871
0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Architectural Coating
3.9138
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
SubCategory lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total
Fugitive PM2.5
Exhaust PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Mitigated
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10
Exhaust PM10
0.0000 96.8184 96.8184 0.0935 0.0000 98.78260.2973 0.2973 0.2973 0.2973Total 35.3281 0.6194 53.7588 2.8400e-003
96.8184 96.8184 0.0935 98.78260.2973 0.2973 0.2973 0.2973Landscaping 1.6271 0.6194 53.7588 2.8400e-003
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hearth 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Consumer Products
29.7871
0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Architectural Coating
3.9138
NBio- CO2
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
SubCategory lb/day lb/day
Exhaust PM10
PM10 Total
Fugitive PM2.5
Exhaust PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2
6.2 Area by SubCategory
UnmitigatedROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data
Project Characteristics - LADWP, 2015 Power Integrated Resource Plan, Table C-1, (2015) C-12.
Land Use - See "LUXE Hotel Operational Inputs"
Construction Phase -
Off-road Equipment -
Off-road Equipment -
CO2 Intensity (lb/MWhr)
1163 CH4 Intensity (lb/MWhr)
0.029 N2O Intensity (lb/MWhr)
0.006
31
Climate Zone 11 Operational Year 2023
Utility Company Los Angeles Department of Water & Power
1.2 Other Project Characteristics
Urbanization Urban Wind Speed (m/s) 2.2 Precipitation Freq (Days)
Strip Mall 40.00 1000sqft 0.92 40,000.00 0
Apartments High Rise 650.00 Dwelling Unit 10.48 770,000.00 1060
Quality Restaurant 40.00 1000sqft 0.92 40,000.00 0
Hotel 300.00 Room 10.00 280,000.00 0
City Park 1.14 Acre 1.14 49,800.00 0
Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces 5.00 1000sqft 0.11 5,000.00 0
Population
Enclosed Parking with Elevator 799.00 Space 7.19 319,600.00 0
1.1 Land Usage
Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 1 of 1 Date: 4/14/2016 6:28 PM
LUXE Hotel - Full Buildout Operations
South Coast Air Basin, Winter
1.0 Project Characteristics
tblFireplaces FireplaceHourDay 3.00 0.00
tblFireplaces FireplaceWoodMass 1,019.20 0.00
tblAreaCoating Area_Nonresidential_Interior 1101600 345888
tblFireplaces FireplaceDayYear 25.00 0.00
tblArchitecturalCoating ConstArea_Residential_Exterior 519,750.00 438,750.00
tblArchitecturalCoating ConstArea_Residential_Interior 1,559,250.00 1,316,250.00
Area Mitigation -
Energy Mitigation -
Water Mitigation -
Waste Mitigation -
Vechicle Emission Factors -
Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value
Woodstoves - No woodstoves nor fireplaces.
Area Coating - Parking lot square footage adjustment as in "AQ Construction Model Inputs"
Energy Use -
Water And Wastewater - See "LUXE Hotel Operational Inputs"
Solid Waste - See "LUXE Hotel Operational Inputs"
Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation -
Demolition -
Grading -
Architectural Coating -
Vehicle Trips - See "LUXE Hotel Operational Inputs" and "Project Trip and VMT Reductions"
Vechicle Emission Factors -
Vechicle Emission Factors -
Off-road Equipment -
Off-road Equipment -
Off-road Equipment -
Off-road Equipment -
Off-road Equipment -
Trips and VMT -
tblVehicleTrips CW_TL 16.60 11.35
tblVehicleTrips CW_TL 16.60 0.00
tblVehicleTrips CW_TL 16.60 0.00
tblVehicleTrips CW_TL 16.60 0.00
tblVehicleTrips CNW_TL 6.90 4.72
tblVehicleTrips CNW_TL 6.90 4.72
tblVehicleTrips CNW_TL 6.90 4.72
tblVehicleTrips CNW_TL 6.90 0.00
tblVehicleTrips CNW_TL 6.90 0.00
tblVehicleTrips CNW_TL 6.90 0.00
tblVehicleTrips CC_TL 8.40 5.74
tblVehicleTrips CC_TL 8.40 5.74
tblVehicleTrips CC_TL 8.40 5.74
tblVehicleTrips CC_TL 8.40 0.00
tblVehicleTrips CC_TL 8.40 0.00
tblVehicleTrips CC_TL 8.40 0.00
tblSolidWaste SolidWasteGenerationRate 36.50 37.00
tblSolidWaste SolidWasteGenerationRate 42.00 37.00
tblSolidWaste SolidWasteGenerationRate 0.10 0.00
tblSolidWaste SolidWasteGenerationRate 164.25 234.00
tblProjectCharacteristics OperationalYear 2014 2023
tblSolidWaste SolidWasteGenerationRate 299.00 1,450.00
tblLandUse Population 1,859.00 1,060.00
tblProjectCharacteristics CO2IntensityFactor 1227.89 1163
tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 435,600.00 280,000.00
tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 650,000.00 770,000.00
tblFireplaces NumberWood 32.50 0.00
tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 49,658.40 49,800.00
tblFireplaces NumberGas 552.50 0.00
tblFireplaces NumberNoFireplace 65.00 0.00
tblWater OutdoorWaterUseRate 0.00 805,956.01
tblWater OutdoorWaterUseRate 845,559.00 7,851,670.73
tblWater OutdoorWaterUseRate 26,698,986.59 10,262,792.60
tblWater OutdoorWaterUseRate 1,358,288.74 634,394.33
tblWater IndoorWaterUseRate 12,141,348.50 7,331,857.20
tblWater IndoorWaterUseRate 2,962,900.86 447,733.33
tblWater IndoorWaterUseRate 0.00 1,278,412.99
tblWater IndoorWaterUseRate 7,610,031.00 12,454,374.27
tblWater IndoorWaterUseRate 42,350,116.65 16,278,912.40
tblWater IndoorWaterUseRate 0.00 1,006,280.67
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 89.95 86.48
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 44.32 29.03
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 1.59 0.00
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 8.17 6.13
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 20.43 29.03
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 6.59 3.29
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 5.95 6.13
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 72.16 86.48
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 6.07 3.29
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 1.59 0.00
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 94.36 86.48
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 42.04 29.03
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 1.59 0.00
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 8.19 6.13
tblVehicleTrips HW_TL 14.70 10.05
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 7.16 3.29
tblVehicleTrips HO_TL 8.70 5.95
tblVehicleTrips HS_TL 5.90 4.03
tblVehicleTrips CW_TL 16.60 11.35
tblVehicleTrips CW_TL 16.60 11.35
0.0000 42,261.9812
42,261.9812
2.0476 0.0995 42,335.8270
27.3215 1.4897 28.8111 7.2982 1.4198 8.7180Total 68.2281 65.4309 322.4446 0.4268
36,737.7846
36,737.7846
1.8501 36,776.6361
27.3215 0.8486 28.1701 7.2982 0.7788 8.0770Mobile 32.4025 60.3407 265.2679 0.3968
5,427.3782
5,427.3782 0.1040 0.0995 5,460.4083
0.3437 0.3437 0.3437 0.3437Energy 0.4975 4.4708 3.4179 0.0271
0.0000 96.8184 96.8184 0.0935 0.0000 98.78260.2973 0.2973 0.2973 0.2973Area 35.3281 0.6194 53.7588 2.8400e-003
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total
Fugitive PM2.5
Exhaust PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Mitigated Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10
Exhaust PM10
0.0000 43,547.5345
43,547.5345
2.0723 0.1231 43,629.2039
27.3215 1.5711 28.8926 7.2982 1.5013 8.7995Total 68.3459 66.4827 323.2018 0.4332
36,737.7846
36,737.7846
1.8501 36,776.6361
27.3215 0.8486 28.1701 7.2982 0.7788 8.0770Mobile 32.4025 60.3407 265.2679 0.3968
6,712.9315
6,712.9315 0.1287 0.1231 6,753.7853
0.4252 0.4252 0.4252 0.4252Energy 0.6154 5.5227 4.1752 0.0336
0.0000 96.8184 96.8184 0.0935 0.0000 98.78260.2973 0.2973 0.2973 0.2973Area 35.3281 0.6194 53.7588 2.8400e-003
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total
Fugitive PM2.5
Exhaust PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
2.2 Overall Operational
Unmitigated Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10
Exhaust PM10
2.0 Emissions Summary
tblWoodstoves WoodstoveDayYear 25.00 0.00
tblWoodstoves WoodstoveWoodMass 999.60 0.00
tblWoodstoves NumberCatalytic 32.50 0.00
tblWoodstoves NumberNoncatalytic 32.50 0.00
tblWater OutdoorWaterUseRate 774,979.69 4,622,257.80
tblWater OutdoorWaterUseRate 1,815,971.49 282,266.67
Total 8,597.90 8,597.90 8,597.90 12,893,077 12,893,077
Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces 0.00 0.00 0.00
Strip Mall 1,161.20 1,161.20 1161.20 1,512,170 1,512,170
Quality Restaurant 3,459.20 3,459.20 3459.20 3,383,641 3,383,641
Hotel 1,839.00 1,839.00 1839.00 3,000,443 3,000,443
Enclosed Parking with Elevator 0.00 0.00 0.00
City Park 0.00 0.00 0.00
Annual VMT
Apartments High Rise 2,138.50 2,138.50 2138.50 4,996,822 4,996,822
4.2 Trip Summary Information
Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated
Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT
36,737.7846
36,737.7846
1.8501 36,776.6361
27.3215 0.8486 28.1701 7.2982 0.7788 8.0770Unmitigated 32.4025 60.3407 265.2679 0.3968
36,737.7846
36,737.7846
1.8501 36,776.6361
27.3215 0.8486 28.1701 7.2982 0.7788 8.0770Mitigated 32.4025 60.3407 265.2679 0.3968
NBio- CO2
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Exhaust PM10
PM10 Total
Fugitive PM2.5
Exhaust PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2
4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile
4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10
0.00 2.95 2.95 1.19 19.15 2.960.00 5.18 0.28 0.00 5.42 0.93
NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent Reduction
0.17 1.58 0.23 1.48
Exhaust PM10
PM10 Total
Fugitive PM2.5
Exhaust PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10
6,753.7853
0.4252 6,712.9315
6,712.9315 0.1287 0.12310.0336 0.4252 0.4252 0.4252
5,427.3782
5,427.3782 0.1040 0.0995 5,460.4083
NaturalGas Unmitigated
0.6154 5.5227 4.1752
0.3437 0.3437 0.3437 0.3437
Category lb/day lb/day
NaturalGas Mitigated
0.4975 4.4708 3.4179 0.0271
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2eFugitive PM10
Exhaust PM10
PM10 Total
Fugitive PM2.5
Exhaust PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
4.4 Fleet Mix
Historical Energy Use: N
5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy
Exceed Title 24
ROG NOx CO SO2
0.001923 0.002530 0.004314 0.000602 0.002075
5.0 Energy Detail
SBUS MH
0.516610 0.060517 0.179979 0.140587 0.041566 0.006616 0.015092 0.027587
LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY
0.00 0.00 0 0 0
LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1
64.40 19.00 45 40 15
Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
69.00 19.00 38 18 44
Strip Mall 11.35 5.74 4.72 16.60
61.60 19.00 58 38 4
Quality Restaurant 11.35 5.74 4.72 12.00
0.00 0.00 0 0 0
Hotel 11.35 5.74 4.72 19.40
48.00 19.00 66 28 6
Enclosed Parking with Elevator 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
19.20 40.60 86 11 3
City Park 0.00 0.00 0.00 33.00
H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by
Apartments High Rise 10.05 4.03 5.95 40.20
4.3 Trip Type Information
Miles Trip % Trip Purpose %
Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W
6,712.9315 6,712.9315
0.1287 0.1231 6,753.7853
0.4252 0.4252 0.4252 0.4252Total 0.6154 5.5227 4.1752 0.0336
1,428.8058 1,428.8058
0.0274 0.0262 1,437.5013
0.0905 0.0905 0.0905 0.0905Apartments High Rise
12144.8 0.1310 1.1192 0.4763 7.1400e-003
21.9178 21.9178 4.2000e-004
4.0000e-004
22.05121.3900e-003
1.3900e-003
1.3900e-003
1.3900e-003
Strip Mall 186.301 2.0100e-003
0.0183 0.0153 1.1000e-004
3,004.1579 3,004.1579
0.0576 0.0551 3,022.4407
0.1903 0.1903 0.1903 0.1903Quality Restaurant 25535.3 0.2754 2.5035 2.1029 0.0150
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
2,258.0500 2,258.0500
0.0433 0.0414 2,271.7921
0.1430 0.1430 0.1430 0.1430Hotel 19193.4 0.2070 1.8817 1.5806 0.0113
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Enclosed Parking with Elevator
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000City Park 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day
Exhaust PM10
PM10 Total
Fugitive PM2.5
Exhaust PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2
5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
Unmitigated
NaturalGas Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10
98.78260.2973 0.0000 96.8184 96.8184 0.0935 0.00002.8400e-003
0.2973 0.2973 0.2973
96.8184 96.8184 0.0935 0.0000 98.7826
Unmitigated 35.3281 0.6194 53.7588
0.2973 0.2973 0.2973 0.2973 0.0000
Category lb/day lb/day
Mitigated 35.3281 0.6194 53.7588 2.8400e-003
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2eFugitive PM10
Exhaust PM10
PM10 Total
Fugitive PM2.5
Exhaust PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
6.0 Area Detail
6.1 Mitigation Measures Area
Use Low VOC Paint - Residential Interior
No Hearths Installed
ROG NOx CO SO2
5,427.3782 5,427.3782
0.1040 0.0995 5,460.4083
0.3437 0.3437 0.3437 0.3437Total 0.4975 4.4708 3.4179 0.0271
1,039.7888 1,039.7888
0.0199 0.0191 1,046.1168
0.0659 0.0659 0.0659 0.0659Apartments High Rise
8.8382 0.0953 0.8145 0.3466 5.2000e-003
16.3017 16.3017 3.1000e-004
3.0000e-004
16.40091.0300e-003
1.0300e-003
1.0300e-003
1.0300e-003
Strip Mall 0.138564 1.4900e-003
0.0136 0.0114 8.0000e-005
2,794.2266 2,794.2266
0.0536 0.0512 2,811.2318
0.1770 0.1770 0.1770 0.1770Quality Restaurant 23.7509 0.2561 2.3285 1.9560 0.0140
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
1,577.0611 1,577.0611
0.0302 0.0289 1,586.6588
0.0999 0.0999 0.0999 0.0999Hotel 13.405 0.1446 1.3142 1.1039 7.8900e-003
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Enclosed Parking with Elevator
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000City Park 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total
Fugitive PM2.5
Exhaust PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Mitigated
NaturalGas Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10
Exhaust PM10
0.0000 96.8184 96.8184 0.0935 0.0000 98.78260.2973 0.2973 0.2973 0.2973Total 35.3281 0.6194 53.7588 2.8400e-003
96.8184 96.8184 0.0935 98.78260.2973 0.2973 0.2973 0.2973Landscaping 1.6271 0.6194 53.7588 2.8400e-003
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hearth 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Consumer Products
29.7871
0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Architectural Coating
3.9138
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
SubCategory lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total
Fugitive PM2.5
Exhaust PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Mitigated
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10
Exhaust PM10
0.0000 96.8184 96.8184 0.0935 0.0000 98.78260.2973 0.2973 0.2973 0.2973Total 35.3281 0.6194 53.7588 2.8400e-003
96.8184 96.8184 0.0935 98.78260.2973 0.2973 0.2973 0.2973Landscaping 1.6271 0.6194 53.7588 2.8400e-003
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hearth 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Consumer Products
29.7871
0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Architectural Coating
3.9138
NBio- CO2
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
SubCategory lb/day lb/day
Exhaust PM10
PM10 Total
Fugitive PM2.5
Exhaust PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
Bio- CO2
6.2 Area by SubCategory
Unmitigated
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10
AppendixA.3OperationalEmissions(EMFAC2014)
ExistingandProject(InterimandFullBuildout)TripandVMTReductions
ExistingandProject(InterimandFullBuildout)MobileSourceEmissions
1020 S. Figueroa Street ProjectDraft Environmental Impact ReportQuantifying Greenhouse Gas Mitigation Measures ‐ Transportation (Based on CAPCOA Guidance (August 2010))
Purpose:This section provides calculations for vehicle miles traveled (VMT) reductions from BAU characteristics based on guidance contained in the California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA),Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Mitigation Measures (August 2010).
Notes on Calculations:1. Percent VMT reduced is calculated individually for each measure based on the formulas for each measure.2. Certain individual measures or groups of measures have VMT reduction caps, as indicated in the calculations. 3. The location type determines the VMT reduction caps for LUT‐2 as well as the global transportation VMT reduction cap.4. The VMT reduction cap for the LUT/SDT/PDT/TST group of measures is 5% less than the global transportation cap.5. When summing the total VMT reductions from multiple measures, a double counting correction is applied as follows.
a. The total percent reductions from the different measures are NOT added together to avoid double counting. VMT reductions for each successive measure are applied only to the "remaining" VMT after the reductions from the previous measure have been taken out.
b. In order to calculate the "effective" VMT reduction percent due to multiple measures, the following formula is applied:Total Percent VMT Reduction % =
= 100% ‐ [(100% ‐ Measure 1 Reduction %) × (100% ‐ Measure 2 Reduction %) × (100% ‐ Measure 3 Reduction %) × … ]
Example:Measure 1 VMT Reduction = 5%Measure 2 VMT Reduction = 10%Measure 3 VMT Reduction = 7%Total Percent VMT Reduction % = 100% ‐ [(100% ‐ 5%) × (100% ‐ 10%) × (100% ‐ 7%)]
= 100% ‐ [(95%) × (90%) × (93%)] = 100% ‐ 79.5% = 20.5% (this is less than 5% + 10% + 7% = 22%, due to the double counting correction)
Note: Values in the above example are in percent format and 95% is equivalent to 0.95 in decimal format.Multiplying values that are less than 1 in decimal format results in a smaller number.
