“Psychosomatic Sensory” Ryan Ponquett VP Taste & Innovation 20 February, 2018
“Psychosomatic Sensory”
Ryan PonquettVP Taste & Innovation20 February, 2018
2 | Taste & Nutrition
Real - Imagined - Sensory - Experiences???
• “Psycho” = mind• “soma” = body
• First place to sta rt with the exercise in sodium reduction is the “psycho” part– In the marketing department – In the development department
• Fear 1: Na reduction = reduced taste = reduced preference/too much difference = risk of lost sa les
• Fear 2: Sa lt is cheap filler = costly = higher price = risk of lost sa les
3 | Taste & Nutrition
Solve business attitude to salty taste first
• Can there be a taste difference or not?– 9/10 times there actua lly can…– In 2016 reduction in stocks, soups, and sauces we found consumer
preference for reduced sodium formula tions before deployment of any expensive sodium reduction technologies … our food was just TOO SALTY
Solve consumer experience to sa lty taste next• Offer the consumer a grea ter sensory experience
– Don’t just think about “sa ltiness” … Think TOTAL SENSORY– Taste, Aroma, Colour, Texture
4 | Taste & Nutrition
What is Taste?
5 | Taste & Nutrition
Eating is a Critical Sensory and Intellectual ExperienceHumans are judgemental at a higher reasoning level…..intellect leads to values
– Religious (Halal, Kosher, Vegetarian)– Safety (GMO, artificial, allergies….) – Ethics (environmental, fair trade, sustainability, carbon
footprint…)
Humans are judgemental at a primal level of physical– “Hedonic” (rejection, acceptance, enjoyment)– There are 25 genes encoding bitter receptors but only 2
for Sweet and 2 for Umami, 2 ‘ion channel’ types for salty and sour
– We are physiologically wired to “detect the fakes”
6 | Taste & Nutrition
Taste is the #1 Driver of Consumer Purchasing Decisions
85%88%
84%87% 86% 87% 87%
89% 90%
64%
72% 70%74% 73%
79%
73% 71% 73%
58%
65%62% 61%
58%
66%61%
64% 71%
48%
55% 55%52% 56%
58%53%
56%51%
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
Taste
Price
Healthfulness
Convenience
How much impact do these have on food/beverage purchase decisions?
% rating 4 to 5 on 5-point scale, from No Impact to A Great Impact
IFIC Food and Health Survey, 2014
Consumer-Centric Approach to “Taste”
8 | Taste & Nutrition
Tasting involves Three neural systems
Trigeminal Gustatory Olfactory
9 | Taste & Nutrition
Eating involves all the senses…
Gustatory
Trigeminal
Olfactorynose
tongue
eyesearsjaws
10 | Taste & Nutrition
At least 3 stages of the eating experience, perhaps 4?
1. Sight, touch, smell
2. Ora l cavity – texture, basic tastes, mouthfeel, retronasa l aromas
3. Ingestion – the act of swallowing and introduction of food into the stomach. Gut has taste receptors and somatosensory receptors
4. Digestion - Can our bodies distinguish after ea ting whether they rea lly buy into the previous meal? (gastric purging, associa tion with bad flavour memories)
Masterchef!....Judging our Food for Fit for Consumption
11 | Taste & Nutrition
Oral cavity - Sound
• Snaps, crackles, crunches, pops, fizzes…
• Eating a cookie can be an explosive sensory experience as sound waves are transla ted into neura l signals tha t ignite our auditory cortex
• Research shows tha t high pitched sounds tend to boost the perception of sweet, while low pitched sound tend to enhance more bitter characteristics
When the sta rt of our ea t experience passes the tests of sight, touch (and aroma) we a llow the more intimate experience of putting the food into our mouths
TRIGEMINAL
12 | Taste & Nutrition
Oral cavity - Mouthfeel
• Part of the trigeminal system, effects amplify 6x the number of bra in sites activa ted when combined with taste
• The textural experience of the food will influence the swallowing decision
• Very appealing or very detracting to acceptanceof the food stuff
• A negative textura l experience can negatively a ffect flavour preference forever
TRIGEMINAL
13 | Taste & Nutrition
Oral cavity - Basic Tastes
Oleogustas Osmola lity Water
Carbon dioxide Kokumi
5 basic tastes and the list is growing…
GUSTATORY
14 | Taste & Nutrition
Oral cavity - Aroma• The aroma we perceive through our nasa l
cavity, especia lly retronasally , sends signals to our olfactory cortex
• 25% gusta tory information and 75% olfactory • Smell activa tes more bra in sites than any other
sense• Aromas acquire significance through food
ingestion (programmed!)• Aroma preference is learned and resistant to
extinction• Bad aroma memories more powerful than good
OLFACTORY
15 | Taste & Nutrition
Neuroscience leading to better understanding of sensory perceptions
16 | Taste & Nutrition
Painless injections…Denta lVibe Tool
• Gate Control Theory of pain…motion, pain, temperature and pressure travel nerves fibres running parallel
• yields a “summary signal”…• can overwhelm pain sensation by enhancing motion and pressure
17 | Taste & Nutrition
Immersive Technologies for Sensory• Chris Simons
– Get very different outcomes closer approximating rea l market behaviours with Immersive Technologies tha t simula te environments where particular foodstuffs a re consumed
– Point being…there is more to taste than the papillae on the tongue with the specific receptors!
