ANNUAL BUSINESS PLAN Volume 2 2008/2009 · Annual Business Plan – volume 2 2008/2009 Page 2 of 62 Glossary Appendix A Kerb side recycling proposal from 2008/2009. Council report

ANNUAL BUSINESS PLAN

Volume 2

2008/2009

To be read in conjunction with

2008/2009 Annual Business Plan

And 2008/2009 Budget

Annual Business Plan – volume 22008/2009

Page 2 of 62

Glossary

Appendix

A Kerb side recycling proposal from 2008/2009. Council report 133.2.1 to Council meeting 14 May 2007

B Maps – 2 bin waste collection

C Rubbish Bin Allocation and Charges – report 349.2.6 to Council 29 January 2008

D Strategic Management Plan – update December 2007


Page 3 of 62

GLOSSARY

Asset Sustainability RatioAsset Sustainability Ratio indicates whether the Council is renewing or replacing existing non-financial assets at the same rate as its overall stock of assets is wearing out. The ratio is calculated by measuring capital expenditure on renewal and replacement of assets relative to the level of depreciation. Where a Council has a soundly based Infrastructure and Asset Management Plan, a more meaningful asset sustainability ratio would be calculated by measuring the actual level of capital expenditure on renewal and replacement of assets (or proposed in the Budget) with the optimal level identified in the Plan.

Financial AssetsFinancial Assets include cash, investments, loans to community groups, receivables and repayments, but excludes equity held in Council businesses. Also, inventories and land held for resale are not regarded as financial assets.

Financial SustainabilityFinancial Sustainability is where planned long-term service and infrastructure levels and standards are met without unplanned and disruptive increases in rates or cuts to services. An Independent Inquiry into the Financial Sustainability of Local Government commissioned by the LGA identified the Rural City of Murray Bridge as category 3 – sustainable with a moderate margin of comfort.

A six-fold categorisation of the sustainability of a council’s long-term financial performance and position was suggested by the Inquiry’s Independent advisers:

Category 1 – (> 15% operating surplus ratio) sustainable with a very substantial margin of comfort

Category 2 – (5% to 15% operating surplus ratio) sustainable with a substantial margin of comfort

Category 3 – (0% to 15% operating surplus ratio) sustainable with a very moderate margin of comfort

Category 4 – (0% to -7%1/2% operating deficit ratio) sustainable with a very minimummargin of comfort

Category 5 – (-71/2% to -10% operating deficit ratio) sustainable currently but vulnerable in the short to medium term.

Category 6 – (> -10% operating deficit ratio) unsustainable

Local Government Price Index (LGPI)The LGPI is a reliable and independent measure of the inflationary effect on price changes in the South Australian Local Government sector. It was developed by the Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) and is updated quarterly. The index is similar in nature to the Consumer Price Index (CPI), however represents the movements of prices associated with the goods and services consumed by Local Government in South Australia as opposed to the basket of goods and services consumed by the ‘average metropolitan household’. Unlike the CPI however, the LGPI is not an ‘official’ ABS publication.

Net Financial Liabilities


Page 4 of 62

Net Financial Liabilities equals total liabilities less financial assets, where financial assets for this purpose includes cash, investments, loans to community groups, receivables and prepayments, but excludes equity held in Council businesses, inventories and land held for resale.

Net Financial Liabilities RatioNet Financial Liabilities Ratio expresses Net Financial Liabilities as a percentage of total operating revenue. The ratio allows interested parties to readily equate the outstanding level of the Council’s accumulated financial obligations against the level of one-year’s operating revenue. Where the ratio is falling over time, it generally indicates that the Council’s capacity to meet its financial obligations is strengthening.

Net Lending/(Borrowing)Net Lending/(Borrowing) equals Operating Surplus/(Deficit), less net outlays on non-financial assets. The Net Lending/(Borrowing) result is a measure of the Council’s overall (ie Operating and Capital) budget on an accrual basis. Achieving a zero result on the Net Lending/(Borrowing) measure in any one year essentially means that the Council has met all of its expenditure (both operating and capital) from the current year’s revenues.

Non-financial or Physical AssetsNon-financial or Physical Assets means infrastructure, land, buildings, plant, equipment, furniture and fittings, library books and inventories.

Operating DeficitOperating Deficit is where operating revenues less operating expenses is negative and operating income is therefore not sufficient to cover all operating expenses.

Operating ExpensesOperating expenses are operating expenses including depreciation but excluding losses on disposal or revaluation of non-financial assets.

Operating RevenuesOperating revenues are operating revenues shown in the income statement but exclude profit on disposal of non-financial assets and amounts received specifically for new/upgraded assets, eg from a developer. For ratios calculated where the denominator specified is total operating revenue or rate revenue, Natural Resource Management (NRM) levy revenue is excluded.

Operating SurplusOperating Surplus is where operating revenues less operating expenses is positive and operating revenue is therefore sufficient to cover all operating expenses.


Page 5 of 62

APPENDIX A


Page 6 of 62

Report to Council 14 May 2008

133.2.1 KERBSIDE RECYCLING SERVICE - (SF448)Officers: Martin Waddington & Rachel Hamilton

Purpose

1. To provide a summary of the outcomes of the district wide community survey undertaken in January 2007.

2. To seek endorsement of the recommended next step forward for Council in relation to introducing a new kerbside waste and recycling service to the community.

Background

At it’s meeting on the 12th February 2006, Council resolved that:

“Council consider and look into the possibilities of having a recycle waste pick up within its area.”

At a further meeting on the 27th March 2006, Council resolved to:

“Engage a consultant or appropriate person to prepare a public consultation agenda with a view to obtaining and assessing opinions on the needs for such a service and how best the service may be delivered to the community.”

These resolutions are consistent with Council’s 2005 - 2010 Strategic Management Plan which under Strategic Priorities, Section 4.2 states for Council to:

“Identify resource recycling and waste management opportunities”

The Rural City of Murray Bridge (RCMB) currently does not offer a kerbside recycling service but instead relies on residents transporting their recyclables and green wastes to facilities such as the Brinkley Waste Depot and other recycling depots located within Murray Bridge.

The recently released State Waste Strategy 2005 – 2010 has among others, the following objective:

“All Council’s to provide high performance kerbside or equivalent systems servicing householders throughout South Australia by 2010”

The Rural City of Murray Bridge is currently a member of the Murray and Mallee Regional Waste Group and council contributed towards the development of the Murray and Mallee Region Waste Management Plan which was completed in February 2006. This plan provides an overview of existing waste and recycling facilities and services from a regional perspective including recommendations for possible future direction for the region. The Plan also identified RCMB as a Council where a kerbside recycling service would be viable due to adequate utilisation of the additional vehicle required.

Council has also been successful in obtaining grant funding from Zero Waste SA of $80 000 towards the implementation of a ‘high performance’ kerbside recycling system. Demonstrated high performance systems include both the two-bin waste and recycling system (comprising of a 140L


Page 7 of 62

waste bin collected weekly and a 240L recycling bin collected fortnightly) or a weekly 50/50 split 240L bin system (providing that the weekly Zero Waste SA recycling targets can be met). Many Councils are moving towards the two-bin kerbside waste and recycling system due to increased flexibility in areas such as transportation, slightly larger capacity for bulky recyclable materials and clearer distinction for residents regarding waste and recycling receptacles.

At the Council meeting on the 11th December 2006, Council resolved to:“Proceed with the community consultation process…” and;

“Consider a further report submitted to Council in early 2007 detailing the outcomes of the community consultation process”

A community survey was distributed to 8500 ratepayers throughout the Rural City of Murray Bridge in January 2007. The survey consisted of a postcard style reply paid card with another double sided information card detailing the proposed system including indicative costs. A copy of the information card and reply paid postcard are provided in attachment 1. Surveys were distributed the week commencing January 15th 2007 with responses due by the 16th February 2007, allowing four weeks for responses.

Council was then briefed on the results of the survey on the 10th of April 2007.

This report provides a summary of the outcomes of the community consultation for formal consideration by Council.

Discussion

Results of Survey

General InformationCouncil received 2346 responses from the survey which equates to a 28% response rate, which is a very encouraging result. Of the total responses received, 81% nominated that they were from Murray Bridge (township). The remaining 19% were fairly well distributed throughout the Council area. 97% of the respondents were residential premises. The graphs shown below outline the gender and age distribution of the respondents.


Page 8 of 62

Murray Bridge ABS Data - Age

Under 1824%

18-248%

25-3414%

35-4415%

45-5413%

55-6411%

65+15%

There was almost a 50/50 split of males to females responding with a slightly higher proportion of females. This was mostly observed within the under 65 age groups with slightly more males responding in the over 65 age group.