EXISTING SETTINGDraft Environmental Impact ReportQuantifying Greenhouse Gas Mitigation Measures ‐ Transportation (Based on CAPCOA Guidance (August 2010))
BUSINESS AS USUAL PROJECT
Location Type Global % VMT Reduction Cap Location Type Global % VMT Reduction CapUrban: 75% Suburban Center: 20%Less than 5 miles from central business district Typically 20 miles or more from central business districtJobs‐rich (jobs/housing ratio greater than 1.5) Balanced jobs‐housingTypical buildings are 6 stories or higher Typical buildings are 2 storiesGrid street pattern Grid street patternMinimal setbacks Setbacks 0 ‐ 20 feetParking constrained on‐ and off‐street Parking somewhat constrained on‐street; ample off‐streetParking prices high/highest in the region Parking prices low (if priced at all)High‐quality rail; bus service at 10 min or less in peak hours Bus service at 20 ‐ 30 min and/or commuter rail station
Compact Infill: 40% Suburban: 15%Typically 5 ‐ 15 miles from central business district Typically 20 miles or more from central business districtBalanced jobs‐housing (jobs/housing ratio from 0.9 to 1.2) Housing‐richTypical buildings are 2 ‐ 4 stories Typical buildings are 1 ‐ 2 storiesGrid street pattern Curvilinear street pattern (cul‐de‐sac based)Setbacks 0 ‐ 20 feet Parking between street and buildings; large lot residential Total Global Transportation VMT Reduction = 29.82% Cap: 75%Parking constrained Parking ample; largely surface lot‐based (Includes double counting correction.)Parking prices low/moderate No parking pricesRail w/in 2 miles; bus service at 15 min or less in peak hours Limited bus service at 30 minute headways or more Total LUT/SDT/PDT/TST VMT Reduction = 29.82% Cap: 70%
Land Use/Location Transportation Measures (65% Reduction Cap) Total LUT % VMT Reduction = 29.82% Cap: 65%
LUT‐1 Increase Density % VMT Reduction = A × B [not to exceed 30%] % VMT Reduction = 0.08% Cap: 30%
A (housing) = (Number of DU/acre ‐ 7.6 ) / 7.6 Number of DU/acre: ‐ A = 0%A (jobs) = (Number of Jobs/acre ‐ 20 ) / 20 Number of Jobs/acre: 43.7 A = 119%B = 0.07%
LUT‐2 Increase Location Efficiency % VMT Reduction Cap for all LUT measures Urban LUT % VMT Reduction Cap: 65%Compact Infill LUT % VMT Reduction Cap: 30%
Suburban Center LUT % VMT Reduction Cap: 10%
LUT‐3 Increase Diversity of Urban and % VMT Reduction = Land Use × B [not to exceed 30%] % VMT Reduction = 0.00% Cap: 30%Suburban Developments (Mixed Use) Land Use = % increase in land use index vs. single use
= (Land Use Index ‐ 0.15) / 0.15 Single family sqft: ‐ a1 = ‐
Land Use Index = ‐a / ln(6) Multi‐family sqft: ‐ a2 = ‐ a = ∑ ai × ln(ai) Commercial sqft: ‐ a3 = ‐ ai = building floor area / total square feet of area considered Industrial sqft: ‐ a4 = ‐ a1 = single family Institutional sqft: ‐ a5 = ‐ a2 = multi‐family Park sqft: ‐ a6 = ‐ a3 = commercial B = 0.09 Total sqft: ‐ a4 = industrial
(ACOUNTED FOR IN TRAFFIC STUDY) a5 = institutional (Note: If ai = 0, then set ai = 0.0000001)
a6 = park
LUT‐4 Increase Destination Accessibility % VMT Reduction = Center Distance × B [not to exceed 20%] % VMT Reduction = 18.33% Cap: 20%Center Distance = (12 ‐ Miles to downtown or job center) / 12B = 0.20 Miles to downtown or job center: 1.0
(Note: Only effective for 8 miles or less)
Urban: The urban project will be predominantly characterized by properties on which various uses, such as office, commercial, institutional, and residential, are combined in a single building or on a single site in an integrated development project with functional interrelationships and a coherent physical design.
Suburban: The suburban project will have at least three uses of the following on site and/or offsite within ¼‐mile: Residential Development, Retail Development, Park, Open Space, or Office.
LUT‐5 Increase Transit Accessibility % VMT Reduction = Transit × B [not to exceed 30%] % VMT Reduction = 0.00% Cap: 30%Transit = % project transit ‐ % typical ITE transit
(ACOUNTED FOR IN TRAFFIC STUDY) % project transit = ‐50x + 38 [where x = 0 ‐ 0.5 miles to transit] Miles to transit:‐4.4x + 15.2 [where x = 0.5 ‐ 3 miles to transit]
% typical ITE transit = 1.3% (Note: Only effective for 3 miles or less)B = 0.67
LUT‐6 Integrated Affordable and % VMT Reduction = 4% × % units BMR % VMT Reduction = 0.00%Below Market Rate Housing
% of units below market rate:
(Note: Only effective up to 30%)
LUT‐7 Orient Project Toward Non‐Auto Not quantified separately; Assumed to be included in LUT‐3Corridor (If included in LUT‐3, VMT reduction should be at least 0.5% per 1% inprovement in transit frequency and
0.5% per 10% increase in transit ridership)
LUT‐8 Locate Project near Bike Path/Bike Lanes Not quantified separately; Assumed to be included in LUT‐4(If included in LUT‐4, VMT reduction should be at least 0.625%)
LUT‐9 Improve Design of Development % VMT Reduction = Intersections × B % VMT Reduction = 14.00%Intersections = % increase vs. typical ITE suburban = (Intersections per square mile of project ‐ 36) / 36 Intersections per square mile: 78 B = 0.12
(Note: Only effective up to 100)
Neighborhood/Site Enhancement Measures (5% Reduction Cap without NEV; 15% Reduction Cap with NEV) Total SDT % VMT Reduction = 0.00% Cap: 5% without NEVCap: 15% With NEV
SDT‐1 Provide Pedestrian Network VMT reduction based on urban/rural context and % VMT Reduction = 0.00%Improvements pedestrian accomodations
Pedestrian network on‐site and connecting off‐site (urban/suburban): 2%Pedestrian network on‐site (urban/suburban): 1%
(Mark an "X" in one of the above)
SDT‐2 Provide Traffic Calming Measures Marked crosswalks, count‐down signal timers, % VMT Reduction = 0.00%curb extensions, speed tables, rasied crosswalks, % of streets with improvementsraised intersections, median islands, tight corner radii, 25% of streets with improvements: A A B C Droundabouts, on‐street parking, planter strips with trees, 50% of streets with improvements: B W 0.25% 0.25% 0.50% 0.50%chicanes/chokers, and others. 75% of streets with improvements: C X 0.25% 0.50% 0.50% 0.75%
100% of streets with improvements: D Y 0.50% 0.50% 0.75% 0.75%Z 0.50% 0.75% 0.75% 1.00%
25% of intersctions with improvements: W50% of intersctions with improvements: X75% of intersctions with improvements: Y
100% of intersctions with improvements: Z
(Mark an "X" in one of the above for each group)
% of intersections
with
improvem
ents
SDT‐3 Neighborhood Electric Vehicle Network % VMT Reduction = Pop × Number × NEVPop × Number = NEVs per household [0.04 to 1.0] % VMT Reduction = 0.00%NEV = VMT reduction rate per household [12.7%]
Low NEVs per Household: 0.04High NEVs per Household: 1.0
(Mark an "X" in one of the above)
SDT‐4 Create Urban Non‐Motorized Zones Not quantified separately; Assumed to be included in SDT‐1(If included in SDT‐1, VMT reduction should be at least 0.01% to 0.2%)
SDT‐5 Incorporate Bike Lane Street Design Not quantified separately; Assumed to be included in LUT‐9(If included in LUT‐9, VMT reduction should be at least 1% of worker commute per additional mile of bike lanes per square mile)
SDT‐6 Provide Bike Parking in Non‐Residential Not quantified separately; Assumed to be included in LUT‐9Projects (If included in LUT‐9, VMT reduction should be at least 0.625%)
SDT‐7 Provide Bike Parking in Multi‐Unit Not quantified separately; Assumed to be included in LUT‐9Residential Projects
SDT‐8 Provide Electric Vehicle Parking Not quantified separately; Assumed to be included in SDT‐3
SDT‐9 Dedicated Land for Bike Trails Not quantified separately; Assumed to be included in LUT‐9
Parking Policy/Pricing (20% Reduction Cap) Total PDT % VMT Reduction = 0.00% Cap: 20%
PDT‐1 Limit Parking Supply % VMT Reduction = % VMT Reduction = 0.00% Cap: 12.50%= (Actual Parking ‐ ITE Parking) / ITE Parking × 0.5
Actual Parking Spaces: ‐ ITE Parking Spaces: ‐
PDT‐2 Unbunble Parking Costs from Property % VMT Reduction = Change in vehicle cost × elasticity × A % VMT Reduction = 0.00% Cap: 13%Change in vehicle cost = Monthly parking cost × (12/$4000)Elasticity = 0.4 Monthly parking cost: ‐$ A = 85%
PDT‐3 Implement Market Price Public Parking % VMT Reduction = Park$ × B % VMT Reduction = 0.00% Cap: 5.5%(On‐Street) Park$ = Percent increase in on‐street parking prices
[minimum of 25%] Actual On‐Street Parking Price: ‐$ B = 0.11 Baseline On‐Street Parking Price: ‐$
PDT‐4 Require Residential Area Parking Permits Not quantified separately; Assumed to be included in PDT‐1, ‐2‐, and ‐3(If included in LUT‐9, VMT reduction should be at least 0.09% to 0.36% depending on land use)
Transit System Improvements (10% Reduction Cap) Total TST % VMT Reduction = 0.00% Cap: 10%
TST‐1 Provide a Bus Rapid Transit System % VMT Reduction = Riders × Mode × Lines × D % VMT Reduction = 0.00% Cap: 3.2%Riders = 28%Mode = 17% Urban Center Urban Center: 17%
4% Urban Urban: 4%1.30% Suburban Suburban: 1.30%
Lines = Percent of lines serving project converting to BRTD = 0.67 (Mark an "X" in one of the above)
Lines Converting to BRT: 0%Total Baseline Lines:
TST‐2 Implement Transit Access Improvements Not quantified separately; Assumed to be included in TST‐3 and ‐4
TST‐3 Expand Transit Network % VMT Reduction = Coverage × B × Mode × D % VMT Reduction = 0.00% Cap: 8.2%Coverage = % increase in transit network coverage
B = 0.65 Urban Center Urban Center: 17% 0.650.72 Urban Urban: 4% 0.721.01 Suburban Suburban: 1.30% 1.01
Mode = 17% Urban Center4% Urban (Mark an "X" in one of the above)
1.30% SuburbanD = 0.67 Coverage:
TST‐4 Increase Transit Service Frequency/Speed % VMT Reduction = Headway × B × C × Mode × E % VMT Reduction = 0.00% Cap: 2.5%Headway = % reduction in headways [15% ‐ 80%]
B = 0.32 Urban Urban Center: 17% 0.320.36 Suburban Urban: 4% 0.32
C = 50% < 50% lines improved Suburban: 1.30% 0.3685% >= 50% lines improved
Mode = 17% Urban Center (Mark an "X" in one of the above)4% Urban
1.30% Suburban Headway:E = 0.67 Percent of Lines Improved:
TST‐5 Provide Bike Parking Near Transit Not quantified separately; Assumed to be included in TST‐3 and ‐4
TST‐6 Provide Local Shuttles Not quantified separately; Assumed to be included in TST‐3 and ‐4
Commute Trip Reduction (25% Reduction Cap ‐ WORK VMT ONLY) Total TRT % Work VMT Reduction = 0.00% Cap: 25%% Work VMT of Total VMT: 2.5%
Total TRT % Overall VMT Reduction = 0.00% Cap: 15%
TRT‐1 Implement Voluntary Commute % Work VMT Reduction = A × B % Work VMT Reduction = 0.00% Cap: 6.2%Trip Reduction Program A = 6.2% Urban
5.4% Suburban Center Urban: 6.2%5.2% Suburban Suburban Center: 5.4%
B = % employees eligible Suburban: 5.2%
(Mark an "X" in one of the above)
% Employees Eligible:
TRT‐2 Implement Required Commute % Work VMT Reduction = A × B % Work VMT Reduction = 0.00% Cap: 21.0%Trip Reduction Program A = 21%
B = % employees eligible % Employees Eligible:
TRT‐3 Provide Ride‐Sharing Programs % Work VMT Reduction = Commute × Employee % Work VMT Reduction = 0.00% Cap: 15.0%Commute = 15% Urban
10% Suburban Center Urban: 15%5% Suburban Suburban Center: 10%
Employee = % employees eligible Suburban: 5%
(Mark an "X" in one of the above)
% Employees Eligible:
TRT‐4 Implement Subsidized or Discounted % Work VMT Reduction = A × B × C % Work VMT Reduction = 0.00% Cap: 20.0%Transit Program A = % reduction in commute vehicle trips
B = % employees eligible Urban: AC = Adjustment from VT to VMT [1.0] Suburban Center: B W X Y Z
Suburban: C A 6.2% 12.9% 20% 20%B 3.4% 7.3% 16.4% 20%
Transit Subsidy: $0.75 W C 1.5% 3.3% 7.9% 20%Transit Subsidy: $1.49 XTransit Subsidy: $2.98 YTransit Subsidy: $5.96 Z
(Mark an "X" in one of the above for each group)
% Employees Eligible:
TRT‐5 Provide End of Trip Facilities Not quantified separately; Assumed to be included in TRT‐1 through ‐3(If included, Work VMT reduction should be 2% to 5%, or total VMT reduction should be 0.02% to 0.625%)
TRT‐6 Encourage Telecommuting and % Reduction in Commute VMT % Work VMT Reduction = 0.00% Cap: 5.5%Alternate Work Schedules
9‐day/80‐hour Work Week: A4‐day/40‐hour Work Week: B V W X Y ZTelecommuting 1.5 Days: C A 0.07% 0.21% 0.35% 0.70% 1.75%
B 0.15% 0.45% 0.75% 1.50% 3.75%Employee Participation: 1% V C 0.22% 0.66% 1.10% 2.20% 5.50%Employee Participation: 3% WEmployee Participation: 5% X
Employee Participation: 10% YEmployee Participation: 25% Z
(Mark an "X" in one of the above for each group)
TRT‐7 Implement Commute Trip Reduction % Work VMT Reduction = A × B × C % Work VMT Reduction = 0.00% Cap: 4.0%Marketing A = % reduction in commute vehicle trips [4%]
B = % employees eligible % Employees Eligible:C = Adjustment from VT to VMT [1.0]
TRT‐8 Implement Preferential Permit Not quantified separately; Assumed to be included in TRT‐1 through ‐3Parking Program
Sche
dule
Employee Participation
Setting
Daily Transit Subsidy
TRT‐9 Implement Car‐Sharing Program % Work VMT Reduction = A × B / C % Work VMT Reduction = 0.00% Cap: 0.74%A = % reduction in car‐share member annual VMT [37%]B = number of car share members per shared car [20] Urban: 1,000
C = 1,000 Urban Suburban: 2,000 2,000 Suburban
(Mark an "X" in one of the above)
TRT‐10 Implement a School Pool Program Not applicable.
TRT‐11 Provide Employer‐Sponsored % Work VMT Reduction = A × B × C % Work VMT Reduction = 0.00% Cap: 13.4%Vanpool/Shuttle A = % shift in vanpool mode share of commute trips
= 2% to 20% A: Shift in Vanpool Mode Share:B = % employees eligible B: Employees Eligible:C = 0.67
TRT‐12 Implement Bike Sharing Program Not quantified separately; Assumed to be included in LUT‐9 and SDT‐5(If included, total VMT reduction should be at least 0.03%)
TRT‐13 Implement School Bus Program Not applicable.
