Top Banner
MIT-LFEE 2004-003 RP Emissions Reductions from Solar PV Systems pg.BIIIc–0 Appendix B Section IIIc – CO2 Load Shape Following Emission Rates for 1998 to 2002 Figure BIIIc - 1. NEWE – CO2 Load Shape Following Emission Rate Profiles............................................................ 2 Figure BIIIc - 2. NYAS – CO2 Load Shape Following Emission Rate Profiles ............................................................ 3 Figure BIIIc - 3. MAAC – CO2 Load Shape Following Emission Rate Profiles ............................................................ 4 Figure BIIIc - 4. ECOV – CO2 Load Shape Following Emission Rate Profiles ............................................................ 5 Figure BIIIc - 5. ECMI – CO2 Load Shape Following Emission Rate Profiles ............................................................. 6 Figure BIIIc - 6. SRVC – CO2 Load Shape Following Emission Rate Profiles ............................................................ 7 Figure BIIIc - 7. SRTV – CO2 Load Shape Following Emission Rate Profiles............................................................. 8 Figure BIIIc - 8. SRSO – CO2 Load Shape Following Emission Rate Profiles ............................................................ 9 Figure BIIIc - 9. SRMV – CO2 Load Shape Following Emission Rate Profiles ........................................................... 10 Figure BIIIc - 10. FRC – CO2 Load Shape Following Emission Rate Profiles ............................................................ 11 Figure BIIIc - 11. MANN – CO2 Load Shape Following Emission Rate Profiles ......................................................... 12 Figure BIIIc - 12. MANS – CO2 Load Shape Following Emission Rate Profiles ......................................................... 13 Figure BIIIc - 13. SPNO – CO2 Load Shape Following Emission Rate Profiles ......................................................... 14 Figure BIIIc - 14. SPSO – CO2 Load Shape Following Emission Rate Profiles.......................................................... 15 Figure BIIIc - 15. ERCT – CO2 Load Shape Following Emission Rate Profiles .......................................................... 16 Figure BIIIc - 16. MAPP – CO2 Load Shape Following Emission Rate Profiles.......................................................... 17 Figure BIIIc - 17. ROCK – CO2 Load Shape Following Emission Rate Profiles ......................................................... 18 Figure BIIIc - 18. NWGB – CO2 Load Shape Following Emission Rate Profiles ........................................................ 19 Figure BIIIc - 19. NWPN – CO2 Load Shape Following Emission Rate Profiles......................................................... 20 Figure BIIIc - 20. WSSW – CO2 Load Shape Following Emission Rate Profiles ........................................................ 21 Figure BIIIc - 21. CALI – CO2 Load Shape Following Emission Rate Profiles ........................................................... 22
23

Appendix B Section IIIc – CO2 Load Shape Following ...web.mit.edu/agrea/docs/MIT-LFEE_2004-003e_BIIIc.pdfSRMV (Mississippi Valley) for the years 1998 through 2002. Total emissions

Sep 24, 2020

Download

Documents

dariahiddleston
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Appendix B Section IIIc – CO2 Load Shape Following ...web.mit.edu/agrea/docs/MIT-LFEE_2004-003e_BIIIc.pdfSRMV (Mississippi Valley) for the years 1998 through 2002. Total emissions

MIT-LFEE 2004-003 RP Emissions Reductions from Solar PV Systems pg.BIIIc–0

Appendix B Section IIIc – CO2 Load Shape Following Emission Ratesfor 1998 to 2002

