Top Banner
An Overview of SERU 2014 Results: The Student Experience in the Research University (SERU) survey provides important feedback from students about their level of satisfaction, engagement, educational achievements, goals, and the perceptions of the academic and student life environment at participating AAU institutions including Rutgers Biomedical and Health Sciences (RBHS). It is important to recognize that SERU responses, like many large scale student surveys, are often viewed as indirect measures of student outcomes. However, these survey responses from students still provide important empirical information about how they view their student experience at Rutgers and its components (schools, majors, etc.); these responses can assist in the effort to improve the overall student environment of the university. Moreover, the SERU survey results provide an important assessment about how well Rutgers-RBHS is doing in improving one of the key critical priorities of the Rutgers-RBHS Strategic Plan: Transforming the Student Experience. The following report includes pie charts that highlight specific information reported by students at your school, RBHS, as a whole, and other participating AAU institutions. The AAU institutions that participated in the 2014 administration were the Universities of California, Iowa, Michigan, Minnesota, Pittsburgh, Southern California, Virginia, Washington in addition to Indiana, Texas A&M, and Purdue Universities. Scaled factor analyses were conducted to measure aggregate responses for a particular dimension. Quantiles of the complete set of respondents from all schools were examined to establish high, medium, and low reported levels within each dimension. A value equal or lower to the first quantile was labeled ‘Low’, a value equal or higher to the third quantile was labeled ‘High’, and all values between were labeled ‘Medium’. There were a total of eight dimensions with a variety of items included in each one. In the interest of space, the number of items used in each dimension is listed along with some examples of items used. Please contact the Office of Institutional Research and Academic Planning for a complete list of items used in each dimension.
77

An Overview of SERU 2014 Results - Rutgers Universityoirap.rutgers.edu/surveys/SERU/2014/Ernest Mario...engagement, time allocation, and motivations for major selection by gender,

Jul 24, 2020

Download

Documents

dariahiddleston
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: An Overview of SERU 2014 Results - Rutgers Universityoirap.rutgers.edu/surveys/SERU/2014/Ernest Mario...engagement, time allocation, and motivations for major selection by gender,

An Overview of SERU 2014 Results:

The Student Experience in the Research University (SERU) survey provides important feedback from students about their level of satisfaction, engagement, educational achievements, goals, and the perceptions of the academic and student life environment at participating AAU institutions including Rutgers Biomedical and Health Sciences (RBHS). It is important to recognize that SERU responses, like many large scale student surveys, are often viewed as indirect measures of student outcomes. However, these survey responses from students still provide important empirical information about how they view their student experience at Rutgers and its components (schools, majors, etc.); these responses can assist in the effort to improve the overall student environment of the university. Moreover, the SERU survey results provide an important assessment about how well Rutgers-RBHS is doing in improving one of the key critical priorities of the Rutgers-RBHS Strategic Plan: Transforming the Student Experience.

The following report includes pie charts that highlight specific information reported by students at your school, RBHS, as a whole, and other participating AAU institutions. The AAU institutions that participated in the 2014 administration were the Universities of California, Iowa, Michigan, Minnesota, Pittsburgh, Southern California, Virginia, Washington in addition to Indiana, Texas A&M, and Purdue Universities.

Scaled factor analyses were conducted to measure aggregate responses for a particular dimension. Quantiles of the complete set of respondents from all schools were examined to establish high, medium, and low reported levels within each dimension. A value equal or lower to the first quantile was labeled ‘Low’, a value equal or higher to the third quantile was labeled ‘High’, and all values between were labeled ‘Medium’. There were a total of eight dimensions with a variety of items included in each one. In the interest of space, the number of items used in each dimension is listed along with some examples of items used. Please contact the Office of Institutional Research and Academic Planning for a complete list of items used in each dimension.

Page 2: An Overview of SERU 2014 Results - Rutgers Universityoirap.rutgers.edu/surveys/SERU/2014/Ernest Mario...engagement, time allocation, and motivations for major selection by gender,

Dimension Number of Items Item examples

Satisfaction with educational experience 29

1) Quality of faculty instruction 2) Advising by faculty on academic matters 3) Are program requirements well defined?

Current skills self-assessment 14 1) Analytical and critical thinking skills 2) Ability to read and comprehend academic material

Engagement with studies 16 1) Interacted with faculty during lecture class sessions 2) Communicated with a faculty member by e-mail or in person

Gains in self-assessment of skills 14 1) Change in analytical and critical thinking skills

2) Understanding of a specific field of study

Development of scholarship 9

1)Examined how others gathered and interpreted data and assessed the soundness of their conclusions 2) Incorporated ideas or concepts from different courses when completing assignments

Campus climate for diversity 8 1) Students of my race/ethnicity are respected on this campus 2) Students of my gender are respected on this campus

Academic disengagement 12 1) Partying 2) Skipped class

Research activities 8 1) Assist faculty in research with course credit 2) At least one student research course (a course in which you learned research methods or researched a topic)

Finally, comparative breakout tables between an individual school and RBHS respondents across various aspects of student satisfaction, engagement, time allocation, and motivations for major selection by gender, ethnicity, enrollment status, and class level are reported. Breakouts by major were also reported for each individual school without the RBHS comparison.

This report was prepared by Victoria Porterfield at the Office of Institutional Research and Academic Planning. For any questions, please contact her directly at [email protected].

Page 3: An Overview of SERU 2014 Results - Rutgers Universityoirap.rutgers.edu/surveys/SERU/2014/Ernest Mario...engagement, time allocation, and motivations for major selection by gender,

2014 Dean's Report

Ernest Mario School of Pharmacy

Satisfaction with overall academic experience

Satisfied is defined by a response of 'Very satisfied', 'Satisfied', or 'Somewhat satisfied'; Dissatisfied is defined by a response of 'Very dissatisfied', 'Dissatisfied', or 'Somewhat dissatisfied'Participating AAU institutions include the Universities of California, Iowa, Michigan, Minnesota, Pittsburgh, Southern California, Virginia, Washington plus Indiana, Texas A&M and Purdue Universities

Satisfied Dissatisfied

Ernest Mario School of Pharmacy

25.14%

74.86%

All RBHS Undergraduates (except PHARM)

11.73%

88.27%

Other Participating AAU Schools

16.91%

83.09%

Page 4: An Overview of SERU 2014 Results - Rutgers Universityoirap.rutgers.edu/surveys/SERU/2014/Ernest Mario...engagement, time allocation, and motivations for major selection by gender,

2014 Dean's Report

Ernest Mario School of Pharmacy

Satisfaction with overall social experience

Satisfied is defined by a response of 'Very satisfied', 'Satisfied', or 'Somewhat satisfied'; Dissatisfied is defined by a response of 'Very dissatisfied', 'Dissatisfied', or 'Somewhat dissatisfied'Participating AAU institutions include the Universities of California, Iowa, Michigan, Minnesota, Pittsburgh, Southern California, Virginia, Washington plus Indiana, Texas A&M and Purdue Universities

Satisfied Dissatisfied

Ernest Mario School of Pharmacy

17.0%

83.0%

All RBHS Undergraduates (except PHARM)

9.8%

90.2%

Other Participating AAU Schools

20.6%

79.4%

Page 5: An Overview of SERU 2014 Results - Rutgers Universityoirap.rutgers.edu/surveys/SERU/2014/Ernest Mario...engagement, time allocation, and motivations for major selection by gender,

2014 Dean's Report

Ernest Mario School of Pharmacy

Satisfaction with value of your education for the price you're paying

Satisfied is defined by a response of 'Very satisfied', 'Satisfied', or 'Somewhat satisfied'; Dissatisfied is defined by a response of 'Very dissatisfied', 'Dissatisfied', or 'Somewhat dissatisfied'Participating AAU institutions include the Universities of California, Iowa, Michigan, Minnesota, Pittsburgh, Southern California, Virginia, Washington plus Indiana, Texas A&M and Purdue Universities

Satisfied Dissatisfied

Ernest Mario School of Pharmacy

35.43%

64.57%

All RBHS Undergraduates (except PHARM)

22.08%

77.92%

Other Participating AAU Schools

30.51%

69.49%

Page 6: An Overview of SERU 2014 Results - Rutgers Universityoirap.rutgers.edu/surveys/SERU/2014/Ernest Mario...engagement, time allocation, and motivations for major selection by gender,

2014 Dean's Report

Ernest Mario School of Pharmacy

Communicated with a faculty member by e-mail or in person

Participating AAU institutions include the Universities of California, Iowa, Michigan, Minnesota, Pittsburgh, Southern California, Virginia, Washington plus Indiana, Texas A&M and Purdue Universities

Often or Very Often Occasionally or Somewhat Often Never or Rarely

Ernest Mario School of Pharmacy

16.84%

52.63%

30.53%

All RBHS Undergraduates (except PHARM)

2.13%

26.44%

71.43%

Other Participating AAU Schools

9.50%

43.49%

47.02%

Page 7: An Overview of SERU 2014 Results - Rutgers Universityoirap.rutgers.edu/surveys/SERU/2014/Ernest Mario...engagement, time allocation, and motivations for major selection by gender,

2014 Dean's Report

Ernest Mario School of Pharmacy

Interacted with faculty during lecture class sessions

Participating AAU institutions include the Universities of California, Iowa, Michigan, Minnesota, Pittsburgh, Southern California, Virginia, Washington plus Indiana, Texas A&M and Purdue Universities

Often or Very Often Occasionally or Somewhat Often Never or Rarely

Ernest Mario School of Pharmacy

42.11%

42.11%

15.79%

All RBHS Undergraduates (except PHARM)

12.31%

38.14%

49.55%

Other Participating AAU Schools

24.86%

45.26%

29.88%

Page 8: An Overview of SERU 2014 Results - Rutgers Universityoirap.rutgers.edu/surveys/SERU/2014/Ernest Mario...engagement, time allocation, and motivations for major selection by gender,

2014 Dean's Report

Ernest Mario School of Pharmacy

Sought academic help from instructor or tutor when needed

Participating AAU institutions include the Universities of California, Iowa, Michigan, Minnesota, Pittsburgh, Southern California, Virginia, Washington plus Indiana, Texas A&M and Purdue Universities

Often or Very Often Occasionally or Somewhat Often Never or Rarely

Ernest Mario School of Pharmacy

32.43%

38.92%

28.65%

All RBHS Undergraduates (except PHARM)

36.89%

39.63%

23.48%

Other Participating AAU Schools

25.46%

45.20%

29.34%

Page 9: An Overview of SERU 2014 Results - Rutgers Universityoirap.rutgers.edu/surveys/SERU/2014/Ernest Mario...engagement, time allocation, and motivations for major selection by gender,

2014 Dean's Report

Ernest Mario School of Pharmacy

Hours per week attending classes, discussion sections, or labs

Participating AAU institutions include the Universities of California, Iowa, Michigan, Minnesota, Pittsburgh, Southern California, Virginia, Washington plus Indiana, Texas A&M and Purdue Universities

More than 25 25-16 15-6 Less than 6

Ernest Mario School of Pharmacy

17.49%

44.81%

31.69%

6.01%

All RBHS Undergraduates (except PHARM)

17.28%

33.95%

37.65%

11.11%

Other Participating AAU Schools

6.65%

39.32%48.55%

5.47%

Page 10: An Overview of SERU 2014 Results - Rutgers Universityoirap.rutgers.edu/surveys/SERU/2014/Ernest Mario...engagement, time allocation, and motivations for major selection by gender,

2014 Dean's Report

Ernest Mario School of Pharmacy

Hours per week studying and other academic activities outside of class

Participating AAU institutions include the Universities of California, Iowa, Michigan, Minnesota, Pittsburgh, Southern California, Virginia, Washington plus Indiana, Texas A&M and Purdue Universities

More than 25 25-16 15-6 Less than 6

Ernest Mario School of Pharmacy

24.58%

26.26%

35.75%

13.41%

All RBHS Undergraduates (except PHARM)

14.64%

27.10%

43.61%

14.64%

Other Participating AAU Schools

10.73%

25.18%

49.19%

14.90%

Page 11: An Overview of SERU 2014 Results - Rutgers Universityoirap.rutgers.edu/surveys/SERU/2014/Ernest Mario...engagement, time allocation, and motivations for major selection by gender,

2014 Dean's Report

Ernest Mario School of Pharmacy

Motivation for Major Selection: Prepares me for a fulfilling career

Participating AAU institutions include the Universities of California, Iowa, Michigan, Minnesota, Pittsburgh, Southern California, Virginia, Washington plus Indiana, Texas A&M and Purdue Universities

Yes No

Ernest Mario School of Pharmacy

7.43%

92.57%

All RBHS Undergraduates (except PHARM)

1.53%

98.47%

Other Participating AAU Schools

10.66%

89.34%

Page 12: An Overview of SERU 2014 Results - Rutgers Universityoirap.rutgers.edu/surveys/SERU/2014/Ernest Mario...engagement, time allocation, and motivations for major selection by gender,

2014 Dean's Report

Ernest Mario School of Pharmacy

Motivation for Major Selection: Prepares me for graduate/professional school

Participating AAU institutions include the Universities of California, Iowa, Michigan, Minnesota, Pittsburgh, Southern California, Virginia, Washington plus Indiana, Texas A&M and Purdue Universities

Yes No

Ernest Mario School of Pharmacy

43.10%

56.90%

All RBHS Undergraduates (except PHARM)

32.69%

67.31%

Other Participating AAU Schools

39.35%

60.65%

Page 13: An Overview of SERU 2014 Results - Rutgers Universityoirap.rutgers.edu/surveys/SERU/2014/Ernest Mario...engagement, time allocation, and motivations for major selection by gender,

2014 Dean's Report

Satisfaction with overall academic experience

Satisfied is defined by a response of 'Very satisfied', 'Satisfied', or 'Somewhat satisfied'; Dissatisfied is defined by a response of 'Very dissatisfied', 'Dissatisfied', or 'Somewhat dissatisfied'Participating AAU institutions include the Universities of California, Iowa, Michigan, Minnesota, Pittsburgh, Southern California, Virginia, Washington plus Indiana, Texas A&M and Purdue Universities

Satisfied Dissatisfied

All RBHS Undergraduates

16.6%

83.4%

Other Participating AAU Schools

16.9%

83.1%

Page 14: An Overview of SERU 2014 Results - Rutgers Universityoirap.rutgers.edu/surveys/SERU/2014/Ernest Mario...engagement, time allocation, and motivations for major selection by gender,

2014 Dean's Report

Satisfaction with overall social experience

Satisfied is defined by a response of 'Very satisfied', 'Satisfied', or 'Somewhat satisfied'; Dissatisfied is defined by a response of 'Very dissatisfied', 'Dissatisfied', or 'Somewhat dissatisfied'Participating AAU institutions include the Universities of California, Iowa, Michigan, Minnesota, Pittsburgh, Southern California, Virginia, Washington plus Indiana, Texas A&M and Purdue Universities

Satisfied Dissatisfied

All RBHS Undergraduates

12.45%

87.55%

Other Participating AAU Schools

20.64%

79.36%

Page 15: An Overview of SERU 2014 Results - Rutgers Universityoirap.rutgers.edu/surveys/SERU/2014/Ernest Mario...engagement, time allocation, and motivations for major selection by gender,

2014 Dean's Report

Satisfaction with value of your education for the price you're paying

Satisfied is defined by a response of 'Very satisfied', 'Satisfied', or 'Somewhat satisfied'; Dissatisfied is defined by a response of 'Very dissatisfied', 'Dissatisfied', or 'Somewhat dissatisfied'Participating AAU institutions include the Universities of California, Iowa, Michigan, Minnesota, Pittsburgh, Southern California, Virginia, Washington plus Indiana, Texas A&M and Purdue Universities

Satisfied Dissatisfied

All RBHS Undergraduates

26.92%

73.08%

Other Participating AAU Schools

30.51%

69.49%

Page 16: An Overview of SERU 2014 Results - Rutgers Universityoirap.rutgers.edu/surveys/SERU/2014/Ernest Mario...engagement, time allocation, and motivations for major selection by gender,

2014 Dean's Report

Communicated with a faculty member by e-mail or in person

Participating AAU institutions include the Universities of California, Iowa, Michigan, Minnesota, Pittsburgh, Southern California, Virginia, Washington plus Indiana, Texas A&M and Purdue Universities

Often or Very Often Occasionally or Somewhat Often Never or Rarely

All RBHS Undergraduates

7.51%

36.03%

56.45%

Other Participating AAU Schools

9.50%

43.49%

47.02%

Page 17: An Overview of SERU 2014 Results - Rutgers Universityoirap.rutgers.edu/surveys/SERU/2014/Ernest Mario...engagement, time allocation, and motivations for major selection by gender,

2014 Dean's Report

Interacted with faculty during lecture class sessions

Participating AAU institutions include the Universities of California, Iowa, Michigan, Minnesota, Pittsburgh, Southern California, Virginia, Washington plus Indiana, Texas A&M and Purdue Universities

Often or Very Often Occasionally or Somewhat Often Never or Rarely

All RBHS Undergraduates

23.14%

39.58%

37.28%

Other Participating AAU Schools

24.86%

45.26%

29.88%

Page 18: An Overview of SERU 2014 Results - Rutgers Universityoirap.rutgers.edu/surveys/SERU/2014/Ernest Mario...engagement, time allocation, and motivations for major selection by gender,

2014 Dean's Report

Sought academic help from instructor or tutor when needed

Participating AAU institutions include the Universities of California, Iowa, Michigan, Minnesota, Pittsburgh, Southern California, Virginia, Washington plus Indiana, Texas A&M and Purdue Universities

Often or Very Often Occasionally or Somewhat Often Never or Rarely

All RBHS Undergraduates

35.28%

39.38%

25.34%

Other Participating AAU Schools

25.46%

45.20%

29.34%

Page 19: An Overview of SERU 2014 Results - Rutgers Universityoirap.rutgers.edu/surveys/SERU/2014/Ernest Mario...engagement, time allocation, and motivations for major selection by gender,

2014 Dean's Report

Hours per week attending classes, discussion sections, or labs

Participating AAU institutions include the Universities of California, Iowa, Michigan, Minnesota, Pittsburgh, Southern California, Virginia, Washington plus Indiana, Texas A&M and Purdue Universities

More than 25 25-16 15-6 Less than 6

All RBHS Undergraduates

17.36%

37.87%

35.50%

9.27%

Other Participating AAU Schools

6.65%

39.32%

48.55%

5.47%

Page 20: An Overview of SERU 2014 Results - Rutgers Universityoirap.rutgers.edu/surveys/SERU/2014/Ernest Mario...engagement, time allocation, and motivations for major selection by gender,

2014 Dean's Report

Hours per week studying and other academic activities outside of class

Participating AAU institutions include the Universities of California, Iowa, Michigan, Minnesota, Pittsburgh, Southern California, Virginia, Washington plus Indiana, Texas A&M and Purdue Universities

More than 25 25-16 15-6 Less than 6

All RBHS Undergraduates

18.20%

26.80%

40.80%

14.20%

Other Participating AAU Schools

10.73%

25.18%

49.19%

14.90%

Page 21: An Overview of SERU 2014 Results - Rutgers Universityoirap.rutgers.edu/surveys/SERU/2014/Ernest Mario...engagement, time allocation, and motivations for major selection by gender,

2014 Dean's Report

Motivation for Major Selection: Prepares me for a fulfilling career

Participating AAU institutions include the Universities of California, Iowa, Michigan, Minnesota, Pittsburgh, Southern California, Virginia, Washington plus Indiana, Texas A&M and Purdue Universities

Yes No

All RBHS Undergraduates

3.89%

96.11%

Other Participating AAU Schools

10.66%

89.34%

Page 22: An Overview of SERU 2014 Results - Rutgers Universityoirap.rutgers.edu/surveys/SERU/2014/Ernest Mario...engagement, time allocation, and motivations for major selection by gender,

2014 Dean's Report

Motivation for Major Selection: Prepares me for graduate/professional school

Participating AAU institutions include the Universities of California, Iowa, Michigan, Minnesota, Pittsburgh, Southern California, Virginia, Washington plus Indiana, Texas A&M and Purdue Universities

Yes No

All RBHS Undergraduates

36.87%

63.13%

Other Participating AAU Schools

39.35%

60.65%

Page 23: An Overview of SERU 2014 Results - Rutgers Universityoirap.rutgers.edu/surveys/SERU/2014/Ernest Mario...engagement, time allocation, and motivations for major selection by gender,

2014 Dean's Report Ernest Mario School of Pharmacy

Ernest Mario School of

Pharmacy All RBHS Undergraduates

(except Pharmacy) All RBHS Undergraduates Other Participating AAU

Schools*

Dimension Reported

Level N Percent N Percent N Percent N Percent Satisfaction with Educational Experience High 16 12.0 % 61 33.3 % 77 24.3 % 16,258 25.2 %

Medium 66 49.6 % 86 46.9 % 152 48.1 % 32,283 50.1 % Low 51 38.3 % 36 19.6 % 87 27.5 % 15,810 24.5 %

Total 133 100.0 % 183 100.0 % 316 100.0 % 64,351 100.0 % Current Skills Self-Assessment High 38 22.8 % 102 34.9 % 140 30.5 % 25,989 24.6 %

Medium 81 48.7 % 170 58.2 % 251 54.8 % 52,779 50.1 % Low 47 28.3 % 20 6.8 % 67 14.6 % 26,496 25.1 %

Total 166 100.0 % 292 100.0 % 458 100.0 % 105,264 100.0 % Engagement with Studies High 26 14.7 % 127 43.1 % 153 32.5 % 28,154 24.8 %

Medium 72 40.9 % 133 45.2 % 205 43.6 % 56,831 50.0 % Low 78 44.3 % 34 11.5 % 112 23.8 % 28,515 25.1 %

Total 176 100.0 % 294 100.0 % 470 100.0 % 113,500 100.0 % Gains in Self-Assessment of Skills High 25 15.3 % 62 21.6 % 87 19.3 % 25,801 24.8 %

Medium 83 50.9 % 133 46.5 % 216 48.1 % 51,949 50.0 % Low 55 33.7 % 91 31.8 % 146 32.5 % 25,972 25.0 %

Total 163 100.0 % 286 100.0 % 449 100.0 % 103,722 100.0 % Development of Scholarship High 46 27.3 % 108 36.3 % 154 33.1 % 26,613 25.0 %

Medium 66 39.2 % 137 46.1 % 203 43.6 % 53,116 50.0 % Low 56 33.3 % 52 17.5 % 108 23.2 % 26,480 24.9 %

Total 168 100.0 % 297 100.0 % 465 100.0 % 106,209 100.0 % Campus Climate for Diversity High 30 17.0 % 72 24.5 % 102 21.7 % 27,154 24.9 %

Medium 94 53.4 % 166 56.6 % 260 55.4 % 54,591 50.1 % Low 52 29.5 % 55 18.7 % 107 22.8 % 27,202 24.9 %

Total 176 100.0 % 293 100.0 % 469 100.0 % 108,947 100.0 % Academic Disengagement High 47 26.5 % 32 10.3 % 79 16.2 % 27,207 24.7 %

Medium 75 42.3 % 89 28.8 % 164 33.8 % 55,217 50.2 % Low 55 31.0 % 187 60.7 % 242 49.8 % 27,366 24.9 %

Total 177 100.0 % 308 100.0 % 485 100.0 % 109,790 100.0 % Research Activities High 30 17.5 % 68 22.5 % 98 20.7 % 24,911 23.2 %

Medium 91 53.2 % 191 63.4 % 282 59.7 % 53,035 49.5 % Low 50 29.2 % 42 13.9 % 92 19.4 % 29,188 27.2 %

Total 171 100.0 % 301 100.0 % 472 100.0 % 107,134 100.0 %

* Other Participating AAU institutions include the Universities of California, Iowa, Michigan, Minnesota, Pittsburgh, Southern California, Virginia, Washington plus Indiana, Texas A&M and Purdue

Universities NOTE 1: Students that responded to this survey but did not respond to items used for a dimension's factor analyses were not included in percentages

NOTE 2: Percent totals may not always equal 100% due to rounding

Page 24: An Overview of SERU 2014 Results - Rutgers Universityoirap.rutgers.edu/surveys/SERU/2014/Ernest Mario...engagement, time allocation, and motivations for major selection by gender,

2014 Dean's Report Ernest Mario School of Pharmacy

Demographics Number of Respondents

Ernest Mario School of

Pharmacy All RBHS Undergraduates Gender Female 124 410

Male 66 114 Ethnicity African American 3 48

Chicano- Latino 3 45 Asian- Filipino- Pacific Islander

133 198

White 30 187 International- Foreign Visa 15 18 Other 6 28

Enrollment Status Full-Time 190 286 Part-Time . 238

Academic Class Level

Freshman 48 93 Sophomore 11 42 Junior 52 167 Senior 79 219 Unclassified . 3

NOTE 1: Students that responded to this survey but did not respond to a particular item were removed from the item's analysis and not included in percentages

NOTE 2: Percent totals may not always equal 100% due to rounding

Page 25: An Overview of SERU 2014 Results - Rutgers Universityoirap.rutgers.edu/surveys/SERU/2014/Ernest Mario...engagement, time allocation, and motivations for major selection by gender,

2014 Dean's Report Ernest Mario School of Pharmacy

Ernest Mario School of

Pharmacy All RBHS Undergraduate Satisfied* Dissatisfied** Satisfied* Dissatisfied**

Level of Satisfaction Gender N Percent N Percent N Percent N Percent Ability to get into a major that you want Female 103 92.7 % 8 7.2 % 344 94.2 % 21 5.7 %

Male 51 91.0 % 5 8.9 % 93 93.9 % 6 6.0 % Total 154 92.2 % 13 7.7 % 437 94.1 % 27 5.8 %

Access to faculty outside of class Female 88 80.0 % 22 20.0 % 305 84.2 % 57 15.7 % Male 47 81.0 % 11 18.9 % 85 84.1 % 16 15.8 % Total 135 80.3 % 33 19.6 % 390 84.2 % 73 15.7 %

Access to small classes Female 67 59.8 % 45 40.1 % 300 81.9 % 66 18.0 % Male 36 62.0 % 22 37.9 % 76 76.0 % 24 24.0 % Total 103 60.5 % 67 39.4 % 376 80.6 % 90 19.3 %

Advising by departmental staff on academic matters

Female 84 75.0 % 28 25.0 % 295 80.6 % 71 19.3 % Male 46 80.7 % 11 19.2 % 81 81.8 % 18 18.1 % Total 130 76.9 % 39 23.0 % 376 80.8 % 89 19.1 %

Advising by faculty on academic matters Female 90 79.6 % 23 20.3 % 310 84.0 % 59 15.9 % Male 45 78.9 % 12 21.0 % 80 79.2 % 21 20.7 % Total 135 79.4 % 35 20.5 % 390 82.9 % 80 17.0 %

Advising by school or college staff on academic matters

Female 84 75.0 % 28 25.0 % 292 79.5 % 75 20.4 % Male 47 82.4 % 10 17.5 % 82 81.1 % 19 18.8 % Total 131 77.5 % 38 22.4 % 374 79.9 % 94 20.0 %

Availability of courses for general education or breadth requirements

Female 85 76.5 % 26 23.4 % 305 85.4 % 52 14.5 % Male 45 78.9 % 12 21.0 % 82 82.0 % 18 18.0 % Total 130 77.3 % 38 22.6 % 387 84.6 % 70 15.3 %

Availability of courses needed for graduation

Female 100 88.4 % 13 11.5 % 335 91.2 % 32 8.7 % Male 50 87.7 % 7 12.2 % 91 90.0 % 10 9.9 % Total 150 88.2 % 20 11.7 % 426 91.0 % 42 8.9 %

Availability of library research materials Female 106 93.8 % 7 6.1 % 335 91.5 % 31 8.4 % Male 47 82.4 % 10 17.5 % 87 86.1 % 14 13.8 % Total 153 90.0 % 17 10.0 % 422 90.3 % 45 9.6 %

Educational enrichment programs (e.g., study abroad, internships)

Female 73 64.6 % 40 35.3 % 265 74.0 % 93 25.9 % Male 40 70.1 % 17 29.8 % 77 76.2 % 24 23.7 % Total 113 66.4 % 57 33.5 % 342 74.5 % 117 25.4 %