TRT‐14 Price Workplace Parking % Work VMT Reduction = A × B % Work VMT Reduction = 0.00% Cap: 19.7%A = % reduction in commute VMTB = % employees subject to priced parking Urban: A
Suburban Center: B W X Y ZSuburban: C A 6.9% 12.5% 16.8% 19.7%
B 1.8% 3.7% 5.4% 6.8%Daily Parking Charge: $1 W C 0.5% 1.2% 1.9% 2.8%Daily Parking Charge: $2 XDaily Parking Charge: $3 YDaily Parking Charge: $6 Z
(Mark an "X" in one of the above for each group)
% Employees Subject to Priced Parking:
TRT‐15 Implement Employee Parking % Work VMT Reduction = A × B % Work VMT Reduction = 0.00% Cap: 7.7%Cash‐Out
A = 7.7% Urban Urban: 7.7%4.5% Suburban Center Suburban Center: 4.5%3.0% Suburban Suburban: 3.0%
B = % employees eligible(Mark an "X" in one of the above)
% Employees Eligible:
Setting
Daily Parking Charge
INTERIM YEAR: 1020 S. Figueroa Street ProjectDraft Environmental Impact ReportQuantifying Greenhouse Gas Mitigation Measures ‐ Transportation (Based on CAPCOA Guidance (August 2010))
PROPOSED PROJECT
Location Type Global % VMT Reduction Cap Location Type Global % VMT Reduction CapUrban: 75% Suburban Center: 20%Less than 5 miles from central business district Typically 20 miles or more from central business districtJobs‐rich (jobs/housing ratio greater than 1.5) Balanced jobs‐housingTypical buildings are 6 stories or higher Typical buildings are 2 storiesGrid street pattern Grid street patternMinimal setbacks Setbacks 0 ‐ 20 feetParking constrained on‐ and off‐street Parking somewhat constrained on‐street; ample off‐streetParking prices high/highest in the region Parking prices low (if priced at all)High‐quality rail; bus service at 10 min or less in peak hours Bus service at 20 ‐ 30 min and/or commuter rail station
Compact Infill: 40% Suburban: 15%Typically 5 ‐ 15 miles from central business district Typically 20 miles or more from central business districtBalanced jobs‐housing (jobs/housing ratio from 0.9 to 1.2) Housing‐richTypical buildings are 2 ‐ 4 stories Typical buildings are 1 ‐ 2 storiesGrid street pattern Curvilinear street pattern (cul‐de‐sac based)Setbacks 0 ‐ 20 feet Parking between street and buildings; large lot residential Total Global Transportation VMT Reduction = 31.65% Cap: 75%Parking constrained Parking ample; largely surface lot‐based (Includes double counting correction.)Parking prices low/moderate No parking pricesRail w/in 2 miles; bus service at 15 min or less in peak hours Limited bus service at 30 minute headways or more Total LUT/SDT/PDT/TST VMT Reduction = 31.65% Cap: 70%
Land Use/Location Transportation Measures (65% Reduction Cap) Total LUT % VMT Reduction = 30.26% Cap: 65%
LUT‐1 Increase Density % VMT Reduction = A × B [not to exceed 30%] % VMT Reduction = 0.70% Cap: 30%
A (housing) = (Number of DU/acre ‐ 7.6 ) / 7.6 Number of DU/acre: 107.4 A = 500%A (jobs) = (Number of Jobs/acre ‐ 20 ) / 20 Number of Jobs/acre: 151.5 A = 500%B = 0.07%
LUT‐2 Increase Location Efficiency % VMT Reduction Cap for all LUT measures Urban LUT % VMT Reduction Cap: 65%Compact Infill LUT % VMT Reduction Cap: 30%
Suburban Center LUT % VMT Reduction Cap: 10%
LUT‐3 Increase Diversity of Urban and % VMT Reduction = Land Use × B [not to exceed 30%] % VMT Reduction = 0.00% Cap: 30%Suburban Developments (Mixed Use) Land Use = % increase in land use index vs. single use
= (Land Use Index ‐ 0.15) / 0.15 Single family sqft: ‐ a1 = ‐ Land Use Index = ‐a / ln(6) Multi‐family sqft: ‐ a2 = ‐ a = ∑ ai × ln(ai) Commercial sqft: ‐ a3 = ‐ ai = building floor area / total square feet of area considered Industrial sqft: ‐ a4 = ‐ a1 = single family Institutional sqft: ‐ a5 = ‐ a2 = multi‐family Park sqft: ‐ a6 = ‐ a3 = commercial B = 0.09 Total sqft: ‐ a4 = industrial
(ACOUNTED FOR IN TRAFFIC STUDY) a5 = institutional (Note: If ai = 0, then set ai = 0.0000001)a6 = park
LUT‐4 Increase Destination Accessibility % VMT Reduction = Center Distance × B [not to exceed 20%] % VMT Reduction = 18.33% Cap: 20%Center Distance = (12 ‐ Miles to downtown or job center) / 12B = 0.20 Miles to downtown or job center: 1.0
(Distance to Downtown's Financial District)(Note: Only effective for 8 miles or less)
Urban: The urban project will be predominantly characterized by properties on which various uses, such as office, commercial, institutional, and residential, are combined in a single building or on a single site in an integrated development project with functional interrelationships and a coherent physical design.
Suburban: The suburban project will have at least three uses of the following on site and/or offsite within ¼‐mile: Residential Development, Retail Development, Park, Open Space, or Office.
LUT‐5 Increase Transit Accessibility % VMT Reduction = Transit × B [not to exceed 30%] % VMT Reduction = 0.00% Cap: 30%Transit = % project transit ‐ % typical ITE transit
(ACOUNTED FOR IN TRAFFIC STUDY) % project transit = ‐50x + 38 [where x = 0 ‐ 0.5 miles to transit] Miles to transit:‐4.4x + 15.2 [where x = 0.5 ‐ 3 miles to transit]
% typical ITE transit = 1.3% (Note: Only effective for 3 miles or less)B = 0.67
LUT‐6 Integrated Affordable and % VMT Reduction = 4% × % units BMR % VMT Reduction = 0.00%Below Market Rate Housing
% of units below market rate:
(Note: Only effective up to 30%)
LUT‐7 Orient Project Toward Non‐Auto Not quantified separately; Assumed to be included in LUT‐3Corridor (If included in LUT‐3, VMT reduction should be at least 0.5% per 1% inprovement in transit frequency and
0.5% per 10% increase in transit ridership)
LUT‐8 Locate Project near Bike Path/Bike Lanes Not quantified separately; Assumed to be included in LUT‐4(If included in LUT‐4, VMT reduction should be at least 0.625%)
LUT‐9 Improve Design of Development % VMT Reduction = Intersections × B % VMT Reduction = 14.00%Intersections = % increase vs. typical ITE suburban = (Intersections per square mile of project ‐ 36) / 36 Intersections per square mile: 78 B = 0.12 (Estimated based on count of intersections within 1 mile radius of project site.)
(Note: Only effective up to 100)
Neighborhood/Site Enhancement Measures (5% Reduction Cap without NEV; 15% Reduction Cap with NEV) Total SDT % VMT Reduction = 2.00% Cap: 5% without NEVCap: 15% With NEV
SDT‐1 Provide Pedestrian Network VMT reduction based on urban/rural context and % VMT Reduction = 2.00%Improvements pedestrian accomodations
Pedestrian network on‐site and connecting off‐site (urban/suburban): X 2%Pedestrian network on‐site (urban/suburban): 1%
(Mark an "X" in one of the above)
SDT‐2 Provide Traffic Calming Measures Marked crosswalks, count‐down signal timers, % VMT Reduction = 0.00%curb extensions, speed tables, rasied crosswalks, % of streets with improvementsraised intersections, median islands, tight corner radii, 25% of streets with improvements: A A B C Droundabouts, on‐street parking, planter strips with trees, 50% of streets with improvements: B W 0.25% 0.25% 0.50% 0.50%chicanes/chokers, and others. 75% of streets with improvements: C X 0.25% 0.50% 0.50% 0.75%
100% of streets with improvements: D Y 0.50% 0.50% 0.75% 0.75%Z 0.50% 0.75% 0.75% 1.00%
25% of intersctions with improvements: W50% of intersctions with improvements: X75% of intersctions with improvements: Y100% of intersctions with improvements: Z
(Mark an "X" in one of the above for each group)
% of intersections
with
improvem
ents
SDT‐3 Neighborhood Electric Vehicle Network % VMT Reduction = Pop × Number × NEVPop × Number = NEVs per household [0.04 to 1.0] % VMT Reduction = 0.00%NEV = VMT reduction rate per household [12.7%]
Low NEVs per Household: 0.04High NEVs per Household: 1.0
(Mark an "X" in one of the above)
SDT‐4 Create Urban Non‐Motorized Zones Not quantified separately; Assumed to be included in SDT‐1(If included in SDT‐1, VMT reduction should be at least 0.01% to 0.2%)
SDT‐5 Incorporate Bike Lane Street Design Not quantified separately; Assumed to be included in LUT‐9(If included in LUT‐9, VMT reduction should be at least 1% of worker commute per additional mile of bike lanes per square mile)
SDT‐6 Provide Bike Parking in Non‐Residential Not quantified separately; Assumed to be included in LUT‐9Projects (If included in LUT‐9, VMT reduction should be at least 0.625%)
SDT‐7 Provide Bike Parking in Multi‐Unit Not quantified separately; Assumed to be included in LUT‐9Residential Projects
SDT‐8 Provide Electric Vehicle Parking Not quantified separately; Assumed to be included in SDT‐3
SDT‐9 Dedicated Land for Bike Trails Not quantified separately; Assumed to be included in LUT‐9
Parking Policy/Pricing (20% Reduction Cap) Total PDT % VMT Reduction = 0.00% Cap: 20%
PDT‐1 Limit Parking Supply % VMT Reduction = % VMT Reduction = 0.00% Cap: 12.50%= (Actual Parking ‐ ITE Parking) / ITE Parking × 0.5
Actual Parking Spaces: ‐ ITE Parking Spaces: ‐
PDT‐2 Unbunble Parking Costs from Property % VMT Reduction = Change in vehicle cost × elasticity × A % VMT Reduction = 0.00% Cap: 13%Change in vehicle cost = Monthly parking cost × (12/$4000)Elasticity = 0.4 Monthly parking cost: ‐$ A = 85%
PDT‐3 Implement Market Price Public Parking % VMT Reduction = Park$ × B % VMT Reduction = 0.00% Cap: 5.5%(On‐Street) Park$ = Percent increase in on‐street parking prices
[minimum of 25%] Actual On‐Street Parking Price: ‐$ B = 0.11 Baseline On‐Street Parking Price: ‐$
PDT‐4 Require Residential Area Parking Permits Not quantified separately; Assumed to be included in PDT‐1, ‐2‐, and ‐3(If included in LUT‐9, VMT reduction should be at least 0.09% to 0.36% depending on land use)
Transit System Improvements (10% Reduction Cap) Total TST % VMT Reduction = 0.00% Cap: 10%
TST‐1 Provide a Bus Rapid Transit System % VMT Reduction = Riders × Mode × Lines × D % VMT Reduction = 0.00% Cap: 3.2%Riders = 28%Mode = 17% Urban Center Urban Center: 17%
4% Urban Urban: 4%1.30% Suburban Suburban: 1.30%
Lines = Percent of lines serving project converting to BRTD = 0.67 (Mark an "X" in one of the above)
Lines Converting to BRT: 0%Total Baseline Lines:
TST‐2 Implement Transit Access Improvements Not quantified separately; Assumed to be included in TST‐3 and ‐4
TST‐3 Expand Transit Network % VMT Reduction = Coverage × B × Mode × D % VMT Reduction = 0.00% Cap: 8.2%Coverage = % increase in transit network coverage
B = 0.65 Urban Center Urban Center: 17% 0.650.72 Urban Urban: 4% 0.721.01 Suburban Suburban: 1.30% 1.01
Mode = 17% Urban Center4% Urban (Mark an "X" in one of the above)
1.30% SuburbanD = 0.67 Coverage:
TST‐4 Increase Transit Service Frequency/Speed % VMT Reduction = Headway × B × C × Mode × E % VMT Reduction = 0.00% Cap: 2.5%Headway = % reduction in headways [15% ‐ 80%]
B = 0.32 Urban Urban Center: 17% 0.320.36 Suburban Urban: 4% 0.32
C = 50% < 50% lines improved Suburban: 1.30% 0.3685% >= 50% lines improved
Mode = 17% Urban Center (Mark an "X" in one of the above)4% Urban
1.30% Suburban Headway:E = 0.67 Percent of Lines Improved:
TST‐5 Provide Bike Parking Near Transit Not quantified separately; Assumed to be included in TST‐3 and ‐4
TST‐6 Provide Local Shuttles Not quantified separately; Assumed to be included in TST‐3 and ‐4
Commute Trip Reduction (25% Reduction Cap ‐ WORK VMT ONLY) Total TRT % Work VMT Reduction = 0.00% Cap: 25%% Work VMT of Total VMT: 2.5%
Total TRT % Overall VMT Reduction = 0.00% Cap: 15%
TRT‐1 Implement Voluntary Commute % Work VMT Reduction = A × B % Work VMT Reduction = 0.00% Cap: 6.2%Trip Reduction Program A = 6.2% Urban
5.4% Suburban Center Urban: 6.2%5.2% Suburban Suburban Center: 5.4%
B = % employees eligible Suburban: 5.2%
(Mark an "X" in one of the above)
% Employees Eligible:
TRT‐2 Implement Required Commute % Work VMT Reduction = A × B % Work VMT Reduction = 0.00% Cap: 21.0%Trip Reduction Program A = 21%
B = % employees eligible % Employees Eligible:
TRT‐3 Provide Ride‐Sharing Programs % Work VMT Reduction = Commute × Employee % Work VMT Reduction = 0.00% Cap: 15.0%Commute = 15% Urban
10% Suburban Center Urban: 15%5% Suburban Suburban Center: 10%
Employee = % employees eligible Suburban: 5%
(Mark an "X" in one of the above)
% Employees Eligible:
TRT‐4 Implement Subsidized or Discounted % Work VMT Reduction = A × B × C % Work VMT Reduction = 0.00% Cap: 20.0%Transit Program A = % reduction in commute vehicle trips
B = % employees eligible Urban: AC = Adjustment from VT to VMT [1.0] Suburban Center: B W X Y Z
Suburban: C A 6.2% 12.9% 20% 20%B 3.4% 7.3% 16.4% 20%
Transit Subsidy: $0.75 W C 1.5% 3.3% 7.9% 20%Transit Subsidy: $1.49 XTransit Subsidy: $2.98 YTransit Subsidy: $5.96 Z
(Mark an "X" in one of the above for each group)
% Employees Eligible:
TRT‐5 Provide End of Trip Facilities Not quantified separately; Assumed to be included in TRT‐1 through ‐3(If included, Work VMT reduction should be 2% to 5%, or total VMT reduction should be 0.02% to 0.625%)
TRT‐6 Encourage Telecommuting and % Reduction in Commute VMT % Work VMT Reduction = 0.00% Cap: 5.5%Alternate Work Schedules
9‐day/80‐hour Work Week: A4‐day/40‐hour Work Week: B V W X Y ZTelecommuting 1.5 Days: C A 0.07% 0.21% 0.35% 0.70% 1.75%
B 0.15% 0.45% 0.75% 1.50% 3.75%Employee Participation: 1% V C 0.22% 0.66% 1.10% 2.20% 5.50%Employee Participation: 3% WEmployee Participation: 5% XEmployee Participation: 10% YEmployee Participation: 25% Z
(Mark an "X" in one of the above for each group)
TRT‐7 Implement Commute Trip Reduction % Work VMT Reduction = A × B × C % Work VMT Reduction = 0.00% Cap: 4.0%Marketing A = % reduction in commute vehicle trips [4%]
B = % employees eligible % Employees Eligible:C = Adjustment from VT to VMT [1.0]
TRT‐8 Implement Preferential Permit Not quantified separately; Assumed to be included in TRT‐1 through ‐3Parking Program
Setting
Daily Transit Subsidy
Sche
dule
Employee Participation
TRT‐9 Implement Car‐Sharing Program % Work VMT Reduction = A × B / C % Work VMT Reduction = 0.00% Cap: 0.74%A = % reduction in car‐share member annual VMT [37%]B = number of car share members per shared car [20] Urban: 1,000
C = 1,000 Urban Suburban: 2,000 2,000 Suburban
(Mark an "X" in one of the above)
TRT‐10 Implement a School Pool Program Not applicable.
TRT‐11 Provide Employer‐Sponsored % Work VMT Reduction = A × B × C % Work VMT Reduction = 0.00% Cap: 13.4%Vanpool/Shuttle A = % shift in vanpool mode share of commute trips
= 2% to 20% A: Shift in Vanpool Mode Share:B = % employees eligible B: Employees Eligible:C = 0.67
TRT‐12 Implement Bike Sharing Program Not quantified separately; Assumed to be included in LUT‐9 and SDT‐5(If included, total VMT reduction should be at least 0.03%)
TRT‐13 Implement School Bus Program Not applicable.
TRT‐14 Price Workplace Parking % Work VMT Reduction = A × B % Work VMT Reduction = 0.00% Cap: 19.7%A = % reduction in commute VMTB = % employees subject to priced parking Urban: A
Suburban Center: B W X Y ZSuburban: C A 6.9% 12.5% 16.8% 19.7%
B 1.8% 3.7% 5.4% 6.8%Daily Parking Charge: $1 W C 0.5% 1.2% 1.9% 2.8%Daily Parking Charge: $2 XDaily Parking Charge: $3 YDaily Parking Charge: $6 Z
(Mark an "X" in one of the above for each group)
% Employees Subject to Priced Parking:
TRT‐15 Implement Employee Parking % Work VMT Reduction = A × B % Work VMT Reduction = 0.00% Cap: 7.7%Cash‐Out
A = 7.7% Urban Urban: 7.7%4.5% Suburban Center Suburban Center: 4.5%3.0% Suburban Suburban: 3.0%
B = % employees eligible(Mark an "X" in one of the above)
% Employees Eligible:
Setting
Daily Parking Charge
FULL BUILDOUT: 1020 S. Figueroa Street ProjectDraft Environmental Impact ReportQuantifying Greenhouse Gas Mitigation Measures ‐ Transportation (Based on CAPCOA Guidance (August 2010))
BUSINESS AS USUAL PROJECT
Location Type Global % VMT Reduction Cap Location Type Global % VMT Reduction CapUrban: 75% Suburban Center: 20%Less than 5 miles from central business district Typically 20 miles or more from central business districtJobs‐rich (jobs/housing ratio greater than 1.5) Balanced jobs‐housingTypical buildings are 6 stories or higher Typical buildings are 2 storiesGrid street pattern Grid street patternMinimal setbacks Setbacks 0 ‐ 20 feetParking constrained on‐ and off‐street Parking somewhat constrained on‐street; ample off‐streetParking prices high/highest in the region Parking prices low (if priced at all)High‐quality rail; bus service at 10 min or less in peak hours Bus service at 20 ‐ 30 min and/or commuter rail station
Compact Infill: 40% Suburban: 15%Typically 5 ‐ 15 miles from central business district Typically 20 miles or more from central business districtBalanced jobs‐housing (jobs/housing ratio from 0.9 to 1.2) Housing‐richTypical buildings are 2 ‐ 4 stories Typical buildings are 1 ‐ 2 storiesGrid street pattern Curvilinear street pattern (cul‐de‐sac based)Setbacks 0 ‐ 20 feet Parking between street and buildings; large lot residential Total Global Transportation VMT Reduction = 31.65% Cap: 75%Parking constrained Parking ample; largely surface lot‐based (Includes double counting correction.)Parking prices low/moderate No parking pricesRail w/in 2 miles; bus service at 15 min or less in peak hours Limited bus service at 30 minute headways or more Total LUT/SDT/PDT/TST VMT Reduction = 31.65% Cap: 70%
Land Use/Location Transportation Measures (65% Reduction Cap) Total LUT % VMT Reduction = 30.26% Cap: 65%
LUT‐1 Increase Density % VMT Reduction = A × B [not to exceed 30%] % VMT Reduction = 0.70% Cap: 30%
A (housing) = (Number of DU/acre ‐ 7.6 ) / 7.6 Number of DU/acre: 240.7 A = 500%A (jobs) = (Number of Jobs/acre ‐ 20 ) / 20 Number of Jobs/acre: 205.9 A = 500%B = 0.07%
LUT‐2 Increase Location Efficiency % VMT Reduction Cap for all LUT measures Urban LUT % VMT Reduction Cap: 65%Compact Infill LUT % VMT Reduction Cap: 30%
Suburban Center LUT % VMT Reduction Cap: 10%
LUT‐3 Increase Diversity of Urban and % VMT Reduction = Land Use × B [not to exceed 30%] % VMT Reduction = 0.00% Cap: 30%Suburban Developments (Mixed Use) Land Use = % increase in land use index vs. single use
= (Land Use Index ‐ 0.15) / 0.15 Single family sqft: ‐ a1 = ‐
Land Use Index = ‐a / ln(6) Multi‐family sqft: ‐ a2 = ‐ a = ∑ ai × ln(ai) Commercial sqft: ‐ a3 = ‐ ai = building floor area / total square feet of area considered Industrial sqft: ‐ a4 = ‐ a1 = single family Institutional sqft: ‐ a5 = ‐ a2 = multi‐family Park sqft: ‐ a6 = ‐ a3 = commercial B = 0.09 Total sqft: ‐ a4 = industrial
(ACOUNTED FOR IN TRAFFIC STUDY) a5 = institutional (Note: If ai = 0, then set ai = 0.0000001)
a6 = park
LUT‐4 Increase Destination Accessibility % VMT Reduction = Center Distance × B [not to exceed 20%] % VMT Reduction = 18.33% Cap: 20%Center Distance = (12 ‐ Miles to downtown or job center) / 12B = 0.20 Miles to downtown or job center: 1.0
(Distance to Downtown's Financial District)(Note: Only effective for 8 miles or less)
Suburban: The suburban project will have at least three uses of the following on site and/or offsite within ¼‐mile: Residential Development, Retail Development, Park, Open Space, or Office.
