Technical Appendix Index TECHNICAL APPENDIX INDEX Agenda item no. Agenda item Appendix Ref. Description 5.1 P&I Sub-Group Chairs report A01 A02 A03 A04 A05 A06 A07 A08a A08b Monthly Report (May 2020) As submitted to P&I Sub-Group meeting OM Definitions Programme Summary 2020/21 As submitted to P&I Sub-Group meeting Yorkshire Area Priority Programme Local Levy Programme update As submitted to P&I Sub-Group meeting Local Levy Current Programme and Pipeline July 2020 including P&I recommendations 2020/21 Local Levy Programme Headline Statistics New Levy Requests Summary Table As submitted to P&I Sub-Group meeting New Levy Requests Simplified Summary Table As submitted to P&I Sub-Group meeting
29
Embed
TECHNICAL APPENDIX INDEX - GOV UK · 2020-07-17 · Technical Appendix Index . TECHNICAL APPENDIX INDEX. Agenda item no. Agenda item Appendix Ref. Description 5.1 P&I Sub-Group Chairs
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Technical Appendix Index
TECHNICAL APPENDIX INDEX
Agenda item no.
Agenda item Appendix Ref.
Description
5.1 P&I Sub-Group Chairs report
A01
A02
A03
A04
A05
A06
A07
A08a
A08b
Monthly Report (May 2020) As submitted to P&I Sub-Group meeting
OM Definitions
Programme Summary 2020/21 As submitted to P&I Sub-Group meeting
Yorkshire Area Priority Programme
Local Levy Programme update As submitted to P&I Sub-Group meeting
Local Levy Current Programme and Pipeline July 2020 including P&I recommendations
2020/21 Local Levy Programme Headline Statistics
New Levy Requests Summary Table As submitted to P&I Sub-Group meeting
New Levy Requests Simplified Summary Table As submitted to P&I Sub-Group meeting
OM2 Number of households moved out of any flood probability category to a lower probability category
OM2b The number of households moved from the very significant or significant probability category to the moderate or low probability category
OM2c The number of households in the 20% most deprived areas moved out of the significant or very significant probability categories to the moderate or low probability category.
OM3 The number of households with reduced risk of coastal erosion OM3b The number of households protected against loss in 20 yrs from coastal
erosion OM3c The number of households in the 20% most deprived areas protected
against loss in 20 yrs from coastal erosion OM4a Hectares of water dependent habitat created or improved to help meet the
objectives of the Water Framework Directive OM4b Hectares of intertidal habitat created to help meet the objectives of the
Water Framework Directive for areas protected under the EU Habitats/Birds Directive
OM4c Kilometres of rivers protected under the EU Habitats/Birds Directive improved to help meet the objectives of the Water Framework Directive
Back to agenda
Back to agenda
Technical Appendix A02
May In Year Capital MonitoringFlood Risk Partnership(All)
Blacktoft Erosion Protection Project (BEPP) Neil Longden Robert Bayton Julia Somers 05/20 09/20 09/20 11/20 377 377 120 120 4 106% 41.7 21
Hempholme and Wilfholme Pumping Station Refurb Neil Longden Louis Harvey Katherine Huddleston09/19 09/19 07/20 09/20 747 104 851 0 0 3 128% 5.0 38 1,041
IDB Eastrington and Laxton Flood Management Project Neil Longden Paul Stockhill Jon Freed 04/15 01/00 07/17 03/18 272 0 5 105% 2.8 511 253 736
Gilberdyke and Blacktoft Flood Management Project Neil Longden Paul Stockhill Jon Freed 01/00 11/17 09/17 06/19 833 0 5 100% 3.4 1,235 160 110
LA Anlaby and East Ella Flood Alleviation Scheme Neil Longden Paul Stockhill Dean Hamblin 12/15 09/17 09/17 01/20 1,766 0 4 3,645 113% 6.3 19,309 5,992
Cottingham and Orchard Park Flood Alleviation Scheme Neil Longden Paul Stockhill Dean Hamblin 04/16 08/17 10/17 08/20 2,809 2,809 1,008 1,042 4 1,500 126% 7.1 13,113 6,079
Hessle Foreshore Tidal Defences (HeFTD) Neil Longden Paul Stockhill Dean Hamblin 03/18 02/19 04/19 11/20 6,002 6,002 4,464 4,464 4 3,541 729% 93.9 4,566 4,238
Pocklington Flood Alleviation Scheme Neil Longden Paul Stockhill Dean Hamblin 12/16 09/18 09/18 08/19 134 0 4 100% 1.7 941 44 500 3,000
Willerby and Derringham Flood Alleviation Scheme (WADFAS)Neil Longden Joe Noake Dean Hamblin 01/00 03/14 03/14 03/16 8,085 0 5 739% 37.5 5,730 4,434
Hull and Holderness Flood Alleviation Scheme (Phase 1 - Tidal)Neil Longden Paul Stockhill Dean Hamblin 05/16 03/16 05/16 03/18 609 0 5 323% 33.9 1,970 4,143
Withernsea Groyne Field Improvements Phase 1 Neil Longden Paul Stockhill Edward Hinton 11/15 02/17 04/17 03/18 106 0 5 107% 9.5 2,816
North Yorkshire EA Clifton Ings Barrier Bank Adam TunningleyEdward SorfleetTom Cochrane 12/14 01/20 09/20 09/22 1,382 4,987 4,283 10,652 0 0 3 5,686 5,178 330% 1.1 1,286 6,053
Grand Total 143,203 121,143 134,927 68,154 467,427 64,803 22,719 144,522 132,572 107,818 87,454 396,012 97,912 16,557 111,718 13,057 29,478 14,110
Already delivered 43,865
6 year forecast 66,584
6 Year Funding SourcesRoles Gateways Spend forecast £k Outcomes Jan 20 Consented Programme
494
21,921
Fig 6a: OM2+3 20/21 by Overall Confidence Rating
1 - Low
2 - Medium - Low
3 - Medium - High
4 - High
5 - Complete in2020/21
Back to agenda
Back to agenda
Technical Appendix A04
Technical Appendix A05
Yorkshire Regional Flood and Coastal Committee Back to agenda
Meeting:
YRFCC Programming and Investment Sub-Group
Subject: Local Levy Programme Update
Date: Thursday 25 June 2020
PURPOSE: FOR INFORMATION / DISCUSSION / RECOMMENDATION To:
Provide the Sub-Group with a final outturn for 2019/20 and baseline for the 2020/21 Local Levy programme;
Provide the Sub-Group with an update on progress with the 2020/21 Local Levy programme;
Present requests received for Local Levy funding and seek the Sub-Group’s recommendation to the Committee in relation to these; and
Provide an indication of likely and potential future Local Levy needs.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
At the April 2020 Committee meeting we presented a forecast of the 2019/20 year-end position. This paper presents the final outturn for 2019/20 and baselines the 2020/21 Levy programme as a result of this.