Figure BIIIc - 1. NEWE – CO2 Load Shape Following Emission Rate Profiles............................................................ 2Figure BIIIc - 2. NYAS – CO2 Load Shape Following Emission Rate Profiles ............................................................ 3Figure BIIIc - 3. MAAC – CO2 Load Shape Following Emission Rate Profiles ............................................................ 4Figure BIIIc - 4. ECOV – CO2 Load Shape Following Emission Rate Profiles ............................................................ 5Figure BIIIc - 5. ECMI – CO2 Load Shape Following Emission Rate Profiles............................................................. 6Figure BIIIc - 6. SRVC – CO2 Load Shape Following Emission Rate Profiles ............................................................ 7Figure BIIIc - 7. SRTV – CO2 Load Shape Following Emission Rate Profiles............................................................. 8Figure BIIIc - 8. SRSO – CO2 Load Shape Following Emission Rate Profiles ............................................................ 9Figure BIIIc - 9. SRMV – CO2 Load Shape Following Emission Rate Profiles ...........................................................10Figure BIIIc - 10. FRC – CO2 Load Shape Following Emission Rate Profiles............................................................11Figure BIIIc - 11. MANN – CO2 Load Shape Following Emission Rate Profiles.........................................................12Figure BIIIc - 12. MANS – CO2 Load Shape Following Emission Rate Profiles .........................................................13Figure BIIIc - 13. SPNO – CO2 Load Shape Following Emission Rate Profiles .........................................................14Figure BIIIc - 14. SPSO – CO2 Load Shape Following Emission Rate Profiles..........................................................15Figure BIIIc - 15. ERCT – CO2 Load Shape Following Emission Rate Profiles..........................................................16Figure BIIIc - 16. MAPP – CO2 Load Shape Following Emission Rate Profiles..........................................................17Figure BIIIc - 17. ROCK – CO2 Load Shape Following Emission Rate Profiles .........................................................18Figure BIIIc - 18. NWGB – CO2 Load Shape Following Emission Rate Profiles ........................................................19Figure BIIIc - 19. NWPN – CO2 Load Shape Following Emission Rate Profiles.........................................................20Figure BIIIc - 20. WSSW – CO2 Load Shape Following Emission Rate Profiles ........................................................21Figure BIIIc - 21. CALI – CO2 Load Shape Following Emission Rate Profiles...........................................................22

Page 2: Appendix B Section IIIc – CO2 Load Shape Following ...web.mit.edu/agrea/docs/MIT-LFEE_2004-003e_BIIIc.pdfSRMV (Mississippi Valley) for the years 1998 through 2002. Total emissions

MIT-LFEE 2004-003 RP Emissions Reductions from Solar PV Systems pg.BIIIc–1

Ave (kg/MWh)Total

(t/8760MWh)

19988317279

Ave (kg/MWh)Total

(t/8760MWh)

CO2 Load Shape Following Emission Rate Profiles

Contour plots show emissions from 1MWh of load shapefollowing generation in each hour of the year. Alternatively, thiscan be thought of as the emissions that would be avoided fromapplying 1MWh of non-emitting generation or demand sidemanagement in each hour of the year.

Below the contour plot is a chart that displays the average loadshape following emission rate for the year and the totalemissions from 8760 MWh of generation. That is, the totalemissions from 1 MWh of load shape following generation ineach hour of the year.

Five plots are shown for each subregion, one plot for each yearfrom 1998 through 2002.

CO2(kg/MWh)

4 8 12 16 20 24

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

Page 3: Appendix B Section IIIc – CO2 Load Shape Following ...web.mit.edu/agrea/docs/MIT-LFEE_2004-003e_BIIIc.pdfSRMV (Mississippi Valley) for the years 1998 through 2002. Total emissions

MIT-LFEE 2004-003 RP Emissions Reductions from Solar PV Systems pg.BIIIc–2

1998 1999 2000 2001 2002831 797 750 738 7637279 6981 6590 6467 6686

Ave (kg/MWh)Total

(t/8760MWh)Figure BIIIc - 1. NEWE – CO2 Load Shape Following Emission Rate Profiles

Contour plots show CO2 emissions (kg) from 1MWh of load shape following generation in each hour inNEWE (New England) for the years 1998 through 2002. Total emissions from 1MWh generated in eachhour of the year (8760 MWh) and average yearly emission rates are shown below the profiles.

CO2 Load Shape Following Emission Rate – 1998 through 2002NEWE (New England) – (365 days x 24 hours)

CO2(kg/MWh)

4 8 12 16 20 24

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

Page 4: Appendix B Section IIIc – CO2 Load Shape Following ...web.mit.edu/agrea/docs/MIT-LFEE_2004-003e_BIIIc.pdfSRMV (Mississippi Valley) for the years 1998 through 2002. Total emissions

MIT-LFEE 2004-003 RP Emissions Reductions from Solar PV Systems pg.BIIIc–3

Ave (kg/MWh)Total

(t/8760MWh)

Figure BIIIc - 2. NYAS – CO2 Load Shape Following Emission Rate Profiles

Contour plots show CO2 emissions (kg) from 1MWh of load shape following generation in each hour inNYAS (New York) for the years 1998 through 2002. Total emissions from 1MWh generated in each hour ofthe year (8760 MWh) and average yearly emission rates are shown below the profiles.

