DELIMITATION COMMISSION OF INDIA Nirvachan Sadan Ashoka, Road, New Delhi – 110001. SHANGARA RAM TEL. 011 - 23052005 SECRETARY FAX 011 - 23052006 No. 282/AP/2007 Dated 22 nd January, 2007. Magha: 2 , 1928 (SAKA). ORDER NO. 37 In pursuance of Section 8 read with Section 4 of the Delimitation Act, 2002 (33 of 2002), and having regard to all other relevant Constitutional and statutory provisions in this regard, the Delimitation Commission hereby determines: - a) the total number of seats to be allocated to the State of Andhra Pradesh in the House of the People as Forty- two (42); b) of the total number of Forty- two (42); seats so allocated to the State of Andhra Pradesh in the House of the People, the number of seats to be reserved for the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes as Seven (7) and Three (3) respectively; c) the total number of seats to be assigned to the Legislative Assembly of the State of Andhra Pradesh, as Two hundred Ninety four (294); and d) of the total number of Two hundred Ninety four (294) seats so assigned to the Legislative Assembly of the State of Andhra Pradesh, the number of seats to be reserved for the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes as Forty-eight (48) and Nineteen (19) respectively. By Order, (SHANGARA RAM) TO BE PUBLISHED IN EXTRAORDINARY ISSUE OF THE GAZETTE OF INDIA PART II SECTION 3(iii) DATED 22 nd January, 2007. TO BE PUBLISHED IN EXTRAORDINARY ISSUE OF ANDHRA PRADESH STATE GAZETTE, DATED 22 nd January, 2007.
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
DELIMITATION COMMISSION OF INDIA Nirvachan Sadan Ashoka, Road, New Delhi – 110001.
In pursuance of Section 8 read with Section 4 of the Delimitation Act, 2002 (33 of 2002), and having regard to all other relevant Constitutional and statutory provisions in this regard, the Delimitation Commission hereby determines: -
a) the total number of seats to be allocated to the State of Andhra Pradesh in the House of the People as Forty- two (42);
b) of the total number of Forty- two (42); seats so allocated to the State of Andhra
Pradesh in the House of the People, the number of seats to be reserved for the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes as Seven (7) and Three (3) respectively;
c) the total number of seats to be assigned to the Legislative Assembly of the State of
Andhra Pradesh, as Two hundred Ninety four (294); and
d) of the total number of Two hundred Ninety four (294) seats so assigned to the Legislative Assembly of the State of Andhra Pradesh, the number of seats to be reserved for the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes as Forty-eight (48) and Nineteen (19) respectively.
By Order,
(SHANGARA RAM)
TO BE PUBLISHED IN EXTRAORDINARY ISSUE OF THE GAZETTE OF INDIA PART II SECTION 3(iii) DATED 22nd January, 2007. TO BE PUBLISHED IN EXTRAORDINARY ISSUE OF ANDHRA PRADESH STATE GAZETTE, DATED 22nd January, 2007.
DELIMITATION COMMISSION OF INDIA Nirvachan Sadan Ashoka, Road, New Delhi – 110 001.
In pursuance of sub-section (2) of Section 9 of the Delimitation Act, 2002 (33 of 2002), the
Delimitation Commission hereby publishes its proposals for the delimitation of Parliamentary and
Assembly Constituencies in the State of Andhra Pradesh, together with the dissenting proposals of the
Associate Members, and specifies 5th February, 2007 (Monday) as the date on or after which the
proposals will be further considered by it.
2. Any objections or suggestions in regard to these proposals should reach the Secretary,
Delimitation Commission, Nirvachan Sadan, Ashoka Road, New Delhi – 110001 on or before the said
date.
PROPOSALS
(i) The territorial constituencies into which the State of Andhra Pradesh shall be divided for the purpose of elections to (a) the Legislative Assembly of the State of Andhra Pradesh, and (b) the House of the People, the extent of each such constituency and the constituencies in which the seats are reserved for the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes shall be as shown in the Table-A and Table-B respectively; and (ii) Whereas the name of a constituency as shown in Table A or Table B is distinguished by the brackets and letters (SC), the seat in that constituency is reserved for the Scheduled Castes.
(iii) Where the name of a constituency as shown in Table A or Table B is distinguished by the brackets and letters (ST), the seat in that constituency is reserved for the Scheduled Tribes.
(HERE PRINT THE MATTER) By Order
(SHANGARA RAM)
TO BE PUBLISHED IN EXTRAORDINARY ISSUE OF THE GAZETTE OF INDIA PART II SECTION 3(iii) DATED 22nd January, 2007. TO BE PUBLISHED IN EXTRAORDINARY ISSUE OF ANDHRA PRADESH STATE GAZETTE, DATED 22nd January, 2007.
TABLE – A ASSEMBLY CONSTITUENCIES AND THEIR EXTENT
S.N. Name of Assembly Constituency Extent of the Constituency
1-DISTRICT-ADILABAD 1.
Sirpur Koutala, Bejjur, Kagaznagar, Sirpur and Dahegaon Mandals.
2 Chennur (SC)
Jaipur, Chennur, Kotapalle and Mandamarri Mandals.
3 Bellampally (SC)
Kasipet, Tandoor, Bellampally, Bheemini, Nennel and Vemanpalle Mandals.
Dissenting Proposal of Associate Members NEW DELHI
Date:10.1.2007 [1]
To Justice Kuldip Singhji, Hon'ble Chairman Delimitation Commission of India, Nirvachan Sadan, Ashoka Road, New Delhi. Sir,
Sub: - Andhra Pradesh – Delimitation Commission proposals - suggestions by Associate Members of Andhra Pradesh in shape of dissent to Publish relating to Parliamentary Constituencies – Reconsideration – Regarding.
*** We the Associated Members of the Delimitation Commission would like to bring to your kind notice to consider the following proposals of various Parliamentary Constituencies of various districts of Andhra Pradesh by way of dissent to the proposals of the Delimitation Commission on the representation given to us and request, you to consider the proposal enclosed herewith of (3)-Karimnagar, (4)-Nizambad, (5)-Zahirabad, (6)-Medak, (11)-Mahaboobnagar, (12)-Nagarkurnool, (13)-Nalgonda, (14)-Bhongir, (20)-Vizianagaram, (21)-Visakhapatnam, (30)-Guntur, (31)-Narasaraopet, (32)-Baptla (SC), (33)-Ongole, (36)-Ananthpur, (37)-Hindpur, (40)-Gudur (SC), (42)-Chittor. The total number of Parliamentary constituencies with few changes of Assembly constituencies from one Parliamentary Constituency to other without altering the limit of population as well as within the limit of guidelines of delimitation Commission are 18 Parliamentary Constituencies.
Hence, we request the Delimitation Commission may be pleased to publish the proposals proposed by us in the Newspapers as well as Gazettes for public information and discussion thereon.
With regards,
Yours sincerely,
Sd/- Sd/- Sd/-
1) N. Janardhana Reddy, MP, 2) Y.S. Vivekananda Reddy, MP, 3) G. Venkata Swamy, MP,
Sd/- Sd/- Sd/-
4) N. Kiran Kumar Reddy, MLA, 5) G.Venkata Reddy, MLA, 6) M. Budha Prasad, MLA,
Sd/-
7) D. Raja Narasimha, MLA.
Copy to Sri. N.Gopal Swami, Chief Election Commissioner of India, New Delhi.
Copy to Dr. A.V.S. Reddy, State Election Commissioner of A.P. Hyderabad.
ANDHRA PRADESH – DISSENT NOTE TO BE PUBLISHED
(3)-Karimnagar (SC), (4)-Nizamabad, (5)-Zaheerabad and (6)-Medak are interlinked.
The Delimitation Commission has proposed (20)-Metapalli, (21)-Jagtial Assembly Constituencies
in (4)-Nizamabad Parliamentary Constituency both are very close to Karimnagar Assembly
Constituency and are existing in Karimnagar Parliamentary Constituency. (20)-Metapalli and 921)-
Jagtial Assembly Constituencies should be retained in Karimnagar Parliamentary Constituency. (14)-
Banswada and (15)-Jukkal Assembly Constituencies are nearer to the (17)-Nizamabad Assembly
Constituency and are already existing in (4)-Nizamabad Parliamentary Constituency. Subsequently
changes to (5)-Medak and (6)-Zaheerabad Parliamentary Constitluencies are inevitable.
(5)-Zahirabad Lok Sabha seat (Dissent).
Revised proposed of the Constituency with the following Assembly Constituencies: -
a) (39)-Sangareddy b) (41)-Tupran c) (37)-Narsapur Medak District d) (40)-Patancheru e) (35)-Narayankhed f) (38)-Zahirabad (SC) g) (36)-Andole (SC)
(6)-Medak Lok Sabha Seat: -
Revised proposed Constituencies as follows (Dissent) :
a) (31)-huzurabad - Karimnagar District
b) (32)-Husnabad- Which are now proposed in 3-Karimnagar P.C.
c) (33)-Siddipet
d) (34)-Medak
e) (42)-Gajwal Medak District f) (16)-Yellareddy g) (17)-Kamareddy
N.B: Yellareddy and Kamareddy Assembly Constituencies are proposed by the Commission in
Zahirabad (5) Lok Sabha seat, which are against the principles of Communication and Contiguity of
guidelines of the Commission.
All Constituencies are Medak District only. Atleast one Lok Sabha seat should formulated from each
District.
(11)-Mahabubnagar and (12)-Nagarkurnool Parliamentary
Constituencies are interlinked.
(75)-Jedcherla Assembly Constituency, (84)-Shadnagar Assembly Constituencies are is to be deleted from (11)-Mahabubnagar Parliamentary Constituency and include in (12)-Nagarkurnool Parliamentary Constituency. The said 2 Constituencies are in existing Nagarkurnool Parliamentary Constituency. Consequently (78)-Wanaparthi, (79)-Gadwal Assembly Constituency and add to (11)-Mahabubnagar in place of (75 & 84) Assembly Constituencies.
By adjustment of these two Assembly Constituency’s in Nagarkurnool can be formed as follows:
N.B. Revised proposal by way of Dissent as follows
(11)-Mahabubnagar Constituency:-
a. (72)-Kodangal, b. (73)-Narayanpet, c. (74)-Mahaboobnagar, Mahabubnagar District d. (76)-Devarakadra, e. (77)-Maktal, f. (78)-Wanaparthy, g. (79)-Gadwal,
(12)-Nagarkurnool Constituency:-
a. (75)-Jedcherla, b. (80)-Alampur, c. (82)-Achampet, d. (81)-Nagarkurnool, Mahabubnagar District e. (83)-Kalvakurthy, f. (84)-Shadnagar, g. (85)-Kollapur
(14)-Bhongir and (13)-Nalgonda Parliamentary
Constituencies both are interlinked:-
The proposal of the Commission to include (48)-Ibrahimpatnam and (93)-Munugode is to be
deleted from (13)-Nalgonda Parliamentary Constituency and added to (14)-Bhongir in place of (90)-
Kodad and (91)-Suryapet Assembly Constituencies may be included in (13)-Nalgonda Lok Sabha seat
is with vice versa. Keeping in view of the contiguity and the existing Assembly Constituency. Changes
proposed to (14)-Bhongir Parliamentary Constituency which is a newly constituted constituency by
abolishing Miryalaguda Parliamentary Constituency. The above motioned changes of AC’s is necessary
in (13)-Nalgonda and (14)-Bhongir Lok Sabha seats.
N.B: Revised proposal by way of Dissent as follows:
(13)-Nalgonda Constituencies:-
a. (86)-Devarakonda, b. (87)-Nagarjun Sagar, c. (88)-Miryalaguda, d. (89)-huzurnagar, Nalgonda District e. (90)-Kodada, f. (91)-Suryapaeta, g. (92)-Nalgonda
(14)-Bhongir Constituency:-
a. (48)-Ibrahimpatnam - Ranga Reddy District b. (93)-Munugode, - Nalgonda District c. (94)-Bhongir, - Nalgonda District d. (95)-Nakherekal, - Nalgonda District e. (96)-Thungaturthi, - Nalgonda District f. (97)-Aler, - Nalgonda District g. (98)-Janagam - Warangal District
(20)-Vizianagaram and (21)-Visakhapatnam Parliamentary Constituencies are interlinked: -
(135)-Gajapathinagaram Assembly Constituency is an existing Assembly Constiteuncy in Bobbili
Parliamentary Constituency which is now renamed as (20)-Vizianagaram Parliamentary Constituency.
Hence (135)-Gajapathinagaram Assembly Constituency may be considered to retain in Vizianagaram
Parliamentary Constituency by deleting from (21)-Visakhapatnam. By deleting Gajapatinagar
Assembly Constituency from Visakhapatnam Parliamentary Constituency (150)-Pendurthi Assembly
Constituency may be included.
N.B. Revised proposal by way of Dissent as follows:
(20)-Vizianagaram Constituency: -
a. (126)-Etcherla - Srikakulam District b. (128)-Rajam, - Srikakulam District c. (133)-Bobbili, - Srikakulam District d. (134)-Cheepurpalli, - Srikakulam District e. (136)-Bhogapuram, - Vizianagaram District f. (135)-Gajapatinagaram, - Vizianagaram District g. (143)-Vizayanagaram - Vizianagaram District
(21)-Visakhapatnam Constituency: -
a. (150)-Pendurthi b. (138)-S.Kota, c. (139)-Bhimili, Visakhapatnam District d. (140)-Visakhapatnam East, e. (141)- Visakhapatnam South, f. (142)- Visakhapatnam, North, g. (143)- Visakhapatnam West
(a) (129)-Palakonda (ST) Assembly to be deleted (20)-Vizayanagaram Lok Sabha seat and add to (18)-Araku Parliament seat.
(b) (146)-Madugula Assembly, which is seat, scheduled is Araku. Parliament which is ST Parliament seat may be deleted and add to Anakapalu (22) Parliament seat in place of 150 Pendurthy Assembly constituency.
Kanigiri and 7. (221)-yerragondapalem in (33)-Ongole Parliamentary Constituency with a total
population of 18,80,962. In this connection we would like to bring to your kind notice that (226)-Santhanuthalapadu (SC) Assembly Constituency which is included in (32)-Baptla Parliamentary Constituency is situated around Ongole Assembly Constituency. Hence, (226)-
Santhanuthalapadu (SC) Assembly Constituency can not be excluded from Ongole Parliamentary
Constituency to fulfil guidelines of the Delimitation Commission i.e. Contiguity, public
Convenience and Communication. In addition the people belongs to all the 4 mandals of (2260-
Constituency which is an existing Assembly Constituency in Guntur Parliamentary Constituency
is to be retained in Guntur Parliamentary Constituency only.