The Levy outturn in 2019/20 was just over £3.4 million, leaving just under £2.4 million to be carried into 2020/21.
A total of just under £5 million of Levy funding is available for investment in 2020/21 and the baseline programme utilises just under £4.1 million of this, leaving just over £900,000 unallocated.
£3,000 of Levy from the previously approved programme has been released for reallocation as it is no longer required.
As at the end of May 2020, just under £200,000 has been spent, with an indicative full year forecast of just under £2.9 million.
We have received new Levy requests totalling just under £200,000. These are outlined in section 4 with details in Appendix 2 and 3. These requests can be accommodated within the programme, and if all are recommended for inclusion in the programme £900,000 would remain available for allocation up to the end of 2020/21.
Due to the proximity of the end of the current six-year programme the implications of likely pipeline Levy requests arising from the last annual programme refresh are factored into the future programme. It also considers the implications of further potential Levy requests previously highlighted to the Sub-Group.
Technical Appendix A05
RECOMMENDATIONS: The Sub-Group is asked to:
note the release of £3,000 allocation back into the Levy programme for reallocation;
recommend the approval of the 2020/21 baselined Local Levy programme as detailed in Appendix 1 to the Committee; and
make recommendations to the Committee for additions to the Levy programme from the requests received detailed in Appendices 2 and 3.
Technical Appendix A05
1. INTRODUCTION
1.1 This paper provides an overview of the Yorkshire RFCC’s Local Levy programme. It provides a final statement on the financial performance of the 2019/20 Local Levy programme and sets a baseline for the 2020/21 Levy allocations. It presents proposed changes to existing projects and considers additional Levy needs put forward for inclusion in the current Levy programme. It also considers the implications of pipeline Levy needs identified and further potential Levy requests previously highlighted to the Sub-Group.
1.2 This paper is supported by 4 appendices, referred to throughout this document.
2. FINAL 2019/20 FINANCIAL POSITION
2.1 At the April Committee meeting we presented a forecast of the 2019/20 year-end position. At that time we were forecasting an outturn of just over £2.6 million. The final Levy claimed in 2019/20 was just over £3.4 million. Table 1 below summarises the final programme position at the end of year and the detail appears in Appendix 1.
Table 1 – YRFCC Local Levy 2019/20 Financial Summary (£k)
Total Levy funding available in 2019/20 (including balances carried from previous years)
5,796
Total Levy programme 2019/20 (approved April 2019)
2,770
Final outturn 3,403
Balance to be carried forward to 2020/21 2,393
2.2 The final outturn for 2019/20 achieved and exceeded the forecast primarily because the opportunity was taken to adjust the balance of funding between Local Levy and FCRM GiA for the Filey Flood Alleviation Works (Scarborough Borough Council, line 61, Appendix 1) in order to achieve end of year targets for both funding streams. Levy allocations previously for 2020/21 were also paid at the end of 2019/20 on a couple of other projects: all of these have the effect of advancing allocations previously in 2020/21 into 2019/20. Countering this, a number of projects spent or claimed less than their allocated amount and the unspent allocations have been carried forward into 2020/21 (see section 3).
2.3 Sub-Group members attention is drawn to the fact that the anticipated refund of £80,000 approved Local Levy funds previously drawn down by Derbyshire County Council (DCC) for the Chesterfield Integrated Pluvial Fluvial Model (Derbyshire County Council, line 66) was completed in 2019/20.
3. OVERVIEW OF 2020/21 PROGRAMME
Baseline Programme
3.1 The Committee raised a Local Levy for 2020/21 of just under £2.6 million which, when supplemented by the £2.4 million carried from previous years (Table 1 above), gives a total of just under £5 million available for investment.
3.2 The programme for 2020/21 has been baselined to adjust for work not completed or claimed for in 2019/20 and grant claims paid earlier than previously anticipated. There have been no requests to re-profile Levy from 2020/21 into future years. All changes to
Technical Appendix A05
the programme are shown in red font in Appendix 1, to which the following line numbers refer. The significant re-profiling between 2019/20 and 2020/21 is:
The opportunity was taken to advance Levy funding for Filey Flood Alleviation Works (Scarborough Borough Council, line 61) into 2019/20 in order to achieve year-end financial targets as referred to in paragraph 2.2. This removes £930,000 allocation from the 2020/21 programme.
Three Brooks Environmental Scheme, Manor, Sheffield (Sheffield City Council, line 75). Work on developing this project continued in 2019/20 using other funding sources. The project scope is being revised and SCC have requested that the remaining £75,000 Levy allocation is transferred into 2020/21 until a final solution and costings are confirmed.
South Elmsall FAS - Ea Beck & Langthwaite Beck (Environment Agency, line 117). Delivery of the project has been delayed due to the need to revisit hydrological data for use in the model following recent significant flood events. The model has now been delivered however its review has also been delayed due to recent flood incidents. The remaining £67,000 Levy allocation has therefore been transferred into 2020/21.
3.3 Sub-Group members are reminded that at the April 2020 YRFCC meeting the Committee could only agree in principle to the recommendations of the April 2020 P&I chairs report and that these decisions need to be formally ratified at the Committee’s July 2020 meeting. The programme in Appendix 1 and all subsequent tables in this paper assume that these recommendations (for Robin Hood’s Bay Seawall capital maintenance scheme (Scarborough Borough Council, line 62); Wilder Waterways in the Lower Don (Environment Agency, line 71); Reid Park Beck, Horbury, Wakefield (Wakefield District Council, line 118); and SME Indirect Costs and Flood Risk (Environment Agency, line 129) will be ratified at that meeting.
3.4 Sub-Group members attention is also drawn to the fact that Leeds City Council (LCC) have advised us that a duplicate payment of £50,000 of Local Levy was made to them in 2019/20 for Wyke Beck improvements (LCC, line 116). As such the funds will be returned to Local Levy balances during 2020/21 and this is reflected in the programme. Along with the previously advised expected return of £46,000 of Local Levy from Scarborough Borough Council for Cell 1 Water Framework Directive and Strategic SEA (line 60) this means that just under £100,000 of Local Levy is due to be returned to YRFCC for reallocation during 2020/21.
3.5 We have been notified that the remaining £3,000 Levy allocation for Strategy and delivery in the Eastburn/Glusburn Beck catchment (Environment Agency, line 58) can now be released. A long list of options for managing flood risk issues from all sources has been developed and will now be reviewed to decide on the appropriate way forward.
3.6 Sub-Group members are asked to note the release of £3,000 allocation back into the Levy programme for reallocation.
3.7 The proposed baseline programme for 2020/21 is presented in Appendix 1 (“Local Levy for Approval” column).
3.8 Sub-Group members are asked to recommend the approval of the 2020/21 baselined Local Levy programme as detailed in Appendix 1 to the Committee.