– Neura l connectivity is a powerful tool to use to manipula te perceptions or the ”volume” of sensory inputs
18 | Taste & Nutrition
Tapping into the Subconscious: New Sensory Science Lab to Explore Mysteries of Flavor, Aroma, Appetite
The lab will allow researchers to gather physiological data, including heart rate, respiration and skin perspiration, to helpmeasure unconscious reactions to various food-related stimuli including flavors, packaging or visual images of company logos
2 dimensioons: arousal and liking
19 | Taste & Nutrition
What did we learn from 2016 sodium reduction work?
20 | Taste & Nutrition
Sweeping Statements…(from “yours truly”)• 80% of the sa lty tasting products can be adjusted with sa lty
taste differences – because they are cooking a ids or food solutions tha t can be
manipula ted in-home for sa lt adjustment…and probably won’t be much
– portion size can be reduced when sa lt is decreased to keep price points
• 20% tend to be in products ea ten “as is” eg. Snacks, processed meats, bread– taste profiles tend to be more critica l here– textura l/visua l qualities lost from sodium reduction critica l
21 | Taste & Nutrition
Strong brands can carry off “radical changes”• Example in Stock cubes
– Unilever reduced sodium without trying to compensa te for lost sa lty taste
– removed “flavourings” as part of the formula tion– offered consumers a different taste experience under exactly same
brand– preserved margin, mainta ined price points to acceptable– usage increased (made possible with lower sa lt)– Stock cubes an “ingredient” and sa lt can be added if deemed
necessary
22 | Taste & Nutrition
2016 Na reduction gave better tasting products• Most of the work we did in soups, sauces and stocks gave
preferred products• Savoury culinary offerings were just TOO sa lty (turns out)
2019 Na reduction ?• not the same case
– Critica l sa lt level for savoury ba lance, more of a need for taste modula tion tools ba lanced against cost
– Critica l functional level leading to textura l/visua l changes eg. bread
23 | Taste & Nutrition
But...necessity in mother of invention!• Example bread:
– sodium ions strengthen the gluten protein for gassing volume and number of gas-cells for whiteness
– there a re other factors tha t a ffect these dimensions ie. emulsifica tion and carbohydra te structure
– can address gassing and gas-cell number by modifying these aspects using enzymes and/or emulsifiers
– will cost more but fluctua ting exchange ra te does worse things than this
– everyone is in the same boat! – think outside the box! …is a four square-sided loaf the only way?