4) The re-constituted (207)-Ponnuru Assembly Constituency now proposed to include in (30)-
Guntur Parliamentary Constituency is to be deleted and to be added (32)-Baptla (SC)
Parliamentary Constituency and which is already an existing Assembly Constituency of
(32)-Baptla Parliamentary Constituency by deleting (226)-Sanathanuthalapadu (SC) Assembly
Constituency.
N.B. Revised proposal by way of Dissent as follows: (30)-Guntur Constituency: -
a. (205)-Tadikonda b. (206)-Mangalagiri, c. (212)-Pathipadu, Guntur District d. (213)-North Guntur, e. (214)-South Guntur, f. (215)-Chilkuripaeta , g. (210)-Tenali (31)-Narasaraopet Constituency: - a. (204)-Pedakurapadu, - Guntur District b. (216)-Narasarao Pet, - Guntur District c. (217)-Sattenapalle, - Guntur District d. (218)-Vinukonda, - Guntur District e. (220)-Macherla, - Guntur District f. (221)-Yeragondapalem - Prakasam District (32)-Baptla (SC) Constiteucy: - a. (208)- Duggirala/Vemur, - Guntur District b. (207)-Ponnur, - Guntur District c. (209)-Repalle, - Guntur District d. (211)-Baptla, - Guntur District e. (223)-Parchur, - Prakasam District f. (224)-Addakni, - Prakasam District g. (225)-Chirala - Prakasam District (33)-Ongole Constituency: - a. (222)-Darsi, b. (227)-Ongole, c. (229)-Kondapi, d. (230)-Markapuram, Prakasam Disrict e. (231)-Giddalur, f. (232)-Kangiri g. (226)- Sanathanuthalapadu
(36)-Ananthapur and (37)-Hindupur Parliamentary Constituencies. Both are interlinked.
In (36)-Ananthapur Parliamentary Constituency (274)- Rapthadu Assembly Constituency is
included which is a new Assembly Constituency is proposed to include in (37)-Hindupur Parliamentary
Constituency. (271)-Singanamala (SC) Assembly Constituency existing in Ananthapur Parliamentary
Constituency may be retained by deleting from Hindupur Parliamentary Constituency for the reason that
(271)-Singanamala (SC) Assembly Constituency is very close and adjacent to Ananthapur Assembly
Constituency within the radius of 5 to 10 Kms and where as Hindupur is more than 100 Kms from
Singanamala and the people Singanamala Assembly Constituency should go through Ananthapur Assembly
Constituency only.
The proposal is with in guideline of Commission of contiguity and public convenience.
N.B. Revised proposal by way of Dissent as follows: (36)-Ananthapur Constituency: - a. (267)-Rayadurg, b. (268)-Uravakonda, c. (269)-Guntakal, d. (270)-Thadipatri, Ananthapur District e. (271)-Singanamala, f. (272)-Ananthpur, g. (273)-Kalyanadurg
(37)-Hindupur Constituency: - a. (274)-Nallamada, b. (275)-Madakasira c. (276)-Hindupur, d. (277)-Penugonda, Ananthapur District e. (278)-Puttaparthi, f. (279)-Dharmavaram, g. (280)-Kaditi
(40)-Tirupathi (SC) and (42)-Chittoor (SC) Parliamentary Constituencies proposed by the Commission are interlinked ;
1) The agreed principal of the Commissioner to constitute 3 Lok Sabha seats for SCs for Coastal
Region, (1) from Rayalaseema Region and (3) from Telengana Region is to be strictly adhered to. In fact
(40)-Tirupathi (SC) Parliamentary Constituency and (42)-Chittoor (SC) Parliamentary Constituency are
situated in Rayalaseema Region only. With result of this 2 Parliamentary Constituencies meant for SCs are
carved out in Coastal Andhra. Hence, we request the Commission should consider constituting third SC
Parliamentary Constituency from Coastal Andhra with Gudur Headquarters with the following Assembly
Srikalahasthi, (288)-Satyaveedu (SC) and (289)-Nagiri, with the highest population of SCs (26.74)% in the
State.
2. The proposal of Tirupathi (SC) Parliamentary Constituency proposed by the Commission is to be
abolished and the (286)-Tirupathi Assembly Constituency to be included in (42)-Chittoor (SC)
Parliamentary Constituency for the reason mentioned above.
3. The name of the Parliamentary Constituency may be named after either as (42)-Chittoor or Tirupathi (SC) Parliamentary Constituency. Thus the ratio of allocation of SC reserved
Parliamentary Constituencies as decided by the Commission can be fulfilled in the State.
4. (285)-Chandragiri Assembly Constituency and (286)-Tirupathi AC are inter connected and
necessarily both Assembly Constituency is to be included in one Parliamentary Constituency i.e.
(42)-Chittoor (SC) Parliamentary Constituency. Where as the Commission proposed to include
Tirupathi AC in Tirupathi Parliamentary Constituency and Chandragiri Assembly Constituency
which is now proposed by the Commission in place of Tirumala Assembly Constituency (which is
originally proposed by the Delimitation Commission in its working paper).
5. Thus (40-Gudur) Lok Sabha and 9420-Chittoor/Tirupathi (SC) Parliamentary Constituency
in place of Tirupathi (SC) may be considered as follows.
(241)-Venkatagiri, (287)-Srikalahasthi, (288)-Satyaveedu (SC) and (289)- Nagiri with a total
population of 18,95,088 and the SC percentage of 26.74.
(42)-Chittoor or Tirupathi (SC): - (285)-Chandragiri, (286)-Tirupathi, (290)-G.D.Nellore
(SC0, (291)-Chittoor, (292)-Pauthalapattu (SC), (293)-Palamaneru, (294)-Kuppam with a total
population of 18,76,616 and the percentage of SC is 19.65%.
N.B: Revised proposal by way of Dissent as follows (40)-Gudur (SC) Constituency (Newly proposed in place of Tirupathi): -
a. (238)-Survepalle/Rapur, - Nellore District b. (239)-Gudur, - Nellore District c. (240)-Sullurpeta, - Nellore District d. (241)-Venkatagiri, - Nellore District e. (287)-Srikalahast, - Chittoor District f. (288)-Sathyavedu, - Chittoor District g. (289)-Nagiri, - Chittoor District (42)-Chittoor (SC) Constituency: - a. (285)-Chandragiri, b. (286)-Tirupati, c. (290)-G.D.Nellore, d. (291)-Chittoor, - Chittoor District e. (292)-Puthalapattu, f. (293)-Palamaner, g. (294)-Kuppam
[2] NEW DELHI,
Date: 10.1.2007 To Justice Kuldip Singh ji, Hon’ble Chairman Delimitation Commission of India, Nirvachan Sadan, Ashoka Road, New Delhi. Sir,
Sub:- Andhra Pradesh - Delimitation Commission proposals – suggestions by Associated Members of Andhra Pradesh in shape of dissent to publish Relating to Assembly Constituencies – Reconsideration – Regarding.
* * *
We the Associated Members of the Delimitation Commission would like to bring to your kind notice to consider the following proposals of various Assembly Constituencies of various districts of Andhra Pradesh by way of dissent to the proposals of the Delimitation Commission on the representations of given to us and request, you to consider the proposal enclosed herewith of (2)-Nizamabad, (3)-Karimnagar, (4)-Medak, (10)-Khammam, (7)-Mahaboobnagar, (6)-Hyderabad, (14)-East Godavari, (15)-W.Godavari, (17)-Guntur, (18)-Prakasam, (19)-Nellore, (20)-Kadapa, (21) – Kurnool, (22)-Anantapur & (23)-Chittoor. The total number of Assembly Constituencies with few changes of Mandals from one Assembly Constituency to other without altering the limit of population as well as within the limit of guidelines of delimitation commission.
Hence, we request the Delimitation Commission may be pleased to publish the proposals proposed by us in the Newspapers as well as Gazettes for public information and discussion thereon.
Copy to Sri. N.Gopal Swami, Chief Election Commissioner ofIndia, Nirvachan Sadan, New Delhi. Copy to Dr.A.V.S.Reddy, State Election Commissioner, Governement of A.P., Hyderabad.
ANDHRA PRADESH – DISSENT NOTE TO BE PUBLISHED. 02 – DISTRICT : NIZAMABAD
(11) Armur and (19) Balakonda Assembly Constituencies are interlinked. The Delimitation Commission has proposed (19) Balakonda AC with (1) Balakonda, (2) Morthad, (3) Kammarapalli, (4) Bheemgal and (5) Velpur Mandals. The existing Balakonda Assembly Constituency consists of Balkonda and parts of Morthad, Nandipet, Armoor and Kammarpally Mandals. After the submergence of the Nandipet Mandal Villages in the backwaters of Sri Ram Sagar Project, the people of Nandipet were rehabilitated on elevated reaches of the same area, closer to Balkonda. People of both the Mandals are presently connected by a road link and the same is being improved into a major road to continue their economic and social activities.
In the light of these developments it will be justified to retain the Nandipet Mandal in the (19) Balkonda Assembly Constituency with existing Balkonda and the entire Morthad, Kammarpally Mandals which are within the permissible population limits and the Mandals Bheemgal and Velpur may be retained in the Armoor Assembly Constituency while deleting from 19-Balkonda assembly Constituency. 04 – DISTRICT : MEDAK (37)-Narsapur and (41)-Thoopran Assembly Constituencies are interlinked. As per the proposals of the Delimitation Commission (37)- Narsapur Assembly Constituency is proposed with the following Mandals. Narsapur, Kulcharam, Hathnoora, Yeldurthi and Pulkal Mandals. Yeldurthy Mandal is close to Thoopran and Shivampet Mandal is existing in (37)- Narsapur AC. Yeldurthy may be added to (41)- Thoopran AC while deleting Shivampet Mandal. There is a river between Pulkal and Narsapur. The people of Pulkal to reach Narsapur via Andhole or Sangareddy, both are another Constituency headquarters. Necessarily Pulkal Mandal may be added to (36)- Andhole (SC) Assembly Constituency. Munipalle Mandal is to be added to (39)-Sangareddy Assembly Constituency.
3-Karimnagar District Constituency wise deletions and additions to the proposals of the delimitation commission are as follows
METPALLY CONSTITUENCY No.20 S.NO. Mandals to be deleted S.No. Mandals to be added Korutla Mandal including
Municipality 1 Kathalapur
2 Madipalli Note: 1. On deletion Korutla Mandal and Municipality proposed to be added in
Dharmapuri Constituency No.22. 2. Kathalapur & Madipalli Mandals are proposed to be added are to be deleted
from Vemulavada Constituency No.28.
3. Metpally Constituency may be framed wtith the following Mandals as follows. S.No. Name of the Mandal
1 Raikal 1 Mallial 2 Sarangapur 2 Kodimyal 3 Gollapalli Note: 1. Raikal and Sarangapur Mandals on deletion proposed to be added in
Dharmapuri Constituency No.22.
2. Mallial and Kodimyal Mandals which are to be added are proposed to be
deleted from Choppadandi Constituency No.27.
3. Gollapalli Mandals proposed to be added is to be deleted from Dharmapuri
Constituency No.22.
4. Jagityal Constituency may be framed with the following Mandals as follows S.No. Name of the Mandal
Population SC’s
ST’s
1. Jagityal 150565 17968 961 2. Mallial 45244 9050 176 3 Kodimyl 42346 8538 879 4 Gollapalli 41648 8738 311 Grand Total 279803 44294 2327 DHARMAPURI CONSTITUENCY NO.22 S.No. Mandals to be deleted S.No. Mandals to be added 1. Dharmaram 1 Sarangapur 2 Velagatur 2 Raikal 3 Gollapalli 3 Korutla Mandal & Municipality 4 Pegadapalli Note: 1. On deletion the Dharmaram, velagatur & pegadapalli are to be added to
Choppadandi Constituency No.27.
2. On deletion the Goaapalli is to be added to Jagityal Consituency No.21. 3. Sarangapur and Raikal which are to be added ae proposed to be deleted from
Jagityal Constituency No.21. 4. Korutla Mandal & Municipality which is proposed to be added is to be deleted
from Metpally Constituency No.20.
N.B. Korutla & Metpally are different Municipalities further Korutla Municipality is existing in
Buggaram Constituency (Now Dharamapuri) and Metpally is existing in Metpally
Constituency.
5. Dharmapuri Constituency may be framed with the following Mandals as follows
S.No. Name of the Mandal Population SC’s ST’s 1 Dharmapuri 73230 15648 588 2 Sarangapur 40881 7400 2240 3 Raikal 58807 7666 3743 4 Korutla 94429 11410 978 Grand Total 267347 42124 7549
CHOPPADANDI CONSTITUENCY NO.27 S.No. Mandals to be deleted S.No Mandals to be added 1 Mallial 1 Dharmaram 2 Kodimyal 2 Velagatur 3 Pegadapalli Note: 1. Mallial & Kodimyal which are to be deleted are proposed to be added in
Metpally Constituency No. 20. 2. Dharmaram, Pegadapalli & Velagatur wich are proposed to be added is to be
deleted from the Dharmapuri Constituency No.22.
3. Choppadandi Constituency may be framed with the following Mandals as follows
S.No. Name of the Mandal Population SC’s ST’s 1. Gangadhar 46879 9551 284 2 Ramadugu 47654 10747 1107 3. Choppadandi 48659 12049 665 4. Pagadapalli 44879 8290 977 5. Dharmaram 49636 10432 2755 6 Velgatur 47229 13520 145 Grand Total 284936 64589 5933 VEMULAVADA CONSTITUNCY NO.28 S.No. Mandals to be deleted S.No Mandals to be added 1 Kathalapur 1 Boenapalli 2 Medipalli 2 Yellareddipeta Note: 1. On deletion Kathalapur & Medipalli which are proposed to be added in
Metpalli Constituency No.20. 2. Boenapalli which is to be added is to be deleted from Choppadadi
Constituency No.27. 3. Yellareddipeta which is to be added is to be deleted from Sircilla
Constituency No. 4. Vemulavada Constituency may be framed with the following Mandals as
follows
S.No. Name of the Mandal Population SC’s ST’s 1 Vemulavada 73421 13729 497 2 Boenpalli 37564 9908 114 3 Chandurthi 40558 7427 932 4 Konaraopet 41381 9770 1915 5 Yellareddipet Grand Total
07 – DISTRICT : MAHBUBNAGAR (76) Devarakadara and (78) Wanaparthy Assembly Constituencies are interlinked. The Delimitation Commission proposed the following Mandals to (78) Wanaparthy Assembly Constituency with 1) Wanaparthy municipality and Mandal, 2) Gopalpet, 3) Pebbair and 4) Kothakota Mandals. While (76) Devarakadra AC proposed with Devarakadra, Peddamandadi, Ghanpur, Boothpur, Addakal and Chinnachintakunta Mandals. For the following reasons the Commission may be considered to interchange the Mandals between Assembly Constituencies of (76 and 78).