3.9 We have not received any requests to make changes to the programme in future years.
Technical Appendix A05
3.10 Following the changes outlined in paragraphs 3.2-3.5 above, the profiled programme spend is as shown in Table 2. With the proximity of the end of the current six-year programme this table takes into account the indicative pipeline Levy requests expected as a result of the last annual programme refresh. Sub-Group members are reminded that these likely pipeline requests have only been identified by eight RMAs (around one third of those identifying projects), with the majority of them (both by number and value) from a single RMA. It is therefore likely that as RMA programmes develop further requests for Levy will arise, particularly from the RMAs who haven’t currently identified any.
Table 2 - YRFCC Local Levy Programme 2020/21 to 2024/25 (£k)
2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 2024/25
Local Levy raised (assumed) 2,593 2,593 2,593 2,593 2,593
Balances carried from previous year 2,393 929 3,060 4,420 5,660
Total Local Levy available in year 4,986 3,521 5,653 7,012 8,252
Total programmed spend (current programme) 4,057 271 168 96 60
Total YRFCC Levy pipeline 0 190 1,065 1,257 507
Total programmed spend inc. Pipeline (not yet approved) 4,057 461 1,233 1,353 567
Balance to carry at year-end 929 3,060 4,420 5,660 7,686
Progress update
3.11 Appendix 1 gives an indication of spend to the end of May 2020 of just under £200,000 against a full year forecast of just under £2.9 million. Members should note that due to the complexities of apportioning spend between funding sources the quoted Local Levy spend to date and full year forecast should be taken as indicative.
3.12 Sub-Group members are reminded that the ‘in principle’ allocation to Robin Hood’s Bay Seawall capital maintenance scheme (Scarborough Borough Council, line 62) in 2020/21 is on the understanding that £64,000 of this is underwriting Scarborough Borough Council until such time as they are able to approve an additional contribution. As such, £64,000 of the current allocation could be returned to the programme for reallocation.
3.13 Committee approval for changes in Levy allocation (value or timing) is only sought when requested by the delivery authority. All other variances are treated as ‘noise’ in the programme due to the aforementioned complexities of apportioning spend. All RMAs are reminded that any spend beyond the amount of Levy approved by the RFCC at their quarterly meetings is at their own risk.
4. NEW REQUESTS FOR LEVY FUNDING
4.1 Following the changes outlined in section 3 above, the value of Levy programmed for 2020/21 is now just over £4 million and, with the current knowledge we have of pipeline Levy needs, the pressure on funding (as shown in Table 2) is in this financial year. This shows that just over £900,000 worth of work could be added into the programme during this financial year without the programme becoming overcommitted.
4.2 Requests have been received from two risk management authorities to allocate Levy towards two projects with a total value of £197,400. Proformas for these requests appear
Technical Appendix A05
in Appendix 2 and the requests are summarised in Appendix 3, to which the following line numbers refer. One of the requests is for extra Levy towards a project in the current Levy programme (the Upper Rother Natural Flood Management Officer (line 1)). The other request is for Levy in support of a project not previously shown in the Committee’s Levy programme (line 2). The requests have all been endorsed and prioritised by the relevant Flood Risk Partnership.
4.3 As with all other projects in the Committee’s Levy programme, to be accepted onto the programme all projects should demonstrate that they meet the Committee’s Levy criteria that were endorsed at the April 2017 Committee meeting (Appendix 4). Scheme related requests have been fully rated against the assessment methodology approved by the Committee in April 2017 and non-scheme requests have been rated where applicable (all ratings are summarised in Appendix 3).
4.4 If all the requested additions to the programme are recommended to the Committee the future profiled programme spend would be as shown in Table 3 in bold. As for Table 2, this table takes into account the impact of the indicative pipeline Levy requests expected as a result of the last annual programme refresh.
Table 3 - YRFCC Local Levy Programme 2020/21 to 2024/25 (£k) with all new requests added
2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 2024/25
Local Levy raised (assumed) 2,593 2,593 2,593 2,593 2,593
Balances carried from previous year 2,393 902 2,967 4,261 5,462
Total Local Levy available in year 4,986 3,494 5,560 6,854 8,055
Total programmed spend (Current Programme) if all requests recommended
4,084 337 234 135 60
Total YRFCC Levy pipeline 0 190 1,065 1,257 507
Total programmed spend if all requests recommended and incl. Pipeline (not yet approved)
4,084 527 1,299 1,391 567
Balance to carry at year-end 902 2,967 4,261 5,462 7,488
4.5 Appendix 3 and Table 3 show that the requests received can all be accommodated from within the Levy funding currently available, leaving £900,000 available for allocation up to the end of 2020/21. Sub-Group members are reminded that they have already been notified of the potential for further requests for Levy over the next few years that are not currently included the pipeline programme and Table 3. These have a value in the order of £3m and are as follows:
Potential for further requests for Levy to support delivery of the Rotherham to Kilnhurst Flood Alleviation Scheme (Phase 2) as discussed at the March 2019 P&I meeting.
Following discussion of Levy for the Kirkby Wharfe Flood Alleviation Scheme at the June 2018 P&I meeting and allocation in July 2018, work is ongoing to efficiently identify an appropriate solution and there is still potential that an additional Levy request will be received.
Tadcaster Flood Alleviation Scheme, highlighted at June 2018 P&I. While the LEP are funding the business case development and additional government
Technical Appendix A05
funding towards the scheme was announced in September 2019 as part of the £62 million fund to better protect communities from flooding, until the business case is completed it is still possible that there may be a call on Levy, as a last resort, to complete the funding package.
4.6 Sub-Group members are asked to make recommendations to the Committee for additions to the Levy programme from the requests received detailed in Appendices 2 and 3.
4.7 Once approved, Sub-Group members and officers are reminded that the Committee discussed expected timescales for the delivery of Levy funded schemes at the January 2015 meeting, and these appear at the end of the Local Levy criteria reproduced in Appendix 4. All risk management authorities are encouraged to follow these timescales and to discuss any difficulties with achieving these with their Area Flood and Coastal Risk Manager in the first instance.
5. RECOMMENDATION
5.1 The Sub-Group is requested to:
a) note the release of £3,000 allocation back into the Levy programme forreallocation;
b) recommend the approval of the 2020/21 baselined Local Levy programme asdetailed in Appendix 1 to the Committee; and
c) make recommendations to the Committee for additions to the Levy programmefrom the requests received detailed in Appendices 2 and 3.