CO2 Load Shape Following Emission Rate – 1998 through 2002NYAS (New York) – (365 days x 24 hours)

1998 1999 2000 2001 2002767 723 751 729 7216719 6330 6598 6390 6317

CO2(kg/MWh)

4 8 12 16 20 24

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

Page 5: Appendix B Section IIIc – CO2 Load Shape Following ...web.mit.edu/agrea/docs/MIT-LFEE_2004-003e_BIIIc.pdfSRMV (Mississippi Valley) for the years 1998 through 2002. Total emissions

MIT-LFEE 2004-003 RP Emissions Reductions from Solar PV Systems pg.BIIIc–4

Ave (kg/MWh)Total

(t/8760MWh)

Figure BIIIc - 3. MAAC – CO2 Load Shape Following Emission Rate Profiles

Contour plots show CO2 emissions (kg) from 1MWh of load shape following generation in each hour inMAAC (Mid-Atlantic) for the years 1998 through 2002. Total emissions from 1MWh generated in each hourof the year (8760 MWh) and average yearly emission rates are shown below the profiles.

1998 1999 2000 2001 2002844 758 732 747 7667396 6637 6431 6540 6709

CO2 Load Shape Following Emission Rate – 1998 through 2002MAAC (Mid-Atlantic) – (365 days x 24 hours)

CO2(kg/MWh)

4 8 12 16 20 24

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

Page 6: Appendix B Section IIIc – CO2 Load Shape Following ...web.mit.edu/agrea/docs/MIT-LFEE_2004-003e_BIIIc.pdfSRMV (Mississippi Valley) for the years 1998 through 2002. Total emissions

MIT-LFEE 2004-003 RP Emissions Reductions from Solar PV Systems pg.BIIIc–5

Ave (kg/MWh)Total

(t/8760MWh)

Figure BIIIc - 4. ECOV – CO2 Load Shape Following Emission Rate Profiles

Contour plots show CO2 emissions (kg) from 1MWh of load shape following generation in each hour inECOV (Mid-Atlantic) for the years 1998 through 2002. Total emissions from 1MWh generated in each hourof the year (8760 MWh) and average yearly emission rates are shown below the profiles.

1998 1999 2000 2001 2002875 842 835 801 8017668 7376 7331 7013 7015

CO2 Load Shape Following Emission Rate – 1998 through 2002ECOV (Ohio Valley) – (365 days x 24 hours)

CO2(kg/MWh)

4 8 12 16 20 24

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

Page 7: Appendix B Section IIIc – CO2 Load Shape Following ...web.mit.edu/agrea/docs/MIT-LFEE_2004-003e_BIIIc.pdfSRMV (Mississippi Valley) for the years 1998 through 2002. Total emissions

MIT-LFEE 2004-003 RP Emissions Reductions from Solar PV Systems pg.BIIIc–6

Ave (kg/MWh)Total

(t/8760MWh)

1998 1999 2000 2001 2002838 740 739 770 8587337 6482 6492 6744 7517

Figure BIIIc - 5. ECMI – CO2 Load Shape Following Emission Rate Profiles

Contour plots show CO2 emissions (kg) from 1MWh of load shape following generation in each hour inECMI (Michigan) for the years 1998 through 2002. Total emissions from 1MWh generated in each hour ofthe year (8760 MWh) and average yearly emission rates are shown below the profiles.