Opportunities for research experience or to produce creative products

Female 89 79.4 % 23 20.5 % 294 81.4 % 67 18.5 % Male 47 81.0 % 11 18.9 % 82 80.3 % 20 19.6 % Total 136 80.0 % 34 20.0 % 376 81.2 % 87 18.7 %

NOTE 1: Students that responded to this survey but did not respond to a particular item were removed from the item's analysis and not included in percentages

NOTE 2: Percent totals may not always equal 100% due to rounding *Satisfied is defined by a response of 'Very satisfied', 'Satisfied', or 'Somewhat satisfied'

**Dissatisfied is defined by a response of 'Very dissatisfied', 'Dissatisfied', or 'Somewhat dissatisfied'

Page 26: An Overview of SERU 2014 Results - Rutgers Universityoirap.rutgers.edu/surveys/SERU/2014/Ernest Mario...engagement, time allocation, and motivations for major selection by gender,

2014 Dean's Report Ernest Mario School of Pharmacy

Ernest Mario School of

Pharmacy All RBHS Undergraduate Satisfied* Dissatisfied** Satisfied* Dissatisfied**

Level of Satisfaction Gender N Percent N Percent N Percent N Percent Quality of faculty instruction Female 96 84.9 % 17 15.0 % 319 86.6 % 49 13.3 %

Male 48 84.2 % 9 15.7 % 83 83.8 % 16 16.1 % Total 144 84.7 % 26 15.2 % 402 86.0 % 65 13.9 %

Quality of lower-division courses in your major

Female 83 72.8 % 25 21.9 % 254 76.0 % 48 14.3 % Male 43 72.8 % 13 22.0 % 73 76.0 % 20 20.8 % Total 126 72.8 % 38 21.9 % 327 76.0 % 68 15.8 %

Quality of teaching by graduate student TAs

Female 95 84.8 % 17 15.1 % 304 86.1 % 49 13.8 % Male 41 71.9 % 16 28.0 % 78 78.0 % 22 22.0 % Total 136 80.4 % 33 19.5 % 382 84.3 % 71 15.6 %

Quality of upper-division courses in your major

Female 82 71.9 % 17 14.9 % 258 77.2 % 27 8.0 % Male 42 71.1 % 7 11.8 % 73 76.0 % 11 11.4 % Total 124 71.6 % 24 13.8 % 331 76.9 % 38 8.8 %

Satisfaction with grade point average Female 77 66.3 % 39 33.6 % 312 82.5 % 66 17.4 % Male 36 60.0 % 24 40.0 % 75 71.4 % 30 28.5 % Total 113 64.2 % 63 35.7 % 387 80.1 % 96 19.8 %

Satisfaction with overall academic experience

Female 88 75.8 % 28 24.1 % 322 85.4 % 55 14.5 % Male 43 72.8 % 16 27.1 % 79 75.9 % 25 24.0 % Total 131 74.8 % 44 25.1 % 401 83.3 % 80 16.6 %

Satisfaction with overall social experience

Female 96 82.7 % 20 17.2 % 330 87.7 % 46 12.2 % Male 50 83.3 % 10 16.6 % 91 86.6 % 14 13.3 % Total 146 82.9 % 30 17.0 % 421 87.5 % 60 12.4 %

Satisfaction with value of your education for the price you're paying

Female 77 66.3 % 39 33.6 % 288 76.1 % 90 23.8 % Male 36 61.0 % 23 38.9 % 64 61.5 % 40 38.4 % Total 113 64.5 % 62 35.4 % 352 73.0 % 130 26.9 %

Variety of courses available in your major

Female 77 67.5 % 34 29.8 % 260 77.6 % 61 18.2 % Male 40 67.7 % 18 30.5 % 72 75.0 % 23 23.9 % Total 117 67.6 % 52 30.0 % 332 77.0 % 84 19.4 %

NOTE 1: Students that responded to this survey but did not respond to a particular item were removed from the item's analysis and not included in percentages

NOTE 2: Percent totals may not always equal 100% due to rounding *Satisfied is defined by a response of 'Very satisfied', 'Satisfied', or 'Somewhat satisfied'

**Dissatisfied is defined by a response of 'Very dissatisfied', 'Dissatisfied', or 'Somewhat dissatisfied'

Page 27: An Overview of SERU 2014 Results - Rutgers Universityoirap.rutgers.edu/surveys/SERU/2014/Ernest Mario...engagement, time allocation, and motivations for major selection by gender,

2014 Dean's Report Ernest Mario School of Pharmacy

Ernest Mario School of

Pharmacy All RBHS Undergraduates Satisfied* Dissatisfied** Satisfied* Dissatisfied**

Level of Satisfaction Ethnicity N Percent N Percent N Percent N Percent Ability to get into a major that you want African American 2 100.0 % . . 34 100.0 % . .

Chicano- Latino 3 100.0 % . . 37 90.2 % 4 9.7 % Asian- Filipino- Pacific Islander 105 90.5 % 11 9.4 % 158 91.3 % 15 8.6 %

White 24 92.3 % 2 7.6 % 167 96.5 % 6 3.4 % International- Foreign Visa 14 100.0 % . . 17 100.0 % . .

Other 6 100.0 % . . 24 92.3 % 2 7.6 % Total 154 92.2 % 13 7.7 % 437 94.1 % 27 5.8 %

Access to faculty outside of class African American 2 100.0 % . . 31 88.5 % 4 11.4 % Chicano- Latino 2 66.6 % 1 33.3 % 36 90.0 % 4 10.0 %

Asian- Filipino- Pacific Islander 90 77.5 % 26 22.4 % 136 78.6 % 37 21.3 % White 25 92.5 % 2 7.4 % 151 87.7 % 21 12.2 %

International- Foreign Visa 10 71.4 % 4 28.5 % 12 70.5 % 5 29.4 % Other 6 100.0 % . . 24 92.3 % 2 7.6 % Total 135 80.3 % 33 19.6 % 390 84.2 % 73 15.7 %

Access to small classes African American 2 100.0 % . . 33 94.2 % 2 5.7 % Chicano- Latino 2 66.6 % 1 33.3 % 36 87.8 % 5 12.1 %

Asian- Filipino- Pacific Islander 72 61.0 % 46 38.9 % 122 70.5 % 51 29.4 % White 15 55.5 % 12 44.4 % 151 86.7 % 23 13.2 %

International- Foreign Visa 8 57.1 % 6 42.8 % 11 64.7 % 6 35.2 % Other 4 66.6 % 2 33.3 % 23 88.4 % 3 11.5 % Total 103 60.5 % 67 39.4 % 376 80.6 % 90 19.3 %

Advising by departmental staff on academic matters

African American 2 100.0 % . . 32 88.8 % 4 11.1 % Chicano- Latino 1 50.0 % 1 50.0 % 31 77.5 % 9 22.5 %

Asian- Filipino- Pacific Islander 85 72.0 % 33 27.9 % 131 75.7 % 42 24.2 % White 24 88.8 % 3 11.1 % 145 83.8 % 28 16.1 %

International- Foreign Visa 12 85.7 % 2 14.2 % 14 82.3 % 3 17.6 % Other 6 100.0 % . . 23 88.4 % 3 11.5 % Total 130 76.9 % 39 23.0 % 376 80.8 % 89 19.1 %

NOTE 1: Students that responded to this survey but did not respond to a particular item were removed from the item's analysis and not included in percentages

NOTE 2: Percent totals may not always equal 100% due to rounding *Satisfied is defined by a response of 'Very satisfied', 'Satisfied', or 'Somewhat satisfied'

**Dissatisfied is defined by a response of 'Very dissatisfied', 'Dissatisfied', or 'Somewhat dissatisfied'

Page 28: An Overview of SERU 2014 Results - Rutgers Universityoirap.rutgers.edu/surveys/SERU/2014/Ernest Mario...engagement, time allocation, and motivations for major selection by gender,

2014 Dean's Report Ernest Mario School of Pharmacy

Ernest Mario School of

Pharmacy All RBHS Undergraduates Satisfied* Dissatisfied** Satisfied* Dissatisfied**

Level of Satisfaction Ethnicity N Percent N Percent N Percent N Percent Advising by faculty on academic matters African American 2 100.0 % . . 32 88.8 % 4 11.1 %

Chicano- Latino 1 50.0 % 1 50.0 % 32 80.0 % 8 20.0 % Asian- Filipino- Pacific Islander 88 74.5 % 30 25.4 % 140 80.0 % 35 20.0 %

White 25 89.2 % 3 10.7 % 151 85.7 % 25 14.2 % International- Foreign Visa 13 92.8 % 1 7.1 % 15 88.2 % 2 11.7 %

Other 6 100.0 % . . 20 76.9 % 6 23.0 % Total 135 79.4 % 35 20.5 % 390 82.9 % 80 17.0 %

Advising by school or college staff on academic matters

African American 2 100.0 % . . 31 86.1 % 5 13.8 % Chicano- Latino 1 50.0 % 1 50.0 % 32 82.0 % 7 17.9 %

Asian- Filipino- Pacific Islander 87 73.7 % 31 26.2 % 136 77.7 % 39 22.2 % White 24 88.8 % 3 11.1 % 141 80.5 % 34 19.4 %

International- Foreign Visa 12 85.7 % 2 14.2 % 14 82.3 % 3 17.6 % Other 5 83.3 % 1 16.6 % 20 76.9 % 6 23.0 % Total 131 77.5 % 38 22.4 % 374 79.9 % 94 20.0 %

Availability of courses for general education or breadth requirements

African American 2 100.0 % . . 34 97.1 % 1 2.8 % Chicano- Latino 2 100.0 % . . 36 90.0 % 4 10.0 %

Asian- Filipino- Pacific Islander 88 75.2 % 29 24.7 % 132 76.7 % 40 23.2 % White 23 85.1 % 4 14.8 % 150 89.2 % 18 10.7 %

International- Foreign Visa 11 78.5 % 3 21.4 % 12 75.0 % 4 25.0 % Other 4 66.6 % 2 33.3 % 23 88.4 % 3 11.5 % Total 130 77.3 % 38 22.6 % 387 84.6 % 70 15.3 %

Availability of courses needed for graduation

African American 1 50.0 % 1 50.0 % 32 91.4 % 3 8.5 % Chicano- Latino 2 100.0 % . . 37 92.5 % 3 7.5 %

Asian- Filipino- Pacific Islander 104 88.1 % 14 11.8 % 153 87.9 % 21 12.0 % White 24 85.7 % 4 14.2 % 164 93.1 % 12 6.8 %

International- Foreign Visa 13 92.8 % 1 7.1 % 15 88.2 % 2 11.7 % Other 6 100.0 % . . 25 96.1 % 1 3.8 % Total 150 88.2 % 20 11.7 % 426 91.0 % 42 8.9 %

NOTE 1: Students that responded to this survey but did not respond to a particular item were removed from the item's analysis and not included in percentages

NOTE 2: Percent totals may not always equal 100% due to rounding *Satisfied is defined by a response of 'Very satisfied', 'Satisfied', or 'Somewhat satisfied'

**Dissatisfied is defined by a response of 'Very dissatisfied', 'Dissatisfied', or 'Somewhat dissatisfied'

Page 29: An Overview of SERU 2014 Results - Rutgers Universityoirap.rutgers.edu/surveys/SERU/2014/Ernest Mario...engagement, time allocation, and motivations for major selection by gender,

2014 Dean's Report Ernest Mario School of Pharmacy

Ernest Mario School of

Pharmacy All RBHS Undergraduates Satisfied* Dissatisfied** Satisfied* Dissatisfied**

Level of Satisfaction Ethnicity N Percent N Percent N Percent N Percent Availability of library research materials African American 2 100.0 % . . 32 91.4 % 3 8.5 %

Chicano- Latino 2 100.0 % . . 35 89.7 % 4 10.2 % Asian- Filipino- Pacific Islander 104 88.1 % 14 11.8 % 153 87.4 % 22 12.5 %

White 25 89.2 % 3 10.7 % 160 91.4 % 15 8.5 % International- Foreign Visa 14 100.0 % . . 17 100.0 % . .

Other 6 100.0 % . . 25 96.1 % 1 3.8 % Total 153 90.0 % 17 10.0 % 422 90.3 % 45 9.6 %

Educational enrichment programs (e.g., study abroad, internships)

African American 2 100.0 % . . 28 80.0 % 7 20.0 % Chicano- Latino 1 50.0 % 1 50.0 % 28 71.7 % 11 28.2 %

Asian- Filipino- Pacific Islander 76 64.4 % 42 35.5 % 117 67.6 % 56 32.3 % White 22 78.5 % 6 21.4 % 140 82.8 % 29 17.1 %

International- Foreign Visa 8 57.1 % 6 42.8 % 9 52.9 % 8 47.0 % Other 4 66.6 % 2 33.3 % 20 76.9 % 6 23.0 % Total 113 66.4 % 57 33.5 % 342 74.5 % 117 25.4 %

Opportunities for research experience or to produce creative products

African American 2 100.0 % . . 32 91.4 % 3 8.5 % Chicano- Latino 2 66.6 % 1 33.3 % 29 72.5 % 11 27.5 %

Asian- Filipino- Pacific Islander 90 76.9 % 27 23.0 % 132 76.7 % 40 23.2 % White 23 82.1 % 5 17.8 % 146 84.3 % 27 15.6 %

International- Foreign Visa 13 92.8 % 1 7.1 % 14 82.3 % 3 17.6 % Other 6 100.0 % . . 23 88.4 % 3 11.5 % Total 136 80.0 % 34 20.0 % 376 81.2 % 87 18.7 %

Quality of faculty instruction African American 2 100.0 % . . 34 97.1 % 1 2.8 % Chicano- Latino 1 33.3 % 2 66.6 % 33 80.4 % 8 19.5 %

Asian- Filipino- Pacific Islander 100 84.7 % 18 15.2 % 150 85.7 % 25 14.2 % White 25 89.2 % 3 10.7 % 153 87.9 % 21 12.0 %

International- Foreign Visa 10 76.9 % 3 23.0 % 12 75.0 % 4 25.0 % Other 6 100.0 % . . 20 76.9 % 6 23.0 % Total 144 84.7 % 26 15.2 % 402 86.0 % 65 13.9 %

NOTE 1: Students that responded to this survey but did not respond to a particular item were removed from the item's analysis and not included in percentages

NOTE 2: Percent totals may not always equal 100% due to rounding *Satisfied is defined by a response of 'Very satisfied', 'Satisfied', or 'Somewhat satisfied'

**Dissatisfied is defined by a response of 'Very dissatisfied', 'Dissatisfied', or 'Somewhat dissatisfied'

Page 30: An Overview of SERU 2014 Results - Rutgers Universityoirap.rutgers.edu/surveys/SERU/2014/Ernest Mario...engagement, time allocation, and motivations for major selection by gender,

2014 Dean's Report Ernest Mario School of Pharmacy

Ernest Mario School of

Pharmacy All RBHS Undergraduates Satisfied* Dissatisfied** Satisfied* Dissatisfied**

Level of Satisfaction Ethnicity N Percent N Percent N Percent N Percent Quality of lower-division courses in your major

African American 2 100.0 % . . 27 84.3 % 1 3.1 % Chicano- Latino 2 66.6 % 1 33.3 % 27 77.1 % 5 14.2 %

Asian- Filipino- Pacific Islander 86 72.2 % 26 21.8 % 125 73.9 % 35 20.7 % White 23 79.3 % 5 17.2 % 123 76.8 % 19 11.8 %

International- Foreign Visa 7 50.0 % 6 42.8 % 9 56.2 % 6 37.5 % Other 6 100.0 % . . 16 88.8 % 2 11.1 % Total 126 72.8 % 38 21.9 % 327 76.0 % 68 15.8 %

Quality of teaching by graduate student TAs

African American 2 100.0 % . . 30 85.7 % 5 14.2 % Chicano- Latino 3 100.0 % . . 34 85.0 % 6 15.0 %

Asian- Filipino- Pacific Islander 92 79.3 % 24 20.6 % 137 79.6 % 35 20.3 % White 23 82.1 % 5 17.8 % 144 87.2 % 21 12.7 %

International- Foreign Visa 11 78.5 % 3 21.4 % 13 81.2 % 3 18.7 % Other 5 83.3 % 1 16.6 % 24 96.0 % 1 4.0 % Total 136 80.4 % 33 19.5 % 382 84.3 % 71 15.6 %

Quality of upper-division courses in your major

African American 2 100.0 % . . 27 84.3 % . . Chicano- Latino 1 33.3 % 2 66.6 % 29 82.8 % 4 11.4 %

Asian- Filipino- Pacific Islander 86 72.2 % 16 13.4 % 125 73.9 % 19 11.2 % White 20 68.9 % 4 13.7 % 123 76.8 % 12 7.5 %

International- Foreign Visa 9 64.2 % 2 14.2 % 11 68.7 % 2 12.5 % Other 6 100.0 % . . 16 88.8 % 1 5.5 % Total 124 71.6 % 24 13.8 % 331 76.9 % 38 8.8 %

Satisfaction with grade point average African American . . 3 100.0 % 35 85.3 % 6 14.6 % Chicano- Latino 2 66.6 % 1 33.3 % 35 85.3 % 6 14.6 %

Asian- Filipino- Pacific Islander 76 62.8 % 45 37.1 % 119 66.1 % 61 33.8 % White 20 68.9 % 9 31.0 % 164 91.6 % 15 8.3 %

International- Foreign Visa 10 71.4 % 4 28.5 % 13 76.4 % 4 23.5 % Other 5 83.3 % 1 16.6 % 21 84.0 % 4 16.0 % Total 113 64.2 % 63 35.7 % 387 80.1 % 96 19.8 %

NOTE 1: Students that responded to this survey but did not respond to a particular item were removed from the item's analysis and not included in percentages

NOTE 2: Percent totals may not always equal 100% due to rounding *Satisfied is defined by a response of 'Very satisfied', 'Satisfied', or 'Somewhat satisfied'

**Dissatisfied is defined by a response of 'Very dissatisfied', 'Dissatisfied', or 'Somewhat dissatisfied'

Page 31: An Overview of SERU 2014 Results - Rutgers Universityoirap.rutgers.edu/surveys/SERU/2014/Ernest Mario...engagement, time allocation, and motivations for major selection by gender,

2014 Dean's Report Ernest Mario School of Pharmacy

Ernest Mario School of

Pharmacy All RBHS Undergraduates Satisfied* Dissatisfied** Satisfied* Dissatisfied**

Level of Satisfaction Ethnicity N Percent N Percent N Percent N Percent Satisfaction with overall academic experience

African American 2 66.6 % 1 33.3 % 37 92.5 % 3 7.5 % Chicano- Latino 1 50.0 % 1 50.0 % 34 87.1 % 5 12.8 %

Asian- Filipino- Pacific Islander 89 73.5 % 32 26.4 % 139 77.2 % 41 22.7 % White 25 86.2 % 4 13.7 % 159 88.8 % 20 11.1 %

International- Foreign Visa 8 57.1 % 6 42.8 % 10 58.8 % 7 41.1 % Other 6 100.0 % . . 22 84.6 % 4 15.3 % Total 131 74.8 % 44 25.1 % 401 83.3 % 80 16.6 %

Satisfaction with overall social experience

African American 3 100.0 % . . 38 92.6 % 3 7.3 % Chicano- Latino 3 100.0 % . . 36 90.0 % 4 10.0 %

Asian- Filipino- Pacific Islander 101 83.4 % 20 16.5 % 152 84.4 % 28 15.5 % White 22 75.8 % 7 24.1 % 156 88.1 % 21 11.8 %

International- Foreign Visa 12 85.7 % 2 14.2 % 14 82.3 % 3 17.6 % Other 5 83.3 % 1 16.6 % 25 96.1 % 1 3.8 % Total 146 82.9 % 30 17.0 % 421 87.5 % 60 12.4 %

Satisfaction with value of your education for the price you're paying

African American 2 66.6 % 1 33.3 % 32 80.0 % 8 20.0 % Chicano- Latino 1 50.0 % 1 50.0 % 32 80.0 % 8 20.0 %

Asian- Filipino- Pacific Islander 74 61.1 % 47 38.8 % 114 63.3 % 66 36.6 % White 24 82.7 % 5 17.2 % 144 80.4 % 35 19.5 %

International- Foreign Visa 6 42.8 % 8 57.1 % 8 47.0 % 9 52.9 % Other 6 100.0 % . . 22 84.6 % 4 15.3 % Total 113 64.5 % 62 35.4 % 352 73.0 % 130 26.9 %

Variety of courses available in your major

African American 1 50.0 % 1 50.0 % 29 90.6 % 2 6.2 % Chicano- Latino 1 33.3 % 2 66.6 % 27 77.1 % 6 17.1 %

Asian- Filipino- Pacific Islander 79 66.3 % 38 31.9 % 118 69.4 % 50 29.4 % White 22 75.8 % 6 20.6 % 132 82.5 % 20 12.5 %

International- Foreign Visa 8 57.1 % 5 35.7 % 9 56.2 % 5 31.2 % Other 6 100.0 % . . 17 94.4 % 1 5.5 % Total 117 67.6 % 52 30.0 % 332 77.0 % 84 19.4 %

NOTE 1: Students that responded to this survey but did not respond to a particular item were removed from the item's analysis and not included in percentages

NOTE 2: Percent totals may not always equal 100% due to rounding *Satisfied is defined by a response of 'Very satisfied', 'Satisfied', or 'Somewhat satisfied'

**Dissatisfied is defined by a response of 'Very dissatisfied', 'Dissatisfied', or 'Somewhat dissatisfied'

Page 32: An Overview of SERU 2014 Results - Rutgers Universityoirap.rutgers.edu/surveys/SERU/2014/Ernest Mario...engagement, time allocation, and motivations for major selection by gender,

2014 Dean's Report Ernest Mario School of Pharmacy

Ernest Mario School of

Pharmacy All RBHS Undergraduates Satisfied* Dissatisfied** Satisfied* Dissatisfied**

Level of Satisfaction Enrollment

Status N Percent N Percent N Percent N Percent Ability to get into a major that you want Full-Time 154 92.2 % 13 7.7 % 233 92.8 % 18 7.1 %

Part-Time . . . . 204 95.7 % 9 4.2 % Total 154 92.2 % 13 7.7 % 437 94.1 % 27 5.8 %

Access to faculty outside of class Full-Time 135 80.3 % 33 19.6 % 211 83.7 % 41 16.2 % Part-Time . . . . 179 84.8 % 32 15.1 % Total 135 80.3 % 33 19.6 % 390 84.2 % 73 15.7 %

Access to small classes Full-Time 103 60.5 % 67 39.4 % 179 70.7 % 74 29.2 % Part-Time . . . . 197 92.4 % 16 7.5 % Total 103 60.5 % 67 39.4 % 376 80.6 % 90 19.3 %

Advising by departmental staff on academic matters

Full-Time 130 76.9 % 39 23.0 % 198 79.2 % 52 20.8 % Part-Time . . . . 178 82.7 % 37 17.2 % Total 130 76.9 % 39 23.0 % 376 80.8 % 89 19.1 %

Advising by faculty on academic matters Full-Time 135 79.4 % 35 20.5 % 209 82.2 % 45 17.7 % Part-Time . . . . 181 83.7 % 35 16.2 % Total 135 79.4 % 35 20.5 % 390 82.9 % 80 17.0 %

Advising by school or college staff on academic matters

Full-Time 131 77.5 % 38 22.4 % 197 78.1 % 55 21.8 % Part-Time . . . . 177 81.9 % 39 18.0 % Total 131 77.5 % 38 22.4 % 374 79.9 % 94 20.0 %

Availability of courses for general education or breadth requirements

Full-Time 130 77.3 % 38 22.6 % 200 79.6 % 51 20.3 % Part-Time . . . . 187 90.7 % 19 9.2 % Total 130 77.3 % 38 22.6 % 387 84.6 % 70 15.3 %

Availability of courses needed for graduation

Full-Time 150 88.2 % 20 11.7 % 228 89.7 % 26 10.2 % Part-Time . . . . 198 92.5 % 16 7.4 % Total 150 88.2 % 20 11.7 % 426 91.0 % 42 8.9 %

Availability of library research materials Full-Time 153 90.0 % 17 10.0 % 228 90.1 % 25 9.8 % Part-Time . . . . 194 90.6 % 20 9.3 % Total 153 90.0 % 17 10.0 % 422 90.3 % 45 9.6 %

Educational enrichment programs (e.g., study abroad, internships)

Full-Time 113 66.4 % 57 33.5 % 175 68.8 % 79 31.1 % Part-Time . . . . 167 81.4 % 38 18.5 % Total 113 66.4 % 57 33.5 % 342 74.5 % 117 25.4 %

Opportunities for research experience or to produce creative products

Full-Time 136 80.0 % 34 20.0 % 200 79.0 % 53 20.9 % Part-Time . . . . 176 83.8 % 34 16.1 % Total 136 80.0 % 34 20.0 % 376 81.2 % 87 18.7 %

NOTE 1: Students that responded to this survey but did not respond to a particular item were removed from the item's analysis and not included in percentages

NOTE 2: Percent totals may not always equal 100% due to rounding *Satisfied is defined by a response of 'Very satisfied', 'Satisfied', or 'Somewhat satisfied'

**Dissatisfied is defined by a response of 'Very dissatisfied', 'Dissatisfied', or 'Somewhat dissatisfied'

Page 33: An Overview of SERU 2014 Results - Rutgers Universityoirap.rutgers.edu/surveys/SERU/2014/Ernest Mario...engagement, time allocation, and motivations for major selection by gender,

2014 Dean's Report Ernest Mario School of Pharmacy

Ernest Mario School of

Pharmacy All RBHS Undergraduates Satisfied* Dissatisfied** Satisfied* Dissatisfied**

Level of Satisfaction Enrollment

Status N Percent N Percent N Percent N Percent Quality of faculty instruction Full-Time 144 84.7 % 26 15.2 % 220 86.9 % 33 13.0 %

Part-Time . . . . 182 85.0 % 32 14.9 % Total 144 84.7 % 26 15.2 % 402 86.0 % 65 13.9 %

Quality of lower-division courses in your major

Full-Time 126 72.8 % 38 21.9 % 194 75.4 % 53 20.6 % Part-Time . . . . 133 76.8 % 15 8.6 % Total 126 72.8 % 38 21.9 % 327 76.0 % 68 15.8 %

Quality of teaching by graduate student TAs

Full-Time 136 80.4 % 33 19.5 % 207 82.1 % 45 17.8 % Part-Time . . . . 175 87.0 % 26 12.9 % Total 136 80.4 % 33 19.5 % 382 84.3 % 71 15.6 %

Quality of upper-division courses in your major

Full-Time 124 71.6 % 24 13.8 % 189 73.5 % 28 10.8 % Part-Time . . . . 142 82.0 % 10 5.7 % Total 124 71.6 % 24 13.8 % 331 76.9 % 38 8.8 %

Satisfaction with grade point average Full-Time 113 64.2 % 63 35.7 % 177 67.8 % 84 32.1 % Part-Time . . . . 210 94.5 % 12 5.4 % Total 113 64.2 % 63 35.7 % 387 80.1 % 96 19.8 %

Satisfaction with overall academic experience

Full-Time 131 74.8 % 44 25.1 % 208 80.0 % 52 20.0 % Part-Time . . . . 193 87.3 % 28 12.6 % Total 131 74.8 % 44 25.1 % 401 83.3 % 80 16.6 %

Satisfaction with overall social experience

Full-Time 146 82.9 % 30 17.0 % 222 85.0 % 39 14.9 % Part-Time . . . . 199 90.4 % 21 9.5 % Total 146 82.9 % 30 17.0 % 421 87.5 % 60 12.4 %

Satisfaction with value of your education for the price you're paying

Full-Time 113 64.5 % 62 35.4 % 180 69.2 % 80 30.7 % Part-Time . . . . 172 77.4 % 50 22.5 % Total 113 64.5 % 62 35.4 % 352 73.0 % 130 26.9 %

Variety of courses available in your major

Full-Time 117 67.6 % 52 30.0 % 182 70.8 % 70 27.2 % Part-Time . . . . 150 86.2 % 14 8.0 % Total 117 67.6 % 52 30.0 % 332 77.0 % 84 19.4 %

NOTE 1: Students that responded to this survey but did not respond to a particular item were removed from the item's analysis and not included in percentages

