An Evaluation of the Wireless Internet Radio Network on the University of Nigeria, Nsukka Campus By Fifty 4th Year Students of the Department of Electronic Engineering, University of Nigeria, Nsukka. Lecturer: Prof. A Nzeakor January 2008.
An Evaluation of the Wireless Internet Radio Network
on the University of Nigeria, Nsukka Campus
ByFifty 4th Year Students of the Department of Electronic Engineering,
University of Nigeria, Nsukka.
Lecturer: Prof. A Nzeakor
January 2008.
EXPECTATIONEXPECTATION
Produce a signal-strength map around each of the radio hotspots, using a laptop/notebook or any measuring instrument of their choice. The monitoring/recording shall be on daily basis, and the map produced on weekly basis.
Explain/determine/investigate/develop the basic scientific principles underlying this signal strength variation around the hotspot, giving mathematical models (expressions), measuring parameters and the best methods and instruments for the measurement.
Comment on the quality of service of the overall radio network within the campus and proffer solution for better quality of service.
GENERAL
GROUPLEADER
ATA ONA N.
SUB GROUP 1LEADER
EKWUNIFE CHINEDU
SUB GROUP 2 LEADER
AMADI ANTHONY C.
SUB GROUP 3 LEADER
AJAH GENESIS N.
SUB GROUP 4 LEADER
EZE CHIOMA
SUB GROUP 5
EZE AMUCHE
SUB GROUP 6LEADER
ATA ONA N.
SUB GROUP 7LEADER
ASIEGBU CHIAGOZIE
SUB GROUP 8 LEADER
ELEKE CHUKWUDI
EKEH ABEL
ALEKE AUGUSTINE
AGALAMANYI CHUKA
ABADOM OSMOND
AGBO CORNELIUS
EDOZIE NWABUEZE
ANYANWU OKECHUKWU
AGBO A. O.
AGHAHOVWIA BLESSING
AGU CHRISTOPHER
AGBO EKENE C
EZE CORNELIUS
AMARAIHI EMMASON
AGOSI REMY CHIKA
EZE ANTHONY
BEREFAGHA PAGAYE
AGBO CHIBUZO
AHANEKU UCHE
AKAI STEPHEN
ALADINO NATHAN EFE
ANOSIKE FRANCIS
AMOBI CLEMENT
EGE JUDE
ANAKA N. O.
ANUEYIAGU VIRTUS
ADINDU PRINCE
ARUAH BRENDAN
ASOGWA B. C.
ASONYE J. C.
EGWUONWU FREDRICK
EZEAH CHIOMA
AZUMARA CHARLES
CHINWEZE B. C.
CHUKWU SAMUEL
EGERSON JESSE
EGBINE FREDRICK
ATABA FLORENCE
AJAWUIHE VICTOR
ETIKO CHIJIOKE
EKEH SAMSON O.
ENETE CHRISTIAN
EZE E. I.
PLANNING
LOGISTICS
8 MEASURING TAPES FOR EACH SUB-GROUP 4 LAPTOPS WITH WIRELESS NETWORK
CARDS MEASUREMENTS TAKEN IN STEPS OF 50M PEGS FOR DENOTING PARTICULAR
DISTANCES
WIRELESS TERMINOLOGIES
Wireless Technology Hotspots MAC address verification Wireless Client Devices Wireless Access Points SSIDs
Wireless
Causes of Signal Variation
The signals are transmitted through wireless medium, which cannot be represented as an Ideal Band Pass Filter
Signal band Received band
REASON
This is because our medium of data transfer is not a lossless medium. On the contrary, loses occur as a result of the following phenomena:
Attenuation Interference Multi-path scattering
Attenuation is the weakening of a signal as it gets farther away from the source.
Distance is a major cause of attenuation in transmission, as demonstrated below:
The effect of distance on the strength of electromagnetic waves in free space is given by the following equation:
P (proportional to) 1/r2
For Terrestrial transmission the equation is
P (proportional to) 1/r3
Interference is the extraneous transmission of two signals and its effect is generally more destructive than constructive.
The wireless radio network on the campus operates on the 2.4GHz microwave band, which incidentally, is the band for Bluetooth.
P (proportional to) 1/r2
For Terrestrial transmission the equation is
P (proportional to) 1/r3
Interference is the extraneous transmission of two signals and its effect is generally more destructive than constructive.