1. Peddamandadi Mandal is being closely adjacent to Wanaparthy Municipality which is the Constituency head quarter and also revenue division head quarter. The first village of this Mandal is within the radius of 5 kms from Wanaparthy town. For every activity they come to Wanaparthy town. Hence, it may be included in Wanaprthy.
2. Ghanpur Mandal is also in close proximity to Wanaparthy town the
Constituency head quarter and revenue divisional head quarter. All walks of people have to come to Wanaparthy municipality for day-to-day activity including business. It is adjacent to Wanaparthy Mandal and as well as Peddamandadi Mandal. The first village of this Mandal falls under the radius of 10 KMs from Wanaparthy town. The above proposal as per the guidelines Delimitation Commission relating to contiguity, communication and public convenience. It may be included in Wanaparthy.
3. The proposal of the Commission in the proposed Devarkonda
Assembly Constituency (76) carved with Peddamandadi and Ghanpur Mandals along with other Mandals, which are far away from Devarkadra proposed Constituency head quarters. The people of the above mentioned two Mandals have to travel via Mahaboobnagar district head quarters to reach proposed Devarkadra Constituency. Hence, to be deleted from Devarkadra.
4. If Peddamandadi and Ghanpur Mandals are included in the
Wanaparthy Assembly Constituency (78) as mentioned above the Kothakota Mandal has to be excluded from Wanaparthy Assembly Constituency and include in the proposed Devarkadra Assembly Constituency (76) in place of Peddamandadi and Ghanpur Mandals.
07 – DISTRICT : MAHBUBNAGAR 5. Kothakota town and Mandal is one of the largest populated in
Mahaboobnagar district and located on National Highway No: 7.
Hence, the population of Kothakota Mandal (which is proposed by us in Devarakhadra Constituency) is largest than Devarakhadra. Hence, it may be named after on Kothakota Assembly Constituency.
6. (80) Alampur Assembly Constituency :- leej Mandal may be deleted and Pebbair Mandal may be added. This proposal rectifies the geographical problems.
14 – DISTRICT : EAST GODAVARI
1) 159-Kakinada Rural, 160-Kakinada city assembly Constituencies are interlinked
The distribution of wards is not proper in these Constituencies. We are proposing the following distribution.
159-Kakinada Rural Kakinada Muncipal Corporation Ward No 1 to 4 by deliting from 160-Kakinada City. Wards to 1 to 4 are very close to the other villages of Kakinada Rural. 160-Kakinada City Kakinada Muncipal Corporation Ward No 5 to 70 by deliting from wards 66 to 70 from (159) Kakinada Rural taking into consideration the geographical consideration.
14. DISTRICT: WEST GODAVARI
The Assembly Constituencies of 186 – Polavaram (ST), 187 – Chintalapudi (SC), 185 – Gopalapuram (SC), 173 – Kovvur (SC) are interlinked.
The proposal of the Commission to include T Narasapuram Mandal in 186 - Polavaram (ST) is very ill conceived, as the T Narasapuram and Buttayagudem Mandals are not interconnected. To reach Polavaram the people have to cross Jangareddigudem Mandal which is an another Constituency, that is also separated by the Yerrakalava reservoir from T Narasapuram Mandal. Hence T Narasapuram Mandal should be included in 187 – Chintalapudi (SC). The above changes will be within the permissible population limit.
Subsequently, Jangareddigudem Mandal can be included in 187 -
Polavaram (ST) assembly Constituency. Koyyalagudem Mandal proposed in 187 –
Polavaram (ST) is very easily accessible to Nallajarla and can be included in that
Constituency 174. The Polavaram Constituency can be retained as ST if Koyyalagudem
Mandal are removed and Jangareddigudem is added. This will cover the whole Scheduled Area in West Godavari district. Gopalapuram Mandal can be added to 173 – Kovvur(SC) and 174 – AC may be renamed as Nallajarla Constituency. The same was proposed in the commission’s working paper.
(b) In the proposed Pinapaka Assembly Constituency, excepting Palvoncha all
other Mandals are predominantly by Tribal Population. The interest of Tribals will
be better protected if all predominantly Tribal Mandals are put together so that an
integrated Tribal development could take place Assembly Constituency.
Palvoncha Mandal at a distance of 90 KMs From Pinapaka which is inconvenient
to the public.
Hence Palvoncha Mandal may be deleted and added to 117-Kothaguded
Assembly Constituency. Add Tekulapally Mandal which is dominated by Tribal
population of 78.10% to 110-Pinapaka Assembly Constituency.
We propose Pinapaka Assembly Constituency (1) Pinapaka (2) Manguru
(3) Aswapruam (4) Gundala and (5) Tekulapally with a Total population of 216328.
Thus Tekulapally Mandal proposed in Kothagudam Assembly Constituency
may be deleted and add to (110) Pinapaka Assembly Constituency. Palovancha Mandal may be deleted from (110) Pinapaka Assembly Constituency
and add to (117). There will be a slight decrease in the Pinapaka Constituency population limit
which will get corrected once the Polavaram project is completed as two Mandals
(Kunavaram and V.R.Puram) will get fully submerged and two Mandals
(Bhadrachalam Assembly Constituency and Chintur) will get partly submerged.
The resulting re-settlement of the population from these four Mandals to the
Pinapaka Assembly Constituency will correct the excess population in
Bhadrachalam Assembly Constituency as well as decrease population in Pinapaka
Assembly Constituency. The Polavaram project works are in progress and the
people of submerging area are going to the western bank of Gadavari River for the
protection of their life style and life tradition.
4.(117) Kothagudem Assembly Constituency:- (a) The existing Kothagudem Assembly Constituency almost
full Mandals of (1) Kothagudam (2) Palvoncah and parts of (3) Chandrugonda
and (4) Penubally Mandals.
(b) As per the Commission proposal (1) Kothagudem (2)
Tekulapally and (3) Julurupad Mandals in (117) Kothagudem Assembly
Constituncy is not justified as it is not convenient to the public i.e. communication
and Administrative point of view.
(c) Kothagudm Municipality and Palvoncha Municipality are contiguous
(Twin towns) and Industrially linked and Non Tribal Population dominated
places Assembly Constituency.
(d) (117) Kothagudem Assembly Constituency proposed by the
Commission, excepting Kothagudam all other Mandals are predominantly have
Tribal population. Kothagudem has predominantly population whose occupation is
mostly either Industrial or Industrial related Assembly Constituencytivities and
Tribal population is very much less. The interest and culture of the Tribal will
be better protected if all predominantly Tribal areas i.e. Tekulapally and Julurpad Mandals are put together with another Tribal dominated Constituency. So that an
integrated Tribal development could take place Assembly Constituency.
(e) Hence we proposed to delete Tekulapally and Julurpad Mandals
from the (117) Kothagudem Assembly Constituency as draft proposal of the
Commission. We proposed to add Tekulapally Mandal to (110) Pinapaka Assembly Constituency and Julurupad Mandal to (115) Konijerla/Enkuru Assembly Constituency.
We propose (117) Kothagudam Assembly Constituency with
Kothagudam and Palvoncah Mandals. The proposals is as per the guidelines of
Khammam Urban Mandal exclusing Khammam Municipality should be
separated and add to (1) Enkuru, (2) Julurpad, (3) Konijerla and (4) Tallada
Mandals which are porposed in (115) (Wyra) Enkuru Assembly Constituency
with a total population of 271300, out of ST. population is 21.65% as Wyra Mandal
is added to Madhira Constituency.
The Commission proposed Khammam Assembly Constituency with
Khammam Urban Mandal only. Khammam Urban Mandal with Khammam Municipality, Khammam Rural Mandal and Chintakani Mandals in existing
position in Khammam Assembly Constituency.
Khammam Urban Mandal includes Khammam Municipality and surrounding villages
on Eastern and North Eastern villages to the town whereas Khammam Rural Mandal is
all together a different Mandal situated on the Westend side of Khammam town.
Khammam Rural which is the western side of the Khammam town with a total
population of 73291 should be merged with the population of Khammam Municipality
of 159544 population thus population is the total of 232835 as one Constituency which
is an existing constituency.
8. (111) Yellandu Assembly Constituency
The Commission proposed Yellandu Assembly Constituency with (1) Yelllandu (2)
Bayyaram (3) Garla (4) Singreni Mandals. We proposed to add only Kamepally
Mandal to draft proposal of Delimitation Commission for geographical and
administrative convenience to the public. We propose Yellandu Assembly
Constituency ST Reserved Constituency as in draft proposals with 43.76% of ST
population.
(15) Krishna District : (199) – Satyanarayanapuram and (200) –Vijayawada Patamata Assembly Constituencies : a) The Delimitation Commission proposed Vijayawada Municipal Corporation wards 41 & 75 in (200) – Vijayawada Patamata Constituency. Delete these two wards from Vijayawada Patamata Assembly and add wards 44 and 49 on geographical point of view. b) while wards 41 and 75 is deleted from (200) Vijayawada Patamata AC the ward No:41 may be included in (199) Satyanarayanapuram AC and ward No:75 may be considered to include in (198) Bhavanipuram Assembly Constituency. c) The above proposal is on the representation of local public representatives and it on the guidelines of Delimitation Commission. 17 – DISTRICT : GUNTUR
1) Existing Assembly Constituencies 19, proposed assembly Constituencies are 17 2) Duggirala assembly Constituency originally proposed in the working
paper circulated to the associate members, subsequently abolished in the draft proposals. It is unjust and not reasonable
3) Elimination of Kuchinapudi assembly Constituency is not disputed. Creation of (207) Ponnur assembly Constituency with Ponnur municipality and rural, Chebrolu Mandal, Peddakakani Mandal is most unreasonable against the princeples ie communication, contiguity, and Public Convinience under delimitation guidelines. In between Pedakakani Mandal and Chebrole Mandal there are Guntur city as well as Guntur rural Mandals now proposed as part of Prathipadu Constituency.
4) The people of Pedakakani Mandal have to cross Guntur to reach Ponnur
that is far away from Ponnur. Peddakakani Mandal should be necessarily include in (206) Mangalagiri assembly Constituency, while Peddakakani Mandal is very adjacent to 206 Mangalagiri Assembly Constituency. Mangalagiri Assembly it may form Mangalagiri Municipality & Mandal, Tadepalli Mandal and Peddakakani Mandals.
5) a. The proposal by the Commission that Peddakakani Mandal to be
included in (207) Ponnur Assembly Constituency is against the very basic guidelines of Commission.
b) (207) Ponnur Assembly Constituency is to be carved out with the following Mandals. 1) Ponnur municipality and Mandal, 2)Kakumanu Mandal and 3) Peddanandipadu Mandals. c) The proposal of the Commission to formulate (212) Prathipadu assembly Constituency as reserved for schedule caste is most unreasonable and not in conformity to the guidelines of the Delimitation commission.
6) The proposal have to be reconsidered in the following manner. Prathipadu
Mandal, Guntur rural Mandal, Vatticherukuru Mandal and Chebrolu Mandal for Prathipadu Assembly Constituency.
17 – DISTRICT : GUNTUR
7) a.) Delete Battiprolu Mandal in (209) Repalle Assembly Constituency and
add Cherukpalli Mandal in its place to Repalle.
b) Delete Cherukpalli Mandal from (208) Vemuru Assembly Constituency and add Battirprolu Mandal from (209) Repalle Assembly Constituency. 8) (205) Tadikonda(SC) Assembly Constituency, 204 Pedakurapadu
Assembly Constituency, (217) Sattenapalli assembly Constituency are interlinked.
a) (205) Tadikonda (SC) Assembly Constituency : The Tadikonda Assembly Constituency proposed by the Commission adding Phirangipuram Mandal which is far away from Tadikonda and in between Phirangipuram and Tadikonda the villages of Guntur rural Mandal are situated. Hence there is no connection between Tadikonda and Phirangipuram Mandals.
(b) Phirangipuram Mandal is existing in Sattenapalli AC. Hence, Phirangipuram Mandal is to be include to (217) Sattenapalli AC in place of Rajupalem Mandal. The proposal of delimitation commission to include Amaravathi Mandal in (204) Pedakurapadu assembly Constituency is not convenient to the public and Amaravathi Mandal is close compactness and contiguity with Tadikonda, where there is highway road from Tadikonda to Amaravathi. (c) Amaravathi should not be convenient to include in Pedakurapadu Assembly Constituency as proposed by the delimitation commission. Rajupalem Mandal which is at present in Peddakurapadu Assembly Constituency may be retained in (204) Peddakurapadu Assembly Constituency in place of Amaravathi Mandal. The proposals is with in the guidelines of the Delimitation Commission. 9) (213)-Guntur North, (214)-Guntur South assembly Constituencies are
interlinked
The distribution of wards is not proper in these Constituencies. We are proposing the following distribution.
(213)-Guntur North :- Guntur Muncipal Corporation Ward No 1 to 8 and 15. (214)-Guntur South :- Guntur Muncipal Corporation Ward No 9 to 14 and 16 to 28. The above wards are contiguous. Tenali Railway track taken as boundary and divide the Constituencies where as the Delimitation Commission divided it only on the basis of city roads, which is not at all convenient to the public and geographically not in contiguity. The above proposed wards are almost in the existing Constituencies of Guntur –I and II.
18 – DISTRICT : PRAKASAM
1) The Assembly Constituencies of Yerragondapalem, Giddaluru, Markapuram and Darsi Constituencies are interlinked.
2) The proposal of the Commission to include Ardhaveedu Mandal in
221 Yerragondapalem assembly Constituency is quite contrary is to be very basic guidelines of the delimitation commission. Ardhaveedu Mandal is very close affinity and accessible to Giddaluru. The people of Ardhaveedu to reach Yerragondapalem has to come across 231 Giddaluru , 230 Markapuram assembly Constituency’s. Further there is reserve forest between Peddaraveedu and Ardhaveedu Mandals. Hence, Ardhaveedu should necessarily include in 231 Giddaluru assembly Constituency. By deleting Ardhaveedu from
Yerragondapalem assembly Constituency, the Yerragondapalem Constituency is within the permissible population limit, with a population of 2,34,037.
3) Cumbum Mandal should be included in Markapuram assembly
Constituency in place of Podili Mandal. Podili Mandal at present in existing Constituency of 222-Darsi assembly Constituency. Podili to Darsi is only 10 KM whereas Podili to Markapuram is at a distance of 40 KM. Donakonda Mandal now proposed by the Commission in Darsi assembly Constituency may be included in Markapuram assembly Constituency. These above proposals are in conformity to the guidelines of the delimitation commission and act is enacted in the Parliament.