NOTE 2: Percent totals may not always equal 100% due to rounding *Satisfied is defined by a response of 'Very satisfied', 'Satisfied', or 'Somewhat satisfied'

**Dissatisfied is defined by a response of 'Very dissatisfied', 'Dissatisfied', or 'Somewhat dissatisfied'

Page 34: An Overview of SERU 2014 Results - Rutgers Universityoirap.rutgers.edu/surveys/SERU/2014/Ernest Mario...engagement, time allocation, and motivations for major selection by gender,

2014 Dean's Report Ernest Mario School of Pharmacy

Ernest Mario School of

Pharmacy All RBHS Undergraduates Satisfied* Dissatisfied** Satisfied* Dissatisfied**

Level of Satisfaction Academic

Class Level N Percent N Percent N Percent N Percent Ability to get into a major that you want Freshman 37 86.0 % 6 13.9 % 72 88.8 % 9 11.1 %

Sophomore 9 90.0 % 1 10.0 % 33 91.6 % 3 8.3 % Junior 43 95.5 % 2 4.4 % 144 97.9 % 3 2.0 % Senior 65 94.2 % 4 5.7 % 186 93.9 % 12 6.0 %

Unclassified . . . . 2 100.0 % . . Total 154 92.2 % 13 7.7 % 437 94.1 % 27 5.8 %

Access to faculty outside of class Freshman 36 81.8 % 8 18.1 % 67 80.7 % 16 19.2 % Sophomore 9 90.0 % 1 10.0 % 29 80.5 % 7 19.4 %

Junior 37 82.2 % 8 17.7 % 127 86.9 % 19 13.0 % Senior 53 76.8 % 16 23.1 % 165 84.1 % 31 15.8 %

Unclassified . . . . 2 100.0 % . . Total 135 80.3 % 33 19.6 % 390 84.2 % 73 15.7 %

Access to small classes Freshman 31 68.8 % 14 31.1 % 64 76.1 % 20 23.8 % Sophomore 6 60.0 % 4 40.0 % 30 85.7 % 5 14.2 %

Junior 26 56.5 % 20 43.4 % 120 81.6 % 27 18.3 % Senior 40 57.9 % 29 42.0 % 160 80.8 % 38 19.1 %

Unclassified . . . . 2 100.0 % . . Total 103 60.5 % 67 39.4 % 376 80.6 % 90 19.3 %

Advising by departmental staff on academic matters

Freshman 33 75.0 % 11 25.0 % 65 78.3 % 18 21.6 % Sophomore 8 80.0 % 2 20.0 % 30 83.3 % 6 16.6 %

Junior 39 84.7 % 7 15.2 % 128 85.9 % 21 14.0 % Senior 50 72.4 % 19 27.5 % 151 77.4 % 44 22.5 %

Unclassified . . . . 2 100.0 % . . Total 130 76.9 % 39 23.0 % 376 80.8 % 89 19.1 %

Advising by faculty on academic matters Freshman 35 79.5 % 9 20.4 % 66 79.5 % 17 20.4 % Sophomore 9 90.0 % 1 10.0 % 29 80.5 % 7 19.4 %

Junior 37 80.4 % 9 19.5 % 129 86.5 % 20 13.4 % Senior 54 77.1 % 16 22.8 % 164 82.0 % 36 18.0 %

Unclassified . . . . 2 100.0 % . . Total 135 79.4 % 35 20.5 % 390 82.9 % 80 17.0 %

NOTE 1: Students that responded to this survey but did not respond to a particular item were removed from the item's analysis and not included in percentages

NOTE 2: Percent totals may not always equal 100% due to rounding *Satisfied is defined by a response of 'Very satisfied', 'Satisfied', or 'Somewhat satisfied'

**Dissatisfied is defined by a response of 'Very dissatisfied', 'Dissatisfied', or 'Somewhat dissatisfied'

Page 35: An Overview of SERU 2014 Results - Rutgers Universityoirap.rutgers.edu/surveys/SERU/2014/Ernest Mario...engagement, time allocation, and motivations for major selection by gender,

2014 Dean's Report Ernest Mario School of Pharmacy

Ernest Mario School of

Pharmacy All RBHS Undergraduates Satisfied* Dissatisfied** Satisfied* Dissatisfied**

Level of Satisfaction Academic

Class Level N Percent N Percent N Percent N Percent Advising by school or college staff on academic matters

Freshman 33 75.0 % 11 25.0 % 62 75.6 % 20 24.3 % Sophomore 9 90.0 % 1 10.0 % 30 83.3 % 6 16.6 %

Junior 39 84.7 % 7 15.2 % 126 84.5 % 23 15.4 % Senior 50 72.4 % 19 27.5 % 154 77.3 % 45 22.6 %

Unclassified . . . . 2 100.0 % . . Total 131 77.5 % 38 22.4 % 374 79.9 % 94 20.0 %

Availability of courses for general education or breadth requirements

Freshman 35 79.5 % 9 20.4 % 68 85.0 % 12 15.0 % Sophomore 9 100.0 % . . 30 90.9 % 3 9.0 %

Junior 37 80.4 % 9 19.5 % 126 86.8 % 19 13.1 % Senior 49 71.0 % 20 28.9 % 162 81.8 % 36 18.1 %

Unclassified . . . . 1 100.0 % . . Total 130 77.3 % 38 22.6 % 387 84.6 % 70 15.3 %

Availability of courses needed for graduation

Freshman 36 81.8 % 8 18.1 % 73 87.9 % 10 12.0 % Sophomore 10 100.0 % . . 35 97.2 % 1 2.7 %

Junior 40 86.9 % 6 13.0 % 134 90.5 % 14 9.4 % Senior 64 91.4 % 6 8.5 % 183 91.5 % 17 8.5 %

Unclassified . . . . 1 100.0 % . . Total 150 88.2 % 20 11.7 % 426 91.0 % 42 8.9 %

Availability of library research materials Freshman 41 93.1 % 3 6.8 % 71 87.6 % 10 12.3 % Sophomore 10 100.0 % . . 34 94.4 % 2 5.5 %

Junior 39 84.7 % 7 15.2 % 133 89.8 % 15 10.1 % Senior 63 90.0 % 7 10.0 % 182 91.0 % 18 9.0 %

Unclassified . . . . 2 100.0 % . . Total 153 90.0 % 17 10.0 % 422 90.3 % 45 9.6 %

Educational enrichment programs (e.g., study abroad, internships)

Freshman 35 79.5 % 9 20.4 % 62 77.5 % 18 22.5 % Sophomore 6 60.0 % 4 40.0 % 25 71.4 % 10 28.5 %

Junior 30 65.2 % 16 34.7 % 112 76.7 % 34 23.2 % Senior 42 60.0 % 28 40.0 % 142 72.0 % 55 27.9 %

Unclassified . . . . 1 100.0 % . . Total 113 66.4 % 57 33.5 % 342 74.5 % 117 25.4 %

NOTE 1: Students that responded to this survey but did not respond to a particular item were removed from the item's analysis and not included in percentages

NOTE 2: Percent totals may not always equal 100% due to rounding *Satisfied is defined by a response of 'Very satisfied', 'Satisfied', or 'Somewhat satisfied'

**Dissatisfied is defined by a response of 'Very dissatisfied', 'Dissatisfied', or 'Somewhat dissatisfied'

Page 36: An Overview of SERU 2014 Results - Rutgers Universityoirap.rutgers.edu/surveys/SERU/2014/Ernest Mario...engagement, time allocation, and motivations for major selection by gender,

2014 Dean's Report Ernest Mario School of Pharmacy

Ernest Mario School of

Pharmacy All RBHS Undergraduates Satisfied* Dissatisfied** Satisfied* Dissatisfied**

Level of Satisfaction Academic

Class Level N Percent N Percent N Percent N Percent Opportunities for research experience or to produce creative products

Freshman 38 84.4 % 7 15.5 % 69 83.1 % 14 16.8 % Sophomore 7 70.0 % 3 30.0 % 24 68.5 % 11 31.4 %

Junior 36 78.2 % 10 21.7 % 119 81.5 % 27 18.4 % Senior 55 79.7 % 14 20.2 % 163 82.3 % 35 17.6 %

Unclassified . . . . 1 100.0 % . . Total 136 80.0 % 34 20.0 % 376 81.2 % 87 18.7 %

Quality of faculty instruction Freshman 37 82.2 % 8 17.7 % 69 82.1 % 15 17.8 % Sophomore 9 90.0 % 1 10.0 % 31 86.1 % 5 13.8 %

Junior 37 80.4 % 9 19.5 % 124 84.3 % 23 15.6 % Senior 61 88.4 % 8 11.5 % 176 88.8 % 22 11.1 %

Unclassified . . . . 2 100.0 % . . Total 144 84.7 % 26 15.2 % 402 86.0 % 65 13.9 %

Quality of lower-division courses in your major

Freshman 35 77.7 % 8 17.7 % 50 72.4 % 10 14.4 % Sophomore 8 80.0 % 1 10.0 % 27 77.1 % 6 17.1 %

Junior 34 72.3 % 9 19.1 % 98 78.4 % 14 11.2 % Senior 49 69.0 % 20 28.1 % 152 75.6 % 38 18.9 %

Total 126 72.8 % 38 21.9 % 327 76.0 % 68 15.8 % Quality of teaching by graduate student TAs

Freshman 33 75.0 % 11 25.0 % 61 77.2 % 18 22.7 % Sophomore 8 88.8 % 1 11.1 % 26 78.7 % 7 21.2 %

Junior 39 84.7 % 7 15.2 % 125 88.0 % 17 11.9 % Senior 56 80.0 % 14 20.0 % 168 85.2 % 29 14.7 %

Unclassified . . . . 2 100.0 % . . Total 136 80.4 % 33 19.5 % 382 84.3 % 71 15.6 %

Quality of upper-division courses in your major

Freshman 28 62.2 % 9 20.0 % 43 62.3 % 10 14.4 % Sophomore 7 70.0 % . . 21 60.0 % 3 8.5 %

Junior 32 68.0 % 5 10.6 % 97 77.6 % 7 5.6 % Senior 57 80.2 % 10 14.0 % 170 84.5 % 18 8.9 %

Total 124 71.6 % 24 13.8 % 331 76.9 % 38 8.8 %

NOTE 1: Students that responded to this survey but did not respond to a particular item were removed from the item's analysis and not included in percentages

NOTE 2: Percent totals may not always equal 100% due to rounding *Satisfied is defined by a response of 'Very satisfied', 'Satisfied', or 'Somewhat satisfied'

**Dissatisfied is defined by a response of 'Very dissatisfied', 'Dissatisfied', or 'Somewhat dissatisfied'

Page 37: An Overview of SERU 2014 Results - Rutgers Universityoirap.rutgers.edu/surveys/SERU/2014/Ernest Mario...engagement, time allocation, and motivations for major selection by gender,

2014 Dean's Report Ernest Mario School of Pharmacy

Ernest Mario School of

Pharmacy All RBHS Undergraduates Satisfied* Dissatisfied** Satisfied* Dissatisfied**

Level of Satisfaction Academic

Class Level N Percent N Percent N Percent N Percent Satisfaction with grade point average Freshman 29 63.0 % 17 36.9 % 65 75.5 % 21 24.4 %

Sophomore 5 50.0 % 5 50.0 % 26 68.4 % 12 31.5 % Junior 31 64.5 % 17 35.4 % 132 85.7 % 22 14.2 % Senior 48 66.6 % 24 33.3 % 162 79.8 % 41 20.1 %

Unclassified . . . . 2 100.0 % . . Total 113 64.2 % 63 35.7 % 387 80.1 % 96 19.8 %

Satisfaction with overall academic experience

Freshman 36 80.0 % 9 20.0 % 72 85.7 % 12 14.2 % Sophomore 6 60.0 % 4 40.0 % 30 81.0 % 7 18.9 %

Junior 30 62.5 % 18 37.5 % 122 78.7 % 33 21.2 % Senior 59 81.9 % 13 18.0 % 175 86.2 % 28 13.7 %

Unclassified . . . . 2 100.0 % . . Total 131 74.8 % 44 25.1 % 401 83.3 % 80 16.6 %

Satisfaction with overall social experience

Freshman 38 82.6 % 8 17.3 % 73 84.8 % 13 15.1 % Sophomore 10 100.0 % . . 38 100.0 % . .

Junior 41 85.4 % 7 14.5 % 136 88.3 % 18 11.6 % Senior 57 79.1 % 15 20.8 % 172 85.5 % 29 14.4 %

Unclassified . . . . 2 100.0 % . . Total 146 82.9 % 30 17.0 % 421 87.5 % 60 12.4 %

Satisfaction with value of your education for the price you're paying

Freshman 28 62.2 % 17 37.7 % 60 70.5 % 25 29.4 % Sophomore 4 40.0 % 6 60.0 % 23 60.5 % 15 39.4 %

Junior 31 64.5 % 17 35.4 % 114 74.0 % 40 25.9 % Senior 50 69.4 % 22 30.5 % 153 75.3 % 50 24.6 %

Unclassified . . . . 2 100.0 % . . Total 113 64.5 % 62 35.4 % 352 73.0 % 130 26.9 %

Variety of courses available in your major

Freshman 34 75.5 % 11 24.4 % 53 76.8 % 12 17.3 % Sophomore 7 70.0 % 2 20.0 % 24 68.5 % 9 25.7 %

Junior 26 55.3 % 18 38.2 % 95 75.3 % 24 19.0 % Senior 50 70.4 % 21 29.5 % 160 79.6 % 39 19.4 %

Total 117 67.6 % 52 30.0 % 332 77.0 % 84 19.4 %

NOTE 1: Students that responded to this survey but did not respond to a particular item were removed from the item's analysis and not included in percentages

NOTE 2: Percent totals may not always equal 100% due to rounding *Satisfied is defined by a response of 'Very satisfied', 'Satisfied', or 'Somewhat satisfied'

**Dissatisfied is defined by a response of 'Very dissatisfied', 'Dissatisfied', or 'Somewhat dissatisfied'

Page 38: An Overview of SERU 2014 Results - Rutgers Universityoirap.rutgers.edu/surveys/SERU/2014/Ernest Mario...engagement, time allocation, and motivations for major selection by gender,

2014 Dean's Report Ernest Mario School of Pharmacy

Ernest Mario School of Pharmacy All RBHS Undergraduate

Never or Rarely

Occasionally or Somewhat

Often Often or

Very Often Never or Rarely

Occasionally or Somewhat

Often Often or

Very Often Frequency of Activity Gender N Percent N Percent N Percent N Percent N Percent N Percent

Asked an insightful question in class Female 63 51.2 % 44 35.7 % 16 13.0 % 112 27.6 % 169 41.7 % 124 30.6 % Male 26 39.3 % 25 37.8 % 15 22.7 % 31 27.1 % 50 43.8 % 33 28.9 % Total 89 47.0 % 69 36.5 % 31 16.4 % 143 27.5 % 219 42.1 % 157 30.2 %

Brought up ideas or concepts from different courses during class discussions

Female 53 42.7 % 52 41.9 % 19 15.3 % 98 24.1 % 161 39.6 % 147 36.2 % Male 29 43.9 % 21 31.8 % 16 24.2 % 36 31.8 % 39 34.5 % 38 33.6 % Total 82 43.1 % 73 38.4 % 35 18.4 % 134 25.8 % 200 38.5 % 185 35.6 %

Chosen challenging courses, when possible, even though you might lower your GPA by doing so

Female 26 21.1 % 54 43.9 % 43 34.9 % 118 29.3 % 163 40.5 % 121 30.0 % Male 13 19.6 % 19 28.7 % 34 51.5 % 31 27.4 % 35 30.9 % 47 41.5 % Total 39 20.6 % 73 38.6 % 77 40.7 % 149 28.9 % 198 38.4 % 168 32.6 %

Communicated with a faculty member by e-mail or in person

Female 21 16.9 % 70 56.4 % 33 26.6 % 28 6.9 % 140 34.5 % 237 58.5 % Male 11 16.6 % 30 45.4 % 25 37.8 % 11 9.7 % 47 41.5 % 55 48.6 % Total 32 16.8 % 100 52.6 % 58 30.5 % 39 7.5 % 187 36.1 % 292 56.3 %

Contributed to a class discussion Female 48 38.7 % 55 44.3 % 21 16.9 % 69 16.8 % 145 35.4 % 195 47.6 % Male 20 30.3 % 27 40.9 % 19 28.7 % 22 19.2 % 43 37.7 % 49 42.9 % Total 68 35.7 % 82 43.1 % 40 21.0 % 91 17.3 % 188 35.9 % 244 46.6 %

Extensively revised a paper before submitting it to be graded

Female 33 27.2 % 51 42.1 % 37 30.5 % 66 16.4 % 145 36.0 % 191 47.5 % Male 17 26.1 % 25 38.4 % 23 35.3 % 23 20.7 % 46 41.4 % 42 37.8 % Total 50 26.8 % 76 40.8 % 60 32.2 % 89 17.3 % 191 37.2 % 233 45.4 %

Found a course so interesting that you did more work than was required

Female 44 35.4 % 62 50.0 % 18 14.5 % 104 25.6 % 192 47.4 % 109 26.9 % Male 18 29.0 % 31 50.0 % 13 20.9 % 33 30.2 % 50 45.8 % 26 23.8 % Total 62 33.3 % 93 50.0 % 31 16.6 % 137 26.6 % 242 47.0 % 135 26.2 %

Gone to class unprepared Female 53 43.4 % 58 47.5 % 11 9.0 % 256 63.5 % 124 30.7 % 23 5.7 % Male 27 41.5 % 31 47.6 % 7 10.7 % 58 51.7 % 42 37.5 % 12 10.7 % Total 80 42.7 % 89 47.5 % 18 9.6 % 314 60.9 % 166 32.2 % 35 6.7 %

Gone to class without completing assigned reading

Female 45 37.1 % 57 47.1 % 19 15.7 % 205 51.3 % 147 36.8 % 47 11.7 % Male 31 47.6 % 22 33.8 % 12 18.4 % 53 47.3 % 41 36.6 % 18 16.0 % Total 76 40.8 % 79 42.4 % 31 16.6 % 258 50.4 % 188 36.7 % 65 12.7 %

Had a class in which the professor knew or learned your name

Female 50 40.3 % 48 38.7 % 26 20.9 % 62 15.1 % 109 26.7 % 237 58.0 % Male 18 27.2 % 27 40.9 % 21 31.8 % 19 16.6 % 39 34.2 % 56 49.1 % Total 68 35.7 % 75 39.4 % 47 24.7 % 81 15.5 % 148 28.3 % 293 56.1 %

Helped a classmate better understand the course material when studying together

Female 14 11.4 % 64 52.4 % 44 36.0 % 57 14.1 % 181 44.9 % 165 40.9 % Male 10 15.3 % 26 40.0 % 29 44.6 % 18 16.0 % 47 41.9 % 47 41.9 % Total 24 12.8 % 90 48.1 % 73 39.0 % 75 14.5 % 228 44.2 % 212 41.1 %

NOTE 1: Students that responded to this survey but did not respond to a particular item were removed from the item's analysis and not included in percentages

NOTE 2: Percent totals may not always equal 100% due to rounding

Page 39: An Overview of SERU 2014 Results - Rutgers Universityoirap.rutgers.edu/surveys/SERU/2014/Ernest Mario...engagement, time allocation, and motivations for major selection by gender,

2014 Dean's Report Ernest Mario School of Pharmacy

Ernest Mario School of Pharmacy All RBHS Undergraduate

Never or Rarely

Occasionally or Somewhat

Often Often or

Very Often Never or Rarely

Occasionally or Somewhat

Often Often or

Very Often Frequency of Activity Gender N Percent N Percent N Percent N Percent N Percent N Percent

Interacted with faculty during lecture class sessions

Female 52 41.9 % 58 46.7 % 14 11.2 % 89 21.8 % 167 40.9 % 152 37.2 % Male 28 42.4 % 22 33.3 % 16 24.2 % 32 28.0 % 40 35.0 % 42 36.8 % Total 80 42.1 % 80 42.1 % 30 15.7 % 121 23.1 % 207 39.6 % 194 37.1 %

Made a class presentation Female 45 36.2 % 63 50.8 % 16 12.9 % 70 17.1 % 162 39.8 % 175 42.9 % Male 17 25.7 % 26 39.3 % 23 34.8 % 23 20.3 % 45 39.8 % 45 39.8 % Total 62 32.6 % 89 46.8 % 39 20.5 % 93 17.8 % 207 39.8 % 220 42.3 %

Raised your standard for acceptable effort due to the high standards of a faculty member

Female 23 19.0 % 68 56.1 % 30 24.7 % 62 15.3 % 208 51.6 % 133 33.0 % Male 12 18.4 % 33 50.7 % 20 30.7 % 22 20.0 % 52 47.2 % 36 32.7 % Total 35 18.8 % 101 54.3 % 50 26.8 % 84 16.3 % 260 50.6 % 169 32.9 %

Skipped class Female 50 41.6 % 56 46.6 % 14 11.6 % 298 74.6 % 80 20.0 % 21 5.2 % Male 26 40.6 % 24 37.5 % 14 21.8 % 66 59.4 % 31 27.9 % 14 12.6 % Total 76 41.3 % 80 43.4 % 28 15.2 % 364 71.3 % 111 21.7 % 35 6.8 %

Sought academic help from instructor or tutor when needed

Female 41 34.1 % 42 35.0 % 37 30.8 % 145 36.1 % 154 38.4 % 102 25.4 % Male 19 29.2 % 30 46.1 % 16 24.6 % 35 31.5 % 48 43.2 % 28 25.2 % Total 60 32.4 % 72 38.9 % 53 28.6 % 180 35.1 % 202 39.4 % 130 25.3 %

Taken a small research-oriented seminar with faculty

Female 96 78.0 % 17 13.8 % 10 8.1 % 306 75.0 % 71 17.4 % 31 7.5 % Male 46 69.6 % 12 18.1 % 8 12.1 % 79 69.9 % 21 18.5 % 13 11.5 % Total 142 75.1 % 29 15.3 % 18 9.5 % 385 73.8 % 92 17.6 % 44 8.4 %

Talked with the instructor outside of class about issues and concepts derived from a course

Female 56 45.1 % 52 41.9 % 16 12.9 % 136 33.2 % 154 37.6 % 119 29.0 % Male 26 39.3 % 24 36.3 % 16 24.2 % 36 31.5 % 47 41.2 % 31 27.1 % Total 82 43.1 % 76 40.0 % 32 16.8 % 172 32.8 % 201 38.4 % 150 28.6 %

Turned in a course assignment late Female 104 85.2 % 16 13.1 % 2 1.6 % 358 88.6 % 39 9.6 % 7 1.7 % Male 49 75.3 % 10 15.3 % 6 9.2 % 86 76.7 % 20 17.8 % 6 5.3 % Total 153 81.8 % 26 13.9 % 8 4.2 % 444 86.0 % 59 11.4 % 13 2.5 %

Worked on class projects or studied as a group with classmates outside of class

Female 25 20.4 % 52 42.6 % 45 36.8 % 75 18.5 % 156 38.6 % 173 42.8 % Male 14 21.8 % 29 45.3 % 21 32.8 % 23 20.7 % 52 46.8 % 36 32.4 % Total 39 20.9 % 81 43.5 % 66 35.4 % 98 19.0 % 208 40.3 % 209 40.5 %

Worked with a faculty member on an activity other than coursework (e.g., student organization, campus committee, cultural activity)

Female 79 63.7 % 32 25.8 % 13 10.4 % 259 63.3 % 95 23.2 % 55 13.4 % Male 38 57.5 % 16 24.2 % 12 18.1 % 60 52.6 % 31 27.1 % 23 20.1 % Total 117 61.5 % 48 25.2 % 25 13.1 % 319 60.9 % 126 24.0 % 78 14.9 %

NOTE 1: Students that responded to this survey but did not respond to a particular item were removed from the item's analysis and not included in percentages

NOTE 2: Percent totals may not always equal 100% due to rounding

Page 40: An Overview of SERU 2014 Results - Rutgers Universityoirap.rutgers.edu/surveys/SERU/2014/Ernest Mario...engagement, time allocation, and motivations for major selection by gender,

2014 Dean's Report Ernest Mario School of Pharmacy

Ernest Mario School of Pharmacy All RBHS Undergraduates

Never or Rarely

Occasionally or Somewhat

Often Often or

Very Often Never or Rarely

Occasionally or Somewhat

Often Often or

Very Often Frequency of Activity Ethnicity N Percent N Percent N Percent N Percent N Percent N Percent

Asked an insightful question in class African American . . 3 100.0 % . . 3 6.5 % 27 58.6 % 16 34.7 % Chicano- Latino 3 100.0 % . . . . 10 22.2 % 20 44.4 % 15 33.3 %

Asian- Filipino- Pacific Islander 65 49.2 % 45 34.0 % 22 16.6 % 85 43.1 % 71 36.0 % 41 20.8 % White 12 40.0 % 10 33.3 % 8 26.6 % 31 16.7 % 79 42.7 % 75 40.5 %

International- Foreign Visa 7 46.6 % 8 53.3 % . . 7 38.8 % 10 55.5 % 1 5.5 % Other 2 33.3 % 3 50.0 % 1 16.6 % 7 25.0 % 12 42.8 % 9 32.1 % Total 89 47.0 % 69 36.5 % 31 16.4 % 143 27.5 % 219 42.1 % 157 30.2 %

Brought up ideas or concepts from different courses during class discussions

African American . . 2 66.6 % 1 33.3 % 4 8.5 % 23 48.9 % 20 42.5 % Chicano- Latino 2 66.6 % 1 33.3 % . . 10 22.7 % 19 43.1 % 15 34.0 %

Asian- Filipino- Pacific Islander 61 45.8 % 51 38.3 % 21 15.7 % 76 38.5 % 75 38.0 % 46 23.3 % White 10 33.3 % 9 30.0 % 11 36.6 % 31 16.7 % 63 34.0 % 91 49.1 %

International- Foreign Visa 6 40.0 % 8 53.3 % 1 6.6 % 6 33.3 % 11 61.1 % 1 5.5 % Other 3 50.0 % 2 33.3 % 1 16.6 % 7 25.0 % 9 32.1 % 12 42.8 % Total 82 43.1 % 73 38.4 % 35 18.4 % 134 25.8 % 200 38.5 % 185 35.6 %

Chosen challenging courses, when possible, even though you might lower your GPA by doing so

African American 1 33.3 % 2 66.6 % . . 16 34.0 % 18 38.2 % 13 27.6 % Chicano- Latino . . 3 100.0 % . . 15 34.0 % 16 36.3 % 13 29.5 %

Asian- Filipino- Pacific Islander 28 21.2 % 51 38.6 % 53 40.1 % 50 25.6 % 78 40.0 % 67 34.3 % White 8 26.6 % 6 20.0 % 16 53.3 % 56 30.2 % 68 36.7 % 61 32.9 %

International- Foreign Visa 1 6.6 % 8 53.3 % 6 40.0 % 1 5.8 % 10 58.8 % 6 35.2 % Other 1 16.6 % 3 50.0 % 2 33.3 % 11 40.7 % 8 29.6 % 8 29.6 % Total 39 20.6 % 73 38.6 % 77 40.7 % 149 28.9 % 198 38.4 % 168 32.6 %

Communicated with a faculty member by e-mail or in person

African American . . 1 33.3 % 2 66.6 % 1 2.1 % 10 21.2 % 36 76.5 % Chicano- Latino 1 33.3 % 2 66.6 % . . 1 2.2 % 16 35.5 % 28 62.2 %

Asian- Filipino- Pacific Islander 25 18.7 % 71 53.3 % 37 27.8 % 28 14.2 % 89 45.4 % 79 40.3 % White 5 16.6 % 13 43.3 % 12 40.0 % 8 4.3 % 48 26.0 % 128 69.5 %

International- Foreign Visa . . 10 66.6 % 5 33.3 % . . 11 61.1 % 7 38.8 % Other 1 16.6 % 3 50.0 % 2 33.3 % 1 3.5 % 13 46.4 % 14 50.0 % Total 32 16.8 % 100 52.6 % 58 30.5 % 39 7.5 % 187 36.1 % 292 56.3 %