Under 180%

18-242%

25-348%

35-4417%

45-5420%

55-6421%

65+32%

Gender of Respondents to Survey

M33%

F45%

MF9%

Blank13%


Page 9 of 62

It is apparent from comparing the nominated age of the respondents to the survey to that outlined in the ABS data that a slightly higher proportion of the over 65 population responded to the survey as a proportion of the community as a whole.

Do you recycle any of the following materials?Respondents were asked to indicate how they dispose of a range of materials listed including reuse, recycle or put into the general waste. The following provides a summary of the responses received.

Nominated disposal methods of various recyclable materials

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Newspaper/magazines

Cardboard

Junkmail

Egg Cartons

Telephone books

Milk & Juice Cartons

All Steel Cans

Aluminium Cans

Glass bottles

Glass jars

Plastic drink containers

Plastic soft drink bottles

Other Plastic containers

Re

cycl

able

Mat

eria

l

Percentage of respondents

Reuse

Recycle

Waste

Whilst there is a level of recycling prevalent from the nominated responses which is encouraging and even more importantly reuse of materials occurring, there is still a significant amount of material being placed into the general waste stream, in particular those materials where a container deposit return is not available such as junk mail, plastic containers (other than drink containers) and a significant proportion of steel cans as well. Theoretically all of these materials could be recycled through a kerbside recycling collection system.

It is worth noting that the frequency that these materials are recycled was not considered as part of the survey so whilst it provides an indication of the level that people would likely to recycle generally, the extent to which this occurs cannot be quantified. This level of detail was not considered necessary for the purposes of this survey.

If you recycle items, which recycling facility do you currently take them


Page 10 of 62

Nominated location people take materials for Recycling

0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000

Adelaide Hills Council

Friends

Picked up

Adelaide

Family

School

Mt Barker

Church

Other

Lions

Any/Both/Local

Murray Bridge

No response

Wally's

Lo

cati

on

Numberof Responses


Page 11 of 62

70% of respondents indicated a location that they took their recycling. Of those that provided a response, 55% of these nominated Wally’s as the main location followed by 30% stating Murray Bridge and 4% stating any/both recycling facilities.

Those that indicated ‘other’ included the courthouse, drop off bins, public skip, unsure and Council car park. This indicates that the awareness of whether something is recycled isn’t necessarily clear and further education of what can and cannot be recycled and where materials are recycled would be beneficial for the community.

Do you support Council introducing a new kerbside waste and recycling system?

RESPONSE PERCENT OF RESPONDENTS

(%)YES 59.4NO 36.4

UNSURE/BLANK 4.4

Almost 60% of respondents indicated that they would be in favour introducing a new kerbside waste and recycling system. Importantly, indicative costs were provided as part of the survey to ensure that ratepayers were able to make an informed decision. Understandably there will be some opposition to Council introducing a service if a service charge is being introduced, however it is encouraging that 60% of respondents still indicated that they would be in support of the service. Attachment 2 shows the number of responses by township/area and the percentage breakdown of the responses.

CommentsThere was room provided for respondents to make comments at the bottom of the survey. Many of the respondents provided more than one comment and all comments have been recorded.

Of the 1389 respondents that were in support of Council introducing the service, only 33% made comments. The main themes of the comments included:

Thought it should be ‘free’ or included in rates (213) Wanted green waste collection as well (54) Thought 140L bins were too small (49) Long overdue (43) Would be more convenient/find it easier to use (28) Wanted hard waste collection as well (16)

Of the 854 respondents that were not in support of Council introducing the service, 73% made comments. These included:

Thought it should be ‘free’ or included in rates (264) Don’t want to pay/don’t need (103) Stated that they recycle already (97) Stated that they were happy as they are (64) Thought the 140L bins were too small (55)


Page 12 of 62

Whilst some respondents were worried that the 140 litre bins are too small, it is important to note that a 240 litre recycling bin collected fortnightly combined with a 140 litre waste bin collected weekly (total 520 litres per fortnight), generally provides sufficient capacity for waste disposal for the majority of households. This compares to the current fortnightly capacity of 480 litres per fortnight (2 x 240 litre). A lot of items currently being placed into the general waste bin could in fact be placed into the recycling bin. A comprehensive education campaign would be required to inform residents of what is able to be recycled through a kerbside recycling system, to encourage residents to continue to utilise their local recycling facilities for container deposit materials and to educate them on waste minimisation practices. Those households where the 140 litre waste bin is not sufficient would be in the minority (i.e. large families etc) and Council could provide the option for an additional bin upon application, and at an additional cost, if it chooses.

Other general themes of comments that emerged from the survey include:

“Council will make extra money”“Already recycle and get paid for it”“Should be cost neutral”

These are important for Council to consider as it highlights some of the misconceptions prevalent in the community that Council should look at addressing in any future community education or communications.

“Monthly collections”

Monthly collections is another option that Council could consider for kerbside recycling which would reduce the overall cost per annum, whilst still providing an improved level of service. However this may not be sufficient for many residents of the Rural City of Murray Bridge and is thus not recommended.

Overall the survey results provide useful information to assist Council in its decision making for kerbside services including highlighting issues for further consideration.

Issues for further consideration Monthly recycling collection options to reduce costs; Overall benefits to the community as a whole; Future cost to dispose of waste to landfill; Environmental benefits in reducing waste to landfill; Ability to accommodate growing demand for service in the future; Addressing community concerns about impacts on local businesses, Council profiting from

recycling etc.

Council will ultimately decide the future direction for waste and recycling in the Rural City of Murray Bridge taking into account the considerations outlined above and Council’s strategic plan.

Introduction of a service chargeSome rural councils have introduced service charges as a means of separating out the cost of the waste service and clearly representing this on the rates notice. The service charge also provides a means of dedicated funds for the provision of the service as there are legal requirements under the Local Government Act 1999 for the raising and allocation of the funds associated with a service charge.


Page 13 of 62

Councils that currently charge a refuse service charge include Barossa, Mount Barker and Kangaroo Island Councils. An overview of some relevant neighbouring Councils is provided for information below.

Barossa CouncilThe Barossa Council recently released a draft waste management strategy that outlined 2 options for district wide kerbside waste and recycling collection, both of which included a two-bin system. The proposed estimated service charge outlined in the strategy ranges from $120 – 180 per annum, dependent on collection system type. The Barossa Council recently resolved to move to a district wide system with 140L waste collected weekly and 240L recycling collected fortnightly for an annual service charge.

The District Council Of Mount BarkerThe District Council of Mount Barker currently provides a weekly 240L split bin (half for waste and half for recycling) kerbside collection to townships only. Ratepayers that receive this service currently pay the annual service charge of $101. This amount pays for 100% of the costs associated with the service including waste disposal to landfill. The Council recently undertook a review of waste & recycling services including a district wide community consultation process. Council is proposing to go out to tender on a two bin kerbside waste and recycling system comprising of a 140L weekly waste collection and 240L fortnightly recycling collection. It is estimated that the service charge will increase to provide this service to approximately $130.

Council should consider the various options available for establishing a service charge for waste management. For example the initial proposal was to introduce a service charge to enable the provision of the two bin kerbside waste and recycling system. The cost outlined in the proposal is the cost to fund the new bin and the additional recycling collection, so is not representative of the full cost to provide the service (recycling and waste). There may be negative implications of this for the ratepayer as it may be seen as a cost to recycle? Policy decisions need to be made to determine the approach taken for the service charge as the community may think that the approximate cost provided of $65 is the total cost to provide waste and recycling services to the community and therefore the wrong message may be communicated. Other issues relating to this have been outlined in more detail in the legal section of the report.

Policy implications

1. Financial/budgetBased on the information that went to the community in January 2007, the potential financial implication for ratepayers for the new service is that they will pay an annual service charge of approximately $55 - $65 depending on a number of variables such as the provider of the service and where the recyclable material is processed. This is the amount required per ratepayer to cover the cost of new waste bins, additional fortnightly collection, as well as transport and processing of the recyclable material. Council would still be subsidising the cost of waste collection and disposal and the true cost of the total kerbside waste and recycling service would not be reflected in the service charge. The potential problem with this is that ratepayers may interpret the service charge as the entire cost of providing the service when in fact it is more likely to be double this amount. This needs to be taken into consideration when establishing the service charge.


Page 14 of 62

Another option to reduce the cost of the recycling service (and consequently the service charge) would be to include monthly collections as part of a tender process so that Council could adequately compare the costs once it has accurately costed.

Other Cost Reductions/AssumptionsAssuming 1000 tonnes of recycling is diverted from landfill per annum, based on the standard kerbside recycling figures from Zero Waste SA kerbside waste and recycling audits, Council would save approximately $37,000 per annum in sending waste to landfill in gate fees alone and $11 000 in EPA landfill levies in the next financial year. This cost does not include the savings in the extended amount of time to fill a landfill cell and consequently pay for the additional construction of a new cell to deposit waste material as this is currently not fully quantified.

