Copyright © 2008 Accenture All Rights Reserved. Accenture, its logo, and High Performance Delivered are trademarks of Accenture. Annual Performance Management Process: Overview for IDC Employees (Solutions and Services Workforces)
Oct 28, 2014
Copyright © 2008 Accenture All Rights Reserved. Accenture, its logo, and High Performance Delivered are trademarks of Accenture.
Annual Performance Management Process: Overview for IDC Employees (Solutions and Services Workforces)
2Copyright © 2008 Accenture All Rights Reserved.
The Performance Year began in June
AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAYJUN JUL
Set Objectives:Set / Review objectives
for the individuals at the beginning of the
performance year
Assess Outcomes (mid year):- Review of objectives- Discussion and documentation of six monthly feedback for employees
Rating/ promotioncommunication to
employees
Assess Outcomes (final):Self Input: March - April
Feedback discussion and documentation: April
Relative Performance Assessment: Laddering
& Moderation (May - mid June)
Performance Year : 01 June to 31 May
ARD: Creation of CDP Midyear review of CDP
Compensation letter release (01
Sep)
Relative Performance Assessment: Laddering
& Moderation (May – mid June)
3Copyright © 2008 Accenture All Rights Reserved.
Objectives of this session
• In this session, we will –
– Discuss the important steps in the Annual process
– Understand expectations from the key players – employees, supervisors and counselors
– Take note of the timelines
– Become aware of the resources and enablers
4Copyright © 2008 Accenture All Rights Reserved.
•Feedback should be documented in ‘Detailed Feedback & Rating’ ONLY. •Ratings against Leadership Contribution Areas and Behavioral Competencies (Performance Factors) will form an important input for relative assessment process
Employee Project Supervisor*
*For employees moderated on GCP, the Final Supervisor/ Final Moderation Rep identified will represent the employee in the final moderation meetings
•Review Self Input, all other feedback documented on myP, connect with previous/ current project supervisors and document preliminary recommendation on myP•Discuss performance feedback with the employee•Represent assignee in GCP final moderations for final rating and promotion recommendations, based on performance and promotion readiness by analyzing information available on myP•Communicate final rating and promotion decision
Counselor
• Provide feedback to the employee, post reviewing the self input
• Post discussion with the Employee, make changes, if any, to the assessment and submit it on myP
• Represent the employee during the laddering and moderation meetings
• Provide input, if any, on counselee’s performance and discuss the feedback with counselee and his/ her supervisor
• Enable counselees develop action plans as per the feedback received as a part of Annual Review Discussion
• Document self input and include when requesting for assessment
• Have a feedback discussion with the Supervisor
• Review feedback received from the Supervisor and discuss changes with him/ her, if any
Who are the key players ?
5Copyright © 2008 Accenture All Rights Reserved.
Step 1:
Employee evaluates his/ her performance and documents self input against the current Performance Year Objectives
6Copyright © 2008 Accenture All Rights Reserved. Accenture, its logo, and High Performance Delivered are trademarks of Accenture.
Means of ensuring that employee has a voice in the process
Helps assessor to review employee’s assessment of his/her contribution
Strong foundation for assessor address potential gaps between
his/her and employee’s perception of the employee's performance
•Describe the context
•Use numbers/ percentages
•State impact of results
•Avoid repetition
•Highlight outcome
How to document self input effectively?
7Copyright © 2008 Accenture All Rights Reserved. Accenture, its logo, and High Performance Delivered are trademarks of Accenture.
How to document self input effectively? Job Aids for documenting self input
Business Operator Poor self input document Appropriate self input document
Meet deliverable requirements or service level metrics
I have been delivering quality deliverables well ahead of the time always even if I had to work on multiple projects at a time and had dependencies on multiple teams.
Coding delivered as per the clients' requirement and adhering to quality standards. a) Slippage not more than 1 per 10 requests handled
95% of the testing is done independently and most of it rectified during peer reviews without any unacceptable delays. Able to perform 97% percent of the test till date
Value Creator Poor self input document Appropriate self input document
Establish self as expert or key contributor
Took initiative to be a subject matter expert for X campaigns and documented the campaign learnings in detail. Independently managed all the communication and process updates with the client.
- Worked as SME for 3 key X segments
- Key contribution for 2 modules
a. Key contribution provided for Scheduling - Custom reports migration. Played important role in resolving scheduler issues and save time by reduction of manual work. Received award points for this effort.
b. Key contribution provided for Y module, to bring the project on track and minimize delay and in the end deliver it with 0 UAT and post-release defects.
8Copyright © 2008 Accenture All Rights Reserved. Accenture, its logo, and High Performance Delivered are trademarks of Accenture.
People Developer Poor self input document Appropriate self input document
Build skills of team Helped 6 junior team members to build their technical skills as well as guided them to put structured efforts. As 2 junior members started their first project, got opportunity to groom them.
1. Took training sessions for 2 new resources - X and Y. Trained the new Y resources on packages, SQL Server and functional aspects for ABC campaigns.