NOTE 1: Students that responded to this survey but did not respond to a particular item were removed from the item's analysis and not included in percentages

NOTE 2: Percent totals may not always equal 100% due to rounding

Page 41: An Overview of SERU 2014 Results - Rutgers Universityoirap.rutgers.edu/surveys/SERU/2014/Ernest Mario...engagement, time allocation, and motivations for major selection by gender,

2014 Dean's Report Ernest Mario School of Pharmacy

Ernest Mario School of Pharmacy All RBHS Undergraduates

Never or Rarely

Occasionally or Somewhat

Often Often or

Very Often Never or Rarely

Occasionally or Somewhat

Often Often or

Very Often Frequency of Activity Ethnicity N Percent N Percent N Percent N Percent N Percent N Percent

Contributed to a class discussion African American . . 2 66.6 % 1 33.3 % 3 6.3 % 12 25.5 % 32 68.0 % Chicano- Latino 3 100.0 % . . . . 7 15.5 % 15 33.3 % 23 51.1 %

Asian- Filipino- Pacific Islander 49 36.8 % 57 42.8 % 27 20.3 % 56 28.2 % 87 43.9 % 55 27.7 % White 11 36.6 % 10 33.3 % 9 30.0 % 19 10.1 % 52 27.8 % 116 62.0 %

International- Foreign Visa 4 26.6 % 9 60.0 % 2 13.3 % 4 22.2 % 11 61.1 % 3 16.6 % Other 1 16.6 % 4 66.6 % 1 16.6 % 2 7.1 % 11 39.2 % 15 53.5 % Total 68 35.7 % 82 43.1 % 40 21.0 % 91 17.3 % 188 35.9 % 244 46.6 %

Extensively revised a paper before submitting it to be graded

African American 1 33.3 % 2 66.6 % . . 6 13.3 % 17 37.7 % 22 48.8 % Chicano- Latino . . 2 66.6 % 1 33.3 % 5 11.1 % 16 35.5 % 24 53.3 %

Asian- Filipino- Pacific Islander 36 27.9 % 53 41.0 % 40 31.0 % 46 24.0 % 79 41.3 % 66 34.5 % White 9 30.0 % 7 23.3 % 14 46.6 % 22 11.8 % 61 32.7 % 103 55.3 %

International- Foreign Visa 4 26.6 % 7 46.6 % 4 26.6 % 5 27.7 % 8 44.4 % 5 27.7 % Other . . 5 83.3 % 1 16.6 % 5 17.8 % 10 35.7 % 13 46.4 % Total 50 26.8 % 76 40.8 % 60 32.2 % 89 17.3 % 191 37.2 % 233 45.4 %

Found a course so interesting that you did more work than was required

African American 1 33.3 % 2 66.6 % . . 6 12.7 % 24 51.0 % 17 36.1 % Chicano- Latino 2 66.6 % 1 33.3 % . . 13 28.8 % 20 44.4 % 12 26.6 %

Asian- Filipino- Pacific Islander 45 34.8 % 64 49.6 % 20 15.5 % 66 34.3 % 87 45.3 % 39 20.3 % White 9 30.0 % 14 46.6 % 7 23.3 % 41 22.1 % 89 48.1 % 55 29.7 %

International- Foreign Visa 3 20.0 % 9 60.0 % 3 20.0 % 3 16.6 % 10 55.5 % 5 27.7 % Other 2 33.3 % 3 50.0 % 1 16.6 % 8 29.6 % 12 44.4 % 7 25.9 % Total 62 33.3 % 93 50.0 % 31 16.6 % 137 26.6 % 242 47.0 % 135 26.2 %

Gone to class unprepared African American 1 33.3 % 2 66.6 % . . 37 82.2 % 7 15.5 % 1 2.2 % Chicano- Latino 1 33.3 % 2 66.6 % . . 37 82.2 % 7 15.5 % 1 2.2 %

Asian- Filipino- Pacific Islander 55 42.3 % 60 46.1 % 15 11.5 % 88 45.5 % 85 44.0 % 20 10.3 % White 15 50.0 % 13 43.3 % 2 6.6 % 133 71.5 % 46 24.7 % 7 3.7 %

International- Foreign Visa 5 33.3 % 9 60.0 % 1 6.6 % 7 38.8 % 9 50.0 % 2 11.1 % Other 3 50.0 % 3 50.0 % . . 12 42.8 % 12 42.8 % 4 14.2 % Total 80 42.7 % 89 47.5 % 18 9.6 % 314 60.9 % 166 32.2 % 35 6.7 %

NOTE 1: Students that responded to this survey but did not respond to a particular item were removed from the item's analysis and not included in percentages

NOTE 2: Percent totals may not always equal 100% due to rounding

Page 42: An Overview of SERU 2014 Results - Rutgers Universityoirap.rutgers.edu/surveys/SERU/2014/Ernest Mario...engagement, time allocation, and motivations for major selection by gender,

2014 Dean's Report Ernest Mario School of Pharmacy

Ernest Mario School of Pharmacy All RBHS Undergraduates

Never or Rarely

Occasionally or Somewhat

Often Often or

Very Often Never or Rarely

Occasionally or Somewhat

Often Often or

Very Often Frequency of Activity Ethnicity N Percent N Percent N Percent N Percent N Percent N Percent

Gone to class without completing assigned reading

African American 1 33.3 % 1 33.3 % 1 33.3 % 31 67.3 % 11 23.9 % 4 8.6 % Chicano- Latino 1 33.3 % 1 33.3 % 1 33.3 % 29 67.4 % 11 25.5 % 3 6.9 %

Asian- Filipino- Pacific Islander 49 37.9 % 58 44.9 % 22 17.0 % 73 38.0 % 88 45.8 % 31 16.1 % White 16 53.3 % 10 33.3 % 4 13.3 % 109 59.2 % 61 33.1 % 14 7.6 %

International- Foreign Visa 6 40.0 % 6 40.0 % 3 20.0 % 7 38.8 % 7 38.8 % 4 22.2 % Other 3 50.0 % 3 50.0 % . . 9 32.1 % 10 35.7 % 9 32.1 % Total 76 40.8 % 79 42.4 % 31 16.6 % 258 50.4 % 188 36.7 % 65 12.7 %

Had a class in which the professor knew or learned your name

African American . . 1 33.3 % 2 66.6 % . . 11 23.9 % 35 76.0 % Chicano- Latino 1 33.3 % 1 33.3 % 1 33.3 % 2 4.4 % 11 24.4 % 32 71.1 %

Asian- Filipino- Pacific Islander 46 34.5 % 54 40.6 % 33 24.8 % 52 26.2 % 72 36.3 % 74 37.3 % White 14 46.6 % 7 23.3 % 9 30.0 % 18 9.6 % 34 18.1 % 135 72.1 %

International- Foreign Visa 5 33.3 % 9 60.0 % 1 6.6 % 5 27.7 % 10 55.5 % 3 16.6 % Other 2 33.3 % 3 50.0 % 1 16.6 % 4 14.2 % 10 35.7 % 14 50.0 % Total 68 35.7 % 75 39.4 % 47 24.7 % 81 15.5 % 148 28.3 % 293 56.1 %

Helped a classmate better understand the course material when studying together

African American 1 33.3 % 1 33.3 % 1 33.3 % 8 17.3 % 18 39.1 % 20 43.4 % Chicano- Latino . . 2 66.6 % 1 33.3 % 6 13.3 % 18 40.0 % 21 46.6 %

Asian- Filipino- Pacific Islander 18 13.8 % 62 47.6 % 50 38.4 % 28 14.5 % 89 46.1 % 76 39.3 % White 3 10.0 % 12 40.0 % 15 50.0 % 28 15.1 % 79 42.7 % 78 42.1 %

International- Foreign Visa 1 6.6 % 9 60.0 % 5 33.3 % 1 5.5 % 12 66.6 % 5 27.7 % Other 1 16.6 % 4 66.6 % 1 16.6 % 4 14.2 % 12 42.8 % 12 42.8 % Total 24 12.8 % 90 48.1 % 73 39.0 % 75 14.5 % 228 44.2 % 212 41.1 %

Interacted with faculty during lecture class sessions

African American . . 3 100.0 % . . 7 14.5 % 18 37.5 % 23 47.9 % Chicano- Latino 2 66.6 % 1 33.3 % . . 6 13.3 % 20 44.4 % 19 42.2 %

Asian- Filipino- Pacific Islander 57 42.8 % 54 40.6 % 22 16.5 % 68 34.3 % 78 39.3 % 52 26.2 % White 13 43.3 % 10 33.3 % 7 23.3 % 29 15.5 % 69 37.0 % 88 47.3 %

International- Foreign Visa 5 33.3 % 10 66.6 % . . 5 27.7 % 13 72.2 % . . Other 3 50.0 % 2 33.3 % 1 16.6 % 6 22.2 % 9 33.3 % 12 44.4 % Total 80 42.1 % 80 42.1 % 30 15.7 % 121 23.1 % 207 39.6 % 194 37.1 %

NOTE 1: Students that responded to this survey but did not respond to a particular item were removed from the item's analysis and not included in percentages

NOTE 2: Percent totals may not always equal 100% due to rounding

Page 43: An Overview of SERU 2014 Results - Rutgers Universityoirap.rutgers.edu/surveys/SERU/2014/Ernest Mario...engagement, time allocation, and motivations for major selection by gender,

2014 Dean's Report Ernest Mario School of Pharmacy

Ernest Mario School of Pharmacy All RBHS Undergraduates

Never or Rarely

Occasionally or Somewhat

Often Often or

Very Often Never or Rarely

Occasionally or Somewhat

Often Often or

Very Often Frequency of Activity Ethnicity N Percent N Percent N Percent N Percent N Percent N Percent

Made a class presentation African American . . 2 66.6 % 1 33.3 % 1 2.1 % 19 41.3 % 26 56.5 % Chicano- Latino 1 33.3 % 1 33.3 % 1 33.3 % 1 2.2 % 18 40.0 % 26 57.7 %

Asian- Filipino- Pacific Islander 43 32.3 % 63 47.3 % 27 20.3 % 55 27.7 % 82 41.4 % 61 30.8 % White 13 43.3 % 9 30.0 % 8 26.6 % 30 16.2 % 65 35.1 % 90 48.6 %

International- Foreign Visa 5 33.3 % 8 53.3 % 2 13.3 % 5 27.7 % 10 55.5 % 3 16.6 % Other . . 6 100.0 % . . 1 3.5 % 13 46.4 % 14 50.0 % Total 62 32.6 % 89 46.8 % 39 20.5 % 93 17.8 % 207 39.8 % 220 42.3 %

Raised your standard for acceptable effort due to the high standards of a faculty member

African American . . 1 33.3 % 2 66.6 % 6 13.3 % 20 44.4 % 19 42.2 % Chicano- Latino 1 33.3 % 1 33.3 % 1 33.3 % 6 13.3 % 20 44.4 % 19 42.2 %

Asian- Filipino- Pacific Islander 26 20.1 % 72 55.8 % 31 24.0 % 37 19.2 % 101 52.6 % 54 28.1 % White 5 16.6 % 13 43.3 % 12 40.0 % 26 14.0 % 96 51.8 % 63 34.0 %

International- Foreign Visa 3 20.0 % 8 53.3 % 4 26.6 % 4 22.2 % 9 50.0 % 5 27.7 % Other . . 6 100.0 % . . 5 17.8 % 14 50.0 % 9 32.1 % Total 35 18.8 % 101 54.3 % 50 26.8 % 84 16.3 % 260 50.6 % 169 32.9 %

Skipped class African American 1 33.3 % 1 33.3 % 1 33.3 % 40 86.9 % 3 6.5 % 3 6.5 % Chicano- Latino 2 66.6 % 1 33.3 % . . 39 86.6 % 5 11.1 % 1 2.2 %

Asian- Filipino- Pacific Islander 44 34.6 % 63 49.6 % 20 15.7 % 97 51.0 % 73 38.4 % 20 10.5 % White 17 56.6 % 9 30.0 % 4 13.3 % 156 85.2 % 21 11.4 % 6 3.2 %

International- Foreign Visa 9 60.0 % 3 20.0 % 3 20.0 % 12 66.6 % 3 16.6 % 3 16.6 % Other 3 50.0 % 3 50.0 % . . 20 71.4 % 6 21.4 % 2 7.1 % Total 76 41.3 % 80 43.4 % 28 15.2 % 364 71.3 % 111 21.7 % 35 6.8 %

Sought academic help from instructor or tutor when needed

African American . . 2 66.6 % 1 33.3 % 16 34.7 % 19 41.3 % 11 23.9 % Chicano- Latino 1 50.0 % 1 50.0 % . . 18 41.8 % 15 34.8 % 10 23.2 %

Asian- Filipino- Pacific Islander 41 31.5 % 53 40.7 % 36 27.6 % 68 35.2 % 75 38.8 % 50 25.9 % White 12 41.3 % 7 24.1 % 10 34.4 % 62 33.6 % 74 40.2 % 48 26.0 %

International- Foreign Visa 4 26.6 % 6 40.0 % 5 33.3 % 5 27.7 % 8 44.4 % 5 27.7 % Other 2 33.3 % 3 50.0 % 1 16.6 % 11 39.2 % 11 39.2 % 6 21.4 % Total 60 32.4 % 72 38.9 % 53 28.6 % 180 35.1 % 202 39.4 % 130 25.3 %

NOTE 1: Students that responded to this survey but did not respond to a particular item were removed from the item's analysis and not included in percentages

NOTE 2: Percent totals may not always equal 100% due to rounding

Page 44: An Overview of SERU 2014 Results - Rutgers Universityoirap.rutgers.edu/surveys/SERU/2014/Ernest Mario...engagement, time allocation, and motivations for major selection by gender,

2014 Dean's Report Ernest Mario School of Pharmacy

Ernest Mario School of Pharmacy All RBHS Undergraduates

Never or Rarely

Occasionally or Somewhat

Often Often or

Very Often Never or Rarely

Occasionally or Somewhat

Often Often or

Very Often Frequency of Activity Ethnicity N Percent N Percent N Percent N Percent N Percent N Percent

Taken a small research-oriented seminar with faculty

African American 3 100.0 % . . . . 33 68.7 % 12 25.0 % 3 6.2 % Chicano- Latino 3 100.0 % . . . . 28 62.2 % 12 26.6 % 5 11.1 %

Asian- Filipino- Pacific Islander 98 74.2 % 19 14.3 % 15 11.3 % 147 75.0 % 31 15.8 % 18 9.1 % White 25 83.3 % 3 10.0 % 2 6.6 % 143 76.4 % 29 15.5 % 15 8.0 %

International- Foreign Visa 8 53.3 % 6 40.0 % 1 6.6 % 11 61.1 % 6 33.3 % 1 5.5 % Other 5 83.3 % 1 16.6 % . . 23 85.1 % 2 7.4 % 2 7.4 % Total 142 75.1 % 29 15.3 % 18 9.5 % 385 73.8 % 92 17.6 % 44 8.4 %

Talked with the instructor outside of class about issues and concepts derived from a course

African American . . 2 66.6 % 1 33.3 % 11 22.9 % 19 39.5 % 18 37.5 % Chicano- Latino 3 100.0 % . . . . 13 28.8 % 12 26.6 % 20 44.4 %

Asian- Filipino- Pacific Islander 56 42.1 % 56 42.1 % 21 15.7 % 74 37.3 % 83 41.9 % 41 20.7 % White 14 46.6 % 7 23.3 % 9 30.0 % 57 30.6 % 64 34.4 % 65 34.9 %

International- Foreign Visa 6 40.0 % 8 53.3 % 1 6.6 % 7 38.8 % 9 50.0 % 2 11.1 % Other 3 50.0 % 3 50.0 % . . 10 35.7 % 14 50.0 % 4 14.2 % Total 82 43.1 % 76 40.0 % 32 16.8 % 172 32.8 % 201 38.4 % 150 28.6 %

Turned in a course assignment late African American 2 66.6 % 1 33.3 % . . 41 89.1 % 5 10.8 % . . Chicano- Latino 3 100.0 % . . . . 41 91.1 % 3 6.6 % 1 2.2 %

Asian- Filipino- Pacific Islander 106 81.5 % 17 13.0 % 7 5.3 % 162 83.9 % 24 12.4 % 7 3.6 % White 24 80.0 % 5 16.6 % 1 3.3 % 162 87.0 % 21 11.2 % 3 1.6 %

International- Foreign Visa 13 86.6 % 2 13.3 % . . 16 88.8 % 2 11.1 % . . Other 5 83.3 % 1 16.6 % . . 22 78.5 % 4 14.2 % 2 7.1 % Total 153 81.8 % 26 13.9 % 8 4.2 % 444 86.0 % 59 11.4 % 13 2.5 %

Worked on class projects or studied as a group with classmates outside of class

African American . . 1 33.3 % 2 66.6 % 8 17.3 % 16 34.7 % 22 47.8 % Chicano- Latino 1 33.3 % 1 33.3 % 1 33.3 % 6 13.3 % 15 33.3 % 24 53.3 %

Asian- Filipino- Pacific Islander 29 22.4 % 52 40.3 % 48 37.2 % 43 22.3 % 75 39.0 % 74 38.5 % White 5 16.6 % 13 43.3 % 12 40.0 % 36 19.3 % 77 41.3 % 73 39.2 %

International- Foreign Visa 3 20.0 % 10 66.6 % 2 13.3 % 3 16.6 % 13 72.2 % 2 11.1 % Other 1 16.6 % 4 66.6 % 1 16.6 % 2 7.1 % 12 42.8 % 14 50.0 % Total 39 20.9 % 81 43.5 % 66 35.4 % 98 19.0 % 208 40.3 % 209 40.5 %

NOTE 1: Students that responded to this survey but did not respond to a particular item were removed from the item's analysis and not included in percentages

NOTE 2: Percent totals may not always equal 100% due to rounding

Page 45: An Overview of SERU 2014 Results - Rutgers Universityoirap.rutgers.edu/surveys/SERU/2014/Ernest Mario...engagement, time allocation, and motivations for major selection by gender,

2014 Dean's Report Ernest Mario School of Pharmacy

Ernest Mario School of Pharmacy All RBHS Undergraduates

Never or Rarely

Occasionally or Somewhat

Often Often or

Very Often Never or Rarely

Occasionally or Somewhat

Often Often or

Very Often Frequency of Activity Ethnicity N Percent N Percent N Percent N Percent N Percent N Percent

Worked with a faculty member on an activity other than coursework (e.g., student organization, campus committee, cultural activity)

African American 3 100.0 % . . . . 33 70.2 % 8 17.0 % 6 12.7 % Chicano- Latino 1 33.3 % . . 2 66.6 % 27 60.0 % 9 20.0 % 9 20.0 %

Asian- Filipino- Pacific Islander 85 63.9 % 32 24.0 % 16 12.0 % 123 62.1 % 49 24.7 % 26 13.1 % White 18 60.0 % 6 20.0 % 6 20.0 % 106 56.6 % 47 25.1 % 34 18.1 %

International- Foreign Visa 7 46.6 % 8 53.3 % . . 9 50.0 % 9 50.0 % . . Other 3 50.0 % 2 33.3 % 1 16.6 % 21 75.0 % 4 14.2 % 3 10.7 % Total 117 61.5 % 48 25.2 % 25 13.1 % 319 60.9 % 126 24.0 % 78 14.9 %

NOTE 1: Students that responded to this survey but did not respond to a particular item were removed from the item's analysis and not included in percentages

NOTE 2: Percent totals may not always equal 100% due to rounding

Page 46: An Overview of SERU 2014 Results - Rutgers Universityoirap.rutgers.edu/surveys/SERU/2014/Ernest Mario...engagement, time allocation, and motivations for major selection by gender,

2014 Dean's Report Ernest Mario School of Pharmacy

Ernest Mario School of Pharmacy All RBHS Undergraduates

Never or Rarely

Occasionally or Somewhat

Often Often or

Very Often Never or Rarely

Occasionally or Somewhat

Often Often or

Very Often

Frequency of Activity Enrollment

Status N Percent N Percent N Percent N Percent N Percent N Percent Asked an insightful question in class Full-Time 89 47.0 % 69 36.5 % 31 16.4 % 112 39.2 % 107 37.5 % 66 23.1 %

Part-Time . . . . . . 31 13.2 % 112 47.8 % 91 38.8 % Total 89 47.0 % 69 36.5 % 31 16.4 % 143 27.5 % 219 42.1 % 157 30.2 %

Brought up ideas or concepts from different courses during class discussions

Full-Time 82 43.1 % 73 38.4 % 35 18.4 % 102 35.7 % 109 38.2 % 74 25.9 % Part-Time . . . . . . 32 13.6 % 91 38.8 % 111 47.4 % Total 82 43.1 % 73 38.4 % 35 18.4 % 134 25.8 % 200 38.5 % 185 35.6 %

Chosen challenging courses, when possible, even though you might lower your GPA by doing so

Full-Time 39 20.6 % 73 38.6 % 77 40.7 % 63 22.1 % 115 40.3 % 107 37.5 % Part-Time . . . . . . 86 37.3 % 83 36.0 % 61 26.5 % Total 39 20.6 % 73 38.6 % 77 40.7 % 149 28.9 % 198 38.4 % 168 32.6 %

Communicated with a faculty member by e-mail or in person

Full-Time 32 16.8 % 100 52.6 % 58 30.5 % 35 12.2 % 123 43.1 % 127 44.5 % Part-Time . . . . . . 4 1.7 % 64 27.4 % 165 70.8 % Total 32 16.8 % 100 52.6 % 58 30.5 % 39 7.5 % 187 36.1 % 292 56.3 %

Contributed to a class discussion Full-Time 68 35.7 % 82 43.1 % 40 21.0 % 77 26.9 % 123 43.0 % 86 30.0 % Part-Time . . . . . . 14 5.9 % 65 27.4 % 158 66.6 % Total 68 35.7 % 82 43.1 % 40 21.0 % 91 17.3 % 188 35.9 % 244 46.6 %

Extensively revised a paper before submitting it to be graded

Full-Time 50 26.8 % 76 40.8 % 60 32.2 % 63 22.6 % 108 38.8 % 107 38.4 % Part-Time . . . . . . 26 11.0 % 83 35.3 % 126 53.6 % Total 50 26.8 % 76 40.8 % 60 32.2 % 89 17.3 % 191 37.2 % 233 45.4 %

Found a course so interesting that you did more work than was required

Full-Time 62 33.3 % 93 50.0 % 31 16.6 % 93 33.3 % 129 46.2 % 57 20.4 % Part-Time . . . . . . 44 18.7 % 113 48.0 % 78 33.1 % Total 62 33.3 % 93 50.0 % 31 16.6 % 137 26.6 % 242 47.0 % 135 26.2 %

Gone to class unprepared Full-Time 80 42.7 % 89 47.5 % 18 9.6 % 134 47.8 % 121 43.2 % 25 8.9 % Part-Time . . . . . . 180 76.5 % 45 19.1 % 10 4.2 % Total 80 42.7 % 89 47.5 % 18 9.6 % 314 60.9 % 166 32.2 % 35 6.7 %

Gone to class without completing assigned reading

Full-Time 76 40.8 % 79 42.4 % 31 16.6 % 109 39.2 % 122 43.8 % 47 16.9 % Part-Time . . . . . . 149 63.9 % 66 28.3 % 18 7.7 % Total 76 40.8 % 79 42.4 % 31 16.6 % 258 50.4 % 188 36.7 % 65 12.7 %

Had a class in which the professor knew or learned your name

Full-Time 68 35.7 % 75 39.4 % 47 24.7 % 72 25.1 % 102 35.6 % 112 39.1 % Part-Time . . . . . . 9 3.8 % 46 19.4 % 181 76.6 % Total 68 35.7 % 75 39.4 % 47 24.7 % 81 15.5 % 148 28.3 % 293 56.1 %

NOTE 1: Students that responded to this survey but did not respond to a particular item were removed from the item's analysis and not included in percentages

NOTE 2: Percent totals may not always equal 100% due to rounding

Page 47: An Overview of SERU 2014 Results - Rutgers Universityoirap.rutgers.edu/surveys/SERU/2014/Ernest Mario...engagement, time allocation, and motivations for major selection by gender,

2014 Dean's Report Ernest Mario School of Pharmacy

Ernest Mario School of Pharmacy All RBHS Undergraduates

Never or Rarely

Occasionally or Somewhat

Often Often or

Very Often Never or Rarely

Occasionally or Somewhat

Often Often or

Very Often

Frequency of Activity Enrollment

Status N Percent N Percent N Percent N Percent N Percent N Percent Helped a classmate better understand the course material when studying together

Full-Time 24 12.8 % 90 48.1 % 73 39.0 % 33 11.7 % 130 46.4 % 117 41.7 % Part-Time . . . . . . 42 17.8 % 98 41.7 % 95 40.4 % Total 24 12.8 % 90 48.1 % 73 39.0 % 75 14.5 % 228 44.2 % 212 41.1 %

Interacted with faculty during lecture class sessions

Full-Time 80 42.1 % 80 42.1 % 30 15.7 % 88 30.7 % 120 41.9 % 78 27.2 % Part-Time . . . . . . 33 13.9 % 87 36.8 % 116 49.1 % Total 80 42.1 % 80 42.1 % 30 15.7 % 121 23.1 % 207 39.6 % 194 37.1 %

Made a class presentation Full-Time 62 32.6 % 89 46.8 % 39 20.5 % 76 26.5 % 127 44.4 % 83 29.0 % Part-Time . . . . . . 17 7.2 % 80 34.1 % 137 58.5 % Total 62 32.6 % 89 46.8 % 39 20.5 % 93 17.8 % 207 39.8 % 220 42.3 %

Raised your standard for acceptable effort due to the high standards of a faculty member

Full-Time 35 18.8 % 101 54.3 % 50 26.8 % 49 17.6 % 147 52.8 % 82 29.4 % Part-Time . . . . . . 35 14.8 % 113 48.0 % 87 37.0 % Total 35 18.8 % 101 54.3 % 50 26.8 % 84 16.3 % 260 50.6 % 169 32.9 %

Skipped class Full-Time 76 41.3 % 80 43.4 % 28 15.2 % 144 52.1 % 101 36.5 % 31 11.2 % Part-Time . . . . . . 220 94.0 % 10 4.2 % 4 1.7 % Total 76 41.3 % 80 43.4 % 28 15.2 % 364 71.3 % 111 21.7 % 35 6.8 %

Sought academic help from instructor or tutor when needed

Full-Time 60 32.4 % 72 38.9 % 53 28.6 % 93 33.5 % 106 38.2 % 78 28.1 % Part-Time . . . . . . 87 37.0 % 96 40.8 % 52 22.1 % Total 60 32.4 % 72 38.9 % 53 28.6 % 180 35.1 % 202 39.4 % 130 25.3 %

Taken a small research-oriented seminar with faculty

Full-Time 142 75.1 % 29 15.3 % 18 9.5 % 207 72.6 % 50 17.5 % 28 9.8 % Part-Time . . . . . . 178 75.4 % 42 17.7 % 16 6.7 % Total 142 75.1 % 29 15.3 % 18 9.5 % 385 73.8 % 92 17.6 % 44 8.4 %

Talked with the instructor outside of class about issues and concepts derived from a course

Full-Time 82 43.1 % 76 40.0 % 32 16.8 % 111 38.8 % 109 38.1 % 66 23.0 % Part-Time . . . . . . 61 25.7 % 92 38.8 % 84 35.4 % Total 82 43.1 % 76 40.0 % 32 16.8 % 172 32.8 % 201 38.4 % 150 28.6 %

Turned in a course assignment late Full-Time 153 81.8 % 26 13.9 % 8 4.2 % 230 82.1 % 41 14.6 % 9 3.2 % Part-Time . . . . . . 214 90.6 % 18 7.6 % 4 1.6 % Total 153 81.8 % 26 13.9 % 8 4.2 % 444 86.0 % 59 11.4 % 13 2.5 %

Worked on class projects or studied as a group with classmates outside of class

Full-Time 39 20.9 % 81 43.5 % 66 35.4 % 50 17.9 % 116 41.5 % 113 40.5 % Part-Time . . . . . . 48 20.3 % 92 38.9 % 96 40.6 % Total 39 20.9 % 81 43.5 % 66 35.4 % 98 19.0 % 208 40.3 % 209 40.5 %