It is important to note that the costing used is based on the assumption that recyclable material is transported to a processing facility in town. The Murray and Mallee Region Waste Management Plan recommended the establishment of a facility in the region and the cost would likely to be reduced in the instance that a facility was established. In addition to this, there may be an opportunity for a local recycler to set itself up to accommodate kerbside recyclable material, in which case a separate costing would need to be undertaken.

Other assumptions used in the costing include: 7 year contract term New vehicle(s) required Sorting costs at the standard rate including disposal of contamination Supply of 140L waste bin district wide Existing 240L bin lids replaced

Zero Waste SA GrantCouncil has received a grant of $80 000 from Zero Waste SA to put towards the implementation of a kerbside recycling service. It is proposed that the grant would be put towards the retrofitting of the existing 240L waste bins into recycling bins and the community education program.

2. LegalUnder Section 155 (2) of the Local Government Act 1999, Council may impose an annual service charge on rateable (and non-rateable) land within its area to which it provides, or makes available a prescribed service. The collection, treatment or disposal (including recycling) of waste is a prescribed service under Section 155 (1) (b). The requirement for this service charge is that 100% of the revenue raised must be used for that service. Any amounts excess to operating in any given year must be placed into a reserve for future works or unknown expenditures relating to that service. This results in a dedicated fund for providing that particular service to ratepayers.

However, it is not possible to be in a position to launch the service at the beginning of the financial year, necessitating a partial charge for the first year of service. Legal advice informs us that

Include the charge in the annual business plan now so that you can satisfy the public consultation obligations (as informed by Section 151(5)(c)(d)(e),(6) and (8a) ) but declare it to be introduced at 1 January 2008 and only to recover 6 months worth of the annual rate liability, or

Publicly consult on the proposal at a later date (as per Section 151(5) and (6) ) separate to the annual business plan consultation but prior to introduction of the rate and then declare it at any time before 1 January but allowing the Council sufficient time to distribute the rates notices.


Page 15 of 62

Provision for RebatesUnder Section 166 (1) of the Local Government Act 1999, Council can provide a discretionary rebate of rates or service charge under a specific set of conditions.

Considering the introduction of rebates would need to be approached with caution as it may raise administration difficulties in implementation and could jeopardise the ability to fully cover the cost of providing the service. If Council wanted to consider providing rebates for this service charge, then it would need to rework the overall service charge amount to accommodate this or alternatively subsidise the cost of the service to make up the difference.

Zero Waste SA GrantTo receive the Zero Waste SA grant money, Council is required to sign a legal agreement to put the funds towards a ‘high performance’ kerbside recycling program. This has now been done.

3. Risk ManagementThe greatest risk to Council is that some may still remain not be in favour of the idea of introducing a kerbside recycling service based on a perception of additional cost despite a well informed public consultation process.

4. Staffing/Work PlansThere would be implications on the following departments as a result of this recommendation.

Rates/Finance department. Staff would be required to undertake further work on the implications of the service charge and consider the best approach for the Rural City of Murray Bridge given the considerations outlined in this report.

In addition to this, it would also require resources from the rates department for the initial implementation of the service charge. Once this has been implemented it will be purely a maintenance role.

An overall project manager would be assigned to coordinate the launch of the service.

Contracts development and administrationSuitable resourcing would be required to develop tender specifications for the proposed new service as well as the tender process itself. Should the contract proceed it would then be included into the role of the current administrator of the waste collection contract.

Customer ServiceShould the service proceed, customer service staff would also have a significant role to play, particularly in the initial implementation of the service. Staff training would be crucial to ensure a successful outcome.

It is important to note that the timeframe to commence a kerbside recycling service usually requires between 6-9 months for the tender process, contract negotiation, roll out of bins and community education program, therefore it will not be possible to launch the service before the end of 2007.

5. EnvironmentalThe recommendation will potentially contribute to improving recycling rates in the Council area which will ultimately reduce waste to landfill.


Page 16 of 62

6. SocialThe community survey provided the opportunity for all ratepayers within the Council area to have their say about the proposed service to the community, as it will potentially impact on the entire community.

In addition to this it also provided information about the proposed service and the advantages of providing a kerbside recycling service, not only to the individual ratepayer, but the community as a whole.

Council has also contacted local stakeholders in the recycling industry separately to communicate the process that Council is embarking on and to ensure they are kept informed of the process and have the opportunity to discuss any concerns early in the process. Council will continue to update local stakeholders on the progress of the review process.

7. Strategic PlansThe kerbside recycling community survey is consistent with the 2005 – 2010 Strategic Management Plan. The following action is documented in the plan under Strategic Priorities, Section 4.2, Environmental Improvements viz;

“Identify resource recycling and waste management opportunities.”

8. Community ConsultationCouncil has undertaken a community consultation process to seek feedback on the proposal to introduce a kerbside recycling service, whilst providing relevant information for the ratepayer to understand the advantages of introducing such a service.

A media release is also proposed for the local radio station 5MU and the Murray Valley Standard to promote the outcomes of the survey and explain the next steps in the process for Council.

In addition to this, it is imperative that Customer Service staff are kept well informed to adequately field enquiries from the public and act as the first point of contact to clarify any concerns.

RecommendationThat Council notes and receives Item 133.2.1 on Council agenda for 14 May 2007 be received, and;1. Endorse the outcomes of the Kerbside Recycling community survey2. Proceed to develop tender specifications for a district wide two bin kerbside waste and

recycling collection service with a view to calling an open tender including:a. 140L waste bin collected weeklyb. 240L recycling bin collected fortnightly

3. That further work be undertaken on the options for introducing a service charge and /or service rate for the kerbside recycling project for implementation during 2008/2009 and also investigate options for a service charge/service rate for all waste management (waste and kerbside recycling) post 2008/2009.


Page 17 of 62

Cr England movedThat Council notes and receives Item 133.2.1 on Council agenda for 14 May 2007 be received, and;1. Endorse the outcomes of the Kerbside Recycling community survey.

2. Proceed to develop tender specifications for a district wide two bin kerbside waste and recycling collection service with a view to calling an open tender including:

a. 140L waste bin collected weeklyb. 240L recycling bin collected fortnightly

3. That further work be undertaken on the options for introducing a service charge and /or service rate for the kerbside recycling project for implementation during 2008/2009 and also investigate options for a service charge/service rate for all waste management (waste and kerbside recycling) post 2008/2009.

Seconded by Cr Phillips and CARRIED


Page 18 of 62

APPENDIX B


Page 19 of 62

APPENDIX C


Page 20 of 62

349.2.6 RUBBISH BIN ALLOCATION AND CHARGES (SF839)Officer: Martin Waddington

Purpose

To present a draft policy with respect to the provision of rubbish bins to residents and businesses with particular emphasis on how requests for additional bins should be handled.

Background

Council has a kerbside waste collection service currently in place utilising 240Litre MGB’s (Mobile Garbage Bins or “Wheelie Bins”). The service provides for the collection of all waste from households and businesses in all urban and most rural areas. Generally one MGB is allocated per household or business for the purpose of disposing of domestic type waste (e.g. kitchen and lunch room waste) but there are times when additional bins are requested for varying reasons. The current practice is to allow businesses up to four extra bins with a once off charge of $50 per bin with no additional charges. It is not clear whether this applies to residential properties but the general understanding is that it does not, nor is it clear if this is a resolved policy position of Council.

However it must be noted that MGB’s are provided for the collection of domestic style waste such as lunch room waste and not as a substitute for commercial waste such as kitchen waste from a commercial kitchen for example. There is evidence that some commercial operators are requesting additional bins to provide themselves with a cheap means of disposing of their commercial wastes which otherwise should be dealt with through a commercial waste contractor. On the domestic front there are instances where Council officers are requested additional bins where the one allocated bin is of insufficient size. The response to these requests to date is refusal.

Council will shortly be considering the expansion to the garbage services to include a kerbside recycling service and possibly a greenwaste service. Such an expansion of services will provide the community with broader waste disposal options and will go some way to addressing the issue of continually rising costs of landfill by providing alternative domestic style waste solutions. Councilhas resolved to put this project on hold pending further advice on the status of the landfill post October 2007 fire and is in a position to consider options for the future of Brinkley landfill. Nevertheless investigative work is continuing in anticipation of reaching a satisfactory conclusion with respect to the aforementioned landfill investigations in the form of investigations into the future directions for Brinkley Waste Site (refer also Council agenda item 322.2.2).

Discussion

The cost to provide the service per MGB in the urban area is currently $1.22 per lift ($63.44 per annum) which covers the ‘pick up’ and transport costs to landfill. Additional to this is the supply cost of the bin itself which currently is at $58.47 and the cost of disposal which is $0.67 per lift ($34.84 per annum) assuming an average bin load. The disposal figure includes an allowance for the EPA levy. Total cost is $98.28 per MGB per annum (excluding the initial supply cost of the bin).

