Ambassador Design Team meeting #6 March 25, 2015.

Ambassador Design Team meeting #6

March 25, 2015

What’s your 6 word story for today?

• For example: • “ADT is hearing the public’s feedback.”

• Write yours! & Share it!?!

#EdVoicesRI

#EdVoicesRI

Today’s Meeting Goals/Definition of Success

• NOT about products or production• About learning and gaining perspective

– From each other– About where we are going–About where are we now

Meeting Agenda

Time Activity 5:30-5:40 Welcome/Goals 5:40-6:10 Where Are We Going?!6:10-6:30 Getting on the Balcony 6:30-7:15 Hearing Feedback from the Public 7:15-7:25 Getting Organized 7:25-7:30 Next Steps/Close Out

Meeting Values

•Curiosity •Empathy •Optimism

Process GPS

• Today– Beginning of cycle– Pausing to get sense of

overall product thus far– Getting clarity on where

we are going

OUTPUT

Prototype 3: Refined Values &

Priorities plus Draft Key Outcomes

1/10 1/28 2/11 2/25 3/11 3/25 4/1 4/8 4/22 5/2 5/6 5/20 6/3 6/17

INPUTS & OUTPUTS Strategic Plan Development Cycle

OU

TPUT

RI Survey DataStrategy Review

Team

Community Meeting & Strategy Review

Team

Specialized Groups & Strategy

Review TeamStrategy Review

TeamINPU

T

INPU

T

CYCLE 1 CYCLE 2 CYCLE 3 CYCLE 4 Finalize

Prototype 1: Values

Prototype 2: Refined Values & Draft Priorities

Prototype 3: Refined Values &

Priorities plus Draft Key Outcomes

Final Plan

Prototype 4: Refined Values,

Priorities & Outcomes plus Draft Strategies

OUTPUT

OUTPUT

OUTPUT

OUTPUT

OUTPUT

Formative Assessment Check of Group’s Understanding

What will success of the plan look like?

Imagining Success

–1. As members of the ADT, with all of our contributions to this process, how will we know that our efforts have really delivered for kids? (2 min)

– What specifically has changed in 5+ years?

Imagining Success

• 2. Share your “What’s changed?” with another (2 min)

• 3. Report out as pairs (5 min total)

WHAT WILL THE FINAL PRODUCT LOOK LIKE?Getting Perspective Part I

BREAK (5 MIN)

UP ON THE BALCONYGetting Perspective Part II

HEARING FEEDBACK FROM THE PUBLIC

Overview of major feedback

TOTAL respondents Total SRT Total general public Total RIDE Total ADT

373 40 284 32 17

So how might this inform the next set of revisions?

• Micro – done outside of this room• Macro – done now

Should we cut some values & priorities?

• Still have time • No magic minimum

Content of the Plan - Recommendations/Feedback:

• Combine the values Support and Responsibility• Consider combining preparedness and excellence• Personalization is both a priority and value - should it just be a priority? • Should Early Childhood either be expanded to broader description or become a

strategy? • Professional Learning - is job-embedded too narrow? Think bigger to the broader

educator pipeline?• Consider school choice as a priority - Where does it fit? Priority/strategy? • Is assessment statement too narrow? Should it be expanded to quality assurance?

Recommendations Based on Feedback

• Group 1: Where does it fit in the plan? - Recommendations/Feedback:

• Combine the values Support and Responsibility• Consider combining preparedness and excellence• Personalization is both a priority and value - should it

just be a priority?

Content of the Plan - Recommendations/Feedback:

• Group 2. Should Early Childhood either be expanded to broader description or become a strategy?

• Group 3. Professional Learning - is job-embedded too narrow? Think bigger to the broader educator pipeline?

• Group 4. Consider school choice as a priority - Where does it fit? Priority/strategy?

• Group 5. Is assessment statement too narrow? Should it be expanded to quality assurance?

Group Roles

• Facilitator• Scribe• Spokesperson

Goal – Create revisions based on recommendations

• We will use gradients of agreement vote for each

Task – Respond to Recommendations

1. Divide into groups based on recommendation. 2. Silently read feedback (3 min)3. Each member report out on how feedback supports/refutes

recommendation and/or make new recommendation. (1 min/person)4. Discuss & craft recommended changes (5 min)5. Groups pair up & share (2 min) & receive feedback (2 min)6. Back to group to edit (5 min)7. Report out to larger group (1 min per group); clarifying Q&A (2 min)8. Gradients of agreement on each recommendation.

Task – Respond to Recommendations

1. Divide into groups based on recommendation. 2. Silently read feedback (3 min)3. Each member report out on how feedback

supports/refutes recommendation and/or make new recommendation. (1 min/person)

4. Discuss & craft recommended changes (5 min)

Task – Respond to Recommendations

5. Groups pair up & share (2 min) & receive feedback (2 min)

6. Back to group to edit (5 min)7. Report out to larger group (1 min per group); clarifying

Q&A (2 min)8. Gradients of agreement on each recommendation.

Gradients of Agreement

Endorsement/Endorsement with a Minor

Point of Contention

Agreement with

Reservations

Stand Aside Formal Disagreement, but Willing to

Go with Majority

4 3 2 1

Moving the Work Forward

• We Will:– Share out today’s decisions with entire ADT– Send out meeting poll and homework reading

• You Will:– Begin revision of Values and Priorities statements based on

survey feedback

Off-Table Revision Roles

Role ResponsibilityLead writer Pushing work forward by taking

first stab at revision

Thought partner(s) Reads work of lead writer and make suggestions

Off-Table Revision Dates

• March 30 – Lead writer’s draft due

• April 4 - Thought partner’s feedback due

• April 6 - Writer’s final proposal due

• April 8 – Proposal distributed to full ADT for feedback

Sign Up for Off-Table Roles

• Pink sticky = Lead Editor• Yellow sticky = Thought Partner

SECTION 5 – NEXT STEPS

ADT Feedback- It’s Moving too fast (Proposal to Add Meeting)

I pity the fool who isn’t at the meeting

on April 1st!

Announcements

#EdVoicesRI