NOTE 1: Students that responded to this survey but did not respond to a particular item were removed from the item's analysis and not included in percentages

NOTE 2: Percent totals may not always equal 100% due to rounding

Page 48: An Overview of SERU 2014 Results - Rutgers Universityoirap.rutgers.edu/surveys/SERU/2014/Ernest Mario...engagement, time allocation, and motivations for major selection by gender,

2014 Dean's Report Ernest Mario School of Pharmacy

Ernest Mario School of Pharmacy All RBHS Undergraduates

Never or Rarely

Occasionally or Somewhat

Often Often or

Very Often Never or Rarely

Occasionally or Somewhat

Often Often or

Very Often

Frequency of Activity Enrollment

Status N Percent N Percent N Percent N Percent N Percent N Percent Worked with a faculty member on an activity other than coursework (e.g., student organization, campus committee, cultural activity)

Full-Time 117 61.5 % 48 25.2 % 25 13.1 % 166 58.0 % 78 27.2 % 42 14.6 % Part-Time . . . . . . 153 64.5 % 48 20.2 % 36 15.1 % Total 117 61.5 % 48 25.2 % 25 13.1 % 319 60.9 % 126 24.0 % 78 14.9 %

NOTE 1: Students that responded to this survey but did not respond to a particular item were removed from the item's analysis and not included in percentages

NOTE 2: Percent totals may not always equal 100% due to rounding

Page 49: An Overview of SERU 2014 Results - Rutgers Universityoirap.rutgers.edu/surveys/SERU/2014/Ernest Mario...engagement, time allocation, and motivations for major selection by gender,

2014 Dean's Report Ernest Mario School of Pharmacy

Ernest Mario School of Pharmacy All RBHS Undergraduates

Never or Rarely

Occasionally or Somewhat

Often Often or

Very Often Never or Rarely

Occasionally or Somewhat

Often Often or

Very Often

Frequency of Activity Academic

Class Level N Percent N Percent N Percent N Percent N Percent N Percent Asked an insightful question in class Freshman 19 39.5 % 19 39.5 % 10 20.8 % 26 28.2 % 39 42.3 % 27 29.3 %

Sophomore 7 63.6 % 4 36.3 % . . 14 33.3 % 19 45.2 % 9 21.4 % Junior 23 44.2 % 24 46.1 % 5 9.6 % 40 24.0 % 75 45.1 % 51 30.7 % Senior 40 51.2 % 22 28.2 % 16 20.5 % 63 29.1 % 84 38.8 % 69 31.9 %

Unclassified . . . . . . . . 2 66.6 % 1 33.3 % Total 89 47.0 % 69 36.5 % 31 16.4 % 143 27.5 % 219 42.1 % 157 30.2 %

Brought up ideas or concepts from different courses during class discussions

Freshman 19 39.5 % 17 35.4 % 12 25.0 % 28 30.7 % 31 34.0 % 32 35.1 % Sophomore 6 54.5 % 5 45.4 % . . 14 34.1 % 15 36.5 % 12 29.2 %

Junior 23 44.2 % 24 46.1 % 5 9.6 % 39 23.4 % 75 45.1 % 52 31.3 % Senior 34 43.0 % 27 34.1 % 18 22.7 % 52 23.8 % 78 35.7 % 88 40.3 %

Unclassified . . . . . . 1 33.3 % 1 33.3 % 1 33.3 % Total 82 43.1 % 73 38.4 % 35 18.4 % 134 25.8 % 200 38.5 % 185 35.6 %

Chosen challenging courses, when possible, even though you might lower your GPA by doing so

Freshman 14 29.1 % 16 33.3 % 18 37.5 % 28 30.1 % 34 36.5 % 31 33.3 % Sophomore 2 18.1 % 6 54.5 % 3 27.2 % 12 28.5 % 16 38.0 % 14 33.3 %

Junior 5 9.6 % 25 48.0 % 22 42.3 % 40 25.0 % 68 42.5 % 52 32.5 % Senior 18 23.0 % 26 33.3 % 34 43.5 % 67 30.8 % 79 36.4 % 71 32.7 %

Unclassified . . . . . . 2 66.6 % 1 33.3 % . . Total 39 20.6 % 73 38.6 % 77 40.7 % 149 28.9 % 198 38.4 % 168 32.6 %

Communicated with a faculty member by e-mail or in person

Freshman 8 16.6 % 27 56.2 % 13 27.0 % 9 9.6 % 36 38.7 % 48 51.6 % Sophomore 1 9.0 % 8 72.7 % 2 18.1 % 2 4.7 % 19 45.2 % 21 50.0 %

Junior 7 13.4 % 29 55.7 % 16 30.7 % 10 6.1 % 61 37.6 % 91 56.1 % Senior 16 20.2 % 36 45.5 % 27 34.1 % 18 8.2 % 71 32.5 % 129 59.1 %

Unclassified . . . . . . . . . . 3 100.0 % Total 32 16.8 % 100 52.6 % 58 30.5 % 39 7.5 % 187 36.1 % 292 56.3 %

Contributed to a class discussion Freshman 12 25.0 % 20 41.6 % 16 33.3 % 16 17.2 % 36 38.7 % 41 44.0 % Sophomore 3 27.2 % 8 72.7 % . . 10 23.8 % 17 40.4 % 15 35.7 %

Junior 17 32.6 % 26 50.0 % 9 17.3 % 24 14.3 % 66 39.5 % 77 46.1 % Senior 36 45.5 % 28 35.4 % 15 18.9 % 41 18.8 % 68 31.1 % 109 50.0 %

Unclassified . . . . . . . . 1 33.3 % 2 66.6 % Total 68 35.7 % 82 43.1 % 40 21.0 % 91 17.3 % 188 35.9 % 244 46.6 %

NOTE 1: Students that responded to this survey but did not respond to a particular item were removed from the item's analysis and not included in percentages

NOTE 2: Percent totals may not always equal 100% due to rounding

Page 50: An Overview of SERU 2014 Results - Rutgers Universityoirap.rutgers.edu/surveys/SERU/2014/Ernest Mario...engagement, time allocation, and motivations for major selection by gender,

2014 Dean's Report Ernest Mario School of Pharmacy

Ernest Mario School of Pharmacy All RBHS Undergraduates

Never or Rarely

Occasionally or Somewhat

Often Often or

Very Often Never or Rarely

Occasionally or Somewhat

Often Often or

Very Often

Frequency of Activity Academic

Class Level N Percent N Percent N Percent N Percent N Percent N Percent Extensively revised a paper before submitting it to be graded

Freshman 11 22.9 % 12 25.0 % 25 52.0 % 15 16.3 % 24 26.0 % 53 57.6 % Sophomore 1 9.0 % 6 54.5 % 4 36.3 % 3 7.1 % 18 42.8 % 21 50.0 %

Junior 15 30.0 % 23 46.0 % 12 24.0 % 31 18.9 % 65 39.6 % 68 41.4 % Senior 23 29.8 % 35 45.4 % 19 24.6 % 40 18.8 % 84 39.6 % 88 41.5 %

Unclassified . . . . . . . . . . 3 100.0 % Total 50 26.8 % 76 40.8 % 60 32.2 % 89 17.3 % 191 37.2 % 233 45.4 %

Found a course so interesting that you did more work than was required

Freshman 19 41.3 % 15 32.6 % 12 26.0 % 28 31.1 % 30 33.3 % 32 35.5 % Sophomore 1 9.0 % 10 90.9 % . . 9 21.4 % 23 54.7 % 10 23.8 %

Junior 18 35.2 % 26 50.9 % 7 13.7 % 44 26.6 % 85 51.5 % 36 21.8 % Senior 24 30.7 % 42 53.8 % 12 15.3 % 56 26.1 % 104 48.5 % 54 25.2 %

Unclassified . . . . . . . . . . 3 100.0 % Total 62 33.3 % 93 50.0 % 31 16.6 % 137 26.6 % 242 47.0 % 135 26.2 %

Gone to class unprepared Freshman 28 58.3 % 18 37.5 % 2 4.1 % 64 68.8 % 26 27.9 % 3 3.2 % Sophomore 6 54.5 % 5 45.4 % . . 30 71.4 % 10 23.8 % 2 4.7 %

Junior 22 44.0 % 24 48.0 % 4 8.0 % 103 63.1 % 50 30.6 % 10 6.1 % Senior 24 30.7 % 42 53.8 % 12 15.3 % 114 53.2 % 80 37.3 % 20 9.3 %

Unclassified . . . . . . 3 100.0 % . . . . Total 80 42.7 % 89 47.5 % 18 9.6 % 314 60.9 % 166 32.2 % 35 6.7 %

Gone to class without completing assigned reading

Freshman 26 54.1 % 20 41.6 % 2 4.1 % 56 60.8 % 30 32.6 % 6 6.5 % Sophomore 6 54.5 % 5 45.4 % . . 19 46.3 % 19 46.3 % 3 7.3 %

Junior 23 46.0 % 21 42.0 % 6 12.0 % 87 53.3 % 60 36.8 % 16 9.8 % Senior 21 27.2 % 33 42.8 % 23 29.8 % 94 44.3 % 78 36.7 % 40 18.8 %

Unclassified . . . . . . 2 66.6 % 1 33.3 % . . Total 76 40.8 % 79 42.4 % 31 16.6 % 258 50.4 % 188 36.7 % 65 12.7 %

Had a class in which the professor knew or learned your name

Freshman 8 16.6 % 20 41.6 % 20 41.6 % 8 8.6 % 25 27.1 % 59 64.1 % Sophomore 3 27.2 % 7 63.6 % 1 9.0 % 6 14.2 % 15 35.7 % 21 50.0 %

Junior 21 40.3 % 23 44.2 % 8 15.3 % 26 15.5 % 48 28.7 % 93 55.6 % Senior 36 45.5 % 25 31.6 % 18 22.7 % 41 18.8 % 60 27.5 % 117 53.6 %

Unclassified . . . . . . . . . . 3 100.0 % Total 68 35.7 % 75 39.4 % 47 24.7 % 81 15.5 % 148 28.3 % 293 56.1 %

NOTE 1: Students that responded to this survey but did not respond to a particular item were removed from the item's analysis and not included in percentages

NOTE 2: Percent totals may not always equal 100% due to rounding

Page 51: An Overview of SERU 2014 Results - Rutgers Universityoirap.rutgers.edu/surveys/SERU/2014/Ernest Mario...engagement, time allocation, and motivations for major selection by gender,

2014 Dean's Report Ernest Mario School of Pharmacy

Ernest Mario School of Pharmacy All RBHS Undergraduates

Never or Rarely

Occasionally or Somewhat

Often Often or

Very Often Never or Rarely

Occasionally or Somewhat

Often Often or

Very Often

Frequency of Activity Academic

Class Level N Percent N Percent N Percent N Percent N Percent N Percent Helped a classmate better understand the course material when studying together

Freshman 9 18.7 % 20 41.6 % 19 39.5 % 15 16.1 % 34 36.5 % 44 47.3 % Sophomore 2 18.1 % 8 72.7 % 1 9.0 % 3 7.1 % 28 66.6 % 11 26.1 %

Junior 7 14.0 % 25 50.0 % 18 36.0 % 26 15.9 % 72 44.1 % 65 39.8 % Senior 6 7.6 % 37 47.4 % 35 44.8 % 30 14.0 % 92 42.9 % 92 42.9 %

Unclassified . . . . . . 1 33.3 % 2 66.6 % . . Total 24 12.8 % 90 48.1 % 73 39.0 % 75 14.5 % 228 44.2 % 212 41.1 %

Interacted with faculty during lecture class sessions

Freshman 18 37.5 % 20 41.6 % 10 20.8 % 24 25.8 % 29 31.1 % 40 43.0 % Sophomore 4 36.3 % 6 54.5 % 1 9.0 % 7 16.6 % 21 50.0 % 14 33.3 %

Junior 23 44.2 % 25 48.0 % 4 7.6 % 36 21.6 % 71 42.7 % 59 35.5 % Senior 35 44.3 % 29 36.7 % 15 18.9 % 54 24.7 % 85 38.9 % 79 36.2 %

Unclassified . . . . . . . . 1 33.3 % 2 66.6 % Total 80 42.1 % 80 42.1 % 30 15.7 % 121 23.1 % 207 39.6 % 194 37.1 %

Made a class presentation Freshman 7 14.5 % 27 56.2 % 14 29.1 % 9 9.6 % 38 40.8 % 46 49.4 % Sophomore 4 36.3 % 7 63.6 % . . 8 19.5 % 21 51.2 % 12 29.2 %

Junior 22 42.3 % 23 44.2 % 7 13.4 % 32 19.1 % 61 36.5 % 74 44.3 % Senior 29 36.7 % 32 40.5 % 18 22.7 % 43 19.9 % 86 39.8 % 87 40.2 %

Unclassified . . . . . . 1 33.3 % 1 33.3 % 1 33.3 % Total 62 32.6 % 89 46.8 % 39 20.5 % 93 17.8 % 207 39.8 % 220 42.3 %

Raised your standard for acceptable effort due to the high standards of a faculty member

Freshman 7 14.8 % 28 59.5 % 12 25.5 % 9 9.7 % 45 48.9 % 38 41.3 % Sophomore 3 27.2 % 6 54.5 % 2 18.1 % 8 19.0 % 23 54.7 % 11 26.1 %

Junior 15 30.0 % 23 46.0 % 12 24.0 % 33 20.1 % 78 47.5 % 53 32.3 % Senior 10 12.8 % 44 56.4 % 24 30.7 % 34 15.9 % 113 53.0 % 66 30.9 %

Unclassified . . . . . . . . 1 50.0 % 1 50.0 % Total 35 18.8 % 101 54.3 % 50 26.8 % 84 16.3 % 260 50.6 % 169 32.9 %

Skipped class Freshman 22 46.8 % 19 40.4 % 6 12.7 % 63 69.2 % 21 23.0 % 7 7.6 % Sophomore 4 36.3 % 6 54.5 % 1 9.0 % 30 71.4 % 10 23.8 % 2 4.7 %

Junior 25 50.0 % 17 34.0 % 8 16.0 % 127 77.9 % 26 15.9 % 10 6.1 % Senior 25 32.8 % 38 50.0 % 13 17.1 % 141 66.8 % 54 25.5 % 16 7.5 %

Unclassified . . . . . . 3 100.0 % . . . . Total 76 41.3 % 80 43.4 % 28 15.2 % 364 71.3 % 111 21.7 % 35 6.8 %

NOTE 1: Students that responded to this survey but did not respond to a particular item were removed from the item's analysis and not included in percentages

NOTE 2: Percent totals may not always equal 100% due to rounding

Page 52: An Overview of SERU 2014 Results - Rutgers Universityoirap.rutgers.edu/surveys/SERU/2014/Ernest Mario...engagement, time allocation, and motivations for major selection by gender,

2014 Dean's Report Ernest Mario School of Pharmacy

Ernest Mario School of Pharmacy All RBHS Undergraduates

Never or Rarely

Occasionally or Somewhat

Often Often or

Very Often Never or Rarely

Occasionally or Somewhat

Often Often or

Very Often

Frequency of Activity Academic

Class Level N Percent N Percent N Percent N Percent N Percent N Percent Sought academic help from instructor or tutor when needed

Freshman 15 31.2 % 17 35.4 % 16 33.3 % 26 28.2 % 36 39.1 % 30 32.6 % Sophomore 6 54.5 % 4 36.3 % 1 9.0 % 18 42.8 % 14 33.3 % 10 23.8 %

Junior 11 22.0 % 19 38.0 % 20 40.0 % 52 31.7 % 68 41.4 % 44 26.8 % Senior 28 36.8 % 32 42.1 % 16 21.0 % 83 39.3 % 83 39.3 % 45 21.3 %

Unclassified . . . . . . 1 33.3 % 1 33.3 % 1 33.3 % Total 60 32.4 % 72 38.9 % 53 28.6 % 180 35.1 % 202 39.4 % 130 25.3 %

Taken a small research-oriented seminar with faculty

Freshman 39 81.2 % 8 16.6 % 1 2.0 % 64 69.5 % 20 21.7 % 8 8.6 % Sophomore 10 90.9 % 1 9.0 % . . 28 66.6 % 9 21.4 % 5 11.9 %

Junior 40 76.9 % 9 17.3 % 3 5.7 % 135 81.3 % 23 13.8 % 8 4.8 % Senior 53 67.9 % 11 14.1 % 14 17.9 % 156 71.5 % 39 17.8 % 23 10.5 %

Unclassified . . . . . . 2 66.6 % 1 33.3 % . . Total 142 75.1 % 29 15.3 % 18 9.5 % 385 73.8 % 92 17.6 % 44 8.4 %

Talked with the instructor outside of class about issues and concepts derived from a course

Freshman 20 41.6 % 21 43.7 % 7 14.5 % 28 30.1 % 31 33.3 % 34 36.5 % Sophomore 4 36.3 % 6 54.5 % 1 9.0 % 15 35.7 % 14 33.3 % 13 30.9 %

Junior 27 51.9 % 19 36.5 % 6 11.5 % 60 36.1 % 66 39.7 % 40 24.0 % Senior 31 39.2 % 30 37.9 % 18 22.7 % 67 30.5 % 89 40.6 % 63 28.7 %

Unclassified . . . . . . 2 66.6 % 1 33.3 % . . Total 82 43.1 % 76 40.0 % 32 16.8 % 172 32.8 % 201 38.4 % 150 28.6 %

Turned in a course assignment late Freshman 40 83.3 % 7 14.5 % 1 2.0 % 80 86.0 % 9 9.6 % 4 4.3 % Sophomore 10 90.9 % 1 9.0 % . . 37 88.0 % 5 11.9 % . .

Junior 41 82.0 % 7 14.0 % 2 4.0 % 143 87.1 % 18 10.9 % 3 1.8 % Senior 62 79.4 % 11 14.1 % 5 6.4 % 181 84.5 % 27 12.6 % 6 2.8 %

Unclassified . . . . . . 3 100.0 % . . . . Total 153 81.8 % 26 13.9 % 8 4.2 % 444 86.0 % 59 11.4 % 13 2.5 %

Worked on class projects or studied as a group with classmates outside of class

Freshman 13 27.0 % 20 41.6 % 15 31.2 % 17 18.2 % 35 37.6 % 41 44.0 % Sophomore 4 36.3 % 6 54.5 % 1 9.0 % 8 19.0 % 20 47.6 % 14 33.3 %

Junior 14 28.5 % 18 36.7 % 17 34.6 % 34 20.8 % 64 39.2 % 65 39.8 % Senior 8 10.2 % 37 47.4 % 33 42.3 % 38 17.7 % 87 40.6 % 89 41.5 %

Unclassified . . . . . . 1 33.3 % 2 66.6 % . . Total 39 20.9 % 81 43.5 % 66 35.4 % 98 19.0 % 208 40.3 % 209 40.5 %

NOTE 1: Students that responded to this survey but did not respond to a particular item were removed from the item's analysis and not included in percentages

NOTE 2: Percent totals may not always equal 100% due to rounding

Page 53: An Overview of SERU 2014 Results - Rutgers Universityoirap.rutgers.edu/surveys/SERU/2014/Ernest Mario...engagement, time allocation, and motivations for major selection by gender,

2014 Dean's Report Ernest Mario School of Pharmacy

Ernest Mario School of Pharmacy All RBHS Undergraduates

Never or Rarely

Occasionally or Somewhat

Often Often or

Very Often Never or Rarely

Occasionally or Somewhat

Often Often or

Very Often

Frequency of Activity Academic

Class Level N Percent N Percent N Percent N Percent N Percent N Percent Worked with a faculty member on an activity other than coursework (e.g., student organization, campus committee, cultural activity)

Freshman 37 77.0 % 7 14.5 % 4 8.3 % 55 59.7 % 22 23.9 % 15 16.3 % Sophomore 7 63.6 % 3 27.2 % 1 9.0 % 26 61.9 % 9 21.4 % 7 16.6 %

Junior 35 67.3 % 14 26.9 % 3 5.7 % 111 66.4 % 36 21.5 % 20 11.9 % Senior 38 48.1 % 24 30.3 % 17 21.5 % 124 56.6 % 59 26.9 % 36 16.4 %

Unclassified . . . . . . 3 100.0 % . . . . Total 117 61.5 % 48 25.2 % 25 13.1 % 319 60.9 % 126 24.0 % 78 14.9 %

NOTE 1: Students that responded to this survey but did not respond to a particular item were removed from the item's analysis and not included in percentages

NOTE 2: Percent totals may not always equal 100% due to rounding

Page 54: An Overview of SERU 2014 Results - Rutgers Universityoirap.rutgers.edu/surveys/SERU/2014/Ernest Mario...engagement, time allocation, and motivations for major selection by gender,

2014 Dean's Report Ernest Mario School of Pharmacy

Ernest Mario School of Pharmacy All RBHS Undergraduates

More than

25* 25-16** 15-6*** Less than

6**** More than

25* 25-16** 15-6*** Less than

6**** Time Allocation Gender N Percent N Percent N Percent N Percent N Percent N Percent N Percent N Percent

Hours per week on attending classes, discussion sections or labs

Female 29 24.1 % 52 43.3 % 34 28.3 % 5 4.1 % 80 20.1 % 142 35.7 % 140 35.2 % 35 8.8 % Male 3 4.7 % 30 47.6 % 24 38.0 % 6 9.5 % 8 7.3 % 50 45.8 % 39 35.7 % 12 11.0 % Total 32 17.4 % 82 44.8 % 58 31.6 % 11 6.0 % 88 17.3 % 192 37.9 % 179 35.3 % 47 9.2 %

Hours per week on attending movies, concerts, sports, or other entertainment events

Female 2 1.6 % 3 2.5 % 16 13.4 % 98 82.3 % 4 1.0 % 8 2.0 % 39 9.8 % 344 87.0 % Male . . 6 9.5 % 18 28.5 % 39 61.9 % . . 7 6.4 % 28 25.9 % 73 67.5 % Total 2 1.0 % 9 4.9 % 34 18.6 % 137 75.2 % 4 0.7 % 15 2.9 % 67 13.3 % 417 82.9 %

Hours per week on commuting to school and to work

Female . . 5 4.2 % 28 23.5 % 86 72.2 % 10 2.5 % 19 4.7 % 153 38.6 % 214 54.0 % Male . . 5 7.9 % 10 15.8 % 48 76.1 % . . 9 8.2 % 31 28.4 % 69 63.3 % Total . . 10 5.4 % 38 20.8 % 134 73.6 % 10 1.9 % 28 5.5 % 184 36.4 % 283 56.0 %

Hours per week on paid employment off campus (include paid interships)

Female . . 7 5.7 % 33 27.0 % 82 67.2 % 74 18.4 % 49 12.2 % 61 15.2 % 217 54.1 % Male . . 8 12.3 % 7 10.7 % 50 76.9 % 8 7.2 % 16 14.4 % 16 14.4 % 71 63.9 % Total . . 15 8.0 % 40 21.3 % 132 70.5 % 82 16.0 % 65 12.6 % 77 15.0 % 288 56.2 %

Hours per week on paid employment on campus (include paid interships)

Female . . 4 3.2 % 19 15.5 % 99 81.1 % 8 2.0 % 6 1.5 % 34 8.5 % 348 87.8 % Male 1 1.5 % 3 4.6 % 7 10.9 % 53 82.8 % 3 2.7 % 5 4.5 % 10 9.0 % 93 83.7 % Total 1 0.5 % 7 3.7 % 26 13.9 % 152 81.7 % 11 2.1 % 11 2.1 % 44 8.6 % 441 86.9 %

Hours per week on paid employment that related to academic interests

Female 2 2.8 % 5 7.2 % 30 43.4 % 32 46.3 % 36 14.9 % 22 9.1 % 55 22.8 % 128 53.1 % Male 2 6.4 % 7 22.5 % 7 22.5 % 15 48.3 % 10 16.1 % 10 16.1 % 11 17.7 % 31 50.0 % Total 4 4.0 % 12 12.0 % 37 37.0 % 47 47.0 % 46 15.1 % 32 10.5 % 66 21.7 % 159 52.4 %

Hours per week on participating in physical exercise, recreational sports, or physically active hobbies

Female 1 0.8 % 4 3.3 % 22 18.4 % 92 77.3 % 4 1.0 % 15 3.7 % 95 23.9 % 282 71.2 % Male 1 1.5 % 4 6.3 % 22 34.9 % 36 57.1 % 2 1.8 % 5 4.5 % 40 36.6 % 62 56.8 % Total 2 1.0 % 8 4.3 % 44 24.1 % 128 70.3 % 6 1.1 % 20 3.9 % 135 26.7 % 344 68.1 %

Hours per week on participating in spiritual or religious activities

Female 1 0.8 % 4 3.3 % 15 12.7 % 98 83.0 % 3 0.7 % 8 2.0 % 35 8.8 % 348 88.3 % Male 1 1.6 % 3 4.8 % 12 19.3 % 46 74.1 % 1 0.9 % 4 3.7 % 14 12.9 % 89 82.4 % Total 2 1.1 % 7 3.8 % 27 15.0 % 144 80.0 % 4 0.7 % 12 2.3 % 49 9.7 % 437 87.0 %

Hours per week on participating in student clubs or organizations

Female 1 0.8 % 8 6.7 % 20 16.9 % 89 75.4 % 3 0.7 % 12 3.0 % 44 11.1 % 337 85.1 % Male 2 3.1 % 5 7.9 % 10 15.8 % 46 73.0 % 2 1.8 % 6 5.5 % 16 14.8 % 84 77.7 % Total 3 1.6 % 13 7.1 % 30 16.5 % 135 74.5 % 5 0.9 % 18 3.5 % 60 11.9 % 421 83.5 %

Hours per week on partying Female 3 2.5 % 3 2.5 % 11 9.2 % 102 85.7 % 4 1.0 % 6 1.5 % 26 6.5 % 361 90.9 % Male . . 1 1.5 % 10 15.8 % 52 82.5 % . . 1 0.9 % 15 13.7 % 93 85.3 % Total 3 1.6 % 4 2.1 % 21 11.5 % 154 84.6 % 4 0.7 % 7 1.3 % 41 8.1 % 454 89.7 %

NOTE 1: Students that responded to this survey but did not respond to a particular item were removed from the item's analysis and not included in percentages

NOTE 2: Percent totals may not always equal 100% due to rounding *More than 25 is defined by the response ranges of 'More than 30' or '30-26'

**25-16 is defined by the response ranges of '25-21' or '20-16' ***15-6 is defined by the response ranges of '15-11' or '10-6'

****Less than 6 is defined by the response ranges of '5-1' or '0'

Page 55: An Overview of SERU 2014 Results - Rutgers Universityoirap.rutgers.edu/surveys/SERU/2014/Ernest Mario...engagement, time allocation, and motivations for major selection by gender,

2014 Dean's Report Ernest Mario School of Pharmacy

Ernest Mario School of Pharmacy All RBHS Undergraduates

More than

25* 25-16** 15-6*** Less than

6**** More than

25* 25-16** 15-6*** Less than

6**** Time Allocation Gender N Percent N Percent N Percent N Percent N Percent N Percent N Percent N Percent

Hours per week on performing community service or volunteer activities

Female 2 1.6 % 3 2.5 % 16 13.4 % 98 82.3 % 3 0.7 % 6 1.5 % 47 11.9 % 338 85.7 % Male . . 6 9.6 % 8 12.9 % 48 77.4 % . . 8 7.4 % 14 12.9 % 86 79.6 % Total 2 1.1 % 9 4.9 % 24 13.2 % 146 80.6 % 3 0.5 % 14 2.7 % 61 12.1 % 424 84.4 %

Hours per week on socializing with friends

Female 5 4.2 % 13 10.9 % 42 35.2 % 59 49.5 % 12 3.0 % 27 6.8 % 107 26.9 % 251 63.2 % Male 1 1.5 % 14 22.2 % 27 42.8 % 21 33.3 % 2 1.8 % 16 14.6 % 44 40.3 % 47 43.1 % Total 6 3.2 % 27 14.8 % 69 37.9 % 80 43.9 % 14 2.7 % 43 8.4 % 151 29.8 % 298 58.8 %

Hours per week on spending time with family

Female 6 5.1 % 7 5.9 % 24 20.5 % 80 68.3 % 39 9.9 % 36 9.1 % 116 29.5 % 202 51.3 % Male . . 4 6.3 % 19 30.1 % 40 63.4 % 3 2.7 % 8 7.4 % 35 32.4 % 62 57.4 % Total 6 3.3 % 11 6.1 % 43 23.8 % 120 66.6 % 42 8.3 % 44 8.7 % 151 30.1 % 264 52.6 %

Hours per week on studying and other academic activities outside of class

Female 30 25.8 % 34 29.3 % 36 31.0 % 16 13.7 % 71 18.2 % 110 28.2 % 153 39.2 % 56 14.3 % Male 14 22.2 % 13 20.6 % 28 44.4 % 8 12.6 % 20 18.3 % 23 21.1 % 51 46.7 % 15 13.7 % Total 44 24.5 % 47 26.2 % 64 35.7 % 24 13.4 % 91 18.2 % 133 26.6 % 204 40.8 % 71 14.2 %

Hours per week on using the computer or smart phone for non-academic purposes (games, shopping, e-mail/instant messaging, etc.)

