Alamo Heights CCM Item #4 ppt 225 e. oakview

Case # 649FSignificance & Compatibility

Review225 E. Oakview

Presented By: Jason LutzCommunity Development Services Director

City Council MeetingAgenda Item # 4

November 14, 2016

CASE NO. 649F Consider a request of Brister Design Grouprepresenting Alex Whittington, owner, for thesignificance review of the existing mainstructure and compatibility review of theproposed replacement structure located at 225E. Oakview under Demolition Review OrdinanceNo. 1860 in order to demolish 100% of theexisting main structure and construct a newsingle family residence with detachedaccessory structure.

SUMMARY Demolish 100% of the existing main

structure

Construct a new single family residencewith detached accessory structure(carport).

4

BACKGROUND

Zoned SF-A North side of E. Oakview Place,

between Vanderhoeven and N. NewBraunfels

5

6

LOT COVERAGE EXISTING PROPOSEDLot Area 10,350 10,350Main House Footprint 1,463 2,665Front Porch 45 75Side Porch 1Side Porch 2Rear Porch 270 682Garage FootprintCarport Footprint 528Shed(s) FootprintBreezewaysCovered Patio StructureOther Accessory StructuresLot Coverage / Lot Area 1,778 / 10,350 3,950 / 10,350Total Lot Coverage (Max 40%) 17% 38%

7

FLOOR AREA RATIO (FAR) EXISTING PROPOSEDLot Area 10,350 10,350Main House 1st Floor 1,463 2,665Main House 2nd Floor 1,473Garage 1st Floor

Garage 2nd Floor

Other Structures

FAR / Lot Area 1,395 / 10,350 4,138 / 10,350

Total FAR (45% or max 50% with bonuses) 14% 40%

8

POLICY ANALYSIS

Complies with regulations concerningsetbacks, height, and looming standards.

28’ 2” in height (max allowed 33’) asmeasured from average grade.

Building Materials Stone Stucco Standing seam metal Roof

9

HERITAGE TREE REMOVAL (1) 28” Red Oak

No on-site mitigation is proposed Fees in lieu of mitigation will be paid

($2,000)

10

POLICY ANALYSIS The existing 1,463 sq. ft. home was built in

1952 No evidence that the home was built by a noted architect belongs to a distinct architectural style or has any major historical significance

11

EXISTINGSITE PLAN

12

EXISTING STRUCTURE

13

EXISTING STRUCTURE

14

PROPOSED SITE PLAN

15

FRONT ELEVATION

16

REAR ELEVATION

17

RIGHT SIDE ELEVATION

18

LEFT SIDE ELEVATION

19

EXISTING STREETSCAPE

20

PROPOSED STREETSCAPE

21

RENDERING

22

ARB RECOMMENDATION ARB reviewed the project - October18, 2016 Found no significance in the existing

structure Found the proposed structure to be

compatible with the neighborhood Approved the project with the condition that

the chimney extend above the roof ridge line ARB recommendation has been

satisfied

23

PUBLIC NOTIFICATION Postcards were mailed to property owners

within a 200-foot radius of the property,appropriate notice was posted on the Citywebsite and a sign was posted on theproperty

Responses received:

Support: (3)

Oppose: (0)

QUESTIONS?