Urban: The urban project will be predominantly characterized by properties on which various uses, such as office, commercial, institutional, and residential, are combined in a single building or on a single site in an integrated development project with functional interrelationships and a coherent physical design.
LUT‐5 Increase Transit Accessibility % VMT Reduction = Transit × B [not to exceed 30%] % VMT Reduction = 0.00% Cap: 30%Transit = % project transit ‐ % typical ITE transit
(ACOUNTED FOR IN TRAFFIC STUDY) % project transit = ‐50x + 38 [where x = 0 ‐ 0.5 miles to transit] Miles to transit:‐4.4x + 15.2 [where x = 0.5 ‐ 3 miles to transit]
% typical ITE transit = 1.3% (Note: Only effective for 3 miles or less)B = 0.67
LUT‐6 Integrated Affordable and % VMT Reduction = 4% × % units BMR % VMT Reduction = 0.00%Below Market Rate Housing
% of units below market rate:
(Note: Only effective up to 30%)
LUT‐7 Orient Project Toward Non‐Auto Not quantified separately; Assumed to be included in LUT‐3Corridor (If included in LUT‐3, VMT reduction should be at least 0.5% per 1% inprovement in transit frequency and
0.5% per 10% increase in transit ridership)
LUT‐8 Locate Project near Bike Path/Bike Lanes Not quantified separately; Assumed to be included in LUT‐4(If included in LUT‐4, VMT reduction should be at least 0.625%)
LUT‐9 Improve Design of Development % VMT Reduction = Intersections × B % VMT Reduction = 14.00%Intersections = % increase vs. typical ITE suburban = (Intersections per square mile of project ‐ 36) / 36 Intersections per square mile: 78 B = 0.12
(Note: Only effective up to 100)
Neighborhood/Site Enhancement Measures (5% Reduction Cap without NEV; 15% Reduction Cap with NEV) Total SDT % VMT Reduction = 2.00% Cap: 5% without NEVCap: 15% With NEV
SDT‐1 Provide Pedestrian Network VMT reduction based on urban/rural context and % VMT Reduction = 2.00%Improvements pedestrian accomodations
Pedestrian network on‐site and connecting off‐site (urban/suburban): X 2%Pedestrian network on‐site (urban/suburban): 1%
(Mark an "X" in one of the above)
SDT‐2 Provide Traffic Calming Measures Marked crosswalks, count‐down signal timers, % VMT Reduction = 0.00%curb extensions, speed tables, rasied crosswalks, % of streets with improvementsraised intersections, median islands, tight corner radii, 25% of streets with improvements: A A B C Droundabouts, on‐street parking, planter strips with trees, 50% of streets with improvements: B W 0.25% 0.25% 0.50% 0.50%chicanes/chokers, and others. 75% of streets with improvements: C X 0.25% 0.50% 0.50% 0.75%
100% of streets with improvements: D Y 0.50% 0.50% 0.75% 0.75%Z 0.50% 0.75% 0.75% 1.00%
25% of intersctions with improvements: W50% of intersctions with improvements: X75% of intersctions with improvements: Y
100% of intersctions with improvements: Z
(Mark an "X" in one of the above for each group)
with
improvem
ents
% of intersections
SDT‐3 Neighborhood Electric Vehicle Network % VMT Reduction = Pop × Number × NEVPop × Number = NEVs per household [0.04 to 1.0] % VMT Reduction = 0.00%NEV = VMT reduction rate per household [12.7%]
Low NEVs per Household: 0.04High NEVs per Household: 1.0
(Mark an "X" in one of the above)
SDT‐4 Create Urban Non‐Motorized Zones Not quantified separately; Assumed to be included in SDT‐1(If included in SDT‐1, VMT reduction should be at least 0.01% to 0.2%)
SDT‐5 Incorporate Bike Lane Street Design Not quantified separately; Assumed to be included in LUT‐9(If included in LUT‐9, VMT reduction should be at least 1% of worker commute per additional mile of bike lanes per square mile)
SDT‐6 Provide Bike Parking in Non‐Residential Not quantified separately; Assumed to be included in LUT‐9Projects (If included in LUT‐9, VMT reduction should be at least 0.625%)
SDT‐7 Provide Bike Parking in Multi‐Unit Not quantified separately; Assumed to be included in LUT‐9Residential Projects
SDT‐8 Provide Electric Vehicle Parking Not quantified separately; Assumed to be included in SDT‐3
SDT‐9 Dedicated Land for Bike Trails Not quantified separately; Assumed to be included in LUT‐9
Parking Policy/Pricing (20% Reduction Cap) Total PDT % VMT Reduction = 0.00% Cap: 20%
PDT‐1 Limit Parking Supply % VMT Reduction = % VMT Reduction = 0.00% Cap: 12.50%= (Actual Parking ‐ ITE Parking) / ITE Parking × 0.5
Actual Parking Spaces: ‐ ITE Parking Spaces: ‐
PDT‐2 Unbunble Parking Costs from Property % VMT Reduction = Change in vehicle cost × elasticity × A % VMT Reduction = 0.00% Cap: 13%Change in vehicle cost = Monthly parking cost × (12/$4000)Elasticity = 0.4 Monthly parking cost: ‐$ A = 85%
PDT‐3 Implement Market Price Public Parking % VMT Reduction = Park$ × B % VMT Reduction = 0.00% Cap: 5.5%(On‐Street) Park$ = Percent increase in on‐street parking prices
[minimum of 25%] Actual On‐Street Parking Price: ‐$ B = 0.11 Baseline On‐Street Parking Price: ‐$
PDT‐4 Require Residential Area Parking Permits Not quantified separately; Assumed to be included in PDT‐1, ‐2‐, and ‐3(If included in LUT‐9, VMT reduction should be at least 0.09% to 0.36% depending on land use)
Transit System Improvements (10% Reduction Cap) Total TST % VMT Reduction = 0.00% Cap: 10%
TST‐1 Provide a Bus Rapid Transit System % VMT Reduction = Riders × Mode × Lines × D % VMT Reduction = 0.00% Cap: 3.2%Riders = 28%Mode = 17% Urban Center Urban Center: 17%
4% Urban Urban: 4%1.30% Suburban Suburban: 1.30%
Lines = Percent of lines serving project converting to BRTD = 0.67 (Mark an "X" in one of the above)
Lines Converting to BRT: 0%Total Baseline Lines:
TST‐2 Implement Transit Access Improvements Not quantified separately; Assumed to be included in TST‐3 and ‐4
TST‐3 Expand Transit Network % VMT Reduction = Coverage × B × Mode × D % VMT Reduction = 0.00% Cap: 8.2%Coverage = % increase in transit network coverage
B = 0.65 Urban Center Urban Center: 17% 0.650.72 Urban Urban: 4% 0.721.01 Suburban Suburban: 1.30% 1.01
Mode = 17% Urban Center4% Urban (Mark an "X" in one of the above)
1.30% SuburbanD = 0.67 Coverage:
TST‐4 Increase Transit Service Frequency/Speed % VMT Reduction = Headway × B × C × Mode × E % VMT Reduction = 0.00% Cap: 2.5%Headway = % reduction in headways [15% ‐ 80%]
B = 0.32 Urban Urban Center: 17% 0.320.36 Suburban Urban: 4% 0.32
C = 50% < 50% lines improved Suburban: 1.30% 0.3685% >= 50% lines improved
Mode = 17% Urban Center (Mark an "X" in one of the above)4% Urban
1.30% Suburban Headway:E = 0.67 Percent of Lines Improved:
TST‐5 Provide Bike Parking Near Transit Not quantified separately; Assumed to be included in TST‐3 and ‐4
TST‐6 Provide Local Shuttles Not quantified separately; Assumed to be included in TST‐3 and ‐4
Commute Trip Reduction (25% Reduction Cap ‐ WORK VMT ONLY) Total TRT % Work VMT Reduction = 0.00% Cap: 25%% Work VMT of Total VMT: 2.5%
Total TRT % Overall VMT Reduction = 0.00% Cap: 15%
TRT‐1 Implement Voluntary Commute % Work VMT Reduction = A × B % Work VMT Reduction = 0.00% Cap: 6.2%Trip Reduction Program A = 6.2% Urban
5.4% Suburban Center Urban: 6.2%5.2% Suburban Suburban Center: 5.4%
B = % employees eligible Suburban: 5.2%
(Mark an "X" in one of the above)
% Employees Eligible:
TRT‐2 Implement Required Commute % Work VMT Reduction = A × B % Work VMT Reduction = 0.00% Cap: 21.0%Trip Reduction Program A = 21%
B = % employees eligible % Employees Eligible:
TRT‐3 Provide Ride‐Sharing Programs % Work VMT Reduction = Commute × Employee % Work VMT Reduction = 0.00% Cap: 15.0%Commute = 15% Urban
10% Suburban Center Urban: 15%5% Suburban Suburban Center: 10%
Employee = % employees eligible Suburban: 5%
(Mark an "X" in one of the above)
% Employees Eligible:
TRT‐4 Implement Subsidized or Discounted % Work VMT Reduction = A × B × C % Work VMT Reduction = 0.00% Cap: 20.0%Transit Program A = % reduction in commute vehicle trips
B = % employees eligible Urban: AC = Adjustment from VT to VMT [1.0] Suburban Center: B W X Y Z
Suburban: C A 6.2% 12.9% 20% 20%B 3.4% 7.3% 16.4% 20%
Transit Subsidy: $0.75 W C 1.5% 3.3% 7.9% 20%Transit Subsidy: $1.49 XTransit Subsidy: $2.98 YTransit Subsidy: $5.96 Z
(Mark an "X" in one of the above for each group)
% Employees Eligible:
TRT‐5 Provide End of Trip Facilities Not quantified separately; Assumed to be included in TRT‐1 through ‐3(If included, Work VMT reduction should be 2% to 5%, or total VMT reduction should be 0.02% to 0.625%)
TRT‐6 Encourage Telecommuting and % Reduction in Commute VMT % Work VMT Reduction = 0.00% Cap: 5.5%Alternate Work Schedules
9‐day/80‐hour Work Week: A4‐day/40‐hour Work Week: B V W X Y ZTelecommuting 1.5 Days: C A 0.07% 0.21% 0.35% 0.70% 1.75%
B 0.15% 0.45% 0.75% 1.50% 3.75%Employee Participation: 1% V C 0.22% 0.66% 1.10% 2.20% 5.50%Employee Participation: 3% WEmployee Participation: 5% X
Employee Participation: 10% YEmployee Participation: 25% Z
(Mark an "X" in one of the above for each group)
TRT‐7 Implement Commute Trip Reduction % Work VMT Reduction = A × B × C % Work VMT Reduction = 0.00% Cap: 4.0%Marketing A = % reduction in commute vehicle trips [4%]
B = % employees eligible % Employees Eligible:C = Adjustment from VT to VMT [1.0]
TRT‐8 Implement Preferential Permit Not quantified separately; Assumed to be included in TRT‐1 through ‐3Parking Program
Daily Transit Subsidy
Setting
Employee Participation
Sche
dule
TRT‐9 Implement Car‐Sharing Program % Work VMT Reduction = A × B / C % Work VMT Reduction = 0.00% Cap: 0.74%A = % reduction in car‐share member annual VMT [37%]B = number of car share members per shared car [20] Urban: 1,000
C = 1,000 Urban Suburban: 2,000 2,000 Suburban
(Mark an "X" in one of the above)
TRT‐10 Implement a School Pool Program Not applicable.
TRT‐11 Provide Employer‐Sponsored % Work VMT Reduction = A × B × C % Work VMT Reduction = 0.00% Cap: 13.4%Vanpool/Shuttle A = % shift in vanpool mode share of commute trips
= 2% to 20% A: Shift in Vanpool Mode Share:B = % employees eligible B: Employees Eligible:C = 0.67
TRT‐12 Implement Bike Sharing Program Not quantified separately; Assumed to be included in LUT‐9 and SDT‐5(If included, total VMT reduction should be at least 0.03%)
TRT‐13 Implement School Bus Program Not applicable.
TRT‐14 Price Workplace Parking % Work VMT Reduction = A × B % Work VMT Reduction = 0.00% Cap: 19.7%A = % reduction in commute VMTB = % employees subject to priced parking Urban: A
Suburban Center: B W X Y ZSuburban: C A 6.9% 12.5% 16.8% 19.7%
B 1.8% 3.7% 5.4% 6.8%Daily Parking Charge: $1 W C 0.5% 1.2% 1.9% 2.8%Daily Parking Charge: $2 XDaily Parking Charge: $3 YDaily Parking Charge: $6 Z
(Mark an "X" in one of the above for each group)
% Employees Subject to Priced Parking:
TRT‐15 Implement Employee Parking % Work VMT Reduction = A × B % Work VMT Reduction = 0.00% Cap: 7.7%Cash‐Out
A = 7.7% Urban Urban: 7.7%4.5% Suburban Center Suburban Center: 4.5%3.0% Suburban Suburban: 3.0%
B = % employees eligible(Mark an "X" in one of the above)
% Employees Eligible:
Setting
Daily Parking Charge
1020 S. Figueroa Street ProjectDraft Environmental Impact ReportDaily Vehicle Miles Traveled Adjustments
Existing and Project VMT
Land Use (CalEEMod Land U Daily Interim Year Project Trips
Project UsesResidential Units 4.54 Baseline trip rate per DU 4.11 Baseline trip rate per DU(High‐Rise Apartments) ‐20% Transit/Walk Adjustment (Traffic Study) ‐20% Transit/Walk Adjustment (Traffic Study)
3.63 Trip rate per Room less Transit/Walk Adj. 3.29 Trip rate per DU less Transit/Walk Adj.
‐31.7% VMT Reduction (CAPCOA) ‐31.7% VMT Reduction (CAPCOA)
14.70 H‐W Trip Length (Baseline) 14.70 H‐W Trip Length (Baseline)5.90 H‐S Trip Length (Baseline) 5.90 H‐S Trip Length (Baseline)8.70 H‐O Trip Length (Baseline) 8.70 H‐O Trip Length (Baseline)
10.05 H‐W Trip Length (Project) 10.05 H‐W Trip Length (Project)4.03 H‐S Trip Length (Project) 4.03 H‐S Trip Length (Project)5.95 H‐O Trip Length (Project) 5.95 H‐O Trip Length (Project)
Hotel 8.17 Baseline trip rate per Room 8.17 Baseline trip rate per Room 8.17 Baseline trip rate per Room(Hotel) ‐25% Transit/Walk Adjustment (Traffic Study) ‐25% Transit/Walk Adjustment (Traffic Study) ‐25% Transit/Walk Adjustment (Traffic Study)
6.13 Trip rate per Room less Transit/Walk Adj. 6.13 Trip rate per Room less Transit/Walk Adj. 6.13 Trip rate per Room less Transit/Walk Adj.
‐29.8% VMT Reduction (CAPCOA) ‐31.7% VMT Reduction (CAPCOA) ‐31.7% VMT Reduction (CAPCOA)
8.40 C‐C Trip Length (Baseline) 8.40 C‐C Trip Length (Baseline) 8.40 C‐C Trip Length (Baseline)16.60 C‐W Trip Length (Baseline) 16.60 C‐W Trip Length (Baseline) 16.60 C‐W Trip Length (Baseline)6.90 C‐NW Trip Length (Baseline) 6.90 C‐NW Trip Length (Baseline) 6.90 C‐NW Trip Length (Baseline)
5.89 C‐C Trip Length (Project) 5.74 H‐W Trip Length (Project) 5.74 C‐C Trip Length (Project)11.65 C‐W Trip Length (Project) 11.35 H‐S Trip Length (Project) 11.35 C‐W Trip Length (Project)4.84 C‐NW Trip Length (Project) 4.72 H‐O Trip Length (Project) 4.72 C‐NW Trip Length (Project)
Restaurant 127.13 Baseline trip rate per 1000 sf 127.15 Baseline trip rate per 1000 sf(Quality Restaurant) ‐20% Internal Capture Adjustment (Traffic Study) ‐20% Internal Capture Adjustment (Traffic Study)
‐15% Transit/Walk Adjustment (Traffic Study) ‐15% Transit/Walk Adjustment (Traffic Study)86.47 Baseline trip rate per 1000 sf less Adj. 86.48 Trip rate per 1000 sf less Adjustments
‐31.7% VMT Reduction (CAPCOA) ‐31.7% VMT Reduction (CAPCOA)
8.40 C‐C Trip Length (Baseline) 8.40 C‐C Trip Length (Baseline)16.60 C‐W Trip Length (Baseline) 16.60 C‐W Trip Length (Baseline)6.90 C‐NW Trip Length (Baseline) 6.90 C‐NW Trip Length (Baseline)
5.74 C‐C Trip Length (Project) 5.74 C‐C Trip Length (Project)11.35 C‐W Trip Length (Project) 11.35 C‐W Trip Length (Project)4.72 C‐NW Trip Length (Project) 4.72 C‐NW Trip Length (Project)
Retail 42.73 Baseline trip rate per 1000 sf 42.70 Baseline trip rate per 1000 sf(Strip Mall) ‐20% Internal Capture Adjustment (Traffic Study) ‐20% Internal Capture Adjustment (Traffic Study)
‐15% Transit/Walk Adjustment (Traffic Study) ‐15% Transit/Walk Adjustment (Traffic Study)29.07 Baseline trip rate per 1000 sf less Adj. 29.03 Trip rate per 1000 sf less Adjustments
‐31.7% VMT Reduction (CAPCOA) ‐31.7% VMT Reduction (CAPCOA)
8.40 C‐C Trip Length (Baseline) 8.40 C‐C Trip Length (Baseline)16.60 C‐W Trip Length (Baseline) 16.60 C‐W Trip Length (Baseline)6.90 C‐NW Trip Length (Baseline) 6.90 C‐NW Trip Length (Baseline)
5.74 C‐C Trip Length (Project) 5.74 C‐C Trip Length (Project)11.35 C‐W Trip Length (Project) 11.35 C‐W Trip Length (Project)4.72 C‐NW Trip Length (Project) 4.72 C‐NW Trip Length (Project)
Residential Common Areas Trips included in residential land use Trips included in residential land use Trips included in residential land useAbove‐Grade Parking Structure Land use does not generate its own trips Land use does not generate its own trips Land use does not generate its own tripsSubterranean Parking Structure Land use does not generate its own trips Land use does not generate its own trips Land use does not generate its own tripsOpen Space Land use does not generate its own trips Land use does not generate its own trips Land use does not generate its own trips
Daily Existing Trips
Source: PCR Service Corporation, (2016); Gibson Traffic Consulting, (2016).