Female 11 9.2 % 18 15.1 % 61 51.2 % 29 24.3 % 29 7.3 % 49 12.3 % 147 37.1 % 171 43.1 % Male 7 11.1 % 13 20.6 % 25 39.6 % 18 28.5 % 10 9.2 % 21 19.4 % 39 36.1 % 38 35.1 % Total 18 9.8 % 31 17.0 % 86 47.2 % 47 25.8 % 39 7.7 % 70 13.8 % 186 36.9 % 209 41.4 %

Hours per week on watching TV streaming movies/TV on computer or tablet

Female 7 5.8 % 8 6.7 % 39 32.7 % 65 54.6 % 11 2.7 % 29 7.3 % 105 26.5 % 251 63.3 % Male 4 6.3 % 6 9.5 % 28 44.4 % 25 39.6 % 4 3.6 % 9 8.2 % 44 40.3 % 52 47.7 % Total 11 6.0 % 14 7.6 % 67 36.8 % 90 49.4 % 15 2.9 % 38 7.5 % 149 29.5 % 303 60.0 %

NOTE 1: Students that responded to this survey but did not respond to a particular item were removed from the item's analysis and not included in percentages

NOTE 2: Percent totals may not always equal 100% due to rounding *More than 25 is defined by the response ranges of 'More than 30' or '30-26'

**25-16 is defined by the response ranges of '25-21' or '20-16' ***15-6 is defined by the response ranges of '15-11' or '10-6'

****Less than 6 is defined by the response ranges of '5-1' or '0'

Page 56: An Overview of SERU 2014 Results - Rutgers Universityoirap.rutgers.edu/surveys/SERU/2014/Ernest Mario...engagement, time allocation, and motivations for major selection by gender,

2014 Dean's Report Ernest Mario School of Pharmacy

Ernest Mario School of Pharmacy All RBHS Undergraduates

More than

25* 25-16** 15-6*** Less than

6**** More than

25* 25-16** 15-6*** Less than

6**** Time Allocation Ethnicity N Percent N Percent N Percent N Percent N Percent N Percent N Percent N Percent

Hours per week on attending classes, discussion sections or labs

African American 1 33.3 % 1 33.3 % 1 33.3 % . . 10 21.7 % 14 30.4 % 18 39.1 % 4 8.6 % Chicano- Latino . . 1 33.3 % 2 66.6 % . . 10 22.7 % 12 27.2 % 19 43.1 % 3 6.8 %

Asian- Filipino- Pacific Islander 24 18.7 % 52 40.6 % 46 35.9 % 6 4.6 % 31 16.4 % 77 40.7 % 70 37.0 % 11 5.8 % White 5 17.2 % 17 58.6 % 5 17.2 % 2 6.8 % 31 17.0 % 70 38.4 % 56 30.7 % 25 13.7 %

International- Foreign Visa 2 14.2 % 8 57.1 % 2 14.2 % 2 14.2 % 3 17.6 % 9 52.9 % 3 17.6 % 2 11.7 % Other . . 3 50.0 % 2 33.3 % 1 16.6 % 3 10.7 % 10 35.7 % 13 46.4 % 2 7.1 % Total 32 17.4 % 82 44.8 % 58 31.6 % 11 6.0 % 88 17.3 % 192 37.9 % 179 35.3 % 47 9.2 %

Hours per week on attending movies, concerts, sports, or other entertainment events

African American . . . . 1 33.3 % 2 66.6 % . . 2 4.3 % 3 6.5 % 41 89.1 % Chicano- Latino . . . . . . 3 100.0 % . . . . 4 9.3 % 39 90.6 %

Asian- Filipino- Pacific Islander 2 1.5 % 6 4.7 % 24 18.8 % 95 74.8 % 2 1.0 % 6 3.2 % 33 17.6 % 146 78.0 % White . . 3 10.3 % 5 17.2 % 21 72.4 % 2 1.0 % 5 2.7 % 22 12.0 % 153 84.0 %

International- Foreign Visa . . . . 3 21.4 % 11 78.5 % . . . . 3 17.6 % 14 82.3 % Other . . . . 1 16.6 % 5 83.3 % . . 2 7.1 % 2 7.1 % 24 85.7 % Total 2 1.0 % 9 4.9 % 34 18.6 % 137 75.2 % 4 0.7 % 15 2.9 % 67 13.3 % 417 82.9 %

Hours per week on commuting to school and to work

African American . . . . . . 3 100.0 % 6 13.0 % 4 8.6 % 13 28.2 % 23 50.0 % Chicano- Latino . . . . 1 33.3 % 2 66.6 % . . 2 4.5 % 21 47.7 % 21 47.7 %

Asian- Filipino- Pacific Islander . . 9 7.0 % 26 20.4 % 92 72.4 % . . 12 6.4 % 52 27.8 % 123 65.7 % White . . 1 3.4 % 8 27.5 % 20 68.9 % 3 1.6 % 7 3.8 % 83 45.3 % 90 49.1 %

International- Foreign Visa . . . . 2 14.2 % 12 85.7 % . . 1 5.8 % 3 17.6 % 13 76.4 % Other . . . . 1 16.6 % 5 83.3 % 1 3.5 % 2 7.1 % 12 42.8 % 13 46.4 % Total . . 10 5.4 % 38 20.8 % 134 73.6 % 10 1.9 % 28 5.5 % 184 36.4 % 283 56.0 %

Hours per week on paid employment off campus (include paid interships)

African American . . . . . . 3 100.0 % 11 24.4 % 2 4.4 % 7 15.5 % 25 55.5 % Chicano- Latino . . . . . . 3 100.0 % 13 28.8 % 9 20.0 % 5 11.1 % 18 40.0 %

Asian- Filipino- Pacific Islander . . 10 7.6 % 30 23.0 % 90 69.2 % 11 5.7 % 20 10.4 % 36 18.7 % 125 65.1 % White . . 5 16.6 % 8 26.6 % 17 56.6 % 43 23.3 % 28 15.2 % 26 14.1 % 87 47.2 %

International- Foreign Visa . . . . 1 6.6 % 14 93.3 % 1 5.5 % . . 2 11.1 % 15 83.3 % Other . . . . 1 16.6 % 5 83.3 % 3 10.7 % 6 21.4 % 1 3.5 % 18 64.2 % Total . . 15 8.0 % 40 21.3 % 132 70.5 % 82 16.0 % 65 12.6 % 77 15.0 % 288 56.2 %

NOTE 1: Students that responded to this survey but did not respond to a particular item were removed from the item's analysis and not included in percentages

NOTE 2: Percent totals may not always equal 100% due to rounding *More than 25 is defined by the response ranges of 'More than 30' or '30-26'

**25-16 is defined by the response ranges of '25-21' or '20-16' ***15-6 is defined by the response ranges of '15-11' or '10-6'

****Less than 6 is defined by the response ranges of '5-1' or '0'

Page 57: An Overview of SERU 2014 Results - Rutgers Universityoirap.rutgers.edu/surveys/SERU/2014/Ernest Mario...engagement, time allocation, and motivations for major selection by gender,

2014 Dean's Report Ernest Mario School of Pharmacy

Ernest Mario School of Pharmacy All RBHS Undergraduates

More than

25* 25-16** 15-6*** Less than

6**** More than

25* 25-16** 15-6*** Less than

6**** Time Allocation Ethnicity N Percent N Percent N Percent N Percent N Percent N Percent N Percent N Percent

Hours per week on paid employment on campus (include paid interships)

African American . . . . 2 66.6 % 1 33.3 % 1 2.2 % 2 4.4 % 6 13.3 % 36 80.0 % Chicano- Latino . . . . 1 33.3 % 2 66.6 % 1 2.3 % . . 3 6.9 % 39 90.6 %

Asian- Filipino- Pacific Islander 1 0.7 % 3 2.3 % 17 13.0 % 109 83.8 % 2 1.0 % 3 1.5 % 22 11.4 % 165 85.9 % White . . 2 6.8 % 5 17.2 % 22 75.8 % 7 3.8 % 4 2.2 % 11 6.0 % 159 87.8 %

International- Foreign Visa . . . . . . 15 100.0 % . . . . . . 18 100.0 % Other . . 2 33.3 % 1 16.6 % 3 50.0 % . . 2 7.1 % 2 7.1 % 24 85.7 % Total 1 0.5 % 7 3.7 % 26 13.9 % 152 81.7 % 11 2.1 % 11 2.1 % 44 8.6 % 441 86.9 %

Hours per week on paid employment that related to academic interests

African American . . . . . . 2 100.0 % 5 17.8 % . . 4 14.2 % 19 67.8 % Chicano- Latino . . . . . . 1 100.0 % 4 13.3 % 3 10.0 % 2 6.6 % 21 70.0 %

Asian- Filipino- Pacific Islander 1 1.4 % 7 9.8 % 29 40.8 % 34 47.8 % 7 6.6 % 12 11.4 % 37 35.2 % 49 46.6 % White 1 5.0 % 5 25.0 % 7 35.0 % 7 35.0 % 25 20.8 % 15 12.5 % 20 16.6 % 60 50.0 %

International- Foreign Visa . . . . . . 1 100.0 % 1 33.3 % . . . . 2 66.6 % Other 2 40.0 % . . 1 20.0 % 2 40.0 % 4 23.5 % 2 11.7 % 3 17.6 % 8 47.0 % Total 4 4.0 % 12 12.0 % 37 37.0 % 47 47.0 % 46 15.1 % 32 10.5 % 66 21.7 % 159 52.4 %

Hours per week on participating in physical exercise, recreational sports, or physically active hobbies

African American . . . . . . 3 100.0 % 1 2.1 % 2 4.3 % 11 23.9 % 32 69.5 % Chicano- Latino . . 1 33.3 % 1 33.3 % 1 33.3 % . . 1 2.2 % 13 29.5 % 30 68.1 %

Asian- Filipino- Pacific Islander 2 1.5 % 5 3.9 % 29 22.8 % 91 71.6 % 3 1.5 % 6 3.1 % 46 24.4 % 133 70.7 % White . . 2 6.8 % 12 41.3 % 15 51.7 % 1 0.5 % 7 3.8 % 62 34.0 % 112 61.5 %

International- Foreign Visa . . . . 1 7.1 % 13 92.8 % 1 5.8 % . . 1 5.8 % 15 88.2 % Other . . . . 1 16.6 % 5 83.3 % . . 4 14.2 % 2 7.1 % 22 78.5 % Total 2 1.0 % 8 4.3 % 44 24.1 % 128 70.3 % 6 1.1 % 20 3.9 % 135 26.7 % 344 68.1 %

Hours per week on participating in spiritual or religious activities

African American . . . . . . 3 100.0 % 1 2.2 % 1 2.2 % 5 11.1 % 38 84.4 % Chicano- Latino . . . . . . 3 100.0 % . . . . 2 4.5 % 42 95.4 %

Asian- Filipino- Pacific Islander 1 0.7 % 6 4.7 % 19 15.0 % 100 79.3 % 1 0.5 % 8 4.2 % 25 13.3 % 153 81.8 % White . . 1 3.4 % 5 17.2 % 23 79.3 % 1 0.5 % 1 0.5 % 11 6.0 % 169 92.8 %

International- Foreign Visa 1 7.6 % . . 2 15.3 % 10 76.9 % 1 6.2 % . . 3 18.7 % 12 75.0 % Other . . . . 1 16.6 % 5 83.3 % . . 2 7.1 % 3 10.7 % 23 82.1 % Total 2 1.1 % 7 3.8 % 27 15.0 % 144 80.0 % 4 0.7 % 12 2.3 % 49 9.7 % 437 87.0 %

NOTE 1: Students that responded to this survey but did not respond to a particular item were removed from the item's analysis and not included in percentages

NOTE 2: Percent totals may not always equal 100% due to rounding *More than 25 is defined by the response ranges of 'More than 30' or '30-26'

**25-16 is defined by the response ranges of '25-21' or '20-16' ***15-6 is defined by the response ranges of '15-11' or '10-6'

****Less than 6 is defined by the response ranges of '5-1' or '0'

Page 58: An Overview of SERU 2014 Results - Rutgers Universityoirap.rutgers.edu/surveys/SERU/2014/Ernest Mario...engagement, time allocation, and motivations for major selection by gender,

2014 Dean's Report Ernest Mario School of Pharmacy

Ernest Mario School of Pharmacy All RBHS Undergraduates

More than

25* 25-16** 15-6*** Less than

6**** More than

25* 25-16** 15-6*** Less than

6**** Time Allocation Ethnicity N Percent N Percent N Percent N Percent N Percent N Percent N Percent N Percent

Hours per week on participating in student clubs or organizations

African American . . . . 1 33.3 % 2 66.6 % 1 2.1 % . . 3 6.5 % 42 91.3 % Chicano- Latino . . . . 1 33.3 % 2 66.6 % . . . . 4 9.0 % 40 90.9 %

Asian- Filipino- Pacific Islander 2 1.5 % 11 8.7 % 23 18.2 % 90 71.4 % 2 1.0 % 12 6.4 % 37 19.7 % 136 72.7 % White . . 2 6.8 % 3 10.3 % 24 82.7 % 1 0.5 % 3 1.6 % 13 7.1 % 165 90.6 %

International- Foreign Visa 1 7.1 % . . . . 13 92.8 % 1 5.8 % . . . . 16 94.1 % Other . . . . 2 33.3 % 4 66.6 % . . 3 10.7 % 3 10.7 % 22 78.5 % Total 3 1.6 % 13 7.1 % 30 16.5 % 135 74.5 % 5 0.9 % 18 3.5 % 60 11.9 % 421 83.5 %

Hours per week on partying African American . . . . 1 33.3 % 2 66.6 % . . . . 1 2.1 % 45 97.8 % Chicano- Latino . . . . . . 3 100.0 % . . . . . . 44 100.0 %

Asian- Filipino- Pacific Islander 3 2.3 % 3 2.3 % 14 11.0 % 107 84.2 % 3 1.5 % 3 1.5 % 19 10.1 % 163 86.7 % White . . . . 6 20.6 % 23 79.3 % 1 0.5 % . . 19 10.3 % 163 89.0 %

International- Foreign Visa . . 1 7.1 % . . 13 92.8 % . . 1 5.8 % 1 5.8 % 15 88.2 % Other . . . . . . 6 100.0 % . . 3 10.7 % 1 3.5 % 24 85.7 % Total 3 1.6 % 4 2.1 % 21 11.5 % 154 84.6 % 4 0.7 % 7 1.3 % 41 8.1 % 454 89.7 %

Hours per week on performing community service or volunteer activities

African American . . . . . . 3 100.0 % . . 1 2.1 % 9 19.5 % 36 78.2 % Chicano- Latino . . . . 1 33.3 % 2 66.6 % . . . . 6 14.2 % 36 85.7 %

Asian- Filipino- Pacific Islander 2 1.5 % 7 5.5 % 19 15.0 % 98 77.7 % 2 1.0 % 7 3.7 % 27 14.4 % 151 80.7 % White . . 1 3.4 % 3 10.3 % 25 86.2 % 1 0.5 % 3 1.6 % 18 9.8 % 160 87.9 %

International- Foreign Visa . . 1 7.1 % . . 13 92.8 % . . 1 5.8 % . . 16 94.1 % Other . . . . 1 16.6 % 5 83.3 % . . 2 7.1 % 1 3.5 % 25 89.2 % Total 2 1.1 % 9 4.9 % 24 13.2 % 146 80.6 % 3 0.5 % 14 2.7 % 61 12.1 % 424 84.4 %

Hours per week on socializing with friends

African American . . . . 2 66.6 % 1 33.3 % 1 2.1 % 2 4.3 % 11 23.9 % 32 69.5 % Chicano- Latino . . 1 33.3 % 2 66.6 % . . . . 2 4.5 % 7 15.9 % 35 79.5 %

Asian- Filipino- Pacific Islander 5 3.9 % 19 14.9 % 47 37.0 % 56 44.0 % 9 4.7 % 22 11.7 % 67 35.6 % 90 47.8 % White 1 3.4 % 5 17.2 % 9 31.0 % 14 48.2 % 3 1.6 % 12 6.5 % 50 27.3 % 118 64.4 %

International- Foreign Visa . . 2 14.2 % 8 57.1 % 4 28.5 % . . 2 11.7 % 9 52.9 % 6 35.2 % Other . . . . 1 16.6 % 5 83.3 % 1 3.5 % 3 10.7 % 7 25.0 % 17 60.7 % Total 6 3.2 % 27 14.8 % 69 37.9 % 80 43.9 % 14 2.7 % 43 8.4 % 151 29.8 % 298 58.8 %

NOTE 1: Students that responded to this survey but did not respond to a particular item were removed from the item's analysis and not included in percentages

NOTE 2: Percent totals may not always equal 100% due to rounding *More than 25 is defined by the response ranges of 'More than 30' or '30-26'

**25-16 is defined by the response ranges of '25-21' or '20-16' ***15-6 is defined by the response ranges of '15-11' or '10-6'

****Less than 6 is defined by the response ranges of '5-1' or '0'

Page 59: An Overview of SERU 2014 Results - Rutgers Universityoirap.rutgers.edu/surveys/SERU/2014/Ernest Mario...engagement, time allocation, and motivations for major selection by gender,

2014 Dean's Report Ernest Mario School of Pharmacy

Ernest Mario School of Pharmacy All RBHS Undergraduates

More than

25* 25-16** 15-6*** Less than

6**** More than

25* 25-16** 15-6*** Less than

6**** Time Allocation Ethnicity N Percent N Percent N Percent N Percent N Percent N Percent N Percent N Percent

Hours per week on spending time with family

African American . . . . . . 3 100.0 % 5 11.1 % 3 6.6 % 16 35.5 % 21 46.6 % Chicano- Latino . . . . . . 3 100.0 % 6 13.6 % . . 18 40.9 % 20 45.4 %

Asian- Filipino- Pacific Islander 5 4.0 % 9 7.2 % 31 24.8 % 80 64.0 % 13 6.9 % 15 8.0 % 47 25.2 % 111 59.6 % White . . 2 6.8 % 10 34.4 % 17 58.6 % 16 8.7 % 22 12.0 % 60 32.9 % 84 46.1 %

International- Foreign Visa 1 7.1 % . . . . 13 92.8 % 1 6.2 % . . 1 6.2 % 14 87.5 % Other . . . . 2 33.3 % 4 66.6 % 1 3.5 % 4 14.2 % 9 32.1 % 14 50.0 % Total 6 3.3 % 11 6.1 % 43 23.8 % 120 66.6 % 42 8.3 % 44 8.7 % 151 30.1 % 264 52.6 %

Hours per week on studying and other academic activities outside of class

African American 1 33.3 % . . 1 33.3 % 1 33.3 % 9 19.5 % 12 26.0 % 18 39.1 % 7 15.2 % Chicano- Latino 1 33.3 % 1 33.3 % 1 33.3 % . . 6 13.6 % 6 13.6 % 22 50.0 % 10 22.7 %

Asian- Filipino- Pacific Islander 31 24.8 % 34 27.2 % 43 34.4 % 17 13.6 % 38 20.4 % 50 26.8 % 72 38.7 % 26 13.9 % White 8 27.5 % 7 24.1 % 12 41.3 % 2 6.8 % 30 16.7 % 55 30.7 % 76 42.4 % 18 10.0 %

International- Foreign Visa 3 23.0 % 4 30.7 % 3 23.0 % 3 23.0 % 4 25.0 % 4 25.0 % 5 31.2 % 3 18.7 % Other . . 1 16.6 % 4 66.6 % 1 16.6 % 4 14.2 % 6 21.4 % 11 39.2 % 7 25.0 % Total 44 24.5 % 47 26.2 % 64 35.7 % 24 13.4 % 91 18.2 % 133 26.6 % 204 40.8 % 71 14.2 %

Hours per week on using the computer or smart phone for non-academic purposes (games, shopping, e-mail/instant messaging, etc.)

African American 1 33.3 % 1 33.3 % . . 1 33.3 % 4 8.6 % 3 6.5 % 11 23.9 % 28 60.8 % Chicano- Latino . . 1 33.3 % 1 33.3 % 1 33.3 % 3 6.8 % 4 9.0 % 13 29.5 % 24 54.5 %

Asian- Filipino- Pacific Islander 14 11.0 % 22 17.3 % 58 45.6 % 33 25.9 % 22 11.7 % 30 15.9 % 86 45.7 % 50 26.5 % White 2 6.8 % 5 17.2 % 19 65.5 % 3 10.3 % 8 4.4 % 24 13.2 % 62 34.2 % 87 48.0 %

International- Foreign Visa 1 7.1 % 1 7.1 % 5 35.7 % 7 50.0 % 1 5.8 % 1 5.8 % 6 35.2 % 9 52.9 % Other . . 1 16.6 % 3 50.0 % 2 33.3 % 1 3.5 % 8 28.5 % 8 28.5 % 11 39.2 % Total 18 9.8 % 31 17.0 % 86 47.2 % 47 25.8 % 39 7.7 % 70 13.8 % 186 36.9 % 209 41.4 %

Hours per week on watching TV streaming movies/TV on computer or tablet

African American 1 33.3 % . . . . 2 66.6 % 1 2.1 % . . 11 23.9 % 34 73.9 % Chicano- Latino . . . . 1 33.3 % 2 66.6 % 1 2.2 % 2 4.5 % 13 29.5 % 28 63.6 %

Asian- Filipino- Pacific Islander 9 7.0 % 13 10.2 % 48 37.7 % 57 44.8 % 10 5.3 % 19 10.1 % 67 35.6 % 92 48.9 % White 1 3.4 % 1 3.4 % 11 37.9 % 16 55.1 % 2 1.0 % 10 5.4 % 47 25.8 % 123 67.5 %

International- Foreign Visa . . . . 6 42.8 % 8 57.1 % . . . . 7 41.1 % 10 58.8 % Other . . . . 1 16.6 % 5 83.3 % 1 3.5 % 7 25.0 % 4 14.2 % 16 57.1 % Total 11 6.0 % 14 7.6 % 67 36.8 % 90 49.4 % 15 2.9 % 38 7.5 % 149 29.5 % 303 60.0 %

NOTE 1: Students that responded to this survey but did not respond to a particular item were removed from the item's analysis and not included in percentages

NOTE 2: Percent totals may not always equal 100% due to rounding *More than 25 is defined by the response ranges of 'More than 30' or '30-26'

**25-16 is defined by the response ranges of '25-21' or '20-16' ***15-6 is defined by the response ranges of '15-11' or '10-6'

****Less than 6 is defined by the response ranges of '5-1' or '0'

Page 60: An Overview of SERU 2014 Results - Rutgers Universityoirap.rutgers.edu/surveys/SERU/2014/Ernest Mario...engagement, time allocation, and motivations for major selection by gender,

2014 Dean's Report Ernest Mario School of Pharmacy

Ernest Mario School of Pharmacy All RBHS Undergraduates

More than

25* 25-16** 15-6*** Less than

6**** More than

25* 25-16** 15-6*** Less than

6****

Time Allocation Enrollment

Status N Percent N Percent N Percent N Percent N Percent N Percent N Percent N Percent Hours per week on attending classes, discussion sections or labs

Full-Time 32 17.4 % 82 44.8 % 58 31.6 % 11 6.0 % 41 15.0 % 125 45.7 % 95 34.7 % 12 4.3 % Part-Time . . . . . . . . 47 20.1 % 67 28.7 % 84 36.0 % 35 15.0 % Total 32 17.4 % 82 44.8 % 58 31.6 % 11 6.0 % 88 17.3 % 192 37.9 % 179 35.3 % 47 9.2 %

Hours per week on attending movies, concerts, sports, or other entertainment events

Full-Time 2 1.0 % 9 4.9 % 34 18.6 % 137 75.2 % 3 1.1 % 12 4.4 % 52 19.2 % 203 75.1 % Part-Time . . . . . . . . 1 0.4 % 3 1.2 % 15 6.4 % 214 91.8 % Total 2 1.0 % 9 4.9 % 34 18.6 % 137 75.2 % 4 0.7 % 15 2.9 % 67 13.3 % 417 82.9 %

Hours per week on commuting to school and to work

Full-Time . . 10 5.4 % 38 20.8 % 134 73.6 % 1 0.3 % 14 5.1 % 66 24.2 % 191 70.2 % Part-Time . . . . . . . . 9 3.8 % 14 6.0 % 118 50.6 % 92 39.4 % Total . . 10 5.4 % 38 20.8 % 134 73.6 % 10 1.9 % 28 5.5 % 184 36.4 % 283 56.0 %

Hours per week on paid employment off campus (include paid interships)

Full-Time . . 15 8.0 % 40 21.3 % 132 70.5 % 8 2.8 % 36 12.9 % 53 18.9 % 182 65.2 % Part-Time . . . . . . . . 74 31.7 % 29 12.4 % 24 10.3 % 106 45.4 % Total . . 15 8.0 % 40 21.3 % 132 70.5 % 82 16.0 % 65 12.6 % 77 15.0 % 288 56.2 %

Hours per week on paid employment on campus (include paid interships)

Full-Time 1 0.5 % 7 3.7 % 26 13.9 % 152 81.7 % 3 1.0 % 8 2.8 % 42 15.1 % 225 80.9 % Part-Time . . . . . . . . 8 3.4 % 3 1.3 % 2 0.8 % 216 94.3 % Total 1 0.5 % 7 3.7 % 26 13.9 % 152 81.7 % 11 2.1 % 11 2.1 % 44 8.6 % 441 86.9 %

Hours per week on paid employment that related to academic interests

Full-Time 4 4.0 % 12 12.0 % 37 37.0 % 47 47.0 % 12 7.4 % 20 12.3 % 49 30.2 % 81 50.0 % Part-Time . . . . . . . . 34 24.1 % 12 8.5 % 17 12.0 % 78 55.3 % Total 4 4.0 % 12 12.0 % 37 37.0 % 47 47.0 % 46 15.1 % 32 10.5 % 66 21.7 % 159 52.4 %

Hours per week on participating in physical exercise, recreational sports, or physically active hobbies

Full-Time 2 1.0 % 8 4.3 % 44 24.1 % 128 70.3 % 3 1.1 % 13 4.7 % 72 26.4 % 184 67.6 % Part-Time . . . . . . . . 3 1.2 % 7 3.0 % 63 27.0 % 160 68.6 % Total 2 1.0 % 8 4.3 % 44 24.1 % 128 70.3 % 6 1.1 % 20 3.9 % 135 26.7 % 344 68.1 %

Hours per week on participating in spiritual or religious activities

Full-Time 2 1.1 % 7 3.8 % 27 15.0 % 144 80.0 % 3 1.1 % 8 2.9 % 35 12.9 % 224 82.9 % Part-Time . . . . . . . . 1 0.4 % 4 1.7 % 14 6.0 % 213 91.8 % Total 2 1.1 % 7 3.8 % 27 15.0 % 144 80.0 % 4 0.7 % 12 2.3 % 49 9.7 % 437 87.0 %

Hours per week on participating in student clubs or organizations

Full-Time 3 1.6 % 13 7.1 % 30 16.5 % 135 74.5 % 4 1.4 % 16 5.9 % 56 20.6 % 195 71.9 % Part-Time . . . . . . . . 1 0.4 % 2 0.8 % 4 1.7 % 226 96.9 % Total 3 1.6 % 13 7.1 % 30 16.5 % 135 74.5 % 5 0.9 % 18 3.5 % 60 11.9 % 421 83.5 %

Hours per week on partying Full-Time 3 1.6 % 4 2.1 % 21 11.5 % 154 84.6 % 4 1.4 % 6 2.2 % 35 12.8 % 227 83.4 % Part-Time . . . . . . . . . . 1 0.4 % 6 2.5 % 227 97.0 % Total 3 1.6 % 4 2.1 % 21 11.5 % 154 84.6 % 4 0.7 % 7 1.3 % 41 8.1 % 454 89.7 %

NOTE 1: Students that responded to this survey but did not respond to a particular item were removed from the item's analysis and not included in percentages

NOTE 2: Percent totals may not always equal 100% due to rounding *More than 25 is defined by the response ranges of 'More than 30' or '30-26'

**25-16 is defined by the response ranges of '25-21' or '20-16' ***15-6 is defined by the response ranges of '15-11' or '10-6'

****Less than 6 is defined by the response ranges of '5-1' or '0'

Page 61: An Overview of SERU 2014 Results - Rutgers Universityoirap.rutgers.edu/surveys/SERU/2014/Ernest Mario...engagement, time allocation, and motivations for major selection by gender,

2014 Dean's Report Ernest Mario School of Pharmacy

Ernest Mario School of Pharmacy All RBHS Undergraduates

More than

25* 25-16** 15-6*** Less than

6**** More than

25* 25-16** 15-6*** Less than

6****

Time Allocation Enrollment

Status N Percent N Percent N Percent N Percent N Percent N Percent N Percent N Percent Hours per week on performing community service or volunteer activities

Full-Time 2 1.1 % 9 4.9 % 24 13.2 % 146 80.6 % 3 1.1 % 12 4.4 % 35 12.9 % 220 81.4 % Part-Time . . . . . . . . . . 2 0.8 % 26 11.2 % 204 87.9 % Total 2 1.1 % 9 4.9 % 24 13.2 % 146 80.6 % 3 0.5 % 14 2.7 % 61 12.1 % 424 84.4 %

Hours per week on socializing with friends

Full-Time 6 3.2 % 27 14.8 % 69 37.9 % 80 43.9 % 12 4.4 % 34 12.5 % 114 41.9 % 112 41.1 % Part-Time . . . . . . . . 2 0.8 % 9 3.8 % 37 15.8 % 186 79.4 % Total 6 3.2 % 27 14.8 % 69 37.9 % 80 43.9 % 14 2.7 % 43 8.4 % 151 29.8 % 298 58.8 %

Hours per week on spending time with family

Full-Time 6 3.3 % 11 6.1 % 43 23.8 % 120 66.6 % 11 4.0 % 21 7.8 % 69 25.6 % 168 62.4 % Part-Time . . . . . . . . 31 13.3 % 23 9.9 % 82 35.3 % 96 41.3 % Total 6 3.3 % 11 6.1 % 43 23.8 % 120 66.6 % 42 8.3 % 44 8.7 % 151 30.1 % 264 52.6 %

Hours per week on studying and other academic activities outside of class

Full-Time 44 24.5 % 47 26.2 % 64 35.7 % 24 13.4 % 55 20.4 % 68 25.2 % 111 41.2 % 35 13.0 % Part-Time . . . . . . . . 36 15.6 % 65 28.2 % 93 40.4 % 36 15.6 % Total 44 24.5 % 47 26.2 % 64 35.7 % 24 13.4 % 91 18.2 % 133 26.6 % 204 40.8 % 71 14.2 %

Hours per week on using the computer or smart phone for non-academic purposes (games, shopping, e-mail/instant messaging, etc.)