CO2 Load Shape Following Emission Rate – 1998 through 2002ECMI (Michigan) – (365 days x 24 hours)

CO2(kg/MWh)

4 8 12 16 20 24

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

Page 8: Appendix B Section IIIc – CO2 Load Shape Following ...web.mit.edu/agrea/docs/MIT-LFEE_2004-003e_BIIIc.pdfSRMV (Mississippi Valley) for the years 1998 through 2002. Total emissions

MIT-LFEE 2004-003 RP Emissions Reductions from Solar PV Systems pg.BIIIc–7

Ave (kg/MWh)Total

(t/8760MWh)

1998 1999 2000 2001 2002883 861 863 852 8457736 7545 7580 7461 7403

Figure BIIIc - 6. SRVC – CO2 Load Shape Following Emission Rate Profiles

Contour plots show CO2 emissions (kg) from 1MWh of load shape following generation in each hour inSRVC (Virginia/Carolinas) for the years 1998 through 2002. Total emissions from 1MWh generated in eachhour of the year (8760 MWh) and average yearly emission rates are shown below the profiles.

CO2 Load Shape Following Emission Rate – 1998 through 2002SRVC (Virginia/Carolinas) – (365 days x 24 hours)

CO2(kg/MWh)

4 8 12 16 20 24

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

Page 9: Appendix B Section IIIc – CO2 Load Shape Following ...web.mit.edu/agrea/docs/MIT-LFEE_2004-003e_BIIIc.pdfSRMV (Mississippi Valley) for the years 1998 through 2002. Total emissions

MIT-LFEE 2004-003 RP Emissions Reductions from Solar PV Systems pg.BIIIc–8

Ave (kg/MWh)Total

(t/8760MWh)

1998 1999 2000 2001 2002928 943 934 943 9618126 8262 8205 8262 8419

Figure BIIIc - 7. SRTV – CO2 Load Shape Following Emission Rate Profiles

Contour plots show CO2 emissions (kg) from 1MWh of load shape following generation in each hour inSRTV (Tennessee Valley) for the years 1998 through 2002. Total emissions from 1MWh generated in eachhour of the year (8760 MWh) and average yearly emission rates are shown below the profiles.

CO2 Load Shape Following Emission Rate – 1998 through 2002SRTV (Tennessee Valley) – (365 days x 24 hours)

CO2(kg/MWh)

4 8 12 16 20 24

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

Page 10: Appendix B Section IIIc – CO2 Load Shape Following ...web.mit.edu/agrea/docs/MIT-LFEE_2004-003e_BIIIc.pdfSRMV (Mississippi Valley) for the years 1998 through 2002. Total emissions

MIT-LFEE 2004-003 RP Emissions Reductions from Solar PV Systems pg.BIIIc–9

Ave (kg/MWh)Total

(t/8760MWh)

1998 1999 2000 2001 2002842 837 813 848 8207379 7335 7145 7426 7183

Figure BIIIc - 8. SRSO – CO2 Load Shape Following Emission Rate Profiles

Contour plots show CO2 emissions (kg) from 1MWh of load shape following generation in each hour inSRSO (Southeast) for the years 1998 through 2002. Total emissions from 1MWh generated in each hourof the year (8760 MWh) and average yearly emission rates are shown below the profiles.

CO2 Load Shape Following Emission Rate – 1998 through 2002SRSO (Southeast) – (365 days x 24 hours)

CO2(kg/MWh)

4 8 12 16 20 24

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

Page 11: Appendix B Section IIIc – CO2 Load Shape Following ...web.mit.edu/agrea/docs/MIT-LFEE_2004-003e_BIIIc.pdfSRMV (Mississippi Valley) for the years 1998 through 2002. Total emissions

MIT-LFEE 2004-003 RP Emissions Reductions from Solar PV Systems pg.BIIIc–10

Ave (kg/MWh)Total

(t/8760MWh)

1998 1999 2000 2001 2002767 759 764 780 7716717 6650 6711 6833 6752

Figure BIIIc - 9. SRMV – CO2 Load Shape Following Emission Rate Profiles

Contour plots show CO2 emissions (kg) from 1MWh of load shape following generation in each hour inSRMV (Mississippi Valley) for the years 1998 through 2002. Total emissions from 1MWh generated in eachhour of the year (8760 MWh) and average yearly emission rates are shown below the profiles.