Council currently absorbs the cost of operating the garbage service within the general rate. Consequently the true cost of running the service per bin is not well understood in the community as it is regarded as ‘all part of the service’. But in essence, for each bin provided by Council, thedirect cost to service the bin is $98.28 per annum, plus the cost of the bin itself.


Page 21 of 62

In moving forward in addressing the occasional requests by community members for an additional bin to the one already provided, Council has three options available to it:

Option 1 – Keep the arrangements as they are but formalise them in a Policy document i.e. Allow up to six extra bins per business at the initial supply cost of $58.47 and absorb the ongoing cost thereafter, and refuse extra bins for residential use.

Option 2 – Refuse to allocate extra bins for either residents or businesses, advising that additional waste over the amount able to be handled by the original bin allocation for each property will need to be disposed of privately.

Option 3 – Resolve to issue on request to any business or resident an extra MGB at an initial current supply cost of $58.47 and an ongoing annual charge of $100 per annum indexed to inflation for each additional bin required.

Of the three options described, it is recommended to pursue Option 3 because it achieves four important objectives

1. It provides a service where such a need genuinely exists2. It does not impose an additional burden on the general ratepayer as the extra bins are

separately charged against the property concerned.3. The cost structure is such that it provides an incentive to seek other forms of waste

disposal such as recycling.4. Provides a disincentive to businesses seeking to deal with commercial wastes through the

provision of numerous extra bins as opposed to privately hiring an industrial bin for such uses.

The Local Government Act 1999 provides for the ability to impose a service charge for this sort of thing and would be applied at the time rates notices are issued. Therefore the bin would have to be associated with the property rather than the individual. The public must however be consulted via our upcoming Annual Business Plan.

Council would provide one Council endorsed 240L Mobile Garbage Bin to each residential and commercial / business property at an initial one-off cost as gazetted each year under the annual declaration of rates, service rates and charges and separate rates and charges. No further charges will apply. All bin collection costs are included within the total yearly Council Rates levied.

Should a request for an extra bin be made during the year a first up pro rata payment will need to be made additional to the once off cost of $50 for the provision of the bin itself. Alternatively Council could absorb the $50 bin provision cost and retain ownership of the asset.

A draft policy document has been developed to support Option 3 and is attached 349.2.6.

Council should also note that the eventual introduction of a kerbside recycling service may attract similar requests. In this event, Councils policy would be easily modified and extended to include recycling and/or greenwaste services should Council see fit to do so.

Recommendation

That:1. The information contained in report 349.2.6 on Council agenda of 29 January 2008 be

received and noted.


Page 22 of 62

2. Council supports the provision of additional bins in principle (that is, more than one bin) to ratepayers on a cost neutral basis through a separate charge being as follows

a. $100 service fee per annum per additional bin effective as of 1 July 2008 and then indexed to inflation thereafter for subsequent years: to be levied as a service charge via the rates notice

b. Supply cost of the bin at the current unit rate ($58.47) plus CPI as of 1 July 2008.3. That the ‘service fee’ is treated retrospectively (that is, from 1 July 2008 for those that have

more than one bin) with respect to additional bins that have already been allocated in the past.

4. Council endorses the draft policy attached entitled “Provision of Council Mobile Garbage Bins”

5. Council notes that the policy (‘4’ above) will be expanded to included similar requests for possible future kerbside recycling and greenwaste bins.

6. That Council consults the public on this proposal via its upcoming Annual Business Plan process.

Cr Wilson movedThat:

1. The information contained in report 349.2.6 on Council agenda of 29 January 2008 be received and noted.


a. $100 service fee per annum per additional residential bin effective as of 1 July 2008 and then indexed to inflation thereafter for subsequent years: to be levied as a service charge via the rates notice




5. Council notes that the policy (‘4’ above) will be expanded to included similar requests for possible future kerbside recycling and green waste bins.


7. Maximum allocation of 4 bins to apply.Seconded by Cr Nutt

AMENDMENT

Cr England movedThat the recommendation be adopted:

1. The information contained in report 349.2.6 on Council agenda of 29 January 2008 be received and noted.



Page 23 of 62





5. Council notes that the policy (‘4’ above) will be expanded to included similar requests for possible future kerbside recycling and green waste bins.


Seconded by Cr Simmons

The Amendment was Put First and CarriedOn becoming the Substantive Motion the Motion was Put and Carried.

That the recommendation be adopted:1. The information contained in report 349.2.6 on Council agenda of 29 January 2008 be

received and noted.2. Council supports the provision of additional bins in principle (that is, more than one bin) to

ratepayers on a cost neutral basis through a separate charge being as followsa. $100 service fee per annum per additional bin effective as of 1 July 2008 and then indexed

to inflation thereafter for subsequent years: to be levied as a service charge via the rates notice


more than one bin) with respect to additional bins that have already been allocated in the past.4. Council endorses the draft policy attached entitled “Provision of Council Mobile Garbage Bins”5. Council notes that the policy (‘4’ above) will be expanded to included similar requests for

possible future kerbside recycling and green waste bins.6. That Council consults the public on this proposal via its upcoming Annual Business Plan

process.


Page 24 of 62

Appendix 349.2.6

Council Adopted Policy

Provision of Council Mobile Garbage Bins

Responsible Officer

Martin Waddington Policy Number IT:4

Date Approved:Council Resolution

Number349.2.6

Previous Revision Date: Date of Next Review

Applicable Legislation

Local Government Act 1999

Policy Objectives

To provide consistent practice with the supply and collection of Council Mobile Garbage Bins (MGB’s) to residential properties and commercial / business properties throughout the Rural City of Murray Bridge.

Principles

One 240L Council issued MGB is allocated per residential and commercial / business property. For owners of a new or established property for which there is no existing Council bin, a one-off charge levied under Council’s current Rating Policy is applied. No MGB’s are provided to vacant properties.

The MGB is intended for the disposal of ordinary household and lunch room garbage and is not a substitute for a hard refuse disposal service.

The MGB issued remains the property of The Council and is not transferable from the original property to which it was allocated.

Council bins are endorsed with the Council logo on the front of the bin and only Council endorsed bins will be collected by Council’s Kerbside Domestic Waste Collection Contractor.

The allocation of an additional Council Mobile Garbage Bin to a residential or commercial / business property may be provided following Council assessment of a written application request provided by the property owner.

Council reserves the Right to vary the above Policy at any time.


Page 25 of 62

Introduction

The Rural City of Murray Bridge currently provides a kerbside domestic waste collection service to ratepayers with a single 240L Council Mobile Garbage Bin (MGB’s) or “wheelie bin” being provided to each occupied residential and commercial / business property. This policy provides guidance on the allocation, use and charges with respect to the provision of MGB’s

Local Government Act (“The Act)

Section 155 of the Local Government Act 1999, applies

Policy Statement

1. Council will provide ONE (1) Council endorsed 240L Mobile Garbage Bin to each residential and commercial / business property at an initial one-off cost as gazetted each year under the annual declaration of rates, service rates and charges and separate rates and charges. No further charges will apply. All bin collection costs are included within the total yearly Council Rates levied.

2. Additional Council endorsed Mobile Garbage Bins may be supplied to a residential or commercial / business property following Council assessment of a written application request provided by the property owner.

3. Requests for additional Council Mobile Garbage Bins MUST be made in writing to Council by the property owner.

4. Council will respond to the property owner with written justification of the final decision reached following investigation and assessment of the written application request.

5. Supply of additional Council Mobile Garbage Bins to a residential or commercial / business property will incur the following charge for each additional Council bin supplied for kerbside domestic waste collection:


b. Supply cost of the bin at the current unit rate ($58.47) plus CPI as of 1 July 2008.

6. Council reserves the right to reclaim any additional Council Mobile Garbage Bin should the annual fee be greater than three (3) months overdue in payment.

7. A Council bin that is presumed “stolen” must be reported by the property owner to the Police where a Police Report Number will be issued and the matter then reported to Council by the property owner. In this event, a replacement Council bin with new Council bin serial number will be provided to the property owner without application of the above one-off charge levied under Council’s current Rating Policy.


Page 26 of 62

Post Implementation ActionElectronic PDF version will be maintained on the Rural City of Murray Bridge website for public viewing.

The Rural City of Murray Bridge Council’s “Provision of Council Mobile Garbage Bins” Policy will be reviewed on an annual basis in the month of May and at the first meeting of a Council following a periodic election. Council may revise or review the above Policy at any time.

Endorsed by Council on . . . . . . . . .