Full-Time 18 9.8 % 31 17.0 % 86 47.2 % 47 25.8 % 27 9.9 % 47 17.2 % 126 46.3 % 72 26.4 % Part-Time . . . . . . . . 12 5.1 % 23 9.9 % 60 25.8 % 137 59.0 % Total 18 9.8 % 31 17.0 % 86 47.2 % 47 25.8 % 39 7.7 % 70 13.8 % 186 36.9 % 209 41.4 %

Hours per week on watching TV streaming movies/TV on computer or tablet

Full-Time 11 6.0 % 14 7.6 % 67 36.8 % 90 49.4 % 14 5.1 % 25 9.1 % 96 35.2 % 137 50.3 % Part-Time . . . . . . . . 1 0.4 % 13 5.5 % 53 22.7 % 166 71.2 % Total 11 6.0 % 14 7.6 % 67 36.8 % 90 49.4 % 15 2.9 % 38 7.5 % 149 29.5 % 303 60.0 %

NOTE 1: Students that responded to this survey but did not respond to a particular item were removed from the item's analysis and not included in percentages

NOTE 2: Percent totals may not always equal 100% due to rounding *More than 25 is defined by the response ranges of 'More than 30' or '30-26'

**25-16 is defined by the response ranges of '25-21' or '20-16' ***15-6 is defined by the response ranges of '15-11' or '10-6'

****Less than 6 is defined by the response ranges of '5-1' or '0'

Page 62: An Overview of SERU 2014 Results - Rutgers Universityoirap.rutgers.edu/surveys/SERU/2014/Ernest Mario...engagement, time allocation, and motivations for major selection by gender,

2014 Dean's Report Ernest Mario School of Pharmacy

Ernest Mario School of Pharmacy All RBHS Undergraduates

More than

25* 25-16** 15-6*** Less than

6**** More than

25* 25-16** 15-6*** Less than

6****

Time Allocation Academic

Class Level N Percent N Percent N Percent N Percent N Percent N Percent N Percent N Percent Hours per week on attending classes, discussion sections or labs

Freshman 10 21.2 % 15 31.9 % 16 34.0 % 6 12.7 % 22 24.1 % 28 30.7 % 33 36.2 % 8 8.7 % Sophomore 1 10.0 % 3 30.0 % 5 50.0 % 1 10.0 % 11 27.5 % 13 32.5 % 15 37.5 % 1 2.5 %

Junior 7 14.0 % 26 52.0 % 15 30.0 % 2 4.0 % 30 18.6 % 62 38.5 % 58 36.0 % 11 6.8 % Senior 14 18.4 % 38 50.0 % 22 28.9 % 2 2.6 % 25 11.8 % 89 42.1 % 71 33.6 % 26 12.3 %

Unclassified . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 66.6 % 1 33.3 % Total 32 17.4 % 82 44.8 % 58 31.6 % 11 6.0 % 88 17.3 % 192 37.9 % 179 35.3 % 47 9.2 %

Hours per week on attending movies, concerts, sports, or other entertainment events

Freshman . . 3 6.5 % 6 13.0 % 37 80.4 % . . 3 3.3 % 10 11.2 % 76 85.3 % Sophomore . . . . 1 10.0 % 9 90.0 % . . 1 2.5 % 3 7.5 % 36 90.0 %

Junior 1 2.0 % 2 4.0 % 13 26.0 % 34 68.0 % 2 1.2 % 6 3.7 % 19 11.8 % 134 83.2 % Senior 1 1.3 % 4 5.2 % 14 18.4 % 57 75.0 % 2 0.9 % 5 2.3 % 35 16.6 % 168 80.0 %

Unclassified . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 100.0 % Total 2 1.0 % 9 4.9 % 34 18.6 % 137 75.2 % 4 0.7 % 15 2.9 % 67 13.3 % 417 82.9 %

Hours per week on commuting to school and to work

Freshman . . 2 4.3 % 6 13.0 % 38 82.6 % 2 2.2 % 3 3.3 % 27 30.0 % 58 64.4 % Sophomore . . 1 10.0 % 2 20.0 % 7 70.0 % 1 2.5 % 5 12.5 % 8 20.0 % 26 65.0 %

Junior . . 3 6.0 % 12 24.0 % 35 70.0 % 3 1.8 % 9 5.5 % 67 41.6 % 82 50.9 % Senior . . 4 5.2 % 18 23.6 % 54 71.0 % 4 1.8 % 11 5.2 % 80 37.9 % 116 54.9 %

Unclassified . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 66.6 % 1 33.3 % Total . . 10 5.4 % 38 20.8 % 134 73.6 % 10 1.9 % 28 5.5 % 184 36.4 % 283 56.0 %

Hours per week on paid employment off campus (include paid interships)

Freshman . . 1 2.0 % 2 4.1 % 45 93.7 % 11 11.8 % 9 9.6 % 5 5.3 % 68 73.1 % Sophomore . . . . 3 27.2 % 8 72.7 % . . . . 10 24.3 % 31 75.6 %

Junior . . 3 6.0 % 16 32.0 % 31 62.0 % 25 15.4 % 20 12.3 % 30 18.5 % 87 53.7 % Senior . . 11 14.1 % 19 24.3 % 48 61.5 % 44 20.6 % 35 16.4 % 32 15.0 % 102 47.8 %

Unclassified . . . . . . . . 2 66.6 % 1 33.3 % . . . . Total . . 15 8.0 % 40 21.3 % 132 70.5 % 82 16.0 % 65 12.6 % 77 15.0 % 288 56.2 %

Hours per week on paid employment on campus (include paid interships)

Freshman 1 2.0 % . . 10 20.8 % 37 77.0 % 1 1.0 % 2 2.1 % 13 14.1 % 76 82.6 % Sophomore . . . . 1 9.0 % 10 90.9 % 1 2.3 % . . 8 19.0 % 33 78.5 %

Junior . . 2 4.0 % 7 14.0 % 41 82.0 % 2 1.2 % 4 2.4 % 8 4.9 % 147 91.3 % Senior . . 5 6.4 % 8 10.3 % 64 83.1 % 7 3.3 % 5 2.3 % 15 7.1 % 182 87.0 %

Unclassified . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 100.0 % Total 1 0.5 % 7 3.7 % 26 13.9 % 152 81.7 % 11 2.1 % 11 2.1 % 44 8.6 % 441 86.9 %

NOTE 1: Students that responded to this survey but did not respond to a particular item were removed from the item's analysis and not included in percentages

NOTE 2: Percent totals may not always equal 100% due to rounding *More than 25 is defined by the response ranges of 'More than 30' or '30-26'

**25-16 is defined by the response ranges of '25-21' or '20-16' ***15-6 is defined by the response ranges of '15-11' or '10-6'

****Less than 6 is defined by the response ranges of '5-1' or '0'

Page 63: An Overview of SERU 2014 Results - Rutgers Universityoirap.rutgers.edu/surveys/SERU/2014/Ernest Mario...engagement, time allocation, and motivations for major selection by gender,

2014 Dean's Report Ernest Mario School of Pharmacy

Ernest Mario School of Pharmacy All RBHS Undergraduates

More than

25* 25-16** 15-6*** Less than

6**** More than

25* 25-16** 15-6*** Less than

6****

Time Allocation Academic

Class Level N Percent N Percent N Percent N Percent N Percent N Percent N Percent N Percent Hours per week on paid employment that related to academic interests

Freshman . . 1 5.2 % 2 10.5 % 16 84.2 % 1 2.1 % 3 6.5 % 6 13.0 % 36 78.2 % Sophomore . . . . 1 20.0 % 4 80.0 % . . . . 5 25.0 % 15 75.0 %

Junior . . 3 10.0 % 15 50.0 % 12 40.0 % 12 12.9 % 9 9.6 % 23 24.7 % 49 52.6 % Senior 4 8.6 % 8 17.3 % 19 41.3 % 15 32.6 % 32 22.6 % 20 14.1 % 31 21.9 % 58 41.1 %

Unclassified . . . . . . . . 1 33.3 % . . 1 33.3 % 1 33.3 % Total 4 4.0 % 12 12.0 % 37 37.0 % 47 47.0 % 46 15.1 % 32 10.5 % 66 21.7 % 159 52.4 %

Hours per week on participating in physical exercise, recreational sports, or physically active hobbies

Freshman 1 2.1 % 2 4.3 % 10 21.7 % 33 71.7 % 2 2.2 % 3 3.3 % 18 20.0 % 67 74.4 % Sophomore . . . . 1 10.0 % 9 90.0 % . . 2 5.0 % 13 32.5 % 25 62.5 %

Junior . . 3 6.0 % 12 24.0 % 35 70.0 % 2 1.2 % 6 3.7 % 46 28.3 % 108 66.6 % Senior 1 1.3 % 3 3.9 % 21 27.6 % 51 67.1 % 2 0.9 % 9 4.2 % 58 27.6 % 141 67.1 %

Unclassified . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 100.0 % Total 2 1.0 % 8 4.3 % 44 24.1 % 128 70.3 % 6 1.1 % 20 3.9 % 135 26.7 % 344 68.1 %

Hours per week on participating in spiritual or religious activities

Freshman . . 2 4.3 % 7 15.2 % 37 80.4 % 1 1.1 % 3 3.3 % 9 10.1 % 76 85.3 % Sophomore . . . . 1 10.0 % 9 90.0 % . . . . 4 10.0 % 36 90.0 %

Junior 1 2.0 % 4 8.1 % 8 16.3 % 36 73.4 % 1 0.6 % 6 3.7 % 15 9.3 % 139 86.3 % Senior 1 1.3 % 1 1.3 % 11 14.6 % 62 82.6 % 2 0.9 % 2 0.9 % 21 10.0 % 184 88.0 %

Unclassified . . . . . . . . . . 1 33.3 % . . 2 66.6 % Total 2 1.1 % 7 3.8 % 27 15.0 % 144 80.0 % 4 0.7 % 12 2.3 % 49 9.7 % 437 87.0 %

Hours per week on participating in student clubs or organizations

Freshman . . 2 4.3 % 10 21.7 % 34 73.9 % 1 1.1 % 3 3.3 % 12 13.3 % 74 82.2 % Sophomore . . 1 10.0 % . . 9 90.0 % . . 1 2.5 % 6 15.0 % 33 82.5 %

Junior 2 4.0 % 3 6.1 % 6 12.2 % 38 77.5 % 2 1.2 % 4 2.4 % 10 6.2 % 145 90.0 % Senior 1 1.3 % 7 9.2 % 14 18.4 % 54 71.0 % 2 0.9 % 10 4.7 % 32 15.2 % 166 79.0 %

Unclassified . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 100.0 % Total 3 1.6 % 13 7.1 % 30 16.5 % 135 74.5 % 5 0.9 % 18 3.5 % 60 11.9 % 421 83.5 %

Hours per week on partying Freshman . . 2 4.3 % 6 13.0 % 38 82.6 % . . 2 2.2 % 7 7.7 % 81 90.0 % Sophomore . . . . . . 10 100.0 % . . . . 4 10.0 % 36 90.0 %

Junior 1 2.0 % 1 2.0 % 5 10.0 % 43 86.0 % 1 0.6 % 2 1.2 % 15 9.2 % 144 88.8 % Senior 2 2.6 % 1 1.3 % 10 13.1 % 63 82.8 % 3 1.4 % 3 1.4 % 15 7.1 % 190 90.0 %

Unclassified . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 100.0 % Total 3 1.6 % 4 2.1 % 21 11.5 % 154 84.6 % 4 0.7 % 7 1.3 % 41 8.1 % 454 89.7 %

NOTE 1: Students that responded to this survey but did not respond to a particular item were removed from the item's analysis and not included in percentages

NOTE 2: Percent totals may not always equal 100% due to rounding *More than 25 is defined by the response ranges of 'More than 30' or '30-26'

**25-16 is defined by the response ranges of '25-21' or '20-16' ***15-6 is defined by the response ranges of '15-11' or '10-6'

****Less than 6 is defined by the response ranges of '5-1' or '0'

Page 64: An Overview of SERU 2014 Results - Rutgers Universityoirap.rutgers.edu/surveys/SERU/2014/Ernest Mario...engagement, time allocation, and motivations for major selection by gender,

2014 Dean's Report Ernest Mario School of Pharmacy

Ernest Mario School of Pharmacy All RBHS Undergraduates

More than

25* 25-16** 15-6*** Less than

6**** More than

25* 25-16** 15-6*** Less than

6****

Time Allocation Academic

Class Level N Percent N Percent N Percent N Percent N Percent N Percent N Percent N Percent Hours per week on performing community service or volunteer activities

Freshman . . 3 6.5 % 4 8.6 % 39 84.7 % . . 3 3.3 % 11 12.3 % 75 84.2 % Sophomore . . 1 10.0 % . . 9 90.0 % . . 2 5.1 % 6 15.3 % 31 79.4 %

Junior 1 2.0 % 3 6.0 % 7 14.0 % 39 78.0 % 1 0.6 % 5 3.0 % 17 10.4 % 139 85.8 % Senior 1 1.3 % 2 2.6 % 13 17.3 % 59 78.6 % 2 0.9 % 4 1.9 % 26 12.4 % 177 84.6 %

Unclassified . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 33.3 % 2 66.6 % Total 2 1.1 % 9 4.9 % 24 13.2 % 146 80.6 % 3 0.5 % 14 2.7 % 61 12.1 % 424 84.4 %

Hours per week on socializing with friends

Freshman . . 12 26.0 % 19 41.3 % 15 32.6 % 2 2.2 % 13 14.4 % 28 31.1 % 47 52.2 % Sophomore 1 10.0 % 2 20.0 % 1 10.0 % 6 60.0 % 3 7.5 % 4 10.0 % 11 27.5 % 22 55.0 %

Junior 1 2.0 % 4 8.0 % 22 44.0 % 23 46.0 % 2 1.2 % 11 6.7 % 39 24.0 % 110 67.9 % Senior 4 5.2 % 9 11.8 % 27 35.5 % 36 47.3 % 7 3.3 % 15 7.1 % 72 34.1 % 117 55.4 %

Unclassified . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 33.3 % 2 66.6 % Total 6 3.2 % 27 14.8 % 69 37.9 % 80 43.9 % 14 2.7 % 43 8.4 % 151 29.8 % 298 58.8 %

Hours per week on spending time with family

Freshman 1 2.1 % 5 10.8 % 10 21.7 % 30 65.2 % 9 10.0 % 6 6.6 % 23 25.5 % 52 57.7 % Sophomore 1 10.0 % . . 1 10.0 % 8 80.0 % 4 10.5 % 2 5.2 % 9 23.6 % 23 60.5 %

Junior 3 6.0 % 3 6.0 % 14 28.0 % 30 60.0 % 12 7.4 % 15 9.3 % 54 33.5 % 80 49.6 % Senior 1 1.3 % 3 4.0 % 18 24.3 % 52 70.2 % 16 7.6 % 21 10.0 % 65 31.1 % 107 51.1 %

Unclassified . . . . . . . . 1 33.3 % . . . . 2 66.6 % Total 6 3.3 % 11 6.1 % 43 23.8 % 120 66.6 % 42 8.3 % 44 8.7 % 151 30.1 % 264 52.6 %

Hours per week on studying and other academic activities outside of class

Freshman 8 17.3 % 10 21.7 % 17 36.9 % 11 23.9 % 10 11.2 % 25 28.0 % 36 40.4 % 18 20.2 % Sophomore . . 4 40.0 % 5 50.0 % 1 10.0 % 7 17.5 % 11 27.5 % 18 45.0 % 4 10.0 %

Junior 10 20.8 % 13 27.0 % 20 41.6 % 5 10.4 % 35 22.0 % 45 28.3 % 60 37.7 % 19 11.9 % Senior 26 34.6 % 20 26.6 % 22 29.3 % 7 9.3 % 39 18.7 % 52 25.0 % 88 42.3 % 29 13.9 %

Unclassified . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 66.6 % 1 33.3 % Total 44 24.5 % 47 26.2 % 64 35.7 % 24 13.4 % 91 18.2 % 133 26.6 % 204 40.8 % 71 14.2 %

Hours per week on using the computer or smart phone for non-academic purposes (games, shopping, e-mail/instant messaging, etc.)

Freshman 6 13.0 % 7 15.2 % 24 52.1 % 9 19.5 % 9 10.0 % 11 12.2 % 34 37.7 % 36 40.0 % Sophomore 1 10.0 % 3 30.0 % 3 30.0 % 3 30.0 % 5 12.8 % 7 17.9 % 10 25.6 % 17 43.5 %

Junior 4 8.0 % 6 12.0 % 24 48.0 % 16 32.0 % 11 6.8 % 17 10.5 % 58 36.0 % 75 46.5 % Senior 7 9.2 % 15 19.7 % 35 46.0 % 19 25.0 % 14 6.6 % 34 16.1 % 83 39.3 % 80 37.9 %

Unclassified . . . . . . . . . . 1 33.3 % 1 33.3 % 1 33.3 % Total 18 9.8 % 31 17.0 % 86 47.2 % 47 25.8 % 39 7.7 % 70 13.8 % 186 36.9 % 209 41.4 %

NOTE 1: Students that responded to this survey but did not respond to a particular item were removed from the item's analysis and not included in percentages

NOTE 2: Percent totals may not always equal 100% due to rounding *More than 25 is defined by the response ranges of 'More than 30' or '30-26'

**25-16 is defined by the response ranges of '25-21' or '20-16' ***15-6 is defined by the response ranges of '15-11' or '10-6'

****Less than 6 is defined by the response ranges of '5-1' or '0'

Page 65: An Overview of SERU 2014 Results - Rutgers Universityoirap.rutgers.edu/surveys/SERU/2014/Ernest Mario...engagement, time allocation, and motivations for major selection by gender,

2014 Dean's Report Ernest Mario School of Pharmacy

Ernest Mario School of Pharmacy All RBHS Undergraduates

More than

25* 25-16** 15-6*** Less than

6**** More than

25* 25-16** 15-6*** Less than

6****

Time Allocation Academic

Class Level N Percent N Percent N Percent N Percent N Percent N Percent N Percent N Percent Hours per week on watching TV streaming movies/TV on computer or tablet

Freshman 3 6.5 % 4 8.6 % 19 41.3 % 20 43.4 % 4 4.4 % 5 5.5 % 32 35.5 % 49 54.4 % Sophomore . . 2 20.0 % 4 40.0 % 4 40.0 % . . 4 10.0 % 10 25.0 % 26 65.0 %

Junior 3 6.0 % 3 6.0 % 19 38.0 % 25 50.0 % 4 2.4 % 10 6.1 % 48 29.6 % 100 61.7 % Senior 5 6.5 % 5 6.5 % 25 32.8 % 41 53.9 % 7 3.3 % 19 9.0 % 58 27.6 % 126 60.0 %

Unclassified . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 33.3 % 2 66.6 % Total 11 6.0 % 14 7.6 % 67 36.8 % 90 49.4 % 15 2.9 % 38 7.5 % 149 29.5 % 303 60.0 %

NOTE 1: Students that responded to this survey but did not respond to a particular item were removed from the item's analysis and not included in percentages

NOTE 2: Percent totals may not always equal 100% due to rounding *More than 25 is defined by the response ranges of 'More than 30' or '30-26'

**25-16 is defined by the response ranges of '25-21' or '20-16' ***15-6 is defined by the response ranges of '15-11' or '10-6'

****Less than 6 is defined by the response ranges of '5-1' or '0'

Page 66: An Overview of SERU 2014 Results - Rutgers Universityoirap.rutgers.edu/surveys/SERU/2014/Ernest Mario...engagement, time allocation, and motivations for major selection by gender,

2014 Dean's Report Ernest Mario School of Pharmacy

Ernest Mario School of

Pharmacy All RBHS

Undergraduates Yes No Yes No

Motivation for Selection of Major Gender N Percent N Percent N Percent N Percent Allows time for other activities Female 73 63.4 % 42 36.5 % 212 62.5 % 127 37.4 %

Male 32 53.3 % 28 46.6 % 55 56.7 % 42 43.2 % Total 105 60.0 % 70 40.0 % 267 61.2 % 169 38.7 %

Couldn’t get into my first choice of major Female 16 14.0 % 98 85.9 % 41 12.1 % 296 87.8 % Male 17 28.8 % 42 71.1 % 23 23.9 % 73 76.0 % Total 33 19.0 % 140 80.9 % 64 14.7 % 369 85.2 %

Intellectual Curiosity Female 103 89.5 % 12 10.4 % 303 89.3 % 36 10.6 % Male 54 90.0 % 6 10.0 % 84 86.5 % 13 13.4 % Total 157 89.7 % 18 10.2 % 387 88.7 % 49 11.2 %

Leads to a high paying job Female 106 92.1 % 9 7.8 % 286 84.3 % 53 15.6 % Male 57 96.6 % 2 3.3 % 87 90.6 % 9 9.3 % Total 163 93.6 % 11 6.3 % 373 85.7 % 62 14.2 %

Other Female 7 18.9 % 30 81.0 % 18 15.7 % 96 84.2 % Male 3 11.5 % 23 88.4 % 7 16.2 % 36 83.7 % Total 10 15.8 % 53 84.1 % 25 15.9 % 132 84.0 %

Parental/family desires Female 86 74.7 % 29 25.2 % 188 55.4 % 151 44.5 % Male 44 73.3 % 16 26.6 % 61 62.8 % 36 37.1 % Total 130 74.2 % 45 25.7 % 249 57.1 % 187 42.8 %

Prepares me for a fulfilling career Female 108 93.9 % 7 6.0 % 329 96.7 % 11 3.2 % Male 54 90.0 % 6 10.0 % 91 93.8 % 6 6.1 % Total 162 92.5 % 13 7.4 % 420 96.1 % 17 3.8 %

Prepares me for graduate school Female 65 56.5 % 50 43.4 % 216 63.9 % 122 36.0 % Male 34 57.6 % 25 42.3 % 58 60.4 % 38 39.5 % Total 99 56.8 % 75 43.1 % 274 63.1 % 160 36.8 %

Prestige Female 94 81.7 % 21 18.2 % 230 67.6 % 110 32.3 % Male 47 78.3 % 13 21.6 % 70 72.1 % 27 27.8 % Total 141 80.5 % 34 19.4 % 300 68.6 % 137 31.3 %

Provides international opportunities Female 46 40.3 % 68 59.6 % 171 50.5 % 167 49.4 % Male 28 47.4 % 31 52.5 % 49 51.0 % 47 48.9 % Total 74 42.7 % 99 57.2 % 220 50.6 % 214 49.3 %

NOTE 1: Students that responded to this survey but did not respond to a particular item were removed from the item's analysis and not included in percentages

NOTE 2: Percent totals may not always equal 100% due to rounding

Page 67: An Overview of SERU 2014 Results - Rutgers Universityoirap.rutgers.edu/surveys/SERU/2014/Ernest Mario...engagement, time allocation, and motivations for major selection by gender,

2014 Dean's Report Ernest Mario School of Pharmacy

Ernest Mario School of

Pharmacy All RBHS

Undergraduates Yes No Yes No

Motivation for Selection of Major Ethnicity N Percent N Percent N Percent N Percent Allows time for other activities African American 3 100.0 % . . 22 64.7 % 12 35.2 %

Chicano- Latino 2 66.6 % 1 33.3 % 21 60.0 % 14 40.0 % Asian- Filipino- Pacific Islander 73 60.8 % 47 39.1 % 110 63.9 % 62 36.0 %

White 15 51.7 % 14 48.2 % 94 58.3 % 67 41.6 % International- Foreign Visa 8 57.1 % 6 42.8 % 9 56.2 % 7 43.7 %

Other 4 66.6 % 2 33.3 % 11 61.1 % 7 38.8 % Total 105 60.0 % 70 40.0 % 267 61.2 % 169 38.7 %

Couldn’t get into my first choice of major African American . . 3 100.0 % 4 12.1 % 29 87.8 % Chicano- Latino . . 2 100.0 % 4 11.7 % 30 88.2 %

Asian- Filipino- Pacific Islander 27 22.6 % 92 77.3 % 37 21.6 % 134 78.3 % White 4 13.7 % 25 86.2 % 14 8.6 % 147 91.3 %

International- Foreign Visa 1 7.1 % 13 92.8 % 1 6.2 % 15 93.7 % Other 1 16.6 % 5 83.3 % 4 22.2 % 14 77.7 % Total 33 19.0 % 140 80.9 % 64 14.7 % 369 85.2 %

Intellectual Curiosity African American 3 100.0 % . . 31 91.1 % 3 8.8 % Chicano- Latino 2 66.6 % 1 33.3 % 29 82.8 % 6 17.1 %