The wireless radio network on the campus operates on the 2.4GHz microwave band, which incidentally, is the band for Bluetooth.
Effect of Interference
Wireless
Multi-path scattering is a phenomenon where a signal reaches a receiver from multiple paths due to part of the signal bouncing off from various objects. If these signals arrive at the receiver out of phase, they can cancel each other.
Metallic objects particularly buildings do not allow much penetration of EM waves
A scientific explanation was provided by Scientist Karl Friedrich Gauss, using his metal sphere analogy. Gauss Law states that the charge enclosed by a closed surface is a result of the cumulative electric field density in the enclosure.
D.ds = Q In metallic enclosures, there is negligible
electric field density and therefore little or no electric field strength or signal.
FIELD WORK ANALYSIS
The field work was done on the basis of random statistics. (The various readings were taken from hotspots at different times of different days which helped in providing a generalized variation of the Quality of Service (QoS)).
-100
-50
0
50
100
150
200
Distance
Day1(16th)
Day2(17th)
Day3(18th)
Day4(19th)
Day5(20th)
Day6(21st)
Day7(22nd)
Days
Engineering Signal Variation
Distance
Signal Strength
Signal
-100
-50
0
50
100
150
200
Distance
Day1(16th)
Day2(17th)
Day3(18th)
Day4(19th)
Day5(20th)
Day6(21st)
Day7(22nd)
Days
Arts Signal Variation
Distance
Signal Strength
Signal
-100
-50
0
50
100
150
200
Distance
Day1(16th)
Day2(17th)
Day3(18th)
Day4(19th) Day5(20th)
Day6(21st)
Day7(22nd)
Days
Education Signal Variation
Distance
Signal Strength
Signal
-100
-50
0
50
100
150
200
Distance
Day1(16th)
Day2(17th)
Day3(18th)
Day4(19th)
Day5(20th)
Day6(21st)
Day7(22nd)
Days
Abuja Signal Variation
Distance
Signal Strength
Signal
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
200
Distance
Day1(16th)
Day2(17th)
Day3(18th)
Day4(19th)
Day5(20th)
Day6(21st)
Day7(22nd)
Days
VET MED Signal Variation
Distance
Signal Strength
-100
-50
0
50
100
150
200
Distance
Day1(16th)
Day2(17th)
Day3(18th)
Day4(19th)
Day5(20th)
Day6(21st)
Day7(22nd)
Days
Jimbaz Signal Variation
Distance
Signal Strength
Signal
-100
-50
0
50
100
150
200
Distance
Day1(16th)
Day2(17th)
Day3(18th)
Day4(19th)
Day5(20th)
Day6(21st)
Day7(22nd)
Days
Home Scence & Nutrition
Distance
Signal Strength
Signal
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
200
Distance
Day1(16th)
Day2(17th)
Day3(18th)
Day4(19th)
Day5(20th)
Day6(21st)
Day7(22nd)
Days
Social Science Signal Variation
Distance
Signal Strength
LIMITATIONS DURING SURVEYLIMITATIONS DURING SURVEY
Inaccessibility
Limited materials
Poor measuring materials
Inexperience
PROBLEMSPROBLEMS
Obstacles
No signal inside buildings
Poor signal in lower elevations
Excellent signals, no internet service
PROFERRED SOLUTIONSPROFERRED SOLUTIONS
Higher transmission power
Indoor transceivers
Height of Installed antenna
Manpower
Quality of Service (QoS)
End-user’s satisfaction
Service availability
Value for money
Support services for the end-user
CONCLUSION
Conclusively, in delivering an efficient hotspot service, some requirements must be met.
CoverageSignal qualityAvailable internet service; among others
University of Nigeria, Nsukka already has a good platform, all that is necessary is to improve their services
REFERENCESREFERENCES
Jeffrey Wheat, Itisei Randy, Tockey Jackie, Neely Alicia, McCullough Andy “Designing a wireless.pdf”. Syngress Publishing Inc., Rockland, MA 02370, 2001.
Campus Network Fundamentals, Copyright 2006, Cisco Press.
Wireless Fidelity (Wi-Fi), www.about.com
All About Wireless Networks, www.howstuffswork.com