Daily Full Buildout Project Trips
1020 S. Figueroa Street ProjectAir Quality and Greenhouse Gas AssessmentMobile Source Emissions
PM10 PM10 PM10 PM2_5 PM2_5 PM2_5Year Period ROG NOx CO SOx RD a Exh+BW+TW b Total RD a Exh+BW+TW b Total CO2
2015 Winter 9.60E‐08 7.26E‐08 7.81E‐07 1.52E‐09 3.31E‐07 1.90E‐08 3.50E‐07 8.11E‐08 8.20E‐09 8.93E‐082015 Summer 8.04E‐08 5.73E‐08 7.01E‐07 1.40E‐09 3.31E‐07 1.65E‐08 3.47E‐07 8.11E‐08 7.14E‐09 8.83E‐082015 Annual 1.54E‐04
2015 Max 9.60E‐08 7.26E‐08 7.81E‐07 1.52E‐09 3.31E‐07 1.90E‐08 3.50E‐07 8.11E‐08 8.20E‐09 8.93E‐08 1.54E‐042020 Winter 5.42E‐08 3.79E‐08 4.35E‐07 1.31E‐09 3.31E‐07 1.90E‐08 3.49E‐07 8.11E‐08 8.10E‐09 8.92E‐082020 Summer 5.26E‐08 3.44E‐08 4.57E‐07 1.39E‐09 3.31E‐07 1.90E‐08 3.49E‐07 8.11E‐08 8.10E‐09 8.92E‐082020 Annual 1.33E‐04
2020 Max 5.42E‐08 3.79E‐08 4.57E‐07 1.39E‐09 3.31E‐07 1.90E‐08 3.49E‐07 8.11E‐08 8.10E‐09 8.92E‐08 1.33E‐042023 Winter 4.39E‐08 2.73E‐08 3.40E‐07 1.17E‐09 3.31E‐07 1.88E‐08 3.49E‐07 8.11E‐08 8.00E‐09 8.91E‐082023 Summer 4.25E‐08 2.48E‐08 3.59E‐07 1.23E‐09 3.31E‐07 1.88E‐08 3.49E‐07 8.11E‐08 8.00E‐09 8.91E‐082023 Annual 1.18E‐04
2023 Max 4.39E‐08 2.73E‐08 3.59E‐07 1.23E‐09 3.31E‐07 1.88E‐08 3.49E‐07 8.11E‐08 8.00E‐09 8.91E‐08 1.18E‐04Notes:a. RD = Road Dustb. Exh = Exhaust; BW = Break Wear; TW = Tire WearSource: EMFAC2014
Daily Annual CO2PM10 PM10 PM10 PM2_5 PM2_5 PM2_5
Scenario VMT ROG NOx CO SOx RD a Exh+BW+TW b Total RD a Exh+BW+TW b Total Scenario VMT (MT/yr)Existing 9,624 1.8 1.4 15.0 0.03 6.4 0.4 6.7 1.6 0.2 1.7 Existing 2,599,399 362Interim Year 27,015 2.9 2.0 24.7 0.07 17.9 1.0 18.9 4.4 0.4 4.8 Interim Year 7,296,747 878Full Buildout 47,734 4.2 2.6 34.3 0.12 31.6 1.8 33.4 7.7 0.8 8.5 Full Buildout 12,893,077 1,381
Notes: Source: CalEEMod (VMT); ESA PCR, 2016a. RD = Road Dustb. Exh = Exhaust; BW = Break Wear; TW = Tire WearSource: CalEEMod (VMT); ESA PCR, 2016
Emission Factors (tons/mi)
Emissions (lbs/day)
6
1020 S. Figueroa Street ProjectAir Quality and Greenhouse Gas Assessment
Paved Road Dust Emission Factors (Assumes No Precipitation)
Formula: EFDust,P = (k (sL)0.91 × (W)1.02)
Where:EFDust,P = Paved Road Dust Emission Factor (having the same units as k)k = particle size multipliersL = road surface silt loading (g/m2)W = average fleet vehicle weight (tons) (CARB uses 2.4 tons as a fleet average vehicle weight factor)
Emission Factor (grams per VMT)PM10 PM2.5
k 0.9979 0.2449sL 0.1 0.1W 2.4 2.4
EFDust,P 3.00E‐01 7.36E‐02
Sources:
SCAQMD, CalEEMod, Version 2013.2.2.CARB, Entrained Dust from Paved Road Travel: Emission Estimation Methodology Background Document , (1997).
USEPA, AP‐42 , Fifth Edition, Volume I, Chapter 13.2.1 ‐ Paved Roads, (2011).
ESA PCR, 2016.
AppendixA.4OperationalProjectCharbroilerEmissions
1020 S. Figueroa Street ProjectDraft Environmental Impact ReportAir Quality Assessment
Project ‐ Estimated Charbroiler Stationary Source Emissions
Quantity3
Source1
VOC PM10 (lb/day) VOC PM10 VOC PM10
ProjectCharbroiler ‐ 25% fat Hamburger 3.94 32.65 116.5 86% 83% 0.06 0.65 Charbroiler ‐ Chicken 1.82 10.48 116.5 86% 83% 0.03 0.21
Total Emissions 0.09 0.85
Notes:1. Source type is based on the meat with the highest emission factors.2.
3.4.
5. It is assumed that PM10 emissions also represent PM2.5 emissions.
Source: PCR Services Corporation, 2016.
South Coast Air Quality Management District Rule 1138 (Control of Emissions from Restaurant Operations) regulates PM10 and VOC emissions from fast‐food restaurants with charbroilers. Catalytic oxidizers reduce VOC emissions by approximately 86 percent and PM10 emissions by approximately 83 percent.
Uncontrolled Emission Factors2
(lb/1000 lb)Controlled Emissions5
(pounds/day)Emissions Controls4
(percent reduction)
Quantity of meats charbroiled is based on the average pounds of meat cooked per restaurant consisting of 50% hamburger meat and 50% chicken.
South Coast Air Quality Management District, Emission Factors for Commercial Cooking Operations, http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default‐source/rule‐book/Proposed‐Rules/1138/par1138pdsr_appendixi.pdf?sfvrsn=2. Accessed April 2016.
AppendixA.5SouthCoastAirQualityManagementDistrictRule403
403 - 1
(Adopted May 7, 1976) (Amended November 6, 1992) (Amended July 9, 1993) (Amended February 14, 1997)
(Amended December 11, 1998)(Amended April 2, 2004) (Amended June 3, 2005)
RULE 403. FUGITIVE DUST
(a) Purpose
The purpose of this Rule is to reduce the amount of particulate matter entrained in
the ambient air as a result of anthropogenic (man-made) fugitive dust sources by
requiring actions to prevent, reduce or mitigate fugitive dust emissions.
(b) Applicability
The provisions of this Rule shall apply to any activity or man-made condition
capable of generating fugitive dust.
(c) Definitions
(1) ACTIVE OPERATIONS means any source capable of generating fugitive
dust, including, but not limited to, earth-moving activities,
construction/demolition activities, disturbed surface area, or heavy- and
light-duty vehicular movement.
(2) AGGREGATE-RELATED PLANTS are defined as facilities that produce
and / or mix sand and gravel and crushed stone.
(3) AGRICULTURAL HANDBOOK means the region-specific guidance
document that has been approved by the Governing Board or hereafter
approved by the Executive Officer and the U.S. EPA. For the South Coast
Air Basin, the Board-approved region-specific guidance document is the
Rule 403 Agricultural Handbook dated December 1998. For the
Coachella Valley, the Board-approved region-specific guidance document
is the Rule 403 Coachella Valley Agricultural Handbook dated April 2,
2004.
(4) ANEMOMETERS are devices used to measure wind speed and direction
in accordance with the performance standards, and maintenance and
calibration criteria as contained in the most recent Rule 403
Implementation Handbook.
(5) BEST AVAILABLE CONTROL MEASURES means fugitive dust
control actions that are set forth in Table 1 of this Rule.
Rule 403 (cont.) (Amended June 3, 2005)
403 - 2
(6) BULK MATERIAL is sand, gravel, soil, aggregate material less than two
inches in length or diameter, and other organic or inorganic particulate
matter.
(7) CEMENT MANUFACTURING FACILITY is any facility that has a
cement kiln at the facility.
(8) CHEMICAL STABILIZERS are any non-toxic chemical dust suppressant
which must not be used if prohibited for use by the Regional Water
Quality Control Boards, the California Air Resources Board, the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA), or any applicable law, rule
or regulation. The chemical stabilizers shall meet any specifications,
criteria, or tests required by any federal, state, or local water agency.
Unless otherwise indicated, the use of a non-toxic chemical stabilizer shall
be of sufficient concentration and application frequency to maintain a
stabilized surface.
(9) COMMERCIAL POULTRY RANCH means any building, structure,
enclosure, or premises where more than 100 fowl are kept or maintained
for the primary purpose of producing eggs or meat for sale or other
distribution.
(10) CONFINED ANIMAL FACILITY means a source or group of sources of
air pollution at an agricultural source for the raising of 3,360 or more fowl
or 50 or more animals, including but not limited to, any structure,
building, installation, farm, corral, coop, feed storage area, milking parlor,
or system for the collection, storage, or distribution of solid and liquid
manure; if domesticated animals, including horses, sheep, goats, swine,
beef cattle, rabbits, chickens, turkeys, or ducks are corralled, penned, or
otherwise caused to remain in restricted areas for commercial agricultural
purposes and feeding is by means other than grazing.
(11) CONSTRUCTION/DEMOLITION ACTIVITIES means any on-site
mechanical activities conducted in preparation of, or related to, the
building, alteration, rehabilitation, demolition or improvement of property,
including, but not limited to the following activities: grading, excavation,
loading, crushing, cutting, planing, shaping or ground breaking.
(12) CONTRACTOR means any person who has a contractual arrangement to
conduct an active operation for another person.
(13) DAIRY FARM is an operation on a property, or set of properties that are
contiguous or separated only by a public right-of-way, that raises cows or
Rule 403 (cont.) (Amended June 3, 2005)
403 - 3
produces milk from cows for the purpose of making a profit or for a
livelihood. Heifer and calf farms are dairy farms.
(14) DISTURBED SURFACE AREA means a portion of the earth's surface
which has been physically moved, uncovered, destabilized, or otherwise
modified from its undisturbed natural soil condition, thereby increasing
the potential for emission of fugitive dust. This definition excludes those
areas which have:
(A) been restored to a natural state, such that the vegetative ground
cover and soil characteristics are similar to adjacent or nearby
natural conditions;
(B) been paved or otherwise covered by a permanent structure; or
(C) sustained a vegetative ground cover of at least 70 percent of the
native cover for a particular area for at least 30 days.
(15) DUST SUPPRESSANTS are water, hygroscopic materials, or non-toxic
chemical stabilizers used as a treatment material to reduce fugitive dust
emissions.
(16) EARTH-MOVING ACTIVITIES means the use of any equipment for any
activity where soil is being moved or uncovered, and shall include, but not
be limited to the following: grading, earth cutting and filling operations,
loading or unloading of dirt or bulk materials, adding to or removing from
open storage piles of bulk materials, landfill operations, weed abatement
through disking, and soil mulching.
(17) DUST CONTROL SUPERVISOR means a person with the authority to
expeditiously employ sufficient dust mitigation measures to ensure
compliance with all Rule 403 requirements at an active operation.
(18) FUGITIVE DUST means any solid particulate matter that becomes
airborne, other than that emitted from an exhaust stack, directly or
indirectly as a result of the activities of any person.
(19) HIGH WIND CONDITIONS means that instantaneous wind speeds
exceed 25 miles per hour.
(20) INACTIVE DISTURBED SURFACE AREA means any disturbed surface
area upon which active operations have not occurred or are not expected to
occur for a period of 20 consecutive days.
(21) LARGE OPERATIONS means any active operations on property which
contains 50 or more acres of disturbed surface area; or any earth-moving
operation with a daily earth-moving or throughput volume of 3,850 cubic
Rule 403 (cont.) (Amended June 3, 2005)
403 - 4
meters (5,000 cubic yards) or more three times during the most recent
365-day period.
(22) OPEN STORAGE PILE is any accumulation of bulk material, which is
not fully enclosed, covered or chemically stabilized, and which attains a
height of three feet or more and a total surface area of 150 or more square
feet.
(23) PARTICULATE MATTER means any material, except uncombined
water, which exists in a finely divided form as a liquid or solid at standard
conditions.
(24) PAVED ROAD means a public or private improved street, highway, alley,
public way, or easement that is covered by typical roadway materials, but
excluding access roadways that connect a facility with a public paved
roadway and are not open to through traffic. Public paved roads are those
open to public access and that are owned by any federal, state, county,
municipal or any other governmental or quasi-governmental agencies.
Private paved roads are any paved roads not defined as public.
(25) PM10 means particulate matter with an aerodynamic diameter smaller
than or equal to 10 microns as measured by the applicable State and
Federal reference test methods.
(26) PROPERTY LINE means the boundaries of an area in which either a
person causing the emission or a person allowing the emission has the
legal use or possession of the property. Where such property is divided
into one or more sub-tenancies, the property line(s) shall refer to the
boundaries dividing the areas of all sub-tenancies.
(27) RULE 403 IMPLEMENTATION HANDBOOK means a guidance
document that has been approved by the Governing Board on April 2,
2004 or hereafter approved by the Executive Officer and the U.S. EPA.
(28) SERVICE ROADS are paved or unpaved roads that are used by one or
more public agencies for inspection or maintenance of infrastructure and
which are not typically used for construction-related activity.
(29) SIMULTANEOUS SAMPLING means the operation of two PM10samplers in such a manner that one sampler is started within five minutes
of the other, and each sampler is operated for a consecutive period which
must be not less than 290 minutes and not more than 310 minutes.
(30) SOUTH COAST AIR BASIN means the non-desert portions of Los
Angeles, Riverside, and San Bernardino counties and all of Orange
Rule 403 (cont.) (Amended June 3, 2005)
403 - 5
County as defined in California Code of Regulations, Title 17, Section
60104. The area is bounded on the west by the Pacific Ocean, on the
north and east by the San Gabriel, San Bernardino, and San Jacinto
Mountains, and on the south by the San Diego county line.
(31) STABILIZED SURFACE means any previously disturbed surface area or
open storage pile which, through the application of dust suppressants,
shows visual or other evidence of surface crusting and is resistant to wind-
driven fugitive dust and is demonstrated to be stabilized. Stabilization can
be demonstrated by one or more of the applicable test methods contained
in the Rule 403 Implementation Handbook.
(32) TRACK-OUT means any bulk material that adheres to and agglomerates
on the exterior surface of motor vehicles, haul trucks, and equipment
(including tires) that have been released onto a paved road and can be
removed by a vacuum sweeper or a broom sweeper under normal
operating conditions.
(33) TYPICAL ROADWAY MATERIALS means concrete, asphaltic
concrete, recycled asphalt, asphalt, or any other material of equivalent
performance as determined by the Executive Officer, and the U.S. EPA.
(34) UNPAVED ROADS means any unsealed or unpaved roads, equipment
paths, or travel ways that are not covered by typical roadway materials.
Public unpaved roads are any unpaved roadway owned by federal, state,
county, municipal or other governmental or quasi-governmental agencies.
Private unpaved roads are all other unpaved roadways not defined as
public.
(35) VISIBLE ROADWAY DUST means any sand, soil, dirt, or other solid
particulate matter which is visible upon paved road surfaces and which
can be removed by a vacuum sweeper or a broom sweeper under normal
operating conditions.
(36) WIND-DRIVEN FUGITIVE DUST means visible emissions from any
disturbed surface area which is generated by wind action alone.
(37) WIND GUST is the maximum instantaneous wind speed as measured by
an anemometer.
(d) Requirements
(1) No person shall cause or allow the emissions of fugitive dust from any
active operation, open storage pile, or disturbed surface area such that:
Rule 403 (cont.) (Amended June 3, 2005)
403 - 6
(A) the dust remains visible in the atmosphere beyond the property line
of the emission source; or
(B) the dust emission exceeds 20 percent opacity (as determined by the
appropriate test method included in the Rule 403 Implementation
Handbook), if the dust emission is the result of movement of a
motorized vehicle.
(2) No person shall conduct active operations without utilizing the applicable
best available control measures included in Table 1 of this Rule to
minimize fugitive dust emissions from each fugitive dust source type
within the active operation.