Asian- Filipino- Pacific Islander 105 87.5 % 15 12.5 % 151 87.7 % 21 12.2 % White 27 93.1 % 2 6.8 % 144 89.4 % 17 10.5 %

International- Foreign Visa 14 100.0 % . . 16 100.0 % . . Other 6 100.0 % . . 16 88.8 % 2 11.1 % Total 157 89.7 % 18 10.2 % 387 88.7 % 49 11.2 %

Leads to a high paying job African American 2 66.6 % 1 33.3 % 27 79.4 % 7 20.5 % Chicano- Latino 3 100.0 % . . 31 88.5 % 4 11.4 %

Asian- Filipino- Pacific Islander 112 93.3 % 8 6.6 % 158 91.8 % 14 8.1 % White 26 92.8 % 2 7.1 % 126 78.7 % 34 21.2 %

International- Foreign Visa 14 100.0 % . . 15 93.7 % 1 6.2 % Other 6 100.0 % . . 16 88.8 % 2 11.1 % Total 163 93.6 % 11 6.3 % 373 85.7 % 62 14.2 %

NOTE 1: Students that responded to this survey but did not respond to a particular item were removed from the item's analysis and not included in percentages

NOTE 2: Percent totals may not always equal 100% due to rounding

Page 68: An Overview of SERU 2014 Results - Rutgers Universityoirap.rutgers.edu/surveys/SERU/2014/Ernest Mario...engagement, time allocation, and motivations for major selection by gender,

2014 Dean's Report Ernest Mario School of Pharmacy

Ernest Mario School of

Pharmacy All RBHS

Undergraduates Yes No Yes No

Motivation for Selection of Major Ethnicity N Percent N Percent N Percent N Percent Other African American . . 1 100.0 % 2 10.5 % 17 89.4 %

Chicano- Latino . . 1 100.0 % 1 9.0 % 10 90.9 % Asian- Filipino- Pacific Islander 7 15.9 % 37 84.0 % 9 15.7 % 48 84.2 %

White 1 11.1 % 8 88.8 % 10 17.8 % 46 82.1 % International- Foreign Visa 2 28.5 % 5 71.4 % 2 25.0 % 6 75.0 %

Other . . 1 100.0 % 1 16.6 % 5 83.3 % Total 10 15.8 % 53 84.1 % 25 15.9 % 132 84.0 %

Parental/family desires African American . . 3 100.0 % 15 44.1 % 19 55.8 % Chicano- Latino 2 66.6 % 1 33.3 % 17 48.5 % 18 51.4 %

Asian- Filipino- Pacific Islander 97 80.8 % 23 19.1 % 129 75.4 % 42 24.5 % White 15 51.7 % 14 48.2 % 62 38.2 % 100 61.7 %

International- Foreign Visa 11 78.5 % 3 21.4 % 12 75.0 % 4 25.0 % Other 5 83.3 % 1 16.6 % 14 77.7 % 4 22.2 % Total 130 74.2 % 45 25.7 % 249 57.1 % 187 42.8 %

Prepares me for a fulfilling career African American 3 100.0 % . . 34 100.0 % . . Chicano- Latino 2 66.6 % 1 33.3 % 31 88.5 % 4 11.4 %

Asian- Filipino- Pacific Islander 111 92.5 % 9 7.5 % 163 94.7 % 9 5.2 % White 26 89.6 % 3 10.3 % 158 97.5 % 4 2.4 %

International- Foreign Visa 14 100.0 % . . 16 100.0 % . . Other 6 100.0 % . . 18 100.0 % . . Total 162 92.5 % 13 7.4 % 420 96.1 % 17 3.8 %

Prepares me for graduate school African American 1 33.3 % 2 66.6 % 28 82.3 % 6 17.6 % Chicano- Latino 1 50.0 % 1 50.0 % 21 63.6 % 12 36.3 %

Asian- Filipino- Pacific Islander 70 58.3 % 50 41.6 % 109 63.7 % 62 36.2 % White 15 51.7 % 14 48.2 % 92 56.7 % 70 43.2 %

International- Foreign Visa 9 64.2 % 5 35.7 % 11 68.7 % 5 31.2 % Other 3 50.0 % 3 50.0 % 13 72.2 % 5 27.7 % Total 99 56.8 % 75 43.1 % 274 63.1 % 160 36.8 %

NOTE 1: Students that responded to this survey but did not respond to a particular item were removed from the item's analysis and not included in percentages

NOTE 2: Percent totals may not always equal 100% due to rounding

Page 69: An Overview of SERU 2014 Results - Rutgers Universityoirap.rutgers.edu/surveys/SERU/2014/Ernest Mario...engagement, time allocation, and motivations for major selection by gender,

2014 Dean's Report Ernest Mario School of Pharmacy

Ernest Mario School of

Pharmacy All RBHS

Undergraduates Yes No Yes No

Motivation for Selection of Major Ethnicity N Percent N Percent N Percent N Percent Prestige African American 3 100.0 % . . 22 64.7 % 12 35.2 %

Chicano- Latino 3 100.0 % . . 20 57.1 % 15 42.8 % Asian- Filipino- Pacific Islander 95 79.1 % 25 20.8 % 136 79.0 % 36 20.9 %

White 23 79.3 % 6 20.6 % 93 57.4 % 69 42.5 % International- Foreign Visa 12 85.7 % 2 14.2 % 13 81.2 % 3 18.7 %

Other 5 83.3 % 1 16.6 % 16 88.8 % 2 11.1 % Total 141 80.5 % 34 19.4 % 300 68.6 % 137 31.3 %

Provides international opportunities African American 2 66.6 % 1 33.3 % 25 73.5 % 9 26.4 % Chicano- Latino . . 2 100.0 % 20 58.8 % 14 41.1 %

Asian- Filipino- Pacific Islander 53 44.5 % 66 55.4 % 88 51.7 % 82 48.2 % White 11 37.9 % 18 62.0 % 72 44.4 % 90 55.5 %

International- Foreign Visa 6 42.8 % 8 57.1 % 7 43.7 % 9 56.2 % Other 2 33.3 % 4 66.6 % 8 44.4 % 10 55.5 % Total 74 42.7 % 99 57.2 % 220 50.6 % 214 49.3 %

NOTE 1: Students that responded to this survey but did not respond to a particular item were removed from the item's analysis and not included in percentages

NOTE 2: Percent totals may not always equal 100% due to rounding

Page 70: An Overview of SERU 2014 Results - Rutgers Universityoirap.rutgers.edu/surveys/SERU/2014/Ernest Mario...engagement, time allocation, and motivations for major selection by gender,

2014 Dean's Report Ernest Mario School of Pharmacy

Ernest Mario School of

Pharmacy All RBHS

Undergraduates Yes No Yes No

Motivation for Selection of Major Enrollment

Status N Percent N Percent N Percent N Percent Allows time for other activities Full-Time 105 60.0 % 70 40.0 % 158 60.7 % 102 39.2 %

Part-Time . . . . 109 61.9 % 67 38.0 % Total 105 60.0 % 70 40.0 % 267 61.2 % 169 38.7 %

Couldn’t get into my first choice of major Full-Time 33 19.0 % 140 80.9 % 44 17.0 % 214 82.9 % Part-Time . . . . 20 11.4 % 155 88.5 % Total 33 19.0 % 140 80.9 % 64 14.7 % 369 85.2 %

Intellectual Curiosity Full-Time 157 89.7 % 18 10.2 % 231 88.8 % 29 11.1 % Part-Time . . . . 156 88.6 % 20 11.3 % Total 157 89.7 % 18 10.2 % 387 88.7 % 49 11.2 %

Leads to a high paying job Full-Time 163 93.6 % 11 6.3 % 231 89.1 % 28 10.8 % Part-Time . . . . 142 80.6 % 34 19.3 % Total 163 93.6 % 11 6.3 % 373 85.7 % 62 14.2 %

Other Full-Time 10 15.8 % 53 84.1 % 14 17.0 % 68 82.9 % Part-Time . . . . 11 14.6 % 64 85.3 % Total 10 15.8 % 53 84.1 % 25 15.9 % 132 84.0 %

Parental/family desires Full-Time 130 74.2 % 45 25.7 % 178 68.4 % 82 31.5 % Part-Time . . . . 71 40.3 % 105 59.6 % Total 130 74.2 % 45 25.7 % 249 57.1 % 187 42.8 %

Prepares me for a fulfilling career Full-Time 162 92.5 % 13 7.4 % 245 94.2 % 15 5.7 % Part-Time . . . . 175 98.8 % 2 1.1 % Total 162 92.5 % 13 7.4 % 420 96.1 % 17 3.8 %

Prepares me for graduate school Full-Time 99 56.8 % 75 43.1 % 161 62.1 % 98 37.8 % Part-Time . . . . 113 64.5 % 62 35.4 % Total 99 56.8 % 75 43.1 % 274 63.1 % 160 36.8 %

Prestige Full-Time 141 80.5 % 34 19.4 % 201 77.3 % 59 22.6 % Part-Time . . . . 99 55.9 % 78 44.0 % Total 141 80.5 % 34 19.4 % 300 68.6 % 137 31.3 %

Provides international opportunities Full-Time 74 42.7 % 99 57.2 % 122 47.2 % 136 52.7 % Part-Time . . . . 98 55.6 % 78 44.3 % Total 74 42.7 % 99 57.2 % 220 50.6 % 214 49.3 %

NOTE 1: Students that responded to this survey but did not respond to a particular item were removed from the item's analysis and not included in percentages

NOTE 2: Percent totals may not always equal 100% due to rounding

Page 71: An Overview of SERU 2014 Results - Rutgers Universityoirap.rutgers.edu/surveys/SERU/2014/Ernest Mario...engagement, time allocation, and motivations for major selection by gender,

2014 Dean's Report Ernest Mario School of Pharmacy

Ernest Mario School of

Pharmacy All RBHS

Undergraduates Yes No Yes No

Motivation for Selection of Major

Academic Class Level N Percent N Percent N Percent N Percent

Allows time for other activities Freshman 31 67.3 % 15 32.6 % 46 65.7 % 24 34.2 % Sophomore 6 60.0 % 4 40.0 % 21 58.3 % 15 41.6 %

Junior 26 54.1 % 22 45.8 % 78 60.4 % 51 39.5 % Senior 42 59.1 % 29 40.8 % 122 60.6 % 79 39.3 %

Total 105 60.0 % 70 40.0 % 267 61.2 % 169 38.7 % Couldn’t get into my first choice of major Freshman 10 22.2 % 35 77.7 % 13 18.8 % 56 81.1 %

Sophomore 2 20.0 % 8 80.0 % 7 19.4 % 29 80.5 % Junior 9 18.7 % 39 81.2 % 21 16.2 % 108 83.7 % Senior 12 17.1 % 58 82.8 % 23 11.5 % 176 88.4 %

Total 33 19.0 % 140 80.9 % 64 14.7 % 369 85.2 % Intellectual Curiosity Freshman 42 91.3 % 4 8.6 % 63 90.0 % 7 10.0 %

Sophomore 8 80.0 % 2 20.0 % 30 83.3 % 6 16.6 % Junior 46 95.8 % 2 4.1 % 117 90.0 % 13 10.0 % Senior 61 85.9 % 10 14.0 % 177 88.5 % 23 11.5 %

Total 157 89.7 % 18 10.2 % 387 88.7 % 49 11.2 % Leads to a high paying job Freshman 43 93.4 % 3 6.5 % 61 87.1 % 9 12.8 %

Sophomore 9 90.0 % 1 10.0 % 30 83.3 % 6 16.6 % Junior 45 93.7 % 3 6.2 % 107 82.3 % 23 17.6 % Senior 66 94.2 % 4 5.7 % 175 87.9 % 24 12.0 %

Total 163 93.6 % 11 6.3 % 373 85.7 % 62 14.2 % Other Freshman 3 15.7 % 16 84.2 % 5 16.1 % 26 83.8 %

Sophomore . . 3 100.0 % 1 10.0 % 9 90.0 % Junior 1 5.2 % 18 94.7 % 6 12.7 % 41 87.2 % Senior 6 27.2 % 16 72.7 % 13 18.8 % 56 81.1 %

Total 10 15.8 % 53 84.1 % 25 15.9 % 132 84.0 % Parental/family desires Freshman 34 73.9 % 12 26.0 % 44 62.8 % 26 37.1 %

Sophomore 8 80.0 % 2 20.0 % 22 61.1 % 14 38.8 % Junior 34 70.8 % 14 29.1 % 66 51.1 % 63 48.8 % Senior 54 76.0 % 17 23.9 % 117 58.2 % 84 41.7 %

Total 130 74.2 % 45 25.7 % 249 57.1 % 187 42.8 %

NOTE 1: Students that responded to this survey but did not respond to a particular item were removed from the item's analysis and not included in percentages

NOTE 2: Percent totals may not always equal 100% due to rounding

Page 72: An Overview of SERU 2014 Results - Rutgers Universityoirap.rutgers.edu/surveys/SERU/2014/Ernest Mario...engagement, time allocation, and motivations for major selection by gender,

2014 Dean's Report Ernest Mario School of Pharmacy

Ernest Mario School of

Pharmacy All RBHS

Undergraduates Yes No Yes No

Motivation for Selection of Major

Academic Class Level N Percent N Percent N Percent N Percent

Prepares me for a fulfilling career Freshman 44 95.6 % 2 4.3 % 68 97.1 % 2 2.8 % Sophomore 8 80.0 % 2 20.0 % 33 91.6 % 3 8.3 %

Junior 43 89.5 % 5 10.4 % 124 95.3 % 6 4.6 % Senior 67 94.3 % 4 5.6 % 195 97.0 % 6 2.9 %

Total 162 92.5 % 13 7.4 % 420 96.1 % 17 3.8 % Prepares me for graduate school Freshman 28 62.2 % 17 37.7 % 43 63.2 % 25 36.7 %

Sophomore 4 40.0 % 6 60.0 % 20 55.5 % 16 44.4 % Junior 26 54.1 % 22 45.8 % 84 65.1 % 45 34.8 % Senior 41 57.7 % 30 42.2 % 127 63.1 % 74 36.8 %

Total 99 56.8 % 75 43.1 % 274 63.1 % 160 36.8 % Prestige Freshman 34 73.9 % 12 26.0 % 44 62.8 % 26 37.1 %

Sophomore 7 70.0 % 3 30.0 % 26 72.2 % 10 27.7 % Junior 37 77.0 % 11 22.9 % 86 66.1 % 44 33.8 % Senior 63 88.7 % 8 11.2 % 144 71.6 % 57 28.3 %

Total 141 80.5 % 34 19.4 % 300 68.6 % 137 31.3 % Provides international opportunities Freshman 20 45.4 % 24 54.5 % 33 48.5 % 35 51.4 %

Sophomore 3 30.0 % 7 70.0 % 16 44.4 % 20 55.5 % Junior 21 43.7 % 27 56.2 % 64 49.6 % 65 50.3 % Senior 30 42.2 % 41 57.7 % 107 53.2 % 94 46.7 %

Total 74 42.7 % 99 57.2 % 220 50.6 % 214 49.3 %

NOTE 1: Students that responded to this survey but did not respond to a particular item were removed from the item's analysis and not included in percentages

NOTE 2: Percent totals may not always equal 100% due to rounding

Page 73: An Overview of SERU 2014 Results - Rutgers Universityoirap.rutgers.edu/surveys/SERU/2014/Ernest Mario...engagement, time allocation, and motivations for major selection by gender,

2014 Dean's Report Ernest Mario School of Pharmacy

Ernest Mario School of Pharmacy Satisfied* Dissatisfied** Total

Level of Satisfaction

Major (Defined by CIP) N Percent N Percent N Percent

Ability to get into a major that you want

Pharmacy 154 92.2 % 13 7.7 % 167 100.0 % Total 154 92.2 % 13 7.7 % 167 100.0 %

Access to faculty outside of class

Pharmacy 135 80.3 % 33 19.6 % 168 100.0 % Total 135 80.3 % 33 19.6 % 168 100.0 %

Access to small classes Pharmacy 103 60.5 % 67 39.4 % 170 100.0 % Total 103 60.5 % 67 39.4 % 170 100.0 %

Advising by departmental staff on academic matters

Pharmacy 130 76.9 % 39 23.0 % 169 100.0 % Total 130 76.9 % 39 23.0 % 169 100.0 %

Advising by faculty on academic matters

Pharmacy 135 79.4 % 35 20.5 % 170 100.0 % Total 135 79.4 % 35 20.5 % 170 100.0 %

Advising by school or college staff on academic matters

Pharmacy 131 77.5 % 38 22.4 % 169 100.0 % Total 131 77.5 % 38 22.4 % 169 100.0 %

Availability of courses for general education or breadth requirements

Pharmacy 130 77.3 % 38 22.6 % 168 100.0 % Total 130 77.3 % 38 22.6 % 168 100.0 %

Availability of courses needed for graduation

Pharmacy 150 88.2 % 20 11.7 % 170 100.0 % Total 150 88.2 % 20 11.7 % 170 100.0 %

Availability of library research materials

Pharmacy 153 90.0 % 17 10.0 % 170 100.0 % Total 153 90.0 % 17 10.0 % 170 100.0 %

Educational enrichment programs (e.g., study abroad, internships)

Pharmacy 113 66.4 % 57 33.5 % 170 100.0 % Total 113 66.4 % 57 33.5 % 170 100.0 %

Opportunities for research experience or to produce creative products

Pharmacy 136 80.0 % 34 20.0 % 170 100.0 % Total 136 80.0 % 34 20.0 % 170 100.0 %

Quality of faculty instruction

Pharmacy 144 84.7 % 26 15.2 % 170 100.0 % Total 144 84.7 % 26 15.2 % 170 100.0 %

Quality of lower-division courses in your major

Pharmacy 126 72.8 % 38 21.9 % 164 94.7 % Total 126 72.8 % 38 21.9 % 164 94.7 %

Quality of teaching by graduate student TAs

Pharmacy 136 80.4 % 33 19.5 % 169 100.0 % Total 136 80.4 % 33 19.5 % 169 100.0 %

Quality of upper-division courses in your major

Pharmacy 124 71.6 % 24 13.8 % 148 85.5 % Total 124 71.6 % 24 13.8 % 148 85.5 %

NOTE 1: Students that responded to this survey but did not respond to a particular item were removed from the item's analysis and not included in percentages

NOTE 2: Percent totals may not always equal 100% due to rounding *Satisfied is defined by a response of 'Very satisfied', 'Satisfied', or 'Somewhat satisfied'

**Dissatisfied is defined by a response of 'Very dissatisfied', 'Dissatisfied', or 'Somewhat dissatisfied'

Page 74: An Overview of SERU 2014 Results - Rutgers Universityoirap.rutgers.edu/surveys/SERU/2014/Ernest Mario...engagement, time allocation, and motivations for major selection by gender,

2014 Dean's Report Ernest Mario School of Pharmacy

Ernest Mario School of Pharmacy Satisfied* Dissatisfied** Total

Level of Satisfaction

Major (Defined by CIP) N Percent N Percent N Percent

Satisfaction with grade point average

Pharmacy 113 64.2 % 63 35.7 % 176 100.0 % Total 113 64.2 % 63 35.7 % 176 100.0 %

Satisfaction with overall academic experience

Pharmacy 131 74.8 % 44 25.1 % 175 100.0 % Total 131 74.8 % 44 25.1 % 175 100.0 %

Satisfaction with overall social experience

Pharmacy 146 82.9 % 30 17.0 % 176 100.0 % Total 146 82.9 % 30 17.0 % 176 100.0 %

Satisfaction with value of your education for the price you're paying

Pharmacy 113 64.5 % 62 35.4 % 175 100.0 % Total 113 64.5 % 62 35.4 % 175 100.0 %

Variety of courses available in your major

Pharmacy 117 67.6 % 52 30.0 % 169 97.6 % Total 117 67.6 % 52 30.0 % 169 97.6 %

NOTE 1: Students that responded to this survey but did not respond to a particular item were removed from the item's analysis and not included in percentages

NOTE 2: Percent totals may not always equal 100% due to rounding *Satisfied is defined by a response of 'Very satisfied', 'Satisfied', or 'Somewhat satisfied'

**Dissatisfied is defined by a response of 'Very dissatisfied', 'Dissatisfied', or 'Somewhat dissatisfied'

Page 75: An Overview of SERU 2014 Results - Rutgers Universityoirap.rutgers.edu/surveys/SERU/2014/Ernest Mario...engagement, time allocation, and motivations for major selection by gender,

2014 Dean's Report Ernest Mario School of Pharmacy

Ernest Mario School of Pharmacy

Never or Rarely

Occasionally or Somewhat

Often Often or

Very Often Total

Frequency of Activity

Major (Defined by CIP) N Percent N Percent N Percent N Percent

Asked an insightful question in class

Pharmacy 89 47.0 % 69 36.5 % 31 16.4 % 189 100.0 % Total 89 47.0 % 69 36.5 % 31 16.4 % 189 100.0 %

Brought up ideas or concepts from different courses during class discussions

Pharmacy 82 43.1 % 73 38.4 % 35 18.4 % 190 100.0 % Total 82 43.1 % 73 38.4 % 35 18.4 % 190 100.0 %

Chosen challenging courses, when possible, even though you might lower your GPA by doing so

Pharmacy 39 20.6 % 73 38.6 % 77 40.7 % 189 100.0 % Total 39 20.6 % 73 38.6 % 77 40.7 % 189 100.0 %

Communicated with a faculty member by e-mail or in person

Pharmacy 32 16.8 % 100 52.6 % 58 30.5 % 190 100.0 % Total 32 16.8 % 100 52.6 % 58 30.5 % 190 100.0 %

Contributed to a class discussion

Pharmacy 68 35.7 % 82 43.1 % 40 21.0 % 190 100.0 % Total 68 35.7 % 82 43.1 % 40 21.0 % 190 100.0 %

Extensively revised a paper before submitting it to be graded

Pharmacy 50 26.8 % 76 40.8 % 60 32.2 % 186 100.0 % Total 50 26.8 % 76 40.8 % 60 32.2 % 186 100.0 %

Found a course so interesting that you did more work than was required

Pharmacy 62 33.3 % 93 50.0 % 31 16.6 % 186 100.0 % Total 62 33.3 % 93 50.0 % 31 16.6 % 186 100.0 %

Gone to class unprepared Pharmacy 80 42.7 % 89 47.5 % 18 9.6 % 187 100.0 % Total 80 42.7 % 89 47.5 % 18 9.6 % 187 100.0 %

Gone to class without completing assigned reading

Pharmacy 76 40.8 % 79 42.4 % 31 16.6 % 186 100.0 % Total 76 40.8 % 79 42.4 % 31 16.6 % 186 100.0 %

Had a class in which the professor knew or learned your name

Pharmacy 68 35.7 % 75 39.4 % 47 24.7 % 190 100.0 % Total 68 35.7 % 75 39.4 % 47 24.7 % 190 100.0 %

Helped a classmate better understand the course material when studying together

Pharmacy 24 12.8 % 90 48.1 % 73 39.0 % 187 100.0 % Total 24 12.8 % 90 48.1 % 73 39.0 % 187 100.0 %

NOTE 1: Students that responded to this survey but did not respond to a particular item were removed from the item's analysis and not included in percentages

NOTE 2: Percent totals may not always equal 100% due to rounding

Page 76: An Overview of SERU 2014 Results - Rutgers Universityoirap.rutgers.edu/surveys/SERU/2014/Ernest Mario...engagement, time allocation, and motivations for major selection by gender,

2014 Dean's Report Ernest Mario School of Pharmacy

Ernest Mario School of Pharmacy

Never or Rarely

Occasionally or Somewhat

Often Often or

Very Often Total

Frequency of Activity

Major (Defined by CIP) N Percent N Percent N Percent N Percent

Interacted with faculty during lecture class sessions

Pharmacy 80 42.1 % 80 42.1 % 30 15.7 % 190 100.0 % Total 80 42.1 % 80 42.1 % 30 15.7 % 190 100.0 %

Made a class presentation Pharmacy 62 32.6 % 89 46.8 % 39 20.5 % 190 100.0 % Total 62 32.6 % 89 46.8 % 39 20.5 % 190 100.0 %

Raised your standard for acceptable effort due to the high standards of a faculty member

Pharmacy 35 18.8 % 101 54.3 % 50 26.8 % 186 100.0 % Total 35 18.8 % 101 54.3 % 50 26.8 % 186 100.0 %

Skipped class Pharmacy 76 41.3 % 80 43.4 % 28 15.2 % 184 100.0 % Total 76 41.3 % 80 43.4 % 28 15.2 % 184 100.0 %

Sought academic help from instructor or tutor when needed

Pharmacy 60 32.4 % 72 38.9 % 53 28.6 % 185 100.0 % Total 60 32.4 % 72 38.9 % 53 28.6 % 185 100.0 %

Taken a small research-oriented seminar with faculty

Pharmacy 142 75.1 % 29 15.3 % 18 9.5 % 189 100.0 % Total 142 75.1 % 29 15.3 % 18 9.5 % 189 100.0 %

Talked with the instructor outside of class about issues and concepts derived from a course

Pharmacy 82 43.1 % 76 40.0 % 32 16.8 % 190 100.0 % Total 82 43.1 % 76 40.0 % 32 16.8 % 190 100.0 %

Turned in a course assignment late

Pharmacy 153 81.8 % 26 13.9 % 8 4.2 % 187 100.0 % Total 153 81.8 % 26 13.9 % 8 4.2 % 187 100.0 %

Worked on class projects or studied as a group with classmates outside of class

Pharmacy 39 20.9 % 81 43.5 % 66 35.4 % 186 100.0 % Total 39 20.9 % 81 43.5 % 66 35.4 % 186 100.0 %

Worked with a faculty member on an activity other than coursework (e.g., student organization, campus committee, cultural activity)

Pharmacy 117 61.5 % 48 25.2 % 25 13.1 % 190 100.0 % Total 117 61.5 % 48 25.2 % 25 13.1 % 190 100.0 %

NOTE 1: Students that responded to this survey but did not respond to a particular item were removed from the item's analysis and not included in percentages

NOTE 2: Percent totals may not always equal 100% due to rounding

Page 77: An Overview of SERU 2014 Results - Rutgers Universityoirap.rutgers.edu/surveys/SERU/2014/Ernest Mario...engagement, time allocation, and motivations for major selection by gender,

2014 Dean's Report Ernest Mario School of Pharmacy

Ernest Mario School of Pharmacy Yes No Total

Motivation for Selection of Major

Major (Defined by CIP) N Percent N Percent N Percent

Allows time for other activities Pharmacy 105 60.0 % 70 40.0 % 175 100.0 % Total 105 60.0 % 70 40.0 % 175 100.0 %

Couldn’t get into my first choice of major Pharmacy 33 19.0 % 140 80.9 % 173 100.0 % Total 33 19.0 % 140 80.9 % 173 100.0 %

Intellectual Curiosity Pharmacy 157 89.7 % 18 10.2 % 175 100.0 % Total 157 89.7 % 18 10.2 % 175 100.0 %

Leads to a high paying job Pharmacy 163 93.6 % 11 6.3 % 174 100.0 % Total 163 93.6 % 11 6.3 % 174 100.0 %

Other Pharmacy 10 15.8 % 53 84.1 % 63 100.0 % Total 10 15.8 % 53 84.1 % 63 100.0 %

Parental/family desires Pharmacy 130 74.2 % 45 25.7 % 175 100.0 % Total 130 74.2 % 45 25.7 % 175 100.0 %

Prepares me for a fulfilling career Pharmacy 162 92.5 % 13 7.4 % 175 100.0 % Total 162 92.5 % 13 7.4 % 175 100.0 %

Prepares me for graduate school Pharmacy 99 56.8 % 75 43.1 % 174 100.0 % Total 99 56.8 % 75 43.1 % 174 100.0 %

Prestige Pharmacy 141 80.5 % 34 19.4 % 175 100.0 % Total 141 80.5 % 34 19.4 % 175 100.0 %

Provides international opportunities Pharmacy 74 42.7 % 99 57.2 % 173 100.0 % Total 74 42.7 % 99 57.2 % 173 100.0 %

NOTE 1: Students that responded to this survey but did not respond to a particular item were removed from the item's analysis and not included in percentages

NOTE 2: Percent totals may not always equal 100% due to rounding