SARAH DUCKER Yorkshire Area FCRM Programme Advisor
Back to agenda
Technical Appendix A06- Local Levy Programme July 2020 including P and I recommendationsShowing all projects with identified Levy needs starting within the current programme and pipeline
16/07/2020
Total Cost£k
Approved Local Levy Allocation
£k
Local Levy for Approval
£k
Hull & East Riding Partnership
Projects with identified Local Levy needs ending in 2019/20
1 Pocklington Flood Alleviation Scheme East Riding East Riding of Yorkshire Council 134 4,583 0 44 44 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 44
20/21 Local Levy Programme Progress to the end of May
3 Coastal Adaptation Fund (2017-18 to 2024-25) East Riding East Riding of Yorkshire Council 21 687 0 60 60 0 60 60 0 0 0 0 0 120 0 59
4 Warter Addlekeld Drainage Improvements East Riding East Riding of Yorkshire Council 0 15 0 0 0 0 15 15 0 0 0 0 0 15 0 0
5 Hayton Flood Conveyance Scheme East Riding East Riding of Yorkshire Council 0 45 0 0 0 0 25 25 0 0 0 0 0 25 0 0
6 Living with Water Partnership East Riding Environment Agency 0 25 0 25 0 25 0 25 0 0 0 0 0 25 0 0 Reprofile
The Levy for this project was allocated to fund community engagement through innovative community events and another Hulltimate Education schools event in 2020. Logistical and supplier problems and subsequent impacts of Covid-19 have caused delays which have meant the funds allocated for 2019/20 have not been spent and have therefore been carried forward into 2020/21.
Projects with future identified Local Levy needs
7 Beeford Village Flood Alleviation Scheme* East Riding East Riding of Yorkshire Council 53 1,208 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 50 0 0 50
8 Cherry Burton The Meadows East Riding East Riding of Yorkshire Council 20 1,098 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 40 30 0 70
9 Hornsea Mere Water Level and Quality Scheme East Riding East Riding of Yorkshire Council 144 2,638 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100 0 0 0 100
10 Molescroft Sister Beck Flood Alleviation Scheme* East Riding East Riding of Yorkshire Council 218 2,266 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 30 0 30
11 South Cave Flood Alleviation Scheme* East Riding East Riding of Yorkshire Council 41 2,103 0 0 0 0 0 0 26 68 6 0 0 100
Projects with future identified Local Levy needs in the pipeline (not yet recommended for inclusion in programme)
12 Stone Creek Pumping Station Relocation and associated
worksEast Riding
Beverley and North
Holderness IDB50 2,000 0 125 125 0 0 250
13 Beeford Village Flood Alleviation Scheme East RidingEast Riding of Yorkshire
Council53 1,208 0 0 0 50 0 50
14 Bessingby Industrial Estate Flood Mitigation East RidingEast Riding of Yorkshire
Council0 114 0 0 0 0 40 40
15 Bilton FAS East RidingEast Riding of Yorkshire
Council20 185 0 15 10 0 0 25
16 Bridlington - Dukes Park SUDs and Reconnection East RidingEast Riding of Yorkshire
Council70 1,182 0 50 50 0 0 100
17 Brough - York Area SUDs East RidingEast Riding of Yorkshire
Council18 665 0 0 0 0 50 50
18 Brigham Highway Drainage East RidingEast Riding of Yorkshire
Council0 50 0 0 40 0 0 40
19 Brough - Blackburn Surface Water East RidingEast Riding of Yorkshire
Council21 370 0 50 50 0 0 100
20 Burton Pidsea - Residual risk East RidingEast Riding of Yorkshire
Council39 410 0 0 0 0 15 15
21 Carnaby Industrial Estate Attenuation East RidingEast Riding of Yorkshire
Council2 1,050 0 25 50 0 0 75
22 Coniston - FAS East RidingEast Riding of Yorkshire
Council2 40 0 0 0 0 30 30
23 Cottingham North FAS (Harland Way / Badgers Wood) East RidingEast Riding of Yorkshire
Council4 85 0 55 0 0 0 55
24 Driffield Surface Water FAS East RidingEast Riding of Yorkshire
Council19 125 0 10 0 0 0 10
25 Dunswell Embankment Improvements East RidingEast Riding of Yorkshire
Council99 2,040 0 0 50 0 0 50
26 Easington Drainage Improvements East RidingEast Riding of Yorkshire
Council8 50 0 0 15 0 0 15
20/21Year 0
Full Year Forecast
TotalAll Years
Change to allocation
requested?
21/22Year 1 Reason for changeSpend to
Date22/23Year 2
20/21 Progress - local levy funding only
(to end of May 2020)£k
25/26 onwards
20/21Year 0
23/24Year 3
Future Years indicative Local Levy profile (not yet approved)£k
Previous Local Levy
Spend£k
Final Outturn 19/20 £k
19/20 Approved 19/20 Outturn Variance 24/25
Year 4
REFERENCE Descriptive Details
Total Project Cost
(all funding sources)
Previous Years
Pre 19/20
Estimated No. Houses to
Benefit (OM2/OM3)
Line Number Project Name LLFA Location Lead Risk Management
Authority
Location and Ownership
Page 1 of 8
Back to agenda
Technical Appendix A06- Local Levy Programme July 2020 including P and I recommendationsShowing all projects with identified Levy needs starting within the current programme and pipeline
16/07/2020
Total Cost£k
Approved Local Levy Allocation
£k
Local Levy for Approval
£k
20/21Year 0
Full Year Forecast
TotalAll Years
Change to allocation
requested?