(3) No person shall cause or allow PM10 levels to exceed 50 micrograms per
cubic meter when determined, by simultaneous sampling, as the difference
between upwind and downwind samples collected on high-volume
particulate matter samplers or other U.S. EPA-approved equivalent
method for PM10 monitoring. If sampling is conducted, samplers shall
be:
(A) Operated, maintained, and calibrated in accordance with 40 Code
of Federal Regulations (CFR), Part 50, Appendix J, or appropriate
U.S. EPA-published documents for U.S. EPA-approved equivalent
method(s) for PM10.
(B) Reasonably placed upwind and downwind of key activity areas and
as close to the property line as feasible, such that other sources of
fugitive dust between the sampler and the property line are
minimized.
(4) No person shall allow track-out to extend 25 feet or more in cumulative
length from the point of origin from an active operation. Notwithstanding
the preceding, all track-out from an active operation shall be removed at
the conclusion of each workday or evening shift.
(5) No person shall conduct an active operation with a disturbed surface area
of five or more acres, or with a daily import or export of 100 cubic yards
or more of bulk material without utilizing at least one of the measures
listed in subparagraphs (d)(5)(A) through (d)(5)(E) at each vehicle egress
from the site to a paved public road.
(A) Install a pad consisting of washed gravel (minimum-size: one inch)
maintained in a clean condition to a depth of at least six inches and
extending at least 30 feet wide and at least 50 feet long.
Rule 403 (cont.) (Amended June 3, 2005)
403 - 7
(B) Pave the surface extending at least 100 feet and at least 20 feet
wide.
(C) Utilize a wheel shaker/wheel spreading device consisting of raised
dividers (rails, pipe, or grates) at least 24 feet long and 10 feet
wide to remove bulk material from tires and vehicle undercarriages
before vehicles exit the site.
(D) Install and utilize a wheel washing system to remove bulk material
from tires and vehicle undercarriages before vehicles exit the site.
(E) Any other control measures approved by the Executive Officer and
the U.S. EPA as equivalent to the actions specified in
subparagraphs (d)(5)(A) through (d)(5)(D).
(6) Beginning January 1, 2006, any person who operates or authorizes the
operation of a confined animal facility subject to this Rule shall implement
the applicable conservation management practices specified in Table 4 of
this Rule.
(e) Additional Requirements for Large Operations
(1) Any person who conducts or authorizes the conducting of a large
operation subject to this Rule shall implement the applicable actions
specified in Table 2 of this Rule at all times and shall implement the
applicable actions specified in Table 3 of this Rule when the applicable
performance standards can not be met through use of Table 2 actions; and
shall:
(A) submit a fully executed Large Operation Notification (Form 403
N) to the Executive Officer within 7 days of qualifying as a large
operation;
(B) include, as part of the notification, the name(s), address(es), and
phone number(s) of the person(s) responsible for the submittal, and
a description of the operation(s), including a map depicting the
location of the site;
(C) maintain daily records to document the specific dust control
actions taken, maintain such records for a period of not less than
three years; and make such records available to the Executive
Officer upon request;
Rule 403 (cont.) (Amended June 3, 2005)
403 - 8
(D) install and maintain project signage with project contact signage
that meets the minimum standards of the Rule 403 Implementation
Handbook, prior to initiating any earthmoving activities;
(E) identify a dust control supervisor that:
(i) is employed by or contracted with the property owner or
developer;
(ii) is on the site or available on-site within 30 minutes during
working hours;
(iii) has the authority to expeditiously employ sufficient dust
mitigation measures to ensure compliance with all Rule
requirements;
(iv) has completed the AQMD Fugitive Dust Control Class and
has been issued a valid Certificate of Completion for the
class; and
(F) notify the Executive Officer in writing within 30 days after the site
no longer qualifies as a large operation as defined by paragraph
(c)(18).
(2) Any Large Operation Notification submitted to the Executive Officer or
AQMD-approved dust control plan shall be valid for a period of one year
from the date of written acceptance by the Executive Officer. Any Large
Operation Notification accepted pursuant to paragraph (e)(1), excluding
those submitted by aggregate-related plants and cement manufacturing
facilities must be resubmitted annually by the person who conducts or
authorizes the conducting of a large operation, at least 30 days prior to the
expiration date, or the submittal shall no longer be valid as of the
expiration date. If all fugitive dust sources and corresponding control
measures or special circumstances remain identical to those identified in
the previously accepted submittal or in an AQMD-approved dust control
plan, the resubmittal may be a simple statement of no-change (Form
403NC).
(f) Compliance Schedule
The newly amended provisions of this Rule shall become effective upon adoption.
Pursuant to subdivision (e), any existing site that qualifies as a large operation
will have 60 days from the date of Rule adoption to comply with the notification
and recordkeeping requirements for large operations. Any Large Operation
Rule 403 (cont.) (Amended June 3, 2005)
403 - 9
Notification or AQMD-approved dust control plan which has been accepted prior
to the date of adoption of these amendments shall remain in effect and the Large
Operation Notification or AQMD-approved dust control plan annual resubmittal
date shall be one year from adoption of this Rule amendment.
(g) Exemptions
(1) The provisions of this Rule shall not apply to:
(A) Dairy farms.
(B) Confined animal facilities provided that the combined disturbed
surface area within one continuous property line is one acre or less.
(C) Agricultural vegetative crop operations provided that the combined
disturbed surface area within one continuous property line and not
separated by a paved public road is 10 acres or less.
(D) Agricultural vegetative crop operations within the South Coast Air
Basin, whose combined disturbed surface area includes more than
10 acres provided that the person responsible for such operations:
(i) voluntarily implements the conservation management
practices contained in the Rule 403 Agricultural Handbook;
(ii) completes and maintains the self-monitoring form
documenting sufficient conservation management
practices, as described in the Rule 403 Agricultural
Handbook; and
(iii) makes the completed self-monitoring form available to the
Executive Officer upon request.
(E) Agricultural vegetative crop operations outside the South Coast Air
Basin whose combined disturbed surface area includes more than
10 acres provided that the person responsible for such operations:
(i) voluntarily implements the conservation management
practices contained in the Rule 403 Coachella Valley
Agricultural Handbook; and
(ii) completes and maintains the self-monitoring form
documenting sufficient conservation management
practices, as described in the Rule 403 Coachella Valley
Agricultural Handbook; and
(iii) makes the completed self-monitoring form available to the
Executive Officer upon request.
Rule 403 (cont.) (Amended June 3, 2005)
403 - 10
(F) Active operations conducted during emergency life-threatening
situations, or in conjunction with any officially declared disaster or
state of emergency.
(G) Active operations conducted by essential service utilities to
provide electricity, natural gas, telephone, water and sewer during
periods of service outages and emergency disruptions.
(H) Any contractor subsequent to the time the contract ends, provided
that such contractor implemented the required control measures
during the contractual period.
(I) Any grading contractor, for a phase of active operations,
subsequent to the contractual completion of that phase of earth-
moving activities, provided that the required control measures have
been implemented during the entire phase of earth-moving
activities, through and including five days after the final grading
inspection.
(J) Weed abatement operations ordered by a county agricultural
commissioner or any state, county, or municipal fire department,
provided that:
(i) mowing, cutting or other similar process is used which
maintains weed stubble at least three inches above the soil;
and
(ii) any discing or similar operation which cuts into and
disturbs the soil, where watering is used prior to initiation
of these activities, and a determination is made by the
agency issuing the weed abatement order that, due to fire
hazard conditions, rocks, or other physical obstructions, it
is not practical to meet the conditions specified in clause
(g)(1)(H)(i). The provisions this clause shall not exempt
the owner of any property from stabilizing, in accordance
with paragraph (d)(2), disturbed surface areas which have
been created as a result of the weed abatement actions.
(K) sandblasting operations.
(2) The provisions of paragraphs (d)(1) and (d)(3) shall not apply:
(A) When wind gusts exceed 25 miles per hour, provided that:
Rule 403 (cont.) (Amended June 3, 2005)
403 - 11
(i) The required Table 3 contingency measures in this Rule are
implemented for each applicable fugitive dust source type,
and;
(ii) records are maintained in accordance with subparagraph
(e)(1)(C).
(B) To unpaved roads, provided such roads:
(i) are used solely for the maintenance of wind-generating
equipment; or
(ii) are unpaved public alleys as defined in Rule 1186; or
(iii) are service roads that meet all of the following criteria:
(a) are less than 50 feet in width at all points along the
road;
(b) are within 25 feet of the property line; and
(c) have a traffic volume less than 20 vehicle-trips per
day.
(C) To any active operation, open storage pile, or disturbed surface
area for which necessary fugitive dust preventive or mitigative
actions are in conflict with the federal Endangered Species Act, as
determined in writing by the State or federal agency responsible
for making such determinations.
(3) The provisions of (d)(2) shall not apply to any aggregate-related plant or
cement manufacturing facility that implements the applicable actions
specified in Table 2 of this Rule at all times and shall implement the
applicable actions specified in Table 3 of this Rule when the applicable
performance standards of paragraphs (d)(1) and (d)(3) can not be met
through use of Table 2 actions.
(4) The provisions of paragraphs (d)(1), (d)(2), and (d)(3) shall not apply to:
(A) Blasting operations which have been permitted by the California
Division of Industrial Safety; and
(B) Motion picture, television, and video production activities when
dust emissions are required for visual effects. In order to obtain
this exemption, the Executive Officer must receive notification in
writing at least 72 hours in advance of any such activity and no
nuisance results from such activity.
(5) The provisions of paragraph (d)(3) shall not apply if the dust control
actions, as specified in Table 2, are implemented on a routine basis for
Rule 403 (cont.) (Amended June 3, 2005)
403 - 12
each applicable fugitive dust source type. To qualify for this exemption, a
person must maintain records in accordance with subparagraph (e)(1)(C).
(6) The provisions of paragraph (d)(4) shall not apply to earth coverings of
public paved roadways where such coverings are approved by a local
government agency for the protection of the roadway, and where such
coverings are used as roadway crossings for haul vehicles provided that
such roadway is closed to through traffic and visible roadway dust is
removed within one day following the cessation of activities.
(7) The provisions of subdivision (e) shall not apply to:
(A) officially-designated public parks and recreational areas, including
national parks, national monuments, national forests, state parks,
state recreational areas, and county regional parks.
(B) any large operation which is required to submit a dust control plan
to any city or county government which has adopted a District-
approved dust control ordinance.
(C) any large operation subject to Rule 1158, which has an approved
dust control plan pursuant to Rule 1158, provided that all sources
of fugitive dust are included in the Rule 1158 plan.
(8) The provisions of subparagraph (e)(1)(A) through (e)(1)(C) shall not apply
to any large operation with an AQMD-approved fugitive dust control plan
provided that there is no change to the sources and controls as identified in
the AQMD-approved fugitive dust control plan.
(h) Fees
Any person conducting active operations for which the Executive Officer
conducts upwind/downwind monitoring for PM10 pursuant to paragraph
(d)(3) shall be assessed applicable Ambient Air Analysis Fees pursuant to
Rule 304.1. Applicable fees shall be waived for any facility which is
exempted from paragraph (d)(3) or meets the requirements of paragraph
(d)(3).
Ru
le 4
03 (
con
t.)
(Am
end
ed J
un
e 3,
200
5)
TA
BL
E 1
B
ES
T A
VA
ILA
BL
E C
ON
TR
OL
ME
AS
UR
ES
(A
pp
lica
ble
to
All
Con
stru
ctio
n A
ctiv
ity
Sou
rces
)
403
- 13
Sou
rce
Cat
egor
y
C
ontr
ol M
easu
re
G
uid
ance
Bac
kfil
ling
01
-1
01-2
01-3
Sta
bili
ze b
ackf
ill m
ater
ial w
hen
not a
ctiv
ely
hand
ling
; and
S
tabi
lize
bac
kfil
l mat
eria
l dur
ing
hand
ling
; and
S
tabi
lize
soi
l at c
ompl
etio
n of
act
ivit
y.
Mix
bac
kfil
l soi
l wit
h w
ater
pri
or to
mov
ing
Ded
icat
e w
ater
truc
k or
hig
h ca
paci
ty h
ose
to
back
fill
ing
equi
pmen
t E
mpt
y lo
ader
buc
ket s
low
ly s
o th
at n
o du
st
plum
es a
re g
ener
ated
M
inim
ize
drop
hei
ght f
rom
load
er b
ucke
t
Cle
arin
g an
d gr
ubbi
ng02
-1
02-2
02-3
Mai
ntai
n st
abil
ity
of s
oil t
hrou
gh p
re-w
ater
ing
of
site
pri
or to
cle
arin
g an
d gr
ubbi
ng; a
nd
Sta
bili
ze s
oil d
urin
g cl
eari
ng a
nd g
rubb
ing
acti
viti
es; a
nd
Sta
bili
ze s
oil i
mm
edia
tely
aft
er c
lear
ing
and
grub
bing
act
ivit
ies.
Mai
ntai
n li
ve p
eren
nial
veg
etat
ion
whe
re
poss
ible
App
ly w
ater
in s
uffi
cien
t qua
ntit
y to
pre
vent
ge
nera
tion
of
dust
plu
mes
Cle
arin
g fo
rms
03-1
03
-203
-3
Use
wat
er s
pray
to c
lear
for
ms;
or
Use
sw
eepi
ng a
nd w
ater
spr
ay to
cle
ar f
orm
s; o
r U
se v
acuu
m s
yste
m to
cle
ar f
orm
s.
Use
of
high
pre
ssur
e ai
r to
cle
ar f
orm
s m
ay c
ause
ex
ceed
ance
of
Rul
e re
quir
emen
ts
Cru
shin
g 04
-1
04-2
Sta
bili
ze s
urfa
ce s
oils
pri
or to
ope
rati
on o
f su
ppor
t equ
ipm
ent;
and
S
tabi
lize
mat
eria
l aft
er c
rush
ing.
Fol
low
per
mit
con
diti
ons
for
crus
hing
equ
ipm
ent
Pre
-wat
er m
ater
ial p
rior
to lo
adin
g in
to c
rush
er
Mon
itor
cru
sher
em
issi
ons
opac
ity
App
ly w
ater
to c
rush
ed m
ater
ial t
o pr
even
t dus
t pl
umes
Ru
le 4
03 (
con
t.)
(Am
end
ed J
un
e 3,
200
5)
TA
BL
E 1
B
ES
T A
VA
ILA
BL
E C
ON
TR
OL
ME
AS
UR
ES
(A
pp
lica
ble
to
All
Con
stru
ctio
n A
ctiv
ity
Sou
rces
)
403
- 14
Sou
rce
Cat
egor
y
C
ontr
ol M
easu
re
G
uid
ance
Cut
and
fil
l 05
-1
05-2
Pre
-wat
er s
oils
pri
or to
cut
and
fil
l act
ivit
ies;
and
Sta
bili
ze s
oil d
urin
g an
d af
ter
cut a
nd f
ill a
ctiv
itie
s.
For
larg
e si
tes,
pre
-wat
er w
ith
spri
nkle
rs o
r w
ater
truc
ks a
nd a
llow
tim
e fo
r pe
netr
atio
n U
se w
ater
truc
ks/p
ulls
to w
ater
soi
ls to
dep
th
of c
ut p
rior
to s
ubse
quen
t cut
s
Dem
olit
ion
– m
echa
nica
l/m
anua
l 06
-1
06-2
06-3
06-4
Sta
bili
ze w
ind
erod
ible
sur
face
s to
red
uce
dust
; and
Sta
bili
ze s
urfa
ce s
oil w
here
sup
port
equ
ipm
ent a
nd
vehi
cles
wil
l ope
rate
; and
S
tabi
lize
loos
e so
il a
nd d
emol
itio
n de
bris
; and
C
ompl
y w
ith
AQ
MD
Rul
e 14
03.
App
ly w
ater
in s
uffi
cien
t qua
ntit
ies
to
prev
ent t
he g
ener
atio
n of
vis
ible
dus
t plu
mes
Dis
turb
ed s
oil
07-1
07-2
Sta
bili
ze d
istu
rbed
soi
l thr
ough
out t
he c
onst
ruct
ion
site
; and
S
tabi
lize
dis
turb
ed s
oil b
etw
een
stru
ctur
es
Lim
it v
ehic
ular
traf
fic
and
dist
urba
nces
on
soil
s w
here
pos
sibl
e If
inte
rior
blo
ck w
alls
are
pla
nned
, ins
tall
as
earl
y as
pos
sibl
e A
pply
wat
er o
r a
stab
iliz
ing
agen
t in
suff
icie
nt q
uant
itie
s to
pre
vent
the
gene
rati
on o
f vi
sibl
e du
st p
lum
es
Ear
th-m
ovin
g ac
tivi
ties
08-1
08-2
08-3
Pre
-app
ly w
ater
to d
epth
of
prop
osed
cut
s; a
nd
Re-
appl
y w
ater
as
nece
ssar
y to
mai
ntai
n so
ils
in a
da
mp
cond
itio
n an
d to
ens
ure
that
vis
ible
em
issi
ons
do n
ot e
xcee
d 10
0 fe
et in
any
dir
ecti
on; a
nd
Sta
bili
ze s
oils
onc
e ea
rth-
mov
ing
acti
viti
es a
re
com
plet
e.
Gra
de e
ach
proj
ect p
hase
sep
arat
ely,
tim
ed
to c
oinc
ide
wit
h co
nstr
ucti
on p
hase
U
pwin
d fe
ncin
g ca
n pr
even
t mat
eria
l m
ovem
ent o
n si
te
App
ly w
ater
or
a st
abil
izin
g ag
ent i
n su
ffic
ient
qua
ntit
ies
to p
reve
nt th
e ge
nera
tion
of
visi
ble
dust
plu
mes
Ru
le 4
03 (
con
t.)