Page 27 of 62

APPENDIX D

1 – Growth ManagementThe population of the Council area in 2005 is 18,000; this is expected to increase to more than 30,000 by 2025. Council proposes an era of planned and coordinated development that supports existing and new businesses, creates employment opportunities, protects rural production areas and provides for residential and industrial growth in response to this growth pressure. Council considers that economic growth and urban growth within Murray Bridge and other townships, will assist and provide, overtime, the base and financial capacity needed to sustain essential infrastructure, environmental programs, commercial development, and community services and facilities.

ACTION TASK Priority TIMELINE COMMENTS

Prepare and implement a 10 year Growth Management Plan for the Council area to drive the Strategic Management Plan outcomes

Provide support to the strategic role of Council for delivery of strategic policies with appropriate resources, skills and networks, regional partnerships and resource sharing

1 May-06

2005 UpdateProvision of detailed advice and reports from Council's Senior Management Team and administration on the variety of headings including, Growth Management Strategy; Fund Management and Infrastructure provisions; completion of SMP; population forecasting and action plan; preparation of detailed works schedule and budget strategy linked to SMP; preparation of internal performance management plans linked to Council's SMP. Continue to build and provide strong networks with key partners such as MRDB, ML Business & Tourism Organisation, MB Tourism & Marketing, ML Enterprise Estate and relevant Government agencies.

Dec 2006 UpdateUrban Growth, Riverfront Management, Dairy Flat and Prison Project proceeding well and nearing completion. Series of grant funds sourced for such, totalling $90K.

Dec 2007 UpdateUrban Growth Plan completed and adopted.Riverfront Management Plan completed and adopted.Dairy Flat plan completed and pending adoption.Prison Project completed and pending adoption.All projects completed on time and in budget.Urban Growth Plan was the recipient of State Planning Institute of Australia Award.Review of Council’s Strategic Management Plan 2005-2010 is underway.


Page 29 of 62

Define physical plans in terms of urban capacities, staging, buffers, transport & open space networks, land capability, environment management, staging and optimising infrastructure efficiencies.

1 Jun-07

2005 UpdateBe delivered via Urban Growth Management Plan to be let in early 2006 and Stormwater Management Plan already commissioned.Dec 2006 UpdateUrban Growth Management Plan nearing completion and will be out for Community Consultation Q3/Q4 2007.Dec 2007 UpdateAs Above plus need for further work on infrastructure plan and traffic and transport planning.Stormwater Management Plan completed and adopted by Council and formed basis on implementation of 10 yearStormwater infrastructure works as part of 10 year financial plan.

Change policy to reflect and facilitate physical plans. Through amendment of the Development Plan, agricultural land and primary production activities will be protected bringing clearly to the preferred locations for agriculture, intensive animal keeping, industry, commercial and urban development, support for environmentally sustainable farming practices, and buffers between sensitive land use activities. Through amendment to the Development Plan and the Murraylands Regional Development Board promote 'value adding' food production and an export culture

1 Jun-08

2005 UpdateVia existing PARs; Via recommendations out of Growth Management PlanDec 2006 UpdateMinor township, minor industry and Rural PAR all finalised and adopted in 2006.Dec 2007 UpdateSignificant movement on Rural PAR with Council’s lobbying successful and PAR now on Minister’s desk and has support of his development policy committee.Urban Development Plan adopted.Workshop sessions initiated with Elected Members to review priority PARs emanating out of Urban Growth Management Plan recommendations. Council active participant of MRDB RIO project and funding project to tune of $75,000.


Page 30 of 62

Engage Government agencies, departments, Murraylands Regional Development Board, River Murray Catchment Water Management Board and others.

2 May-07

2005 UpdateRefer aboveDec 2006 UpdateActive in informing Community and lobbying with regard to proposed Wellington Weir in 2006.Dec 2007 UpdateAs above, also Council has proactively established a water working party and also sits on the Regional Water TaskForce chaired by Dean Brown. Actively pursuing consultancies regarding drought proofing initiatives for Murray Bridge and has shown initiative and leadership with regard to publicising water initiatives and its drought policy to the community. Minister has listened to Council’s lobbying with regard to Wellington Weir and has supported our request for an EIS to be published.Successfully sourced $20,000 towards funding RM for water consultancy study.

Position for 3rd generation industry focus, including seeking Government and private sector support

1 May-07

2005 & 2006 UpdateSee Urban Growth Management PlanDec 2007 UpdateSee above. Urban Growth Plan establishes proposal for major enterprise zone near Monteith and further industrial commercial development opportunities at Murray Bridge and Monarto.

Review non-core services through evaluation against selected criteria 2 Ongoing

2005 UpdateVia annual review of SMPDec 2006 UpdateConsiderable time spent during 2006 on 10 year financial plan preparation and internal analysis of core services. Discussions papers highlight need to focus on core activities and dangers of spending less money on infrastructure provision.


Page 31 of 62

Dec 2007 UpdateAs above. The development of an asset management plan will further inform this matter and will be completed by end 2008. Asset management plans for road infrastructure, stormwater, Council buildings and assets to be included.Service reviews initiated as a management initiative as supported by Council with Development & Environmental Services and Infrastructure & Technical Services being undertaken in Q3 & Q4 of 2007/08. Council needs to continue to monitor non core activities with regard to budget and financial sustainability issues.


Page 32 of 62

2 – Infrastructure Provision

Council acknowledges the need to provide the necessary infrastructure to achieve urban growth within Murray Bridge and other townships. Council will be a party to the planning and staging of most infrastructure works, as growth will be adversely affected unless appropriate infrastructure is in place.

ACTION TASKPriority

TIMELINE COMMENTS

Co-ordinate and implement necessary infrastructure development within the Council areas.

Develop a stormwater management plan which embodies best practice environmental principles

2 May-08

2005 UpdateTonkin Engineering commissioned - 1/2 way through process.

Dec 2006 UpdateTonkins report to Council Q3/Q4 2007 90% complete. Major stormwater projects completed.

Dec 2007 UpdateStormwater management strategy completed and adopted by Council. Major stormwater projects completed within Murray Bridge Urban Growth area as part of priority works. 10 year financial plan factors in significant further works in accordance with Stormwater Management Plan. $700,000 per year for 10 years.

Promote the wetland and stormwater projects along the River Corridor in conjunction with State Government and the private sector

3 Ongoing

2005 UpdateThe design of Narooma wetland is currently approaching conclusion. This together with the Tumbella wetland are jointly funded projects between Council and the RMCWMB. The Tumbella wetland is due to be constructed in 2006.

Dec 2006 UpdateTumbella wetland completed and Rural Avenue wetland completed. Sourced major grant in vicinity of $750K for stormwater projects.


Page 33 of 62

Dec 2007 UpdateNarooma Wetland held up by developers. Predesign work (hydro geological assessment) continues to EPA satisfaction prior to a possible full design. Further work regarding Rocky Gully wetlands in place re possible lagoon road closure. KESAB award for Swanport Wetland through assistance Glenn Dean and volunteers our proactive depot, horticulture division with regard to wetland and environmental initiatives.

Engage and facilitate Government agencies, departments and the private sector to ensure co-ordinated and staged delivery of water supply, power, gas, sewerage and effluent disposal, waste management, under grounding of power, data access and telephone line, freight routes and arterial roads

2 May-08

2005 UpdateEngaged SA Water with regard to future of sewage system, with further and ongoing discussions required relating to delivery of upgraded infrastructure provision. SA Water will be a key partner in the preparation of the Urban Growth Management Plan. Effluent disposal will remain a key issue impacting on the growth of Murray Bridge should Council wish to expand its urban boundary on the eastern side of Murray Bridge and other unsewered areas. Waste management remains a critical issue for our City with ongoing management of the Brinkley landfill site. Key goals due by SMP in May 2008 will be progressed once the Brinkley landfill issue has been resolved with regard to other initiatives such as green waste and recycling etc. However Council has already commissioned as a partner to MMLGA regarding Regional Waste Management Strategy. Council has partnered with MRDB with regard to IT and broadband data issues throughout the ML and continues to lobby government with regard to the better management arterial routes and b-double routes. Brinkley Landfill is being studied by Mauncell Engineers to ascertain its potential as a regional landfill through the MMLGA.


Page 34 of 62

Dec 2006 Update MMLGA IT broadband – Agile approved. Urban Growth Management Plan nearing completion. Via partnership pilot project with NRM likely to

investigate water reuse for SA Water, T&R. Kerbside recycling initiative progressed to community

consultation stage. Ongoing issues with EPA and Brinkley but new cell is

under construction and better relationship built with EPA.

Formal invitation has been extended to Paul Vogel, CEO EPA to visit us.

SA Water approached to explore opportunities to access treated effluent as an irrigation water resource

Dec 2007 Update Water savings project commenced and underway. Proactive membership of Councils Water Working Party

and Dean Brown’s water resources working group. Actively engaged relevant Ministers face to face on

water issues and opportunities. Actively working with SA Water who have agreed to

commence budget considerations for total upgrade of sewer systems and are utilising Council’s Urban Growth Management Plan as a basis for research.