4) 225 Chirala and 223 Parchuru assembly Constituencies are
interlinked. Karamchedu Mandal now proposed in 223 Parchuru assembly Constituency may be included in 225 Chirala assembly Constituency, baring 1/3rd of the population of Karamchedu Mandal is in existing Constituency of (225) Chirala assembly Constituency. People of Karamchedu Mandal should go daily to Chirala for their administrative, marketing purposes. It is nearer to Chirala than Parchuru. Hence, (225) Chirala Assembly Constituency may be constituted with following Mandals. Chirala municipality, rural, Vetapalem Mandal and Karamchedu Mandals. The total population of the proposed 225 Chirala assembly Constituency is 2,70,242 which is within the population limit. Hence, Karamchedu Mandal may be deleted from 223 Parchuru assembly Constituency and adding to 223 Chirala assembly Constituency
18 – DISTRICT : PRAKASAM
5) While deleting Karamchedu Mandal from 223 Parchuru assembly
Constituency the Parchuru assembly Constituency population is 2,38,642 that is in limit. The above changes will be within the permissible population limits.
6) Singarayakonda Mandal was proposed in 229-Kondepi assembly
Constituency may be added to 228-Kandukur in place of Voletivaripalem as they have close affinity.
Dissent note on 19- Nellore District Assembly Constituencies :
The proposals of the Delimitation Commission have to be reconsidered of
Assembly Constituencies for the following reasons.
1) Existing number of Assembly Constituencies in NELLORE DISTRICT is 11. One Assembly Constituency is reduced. The proposal have to be
formulated keeping in view of the population, 10 Assembly Constituencies
have carved out. The proposal of the Delimitation Commission abolishing
existing Alluru is not in dispute.
2) But abolishing of Rapur Assembly Constituency in addition to Allur is
objectionable and Rapur Assembly Constituency is to be retained either in
the shape of 238.Rapur / Sarvepalli.
3) The proposals of certain Assembly Constituencies are not in conformity
with the Guidelines of Delimitation Commission. For example Indukuripet Mandal now proposed in (235) Kovur Assembly Constituency. Indukuripet
Mandal is on other side of Penna River. There is no communication
between (235) Kovur Assembly Constituency and Indukuripet Mandal.
Indukuripet Mandal. May be included in (237)-Nellore Rural Assembly
Constituency. In view of the above change other inevitable changes of
Mandals become necessary. Hence following change of Mandals in
Assembly Constituencies as follows.
4) Indukuripet Mandal may be deleted from (235) Kovur Assembly Constituency
Buchireddypalem which is now proposed by Delimitation Commission in (234)
Atmakur Assembly Constituency is to be included in (235) Kovur Assembly
Constituency in place of Indukuripet Mandal while deleting Buchireddypalem
Mandal from (234) Atmakur Assembly Constituency Kaluvoya Mandal is
proposed in (241) Venkatagiri Constituency is to be included in (234) Atmakur
Assembly Constituency by deleting from Venkatagiri Assembly Constituency.
5) Thotapalligudur Mandal, which is proposed in (238), Sarvepalli Assembly
may be included in (237) Nellore rural Assembly Constituency that is very adjacent
to Nellore Manadal and Municipal Corporation. 19- Nellore District:- 6) It is a fact that some Municipal Corporation wards are included in (237)-Nellore
Rural Assembly Constituency While deleting Thotapalligudur Mandal deleting
from (238) Sarvepalli Assembly Constituency, Rapur Mandal may be added to
(238) Sarvepalli Assembly Constituency. It may be renamed as (238)-RAPUR or
Sarvepalli, by changing the above Mandals Rapur is an existing Assembly
Constituency but also a Mandal Head quarter where Sarvepalli is a very small
village. We have submitted the same in our proposals.
7) In (241) Venkatagiri Assembly Constituency may be reconstituted with the
following Mandals: Venkatagiri, Balayapalle, Dakkili, Sydapuram, Ozili and Pellakur. Rapur and Kaluvoya Mandals which are included in (241) Venkatagiri
Assembly Constituency may be deleted. Ozili and Pellkur Mandals which are now
proposed in Sullurpet assembly may be added to (241) Venkatagiri Assembly
Constituency. Chittamur Mandal which is now proposed in (239) Gudur (SC)
Assembly Constituency may be deleted and include in Sullurpet Assembly
Constituency. The (239) Gudur (SC) Assembly Constituency may be constituted
with the following Mandals:
1) Gudur including Municipality, 2) Chillakur, 3) Kota and 4) Vakadu.
8) (236) Nellore City Assembly Constituency may be constituted with the
following wards of Nellore Municipal Corporation. From ward No.12 to Ward No.44,
wards are very contiguity and compact to the public.
Where as (237)-Nellore Rural Assembly Constituency may be
constituted with wards of Nellore Municipal Corporation from ward 1 to 11
and 45, 46, also Nellore Rural Mandal, Indukurpaet, Thotapalli Gudur
Mandals which is convenient and with in the frame work of Guide lines of Delimitation Commission.
20 – DISTRICT: KADAPA Keeping inview of the guidelines as well as geographical conditions existing in the district like River, Forest and Hills on ground level. We the Associates Members proposed following changes in the draft proposals of the Delimitation Commission circulated to us. Details as follows :- (243) Badvel Assembly Constituency :- a) B.Koduru Mandal may be deleted and it may be added to (252) Mydukur Assembly Constituency in place of Chapadu Mandal. Brahmamgari Matam Mandal also may be deleted and may be add to (252) Mydukur Assembly Constituency in addition. b. Atlur Mandal now proposed by the Commission may be deleted from (244) Rayachoti Assembly Constituency and add to (243) Badvel Assembly Constituency. C. Sidhout Mandal now proposed into (244) Rajampeta Assembly Constituency may be added to (243) Badvel Assembly Constituency. d. (249) Kamalapuram Assembly Constituency : - Lakkireddipalli, Ramapuram Mandals now proposed by the Commission in Kamalapuram may be deleted and added to (247) Rayachoti Assembly Constituency. By deleting Lakkireddipally, Ramapuram Mandals from Kamalapuram Assembly Constituency and Chapadu Mandal in Kamalapuram Constituency. Chapadu Mandal which is now proposed by Delimitation Commission is added to Kamalapuram. e. from (247) Rayachoti Assembly Constituency T.Sundupalli Mandal may be deleted and added to (244) Rajampet Assembly Constituency. f. (244) Rajampet Assembly Constituency :- Delete Siddout and Atlur Mandals from Rajampet and add T.Sundupalli Mandals to Rajampet while deleting from Rayachoti Assembly Constituency which is proposed by the Delimitation Commission. The above changes are made with in the permissible population and without effecting reserved seats.
21 – DISTRICT : KURNOOL (254)- Srisailam Assembly Constituency:- The Commission has
proposed No. 254 Srisailam AC with the following Mandals. Srisailam Mandal, Atmakur Mandal, Velugode Mandal, Bandi Atmakur Mandal and Mahanandi Mandal. Mahanandi Mandal which is included in the present proposal is not at all connected with any other Mandals of the Assembly Constituency. The people of Mahanandi Mandal have to cross Nandyal Assembly Constituency to reach Srisailam, the proposed Assembly Constituency head quarters, which is far away, about 160 KM. Pamulapadu Mandal is proposed to be included in 255 Nandikotkur Assembly Constituency. Pamulapadu Mandal as it is in the existing Atmakur Assembly Constituency. It is in close affinity and adjacent to Atmakur Mandal. The people of Pamulapadu Mandal have to come to Atmakur Mandal for all practical purposes, which is head quarters of existing Atmakur Assembly Constituency.
Hence, the formation of 254 Srisailam Assembly Constituency may be considered with the following Mandals Srisailam Mandal, Atmakur Mandal, Pamulapadu Mandal, Velugoda Mandal and Bandi Atmakur Mandal. 22 – DISTRICT : ANANTAPUR Inspite of no change in the number of Assembly Constituencies Anantapur district, the existing (274) Nallamada Constituency is eliminated. But it should be retained. (274) NALLAMADA ASSEMBLY CONSTITUENCY :- (274)- Nallamada Assembly Constituency may be considered with following Mandals. Nallamada, Mudigubba, Bukkapatnam, Obuladevaracheruvu, Tanakal, Amadagur and N.P.Kunta. (273) KALYANDURG ASSEMBLY CONSTITUENCY :- (273) Kalyandurg Assembly Constituency may be considered with the following Mandals. Kalyandurg, Atmakur, Beluguppa, Brahmasamudram, Settur, Kundurpi may be considered. (268) URAVAKONDA ASSEMBLY CONSTITUENCY :- Atmakur Mandal should be added. Pamidi Mandal may be added to 268 Uravakonda Assembly Constituency. Instead, the Beluguppa Mandal should be shifted to (273) Kalyanadurg Assembly Constituency. (279) DHARMAVARAM ASSEMBLY CONSTITUENCY:- (279) Dharmavaram Assembly Constituency may be considered with the following Mandals. Dharmavaram, Rapthadu, Yellanur, Bathalapalle and Tadimarri may be considered.
(277) PENUGONDA ASSEMBLY CONSTITUENCY :- (277) Penugonda Assembly Constituency may be considered with the following Mandals. Penugonda, Chennekothapalle, Ramagiri, Roddam, Kambadur and Kanaganapalle. (278)- PUTTAPARTHY ASSEMBLY CONSTITUENCY :- (278)- Puttaparthy Assembly Constituency may be considered with the following Mandals. Puttaparthy, Kothacheruvu, Chilamathur, Gorantla and Somandepalli. 23 – DISTRICT : CHITTOOR :-
Nindra Mandal is in (288) – Satyavedu Assembly Constituency may be
deleted and added to (289)-Nagari Constituency in place of Narayanavanam
Mandal. It may be retained in Satyaveedu Constituency by vice versa.
[3] MANDALI BUDHA PRASAD M.L.A. 91-AVANIGADDA-INC Dhanalaxmi Towers ASSOCIATE MEMBER Dharamakaram Road, DELIMITATION COMMISSION Ameerpet OF INDIA Hyderabad NEW DELHI.
To
Sri Kuldeep Singhji The Hon’ble Chairman Delimitation commission of India, New Delhi. Respected Sir,
Sub: A.P Delimitation Proposals of Assembly Constituencies of Khammam Dsitrict - Reconsideration – Request to Publish in News papers along with the proposals of the Delimitation Commission - Regarding
1. We are herewith submitting the proposals of Assembly Constituencies of Khammam
District. for reconsideration with full particulars of the population with SC & ST
percentage to each mandal in all proposed constituencies on the basis of 2001 censes and
MANDALI BUDHA PRASAD M.L.A. 91-AVANIGADDA-INC Dhanalaxmi Towers ASSOCIATE MEMBER Dharamakaram Road, DELIMITATION COMMISSION Ameerpet OF INDIA Hyderabad NEW DELHI.
..2..
Hence we proposed to add Tekulapally mandal which is dominated by Tribal
population of 34335 with percentage 78.10 % instead of Palvoncah mandal. We propose Pinapaka Assembly constituency as ST constituency with 35.41
percentage of ST population and 94,839 population of ST with (1) Pinapaka (2)
Manguru (3) Aswapruam (4) Gundala and (5) Tekulapally with a Total population of
216328.
Thus Tekulapally Mandal proposed in Kothagudam Assembly Constituency may be deleted and add to (110) Pinapaka Assembly Constituency. Palovancha mandal may
be deleted from (110) Pinapaka Assemblyl Constituency and add to ( 117) Kothagudam Assembly Constituency
4. (117) Kothagudem Assembly constituency (a) The existing Kothagudem Assembly constituency with four mandals (1)
Kothagudam (2) Palvoncah (3) Chandrugonda and (4) Penubally mandals. It
has been split into three Assembly constituencies by the draft proposal of the
Delimitation Commission.
(b) As per the Commission proposal (1) Kothagudem (2) Tekulapally and (3)
Julurupad mandals in (117) Kothagudem Assembly constituency is not
justified as it is not convenient to the public i.e communication and Administrative
the twin towns and mandals are not meged in one same constituency the people
of those Rural and urban area will face difficulty in all aspects.
Cond..3
MANDALI BUDHA PRASAD M.L.A. 91-AVANIGADDA-INC Dhanalaxmi Towers ASSOCIATE MEMBER Dharamakaram Road, DELIMITATION COMMISSION Ameerpet OF INDIA Hyderabad NEW DELHI.
..3..
(d) In the proposed Kothagudem Assembly Constituency proposed by the
Commission, excepting Kothagudam all other mandals are predominantly have
Tribal population. Kothagudem has predominantly population whose occupation is
mostly either Industrial or Industrial related activities and Tribal population is very much less. The interest and culture of the Tribal will be better protected if all
predominantly Tribal areas i.e Tekulapally and Julurpad mandals are put
together with another Tribal dominated constituency. So that an integrated Tribal
development could take place.
(e) Hence we proposed to delete Tekulapally and Julurpad Mandals from the
Kothagudem Assembly constituency as draft proposal of the Commission. We
proposed to add Tekulapally mandal to (110) Pinapaka Assembly constituency
and Julurupad Mandal to (115) Enkuru Assembly constituency.
We propose (117) Kothagudam Assembly constituency with Kothagudam and
Palvoncah Mandals with a total population of 284012, out of which S.C population
of 48546 (17.09%) S.T population of 58800 ( 20.71% ).
The proposal is as per the guidelines of the Delimitation Commission.
Regarding Kothagudam Assembly Constituency the above mentioned reasons
were already discussed in the meeting by the Associated members with the
Delimitation commission and requested for the consideration of the above
mentioned facts.
5. (113 ) Palair Assembly Constituency (a) The proposals circulated by the Delimitation Commission is that Mudigonda
Mandal which is now existing in Palair Assembly constituency. is included
in
Madhira Assembly Constituency. In view of Munneru River is situated in Cond..4.
MANDALI BUDHA PRASAD M.L.A. 91-AVANIGADDA-INC Dhanalaxmi Towers ASSOCIATE MEMBER Dharamakaram Road, DELIMITATION COMMISSION Ameerpet OF INDIA Hyderabad NEW DELHI.
..4..
between Mudigonda and Chintakami Mandals, there is no access and
contiguity.Therefore we propose to retain Mudigond Mandal in Palair Assembly Constituency, instead of Khammam Rural Mandal. Khammam rural mandal may
be included in (112) Khammam Assembly Constituency. (b) In the draft proposals Palair Assembly Constituency is proposed as O.C
Constituency whereas we propose S.C Assembly Constituency with 22.4% of S.C
population.