(Am
end
ed J
un
e 3,
200
5)
TA
BL
E 1
B
ES
T A
VA
ILA
BL
E C
ON
TR
OL
ME
AS
UR
ES
(A
pp
lica
ble
to
All
Con
stru
ctio
n A
ctiv
ity
Sou
rces
)
403
- 15
Sou
rce
Cat
egor
y
C
ontr
ol M
easu
re
G
uid
ance
Impo
rtin
g/ex
port
ing
of b
ulk
mat
eria
ls
09-1
09-2
09-3
09-4
09-5
Sta
bili
ze m
ater
ial w
hile
load
ing
to r
educ
e fu
giti
ve
dust
em
issi
ons;
and
M
aint
ain
at le
ast s
ix in
ches
of
free
boar
d on
hau
l ve
hicl
es; a
nd
Sta
bili
ze m
ater
ial w
hile
tran
spor
ting
to r
educ
e fu
giti
ve d
ust e
mis
sion
s; a
nd
Sta
bili
ze m
ater
ial w
hile
unl
oadi
ng to
red
uce
fugi
tive
du
st e
mis
sion
s; a
nd
Com
ply
wit
h V
ehic
le C
ode
Sec
tion
231
14.
Use
tarp
s or
oth
er s
uita
ble
encl
osur
es o
n ha
ul tr
ucks
C
heck
bel
ly-d
ump
truc
k se
als
regu
larl
y an
d re
mov
e an
y tr
appe
d ro
cks
to p
reve
nt s
pill
age
Com
ply
wit
h tr
ack-
out
prev
enti
on/m
itig
atio
n re
quir
emen
ts
Pro
vide
wat
er w
hile
load
ing
and
unlo
adin
g to
red
uce
visi
ble
dust
plu
mes
Lan
dsca
ping
10
-1
Sta
bili
ze s
oils
, mat
eria
ls, s
lope
s A
pply
wat
er to
mat
eria
ls to
sta
bili
ze
Mai
ntai
n m
ater
ials
in a
cru
sted
con
diti
on
Mai
ntai
n ef
fect
ive
cove
r ov
er m
ater
ials
S
tabi
lize
slo
ping
sur
face
s us
ing
soil
bin
ders
un
til v
eget
atio
n or
gro
und
cove
r ca
n ef
fect
ivel
y st
abil
ize
the
slop
es
Hyd
rose
ed p
rior
to r
ain
seas
on
Roa
d sh
ould
er
mai
nten
ance
11
-1
11-2
App
ly w
ater
to u
npav
ed s
houl
ders
pri
or to
cle
arin
g;
and
App
ly c
hem
ical
dus
t sup
pres
sant
s an
d/or
was
hed
grav
el to
mai
ntai
n a
stab
iliz
ed s
urfa
ce a
fter
co
mpl
etin
g ro
ad s
houl
der
mai
nten
ance
.
Inst
alla
tion
of
curb
ing
and/
or p
avin
g of
roa
d sh
ould
ers
can
redu
ce r
ecur
ring
mai
nten
ance
co
sts
Use
of
chem
ical
dus
t sup
pres
sant
s ca
n in
hibi
t veg
etat
ion
grow
th a
nd r
educ
e fu
ture
ro
ad s
houl
der
mai
nten
ance
cos
ts
Ru
le 4
03 (
con
t.)
(Am
end
ed J
un
e 3,
200
5)
TA
BL
E 1
B
ES
T A
VA
ILA
BL
E C
ON
TR
OL
ME
AS
UR
ES
(A
pp
lica
ble
to
All
Con
stru
ctio
n A
ctiv
ity
Sou
rces
)
403
- 16
Sou
rce
Cat
egor
y
C
ontr
ol M
easu
re
G
uid
ance
Scr
eeni
ng
12-1
12
-2
12-3
Pre
-wat
er m
ater
ial p
rior
to s
cree
ning
; and
L
imit
fug
itiv
e du
st e
mis
sion
s to
opa
city
and
plu
me
leng
th s
tand
ards
; and
S
tabi
lize
mat
eria
l im
med
iate
ly a
fter
scr
eeni
ng.
Ded
icat
e w
ater
truc
k or
hig
h ca
paci
ty h
ose
to s
cree
ning
ope
rati
on
Dro
p m
ater
ial t
hrou
gh th
e sc
reen
slo
wly
and
m
inim
ize
drop
hei
ght
Inst
all w
ind
barr
ier
wit
h a
poro
sity
of
no
mor
e th
an 5
0% u
pwin
d of
scr
een
to th
e he
ight
of
the
drop
poi
nt
Sta
ging
are
as
13-1
13
-2S
tabi
lize
sta
ging
are
as d
urin
g us
e; a
nd
Sta
bili
ze s
tagi
ng a
rea
soil
s at
pro
ject
com
plet
ion.
L
imit
siz
e of
sta
ging
are
a L
imit
veh
icle
spe
eds
to 1
5 m
iles
per
hou
r L
imit
num
ber
and
size
of
stag
ing
area
en
tran
ces/
exis
ts
Sto
ckpi
les/
Bul
k M
ater
ial
Han
dlin
g
14-1
14-2
Sta
bili
ze s
tock
pile
d m
ater
ials
. S
tock
pile
s w
ithi
n 10
0 ya
rds
of o
ff-s
ite
occu
pied
bu
ildi
ngs
mus
t not
be
grea
ter
than
eig
ht f
eet i
n he
ight
; or
mus
t hav
e a
road
bla
ded
to th
e to
p to
all
ow
wat
er tr
uck
acce
ss o
r m
ust h
ave
an o
pera
tion
al w
ater
ir
riga
tion
sys
tem
that
is c
apab
le o
f co
mpl
ete
stoc
kpil
e co
vera
ge.
Add
or
rem
ove
mat
eria
l fro
m th
e do
wnw
ind
port
ion
of th
e st
orag
e pi
le
Mai
ntai
n st
orag
e pi
les
to a
void
ste
ep s
ides
or
fac
es
Ru
le 4
03 (
con
t.)
(Am
end
ed J
un
e 3,
200
5)
TA
BL
E 1
B
ES
T A
VA
ILA
BL
E C
ON
TR
OL
ME
AS
UR
ES
(A
pp
lica
ble
to
All
Con
stru
ctio
n A
ctiv
ity
Sou
rces
)
403
- 17
Sou
rce
Cat
egor
y
C
ontr
ol M
easu
re
G
uid
ance
Tra
ffic
are
as f
or
cons
truc
tion
acti
viti
es
15-1
15-2
15-3
Sta
bili
ze a
ll o
ff-r
oad
traf
fic
and
park
ing
area
s; a
nd
Sta
bili
ze a
ll h
aul r
oute
s; a
nd
Dir
ect c
onst
ruct
ion
traf
fic
over
est
abli
shed
hau
l ro
utes
.
App
ly g
rave
l/pa
ving
to a
ll h
aul r
oute
s as
so
on a
s po
ssib
le to
all
fut
ure
road
way
are
as
Bar
rier
s ca
n be
use
d to
ens
ure
vehi
cles
are
on
ly u
sed
on e
stab
lish
ed p
arki
ng a
reas
/hau
l ro
utes
Tre
nchi
ng
16-1
16-2
Sta
bili
ze s
urfa
ce s
oils
whe
re tr
ench
er o
r ex
cava
tor
and
supp
ort e
quip
men
t wil
l ope
rate
; and
S
tabi
lize
soi
ls a
t the
com
plet
ion
of tr
ench
ing
acti
viti
es.
Pre
-wat
erin
g of
soi
ls p
rior
to tr
ench
ing
is a
n ef
fect
ive
prev
enti
ve m
easu
re.
For
dee
p tr
ench
ing
acti
viti
es, p
re-t
renc
h to
18
inch
es
soak
soi
ls v
ia th
e pr
e-tr
ench
and
res
umin
g tr
ench
ing
Was
hing
mud
and
soi
ls f
rom
equ
ipm
ent a
t th
e co
nclu
sion
of
tren
chin
g ac
tivi
ties
can
pr
even
t cru
stin
g an
d dr
ying
of
soil
on
equi
pmen
t
Tru
ck lo
adin
g 17
-1
17-2
Pre
-wat
er m
ater
ial p
rior
to lo
adin
g; a
nd
Ens
ure
that
fre
eboa
rd e
xcee
ds s
ix in
ches
(C
VC
23
114)
Em
pty
load
er b
ucke
t suc
h th
at n
o vi
sibl
e du
st p
lum
es a
re c
reat
ed
Ens
ure
that
the
load
er b
ucke
t is
clos
e to
the
truc
k to
min
imiz
e dr
op h
eigh
t whi
le lo
adin
g
Tur
f O
vers
eedi
ng
18-1
18-2
App
ly s
uffi
cien
t wat
er im
med
iate
ly p
rior
to
cond
ucti
ng tu
rf v
acuu
min
g ac
tivi
ties
to m
eet o
paci
ty
and
plum
e le
ngth
sta
ndar
ds; a
nd
Cov
er h
aul v
ehic
les
prio
r to
exi
ting
the
site
.
Hau
l was
te m
ater
ial i
mm
edia
tely
off
-sit
e
Ru
le 4
03 (
con
t.)
(Am
end
ed J
un
e 3,
200
5)
TA
BL
E 1
B
ES
T A
VA
ILA
BL
E C
ON
TR
OL
ME
AS
UR
ES
(A
pp
lica
ble
to
All
Con
stru
ctio
n A
ctiv
ity
Sou
rces
)
403
- 18
Sou
rce
Cat
egor
y
C
ontr
ol M
easu
re
G
uid
ance
Unp
aved
road
s/pa
rkin
g lo
ts
19-1
19-2
Sta
bili
ze s
oils
to m
eet t
he a
ppli
cabl
e pe
rfor
man
ce
stan
dard
s; a
nd
Lim
it v
ehic
ular
trav
el to
est
abli
shed
unp
aved
roa
ds
(hau
l rou
tes)
and
unp
aved
par
king
lots
.
Res
tric
ting
veh
icul
ar a
cces
s to
est
abli
shed
un
pave
d tr
avel
pat
hs a
nd p
arki
ng lo
ts c
an
redu
ce s
tabi
liza
tion
req
uire
men
ts
Vac
ant l
and
20-1
In
inst
ance
s w
here
vac
ant l
ots
are
0.10
acr
e or
larg
er
and
have
a c
umul
ativ
e ar
ea o
f 50
0 sq
uare
fee
t or
mor
e th
at a
re d
rive
n ov
er a
nd/o
r us
ed b
y m
otor
ve
hicl
es a
nd/o
r of
f-ro
ad v
ehic
les,
pre
vent
mot
or
vehi
cle
and/
or o
ff-r
oad
vehi
cle
tres
pass
ing,
par
king
an
d/or
acc
ess
by in
stal
ling
bar
rier
s, c
urbs
, fen
ces,
ga
tes,
pos
ts, s
igns
, shr
ubs,
tree
s or
oth
er e
ffec
tive
co
ntro
l mea
sure
s.
Rule 403 (cont.) (Amended June 3, 2005)
403 - 19
Table 2 DUST CONTROL MEASURES FOR LARGE OPERATIONS
FUGITIVE DUST SOURCE CATEGORY CONTROL ACTIONS
Earth-moving (except construction cutting and filling areas, and mining operations)
(1a) Maintain soil moisture content at a minimum of 12 percent, as determined by ASTM method D-2216, or other equivalent method approved by the Executive Officer, the California Air Resources Board, and the U.S. EPA. Two soil moisture evaluations must be conducted during the first three hours of active operations during a calendar day, and two such evaluations each subsequent four-hour period of active operations; OR
(1a-1) For any earth-moving which is more than 100 feet from all property lines, conduct watering as necessary to prevent visible dust emissions from exceeding 100 feet in length in any direction.
Earth-moving:Construction fill areas:
(1b) Maintain soil moisture content at a minimum of 12 percent, as determined by ASTM method D-2216, or other equivalent method approved by the Executive Officer, the California Air Resources Board, and the U.S. EPA. For areas which have an optimum moisture content for compaction of less than 12 percent, as determined by ASTM Method 1557 or other equivalent method approved by the Executive Officer and the California Air Resources Board and the U.S. EPA, complete the compaction process as expeditiously as possible after achieving at least 70 percent of the optimum soil moisture content. Two soil moisture evaluations must be conducted during the first three hours of active operations during a calendar day, and two such evaluations during each subsequent four-hour period of active operations.
Rule 403 (cont.) (Amended June 3, 2005)
403-20
Table 2 (Continued) FUGITIVE DUST SOURCE CATEGORY CONTROL ACTIONS
Earth-moving:Construction cut areas and mining operations:
(1c) Conduct watering as necessary to prevent visible emissions from extending more than 100 feet beyond the active cut or mining area unless the area is inaccessible to watering vehicles due to slope conditions or other safety factors.
Disturbed surface areas (except completed grading areas)
(2a/b) Apply dust suppression in sufficient quantity and frequency to maintain a stabilized surface. Any areas which cannot be stabilized, as evidenced by wind driven fugitive dust must have an application of water at least twice per day to at least 80 percent of the unstabilized area.
Disturbed surface areas: Completed grading areas
(2c) Apply chemical stabilizers within five working days of grading completion; OR
(2d) Take actions (3a) or (3c) specified for inactive disturbed surface areas.
Inactive disturbed surface areas
(3a) Apply water to at least 80 percent of all inactive disturbed surface areas on a daily basis when there is evidence of wind driven fugitive dust, excluding any areas which are inaccessible to watering vehicles due to excessive slope or other safety conditions; OR
(3b) Apply dust suppressants in sufficient quantity and frequency to maintain a stabilized surface; OR
(3c) Establish a vegetative ground cover within 21 days after active operations have ceased. Ground cover must be of sufficient density to expose less than 30 percent of unstabilized ground within 90 days of planting, and at all times thereafter; OR
(3d) Utilize any combination of control actions (3a), (3b), and (3c) such that, in total, these actions apply to all inactive disturbed surface areas.
Rule 403 (cont.) (Amended June 3, 2005)
403-21
Table 2 (Continued) FUGITIVE DUST SOURCE CATEGORY CONTROL ACTIONS
Unpaved Roads (4a) Water all roads used for any vehicular traffic at least once per every two hours of active operations [3 times per normal 8 hour work day]; OR
(4b) Water all roads used for any vehicular traffic once daily and restrict vehicle speeds to 15 miles per hour; OR
(4c) Apply a chemical stabilizer to all unpaved road surfaces in sufficient quantity and frequency to maintain a stabilized surface.
Open storage piles (5a) Apply chemical stabilizers; OR (5b) Apply water to at least 80 percent of the surface
area of all open storage piles on a daily basis when there is evidence of wind driven fugitive dust; OR
(5c) Install temporary coverings; OR (5d) Install a three-sided enclosure with walls with no
more than 50 percent porosity which extend, at a minimum, to the top of the pile. This option may only be used at aggregate-related plants or at cement manufacturing facilities.
All Categories (6a) Any other control measures approved by the Executive Officer and the U.S. EPA as equivalent to the methods specified in Table 2 may be used.
Rule 403 (cont.) (Amended June 3, 2005)
403-22
TABLE 3 CONTINGENCY CONTROL MEASURES FOR LARGE OPERATIONS
FUGITIVE DUST SOURCECATEGORY
CONTROL MEASURES
Earth-moving (1A) Cease all active operations; OR (2A) Apply water to soil not more than 15 minutes prior to
moving such soil. Disturbed surface areas
(0B) On the last day of active operations prior to a weekend, holiday, or any other period when active operations will not occur for not more than four consecutive days: apply water with a mixture of chemical stabilizer diluted to not less than 1/20 of the concentration required to maintain a stabilized surface for a period of six months; OR
(1B) Apply chemical stabilizers prior to wind event; OR (2B) Apply water to all unstabilized disturbed areas 3
times per day. If there is any evidence of wind driven fugitive dust, watering frequency is increased to a minimum of four times per day; OR
(3B) Take the actions specified in Table 2, Item (3c); OR (4B) Utilize any combination of control actions (1B), (2B),
and (3B) such that, in total, these actions apply to all disturbed surface areas.
Unpaved roads (1C) Apply chemical stabilizers prior to wind event; OR (2C) Apply water twice per hour during active operation;
OR(3C) Stop all vehicular traffic.
Open storage piles (1D) Apply water twice per hour; OR (2D) Install temporary coverings.
Paved road track-out (1E) Cover all haul vehicles; OR (2E) Comply with the vehicle freeboard requirements of
Section 23114 of the California Vehicle Code for both public and private roads.
All Categories (1F) Any other control measures approved by the Executive Officer and the U.S. EPA as equivalent to the methods specified in Table 3 may be used.
Rule 403 (cont.) (Amended June 3, 2005)
403-23
Table 4 (Conservation Management Practices for Confined Animal Facilities)
SOURCECATEGORY
CONSERVATION MANAGEMENT PRACTICES
ManureHandling
(1a)(1b)
Cover manure prior to removing material off-site; AND Spread the manure before 11:00 AM and when wind conditions are less than 25 miles per hour; AND
(Onlyapplicable to Commercial PoultryRanches)
(1c)
(1d)
Utilize coning and drying manure management by removing manure at laying hen houses at least twice per year and maintain a base of no less than 6 inches of dry manure after clean out; or in lieu of complying with conservation management practice (1c), comply with conservation management practice (1d). Utilize frequent manure removal by removing the manure from laying hen houses at least every seven days and immediately thin bed dry the material.
FeedstockHandling
(2a) Utilize a sock or boot on the feed truck auger when filling feed storage bins.
DisturbedSurfaces
(3a)
(3b)
(3c)
Maintain at least 70 percent vegetative cover on vacant portions of the facility; OR Utilize conservation tillage practices to manage the amount, orientation and distribution of crop and other plant residues on the soil surface year-round, while growing crops (if applicable) in narrow slots or tilled strips; OR Apply dust suppressants in sufficient concentrations and frequencies to maintain a stabilized surface.
UnpavedRoads
(4a)
(4b)
(4c)
Restrict access to private unpaved roads either through signage or physical access restrictions and control vehicular speeds to no more than 15 miles per hour through worker notifications, signage, or any other necessary means; OR Cover frequently traveled unpaved roads with low silt content material (i.e., asphalt, concrete, recycled road base, or gravel to a minimum depth of four inches); OR Treat unpaved roads with water, mulch, chemical dust suppressants or other cover to maintain a stabilized surface.
EquipmentParking Areas
(5a)
(5b)
Apply dust suppressants in sufficient quantity and frequency to maintain a stabilized surface; OR Apply material with low silt content (i.e., asphalt, concrete, recycled road base, or gravel to a depth of four inches).