21/22Year 1 Reason for changeSpend to
Date22/23Year 2
20/21 Progress - local levy funding only
(to end of May 2020)£k
25/26 onwards
20/21Year 0
23/24Year 3
Future Years indicative Local Levy profile (not yet approved)£k
Previous Local Levy
Spend£k
Final Outturn 19/20 £k
19/20 Approved 19/20 Outturn Variance 24/25
Year 4
REFERENCE Descriptive Details
Total Project Cost
(all funding sources)
Previous Years
Pre 19/20
Estimated No. Houses to
Benefit (OM2/OM3)
Line Number Project Name LLFA Location Lead Risk Management
Authority
Location and Ownership
27 Etton Highway Drainage East RidingEast Riding of Yorkshire
Council1 50 0 0 0 0 25 25
28 Fimber B1248 Highway Drain East RidingEast Riding of Yorkshire
Council0 60 0 0 0 0 40 40
29 Gembling Common Drain East RidingEast Riding of Yorkshire
Council1 65 0 0 0 0 40 40
30 Gilberdyke SUDs Retrofit East RidingEast Riding of Yorkshire
Council52 436 0 0 40 50 50 140
31 Groundwater - Risk identification and mitigation East RidingEast Riding of Yorkshire
Council0 50 0 0 0 0 25 25
32 Hessle Fleet Drain Fluvial/Pluvial Scheme East RidingEast Riding of Yorkshire
Council110 1,500 0 0 0 100 0 100
33 High Catton Highway Drainage East RidingEast Riding of Yorkshire
Council2 45 35 0 0 0 0 35
34 Hornsea - Residual Surface Water Risk mitigation East RidingEast Riding of Yorkshire
Council5 95 0 0 0 0 10 10
35 Hull and Holderness Flood Alleviation Scheme P2
(Inland)East Riding
East Riding of Yorkshire
Council668 10,275 0 500 500 0 0 1,000
36 Kilnwick Village Drainage Improvements East RidingEast Riding of Yorkshire
Council0 50 0 0 0 0 30 30
37 Leven FAS East RidingEast Riding of Yorkshire
Council70 1,071 0 35 0 0 0 35
38 Lockington - North FAS East RidingEast Riding of Yorkshire
Council6 1,000 0 0 10 15 0 25
39 Market Weighton FAS East RidingEast Riding of Yorkshire
Council69 821 0 15 45 40 0 100
40 Molescroft Sister Beck Flood Alleviation Scheme East RidingEast Riding of Yorkshire
Council218 2,266 0 0 0 70 100 170
41 Nafferton Nethergate Phase 2 East RidingEast Riding of Yorkshire
Council10 95 0 0 0 0 15 15
42 North Cave, Newport Road East RidingEast Riding of Yorkshire
Council14 120 0 25 0 0 0 25
43 North Ferriby - Humber Road Flowpath investigations East RidingEast Riding of Yorkshire
Council13 75 0 10 0 0 0 10
44 North Ferriby - Southfield East RidingEast Riding of Yorkshire
Council1 35 25 0 0 0 0 25
45 Nunburnholme Flood Alleviation Scheme East RidingEast Riding of Yorkshire
Council9 110 0 0 0 30 0 30
46 Old Goole Improvements East RidingEast Riding of Yorkshire
Council3 50 0 0 0 0 25 25
47 Rawcliffe (Manor Fields) East RidingEast Riding of Yorkshire
Council0 35 0 0 0 0 20 20
48 Shiptonthorpe FAS East RidingEast Riding of Yorkshire
Council10 60 0 0 15 0 0 15
49 Skidby FAS East RidingEast Riding of Yorkshire
Council3 85 0 0 0 10 0 10
50 Skirlaugh FAS East RidingEast Riding of Yorkshire
Council12 75 0 0 0 0 15 15
51 Snaith Drainage Improvements East RidingEast Riding of Yorkshire
Council16 95 0 0 0 0 20 20
52 South Cave Flood Alleviation Scheme East RidingEast Riding of Yorkshire
Council41 2,103 0 0 100 0 0 100
53 Swinefleet FAS East RidingEast Riding of Yorkshire
Council1 30 0 0 0 0 20 20
54 Wilberfoss Flood Alleviation Schemes East RidingEast Riding of Yorkshire
Council100 1,035 0 25 25 0 0 50
55 Withernsea SUDS East RidingEast Riding of Yorkshire
Council12 1,420 0 0 0 0 35 35
56 Woodmansey Improvements East RidingEast Riding of Yorkshire
Technical Appendix A06- Local Levy Programme July 2020 including P and I recommendationsShowing all projects with identified Levy needs starting within the current programme and pipeline
16/07/2020
Total Cost£k
Approved Local Levy Allocation
£k
Local Levy for Approval
£k
20/21Year 0
Full Year Forecast
TotalAll Years
Change to allocation
requested?
21/22Year 1 Reason for changeSpend to
Date22/23Year 2
20/21 Progress - local levy funding only
(to end of May 2020)£k
25/26 onwards
20/21Year 0
23/24Year 3
Future Years indicative Local Levy profile (not yet approved)£k
Previous Local Levy
Spend£k
Final Outturn 19/20 £k
19/20 Approved 19/20 Outturn Variance 24/25
Year 4
REFERENCE Descriptive Details
Total Project Cost
(all funding sources)
Previous Years
Pre 19/20
Estimated No. Houses to
Benefit (OM2/OM3)
Line Number Project Name LLFA Location Lead Risk Management
Authority
Location and Ownership
North Yorkshire
Projects with identified Local Levy needs ending in 2019/20
57 Carr Lane, York York City of York Council 12 50 0 50 50 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 50
58 Strategy and delivery in Eastburn/Glusburn Beck catchment North Yorkshire Environment Agency 141 727 16 14 11 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 27 Change
The initial assessment was completed in 2019/20 and we have been notified of the release of the remaining £3k of the allocation back into the Levy programme. A long list of options for managing flood risk issues from all sources has been developed and will now be reviewed to decide on the appropriate way forward.
2020/21 Local Levy Programme Progress to the end of May
Work on the project was progressing well to the end of 2019 however staffing changes and capacity limitations following February’s floods and Covid-19 have caused delays. These issues have been resolved and work is progressing with ground investigations, therefore the unspent allocation has been carried forward into 2020/21.
60 Cell 1 Water Framework Directive and Strategic SEA North Yorkshire Scarborough Borough Council 0 104 50 0 0 0 -46 -46 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0
61 Filey Flood Alleviation Works North Yorkshire Scarborough Borough Council 0 4,740 755 0 930 -930 955 25 0 0 0 0 0 1,710 0 18 Reprofile
At a programme level the opportunity was taken to adjust the balance of funding between Local Levy and FCRM GiA on this project in 2019/20 in order to achieve end of year targets for both funding streams. This has the effect of advancing the Levy allocation previously in 2020/21 into 2019/20.
62 Robin Hood's Bay Seawall Capital Maintenance Scheme North Yorkshire Scarborough Borough Council 0 823 0 0 0 0 200 200 0 0 0 0 0 200 0 86
Technical Appendix A06- Local Levy Programme July 2020 including P and I recommendationsShowing all projects with identified Levy needs starting within the current programme and pipeline
16/07/2020
Total Cost£k
Approved Local Levy Allocation
£k
Local Levy for Approval
£k
20/21Year 0
Full Year Forecast
TotalAll Years
Change to allocation
requested?
21/22Year 1 Reason for changeSpend to
Date22/23Year 2
20/21 Progress - local levy funding only
(to end of May 2020)£k
25/26 onwards
20/21Year 0
23/24Year 3
Future Years indicative Local Levy profile (not yet approved)£k
Previous Local Levy
Spend£k
Final Outturn 19/20 £k
19/20 Approved 19/20 Outturn Variance 24/25
Year 4
REFERENCE Descriptive Details
Total Project Cost
(all funding sources)
Previous Years
Pre 19/20
Estimated No. Houses to
Benefit (OM2/OM3)
Line Number Project Name LLFA Location Lead Risk Management
Authority
Location and Ownership
South Yorkshire
Projects with identified Local Levy needs ending in 2019/20
66 Chesterfield Integrated Pluvial Fluvial Model Derbyshire Derbyshire County Council 0 0 80 -80 -80 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Work has been progressing throughout 2019/20, however the claim for the 2019/20 allocation was not able to be processed by year end. It is now expected that the full £70k allocation will be drawn down in 2020/21.