6. (114) Madhira Assembly Constituency
The commission proposed Madhira Assembly Constituency with (1) Madhira
(2) Yerruplam (3) Bonakal (4) Chintakani and (5) Mduigonda mandals. In view of
Munneru River between Mudigonda and Chintakani mandals, there is no
access and continuity. Hence we propose to add Wyra mandal which is an existing
mandal in Madhira Constituency in place of Mudigonda mandal. In view of the
changes made Madhira Constituency Continues to be as S.C. Constituency with
26.61% of S.C. population
7. (115) Wyra Assembly Constituency Khammam Urban Mandal excluding Khammam Municipality should be
separated and add to (1) Enkuru, (2) Julurpad, (3)Konijerla and (4)Tallada
mandals which are proposed in (115) Enkuru Assembly Constituency (A new name is given) with a total population of 271300, out of ST. population is 21.65%
as Wyra Mandal is added to Madhira Constituency.
Wyra Manadal which is proposed in Wyra Constituency by Delimitation
Commission should be deleted and add to (114) Madhira Assembly Constituency,
by deleting Wyra mandal from Wyra Constituency. We propose the Constituency
renamed as Enkur Assembly Constituency.
Cond..5
MANDALI BUDHA PRASAD M.L.A. 91-AVANIGADDA-INC Dhanalaxmi Towers ASSOCIATE MEMBER Dharamakaram Road, DELIMITATION COMMISSION Ameerpet OF INDIA Hyderabad NEW DELHI.
..5..
8. (111) Yellandu Assembly Constituency The Commission proposed Yellandu Assembly Constituency with (1)
Yellandu (2) Bayyaram (3) Garla (4) Singreni mandals. We proposed to add only
Kamepally mandal to draft proposal of Delimitation Commission for geographical
and administrative convenience to the public. We propose Yellandu Assembly Constituency ST Reserved constituency as in draft proposal with 43.76% of ST
Population.
9. (112) Khammam Assembly Constituency The Commission proposed Khammam Assembly Constituency with
Khammam urban mandal only. Khammam urban mandal with Khamma Municipality, Khammam Rural mandal and Chintakani mandals are in existing
position in Khammam Assembly Constituency. Khammam Urban Mandal includes Khammam Municipality and surrounding
villages on Eastern and North Eastern villages to the town where as Khammam
Rural Mandal is all together a different mandal situated on the Westerned side of
Khammam town. Khammam Rural which is the Western side of the Khammam
town with a total population of 73291 should be merged with the population of
Khammam Municipality of 159544 population thus population is the total of 232835
as One Constituency which is an existing Constituency.
Yours sincerely, Enclosed: - Sd/- 1.Plan of District Showing the (Associated Member)
Assembly Constituencies. Delimitation Commission
2. Statistical Data of Assembly Constituencies of India. New Delhi. Proposed.
DELIMITAITON PROPOSALS OF ASSEMBLY CONSTITUENCIES OF KHAMMAM DISTRICT OF
ANDHRA PRADESH 2001 Population District Average: 257893
Distrcit Total 2578927 Minimum: 232103 Maximum: 283682 C.No. Constituency Mandal 2001Census Population Percentage Total SC ST SC ST
[4] GADE VENKAT REDDY M.L.A. BAPATLA - INC 402, MS-2, Block ASSOCIATE MEMBER Old M.L.A. Qtrs, DELIMITATION COMMISSION Hyderguda, OF INDIA Hyderabad-29. NEW DELHI. Cell : 9848027091 To
Sri Kuldeep Singhji The Hon’ble Chairman Delimitation commission of India, New Delhi. Respected Sir,
Sub: A.P Delimitation Proposals of Assembly Constituencies of Khammam Dsitrict - Reconsideration – Request to Publish in News papers along with the proposals of the Delimitation Commission - Regarding
1. We are herewith submitting the proposals of Assembly Constituencies of Khammam
District. For reconsideration with full particulars of the population with SC & ST
percentage to each mandal in all proposed constituencies on the basis of 2001 censes and
guidelines given by the Delimitation commission.
2. We proposed little alternations in (110) Pinapaka (111) Yellandu (112) Khammam (113) Palair (114) Madhira (115) Wyra and (117) Kothgudem Assembly Constituencies. 3. (110)Pinapaka Assembly Constituency (a) The Commission proposed Pinapaka Assembly constituency with (1) Pinapaka (2) Manuguru (3) Aswapuram (4) Gundala and (5) Palvoncha Mandals (b) In the proposed Pinapaka Assembly constituency, excepting Palvoncha all other mandals are predominantly by Tribal Population. The interest of Tribal will be better protected if all predominantly Tribal areas are put together so that an integrated Tribal development could take place. (c) Palvoncha Mandal with its head quarters at Palvoncha is located at a distance of above 90 Kms. From Pinapaka which is inconvenient to the public.
Cond..2
..2..
Hence we proposed to add Tekulapally mandal which is dominated by Tribal
population of 34335 with percentage 78.10 % instead of Palvoncah mandal. We propose Pinapaka Assembly constituency as ST constituency with 35.41
percentage of ST population and 94,839 population of ST with (1) Pinapaka (2)
Manguru (3) Aswapruam (4) Gundala and (5) Tekulapally with a Total population of
216328.
Thus Tekulapally Mandal proposed in Kothagudam Assembly Constituency may be deleted and add to (110) Pinapaka Assembly Constituency. Palovancha mandal may
be deleted from (110) Pinapaka Assemblyl Constituency and add to ( 117) Kothagudam Assembly Constituency
4. (117) Kothagudem Assembly constituency (a) The existing Kothagudem Assembly constituency with four mandals (1)
Kothagudam (2) Palvoncah (3) Chandrugonda and (4) Penubally mandals. It
has been split into three Assembly constituencies by the draft proposal of the
Delimitation Commission.
(b) As per the Commission proposal (1) Kothagudem (2) Tekulapally and (3)
Julurupad mandals in (117) Kothagudem Assembly constituency is not
justified as it is not convenient to the public i.e communication and Administrative
point of view.
(c) Kothagudm Municipality and Palvoncha Municipality are contiguous (Twin towns) and Industrially linked and Non-Tribal population dominated places. If
the twin towns and mandals are not meged in one same constituency the people
of those Rural and urban area will face difficulty in all aspects.
Cond..3
..3..
(d) In the proposed Kothagudem Assembly Constituency proposed by the
Commission, excepting Kothagudam all other mandals are predominantly have
Tribal population. Kothagudem has predominantly population whose occupation is
mostly either Industrial or Industrial related activities and Tribal population is very much less. The interest and culture of the Tribal will be better protected if all
predominantly Tribal areas i.e Tekulapally and Julurpad mandals are put
together with another Tribal dominated constituency. So that an integrated Tribal
development could take place.
(e) Hence we proposed to delete Tekulapally and Julurpad Mandals from the
Kothagudem Assembly constituency as draft proposal of the Commission. We
proposed to add Tekulapally mandal to (110) Pinapaka Assembly constituency
and Julurupad Mandal to (115) Enkuru Assembly constituency.
We propose (117) Kothagudam Assembly constituency with Kothagudam and
Palvoncah Mandals with a total population of 284012, out of which S.C population
of 48546 (17.09%) S.T population of 58800 (20.71%).
The proposal is as per the guidelines of the Delimitation Commission.
Regarding Kothagudam Assembly Constituency the above mentioned reasons
were already discussed in the meeting by the Associated members with the
Delimitation commission and requested for the consideration of the above
mentioned facts.
5. (113 ) Palair Assembly Constituency (b) The proposals circulated by the Delimitation Commission is that Mudigonda
Mandal which is now existing in Palair Assembly constituency. is included
in
Madhira Assembly Constituency. In view of Munneru River is situated in Cond..4.
..4..
between Mudigonda and Chintakami Mandals, there is no access and contiguity.
Therefore we propose to retain Mudigond Mandal in Palair Assembly Constituency, instead of Khammam Rural Mandal. Khammam rural mandal may
be included in (112) Khammam Assembly Constituency. (b) In the draft proposals Palair Assembly Constituency is proposed as O.C
Constituency whereas we propose S.C Assembly Constituency with 22.4% of S.C
population.
6. (114) Madhira Assembly Constituency
The commission proposed Madhira Assembly Constituency with (1) Madhira
(2) Yerruplam (3) Bonakal (4) Chintakani and (5) Mduigonda mandals. In view of
Munneru River between Mudigonda and Chintakani mandals, there is no
access and continuity. Hence we propose to add Wyra mandal, which is an
existing mandal in Madhira Constituency in place of Mudigonda mandal. In view of
the changes made Madhira Constituency Continues to be as S.C. Constituency
with 26.61% of S.C. population
7. (115) Wyra Assembly Constituency Khammam Urban Mandal excluding Khammam Municipality should be
separated and add to (1) Enkuru, (2) Julurpad, (3) Konijerla and (4) Tallada
mandals which are proposed in (115) Enkuru Assembly Constituency (A new name is given) with a total population of 271300, out of ST. population is 21.65%
as Wyra Mandal is added to Madhira Constituency.
Wyra Manadal which is proposed in Wyra Constituency by Delimitation
Commission should be deleted and add to (114) Madhira Assembly Constituency,
by deleting Wyra mandal from Wyra Constituency. We propose the Constituency
renamed as Enkur Assembly Constituency.
Cond..5
..5..
8. (111) Yellandu Assembly Constituency The Commission proposed Yellandu Assembly Constituency with (1)
Yellandu (2) Bayyaram (3) Garla (4) Singreni mandals. We proposed to add only
Kamepally mandal to draft proposal of Delimitation Commission for geographical
and administrative convenience to the public. We propose Yellandu Assembly Constituency ST Reserved constituency as in draft proposal with 43.76% of ST
Population.
9. (112) Khammam Assembly Constituency The Commission proposed Khammam Assembly Constituency with
Khammam urban mandal only. Khammam urban mandal with Khamma Municipality, Khammam Rural mandal and Chintakani mandals are in existing
position in Khammam Assembly Constituency. Khammam Urban Mandal includes Khammam Municipality and surrounding
villages on Eastern and North Eastern villages to the town where as Khammam
Rural Mandal is all together a different mandal situated on the Westerned side of
Khammam town. Khammam Rural which is the Western side of the Khammam
town with a total population of 73291 should be merged with the population of
Khammam Municipality of 159544 population thus population is the total of 232835
as One Constituency which is an existing Constituency.
Yours sincerely, Enclosed: - Sd/- 1.Plan of District Showing the (Associated Member)
Assembly Constituencies. Delimitation Commission
2. Statistical Data of Assembly Constituencies of India. New Delhi. Proposed.
DELIMITAITON PROPOSALS OF ASSEMBLY CONSTITUENCIES OF KHAMMAM DISTRICT OF
ANDHRA PRADESH 2001 Population District Average: 257893
Distrcit Total 2578927 Minimum: 232103 Maximum: 283682 C.No. Constituency Mandal 2001Census Population Percentage Total SC ST SC ST
9th January, 2007. Respected Justice Kuldip Singh ji,
Sub : Delimitation of Constituencies – Andhra Pradesh State – Draft
proposals – Dissenting Proposals for publishing alongwith the Draft Proposals of the Commission – Reg.
Ref : Your letter No.282/AP/2006.Vol.IV dated 22nd December’06.
_ _ _ _ We are submitting herewith the following Dissenting Proposals for Assembly
Segments and Parliamentary Segments for the State of Andhra Pradesh, for your kind consideration and with a request to publish along with the Draft Proposals of the Commission. HYDERABAD AND RANGA REDDY DISTRICTS In Hyderabad District, the Draft Proposal relating to the proposed Goshamahal Constituency is not in accordance with the guidelines and does not take into consideration the special features of Maharajgunj Constituency. The Maharajgunj Constituency has at present hardly 1,20,000 population, probably the smallest not only in Hyderabad but in Andhra Pradesh also. The depletion of population in this area since the last delimitation is due to the fact that it was once a central commercial business district and thickly populated originally. Most of the wholesale and other business institutions have shifted because of congestion and the number of residents living in the area has come down. The constituency has another special feature i.e., non-muslim minorities, religious and linguistic minorities like Rajputs, Marwadis, Maharashtrians and Sikhs predominantly inhabit this area. The Ward No.15 which is already in Maharajgunj and should have been retained in Goshamahal has been added on to Himayatnagar, increasing the population of Himayatnagar to 2,75,115. So, Ward No.15 which has only 28,561 should be retained in Goshamahal without any disturbance to Himayatnagar. This does not involve splitting of Ward No.15 at all. Ward No.13 which has been split has been distributed between Bahadurpura, Karwan and Goshamahal Constituencies. Bahadurpura Constituency is on the southern side of River Musi whereas Ward No.13 is on the northern side of River Musi. Hence, Block No.2 & 3 of Ward No.13 has to be retained in Goshamahal alongwith Block No.1. Block No.1 & 2 of Ward No.20 which are adjacent and well connected by three bridges has to be added. The proposed Goshamahal would be as follows :-
Goshamahal Ward No.13 Block 1 19244 Block 2 31930 Block 3 10506 Ward No.14 63417 Ward No.15 28561 Ward No.20 Block 1 6011 Block 2 19083 Ward No.21 50294 Grand Total 229046 Consequently, Bahadurpura, Falaknuma Constituencies will undergo a small change on the following lines :- BAHADURPURA TOTAL SC ST Ward No.19 ( Block 1+2+3+5) 201383 2493 832 Ward No.20 (Block 3+4+7) 48714 443 5 GRAND TOTAL 250097 2936 837 FALAKNUMA TOTAL SC ST Ward No.18 ( Block 1+2+3+5+6) 105074 10133 4463 Ward No.18 (Block 9) 23191 882 304 Ward No.19 (Block 4) 51671 380 23 Ward No.20 (Block 5 + 6) 21569 1465 885 Ward No.22 (Block 22) 2939 5 0 Ward No.33 65003 2749 72 GRAND TOTAL 269447 15614 5747 NIZAMABAD DISTRICT Yellareddy Constituency is having a population of 2,80,723 as per the Draft Proposal and Armoor and Jukkal have only 2,27,106 and 2,28,383. This variation can be corrected only if some Mandals which are far away are made part of the nearby constituency. For example in Yellareddy Constituency, Domakonda and Biknoor mandals are nearly 100 kms., away from Yellareddy and there is no justification for this. These may be deleted from Yellareddy Constituency and added to Kamareddy which is almost in the periphery of Kamareddy. Sadashivnagar Mandal from Kamareddy Constituency, Gandhari of Banswada Constituency may be included in Yellareddy, as was the case previously. This arrangement ensures continuity, convenience and is in accordance with the guidelines. Conseqently, Sirikonda mandal proposed in Kamareddy Constituency may be deleted and added to Nizamabad Rural Constituency and Maklur mandal deleted from Nizamabad Rural Constituency and added to Armoor Constituency. This is done with a view to ensure geographical contiguity, communication, accessibility and convenience.