Kerbside recycling project put on hold due to Brinkley fire.

Cost overruns on Brinkley due to fire reported to Council and pursuing potential cost recovery with contractor.

Rebuild strong relationship with EPA notably via relationship on mitigating fire incident.

Fire and expeditious resolution of Brinkley fire


Page 35 of 62

mitigation. Commenced EOI process for future of Brinkley Waste

Management facility. Undertaken fibre optic cable communications link for

Council services. Successful in sourcing largest road grant of $2.1 million

for Ferries McDonald Road. Working on possible water supply solution for Wood

Lane together with SA Water. Commissioned and completed report with regard to

STEDs schemes and reporting to Council.

Formulate a Disability Action Plan 3 May-08

2005 UpdateBudgeted to do in 05/06. The outline has been done

Dec 2006 UpdateThis item has been carried foreword in the budget with the audit with the auditor currently being sourced. The results will mesh into the asset maintenance reports also being planned.ETA of delivery of appointment is 05/07 with the resultant works being factored over at least five years.

Dec 2007 UpdateAs above.


Page 36 of 62

3 – Community Planning & FacilitiesCouncil endeavours to provide services and facilities that support the civic, cultural, recreational, business and social aspirations of the community. These aspirations include providing for the disabled, ageing, youth, cultural needs, and other social planning matters.


Prepare a Council wide Recreation & Sport Plan, following on from the Murraylands Open Space Recreation & Sport Strategy, with a focus on shared facilities and regional level facilities in the Rural City of Murray Bridge

3 Jun-07

2005 UpdateEOI completed. Additional grant funds sourced to engage consultant to undertake project. Funding application not successful. Minister to be approached to assist.

Dec 2006 UpdateUnsuccessful in receiving grant – direction needed on how Council wishes to pursue – possibly need own funds via 2007/08 budget.

Dec 2007 updateAs above, been unsuccessful in receiving grant via 2008 Strategic plan review. Council to revisit this matter and prioritise it as considerable funds will need to be set aside and significant resources to undertake this comprehensive research. Once the Library, Town Hall, South Terrace and many other infrastructure issues are settled, Council should re-focus on the need for common purpose indoor recreation facilities in our district.

Consider facilitation of a new regional indoor recreation and sporting facility following feasibility review and in partnership with private sector support

3 Jul-08

2005 & 2006 UpdateIncluded in above.

Dec 2007 updateAs above.


Page 37 of 62

Provide regular communication through Council's website, newsletter & local media

3 Ongoing

2005 UpdateContinuing process but needs refining.

Dec 2006 UpdateWebsite upgrade launched, Rural City Review has been upgraded, strong community consultation, eg Urban Growth Plan, Strategic Management Plan, Kerbside recycling, 5MU, attendance at community functions and community meetings.

Dec 2007 UpdateAs above. Continue to be very active in media relations and have also appointed a Marketing & Special Projects Manager to assist in this area with immediate results, namely with regard to water/drought media relations.

Integrate community consultation into key strategies and projects

3 Ongoing

2005 & 2006 UpdateCompleted & key request of our Consultation Policy - SMP record turnout was tantamount to this

Dec 2007 UpdateWe pride ourselves on thorough community consultation ego Urban Growth Management Plano Dairy Plano Riverfront Management Plano Correctional Services precinct redevelopmento Forensic Mental Health relocationo Sunnyside Management Plano Kerbside recyclingo Waste managemento Budgeto Annual Business Plan


Page 38 of 62

o Town Hall Projecto Community Libraryo Regular and frequent updates via radio, Rural City

Review and targeted press releases and media

Prepare a forward program for community, recreational and tourist events and the improvement of community and cultural facilities

Work with key organisations such as the Business and Tourism Association, Rowing Club, Speedway, Pedal Prix to identify further facilities & events

3 Ongoing

2005 UpdateDeveloped strong partnerships with MB Business Association, Speedway and Pedal Prix with regard to regional marketing & tourism events. 2005 PP was the most successful ever and Council has also built a very strong relationship with other events in Murray Bridge such as the Pageant and Fireworks display, Monarto Plough day, Callington Fair, MB Show, Karoonda Farm Fair, International Day of People with a disAbility, various regional functions and cultural events and regional art gallery, SA Stumpy awards various youth engagement initiatives as recognised by 2 National Awards and 1 SA Great Award, MB Race Club, various sporting events, Australia Day Awards, etc. Marketing Manager recently appointed in line with Council's SMP and Organisational Review to assist in delivery of such projects and to work towards achieving further improvement of Community Cultural facilities.

Dec 2006 UpdateSimilar results in 2006 and Community and Council continue to be highly successful in receiving awards.

Sourced new events, being 1956 Flood Anniversary, Masters Games, Murray Bridge Auto Fest. Major events are stretching Council resources.


Page 39 of 62

Dec 2007 UpdateContinue to foster ongoing excellent relationships with Regional partners. Active participant on Business & Tourism Association and allied projects actively supporting re Pedal Prix and signed 10 year agreement. Lodged submission for 2010 Regional Masters Games and successfully brokered initial Auto Fest event and further Auto Fest event for 2008. Continue to support other district wide events such as the Pageant, Monarto Plough Day, Callington Fair, Murray Bridge Show, Karoonda Farm Fair and various other events listed above. Council continues to be recognised for awards with most recent awards being KESAB awards, PIA awards, Risk Manager of the year award. Nominated for Kellogs Heart Foundation Award. Active Cultural & Development Committee and various other internal and external community based committees. Good progress to date on Town Hall feasibility study which will be ready for community consultation Q3/Q4 2007/08.

Develop the Murray Bridge Railway Lands Tourist Precinct

2

Jun-08

2005 UpdateStill in concept stages.

Dec 2006 UpdateBusiness plan finalised and adopted. Minister agreed to place land on market for private sector involvement.

Dec 2007 UpdateMinister announced land will go to the market in March 2008 as a result of active lobbying by Council, CEO and Mayor.


Page 40 of 62

Enhance the popularity of the swimming pool including review of ageing infrastructure

3

Jun-08

2005 UpdateSignage to be updated in conjunction with Sarah McCallum. Review of aging infrastructure to be carried out in consideration with the wider review of recreational services.

Dec 2006 UpdateVarious marketing initiatives targeted and new infrastructure in place with marginal improved results.

Dec 2007 UpdateThorough OHS Audit undertaken at Swimming Pool and recommendations being implemented. Restructured management arrangements of pool under Corporate & Community Services and Asset Management portfolio and with assistance of Ted Hunter launched various initiatives to encourage high participation at Pool, notably with some of the recent lap swimming and story telling. Also restructured fee arrangements and increased levies to the amateur swimming club with their consent.

Investigate walking trail development between Toora to Swanport and Avoca Dell to Swanport (both sides of the River Murray)

3

Jun-08

2005 UpdateActively promote need to retain Crown Land corridor along River Murray. Consider 06/07 financial year master plan

Dec 2006 UpdateKey component of Riverfront Management Plan.

Dec 2007 UpdateAs above. Further work required on this heading and should be re-prioritised in the Strategic Management Plan review. Will be included in scope of work for Railway


Page 41 of 62

precinct in the open space linkages between Sturt Reserve and Long Island Reserve and be part of the future Narooma redevelopment will assist in reaching these goals in part. Discussions held with Community representatives in relation to extending a trail through Woods Point and potentially Wellington as a combined walking and cycle track.

Consider future library accommodation and enhancements

2 May-07

2005 updateSelection of site made. South Tce retail precinct needs to be progressed as next step.

Dec 2006 UpdatePending outcome of South Terrace retail precinct.

Dec 2007 UpdateSouth Terrace Retail precinct is at formal tender stage and options for Library are looking extremely promising.

Promote and market the Regional Art galley and enhance interpretation of cultural heritage

2 May-08

2005 UpdateSome improvements made. Ongoing will feature in 06/07 budget & management plan

Dec 2006 UpdateThe marketing plan for the Gallery is not complete but two initiatives are a major promotion of the Pro Hart exhibition and major Council support of the Rotary Exhibition with a focus on their 20th anniversary. Extent of the support for this event is to be gauged by the offering of a $6k acquisitive prize


Page 42 of 62

Dec 2007 UpdateThe Gallery has been proactively marketed and continues to attract excellent promotions and exhibitions via initiatives of Gallery Director and Committee. Further enhancements to Town Hall and Sixth Street precinct will further improve the marketing and promotion of the Regional Art Gallery. The Regional Art Gallery being recognised as a leader in regional galleries in South Australia.

Investigate opportunities for Town Hall management and redevelopment

1 May-06

2005 UpdateCommittee in place, Structure report due 31/1/06

Dec 2006 UpdateOutcome of funding grant for feasibility due Q3 2007.

Dec 2007 updateAs above Town Hall feasibility has commenced.