2. Helped team members (A and B) in optimizing their SQL queries, modifying/designing packages, answering questions from the client/onshore liaison.
3. Help ABC team maintain up to date campaign status.
4. Learnt the process of running ABC campaigns in project and helped team members create a draft version of the run books.
5. Conducted two trainings on Z for the team members to enhance technical skills and smooth running of the project
How to document self input effectively? Job Aids for documenting self input
9Copyright © 2008 Accenture All Rights Reserved.
Step 2:
The Supervisor provides feedback and absolute ratings to the employee for his/ her performance in Performance Year on the three Leadership Contribution Areas and Performance Factors
10Copyright © 2008 Accenture All Rights Reserved.
Understanding Leadership Contribution Areas and Behavioral Competencies (Performance Factors)
Leadership Contribution Areas
•Business Operator•Value Creator•People Developer
Behavioral Competencies (Performance Factors)*Services
•Drives to Add Value
•Organizes and Directs Complex Work Efforts
•Analyzes and Solves Poorly Defined Problems
•Builds and Applies Skills and Capabilities
•Establishes Personal Credibility with Clients and
Others
•Maximizes Team's Performance
•Anticipates and Handles Critical Situations
•Builds and Sustains Client Ownership and
Commitment
•Negotiates Solutions and Resolves Conflicts
•Creates and Seizes Business Opportunities
Solutions
•Organizes and Directs Complex Work Efforts
•Drives for Value Added Results
•Anticipates and Handles Critical Situations
•Builds Technical Capabilities
•Demonstrates Professionalism and Confidence
•Maximizes Team's Performance
•Communicates and Influences Effectively
•Creates and Seizes Business Opportunities
*Vary as per career level
11Copyright © 2008 Accenture All Rights Reserved.
What should you expect from your feedback discussion/ documentation?
Outcomes are assessed in two dimensions: results and behaviors. Your supervisor will document and rate:
• WHAT you have achieved, the results, in the context of the three Leadership Contribution Areas.(LCAs)
• HOW you went about achieving results – Behavioral Competencies - are assessed using Performance
Factors
A detailed performance assessment includes:
Description and contribution within each Leadership Contribution Area – Value Creator, People Developer, and Business Operator
A rating for each of the three LCAs
A rating for each Behavioral Competency (Performance Factor)
Note: The absolute ratings are a key input into the relative assessment during the annual process
Description of strengths and areas for development
12Copyright © 2008 Accenture All Rights Reserved.
What should you expect from your feedback discussion/ documentation?Understanding Rating scale for LCAs
If Rating Definition
You produced results, on multiple occasions that clearly surpassed expectations for this career level and on no occasions did the results clearly fail to meet expectations
Exceeded
Expectations
Delivered results significantly beyond those typical of the career level.
You produced results that sometimes surpassed expectations but generally were in line with expectations for this career level
Met Expectations Delivered results in line with career level and available opportunities
There were one or two occasions when better results could have been achieved with more skills, effort or focus
Partially MetExpectations
Results could have been more substantial, given career level and available opportunities.
There were assignments or tasks that needed to be redone, handed to others or where guidance was repeatedly necessary
Did Not MeetExpectations
Results were deficient or clearly below expectations, given career level and available opportunities.
13Copyright © 2008 Accenture All Rights Reserved.
If Rating Definition
You have been consistently handling situations where most others at your level struggled
Exceeded Expectations
Effectively demonstrated the Factor consistently above and beyond expectations (i.e., all of the time and in all situations)
You effectively handled typical situations when they arose
Met Expectations Effectively demonstrated the Factor in line with expectations (i.e., most of the time and in many situations)
There were some typical situations you could have handled more effectively
Partially Met Expectations
Effectively demonstrated the Factor in some, but not all situations; some improvement is required
You frequently needed help or support with handling situations
Did Not Meet Expectations
Had difficulty demonstrating the Factor; significant improvement required
What should you expect from your feedback?Understanding Rating scale for Behavioral Competencies (Performance Factors)
14Copyright © 2008 Accenture All Rights Reserved.
Step 3:
Supervisor represents the employee in moderations for relative assessment against the peer group
15Copyright © 2008 Accenture All Rights Reserved.
Relative Assessment: Approach to Ratings
In detailed feedback and rating form, reviewer needs to rate results achieved and behavioral competencies (performance factors) against the above rating scale.
Outcome of moderation would be final rating
per the above rating scale
Exceeded expectations
Met expectations
Partially met expectations
Did not meet expectations
No basis
Contribution at the Very Top of Peer Group (5% of peer group)
Contribution Significantly Above Peer Group (25% of peer group)
Contribution Above Peer Group (20% of peer group)
Contribution Consistent with Peer Group (40% of peer group)
Contribution Below Peer Group (10% of peer group)
Requires Improvement (Need basis)
Individual performance is…Employee’s results
(Leadership Contribution Areas) and Behavioral
Competencies (performance factor) ratings
Relative contribution is…Employee’s final rating
based on performance when compared to the
peer group
16Copyright © 2008 Accenture All Rights Reserved.