Our objections may be considered and delimitation modified accordingly. If these minor changes are made, it would ensure that the population is more or less nearer to the permitted average than now as indicated in the below statement. *It is submitted that the name of the proposed NIZAMABAD RURAL CONSTITUENCY may be considered and re-designated as DICHPALLY, as it was previously known. If our dissent is considered, the revised proposal would read as follows :- YELLAREDDY CONSTITUENCY Name of Mandal Total SC ST Yellareddy 44883 6361 2725 Nagareddypet 32053 6322 2201 Lingampet 43904 6308 6501 Gandhari 49951 5560 13489 Tadwai 45049 9243 3747 Sadasivnagri 53417 11035 1639 TOTAL 270257 44829 30302 KAMAREDDY CONSTITUENCY Name of Mandal Total SC ST Kamareddy 106298 11662 2231 Macha Reddy 54406 8381 9291 Domakonda 55189 10289 322 Bhiknoor 59645 10249 1013 TOTAL 275538 40581 12857 NIZAMABAD RURAL CONSTITUENCY* Name of Mandal Total SC ST Nizamabad 83628 11860 11426 Dichpally 71091 10217 10648 Dharpally 44152 5762 6136 Sirkonda 46935 6960 9659 TOTAL 245806 34799 37869 ARMOOR CONSTITUENCY Name of Mandal Total SC ST Armoor 113018 17751 3032 Jakranpally 43636 7877 3268 Nandipet 70452 12433 3649 Makloor 55109 10320 7034 TOTAL 282215 48381 16983
BANSWADA CONSTITUENCY Name of Mandal Total SC ST
Birkur 47114 6536 5729 Varni 67684 8006 8841 Banswada 58081 6237 5500 Kotgir 54329 9105 2618 TOTAL 227208 29884 27588 VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT In the Draft Proposal, Jami mandal is proposed in Gajapathinagaram (135). As Jami mandal is very near to Srungavarapukota A/c (138) (within 4 km radius) than Gajapathinagaram, which is 40 km away and the people of Jami mandal have to cross Srungavarapukota to reach Gajapthinagaram. The people of Jami are agitating for a change in the draft proposal and hence it is suggested that it should be included in Srungavarapukota instead of Gajapathinagaram, which is as per the guidelines, administration purpose and for the convenience of the people. EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT In the Draft Proposal, Tallarevu mandal is proposed in 51 Ramachandrapuram A/c where as Pamarru mandal is proposed in Mummidivaram A/c. Proposing the Pamarru mandal in Mummidivaram A/c is most inconvenient not only to the people of the mandal also to the Peoples Representatives. Geographically also, it is far away from Mummidivaram A/c. The River Godavari is running between the Pamarru mandal and the remaining Mummidivaram constituency. There are three other mandals in between Pamarru mandal and the remaining Mummidivaram constituency on the other side. The distance between Pamarru mandal and the remaining Mummidavaram constituency is about 45 kms on Road Way. There is no direct bus facility between Pamarru mandal and to the Mummidivaram which is the head quarters of the constituency. The people of Pamarru mandal have to change a minimum of 4 buses on road way to reach Mummidivaram. Pamarru mandal is also just adjacent to Ramachandrapuram which is in a distance of 8 kms only. There are so many bus facilities from Ramachandrapuram RTC bus depot to several villages of Pamarru mandal. On the other side, Tallarevu mandal which is included in Ramachandrapuram A/c is on the 214 National Highway which is running through Mummidivaram with a number of bus facilities. It is also connected to Mummidivaram A/c with a bridge on River Godavari. As it is not in accordance with the guidelines of the Delimitation and inconvenient for administration purposes and also to the people of Pamarru mandal, we suggest to favourably consider that Pamarru mandal is included in Ramachandrapuram A/c whereas Tallarevu mandal may be included in Mummidivaram constituency. PROPOSED RAMACHANDRAPURAM CONSTITUENCY 1. Ramachandrapuram mandal and town 1,10,161 2. Kajuluru mandal 70,085 3. Pamarru mandal 66,136 - - - - - - - 2,46,363 - - - - - - -
PROPOSED MUMMIDIVARAM CONSTITUENCY 1. Mummidavaram mandal 66,180 2. Katrenikona mandal 73,685 3. I. Polavaram mandal 67,454 4. Tallarevu mandal 79,912 - - - - - - 2.87,231 - - - - - - - NELLORE DISTRICT In the Draft Proposal to the Nellore District District, there are many discrepancies in constituting some of the constituencies. People have to face a lot of inconvenience geographically and it will become difficult for them to seek administrative help as there is no contiguity in the constituency. To cite an example for this, Indukurpet mandal which is on the southern side of the ‘Penna River’ is included in the Kovur constituency which is on the northern side of the same river. There are so many such discrepancies. Keeping all such discrepancies in view, we are submitting a new proposal for your favourable consideration. Constituency Mandal Name Population 1. UDAYAGIRI Seetharamapuram 22342 Udayagiri 33413 Varikuntapadu 28160 Vinjamur 36351 Dattalur 23633 Marripadu 39129 Kaligiri 40589 Kondapuram 37283 Grand Total 260900 2. KAVALI Jaladanki 44059 Kavali 140453 Bogole 48935 Allur 52990 Grand Total 286437 3. KOVUR Kovur 72051 Kodavalur 46563 Vidavalur 46793 Buchireddipalem 72566 Dagadarthi 35742 Grand Total 273715 4. ATMAKUR Sangam 41368 Anumasamudrampeta 32681 Atmakur 59242 Ananthasagaram 39908 Chejerla 33755 Kaluvoya 41668 Grand Total 248622
5. NELLORE CITY Nellore city 1st Dvn &12 to50 Dvn 290000 Grand Total 290000 6. NELLORE RURAL Indukurpet 57460 Thotapalligudur 49545 Nellore Rural 103586 Nellore City (2nd to 11th Division) 80000 Grand Total 290591 7. SARVEPALLI Rapur 44424 Poldalakur 62742 Venkatachalam 55592 Muthukur 50712 Manubolu 35828 Grand Total 249298 8. GUDUR (SC) Gudur 114356 Chillakur 46475 Kota 51172 Vakadu 33927 Grand Total 245930 9. SALLURPETA (SC) Sullurpet 75928 Tada 42018 Doravarisatram 32243 Naidupet 68631 Chittamur 37246 Grand Total 256066 10. VENKATAGIRI Venkatagiri 75236 Dakkili 38684 Sydapuram 43292 Balayapalle 32653 Ojili 34966 Pellakur 33746 Grand Total 258577
17-GUNTUR DISTRICT 207-Ponnuru and 212-Prathipadu A/Cs In the Draft Proposal, two mandals in 2 A/Cs i.e., minor changes in 207-Ponnuru and 212-Prathipadu A/c is recommended. Ponnur A/c with Ponnur, Chebrolu, Peddakakani mandals is not properly constituted. There is no direct route between Ponnur and Pedakakani mandals as people of Pedakakani should travel via Guntur Mandal which is another A/c. Inspite of this, we request to include Pedakakani mandal in Prathipadu (SC) A/c by deleting Kakumanu mandal which is now proposed in 212-Prathipadu A/c. Existing also majority villages of Pedakakani mandal ae in Prathipadu (SC) A/c. Kakumanu mandal fully existing in Ponnur A/c. Geographically and also as per the Commission guidelines, it is convenient to Ponnur A/c. This proposal will not effect any Reserved Constituencies and the same of 212-Prathipadu, 208-Vemuru and 205-Tadikonda will remain SC Reservation. Guntur Town The Draft Proposal of Guntur town dividing it as Guntur (North) and Guntur (South is unjust and without following natural boundaries. A small lande of 20’ wide is taken as boundary which will confuse the public. A Railway track is dividing the town into North and South naturally. North of Railway Track is North Guntur whereas South of Railway Track is South Guntur. Instead of this, the proposed boundary is taken at along a small lane and road, dividing Guntur as East and West Guntur, which is unjust and unnatural. If the Guntur city is divided as Hyderabad i.e., Tenali Railway Track as boundary census ward no.1 to 8 and 15 as Guntur north and 9 to 14, 16 to 28 as Guntur South. Hence, it is proposed that Guntur is divided as North and South instead of East and West. The proposed suggestion showing Guntur (North) & Guntur (South) on map is enclosed herewith. WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT In the Draft Proposal to the West Godavari District, there are many discrepancies in constituting some of the constituencies. People have to face a lot of inconvenience geographically and it will become difficult for them to seek administrative help as there is no contiguity in the constituency. There are so many such discrepancies. In the original re-organisation of Assembly Constituencies in West Godavari District provided to us, Polavaram Assembly Segmet was named as Jangareddigudem and comprised of Jangareddyigudem Mandal, Koyyalagudem Mandal and Buttaigudem Mandal and Polavaram Mandal. Chintalapudi Consitutency (SC) comprised of Chintalapudi Mandal, Lingapalem Mandal, Kamavarapukota Mandal, T. Narsapuram Mandal and Jeelugumelli Mandal. To our surprise, the said two Assembly Constituencies have been notified in the Draft Notification changing the Mandals thereby by-passing the statutory norms of not deviating plus or minus 10% of the accepted population of the District population per constituency. Now, Polavaram has a deviation of minus 2.5% while Jangareddiguden in the original list given to us had plus 3.36% whereas in the case of Chintalapudi Segment original list, the deviation was plus 7.95% and in the draft published now has plus 13.82% exceeding the accepted norms of 10% plus or minus. The District average is 2,53,568
population per A/C. As per the Draft Notification, Chintalapudi (SC) has a population of 2,88,616, +13.82%. As per the norm of contiguity with communication facility, this is also not there. People from T. Narsapuram Mandal has to go via Jangareddigudem Mandal to Polavaram. Same is the case of Jangareddigudem (M). People to go to Chintalapudi have to go via T. Narsapuram Mandal. Hence, we request as follows :- Constituency Mandal Name Population 186-JANGAREDDIGUDEM Polavaram 43710 Buttayagudem 51878 Jangareddigudem 95251 Koyalagudem 71249 Grand Total 262088 187-CHINTALAPUDI Chintalapudi 84929 Lingapalem 54844 T. Narsapuram 51881 Kamavarapukota 53592 Jeelugumilli 28501 Grand Total 273747 NALLAJERLA / GOPALAPURAM (SC)* Nallajerla Devarapalli Gopalapuram Tallapudi Total Population 261560 *D. Tirumala is far away to the Nallajerla A/c. D. Tirumala is proposed in Unguturu A/c. Hence, Tallapudi mandal has been proposed in place of D. Tirumala mandal. The political parties have agreed for change as above constituency Gopalapuram which is centrally located and existing Assembly Constituency may be proposed in place of Nallajerla. Hence recommended. UNGUTUR* Unguturu Bhimaldole Nidamarru Dwaraka Tirumala Total Population 251315 *Akiveedu mandal is far away from Ungutur A/c and the adjacent mandal D. Tirumala has to be included in place of the villages of Akiveedu mandal. The political parties have also agreed for the above proposal. Hence recommended. KOVVUR* Kovvur Chagallu Nidadavole Total Population 284438
*The political parties have not agreed to create Nidadavole A/c. They proposed the Kovvur A/c consisting of Kovvur, Chagallu and Nidadavole mandals and there is no splitting up of mandals. The proposals may be accepted. Hence recommended. TADEPALLIGUDEM* Tadepalligudem (including MPL) Pentapadu Mdl Part Jatlapalem Padamaravipparu Parimella Yanalapalli Umamaheswaram Pentapadu D. Ch. Kandrika Kaspapentapadu Akuteegapadu Mudunuru Darsiparru Bodapadu Prathipadu Total Population 230857 *13 villages of Pentapadu mandal and T.P. Gudem mandal & municipality to maintain minimum population limit for Tadepalligudam A/c. Hence recommended. TANUKU* Tanuku Udrajavaram Pentapadu Mandal Part Alampuram Racherla Vallurupalli Ravipadu B. Kondepadu Korumilli Chintapalli Meenavalluru Total Population 235469 *The political parties have agreed to retain the existing constituency. Hence there is no need to change the boundaries of the Tanuku A/c. Hence recommended. ELURU* Eluru Municipality Eluru Mandal Part Satrampadu Gavaravaram Tangellamudi Komadavolu Chodimella Sanivarapupeta Komdavolu Rural Ponangi Eluru Rural Total Population 250332
*There is no necessity to change the proposals of the Delimitation Commission, hence recommended. DENDULURU* Denduluru Pedavegi Pedapadu Eluru Mandal Part Malkapuram Chataparru Jalipudi Katlampudi Madepalli Manuru Sriparru Kalakurru Komatilanka Gudiwakalanka Kokkiraillanka Pydichintapadu Prathikollalanka Total Population 251238 *The political parties have agreed the proposals of DLC relating to Dendulur A/c. Hence there is no necessity to change the proposals of the DLC. Hence recommended. ATTILI* Iragavaram Attili Penumantra Ganapavaram Total Population 263334 *The DLC has not proposed the Attili A/c but the political parties have strongly opposed the decision of the DLC. The political parties have proposed to form Attili a/c. Hence the Atili Constituency is proposed consisting of Iragavaram, Attili, Penumantra, Ganapavaram mandals which was also proposed by the INC. BHIMAVARAM* Bhimavaram Municipality Bhimavaram mandal Rural Palacaderu Mandal Part Srungavruksham Pennada Agraharam Goraganamudi Vissakoderu Total Population 246535 *The proposals of the political parties for Bhimavaram A/c may be accepted. Hence recommended. NARSAPUR* Mogaltur Narsapur Elamanchili Mandal Part Utada
Kaza Kalagampudi Yenuguvanilanka Chinchinada Elamanchili Total Population 238153 *The political parties have agreed to retain the existing area of the Narsapur A/c. Hence no changes are necessary in respect of Narsapur A/c. PALACOLE* Palacole Veeravasaram Elamanchili Mandal Part Neredumilli Panumarru Gomparru Burugupalli Doddipatla Ilapakurru Sirugalapalli Medapadu Konteru Total Population 238610 *The proposals of the political parties may be accepted as the proposed villages of Elamanchili mandal is accessible and contiguity to the Palacole town. Hence recommended. ACHANTA (PENUGONDA)* Achanta Poduru Penugonda Peravali Total Population 267985 *The DLC has not proposed to retain the Penugonda A/c and proposed the Achanta A/c consisting of Penugonda. Achanta, Peravalli mandals and part of Poduru mandal (7 villages). Hence the Achanta A/c may be proposed consisting of Penugonda, Achanta, Peravali, Poduru mandals to avoid splitting up of the mandals. Hence may be recommended. KALLA / UNDI* Kalla Undi Akiveedu Polacoderu Mandal Part Garagaparru Mypa Korukollu Mogallu Kondepudi Vendra Agraharam Vendra Palacoderu Gollalakoderu Kumudavalli Total Population 247856
*Gangavaram mandal which is proposed by DLC is far away from the constituency andit is better to include 10 villages of Polacoderu mandal. The Akiveedu mandal has already been included in the Kalla A/c to maintain contiguity of the constituency. Keeping all such discrepancies in view, we are submitting a new proposal as per attached annexure, for your favourable consideration. NALGONDA DISTRICT
In the Draft proposals of Delimitation of Constituencies released by the Commission, it is observed that Narkatpally mandal is included in Munugodu constituency apart from five other mandals. It is brought to your kind notice that Narkatpally mandal is topographically quite away from other mandals of the Munugodu constituency. Further, this mandal is very closely attached to the Nakrekal constituency. Not only this mandal is close to the Nakrekal constituency, this mandal was earlier part and parcel of Nakrekal Panchayathi Samithi. The people of this mandal feel convenient to reach Nakrekal instead of Munugodu constituency. Many of the villages of this mandal are attached to the other mandals of the Nakrekal constituency. Therefore, it is appropriate to request the Commission to detach this mandal from Munugodu constituency and to include in Nakrekal constituency.