AppendixA.6ConstructionHealthRiskAssessmentCalculations
1020 S. Figueroa Street Project Draft Environmental Impact ReportConstruction Health Risk Assessment
Annual Work Days Work Hours Emissions RateConstruction Phase DPM Source Year DPM per Year per Day during
Emissions a Work Period(pounds/year) (days/year) (hours/day) (grams/second)
Off‐Road EquipmentPhase I
Site Preparation Off‐Road Equipment Year 1 0.1 5 8 3.15E‐04Demolition Off‐Road Equipment Year 1 0.4 10 8 5.98E‐04Grading Off‐Road Equipment Year 1 4.6 51 8 1.43E‐03Foundation‐1 Off‐Road Equipment Year 1 1.7 38 8 7.13E‐04
Foundation‐2 Off‐Road Equipment Year 2 0.5 12 8 7.09E‐04Building Construction‐1 Off‐Road Equipment Year 2 9.7 249 8 6.12E‐04Architectural Coating‐1 Off‐Road Equipment Year 2 0.2 63 8 6.00E‐05
Building Construction‐2 Off‐Road Equipment Year 3 10.2 261 8 6.13E‐04Architectural Coating‐ 2 Off‐Road Equipment Year 3 1.0 261 8 6.28E‐05Paving Off‐Road Equipment Year 3 0.4 21 8 2.85E‐04
Building Construction‐3 Off‐Road Equipment Year 4 4.2 108 8 6.12E‐04Architectural Coating‐ 3 Off‐Road Equipment Year 4 0.3 70 8 6.30E‐05
Phase IIDemolition Off‐Road Equipment Year 4 4.4 72 8 9.62E‐04Grading Off‐Road Equipment Year 4 3.2 35 8 1.43E‐03Foundation‐ 1 Off‐Road Equipment Year4 1.2 27 8 7.12E‐04
Foundation‐2 Off‐Road Equipment Year 5 0.7 16 8 7.09E‐04Building Construction‐ 1 Off‐Road Equipment Year 5 5.2 245 8 3.37E‐04Architectural Coating‐ 1 Off‐Road Equipment Year 5 0.4 105 8 6.30E‐05Paving Off‐Road Equipment Year 5 0.4 20 8 2.83E‐04
Building Construction‐ 2 Off‐Road Equipment Year 6 5.6 260 8 3.37E‐04Architectural Coating‐ 2 Off‐Road Equipment Year 6 1.0 260 8 6.30E‐05
Building construction‐ 3 Off‐Road Equipment Year 7 1.1 53 8 3.39E‐04Architectural Coating‐ 3 Off‐Road Equipment Year 7 0.0 10 8 6.30E‐05
Subtotal
Maximum 12‐Month Emissions Off‐Road Equipment 13.0 261 8 7.85E‐04(for Chronic HI analysis)
Notes:
a. California Air Resources Board, California Emissions Estimator Model (CalEEMod).
Source: PCR Services Corporation, 2016
Off‐Road Heavy‐Duty Construction Equipment Emission Rates
Total Work Days Work Hours One‐Way DPM Running Emissions RateConstruction Phase DPM Source Year One‐Way per Year per Day Trip Distance Emissions during
Truck Trips per Day a Factor b Work Period(days/year) (hours/day) (miles) (grams/mile) (grams/second)
On‐Road TrucksPhase I
Site Preparation Year 1 5 8 0.00E+00Demolition T7 Single Construction Year 1 2 10 8 0.86 0.0718 4.29E‐07Grading T7 Single Construction Year 1 280 51 8 0.86 0.0718 1.18E‐05Foundation‐1 T7 Single Construction Year 1 43 38 8 0.86 0.0718 2.42E‐06
Foundation‐2 T7 Single Construction Year 2 43 12 8 0.86 0.0393 4.21E‐06Building Construction‐1 On‐Road MHDT/HHDT Trucks Year 2 111 249 8 0.86 0.0552 7.35E‐07Architectural Coating‐1 Year 2 63 8
Building Construction‐2 On‐Road MHDT/HHDT Trucks Year 3 111 261 8 0.86 0.0489 6.21E‐07Architectural Coating‐ 2 Year 3 261 8Paving Year 3 21 8
Building Construction‐3 On‐Road MHDT/HHDT Trucks Year 4 111 108 8 0.86 0.0345 1.06E‐06Architectural Coating‐ 3 Year 4 70 8
Phase IIDemolition T7 Single Construction Year 4 28 72 8 0.86 0.0212 2.46E‐07Grading T7 Single Construction Year 4 420 35 8 0.86 0.0212 7.61E‐06Foundation‐ 1 T7 Single Construction Year4 45 27 8 0.86 0.0212 1.06E‐06
Foundation‐2 T7 Single Construction Year 5 45 16 8 0.86 0.0192 1.61E‐06Building Construction‐ 1 On‐Road MHDT/HHDT Trucks Year 5 111 245 8 0.86 0.0136 1.84E‐07Architectural Coating‐ 1 Year 5 105 8Paving Year 5 20 8
Building Construction‐ 2 On‐Road MHDT/HHDT Trucks Year 6 111 260 8 0.86 0.0124 1.58E‐07Architectural Coating‐ 2 Year 6 260 8
Building construction‐ 3 On‐Road MHDT/HHDT Trucks Year 7 111 53 8 0.86 0.0056 3.49E‐07Architectural Coating‐ 3 Year 7 10 8
Maximum 12‐Month Emissions On‐Road MHDT/HHDT Trucks 433 261 8 0.86 0.0597 2.95E‐06(for Chronic HI analysis)
Notes:a. The portion of the on‐road trip length within a 1/4 mile of the Project Site.b. California Air Resources Board, EMFAC2014 on‐road vehicle emissions model.Source: PCR Services Corporation, 2016
On‐Road Construction Haul, Concrete, and Vendor Truck Emission Rates
Total Work Days Work Hours Idling Time DPM Idling Emissions RateConstruction Phase DPM Source Year Number of per Year per Day per Truck Emissions during
Trucks Factor a Work Period(days/year) (hours/day) (minutes) (grams/min) (grams/second)
On‐Road TrucksPhase I
Site Preparation Year 1 5 8 15Demolition T7 Single Construction Year 1 2 10 8 15 2.22E‐01 2.31E‐05Grading T7 Single Construction Year 1 280 51 8 15 2.22E‐01 6.34E‐04Foundation‐1 T7 Single Construction Year 1 43 38 8 15 2.22E‐01 1.31E‐04
Foundation‐2 T7 Single Construction Year 2 43 12 8 15 1.54E‐01 2.88E‐04Building Construction‐1 On‐Road MHDT/HHDT Trucks Year 2 111 249 8 15 1.49E‐01 3.46E‐05Architectural Coating‐1 Year 2 63 8 15
Building Construction‐2 On‐Road MHDT/HHDT Trucks Year 3 111 261 8 15 1.24E‐01 2.75E‐05Architectural Coating‐ 2 Year 3 261 8 15Paving Year 3 21 8 15
Building Construction‐3 On‐Road MHDT/HHDT Trucks Year 4 111 108 8 15 7.40E‐02 3.96E‐05Architectural Coating‐ 3 Year 4 70 8 15
Phase II 15Demolition T7 Single Construction Year 4 28 72 8 15 1.58E‐02 3.19E‐06Grading T7 Single Construction Year 4 420 35 8 15 1.58E‐02 9.86E‐05Foundation‐ 1 T7 Single Construction Year4 45 27 8 15 1.58E‐02 1.37E‐05
Foundation‐2 T7 Single Construction Year 5 45 16 8 15 1.37E‐02 2.01E‐05Building Construction‐ 1 On‐Road MHDT/HHDT Trucks Year 5 111 245 8 15 1.82E‐02 4.29E‐06Architectural Coating‐ 1 Year 5 105 8 15Paving Year 5 20 8 15
Building Construction‐ 2 On‐Road MHDT/HHDT Trucks Year 6 111 260 8 15 1.58E‐02 3.51E‐06Architectural Coating‐ 2 Year 6 260 8 15
Building construction‐ 3 On‐Road MHDT/HHDT Trucks Year 7 111 53 8 15 9.58E‐03 1.05E‐05Architectural Coating‐ 3 Year 7 10 8 15
Maximum 12‐Month Emissions Idling MHDT/HHDT Trucks 433 261 8 15 0.1740 1.50E‐04(for Chronic HI analysis)
Notes:
a. California Air Resources Board, EMFAC2014 on‐road vehicle emissions model.
Source: PCR Services Corporation, 2016
Idling Construction Haul, Concrete, and Vendor Truck Emission Rates
1020 S. Figueroa Street Project Draft Environmental Impact ReportConstruction Health Risk Assessment
AERMOD Source Characteristics
Emission Source Source Number Length Source Group Release Length Length Initial Initial Plume Plume Exit Inside Exit FlowType of Sources of Line Unitized Height of Side X of Side Y Lateral Vertical Height Width Temp Diameter Rate
Emission Rate(m) (g/s) (m) (m) (m) (m) (m) (m) (m) (°F) (ft) (ft3/s)
Source Group 1Off‐Road Heavy‐Duty Construction Equipment Volume 12 0.0833 5 15 15 3.49 1.16 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/aPhase I
Source Group 2Off‐Road Heavy‐Duty Construction Equipment Volume 15 0.0667 5 15 15 3.49 1.16 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/aPhase II
Source Group 2On‐Road Haul and Vendor Trucks 1 Line‐Volume 1 192.7 0.1484 6 n/a n/a 10.2 16.0 n/a n/a n/aOn‐Road Haul and Vendor Trucks 2 Line‐Volume 1 128.5 0.0990 6 n/a n/a 10.2 16.0 n/a n/a n/aOn‐Road Haul and Vendor Trucks 3 Line‐Volume 1 335.9 0.2588 6 n/a n/a 10.2 21.0 n/a n/a n/aOn‐Road Haul and Vendor Trucks 4 Line‐Volume 1 111.1 0.0856 6 n/a n/a 10.2 24.0 n/a n/a n/aOn‐Road Haul and Vendor Trucks 5 Line‐Volume 1 234.1 0.2336 6 n/a n/a 10.2 12.0 n/a n/a n/aOn‐Road Haul and Vendor Trucks 6 Line‐Volume 1 295.8 0.2951 6 n/a n/a 10.2 12.0 n/a n/a n/a
Source Group 3Idling Haul and Vendor Trucks Phase I Volume 1 1.0000 5 26 26 6.05 1.16 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a
Source Group 4 Volume 1 1.0000 5 26 26 6.05 1.16 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/aIdling Haul and Vendor Trucks Phase II
Source: PCR Services Corporation, 2016
1020 S. Figueroa Street Project Draft Environmental Impact ReportConstruction Health Risk Assessment
AERMOD Results
Emission Source Source Source Group Unitized Max AERMOD ConcentrationType South‐East (383360.00, 3767670.00)
Source Group 1 51.99Off‐Road Heavy‐Duty Construction Equipment (Phase I) Volume
Source Group 2Off‐Road Heavy‐Duty Construction Equipment (Phase 2) Volume 8.47
Source Group 3 4.57On‐Road Haul and Vendor Trucks 1 Line‐VolumeOn‐Road Haul and Vendor Trucks 2 Line‐VolumeOn‐Road Haul and Vendor Trucks 3 Line‐VolumeOn‐Road Haul and Vendor Trucks 4 Line‐VolumeOn‐Road Haul and Vendor Trucks 5 Line‐VolumeOn‐Road Haul and Vendor Trucks 6 Line‐Volume
Source Group 4 34.78Idling Haul and Vendor Trucks (Phase I) Volume
Source Group 5 4.57Idling Haul and Vendor Trucks (Phase II) Volume
Source: Lakes Environmental, AERMOD View 9.1.0 (Version 15181), 2016; PCR Services Corporation, 2016
1020 S. Figueroa Street Project Draft Environmental Impact ReportConstruction Health Risk Assessment
Maximum Individual Cancer Risk Calculations ‐ Sensitive Receptors located Southeast of the Project Site
Phase I Off-Road Equipment On-Road Idling Off-Road Equipment On-Road IdlingSite Preparation Year 1 5 0.000314995 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 3rd 1.64E-02 0.00E+00 0.00E+00Demolition Year 1 10 0.00059849 4.29E-07 2.31E-05 3rd 3.11E-02 1.96E-06 8.03E-04Grading Year 1 51 0.001432917 1.18E-05 6.34E-04 3rd 7.45E-02 5.38E-05 2.20E-02Foundation-1 Year 1 38 0.000712883 2.42E-06 1.31E-04 0<2 3.71E-02 1.11E-05 4.54E-03
0 0 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00Foundation-2 Year 2 12 0.000708738 4.21E-06 2.88E-04 0<2 3.68E-02 1.92E-05 1.00E-02Building Construction-1 Year 2 249 0.000612279 7.35E-07 3.46E-05 0<2 3.18E-02 3.36E-06 1.20E-03Architectural Coating-1 Year 2 63 5.9999E-05 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0<2 3.12E-03 0.00E+00 0.00E+00
0 0 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00Building Construction-2 Year 3 157 0.000613093 6.21E-07 2.75E-05 0<2 3.19E-02 2.84E-06 9.56E-04Building Construction-2 Year 3 104 0.000613093 6.21E-07 2.75E-05 2<16 3.19E-02 2.84E-06 9.56E-04Architectural Coating- 2 Year 3 157 6.27576E-05 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0<2 3.26E-03 0.00E+00 0.00E+00Architectural Coating- 2 Year 3 104 6.27576E-05 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 2<16 3.26E-03 0.00E+00 0.00E+00Paving Year 3 21 0.000284995 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0<2 1.48E-02 0.00E+00 0.00E+00
0 0 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00Building Construction-3 Year 4 108 0.00061249 1.06E-06 3.96E-05 2<16 3.18E-02 4.84E-06 1.38E-03Architectural Coating- 3 Year 4 70 6.29989E-05 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 2<16 3.28E-03 0.00E+00 0.00E+00
Phase IIDemolition Year 4 72 0.000962484 2.46E-07 3.19E-06 2<16 0.008152238 1.13E-06 1.46E-05Grading Year 4 35 0.001430976 7.61E-06 9.86E-05 2<16 0.012120367 3.48E-05 4.51E-04Foundation- 1 Year4 27 0.000711655 1.06E-06 1.37E-05 2<16 0.006027716 4.83E-06 6.26E-05
0 0 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0 0.00E+00 0.00E+00Foundation-2 Year 5 16 0.000708738 1.61E-06 2.01E-05 2<16 0.006003012 7.37E-06 9.19E-05Building Construction- 1 Year 5 245 0.000336851 1.84E-07 4.29E-06 2<16 0.002853132 8.42E-07 1.96E-05Architectural Coating- 1 Year 5 105 6.29989E-05 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 2<16 0.000533601 0.00E+00 0.00E+00Paving Year 5 20 0.000283495 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 2<16 0.002401205 0.00E+00 0.00E+00
0 0 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0 0.00E+00 0.00E+00Building Construction- 2 Year 6 260 0.000336802 1.58E-07 3.51E-06 2<16 0.002852713 7.20E-07 1.60E-05Architectural Coating- 2 Year 6 260 6.29989E-05 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 2<16 0.000533601 0.00E+00 0.00E+00
0 0 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0 0.00E+00 0.00E+00Building construction- 3 Year 7 53 0.000338768 3.49E-07 1.05E-05 2<16 0.002869364 1.60E-06 4.78E-05Architectural Coating- 3 Year 7 10 6.29989E-05 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 2<16 0.000533601 0.00E+00 0.00E+00
Cancer Risk CalculationsParameter Age Bins Exposure Age Bin
3rd Trimester 0 < 2 2 < 16 16 < 30 31 < 70
DBR Daily Breathing Rate (L/kg (body weight) per day) 361 1090 745 335 290A Inhalation absorption factor (default = 1). 1 1 1 1 1EF Exposure Frequency (days/year) 350 350 350 350 350ED Exposure Duration (years) 0.25 2 14 14 30.25 40 70.25FAH Fraction of Time at Home 1 0.85 0.72 0.73 0.73AT Averaged Exposure Time Period (days) 25550 25550 25550 25550 25550ASF Age Sensitvity Factor 10 10 3 1 1
CONC Toxic Air Contaminant Concentration (µg/m3) 5.84E‐02 2.27E‐02 2.10E‐03 0.00E+00 0DOSE [= CONC × DBR × A × EF × ED × FAH / AT] (mg/kg‐d) 7.22E‐02 5.75E‐01 2.16E‐01 0.00E+00 0.00E+00
CPF Cancer Potency Factor (mg/kg‐d)‐1
Diesel Particulate Matter 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1
RISK Cancer Risk (in one million) [= DOSE × CPF × ASF] 7.94E‐01 6.33E+00 7.12E‐01 0.00E+00 7.83E+00 0.00E+00 7.83E+00
MICREmission Rate
Total 70 Year
Work Day per Year Age binPhase 1
Phase 2
1020 S. Figueroa Street Project Draft Environmental Impact ReportConstruction Health Risk Assessment
Maximum Non‐cancer Chronic Hazards / Toxicological Endpoints*
Receptor Group Pollutant CREL1 CONC WFrac CONCWF HI ALIM BN CVS DEV ENDC EYE HEM IMMUN KIDN NS REPRO RESP SK Threshold Over?
MEI Sensitive ‐ East DPM 5.00E+00 4.61E‐02 1.00E+00 4.61E‐02 9.22E‐03 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 9.22E‐03 ‐ 1.0 NO
Sources:
1. California Air Resources Board, "Consolidated Table of OEHHA/ARB Approved Risk Assessment Health Values" and "OEHHA/ARB Approved Chronic Reference Exposure Levels and Target Organs," http://www.arb.ca.gov/toxics/healthval/healthval.htm.
Tables last updated: January 30, 2014. Downloaded 03/13/2014.
Where: * Key to Toxicological Endpoints
CONCWF Pollutant Concentration (µg/m3) multiplied by the weight fraction ALIM Alimentary Tract EYE Eye NS Nervous SystemCREL Chronic Reference Exposure Level BN Bone HEM Hematologic System REPRO Reproductive SystemHI Hazard Index CVS Cardiovascular System IMMUN Immune System RESP Respiratory SystemMEI Maximally Exposed Individual DEV Developmental System KIDN Kidney SK SkinWFrac Weight fraction of speciated component ENDC Endocrine System