The P&I Sub-Group recommend that the YRFCC approve the additional Local Levy allocation of £116k across 21/22 - 23/24 to fund an extention of this post. See Technical Appendix A08, line 1, for more details.
DMBC have confirmed a total value of £50k Levy was claimed in error at year end, which was £30k over the approved allocation for 2019/20. These funds are being used in 2020/21 along with the remaining allocation on progressing the culvert development OBC.
72 Wilder Waterways in the Lower Don (WiLD) Doncaster Environment Agency 0 115 0 0 0 0 35 35 0 0 0 0 0 35 0 11
The Levy was not able to be spent in 2019/20 due to delays in agreeing scope, which have now been resolved. The allocation has therefore been reprofiled into 2020/21 and will be spent on continuing with programme development and business case.
A claim for this allocation was not able to be made by Sheffield CC by year end due to delays associated with review and re-validation of the model following the November 2019 floods. The allocation has therefore been reprofiled into 2020/21.
75 Three Brooks Environmental Scheme, Manor, Sheffield Sheffield Sheffield City Council 28 1,673 50 75 0 75 0 75 0 0 0 0 0 125 0 41 Reprofile
Work on developing this project continued in 2019/20 using other funding sources. The project scope is being revised and Sheffield City Council have requested that the remaining Levy allocation is transferred into 2020/21 until a final solution and costings are confirmed.
76 Sheffield Upper Don Flood Alleviation Scheme Sheffield Sheffield City Council 276 30,159 180 0 0 0 145 145 0 0 0 0 0 325 0 118
77 Putting The Sheaf Back Into Sheffield Sheffield Sheffield City Council 0 550 0 0 0 0 100 100 0 0 0 0 0 100 0 0
Technical Appendix A06- Local Levy Programme July 2020 including P and I recommendationsShowing all projects with identified Levy needs starting within the current programme and pipeline
16/07/2020
Total Cost£k
Approved Local Levy Allocation
£k
Local Levy for Approval
£k
20/21Year 0
Full Year Forecast
TotalAll Years
Change to allocation
requested?
21/22Year 1 Reason for changeSpend to
Date22/23Year 2
20/21 Progress - local levy funding only
(to end of May 2020)£k
25/26 onwards
20/21Year 0
23/24Year 3
Future Years indicative Local Levy profile (not yet approved)£k
Previous Local Levy
Spend£k
Final Outturn 19/20 £k
19/20 Approved 19/20 Outturn Variance 24/25
Year 4
REFERENCE Descriptive Details
Total Project Cost
(all funding sources)
Previous Years
Pre 19/20
Estimated No. Houses to
Benefit (OM2/OM3)
Line Number Project Name LLFA Location Lead Risk Management
Authority
Location and Ownership
West Yorkshire
Projects with identified Local Levy needs ending in 2019/20
Bradford Flood Programme Projects:
82 Baildon Surface Water Study Bradford Bradford City Council 55 244 0 30 30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 30
83 Goose Eye Surface Water Study Bradford Bradford City Council 40 179 0 25 25 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25
2020/21 Local Levy Programme Progress to the end of May
Bradford Flood Programme Projects: 0 0
90 Bradford Resilience Group Bradford Bradford City Council 0 155 122 33 25 8 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 155 0 8 ReprofileBradford City Council have requested to reprofile the remaining £8k of the 2019/20 Levy allocation into 2020/21 due to delays with the procurement of flood forecasting software.
92 Worth Catchment Modelling Bradford Environment Agency 0 281 103 10 0 10 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 113 0 0 ReprofileWork on this project is drawing to a close and therefore the remaining allocation has been carried forward into 2020/21 until final accounts have been confirmed.
An underspend of Levy on this project was due to securing a lower price for site ground investigation works than was originally quoted, meaning the forecasted risk allowance was not fully realised. Therefore the unspent allocation has been carried forward into 2020/21.
95 Hebden Bridge FAS Calderdale Environment Agency 130 27,240 32 400 399 1 365 366 0 0 0 0 0 797 25 276 Reprofile This project has spent less than its allocated amount and the unspent allocation has been carried forward into 2020/21.
The project experienced delays due to issues with ground conditions and limited supplier capacity following the flooding events in November 2019. This project has therefore spent less than its allocated amount and the unspent allocation has been carried forward into 2020/21.
Kirklees Borough Council confirm that work on these projects is drawing to a close, therefore the remaining allocations have been carried forward into 2020/21 until final accounts have been confirmed.
Page 5 of 8
Technical Appendix A06- Local Levy Programme July 2020 including P and I recommendationsShowing all projects with identified Levy needs starting within the current programme and pipeline
16/07/2020
Total Cost£k
Approved Local Levy Allocation
£k
Local Levy for Approval
£k
20/21Year 0
Full Year Forecast
TotalAll Years
Change to allocation
requested?
21/22Year 1 Reason for changeSpend to
Date22/23Year 2
20/21 Progress - local levy funding only
(to end of May 2020)£k
25/26 onwards
20/21Year 0
23/24Year 3
Future Years indicative Local Levy profile (not yet approved)£k
Previous Local Levy
Spend£k
Final Outturn 19/20 £k
19/20 Approved 19/20 Outturn Variance 24/25
Year 4
REFERENCE Descriptive Details
Total Project Cost
(all funding sources)
Previous Years
Pre 19/20
Estimated No. Houses to
Benefit (OM2/OM3)
Line Number Project Name LLFA Location Lead Risk Management
Kirklees Borough Council confirm that work on this study has been progressing during 2019/20 and the claim was funded by FCRM GiA. This has meant that the allocation has been carried forward into 2020/21.
Leeds City Council confirm that the end of phase 2 of the study has been completed and a preferred solution has been identified. The aim was to progress straight to a detailed design and OBC submission early in 2020/21 in order to be ready to implement the de-culverting downstream of Old Close in 2021/22. The Levy allocation was claimed ahead of year end to enable LCC to make an early start to this next phase.
110 Potternewton Surface Water Flood Alleviation Scheme, Leeds. Leeds Leeds City Council 44 280 0 30 30 0 20 20 0 0 0 0 0 50 8 20
111 Victoria Road Surface Water Flood Alleviation Scheme, Guiseley, Leeds Leeds Leeds City Council 39 150 0 30 30 0 20 20 0 0 0 0 0 50 0 20
116 Wyke Beck Improvements Leeds Leeds City Council 0 5,548 50 0 50 -50 0 -50 0 0 0 0 0 50 0 -50 Change£50k unapproved Local Levy was paid in error for this project during 2019/20. The process for refunding this payment is underway and it is expected to return to Levy balances during 2020/21.
The delivery of the model, on which this study will be based, was delayed due to issues clarifying the validity of hydrological data. The project has therefore spent less than its allocated amount and the unspent allocation has been carried forward into 2020/21.
