1 OPTIMUM CONDITIONS OPTIMUM CONDITIONS FOR FOR VARIABLE PITCH MILLING VARIABLE PITCH MILLING Hassan Fazelinia • • Nejat Olgac Department of Mechanical Engineering Department of Mechanical Engineering University of Connecticut University of Connecticut
ALARM LAB. OPTIMUM CONDITIONS FOR VARIABLE PITCH MILLING. Hassan Fazelinia • Nejat Olgac Department of Mechanical Engineering University of Connecticut. ALARM LAB. Outline. The Problem and Motivation Process Dynamics Review of CTCR Paradigm - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
1
OPTIMUM CONDITIONSOPTIMUM CONDITIONS FOR FOR
VARIABLE PITCH MILLINGVARIABLE PITCH MILLING
Hassan Fazelinia • • Nejat Olgac
Department of Mechanical Engineering Department of Mechanical Engineering University of ConnecticutUniversity of Connecticut
2
• The Problem and Motivation• Process Dynamics• Review of CTCR Paradigm
(A unique process for Multiple Time Delayed Systems)• Measure of Chatter Rejection• Optimization problem
Outline
3
Variable vs. Uniform Pitch Cutter
Uniform Pitch end mill
1= 902= 90
Variable Pitch end mill
1= 702= 110
Notable earlier work:[1] Slavicek, J., 1965, “The Effect of Irregular Tooth Pitch on Stability of Milling.” 6th MTDR Conference, London, Pergamon Press.
[2] Minis, I. and Yanushevsky, R. , 1993, "A New Theoretical Approach for the Prediction of Machine Tool Chatter in Milling." ASME Journal of Engineering for Industry 115(1), 1-8.
[3] Altintas, Y. and Budak, E., 1995, "Analytical Prediction of Stability Lobes in Milling." Annals of the CIRP 44(1), 357-362.
a
4
+ Feed
Process Dynamics
•Olgac, N. and Sipahi, R., “A Unique Methodology for Chatter Stability Mapping in Simultaneous Machining”. ASME, Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering, 2005. 127(4).
•Sipahi, R. and Olgac, N. , Stability in Variable-Pitch Milling Regarding Regenerative Chatter, IMECE 2006
• The pitch angle selection on the tool.• Optimum depth of cut and the spindle speed?
11
Objective function:
• Measure of chatter rejection:
21 aseJ dom
a 2130][ rpmN
domse
• Axial depth of cut:• Spindle speed:
0,
12
Preliminary results:
JJ
13
Optimum points for different depth of cut
14
• On going studies:– Experimental validation– Optimization for different number of flutes
• Acknowledgment:– NSF, DoE, Pratt & Whitney
Conclusion
15
Thank You!Thank You!Questions?Questions?
16
dtdD
y
x
FF
yxis 2D transfer function between)(DG
[4] Olgac, N. and Sipahi, R., “A Unique Methodology for Chatter Stability Mapping in Simultaneous Machining”. ASME, Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering, 2005. 127(4).
vi
uii F
F
0
00F is the nominal cutting force under rigid tool assumption.
: cutting force constantsvu KK ,
when tooth i is in the cut when tooth i is out of the cut
01
ig
yx
ii
iii CosSin
SinCosL
i
i
vu rotation matrix transforming
2
: axial depth of cut: the number of teeth: the tooth passing period between the i th and i + 1st teeth