In the similar way, Chityal mandal is wrongly included in Nakrekal constituency. In fact, this Chityal mandal is closely attached to the Munugodu mandal as well as other mandals of the Munugodu constituency. Earlier, this Chityal mandal was part and parcel of Munugodu Panchayathi Samithi. Further, some of the villages names ‘Vembai’, ‘Thallavellemula’ and Elikatte of the Chityal mandal are presently part and parcel of Munugodu constituency. Always, the people of this mandal feel convenient to reach Munugodu constituency. If this mandal is attached to the Nekrekal constituency, they shall have to cross the Nakrekal mandal all the way to reach Nakrekal, which is against the sprit and principles of the Delimitation Policy. In any way, inclusion of Chityal mandal in Nakrekal constituency is not correct, similarly inclusion of Narketpally mandal in Munugodu constituency is not at all correct. In view of this, we propose to include Chityal mandal in Munugodu constituency dropping Narketpally mandal and in the same way, to include Narketpally mandal in Nakrekal constituency dropping ‘Chityal’ mandal from the draft proposals. 93-Munugodu Assembly Constituency
Ramannapet 52322 9796 470 Kattangur 40613 9083 459 Nakrekal 55030 10342 826 Kethepally 34844 9644 259 Valigonda 53010 10708 166 Narketpally* 46150 10067 347 Total 281969 59640 2527 +4.18% 94-BHONGIR A/C We also submit the following proposal regarding the inordinate proposal of shifting Bommalaramaram mandal from the existing 94-Bhongir constituency to 97-Alair constituency. The geographic location of Bommalaramaram mandal is located at a distance of 22 kms from Bhongir head quarters which is well within the geographic bounders. The people of Bommalaramamam mandal in order to go to the new proposed headquarters have to travel double the distance i.e., 45 km, that too via Bhongir A/c headquarters. If Bommalaramamam mandal is detached from Bhongir and attached to Alair as proposed, the people will have to face insurmountable hardship and all welfare and social measures would invariably fail. The people of Bommalaramamam mandal are agitating against the proposed change and the Sarpanchas, MPTCs, ZPTC and MPP and all the villagers of the mandal have given their written representation against such a change. Hence, we request your favourable consideration to retain Bommalaramaman mandal in Bhongir A/c, as follows. The total population of Bhongir A/c will now be 290025, which is within the permissible limits. Constituency Mandal Name Population 94-BHONGIR Choutuppal 65825 Bhongir 99715 Bibinagar 45992 Pochampally 44379 Bommalaramamam 34114 Grand Total 290025 97-ALAIR Turkapally 32142 Rajapet 40612 Yadagirigutta 52010 Alair 50242 Gundala 36279 Atmakur 38813 Grand Total 250098
CHITTOOR DISTRICT In the Draft Proposal of Chittoor District, in the reorganization of certain
constituencies, the geography and the public interests are not taken care of. For instance, Gurramkonda mandal, which is nearer to Thamballapalle i.e., 20 kms. Is added to Piler constituency. The distance from Piler to Gurramkonda is more than 60 kms. Likewise, Kurabalakota mandal is nearer to Madanapalle than Thamballapalle, but it is added to Thamballapalle constituency. Ramasamudram mandal is very near to Punganur, yet it is added to Madanapalle. Above al, Rompicherla mandal is added to Punganur constituency. The distance between Rompicherla and Punganur is more than 78 kms. It is not logical and rational to add it to a far away constituency like Punganur. Rompicherla mandal is started from Piler 2 kms ad the other surrounding panchayats are adjacent to Piler mandal. The transport facilities are also very convenient to the people of Rompicherla to reach Piler within short time. Hence, it is requested to reorganize the constituencies keeping in view the topography and geography of the entire district by adding Gurramkonda to Thamballapalle, Kurabalakota to Madanapalle, Ramasamudram to Punganur and Rompicherla to Piler, as follows :- Constituency Mandal Name Population 1. PILER Piler 61824 Kalikiri 46413 Vayalapadu 44725 Kalakada 34279 Kambamvaripalli 43353 Rompicherla 27359 Grand Total 257953 2. THAMBALLAPALLE Thamballapalle 38693 Peddmandyam 34453 Gurramkonda 41769 B. Kothakota 54688 Molakalacheruvu 41711 Peddatippasamudram 51040 Grand Total 262354 3. MADANAPALLE Kurabalakota 37686 Madanapalle 190512 Nimmanapalle 31166 Grand Total 259367 4. PUNGANUR Punganur 94784 Ramasamudram 45078 Chowdepalli 40410 Somala 42987 Sodum 33771 Pulicherla 38554 Grand Total 295584
We have represented to the DLC that the existing Kuppam A/c should be retained by keeping part of V. Kota mandal i.e., Padigalakuppam, Peddabarinepalle, Bairupalle, Vogu, Yalakallu, Mogaramdoddi, Boyachinnaganipalle, Chinthamakulapalle, S.Bandapalle, Pamuganipalle, Kongatam, Sivun Villages which are in existing Kuppam A/c. Otherwise, entire V. Kota mandal villages may be added to Kuppam constituency.
293-PALAMANER Gangavaram Palamaner Baireddipalli Peddapanjani V. Kota Part (existing villages) 294-KUPPAM Santhipuram Gudupalle Ramakuppam Kuppam V. Kota Part (existing villages) KADAPA DISTRICT 249-KAMALAPURAM & 250-JAMALAMADUGU CONSTITUENCIES
The DLC in their Draft Proposal, Yerraguntla mandal has been included in 250-Jammalamadugu A/c. In 249-Kamalapuram, Lakkireddipalli and Ramapuram mandals have been included. The distance between Kamalapuram and Yerraguntla is 10 kms only, which is more convenient and accessible to the people of Yerranguntla mandal. Whereas, Lakkireddipalli and Ramapuram mandals are far away from Kamalapuram with a distance of more than 75 km. Hence, we are dissenting and request for inclusion of Yerraguntla mandal to Kamalapuram Assembly Segment.
10) KHAMMAM DISTRICT :- (110) Pinapaka Assembly Constituency :- (a) Delimitation Commission proposed Pinapaka (ST) Assembly Constituency with (1) Pinapaka (2) Manuguru (3) Aswapuram (4) Gundala and (5) Palvoncha Mandals.
(b) In the proposed Pinapaka Assembly Constituency, excepting Palvoncha all other Mandals are predominantly by Tribal Population. The interest of Tribals will be better protected if all predominantly Tribal Mandals are put together so that an integrated Tribal development could take place Assembly Constituency. Palvoncha Mandal at a distance of 90 KMs From Pinapaka which is inconvenient to the public.
Hence Palvoncha Mandal may be deleted and added to 117-Kothaguded Assembly Constituency. Add Tekulapally Mandal which is dominated by Tribal population of 78.10 % to 110- Pinapaka Assembly Constituency.
We propose Pinapaka Assembly Constituency (1) Pinapaka (2) Manguru (3)
Aswapruam (4) Gundala and (5) Tekulapally with a Total population of 216328. Thus Tekulapally Mandal proposed in Kothagudam Assembly Constituency may be deleted and add to (110) Pinapaka Assembly Constituency. Palovancha Mandal may be deleted from (110) Pinapaka Assemblyl Constituency and add to (117).
There will be a slight decrease in the Pinapaka Constituency population limit which
will get corrected once the Polavaram project is completed as two Mandals (Kunavaram and V.R.Puram) will get fully submerged and two Mandals (Bhadrachalam Assembly Constituency and Chintur) will get partly submerged. The resulting re-settlement of the population from these four Mandals to the Pinapaka Assembly Constituency will correct the excess population in Bhadrachalam Assembly Constituency Assembly Constituency as well as decrease population in the Pinapaka Assembly Constituency. The Polavaram project works are in progress and the people of submerging area are going to the western bank of Godavari River for the protection of their life style and life tradition. 4. (117) Kothagudem Assembly Constituency :- (a) The existing Kothagudem Assembly Constituency almost full Mandals of (1) Kothagudam (2) Palvoncah and parts of (3) Chandrugonda and (4) Penubally Mandals. (b) As per the Commission proposal (1) Kothagudem (2) Tekulapally and (3) Julurupad Mandals in (117) Kothagudem Assembly Constituency is not justified as it is not convenient to the public i.e communication and Administrative point of view. (c) Kothagudm Municipality and Palvoncha Municipality are contiguous (Twin towns) and Industrially linked and Non Tribal population dominated places Assembly Constituency. (d) (117) Kothagudem Assembly Constituency proposed by the Commission, excepting Kothagudam all other Mandals are predominantly have Tribal population. Kothagudem has predominantly population whose occupation is mostly either Industrial or Industrial related Assembly Constituencytivities and Tribal population is very much less. The interest and culture of the Tribal will be better protected if all predominantly Tribal areas i.e Tekulapally and Julurpad Mandals are put together with another Tribal dominated Constituency. So that an integrated Tribal development could take place Assembly Constituency. (e) Hence we proposed to delete Tekulapally and Julurpad Mandals from the (117)
Kothagudem Assembly Constituency as draft proposal of the Commission. We
proposed to add Tekulapally Mandal to (110) Pinapaka Assembly Constituency and
Julurupad Mandal to (115) Konijerla/Enkuru Assembly Constituency.
We propose (117) Kothagudam Assembly Constituency with Kothagudam and Palvoncah Mandals. The proposal is as per the guidelines of the Delimitation Commission. 5. (113 ) Palair (114) Madhira, (112) Khammam, (115) Wyra Assembly Constituency are interlinked.
Mudigonda Mandal have been proposed in (114) Madhira Assembly Constituency. But there is no direct connectivity between Madhira and Mudigonda Mandals as there is MUNERU RIVER flowing between these two Mandals and there is no Road Bridge on this river. So Mudigonda Mandal people have to travel through Nelakondapalli Mandal, Khammam Urban & Rural Mandal and Wyra Mandals to reach Madhira Assembly Constituency i.e they have to cross (112) Khammam, (113) Palair and (115) Wyra proposed Assembly Constituencies.
Hence we request you to add Mudigonda Mandal in to 113-Palair Assembly Constituencies, which is most appropriate.
The commission proposed Madhira Assembly Constituency with (1) Madhira (2) Yerruplam (3) Bonakal (4) Chintakani and (5) Mduigonda Mandals. Khammam Urban Mandal excluding Khammam Municipality should be separated and add to (1) Enkuru, (2) Julurpad, (3)Konijerla and (4)Tallada Mandals which are proposed in (115) (Wyra) Enkuru Assembly Constituency with a total population of 271300, out of ST. population is 21.65% as Wyra Mandal is added to Madhira Constituency. The Commission proposed Khammam Assembly Constituency with Khammam urban Mandal only. Khammam urban Mandal with Khamma Municipality, Khammam Rural Mandal and Chintakani Mandals are in existing position in Khammam Assembly Constituency.
Khammam Urban Mandal includes Khammam Municipality and surrounding villages on Eastern and North Eastern villages to the town where as Khammam Rural Mandal is all together a different Mandal situated on the Westerned side of Khammam town. Khammam Rural which is the Western side of the Khammam town with a total population of 73291 should be merged with the population of Khammam Municipality of 159544 population thus population is the total of 232835 as One Constituency which is an existing Constituency.
8. (111) Yellandu Assembly Constituency The Commission proposed Yellandu Assembly Constituency with (1) Yellandu
(2) Bayyaram (3) Garla (4) Singreni Mandals. We proposed to add only Kamepally Mandal to draft proposal of Delimitation Commission for geographical and administrative convenience to the public. We propose Yellandu Assembly Constituency ST Reserved Constituency as in draft proposal with 43.76% of ST Population.
18. PRAKASAM DISTRICT • All of the three proposed SC reserved constituencies 226.
Santhanuthalapadu, 224. Addanki and 229. Kondapi Acs are continuous and clustered. Under section 9(1) (c) of the Delimitation Act 2002,the Constituencies for SCs are to be distributed and this rule has been violated in this district. Hence the three SC reserved seats shall be distributed in the district.
• Doranala and Arthaveedu Mandals were proposed in 221. Yerragondapalem Constituency. All of these areas are falling in Nallamalai Forest Area and Dornala mandal is at the highest altitude of the surround areas. This Dornal mandal has direct road access only to Markapur through a Ghat road. Hence Dornala mandal are convenient to proposed in 230. Markapur AC and Ardhaveedu mandal may be added to Giddalur constituency is convenient.
• 229. Kondapi AC is proposed with Singarayakonda, Kondapi, Tangutur, Zarugumilli, Ponnalur and Marripudi mandals. But Tangutur mandal is divided with river Musi and it doesn’t have direct access with the remaining proposed mandals of 229. Kondepi AC.
• And this Tangutur mandal has good conveyance to Santhanuthalapadu. Also Tangutur Mandal is in Ongole Revenue Division and remaining proposed mandals of 226. Santhanuthalapadu AC. Hence Tangutur Mandal shall be proposed in 226. Santhanuthalapadu AC.