24 | Taste & Nutrition
Think of taste like “frames” in a movie…
26 | Taste & Nutrition
Practical considerations• “Matching” a sodium reduction product to the origina l standard is
HARD and is a lengthy and highly itera tive process• “Improving” is a lot easier and there a re basic rules a round tastant
interactions eg. Sa lt vs sugar, sour vs sa lty, umami ba lance tha t need to be done first
• Snack seasonings in big branded companies require extremely hard work because a lot of work goes into selecting them in the first place…no getting away from this! Tools a re very NB here
• The shear volume of work means compromise for many marketing/business leads
• No-one makes much money out of selling the tools, they get approved by a customer for interna l use by a flavour house supplying a flavouring/seasoning
27 | Taste & Nutrition
Ingredients Taste Base Functional Base
Visual Base
Meatiness Species Specific
Balance
Salt 2.168 2.168 2.168 2.168 2.168 2.168MSG 0.278 0.278 0.278 0.278 0.278 0.278I+G 0.014 0.014 0.014 0.014 0.014 0.014White Sugar 2.451 2.451 2.451 2.451 2.451 2.451Acids 0.026 0.026 0.026 0.026 0.026 0.026
Creamer 2.790 2.790 2.790 2.790 2.790Gum 0.327 0.327 0.327 0.327 0.327Instant Starch 3.268 3.268 3.268 3.268 3.268Vegetable Fat 0.297 0.297 0.297 0.297 0.297
Caramel 0.185 0.185 0.185 0.185Ponceau Supra 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001Sunset Yellow Supra 0.011 0.011 0.011 0.011Textured Vegetable Protein 0.350 0.350 0.350 0.350
Meatyhart S8sd 0.083 0.083 0.083Meatyhart Chicken 0.930 0.930 0.930
Beef Flavour 0.108 0.108
Spice Blend 2.640
Total 4.937 11.619 12.166 13.179 13.287 15.927
Ingredients: thickener (E1412), creamer, sugar, spices, salt, thermal process flavours, texturised vegetable protein, gum (E412), vegetable fat, MSG (E621), caramel (E150c), acids (E262), flavourings, I+G (E631, E627), artificial colourants (E124, E110)
Instant Spicy Beef & Tomato Soup
umami
soursweet
functional
appearance
"Chefiness”
meatiness, beefiness, cooking method
Sheet1
IngredientsTaste BaseFunctional BaseVisual BaseMeatinessSpecies SpecificBalanceGrams in 100
Salt2.1682.1682.1682.1682.1682.16813.610
MSG0.2780.2780.2780.2780.2780.2781.745
I+G0.0140.0140.0140.0140.0140.0140.088
White Sugar2.4512.4512.4512.4512.4512.45115.386
Acids0.0260.0260.0260.0260.0260.0260.163
Creamer2.7902.7902.7902.7902.79017.514
Gum0.3270.3270.3270.3270.3272.053
Instant Starch3.2683.2683.2683.2683.26820.515
Vegetable Fat0.2970.2970.2970.2970.2971.864
Caramel0.1850.1850.1850.1851.161
Ponceau Supra0.0010.0010.0010.0010.006
Sunset Yellow Supra0.0110.0110.0110.0110.069
Textured Vegetable Protein0.3500.3500.3500.3502.200
Meatyhart S8sd0.0830.0830.0830.521
Meatyhart Chicken0.9300.9300.9305.838
Beef Flavour0.1080.1080.677
Spice Blend2.64015.590
Total4.93711.61912.16613.17913.28715.927100.000
28 | Taste & Nutrition
Taste Base
Functional Base
Visual Base
Meatiness BalanceSpecies Specific
Instant Spicy Beef & Tomato Soup
29 | Taste & Nutrition
Thank you…
“Psychosomatic Sensory”��Real - Imagined - Sensory - Experiences???Solve business attitude to salty taste firstWhat is Taste?Slide Number 5Taste is the #1 Driver of Consumer Purchasing Decisions�Consumer-Centric �Approach to “Taste”Tasting involves Three neural systemsEating involves all the senses…Masterchef!....Judging our Food for Fit for ConsumptionOral cavity - SoundOral cavity - MouthfeelOral cavity - Basic TastesSlide Number 14Neuroscience leading to better understanding of sensory perceptionsPainless injections…DentalVibe ToolImmersive Technologies for SensoryTapping into the Subconscious: New Sensory Science Lab to Explore Mysteries of Flavor, Aroma, AppetiteWhat did we learn from 2016 sodium reduction work?Sweeping Statements…(from “yours truly”)Strong brands can carry off “radical changes”2016 Na reduction gave better tasting productsBut...necessity in mother of invention!Think of taste like “frames” in a movie…Practical considerationsSlide Number 27Slide Number 28Thank you…