Relative Assessment: Promotion Criteria
There are broadly the following criteria for assessing promotion readiness for Solutions Workforce employees :
The Promotion Eligibility Guidelines will be made available on IDC Home portal
Services Workforce: All employees in Services Workforce will be promoted through the quarterly Real Time Promotion process based on availability of positions.
Growth plans and business
affordability for the next FY
Time spent at levelConsistent
performance
Potential to perform at the
next level
17Copyright © 2008 Accenture All Rights Reserved.
IDC ModerationIG Moderation DU/DG ModerationProject Laddering
By mid June
Key Steps • Ranking, Ratings &
Promotion
recommendations
made for all
employees
• Ratings &
Promotion finalized
for levels upto TL/
Level D.
• Ratings &
Promotion
recommendations
for AM & M / Levels
C to B.
• Ratings &
Promotion finalized
for levels AM & M/
Levels C to B
• Rating for SM/
Level A
• Ratings finalized for
SM
• Sign off on M to SM
Promotions
• *Review & sign off
on Rating of top
30% M
Relative Assessment process: Key Steps for offshore moderations
May – early June
18Copyright © 2008 Accenture All Rights Reserved.
Relative Assessment process: Key Steps for GCP moderations
Final Sign Off
Offshore IG &
Host country GCP
sponsor sign off
IG Moderation
Project
Calibration/Laddering
• Project ranking,
preliminary ratings
and promotion
recommendations
made for all
employees
• Project Supervisors
to represent the
employee during
the project
calibration /
laddering
• Final ratings & final
promotion
recommendations for
levels upto M / Level
B.
• Final Supervisors to
represent employees
in these sessions.
• Moderator to sign off
on the final rating &
promotion decision
• Final ratings &
promotion decisions
to be reviewed and
signed off by IG HR
& Business SPOC
• The host country
GCP sponsors to
sign off on the GCP
ratings &
promotions for their
respective
geography
• The IDC GCP
sponsor to sign off
on the GCP ratings
& promotions for
their respective
geography
• Ratings & promotion
decisions to be
signed off by the
IDC leadership team
By mid JuneMay – early June
19Copyright © 2008 Accenture All Rights Reserved.
Employees Supervisors Counselors
Complete all Annual Process Trainings to understand process and expectations
Complete all Annual Process Trainings to understand process and expectations
Complete all Annual Process Trainings to understand process and expectations
•Update supervisor details on AST (by mid March)•Provide self input and request for assessment (by early April)•Meet with counselor to discuss self input and provide context on performance during the year (mid March to early April)
Encourage your team members to document self input (mid March to early April)
Meet with counselee to obtain necessary context on performance during the year (mid March to early April)
Meet with supervisor to discuss performance assessment
Ensure that supervisor receives feedback for all work done including additional contributions and make all necessary information available to supervisor to enable him/ her to represent you in laddering and moderations
(April)
•Supervisor to review Self Input, all other feedback documented on myP, connect with previous/ project supervisors and document feedback for entire performance year in detailed feedback and rating form.•Additional feedback provider to document assessment in general feedback form•Meet with employee for feedback discussion
(April)
Provide general feedback to the Counselee on his responsibilities under the Career Counseling framework
(April)
Responsibilities and Next Steps
20Copyright © 2008 Accenture All Rights Reserved.
Responsibilities and Next Steps
Employees Supervisors Counselors
Participate in laddering and moderation discussions
(May to mid June)
Provide inputs and additional context to the supervisors, if any, prior to moderations
Participate in rating and promotion communication discussion
(August end)
Anchor rating and promotion communication discussion
(August end)
Participate in rating and promotion communication discussion
(August end)
Meet with counselor for ARD and document CDP (Sep-Oct)
Meet with counselees for ARD and document CDP (Sep – Oct)
21Copyright © 2008 Accenture All Rights Reserved.
What resources will enable you?
Source Information
myPerformance tool (click here to access)
myPerformance website from where you can access and review objectives, review self input, and document feedback. Tool Support - In case of any technical issues faced with the tool, call to be logged with CIO support via BizInquiry
Assess Outcomes Training is available on myLearning:
A self-paced, computer-based training to teach you how to initiate a request for an assessment, effectively document self input on results, and describe and document performance.
Query Resolution (myRequests)If you have questions about the Performance Management process, please reach out to Employee Connect Services team - by dialing 2222 or logging a request on myRequests
Tips for Creating Self Input Refer to useful tips for Documenting and Reviewing Self Input Results
Tips for Providing Feedback A variety of help content is available to assist you in documenting feedback
Job Aid - Self Input and Request Feedback
22Copyright © 2008 Accenture All Rights Reserved.
Are you familiar with myPerformance?
Click How to Create Self Input for step-by-step system instructions
Click How to Request Feedback for step-by-step system instructions
Click How to Provide Feedback for step-by-step system instructions
You need to access and review objectives, review self input, and document feedback on https://myperformance.accenture.com