118 Reid Park Beck, Horbury, Wakefield Wakefield Wakefield Metropolitan District Council 17 105 0 0 0 0 60 60 0 0 0 0 0 60 0 0
Technical Appendix A06- Local Levy Programme July 2020 including P and I recommendationsShowing all projects with identified Levy needs starting within the current programme and pipeline
16/07/2020
Total Cost£k
Approved Local Levy Allocation
£k
Local Levy for Approval
£k
20/21Year 0
Full Year Forecast
TotalAll Years
Change to allocation
requested?
21/22Year 1 Reason for changeSpend to
Date22/23Year 2
20/21 Progress - local levy funding only
(to end of May 2020)£k
25/26 onwards
20/21Year 0
23/24Year 3
Future Years indicative Local Levy profile (not yet approved)£k
Previous Local Levy
Spend£k
Final Outturn 19/20 £k
19/20 Approved 19/20 Outturn Variance 24/25
Year 4
REFERENCE Descriptive Details
Total Project Cost
(all funding sources)
Previous Years
Pre 19/20
Estimated No. Houses to
Benefit (OM2/OM3)
Line Number Project Name LLFA Location Lead Risk Management
Authority
Location and Ownership
North and West Yorkshire
2020/21 Local Levy Programme Progress to the end of May
Work has been progressing on two of the three strands of this project, with the underspend represented by delays associated with Tadcaster FAS. This has meant that the project has spent less than its allocated amount and the unspent allocation has been carried forward into 2020/21.
Subtotals - North and West Yorkshire Partnership (Currently Programmed) 0 100 0 45 15 30 25 55 30 0 0 0 0 100 18 46
Yorkshire Wide
2020/21 Local Levy Programme Progress to the end of May
NEW Yorkshire Natural Flood Management (NFM) Community of Practice (COP) Yorkshire-wide Leeds City Council 0 119 0 0 0 0 0 14 27 27 13 0 0 81 0 0 New The P&I Sub-Group recommend that the YRFCC approve the Local
Levy allocation. See Techinical Appendix A08, line 2, for more details.
The P&I Sub-Group support the Environment Sub-Group's request to earmark £600,000 of Local Levy to support a strategic, region wide approach to developing Natural Flood Managment. Please see agenda item 5.4 paper YRFCC/303 for more details. This holding line represents the remaining earmarked value.
Technical Appendix A06- Local Levy Programme July 2020 including P and I recommendationsShowing all projects with identified Levy needs starting within the current programme and pipeline
16/07/2020
Total Cost£k
Approved Local Levy Allocation
£k
Local Levy for Approval
£k
20/21Year 0
Full Year Forecast
TotalAll Years
Change to allocation
requested?
21/22Year 1 Reason for changeSpend to
Date22/23Year 2
20/21 Progress - local levy funding only
(to end of May 2020)£k
25/26 onwards
20/21Year 0
23/24Year 3
Future Years indicative Local Levy profile (not yet approved)£k
Previous Local Levy
Spend£k
Final Outturn 19/20 £k
19/20 Approved 19/20 Outturn Variance 24/25
Year 4
REFERENCE Descriptive Details
Total Project Cost
(all funding sources)
Previous Years
Pre 19/20
Estimated No. Houses to
Benefit (OM2/OM3)
Line Number Project Name LLFA Location Lead Risk Management
2,529 2,593 2,593 2,593 2,593 2,593 2,593 Red text
3,267 2,393 2,393 929 3,250 5,675 8,171
5,796 4,986 4,986 3,521 5,843 8,267 10,764
2,770 4,693 4,693 271 168 96 60
3,403 4,693 4,057 271 168 96 60
2,393 293 929 3,250 5,675 8,171 10,704
With recommended additions to the programme:
Total LL available in year 4,986 3,507 5,763 8,122 10,566
Total programmed spend 4,071 337 234 148 60
Balance to carry at year-end 915 3,170 5,529 7,974 10,506
Current Programme with recommended additions and pipeline 20/21 Approved 20/21 Proposed 21/22 22/23 23/24 24/25
2,593 2,593 2,593 2,593 2,593 2,593
2,393 2,393 715 2,580 3,674 4,862
4,986 4,986 3,307 5,173 6,267 7,455
4,693 4,271 727 1,499 1,404 567
293 715 2,580 3,674 4,862 6,888
Total programmed spend following April RFCC
Balances carried from previous yr
Local Levy raised
Balance to carry at year-end
Total programmed spend
Total LL available in year
Allocations approved in principle at April YRFCC meeting requiring ratification
<> Change from previous programme
+/- £50k
* projects appear in both currentprogramme and pipeline
New / Additional Requests for Local Levy Funding
Balance to carry at year-end
Local Levy raised
Balances carried from previous yr
Total LL available in year
Total programmed spend inc recommended additions and Pipeline (not yet approved)
Page 8 of 8Back to agenda
Data correct as at end of May 2020 Technical Appendix A07 Back to agenda
Back to agenda
[1] Project outcomes are based on Defra’s defined Outcome Measures for the Flood and Coastal Erosion Risk Management (FCERM) capital programme.
of which
of which
And contributes to:
£621k (15%) is being used
alongside GiA funding only
£203k (5%) is
being used alongside
public funding
only£2,883k (71%) is being used with multiple funding
sources
£349k (9%) is being used on its own
There are 48 projects to a value of just under £4.1 million in the baselined 2020/21 Local Levy
Programme.
Over the lifetime of these projects:
2020/21 Local Levy programme headline statistics
the creation of 42 hectares of water
dependent habitats
and the proposed £4.1 million levy investment in 2020/21 breaks down as follows:
this investment is part of a total investment of £138m coming from:
and just under £350m of non-residential
benefits
3,309 households with reduced risk of flooding and 21
with reduced coastal erosion risk
… and contributes to the delivery [1] of:
2,209 households taken out of
significant risk
632 households are in deprived
areas
Total Levy need
£8.9m
GiA£33.4m
Growth£28.9m
Public£38m
Private£200k
Further Contributions Required £28.5m
Technical Appendix A08a - New Levy Requests Summary July 2020
20/21 21/22 22/23 23/24 24/25 Residential Other
New Requests for 2020/21South Yorkshire Partnership
1
Accelerating NFM Impact in the Upper Rother Catchment (Upper Rother NFM Officer Phase 2)
Derbyshire County Council
Stand-alone project Yes 186 Post-investment
decision 116 67% 70 0 39 39 39 0 186 143
In 2019 a partnership between the Don Catchment Rivers Trust (DCRT), Derbyshire County Council (DCC), North East Derbyshire District Council (NEDDC), Chesterfield Borough Council (CBC) and Environment Agency (EA) secured funding from the Local Levy for a two-year trial of an NFM Officer in the Upper Rother Catchment. We firmly belief that this has been very successful. Her work has enabled £127k to be invested in NFM at Grassmoor Country Park. She has built her expertise of NFM techniques, funding and local circumstances, and has accumulated contacts with landowners, communities and professionals. Her portfolio of NFM opportunities has grown rapidly, demonstrating the rich seam of potential interventions waiting to be realised.
