Top Banner
2/28/2013 1 Amphibian Predator Defenses Derek Brawner College of Agriculture Sciences and Natural Resources University of Tennessee - Knoxville Objectives Understand defense h i db mechanisms used by amphibians throughout their life history. Eggs Larvae Adults Lecture Roadmap Amphibians as Prey Amphibian Predators Amphibian Egg Defenses Amphibian Larvae Defenses Amphibian Adult Defenses
13

Amphibian Predator Defenses

Feb 11, 2022

Download

Documents

dariahiddleston
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Amphibian Predator Defenses

2/28/2013

1

Amphibian Predator Defenses

Derek Brawner

College of Agriculture Sciences and Natural Resources

University of Tennessee - Knoxville

ObjectivesUnderstand defense

h i d bmechanisms used by amphibians throughout

their life history.• Eggs

• Larvae

• Adults

Lecture Roadmap

• Amphibians as Preyp y

• Amphibian Predators

• Amphibian Egg Defenses

• Amphibian Larvae Defenses

• Amphibian Adult Defenses

Page 2: Amphibian Predator Defenses

2/28/2013

2

Amphibians as Prey

• Most are small

• Very soft, thin skin

• Eggs and larvae condensed

• Very numerous

• Tasty!

Amphibian Predators

• Invertebrates

• Invertebrate parasites

• Birds

• Mammalsp

• Fish • Crocodiles

• Lizards

• Snakes

• Amphibians

Amphibian Egg Predators

Aquatic• I t b t

Terrestrial• I t b t• Invertebrates

• Caddis flies

• Leeches

• Fish

• Tadpoles

• Invertebrates

• Spiders

• Beetles

• Snakes

• Amphibians

Page 3: Amphibian Predator Defenses

2/28/2013

3

Egg Protection

• Guard eggsGuard eggs

• Cued hatching

• Unpalatable

Video

Guard Eggs

• Dendrobatidae

Guard Eggs

• Gymnophionay p

• Three clutches

• Suburbs of South China

Page 4: Amphibian Predator Defenses

2/28/2013

4

Cued hatching

• Hatching time can respond to different threats and cues

• Hatch response to snake predationp p

• Six species of Agalychnis and Pachymedusa

Cued Hatching

• 4-7 individuals of snakes

• Fasted for at least 24 hours

• Exposed hatching-competent clutches to snakes

• Found that the ability to accelerate hatching in response to risk in all spp

Page 5: Amphibian Predator Defenses

2/28/2013

5

Unpalatability

• Yosemite Toad eggs

• Fed to brook trout individuallyy

• No eggs were consumed

Amphibian Larvae Predators

• Fish

• Birds (wading)( g)

• Mammals

• Invertebrate

Larval Defenses

• Chemical cues

• Freezingg

• Phenotypic Plasticity

• Unpalatability

Page 6: Amphibian Predator Defenses

2/28/2013

6

Chemical Cues

• What are chemical cues?

• Kairomones

• Poison frogs

• Tadpole transfer

• Pheromones

• Communication

• Predator detection

Page 7: Amphibian Predator Defenses

2/28/2013

7

Freezing

• Swimming less when w g wpredators are present

• Reduced swimming responses when exposed to kairomones

Phenotypic Plasticity

• What is phenotypic plasticity?• Amphibian Larvae use phenotypic plasticity to adapt to the presence of a

dpredator• Height of tail fins• Parsley frog and Mediterranean painted frog vs. crawfish, mosquitofish, and

dragonfly larvae

Phenotypic Plasticity

Parsley Frog• H d t ll t ilfi h d t

Mediterranean Painted Frog• N i ifi t diff b t• Had taller tailfins when exposed to

dragonfly larvae

• Had longer tailfins when exposed to crawfish

• No significant difference between the painted frog larvae.

• Invasive species may need more time to evolve

Page 8: Amphibian Predator Defenses

2/28/2013

8

Unpalatability

• Tadpoles can also be unpalatable

• 8 species of tadpoles

• Rated taste on a scale of 1-5

• 1 being “tastes good”p p

• Eaten by 11 students and faculty of 1970 Tropical biography class

g g

• 2 “no taste”

• 5 “very strongly disagreeable”