CO2 Load Shape Following Emission Rate – 1998 through 2002SRMV (Mississippi Valley) – (365 days x 24 hours)

CO2(kg/MWh)

4 8 12 16 20 24

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

Page 12: Appendix B Section IIIc – CO2 Load Shape Following ...web.mit.edu/agrea/docs/MIT-LFEE_2004-003e_BIIIc.pdfSRMV (Mississippi Valley) for the years 1998 through 2002. Total emissions

MIT-LFEE 2004-003 RP Emissions Reductions from Solar PV Systems pg.BIIIc–11

Ave (kg/MWh)Total

(t/8760MWh)

1998 1999 2000 2001 2002787 777 745 769 7696898 6806 6543 6733 6736

Figure BIIIc - 10. FRCC – CO2 Load Shape Following Emission Rate Profiles

Contour plots show CO2 emissions (kg) from 1MWh of load shape following generation in each hour inFRC (Florida) for the years 1998 through 2002. Total emissions from 1MWh generated in each hour of theyear (8760 MWh) and average yearly emission rates are shown below the profiles.

CO2 Load Shape Following Emission Rate – 1998 through 2002FRCC (Florida) – (365 days x 24 hours)

CO2(kg/MWh)

4 8 12 16 20 24

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

Page 13: Appendix B Section IIIc – CO2 Load Shape Following ...web.mit.edu/agrea/docs/MIT-LFEE_2004-003e_BIIIc.pdfSRMV (Mississippi Valley) for the years 1998 through 2002. Total emissions

MIT-LFEE 2004-003 RP Emissions Reductions from Solar PV Systems pg.BIIIc–12

Ave (kg/MWh)Total

(t/8760MWh)

1998 1999 2000 2001 2002837 826 844 828 8147330 7232 7418 7255 7133

Figure BIIIc - 11. MANN – CO2 Load Shape Following Emission Rate Profiles

Contour plots show CO2 emissions (kg) from 1MWh of load shape following generation in each hour inMANN (Wisconsin) for the years 1998 through 2002. Total emissions from 1MWh generated in each hourof the year (8760 MWh) and average yearly emission rates are shown below the profiles.

CO2 Load Shape Following Emission Rate – 1998 through 2002MANN (Wisconsin) – (365 days x 24 hours)

CO2(kg/MWh)

4 8 12 16 20 24

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

Page 14: Appendix B Section IIIc – CO2 Load Shape Following ...web.mit.edu/agrea/docs/MIT-LFEE_2004-003e_BIIIc.pdfSRMV (Mississippi Valley) for the years 1998 through 2002. Total emissions

MIT-LFEE 2004-003 RP Emissions Reductions from Solar PV Systems pg.BIIIc–13

Ave (kg/MWh)Total

(t/8760MWh)

1998 1999 2000 2001 2002813 829 788 817 8327126 7258 6918 7159 7288

Figure BIIIc - 12. MANS – CO2 Load Shape Following Emission Rate Profiles

Contour plots show CO2 emissions (kg) from 1MWh of load shape following generation in each hour inMANS (Illinois) for the years 1998 through 2002. Total emissions from 1MWh generated in each hour ofthe year (8760 MWh) and average yearly emission rates are shown below the profiles.

CO2 Load Shape Following Emission Rate – 1998 through 2002MANS (Illinois) – (365 days x 24 hours)

CO2(kg/MWh)

4 8 12 16 20 24

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

Page 15: Appendix B Section IIIc – CO2 Load Shape Following ...web.mit.edu/agrea/docs/MIT-LFEE_2004-003e_BIIIc.pdfSRMV (Mississippi Valley) for the years 1998 through 2002. Total emissions

MIT-LFEE 2004-003 RP Emissions Reductions from Solar PV Systems pg.BIIIc–14

Ave (kg/MWh)Total

(t/8760MWh)

1998 1999 2000 2001 2002936 948 946 934 9338196 8301 8312 8184 8170

Figure BIIIc - 13. SPNO – CO2 Load Shape Following Emission Rate Profiles

Contour plots show CO2 emissions (kg) from 1MWh of load shape following generation in each hour inSPNO (Kansas) for the years 1998 through 2002. Total emissions from 1MWh generated in each hour ofthe year (8760 MWh) and average yearly emission rates are shown below the profiles.