• And Podili mandal is proposed to Markapur and Podili mandal has direct transportation conveyance with other proposed mandals of 229. Kondepi AC. Hence we request you to change this Podili mandal with 229. Kondepi AC
16. Krishna District
As per the Commission’s working paper 202. Nandigama, 188. Tiruvuru and 189. Nuzivid Acs are proposed for SC Reservation. All of these 3 ACs are concentrated and clustered in Northern part of Krishna District.
The proposal is against and contradiction to section 9(1) (c) of the Delimitation Act 2002, which spells the Constituencies for SCs are to be distributed.
The proposal proposed in the previous working paper of the commission has proposed to form Pamarru AC. All of the Associate Members of all political parties have appreciated and non of them were objected the formation of Pamarru Constituency. But surprisingly Commission has deleted Pamarru Constituency in the latest Draft proposal.
We request you to revise the Pamarru AC as your previous proposal and add Gantasal Mandal to Pamarru Constituency.
This will lead to distribution of one reserved AC to the Eastern part of Krishna District.
THE PARLIAMENTARY CONSTITUENCIES IN HYDERABAD AND RANGA REDDY DISTRICT
There are 29 Assembly Segments in the two districts put together. Even though there are two districts, it may be recalled that they were one district earlier. The increase in the number is purely due to the urban agglomeration of Secunderabad and Hyderabad. Out of 29 Assembly Segments, only 5 constituencies are rural and the remaining are
urban surrounding the twin cities of Hyderabad and Secunderabad. One rural constituency has been added to Nalgonda Parliamentary Segment, leaving 28 Assembly constituencies which will have to be formed into 4 Parliamentary Constituencies. Since Hyderabad City has two parliamentary constituencies but 15 segments, one has to be added to the neighbouring area of Ranga Reddy District.
It is submitted that the cities of Hyderabad and Secunderabad are traditionally called the Twin Cities. One of the parliamentary constituency is known as Secunderabad while the other as Hyderabad. Secunderabad Cantonment is a part of Secunderabad but is inappropriately removed from Secunderabad and added to Malkajgiri. This should be retained in Secunderabad Parliamentary Constituency. Consequently, one constituency from Hyderabad City i.e., Yousufguda which is adjacent to Kukatpally can be added to Malkajgiri Parliamentary Constituency. L.B. Nagar which on the southern part of Hyderabad would more appropriately be a part of the Chevella Parliamentary constituency than Malkajgiri. Sherlingampally which is the western part of Hyderabad City, adjacent to Kukatpally Assembly Segment may consequently be added to Malkajgiri parliamentary constituency.
It is submitted that the name of the proposed Chevella may be considered and re-designated as Vikarabad.
The objection which we are raising is primarily on removal of Secunderabad Cantonment Assembly Segment out of Secunderabad Parliamentary Constituency and also to ensure contiguity and also not breaking up one mandal i.e., Balanagar into two different parliamentary constituencies. It may be noted that a substantial part of Kukatpally Municipality of Balanagar mandal is also to Sherlingampally Assembly Segment. The arrangement is only a small modification regarding names and ensuring continuity and convenience. Consequently, the arrangements suggested will be as follows :- MALKAJGIRI Medchal Uppal Malkajgiri Qutubullapur Kukatpally Serilingampally Yousufguda SECUNDERABAD Secunderabad Cantonment Secunderabad (SC) Musheerabad Amberpet Himayath Nagar Nampally Banjara Hills / Jubilee Hills
HYDERABAD Malakpet Karwan (Golconda) Goshamahal Charminar Falaknuma Chandrayangutta Bahadurpura CHEVELLA Maheshwaram Rajendra Nagar L. B. Nagar Chevalla (SC) Vikarabad (SC) Parigi Tandur CHITTOOR DISTRICT
I am herewith submitting few changes for Parliamentary Constituencies of Chittoor District, based on the ACs proposed in the Commission’s Working Paper for your kind consideration.
Delimitation Commission has Considered Census 2001 as the basis for framing Assembly Constituencies. As per Census 2001, Chittoor District is the 23rd District and i.e. the last district of AndhraPradesh State.
Chittoor District is proposed with 14 Assembly Constituencies as per Delimitation Commission Draft Working Paper.
Ananthapur District is the 22nd District in AP as per Census 2001. Ananthapur District also proposed with 14 Assembly Constituencies. As per the Commission working Paper Ananthapur District is proposed with
sharing its 14Assembly Constituencies in to two Parliamentary Constituencies.
But Chittoor District is proposed with allotting its 14 Assembly Constituencies in to 3 PCs of 3 districts. As Chittore is the last district after Anathapur District, It is also has to be shared for two PCs only with its own district ACs.
This has happened because, leaving one AC (228. Kandukur) of 18. Prakasam District, the commission has suddenly jumped to 21. Kurnool district instead of continuing to 19.
Nellore District, which is completely violating commission’s own guidelines and that to without any particular reason.
Commission shall process in order of following sequence as per census 2001
i. Prakasam (18) ii. Nellore (19) iii. Cuddapah (20) iv. Kurnool (21) v. Ananthapur (22) vi. Chittore (23)
The connectivity and Geographical association also available between all the districts in this order. A state highway is connecting 19. Nellore and 20.
Cuddapah districts and it is passing through Rapur (Nellore District) - Kodur and Rajampet (Cuddapah District).
We request you to form two Parliamentary Constituencies fully contained with 14 Assembly Constituencies of Chittore District by Considering Chittore District as the next District of Ananthapur District as per the Criteria followed for Assembly Constituencies and Census 2001.
During the discussion at the delimitation commission by the associate members it was agreet that the SC parliamentary constituencies should be distributed 3 to Andhra region, 3 to Telengana, and one for Rayalaseema. We have also requested to distribute S.C. parliamentary constituency seats among the segments of the respective regions. To our surprise two parliamentary S.C. seats belonging to rayalaseema region, particularly in chittoor district, contrary to the agreed conditions and also violation of the procedure of delimitation act.
We are herewith enclosing proposal with 2 Parliamentary Constituencies i.e. Madanapalli and Tirupathi/ Chittore forming with 14 Assembly Constituencies of Chittore District as proposed by Delimitation Commission’s Draft Working Paper.
Dissent for 20- Vizianagaram Parliamentary Constituency. 135-Gajapathinagaram Assembly Constituency is an existing Assembly
Constituency in Bobbili Parliamentary Constituency which is now renamed as (20)-Vizianagaram Parliamentary Constituency. (135)-Gajapathinagaram Assembly Constituency is surrounded by Vijayanagaram town as Vijayanagaram P.C also.Hence it may be considered to retain Vizianagaram Parliamentary Constituency.The above change corrects Geographivcally errors in Commissions proposal.
Dissent for 22- Anakapalli Parliamentary Constituency. 146-Madugula Assembly Constituency is an existing Assembly
Constituency in 21-Anakapallii Parliamentary Constituency. It is surrounded all Assembly Constituencies of 21-Anakapalli P.C. There is no considerable number of S.T population in 146-Madugula A.C. It is not appropriate proposal to include in 18-Araku S.T Parliamentary Constituency. Hence it may be considered to retain 146-Madugula in 21-Anakapalli Parliamentary Constituency.
Dissent for 11-Mahabubnagar and 12-Nagarkurnool
Parliamentary Constituencies.
Delimitation Commission has proposed 12- Nagarkurnool P.C was General.Nagarkurnool Parliamentary Constituency is an existing P.C reserved for SC’s. this will create a negative message of S.Cs in Northern Telengana Region. All the S.C reserved Parliamentary Constituencies are proposed in Northern Telangana and are in Contiguity, they should be distributed among other parts of Telangana.
Hence 12-Nagarkurnool PC should be considered as SC reserved
Parliamentary Constituency , 12- Nagarkurnool PC may be proposed the folloeing 75-Jedcherla AC, 84-Shadnagar AC is to be deleted from 11-Mahabubnagar PC and include in 12-Nagarkurnool PC. The above 2 A.Cs are in existing Nagarkurnool PC. Subsequently 78-Wanaparthi, 79-Gadwal AC’s may be deleted from 12-Nagarkurnool PC and added to 11-Mahabubnagar in place of 75 & 84 AC’s. for more public convenient.Hence dissent note.
Dissent for (36)- Ananthapur and (37)-Hindupur Parliamentary Constituencies.
(271)-Singanamala (SC) Assembly Constituency existing in Ananthapur Parliamentary Constituency may be retained by deleting from Hindupur Parliamentary Constituency for the reason that (271)-Singanamala (SC) Assembly Constituency is very close and adjacent to Ananthapur Assembly Constituency within the radius of 10 Kms and where as Hindupur is more than 100 Kms from Singanamala and the people Singanamala Assembly Constituency should go through Ananthapur Corporation and 2 A.Cs of 36)-Ananthapur Parliamentary Constituency. (274)-Rapthadu Assembly Constituency is included in 36)-Ananthapur Parliamentary Constituency (274)-Rapthadu Assembly Constituency may be include in 37, Hindupur Parliamentary for public convenience.
Dissent for (30)- Guntur, (31)-Narasaraopet, (32)-Bapatla (SC), (33)-Ongole
We would like to dissent that 226)-Santhanuthalapadu (SC) Assembly Constituency which is included in 32)-Bapatla Parliamentary
Constituency is situated around Ongole Assembly Constituency.
Hence, (226)-Santhanuthalapadu (SC) Assembly Constituency can not be excluded from Ongole Parliamentary Constituency to over come the problems and to follow guidelines of the Delimitation Commission i.e. Contiguity, public Convenience and Communication. people belongs
to all villages of 226)-Santhanuthalapadu Assembly Constituency have to come to Ongole for their day to day affairs.
While deleting 226)-S.N.Padu(SC) from (32)-Bapatla (SC) Parliamentary Constituency (221)-Yerragondapalem which is proposed has to be included in (31)-Narasaraopet Parliamentary Constituency while deleting from Ongole P.C.
3) After deleting 221)-Yerragondapalem Assembly Constituency from Ongole and adding to 31-Narasaraopet Parliamentary Constituency, consequently (215)-Chilakaluripeta Assembly Constituency which is an existing Assembly Constituency in Guntur Parliamentary Constituency is to be added. 207)-Ponnuru Assembly Constituency now proposed to include in (30)-Guntur Parliamentary Constituency is to be deleted and to be added to 32-Bapatla (SC) Parliamentary Constituency and which is an existing Assembly Constituency of (32)-Bapatla (SC) Parliamentary Constituency.
We once again request the Hon’ble Chairman, Delimitation Commission to consider the above dissenting proposals of Assembly and Parliamentary Constituencies for publishing along with the Draft Proposals of the Commission.
With warm regards, Yours sincerely
Sd/- (9/1/2007)
K. YERRANNAIDU, M.P. (ASSOCIATE MEMBER)
Dr. NAGAM JANARDHAN REDDY, M.L.A.
(ASSOCIATE MEMBER) Encl: as above The Chairman DELIMITATION COMMISSION OF INDIA Nirvachan Sadan Ashoka Road New Delhi – 110001.
10th January, 2007. Respected Justice Kuldip Singh ji,
Sub : Delimitation of Constituencies – Andhra Pradesh State – Draft proposals – Dissenting Proposals for publishing alongwith the Draft Proposals of the Commission – Reg.
Ref : Your letter No.282/AP/2006.Vol.IV dated 22nd December’06.
_ _ _ _
We are submitting herewith the following Dissenting Proposals for Assembly Segments of 16-Krishna District, 18-Prakasam District for the State of Andhra
Pradesh, for your kind consideration and with a request to publish along with the Draft Proposals of the Commission.
With warm regards. Yours sincerely
Sd/-
Dr. NAGAM JANARDHAN REDDY, MLA (ASSOCIATE MEMBER)
Encl: as above The Chairman DELIMITATION COMMISSION OF INDIA Nirvachan Sadan Ashoka Road New Delhi – 110001.
• In 18-Prasam District three proposed SC reserved constituencies 226. Santhanuthalapadu, 224. Addanki and 229. Kondapi ACs are continuous and clustered. Under section 9(1) (c) of the Delimitation Act 2002, the Constituencies for SCs are to be distributed and this rule has been ignored in this district. Hence the three SC reserved seats shall be distributed in the district.
• Doranala and Arthaveedu Mandals were proposed in 221. Yerragondapalem Constituency. All of these areas are falling in Nallamalai Forest Area and Dornala mandal is at the highest altitude of the surround areas. This Dornal mandal has direct road access only to Markapur through a Ghat road. Hence Dornala mandal are convenient to proposed in 230. Markapur AC and Ardhaveedu mandal may be added to Giddalur constituency is convenient.
• 229. Kondapi AC is proposed with Singarayakonda, Kondapi, Tangutur, Zarugumilli, Ponnalur and Marripudi mandals. But Tangutur mandal is divided with river Musi and it doesn’t have direct access with the remaining proposed mandals of 229. Kondepi AC.
• And this Tangutur mandal has good conveyance to Santhanuthalapadu. Also Tangutur Mandal is in Ongole Revenue Division and remaining proposed mandals of 226. Santhanuthalapadu AC. Hence Tangutur Mandal shall be proposed in 226. Santhanuthalapadu AC.
• And Podili mandal is proposed to Markapur and Podili mandal has direct transportation conveyance with other proposed mandals of 229. Kondepi AC. Hence we request you to change this Podili mandal with 229. Kondepi AC
16. Krishna District
As per the Delimitation Commission Draft proposal 2 Mandals have been spited, we have made the proposal with the splitting of 2 Mandals only.As per the Commission’s working paper 202. Nandigama, 188. Tiruvuru and 189. Nuzivid Acs are proposed for SC Reservation. All of these 3 ACs are concentrated and clustered in Northern part of Krishna District.
The proposal is against and contradiction to section 9(1) (c) of the Delimitation Act 2002, which spells the Constituencies for SCs are to be distributed.
The proposal proposed in the previous working paper of the commission has proposed to form197- Pamarru AC. All of the Associate Members of all political parties have appreciated and non of them were objected the formation of Pamarru Constituency. But surprisingly Commission has deleted 197-Pamarru Constituency in the latest Draft proposal.
We request you to revise the 197. Pamarru AC as your previous proposal and add Gantasal Mandal to197- Pamarru Constituency.
This will lead to distribution of one reserved AC to the Eastern part of Krishna District.
18 - DISTRICT: PRAKASM
2001 POPULATION Assembly Existing &
Proposed Seats
Total: 3059423 Total SC ST SC: 651498 Existing 13 1 0
ST: 118241 Proposed 12 3 0
District Average 254952 Accepted Range (- or + 10%) 229457-280447