The officer and Project Board are keen to maximise the positive impact of the role and have devised an ambitious package of deliverables for the next three-year phase (April 2021 – March 2024) of the officer’s employment:1. A programme of NFM capital works2. Engagement with the agricultural sector to provide farm advice and develop more NFM on farmland (a new strand to theofficer’s activities).3. To research how an NFM grant scheme for landowners could operate and be funded and to draw up plans for such ascheme.4. Organisation of volunteering to deliver small-scale NFM measures.To engage with flood-impacted communities (e.g. presentations, guided walks) and encourage involvement in volunteering.
DCRT’s contribution will be:· £90k likely to result from a civil sanction· the raising of match funding in the region of £100k - £300k· expertise of their NFM Officer and Trustees· proven capability for community engagement and ability to persuade landowners of the benefits of NFM
This proposal from DCRT requires an investment of £116.36k (£38.79k per year for three years) from the Levy to cover the officer’s salary and overheads, enabling the proposed package to be delivered.
939 368
Road network,agricultural land, industrial units and commerical property
Limited N/A Mod
erate
Yorkshire Wide
2
Yorkshire Natural Flood Management (NFM) Community of Practice (COP)
Leeds City Council
Stand-alone project No 119 Pre-business
justification 90 76% 0 14 27 27 13 0 81 27
An awareness for the need to integrate land and catchment scale management decisions to successfully increase flood resilience and progress wider environmental priorities has grown rapidly over recent years. This is especially pertinent when considering pending changes to agri-environmental policies due to Brexit and recent flood events across Yorkshire. Successfully implementing Natural Flood Management (NFM) requires working in complex multi-stakeholder partnerships.
High profile NFM projects across Yorkshire including work in Pickering, the Yorkshire Dales, Airedale and Calderdale have established Yorkshire’s approaches to NFM as some of the exemplars in this field, with a number of projects initiated by local communities. More recently, the development of the Leeds University iCASP programme (https://icasp.org.uk/) has facilitated further opportunities to learn from published research to answer current questions in catchment scale land management practices. Many of the outstanding challenges in delivering NFM are still being addressed.
This proposal is supported by the YRFCC Environment Sub-Group Task and Finish (T&F) Group. Local Levy is being requested to: 1. Build on the pilot iCASP NFM Community of Practice (currently 65 organisations working across Yorkshire) sharinglearning and exchanges for practitioners, academics and communities. (Total project costs include those of pilot to date and project in-kind going forward).2. Resource a co-ordinator to organise events, visit NFM sites, and host discussions to build consensus and best practice.3. Develop an online resource of NFM projects across Yorkshire extended to share national best practice.4. Open dialogue with national and regional NFM experts.
Total programmed spend if all requests are recommended and incl. Pipeline (not yet approved)
Estimated No. of Properties to Benefit
Amount of Levy
per property
(£)
Balances carried from previous year
Local Levy raised (assumed)
Project Narrative, including why Levy is requiredNew / additional Levy requested (£k)
Total programmed spend (current programme) from A06
Basic details
Line No. Project Name Project Stage
Assessment against Essential Criteria:
Estimated Benefit
Cost ratioRat
ingOther Infrastructure
to BenefitConfidence in Benefits
Confidence in CostsProject Type
Available for commitment or carry forward to next year
% of Levy requeste
d for current phase
Lead Risk Management
Authority
KEY
Ineligible
None
Moderate
Total YRFCC Levy pipeline from A06
Limited
Total programmed spend (current programme) if all requests are recommended
Total Local Levy available in year
Levy details
Rat
ing
Is the project in
the YRFCC 6 Year
Programme
Significant
Estimated Total Project Cost(all funding
sources) (£k)
Total Levy all years
Funding (£k)
Total cost of current phase (£k)
Delivers flood risk/coastal erosion benefits Value for money
Existing Levy
approved (£k)
Page 1 of 2
Back to agenda
Technical Appendix A08a - New Levy Requests Summary July 2020
New Requests for 2020/21South Yorkshire Partnership
1
Accelerating NFM Impact in the Upper Rother Catchment (Upper Rother NFM Officer Phase 2)
Yorkshire Wide
2
Yorkshire Natural Flood Management (NFM) Community of Practice (COP)
Basic details
Line No. Project Name
Extensive interventions across publicly accessible sites (see E2), as well as volunteering and community engagement programme means the proposed package will make a significant improvement to the character and biodiversity of NFM sites, and increase physical and mental health and social wellbeing.
Significan
t
Helps reduce flood risk in the Rother Valley, the location of several major new developments. It also aligns with Chesterfield’s Local Plan, which aims to prepare for the impacts of climate change
Moderate 100% 0 0% 0 0% 0
£90k will likely come available for capital works in the Moss Valley through the settlement of a civil sanctionIf approved DCC can contribute £10kA further £100k - £300k will be ‘sought for delivery of capital works’ (not secured, though DCRT has a strong track record in securing project funding)
Moderate
Involves the recruitment of volunteers from and consultation of local communities.
Improved catchment management and community involvement in NFM delivery can deliver multiple integrated catchment management benefits, recreational and wellbeing opportunities.
Moderate
The potential project outcomes: active delivery of NFM, best practice has the potential to deliver on inward investment for catchment management, improved flood resilience (economic stability), wider environmental and community welfare benefits.
Moderate 68% 0 0% 29 24% 9
The pilot NFM COP has been funded primarily by iCASP but also secured contributions in kind from a number of partners (speakers, venues, food). Contributions in partner time, expenses not claimed and venues are expected going forward. Potential new partnerships and project proposals to access funding are expected outcomes of the COP learning and networking. Securing new funding for project delivery, monitoring and research is potentially unlimited.
Moderate
Some community based organisations are currently involved in the Community of Practice and this is open to grow. Participating organisations are outlined in Appendix 1.
Actively engage communitiesBenefits the local or regional economy
Assessment against Added Value Criteria:
Likely maximum GiA (£k)R
atin
g
Rat
ing
Details Details
Other:
Time criticality
Level of community
engagementDetailsFunding gap
(£k)
Other contributions
(£k)
% of other contributions
securedDetails
Potential for reputational
damage
Confidence in
Contributions
% of Levy requested for whole project
% of GiA
Wider recreational / environmental benefits
Rat
ing
Levers in additional investment Other drivers
Page 2 of 2
Back to agenda
Technical Appendix A08b - New Levy Requests Simplified Summary July 2020
20/21 21/22 22/23 23/24 24/25 Residential Other
New Requests for 2020/21South Yorkshire Partnership
1
Accelerating NFM Impact in the Upper Rother Catchment (Upper Rother NFM Officer Phase 2)