Acknowledge an understanding of the culture of the traditional Aboriginal landowners

2 Ongoing

2005 updateRecognise our indigenous heritage and acknowledgement of Ngarrindjeri elders during presentations, events and speeches. Have built a strong association with the indigenous people via appointment of Youth and Indigenous officer position and partnering with community events such as Ngoppon. Council has also agreed to display friendship agreements as part of Ngoppon events in our Community Council foyer. Further work remains with Council agreeing to a MOU between Council and Ngarrindjeri people.


Page 43 of 62

Dec 2006 updateAs above and continue strong links. Good engagement on Dry Zone issue.Dec 2007 updateMayor and CEO have built excellent relationships with the Ngarrindjeri Heritage Committee. Formal discussions have progressed with regard to Ngarrindjeri land use agreement.

Support the social aspirations of the aged and youth including community safety and recreation infrastructure

3 Ongoing

2005 & 2006 UpdateLerwin Nursing Home expanded to allow more local people to remain in their community if they require nursing home care; Council has ongoing key role within the Murray Mallee Aging Taskforce (MMAT). MMAT was set up to assist with development of services and to lobby and promote issues affecting the elderly and disabled in the community. Council Community Care Program includes social support and respite components which assist in keeping clients connected to their community.

Dec 2007 UpdateLerwin Nursing Home continues to be our ‘silent’ achiever with excellent management and leadership. Community Care programs continue to be a success with glowing testimonials from Community members receiving valued support. Lerwin Strategic Plan being prepared in consultation with Council and to analyse whether Council should be sourcing further bed licences in the future as per recent request of Council to consider this.Youth Action Committee continues to be vibrant and Council has actively sourced, via the YAC and Shane Thompson, a $1 million Headspace Youth Centre grant.Skate park under construction.


Page 44 of 62

4 – Environmental ImprovementsCouncil endeavours to provide for the needs of communities within Murray Bridge and other townships and settlements within the Council area. A range of programs are planned to improve and enhance the character and amenity of townships within the Council area.


Enhance Murray Bridge and other townships within the Council area as part of an ongoing 5 year town improvement program in consultation with local groups encompassing aspects

Improve entrance signage, heritage identification and interpretation, landscaping, streetscape improvements, street tree planning, and open space

3 Ongoing

2005 Update1st evaluation done 31/12/05. Report to Council on this will be 02/06.

Dec 2006 UpdateNew town entry signage completed.Adelaide Road streetscaping finalised.

Dec 2007 updateGood feedback with regard to town entry signage and budget funds being set aside for additional rural township signage. Have launched small township consultation and community development plan program to assist in identifying further community development plan projects. Full compliments to Depot and Horticulture staff for presentation of the district. Council has identified two future PLEC projects being Swanport Road and Sixth Street.

Offer selective heritage advisory service

3 Ongoing

2005 & 2006 UpdatePresently via State Heritage. Need to review priority status of this.

Dec 2007 UpdateAs above.


Page 45 of 62

Involve community volunteers, youth, schools and service groups to expand community pride

3 Ongoing

2005 & 2006 & 2007 UpdateCouncil has fostered over 100 volunteers in various areas across Council ie Roundhouse, Visitor Information Centre; Public Library; Art Gallery, Captain's Cottage Museum; etc. This has been recognised in 2005 & 2006 with a joint volunteer thank you and Christmas event to pass on our sincere thanks for the efforts of our Volunteers. Through our administration and mainly via our Youth Advisory Committee have built strong links with our youth, schools and service groups to expand Community Pride. Our Community Services area has gained outstanding recognition in this area and strong links with various partners and links as outlined above. Our team is progressing forward plans for the Narooma Wetland project adjacent the River Murray and Sturt Reserve and also with regard to phase 2 of the Adelaide Road stormwater project taking stormwater to the Rocky Gully Creek area via stormwater detention basins. Strong achievements with regard to improvements of key reserve areas such as Avoca Dell, sourced funding for future upgrade of Thiele Reserve and ongoing maintenance on other key reserves. This issue however will become of Council key resources and budget dilemmas in future years given the high demand and cost and maintenance of all riverfront issues.

Identify resource recycling and waste management opportunities

2 Ongoing

2005 UpdateRegional Waste strategy due early 2006 MMLGA

Dec 2006 UpdateKerbside Recycling project commenced.

Dec 2007 UpdateRefer earlier note with regard to waste management


Page 46 of 62

issues. Success in sourcing $88,000 grant from Zero Waste to help introduce kerbside recycling project. Kerbside recycling project put on hold due to fire investigations at Brinkley, however Callington may be an exception as there is an opportunity to joint venue with Mount Barker Council with regard to their kerbside recycling project.

Facilitate improved public access for the waterfront and the creation and revegetation of reserves within the River Corridor, incorporating wetland components where appropriate

3 Ongoing

2005 & 2006 & 2007 UpdateAddressing via joint Urban Growth Management Plan & Riverfront Management Plan linked to previous.Also refer to earlier comments with regard to wetlands and riverfront trails.


Page 47 of 62

5 – Income Generation

Rate revenue alone cannot fund the strategic priorities and other methods of generating income will need to be found. Income can be generated a number of ways including through growth, asset restructuring, joint ventures, public private partnerships and naming rights (where appropriate), funds generation, grants and debt funding. Council will investigate the most appropriate funding options to assist in the delivery of the desired actions and vision in line with Council’s Consultation Policy.

ACTION Task Priority Timeline Comment

Identify income generation opportunities to facilitate funding of other strategic priorities, including potential asset rationalisation, leverage opportunities, partnershipsand shared resources with other Councils, Government departments or the public sector where appropriate

1 Ongoing

2005 UpdateVia 10 year financial plan Council has successfully created a Strategic Development Fund as a key initiative of the SMP. This currently holds $475,000. In addition to our accumulated surplus of $1,200,000 Council has quarantined use of this fund until it has reviewed its SMP in 2006 and completed its 10 year financial plan. Council is also well underway with its review of its land assets with regard to identifying properties that would be surplus to Council's needs with the aim of rationalising and placing returns into Council's Strategic Development fund for future projects. Council has also been successful in sourcing various grants such as $85,000 for the Murray Princess Wharf; $500,000 for stormwater and catchment 21 and ongoing road funding like Federal Government Road to Recovery programs. Although this appears to show a healthy financial position, Council faces significant challenges with regard to sustaining financial commitment at current levels of service.


Page 48 of 62

Dec 2006 UpdateMajor success is sourcing grants in 2006: $525K from CCMS for Stormwater projects $285K from LGA Emergency fund $90K from NRM for Stormwater $10K from TSA for bus study $5K from NRM for Urban Growth Management

Strategy $35K sourced via MRDB for Urban Growth

Management Strategy $40K from Murraylands Youth Sector Network $85K for Murray Princess Wharf HACC projects – additional $29K Community Water Grants - $100K Youth Centre - $24K Skate Park - $84K Private donation to Skate Park - $25K -A further $10K for Youth Centre $88,000 Zero Waste kerb side recycling

Asset & infrastructure review let and results expected Q4 2007. Sustainability issue remains high on agenda with excessive backlog of infrastructure work and looming infrastructure provision via impending results of asset and infrastructure plans.Asset sale project let to Weston Raine & Haine to progress.

Dec 2007 updateContinue to be successful on sourcing external grants, namely:o $1million Head Space Youth Centre


Page 49 of 62

o $2.1 million less Council contribution of Ferries McDonald Road.

o Further State Government stormwater infrastructure funds. ($538K)

o $18K - Arts SAo $20K – Boat rampso $20K – NRM for water projectso $55K – HACCo $40K for Mallee Health (Council)o $150K CCTVProduction of financial paper to audit committee regarding financial performance of Council and challenges ahead with regard to Council’s debt position, debt servicing ratios. Launched service reviews across organisation with regard to level of operational services and potential efficiency gains. Council has reprioritised its 2007/08 budget to focus more on infrastructure provision and depreciating assets. Sourced Boating Industry SA funds for boat ramp upgrade. Lodged further application for back spot funding for Swanport/Long Island Road roundabout and cycle track footpath for Maurice Road/Hindmarsh Road.


Page 50 of 62

Marketing & Promotion


Work with Regional Development Board & Murraylands Tourism & Marketing and other agencies to achieve regional identification

3 Ongoing

2005 & 2006 & 2007 UpdateExtremely strong partnership with MRDB and ML Tourism & Marketing Association via ML Export Identity program and various regional marketing programs with ML Tourism & Marketing. The Association winning consecutive State Awards and consecutive National Awards - the RCMB heavily funds both these organisations.

Establish local promotion/events

3 Ongoing2005 & 2006 & 2007 UpdateKey promotion of local events as detailed in report.


Page 51 of 62

Infrastructure Provision


Promote with SA Water new supply to smaller townships

2

Jun-10

2005 & 2006 updateYet to be commenced.