Adult Amphibian Predators

• Many of the same predators

• Birds

• Mammals

• Reptiles

Page 9: Amphibian Predator Defenses

2/28/2013

9

Adult Amphibian Defenses

• Cryptic Coloration

• Aposematic Colorationp

• Mimicry

• Chemical Defenses

• Behavioral Defenses

Cryptic Coloration

• The first line of defense

• Ground colors• Green, yellow, red, brown, gray

• Salamanders: dark, low skin reflectance, hard to see at night

• Bright colors• Bright green

• Reflect light in near infrared

Aposematic Coloration

• Bright Colors

• Have noxious skin secretions

• Trait has evolved many times

• Fire salamander Salamandrasalamandra

• Emperor newt Tylotriot shanjing

Page 10: Amphibian Predator Defenses

2/28/2013

10

Mimicry

• Mimic a predator with pnoxious secretions

• Not common

Chemical Defenses

• Secretions produced by l l dgranular glands

• Often distributed throughout the body

• Wide array of compounds

• Natural compounds

• Defensive compounds

Video

Active Chemical Defenses

• Most chemical defenses are passivepassive

• Two species are known for squirting poison

• Amazonian toad Rhaebo guttatus

• Fire salamander Salamandrasalamandra

Video

Page 11: Amphibian Predator Defenses

2/28/2013

11

Behavioral Defenses

• Fleeing

• M ff i• Most effective

• Mount Lyell Salamander H. platycephalus

• Defensive Postures

• Physalaemus nattereri

• Unken reflex

• Showsoff bright, hidden colors

Emperor newt Tylototritonshanjing

Spanish ribbed newt Pleurodeles waltl

Hairy Frog Trichobatrachus robustus

Page 12: Amphibian Predator Defenses

2/28/2013

12

Behavioral Defenses

• Reviewed defensive strategies

Page 13: Amphibian Predator Defenses

2/28/2013

13

References

• Adams, C. K., D. Saenz, and R. N. Conner. 2011. Palatability of twelve species of anuran larvae in eastern Texas. The American Midland Naturalist 166: 211-223

• Bei, Y., S. Meng, G. Li, W. Xie, J. Li, and L. Zhang. 2012. First record of nest site and egg guarding in the caecilian Ichthyophis bannanicus (Amphibia: Gymnophiona: Ichthyophiidae). Journal of Natural History 46: 859-865.

• Barry, M. J. and S. Syal. 2013. Metabolic responses of tadpoles to chemical predation cues. Hydrobiologia 700: 267-276.

• Brown, J. L., E. Twomey, V. Morales, and K. Summers. 2008. Phytotelm size in relation to parental care and mating strategies in two species of Peruvian poison frogs. Behaviour 145: 1139-1165.

• Buskirk, Josh Van. 2002. Phenotypic lability and the evoluction of predator-induced plasticity in tadpoles. Evolution 56: 361-370.

• Carlos, J., M.M. Antoniazzi, V. K. Verdade, L. F. Toledo, and M. T. Rodrigues. 2011. The Amazonian Ttad Rhaebo guttatus is able to voluntarily squirt poison from the paratoid macrogrlands. Amphibia-Reptilia 32: 546-549.

• Gomez-Mestre, I., J. J. Wiends, and K. M. Warkentin. 2008. Evolution of adaptive plasticity: risk-sensitive hatching in neotropical leaf treefrogs. Ecological Monographs 78: 205-224.

• Gunzburger, M. S., and J. Travis. 2005. Critical literature review of the evidence for unpalatability of amphibian eggs and larvae. Journal of Herpetology 39: 547-571.

• Grasso, R. L., R. M. Coleman, and C. Davidsion. 2010. Palatability and antipredator response to Yosemite toads (Anaxyrus canorus) to nonnative brook trout (Salvelinusfontinalis) in the Sierra Nevada Mountains of California. Copeia 3: 457-462.

• Maag, N., L. Gehrer, D. C. Woodhams. 2012. Sink or swim: a test of tadpole behavioral responses to predator cues and potential alarm pheromones from skin secretions. Journal of Camparative Physiology 198: 841-846.

References

• Marion, Z. H., and M. E. Hay. 2011. Chemical defense of the eastern newt (Notophthalmus viridescens): variation efficiency against different consumers and in different habitats. PLoS One 6: e27581.

• Melzer, S., L. S. Davis, and P. J. Bishop. 2012. Cutaneous gland secretions of Leiopelma pakeka as a potential mechanism against rat predation. New Zealand Journal of Zoology 39: 329-339.

• Pujol-Buxo E., O. S. Sabastian, N. Garriga, and G. A. Llorente. 2012. How does the invasive/native nature of species influence tadpoles’ plastic responses to predators? Oikos 122: 19-29.

• Schulte, L. M., J. Yeager, R. Schulte, M. Veith, P. Werner, L. A. Beck, S. Lotters. 2011. The smell of success: choice of larval rearing sites by means of chemical cues in a Peruvian poison frog. Animal Behavior 81: 1147-11554.

• Stynoski J L and V R Noble 2012 To beg or to freeze: multimodal sensory integration directs behavior in a tadpole Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 66: 191 199• Stynoski J. L., and V. R. Noble. 2012. To beg or to freeze: multimodal sensory integration directs behavior in a tadpole. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 66: 191-199.

• Toledo, L. F., I. Sazima, and C. F. B. Haddad. 2010. Behavioral defences of anurans: an overview. Ethology Ecology & Evolution 23: 1-25.

• Vockenhuber, E. A., W. Hodl, and A. Amezquita. 2009. Glass fathers do matter: egg attendance enhances embryonic survivorship in glass frog Hyalinobatrachium valerioi. Journal of Herpetology 43: 340-344.

• Warkentin, Karen M. 2011. Environmentally cued hatching across taxa: Embryos respond to risk and opportunity. Integrative and Comparative Biology 51: 14-25.

• Wassersug, Richard. 1970. On the comparative palatability of some dry-season tadpoles from Costa Rica. American Midland Naturalist 86: 101-109.

• Weygoldt, P. 2009. Evolution of parental care in dart poison frogs (Amphibia: Anura: Dendropbatidae). Journal of Zoological Systematics and Evolutionary Research 25: 51-67.

• http://news.bbc.co.uk/earth/hi/earth_news/newsid_8212000/8212623.stm

• http://webecoist.momtastic.com/2008/11/04/9-of-the-most-bizarre-animal-defense-mechanisms/

• http://amphibianrescue.org/2012/11/

• SPECIAL THANKS TO GOOGLE IMAGES FOR ALL THE PICTURES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Questions?