CO2 Load Shape Following Emission Rate – 1998 through 2002SPNO (Kansas) – (365 days x 24 hours)

CO2(kg/MWh)

4 8 12 16 20 24

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

Page 16: Appendix B Section IIIc – CO2 Load Shape Following ...web.mit.edu/agrea/docs/MIT-LFEE_2004-003e_BIIIc.pdfSRMV (Mississippi Valley) for the years 1998 through 2002. Total emissions

MIT-LFEE 2004-003 RP Emissions Reductions from Solar PV Systems pg.BIIIc–15

Ave (kg/MWh)Total

(t/8760MWh)

1998 1999 2000 2001 2002741 727 701 722 7246491 6366 6155 6324 6344

Figure BIIIc - 14. SPSO – CO2 Load Shape Following Emission Rate Profiles

Contour plots show CO2 emissions (kg) from 1MWh of load shape following generation in each hour inSPSO (Oklahoma) for the years 1998 through 2002. Total emissions from 1MWh generated in each hour ofthe year (8760 MWh) and average yearly emission rates are shown below the profiles.

CO2 Load Shape Following Emission Rate – 1998 through 2002SPSO (Oklahoma) – (365 days x 24 hours)

CO2(kg/MWh)

4 8 12 16 20 24

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

Page 17: Appendix B Section IIIc – CO2 Load Shape Following ...web.mit.edu/agrea/docs/MIT-LFEE_2004-003e_BIIIc.pdfSRMV (Mississippi Valley) for the years 1998 through 2002. Total emissions

MIT-LFEE 2004-003 RP Emissions Reductions from Solar PV Systems pg.BIIIc–16

Ave (kg/MWh)Total

(t/8760MWh)

1998 1999 2000 2001 2002655 662 655 682 7015741 5800 5753 5977 6141

Figure BIIIc - 15. ERCT – CO2 Load Shape Following Emission Rate Profiles

Contour plots show CO2 emissions (kg) from 1MWh of load shape following generation in each hour inERCT (Texas) for the years 1998 through 2002. Total emissions from 1MWh generated in each hour of theyear (8760 MWh) and average yearly emission rates are shown below the profiles.

CO2 Load Shape Following Emission Rate – 1998 through 2002ERCT (Texas) – (365 days x 24 hours)

CO2(kg/MWh)

4 8 12 16 20 24

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

Page 18: Appendix B Section IIIc – CO2 Load Shape Following ...web.mit.edu/agrea/docs/MIT-LFEE_2004-003e_BIIIc.pdfSRMV (Mississippi Valley) for the years 1998 through 2002. Total emissions

MIT-LFEE 2004-003 RP Emissions Reductions from Solar PV Systems pg.BIIIc–17

CO2 Load Shape Following Emission Rate – 1998 through 2002MAPP (Northern Plains) – (365 days x 24 hours)

Ave (kg/MWh)Total

(t/8760MWh)

1998 1999 2000 2001 20021008 988 925 931 9288832 8653 8122 8153 8128

Figure BIIIc - 16. MAPP – CO2 Load Shape Following Emission Rate Profiles

Contour plots show CO2 emissions (kg) from 1MWh of load shape following generation in each hour inMAPP (Northern Plains) for the years 1998 through 2002. Total emissions from 1MWh generated in eachhour of the year (8760 MWh) and average yearly emission rates are shown below the profiles.

CO2(kg/MWh)

4 8 12 16 20 24

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

Page 19: Appendix B Section IIIc – CO2 Load Shape Following ...web.mit.edu/agrea/docs/MIT-LFEE_2004-003e_BIIIc.pdfSRMV (Mississippi Valley) for the years 1998 through 2002. Total emissions

MIT-LFEE 2004-003 RP Emissions Reductions from Solar PV Systems pg.BIIIc–18

Ave (kg/MWh)Total

(t/8760MWh)

1998 1999 2000 2001 2002971 951 886 862 8468507 8331 7784 7554 7415

Figure BIIIc - 17. ROCK – CO2 Load Shape Following Emission Rate Profiles

Contour plots show CO2 emissions (kg) from 1MWh of load shape following generation in each hour inROCK (Colorado) for the years 1998 through 2002. Total emissions from 1MWh generated in each hour ofthe year (8760 MWh) and average yearly emission rates are shown below the profiles.