Dec 2007Understood to be low priority for SA Water however we will continue to encourage and lobby on behalf of those communities. SA Water upgrading existing small town plants to incorporate a filtration system, encouraging SA Water with regard to extending Mypolonga Service to include Wood Lane.

Promote the upgrade of SA Water Sewerage in Murray Bridge

2 Jun-10

2005 updateSA Water will be engaging Council in discussion towards the end of 2005/06

Dec 2006 update Discussions to commence 25th Jan 07 with site meeting.

Dec 2007 updateWater Resource Working Party and Water Task Force have progressed this with SA Water. Reported by SA Water at 13 November Water Resource Working Party that SA Water plan to


Page 52 of 62

have the new sewerage treatment plant for Murray Bridge opened and commissioned in line for the Prison project.

Promote and facilitate water and STEDs for Murray Bridge East area

2 Aug-10

2005 & 2006 & 2007 updateAs Above. SA Water engaged in conjunction with the development of the Urban Growth Management Plan. Council has commissioned studies for both of its STEDs systems at Woodlane and Riverglen. Shack area study completed and to be reported to Council with regard to future infrastructure and maintenance provision.

Promote through RDB the provision of natural gas into City of Murray Bridge

2 Jun-10

2005 & 2006 & 2007 updateMurray Bridge is already serviced by a Moomba gas line which services key major industries such as T&R Pastoral, National Foods, regional Hospital and dairy farmers at Jervois. The potential future opportunity exists via MRDB for industry access to Seagas pipeline which currently own acts as an energy pipeline between Victoria and Adelaide.


Page 53 of 62

Assist through Regional Transport Consultative Committee the establishment of transport hubs at Monarto and Tailem Bend and clarify and resolve B Double Routes through the Region

2 Jun-08

2005 updateStrong representation from being member of regional transport consultative committee and also Federal area consultative board membership in assisting us to access funding for establishment of transport hubs at Monarto and Tailem Bend. Council has also assisted the MRDB by funding towards its north south B-double corridor assessment via Ferries McDonald Road, Cambrai, Sedan to Sturt Highway.

Dec 2006 updateSignificant progress with consultation with Coorong Council to identify and plan for site in Murray Bridge/Tailem Bend corridor via Urban Growth Management Plan.

Dec 2007 updateAs above, also significant work by Council in association with regional Councils and MRDB on the Monarto airport intermodal project. Funding sourced by MRDB and engagement of Dynamic Project Delivery commissioned reports as presented to Council investigating opportunities for a Regional Airport and industry intermodal at Monarto South. Further work to


Page 54 of 62

progress.MMLGA undertaking a review of the priority list of roads for region. Preliminary investigation works and survey has begun for the construction of the Ferries McDonald Road project. Further work being undertaken on BDouble route issue.


Page 55 of 62

Environmental Improvements


Assist RDB, PIRSA, SA Water and Dairy industry in examining the appropriate future use of the River Flats

2 Jun-10

2005 updateVia PIRSA and MRDB various regional projects have been initiated including the ML South East Dairy program in establishing a regional dairy plan and addressing issues with regard to future use of the dairy flats. Council has also held initial discussions with SA Water regarding future usage of Toora and Mobilong dairy swamps with the Minister commissioning a master plan study for future use of that land.

Dec 2006 updateCouncil dairy project let and underway.

Dec 2007 updateDairy project complete and pending adoption of Council and for lobbying of Government to implement findings.Planning SA marina study still outstanding after many years and delay is frustrating.

Support environmentally sustainable farming approaches

3 Aug-10

2005 & 2006 & 2007 updateFunding partner of MM Strategic Task Force however future ongoing State funding for this success of this program is uncertain.


Page 56 of 62

Support the initiatives of SA Murray Darling Basin Management Plan

1 May-10

2005 & 2006 & 2007 updateContinue to support initiatives of the SA Murray Darling Basin Commission.Member of Region 6 MDA.

Support RDB initiatives for lobbying for water allocations and maintaining water resources for industries

1 May-10

2005 & 2006 & 2007 updateFunding partner of MRDB to assist in key initiative in lobbying for water allocations and maintaining water resources for industries, attendance at various seminars and information sessions with regard to NRM and RM issues to assist in lobbying for these issues. See earlier comments with regard to the projects.

Support the initiatives of the Dept Environment & Heritage and Dept of Water Land & Biodiversity Conservation for extension/improvement of conservation parks and reserves

3 May-10 2005 & 2006 & 2007 updatePending – low priority target May 2010.

Support regional programs for biodiversity conservation, including through the Monarto area

3 May-10 2005 & 2006 & 2007 updatePending – low priority target May 2010.


Page 57 of 62

Economic Development


Assist through MRDB & Coorong Council a Special Industry area between Murray Bridge & Tailem Bend and/or other suitable localities

3

Jul-10

2005 & 2006 updateVia Urban Growth Management Plan

Dec 2007 updateSite identified at Monteith via Enterprise Zone.

With MBB&T, RDB, SA Great conduct business awards

2 Jun-10

2005 updateConduct of 2005 SA Great Awards and MB Business & Tourism Awards were a huge success. MRD business networks and forums have been very successful and all have been supported by Council.

Dec 2006 updateSimilar results in 2006.

Dec 2007 updateAs above.

Business/industry round tables

2 May-10 2005 & 2006 & 2007 updateSee the above.


Page 58 of 62

Showcase and promote Murray Bridge in conjunction with RDB & MTM

2 May-10

2005 updateDiscussing with Chris Weir of MRDB opportunities to cross promote. Have a meeting with Caroline Hood of SATC in Dec 05 to discuss marketing plans/opportunities.

Dec 2006 updateStrong partnerships exist, success of SA Tourism marketing, Out of Ordinary TV Show, Regional Gallery promotion, Advertiser, 5MU, Standard, new regional events – Murray Bridge is getting ‘on the map.’Dec 2007 updateAs above. Continue to be active in promoting Murray Bridge with National coverage at ALGA 2007 Congress, Channel 10 live to air publicity with Jane Reilly and active participant at most regional events and functions. Applying for grants and receipt of awards is part and parcel of us trying to raise the profile at a State level regarding Murray Bridge and its Council.

Support RDB strategy for succession planning, training & skills retention

2 Jun-10

2005 & 2006 & 2007 UpdateCore business of Board for which we help fund. Also taken a leadership role with T&R Pastoral and MRDB in preparation of the immigration strategy with assistance of DMIA on workforce issues.


Page 59 of 62

Image & Community Pride

ACTION TASK Priority TIMELINE COMMENTSSupport MRDB, tourism marking program & regional promotion

3 ongoing 2005 & 2006 & 2007 updateSee above

Participate in citizen, business & event of the year

2 ongoing2005 & 2006 & 2007 updatevia Australia Day and as above.

Seek recognition of the region through awards and industry publication

2 Jun-10

2005 & 2006 & 2007 updateLink to SA Great Awards, Business & Tourism Association and via Rural City Review


Page 60 of 62

Tourism & Recreation


Develop a recreation cycle/tourist route (Murray-Valley trail) along the River Murray from Mannum to Goolwa in association with the SATC, adjoining Councils and the Murray Darling Association

3 Aug-10

2005 & 2006 & 2007 updateConscious of the need to ensure retention of Council land and Crown land along the RM corridor to assist in the ongoing future development of this initiative.Murray Bridge to Wellington bike trail being investigated. Funding opportunities through State Bicycle Fund being examined.


Page 61 of 62

Council Resolutions

ACTIONTASK

Smaller Townships Enhancement

(res 523.2-14/11/05)

That as an adjunct to the review of Council's Strategic Plan (as proposed at approximately the end of the first year) that complimentary outcomes, addressing their specific needs, be developed for the smaller townships within the Rural City of Murray Bridge to guide both the community bodies and this Council in strategic enhancements for those communities.

Dec 2006 UpdatePending final report – Kerry Medlow.

Dec 2007 updateAs stated earlier project commissioned and workshops scheduled.

Urban Growth Management Plan

(res 524.1.4-14/11/05)

Council sets aside $80,000 in its Q1 financial review for the purpose of undertaking the Urban Growth Management Plan and Riverfront Study via consultancy assistance commencing in early 2006

Council thanks the MRDB for its 'in principle' support for funding a portion of the study via a contribution from the Regional Development Prospectus Project and seeks confirmation of such accordingly

Dec 2006 UpdateProject nearing completion Q3/Q4 2007.

Dec 2007 updateProject completed.


Page 62 of 62

ANNUAL BUSINESS PLAN Volume 2 2008/2009 · Annual Business Plan – volume 2 2008/2009 Page 2 of 62 Glossary Appendix A Kerb side recycling proposal from 2008/2009. Council report

Documents