CO2 Load Shape Following Emission Rate – 1998 through 2002ROCK (Colorado) – (365 days x 24 hours)

CO2(kg/MWh)

4 8 12 16 20 24

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

Page 20: Appendix B Section IIIc – CO2 Load Shape Following ...web.mit.edu/agrea/docs/MIT-LFEE_2004-003e_BIIIc.pdfSRMV (Mississippi Valley) for the years 1998 through 2002. Total emissions

MIT-LFEE 2004-003 RP Emissions Reductions from Solar PV Systems pg.BIIIc–19

CO2 Load Shape Following Emission Rate – 1998 through 2002NWGB (Great Basin) – (365 days x 24 hours)

Ave (kg/MWh)Total

(t/8760MWh)

1998 1999 2000 2001 2002896 870 797 786 8267847 7622 7001 6887 7233

Figure BIIIc - 18. NWGB – CO2 Load Shape Following Emission Rate Profiles

Contour plots show CO2 emissions (kg) from 1MWh of load shape following generation in each hour inNWGB (Great Basin) for the years 1998 through 2002. Total emissions from 1MWh generated in each hourof the year (8760 MWh) and average yearly emission rates are shown below the profiles.

CO2(kg/MWh)

4 8 12 16 20 24

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

Page 21: Appendix B Section IIIc – CO2 Load Shape Following ...web.mit.edu/agrea/docs/MIT-LFEE_2004-003e_BIIIc.pdfSRMV (Mississippi Valley) for the years 1998 through 2002. Total emissions

MIT-LFEE 2004-003 RP Emissions Reductions from Solar PV Systems pg.BIIIc–20

CO2 Load Shape Following Emission Rate – 1998 through 2002NWPN (Pacific Northwest) – (365 days x 24 hours)

Ave (kg/MWh)Total

(t/8760MWh)

1998 1999 2000 2001 20021006 991 909 899 8838814 8681 7985 7876 7732

Figure BIIIc - 19. NWPN – CO2 Load Shape Following Emission Rate Profiles

Contour plots show CO2 emissions (kg) from 1MWh of load shape following generation in each hour inNWPN (Pacific Northwest) for the years 1998 through 2002. Total emissions from 1MWh generated in eachhour of the year (8760 MWh) and average yearly emission rates are shown below the profiles.

CO2(kg/MWh)

4 8 12 16 20 24

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

Page 22: Appendix B Section IIIc – CO2 Load Shape Following ...web.mit.edu/agrea/docs/MIT-LFEE_2004-003e_BIIIc.pdfSRMV (Mississippi Valley) for the years 1998 through 2002. Total emissions

MIT-LFEE 2004-003 RP Emissions Reductions from Solar PV Systems pg.BIIIc–21

1998 1999 2000 2001 2002908 870 791 774 8117952 7623 6945 6784 7107

CO2 Load Shape Following Emission Rate – 1998 through 2002WSSW (Southwest) – (365 days x 24 hours)

Ave (kg/MWh)Total

(t/8760MWh)

Figure BIIIc - 20. WSSW – CO2 Load Shape Following Emission Rate Profiles

Contour plots show CO2 emissions (kg) from 1MWh of load shape following generation in each hour inWSSW (Southwest) for the years 1998 through 2002. Total emissions from 1MWh generated in each hourof the year (8760 MWh) and average yearly emission rates are shown below the profiles.

CO2(kg/MWh)

4 8 12 16 20 24

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

Page 23: Appendix B Section IIIc – CO2 Load Shape Following ...web.mit.edu/agrea/docs/MIT-LFEE_2004-003e_BIIIc.pdfSRMV (Mississippi Valley) for the years 1998 through 2002. Total emissions

MIT-LFEE 2004-003 RP Emissions Reductions from Solar PV Systems pg.BIIIc–22

1998 1999 2000 2001 2002610 607 591 588 6095342 5316 5188 5150 5336

CO2 Load Shape Following Emission Rate – 1998 through 2002CALI (California) – (365 days x 24 hours)

Ave (kg/MWh)Total

(t/8760MWh)Figure BIIIc - 21. CALI – CO2 Load Shape Following Emission Rate Profiles

Contour plots show CO2 emissions (kg) from 1MWh of load shape following generation in each hour inCALI (California) for the years 1998 through 2002. Total emissions from 1MWh generated in each hour ofthe year (8760 MWh) and average yearly emission rates are shown below the profiles.

CO2(kg/MWh)

4 8 12 16 20 24

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000